Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments, 28043-28044 [E7-9589]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 96 / Friday, May 18, 2007 / Notices
subset of permitted sources required to
perform such monitoring. The currently
approved ICR for the entire NSR
program (major and minor) includes
about $228 million in annual burden
costs and about $9 million in annual
preconstruction monitoring costs for
sources.
The incremental annual cost increase
for reviewing authorities is estimated at
$700,000, all as a result of the increased
burden hours. The currently approved
ICR for the entire NSR program includes
about $103 million per year for
reviewing authorities.
What Is the Next Step in the Process for
This ICR?
The EPA will consider the comments
received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will
then be submitted to OMB for review
and approval pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.12. When the final rule is
published in the Federal Register, EPA
will issue another Federal Register
notice pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the
submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional
comments to OMB. If you have any
questions about this ICR or the approval
process, please contact the technical
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Dated: May 8, 2007.
William T. Harnett,
Director, Air Quality Policy Division, Office
of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Office
of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. E7–9599 Filed 5–17–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER-FRL–6687–1]
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Environmental Impact Statements and
Regulations; Availability of EPA
Comments
Availability of EPA comments
prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section
309 of the Clean Air Act and Section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act as amended. Requests for
copies of EPA comments can be directed
to the Office of Federal Activities at
202–564–7167.
An explanation of the ratings assigned
to draft environmental impact
statements (EISs) was published in the
Federal Register dated April 6, 2007 (72
FR 17156).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 May 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20070003, ERP No. D–AFS–
L65530–AK, Tongass Land and
Resource Management Plan, Plan
Amendment, Implementation,
Tongass National Forest, AK.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns about impacts
to water quality and aquatic and
terrestrial habitats. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20070019, ERP No. D–FHW–
G40192–TX, Grand Parkway/State
Highway 99 Improvement Project,
Segment G, from Interstate Highway
(IH) 45 to US 59, Funding, Right-ofWay Grant, U.S. Army COE Section
404 Permit, Harris and Montgomery
Counties, TX.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns about impacts
to wetlands, streams, and air quality.
Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20070067, ERP No. D–SFW–
C64004–PR, Vieques National
Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive
Conservation Plan, Implementation,
Vieques, PR.
Summary: EPA has no objection to the
proposed management plan for
restoration and operation of new refuge
on Vieques, PR. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20070073, ERP No. D–IBR–
K39106–00, Colorado River Interim
Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages
and Coordinated Operations for Lake
Powell and Lake Mead,
Implementation, Colorado River, CO
and CA.
Summary EPA expressed
environmental concerns about adverse
impacts of reduced water availability on
beneficial uses and the need for
additional information on the effects of
climate change, banking of conserved
water, and monitoring. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20060539, ERP No. DE–AFS–
L65155–00, Northern Spotted Owl
Management Plan, Removal or the
Modification to the Survey and
Manage Mitigation Measures,
Standards and Guidelines (to the
Northwest Forest Plan), Addresses the
Effects of an Additional No-Action
Alternative to the (July 2006) Draft
Supplement and to the (2004) Final
Supplemental EIS, Northwest Forest
Plan, OR, WA, and CA.
Summary: EPA has no objection to the
proposed project. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20070098, ERP No. DS–AFS–
J65417–MT, Frenchtown Face
Ecosystem Restoration Project,
Additional Information Maintenance
and Improvement of Forest Health,
Risk Reduction of Damage Insects and
Disease, Lolo National Forest,
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28043
Ninemile Ranger District, Missoula,
MT.
Summary: While EPA expressed
environmental concerns about shortterm effects to 303(d) listed waters, we
believe that watershed restoration
activities included in the project would
likely result in overall water quality
improvement in the long-term. Rating
EC2.
EIS No. 20070129, ERP No. DS–NOA–
A91061–00, Atlantic Mackerel, Squid
and Butterfish, Fishery Management
Plan, Amendment #9,
Implementation, Essential Fish
Habitat (EFH), Exclusive Economic
Zone(EEZ).
Summary: EPA has no objection to the
proposed action. Rating LO.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20070035, ERP No. F–RUS–
J03019–MT, Highwood Generating
Station, 250-megawatt Coal Fired
Power Plant and 6MW of Wind
Generation at a Site near Great Falls,
Construction and Operation, Licenses
Permit, U.S. Army COE Section 10
Permit, Cascade County, MT.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns about the
potential for visibility impairment to
Class I wilderness areas, and
recommended the implementation of
mitigation to reduce visibility
impairments.
EIS No. 20070100, ERP No. F–AFS–
J65448–UT, West Bear Vegetation
Management Project, Timber
Harvesting, Prescribed Burning, Roads
Construction, Township 1 North,
Range 9 East, Salt Lake Principle
Meridian, Evanston Ranger District,
Wasatch-Cache National Forest,
Summit County, UT.
