Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa, 30275-30278 [E7-10490]

Download as PDF 30275 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 104 / Thursday, May 31, 2007 / Rules and Regulations cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 30, 2007. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: May 14, 2007 John B. Askew, Regional Administrator, Region 7. PART 52—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart AA—Missouri 2. In § 52.1320(e) the table is amended by adding an entry in numerical order to read as follows: I § 52.1320 * Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: I Identification of Plan. * * (e) * * * * * EPA-APPROVED MISSOURI NONREGULATORY SIP PROVISIONS Name of nonregulatory SIP provision Applicable geographic or nonattainment area * * * (52) Submittal of the 2002 Base Year Inventory for the Missouri Portion of the St. Louis 8-hour ozone nonattaiment area and Emissions Statement SIP. * St. Louis ........................... [FR Doc. E7–10231 Filed 5–30–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R07–OAR–2007–0124; FRL–8320–3] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES AGENCY: SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the purpose of revising the general emission rate for particulate matter. DATES: This direct final rule will be effective July 30, 2007, without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by July 2, 2007. If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– OAR–2007–0124, by one of the following methods: 1. http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. 2. E-mail: Hamilton.heather@epa.gov. VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:52 May 30, 2007 Jkt 211001 State submittal date * 06/15/06 3. Mail: Heather Hamilton, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. 4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to Heather Hamilton, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2007– 0124. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through http:// www.regulations.gov or e-mail information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected. The http:// www.regulations.gov website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through http:// www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 EPA approval date * 05/31/07 [insert FR page number where the document begins]. Explanation * made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the http:// www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in http:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8 to 4:30 excluding Federal holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine these documents should make an appointment with the office at least 24 hours in advance. E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM 31MYR1 30276 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 104 / Thursday, May 31, 2007 / Rules and Regulations FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Hamilton at (913) 551–7039, or by e-mail at Hamilton.heather@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean EPA. This section provides additional information by addressing the following questions: What is a SIP? Wha t is the Federal approval process for a SIP? What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me? What is being addressed in this document? Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? What action is EPA taking? cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES What is a SIP? Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards established by EPA. These ambient standards are established under section 109 of the CAA, and they currently address six criteria pollutants. These pollutants are: carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, lead, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide. Each state must submit these regulations and control strategies to us for approval and incorporation into the Federally-enforceable SIP. Each Federally-approved SIP protects air quality primarily by addressing air pollution at its point of origin. These SIPs can be extensive, containing state regulations or other enforceable documents and supporting information such as emission inventories, monitoring networks, and modeling demonstrations. What is the Federal approval process for a SIP? In order for state regulations to be incorporated into the Federallyenforceable SIP, states must formally adopt the regulations and control strategies consistent with state and Federal requirements. This process generally includes a public notice, public hearing, public comment period, and a formal adoption by a stateauthorized rulemaking body. Once a state rule, regulation, or control strategy is adopted, the state submits it to us for inclusion into the SIP. We must provide public notice and seek additional public comment regarding the proposed Federal action on the state submission. If adverse comments are received, they must be addressed prior to any final Federal action by us. All state regulations and supporting information approved by EPA under VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:52 May 30, 2007 Jkt 211001 section 110 of the CAA are incorporated into the Federally-approved SIP. Records of such SIP actions are maintained in the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) at title 40, part 52, entitled ‘‘Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans.’’ The actual state regulations which are approved are not reproduced in their entirety in the CFR outright but are ‘‘incorporated by reference,’’ which means that we have approved a given state regulation with a specific effective date. What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me? Enforcement of the state regulation before and after it is incorporated into the Federally-approved SIP is primarily a state responsibility. However, after the regulation is Federally approved, we are authorized to take enforcement action against violators. Citizens are also offered legal recourse to address violations as described in section 304 of the CAA. What is being addressed in this document? The Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) has amended Chapter 23, ‘‘Emission Standards for Contaminants,’’ specifically subrule 23.3(2), paragraph ‘‘a’’ to revise the general emission rate for particulate matter (PM). This revision applies to sources constructed, modified or reconstructed after July 21, 1999, and states that the emission of PM from any process shall not exceed an emission standard of 0.1 grain per dry standard cubic foot of exhaust gas. For sources constructed before July 21, 1999, the revision further states that the emission of PM from any process shall not exceed the amount determined from Table I (the process weight rate limit), or amount specified in a permit if based on the revised emission standards, or established from standards provided in SIP-approved provisions for emission standards and specific processes (567–23.1) (455B) and 567– 23.4 (455B), respectively). In support of the revision, IDNR provided an analysis to show that the revised concentration limit is generally equivalent to the former process weight limit. Iowa reviewed a number of units to determine which standard might result in greater emissions. IDNR found that most of the units could emit higher levels of PM emissions based on the process weight table than the concentration limit. Of the sources reviewed, where the concentration standard resulted in greater PM emissions, the emissions were under the de minimis levels established in the PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 state’s permitting rules. IDNR also noted that, since the revised standard only applied to sources constructed after July 1999, several sources, as a result of NAAQS review for permitting purposes, were required to meet PM limits that were more stringent than either the process weight or concentration standard. EPA reviewed IDNR’s technical justification for this SIP revision and found the justification to be acceptable. Therefore, EPA has determined that this revision will not constitute a relaxation of the SIP. