Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans, 28473-28475 [E7-9755]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 97 / Monday, May 21, 2007 / Notices
of the country of origin was filed on
behalf of Domex Marketing, Inc., L&M
Companies Inc., Nuchief Sales, Inc.,
Oneonata Trading Corporation, PAC
Marketing International, LLC., Rainier
Fruit Company and Sage Marketing
LLC., ‘‘(las Reclamantes)’’. Union
Agricola Regional de Fruticultores del
Estado de Chihuahua A.C., filed a notice
of motion requesting termination in
support of Domex and the others
regarding Secretariat File No. MEXUSA–2003–1904–02.
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Notice of
Motion to Terminate the Panel Review
and support of that motion, the panel
review is terminated as of May 3, 2007.
A panel has not been appointed to this
panel review. Pursuant to Rule 71(2) of
the Rules of Procedure for Article 1904
Binational Panel Review, this panel
review is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Caratina L. Alston, United States
Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite
2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue,
Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438.
Chapter
19 of the North American Free-Trade
Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) establishes a
mechanism to replace domestic judicial
review of final determinations in
antidumping and countervailing duty
cases involving imports from a NAFTA
country with review by independent
binational panels. When a Request for
Panel Review is filed, a panel is
established to act in place of national
courts to review expeditiously the final
determination to determine whether it
conforms with the antidumping or
countervailing duty law of the country
that made the determination.
Under Article 1904 of the Agreement,
which came into force on January 1,
1994, the Government of the United
States, the Government of Canada and
the Government of Mexico established
Rules of Procedure for Article 1904
Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’).
These Rules were published in the
Federal Register on February 23, 1994
(59 FR 8686). The panel review in this
matter was requested and terminated
pursuant to these Rules.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: May 15, 2007.
Caratina L. Alston,
United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat.
[FR Doc. E7–9662 Filed 5–18–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:57 May 18, 2007
Jkt 211001
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
[I.D. 041307C]
Endangered and Threatened Species;
Recovery Plans
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the
availability of the Draft Revised
Recovery Plan ( Draft Revised Plan),
dated May 2007, for the western and
eastern distinct population segments
(DPS) of Steller sea lion (Eumetopias
jubatus). NMFS is soliciting review and
comment on the Draft Revised Plan from
all interested parties. Due to continued
and substantial public interest in the
recovery plan to-date, NMFS is releasing
an updated version of the Draft Revised
Plan for additional review and written
comments.
DATES: Comments on the Draft Revised
Plan must be received by close of
business on August 20, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Kaja
Brix, Assistant Regional Administrator,
Protected Resources Division, Alaska
Region, NMFS, Attn: Ellen Walsh.
Comments may be submitted by:
• E-mail: SSLRP@noaa.gov. Include in
the subject line the following document
identifier: Sea Lion Recovery Plan.
E-mail comments, with or without
attachments, are limited to 5 megabytes.
• Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK
99802.
• Hand delivery to the Federal
Building: 709 West 9th Street, Juneau,
AK.
• Fax: (907) 586 7012.
Interested persons may obtain the
Draft Revised Plan for review from the
above address or online from the NMFS
Alaska Region website: https://
www.fakr.noaa.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kaja
Brix, (907 586 7235), e-mail
kaja.brix@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery plans are guidance
documents that describe the actions
considered necessary for the
conservation and recovery of species
listed under the Endangered Species Act
(ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531 et seq.). Development and
implementation of a recovery plan helps
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28473
to ensure that recovery efforts utilize
limited resources effectively and
efficiently. The ESA requires the
development of recovery plans for listed
species, unless such a plan would not
promote the recovery of a particular
species. The ESA requires that recovery
plans incorporate the following: (1)
Objective, measurable criteria that,
when met, would result in a
determination that the species is no
longer threatened or endangered; (2)
site-specific management actions
necessary to achieve the plan’s goals;
and (3) estimates of the time and costs
required to implement recovery actions.
NMFS will consider all substantive
comments and information presented
during the public comment period prior
to finalizing the Steller Sea Lion
Recovery Plan.
