Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of Critical Habitat for the Hine's Emerald Dragonfly, 28016-28018 [07-2500]
Download as PDF
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
28016
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 96 / Friday, May 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
paragraph (a) of this section must
comply with the following safety
requirements and compliance deadlines.
(1) Identify all segments of pipelines
meeting the criteria and comply with
the reporting requirements of Subpart B
for these segments before [6–12 months
following effective date of final rule]. To
carry out the integrity management
requirements in § 195.452, an operator
may conduct a determination per
§ 195.452(a) in lieu of the 1⁄2 mile buffer.
(2)(i) Establish and apply a program in
accordance with § 195.452 to assure the
integrity of the low-stress pipeline
segments before [12 months following
effective date of final rule].
(ii) Complete the baseline assessment
of all segments in accordance with
§ 195.452(c) not later than [60 months–
84 months following the effective date
of final rule] and complete at least 50
percent of the assessments, beginning
with the highest risk pipe, not later than
[30 months–48 months following the
effective date of final rule].
(3) Comply with all other safety
requirements of this part, except
Subpart H, before [12 months–24
months following effective date of final
rule]. Comply with Subpart H before [24
months–36 months following effective
date of final rule].
(c) Economic compliance burden. (1)
An operator may notify PHMSA in
accordance with § 195.452(m) of
situations meeting the following criteria:
(i) The pipeline meets the criteria in
paragraph (a) of this section;
(ii) The pipeline carries crude oil from
a production facility;
(iii) The pipeline, when in operation,
operates at a flow rate less than or equal
to 14,000 barrels per day; and
(iv) The operator determines it would
abandon or shut-in the pipeline as a
result of the economic burden to comply
with the assessment requirements in
§§ 195.452(d) or (j).
(2) When an operator notifies PHMSA
in accordance with paragraph (c)(1) of
this section, PHMSA will stay
compliance with §§ 195.452(d) and
195.452 (j)(3) until it has completed an
analysis of the notification. PHMSA will
consult the Department of Energy
(DOE), as appropriate, to help analyze
the potential energy impact of loss of
the pipeline. Based on the analysis,
PHMSA may grant the operator a special
permit to allow continued operation of
the line while also assuring safety
through alternative safety requirements.
(d) New USAs. If, after [effective date
of final rule], an operator identifies a
new unusually sensitive area and a
segment of pipeline meets the criteria in
paragraph (a) of this section, the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 May 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
operator must take the following
actions:
(1) Except for paragraph (b)(2) of this
section, implement the requirements of
this part, within [6 months–1 year
following the effective date of final rule]
from the date the area is identified;
(2) Establish and apply the program
required in paragraph (b)(2)(i) within 12
months following the date the area is
identified; and
(3) Complete the baseline assessment
required by paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this
section according to the schedule in
§ 195.452(d)(3).
4. Add § 195.48 in Subpart B to read
as follows:
§ 195.48
Scope.
This subpart prescribes requirements
for periodic reporting and for reporting
of accidents and safety-related
conditions. This subpart applies to all
pipelines subject to this part and,
beginning [6–9 months following the
effective date of final rule], applies to all
rural low-stress hazardous liquid
pipelines.
5. Revise 195.452(m) to read as
follows:
§ 195.452 Pipeline integrity management in
high consequence areas.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) How does an operator notify
PHMSA? An operator must provide any
notification required by this section by:
(1) Entering the information directly
on the Integrity Management Database
Web site at https://primis.phmsa.dot.gov/
imdb/;
(2) Sending the notification to the
Information Resources Manager, Office
of Pipeline Safety, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590; or
(3) Sending the notification to the
Information Resources Manager by
facsimile to (202) 366–7128.
Issued in Washington, DC on May 15,
2007.
