General Administrative Regulations; Administrative Remedies for Non-Compliance, 27981-27988 [E7-9418]
Download as PDF
27981
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 96
Friday, May 18, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
RIN 0563–AB73
General Administrative Regulations;
Administrative Remedies for NonCompliance
Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation (FCIC) proposes to amend 7
CFR part 400, subpart R to clarify
existing administrative remedies, add
additional administrative remedies that
are available as a result of enactment of
section 515(h) of the Federal Crop
Insurance Act (Act) (7 U.S.C. 1515(h)),
and make such other changes as are
necessary to implement the provisions
of section 515(h) of the Act.
DATES: Written comments and opinions
on this proposed rule will be accepted
until close of business on June 18, 2007
and will be considered when the rule is
to be made final.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit comments, titled
‘‘Administrative Remedies for NonCompliance’’, by any of the following
methods:
∑ By Mail to: Deputy Administrator
for Compliance, Risk Management
Agency, United States Department of
Agriculture, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Stop 0806, Washington,
DC 20250–0806.
∑ E-mail:
cynthia.simpson@rma.usda.gov.
∑ Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
∑ A copy of each response will be
available for public inspection and
copying from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., EST,
Monday through Friday, except
holidays, at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Hand, Deputy Administrator
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 May 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be
non significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore,
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This rule does not constitute a
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35).
7 CFR Part 400
SUMMARY:
for Compliance, at the address listed
above, telephone (202) 720–0642.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) establishes
requirements for Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
This rule contains no Federal mandates
(under the regulatory provisions of title
II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section
1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have
sufficient implications to warrant
consultation with the States. The
provisions contained in this rule will
not have a substantial direct effect on
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. All similarly situated
participants are required to comply with
the same standard of conduct contained
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in the Act, the regulations published at
7 CFR chapter IV, the crop policies, and
the applicable procedures. For example,
any producer, whether growing 10 acres
or 10,000 acres, submits the same
documentation for insurance and for a
claim. All agents, whether selling and
servicing five policies or a hundred and
five policies, are required to perform the
same tasks for each. The consequences
for failure to comply with the standards
of conduct are also the same for all
participants and other persons
regardless of the size of their business.
A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has
not been prepared since this regulation
does not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
and, therefore, this regulation is exempt
from the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance under
No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which require intergovernmental
consultation with State and local
officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR
part 3015, subpart V, published at 48 FR
29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
in accordance with Executive Order
12988 on civil justice reform. The
provisions of this rule will not have a
retroactive effect. The provisions of this
rule will preempt State and local laws
to the extent such State and local laws
are inconsistent herewith.
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on the
quality of the human environment,
health, and safety. Therefore, neither an
Environmental Assessment nor an
Environmental Impact Statement is
needed.
Background
Prior to the enactment of the
Agricultural Risk Protection Act of 2000
(ARPA), pursuant to section 506(n) of
the Act (7 U.S.C. 1506(n)), FCIC had the
election of disqualifying or imposing a
$10,000 civil fine on a person who
willfully and intentionally made a false
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
27982
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 96 / Friday, May 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
statement. With respect to the
disqualification, the person was only
disqualified from purchasing crop
insurance or receiving noninsured crop
disaster assistance (NAP) benefits. This
meant the disqualification was only
effective against producers and it would
not apply to other program participants
such as agents, loss adjusters, approved
insurance providers or their employees
or contractors or other persons who may
provide information to a program
participant. With respect to the
imposition of civil fines, either the fine
was insignificant in relation to the
wrongful conduct or in many cases the
person did not have the assets or
resources to pay the fine so its
imposition was meaningless.
Through the enactment of section
515(h) of the Act in ARPA, Congress
significantly strengthened FCIC’s ability
to combat fraud, waste and abuse by
establishing a strong system of
administrative actions that are now
applicable to all participants in the
Federal crop insurance program. Now,
producers, agents, loss adjusters,
approved insurance providers and their
employees and contractors, and any
other persons who willfully and
intentionally provide any false or
inaccurate information to FCIC or to an
approved insurance provider with
respect to a policy or plan of insurance
are subject to remedial administrative
remedies.
If disqualified, participants in the
Federal crop insurance program will be
precluded from such participation. This
means producers will not be able to
insure their crops, agents and loss
adjusters will no longer be able sell,
service or adjust crop insurance
policies, approved insurance providers
would be precluded from holding
reinsurance agreements related to
insurance offered under the authority of
the Act, and other persons, employees
or contractors of approved insurance
providers will not be able to purchase
crop insurance or be affiliated with any
entity participating in the crop
insurance program for the period of
disqualification.
In addition to disqualification from
participating in the Federal crop
insurance program, producers will be
disqualified from receiving benefits
under the Agricultural Market
Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.),
including NAP; the Agricultural Act of
1949 (7 U.S.C. 1421 et seq.); the
Commodity Credit Corporation Charter
Act (15 U.S.C. 714 et seq.); the
Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 (7
U.S.C. 1281 et seq.); Title XII of the
Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C.
3801 et seq.); the Consolidated Farm
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 May 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C.
1921 et seq.); and any law that provides
assistance to a producer of an
agricultural commodity affected by a
crop loss or a decline in the prices of
agricultural commodities. This will
allow greater protection of the interests
of the government by preventing
persons that commit wrongful acts in
one governmental program from
receiving program benefits from other
governmental programs.
Section 515(h) of the Act also
authorizes disqualification of producers,
agents, loss adjusters, approved
insurance providers and their
employees and contractors, and other
persons if such person willfully and
intentionally fails to comply with a
requirement of FCIC. One purpose of
this proposed rule is to define what
constitutes a ‘‘requirement of FCIC.’’
In addition, civil fines have been
increased. Previously only a civil fine of
$10,000 could be imposed, regardless of
how many times the person willfully
and intentionally submits false or
inaccurate information or fails to
comply with a requirement of FCIC.
Now a civil fine can be imposed for
each violation and the civil fine is the
greater of $10,000 or the amount of
pecuniary gain obtained as a result of
the false or inaccurate information
provided or the noncompliance with a
requirement of the Act. For example, a
producer that submits a false claim for
indemnity and collects $50,000 can be
required to repay the $50,000
overpayment and an additional $50,000
in a civil fine, for a total of $100,000
owed, or an agent that submitted 20
false production reports that increased
the amount of indemnities producers
collected by $8,000 per producer can be
required to pay a civil fine of $200,000.
Like the previous administrative
sanction provisions, the gravity of the
violation must be taken into
consideration when determining the
appropriate term of disqualification or
civil fine.
The proposed changes to subpart R
are as follows:
2. Section 400.451—General
1. Heading
3. Section 400.452—Definitions
FCIC is proposing to replace the
heading ‘‘Subpart R—Sanctions’’ with
‘‘Administrative Remedies for NonCompliance’’. FCIC’s policy underlying
administrative actions is the protection
of the public interest from potential
harm from persons who have abused the
program, maintaining program integrity,
and fostering public confidence in the
program. Therefore, ‘‘Administrative
Remedies for Non-Compliance’’ is a
more accurate title for this subpart.
FCIC is proposing to add definitions
for terms used in subpart R.
Specifically, definitions have been
added for the terms ‘‘Act,’’ ‘‘agency,’’
‘‘agent,’’ ‘‘approved insurance
provider,’’ ‘‘affiliate,’’ ‘‘agricultural
commodity,’’ ‘‘FCIC,’’ ‘‘managing
general agent,’’ ‘‘participant,’’ ‘‘person,’’
‘‘policy,’’ ‘‘preponderance of the
evidence,’’ ‘‘principal,’’ ‘‘producer,’’
‘‘requirement of FCIC,’’ ‘‘Standard
Reinsurance Agreement,’’ ‘‘violation,’’
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph
(a) to add a reference to section 515(h)
of the Act, which authorizes
disqualifications and civil fines.
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph
(b) to add the other program participants
and other persons now covered under
section 515(h) of the Act, including
producers, agents, loss adjusters,
approved insurance providers and their
employees and contractors, and other
persons who may submit information
related to the Federal crop insurance
program. In the past, administrative
remedies for the most part targeted a
limited segment of wrongdoers in the
crop insurance industry, the producer,
and there were often inadequate
administrative remedies applicable to
other persons who committed fraud,
waste, and abuse in the Federal crop
insurance program. As a result of the
enactment of section 515(h) of the Act,
administrative sanctions are now
applicable to all program participants
and persons who may provide
information related to the crop
insurance program.
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph
(c) to make minor editorial changes for
clarity.
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph
(d) to clarify that with respect to the
submission of false or inaccurate
statement, this rule is applicable to such
conduct occurring after June 20, 2000,
and with respect to failure to comply
with a requirement of FCIC, this rule is
applicable to such conduct occurring on
and after the date this rule becomes
effective.
FCIC is proposing to add a new
paragraph (e) to clarify that the purpose
of the remedial actions authorized in
this subpart are for the protection of the
public interest from potential harm from
persons who have abused the Federal
crop insurance program, maintaining
program integrity, and fostering public
confidence in the program. The
Government does not want to do
business with persons who abuse its
programs.
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 96 / Friday, May 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
and ‘‘willful and intentional.’’ Given
that the remedial actions apply to all
participants in the Federal crop
insurance program, it is necessary to
identify who qualifies as participants,
such as producers, agencies, agents,
approved insurance providers, and
managing general agents since such
persons or entities are now subject to
the remedial actions in this subpart. The
remedial actions can also apply to
persons who are not participating in the
Federal crop insurance program, but
provide information that constitutes a
willful and intentional violation so such
persons must also be identified. In
addition, it is necessary to define a
‘‘requirement of FCIC’’ to distinguish
requirements of FCIC that may be
contained in policy, the Standard
Reinsurance Agreement or procedure,
for which there are generally adequate
remedies available for the breach, from
violations of requirements, such as
cease and desist letters, letters or
memoranda requiring that specific
action be taken, or violations of policy,
the Standard Reinsurance Agreement or
procedure so egregious that remedial
action is appropriate. Further,
disqualification and civil fines are
imposed upon a showing of a willful
and intentional violation. Therefore, it
is necessary to specify what constitutes
willful and intentional conduct. It is
also important that the standard of proof
be identified for disqualifications and
civil fines. Preponderance of the
evidence was determined to be
appropriate because this is the standard
most commonly used by the government
for imposition of similar administrative
remedies. Most of the definitions will
refer to terms and definitions contained
in other regulations, such as the
Common Crop Insurance Policy Basic
Provisions (7 CFR 457.8) to ensure
consistency and eliminate the need to
revise multiple regulations when the
definition is changed.