NMFS’ goal is to restore endangered
and threatened Steller sea lion
(Eumetopias jubatus) populations to
levels at which they are secure, selfsustaining components of their
ecosystems and no longer require the
protections of the ESA. The Steller sea
lion was listed as a threatened species
under the ESA on April 5, 1990 (55 FR
12645), due to substantial declines in
the western portion of the range. Critical
habitat was designated on August 27,
1993 (58 FR 45269), based on the
locations of terrestrial rookeries and
haulouts, the spatial extent of foraging
trips, and availability of prey. In 1997,
Steller sea lions were reclassified as two
DPSs under the ESA, a western DPS and
an eastern DPS, based on demographic
and genetic dissimilarities (62 FR
24345, 62 FR 30772). Due to a persistent
population decline, the western DPS
was reclassified as endangered at that
time. The increasing eastern DPS
remained classified as threatened.
Through the 1990s, the western DPS
continued to decline. Then between
2000 and 2004, the western population
showed a growth rate of approximately
three percent per year — the first
recorded increase in the population
since the 1970s. Based on recent counts,
the western DPS is currently about
44,800 animals. The eastern DPS is
currently between 45,000 and 51,000
animals and has been increasing at a
rate of approximately three percent per
year for 30 years.
The first Steller sea lion recovery plan
was completed in December 1992 and
encompassed the entire range of the
species. However, the recovery plan
became obsolete after the split into two
DPSs in 1997. By that time, nearly all of
the recovery actions recommended in
the original plan were completed. In
2001, NMFS assembled a new recovery
team to update the plan. The team was
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
28474
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 97 / Monday, May 21, 2007 / Notices
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
comprised of members representing
marine mammal and fishery scientists,
the fishing industry, Alaska Natives,
and environmental organizations. The
recovery team completed a draft
revision in February 2006, then solicited
peer review on the draft recovery plan
in accordance with NMFS’ 1994 peer
review policy. The team requested
review from five scientists and
managers with expertise in recovery
planning, statistical analyses, fisheries,
and marine mammals. In response to
reviewers’ comments, the team clarified
the recovery criteria, added delisting
criteria for the western DPS, and further
refined priorities and recovery actions.
In March 2006, the Team submitted the
revised plan to NOAA Fisheries with
unanimous endorsement from the 17
Team members.
In May 2006, NMFS released the draft
Steller Sea Lion Recovery Plan for
public review and comment (71 FR
29919). On July 20, 2006, NMFS
extended the customary 60-day
comment period until September 1,
2006 (71 FR 41206) to provide
additional time for public review and
comments. NMFS received comments
from 18 individuals and organizations
during the 100-day comment period. We
reviewed these comments and
incorporated recommendations into the
Draft Revised Plan. A summary of
public comments and NMFS’ formal
response to these comments are
available online at https://
www.fakr.noaa.gov/.
Due to extensive public interest and
the controversial nature of this recovery
plan, NMFS is releasing the Draft
Revised Plan for another round of
public reviews and comments. This will
provide the public an opportunity to
review changes made based on earlier
public input and to provide further
comments prior to release of the final
Steller Sea Lion Recovery Plan.
Overview
The Draft Revised Plan contains: (1) A
comprehensive review of Steller sea lion
ecology, (2) a review of previous
conservation actions, (3) a threats
assessment, (4) biological and recovery
criteria for downlisting and delisting, (4)
actions necessary for the recovery of the
species, and (5) estimates of time and
costs for recovery.
The threats assessment concludes that
the following threats to the western DPS
are relatively minor: Alaska Native
subsistence harvest, illegal shooting,
entanglement in marine debris, disease,
and disturbance from vessel traffic and
scientific research. Although much has
been learned about Steller sea lions and
the North Pacific ecosystem,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:57 May 18, 2007
Jkt 211001
considerable uncertainty remains about
the magnitude and likelihood of the
following potential threats (relative
impacts in parenthesis): competition
with fisheries (potentially high),
environmental variability (potentially
high), killer whale predation (medium),
incidental take by fisheries (low), and
toxic substances (medium). In contrast,
no threats were identified for the eastern
DPS. Although several factors that affect
the western DPS also affect the eastern
DPS (e.g., environmental variability,
killer whale predation, toxic substances,
disturbance), these threats do not appear
to be limiting recovery of the population
at this time.