William H. Gute,
Acting Deputy Associate Administrator for
Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 07–2461 Filed 5–15–07; 12:04 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
RIN 1018–AU74
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Designation of Critical
Habitat for the Hine’s Emerald
Dragonfly
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of
comment period.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
reopening of the public comment period
for the proposed designation of critical
habitat for the endangered Hine’s
emerald dragonfly (Somatochlora
hineana) and the draft economic
analysis, under the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We are
reopening the public comment period to
allow additional time for all interested
parties to comment on the proposed
rule, our revision to the proposed rule,
and the associated draft economic
analysis. Comments previously
submitted need not be resubmitted, as
we will incorporate them into the public
record and fully consider them as we
prepare the final rule.
DATES: We will accept public comments
until July 2, 2007.
ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment,
you may submit your comments and
information concerning this proposal,
identified by ‘‘Attn: Hine’s Emerald
Dragonfly Critical Habitat,’’ by any one
of several methods:
(1) Mail or hand-deliver to: John
Rogner, Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Chicago Ecological
Services Field Office, 1250 S. Grove,
Suite 103, Barrington, IL 60010.
(2) Send by electronic mail (e-mail) to
hedch@fws.gov. Please see the Public
Comments Solicited section below for
file format and other information about
electronic filing.
(3) Fax your comments to: (847) 381–
2285.
(4) Submit comments via the Federal
eRulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Rogner, Field Supervisor, Chicago
Ecological Services Field Office, 1250 S.
Grove, Suite 103, Barrington, IL 60010
(telephone (847) 381–2253, extension
28; facsimile (847) 381–2285).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 96 / Friday, May 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Public Comments Solicited
We intend that any final action
resulting from the proposal will be as
accurate and as effective as possible.
Therefore, we hereby solicit comments
or suggestions from the public, other
concerned governmental agencies, the
scientific community, industry, or any
other interested party concerning the
proposed rule. We particularly seek
comments concerning:
(1) The reasons any habitat should or
should not be determined to be critical
habitat as provided by section 4 of the
Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), including
whether the benefit of designation will
outweigh any adverse impacts to the
species due to designation;
(2) Specific information on the
amount and distribution of Hine’s
emerald dragonfly habitat, particularly
what areas should be included in the
designations that were occupied at the
time of listing and that contain features
that are essential for the conservation of
the species and why; and what areas
that were not occupied at the time of
listing are essential to the conservation
of the species and why;
(3) Information that would add further
clarity or specificity to the physical and
biological features determined to be
essential for the conservation of the
Hine’s emerald dragonfly (i.e., primary
constituent elements), particularly
whether the primary constituent
elements as described fulfill the needs
for the various life stages of the Hine’s
emerald dragonfly (e.g., whether old
fields adjacent to and in near proximity
to larval areas are essential features);
(4) Whether lands not currently
occupied by the species should be
included in the designation, and if so,
the basis for such an inclusion;
(5) Whether the methodology used to
map critical habitat units captures all of
the biological and physical features
essential to the conservation of the
Hine’s emerald dragonfly;
(6) Land use designations and current
or planned activities in the subject areas
and their possible impacts on proposed
critical habitat;
(7) Whether the benefit of exclusion
in any particular area outweigh the
benefits of inclusion under Section
4(b)(2) of the Act;
(8) Any foreseeable economic,
national security, or other potential
impacts resulting from the proposed
designation and, in particular, any
impacts on small entities;
(9) We are considering excluding
areas under the jurisdiction of the
Hiawatha National Forest in Michigan,
the Mark Twain National Forest in
Missouri, and the Missouri Department
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 May 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
of Conservation and units under private
ownership in Missouri from the final
designation of critical habitat under
section 4(b)(2) of the Act on the basis of
conservation programs and
partnerships. We will also review other
relevant information for units being
proposed in this rule as we receive it to
determine whether other units may be
appropriate for exclusion from the final
designation under section 4(b)(2) of the
Act. We specifically solicit comment on
the inclusion or exclusion of such areas