4. Section 400.454—Disqualification
and Civil Fines
FCIC is proposing to change the title
of section 400.454 ‘‘Civil penalties’’ and
to replace it with ‘‘Disqualification and
Civil Fines’’. The procedures related to
disqualifications have now been added
to the section, which should be reflected
in the title. Further, the Act now refers
to civil fines, not civil penalties.
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph
(a) to clarify that before any
disqualification or civil fine is imposed,
the participant or other person will have
the opportunity for a hearing on the
record. Proceedings will still be
initiated by a complaint filed by the
Manager of FCIC and the hearing will be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 May 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
before the Department’s Administrative
Law Judges in accordance with 7 CFR
part 1, subpart H.
In paragraph (a), FCIC is also
proposing to clarify the effective date of
disqualification. FCIC is proposing the
effective date of disqualification will be
the date specified in the order issued by
the Administrative Law Judge, Judicial
Officer, or settlement agreement. If no
date is specified in such documents, the
effective date will be the date the
disqualification order or settlement
agreement was issued or executed.
In paragraph (a), FCIC is also
proposing to use a standard of proof of
preponderance of the evidence for
disqualification and civil fines this is
the standard most commonly used by
the government for imposition of similar
administrative remedies. FCIC is also
proposing that disqualification and civil
fines may be imposed even if FCIC or
the approved insurance provider has not
sustained a financial loss. There may be
situations where the false statement or
other misconduct has the potential to
create losses or increase payments but
the act was discovered before the
payment could be made. There may also
be situations where the misconduct can
be used to collect a future indemnity,
such as falsely reporting high yields to
increase the guarantee and a possibility
of a future loss. The fact that any
information is falsely or inaccurately
reported adversely affects program
integrity and has the potential to create
a situation where the public loses
confidence in the program.
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph
(b) to include the situations in section
515(h) of the Act where disqualification
and civil fines may be imposed.
Disqualification and civil fines may be
imposed on a person based on either
willfully and intentionally: (1)
Providing false or inaccurate
information; or (2) failing to comply
with a requirement of FCIC. FCIC is
proposing to clarify that the false or
inaccurate information can be provided
either through action (for example,
falsely reporting the number of acres
planted) or omission to act when there
is knowledge that false or inaccurate
information has or will be provided and
no action is taken to prevent it (for
example, the agent knows the planted
acreage has been falsely reported and
still submits the acreage reports with the
false information). FCIC has determined
that persons who knowingly allow false
or inaccurate statements to be provided
by others affect the program just as
adversely as those who made the false
or inaccurate statement in the first
place.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27983
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph
(c) to specify the standards that will be
applied when FCIC considers imposing
a disqualification or civil fine. The
gravity of the violation will be
considered when determining whether
to impose a disqualification or civil fine,
the length of the disqualification or the
amount, if any, of any civil fine. FCIC
is also proposing that the maximum be
imposed where there have been
multiple violations in the same crop
year or over several crop years, or a
single violation that results in an
overpayment of at least $100,000 or
multiple acts of wrongdoings resulting
in an overpayment in excess of
$100,000. FCIC has determined that
such conduct is so harmful to the
program that the maximum remedial
action is appropriate. However, these
criteria are not all-inclusive and there
may be other circumstances where the
maximum actions are appropriate.
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph
(d) to allow FCIC to impute the
improper conduct of a person to another
person, if such other person knew or
should have known of the improper
conduct, has the power to direct,
manage, control or influence the
activities of the person, participated in
the improper conduct, or the improper
conduct occurred in the connection
with the person’s duties on behalf of the
person to whom the conduct is imputed
or with such persons approval or
acquiescence. There are situations
where the person who provided the
false or inaccurate information has been
directed to do so by another person, a
person participates in providing false or
inaccurate information, such as
obtaining the false information and
passing it on to the person to provide to
an approved insurance provider, or a
person knows that false or inaccurate
information is being provided and does
nothing to stop it. The conduct of the
person who directed the conduct,
participated in providing it, or allowed
it to be provided is just as detrimental
to the crop insurance program.
Therefore, to protect the public interest,
such persons should also be disqualified
or have civil fines imposed. This is the
same as the imputing of conduct
permitted with respect to suspensions
and debarments under 7 CFR 3017.
Disqualifications
FCIC proposes to revise paragraph (e)
to incorporate the expanded range of
administrative remedies made available
under section 515(h) of the Act to
include those that are applicable to: (1)
Producers, which precludes many of the
benefits provided to producers under
other farm programs offered by the
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
27984
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 96 / Friday, May 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Department; and (2) to other
participants in the Federal crop
insurance program and any other person
who may provide information regarding
the insured agricultural commodity,
which precludes such participants or
persons from participating in the
Federal crop insurance program and
receiving any benefit under the Act.
This means such participants or persons
could no longer hold a reinsurance
agreement or be involved in any way in
the sale, service or loss adjustment of a
crop insurance policy and would also be
precluded from purchasing a crop
insurance policy or receiving any
subsidy authorized under the Act.
In paragraph (e), FCIC is also
proposing to specify that
disqualifications are for a period of not
less than one year and not greater than
five years from the date the
disqualification is effective.
Disqualifications of less than one year
could be meaningless because existing
policies can only be terminated at the
next termination date. Disqualifications
of less than one year could begin and
end within the insurance period thereby
making the disqualifications
meaningless. Therefore, FCIC has
determined that one year is the least
period that could be effective.
In addition, in paragraph (e) FCIC is
proposing that disqualifications be
imposed in one-year increments up to
the maximum of five years. Most of the
crop insurance policies and reinsurance
agreements are in effect for one year.
Disqualifications of different periods,
such as 18 months, would be
burdensome and create additional
complexities in determining when
persons are eligible again to participate
in the program.
In paragraph (e) FCIC is also
proposing to specify that the names of
all persons who are disqualified will be
placed into FCIC’s Ineligible Tracking
System (ITS) and reported to the U.S.
General Services Administration (GSA)
in accordance with 7 CFR part 3017.
GSA publishes a list of all persons who
are determined ineligible in its
Excluded Parties List System (EPLS).
FCIC is also proposing to specify that if
a person is doing business with a
disqualified person, such person may
also be subject disqualification. FCIC
does not want to allow persons who
have been disqualified to still
participate in the program through the
association with another person. FCIC
also proposes to make it the
responsibility of a person who
participates in the Federal crop
insurance program to routinely review
ITS and EPLS to ensure that the person
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 May 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
is not doing business with a disqualified
person.
Civil Fines
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph
(f) to specify that, in accordance with
section 515(h) of the Act, the amount of
civil fines will not exceed the greater of
the amount of monetary gain or $10,000.
In addition, in accordance with section
515(h) of the Act, FCIC is proposing that
the civil fine will be imposed for each
violation. FCIC is also proposing to
clarify that a civil fine is a debt owed
to FCIC and that the civil fine must be
paid by the due date specified in the
order issued by the Administrative Law
Judge or Judicial Officer, as applicable,
or the settlement agreement, or, if no
due date is specified, it shall be 30 days
after the date the order was issued or the
settlement agreement signed by FCIC.
This is to clarify that even though the
amount of monetary gain may be owed
to another person, for example, overpaid
indemnity is owed to the approved
insurance provider, the civil fine is
always owed to FCIC. Further, there
must be a due date because FCIC is
proposing that failure to pay by the due
date can subject the person to
ineligibility to participate in the
program. This is to provide a
meaningful consequence for failure to
comply with their responsibility to
timely pay their civil fine. Without such
consequences, persons may delay
forever the payment of such fines.
In paragraph (f), FCIC also proposes to
specify that a civil fine imposed under
this section is in addition to any debt
that may be owed to FCIC or to any
approved insurance provider, such as an
overpaid indemnity, underpaid
premium, or other amounts owed. This
is necessary to distinguish between the
civil fine, which could equal the
amount owed, and the other amount
owed. For example, if the producer was
overpaid $12,000 and a civil fine of
$12,000 is imposed, the producer owes
a total of $24,000. FCIC is also
proposing to specify that, in its sole
discretion, FCIC may settle any civil
fine imposed if it considers it
appropriate or in the best interest of the
USDA.
In paragraph (f), FCIC is also
proposing to specify that the
ineligibility procedures established in
subpart U are not applicable to
ineligibility determinations for
nonpayment of civil fines. This is
necessary because subpart U applies to
producers and there could be confusion
regarding which procedures apply. FCIC
is also proposing to specify that failure
to timely pay a civil fine will make a
person ineligible for further benefits
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
under the Act until the civil fine is paid
in full.
FCIC proposed to add a new
paragraph (g) that specifies the
consequences of disqualification or if a
person fails to timely pay the civil fines.
FCIC is proposing that with respect to
producers, all existing policies will
automatically terminate as of the next
termination date and that new
application cannot be made until the
next sales closing date after the period
of disqualification has ended and the
civil fine is paid in full. This is
consistent with the requirements of
other types of ineligibility and is
necessary under the terms of the policy.
With respect to all other persons, FCIC
is proposing that such persons cannot
be involved in any way with the crop
insurance program. Further, if the
person is an agent or agency, FCIC is
proposing to require that the approved
insurance provider assign the book to
another agent or agency during the
period of disqualification or
ineligibility. This will ensure the
continued, uninterrupted service of the
policy. If the person is an approved
insurance provider, FCIC is proposing
that the approved insurance provider be
precluded from selling any new policies
or renewing any existing policies during
the period of disqualification or
ineligibility. FCIC has made this similar
to a suspension under its reinsurance
agreements because FCIC wants to make
sure that there is uninterrupted service
for all existing policies during the crop
year, but that such policies be cancelled
and transferred for subsequent crop
years if the period of disqualification or
ineligibility is still ongoing.
FCIC is proposing to add a new
paragraph (h) that specifies that the
imposition of disqualification or a civil
fine under this section is in addition to
any other administrative or legal
remedies available under this section or
other applicable law including, but not
limited to, debarment and suspension.
