Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans, 28473-28475 [E7-9755]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 97 / Monday, May 21, 2007 / Notices of the country of origin was filed on behalf of Domex Marketing, Inc., L&M Companies Inc., Nuchief Sales, Inc., Oneonata Trading Corporation, PAC Marketing International, LLC., Rainier Fruit Company and Sage Marketing LLC., ‘‘(las Reclamantes)’’. Union Agricola Regional de Fruticultores del Estado de Chihuahua A.C., filed a notice of motion requesting termination in support of Domex and the others regarding Secretariat File No. MEXUSA–2003–1904–02. SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Notice of Motion to Terminate the Panel Review and support of that motion, the panel review is terminated as of May 3, 2007. A panel has not been appointed to this panel review. Pursuant to Rule 71(2) of the Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Panel Review, this panel review is terminated. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caratina L. Alston, United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat, Suite 2061, 14th and Constitution Avenue, Washington, DC 20230, (202) 482–5438. Chapter 19 of the North American Free-Trade Agreement (‘‘Agreement’’) establishes a mechanism to replace domestic judicial review of final determinations in antidumping and countervailing duty cases involving imports from a NAFTA country with review by independent binational panels. When a Request for Panel Review is filed, a panel is established to act in place of national courts to review expeditiously the final determination to determine whether it conforms with the antidumping or countervailing duty law of the country that made the determination. Under Article 1904 of the Agreement, which came into force on January 1, 1994, the Government of the United States, the Government of Canada and the Government of Mexico established Rules of Procedure for Article 1904 Binational Panel Reviews (‘‘Rules’’). These Rules were published in the Federal Register on February 23, 1994 (59 FR 8686). The panel review in this matter was requested and terminated pursuant to these Rules. pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Dated: May 15, 2007. Caratina L. Alston, United States Secretary, NAFTA Secretariat. [FR Doc. E7–9662 Filed 5–18–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:57 May 18, 2007 Jkt 211001 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [I.D. 041307C] Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Commerce. ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments. AGENCY: SUMMARY: NMFS announces the availability of the Draft Revised Recovery Plan ( Draft Revised Plan), dated May 2007, for the western and eastern distinct population segments (DPS) of Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus). NMFS is soliciting review and comment on the Draft Revised Plan from all interested parties. Due to continued and substantial public interest in the recovery plan to-date, NMFS is releasing an updated version of the Draft Revised Plan for additional review and written comments. DATES: Comments on the Draft Revised Plan must be received by close of business on August 20, 2007. ADDRESSES: Send comments to Kaja Brix, Assistant Regional Administrator, Protected Resources Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn: Ellen Walsh. Comments may be submitted by: • E-mail: SSLRP@noaa.gov. Include in the subject line the following document identifier: Sea Lion Recovery Plan. E-mail comments, with or without attachments, are limited to 5 megabytes. • Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802. • Hand delivery to the Federal Building: 709 West 9th Street, Juneau, AK. • Fax: (907) 586 7012. Interested persons may obtain the Draft Revised Plan for review from the above address or online from the NMFS Alaska Region website: https:// www.fakr.noaa.gov/. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kaja Brix, (907 586 7235), e-mail kaja.brix@noaa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Recovery plans are guidance documents that describe the actions considered necessary for the conservation and recovery of species listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Development and implementation of a recovery plan helps PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 28473 to ensure that recovery efforts utilize limited resources effectively and efficiently. The ESA requires the development of recovery plans for listed species, unless such a plan would not promote the recovery of a particular species. The ESA requires that recovery plans incorporate the following: (1) Objective, measurable criteria that, when met, would result in a determination that the species is no longer threatened or endangered; (2) site-specific management actions necessary to achieve the plan’s goals; and (3) estimates of the time and costs required to implement recovery actions. NMFS will consider all substantive comments and information presented during the public comment period prior to finalizing the Steller