Amendments to Regulations Under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA) To Ensure Trust Protection for Produce Sellers When Using Electronic Invoicing or Other Billing Methods, 29837-29839 [E7-10262]
Download as PDF
29837
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 103
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 46
[Docket Number AMS–FV–07–0009; FV05–
373]
RIN 0581–AC53
Amendments to Regulations Under the
Perishable Agricultural Commodities
Act (PACA) To Ensure Trust Protection
for Produce Sellers When Using
Electronic Invoicing or Other Billing
Methods
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is amending the
regulations under the Perishable
Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA)
to ensure that the status of sellers of
perishable agricultural commodities as
trust creditors is protected when
electronic data interchange (EDI) or
other forms of electronic commerce are
used to invoice buyers. Specifically, the
amendments require that a buyer
licensed under the PACA or its third
party representative accept the PACA
trust notice submitted to it by a seller on
a paper, electronic invoice, or other
billing statement. In addition, the buyer
must allow sufficient data space for the
required trust language regardless of the
billing medium. Finally, any failure, act
or omission inconsistent with this
responsibility is unlawful and a
violation of the PACA.
DATES: Effective Date: June 29, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karla Whalen, Section Head, Trade
Practices Section, or Phyllis Hall, Senior
Marketing Specialist, Trade Practices
Section, 202–720–6873.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:13 May 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
Background of PACA and Trust
Provisions
USDA’s Agricultural Marketing
Service (AMS) administers and enforces
the Perishable Agricultural
Commodities Act (PACA). The PACA
establishes a code of fair trading
practices in the marketing of fresh and
frozen fruits and vegetables in interstate
and foreign commerce. The PACA
protects growers, shippers, distributors,
and retailers dealing in those
commodities by prohibiting unfair and
fraudulent trade practices. The law also
provides a forum to adjudicate or
mediate commercial disputes. Licensees
who violate the PACA may have their
license suspended or revoked, and
principals of such a licensee are
restricted from employment or operating
in the produce industry for a period of
time.
The PACA also imposes a statutory
trust for the benefit of unpaid suppliers
or sellers on perishable agricultural
commodities received and accepted but
not yet paid for, and may encumber
products derived from those
commodities, and any receivables or
proceeds due from the sale of those
commodities or products.
In the case of a business failure or
bankruptcy of an entity subject to
PACA, the debtor’s inventory and
receivables (PACA trust assets) are not
property of the estate and are not
available for general distribution until
the claims of PACA creditors who have
preserved their trust rights have been
satisfied. Because of the statutory trust
provision, PACA trust creditors who
have preserved their trust rights with
the appropriate written notices,
including sellers outside of the United
States, have a far greater chance of
recovering the money owed to them
should an entity subject to PACA go out
of business. The PACA trust provisions
protect producers and the majority of
firms trading in fruits and vegetables as
each buyer of perishable agricultural
commodities in the marketing chain
becomes a seller in its own turn.
In 1995, the PACA was amended to
provide that licensed sellers of fresh and
frozen fruits and vegetables may provide
notice to buyers of their intention to
preserve trust benefits by including
specific language on invoice and billing
documentation. The required language
reads: ‘‘The perishable agricultural
commodities listed on this invoice are
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
sold subject to the statutory trust
authorized by section 5(c) of the
Perishable Agricultural Commodities
Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. 499e(c)). The seller
of these commodities retains a trust
claim over these commodities, all
inventories of food or other products
derived from these commodities, and
any receivables or proceeds from the
sale of these commodities until full
payment is received.’’ (7 U.S.C.
499e(c)(4)).
Amendment of PACA Regulations To
Allow for Electronic Invoicing
The PACA regulations (7 CFR
46.46(a)(5)) were amended in 1997 to
state that electronic communications are
considered ‘‘ordinary or usual billing
and invoice statements’’ within the
meaning of Section 5(c)(4) of the PACA.
Under the 1997 amendments to the
PACA regulations, unpaid PACA
licensed sellers or suppliers of fresh and
frozen fruits and vegetables have the
option of providing notice to buyers of
their intention to preserve their trust
rights by including the specified
language contained in Section 5(c)(4) of
the PACA on their billing or invoice
statements, whether those statements
are paper documentation or electronic
transmissions. Alternatively, as
provided in the PACA and regulations,
sellers (licensed or non-licensed) can
also satisfy the notice requirement by
sending the buyer a separate detailed
notice of their intent to preserve trust
benefits within thirty (30) days of
payment default. Whichever method of
providing notice is used to preserve
trust benefits, in order to claim the
benefit of the trust, payment terms may
not exceed 30 days from date of
acceptance.