Other remedies may serve a different
purpose or have different consequences
and may be equally appropriate for the
wrongful conduct.
5. Section 400.455—Governmentwide
Debarment and Suspension
(Procurement)
FCIC is proposing to delete paragraph
(a) because it does not add to the
content or clarity of the provision.
FCIC is proposing to redesignate
paragraph (b) as paragraph (a) and revise
it to correct the cross references and
better specify that the Federal
Acquisition Regulation will be applied
in debarment and suspension
proceedings involving procurement
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 96 / Friday, May 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
transactions and that the FCIC’s
Manager will have the authority to
suspend or debar any person under this
provision.
FCIC is proposing to redesignate
paragraph (c) as paragraph (b) and revise
it to clarify that if suspended or
debarred, the person may not contract
with FCIC or the Risk Management
Agency. This change is necessary
because the Risk Management Agency
administers the crop insurance program
on behalf of FCIC. FCIC has also made
other minor editorial changes for clarity
and consistency.
6. Section 400.456—Governmentwide
Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement)
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
7. Section 400.457—Program Fraud
Civil Remedies Act
FCIC is proposing to add new
paragraph (d) to specify that civil fines
and assessments imposed under this
provision are in addition to any other
remedies provided by law or imposed
under this subpart. This paragraph was
added to for clarification of how this
statute interacts with other laws and
regulations.
8. Section 400.458—Scheme or Device
FCIC is proposing to delete paragraph
(b)(2) because the nonstandard
classification system is no longer used
15:31 May 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
9. Section 400.459—Indebtedness
FCIC is proposing to remove this
section from subpart R. The
consequences for failure to pay a civil
fine have been included in section
400.454. With respect to any other debt,
the provisions in the policy and 7 CFR
part 400, subpart U apply. Therefore,
this provision is no longer needed.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 400
Administrative practice and
procedure, Penalties.
Proposed Rule
FCIC is proposing to delete paragraph
(a) because it does not add to the
content or clarity of the provision.
FCIC is proposing to redesignate
paragraph (b) as paragraph (a) and revise
it to clarify that suspensions and
debarments will be done in accordance
with 7 CFR part 3017.
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph
(b) to specify the effects of suspension
and debarment involving nonprocurement transactions. FCIC is
proposing that if suspended or debarred,
the person may not contract with FCIC
or the Risk Management Agency. FCIC
is also proposing that if the person is
suspended or debarred, the person
cannot contract with an approved
insurance provider or its contractors.
This is consistent with the provisions in
7 CFR 3017 that participants in the crop
insurance program cannot do business
with debarred or disqualified persons.
FCIC is proposing that FCIC have the
discretion to waive the provisions if the
approved insurance provider has taken
sufficient action to ensure that the
suspended or debarred person will not
be involved in any way with the crop
insurance program or receive any
benefits from any program under the
Act.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
by FCIC and redesignate paragraph
(b)(3) as paragraph (b)(2).
Accordingly, as set forth in the
preamble, the Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation proposes to amend 7 CFR
part 400 as follows:
policies, contracts, reinsurance
agreements, or other applicable statutes
and regulations.
(d) With respect to the submission of
a false or inaccurate statement, this rule
is applicable to any act or omission
occurring after June 20, 2000, and with
respect to failure to comply with a
requirement of FCIC, this rule is
applicable to any act or omission
occurring on and after the date this rule
becomes effective.
(e) The purpose of the remedial
actions authorized in this subpart are for
the protection of the public interest
from potential harm from persons who
have abused the Federal crop insurance
program, maintaining program integrity,
and fostering public confidence in the
program.
4. Revise § 400.452 to read as follows:
§ 400.452
PART 400—GENERAL
ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS
1. Revise the authority citation for 7
CFR 400, subpart R to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l) and 7 U.S.C.
1515(h).
Subpart R—Administrative Remedies
for Non-Compliance
2. Revise the heading for subpart R to
read as set forth above.
3. Revise § 400.451 to read as follows:
§ 400.451
General.
(a) FCIC has implemented a system of
administrative remedies to ensure
program compliance and prevention of
fraud, waste, and abuse within the
Federal crop insurance program. Such
remedies include civil fines and
disqualifications under the authority of
section 515(h) of the Act (7 U.S.C.
1515(h)); government-wide suspension
and debarment under the authority of 48
CFR part 9, 48 CFR part 409, and 7 CFR
part 3017; and civil fines and
assessments under the authority of the
Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act (31
U.S.C. 3801–3812).
(b) The provisions of this subpart
apply to all participants in the Federal
crop insurance program, including but
not limited to producers, agents, loss
adjusters, approved insurance providers
and their employees or contractors, as
well as any other persons who may
provide information to a program
participant and meet the elements for
imposition of one or more
administrative remedies contained in
this subpart.
(c) Any remedial action taken
pursuant to this subpart is in addition
to any other actions specifically
provided in applicable crop insurance
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27985
Definitions.
Act. Has the same meaning as the
term in section 1 of the Common Crop
Insurance Policy Basic Provisions (7
CFR 457.8).
Affiliate. Persons are affiliates of each
other if, directly or indirectly, either one
controls or has the power to control the
other, or, a third person controls or has
the power to control both. Indicia of
control include, but are not limited to:
interlocking management or ownership,
identity of interests among family
members, shared facilities and
equipment, common use of employees,
or a business entity organized following
the disqualification, suspension or
debarment of a person which has the
same or similar management,
ownership, or principal employees as
the disqualified, suspended, debarred,
ineligible, or voluntarily excluded
person.
Agency. The person authorized by an
approved insurance provider, or its
designee, to sell and service a crop
insurance policy under the Federal crop
insurance program.
Agent. Has the same meaning as the
term in 7 CFR 400.701.
Agricultural commodity. Has the same
meaning as the term in section 1 of the
Common Crop Insurance Policy Basic
Provisions (7 CFR 457.8).
Approved insurance provider. Has the
same meaning as the term in 7 CFR
400.701.
FCIC. Has the same meaning as the
term in 7 CFR 400.701.
Managing General Agent. Has the
same meaning as the term in 7 CFR
400.701.
Participant. Any person who obtains
any benefit that is derived in whole or
in part from funds paid by FCIC to the
approved insurance provider or
premium paid by the producer.
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
27986
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 96 / Friday, May 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Participants include but are not limited
to producers, agents, loss adjusters,
agencies, managing general agencies,
approved insurance providers, and any
person associated with the approved
insurance provider through
employment, contract, or agreement.
Person. An individual, partnership,
association, corporation, estate, trust or
other legal entity, any affiliate or
principal thereof, and whenever
applicable, a State or political
subdivision or agency of a State.
‘‘Person’’ does not include the United
States Government or any of its
agencies.
Policy. Has the same meaning as the
term in section 1 of the Common Crop
Insurance Policy Basic Provisions (7
CFR 457.8).
Preponderance of the evidence.
Evidence which is of greater weight or
more convincing than the evidence
which is offered in opposition to it; that
is, evidence which as a whole shows
that the fact sought to be proved is more
probable than not.
Principal. A person who is an officer,
director, owner, partner, key employee,
or other person within an entity with
primary management or supervisory
responsibilities; or a person who has a
critical influence on or substantive
control over the activities of the entity.
Producer. A person engaged in
producing an agricultural commodity
for a share of the insured crop, or the
proceeds thereof.
Reinsurance agreement. Has the same
meaning as the term in 7 CFR 400.161,
except that such agreement is only
between FCIC and the approved
insurance provider.
Requirement of FCIC. Includes, but is
not limited to, any regulation,
procedure, policy provision,
reinsurance agreement, or other written
communication from FCIC that requires
a particular program participant or
group of program participants to take a
specific action or to cease and desist
from a taking a specific action. General
regulations procedures, policy
provisions, or reinsurance agreements
for which there is a remedy provided in
such document for the breach will not
be considered a requirement of FCIC
unless such breach arises to the level
where remedial action is appropriate
(For example, multiple breaches of the
same provision in separate policies or
the procedures or multiple breaches of
different provisions in the same policy
or procedure).
Violation. Each act or omission by a
person that satisfies all required
elements for the imposition of a
disqualification or a civil fine under this
subpart.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 May 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
Willful and intentional. To make a
false or inaccurate statement with the
knowledge that the statement is false or
inaccurate at the time the statement was
made; the failure to correct the false or
inaccurate statement when its nature
becomes known to the person who
made it; or to commit an act or omission
with the knowledge that the act or
omission is not in compliance with a
‘‘requirement of FCIC’’ at the time the
act or omission occurred. No showing of
malicious intent is necessary.
5. Revise § 400.454 to read as follows:
§ 400.454
Disqualification and civil fines.
(a) Before any disqualification or civil
fine is imposed, FCIC will provide the
affected participants and other persons
with notice and an opportunity for a
hearing on the record in accordance
with 7 CFR part 1, subpart H.
(1) Proceedings will be initiated when
the Manager of FCIC files a complaint
with the Hearing Clerk, United States
Department of Agriculture.
(2) Disqualifications become effective:
(i) On the date specified in the order
issued by the Administrative Law Judge
or Judicial Officer, as applicable, or if no
date is specified in the order, the date
that the order was issued.
(ii) With respect to a settlement
agreement with FCIC, the date
contained in the settlement agreement
or, if no date is specified, the date that
such agreement is executed by FCIC.
(3) Disqualification and civil fines
may only be imposed if a
preponderance of the evidence shows
that the participant or other person has
met the standards contained in
§ 400.454(b).
(4) Disqualification and civil fines
may be imposed regardless of whether
FCIC or the approved insurance
provider has suffered any monetary
losses.
(b) Disqualification and civil fines
may be imposed on any participant or
person who willfully and intentionally:
(1) Provides any false or inaccurate
information to FCIC or to any approved
insurance provider with respect to a
policy or plan of insurance authorized
under the Act either through action or
omission to act when there is
knowledge that false or inaccurate
information is or will be provided; or
(2) Fails to comply with a requirement
of FCIC.
(c) When imposing any
disqualification or civil fine,
(1) The gravity of the violation must
be considered when determining:
(i) Whether to disqualify a participant
or other person;
(ii) The amount of time that a
participant or other person should be
disqualified;
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(iii) Whether to impose a civil fine;
and
(iv) The amount of a civil fine that
should be imposed.