Sea Lion Recovery Plan. NMFS’ goal is to restore endangered and threatened Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus) populations to levels at which they are secure, selfsustaining components of their ecosystems and no longer require the protections of the ESA. The Steller sea lion was listed as a threatened species under the ESA on April 5, 1990 (55 FR 12645), due to substantial declines in the western portion of the range. Critical habitat was designated on August 27, 1993 (58 FR 45269), based on the locations of terrestrial rookeries and haulouts, the spatial extent of foraging trips, and availability of prey. In 1997, Steller sea lions were reclassified as two DPSs under the ESA, a western DPS and an eastern DPS, based on demographic and genetic dissimilarities (62 FR 24345, 62 FR 30772). Due to a persistent population decline, the western DPS was reclassified as endangered at that time. The increasing eastern DPS remained classified as threatened. Through the 1990s, the western DPS continued to decline. Then between 2000 and 2004, the western population showed a growth rate of approximately three percent per year — the first recorded increase in the population since the 1970s. Based on recent counts, the western DPS is currently about 44,800 animals. The eastern DPS is currently between 45,000 and 51,000 animals and has been increasing at a rate of approximately three percent per year for 30 years. The first Steller sea lion recovery plan was completed in December 1992 and encompassed the entire range of the species. However, the recovery plan became obsolete after the split into two DPSs in 1997. By that time, nearly all of the recovery actions recommended in the original plan were completed. In 2001, NMFS assembled a new recovery team to update the plan. The team was E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM 21MYN1 28474 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 97 / Monday, May 21, 2007 / Notices pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES comprised of members representing marine mammal and fishery scientists, the fishing industry, Alaska Natives, and environmental organizations. The recovery team completed a draft revision in February 2006, then solicited peer review on the draft recovery plan in accordance with NMFS’ 1994 peer review policy. The team requested review from five scientists and managers with expertise in recovery planning, statistical analyses, fisheries, and marine mammals. In response to reviewers’ comments, the team clarified the recovery criteria, added delisting criteria for the western DPS, and further refined priorities and recovery actions. In March 2006, the Team submitted the revised plan to NOAA Fisheries with unanimous endorsement from the 17 Team members. In May 2006, NMFS released the draft Steller Sea Lion Recovery Plan for public review and comment (71 FR 29919). On July 20, 2006, NMFS extended the customary 60-day comment period until September 1, 2006 (71 FR 41206) to provide additional time for public review and comments. NMFS received comments from 18 individuals and organizations during the 100-day comment period. We reviewed these comments and incorporated recommendations into the Draft Revised Plan. A summary of public comments and NMFS’ formal response to these comments are available online at https:// www.fakr.noaa.gov/. Due to extensive public interest and the controversial nature of this recovery plan, NMFS is releasing the Draft Revised Plan for another round of public reviews and comments. This will provide the public an opportunity to review changes made based on earlier public input and to provide further comments prior to release of the final Steller Sea Lion Recovery Plan. Overview The Draft Revised Plan contains: (1) A comprehensive review of Steller sea lion ecology, (2) a review of previous conservation actions, (3) a threats assessment, (4) biological and recovery criteria for downlisting and delisting, (4) actions necessary for the recovery of the species, and (5) estimates of time and costs for recovery. The threats assessment concludes that the following threats to the western DPS are relatively minor: Alaska Native subsistence harvest, illegal shooting, entanglement in marine debris, disease, and disturbance from vessel traffic and scientific research. Although much has been learned about Steller sea lions and the North Pacific ecosystem, VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:57 May 18, 2007 Jkt 211001 considerable uncertainty remains about the magnitude and likelihood of the following potential threats (relative impacts in parenthesis): competition with fisheries (potentially high), environmental variability (potentially high), killer whale predation (medium), incidental take by fisheries (low), and toxic substances (medium). In contrast, no threats were identified for the eastern DPS. Although several factors that affect the western DPS also affect the eastern DPS (e.g., environmental variability, killer whale predation, toxic substances, disturbance), these threats do not appear to be limiting recovery