Since the amendment to the
regulations, a number of produce sellers
voiced concern that their PACA trust
rights might not be preserved if: (1) The
buyer/buyer’s agent either willfully or
through oversight did not receive the
entire electronic transmission (i.e.,
electronic invoice); (2) the buyer/buyer’s
agent did not download the trust
information; (3) the buyer/buyer’s agent
did not opt to receive the information;
(4) the buyer/buyer’s agent did not buy
the data field that allows the inclusion
of the trust language; or (5) the EDI
service provider did not translate the
field that contains the trust language.
Additional concerns were expressed
E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM
30MYR1
29838
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
that the alternate method of trust notice
(i.e., separate trust notice letter) was not
being accepted by some buyers who
require electronic invoicing. Others in
the industry expressed concern about
being charged a fee by the buyer to
accept the notice to preserve their trust
benefits with an electronic invoice, a
paper invoice, or separate trust notice.
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
Advanced Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking
AMS published an Advanced Notice
of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal
Register on January 30, 2006, (71 FR
4831) seeking comments on whether,
and if so, how to amend the PACA
regulations to address industry concerns
regarding electronic invoicing. The
Advance Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking invited comments on: (1)
The types of problems that may need to
be addressed by new regulatory
language; (2) any technological barriers
and solutions; (3) any additional costs
likely to be associated with appropriate
regulations, and opinions regarding who
should bear such costs; (4) whether the
Agency should by regulation define
electronic invoicing methods that must
be made available by licensed buyers,
(e.g., creating a separate field for trust
notice language in electronic invoices);
(5) whether buyers should be required
to accept separate notices (i.e.,
electronic or paper PACA trust) without
restriction or charge; and (6) other
related issues and suggestions. The
comment period ended on March 16,
2006. AMS received 65 comments. The
vast majority of the comments favored
amending the regulations to clarify
electronic invoicing practices so that
sellers have the same protection when
using electronic invoicing as that
afforded through traditional paper
invoices. Therefore, AMS determined it
was appropriate to issue a notice of
proposed rulemaking.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
AMS published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking in the Federal Register on
November 8, 2006, (71 FR 65426)
seeking comments on amending the
PACA regulations to ensure that the
status of sellers of perishable
agricultural commodities as trust
creditors is protected when electronic
data interchange (EDI) or other forms of
electronic commerce are used to invoice
buyers. Specifically, the amendments
would require that a buyer licensed
under the PACA or its third party
representative accept the PACA trust
notice submitted to it by a seller on a
paper, electronic invoice, or other
billing statement. In addition, the buyer
would be required to allow sufficient
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:13 May 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
data space for the required trust
language regardless of the billing
medium. Finally, any failure, act or
omission inconsistent with this
responsibility would be unlawful and a
violation of the PACA.
The comment period ended on
January 8, 2007. We received 41
comments. All commentors supported
AMS’s proposal to amend the
regulations. The comments indicate that
the proposed amendments would
remedy a very serious potential
commercial problem for shippers/
sellers, as well as adapt to industry
practices of enhanced technology; and,
thus would provide the same
protections for the shippers/sellers
when paper invoices or EDI
transmissions are used. Therefore, for
the reasons given in the proposed rule
and based upon comments received, we
are adopting the proposed rule as a final
rule, without change.
Executive Orders 12866 and 12988
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866, and therefore,
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform, and is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This final rule
will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule. There are no administrative
procedures that must be exhausted prior
to any judicial challenge to the
provisions of this final rule.
Effects on Small Businesses
Pursuant to requirements set forth in
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), AMS has considered
the economic impact of this final rule
on small entities. The purpose of the
RFA is to fit regulatory actions to the
scale of businesses subject to such
actions in order that small businesses
will not be unduly or disproportionately
burdened. Small agricultural service
firms have been defined by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR
121.601) as those whose annual receipts
are less than $5,000,000. There are
approximately 15,000 firms licensed
under the PACA, many of which could
be classified as small entities.