(2) The maximum term of
disqualification and civil fines will be
imposed against participants and other
persons who:
(i) Commit multiple violations in the
same crop year or over several crop
years; or
(ii) Commit a single violation but such
violation results in an overpayment of
more than $100,000 or multiple acts of
wrongdoings resulting in an
overpayment in excess of $100,000.
(iii) Commit such other action or
omission of so serious a nature that
imposition of the maximum is
appropriate.
(d) With respect to the imputing of
conduct:
(1) The conduct of any officer,
director, shareholder, partner,
employee, or other individual
associated with an organization, in
violation of § 400.454(b) may be
imputed to that organization when such
conduct occurred in connection with
the individual’s performance of duties
for or on behalf of that organization, or
with the organization’s knowledge,
approval or acquiescence. The
organization’s acceptance of the benefits
derived from the violation is evidence of
knowledge, approval or acquiescence.
(2) The conduct of any organization in
violation of § 400.454(b) may be
imputed to an individual, or from one
individual to another individual, if the
individual to whom the improper
conduct is imputed either participated
in, had knowledge of, or reason to know
of such conduct.
(3) The conduct of one organization in
violation of § 400.454(b) may be
imputed to another organization when
such conduct occurred in connection
with a partnership, joint venture, joint
application, association or similar
arrangement, or when the organization
to whom the improper conduct is
imputed has the power to direct,
manage, control or influence the
activities of the organization responsible
for the improper conduct. Acceptance of
the benefits derived from the conduct is
evidence of knowledge, approval or
acquiescence.
(4) If such conduct is imputed, the
person to whom the conduct is imputed
to may be subject to the same
disqualification and civil fines as the
person from whom the conduct is
imputed.
(e) With respect to disqualifications:
(1) If a person is disqualified and that
person is a:
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 96 / Friday, May 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(i) Producer, the producer will be
precluded from receiving any monetary
or non-monetary benefit provided under
all of the following authorities, or their
successors:
(A) The Act;
(B) The Agricultural Market
Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 7201, et seq.);
(C) The noninsured crop disaster
assistance program (7 U.S.C. 7333);
(D) The Agricultural Act of 1949 (7
U.S.C. 1421 et seq.);
(E) The Commodity Credit
Corporation Charter Act (15 U.S.C. 714
et seq.);
(F) The Agricultural Adjustment Act
of 1938 (7 U.S.C. 1281 et seq.);
(G) Title XII of the Food Security Act
of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.);
(H) The Consolidated Farm and Rural
Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1921, et
seq.); and
(I) Any law that provides assistance to
the producer of an agricultural
commodity affected by a crop loss or
decline in the prices of agricultural
commodities.
(ii) Participant or other person, other
than a producer, such participant or
person will be precluded from
participating in any way in the Federal
crop insurance program and receiving
any monetary or non-monetary benefit
under the Act.
(2) With respect to the term of
disqualification:
(i) The minimum term will be not less
than one year from the effective date
determined in § 400.454(a)(2);
(ii) The maximum term will be not
more than five years from the effective
date determined in § 400.454(a)(2); and
(iii) Disqualification is to be imposed
only in one-year increments, up to the
maximum five years.
(3) Once a disqualification becomes
final, the name, address, and other
identifying information of the
participant or other person shall be
entered into the Ineligible Tracking
System (ITS) maintained by FCIC in
accordance with 7 CFR part 400, subpart
U, and this information along with a list
of the programs that the person is
disqualified from shall be promptly
reported to the General Services
Administration for listing in the
Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) in
accordance with 7 CFR part 3017,
subpart E.
(i) It is a participant’s responsibility to
periodically review the ITS and EPLS to
determine those participants and other
persons who have been disqualified.
(ii) No participant may conduct
business with a disqualified participant
or other person if such business directly
relates to the Federal crop insurance
program, or if, through the business
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 May 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
relationship, the disqualified participant
or other person will derive any
monetary or non-monetary benefit from
a program administered under the Act.
(iii) If a participant or other person
does business with a disqualified
participant or other person, such
participant may be subject to
disqualification under this section.
(f) With respect to civil fines:
(1) A civil fine may be imposed for
each individual action that violates
§ 400.454(b).
(2) The amount of such civil fine shall
not exceed the greater of:
(i) The amount of monetary gain, or
value of the benefit, obtained as a result
of the false or inaccurate information
provided, or the amount obtained as a
result of noncompliance with a
requirement of FCIC; or
(ii) $10,000.
(3) Civil fines are debts owed to FCIC.
(i) A civil fine that is either imposed
under with this subpart, or agreed to
through an executed settlement
agreement with FCIC, must be paid by
the specified due date (If the due date
is not specified in the order issued by
the Administrative Law Judge or
Judicial Officer, as applicable, or the
settlement agreement, it shall be 30 days
after the date the order was issued or the
settlement agreement signed by FCIC).
(ii) Any civil fine imposed under this
section is in addition to any debt that
may be owed to FCIC or to any
approved insurance provider, such an
overpaid indemnity, underpaid
premium, or other amounts owed.
(iii) FCIC, in its sole discretion, may
reduce or otherwise settle any civil fine
imposed under this section whenever it
considers it appropriate or in the best
interest of the USDA.
(4) The ineligibility procedures
established in 7 CFR part 400, subpart
U are not applicable to ineligibility
determinations made under this section
for nonpayment of civil fines.
(5) If a civil fine has been imposed
and the person has not made timely
payment for the total amount due, the
person is ineligible to participate in the
Federal crop insurance program until
the amount due is paid in full.
(g) With respect to any person that has
been disqualified or is otherwise
ineligible due to non-payment of civil
fines in accordance with § 400.454(f):
(1) With respect to producers:
(i) All existing insurance policies will
automatically terminate as of the next
termination date that occurs during the
period of disqualification and while the
civil fine remains unpaid;
(ii) No new policies can be purchased,
and no current policies can be renewed,
between the date that the producer is
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27987
disqualified and the date that the
disqualification ends; and
(iii) New application for insurance
cannot be made for any agricultural
commodity until the next sales closing
date after the period of disqualification
has ended and the civil fine is paid in
full.
(2) With respect to all other persons:
(i) Such person may not be involved
in any function related to the Federal
crop insurance program during the
disqualification or ineligibility period
(including the sale, service, adjustment,
data transmission or storage,
reinsurance, etc. of any crop insurance
policy) or receive any monetary or nonmonetary benefit from a program
administered under the Act.
(ii) If the person is an agent or
insurance agency, the approved
insurance provider must assume all
policies within the agent’s or agency’s
book of business written for the
approved insurance provider and assign
them to a different agent or agency to
service during the period of
disqualification or ineligibility;
(iii) If the person is an approved
insurance provider, the approved
insurance provider shall not sell, or
authorize to be sold, any new policies
or may not renew, or authorize the
renewal of, existing policies, as
determined by FCIC, during the period
of disqualification or ineligibility.
Nothing in this provision affects the
approved insurance provider’s
responsibilities with respect to the
service of existing policies.
(h) Imposition of disqualification or a
civil fine under this section is in
addition to any other administrative or
legal remedies available under this
section or other applicable law
including, but not limited to, debarment
and suspension.
6. Revise § 400.455 to read as follows:
§ 400.455 Governmentwide debarment and
suspension (procurement).
(a) For all transactions undertaken
pursuant to the Federal Acquisition
Regulation, FCIC will proceed under 48
CFR part 9, subpart 9.4 or 48 CFR part
409 when taking action to suspend or
debar persons involved in such
transactions, except that the authority to
suspend or debar under these provisions
will be reserved to the Manager of FCIC,
or the Manager’s designee.
(b) Any person suspended or debarred
under the provisions of 48 CFR part 9,
subpart 9.4 or 48 CFR part 409 will not
be eligible to contract with FCIC or the
Risk Management Agency and will not
be eligible to participate in or receive
any benefit from any program under the
Act during the period of ineligibility.
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
27988
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 96 / Friday, May 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
This includes, but is not limited to,
being employed by or contracting with
any approved insurance provider that
sells, services, or adjusts policies offered
under the authority of the Act. FCIC
may waive this provision if it is satisfied
that the person who employs the
suspended or debarred person has taken
sufficient action to ensure that the
suspended or debarred person will not
be involved, in any way, with FCIC or
receive any benefit from any program
under the Act.
7. Amend § 400.456 as follows:
A. Remove paragraph (a).
B. Redesignate paragraphs (b) through
(d) as paragraphs (a) through (c).
C. Revise newly redesignated
paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
§ 400.456 Governmentwide debarment and
suspension (nonprocurement).
*
*
*
*
*
(a) FCIC will proceed under 7 CFR
part 3017 when taking action to suspend
or debar persons involved in nonprocurement transactions.
(b) Any person suspended or debarred
under the provisions of 7 CFR part 3017,
will not be eligible to contract with
FCIC or the Risk Management Agency
and will not be eligible to participate in
or receive any benefit from any program
under the Act during the period of
ineligibility. This includes, but is not
limited to, being employed by or
contracting with any approved
insurance provider, or its contractors,
that sell, service, or adjust policies
either insured or reinsured by FCIC.
FCIC may waive this provision if it is
satisfied that the approved insurance
provider or contractors have taken
sufficient action to ensure that the
suspended or debarred person will not
be involved in any way with the Federal
crop insurance program or receive any
benefit from any program under the Act.
*
*
*
*
*
8. Amend § 400.457 by adding a new
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
§ 400.457
Act.
Program Fraud Civil Remedies
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Civil penalties and assessments
imposed pursuant to this section are in
addition to any other remedies that may
be prescribed by law or imposed under
this subpart.
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
§ 400.458
[Amended]
9. Amend § 400.458 by removing
paragraph (b)(2), adding an ‘‘or’’ at the
end of paragraph (b)(1) and
redesignating paragraph (b)(3) as
paragraph (b)(2).
§ 400.459
[Removed]
10. Remove § 400.459 from subpart R.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 May 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
Signed in Washington, DC, on May 10,
2007.
