In the Matter of: Rufina Sanchez Lopez, Principal; Winter Aircraft Products SA; a/k/a Ruf S. Lopez SA; C/Ferrocarril 41; 1 DCHA; 28045 Madrid Spain; Respondent; Final Decision and Order, 29960-29963 [07-2675]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
29960
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 30, 2007 / Notices
D–1676(PR)(S)—Self-Assessment
Checklist—Spanish
D–1690(LG)—Address List—local
government
D–1690(TG)—Address List—tribal
government
D–1690(PR)(S)—Address List—Puerto
Rico (Spanish)
D–1691(LG)—Address List Add
Page—local government
D–1691(TG)—Address List Add
Page—tribal government
D–1691(PR)(S)—Address List Add
Page—Puerto Rico (Spanish)
D–1692(LG)—Address Count List—
local government
D–1692(TG)—Address Count List—
tribal government
D–1692(PR)(S)—Address Count List—
Puerto Rico (Spanish)
Type of Review: Reinstatement, with
change, of a previously approved
collection for which approval has
expired.
Affected Public: Tribal, state, and
local governments.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
19,780 governments.
Estimated Time Per Response: 196
hours on average; will vary by
population size of government.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 3,909,829.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: $0.
Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C.,
Chapter 1, Subchapter 1, Section 16.
IV. Request for Comments
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: May 24, 2007.
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–10361 Filed 5–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:13 May 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Voluntary Self-Disclosure of
Antiboycott Violations
Proposed information
collection: Comment request.
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
Written comments must be
submitted on or before July 30, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 6625,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington DC 20230, (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov.).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to Larry Hall, BIS ICB
Liaison, Department of Commerce,
Room 6622, 14th & Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
I. Abstract
This collection of information
supports enforcement of the antiboycott
provisions for the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) by
providing a method for industry to
voluntarily self-disclose antiboycott
violations.
II. Method of Collection
Paper form.
III. Data
OMB Number: 0694–0132.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profit organizations, and not-forprofit institutions.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
10.
Estimated Time Per Response: 10 to
600 hours per response.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 1,280.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: No
start-up capital expenditures.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. In addition, the public is
encouraged to provide suggestions on
how to reduce and/or consolidate the
current frequency of reporting.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they will also become a matter of public
record.
Dated: May 23, 2007
Gwellnar Banks,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–10328 Filed 5–29–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Docket No. 05–BIS–16]
In the Matter of: Rufina Sanchez Lopez,
Principal; Winter Aircraft Products SA;
a/k/a Ruf S. Lopez SA; C/Ferrocarril 41;
1 DCHA; 28045 Madrid Spain;
Respondent; Final Decision and Order
This matter is before me upon a
Recommended Decision and Order of
the Administrative Law Judge (‘‘ALJ’’).
In a charging letter filed on September
12, 2005, the Bureau of Industry and
Security (‘‘BIS’’) alleged that
Respondent, Rufina Sanchez Lopez,
(‘‘Sanchez Lopez’’), in her capacity as
Principal of Winter Aircraft Products SA
(‘‘Winter Aircraft’’), committed two
violations of the Export Administration
Regulations (currently codified at 15
CFR parts 730–774) (2007))
(‘‘Regulations’’) 1, issued under the
Export Administration Act of 1979, as
amended (50 U.S.C. app. 2401–2420
1 The violations charged occurred in 2000. The
Regulations governing the violations at issue are
found in the 2000 version of the Code of Federal
Regulations (15 CFR parts 730–774 (2000)). The
2007 Regulations establish the procedures that
apply to this matter.
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 30, 2007 / Notices
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
(2000)) (the ‘‘Act’’).2 Specifically, the
charging letter alleged that between on
or about November 1, 2000, and on or
about November 17, 2000, Sanchez
Lopez took actions with intent to evade
the Regulations. Specifically, on or
about November 1, 2000, Sanchez
Lopez, acting through her company
Winter Aircraft, acquired aircraft parts,
items subject to the Regulations and
classified under Export Control
Classification Number (‘‘ECCN’’) 9A991,
from U.S. suppliers with intent to
transship such items to Iran. Winter
Aircraft failed to inform the U.S.
suppliers of the ultimate destination of
the items and, as such, no license was
obtained from the U.S. Government for
this transaction, as was required by
Section 746.7 of the Regulations. On or
about November 17, 2000, Winter
Aircraft transshipped the aircraft parts
to Iran. In taking these actions, Sanchez
Lopez committed one violation of
Section 764.2(h) of the Regulations.