The final rule clarifies how to
preserve the trust benefit when using
electronic invoicing. The use of
electronic invoicing will provide
companies an electronic alternative to
paper documentation to give notice of
intent to preserve trust rights, thereby
reducing the time and expense
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
associated with preserving trust rights
under the PACA.
Given the preceding discussion, AMS
has made a determination that the
provisions of this final rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with OMB regulations
(5 CFR part 1320) that implement the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements that are covered by this
final rule were approved under OMB
number 0581–0031 on October 5, 2004,
and expire on October 31, 2007.
E-Government Act Compliance
AMS is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 46
Agricultural commodities, Brokers,
Investigations, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
I For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, AMS amends 7 CFR part 46
as follows:
PART 46—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 46
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: Sec. 15, 46 Stat. 537; 7 U.S.C.
499o.
2. In § 46.46, paragraph (f)(3)
introductory text is revised and new
paragraphs (f)(4) and (5) are added to
read as follows:
I
§ 46.46
Statutory trust.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(3) Licensees may choose an alternate
method of preserving trust benefits from
the requirements described in
paragraphs (f)(1) and (2) of this section.
Licensees may use their invoice or other
billing statement as defined in
paragraph (a)(5) of this section, whether
in documentary or electronic form, to
preserve trust benefits. Alternately, the
licensee’s invoice or other billing
statement, given to the buyer, must
contain:
(i) * * *
(ii) * * *
(4) If the invoice or other billing
statement is in electronic form, the
licensee has met its requirement of
giving the buyer notice of intent to
preserve trust benefits on the face of the
E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM
30MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 30, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
invoice or other billing statement if the
electronic invoice or other billing
statement containing the statement set
forth in paragraph (f)(3)(i) is sent to the
buyer and the electronic transmission
can be verified. The licensee will be
deemed to have given notice to the
buyer of its intent to preserve trust
benefits if the licensee can verify that
the electronic invoice or other billing
statement was sent to a third party
electronic transaction vendor designated
by the buyer. The licensee will have met
the requirement of giving the buyer
written notice of intent to preserve trust
benefits using electronic means if it can
verify that the electronic data invoice or
other billing statement was transmitted
to the buyer, or its designated electronic
transaction vendor, irrespective of
whether or not the buyer or third party
vendor downloads or accepts the trust
statement.
(5) If a buyer conducts its transactions
in perishable agricultural commodities
using an electronic system, the buyer or
its third party electronic vendor must
allow sufficient space for the seller to
include the required trust statement of
intent to preserve trust benefits in the
buyer’s electronic invoices or other
billing statement forms. A buyer or its
designated third party electronic vendor
must accept a seller’s notice of intent to
preserve benefits under the trust using
the required trust statement, whether in
documentary or electronic form, as set
forth in paragraphs (d) and (f) of this
section. Any act or omission which is
inconsistent with this responsibility is
unlawful and in violation of Section 2
of the Act (7 U.S.C. 499b).
Dated: May 23, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing
Service.
[FR Doc. E7–10262 Filed 5–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 925
[Docket No. AMS–FV–07–0028; FV07–925–
1 FR]
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
Grapes Grown in a Designated Area of
Southeastern California; Change in
Reporting Requirements
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule revises the reporting
requirements established under the
California desert grape marketing order,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:13 May 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
which regulates the handling of grapes
grown in a designated area of
Southeastern California. The marketing
order is administered locally by the
California Desert Grape Administrative
Committee (CDGAC or committee). This
rule requires handlers to provide an
annual report to the committee which
lists the acreages devoted to grapes for
fresh shipment, the owners and
locations of the acreages, and varieties
produced thereon that the handler will
be handling during the upcoming
season. This change allows the
committee to collect information on the
acreage and varieties of desert grapes
regulated under the marketing order,
thus improving data collection and the
efficient operation of the program.
