Safety Zone; Thunder on the Niagara, Niagara River, North Tonawanda, NY, 30483-30485 [E7-10500]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 105 / Friday, June 1, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(32)(e) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation because
this rule affects a carriage requirement.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (32)(e), of
the Instruction, an ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:
I
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05–1(g);
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1; section 117.255 also issued under
authority of Pub. L. 102–587, 106 Stat. 5039.
§ 117.145
I
[Removed]
2. Remove § 117.145.
Dated: May 23, 2007.
J.A. Breckenridge,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7–10564 Filed 5–31–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD11–07–011]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
California Route 12 Drawbridge, Near
Isleton, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, Eleventh
Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation
governing the operation of the California
Route 12 Drawbridge across the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:51 May 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
Mokelumne River, mile 3.0, near
Isleton, CA. The deviation is necessary
for the bridge owner, the California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans),
to perform scheduled roadway
maintenance. This deviation allows the
bridge to remain in the closed-tonavigation position Monday through
Thursday, 7 p.m. to 6 a.m., Saturdays
12:01 a.m. to 6 a.m., and Sundays 10
p.m. to 6 a.m.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
7 p.m. on June 4, 2007 through 6 a.m.
on September 15, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this
document are available for inspection or
copying at Commander (dpw), Eleventh
Coast Guard District, Building 50–2,
Coast Guard Island, Alameda, CA
94501–5100, between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The telephone number is (510)
437–3516. The Eleventh Coast Guard
District maintains the public docket for
this temporary deviation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David H. Sulouff, Chief, Bridge Section,
Eleventh Coast Guard District,
telephone (510) 437–3516.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Caltrans
requested a temporary change to the
operation of the California Route 12
Drawbridge, mile 3.0, Mokelumne River,
near Isleton, CA. The California Route
12 Drawbridge navigation span provides
a vertical clearance of 7 feet above Mean
High Water in the closed-to-navigation
position. The draw opens on signal
between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., except that
during the following periods the draw
need only open for recreational vessels
on the hour, 20 minutes past the hour,
and 40 minutes past the hour; Saturdays
10 a.m. until 2 p.m.; Sundays 11 a.m.
until 6 p.m.; Memorial Day, 4th of July,
and Labor Day, 11 a.m. until 6 p.m. At
all other times, it opens on signal if at
least four hours notice is given as
required by 33 CFR 117.175. Navigation
on the waterway is recreational, search
and rescue and commercial traffic
hauling materials for levee repair.
This deviation is effective from 7 p.m.
on June 4, 2007 through 6 a.m. on
September 15, 2007. Caltrans requested
the drawspan be secured in the closedto-navigation position Monday through
Thursday, 7 p.m. to 6 a.m., Saturdays
12:01 a.m. to 6 a.m., and Sundays 10
p.m. to 6 a.m. The drawspan will
resume normal operations, for holidays,
July 2, 2007 through July 7, 2007 and
September 2, 2007 through September 5,
2007. During the temporary deviation
period, the bridge roadway surface will
be rehabilitated. This work can only be
conducted during periods of moderate
temperatures and low humidity. This
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30483
temporary deviation has been
coordinated with waterway users. No
party has indicated this work would
have a significant impact on their
operations. Alternate routes are
available for vessels while the drawspan
is secured in the closed-to-navigation
position. Vessels that can transit the
bridge, while in the closed-to-navigation
position, may continue to do so at any
time.
In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e),
the drawbridge must return to its regular
operating schedule immediately at the
end of the designated time period. This
deviation from the operating regulations
is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.
Dated: May 22, 2007.
J.A. Breckenridge,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Eleventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7–10572 Filed 5–31–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD09–07–025]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Thunder on the Niagara,
Niagara River, North Tonawanda, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone
encompassing the navigable waters of
the upper Niagara River by Gratwick
Riverside Park in North Tonawanda,
NY. This safety zone is necessary to
ensure the safety of spectators and
vessels from the hazards associated with
a powerboat race. This safety zone
restricts vessel traffic from a portion of
the Niagara River at Gratwick Riverside
Park, North Tonawanda, NY.
DATES: This rule is in effect from 11 a.m.
on June 2 to 6 p.m. on June 3, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of the docket CGD09–
07–025, and are available for inspection
or copying at U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Buffalo, 1 Fuhrmann Blvd, Buffalo, New
York 14203 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT
Tracy Wirth, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Buffalo, at (716) 843–9573.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\01JNR1.SGM
01JNR1
30484
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 105 / Friday, June 1, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. The permit
application was not received in time to
publish an NPRM followed by a final
rule before the effective date. Under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying this rule would be
contrary to the public interest or
ensuring the safety of spectators and
vessels during this event and immediate
action is necessary to prevent possible
loss of life or property.