of the population at this time. The Draft Revised Plan identifies an array of substantive actions that will foster recovery of the western DPS by addressing the broad range of threats. It highlights three actions (detailed below) that are especially important to the recovery program for the western DPS: 1. Maintain current fishery conservation measures: After a longterm decline, the western DPS appears to be stabilizing. The first slowing of the decline began in the 1990s, which suggests that management measures implemented in the early 1990s may have been effective in reducing anthropogenic effects (e.g., shooting, harassment, and incidental take). The apparent population stability observed in the last six years appears to be correlated with comprehensive fishery management measures implemented since the late 1990s. Therefore, the current suite of management actions (or their equivalent protection) should be maintained until substantive evidence demonstrates that these measures can be altered without inhibiting recovery. 2. Design and implement an adaptive management program to evaluate fishery conservation measures: A scientifically rigorous adaptive management program should be developed and implemented. A welldesigned adaptive management plan has the potential to assess the relative impact of commercial fisheries on Steller sea lions and distinguish the impacts of fisheries from other threats (including killer whale predation). This program will require a robust experimental design with replication at appropriate temporal and spatial scales. It will be a challenge to construct an adaptive management plan that is statistically sound, meets the requirements of the ESA and can be implemented in a practicable manner. 3. Continue population monitoring and research on the key threats potentially impeding sea lion recovery: Estimates of population abundance and trends, spatial distribution, health, and PO 00000 Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 essential habitat characteristics are fundamental to Steller sea lion management and recovery. Current knowledge of the effects of primary threats on these parameters is insufficient to determine their relative impacts on species recovery. Focused research is needed to assess the effects of threats on sea lion population dynamics and identify suitable mitigation measures. Criteria for reclassification of the eastern DPS and western DPS of Steller sea lion are included in the Draft Revised Plan. In summary, the western DPS of Steller sea lion may be reclassified from endangered to threatened status when all of the following have been met: (1) Counts of non-pups in the U.S. portion of the DPS have increased for 15 years (on average); (2) the population ecology and vital rates in the U.S. region are consistent with the observed trend; (3) the non-pup trends in at least five of the seven subregions are consistent with the overall U.S. trend, and the population trend in any two adjacent sub-regions can not be declining significantly; and (4) all five listing factors [as described in section 4(a)(1) of the ESA] are addressed. The western DPS of Steller sea lion may be delisted when all of the following conditions have been met: (1) Counts of non-pups in the U.S. portion of the DPS have increased at an average annual rate of three percent for 30 years (i.e., 3 generations); (2) the population ecology and vital rates in the U.S. region are consistent with the observed trend; (3) the non-pup trends in at least five of the seven sub-regions are consistent with the overall U.S. trend, the population trend in any two adjacent sub-regions can not be declining significantly, and the population trend in any single sub-region can not have declined by more than 50 percent; and (4) all five listing factors are addressed. The eastern DPS of Steller sea lion may be delisted when all of the following have been met: (1) The population has increased at an average rate of three percent per year for 30 years (i.e., three generations); (2) the population ecology and vital rates are consistent with the observed trend; and (4) all five listing factors are addressed. Time and costs for recovery actions for the western DPS are estimated at $93,840,000 for the first 5 fiscal years and $430,425,000 for full recovery. The recovery program for the eastern DPS will cost an estimated $150,000 for the first year and $1,050,000 total, including 10 years of post-delisting monitoring. E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM 21MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 97 / Monday, May 21, 2007 / Notices Public Comments Solicited NMFS solicits written comments on the draft Revised Recovery Plan. All substantive comments received by the date specified above will be considered prior to final approval of the Plan. Authority: Section 4(f) of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Dated: May 16, 2007. Angela Somma, Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. E7–9755 Filed 5–18–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration XRIN 0648-XA22 Fisheries of the Northeast Region; Overfished Determination of Winter Skate National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notification of overfished determination. