Order Relating to Data Physics Corporation, 29483-29484 [07-2629]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 29, 2007 / Notices
calendar days following publication of
this notice. Please follow the procedures
set forth in Section 315.9 of EDA’s final
rule (71 FR 56704) for procedures for
requesting a public hearing. The Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance official
program number and title of the
program under which these petitions are
submitted is 11.313, Trade Adjustment
Assistance.
Dated: May 21, 2007.
William P. Kittredge,
Program Officer for TAA.
[FR Doc. 07–2647 Filed 5–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–24–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Action Affecting Export Privileges; Data
Physics Corporation; In the Matter of: Data
Physics Corporation; 2025 Gateway Place,
Suite 260, San Jose, CA 95110, Respondent.
Order Relating to Data Physics
Corporation
The Bureau of Industry and Security,
U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘BIS’’)
has initiated an administrative
proceeding against Data Physics
Corporation (hereinafter referred to as
‘‘Data Physics’’), case number 06–BIS–
21, through the issuance of a charging
letter, pursuant to Section 766.3 of the
Export Administration Regulations
(currently codified as 15 CFR parts 730–
774 (2007)) (‘‘Regulations’’) 1 and
Section 13(c) of the Export
Administration Act of 1979, as amended
(50 U.S.C. app. 2401–2420 (2000))
(‘‘Act’’).2 BIS and Data Physics have
agreed to settle case 06–BIS–21 based on
the following five alleged violations of
the Regulations. Specifically, the
charges are:
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Charge 1 15 CFR 764.2(a)—Unlicensed
Export to Listed Entity in China
On or about December 20, 2001, Data
Physics engaged in conduct prohibited by the
Regulations when it exported a DP 550
Vibration Controller, an item subject to the
Regulations, to the Chines Academy of
Launch Vehicle Technology (‘‘CALT’’) in the
1 The violations charged occurred in 2001–2002.
The Regulations governing the violations at issue
are found in the 2001–2002 versions of the Code of
Federal Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730–774 (2001–
2002)). The 2007 Regulations govern the procedural
aspect of the case.
2 Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse
and the President, through Executive Order 13222
of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR, 2001 Comp. 783 (2002)),
which has been extended by successive Presidential
Notices, the most recent being that of August 2,
2006 (71 Fed. Reg. 44,551 (Aug. 7, 2006)), has
continued the Regulations in effect under the
International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50
U.S.C. 1701–1706 (2000)) (‘‘IEEPA’’).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:45 May 25, 2007
Jkt 211001
People’s Republic of China (‘‘China’’), an
organization on BIS’s Entity List,3 without
the license required by the Department of
Commerce. A licensee was required for this
export under Section 744.1 and Supplement
No. 4 to Part 744 of the Regulations. In so
doing, Data Physics committed one violation
of Section 764.2(a) of the Regulations.
Charge 2 15 CFR 764.2(e)—Acting With
Knowledge of a Violation
On or about December 20, 2001, in
connection with the transaction described in
Charge 1 above, Data Physics sold and/or
forwarded a DP 550 Vibration Controller with
knowledge that a violation of the Regulations
would occur in connection with the item. At
all times relevant hereto, Data Physics knew
or should have known that an export license
was required to ship a DP 550 Vibration
Controller, an item subject to the Regulation,
from the United States to CALT, an entity on
BIS’s Entity List. Data Physics had reason to
know that a license was required for this
´
export since, inter alia Office of Export
Enforcement (‘‘OEE’’) special agents visited
Data Physics in May 1999 where they
informed Data Physics’ Chief Technology
Officer and the Director of Manufacturing
and Quality Systems, on the rules and
requirements regarding exports to
organizations on the BIS Entity list. The
Chief Technology Officer then sent an e-mail
to Sri Welaratna, company president,
explaining the rules and included a link to
BIS’s Entity List. In so doing, Data Physics
committed one violation of Section 764.2(e)
of the Regulations.