and:
(a) Whether these areas have features
that are essential to the conservation of
the species or are otherwise essential to
the conservation of the species;
(b) Whether these, or other areas
proposed, but not specifically addressed
in this proposal, warrant exclusion;
(c) Relevant factors that should be
considered by us when evaluating the
basis for not designating these areas as
critical habitat under section 4(b)(2) of
the Act;
(d) Whether management plans in
place adequately provide conservation
measures and protect the Hine’s
emerald dragonfly, its habitat, and
features essential to its conservation;
(e) Whether designation would assist
in the regulation of any threats not
addressed by existing management
plans; and
(f) Whether designating these lands
may result in an increased degree of
threat to the species on these lands;
(10) Whether the draft economic
analysis identifies all State and local
costs attributable to the proposed
critical habitat designation, and
information on any costs that have been
inadvertently overlooked;
(11) Whether the draft economic
analysis makes appropriate assumptions
regarding current practices and likely
regulatory changes imposed as a result
of the designation of critical habitat;
(12) Whether the draft economic
analysis correctly assesses the effect on
regional costs associated with any land
use controls that may derive from the
designation of critical habitat;
(13) Whether the draft economic
analysis appropriately identifies all
costs and benefits that could result from
the designation; and
(14) Whether our approach to critical
habitat designation could be improved
or modified in any way to provide for
greater public participation and
understanding, or to assist us in
accommodating public concern and
comments.
If you wish to comment, you may
submit your comments and materials
concerning this proposal and the draft
economic analysis by any one of several
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
28017
methods (see ADDRESSES section). Please
note that comments merely stating
support or opposition to the actions
under consideration without providing
supporting information, although noted,
will not be considered in making a
determination, as section 4(b)(1)(A) of
the Act directs that determinations to be
made ‘‘solely on the basis of the best
scientific and commercial data
available.’’ Please submit comments
electronically to hedch@fws.gov in
ASCII or Microsoft Word file format.
Please also include ‘‘Attn: Hine’s
Emerald Dragonfly Critical Habitat’’ in
your e-mail subject header and your
name and return address in the body of
your message. If you do not receive a
confirmation from the system that we
have received your e-mail, contact us
directly by calling the Chicago, Illinois,
Ecological Services Field Office at
telephone number (847) 381–2253,
extension 28. Please note that the e-mail
address hedch@fws.gov will be closed
out at the termination of the public
comment period.
Our practice is to make comments,
including names and home addresses of
respondents, available for public review
during regular business hours.
Individual respondents may request that
we withhold their home addresses from
the rulemaking record, which we will
honor to the extent allowable by law.
There also may be circumstances in
which we would withhold from the
rulemaking record a respondent’s
identity, as allowable by law. If you
wish us to withhold your name and/or
address, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comment, but you should be aware that
the Service may be required to disclose
your name and address pursuant to the
Freedom of Information Act. We will
make all submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, available
for public inspection in their entirety.
Comments and materials received will
be available for public inspection, by
appointment, during normal business
hours at the address indicated in the
ADDRESSES section.
Copies of the proposed rule for
critical habitat designation, the revised
proposed rule, and the draft economic
analysis are available on the Internet at
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/
Endangered/ or from the Chicago
Illinois Ecological Services Field Office
(see ADDRESSES).
Our final designation of critical
habitat will take into consideration all
comments and any additional
information we received during the
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
28018
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 96 / Friday, May 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
comment periods. Previous comments
and information submitted during the
initial comment period on the July 26,
2006, proposed rule (71 FR 42442) need
not be resubmitted. The subsequent
comment period on the March 20, 2007,
revised proposed rule and the draft
economic analysis (72 FR 13061) closed
on April 3, 2007. Previous comments
and information submitted during that
comment period need not be
resubmitted. Furthermore, comments
received on the proposal, revised
proposal, or economic analysis after
April 3, 2007, but before this reopening
will be incorporated into the public
record as a part of this reopening and do
not need to be resubmitted.