Eldon Gould,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E7–9418 Filed 5–17–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Housing Service
Rural Business-Cooperative Service
Rural Utility Service
Farm Service Agency
7 CFR Part 1944
Rural Housing Service
7 CFR Part 3551
RIN 0575–AC20
Streamlining of the Section 523 Mutual
and Self-Help Housing Program
Rural Housing Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This action proposes to
replace the Mutual and Self-Help
Housing Program’s (MSH)
administration under 7 CFR part 1944,
Subpart I with 7 CFR part 3551. This
rule will apply to grants executed after
the effective date of the final rule. The
Rural Housing Service (an agency
within the Rural Development mission
area) proposes to streamline and clarify
its regulations for MSH. This action is
taken to reduce regulations, improve
customer service and enhance
efficiency, flexibility, and effectiveness
in managing the program.
DATES: Written or e-mail comments
must be received on or before July 17,
2007. The comment period for
information collections under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
continues through July 17, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
to this rule by any of the following
methods:
• Agency Web Site: https://
www.rurdev.usda.gov/regs. Follow
instructions for submitting comments
on the Web Site.
• E-Mail: comments@wdc.usda.gov.
Include ‘‘RIN No. 0575–AC20’’ in the
subject line of the message.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Submit written comments via
the U.S. Postal Service to the Branch
Chief, Regulations and Paperwork
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Management Branch, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, STOP 0742, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0742.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Submit
written comments via Federal Express
Mail or other courier service requiring a
street address to the Branch Chief,
Regulations and Paperwork
Management Branch, U.S. Department
of Agriculture, 300 7th Street, SW., 7th
Floor, Washington, DC 20024.
All written comments will be
available for public inspection during
regular work hours at 300 7th Street,
SW., 7th Floor address listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Debra S. Mangrum, Senior Loan
Specialist, Special Programs and New
Initiatives Branch, Single Family
Housing Direct Loan Division, RHS,
Stop 0783, Room 2209, South
Agriculture Building, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–0783, telephone
(202) 720–1366.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Classification
This proposed rule has been
determined not to be significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is
adopted: (1) Unless otherwise
specifically provided, all State and local
laws and regulations that are in conflict
with this rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect will be given to this
rule except as specifically prescribed in
the rule; and (3) the appeal procedures
of the National Appeals Division (7 CFR
part 11) must be exhausted before
bringing suit.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104–4, establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local,
and tribal governments and the private
sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA,
the Agency generally must prepare a
written statement, including a costbenefit analysis, for proposed and final
rules with ‘‘Federal mandates’’ that may
result in expenditures to State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or
to the private sector, of $100 million or
more in any one year. When such a
statement is needed for a rule, section
205 of the UMRA generally requires the
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 96 (Friday, May 18, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27981-27988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9418]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 96 / Friday, May 18, 2007 / Proposed
Rules
[[Page 27981]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Part 400
RIN 0563-AB73
General Administrative Regulations; Administrative Remedies for
Non-Compliance
AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) proposes to
amend 7 CFR part 400, subpart R to clarify existing administrative
remedies, add additional administrative remedies that are available as
a result of enactment of section 515(h) of the Federal Crop Insurance
Act (Act) (7 U.S.C. 1515(h)), and make such other changes as are
necessary to implement the provisions of section 515(h) of the Act.
DATES: Written comments and opinions on this proposed rule will be
accepted until close of business on June 18, 2007 and will be
considered when the rule is to be made final.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments, titled
``Administrative Remedies for Non-Compliance'', by any of the following
methods:
By Mail to: Deputy Administrator for Compliance, Risk
Management Agency, United States Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Stop 0806, Washington, DC 20250-0806.
E-mail: cynthia.simpson@rma.usda.gov.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
A copy of each response will be available for public
inspection and copying from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., EST, Monday through
Friday, except holidays, at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Hand, Deputy Administrator for
Compliance, at the address listed above, telephone (202) 720-0642.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
This rule has been determined to be non significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This rule does not constitute a collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to
promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and
the private sector. This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the
regulatory provisions of title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have sufficient implications to
warrant consultation with the States. The provisions contained in this
rule will not have a substantial direct effect on States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. All
similarly situated participants are required to comply with the same
standard of conduct contained in the Act, the regulations published at
7 CFR chapter IV, the crop policies, and the applicable procedures. For
example, any producer, whether growing 10 acres or 10,000 acres,
submits the same documentation for insurance and for a claim. All
agents, whether selling and servicing five policies or a hundred and
five policies, are required to perform the same tasks for each. The
consequences for failure to comply with the standards of conduct are
also the same for all participants and other persons regardless of the
size of their business. A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not been
prepared since this regulation does not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities, and, therefore, this regulation
is exempt from the provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order
12372, which require intergovernmental consultation with State and
local officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V,
published at 48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive
Order 12988 on civil justice reform. The provisions of this rule will
not have a retroactive effect. The provisions of this rule will preempt
State and local laws to the extent such State and local laws are
inconsistent herewith.
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a significant economic impact
on the quality of the human environment, health, and safety. Therefore,
neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact
Statement is needed.
Background
Prior to the enactment of the Agricultural Risk Protection Act of
2000 (ARPA), pursuant to section 506(n) of the Act (7 U.S.C. 1506(n)),
FCIC had the election of disqualifying or imposing a $10,000 civil fine
on a person who willfully and intentionally made a false
[[Page 27982]]
statement. With respect to the disqualification, the person was only
disqualified from purchasing crop insurance or receiving noninsured
crop disaster assistance (NAP) benefits. This meant the
disqualification was only effective against producers and it would not
apply to other program participants such as agents, loss adjusters,
approved insurance providers or their employees or contractors or other
persons who may provide information to a program participant. With
respect to the imposition of civil fines, either the fine was
insignificant in relation to the wrongful conduct or in many cases the
person did not have the assets or resources to pay the fine so its
imposition was meaningless.
Through the enactment of section 515(h) of the Act in ARPA,
Congress significantly strengthened FCIC's ability to combat fraud,
waste and abuse by establishing a strong system of administrative
actions that are now applicable to all participants in the Federal crop
insurance program. Now, producers, agents, loss adjusters, approved
insurance providers and their employees and contractors, and any other
persons who willfully and intentionally provide any false or inaccurate
information to FCIC or to an approved insurance provider with respect
to a policy or plan of insurance are subject to remedial administrative
remedies.
If disqualified, participants in the Federal crop insurance program
will be precluded from such participation. This means producers will
not be able to insure their crops, agents and loss adjusters will no
longer be able sell, service or adjust crop insurance policies,
approved insurance providers would be precluded from holding
reinsurance agreements related to insurance offered under the authority
of the Act, and other persons, employees or contractors of approved
insurance providers will not be able to purchase crop insurance or be
affiliated with any entity participating in the crop insurance program
for the period of disqualification.
In addition to disqualification from participating in the Federal
crop insurance program, producers will be disqualified from receiving
benefits under the Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 7201 et
seq.), including NAP; the Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1421 et
seq.); the Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act (15 U.S.C. 714 et
seq.); the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 (7 U.S.C. 1281 et seq.);
Title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3801 et seq.);
the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1921 et
seq.); and any law that provides assistance to a producer of an
agricultural commodity affected by a crop loss or a decline in the
prices of agricultural commodities. This will allow greater protection
of the interests of the government by preventing persons that commit
wrongful acts in one governmental program from receiving program
benefits from other governmental programs.
Section 515(h) of the Act also authorizes disqualification of
producers, agents, loss adjusters, approved insurance providers and
their employees and contractors, and other persons if such person
willfully and intentionally fails to comply with a requirement of FCIC.
One purpose of this proposed rule is to define what constitutes a
``requirement of FCIC.''
In addition, civil fines have been increased. Previously only a
civil fine of $10,000 could be imposed, regardless of how many times
the person willfully and intentionally submits false or inaccurate
information or fails to comply with a requirement of FCIC. Now a civil
fine can be imposed for each violation and the civil fine is the
greater of $10,000 or the amount of pecuniary gain obtained as a result
of the false or inaccurate information provided or the noncompliance
with a requirement of the Act. For example, a producer that submits a
false claim for indemnity and collects $50,000 can be required to repay
the $50,000 overpayment and an additional $50,000 in a civil fine, for
a total of $100,000 owed, or an agent that submitted 20 false
production reports that increased the amount of indemnities producers
collected by $8,000 per producer can be required to pay a civil fine of
$200,000. Like the previous administrative sanction provisions, the
gravity of the violation must be taken into consideration when
determining the appropriate term of disqualification or civil fine.
The proposed changes to subpart R are as follows:
1. Heading
FCIC is proposing to replace the heading ``Subpart R--Sanctions''
with ``Administrative Remedies for Non-Compliance''. FCIC's policy
underlying administrative actions is the protection of the public
interest from potential harm from persons who have abused the program,
maintaining program integrity, and fostering public confidence in the
program. Therefore, ``Administrative Remedies for Non-Compliance'' is a
more accurate title for this subpart.
2. Section 400.451--General
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph (a) to add a reference to
section 515(h) of the Act, which authorizes disqualifications and civil
fines.
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph (b) to add the other program
participants and other persons now covered under section 515(h) of the
Act, including producers, agents, loss adjusters, approved insurance
providers and their employees and contractors, and other persons who
may submit information related to the Federal crop insurance program.
In the past, administrative remedies for the most part targeted a
limited segment of wrongdoers in the crop insurance industry, the
producer, and there were often inadequate administrative remedies
applicable to other persons who committed fraud, waste, and abuse in
the Federal crop insurance program. As a result of the enactment of
section 515(h) of the Act, administrative sanctions are now applicable
to all program participants and persons who may provide information
related to the crop insurance program.
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph (c) to make minor editorial
changes for clarity.
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph (d) to clarify that with
respect to the submission of false or inaccurate statement, this rule
is applicable to such conduct occurring after June 20, 2000, and with
respect to failure to comply with a requirement of FCIC, this rule is
applicable to such conduct occurring on and after the date this rule
becomes effective.
FCIC is proposing to add a new paragraph (e) to clarify that the
purpose of the remedial actions authorized in this subpart are for the
protection of the public interest from potential harm from persons who
have abused the Federal crop insurance program, maintaining program
integrity, and fostering public confidence in the program. The
Government does not want to do business with persons who abuse its
programs.
3. Section 400.452--Definitions
FCIC is proposing to add definitions for terms used in subpart R.