Background and Purpose
Temporary safety zones are necessary
to ensure the safety of vessels and
spectators from the hazards associated
with powerboat races. Based on recent
accidents that have occurred in other
Captain of the Port zones, the Captain of
the Port Buffalo, has determined
powerboat races pose significant risks to
public safety and property. The likely
combination of large numbers of
recreational vessels, congested
waterways, and alcohol use, could
easily result in serious injuries or
fatalities.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Discussion of Rule
The proposed safety zone consists of
all navigable waters of the Upper
Niagara River located at 42°03′36″ N,
078°54′45″ W to 43°03′09″ N, 078°55′21″
W to 43°03′00″ N, 078°53′42″ W to
43°02′42″ N, 078°54′09″ W and return.
All Geographic coordinates are North
American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83). The
size of this proposed zone was
determined using the location of the
race course approved by the Captain of
the Port Buffalo and local knowledge
concerning wind, waves, and currents.
All persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port or the designated onscene representative. Entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative. The Captain of the Port
or his designated on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866 Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:51 May 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed this rule under
that Order. We expect the economic
impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory
Evaluation is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the
minimal time that vessels will be
restricted from the zone, and the zone
is in areas where the Coast Guard
expects insignificant adverse impact to
mariners from the zone’s activation.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The term
‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule may affect the following
entities, some of which might be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of The Niagara River, North
Tonawanda, NY between 11 a.m. and 6
p.m. on June 2 and June 3, 2007.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: This rule will be
in effect for only seven hours for each
event. Vessel traffic can safely pass
outside the safety zone during the event.
In the event that this temporary safety
zone affects shipping, commercial
vessels may request permission from the
Captain of The Port Buffalo to transit
through the safety zone. The Coast
Guard will give notice to the public via
a Broadcast to Mariners that the
regulation is in effect.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
The Coast Guard recognizes the treaty
rights of Native American Tribes.
Moreover, the Coast Guard is committed
to working with Tribal Governments to
implement local policies and to mitigate
E:\FR\FM\01JNR1.SGM
01JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 105 / Friday, June 1, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
tribal concerns. We have determined
that these special local regulations and
fishing rights protection need not be
incompatible. We have also determined
that this Rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Nevertheless, Indian Tribes that have
questions concerning the provisions of
this Proposed Rule or options for
compliance are encourage to contact the
point of contact listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Homeland Security Management
Directive 5100.1, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, we
believe that this rule should be
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction,
from further environmental
documentation. This event establishes a
safety zone; therefore paragraph (34)(g)
of the Instruction applies.
A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ will be
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD and Department of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:51 May 31, 2007
Jkt 211001
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. A new temporary § 165.T09–025 is
added as follows:
I
§ 165.T09–025 Safety Zone Thunder on the
Niagara, Niagara River, North Tonawanda,
NY.
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: All waters and
the adjacent shoreline of the Upper
Niagara River, North Tonawanda, NY
within two miles northeast of the Grand
Island Bridge (42° 03′36″ N, 078° 54′45″
W to 43° 03′09″ N, 078° 55′21″ W to 43°
03′00″ N, 078° 53′42″ W to 43° 02′42″ N,
078° 54′09″ W and return). All
geographic coordinates are North
American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
(b) Effective period. This regulation is
in effect from 11 a.m. on June 2 to 6
p.m. on June 3, 2007. This regulation
will be enforced from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m.
on June 2 and 3, 2007.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in section 165.23
of this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
30485
Captain of the Port Buffalo, or the
designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his designated on-scene
representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant or petty
officer who has been designated by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
The on-scene representative of the
Captain of the Port or his designated onscene representative may be contacted
via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or the on-scene representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in
the safety zone must comply with all
direction given to them by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative.
Dated: May 18, 2007.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. E7–10500 Filed 5–31–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R03–OAR–2006–0917; FRL–8320–8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Virginia;
Redesignation of the RichmondPetersburg 8-Hour Ozone
Nonattainment Area to Attainment and
Approval of the Area’s Maintenance
Plan and 2002 Base-Year Inventory
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a
redesignation request and a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of
Virginia. The Virginia Department of
Environmental Quality (VADEQ) is
requesting that the RichmondPetersburg nonattainment area (herein
referred to as the ‘‘Richmond Area’’ or
the ‘‘Area’’) be redesignated as
attainment for the 8-hour ozone national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS).