On the basis of information received
during the public comment periods, we
may, during the development of our
final critical habitat determination, find
that areas proposed are not essential, are
appropriate for exclusion under section
4(b)(2) of the Act, or are not appropriate
for exclusion. An area may be excluded
from critical habitat if it is determined
that the benefits of such exclusion
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:31 May 17, 2007
Jkt 211001
outweigh the benefits of including a
particular area as critical habitat, unless
the failure to designate such area as
critical habitat will result in the
extinction of the species. We may
exclude an area from designated critical
habitat based on economic impacts,
national security, or any other relevant
impact.
Background
On July 26, 2006, we published a
proposed rule to designate critical
habitat for the Hine’s emerald dragonfly
(71 FR 42442). On March 20, 2007, we
published revisions to that proposal and
announced the availability of the draft
economic analysis (72 FR 13061). In
total, approximately 27,836 acres (ac)
(11,264 hectares (ha)) fall within the
boundaries of the proposed critical
habitat designation in 50 units located
in Cook, DuPage, and Will Counties in
Illinois; Alpena, Mackinac, and Presque
Isle Counties in Michigan; Dent, Iron,
Morgan, Phelps, Reynolds, Ripley,
Shannon, Washington, and Wayne
Counties in Missouri; and Door and
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Ozaukee Counties in Wisconsin. We are
considering excluding, under section
4(b)(2) of the Act, all 26 units in
Missouri and 2 units in Michigan from
the final critical habitat designation. In
the proposal, we addressed a number of
general issues that are relevant to the
exclusions we are considering,
including conservation partnerships on
non-Federal lands, conservation
agreements, and National Forest plans.
We will submit for publication in the
Federal Register a final critical habitat
designation for the Hine’s emerald
dragonfly on or before August 23, 2007.
Author
The primary author of this notice is
Kristopher Lah of the Chicago, Illinois,
Ecological Services Field Office (see
ADDRESSES).
Dated: May 15, 2007.
Todd Willens,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 07–2500 Filed 5–16–07; 10:43 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 96 (Friday, May 18, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 28016-28018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2500]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 17
RIN 1018-AU74
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Designation of
Critical Habitat for the Hine's Emerald Dragonfly
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; reopening of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce the
reopening of the public comment period for the proposed designation of
critical habitat for the endangered Hine's emerald dragonfly
(Somatochlora hineana) and the draft economic analysis, under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). We are reopening the
public comment period to allow additional time for all interested
parties to comment on the proposed rule, our revision to the proposed
rule, and the associated draft economic analysis. Comments previously
submitted need not be resubmitted, as we will incorporate them into the
public record and fully consider them as we prepare the final rule.
DATES: We will accept public comments until July 2, 2007.
ADDRESSES: If you wish to comment, you may submit your comments and
information concerning this proposal, identified by ``Attn: Hine's
Emerald Dragonfly Critical Habitat,'' by any one of several methods:
(1) Mail or hand-deliver to: John Rogner, Field Supervisor, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Chicago Ecological Services Field Office,
1250 S. Grove, Suite 103, Barrington, IL 60010.
(2) Send by electronic mail (e-mail) to hedch@fws.gov. Please see
the Public Comments Solicited section below for file format and other
information about electronic filing.
(3) Fax your comments to: (847) 381-2285.
