Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent Extension; ORENCIA, 28978-28979 [E7-9945]
Download as PDF
28978
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 23, 2007 / Notices
3. Approve and disapprove contract
proposals for award, not including
proposals for national interim grantee
contracts.
4. Approve and disapprove quality
improvement plans (QIP) as required
under 42 U.S.C. 9836A(d)(2)(B).
5. Conduct, as the responsible HHS
official, informal meetings with current
grantees or current or prospective
delegate agencies as authorized by 45
CFR part 1303.11 and 1303.12.
6. Conduct, as the responsible HHS
official, informal meetings authorized
by 45 CFR part 1303.21 related to
appeals by current or prospective
delegate agencies.
7. Serve as the Approving Official to
sign audit determination letters only
where resolution does not involve a cost
disallowance.
8. Approve and issue termination and
suspension actions resulting from
monitoring review reports approved and
issued by the Regional Office.
Dated: May 15, 2007.
Channell Wilkins,
Director, Office of Head Start.
[FR Doc. E7–9925 Filed 5–22–07; 8:45 am]
(b) Limitations
1. The approval of grant applications
requires concurrence of the appropriate
Grants Officer.
2. The approval of contract proposals
and awards are subject to the
requirements of the Federal Acquisition
Regulations and require consultation
with the Director, Office of Head Start
and the concurrence of the Contracting
Officer.
3. The approval and issuance of
terminations and suspensions resulting
from monitoring review reports
approved and issued by the Regional
Office require the concurrence of the
Director, Office of Head Start.
4. This redelegation shall be exercised
under financial and administrative
requirements applicable to all
Administration for Children and
Families authorities.
5. Any redelegation shall be in writing
and prompt notification must be
provided to all affected managers,
supervisors, and other personnel, and
requires the concurrence of the Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Administration.
(a) Authorities Delegated
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
(c) Effective Date
This redelegation was effective on
April 26, 2007.
(d) Effect on Existing Delegations
This redelegation of authority
supersedes all previous delegations
from the Director, Office of Head Start,
on these subjects.
I hereby affirm and ratify any actions
taken by the Director, Program
Operations Division which, in effect,
involved the exercise of these
authorities prior to the effective date of
this redelegation.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:32 May 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Statement of Organization, Functions
and Delegation of Authority
Notice is hereby given that I have
redelegated to the Regional Program
Managers, American Indian Alaska
Native Program Branch Chief, and
Migrant and Seasonal Program Branch
Chief, Office of Head Start, the
following authorities vested in me by
the Director, Office of Head Start, in the
memoranda dated April 26, 2007.
1. Approve and disapprove refunding
and supplemental funding applications
for existing grantees, not including
designated interim grantees.
2. Approve and disapprove
collaboration grant applications
authorized under 42 U.S.C. 9835.
3. Approve and disapprove contract
proposals for award, not including
proposals for national interim grantee
contracts.
4. Approve and disapprove quality
improvement plans (QIP) as required
under 42 U.S.C. 9836A(d)(2)(B).
5. Conduct, as the responsible HHS
official, informal meetings with current
grantees or current or prospective
delegate agencies as authorized by 45
CFR 1303.11 and 1303.12.
6. Conduct, as the responsible HHS
official, informal meetings authorized
by 45 CFR part 1303.21 related to
appeals by current or prospective
delegate agencies.
7. Serve as the Approving Official to
sign audit determination letters only
where resolution does not involve a cost
disallowance.
8. Approve and issue termination and
suspension actions resulting from
monitoring review reports approved and
issued by the Regional Office.
(b) Limitations
1. The approval of grant applications
requires concurrence of the appropriate
Grants Officer.
2. The approval of contract proposals
and awards are subject to the
requirements of the Federal Acquisition
Regulations and require consultation
with the Director, Office of Head Start
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
and the concurrence of the Contracting
Officer.
3. The approval and issuance of
terminations and suspensions resulting
from monitoring review reports
approved and issued by the Regional
Office require the concurrence of the
Director, Office of Head Start.
4. This redelegation shall be exercised
under financial and administrative
requirements applicable to all
Administration for Children and
Families authorities.
5. Any redelegation shall be in writing
and prompt notification must be
provided to all affected managers,
supervisors, and other personnel, and
requires the concurrence of the Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Administration.
(c) Effective Date
This redelegation was effective on
April 26, 2007.
(d) Effect on Existing Delegations
This redelegation of authority
supersedes all previous delegations
from the Director, Office of Head Start,
on these subjects.
I hereby affirm and ratify any actions
taken by any Regional Program
Manager, the American Indian Alaska
Native Program Branch Chief or the
Migrant and Seasonal Program Branch
Chief which, in effect, involved the
exercise of these authorities prior to the
effective date of this redelegation.