EFFECTIVE DATES: May 31, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terry Vawter, Marketing Specialist, or
Kurt J. Kimmel, Regional Manager,
California Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (559) 487–
5901, Fax: (559) 487–5906, or E-mail:
Terry.Vawter@usda.gov or
Kurt.Kimmel@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final
rule is issued under Marketing
Agreement and Order No. 925, both as
amended (7 CFR part 925), regulating
the handling of grapes grown in a
designated area of southeastern
California, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
The Department of Agriculture
(USDA) is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This final rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. This rule is not intended
to have retroactive effect. This final rule
will not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29839
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This final rule changes the reporting
requirements under the order by
requiring handlers to file an annual
acreage survey which lists the acreages
devoted to grapes, the locations and
owners of the acreage, and varieties
produced thereon for fresh shipment
that the handler will be handling during
the upcoming season. The form
provides information necessary for the
committee to estimate annual
production, determine the necessary
assessment rate, and establish an annual
budget of expenses. This change was
unanimously recommended by the
committee at a meeting on February 6,
2007.
Section 925.60 provides authority for
the committee, with the approval of
USDA, to require handlers to furnish
information to the committee. Currently,
§ 925.60(a) requires handlers to file
reports of shipments of grapes. Under
§ 925.60(b), the committee is authorized,
with the approval of USDA, to require
handlers to furnish such other
information as it may prescribe and may
be necessary to enable the committee to
perform its duties under the order.
The acreage survey is currently an
approved form authorized for use by the
committee. The form was initially
included so that the committee could, at
some future time, recommend requiring
handlers to use the form if it were
determined that aggregating information
on grape acreage would provide a
benefit to the industry.
The committee met on February 6,
2007, and discussed the grape acreage
survey. At this time, the committee
believes the report would provide
valuable information and unanimously
recommended that it be a mandatory
report, such as those authorized under
§ 925.60. This change is intended to
enhance the efficient operation of the
program by permitting the committee to
collect production data, which, in turn,
would allow them to have more
accurate information for establishing a
crop estimate, determining an
E:\FR\FM\30MYR1.SGM
30MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 103 (Wednesday, May 30, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29837-29839]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-10262]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 30, 2007 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 29837]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 46
[Docket Number AMS-FV-07-0009; FV05-373]
RIN 0581-AC53
Amendments to Regulations Under the Perishable Agricultural
Commodities Act (PACA) To Ensure Trust Protection for Produce Sellers
When Using Electronic Invoicing or Other Billing Methods
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture (USDA) is amending the
regulations under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA) to
ensure that the status of sellers of perishable agricultural
commodities as trust creditors is protected when electronic data
interchange (EDI) or other forms of electronic commerce are used to
invoice buyers. Specifically, the amendments require that a buyer
licensed under the PACA or its third party representative accept the
PACA trust notice submitted to it by a seller on a paper, electronic
invoice, or other billing statement. In addition, the buyer must allow
sufficient data space for the required trust language regardless of the
billing medium. Finally, any failure, act or omission inconsistent with
this responsibility is unlawful and a violation of the PACA.
DATES: Effective Date: June 29, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karla Whalen, Section Head, Trade
Practices Section, or Phyllis Hall, Senior Marketing Specialist, Trade
Practices Section, 202-720-6873.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background of PACA and Trust Provisions
USDA's Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS) administers and
enforces the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act (PACA). The PACA
establishes a code of fair trading practices in the marketing of fresh
and frozen fruits and vegetables in interstate and foreign commerce.
The PACA protects growers, shippers, distributors, and retailers
dealing in those commodities by prohibiting unfair and fraudulent trade
practices. The law also provides a forum to adjudicate or mediate
commercial disputes. Licensees who violate the PACA may have their
license suspended or revoked, and principals of such a licensee are
restricted from employment or operating in the produce industry for a
period of time.
The PACA also imposes a statutory trust for the benefit of unpaid
suppliers or sellers on perishable agricultural commodities received
and accepted but not yet paid for, and may encumber products derived
from those commodities, and any receivables or proceeds due from the
sale of those commodities or products.
In the case of a business failure or bankruptcy of an entity
subject to PACA, the debtor's inventory and receivables (PACA trust
assets) are not property of the estate and are not available for
general distribution until the claims of PACA creditors who have
preserved their trust rights have been satisfied. Because of the
statutory trust provision, PACA trust creditors who have preserved
their trust rights with the appropriate written notices, including
sellers outside of the United States, have a far greater chance of
recovering the money owed to them should an entity subject to PACA go
out of business. The PACA trust provisions protect producers and the
majority of firms trading in fruits and vegetables as each buyer of
perishable agricultural commodities in the marketing chain becomes a
seller in its own turn.