Specifically, definitions have been added for the terms ``Act,''
``agency,'' ``agent,'' ``approved insurance provider,'' ``affiliate,''
``agricultural commodity,'' ``FCIC,'' ``managing general agent,''
``participant,'' ``person,'' ``policy,'' ``preponderance of the
evidence,'' ``principal,'' ``producer,'' ``requirement of FCIC,''
``Standard Reinsurance Agreement,'' ``violation,''
[[Page 27983]]
and ``willful and intentional.'' Given that the remedial actions apply
to all participants in the Federal crop insurance program, it is
necessary to identify who qualifies as participants, such as producers,
agencies, agents, approved insurance providers, and managing general
agents since such persons or entities are now subject to the remedial
actions in this subpart. The remedial actions can also apply to persons
who are not participating in the Federal crop insurance program, but
provide information that constitutes a willful and intentional
violation so such persons must also be identified. In addition, it is
necessary to define a ``requirement of FCIC'' to distinguish
requirements of FCIC that may be contained in policy, the Standard
Reinsurance Agreement or procedure, for which there are generally
adequate remedies available for the breach, from violations of
requirements, such as cease and desist letters, letters or memoranda
requiring that specific action be taken, or violations of policy, the
Standard Reinsurance Agreement or procedure so egregious that remedial
action is appropriate. Further, disqualification and civil fines are
imposed upon a showing of a willful and intentional violation.
Therefore, it is necessary to specify what constitutes willful and
intentional conduct. It is also important that the standard of proof be
identified for disqualifications and civil fines. Preponderance of the
evidence was determined to be appropriate because this is the standard
most commonly used by the government for imposition of similar
administrative remedies. Most of the definitions will refer to terms
and definitions contained in other regulations, such as the Common Crop
Insurance Policy Basic Provisions (7 CFR 457.8) to ensure consistency
and eliminate the need to revise multiple regulations when the
definition is changed.
4. Section 400.454--Disqualification and Civil Fines
FCIC is proposing to change the title of section 400.454 ``Civil
penalties'' and to replace it with ``Disqualification and Civil
Fines''. The procedures related to disqualifications have now been
added to the section, which should be reflected in the title. Further,
the Act now refers to civil fines, not civil penalties.
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph (a) to clarify that before
any disqualification or civil fine is imposed, the participant or other
person will have the opportunity for a hearing on the record.
Proceedings will still be initiated by a complaint filed by the Manager
of FCIC and the hearing will be before the Department's Administrative
Law Judges in accordance with 7 CFR part 1, subpart H.
In paragraph (a), FCIC is also proposing to clarify the effective
date of disqualification. FCIC is proposing the effective date of
disqualification will be the date specified in the order issued by the
Administrative Law Judge, Judicial Officer, or settlement agreement. If
no date is specified in such documents, the effective date will be the
date the disqualification order or settlement agreement was issued or
executed.
In paragraph (a), FCIC is also proposing to use a standard of proof
of preponderance of the evidence for disqualification and civil fines
this is the standard most commonly used by the government for
imposition of similar administrative remedies. FCIC is also proposing
that disqualification and civil fines may be imposed even if FCIC or
the approved insurance provider has not sustained a financial loss.
There may be situations where the false statement or other misconduct
has the potential to create losses or increase payments but the act was
discovered before the payment could be made. There may also be
situations where the misconduct can be used to collect a future
indemnity, such as falsely reporting high yields to increase the
guarantee and a possibility of a future loss. The fact that any
information is falsely or inaccurately reported adversely affects
program integrity and has the potential to create a situation where the
public loses confidence in the program.
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph (b) to include the situations
in section 515(h) of the Act where disqualification and civil fines may
be imposed. Disqualification and civil fines may be imposed on a person
based on either willfully and intentionally: (1) Providing false or
inaccurate information; or (2) failing to comply with a requirement of
FCIC. FCIC is proposing to clarify that the false or inaccurate
information can be provided either through action (for example, falsely
reporting the number of acres planted) or omission to act when there is
knowledge that false or inaccurate information has or will be provided
and no action is taken to prevent it (for example, the agent knows the
planted acreage has been falsely reported and still submits the acreage
reports with the false information). FCIC has determined that persons
who knowingly allow false or inaccurate statements to be provided by
others affect the program just as adversely as those who made the false
or inaccurate statement in the first place.
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph (c) to specify the standards
that will be applied when FCIC considers imposing a disqualification or
civil fine. The gravity of the violation will be considered when
determining whether to impose a disqualification or civil fine, the
length of the disqualification or the amount, if any, of any civil
fine. FCIC is also proposing that the maximum be imposed where there
have been multiple violations in the same crop year or over several
crop years, or a single violation that results in an overpayment of at
least $100,000 or multiple acts of wrongdoings resulting in an
overpayment in excess of $100,000. FCIC has determined that such
conduct is so harmful to the program that the maximum remedial action
is appropriate. However, these criteria are not all-inclusive and there
may be other circumstances where the maximum actions are appropriate.
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph (d) to allow FCIC to impute
the improper conduct of a person to another person, if such other
person knew or should have known of the improper conduct, has the power
to direct, manage, control or influence the activities of the person,
participated in the improper conduct, or the improper conduct occurred
in the connection with the person's duties on behalf of the person to
whom the conduct is imputed or with such persons approval or
acquiescence. There are situations where the person who provided the
false or inaccurate information has been directed to do so by another
person, a person participates in providing false or inaccurate
information, such as obtaining the false information and passing it on
to the person to provide to an approved insurance provider, or a person
knows that false or inaccurate information is being provided and does
nothing to stop it. The conduct of the person who directed the conduct,
participated in providing it, or allowed it to be provided is just as
detrimental to the crop insurance program. Therefore, to protect the
public interest, such persons should also be disqualified or have civil
fines imposed. This is the same as the imputing of conduct permitted
with respect to suspensions and debarments under 7 CFR 3017.
Disqualifications
FCIC proposes to revise paragraph (e) to incorporate the expanded
range of administrative remedies made available under section 515(h) of
the Act to include those that are applicable to: (1) Producers, which
precludes many of the benefits provided to producers under other farm
programs offered by the
[[Page 27984]]
Department; and (2) to other participants in the Federal crop insurance
program and any other person who may provide information regarding the
insured agricultural commodity, which precludes such participants or
persons from participating in the Federal crop insurance program and
receiving any benefit under the Act. This means such participants or
persons could no longer hold a reinsurance agreement or be involved in
any way in the sale, service or loss adjustment of a crop insurance
policy and would also be precluded from purchasing a crop insurance
policy or receiving any subsidy authorized under the Act.
In paragraph (e), FCIC is also proposing to specify that
disqualifications are for a period of not less than one year and not
greater than five years from the date the disqualification is
effective. Disqualifications of less than one year could be meaningless
because existing policies can only be terminated at the next
termination date. Disqualifications of less than one year could begin
and end within the insurance period thereby making the
disqualifications meaningless. Therefore, FCIC has determined that one
year is the least period that could be effective.
In addition, in paragraph (e) FCIC is proposing that
disqualifications be imposed in one-year increments up to the maximum
of five years. Most of the crop insurance policies and reinsurance
agreements are in effect for one year. Disqualifications of different
periods, such as 18 months, would be burdensome and create additional
complexities in determining when persons are eligible again to
participate in the program.
In paragraph (e) FCIC is also proposing to specify that the names
of all persons who are disqualified will be placed into FCIC's
Ineligible Tracking System (ITS) and reported to the U.S. General
Services Administration (GSA) in accordance with 7 CFR part 3017. GSA
publishes a list of all persons who are determined ineligible in its
Excluded Parties List System (EPLS). FCIC is also proposing to specify
that if a person is doing business with a disqualified person, such
person may also be subject disqualification. FCIC does not want to
allow persons who have been disqualified to still participate in the
program through the association with another person. FCIC also proposes
to make it the responsibility of a person who participates in the
Federal crop insurance program to routinely review ITS and EPLS to
ensure that the person is not doing business with a disqualified
person.
Civil Fines
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph (f) to specify that, in
accordance with section 515(h) of the Act, the amount of civil fines
will not exceed the greater of the amount of monetary gain or $10,000.
In addition, in accordance with section 515(h) of the Act, FCIC is
proposing that the civil fine will be imposed for each violation. FCIC
is also proposing to clarify that a civil fine is a debt owed to FCIC
and that the civil fine must be paid by the due date specified in the
order issued by the Administrative Law Judge or Judicial Officer, as
applicable, or the settlement agreement, or, if no due date is
specified, it shall be 30 days after the date the order was issued or
the settlement agreement signed by FCIC. This is to clarify that even
though the amount of monetary gain may be owed to another person, for
example, overpaid indemnity is owed to the approved insurance provider,
the civil fine is always owed to FCIC. Further, there must be a due
date because FCIC is proposing that failure to pay by the due date can
subject the person to ineligibility to participate in the program. This
is to provide a meaningful consequence for failure to comply with their
responsibility to timely pay their civil fine. Without such
consequences, persons may delay forever the payment of such fines.
In paragraph (f), FCIC also proposes to specify that a civil fine
imposed under this section is in addition to any debt that may be owed
to FCIC or to any approved insurance provider, such as an overpaid
indemnity, underpaid premium, or other amounts owed. This is necessary
to distinguish between the civil fine, which could equal the amount
owed, and the other amount owed. For example, if the producer was
overpaid $12,000 and a civil fine of $12,000 is imposed, the producer
owes a total of $24,000. FCIC is also proposing to specify that, in its
sole discretion, FCIC may settle any civil fine imposed if it considers
it appropriate or in the best interest of the USDA.
In paragraph (f), FCIC is also proposing to specify that the
ineligibility procedures established in subpart U are not applicable to
ineligibility determinations for nonpayment of civil fines. This is
necessary because subpart U applies to producers and there could be
confusion regarding which procedures apply. FCIC is also proposing to
specify that failure to timely pay a civil fine will make a person
ineligible for further benefits under the Act until the civil fine is
paid in full.
