Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Delaware; Electric Generating Unit Multi-Pollutant Regulation, 27787-27789 [E7-9519]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 95 / Thursday, May 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
laws and executive orders for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 948
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: April 19, 2007.
Michael K. Robinson,
Acting Regional Director, Appalachian
Region.
[FR Doc. E7–9506 Filed 5–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2007–0027; FRL–8316–3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Delaware; Electric Generating Unit
Multi-Pollutant Regulation
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve
a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of
Delaware. This revision pertains to
establishing limits on the emissions of
nitrogen oxides (NOX) and sulfur
dioxide (SO2) from Delaware’s large
electric generation units (EGUs). This
action is being taken under the Clean
Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before June 18, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID Number EPA–
R03–OAR–2007–0027 by one of the
following methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
B. E-mail: miller.linda@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2007–0027,
Linda Miller, Acting Chief, Air Quality
Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region III, 1650 Arch Street,
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2007–
0027. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change, and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:03 May 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The
https://www.regulations.gov Web site is
an (anonymous access( system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
i.e., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. Copies of the State submittal are
available at the Delaware Department of
Natural Resources & Environmental
Control, 89 Kings Highway, P.O. Box
1401, Dover, Delaware 19901.
Rose
Quinto, (215) 814–2182, or by e-mail at
quinto.rose@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
On
November 16, 2006, the Delaware
Department of Natural Resources and
Environmental Control (DNREC)
submitted a revision to its State
Implementation Plan (SIP) for
Regulation No. 1146—Electric
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27787
Generating Unit Multi-Pollutant
Regulation.
I. Background
Regulation No. 1146 establishes NOX,
SO2 and mercury emissions limits to
achieve reductions of those pollutants
from Delaware’s large EGUs of coal-fired
and residual oil-fired EGUs with a
nameplate capacity rating of 25
megawatts (MW) or greater generating
capacity. Only the NOX and SO2
sections of this regulation will be
discussed in this rulemaking. The
mercury sections of this regulation will
be discussed in a separate rulemaking.
Regulation No. 1146 will help
Delaware attain and maintain the
national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS) for ozone and particulate
matter (PM2.5) and will assist Delaware
in achieving the emissions reductions
needed to support Delaware’s 8-hour
ozone reasonable further progress plan
(RFP). This multi-pollutant regulation
will not replace the Federal Clean Air
Interstate Rule (CAIR) requirements and
does not relieve affected sources from
participating in and complying with all
CAIR cap-and-trade program
requirements.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
Regulation No. 1146 applies to coalfired and residual oil-fired EGUs located
in Delaware with a nameplate capacity
rating of 25 MW or greater. The large
EGUs subject to Regulation No. 1146 are
Conective Delmarva Generating, Inc.’s
Edge Moor Generating Station Units 3,
4 and 5 located in New Castle County;
the City of Dover’s McKee Run
Generating Station Unit 3 located in
Kent County; and NRG Energy, Inc.’s
Indian River Generating Station Units 1,
2, 3 and 4 located in Sussex County.
Regulation No. 1146 also contains
definitions; emissions limitations for
NOX and SO2; recordkeeping and
reporting; compliance plan; and annual
mass emission limits for NOX and SO2.
A. Emissions Limitations
1. NOX
Regulation No. 1146 includes short
term NOX emission rate limits and will
be implemented in a phased manner.
For Phase I, May 1, 2009 through
December 31, 2011, the short term NOX
emission rate limit is 0.15 lb/MMBTU of
heat input on a rolling 24-hour average
basis. For Phase II, January 1, 2012 and
beyond, the short term NOX emission
rate limit is 0.125 lb/MMBTU of heat
input on a rolling 24-hour average basis.
A unit subject to this regulation shall
not emit annual NOX mass emissions
that exceed the values shown in Table
I on or after January 1, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
27788
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 95 / Thursday, May 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
TABLE I.—ANNUAL NOX MASS
EMISSIONS LIMITS
Unit
Control period
NOX mass
emissions limit
(tons)
Edge Moor 3 .....................
Edge Moor 4 .....................
Edge Moor 5 .....................
Indian River 1 ...................
Indian River 2 ...................
Indian River 3 ...................
Indian River 4 ...................
McKee Run 3 ....................
773
1339
1348
601
628
977
2032
244
2. SO2
Regulation No. 1146 includes short
term SO2 emission rate limits and will
also be implemented in a phased
manner. For Phase I, May 1, 2009
through December 31, 2011, the short
term SO2 emission rate limit is 0.37 lb/
MMBTU of heat input on a rolling 24hour average basis. For Phase II, January
1, 2012 and beyond, the short term SO2
emission rate limit is 0.26 lb/MMBTU of
heat input on a rolling 24-hour average
basis.