The charging letter further alleged
that between on or about October 19,
2000, and on or about November 22,
2000, Sanchez Lopez took actions with
intent to evade the Regulations.
Specifically, on or about October 19,
2000, Sanchez Lopez, acting through her
company Winter Aircraft, acquired
aircraft parts, items subject to the
Regulations and classified under ECCN
9A991, from U.S. suppliers with intent
to transship such items to Iran. Winter
Aircraft failed to inform the U.S.
suppliers of the ultimate destination of
the items and, as such, no license was
obtained from the U.S. Government for
this transaction, as was required by
Section 746.7 of the Regulations. On or
about November 22, 2000, Winter
Aircraft transshipped the aircraft parts
subject to the Regulations to Iran. In
taking these actions, Sanchez Lopez
committed one violation of Section
764.2(h) of the Regulations.
On September 12, 2005, BIS mailed
the notice of issuance of the charging
letter by registered mail to Sanchez
Lopez at her last known address, in
2 From August 21, 1994, through November 12,
2000, the Act was in lapse. During that period, the
President, through Executive Order 12924, which
had been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the last of which was August 3, 2000 (3
CFR, 2000 Comp. 397 (2001)), continued the
Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–
1706 (2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). On November 13, 2000, the
Act was reauthorized and it remained in effect
through August 20, 2001. Since August 21, 2001,
the Act has been in lapse and the President, through
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR,
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended
by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent
being that of August 3, 2006 (71 FR 44,551 (August
7, 2006)), has continued the Regulations in effect
under IEEPA.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:13 May 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
accordance with Section 766.3(b)(1) of
the Regulations. The notice of issuance
of a charging letter was received by
Sanchez Lopez on or about September
21, 2005. To date, Sanchez Lopez has
not filed an answer to the charging letter
with the ALJ, as required by the
Regulations.
In accordance with Section 766.7 of
the Regulations, BIS filed a Motion for
Default Order on March 20, 2007. This
Motion for Default Order recommended
that Sanchez Lopez be denied export
privileges under the Regulations for a
period often years. Under Section
766.7(a) of the Regulations, ‘‘[f]ailure of
the respondent to file an answer within
the time provided constitutes a waiver
of the respondent’s right to appear,’’ and
‘‘on BIS’s motion and without further
notice to the respondent, [the ALJ] shall
find the facts to be as alleged in the
charging letter.’’ Based upon the record
before him, the ALJ found Sanchez
Lopez in default.
On May 1, 2007, the ALJ issued a
Recommended Decision and Order in
which he found that Sanchez Lopez
committed two violations of Section
764.2(h). The ALJ recommended the
penalty of denial of export privileges for
ten years.
The ALJ’s Recommended Decision
and Order, together with the entire
record in this case, has been referred to
me for final action under Section 766.22
of the Regulations. I find that the record
supports the ALJ’s findings of fact and
conclusions of law. I also find that the
penalty recommended by the ALJ is
appropriate, given the nature of the
violations and the facts of this case, and
the importance of preventing future
unauthorized exports.
Based on my review of the entire
record, I affirm the findings of fact and
conclusions of law in the ALJ’s
Recommended Decision and Order.
Accordingly it is therefore ordered,
First, that for a period of ten years
from the date of this Order, Rufina
Sanchez Lopez, Principal, Winter
Aircraft Products SA, a/k/a Ruf S. Lopez
SA, C/Ferrocarril 41, 28045 Madrid,
Spain, and when acting for or on behalf
of Sanchez Lopez, her representatives,
agents and employees (hereinafter
collectively referred to as the ‘‘Denied
Person’’), may not, directly or indirectly,
participate in any way in any
transaction involving any commodity,
software or technology (hereinafter
collectively referred to as ‘‘item’’)
exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
subject to the Regulations, including,
but not limited to:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29961
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Second, that no person may, directly
or indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
the Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States, including financing or other
support activities related to a
transaction whereby the Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from the Denied Person of
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been exported from the United
States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in
the United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States and that is owned,
possessed or controlled by the Denied
Person, or service any item, of whatever
origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such
service involves the use of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States. For purposes of this paragraph,
servicing means installation,
maintenance, repair, modification or
testing.
Third, that after notice and
opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any
person, firm, corporation, or business
organization related to the Denied
Person by affiliation, ownership,
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
29962
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 30, 2007 / Notices
control, or position of responsibility in
the conduct of trade or related services
may also be made subject to the
provisions of this Order.