FCIC proposed to add a new paragraph (g) that specifies the
consequences of disqualification or if a person fails to timely pay the
civil fines. FCIC is proposing that with respect to producers, all
existing policies will automatically terminate as of the next
termination date and that new application cannot be made until the next
sales closing date after the period of disqualification has ended and
the civil fine is paid in full. This is consistent with the
requirements of other types of ineligibility and is necessary under the
terms of the policy. With respect to all other persons, FCIC is
proposing that such persons cannot be involved in any way with the crop
insurance program. Further, if the person is an agent or agency, FCIC
is proposing to require that the approved insurance provider assign the
book to another agent or agency during the period of disqualification
or ineligibility. This will ensure the continued, uninterrupted service
of the policy. If the person is an approved insurance provider, FCIC is
proposing that the approved insurance provider be precluded from
selling any new policies or renewing any existing policies during the
period of disqualification or ineligibility. FCIC has made this similar
to a suspension under its reinsurance agreements because FCIC wants to
make sure that there is uninterrupted service for all existing policies
during the crop year, but that such policies be cancelled and
transferred for subsequent crop years if the period of disqualification
or ineligibility is still ongoing.
FCIC is proposing to add a new paragraph (h) that specifies that
the imposition of disqualification or a civil fine under this section
is in addition to any other administrative or legal remedies available
under this section or other applicable law including, but not limited
to, debarment and suspension. Other remedies may serve a different
purpose or have different consequences and may be equally appropriate
for the wrongful conduct.
5. Section 400.455--Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension
(Procurement)
FCIC is proposing to delete paragraph (a) because it does not add
to the content or clarity of the provision.
FCIC is proposing to redesignate paragraph (b) as paragraph (a) and
revise it to correct the cross references and better specify that the
Federal Acquisition Regulation will be applied in debarment and
suspension proceedings involving procurement
[[Page 27985]]
transactions and that the FCIC's Manager will have the authority to
suspend or debar any person under this provision.
FCIC is proposing to redesignate paragraph (c) as paragraph (b) and
revise it to clarify that if suspended or debarred, the person may not
contract with FCIC or the Risk Management Agency. This change is
necessary because the Risk Management Agency administers the crop
insurance program on behalf of FCIC. FCIC has also made other minor
editorial changes for clarity and consistency.
6. Section 400.456--Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement)
FCIC is proposing to delete paragraph (a) because it does not add
to the content or clarity of the provision.
FCIC is proposing to redesignate paragraph (b) as paragraph (a) and
revise it to clarify that suspensions and debarments will be done in
accordance with 7 CFR part 3017.
FCIC is proposing to revise paragraph (b) to specify the effects of
suspension and debarment involving non-procurement transactions. FCIC
is proposing that if suspended or debarred, the person may not contract
with FCIC or the Risk Management Agency. FCIC is also proposing that if
the person is suspended or debarred, the person cannot contract with an
approved insurance provider or its contractors. This is consistent with
the provisions in 7 CFR 3017 that participants in the crop insurance
program cannot do business with debarred or disqualified persons. FCIC
is proposing that FCIC have the discretion to waive the provisions if
the approved insurance provider has taken sufficient action to ensure
that the suspended or debarred person will not be involved in any way
with the crop insurance program or receive any benefits from any
program under the Act.
7. Section 400.457--Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act
FCIC is proposing to add new paragraph (d) to specify that civil
fines and assessments imposed under this provision are in addition to
any other remedies provided by law or imposed under this subpart. This
paragraph was added to for clarification of how this statute interacts
with other laws and regulations.
8. Section 400.458--Scheme or Device
FCIC is proposing to delete paragraph (b)(2) because the
nonstandard classification system is no longer used by FCIC and
redesignate paragraph (b)(3) as paragraph (b)(2).
9. Section 400.459--Indebtedness
FCIC is proposing to remove this section from subpart R. The
consequences for failure to pay a civil fine have been included in
section 400.454. With respect to any other debt, the provisions in the
policy and 7 CFR part 400, subpart U apply. Therefore, this provision
is no longer needed.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 400
Administrative practice and procedure, Penalties.
Proposed Rule
Accordingly, as set forth in the preamble, the Federal Crop
Insurance Corporation proposes to amend 7 CFR part 400 as follows:
PART 400--GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS
1. Revise the authority citation for 7 CFR 400, subpart R to read
as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l) and 7 U.S.C. 1515(h).
Subpart R--Administrative Remedies for Non-Compliance
2. Revise the heading for subpart R to read as set forth above.
3. Revise Sec. 400.451 to read as follows:
Sec. 400.451 General.
(a) FCIC has implemented a system of administrative remedies to
ensure program compliance and prevention of fraud, waste, and abuse
within the Federal crop insurance program. Such remedies include civil
fines and disqualifications under the authority of section 515(h) of
the Act (7 U.S.C. 1515(h)); government-wide suspension and debarment
under the authority of 48 CFR part 9, 48 CFR part 409, and 7 CFR part
3017; and civil fines and assessments under the authority of the
Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act (31 U.S.C. 3801-3812).
(b) The provisions of this subpart apply to all participants in the
Federal crop insurance program, including but not limited to producers,
agents, loss adjusters, approved insurance providers and their
employees or contractors, as well as any other persons who may provide
information to a program participant and meet the elements for
imposition of one or more administrative remedies contained in this
subpart.
(c) Any remedial action taken pursuant to this subpart is in
addition to any other actions specifically provided in applicable crop
insurance policies, contracts, reinsurance agreements, or other
applicable statutes and regulations.
(d) With respect to the submission of a false or inaccurate
statement, this rule is applicable to any act or omission occurring
after June 20, 2000, and with respect to failure to comply with a
requirement of FCIC, this rule is applicable to any act or omission
occurring on and after the date this rule becomes effective.
(e) The purpose of the remedial actions authorized in this subpart
are for the protection of the public interest from potential harm from
persons who have abused the Federal crop insurance program, maintaining
program integrity, and fostering public confidence in the program.
4. Revise Sec. 400.452 to read as follows:
Sec. 400.452 Definitions.
Act. Has the same meaning as the term in section 1 of the Common
Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions (7 CFR 457.8).
Affiliate. Persons are affiliates of each other if, directly or
indirectly, either one controls or has the power to control the other,
or, a third person controls or has the power to control both. Indicia
of control include, but are not limited to: interlocking management or
ownership, identity of interests among family members, shared
facilities and equipment, common use of employees, or a business entity
organized following the disqualification, suspension or debarment of a
person which has the same or similar management, ownership, or
principal employees as the disqualified, suspended, debarred,
ineligible, or voluntarily excluded person.
Agency. The person authorized by an approved insurance provider, or
its designee, to sell and service a crop insurance policy under the
Federal crop insurance program.
Agent. Has the same meaning as the term in 7 CFR 400.701.
Agricultural commodity. Has the same meaning as the term in section
1 of the Common Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions (7 CFR 457.8).
Approved insurance provider. Has the same meaning as the term in 7
CFR 400.701.
FCIC. Has the same meaning as the term in 7 CFR 400.701.
Managing General Agent. Has the same meaning as the term in 7 CFR
400.701.
Participant. Any person who obtains any benefit that is derived in
whole or in part from funds paid by FCIC to the approved insurance
provider or premium paid by the producer.
[[Page 27986]]
Participants include but are not limited to producers, agents, loss
adjusters, agencies, managing general agencies, approved insurance
providers, and any person associated with the approved insurance
provider through employment, contract, or agreement.
Person. An individual, partnership, association, corporation,
estate, trust or other legal entity, any affiliate or principal
thereof, and whenever applicable, a State or political subdivision or
agency of a State. ``Person'' does not include the United States
Government or any of its agencies.
Policy. Has the same meaning as the term in section 1 of the Common
Crop Insurance Policy Basic Provisions (7 CFR 457.8).
Preponderance of the evidence. Evidence which is of greater weight
or more convincing than the evidence which is offered in opposition to
it; that is, evidence which as a whole shows that the fact sought to be
proved is more probable than not.
Principal. A person who is an officer, director, owner, partner,
key employee, or other person within an entity with primary management
or supervisory responsibilities; or a person who has a critical
influence on or substantive control over the activities of the entity.
Producer. A person engaged in producing an agricultural commodity
for a share of the insured crop, or the proceeds thereof.
Reinsurance agreement. Has the same meaning as the term in 7 CFR
400.161, except that such agreement is only between FCIC and the
approved insurance provider.
Requirement of FCIC. Includes, but is not limited to, any
regulation, procedure, policy provision, reinsurance agreement, or
other written communication from FCIC that requires a particular
program participant or group of program participants to take a specific
action or to cease and desist from a taking a specific action. General
regulations procedures, policy provisions, or reinsurance agreements
for which there is a remedy provided in such document for the breach
will not be considered a requirement of FCIC unless such breach arises
to the level where remedial action is appropriate (For example,
multiple breaches of the same provision in separate policies or the
procedures or multiple breaches of different provisions in the same
policy or procedure).
Violation. Each act or omission by a person that satisfies all
required elements for the imposition of a disqualification or a civil
fine under this subpart.
Willful and intentional. To make a false or inaccurate statement
with the knowledge that the statement is false or inaccurate at the
time the statement was made; the failure to correct the false or
inaccurate statement when its nature becomes known to the person who
made it; or to commit an act or omission with the knowledge that the
act or omission is not in compliance with a ``requirement of FCIC'' at
the time the act or omission occurred. No showing of malicious intent
is necessary.
5. Revise Sec. 400.454 to read as follows:
Sec. 400.454 Disqualification and civil fines.
(a) Before any disqualification or civil fine is imposed, FCIC will
provide the affected participants and other persons with notice and an
opportunity for a hearing on the record in accordance with 7 CFR part
1, subpart H.
(1) Proceedings will be initiated when the Manager of FCIC files a
complaint with the Hearing Clerk, United States Department of
Agriculture.
(2) Disqualifications become effective:
(i) On the date specified in the order issued by the Administrative
Law Judge or Judicial Officer, as applicable, or if no date is
specified in the order, the date that the order was issued.
(ii) With respect to a settlement agreement with FCIC, the date
contained in the settlement agreement or, if no date is specified, the
date that such agreement is executed by FCIC.
(3) Disqualification and civil fines may only be imposed if a
preponderance of the evidence shows that the participant or other
person has met the standards contained in Sec. 400.454(b).
(4) Disqualification and civil fines may be imposed regardless of
whether FCIC or the approved insurance provider has suffered any
monetary losses.