The Draft Revised Plan identifies an
array of substantive actions that will
foster recovery of the western DPS by
addressing the broad range of threats. It
highlights three actions (detailed below)
that are especially important to the
recovery program for the western DPS:
1. Maintain current fishery
conservation measures: After a longterm decline, the western DPS appears
to be stabilizing. The first slowing of the
decline began in the 1990s, which
suggests that management measures
implemented in the early 1990s may
have been effective in reducing
anthropogenic effects (e.g., shooting,
harassment, and incidental take). The
apparent population stability observed
in the last six years appears to be
correlated with comprehensive fishery
management measures implemented
since the late 1990s. Therefore, the
current suite of management actions (or
their equivalent protection) should be
maintained until substantive evidence
demonstrates that these measures can be
altered without inhibiting recovery.
2. Design and implement an adaptive
management program to evaluate
fishery conservation measures: A
scientifically rigorous adaptive
management program should be
developed and implemented. A welldesigned adaptive management plan has
the potential to assess the relative
impact of commercial fisheries on
Steller sea lions and distinguish the
impacts of fisheries from other threats
(including killer whale predation). This
program will require a robust
experimental design with replication at
appropriate temporal and spatial scales.
It will be a challenge to construct an
adaptive management plan that is
statistically sound, meets the
requirements of the ESA and can be
implemented in a practicable manner.
3. Continue population monitoring
and research on the key threats
potentially impeding sea lion recovery:
Estimates of population abundance and
trends, spatial distribution, health, and
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
essential habitat characteristics are
fundamental to Steller sea lion
management and recovery. Current
knowledge of the effects of primary
threats on these parameters is
insufficient to determine their relative
impacts on species recovery. Focused
research is needed to assess the effects
of threats on sea lion population
dynamics and identify suitable
mitigation measures.
Criteria for reclassification of the
eastern DPS and western DPS of Steller
sea lion are included in the Draft
Revised Plan. In summary, the western
DPS of Steller sea lion may be
reclassified from endangered to
threatened status when all of the
following have been met: (1) Counts of
non-pups in the U.S. portion of the DPS
have increased for 15 years (on average);
(2) the population ecology and vital
rates in the U.S. region are consistent
with the observed trend; (3) the non-pup
trends in at least five of the seven subregions are consistent with the overall
U.S. trend, and the population trend in
any two adjacent sub-regions can not be
declining significantly; and (4) all five
listing factors [as described in section
4(a)(1) of the ESA] are addressed.
The western DPS of Steller sea lion
may be delisted when all of the
following conditions have been met: (1)
Counts of non-pups in the U.S. portion
of the DPS have increased at an average
annual rate of three percent for 30 years
(i.e., 3 generations); (2) the population
ecology and vital rates in the U.S. region
are consistent with the observed trend;
(3) the non-pup trends in at least five of
the seven sub-regions are consistent
with the overall U.S. trend, the
population trend in any two adjacent
sub-regions can not be declining
significantly, and the population trend
in any single sub-region can not have
declined by more than 50 percent; and
(4) all five listing factors are addressed.
The eastern DPS of Steller sea lion
may be delisted when all of the
following have been met: (1) The
population has increased at an average
rate of three percent per year for 30
years (i.e., three generations); (2) the
population ecology and vital rates are
consistent with the observed trend; and
(4) all five listing factors are addressed.
Time and costs for recovery actions
for the western DPS are estimated at
$93,840,000 for the first 5 fiscal years
and $430,425,000 for full recovery. The
recovery program for the eastern DPS
will cost an estimated $150,000 for the
first year and $1,050,000 total, including
10 years of post-delisting monitoring.
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 97 / Monday, May 21, 2007 / Notices
Public Comments Solicited
NMFS solicits written comments on
the draft Revised Recovery Plan. All
substantive comments received by the
date specified above will be considered
prior to final approval of the Plan.
Authority: Section 4(f) of the ESA (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: May 16, 2007.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office
of Protected Resources, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–9755 Filed 5–18–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
XRIN 0648-XA22
Fisheries of the Northeast Region;
Overfished Determination of Winter
Skate
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Notification of overfished
determination.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action serves as a notice
that NMFS, on behalf of the Secretary of
Commerce (Secretary), has determined
that winter skate is overfished. NMFS
notified the New England Fishery
Management Council (Council) of its
determination by letter. The Council is
required to take action within 1 year
following NMFS notification that
overfishing is occurring or a stock is
approaching overfishing, a stock is
overfished or approaching an overfished
condition, or existing remedial action
taken to end overfishing or rebuild an
overfished stock has not resulted in
adequate progress.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Debra Lambert, telephone: (301) 713–
2341.
