Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; SOMAVERT, 29172-29173 [E7-10052]
Download as PDF
29172
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 100 / Thursday, May 24, 2007 / Notices
ESTIMATE OF ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS—Continued
Number of
responses per
respondent
Average
burden hours
per response
Response
burden
(in hours)
Form name
Number of
respondents
Form D: CBA Training Events Report ............
32 CBA Provider Grantees ............................
12
2
768
Total .........................................................
.........................................................................
........................
........................
1952
Dated: May 18, 2007.
Maryam Daneshvar,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E7–10031 Filed 5–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2003E–0457]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; SOMAVERT
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
SOMAVERT and is publishing this
notice of that determination as required
by law. FDA has made the
determination because of the
submission of an application to the
Director of Patents and Trademarks,
Department of Commerce, for the
extension of a patent which claims that
human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD–007), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98–
417) and the Generic Animal Drug and
Patent Term Restoration Act (Public
Law 100–670) generally provide that a
patent may be extended for a period of
up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug
product, medical device, food additive,
or color additive) was subject to
regulatory review by FDA before the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:52 May 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product’s regulatory review period
forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may
receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human drug
products, the testing phase begins when
the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the human drug
product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The
approval phase starts with the initial
submission of an application to market
the human drug product and continues
until FDA grants permission to market
the drug product. Although only a
portion of a regulatory review period
may count toward the actual amount of
extension that the Director of Patents
and Trademarks may award (for
example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human drug product will include all
of the testing phase and approval phase
as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human drug product SOMAVERT
(pegvisomant). SOMAVERT is indicated
for the treatment of acromegaly in
patients who have had an inadequate
response to surgery and/or radiation
therapy and/or other medical therapies,
or for whom these therapies are not
appropriate. Subsequent to this
approval, the Patent and Trademark
Office received a patent term restoration
application for SOMAVERT (U.S. Patent
No. 5,849,535) from Genentech, Inc.,
and the Patent and Trademark Office
requested FDA’s assistance in
determining this patent’s eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated
April 6, 2004, FDA advised the Patent
and Trademark Office that this human
drug product had undergone a
regulatory review period and that the
approval of SOMAVERT represented the
first permitted commercial marketing or
use of the product. Thereafter, the
Patent and Trademark Office requested
that FDA determine the product’s
regulatory review period.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
SOMAVERT is 2,169 days. Of this time,
1,349 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 820 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C.
355(i)) became effective: April 18, 1997.
FDA has verified the applicant’s claim
that the date the investigational new
drug application became effective was
on April 18, 1997.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human drug product under section
505(b) of the act: December 26, 2000.
The applicant claims December 22,
2000, as the date the new drug
application (NDA) for SOMAVERT
(NDA 21–106) was initially submitted.
However, FDA records indicate that
NDA 21–106 was submitted on
December 26, 2000.
3. The date the application was
approved: March 25, 2003. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that NDA
21–106 was approved on March 25,
2003.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 466 days of patent
term extension. Anyone with knowledge
that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of
Dockets Management (see ADDRESSES)
written or electronic comments and ask
for a redetermination by July 23, 2007.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
November 20, 2007. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM
24MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 100 / Thursday, May 24, 2007 / Notices
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: May 7, 2007.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E7–10052 Filed 5–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[UT933–07–4310–DP]
Notice of Intent To Prepare
Supplemental Draft Resource
Management Plans and Environmental
Impact Statements for the Vernal and
Price Field Offices, Utah
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the Bureau of Land Management (BLM),
Vernal and Price Field Offices, Utah, are
preparing Supplemental Draft Resource
Management Plans/Environmental
Impact Statements (Draft RMP/EIS) to
include additional information and
analyses of wilderness characteristics on
lands outside existing Wilderness Study
Areas (WSAs). This information and
analysis includes multiple areas in both
the Vernal and Price Field Office
planning areas.
DATES: Because the BLM has previously
requested (Federal Register, Volume 66,
Number 48, March 12, 2001, pages
14415–14417, and Federal Register,
Volume 66, No. 216, November 7, 2001,
pages 56343–56344) and received
extensive information from the public
on issues to be addressed in these
RMPs, and because the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ)
regulations for implementing the
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) do not require additional
scoping for this supplemental draft
RMP/EIS process (40 CFR 1502.9(c)( 4),
the BLM is not asking for further public
information and comment at this time.
This issue has been defined in earlier
scoping efforts. A 90-day public
comment period will be provided upon
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:52 May 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
29173
release of the supplemental draft
document EISs.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
National Park Service
Shelley Smith, Project Manager, BLM
Utah State Office, P.O. Box 45155, Salt
Lake City, Utah 84145–0155; telephone:
(801) 539–4053; e-mail:
shelley_smith@blm.gov. The public may
also contact Howard Cleavinger,
Assistant Field Manager, BLM Vernal
Field Office, 170 South 500 East, Vernal,
Utah 84078; telephone: (435) 781–4480;
e-mail: howard_cleavinger@blm.gov or
Floyd Johnson, Assistant Field Manager,
BLM Price Field Office, 125 South 600
West, Price, Utah 84501; telephone:
(435) 636–3650; e-mail:
floyd_johnson@blm.gov. Or, the public
may visit the Price RMP Web site at
https://www.blm.gov/rmp/ut/price and
the Vernal RMP Web site at https://
www.blm.gov/rmp/ut/vernal.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: There are
multiple areas in the Price and Vernal
Field Offices, outside of existing
wilderness study areas (WSAs), found to
have wilderness characteristics in
previous inventories. The BLM’s Land
Use Planning Handbook (H–1601–1)
provides guidance for consideration of
non-WSA lands with wilderness
characteristics in land use planning.