Fourth, that this Order does not
prohibit any export, reexport, or other
transaction subject to the Regulations
where the only items involved that are
subject to the Regulations are the
foreign-produced direct product of U.S.origin technology.
Fifth, that this Order shall be served
on the Denied Person and on BIS, and
shall be published in the Federal
Register. In addition, the ALJ’s
Recommended Decision and Order,
except for the section related to the
Recommended Order, shall be
published in the Federal Register.
This Order, which constitutes the
final agency action in this matter, is
effective immediately.
Dated: May 24, 2007.
Mark Foulon,
Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for
Industry and Security.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
1 The violations charged occurred in 2000. The
Regulations governing the violations at issue are
found in the 2000 version of the Code of Federal
Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730–774 (2000)). The
2006 Regulations establish the procedures that
apply to this matter.
2 From August 21, 1994 through November 12,
2000, the Act was in lapse. During that period, the
President, through Executive Order 12,924, which
had been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the last of which was August 3, 2000, 3
CFR, 2000 Comp. 397 (2001), continued the
Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1701–
1706 (2000) (‘‘IEEPA’’). On November 13, 2000, the
Act was reauthorized and it remained in effect
through August 20, 2001. Since August 21, 2001,
the Act has been in lapse and the President, through
Executive Order 13,222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR,
2001 Comp. 783 (2002), as extended by the Notice
of August 3, 2006, 71 FR 44551 (Aug. 7, 2006), has
continued the Regulations in effect under the
IEEPA.
19:13 May 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
A. Legal Authority for Issuing an Order
of Default
Section 766.7 of the Regulations states
that BIS may file a motion for an order
of default if a respondent fails to file a
timely answer to a charging letter. That
section, entitled Default, provides in
pertinent part:
Failure of the respondent to file an answer
within the time provided constitutes a waiver
of the respondent’s right to appear and
contest the allegations in the charging letter.
In such event, the administrative law judge,
on BIS’s motion and without further notice
to the respondent, shall find the facts to be
as alleged in the charging letter and render
an initial or recommended decision
containing findings of fact and appropriate
conclusions of law and issue or recommend
and order imposing appropriate sanctions.
15 CFR 766.7 (2006).
Recommended Decision and Order
On September 12, 2005, the Bureau of
Industry and Security, U.S. Department
of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’), issued a charging
letter initiating this administrative
enforcement proceeding against Rufina
Sanchez Lopez, (‘‘Sanchez Lopez’’), in
her capacity as Principal of Winter
Aircraft Products SA (‘‘Winter
Aircraft’’). The charging letter alleged
that Sanchez Lopez committed two
violations of the Export Administration
Regulations (currently codified at 15
CFR Parts 730–774 (2006)) (the
‘‘Regulations’’),1 issued under the
Export Administration Act of 1979, as
amended (50 U.S.C. app. 2401–2420
(2000) (the ‘‘Act’’).2 In accordance with
§ 766.7 of the Regulations, BIS has
moved for the issuance of an Order of
Default against Sanchez Lopez as
Sanchez Lopez has failed to file an
VerDate Aug<31>2005
answer to the allegations in the charging
letter issued by BIS within the time
period required by law.
Pursuant to § 766.6 of the Regulations,
a respondent must file an answer to the
charging letter ‘‘within 30 days after
being served with notice of the issuance
of the charging letter’’ initiating the
proceeding.
B. Service of the Notice of Issuance of
Charging Letter
In this case, BIS served notice of
issuance of the charging letter in
accordance with § 766.3(b)(1) of the
Regulations when it sent a copy of the
charging letter by registered mail to
Sanchez Lopez at her last known
address on September 12, 2005.
Although, BIS did not receive the signed
registered mail receipt, BIS did receive
a letter from Winter Aircraft, the
company in which Sanchez Lopez is
Principal, acknowledging receipt of the
charging letter on September 21, 2005.
Further, BIS and Winter Aircraft have
engaged in several months of
correspondence regarding the matter.
BIS counsel has advised Sanchez Lopez,
through her company Winter Aircraft,
repeatedly to file an answer to the
charging letter with the Administrative
Law Judge (‘‘ALJ’’). Sanchez Lopez has
failed to file an answer to the charging
letter as required by section 766.6 of the
Regulations. Accordingly, Sanchez
Lopez is in default.
C. Summary of Violations Charged
The charging letter filed by BIS
included a total of two charges.