Pursuant
to sections 304(e)(2) and (e)(7) of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act
(Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C.
1854(e)(2) and (e)(7), and implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 600.310(e)(2),
NMFS sends written notification to
fishery management councils when
overfishing is occurring or a stock is
approaching overfishing; a stock is
overfished or approaching an overfished
condition, or existing action taken to
end previously identified overfishing or
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:57 May 18, 2007
Jkt 211001
28475
rebuilding a previously identified
overfished stock or stock complex has
not resulted in adequate progress. On
February 20, 2007, the NMFS Northeast
Regional Administrator sent a letter
notifying the Council that winter skate
is overfished.
A copy of the notification letter sent
to the Council for the aforementioned
determination is available at https://
www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/
statusoffisheries/SOSmain.htm.
Within 1 year of a notification under
Magnuson-Stevens Act sections
304(e)(2) or (e)(7), the respective
Council must take remedial action in
response to the notification, to end
overfishing if overfishing is occurring;
rebuild an overfished stock or stock
complex to the abundance that can
produce maximum sustainable yield
within an appropriate time frame;
prevent overfishing from occurring if a
stock is approaching overfishing; and/or
prevent a stock from becoming
overfished if it is approaching an
overfished condition (see implementing
regulations at 50 CFR 600.310(e)(3)).
Such action must be submitted to NMFS
within 1 year of notification and may be
in the form of a new fishery
management plan (FMP), an FMP
amendment, or proposed regulations.
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
Dated: May 16, 2007.
James P. Burgess,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable
Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7–9753 Filed 5–18–07; 8:45 am]
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
BILLING CODE 3510–22–S
Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07–2530 Filed 5–17–07; 11:21 am]
Sunshine Act Meetings
TIME AND DATE:
11 a.m., Friday, June 8,
2007.
1155 21st St., NW., Washington,
DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference
Room.
PLACE:
STATUS:
Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Surveillance
Matters.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Eileen A. Donovan, 202–418–5100.
Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07–2529 Filed 5–17–07; 11:21 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–M
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
TIME AND DATE:
11 a.m., Friday, June 15,
2007.
1155 21st St., NW., Washington,
DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference
Room.
PLACE:
STATUS:
Closed.
Surveillance
Matters.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Eileen A. Donovan, 202–418–5100.
BILLING CODE 6351–01–M
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
Sunshine Act Meetings
TIME AND DATE:
11 a.m., Friday, June 29,
2007.
1155 21st St., NW., Washington,
DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference
Room.
PLACE:
STATUS:
Closed.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
Surveillance
Sunshine Act Meetings
TIME AND DATE:
11 a.m., Friday, June 22,
2007.
1155 21st St., NW., Washington,
DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference
Room.
PLACE:
STATUS:
Closed.
Matters.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Matters.
Eileen A. Donovan, 202–418–5100.
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07–2528 Filed 5–17–07; 11:21 am]
Eileen A. Donovan, 202–418–5100.
BILLING CODE 6351–01–M
PO 00000
Eileen A. Donovan,
Acting Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 07–2531 Filed 5–17–07; 11:21 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–M
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Surveillance
E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM
21MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 97 (Monday, May 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28473-28475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9755]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
[I.D. 041307C]
Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS announces the availability of the Draft Revised Recovery
Plan ( Draft Revised Plan), dated May 2007, for the western and eastern
distinct population segments (DPS) of Steller sea lion (Eumetopias
jubatus). NMFS is soliciting review and comment on the Draft Revised
Plan from all interested parties. Due to continued and substantial
public interest in the recovery plan to-date, NMFS is releasing an
updated version of the Draft Revised Plan for additional review and
written comments.
DATES: Comments on the Draft Revised Plan must be received by close of
business on August 20, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Kaja Brix, Assistant Regional
Administrator, Protected Resources Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn:
Ellen Walsh. Comments may be submitted by:
E-mail: SSLRP@noaa.gov. Include in the subject line the
following document identifier: Sea Lion Recovery Plan. E-mail comments,
with or without attachments, are limited to 5 megabytes.
Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802.
Hand delivery to the Federal Building: 709 West 9th
Street, Juneau, AK.
Fax: (907) 586 7012.