Charge 3 15 CFR 764.2(a)—Unlicensed
Export to Listed Entity in China
On or abut March 15, 2002, Data Physics
engaged in conduct prohibited by the
Regulations when it exported a Signalstar
Vector (DP 560) vibration controller, an item
subject to the Regulations, to the Beijing
Automation Equipment Institute (‘‘BACEI’’)
in China, an organization on BIS’s Entity
List,4 without the license required by the
Department of Commerce. A license was
required for this export under Section 744.1
and Supplement No. 4 to Part 744 of the
Regulations. In so doing, Data Physics
committed one violation of Section 764.2(a)
of the Regulations.
Charge 4 15 CFR 764.2(e)—Acting With
Knowledge of a Violation
On or about March 15, 2002, in connection
with the transaction described in Charge 3
above, Data Physics sold and/or forwarded a
Signalstar Vector (DP 560) vibration
controller with knowledge that a violation of
the Regulations would occur in connection
with the item. At all times relevant hereto,
Data Physics knew or should have known
hereto, Data Physics knew or should have
known that an export license was required to
ship a Signalstar Vector (DP 560) vibration
controller, an item subject to the Regulations,
from the United States to BACEI, an entity on
BIS’s Entity List. Data Physics had reason to
know that a license was required for this
3 15
CFR Supplemental No. 4 to Part 744.
4 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29483
export since, inter alia, OEE special agents
visited Data Physics in may 1999 where they
informed Data Physics’ Chief Technology
Officer and the Director of Manufacturing
and Quality Systems, on the rules and
requirements regarding exports to
organizations on the BIS Entity List. The
Chief Technology Officer then sent an e-mail
to Sri Welaratna, company president,
explaining the rules and included a link to
BIS’s Entity List. In so doing, Data Physics
committed one violation of Section 764.2(e)
of the Regulations.
Charge 5 CFR 764.2(g)—False Statement on
Shipper’s Export Declaration
On or about March 15, 2002, in connection
with the transaction described in Charges 3
and 4 above, Data Physics made a false
statement to the U.S. Government in
connection with the submission of an export
control document. Specifically, Data Physics
filed a Shipper’s Export Declaration (‘‘SED’’)
with the U.S. Government stating that the
items that were the subject of the SED
qualified for export as ‘‘NLR,’’ i.e., that no
license was required.This representation was
false, as a license was required for the
Signalstar Vector (DP 560) vibration
controller to be exported to the Beijing
Automation Control Equipment Institute. In
so doing, Data Physics committed one
violation of Section 764.2(g) of the
Regulations.
BIS and Data Physics having entered
into a Settlement Agreement pursuant to
Section 766.18(b) of the Regulations
whereby they agreed to settle this matter
in accordance with the terms and
conditions set forth therein, and the
terms of the Settlement Agreement
having been approved by me;
It is Therefore Ordered:
First, that Data Physics shall pay a
civil penalty of $55,000 to the U.S.
Department of Commerce to be paid
within 30 days from the date of entry of
the Order. Payment shall be made in the
manner specified in the attached
instructions. Additionally:
A. Pursuant to the Debt Collection Act
of 1982, as amended 931 U.S.C. 3701–
3720E (1983 and Supp. 2000)), the civil
penalty owed under this Order accrues
interest as more fully described in the
attached Notice, and, if payment is not
made by the due date specified herein,
Data Physics will be assessed, in
addition to the full amount of the civil
penalty and interest, a penalty charge
and an administrative charge, as more
fully described in the attached Notice.
B. The timely payment of the civil
penalty set forth above is hereby made
a condition to the granting, restoration,
or continuing validity of any export
license, license exception, permission,
or privilege granted, or to be granted, to
Data Physics. Accordingly, if Data
Physics should fail to pay the civil
penalty in a timely manner, the
undersigned may enter an Order
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
29484
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 102 / Tuesday, May 29, 2007 / Notices
denying all of Data Physics’ export
privileges for a period of one year from
the date of entry of this Order.