Specifically, the charging letter alleged
the following:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Charge 1 (15 CFR 764.2(h)—Engaging in a
Transaction With Intent To Evade the
Regulations)
Between on or about November 1, 2000,
and on or about November 17, 2000, Sanchez
Lopez, took actions with intent to evade the
Regulations. Specifically, on or about
November 1, 2000, Sanchez Lopez, acting
through her company Winter Aircraft,
acquired aircraft parts, items subject to the
Regulations and classified under Export
Control Classification Number (‘‘ECCN’’)
9A991, from U.S. suppliers with intent to
transship such items to Iran. Winter Aircraft
failed to inform the U.S. suppliers of the
ultimate destination of the items and, as
such, no license was obtained from the U.S.
Government for this transaction, as was
required by Section 746.7 of the Regulations.
On or about November 17, 2000, Winter
Aircraft transshipped the aircraft parts
subject to the EAR to Iran with a substantial
markup in price. In taking these actions,
Sanchez Lopez committed one violation of
Section 764.2(h) of the Regulations.
Charge 2 (15 CFR 764.2(h)—Engaging in a
Transaction With Intent To Evade the
Regulations)
Between on or about October 19, 2000, and
on or about November 22, 2000, Sanchez
Lopez took actions with intent to evade the
Regulations. Specifically, on or about
October 19, 2000, Sanchez Lopez, acting
through her company Winter Aircraft,
acquired aircraft parts, items subject to the
Regulations and classified under ECCN
9A991, from U.S. suppliers with intent to
transship such items to Iran. Winter Aircraft
failed to inform the U.S. suppliers of the
ultimate destination of the items, and, as
such, no license was obtained from the U.S.
Government for this transaction, as was
required by Section 746.7 of the Regulations.
On or about November 22, 2000, Winter
Aircraft transshipped the aircraft parts
subject to the EAR to Iran with a substantial
markup in price. In taking these actions,
Sanchez Lopez committed one violation of
Section 764.2(h) of the Regulations.
D. Penalty Recommendation
[REDACTED SECTION]
E. Conclusion
Accordingly, the undersigned refers
this Recommended Decision and Order
to the Under Secretary of Commerce for
Industry and Security for review and
final action for the agency, without
further notice to the Respondent, as
provided in § 766.7 of the Regulations.
Within 30 days after receipt of this
Recommended Decision and Order, the
Under Secretary shall issue a written
order affirming, modifying, or vacating
the Recommended Decision and Order.
See 15 CFR 766.22(c).
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 103 / Wednesday, May 30, 2007 / Notices
Dated: May 1, 2007.
Joseph N. Ingolia,
Chief Administrative Law Judge.
[FR Doc. 07–2675 Filed 5–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Docket No. 05–BIS–17]
In the Matter of: Jose Alberto Diaz
Sanchez, President, Winter Aircraft
Products SA, a/k/a Ruf S. Lopez SA; C/
Ferrocarril 41; 1 DCHA 28045 Madrid,
Spain, Respondent; Final Decision and
Order
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
This matter is before me upon a
Recommended Decision and Order of
the Administrative Law Judge (‘‘ALJ’’).
In a charging letter filed on September
12, 2005, the Bureau of Industry and
Security (‘‘BIS’’) alleged that
Respondent, Jose Alberto Diaz Sanchez,
(‘‘Diaz Sanchez’’), in his capacity as
President of Winter Aircraft Products
SA (‘‘Winter Aircraft’’), committed two
violations of the Export Administration
Regulations (currently codified at 15
CFR parts 730–774) (2007))
(‘‘Regulations’’) 1, issued under the
Export Administration Act of 1979, as
amended (50 U.S.C. app. §§ 2401–2420
(2000)) (the ‘‘Act’’).2 Specifically, the
charging letter alleged that between on
or about November 1, 2000, and on or
about November 17, 2000, Diaz Sanchez
took actions with intent to evade the
Regulations. Specifically, on or about
November 1, 2000, Diaz Sanchez, acting
through his company Winter Aircraft,
acquired aircraft parts, items subject to
the Regulations and classified under
Export Control Classification Number
(‘‘ECCN’’) 9A991, from U.S. suppliers
with intent to transship such items to
1 The violations charged occurred in 2000. The
Regulations governing the violations at issue are
found in the 2000 version of the Code of Federal
Regulations (15 CFR parts 730–774 (2000)). The
2007 Regulations establish the procedures that
apply to this matter.