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This action serves as a notice that NMFS, on behalf of the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary), has determined that winter skate is overfished. NMFS notified the New England Fishery Management Council (Council) of its determination by letter. The Council is required to take action within 1 year following NMFS notification that overfishing is occurring or a stock is approaching overfishing, a stock is overfished or approaching an overfished condition, or existing remedial action taken to end overfishing or rebuild an overfished stock has not resulted in adequate progress. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debra Lambert, telephone: (301) 713– 2341. Pursuant to sections 304(e)(2) and (e)(7) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act), 16 U.S.C. 1854(e)(2) and (e)(7), and implementing regulations at 50 CFR 600.310(e)(2), NMFS sends written notification to fishery management councils when overfishing is occurring or a stock is approaching overfishing; a stock is overfished or approaching an overfished condition, or existing action taken to end previously identified overfishing or pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:57 May 18, 2007 Jkt 211001 28475 rebuilding a previously identified overfished stock or stock complex has not resulted in adequate progress. On February 20, 2007, the NMFS Northeast Regional Administrator sent a letter notifying the Council that winter skate is overfished. A copy of the notification letter sent to the Council for the aforementioned determination is available at https:// www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/ statusoffisheries/SOSmain.htm. Within 1 year of a notification under Magnuson-Stevens Act sections 304(e)(2) or (e)(7), the respective Council must take remedial action in response to the notification, to end overfishing if overfishing is occurring; rebuild an overfished stock or stock complex to the abundance that can produce maximum sustainable yield within an appropriate time frame; prevent overfishing from occurring if a stock is approaching overfishing; and/or prevent a stock from becoming overfished if it is approaching an overfished condition (see implementing regulations at 50 CFR 600.310(e)(3)). Such action must be submitted to NMFS within 1 year of notification and may be in the form of a new fishery management plan (FMP), an FMP amendment, or proposed regulations. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Dated: May 16, 2007. James P. Burgess, Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. E7–9753 Filed 5–18–07; 8:45 am] MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: BILLING CODE 3510–22–S Eileen A. Donovan, Acting Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. 07–2530 Filed 5–17–07; 11:21 am] Sunshine Act Meetings TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, June 8, 2007. 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room. PLACE: STATUS: Closed. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Matters. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Eileen A. Donovan, 202–418–5100. Eileen A. Donovan, Acting Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. 07–2529 Filed 5–17–07; 11:21 am] BILLING CODE 6351–01–M COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Sunshine Act Meetings TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, June 15, 2007. 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room. PLACE: STATUS: Closed. Surveillance Matters. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Eileen A. Donovan, 202–418–5100. BILLING CODE 6351–01–M COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION Sunshine Act Meetings TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, June 29, 2007. 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room. PLACE: STATUS: Closed. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance Sunshine Act Meetings TIME AND DATE: 11 a.m., Friday, June 22, 2007. 1155 21st St., NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission Conference Room. PLACE: STATUS: Closed. Matters. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Matters. Eileen A. Donovan, 202–418–5100. CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Eileen A. Donovan, Acting Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. 07–2528 Filed 5–17–07; 11:21 am] Eileen A. Donovan, 202–418–5100. BILLING CODE 6351–01–M PO 00000 Eileen A. Donovan, Acting Secretary of the Commission. [FR Doc. 07–2531 Filed 5–17–07; 11:21 am] BILLING CODE 6351–01–M Frm 00014 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Surveillance E:\FR\FM\21MYN1.SGM 21MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 97 (Monday, May 21, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28473-28475]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9755]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[I.D. 041307C]