In conjunction with its redesignation
request, the Commonwealth submitted a
SIP revision consisting of a maintenance
plan for the Richmond Area that
E:\FR\FM\01JNR1.SGM
01JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 105 (Friday, June 1, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30483-30485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-10500]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD09-07-025]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Thunder on the Niagara, Niagara River, North
Tonawanda, NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone
encompassing the navigable waters of the upper Niagara River by
Gratwick Riverside Park in North Tonawanda, NY. This safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of spectators and vessels from the
hazards associated with a powerboat race. This safety zone restricts
vessel traffic from a portion of the Niagara River at Gratwick
Riverside Park, North Tonawanda, NY.
DATES: This rule is in effect from 11 a.m. on June 2 to 6 p.m. on June
3, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of the docket CGD09-07-025, and are available for
inspection or copying at U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo, 1 Fuhrmann
Blvd, Buffalo, New York 14203 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: LT Tracy Wirth, U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Buffalo, at (716) 843-9573.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 30484]]
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. The permit application was not
received in time to publish an NPRM followed by a final rule before the
effective date. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), good cause exists for making
this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying this rule would be contrary to the public interest
or ensuring the safety of spectators and vessels during this event and
immediate action is necessary to prevent possible loss of life or
property.
Background and Purpose
Temporary safety zones are necessary to ensure the safety of
vessels and spectators from the hazards associated with powerboat
races. Based on recent accidents that have occurred in other Captain of
the Port zones, the Captain of the Port Buffalo, has determined
powerboat races pose significant risks to public safety and property.
The likely combination of large numbers of recreational vessels,
congested waterways, and alcohol use, could easily result in serious
injuries or fatalities.
Discussion of Rule
The proposed safety zone consists of all navigable waters of the
Upper Niagara River located at 42[deg]03'36'' N, 078[deg]54'45'' W to
43[deg]03'09'' N, 078[deg]55'21'' W to 43[deg]03'00'' N,
078[deg]53'42'' W to 43[deg]02'42'' N, 078[deg]54'09'' W and return.
All Geographic coordinates are North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
The size of this proposed zone was determined using the location of the
race course approved by the Captain of the Port Buffalo and local
knowledge concerning wind, waves, and currents.
All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated on-scene
representative. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the Port or
his designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866 Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed this rule under that Order. We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation
is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the minimal time that vessels will
be restricted from the zone, and the zone is in areas where the Coast
Guard expects insignificant adverse impact to mariners from the zone's
activation.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule will have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule may affect the following entities, some of which might be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of The Niagara River, North Tonawanda, NY
between 11 a.m. and 6 p.m. on June 2 and June 3, 2007.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: This
rule will be in effect for only seven hours for each event. Vessel
traffic can safely pass outside the safety zone during the event. In
the event that this temporary safety zone affects shipping, commercial
vessels may request permission from the Captain of The Port Buffalo to
transit through the safety zone. The Coast Guard will give notice to
the public via a Broadcast to Mariners that the regulation is in
effect.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small
businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who
enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and
the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness
to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of
the Coast guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
The Coast Guard recognizes the treaty rights of Native American
Tribes. Moreover, the Coast Guard is committed to working with Tribal
Governments to implement local policies and to mitigate
[[Page 30485]]
tribal concerns. We have determined that these special local
regulations and fishing rights protection need not be incompatible. We
have also determined that this Rule does not have tribal implications
under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Nevertheless, Indian Tribes that have questions concerning the
provisions of this Proposed Rule or options for compliance are
encourage to contact the point of contact listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive
5100.1, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, we believe that this rule should be
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental documentation. This event
establishes a safety zone; therefore paragraph (34)(g) of the
Instruction applies.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. A new temporary Sec. 165.T09-025 is added as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-025 Safety Zone Thunder on the Niagara, Niagara River,
North Tonawanda, NY.
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All
waters and the adjacent shoreline of the Upper Niagara River, North
Tonawanda, NY within two miles northeast of the Grand Island Bridge
(42[deg] 03'36'' N, 078[deg] 54'45'' W to 43[deg] 03'09'' N, 078[deg]
55'21'' W to 43[deg] 03'00'' N, 078[deg] 53'42'' W to 43[deg] 02'42''
N, 078[deg] 54'09'' W and return). All geographic coordinates are North
American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
(b) Effective period. This regulation is in effect from 11 a.m. on
June 2 to 6 p.m. on June 3, 2007. This regulation will be enforced from
11 a.m. to 6 p.m. on June 2 and 3, 2007.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
section 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port Buffalo, or the designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. The on-
scene representative of the Captain of the Port or his designated on-
scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or the on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply with all
direction given to them by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-
scene representative.
Dated: May 18, 2007.
S.J. Ferguson,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. E7-10500 Filed 5-31-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P