Summary: EPA continues to express
concern about the need for an effective
environmental impact monitoring plan
and an adaptive management program.
EIS No. 20070107, ERP No. F–USA–
G15000–TX, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
Project, Base Realignment and Closure
(BRAC) Actions and Other
Transformation Activities,
Implementation, City of San Antonio,
TX.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20070108, ERP No. F–AFS–
L65519–AK, Scratchings Timber Sale
Project, Timber Harvest up to
Approximately 42 Million Board Feet,
Suemez Island, Craig Ranger District,
Tongass National Forest, AK.
Summary: EPA continues to express
environmental concerns about the
potential for cumulative adverse
E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM
18MYN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
28044
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 96 / Friday, May 18, 2007 / Notices
impacts on water quality and high
quality salmon fisheries, as well as
additional impacts to the Dolores
watershed.
EIS No. 20070110, ERP No. F–FHW–
F40432–MN, Trunk Highway 23
Improvements Project, From 0.25
Miles West of CSAH 6 in Kandiyohi
County to 0.3 Miles Southwest of
CSAH 123 Stearns County, City of
Paynesville, Kandiyohi and Stearns
Counties, MN.
Summary: EPA has environmental
concerns about impacts to public
drinking water supply wells and the
lack of specific mitigation
commitments. EPA recommends the
ROD provides firm mitigation
commitments.
EIS No. 20070118, ERP No. F–IBR–
K36146–CA, Folsom Dam Safety and
Flood Damage Reduction Project,
Addressing Hydrologic, Seismic,
Static, and Flood Management Issues,
Sacramento, El Dorado, and Placer
Counties, CA.
Summary: EPA continues to express
environmental concern about potential
water quality impacts from future
actions associated with this project.
EIS No. 20070127, ERP No. F–NPS–
C80015–00, Ellis Island and Statue of
Liberty National Monument
Development Concept Plan, LongTerm Rehabilitation and Reuse for
Historic Buildings, Implementation,
New York Harbor, NY and NJ.
Summary: EPA does not anticipate
that implementation of the preferred
alternative will result in significant
adverse impacts to the environment.
EIS No. 20070138, ERP No. F–NPS–
F61023–OH, Dayton Aviation
Heritage National Historical Park,
General Management Plan
Amendment, Implementation,
Dayton, OH.
Summary: EPA’s previous issues have
been resolved; therefore, EPA does not
object to the proposed action.
EIS No. 20070102, ERP No. FS–COE–
G11035–00, PROGRAMMATIC—Fort
Bliss Texas and New Mexico Mission
and Master Plan, To Modify Current
Land Use, EL Paso, TX and Dona Ana
and Otero Counties, NM.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20070167, ERP No. FS–AFS–
F65047–IN, German Ridge Restoration
Project, New Information on 2006
Land and Resource Management Plan
and on the Inadequate Effects
Analysis, Implementation, Hoosier
National Forest, Tell City Ranger
District, Perry County, IN.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:06 May 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
Summary: EPA’s previous issues have
been resolved; therefore, EPA does not
object to the proposed action.
Dated: May 15, 2007.
Ken Mittelholtz,
Environmental Protection Specialist, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E7–9589 Filed 5–17–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6686–9]
Environmental Impacts Statements;
Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–7167 or https://www.epa.gov/
compliance/nepa/. Weekly receipt of
Environmental Impact Statements filed
05/07/2007 through 05/11/2007
pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 20070183, Final EIS, FHW, CA,
Big Bear Lake Bridge Replacement
Project, near Big Bear Lake on CA–18
from Kilopost 71.1/71.9, Realignment
and Widening Roadways, U.S. COE
Section 404 Permit, Funding, San
Bernardino National Forest, San
Bernardino County, CA, Wait Period
Ends: 06/18/2007, Contact: Tay Dam
213–202–3954.
EIS No. 20070184, Draft EIS, AFS, MT,
North Bridger Allotment Management
Plan Update, Proposal to Update
Allotment Management Plan on 11
Livestock Grazing Allotments,
Baseman Ranger District, Gallanting
National Forest, Gallanting County,
MT, Comment Period Ends: 07/02/
2007, Contact: John Councilman 406–
522–2533.
EIS No. 20070185, Draft EIS, FHW, GA,
Northwest I–75/I–575 Corridor
Project, Transportation
Improvements, Funding, Cobb and
Cherokee Counties, GA, Comment
Period Ends: 07/13/2007, Contact:
Wayne Fedora 404–562–3651.
EIS No. 20070186, Final EIS, SFW, AZ,
Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife
Refuge, Comprehensive Conservation
Plan, Wilderness Stewardship Plan,
Implementation, Ago, AZ, Wait
Period Ends: 06/18/2007, Contact:
John Slowed 505–248–7458.