Endangered and Threatened Species; Recovery Plans

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: NMFS announces the availability of the Draft Revised Recovery 
Plan ( Draft Revised Plan), dated May 2007, for the western and eastern 
distinct population segments (DPS) of Steller sea lion (Eumetopias 
jubatus). NMFS is soliciting review and comment on the Draft Revised 
Plan from all interested parties. Due to continued and substantial 
public interest in the recovery plan to-date, NMFS is releasing an 
updated version of the Draft Revised Plan for additional review and 
written comments.

DATES: Comments on the Draft Revised Plan must be received by close of 
business on August 20, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to Kaja Brix, Assistant Regional 
Administrator, Protected Resources Division, Alaska Region, NMFS, Attn: 
Ellen Walsh. Comments may be submitted by:
     E-mail: SSLRP@noaa.gov. Include in the subject line the 
following document identifier: Sea Lion Recovery Plan. E-mail comments, 
with or without attachments, are limited to 5 megabytes.
     Mail: P.O. Box 21668, Juneau, AK 99802.
     Hand delivery to the Federal Building: 709 West 9th 
Street, Juneau, AK.
     Fax: (907) 586 7012.
    Interested persons may obtain the Draft Revised Plan for review 
from the above address or online from the NMFS Alaska Region website: 
https://www.fakr.noaa.gov/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kaja Brix, (907 586 7235), e-mail 
kaja.brix@noaa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Recovery plans are guidance documents that describe the actions 
considered necessary for the conservation and recovery of species 
listed under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973, as amended (16 
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Development and implementation of a recovery plan 
helps to ensure that recovery efforts utilize limited resources 
effectively and efficiently. The ESA requires the development of 
recovery plans for listed species, unless such a plan would not promote 
the recovery of a particular species. The ESA requires that recovery 
plans incorporate the following: (1) Objective, measurable criteria 
that, when met, would result in a determination that the species is no 
longer threatened or endangered; (2) site-specific management actions 
necessary to achieve the plan's goals; and (3) estimates of the time 
and costs required to implement recovery actions. NMFS will consider 
all substantive comments and information presented during the public 
comment period prior to finalizing the Steller Sea Lion Recovery Plan.
    NMFS' goal is to restore endangered and threatened Steller sea lion 
(Eumetopias jubatus) populations to levels at which they are secure, 
self-sustaining components of their ecosystems and no longer require 
the protections of the ESA. The Steller sea lion was listed as a 
threatened species under the ESA on April 5, 1990 (55 FR 12645), due to 
substantial declines in the western portion of the range. Critical 
habitat was designated on August 27, 1993 (58 FR 45269), based on the 
locations of terrestrial rookeries and haulouts, the spatial extent of 
foraging trips, and availability of prey. In 1997, Steller sea lions 
were reclassified as two DPSs under the ESA, a western DPS and an 
eastern DPS, based on demographic and genetic dissimilarities (62 FR 
24345, 62 FR 30772). Due to a persistent population decline, the 
western DPS was reclassified as endangered at that time. The increasing 
eastern DPS remained classified as threatened. Through the 1990s, the 
western DPS continued to decline. Then between 2000 and 2004, the 
western population showed a growth rate of approximately three percent 
per year -- the first recorded increase in the population since the 
1970s. Based on recent counts, the western DPS is currently about 
44,800 animals. The eastern DPS is currently between 45,000 and 51,000 
animals and has been increasing at a rate of approximately three 
percent per year for 30 years.
    The first Steller sea lion recovery plan was completed in December 
1992 and encompassed the entire range of the species. However, the 
recovery plan became obsolete after the split into two DPSs in 1997. By 
that time, nearly all of the recovery actions recommended in the 
original plan were completed. In 2001, NMFS assembled a new recovery 
team to update the plan. The team was

[[Page 28474]]

comprised of members representing marine mammal and fishery scientists, 
the fishing industry, Alaska Natives, and environmental organizations. 
The recovery team completed a draft revision in February 2006, then 
solicited peer review on the draft recovery plan in accordance with 
NMFS' 1994 peer review policy. The team requested review from five 
scientists and managers with expertise in recovery planning, 
statistical analyses, fisheries, and marine mammals. In response to 
reviewers' comments, the team clarified the recovery criteria, added 
delisting criteria for the western DPS, and further refined priorities 
and recovery actions. In March 2006, the Team submitted the revised 
plan to NOAA Fisheries with unanimous endorsement from the 17 Team 
members.
    In May 2006, NMFS released the draft Steller Sea Lion Recovery Plan 
for public review and comment (71 FR 29919). On July 20, 2006, NMFS 
extended the customary 60-day comment period until September 1, 2006 
(71 FR 41206) to provide additional time for public review and 
comments. NMFS received comments from 18 individuals and organizations 
during the 100-day comment period. We reviewed these comments and 
incorporated recommendations into the Draft Revised Plan. A summary of 
public comments and NMFS' formal response to these comments are 
available online at https://www.fakr.noaa.gov/.
    Due to extensive public interest and the controversial nature of 
this recovery plan, NMFS is releasing the Draft Revised Plan for 
another round of public reviews and comments. This will provide the 
public an opportunity to review changes made based on earlier public 
input and to provide further comments prior to release of the final 
Steller Sea Lion Recovery Plan.