2 From August 21, 1994, through November 12,
2000, the Act was in lapse. During that period, the
President, through Executive Order 12924, which
had been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the last of which was August 3, 2000 (3
CFR, 2000 Comp. 397 (2001)), continued the
Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701–
1706 (2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’). On November 13, 2000, the
Act was reauthorized and it remained in effect
through August 20, 2001. Since August 21, 2001,
the Act has been in lapse and the President, through
Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR,
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended
by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent
being that of August 3, 2006 (71 FR 44,551 (August
7, 2006)), has continued the Regulations in effect
under IEEPA.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:13 May 29, 2007
Jkt 211001
Iran. Winter Aircraft failed to inform the
U.S. suppliers of the ultimate
destination of the items and, as such, no
license was obtained from the U.S.
Government for this transaction, as was
required by Section 746.7 of the
Regulations. On or about November 17,
2000, Winter Aircraft transshipped the
aircraft parts subject to the Regulations
to Iran. In taking these actions, Diaz
Sanchez committed one violation of
Section 764.2(h) of the Regulations.
The charging letter further alleged
that between on or about October 19,
2000, and on or about November 22,
2000, Diaz Sanchez took actions with
intent to evade the Regulations.
Specifically, on or about October 19,
2000, Diaz Sanchez, acting through his
company Winter Aircraft, acquired
aircraft parts, items subject to the
Regulations and classified under ECCN
9A991, from U.S. suppliers with intent
to transship such items to Iran. Winter
Aircraft failed to inform the U.S.
suppliers of the ultimate destination of
the items and, as such, no license was
obtained from the U.S. Government for
this transaction, as was required by
Section 746.7 of the Regulations. On or
about November 22, 2000, Winter
Aircraft transshipped the aircraft parts
to Iran. In taking these actions, Diaz
Sanchez committed one violation of
Section 764.2(h) of the Regulations.
In accordance with Section
766.3(b)(1) of the Regulations, on
September 12,2005, BIS mailed the
notice of issuance of the charging letter
by registered mail to Diaz Sanchez at his
last known address. The notice of
issuance of a charging letter was
received by Diaz Sanchez on or about
September 21, 2005. The record
establishes that BIS and Diaz Sanchez
engaged in several months of
correspondence regarding the matter,
and BIS counsel advised Diaz Sanchez
to file an answer to the charging letter.
To date, Diaz Sanchez has not filed an
answer to the charging letter with the
ALJ, as required by the Regulations.
In accordance with Section 766.7 of
the Regulations, BIS filed a Motion for
Default Order on March 20, 2007. This
Motion for Default Order recommended
that Diaz Sanchez be denied export
privileges for a period of ten years.
Under Section 766.7(a) of the
Regulations, ‘‘[f]ailure of the respondent
to file an answer within the time
provided constitutes a waiver of the
respondent’s right to appear,’’ and ‘‘on
BIS’s motion and without further notice
to the respondent, [the ALJ] shall find
the facts to be as alleged in the charging
letter.’’ Based upon the record before
him, the ALJ found Diaz Sanchez in
default.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29963
On May 1, 2007, the ALJ issued a
Recommended Decision and Order in
which he found that Diaz Sanchez
committed two violations of § 764.2(h).
The ALJ also recommended the penalty
of denial of export privileges for ten
years.
The ALJ’s Recommended Decision
and Order, together with the entire
record in this case, has been referred to
me for final action under Section 766.22
of the Regulations. I find that the record
supports the ALJ’s findings of fact and
conclusions of law. I also find that the
penalty recommended by the ALJ is
appropriate, given the nature of the
violations and the facts of this case, and
the importance of preventing future
unauthorized exports.
Based on my review of the entire
record, I affirm the findings of fact and
conclusions of law in the ALJ’s
Recommended Decision and Order.
Accordingly, it is therefore ordered,
First, that for a period of ten years
from the date of this Order, Jose Alberto
Diaz Sanchez, President, Winter Aircraft
Products SA, a/k/a Ruf S. Lopez SA, C/
Ferrocarril 41, 28045 Madrid, Spain,
and when acting for or on behalf of Diaz
Sanchez, his representatives, agents and
employees (hereinafter collectively
referred to as the ‘‘Denied Person’’), may
not, directly or indirectly, participate in
any way in any transaction involving
any commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from
the United States that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
subject to the Regulations, including,
but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item exported or to be
exported from the United States that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations;
or
C. Benefitting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
that is subject to the Regulations, or in
any other activity subject to the
Regulations.