Dated: May 14, 2007.
Renee Perthuis,
Director, Program Operations Division.
[FR Doc. E7–9928 Filed 5–22–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2006E–0260]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; ORENCIA
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
ORENCIA and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent
E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM
23MYN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 99 / Wednesday, May 23, 2007 / Notices
which claims that human biological
product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments
and petitions to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD–007), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–594–2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Drug Price Competition and
Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Public Law 98–417) and the Generic
Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Public Law 100–670)
generally provide that a patent may be
extended for a period of up to 5 years
so long as the patented item (human
drug product, animal drug product,
medical device, food additive, or color
additive) was subject to regulatory
review by FDA before the item was
marketed. Under these acts, a product’s
regulatory review period forms the basis
for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of
two periods of time: A testing phase and
an approval phase. For human
biological products, the testing phase
begins when the exemption to permit
the clinical investigations of the
biological product becomes effective
and runs until the approval phase
begins. The approval phase starts with
the initial submission of an application
to market the human biological product
and continues until FDA grants
permission to market the biological
product. Although only a portion of a
regulatory review period may count
toward the actual amount of extension
that the Director of Patents and
Trademarks may award (for example,
half the testing phase must be
subtracted as well as any time that may
have occurred before the patent was
issued), FDA’s determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for
a human biological product will include
all of the testing phase and approval
phase as specified in 35 U.S.C.
156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing
the human biological product ORENCIA
(abatacept). ORENCIA is indicated for
reducing signs and symptoms, inducing
major clinical response, slowing the
progression of structural damage, and
improving physical function in adult
patients with moderately to severely
active rheumatoid arthritis who have
had an inadequate response to one or
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:32 May 22, 2007
Jkt 211001
more disease modifying anti-rheumatic
drugs, such as methotrexate or TNF
antagonists. Subsequent to this
approval, the Patent and Trademark
Office received a patent term restoration
application for ORENCIA (U.S. Patent
No. 5,851,795) from Bristol-Myers
Squibb Company, and the Patent and
Trademark Office requested FDA’s
assistance in determining this patent’s
eligibility for patent term restoration. In
a letter dated September 5, 2006, FDA
advised the Patent and Trademark
Office that this human biological
product had undergone a regulatory
review period and that the approval of
ORENCIA represented the first
permitted commercial marketing or use
of the product. Shortly thereafter, the
Patent and Trademark Office requested
that FDA determine the product’s
regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the
applicable regulatory review period for
ORENCIA is 3,803 days. Of this time,
3,536 days occurred during the testing
phase of the regulatory review period,
while 267 days occurred during the
approval phase. These periods of time
were derived from the following dates:
1. The date an exemption under
section 505(i) of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i))
became effective: July 28, 1995. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that the
date the investigational new drug
application became effective was on
July 28, 1995.
2. The date the application was
initially submitted with respect to the
human biological product under section
351 of the Public Health Service Act (42
U.S.C. 262): April 1, 2005. The
applicant claims March 31, 2005, as the
date the biologics license application
(BLA) for ORENCIA (BLA 125118) was
submitted. However, FDA records
indicate that BLA 125118 was received
on April 1, 2005.
3. The date the application was
approved: December 23, 2005. FDA has
verified the applicant’s claim that BLA
125118 was approved on December 23,
2005.
This determination of the regulatory
review period establishes the maximum
potential length of a patent extension.
However, the U.S. Patent and
Trademark Office applies several
statutory limitations in its calculations
of the actual period for patent extension.
In its application for patent extension,
this applicant seeks 1,414 days of patent
term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of
the dates as published are incorrect may
submit to the Division of Dockets
Management (see ADDRESSES) written or
electronic comments and ask for a
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28979
redetermination by July 23, 2007.
Furthermore, any interested person may
petition FDA for a determination
regarding whether the applicant for
extension acted with due diligence
during the regulatory review period by
November 19, 2007. To meet its burden,
the petition must contain sufficient facts
to merit an FDA investigation. (See H.
Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d sess.,
pp. 41–42, 1984.) Petitions should be in
the format specified in 21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be
submitted to the Division of Dockets
Management. Three copies of any
mailed information are to be submitted,
except that individuals may submit one
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Comments and petitions may
be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
Dated: May 2, 2007
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E7–9945 Filed 5–22–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2006E–0501]
Determination of Regulatory Review
Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; GARDASIL
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) has determined
the regulatory review period for
GARDASIL and is publishing this notice
of that determination as required by
law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an
application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of
Commerce, for the extension of a patent
which claims that human biological
product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written or electronic
comments and petitions to the Division
of Dockets Management (HFA–305),
Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD
20852. Submit electronic comments to
https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD–007), Food and Drug
E:\FR\FM\23MYN1.SGM
23MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 99 (Wednesday, May 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28978-28979]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9945]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2006E-0260]
Determination of Regulatory Review Period for Purposes of Patent
Extension; ORENCIA
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has determined the
regulatory review period for ORENCIA and is publishing this notice of
that determination as required by law. FDA has made the determination
because of the submission of an application to the Director of Patents
and Trademarks, Department of Commerce, for the extension of a patent
[[Page 28979]]
which claims that human biological product.