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met? The state submittal has met the public notice requirements for SIP submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submittal also satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In addition, as explained above and in more detail in the technical support document which is part of this docket, the revision meets the substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and implementing regulations. What action is EPA taking? EPA is approving this SIP revision for the purpose of revising the general emission rate for PM. We are processing this action as a direct final action because the revisions make routine changes to the existing rules which are noncontroversial. Therefore, we do not anticipate any adverse comments. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on part of this rule and if that part can be severed from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those parts of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM 31MYR1 30277 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 104 / Thursday, May 31, 2007 / Rules and Regulations under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045, ‘‘Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard. In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 30, 2007. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: May 14, 2007. John B. Askew, Regional Administrator, Region 7. Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows: I PART 52—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart Q—Iowa 2. In § 52.820 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising the entry for 567–23.3 to read as follows: I § 52.820 * Identification of plan. * * (c) * * * * * EPA-APPROVED IOWA REGULATIONS Iowa citation State effective date Title EPA approval date Explanation IOWA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSION [567] * * * * * * * Chapter 23—Emission Standards for Contaminants * 567–23.3 ........... cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES * VerDate Aug<31>2005 * * Specific Contaminants .................... * 14:52 May 30, 2007 12/15/04 * Jkt 211001 PO 00000 * * 5/31/2007 [insert FR page number where the document begins]. * Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 * * Subrule 23.3(3)‘‘d’’ is not SIP approved. * Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM * 31MYR1 * 30278 * * Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 104 / Thursday, May 31, 2007 / Rules and Regulations * * * [FR Doc. E7–10490 Filed 5–30–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 3. Section 215.402 is added to read as follows: I 215.402 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Defense Acquisition Regulations System 48 CFR Parts 209, 215, 225, 249, and 252 Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Technical Amendments Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: DoD is making technical amendments to the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to update organization names and to add references to the DFARS companion resource, Procedures, Guidance, and Information. EFFECTIVE DATE: May 31, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Michele Peterson, Defense Acquisition Regulations System, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DARS), IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3062. Telephone (703) 602–0311; facsimile (703) 602–7887. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule amends DFARS text to update organization names and office symbols, and to add references to internal DoD procedures found in the DFARS companion resource, Procedures, Guidance, and Information (PGI). List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 209, 215, 225, 249, and 252 Government procurement. Michele P. Peterson, Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System. Therefore, 48 CFR Parts 209, 215, 225, 249, and 252 are amended as follows: I 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Parts 209, 215, 225, 249, and 252 continues to read as follows: cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1. PART 209—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS 209.104–70 [Amended] 2. Section 209.104–70 is amended in paragraph (a), in the second sentence, by removing ‘‘(PAIC)’’ and adding in its place ‘‘(CPIC)’’. I 14:52 May 30, 2007 Jkt 211001 Pricing policy. Follow the procedures at PGI 215.402 when conducting cost or price analysis, particularly with regard to acquisitions for sole source commercial items. I 4. Section 215.403–1 is amended as follows: I a. By revising the section heading; I b. By adding paragraph (b); I c. In paragraph (c)(3), by designating the text after ‘‘Commercial items.’’ as paragraph (B); I d. By adding paragraph (c)(3)(A); I e. In newly designated paragraph (c)(3)(B), in the second sentence, by removing ‘‘(c)(3)’’ and adding in its place ‘‘(c)(3)(B)’’; and I f. In paragraph (c)(4)(A)(3), by revising the second sentence to read as follows: 215.403–1 Prohibition on obtaining cost or pricing data (10 U.S.C. 2306a and 41 U.S.C. 254b). (b) Exceptions to cost or pricing data requirements. Follow the procedures at PGI 215.403–1(b). (c) * * * (3) * * * (A) Follow the procedures at PGI 215.403–1(c)(3)(A) for pricing commercial items. * * * * * (4) * * * (A) * * * (3) * * * Follow the procedures at PGI 215.403–1(c)(4)(A) for determining when an exceptional case waiver is appropriate, for approval of such waivers, for partial waivers, and for waivers applicable to unpriced supplies or services. * * * * * I 5. Section 215.403–3 is added to read as follows: 215.403–3 Requiring information other than cost or pricing data. I VerDate Aug<31>2005 PART 215—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION Follow the procedures at PGI 215.403–3. I 6. Section 215.404–1 is amended as follows: I a. By redesignating paragraph (a) as paragraph (2); I b. By adding paragraph (1); and I c. In newly designated paragraph (2), in the introductory text, by removing ‘‘General.’’. The added text reads as follows: 215.404–1 PART 225—FOREIGN ACQUISITION 225.872–5 [Amended] 7. Section 225.872–5 is amended in paragraph (a), in the last sentence, by removing ‘‘Program Acquisition’’ and adding in its place ‘‘Contract Policy’’. I 225.872–6 [Amended] 8. Section 225.872–6 is amended in paragraph (b) by removing ‘‘Program Acquisition’’ and adding in its place ‘‘Contract Policy’’. I PART 249—TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS 249.7000 [Amended] 9. Section 249.7000 is amended in paragraph (a)(1) by removing ‘‘Program Acquisition’’ and adding in its place ‘‘Contract Policy’’. I PART 252—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES 252.225–7004 10. Section 252.225–7004 is amended as follows: I a. By revising the clause date to read ‘‘(MAY 2007)’’; I b. In paragraph (c)(5), by removing ‘‘Program Acquisition’’ and adding in its place ‘‘Contract Policy’’; and I c. In paragraph (c)(5), by removing ‘‘(PAIC)’’ and adding in its place ‘‘(CPIC)’’. I 252.225–7006 11. Section 252.225–7006 is amended as follows: I a. By revising the clause date to read ‘‘(MAY 2007)’’; I b. In paragraph (d), by removing ‘‘Program Acquisition’’ and adding in its place ‘‘Contract Policy’’; and I c. In paragraph (d), by removing ‘‘(PAIC)’’ and adding in its place ‘‘(CPIC)’’. [FR Doc. E7–10336 Filed 5–30–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 5001–08–P Proposal analysis techniques. Frm 00040 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 [Amended] I (1) Follow the procedures at PGI 215.404–1 for proposal analysis. * * * * * PO 00000 [Amended] E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM 31MYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 104 (Thursday, May 31, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30275-30278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-10490]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R07-OAR-2007-0124; FRL-8320-3]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) for the 
purpose of revising the general emission rate for particulate matter.

