Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; KDR 401 and 403 PACEMAKERS, 29336-29337 [E7-10127]
Download as PDF
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
29336
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 101 / Friday, May 25, 2007 / Notices
Policy (HFD–007), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the human drug
product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the human drug product and continues
until FDA grants permission to market
the drug product. Although only a
portion of a regulatory review period
may count toward the actual amount of
extension that the Director of Patents
and Trademarks may award (for
example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product PREZISTA
(darunavir ethanolate). PREZISTA, coadministered with 100 milligrams
ritonavir and with other antiretroviral
agents, is indicated for the treatment of
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
infection in antiretroviral treatmentexperienced adult patients, such as
those with HIV–1 strains resistant to
more than one protease inhibitor.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent
and Trademark Office received a patent
term restoration application for
PREZISTA (U.S. Patent No. 6,248,775)
from G.D. Searle & Co., and the Patent
and Trademark Office requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated February 6, 2007, FDA
advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this human drug product had
undergone a regulatory review period
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 May 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
and that the approval of PREZISTA
represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the
product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent
and Trademark Office requested that
FDA determine the product’s regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
PREZISTA is 1,253 days. Of this time,
1,070 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 183 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(i)) became effective: January 19,
2003. The applicant claims January 20,
2003, as the date the investigational new
drug application (IND) became effective.
However, FDA records indicate that the
IND effective date was January 19, 2003,
which was 30 days after FDA receipt of
the IND.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the act: December 23, 2005.
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim
that the new drug application (NDA) for
PREZISTA (NDA 21–976) was initially
submitted on December 23, 2005.
3. The date the application was
approved: June 23, 2006. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
21–976 was approved on June 23, 2006.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 717 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by July 24, 2007.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
November 21, 2007. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: May 7, 2007.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E7–10147 Filed 5–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2006E–0495]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; KDR 401 and 403
PACEMAKERS
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for KDR
401 and 403 PACEMAKERS and is
publishing this notice of that
determination as required by law. FDA
has made the determination because of
the submission of an application to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks,
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims
those medical devices.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD–007), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM
25MYN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 101 / Friday, May 25, 2007 / Notices
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For medical devices,
the testing phase begins with a clinical
investigation of the device and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the device and continues until
permission to market the device is
granted. Although only a portion of a
regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (half the testing
phase must be subtracted as well as any
time that may have occurred before the
patent was issued), FDA’s determination
of the length of a regulatory review
period for a medical device will include
all of the testing phase and approval
phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(3)(B).
FDA approved for marketing the
medical devices, KDR 401 and 403
PACEMAKERS. KDR 401 and 403
PACEMAKERS are indicated for the
following: Rate adaptive pacing in
patients who may benefit from
increased pacing rates concurrent with
increases in activity and/or minute
ventilation; accepted patient conditions
warranting chronic cardiac pacing
which include: symptomatic
paroxysmal or permanent second or
third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block;
Symptomatic bilateral bundle branch
block; symptomatic paroxysmal or
transient sinus node dysfunctions with
or without associated AV conduction
disorders; bradycardia-tachycardia
syndrome to prevent symptomatic
bradycardia or some forms of
symptomatic tachyarrhythmias; and
vasovagal syndromes or hypersensitive
carotid sinus syndromes. KDR 401 and
403 PACEMAKERS are also indicated
for dual chamber and atrial tracking
modes in patients who may benefit from
maintenance of AV synchrony. Dual
chamber modes are specifically
indicated for treatment of conduction
disorders that require restoration of both
rate and AV synchrony, which include:
Various degrees of AV block to maintain
the atrial contribution to cardiac output
and vasovagal intolerance in the
presence of persistent sinus rhythm.
Subsequent to this approval, the Patent
and Trademark Office received a patent
term restoration application for KDR
401 and 403 PACEMAKERS (U.S. Patent
No. 4,958,632) from Medtronic, Inc.,
and the Patent and Trademark Office
requested FDA’s assistance in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:34 May 24, 2007
Jkt 211001
determining this patent’s eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated
February 22, 2007, FDA advised the
Patent and Trademark Office that these
medical devices had undergone a
regulatory review period and that the
approval of KDR 401 and 403
PACEMAKERS represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use
of the products. Thereafter, the Patent
and Trademark Office requested that
FDA determine the products’ regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
KDR 401 and 403 PACEMAKERS is 716
days. Of this time, 358 days occurred
during the testing phase of the
regulatory review period, while 358
days occurred during the approval
phase. These periods of time were
derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 520(g) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
360j(g)) involving this device became
effective: February 16, 1996. The
applicant claims that the investigational
device exemption (IDE) required under
section 520(g) of the act for human tests
to begin became effective on May 21,
1997. However, FDA records indicate
that the IDE was determined
substantially complete for clinical
studies to have begun on February 16,
1996, which represents the IDE effective
date.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
device under section 515 of the act (21
U.S.C. 360e): February 7, 1997. The
applicant claims February 6, 1997, as
the date the premarket approval
application (PMA) for KDR 401 and 403
PACEMAKERS (PMA 970012) was
initially submitted. However, FDA
records indicate that PMA 970012 was
submitted on February 7, 1997.