(4) Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Rogner, Field Supervisor, Chicago
Ecological Services Field Office, 1250 S. Grove, Suite 103, Barrington,
IL 60010 (telephone (847) 381-2253, extension 28; facsimile (847) 381-
2285).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 28017]]
Public Comments Solicited
We intend that any final action resulting from the proposal will be
as accurate and as effective as possible. Therefore, we hereby solicit
comments or suggestions from the public, other concerned governmental
agencies, the scientific community, industry, or any other interested
party concerning the proposed rule. We particularly seek comments
concerning:
(1) The reasons any habitat should or should not be determined to
be critical habitat as provided by section 4 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 1531
et seq.), including whether the benefit of designation will outweigh
any adverse impacts to the species due to designation;
(2) Specific information on the amount and distribution of Hine's
emerald dragonfly habitat, particularly what areas should be included
in the designations that were occupied at the time of listing and that
contain features that are essential for the conservation of the species
and why; and what areas that were not occupied at the time of listing
are essential to the conservation of the species and why;
(3) Information that would add further clarity or specificity to
the physical and biological features determined to be essential for the
conservation of the Hine's emerald dragonfly (i.e., primary constituent
elements), particularly whether the primary constituent elements as
described fulfill the needs for the various life stages of the Hine's
emerald dragonfly (e.g., whether old fields adjacent to and in near
proximity to larval areas are essential features);
(4) Whether lands not currently occupied by the species should be
included in the designation, and if so, the basis for such an
inclusion;
(5) Whether the methodology used to map critical habitat units
captures all of the biological and physical features essential to the
conservation of the Hine's emerald dragonfly;
(6) Land use designations and current or planned activities in the
subject areas and their possible impacts on proposed critical habitat;
(7) Whether the benefit of exclusion in any particular area
outweigh the benefits of inclusion under Section 4(b)(2) of the Act;
(8) Any foreseeable economic, national security, or other potential
impacts resulting from the proposed designation and, in particular, any
impacts on small entities;
(9) We are considering excluding areas under the jurisdiction of
the Hiawatha National Forest in Michigan, the Mark Twain National
Forest in Missouri, and the Missouri Department of Conservation and
units under private ownership in Missouri from the final designation of
critical habitat under section 4(b)(2) of the Act on the basis of
conservation programs and partnerships. We will also review other
relevant information for units being proposed in this rule as we
receive it to determine whether other units may be appropriate for
exclusion from the final designation under section 4(b)(2) of the Act.
We specifically solicit comment on the inclusion or exclusion of such
areas and:
(a) Whether these areas have features that are essential to the
conservation of the species or are otherwise essential to the
conservation of the species;
(b) Whether these, or other areas proposed, but not specifically
addressed in this proposal, warrant exclusion;
(c) Relevant factors that should be considered by us when
evaluating the basis for not designating these areas as critical
habitat under section 4(b)(2) of the Act;
(d) Whether management plans in place adequately provide
conservation measures and protect the Hine's emerald dragonfly, its
habitat, and features essential to its conservation;
(e) Whether designation would assist in the regulation of any
threats not addressed by existing management plans; and
(f) Whether designating these lands may result in an increased
degree of threat to the species on these lands;
(10) Whether the draft economic analysis identifies all State and
local costs attributable to the proposed critical habitat designation,
and information on any costs that have been inadvertently overlooked;
(11) Whether the draft economic analysis makes appropriate
assumptions regarding current practices and likely regulatory changes
imposed as a result of the designation of critical habitat;
(12) Whether the draft economic analysis correctly assesses the
effect on regional costs associated with any land use controls that may
derive from the designation of critical habitat;
(13) Whether the draft economic analysis appropriately identifies
all costs and benefits that could result from the designation; and
(14) Whether our approach to critical habitat designation could be
improved or modified in any way to provide for greater public
participation and understanding, or to assist us in accommodating
public concern and comments.
If you wish to comment, you may submit your comments and materials
concerning this proposal and the draft economic analysis by any one of
several methods (see ADDRESSES section). Please note that comments
merely stating support or opposition to the actions under consideration
without providing supporting information, although noted, will not be
considered in making a determination, as section 4(b)(1)(A) of the Act
directs that determinations to be made ``solely on the basis of the
best scientific and commercial data available.'' Please submit comments
electronically to hedch@fws.gov in ASCII or Microsoft Word file format.