In 1995, the PACA was amended to provide that licensed sellers of
fresh and frozen fruits and vegetables may provide notice to buyers of
their intention to preserve trust benefits by including specific
language on invoice and billing documentation. The required language
reads: ``The perishable agricultural commodities listed on this invoice
are sold subject to the statutory trust authorized by section 5(c) of
the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930 (7 U.S.C. 499e(c)).
The seller of these commodities retains a trust claim over these
commodities, all inventories of food or other products derived from
these commodities, and any receivables or proceeds from the sale of
these commodities until full payment is received.'' (7 U.S.C.
499e(c)(4)).
Amendment of PACA Regulations To Allow for Electronic Invoicing
The PACA regulations (7 CFR 46.46(a)(5)) were amended in 1997 to
state that electronic communications are considered ``ordinary or usual
billing and invoice statements'' within the meaning of Section 5(c)(4)
of the PACA. Under the 1997 amendments to the PACA regulations, unpaid
PACA licensed sellers or suppliers of fresh and frozen fruits and
vegetables have the option of providing notice to buyers of their
intention to preserve their trust rights by including the specified
language contained in Section 5(c)(4) of the PACA on their billing or
invoice statements, whether those statements are paper documentation or
electronic transmissions. Alternatively, as provided in the PACA and
regulations, sellers (licensed or non-licensed) can also satisfy the
notice requirement by sending the buyer a separate detailed notice of
their intent to preserve trust benefits within thirty (30) days of
payment default. Whichever method of providing notice is used to
preserve trust benefits, in order to claim the benefit of the trust,
payment terms may not exceed 30 days from date of acceptance.
Since the amendment to the regulations, a number of produce sellers
voiced concern that their PACA trust rights might not be preserved if:
(1) The buyer/buyer's agent either willfully or through oversight did
not receive the entire electronic transmission (i.e., electronic
invoice); (2) the buyer/buyer's agent did not download the trust
information; (3) the buyer/buyer's agent did not opt to receive the
information; (4) the buyer/buyer's agent did not buy the data field
that allows the inclusion of the trust language; or (5) the EDI service
provider did not translate the field that contains the trust language.
Additional concerns were expressed
[[Page 29838]]
that the alternate method of trust notice (i.e., separate trust notice
letter) was not being accepted by some buyers who require electronic
invoicing. Others in the industry expressed concern about being charged
a fee by the buyer to accept the notice to preserve their trust
benefits with an electronic invoice, a paper invoice, or separate trust
notice.
Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
AMS published an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the
Federal Register on January 30, 2006, (71 FR 4831) seeking comments on
whether, and if so, how to amend the PACA regulations to address
industry concerns regarding electronic invoicing. The Advance Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking invited comments on: (1) The types of problems that
may need to be addressed by new regulatory language; (2) any
technological barriers and solutions; (3) any additional costs likely
to be associated with appropriate regulations, and opinions regarding
who should bear such costs; (4) whether the Agency should by regulation
define electronic invoicing methods that must be made available by
licensed buyers, (e.g., creating a separate field for trust notice
language in electronic invoices); (5) whether buyers should be required
to accept separate notices (i.e., electronic or paper PACA trust)
without restriction or charge; and (6) other related issues and
suggestions. The comment period ended on March 16, 2006. AMS received
65 comments. The vast majority of the comments favored amending the
regulations to clarify electronic invoicing practices so that sellers
have the same protection when using electronic invoicing as that
afforded through traditional paper invoices. Therefore, AMS determined
it was appropriate to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
AMS published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal
Register on November 8, 2006, (71 FR 65426) seeking comments on
amending the PACA regulations to ensure that the status of sellers of
perishable agricultural commodities as trust creditors is protected
when electronic data interchange (EDI) or other forms of electronic
commerce are used to invoice buyers. Specifically, the amendments would
require that a buyer licensed under the PACA or its third party
representative accept the PACA trust notice submitted to it by a seller
on a paper, electronic invoice, or other billing statement. In
addition, the buyer would be required to allow sufficient data space
for the required trust language regardless of the billing medium.
Finally, any failure, act or omission inconsistent with this
responsibility would be unlawful and a violation of the PACA.