(b) Disqualification and civil fines may be imposed on any
participant or person who willfully and intentionally:
(1) Provides any false or inaccurate information to FCIC or to any
approved insurance provider with respect to a policy or plan of
insurance authorized under the Act either through action or omission to
act when there is knowledge that false or inaccurate information is or
will be provided; or
(2) Fails to comply with a requirement of FCIC.
(c) When imposing any disqualification or civil fine,
(1) The gravity of the violation must be considered when
determining:
(i) Whether to disqualify a participant or other person;
(ii) The amount of time that a participant or other person should
be disqualified;
(iii) Whether to impose a civil fine; and
(iv) The amount of a civil fine that should be imposed.
(2) The maximum term of disqualification and civil fines will be
imposed against participants and other persons who:
(i) Commit multiple violations in the same crop year or over
several crop years; or
(ii) Commit a single violation but such violation results in an
overpayment of more than $100,000 or multiple acts of wrongdoings
resulting in an overpayment in excess of $100,000.
(iii) Commit such other action or omission of so serious a nature
that imposition of the maximum is appropriate.
(d) With respect to the imputing of conduct:
(1) The conduct of any officer, director, shareholder, partner,
employee, or other individual associated with an organization, in
violation of Sec. 400.454(b) may be imputed to that organization when
such conduct occurred in connection with the individual's performance
of duties for or on behalf of that organization, or with the
organization's knowledge, approval or acquiescence. The organization's
acceptance of the benefits derived from the violation is evidence of
knowledge, approval or acquiescence.
(2) The conduct of any organization in violation of Sec.
400.454(b) may be imputed to an individual, or from one individual to
another individual, if the individual to whom the improper conduct is
imputed either participated in, had knowledge of, or reason to know of
such conduct.
(3) The conduct of one organization in violation of Sec.
400.454(b) may be imputed to another organization when such conduct
occurred in connection with a partnership, joint venture, joint
application, association or similar arrangement, or when the
organization to whom the improper conduct is imputed has the power to
direct, manage, control or influence the activities of the organization
responsible for the improper conduct. Acceptance of the benefits
derived from the conduct is evidence of knowledge, approval or
acquiescence.
(4) If such conduct is imputed, the person to whom the conduct is
imputed to may be subject to the same disqualification and civil fines
as the person from whom the conduct is imputed.
(e) With respect to disqualifications:
(1) If a person is disqualified and that person is a:
[[Page 27987]]
(i) Producer, the producer will be precluded from receiving any
monetary or non-monetary benefit provided under all of the following
authorities, or their successors:
(A) The Act;
(B) The Agricultural Market Transition Act (7 U.S.C. 7201, et
seq.);
(C) The noninsured crop disaster assistance program (7 U.S.C.
7333);
(D) The Agricultural Act of 1949 (7 U.S.C. 1421 et seq.);
(E) The Commodity Credit Corporation Charter Act (15 U.S.C. 714 et
seq.);
(F) The Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 (7 U.S.C. 1281 et
seq.);
(G) Title XII of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 3801 et
seq.);
(H) The Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C. 1921,
et seq.); and
(I) Any law that provides assistance to the producer of an
agricultural commodity affected by a crop loss or decline in the prices
of agricultural commodities.
(ii) Participant or other person, other than a producer, such
participant or person will be precluded from participating in any way
in the Federal crop insurance program and receiving any monetary or
non-monetary benefit under the Act.
(2) With respect to the term of disqualification:
(i) The minimum term will be not less than one year from the
effective date determined in Sec. 400.454(a)(2);
(ii) The maximum term will be not more than five years from the
effective date determined in Sec. 400.454(a)(2); and
(iii) Disqualification is to be imposed only in one-year
increments, up to the maximum five years.
(3) Once a disqualification becomes final, the name, address, and
other identifying information of the participant or other person shall
be entered into the Ineligible Tracking System (ITS) maintained by FCIC
in accordance with 7 CFR part 400, subpart U, and this information
along with a list of the programs that the person is disqualified from
shall be promptly reported to the General Services Administration for
listing in the Excluded Parties List System (EPLS) in accordance with 7
CFR part 3017, subpart E.
(i) It is a participant's responsibility to periodically review the
ITS and EPLS to determine those participants and other persons who have
been disqualified.
(ii) No participant may conduct business with a disqualified
participant or other person if such business directly relates to the
Federal crop insurance program, or if, through the business
relationship, the disqualified participant or other person will derive
any monetary or non-monetary benefit from a program administered under
the Act.
(iii) If a participant or other person does business with a
disqualified participant or other person, such participant may be
subject to disqualification under this section.
(f) With respect to civil fines:
(1) A civil fine may be imposed for each individual action that
violates Sec. 400.454(b).
(2) The amount of such civil fine shall not exceed the greater of:
(i) The amount of monetary gain, or value of the benefit, obtained
as a result of the false or inaccurate information provided, or the
amount obtained as a result of noncompliance with a requirement of
FCIC; or
(ii) $10,000.
(3) Civil fines are debts owed to FCIC.
(i) A civil fine that is either imposed under with this subpart, or
agreed to through an executed settlement agreement with FCIC, must be
paid by the specified due date (If the due date is not specified in the
order issued by the Administrative Law Judge or Judicial Officer, as
applicable, or the settlement agreement, it shall be 30 days after the
date the order was issued or the settlement agreement signed by FCIC).
(ii) Any civil fine imposed under this section is in addition to
any debt that may be owed to FCIC or to any approved insurance
provider, such an overpaid indemnity, underpaid premium, or other
amounts owed.
(iii) FCIC, in its sole discretion, may reduce or otherwise settle
any civil fine imposed under this section whenever it considers it
appropriate or in the best interest of the USDA.
(4) The ineligibility procedures established in 7 CFR part 400,
subpart U are not applicable to ineligibility determinations made under
this section for nonpayment of civil fines.
(5) If a civil fine has been imposed and the person has not made
timely payment for the total amount due, the person is ineligible to
participate in the Federal crop insurance program until the amount due
is paid in full.
(g) With respect to any person that has been disqualified or is
otherwise ineligible due to non-payment of civil fines in accordance
with Sec. 400.454(f):
(1) With respect to producers:
(i) All existing insurance policies will automatically terminate as
of the next termination date that occurs during the period of
disqualification and while the civil fine remains unpaid;
(ii) No new policies can be purchased, and no current policies can
be renewed, between the date that the producer is disqualified and the
date that the disqualification ends; and
(iii) New application for insurance cannot be made for any
agricultural commodity until the next sales closing date after the
period of disqualification has ended and the civil fine is paid in
full.
(2) With respect to all other persons:
(i) Such person may not be involved in any function related to the
Federal crop insurance program during the disqualification or
ineligibility period (including the sale, service, adjustment, data
transmission or storage, reinsurance, etc. of any crop insurance
policy) or receive any monetary or non-monetary benefit from a program
administered under the Act.
(ii) If the person is an agent or insurance agency, the approved
insurance provider must assume all policies within the agent's or
agency's book of business written for the approved insurance provider
and assign them to a different agent or agency to service during the
period of disqualification or ineligibility;
(iii) If the person is an approved insurance provider, the approved
insurance provider shall not sell, or authorize to be sold, any new
policies or may not renew, or authorize the renewal of, existing
policies, as determined by FCIC, during the period of disqualification
or ineligibility. Nothing in this provision affects the approved
insurance provider's responsibilities with respect to the service of
existing policies.
(h) Imposition of disqualification or a civil fine under this
section is in addition to any other administrative or legal remedies
available under this section or other applicable law including, but not
limited to, debarment and suspension.
6. Revise Sec. 400.455 to read as follows:
Sec. 400.455 Governmentwide debarment and suspension (procurement).
(a) For all transactions undertaken pursuant to the Federal
Acquisition Regulation, FCIC will proceed under 48 CFR part 9, subpart
9.4 or 48 CFR part 409 when taking action to suspend or debar persons
involved in such transactions, except that the authority to suspend or
debar under these provisions will be reserved to the Manager of FCIC,
or the Manager's designee.
(b) Any person suspended or debarred under the provisions of 48 CFR
part 9, subpart 9.4 or 48 CFR part 409 will not be eligible to contract
with FCIC or the Risk Management Agency and will not be eligible to
participate in or receive any benefit from any program under the Act
during the period of ineligibility.
[[Page 27988]]
This includes, but is not limited to, being employed by or contracting
with any approved insurance provider that sells, services, or adjusts
policies offered under the authority of the Act. FCIC may waive this
provision if it is satisfied that the person who employs the suspended
or debarred person has taken sufficient action to ensure that the
suspended or debarred person will not be involved, in any way, with
FCIC or receive any benefit from any program under the Act.
7. Amend Sec. 400.456 as follows:
A. Remove paragraph (a).
B. Redesignate paragraphs (b) through (d) as paragraphs (a) through
(c).
C. Revise newly redesignated paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 400.456 Governmentwide debarment and suspension
(nonprocurement).
* * * * *
(a) FCIC will proceed under 7 CFR part 3017 when taking action to
suspend or debar persons involved in non-procurement transactions.
(b) Any person suspended or debarred under the provisions of 7 CFR
part 3017, will not be eligible to contract with FCIC or the Risk
Management Agency and will not be eligible to participate in or receive
any benefit from any program under the Act during the period of
ineligibility. This includes, but is not limited to, being employed by
or contracting with any approved insurance provider, or its
contractors, that sell, service, or adjust policies either insured or
reinsured by FCIC. FCIC may waive this provision if it is satisfied
that the approved insurance provider or contractors have taken
sufficient action to ensure that the suspended or debarred person will
not be involved in any way with the Federal crop insurance program or
receive any benefit from any program under the Act.
* * * * *
8. Amend Sec. 400.457 by adding a new paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 400.457 Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act.
* * * * *
(d) Civil penalties and assessments imposed pursuant to this
section are in addition to any other remedies that may be prescribed by
law or imposed under this subpart.
Sec. 400.458 [Amended]
9. Amend Sec. 400.458 by removing paragraph (b)(2), adding an
``or'' at the end of paragraph (b)(1) and redesignating paragraph
(b)(3) as paragraph (b)(2).
Sec. 400.459 [Removed]
10. Remove Sec. 400.459 from subpart R.
Signed in Washington, DC, on May 10, 2007.
Eldon Gould,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. E7-9418 Filed 5-17-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-08-P