Interested persons may obtain the Draft Revised Plan for review
from the above address or online from the NMFS Alaska Region website:
https://www.fakr.noaa.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kaja Brix, (907 586 7235), e-mail
kaja.brix@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery plans are guidance documents that describe the actions
considered necessary for the conservation and recovery of species
listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Development and implementation of a recovery plan
helps to ensure that recovery efforts utilize limited resources
effectively and efficiently. The ESA requires the development of
recovery plans for listed species, unless such a plan would not promote
the recovery of a particular species. The ESA requires that recovery
plans incorporate the following: (1) Objective, measurable criteria
that, when met, would result in a determination that the species is no
longer threatened or endangered; (2) site-specific management actions
necessary to achieve the plan's goals; and (3) estimates of the time
and costs required to implement recovery actions. NMFS will consider
all substantive comments and information presented during the public
comment period prior to finalizing the Steller Sea Lion Recovery Plan.
NMFS' goal is to restore endangered and threatened Steller sea lion
(Eumetopias jubatus) populations to levels at which they are secure,
self-sustaining components of their ecosystems and no longer require
the protections of the ESA. The Steller sea lion was listed as a
threatened species under the ESA on April 5, 1990 (55 FR 12645), due to
substantial declines in the western portion of the range. Critical
habitat was designated on August 27, 1993 (58 FR 45269), based on the
locations of terrestrial rookeries and haulouts, the spatial extent of
foraging trips, and availability of prey. In 1997, Steller sea lions
were reclassified as two DPSs under the ESA, a western DPS and an
eastern DPS, based on demographic and genetic dissimilarities (62 FR
24345, 62 FR 30772). Due to a persistent population decline, the
western DPS was reclassified as endangered at that time. The increasing
eastern DPS remained classified as threatened. Through the 1990s, the
western DPS continued to decline. Then between 2000 and 2004, the
western population showed a growth rate of approximately three percent
per year -- the first recorded increase in the population since the
1970s. Based on recent counts, the western DPS is currently about
44,800 animals. The eastern DPS is currently between 45,000 and 51,000
animals and has been increasing at a rate of approximately three
percent per year for 30 years.
The first Steller sea lion recovery plan was completed in December
1992 and encompassed the entire range of the species. However, the
recovery plan became obsolete after the split into two DPSs in 1997. By
that time, nearly all of the recovery actions recommended in the
original plan were completed. In 2001, NMFS assembled a new recovery
team to update the plan. The team was
[[Page 28474]]
comprised of members representing marine mammal and fishery scientists,
the fishing industry, Alaska Natives, and environmental organizations.
The recovery team completed a draft revision in February 2006, then
solicited peer review on the draft recovery plan in accordance with
NMFS' 1994 peer review policy. The team requested review from five
scientists and managers with expertise in recovery planning,
statistical analyses, fisheries, and marine mammals. In response to
reviewers' comments, the team clarified the recovery criteria, added
delisting criteria for the western DPS, and further refined priorities
and recovery actions. In March 2006, the Team submitted the revised
plan to NOAA Fisheries with unanimous endorsement from the 17 Team
members.
In May 2006, NMFS released the draft Steller Sea Lion Recovery Plan
for public review and comment (71 FR 29919). On July 20, 2006, NMFS
extended the customary 60-day comment period until September 1, 2006
(71 FR 41206) to provide additional time for public review and
comments. NMFS received comments from 18 individuals and organizations
during the 100-day comment period. We reviewed these comments and
incorporated recommendations into the Draft Revised Plan. A summary of
public comments and NMFS' formal response to these comments are
available online at https://www.fakr.noaa.gov/.
Due to extensive public interest and the controversial nature of
this recovery plan, NMFS is releasing the Draft Revised Plan for
another round of public reviews and comments. This will provide the
public an opportunity to review changes made based on earlier public
input and to provide further comments prior to release of the final
Steller Sea Lion Recovery Plan.
Overview
The Draft Revised Plan contains: (1) A comprehensive review of
Steller sea lion ecology, (2) a review of previous conservation
actions, (3) a threats assessment, (4) biological and recovery criteria
for downlisting and delisting, (4) actions necessary for the recovery
of the species, and (5) estimates of time and costs for recovery.