EIS No. 20070187, Draft EIS, COE, TX,
Calhoun County Navigation District’s
(CCD), Proposed Matagorda Ship
Channel Improvement Project to
Widened and Deepen Berthing
Facilities, U.S. Army COE Section 10
and 404 Permits, Calhoun and
Matagorda Counties, TX, Comment
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Period Ends: 07/02/2007, Contact:
Denise Sloan 409–766–3962.
EIS No. 20070188, Draft EIS, FHW, NY,
Fort Drum Connector Route Project,
Proposed Link between I–81 and U.S.
Route 11 at the Fort Drum North Gate,
Town of Le Ray and Pamelia,
Jefferson County, NY, Comment
Period Ends: 07/02/2007 Contact:
Robert E. Arnold 518–431–4127.
EIS No. 20070189, Final EIS, NRS, WV,
Dunloup Creek Watershed Plan,
Voluntary Floodplain Buyout,
Implementation, West Virginia Third
Congressional District, Fayette and
Raleigh Counties, WV, Wait Period
Ends: 06/18/2007, Contact: Kevin
Wickey 304–284–7540.
EIS No. 20070190, Draft EIS, AFS, MT,
Lolo National Forest Integrated Weed
Management, To Establish Beneficial
Vegetation and Weed Resistant Plant
Communities, Missoula, Mineral,
Sanders, Granite, Powell, Lewis and
Clark, Flathead, Ravalli and Lake
Counties, MT, Comment Period Ends:
07/02/2007, Contact: Andy Kulla 406–
329–3962.
EIS No. 20070191, Final EIS, FAA, NM,
Adoption—New Mexico Training
Initiative, Proposal to Modify the
Training Airspace New Cannon Air
Force Base (AFB), NM, Contact: Nan
Terry 817–222–5594.
US DOT/FAA adopted the U.S. DOD/
UAF Final EIS 20060429 filed 10/13/
2006. FAA was a cooperating agency on
the project. Recirculation on the
document is not necessary under
1506.3(b) of the CEQ Regulations.
EIS No. 20070192, Final EIS, AFS, NM,
Buckman Water Diversion Project,
Proposal to Divert Water from Rio
Grande and San Juan-Chama Project,
To Meet Water Supply Needs, Sante
Fe National Forest and Taos Field
Office, Sante Fe County, NM, Wait
Period Ends: 06/18/2007, Contact:
Sanford Hurlocker 505–753–7331.
EIS No. 20070193, Final Supplement,
FAA, LA, ADOPTION—Realistic
Bomber Training Initiative, Addresses
Impacts of Wake Vortices on Surface
Structures, Dyess Air Force Base, TX
and Barksdale Air Force Base, LA,
Contact: Nan Terry 817–222–5594.
US DOT/FAA adopted the U.S. DOD/
UAF Final Supplemental EIS 20060334
filed 8/04/2006. FAA was a cooperating
agency on the project. Recirculation on
the document is not necessary under
1506.3(b) of the CEQ Regulations.
Amended Notices
EIS No. 20070119, Draft EIS, NOA, AK,
Programmatic—Outer Continental
Shelf Seismic Surveys in the Beaufort
and Chukchi Seas, Proposed Offshore
E:\FR\FM\18MYN1.SGM
18MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 96 (Friday, May 18, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28043-28044]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9589]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-6687-1]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended.
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of
Federal Activities at 202-564-7167.
An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental
impact statements (EISs) was published in the Federal Register dated
April 6, 2007 (72 FR 17156).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20070003, ERP No. D-AFS-L65530-AK, Tongass Land and Resource
Management Plan, Plan Amendment, Implementation, Tongass National
Forest, AK.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about impacts to
water quality and aquatic and terrestrial habitats. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20070019, ERP No. D-FHW-G40192-TX, Grand Parkway/State Highway
99 Improvement Project, Segment G, from Interstate Highway (IH) 45 to
US 59, Funding, Right-of-Way Grant, U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permit,
Harris and Montgomery Counties, TX.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about impacts to
wetlands, streams, and air quality. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20070067, ERP No. D-SFW-C64004-PR, Vieques National Wildlife
Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan, Implementation, Vieques, PR.
Summary: EPA has no objection to the proposed management plan for
restoration and operation of new refuge on Vieques, PR. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20070073, ERP No. D-IBR-K39106-00, Colorado River Interim
Guidelines for Lower Basin Shortages and Coordinated Operations for
Lake Powell and Lake Mead, Implementation, Colorado River, CO and CA.
Summary EPA expressed environmental concerns about adverse impacts
of reduced water availability on beneficial uses and the need for
additional information on the effects of climate change, banking of
conserved water, and monitoring. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20060539, ERP No. DE-AFS-L65155-00, Northern Spotted Owl
Management Plan, Removal or the Modification to the Survey and Manage
Mitigation Measures, Standards and Guidelines (to the Northwest Forest
Plan), Addresses the Effects of an Additional No-Action Alternative to
the (July 2006) Draft Supplement and to the (2004) Final Supplemental
EIS, Northwest Forest Plan, OR, WA, and CA.