Second, that no person may, directly
or indirectly, do any of the following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of the Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
E:\FR\FM\30MYN1.SGM
30MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 103 (Wednesday, May 30, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29960-29963]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2675]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Docket No. 05-BIS-16]
In the Matter of: Rufina Sanchez Lopez, Principal; Winter
Aircraft Products SA; a/k/a Ruf S. Lopez SA; C/Ferrocarril 41; 1 DCHA;
28045 Madrid Spain; Respondent; Final Decision and Order
This matter is before me upon a Recommended Decision and Order of
the Administrative Law Judge (``ALJ'').
In a charging letter filed on September 12, 2005, the Bureau of
Industry and Security (``BIS'') alleged that Respondent, Rufina Sanchez
Lopez, (``Sanchez Lopez''), in her capacity as Principal of Winter
Aircraft Products SA (``Winter Aircraft''), committed two violations of
the Export Administration Regulations (currently codified at 15 CFR
parts 730-774) (2007)) (``Regulations'') \1\, issued under the Export
Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. 2401-2420
[[Page 29961]]
(2000)) (the ``Act'').\2\ Specifically, the charging letter alleged
that between on or about November 1, 2000, and on or about November 17,
2000, Sanchez Lopez took actions with intent to evade the Regulations.
Specifically, on or about November 1, 2000, Sanchez Lopez, acting
through her company Winter Aircraft, acquired aircraft parts, items
subject to the Regulations and classified under Export Control
Classification Number (``ECCN'') 9A991, from U.S. suppliers with intent
to transship such items to Iran. Winter Aircraft failed to inform the
U.S. suppliers of the ultimate destination of the items and, as such,
no license was obtained from the U.S. Government for this transaction,
as was required by Section 746.7 of the Regulations. On or about
November 17, 2000, Winter Aircraft transshipped the aircraft parts to
Iran. In taking these actions, Sanchez Lopez committed one violation of
Section 764.2(h) of the Regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The violations charged occurred in 2000. The Regulations
governing the violations at issue are found in the 2000 version of
the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR parts 730-774 (2000)). The
2007 Regulations establish the procedures that apply to this matter.
\2\ From August 21, 1994, through November 12, 2000, the Act was
in lapse. During that period, the President, through Executive Order
12924, which had been extended by successive Presidential Notices,
the last of which was August 3, 2000 (3 CFR, 2000 Comp. 397 (2001)),
continued the Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701-1706 (2000))
(``IEEPA''). On November 13, 2000, the Act was reauthorized and it
remained in effect through August 20, 2001. Since August 21, 2001,
the Act has been in lapse and the President, through Executive Order
13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has
been extended by successive Presidential Notices, the most recent
being that of August 3, 2006 (71 FR 44,551 (August 7, 2006)), has
continued the Regulations in effect under IEEPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The charging letter further alleged that between on or about
October 19, 2000, and on or about November 22, 2000, Sanchez Lopez took
actions with intent to evade the Regulations. Specifically, on or about
October 19, 2000, Sanchez Lopez, acting through her company Winter
Aircraft, acquired aircraft parts, items subject to the Regulations and
classified under ECCN 9A991, from U.S. suppliers with intent to
transship such items to Iran. Winter Aircraft failed to inform the U.S.
suppliers of the ultimate destination of the items and, as such, no
license was obtained from the U.S. Government for this transaction, as
was required by Section 746.7 of the Regulations. On or about November
22, 2000, Winter Aircraft transshipped the aircraft parts subject to
the Regulations to Iran. In taking these actions, Sanchez Lopez
committed one violation of Section 764.2(h) of the Regulations.
On September 12, 2005, BIS mailed the notice of issuance of the
charging letter by registered mail to Sanchez Lopez at her last known
address, in accordance with Section 766.3(b)(1) of the Regulations. The
notice of issuance of a charging letter was received by Sanchez Lopez
on or about September 21, 2005. To date, Sanchez Lopez has not filed an
answer to the charging letter with the ALJ, as required by the
Regulations.
In accordance with Section 766.7 of the Regulations, BIS filed a
Motion for Default Order on March 20, 2007. This Motion for Default
Order recommended that Sanchez Lopez be denied export privileges under
the Regulations for a period often years. Under Section 766.7(a) of the
Regulations, ``[f]ailure of the respondent to file an answer within the
time provided constitutes a waiver of the respondent's right to
appear,'' and ``on BIS's motion and without further notice to the
respondent, [the ALJ] shall find the facts to be as alleged in the
charging letter.'' Based upon the record before him, the ALJ found
Sanchez Lopez in default.
