Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Patuxent River, Calvert County, MD, 30268-30270 [E7-10447]
Download as PDF
30268
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 104 / Thursday, May 31, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
[CGD05–07–037]
RIN 1625–AA00
§ 165.T09–003 Safety Zone, Kenosha
Harbor, Kenosha, WI.
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: All Waters of
Lake Michigan and Kenosha Harbor
within a 300-yard radius of position 42°35′-14″ N, 087°-48′29″ W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective period. This regulation is
effective from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. on
August 11, 2007.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in section 165.23
of this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or his designated onscene representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan
means any Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan to act on his behalf and
is aboard either a Coast Guard or Coast
Guard Auxiliary vessel.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or his on-scene representative
to obtain permission to do so. The
Captain of the Port or his designated onscene representative may be contacted
via VHF Channel 16. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in
the safety zone must comply with all
directions given to them by the Captain
of the Port Lake Michigan or his onscene representative.
Dated: May 16, 2007.
Bruce C. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. E7–10446 Filed 5–30–07; 8:45 am]
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 May 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
2. Add § 165.T09–003 to read as
follows:
I
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Safety Zone; Fireworks Display,
Patuxent River, Calvert County, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone
upon certain waters of the Patuxent
River during a fireworks display. This
action is necessary to provide for the
safety of life on navigable waters during
a fireworks display launched from a
barge, located near Solomons, in Calvert
County, Maryland. This action will
restrict vessel traffic in a portion of the
Patuxent River.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7:30
p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, are part of
docket CGD05–07–037 and are available
for inspection or copying at
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road,
Building 70, Waterways Management
Division, Baltimore, Maryland 21226–
1791, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ronald L. Houck, at Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore, Waterways Management
Division, at (410) 576–2674 or (410)
576–2693.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Regulatory Information
On April 11, 2007, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled ‘‘Safety Zone; Fireworks
Display, Patuxent River, Calvert County,
MD’’ in the Federal Register (72 FR
18176). We received no letters
commenting on the proposed rule. No
public meeting was requested, and none
was held.
Background and Purpose
Each year, thousands of spectators
attend outdoor fireworks displays
discharged from vessels or floating
platforms on or near the navigable
waters of the United States. Accidental
discharge of fireworks and falling hot
embers are a safety concern during such
events. The Coast Guard has the
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
authority to impose appropriate controls
on marine events that may pose a threat
to persons, vessels and facilities under
its jurisdiction. The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone that will be
enforced during a fireworks display
held over the Patuxent River, near
Solomons, in Calvert County, Maryland.
The rule is needed to control movement
through a portion of the waterway that
is expected to be populated by vessels
seeking to view the fireworks display.
The Coast Guard received no written
correspondence in response to the
NPRM. No public meeting was
requested and none was held.
Discussion of Rule
On July 4, 2007, the Solomons Island
Business Association will sponsor an
Independence Day celebration fireworks
display launched from two adjoining
barges located on the Patuxent River
near Solomons, in Calvert County,
Maryland. The planned event includes
an aerial fireworks display beginning at
9 p.m. Due to the need for vessel control
during the fireworks display, vessel
traffic will be restricted to provide for
the safety of spectators and transiting
vessels.
The purpose of this rule is to promote
maritime safety, and to protect the
environment and mariners transiting the
area from the potential hazards due to
falling embers or other debris associated
with a fireworks display from a barge.
This rule establishes a safety zone on
the waters of the Patuxent River, within
a radius of 400 yards around a fireworks
barge, which will be located at position
latitude 38° 19′ 03.0″ N, longitude 076°
26′ 07.6″ W. The Coast Guard
anticipates a large recreational boating
spectator fleet during this event. The
rule will impact the movement of all
vessels operating in a specified area of
the Patuxent River. Interference with
normal port operations is unlikely;
however, if required, will be kept to the
minimum considered necessary to
ensure the safety of life on the navigable
waters immediately before, during, and
after the scheduled event.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 104 / Thursday, May 31, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
30269
Small Entities
Collection of Information
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to operate, remain or
anchor within certain waters of the
Patuxent River, within a radius of 400
yards around a fireworks barge located
at position latitude 38° 19′ 03.0″ N,
longitude 076° 26′ 07.6″ W, from 7:30
p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2007, and if
necessary due to inclement weather,
from 7:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 5,
2007. This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This rule will be
in effect for two and one-half hours,
commercial vessel traffic in this area is
limited, vessels not constrained by their
draft may proceed safely around the
safety zone, and the Coast Guard will
issue maritime advisories widely
available to users of the river before the
effective period.