Summary: EPA has no objection to the proposed project. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20070098, ERP No. DS-AFS-J65417-MT, Frenchtown Face Ecosystem
Restoration Project, Additional Information Maintenance and Improvement
of Forest Health, Risk Reduction of Damage Insects and Disease, Lolo
National Forest, Ninemile Ranger District, Missoula, MT.
Summary: While EPA expressed environmental concerns about short-
term effects to 303(d) listed waters, we believe that watershed
restoration activities included in the project would likely result in
overall water quality improvement in the long-term. Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20070129, ERP No. DS-NOA-A91061-00, Atlantic Mackerel, Squid
and Butterfish, Fishery Management Plan, Amendment 9,
Implementation, Essential Fish Habitat (EFH), Exclusive Economic
Zone(EEZ).
Summary: EPA has no objection to the proposed action. Rating LO.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20070035, ERP No. F-RUS-J03019-MT, Highwood Generating Station,
250-megawatt Coal Fired Power Plant and 6MW of Wind Generation at a
Site near Great Falls, Construction and Operation, Licenses Permit,
U.S. Army COE Section 10 Permit, Cascade County, MT.
Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about the potential
for visibility impairment to Class I wilderness areas, and recommended
the implementation of mitigation to reduce visibility impairments.
EIS No. 20070100, ERP No. F-AFS-J65448-UT, West Bear Vegetation
Management Project, Timber Harvesting, Prescribed Burning, Roads
Construction, Township 1 North, Range 9 East, Salt Lake Principle
Meridian, Evanston Ranger District, Wasatch-Cache National Forest,
Summit County, UT.
Summary: EPA continues to express concern about the need for an
effective environmental impact monitoring plan and an adaptive
management program.
EIS No. 20070107, ERP No. F-USA-G15000-TX, Fort Sam Houston, Texas
Project, Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Actions and Other
Transformation Activities, Implementation, City of San Antonio, TX.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20070108, ERP No. F-AFS-L65519-AK, Scratchings Timber Sale
Project, Timber Harvest up to Approximately 42 Million Board Feet,
Suemez Island, Craig Ranger District, Tongass National Forest, AK.
Summary: EPA continues to express environmental concerns about the
potential for cumulative adverse
[[Page 28044]]
impacts on water quality and high quality salmon fisheries, as well as
additional impacts to the Dolores watershed.
EIS No. 20070110, ERP No. F-FHW-F40432-MN, Trunk Highway 23
Improvements Project, From 0.25 Miles West of CSAH 6 in Kandiyohi
County to 0.3 Miles Southwest of CSAH 123 Stearns County, City of
Paynesville, Kandiyohi and Stearns Counties, MN.
Summary: EPA has environmental concerns about impacts to public
drinking water supply wells and the lack of specific mitigation
commitments. EPA recommends the ROD provides firm mitigation
commitments.
EIS No. 20070118, ERP No. F-IBR-K36146-CA, Folsom Dam Safety and Flood
Damage Reduction Project, Addressing Hydrologic, Seismic, Static, and
Flood Management Issues, Sacramento, El Dorado, and Placer Counties,
CA.
Summary: EPA continues to express environmental concern about
potential water quality impacts from future actions associated with
this project.
EIS No. 20070127, ERP No. F-NPS-C80015-00, Ellis Island and Statue of
Liberty National Monument Development Concept Plan, Long-Term
Rehabilitation and Reuse for Historic Buildings, Implementation, New
York Harbor, NY and NJ.
Summary: EPA does not anticipate that implementation of the
preferred alternative will result in significant adverse impacts to the
environment.
EIS No. 20070138, ERP No. F-NPS-F61023-OH, Dayton Aviation Heritage
National Historical Park, General Management Plan Amendment,
Implementation, Dayton, OH.
Summary: EPA's previous issues have been resolved; therefore, EPA
does not object to the proposed action.
EIS No. 20070102, ERP No. FS-COE-G11035-00, PROGRAMMATIC--Fort Bliss
Texas and New Mexico Mission and Master Plan, To Modify Current Land
Use, EL Paso, TX and Dona Ana and Otero Counties, NM.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
EIS No. 20070167, ERP No. FS-AFS-F65047-IN, German Ridge Restoration
Project, New Information on 2006 Land and Resource Management Plan and
on the Inadequate Effects Analysis, Implementation, Hoosier National
Forest, Tell City Ranger District, Perry County, IN.
Summary: EPA's previous issues have been resolved; therefore, EPA
does not object to the proposed action.
Dated: May 15, 2007.
Ken Mittelholtz,
Environmental Protection Specialist, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E7-9589 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P