A unit subject to this regulation shall
not emit annual SO2 mass emissions
that exceed the values shown in Table
II on or after January 1, 2009.
TABLE II.—ANNUAL SO2 MASS
EMISSIONS LIMITS
Unit
Control period
SO2 mass
emissions limit
(tons)
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
Edge Moor 3 .....................
Edge Moor 4 .....................
Edge Moor 5 .....................
Indian River 1 ...................
Indian River 2 ...................
Indian River 3 ...................
Indian River 4 ...................
McKee Run 3 ....................
1391
2410
2427
1082
1130
1759
3657
439
B. Compliance Demonstration
NOX and SO2 emissions from multiple
units subject to Regulation No. 1146 at
a common facility may be averaged on
a heat input basis to demonstrate
compliance.
Regulation No. 1146 requires
compliance demonstration with the
emissions limitations for NOX and SO2
through the use of EPA and DNREC
approved continuous emissions
monitoring systems (CEMS). Regulation
No. 1146 also requires that these CEMS
must be installed, certified, calibrated,
operated, and maintained in accordance
with EPA requirements. For NOX and
SO2 emissions, Regulation No. 1146
specifies that CEMS must comply with
all 40 CFR part 75; including
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:03 May 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
monitoring, recordkeeping, quality
assurance/quality control (QA/QC), and
reporting requirements. These are the
same requirements that are necessary for
compliance with EPA’s CAIR program,
for which each of the units subject to
this regulation are also subject.
C. Compliance Plan
Regulation No. 1146 requires a
submission of a compliance plan from
the owner or operator of a unit subject
to this regulation to DNREC on or before
July 1, 2007.
D. Recordkeeping and Reporting
Regulation No. 1146 requires
compliance with all applicable
recordkeeping and reporting
requirements of 40 CFR part 75. Owner
or operator of a unit subject to this
regulation shall maintain for a period of
at least 5 years, copies of all
measurements, tests, reports and other
information required by 40 CFR part 75.
This information shall be provided to
DNREC upon request at anytime.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the
Delaware SIP revision for Regulation
No. 1146—Electric Generating Unit
Multi-Pollutant Regulation submitted on
November 16, 2006 pertaining to NOX
and SO2. This regulation will result in
the reduction of NOX and SO2 emissions
from the affected sources. EPA is
soliciting public comments on the
issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered
before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this proposed
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ and therefore is not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)). This action merely proposes
to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this
proposed rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). Because this rule proposes to
approve pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4). This proposed rule also
does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will
it have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely
proposes to approve a state rule
implementing a Federal requirement,
and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This proposed rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this proposed rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct. EPA
has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the executive
order.
This proposed rule pertaining to
Delaware’s Electric Generating Unit
Multi-Pollutant Regulation, does not
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 95 / Thursday, May 17, 2007 / Proposed Rules
impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 10, 2007.
William T. Wisniewski,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. E7–9519 Filed 5–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 131
[EPA–HQ–OW–2007–0259; FRL–8315–3]
Water Quality Standards for Puerto
Rico
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing water
quality standards that would establish
methods to implement Puerto Rico’s
existing antidegradation policy for
waters in the Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 18, 2007.
EPA will hold a public hearing on this
proposed rule on Monday June 4, 2007,
from 2 p.m. to 5 p.m. and from 7 p.m.
to 9 p.m. The public hearing will occur
at the Universidad Metropolitana
(UMET) Theatre, Ave. Ana G. Mendez,
Km 0.3, Cupey, Puerto Rico 00928. If
you need special accommodations at
this meeting, including wheelchair
access or sign language interpreter, you
should contact Yasmin Laguer at 787–
997–5848 at least 10 business days prior
to the meeting so that we can make
appropriate arrangements.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket Id. No. [EPA–HQ–
OW–2007–0259], by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: ow-docket@epa.gov.
• Mail to either: Water Docket,
USEPA, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460 or Docket Manager, Proposed
Water Quality Standards for Puerto
Rico, U.S. EPA Region 2, 290 Broadway,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:03 May 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
New York, New York 10007, Attention
Docket ID No. OW–2007–0259.
• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center,
EPA West Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington,
DC, 20004 or Docket Manager, Proposed
Water Quality Standards for Puerto
Rico, U.S. EPA Region 2, 290 Broadway,
New York, New York 10007, Attention
Docket ID No. OW–2007–0259. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket’s normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OW–2007–
0259. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov
website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means EPA will not
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through www.regulations.gov your
e-mail address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
Internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD–ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
27789
two Docket Facilities. The OW Docket
Center is open from 8:30 a.m. until 4:30
p.m, Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The Docket telephone
number is (202) 566–2426 and the
Docket address is OW Docket, EPA
West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20004. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566–1744.