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520.).
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 May 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This rule
establishes a safety zone.
A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical
Exclusion Determination’’ will be
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
30270
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 104 / Thursday, May 31, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
on board a vessel displaying a Coast
Guard Ensign, and
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on board a vessel displaying a Coast
Guard Ensign.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 7:30 p.m. to 10
p.m. on July 4, 2007, or if necessary due
to inclement weather, from 7:30 p.m. to
10 p.m. on July 5, 2007 instead.
Dated: May 15, 2007.
Brian D. Kelley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Baltimore, Maryland.
[FR Doc. E7–10447 Filed 5–30–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
2. Add temporary § 165.T05–037 to
read as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
§ 165.T05–037 Safety zone; Fireworks
Display, Patuxent River, Calvert County,
MD.
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
I
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the Patuxent
River near Solomons, in Calvert County,
Maryland, surface to bottom, within a
radius of 400 yards around a fireworks
barge which will be located at position
latitude 38° 19′ 03.0″ N, longitude 076°
26′ 07.6″ W. All coordinates reference
Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definition. As used in this section
the designated representative means the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore or any Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been authorized by the Captain
of the Port to act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations. The general
regulations governing safety zones,
found in Sec. 165.23, apply to the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
(1) All vessels and persons are
prohibited from entering this zone,
except as authorized by the Captain of
the Port, Baltimore, Maryland or his
designated representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage within the zone must
request authorization from the Captain
of the Port or his designated
representative by telephone at (410)
576–2693 or by marine band radio on
VHF channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(3) All Coast Guard vessels enforcing
this safety zone can be contacted on
marine band radio VHF channel 16
(156.8 MHz).
(4) The operator of any vessel within
or in the immediate vicinity of this
safety zone shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 May 30, 2007
Jkt 211001
[COTP San Francisco Bay 07–019]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Whales Transiting the
San Francisco Bay and Delta Region,
CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing temporary, moving safety
zones on the navigable waters of the San
Francisco Bay and Delta Region to
contribute to the safety of the boating
public where whales have been sighted
swimming up river from the San
Francisco Bay. These safety zones are
established to ensure the safety of
persons and vessels from hazards,
injury, and damage associated with
higher-than-normal levels of
recreational boating traffic on the water
as individuals attempt to view the
whales. Unauthorized persons or vessels
are prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or remaining in the
safety zones without permission of the
Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.
This rule is effective from 12:01
a.m. May 17, 2007, until 11:59 p.m. June
5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of the docket COTP San
Francisco Bay 07–019 and are available
for inspection or copying at Coast Guard
Sector San Francisco, 1 Yerba Buena
Island, San Francisco, California, 94130,
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ensign Sheral Richardson, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Francisco, at (415)
556–2950 extension 136.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. The Coast
Guard only recently learned of whales
transiting the bay, river and delta
region. Any delay in implementing this
rule would have been impracticable and
contrary to the public interest since
immediate action was necessary to
protect the public from hazards
associated with the transiting whales.
For the same reasons listed in the
previous paragraph, under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Any
delay in the effective date of this rule
would expose mariners to the dangers
posed by the whales.
Background and Purpose
On May 14, 2007 the presence of
possibly four and at least two whales
swimming northerly in the Sacramento
River was reported to the Coast Guard.
The presence of these whales was
confirmed by the Coast Guard and the
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration. These safety zones are
established to ensure the safety of
persons and vessels from hazards,
injury, and damage associated with
higher-than-normal levels of
recreational boating traffic on the water
as individuals attempt to view the
whales. The Coast Guard has
established that there are two
Humpback whales, and these safety
zones will apply to each whale
individually.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing
temporary, moving safety zones in the
navigable waters of the San Francisco
Bay and Delta Region wherever the
whales are located. While the whales
are in transit these safety zones will
apply to the navigable waters around
and under each whale within a radius
of 500 yards. The effect of the
temporary, moving safety zones will be
to restrict general navigation in the
vicinity of the whales while the whales
transit the waters of the bay, and delta.
Except for persons or vessels authorized
by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain
in the safety zone. These safety zones
E:\FR\FM\31MYR1.SGM
31MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 104 (Thursday, May 31, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 30268-30270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-10447]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD05-07-037]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Patuxent River, Calvert County,
MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone upon
certain waters of the Patuxent River during a fireworks display. This
action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable
waters during a fireworks display launched from a barge, located near
Solomons, in Calvert County, Maryland. This action will restrict vessel
traffic in a portion of the Patuxent River.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 5,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket CGD05-07-037 and are available for inspection or
copying at Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins
Point Road, Building 70, Waterways Management Division, Baltimore,
Maryland 21226-1791, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ronald L. Houck, at Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Waterways Management Division, at (410) 576-2674 or
(410) 576-2693.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On April 11, 2007, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled ``Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Patuxent River,
Calvert County, MD'' in the Federal Register (72 FR 18176). We received
no letters commenting on the proposed rule. No public meeting was
requested, and none was held.