C. Data Physics shall perform an audit
of its internal compliance program
within 12 months from the date of entry
of this Order. Said audit shall be in
substantial compliance with the Export
management Systems audit module,
which is available from the BIS Web site
at https://www.bis.doc.gov/
complianceandenforcement/
ExportManagementSystems.htm, which
is incorporated by reference. A copy of
said audit shall be transmitted to the
Office of Export Enforcement, 96 North
Third Street, Suite 250, San Jose,
California 95112 no later than 13
months from the date of entry of the
Order.
Second, that for a period of five years
from the date of entry of the Temporary
Denial Order against Data Physics on
May 23, 2006, Data Physics Corporation,
2025 Gateway Place, Suite 260, San
Jose, CA 95110, its subsidiaries,
successors or assigns, and, when acting
for or on behalf of Data Physics, its
officers, representatives, agents or
employees (‘‘Denied Person(s)’’) may
not, directly or indirectly, participate in
any way in any transaction involving
any commodity, software, or technology
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘item’’) that is subject to the Regulations
and that is exported or to be exported
from the United States to the People’s
Republic of China (‘‘China’’), or in any
other activity subject to the Regulations
that involves China, including, but not
limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using
any license, License Exception, or
export control document that involves
export to China;
B. Carrying on negotiations
concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering,
storing, disposing of, forwarding,
transporting, financing, or otherwise
servicing in any way, any transaction
involving any item that is subject to the
Regulations and that is exported or to be
exported from the United States to
China, or in any other activity subject to
the Regulations that involves China; or
C. Benefiting in any way from any
transaction involving any item exported
or to be exported from the United States
to China that is subject to the
Regulations, or in any other activity
subject to the Regulations that involves
China.
Third, that no person may, directly or
indirectly, do any of the actions
described below with respect to an item
that is subject to the Regulations and
that has been, will be, or is intended to
be exported or reexported to China:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:45 May 25, 2007
Jkt 211001
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf
of a Denied Person any item subject to
the Regulations to China;
B. Take any action that facilitates the
acquisition or attempted acquisition by
a Denied Person of the ownership,
possession, or control of any item
subject to the Regulations that has been
or will be exported from the United
States to China, including financing or
other support activities related to a
transaction whereby a Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such
ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or
to facilitate the acquisition or attempted
acquisition from a denied person of any
item subject to the Regulations that has
been exported from the United States to
China;
D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the
United States any item subject to the
Regulations with knowledge or reason
to know that the item will be, or is
intended to be, exported from the
United States to China; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service
any item subject to the Regulations that
has been or will be exported from the
United States to China and that is
owned, possessed or controlled by a
Denied person, or service any item, of
whatever origin, that is owned,
possessed or controlled by a Denied
Person if such service involves the use
of any item subject to the Regulations
that has been or will be exported from
the United States to China. For purposes
of this paragraph, servicing means
installation, maintenance, repair,
modification or testing.
F. This Order does not prohibit any
export, reexport, or other transaction
subject to the Regulations where the
only items involved that are subject to
the Regulations are the foreignproduced direct product of U.S.-origin
technology.
Fourth, that, after notice and
opportunity for coment as provided in
Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any
person, firm, corporation, or business
orgnaization related to Data Physics by
affiliation, ownership, control, or
postiion of responsibility in the conduct
of trade or related services may also be
made subject to the provisions of the
Order
Fifth, that the charging letter,
amended charging letter, the Settlement
Agreement, and this Order, and the
record of the cases as defined by Section
766.20 of the Regulations shall be made
available to the public. BIS shall notify
the administrative law judge that case
06–BIS–21 is withdrawn from
adjudication.
Sixth, that this Order shall be served
on the Denied Person and on BIS, and
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
shall be pub lished in the Federal
Register.
This Order, which constitutes the
final agency action in this matter, is
effective immedicately.
Entered this 15th day osf May 2007.
Darryl W. Jackson,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export
Enforement.
[FR Doc. 07–2629 Filed 5–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DT–M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
Regulations and Procedures Technical
Advisory Committee; Notice of
Partially Closed Meeting
The Regulations and procedures
Technical Advisory Committee (RPTAC)
will meet June 12, 2007, 9 a.m., Room
3884, in the Herbert C. Hoover Building,
14th Street between Constitution and
Pennsylvania Avenues, NW.,
Washington, DC. The Committee
advises the Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Export Administration on
implementation of the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR) and
provides for continuing review to
update the EAR as needed.