3. The date the application was
approved: January 30, 1998. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that PMA
970012 was approved on January 30,
1998.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 358 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by July 24, 2007.
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
29337
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
November 21, 2007. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: May 7, 2007.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E7–10127 Filed 5–24–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2006D–0480]
Draft Guidance for Industry on
Complementary and Alternative
Medicine Products and Their
Regulation by the Food and Drug
Administration; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, we) is
announcing that it will consider
comments submitted through May 29,
2007, for a draft guidance for industry
entitled ‘‘Complementary and
Alternative Medicine Products and
Their Regulation by the Food and Drug
Administration.’’ Although the
comment period for the draft guidance
ended on April 30, 2007, we will
consider comments submitted through
May 29, 2007, due to confusion as to the
closing date for comments on the draft
guidance.
DATES: Although you can comment on
any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency
considers your comment on this draft
guidance, submit written or electronic
comments on the draft guidance by May
29, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\25MYN1.SGM
25MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 101 (Friday, May 25, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29336-29337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-10127]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2006E-0495]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; KDR 401 and 403 PACEMAKERS
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for KDR 401 and 403 PACEMAKERS and is
publishing this notice of that determination as required by law. FDA
has made the determination because of the submission of an application
to the Director of Patents and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for
the extension of a patent which claims those medical devices.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD-007), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-594-2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
[[Page 29337]]
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For medical devices, the testing
phase begins with a clinical investigation of the device and runs until
the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market the device and continues until
permission to market the device is granted. Although only a portion of
a regulatory review period may count toward the actual amount of
extension that the Director of Patents and Trademarks may award (half
the testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have
occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for a medical device will include
all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(3)(B).
FDA approved for marketing the medical devices, KDR 401 and 403
PACEMAKERS. KDR 401 and 403 PACEMAKERS are indicated for the following:
Rate adaptive pacing in patients who may benefit from increased pacing
rates concurrent with increases in activity and/or minute ventilation;
accepted patient conditions warranting chronic cardiac pacing which
include: symptomatic paroxysmal or permanent second or third-degree
atrioventricular (AV) block; Symptomatic bilateral bundle branch block;
symptomatic paroxysmal or transient sinus node dysfunctions with or
without associated AV conduction disorders; bradycardia-tachycardia
syndrome to prevent symptomatic bradycardia or some forms of
symptomatic tachyarrhythmias; and vasovagal syndromes or hypersensitive
carotid sinus syndromes. KDR 401 and 403 PACEMAKERS are also indicated
for dual chamber and atrial tracking modes in patients who may benefit
from maintenance of AV synchrony. Dual chamber modes are specifically
indicated for treatment of conduction disorders that require
restoration of both rate and AV synchrony, which include: Various
degrees of AV block to maintain the atrial contribution to cardiac
output and vasovagal intolerance in the presence of persistent sinus
rhythm. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent and Trademark Office
received a patent term restoration application for KDR 401 and 403
PACEMAKERS (U.S. Patent No. 4,958,632) from Medtronic, Inc., and the
Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining
this patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter
dated February 22, 2007, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office
that these medical devices had undergone a regulatory review period and
that the approval of KDR 401 and 403 PACEMAKERS represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use of the products. Thereafter, the
Patent and Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the products'
regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
KDR 401 and 403 PACEMAKERS is 716 days. Of this time, 358 days occurred
during the testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 358
days occurred during the approval phase. These periods of time were
derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 520(g) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 360j(g)) involving this
device became effective: February 16, 1996. The applicant claims that
the investigational device exemption (IDE) required under section
520(g) of the act for human tests to begin became effective on May 21,
1997. However, FDA records indicate that the IDE was determined
substantially complete for clinical studies to have begun on February
16, 1996, which represents the IDE effective date.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the device under section 515 of the act (21 U.S.C. 360e): February 7,
1997. The applicant claims February 6, 1997, as the date the premarket
approval application (PMA) for KDR 401 and 403 PACEMAKERS (PMA 970012)
was initially submitted. However, FDA records indicate that PMA 970012
was submitted on February 7, 1997.
3. The date the application was approved: January 30, 1998. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that PMA 970012 was approved on January
30, 1998.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 358 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination
by July 24, 2007. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by November 21,
2007. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d
sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in
21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: May 7, 2007.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E7-10127 Filed 5-24-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S