The threats assessment concludes that the following threats to the
western DPS are relatively minor: Alaska Native subsistence harvest,
illegal shooting, entanglement in marine debris, disease, and
disturbance from vessel traffic and scientific research. Although much
has been learned about Steller sea lions and the North Pacific
ecosystem, considerable uncertainty remains about the magnitude and
likelihood of the following potential threats (relative impacts in
parenthesis): competition with fisheries (potentially high),
environmental variability (potentially high), killer whale predation
(medium), incidental take by fisheries (low), and toxic substances
(medium). In contrast, no threats were identified for the eastern DPS.
Although several factors that affect the western DPS also affect the
eastern DPS (e.g., environmental variability, killer whale predation,
toxic substances, disturbance), these threats do not appear to be
limiting recovery of the population at this time.
The Draft Revised Plan identifies an array of substantive actions
that will foster recovery of the western DPS by addressing the broad
range of threats. It highlights three actions (detailed below) that are
especially important to the recovery program for the western DPS:
1. Maintain current fishery conservation measures: After a long-
term decline, the western DPS appears to be stabilizing. The first
slowing of the decline began in the 1990s, which suggests that
management measures implemented in the early 1990s may have been
effective in reducing anthropogenic effects (e.g., shooting,
harassment, and incidental take). The apparent population stability
observed in the last six years appears to be correlated with
comprehensive fishery management measures implemented since the late
1990s. Therefore, the current suite of management actions (or their
equivalent protection) should be maintained until substantive evidence
demonstrates that these measures can be altered without inhibiting
recovery.
2. Design and implement an adaptive management program to evaluate
fishery conservation measures: A scientifically rigorous adaptive
management program should be developed and implemented. A well-designed
adaptive management plan has the potential to assess the relative
impact of commercial fisheries on Steller sea lions and distinguish the
impacts of fisheries from other threats (including killer whale
predation). This program will require a robust experimental design with
replication at appropriate temporal and spatial scales. It will be a
challenge to construct an adaptive management plan that is
statistically sound, meets the requirements of the ESA and can be
implemented in a practicable manner.
3. Continue population monitoring and research on the key threats
potentially impeding sea lion recovery: Estimates of population
abundance and trends, spatial distribution, health, and essential
habitat characteristics are fundamental to Steller sea lion management
and recovery. Current knowledge of the effects of primary threats on
these parameters is insufficient to determine their relative impacts on
species recovery. Focused research is needed to assess the effects of
threats on sea lion population dynamics and identify suitable
mitigation measures.
Criteria for reclassification of the eastern DPS and western DPS of
Steller sea lion are included in the Draft Revised Plan. In summary,
the western DPS of Steller sea lion may be reclassified from endangered
to threatened status when all of the following have been met: (1)
Counts of non-pups in the U.S. portion of the DPS have increased for 15
years (on average); (2) the population ecology and vital rates in the
U.S. region are consistent with the observed trend; (3) the non-pup
trends in at least five of the seven sub-regions are consistent with
the overall U.S. trend, and the population trend in any two adjacent
sub-regions can not be declining significantly; and (4) all five
listing factors [as described in section 4(a)(1) of the ESA] are
addressed.
The western DPS of Steller sea lion may be delisted when all of the
following conditions have been met: (1) Counts of non-pups in the U.S.
portion of the DPS have increased at an average annual rate of three
percent for 30 years (i.e., 3 generations); (2) the population ecology
and vital rates in the U.S. region are consistent with the observed
trend; (3) the non-pup trends in at least five of the seven sub-regions
are consistent with the overall U.S. trend, the population trend in any
two adjacent sub-regions can not be declining significantly, and the
population trend in any single sub-region can not have declined by more
than 50 percent; and (4) all five listing factors are addressed.
The eastern DPS of Steller sea lion may be delisted when all of the
following have been met: (1) The population has increased at an average
rate of three percent per year for 30 years (i.e., three generations);
(2) the population ecology and vital rates are consistent with the
observed trend; and (4) all five listing factors are addressed.
Time and costs for recovery actions for the western DPS are
estimated at $93,840,000 for the first 5 fiscal years and $430,425,000
for full recovery. The recovery program for the eastern DPS will cost
an estimated $150,000 for the first year and $1,050,000 total,
including 10 years of post-delisting monitoring.
[[Page 28475]]
Public Comments Solicited
NMFS solicits written comments on the draft Revised Recovery Plan.
All substantive comments received by the date specified above will be
considered prior to final approval of the Plan.
Authority: Section 4(f) of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Dated: May 16, 2007.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources,
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-9755 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S