Agenda
Public Session
1. Opening remarks by the Chairman.
2. Presentation of papers or comments
by the Public.
3. Opening remarks by the Bureau of
Industry and Security.
4. Published regulation update.
5. Automated Export System (AES)
update.
6. Working group reports.
Closed Session
7. Discussion of matters determined to
be exempt from the provisions relating
to public meetings found in 5 U.S.C.
app. 2 §§ 10(a)(1) and 10(a)(3).
A limited number of seats will be
available for the public session.
Reservations are not accepted. To the
extent that time permits, members of the
public may present oral statements to
the Committee. The public may submit
written statements at any time before or
after the meeting. However, to facilitate
the distribution of public presentation
materials to the Committee members,
the Committee suggests that presenters
forward the public presentation
materials prior to the meeting to Ms.
Yvette Springer at
Yspringer@bis.doc.gov.
The Assistant Secretary for
Administration, with the concurrence of
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 29, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29483-29484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2629]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
[Action Affecting Export Privileges; Data Physics Corporation; In the
Matter of: Data Physics Corporation; 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 260, San
Jose, CA 95110, Respondent.
Order Relating to Data Physics Corporation
The Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce
(``BIS'') has initiated an administrative proceeding against Data
Physics Corporation (hereinafter referred to as ``Data Physics''), case
number 06-BIS-21, through the issuance of a charging letter, pursuant
to Section 766.3 of the Export Administration Regulations (currently
codified as 15 CFR parts 730-774 (2007)) (``Regulations'') \1\ and
Section 13(c) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, as amended (50
U.S.C. app. 2401-2420 (2000)) (``Act'').\2\ BIS and Data Physics have
agreed to settle case 06-BIS-21 based on the following five alleged
violations of the Regulations. Specifically, the charges are:
\1\ The violations charged occurred in 2001-2002. The
Regulations governing the violations at issue are found in the 2001-
2002 versions of the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR Parts 730-
774 (2001-2002)). The 2007 Regulations govern the procedural aspect
of the case.
\2\ Since August 21, 2001, the Act has been in lapse and the
President, through Executive Order 13222 of August 17, 2001 (3 CFR,
2001 Comp. 783 (2002)), which has been extended by successive
Presidential Notices, the most recent being that of August 2, 2006
(71 Fed. Reg. 44,551 (Aug. 7, 2006)), has continued the Regulations
in effect under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50
U.S.C. 1701-1706 (2000)) (``IEEPA'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge 1 15 CFR 764.2(a)--Unlicensed Export to Listed Entity in China
On or about December 20, 2001, Data Physics engaged in conduct
prohibited by the Regulations when it exported a DP 550 Vibration
Controller, an item subject to the Regulations, to the Chines
Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology (``CALT'') in the People's
Republic of China (``China''), an organization on BIS's Entity
List,\3\ without the license required by the Department of Commerce.
A licensee was required for this export under Section 744.1 and
Supplement No. 4 to Part 744 of the Regulations. In so doing, Data
Physics committed one violation of Section 764.2(a) of the
Regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 15 CFR Supplemental No. 4 to Part 744.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge 2 15 CFR 764.2(e)--Acting With Knowledge of a Violation
On or about December 20, 2001, in connection with the
transaction described in Charge 1 above, Data Physics sold and/or
forwarded a DP 550 Vibration Controller with knowledge that a
violation of the Regulations would occur in connection with the
item. At all times relevant hereto, Data Physics knew or should have
known that an export license was required to ship a DP 550 Vibration
Controller, an item subject to the Regulation, from the United
States to CALT, an entity on BIS's Entity List. Data Physics had
reason to know that a license was required for this export since,
inter ali[aacute] Office of Export Enforcement (``OEE'') special
agents visited Data Physics in May 1999 where they informed Data
Physics' Chief Technology Officer and the Director of Manufacturing
and Quality Systems, on the rules and requirements regarding exports
to organizations on the BIS Entity list. The Chief Technology
Officer then sent an e-mail to Sri Welaratna, company president,
explaining the rules and included a link to BIS's Entity List. In so
doing, Data Physics committed one violation of Section 764.2(e) of
the Regulations.