Please also include ``Attn: Hine's Emerald Dragonfly Critical Habitat''
in your e-mail subject header and your name and return address in the
body of your message. If you do not receive a confirmation from the
system that we have received your e-mail, contact us directly by
calling the Chicago, Illinois, Ecological Services Field Office at
telephone number (847) 381-2253, extension 28. Please note that the e-
mail address hedch@fws.gov will be closed out at the termination of the
public comment period.
Our practice is to make comments, including names and home
addresses of respondents, available for public review during regular
business hours. Individual respondents may request that we withhold
their home addresses from the rulemaking record, which we will honor to
the extent allowable by law. There also may be circumstances in which
we would withhold from the rulemaking record a respondent's identity,
as allowable by law. If you wish us to withhold your name and/or
address, you must state this prominently at the beginning of your
comment, but you should be aware that the Service may be required to
disclose your name and address pursuant to the Freedom of Information
Act. We will make all submissions from organizations or businesses, and
from individuals identifying themselves as representatives or officials
of organizations or businesses, available for public inspection in
their entirety. Comments and materials received will be available for
public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the
address indicated in the ADDRESSES section.
Copies of the proposed rule for critical habitat designation, the
revised proposed rule, and the draft economic analysis are available on
the Internet at https://www.fws.gov/midwest/Endangered/ or from the
Chicago Illinois Ecological Services Field Office (see ADDRESSES).
Our final designation of critical habitat will take into
consideration all comments and any additional information we received
during the
[[Page 28018]]
comment periods. Previous comments and information submitted during the
initial comment period on the July 26, 2006, proposed rule (71 FR
42442) need not be resubmitted. The subsequent comment period on the
March 20, 2007, revised proposed rule and the draft economic analysis
(72 FR 13061) closed on April 3, 2007. Previous comments and
information submitted during that comment period need not be
resubmitted. Furthermore, comments received on the proposal, revised
proposal, or economic analysis after April 3, 2007, but before this
reopening will be incorporated into the public record as a part of this
reopening and do not need to be resubmitted.
On the basis of information received during the public comment
periods, we may, during the development of our final critical habitat
determination, find that areas proposed are not essential, are
appropriate for exclusion under section 4(b)(2) of the Act, or are not
appropriate for exclusion. An area may be excluded from critical
habitat if it is determined that the benefits of such exclusion
outweigh the benefits of including a particular area as critical
habitat, unless the failure to designate such area as critical habitat
will result in the extinction of the species. We may exclude an area
from designated critical habitat based on economic impacts, national
security, or any other relevant impact.
Background
On July 26, 2006, we published a proposed rule to designate
critical habitat for the Hine's emerald dragonfly (71 FR 42442). On
March 20, 2007, we published revisions to that proposal and announced
the availability of the draft economic analysis (72 FR 13061). In
total, approximately 27,836 acres (ac) (11,264 hectares (ha)) fall
within the boundaries of the proposed critical habitat designation in
50 units located in Cook, DuPage, and Will Counties in Illinois;
Alpena, Mackinac, and Presque Isle Counties in Michigan; Dent, Iron,
Morgan, Phelps, Reynolds, Ripley, Shannon, Washington, and Wayne
Counties in Missouri; and Door and Ozaukee Counties in Wisconsin. We
are considering excluding, under section 4(b)(2) of the Act, all 26
units in Missouri and 2 units in Michigan from the final critical
habitat designation. In the proposal, we addressed a number of general
issues that are relevant to the exclusions we are considering,
including conservation partnerships on non-Federal lands, conservation
agreements, and National Forest plans.
We will submit for publication in the Federal Register a final
critical habitat designation for the Hine's emerald dragonfly on or
before August 23, 2007.
Author
The primary author of this notice is Kristopher Lah of the Chicago,
Illinois, Ecological Services Field Office (see ADDRESSES).
Dated: May 15, 2007.
Todd Willens,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 07-2500 Filed 5-16-07; 10:43 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P