The comment period ended on January 8, 2007. We received 41
comments. All commentors supported AMS's proposal to amend the
regulations. The comments indicate that the proposed amendments would
remedy a very serious potential commercial problem for shippers/
sellers, as well as adapt to industry practices of enhanced technology;
and, thus would provide the same protections for the shippers/sellers
when paper invoices or EDI transmissions are used. Therefore, for the
reasons given in the proposed rule and based upon comments received, we
are adopting the proposed rule as a final rule, without change.
Executive Orders 12866 and 12988
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866, and therefore, has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and Budget.
This final rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform, and is not intended to have retroactive effect.
This final rule will not preempt any State or local laws, regulations,
or policies, unless they present an irreconcilable conflict with this
rule. There are no administrative procedures that must be exhausted
prior to any judicial challenge to the provisions of this final rule.
Effects on Small Businesses
Pursuant to requirements set forth in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), AMS has considered the economic
impact of this final rule on small entities. The purpose of the RFA is
to fit regulatory actions to the scale of businesses subject to such
actions in order that small businesses will not be unduly or
disproportionately burdened. Small agricultural service firms have been
defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA) (13 CFR 121.601) as
those whose annual receipts are less than $5,000,000. There are
approximately 15,000 firms licensed under the PACA, many of which could
be classified as small entities.
The final rule clarifies how to preserve the trust benefit when
using electronic invoicing. The use of electronic invoicing will
provide companies an electronic alternative to paper documentation to
give notice of intent to preserve trust rights, thereby reducing the
time and expense associated with preserving trust rights under the
PACA.
Given the preceding discussion, AMS has made a determination that
the provisions of this final rule would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with OMB regulations (5 CFR part 1320) that implement
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35), the
information collection and recordkeeping requirements that are covered
by this final rule were approved under OMB number 0581-0031 on October
5, 2004, and expire on October 31, 2007.
E-Government Act Compliance
AMS is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to promote
the use of the Internet and other information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen access to Government information
and services, and for other purposes.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 46
Agricultural commodities, Brokers, Investigations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, AMS amends 7 CFR part 46 as
follows:
PART 46--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 46 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 15, 46 Stat. 537; 7 U.S.C. 499o.
0
2. In Sec. 46.46, paragraph (f)(3) introductory text is revised and
new paragraphs (f)(4) and (5) are added to read as follows:
Sec. 46.46 Statutory trust.
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(3) Licensees may choose an alternate method of preserving trust
benefits from the requirements described in paragraphs (f)(1) and (2)
of this section. Licensees may use their invoice or other billing
statement as defined in paragraph (a)(5) of this section, whether in
documentary or electronic form, to preserve trust benefits.
Alternately, the licensee's invoice or other billing statement, given
to the buyer, must contain:
(i) * * *
(ii) * * *
(4) If the invoice or other billing statement is in electronic
form, the licensee has met its requirement of giving the buyer notice
of intent to preserve trust benefits on the face of the
[[Page 29839]]
invoice or other billing statement if the electronic invoice or other
billing statement containing the statement set forth in paragraph
(f)(3)(i) is sent to the buyer and the electronic transmission can be
verified. The licensee will be deemed to have given notice to the buyer
of its intent to preserve trust benefits if the licensee can verify
that the electronic invoice or other billing statement was sent to a
third party electronic transaction vendor designated by the buyer. The
licensee will have met the requirement of giving the buyer written
notice of intent to preserve trust benefits using electronic means if
it can verify that the electronic data invoice or other billing
statement was transmitted to the buyer, or its designated electronic
transaction vendor, irrespective of whether or not the buyer or third
party vendor downloads or accepts the trust statement.
(5) If a buyer conducts its transactions in perishable agricultural
commodities using an electronic system, the buyer or its third party
electronic vendor must allow sufficient space for the seller to include
the required trust statement of intent to preserve trust benefits in
the buyer's electronic invoices or other billing statement forms. A
buyer or its designated third party electronic vendor must accept a
seller's notice of intent to preserve benefits under the trust using
the required trust statement, whether in documentary or electronic
form, as set forth in paragraphs (d) and (f) of this section. Any act
or omission which is inconsistent with this responsibility is unlawful
and in violation of Section 2 of the Act (7 U.S.C. 499b).
Dated: May 23, 2007.
Lloyd C. Day,
Administrator, Agricultural Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. E7-10262 Filed 5-29-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-02-P