Overview

    The Draft Revised Plan contains: (1) A comprehensive review of 
Steller sea lion ecology, (2) a review of previous conservation 
actions, (3) a threats assessment, (4) biological and recovery criteria 
for downlisting and delisting, (4) actions necessary for the recovery 
of the species, and (5) estimates of time and costs for recovery.
    The threats assessment concludes that the following threats to the 
western DPS are relatively minor: Alaska Native subsistence harvest, 
illegal shooting, entanglement in marine debris, disease, and 
disturbance from vessel traffic and scientific research. Although much 
has been learned about Steller sea lions and the North Pacific 
ecosystem, considerable uncertainty remains about the magnitude and 
likelihood of the following potential threats (relative impacts in 
parenthesis): competition with fisheries (potentially high), 
environmental variability (potentially high), killer whale predation 
(medium), incidental take by fisheries (low), and toxic substances 
(medium). In contrast, no threats were identified for the eastern DPS. 
Although several factors that affect the western DPS also affect the 
eastern DPS (e.g., environmental variability, killer whale predation, 
toxic substances, disturbance), these threats do not appear to be 
limiting recovery of the population at this time.
    The Draft Revised Plan identifies an array of substantive actions 
that will foster recovery of the western DPS by addressing the broad 
range of threats. It highlights three actions (detailed below) that are 
especially important to the recovery program for the western DPS:
    1. Maintain current fishery conservation measures: After a long-
term decline, the western DPS appears to be stabilizing. The first 
slowing of the decline began in the 1990s, which suggests that 
management measures implemented in the early 1990s may have been 
effective in reducing anthropogenic effects (e.g., shooting, 
harassment, and incidental take). The apparent population stability 
observed in the last six years appears to be correlated with 
comprehensive fishery management measures implemented since the late 
1990s. Therefore, the current suite of management actions (or their 
equivalent protection) should be maintained until substantive evidence 
demonstrates that these measures can be altered without inhibiting 
recovery.
    2. Design and implement an adaptive management program to evaluate 
fishery conservation measures: A scientifically rigorous adaptive 
management program should be developed and implemented. A well-designed 
adaptive management plan has the potential to assess the relative 
impact of commercial fisheries on Steller sea lions and distinguish the 
impacts of fisheries from other threats (including killer whale 
predation). This program will require a robust experimental design with 
replication at appropriate temporal and spatial scales. It will be a 
challenge to construct an adaptive management plan that is 
statistically sound, meets the requirements of the ESA and can be 
implemented in a practicable manner.
    3. Continue population monitoring and research on the key threats 
potentially impeding sea lion recovery: Estimates of population 
abundance and trends, spatial distribution, health, and essential 
habitat characteristics are fundamental to Steller sea lion management 
and recovery. Current knowledge of the effects of primary threats on 
these parameters is insufficient to determine their relative impacts on 
species recovery. Focused research is needed to assess the effects of 
threats on sea lion population dynamics and identify suitable 
mitigation measures.
    Criteria for reclassification of the eastern DPS and western DPS of 
Steller sea lion are included in the Draft Revised Plan. In summary, 
the western DPS of Steller sea lion may be reclassified from endangered 
to threatened status when all of the following have been met: (1) 
Counts of non-pups in the U.S. portion of the DPS have increased for 15 
years (on average); (2) the population ecology and vital rates in the 
U.S. region are consistent with the observed trend; (3) the non-pup 
trends in at least five of the seven sub-regions are consistent with 
the overall U.S. trend, and the population trend in any two adjacent 
sub-regions can not be declining significantly; and (4) all five 
listing factors [as described in section 4(a)(1) of the ESA] are 
addressed.
    The western DPS of Steller sea lion may be delisted when all of the 
following conditions have been met: (1) Counts of non-pups in the U.S. 
portion of the DPS have increased at an average annual rate of three 
percent for 30 years (i.e., 3 generations); (2) the population ecology 
and vital rates in the U.S. region are consistent with the observed 
trend; (3) the non-pup trends in at least five of the seven sub-regions 
are consistent with the overall U.S. trend, the population trend in any 
two adjacent sub-regions can not be declining significantly, and the 
population trend in any single sub-region can not have declined by more 
than 50 percent; and (4) all five listing factors are addressed.
    The eastern DPS of Steller sea lion may be delisted when all of the 
following have been met: (1) The population has increased at an average 
rate of three percent per year for 30 years (i.e., three generations); 
(2) the population ecology and vital rates are consistent with the 
observed trend; and (4) all five listing factors are addressed.
    Time and costs for recovery actions for the western DPS are 
estimated at $93,840,000 for the first 5 fiscal years and $430,425,000 
for full recovery. The recovery program for the eastern DPS will cost 
an estimated $150,000 for the first year and $1,050,000 total, 
including 10 years of post-delisting monitoring.

[[Page 28475]]

Public Comments Solicited

    NMFS solicits written comments on the draft Revised Recovery Plan. 
All substantive comments received by the date specified above will be 
considered prior to final approval of the Plan.

    Authority: Section 4(f) of the ESA (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).

    Dated: May 16, 2007.
Angela Somma,
Chief, Endangered Species Division, Office of Protected Resources, 
National Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. E7-9755 Filed 5-18-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.