Charge 3 15 CFR 764.2(a)--Unlicensed Export to Listed Entity in China
On or abut March 15, 2002, Data Physics engaged in conduct
prohibited by the Regulations when it exported a Signalstar Vector
(DP 560) vibration controller, an item subject to the Regulations,
to the Beijing Automation Equipment Institute (``BACEI'') in China,
an organization on BIS's Entity List,\4\ without the license
required by the Department of Commerce. A license was required for
this export under Section 744.1 and Supplement No. 4 to Part 744 of
the Regulations. In so doing, Data Physics committed one violation
of Section 764.2(a) of the Regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Charge 4 15 CFR 764.2(e)--Acting With Knowledge of a Violation
On or about March 15, 2002, in connection with the transaction
described in Charge 3 above, Data Physics sold and/or forwarded a
Signalstar Vector (DP 560) vibration controller with knowledge that
a violation of the Regulations would occur in connection with the
item. At all times relevant hereto, Data Physics knew or should have
known hereto, Data Physics knew or should have known that an export
license was required to ship a Signalstar Vector (DP 560) vibration
controller, an item subject to the Regulations, from the United
States to BACEI, an entity on BIS's Entity List. Data Physics had
reason to know that a license was required for this export since,
inter alia, OEE special agents visited Data Physics in may 1999
where they informed Data Physics' Chief Technology Officer and the
Director of Manufacturing and Quality Systems, on the rules and
requirements regarding exports to organizations on the BIS Entity
List. The Chief Technology Officer then sent an e-mail to Sri
Welaratna, company president, explaining the rules and included a
link to BIS's Entity List. In so doing, Data Physics committed one
violation of Section 764.2(e) of the Regulations.
Charge 5 CFR 764.2(g)--False Statement on Shipper's Export Declaration
On or about March 15, 2002, in connection with the transaction
described in Charges 3 and 4 above, Data Physics made a false
statement to the U.S. Government in connection with the submission
of an export control document. Specifically, Data Physics filed a
Shipper's Export Declaration (``SED'') with the U.S. Government
stating that the items that were the subject of the SED qualified
for export as ``NLR,'' i.e., that no license was required.This
representation was false, as a license was required for the
Signalstar Vector (DP 560) vibration controller to be exported to
the Beijing Automation Control Equipment Institute. In so doing,
Data Physics committed one violation of Section 764.2(g) of the
Regulations.
BIS and Data Physics having entered into a Settlement Agreement
pursuant to Section 766.18(b) of the Regulations whereby they agreed to
settle this matter in accordance with the terms and conditions set
forth therein, and the terms of the Settlement Agreement having been
approved by me;
It is Therefore Ordered:
First, that Data Physics shall pay a civil penalty of $55,000 to
the U.S. Department of Commerce to be paid within 30 days from the date
of entry of the Order. Payment shall be made in the manner specified in
the attached instructions. Additionally:
A. Pursuant to the Debt Collection Act of 1982, as amended 931
U.S.C. 3701-3720E (1983 and Supp. 2000)), the civil penalty owed under
this Order accrues interest as more fully described in the attached
Notice, and, if payment is not made by the due date specified herein,
Data Physics will be assessed, in addition to the full amount of the
civil penalty and interest, a penalty charge and an administrative
charge, as more fully described in the attached Notice.
B. The timely payment of the civil penalty set forth above is
hereby made a condition to the granting, restoration, or continuing
validity of any export license, license exception, permission, or
privilege granted, or to be granted, to Data Physics. Accordingly, if
Data Physics should fail to pay the civil penalty in a timely manner,
the undersigned may enter an Order
[[Page 29484]]
denying all of Data Physics' export privileges for a period of one year
from the date of entry of this Order.