On May 1, 2007, the ALJ issued a Recommended Decision and Order in
which he found that Sanchez Lopez committed two violations of Section
764.2(h). The ALJ recommended the penalty of denial of export
privileges for ten years.
The ALJ's Recommended Decision and Order, together with the entire
record in this case, has been referred to me for final action under
Section 766.22 of the Regulations. I find that the record supports the
ALJ's findings of fact and conclusions of law. I also find that the
penalty recommended by the ALJ is appropriate, given the nature of the
violations and the facts of this case, and the importance of preventing
future unauthorized exports.
Based on my review of the entire record, I affirm the findings of
fact and conclusions of law in the ALJ's Recommended Decision and
Order.
Accordingly it is therefore ordered,
First, that for a period of ten years from the date of this Order,
Rufina Sanchez Lopez, Principal, Winter Aircraft Products SA, a/k/a Ruf
S. Lopez SA, C/Ferrocarril 41, 28045 Madrid, Spain, and when acting for
or on behalf of Sanchez Lopez, her representatives, agents and
employees (hereinafter collectively referred to as the ``Denied
Person''), may not, directly or indirectly, participate in any way in
any transaction involving any commodity, software or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as ``item'') exported or to be
exported from the United States that is subject to the Regulations, or
in any other activity subject to the Regulations, including, but not
limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item exported or to be exported from the
United States that is subject to the Regulations, or in any other
activity subject to the Regulations; or
C. Benefitting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States that is subject to
the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the Regulations.
Second, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
following:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of the Denied Person any item
subject to the Regulations;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by the Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or
control of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States, including financing or other support
activities related to a transaction whereby the Denied Person acquires
or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from the Denied Person of any item subject to
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States;
D. Obtain from the Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States
and that is owned, possessed or controlled by the Denied Person, or
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by the Denied Person if such service involves the use of any
item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from
the United States. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing means
installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
Third, that after notice and opportunity for comment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any person, firm, corporation, or
business organization related to the Denied Person by affiliation,
ownership,
[[Page 29962]]
control, or position of responsibility in the conduct of trade or
related services may also be made subject to the provisions of this
Order.
Fourth, that this Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or
other transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items
involved that are subject to the Regulations are the foreign-produced
direct product of U.S.-origin technology.
Fifth, that this Order shall be served on the Denied Person and on
BIS, and shall be published in the Federal Register. In addition, the
ALJ's Recommended Decision and Order, except for the section related to
the Recommended Order, shall be published in the Federal Register.
This Order, which constitutes the final agency action in this
matter, is effective immediately.
Dated: May 24, 2007.
Mark Foulon,
Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security.
Recommended Decision and Order
On September 12, 2005, the Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S.
Department of Commerce (``BIS''), issued a charging letter initiating
this administrative enforcement proceeding against Rufina Sanchez
Lopez, (``Sanchez Lopez''), in her capacity as Principal of Winter
Aircraft Products SA (``Winter Aircraft''). The charging letter alleged
that Sanchez Lopez committed two violations of the Export
Administration Regulations (currently codified at 15 CFR Parts 730-774
(2006)) (the ``Regulations''),\1\ issued under the Export
Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50 U.S.C. app. 2401-2420 (2000)
(the ``Act'').\2\ In accordance with Sec. 766.7 of the Regulations,
BIS has moved for the issuance of an Order of Default against Sanchez
Lopez as Sanchez Lopez has failed to file an answer to the allegations
in the charging letter issued by BIS within the time period required by
law.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The violations charged occurred in 2000. The Regulations
governing the violations at issue are found in the 2000 version of
the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730-774 (2000)). The
2006 Regulations establish the procedures that apply to this matter.
\2\ From August 21, 1994 through November 12, 2000, the Act was
in lapse. During that period, the President, through Executive Order
12,924, which had been extended by successive Presidential Notices,
the last of which was August 3, 2000, 3 CFR, 2000 Comp. 397 (2001),
continued the Regulations in effect under the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1701-1706 (2000)
(``IEEPA''). On November 13, 2000, the Act was reauthorized and it
remained in effect through August 20, 2001. Since August 21, 2001,
the Act has been in lapse and the President, through Executive Order
13,222 of August 17, 2001, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002), as extended
by the Notice of August 3, 2006, 71 FR 44551 (Aug. 7, 2006), has
continued the Regulations in effect under the IEEPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Legal Authority for Issuing an Order of Default
Section 766.7 of the Regulations states that BIS may file a motion
for an order of default if a respondent fails to file a timely answer
to a charging letter. That section, entitled Default, provides in
pertinent part:
Failure of the respondent to file an answer within the time
provided constitutes a waiver of the respondent's right to appear
and contest the allegations in the charging letter. In such event,
the administrative law judge, on BIS's motion and without further
notice to the respondent, shall find the facts to be as alleged in
the charging letter and render an initial or recommended decision
containing findings of fact and appropriate conclusions of law and
issue or recommend and order imposing appropriate sanctions.