DATES: This direct final rule will be effective July 30, 2007, without 
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by July 2, 2007. If 
adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 
the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that 
the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2007-0124, by one of the following methods:
    1. http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for 
submitting comments.
    2. E-mail: Hamilton.heather@epa.gov.
    3. Mail: Heather Hamilton, Environmental Protection Agency, Air 
Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, 
Kansas 66101.
    4. Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to Heather 
Hamilton, Environmental Protection Agency, Air Planning and Development 
Branch, 901 North 5th Street, Kansas City, Kansas 66101.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-
2007-0124. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included 
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at 
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information 
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail information that you consider to be CBI 
or otherwise protected. The http://www.regulations.gov website is an 
``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your 
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of 
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without 
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be 
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is 
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you 
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name 
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any 
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to 
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA 
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid 
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of 
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the 
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some 
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such 
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket 
materials are available either electronically in http://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Environmental Protection 
Agency, Air Planning and Development Branch, 901 North 5th Street, 
Kansas City, Kansas 66101. The Regional Office's official hours of 
business are Monday through Friday, 8 to 4:30 excluding Federal 
holidays. The interested persons wanting to examine these documents 
should make an appointment with the office at least 24 hours in 
advance.

[[Page 30276]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Hamilton at (913) 551-7039, or 
by e-mail at Hamilton.heather@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This section provides 
additional information by addressing the following questions:
What is a SIP?
Wha t is the Federal approval process for a SIP?
What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me?
What is being addressed in this document?
Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
What action is EPA taking?

What is a SIP?

    Section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) requires states to develop 
air pollution regulations and control strategies to ensure that state 
air quality meets the national ambient air quality standards 
established by EPA. These ambient standards are established under 
section 109 of the CAA, and they currently address six criteria 
pollutants. These pollutants are: carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, 
ozone, lead, particulate matter, and sulfur dioxide.
    Each state must submit these regulations and control strategies to 
us for approval and incorporation into the Federally-enforceable SIP.
    Each Federally-approved SIP protects air quality primarily by 
addressing air pollution at its point of origin. These SIPs can be 
extensive, containing state regulations or other enforceable documents 
and supporting information such as emission inventories, monitoring 
networks, and modeling demonstrations.

What is the Federal approval process for a SIP?