C. Data Physics shall perform an audit of its internal compliance
program within 12 months from the date of entry of this Order. Said
audit shall be in substantial compliance with the Export management
Systems audit module, which is available from the BIS Web site at
https://www.bis.doc.gov/complianceandenforcement/
ExportManagementSystems.htm, which is incorporated by reference. A copy
of said audit shall be transmitted to the Office of Export Enforcement,
96 North Third Street, Suite 250, San Jose, California 95112 no later
than 13 months from the date of entry of the Order.
Second, that for a period of five years from the date of entry of
the Temporary Denial Order against Data Physics on May 23, 2006, Data
Physics Corporation, 2025 Gateway Place, Suite 260, San Jose, CA 95110,
its subsidiaries, successors or assigns, and, when acting for or on
behalf of Data Physics, its officers, representatives, agents or
employees (``Denied Person(s)'') may not, directly or indirectly,
participate in any way in any transaction involving any commodity,
software, or technology (hereinafter collectively referred to as
``item'') that is subject to the Regulations and that is exported or to
be exported from the United States to the People's Republic of China
(``China''), or in any other activity subject to the Regulations that
involves China, including, but not limited to:
A. Applying for, obtaining, or using any license, License
Exception, or export control document that involves export to China;
B. Carrying on negotiations concerning, or ordering, buying,
receiving, using, selling, delivering, storing, disposing of,
forwarding, transporting, financing, or otherwise servicing in any way,
any transaction involving any item that is subject to the Regulations
and that is exported or to be exported from the United States to China,
or in any other activity subject to the Regulations that involves
China; or
C. Benefiting in any way from any transaction involving any item
exported or to be exported from the United States to China that is
subject to the Regulations, or in any other activity subject to the
Regulations that involves China.
Third, that no person may, directly or indirectly, do any of the
actions described below with respect to an item that is subject to the
Regulations and that has been, will be, or is intended to be exported
or reexported to China:
A. Export or reexport to or on behalf of a Denied Person any item
subject to the Regulations to China;
B. Take any action that facilitates the acquisition or attempted
acquisition by a Denied Person of the ownership, possession, or control
of any item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be
exported from the United States to China, including financing or other
support activities related to a transaction whereby a Denied Person
acquires or attempts to acquire such ownership, possession or control;
C. Take any action to acquire from or to facilitate the acquisition
or attempted acquisition from a denied person of any item subject to
the Regulations that has been exported from the United States to China;
D. Obtain from a Denied Person in the United States any item
subject to the Regulations with knowledge or reason to know that the
item will be, or is intended to be, exported from the United States to
China; or
E. Engage in any transaction to service any item subject to the
Regulations that has been or will be exported from the United States to
China and that is owned, possessed or controlled by a Denied person, or
service any item, of whatever origin, that is owned, possessed or
controlled by a Denied Person if such service involves the use of any
item subject to the Regulations that has been or will be exported from
the United States to China. For purposes of this paragraph, servicing
means installation, maintenance, repair, modification or testing.
F. This Order does not prohibit any export, reexport, or other
transaction subject to the Regulations where the only items involved
that are subject to the Regulations are the foreign-produced direct
product of U.S.-origin technology.
Fourth, that, after notice and opportunity for coment as provided
in Section 766.23 of the Regulations, any person, firm, corporation, or
business orgnaization related to Data Physics by affiliation,
ownership, control, or postiion of responsibility in the conduct of
trade or related services may also be made subject to the provisions of
the Order
Fifth, that the charging letter, amended charging letter, the
Settlement Agreement, and this Order, and the record of the cases as
defined by Section 766.20 of the Regulations shall be made available to
the public. BIS shall notify the administrative law judge that case 06-
BIS-21 is withdrawn from adjudication.
Sixth, that this Order shall be served on the Denied Person and on
BIS, and shall be pub lished in the Federal Register.
This Order, which constitutes the final agency action in this
matter, is effective immedicately.
Entered this 15th day osf May 2007.
Darryl W. Jackson,
Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export Enforement.
[FR Doc. 07-2629 Filed 5-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DT-M