Background and Purpose
Each year, thousands of spectators attend outdoor fireworks
displays discharged from vessels or floating platforms on or near the
navigable waters of the United States. Accidental discharge of
fireworks and falling hot embers are a safety concern during such
events. The Coast Guard has the authority to impose appropriate
controls on marine events that may pose a threat to persons, vessels
and facilities under its jurisdiction. The Coast Guard is establishing
a safety zone that will be enforced during a fireworks display held
over the Patuxent River, near Solomons, in Calvert County, Maryland.
The rule is needed to control movement through a portion of the
waterway that is expected to be populated by vessels seeking to view
the fireworks display.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
The Coast Guard received no written correspondence in response to
the NPRM. No public meeting was requested and none was held.
Discussion of Rule
On July 4, 2007, the Solomons Island Business Association will
sponsor an Independence Day celebration fireworks display launched from
two adjoining barges located on the Patuxent River near Solomons, in
Calvert County, Maryland. The planned event includes an aerial
fireworks display beginning at 9 p.m. Due to the need for vessel
control during the fireworks display, vessel traffic will be restricted
to provide for the safety of spectators and transiting vessels.
The purpose of this rule is to promote maritime safety, and to
protect the environment and mariners transiting the area from the
potential hazards due to falling embers or other debris associated with
a fireworks display from a barge. This rule establishes a safety zone
on the waters of the Patuxent River, within a radius of 400 yards
around a fireworks barge, which will be located at position latitude
38[deg] 19' 03.0'' N, longitude 076[deg] 26' 07.6'' W. The Coast Guard
anticipates a large recreational boating spectator fleet during this
event. The rule will impact the movement of all vessels operating in a
specified area of the Patuxent River. Interference with normal port
operations is unlikely; however, if required, will be kept to the
minimum considered necessary to ensure the safety of life on the
navigable waters immediately before, during, and after the scheduled
event.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
[[Page 30269]]
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities: the owners or
operators of vessels intending to operate, remain or anchor within
certain waters of the Patuxent River, within a radius of 400 yards
around a fireworks barge located at position latitude 38[deg] 19'
03.0'' N, longitude 076[deg] 26' 07.6'' W, from 7:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on
July 4, 2007, and if necessary due to inclement weather, from 7:30 p.m.
to 10 p.m. on July 5, 2007. This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This rule will be in effect for two and one-
half hours, commercial vessel traffic in this area is limited, vessels
not constrained by their draft may proceed safely around the safety
zone, and the Coast Guard will issue maritime advisories widely
available to users of the river before the effective period.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small
businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who
enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and
the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness
to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of
the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. This rule establishes a safety zone.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a final
``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' will be available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
[[Page 30270]]
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T05-037 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-037 Safety zone; Fireworks Display, Patuxent River,
Calvert County, MD.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the Patuxent River near Solomons, in Calvert County, Maryland, surface
to bottom, within a radius of 400 yards around a fireworks barge which
will be located at position latitude 38[deg] 19' 03.0'' N, longitude
076[deg] 26' 07.6'' W. All coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definition. As used in this section the designated
representative means the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Baltimore or any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
authorized by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations. The general regulations governing safety zones,
found in Sec. 165.23, apply to the safety zone described in paragraph
(a) of this section.
(1) All vessels and persons are prohibited from entering this zone,
except as authorized by the Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland or
his designated representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage within the
zone must request authorization from the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative by telephone at (410) 576-2693 or by marine
band radio on VHF channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(3) All Coast Guard vessels enforcing this safety zone can be
contacted on marine band radio VHF channel 16 (156.8 MHz).
(4) The operator of any vessel within or in the immediate vicinity
of this safety zone shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer on board a vessel displaying a
Coast Guard Ensign, and
(ii) Proceed as directed by any commissioned, warrant or petty
officer on board a vessel displaying a Coast Guard Ensign.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 7:30
p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 4, 2007, or if necessary due to inclement
weather, from 7:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. on July 5, 2007 instead.
Dated: May 15, 2007.
Brian D. Kelley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland.
[FR Doc. E7-10447 Filed 5-30-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P