15 CFR 766.7 (2006).
Pursuant to Sec. 766.6 of the Regulations, a respondent must file
an answer to the charging letter ``within 30 days after being served
with notice of the issuance of the charging letter'' initiating the
proceeding.
B. Service of the Notice of Issuance of Charging Letter
In this case, BIS served notice of issuance of the charging letter
in accordance with Sec. 766.3(b)(1) of the Regulations when it sent a
copy of the charging letter by registered mail to Sanchez Lopez at her
last known address on September 12, 2005. Although, BIS did not receive
the signed registered mail receipt, BIS did receive a letter from
Winter Aircraft, the company in which Sanchez Lopez is Principal,
acknowledging receipt of the charging letter on September 21, 2005.
Further, BIS and Winter Aircraft have engaged in several months of
correspondence regarding the matter. BIS counsel has advised Sanchez
Lopez, through her company Winter Aircraft, repeatedly to file an
answer to the charging letter with the Administrative Law Judge
(``ALJ''). Sanchez Lopez has failed to file an answer to the charging
letter as required by section 766.6 of the Regulations. Accordingly,
Sanchez Lopez is in default.
C. Summary of Violations Charged
The charging letter filed by BIS included a total of two charges.
Specifically, the charging letter alleged the following:
Charge 1 (15 CFR 764.2(h)--Engaging in a Transaction With Intent To
Evade the Regulations)
Between on or about November 1, 2000, and on or about November
17, 2000, Sanchez Lopez, took actions with intent to evade the
Regulations. Specifically, on or about November 1, 2000, Sanchez
Lopez, acting through her company Winter Aircraft, acquired aircraft
parts, items subject to the Regulations and classified under Export
Control Classification Number (``ECCN'') 9A991, from U.S. suppliers
with intent to transship such items to Iran. Winter Aircraft failed
to inform the U.S. suppliers of the ultimate destination of the
items and, as such, no license was obtained from the U.S. Government
for this transaction, as was required by Section 746.7 of the
Regulations. On or about November 17, 2000, Winter Aircraft
transshipped the aircraft parts subject to the EAR to Iran with a
substantial markup in price. In taking these actions, Sanchez Lopez
committed one violation of Section 764.2(h) of the Regulations.
Charge 2 (15 CFR 764.2(h)--Engaging in a Transaction With Intent To
Evade the Regulations)
Between on or about October 19, 2000, and on or about November
22, 2000, Sanchez Lopez took actions with intent to evade the
Regulations. Specifically, on or about October 19, 2000, Sanchez
Lopez, acting through her company Winter Aircraft, acquired aircraft
parts, items subject to the Regulations and classified under ECCN
9A991, from U.S. suppliers with intent to transship such items to
Iran. Winter Aircraft failed to inform the U.S. suppliers of the
ultimate destination of the items, and, as such, no license was
obtained from the U.S. Government for this transaction, as was
required by Section 746.7 of the Regulations. On or about November
22, 2000, Winter Aircraft transshipped the aircraft parts subject to
the EAR to Iran with a substantial markup in price. In taking these
actions, Sanchez Lopez committed one violation of Section 764.2(h)
of the Regulations.
D. Penalty Recommendation
[REDACTED SECTION]
E. Conclusion
Accordingly, the undersigned refers this Recommended Decision and
Order to the Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security for
review and final action for the agency, without further notice to the
Respondent, as provided in Sec. 766.7 of the Regulations.
Within 30 days after receipt of this Recommended Decision and
Order, the Under Secretary shall issue a written order affirming,
modifying, or vacating the Recommended Decision and Order. See 15 CFR
766.22(c).
[[Page 29963]]
Dated: May 1, 2007.
Joseph N. Ingolia,
Chief Administrative Law Judge.
[FR Doc. 07-2675 Filed 5-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M