    In order for state regulations to be incorporated into the 
Federally-enforceable SIP, states must formally adopt the regulations 
and control strategies consistent with state and Federal requirements. 
This process generally includes a public notice, public hearing, public 
comment period, and a formal adoption by a state-authorized rulemaking 
body.
    Once a state rule, regulation, or control strategy is adopted, the 
state submits it to us for inclusion into the SIP. We must provide 
public notice and seek additional public comment regarding the proposed 
Federal action on the state submission. If adverse comments are 
received, they must be addressed prior to any final Federal action by 
us.
    All state regulations and supporting information approved by EPA 
under section 110 of the CAA are incorporated into the Federally-
approved SIP. Records of such SIP actions are maintained in the Code of 
Federal Regulations (CFR) at title 40, part 52, entitled ``Approval and 
Promulgation of Implementation Plans.'' The actual state regulations 
which are approved are not reproduced in their entirety in the CFR 
outright but are ``incorporated by reference,'' which means that we 
have approved a given state regulation with a specific effective date.

What does Federal approval of a state regulation mean to me?

    Enforcement of the state regulation before and after it is 
incorporated into the Federally-approved SIP is primarily a state 
responsibility. However, after the regulation is Federally approved, we 
are authorized to take enforcement action against violators. Citizens 
are also offered legal recourse to address violations as described in 
section 304 of the CAA.

What is being addressed in this document?

    The Iowa Department of Natural Resources (IDNR) has amended Chapter 
23, ``Emission Standards for Contaminants,'' specifically subrule 
23.3(2), paragraph ``a'' to revise the general emission rate for 
particulate matter (PM). This revision applies to sources constructed, 
modified or reconstructed after July 21, 1999, and states that the 
emission of PM from any process shall not exceed an emission standard 
of 0.1 grain per dry standard cubic foot of exhaust gas.
    For sources constructed before July 21, 1999, the revision further 
states that the emission of PM from any process shall not exceed the 
amount determined from Table I (the process weight rate limit), or 
amount specified in a permit if based on the revised emission 
standards, or established from standards provided in SIP-approved 
provisions for emission standards and specific processes (567-23.1) 
(455B) and 567-23.4 (455B), respectively). In support of the revision, 
IDNR provided an analysis to show that the revised concentration limit 
is generally equivalent to the former process weight limit. Iowa 
reviewed a number of units to determine which standard might result in 
greater emissions. IDNR found that most of the units could emit higher 
levels of PM emissions based on the process weight table than the 
concentration limit. Of the sources reviewed, where the concentration 
standard resulted in greater PM emissions, the emissions were under the 
de minimis levels established in the state's permitting rules. IDNR 
also noted that, since the revised standard only applied to sources 
constructed after July 1999, several sources, as a result of NAAQS 
review for permitting purposes, were required to meet PM limits that 
were more stringent than either the process weight or concentration 
standard.
    EPA reviewed IDNR's technical justification for this SIP revision 
and found the justification to be acceptable. Therefore, EPA has 
determined that this revision will not constitute a relaxation of the 
SIP.

Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?

    The state submittal has met the public notice requirements for SIP 
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submittal also 
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. In 
addition, as explained above and in more detail in the technical 
support document which is part of this docket, the revision meets the 
substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and 
implementing regulations.

What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is approving this SIP revision for the purpose of revising the 
general emission rate for PM. We are processing this action as a direct 
final action because the revisions make routine changes to the existing 
rules which are noncontroversial. Therefore, we do not anticipate any 
adverse comments. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on 
part of this rule and if that part can be severed from the remainder of 
the rule, EPA may adopt as final those parts of the rule that are not 
the subject of an adverse comment.

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this 
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, 
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action 
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes 
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. 
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because 
this rule approves pre-existing requirements

[[Page 30277]]

under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty 
beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded 
mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as 
described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will 
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on 
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism 
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the 
States, on the relationship between the national government and the 
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule 
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or 
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA. 
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of 
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a state rule implementing a 
Federal standard.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this 
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State 
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to 
disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be 
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP 
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise 
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section 
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an 
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 30, 2007. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial 
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial 
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such 
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings 
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Particulate matter, Reporting 
and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: May 14, 2007.
John B. Askew,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.

0
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended as 
follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart Q--Iowa

0
2. In Sec.  52.820 the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising 
the entry for 567-23.3 to read as follows:


Sec.  52.820  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                          EPA-Approved Iowa Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        State
       Iowa citation                  Title           effective      EPA approval date          Explanation
                                                         date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 IOWA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSION [567]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Chapter 23--Emission Standards for Contaminants
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
567-23.3...................  Specific Contaminants.     12/15/04  5/31/2007 [insert FR    Subrule 23.3(3)``d''
                                                                   page number where the   is not SIP approved.
                                                                   document begins].
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


[[Page 30278]]

* * * * *

 [FR Doc. E7-10490 Filed 5-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P