ADDRESSES: Submit written comments and petitions to the Division of
Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments
to https://www.fda.gov/dockets/ecomments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly Friedman, Office of Regulatory
Policy (HFD-007), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-594-2041.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984
(Public Law 98-417) and the Generic Animal Drug and Patent Term
Restoration Act (Public Law 100-670) generally provide that a patent
may be extended for a period of up to 5 years so long as the patented
item (human drug product, animal drug product, medical device, food
additive, or color additive) was subject to regulatory review by FDA
before the item was marketed. Under these acts, a product's regulatory
review period forms the basis for determining the amount of extension
an applicant may receive.
A regulatory review period consists of two periods of time: A
testing phase and an approval phase. For human biological products, the
testing phase begins when the exemption to permit the clinical
investigations of the biological product becomes effective and runs
until the approval phase begins. The approval phase starts with the
initial submission of an application to market the human biological
product and continues until FDA grants permission to market the
biological product. Although only a portion of a regulatory review
period may count toward the actual amount of extension that the
Director of Patents and Trademarks may award (for example, half the
testing phase must be subtracted as well as any time that may have
occurred before the patent was issued), FDA's determination of the
length of a regulatory review period for a human biological product
will include all of the testing phase and approval phase as specified
in 35 U.S.C. 156(g)(1)(B).
FDA recently approved for marketing the human biological product
ORENCIA (abatacept). ORENCIA is indicated for reducing signs and
symptoms, inducing major clinical response, slowing the progression of
structural damage, and improving physical function in adult patients
with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis who have had an
inadequate response to one or more disease modifying anti-rheumatic
drugs, such as methotrexate or TNF antagonists. Subsequent to this
approval, the Patent and Trademark Office received a patent term
restoration application for ORENCIA (U.S. Patent No. 5,851,795) from
Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, and the Patent and Trademark Office
requested FDA's assistance in determining this patent's eligibility for
patent term restoration. In a letter dated September 5, 2006, FDA
advised the Patent and Trademark Office that this human biological
product had undergone a regulatory review period and that the approval
of ORENCIA represented the first permitted commercial marketing or use
of the product. Shortly thereafter, the Patent and Trademark Office
requested that FDA determine the product's regulatory review period.
FDA has determined that the applicable regulatory review period for
ORENCIA is 3,803 days. Of this time, 3,536 days occurred during the
testing phase of the regulatory review period, while 267 days occurred
during the approval phase. These periods of time were derived from the
following dates:
1. The date an exemption under section 505(i) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355(i)) became effective: July 28,
1995. FDA has verified the applicant's claim that the date the
investigational new drug application became effective was on July 28,
1995.
2. The date the application was initially submitted with respect to
the human biological product under section 351 of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262): April 1, 2005. The applicant claims March
31, 2005, as the date the biologics license application (BLA) for
ORENCIA (BLA 125118) was submitted. However, FDA records indicate that
BLA 125118 was received on April 1, 2005.
3. The date the application was approved: December 23, 2005. FDA
has verified the applicant's claim that BLA 125118 was approved on
December 23, 2005.
This determination of the regulatory review period establishes the
maximum potential length of a patent extension. However, the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office applies several statutory limitations in
its calculations of the actual period for patent extension. In its
application for patent extension, this applicant seeks 1,414 days of
patent term extension.
Anyone with knowledge that any of the dates as published are
incorrect may submit to the Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments and ask for a redetermination
by July 23, 2007. Furthermore, any interested person may petition FDA
for a determination regarding whether the applicant for extension acted
with due diligence during the regulatory review period by November 19,
2007. To meet its burden, the petition must contain sufficient facts to
merit an FDA investigation. (See H. Rept. 857, part 1, 98th Cong., 2d
sess., pp. 41-42, 1984.) Petitions should be in the format specified in
21 CFR 10.30.
Comments and petitions should be submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management. Three copies of any mailed information are to be
submitted, except that individuals may submit one copy. Comments are to
be identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading
of this document. Comments and petitions may be seen in the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Dated: May 2, 2007
Jane A. Axelrad,
Associate Director for Policy, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E7-9945 Filed 5-22-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S