The handbook provides that the BLM
consider these lands and resource
values in planning, and prescribe
measures to protect wilderness
characteristics. These characteristics
include appearance of naturalness,
outstanding opportunities for solitude,
or outstanding opportunities for
primitive and unconfined recreation.
To ensure compliance with the ruling
in the court case, Southern Utah
Wilderness Alliance et al. v. Gale
Norton, in her official capacity as
Secretary of the Interior et al. (Utah
District Court, Case No.
2:04CV574DAK), regarding the sale and
issuance of oil and gas leases on lands
outside of existing WSAs with
wilderness characteristics, the BLM is
supplementing its consideration of nonWSA lands with wilderness
characteristics in land use planning.
BLM shall ensure that (1) adequate
consideration is given to wilderness
characteristics in ongoing RMPs, (2) a
range of alternatives is analyzed for
management of these lands, and (3) an
adequate analysis is prepared from
which to base decisions for future oil
and gas leasing.
Dated: April 4, 2007.
Jeff Rawson,
Associate State Director.
[FR Doc. E7–10032 Filed 5–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–DQ–P
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice of Inventory Completion:
Bernice Pauahi Bishop Museum,
Honolulu, HI; Correction
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice; correction.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice is here given in accordance
with the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of a revision
to an inventory of human remains in the
possession of the Bernice Pauahi Bishop
Museum (Bishop Museum), Honolulu,
HI.
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations
in this notice are the sole responsibility
of the museum, institution, or Federal
agency that has control of the Native
American human remains and
associated funerary objects. The
National Park Service is not responsible
for the determinations in this notice.
This notice corrects information
reported in a Notice of Inventory
Completion for the Bishop Museum
published in the Federal Register on
August 27, 1997 (FR Doc 97–22736,
pages 45437–45438). Officials of the
Bishop Museum have determined that
24 of the 34 cultural items published in
the original notice do not meet the
definition of human remains at 43 CFR
10.2 (d)(1) because while these items
contain human remains, the items
themselves are not considered human
remains under NAGPRA definitions.
The 24 cultural items that are being
removed from the inventory are listed
below.
In 1889, Joseph S. Emerson sold a
wood image from Waimea, O’ahu, to the
Bishop Museum. Human hair is
incorporated in this object. No known
individual was identified.
In 1889, a helmet (or wig)
incorporating human hair and a refuse
container incorporating human teeth
and bone were bequeathed to the Bishop
Museum by Queen Emma. No known
individual was identified.
In 1889, a kahili incorporating human
bone became part of the original
collections of the Bishop Museum. This
kahili was given to Bernice Pauahi by
Ke’elikolani. No known individual was
identified.
In 1891, a refuse container
incorporating human teeth and a kahili
incorporating human bone were
acquired with the collections of the
Hawaiian National Museum which were
E:\FR\FM\24MYN1.SGM
24MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 100 (Thursday, May 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29172-29173]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-10052]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2003E-0457]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; SOMAVERT
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for SOMAVERT and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human drug product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD-007), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-594-2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984 (Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug
and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide
that a patent may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as
the patented item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical
device, food additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a
product's regulatory review period forms the basis for determining the
amount of extension an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human drug products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the human drug product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the
initial submission of an application to market the human drug product
and continues until FDA grants permission to market the drug product.
Although only a portion of a regulatory review period may count toward
the actual amount of extension that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example, half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may have occurred before the patent
was issued), FDA's determination of the length of a regulatory review
period for a human drug product will include all of the testing phase
and approval phase as specified in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the human drug product SOMAVERT
(pegvisomant). SOMAVERT is indicated for the treatment of acromegaly in
patients who have had an inadequate response to surgery and/or
radiation therapy and/or other medical therapies, or for whom these
therapies are not appropriate. Subsequent to this approval, the Patent
and Trademark Office received a patent term restoration application for
SOMAVERT (U.S. Patent No. 5,849,535) from Genentech, Inc., and the
Patent and Trademark Office requested FDA's assistance in determining
this patent's eligibility for patent term restoration. In a letter
dated April 6, 2004, FDA advised the Patent and Trademark Office that
this human drug product had undergone a regulatory review period and
that the approval of SOMAVERT represented the first permitted
commercial marketing or use of the product. Thereafter, the Patent and
Trademark Office requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory
review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
SOMAVERT is 2,169 days. Of this time, 1,349 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 820 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective:
April 18, 1997. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the date
the investigational new drug application became effective was on April
18, 1997.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human drug product under section 505(b) of the act: December 26,
2000. The applicant claims December 22, 2000, as the date the new drug
application (NDA) for SOMAVERT (NDA 21-106) was initially submitted.
However, FDA records indicate that NDA 21-106 was submitted on December
26, 2000.
3. The date the application was approved: March 25, 2003. FDA has
verified the applicant's claim that NDA 21-106 was approved on March
25, 2003.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 466 days of
patent term extension. Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as
published are incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a
redetermination by July 23, 2007. Furthermore, any interested person
may petition FDA for a determination regarding whether the applicant
for extension acted with due diligence during the regulatory review
period by November 20, 2007. To meet its burden, the petition must
contain sufficient facts to merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept.
857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should
be in the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
[[Page 29173]]
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: May 7, 2007.
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E7-10052 Filed 5-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S