Publicly available docket materials are
also available in hard copy at U.S. EPA
Region 2, 290 Broadway, 24th Floor,
New York, New York 10007. This
location is open from 8:30 a.m. until
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number is (212) 637–3807. Publicly
available docket materials will be
viewable electronically at the Caribbean
Environmental Protection Division, U.S.
EPA Region 2, 1492 Ponce De Leon
Avenue, Suite 417, Centro Europa
Building, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00907.
This facility is open from 9 a.m. to 3:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number is
(787) 977–5848.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Wayne Jackson, U.S. EPA Region 2,
Division of Environmental Planning and
Protection, 290 Broadway, New York,
New York 10007 (telephone: 212–637–
3807 or e-mail: jackson.wayne@epa.gov)
or Danielle Fuligni, U.S. EPA
Headquarters, Office of Science and
Technology, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Mail Code 4305T,
Washington, DC 20460 (telephone: 202–
566–0793 or e-mail:
fuligni.danielle@epa.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
section is organized as follows:
Table of Contents
I. General Information
A. What Entities May be Affected by This
Action?
B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare my
Comments for EPA?
II. Background
A. What Are the Applicable Federal
Statutory and Regulatory Requirements?
B. Why Is EPA Proposing Federal
Antidegradation Implementation
Methods for the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico?
III. This Proposed Rule
A. What Are the Proposed Antidegradation
Implementation Methods to Protect
Puerto Rico’s High Quality Waters?
B. How Will Puerto Rico Implement the
Proposed Antidegradation
Implementation Methods?
C. What Are the Cost Implications of the
Proposed Rule?
D. Request for Comment
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27787-27789]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9519]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2007-0027; FRL-8316-3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Delaware; Electric Generating Unit Multi-Pollutant Regulation
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of Delaware. This revision pertains to
establishing limits on the emissions of nitrogen oxides
(NOX) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) from Delaware's
large electric generation units (EGUs). This action is being taken
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before June 18, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number EPA-
R03-OAR-2007-0027 by one of the following methods:
A. https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
B. E-mail: miller.linda@epa.gov.
C. Mail: EPA-R03-OAR-2007-0027, Linda Miller, Acting Chief, Air
Quality Planning Branch, Mailcode 3AP21, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103.
D. Hand Delivery: At the previously-listed EPA Region III address.
Such deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of
boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2007-0027. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change, and may be made available online
at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The https://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an (anonymous access( system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy during normal business hours at the
Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region
III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the
State submittal are available at the Delaware Department of Natural
Resources & Environmental Control, 89 Kings Highway, P.O. Box 1401,
Dover, Delaware 19901.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rose Quinto, (215) 814-2182, or by e-
mail at quinto.rose@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 16, 2006, the Delaware
Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC)
submitted a revision to its State Implementation Plan (SIP) for
Regulation No. 1146--Electric Generating Unit Multi-Pollutant
Regulation.
I. Background
Regulation No. 1146 establishes NOX, SO2 and
mercury emissions limits to achieve reductions of those pollutants from
Delaware's large EGUs of coal-fired and residual oil-fired EGUs with a
nameplate capacity rating of 25 megawatts (MW) or greater generating
capacity. Only the NOX and SO2 sections of this
regulation will be discussed in this rulemaking. The mercury sections
of this regulation will be discussed in a separate rulemaking.
Regulation No. 1146 will help Delaware attain and maintain the
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone and
particulate matter (PM2.5) and will assist Delaware in
achieving the emissions reductions needed to support Delaware's 8-hour
ozone reasonable further progress plan (RFP). This multi-pollutant
regulation will not replace the Federal Clean Air Interstate Rule
(CAIR) requirements and does not relieve affected sources from
participating in and complying with all CAIR cap-and-trade program
requirements.
II. Summary of SIP Revision
Regulation No. 1146 applies to coal-fired and residual oil-fired
EGUs located in Delaware with a nameplate capacity rating of 25 MW or
greater. The large EGUs subject to Regulation No. 1146 are Conective
Delmarva Generating, Inc.'s Edge Moor Generating Station Units 3, 4 and
5 located in New Castle County; the City of Dover's McKee Run
Generating Station Unit 3 located in Kent County; and NRG Energy,
Inc.'s Indian River Generating Station Units 1, 2, 3 and 4 located in
Sussex County.
Regulation No. 1146 also contains definitions; emissions
limitations for NOX and SO2; recordkeeping and
reporting; compliance plan; and annual mass emission limits for
NOX and SO2.
A. Emissions Limitations
1. NOX
Regulation No. 1146 includes short term NOX emission
rate limits and will be implemented in a phased manner. For Phase I,
May 1, 2009 through December 31, 2011, the short term NOX
emission rate limit is 0.15 lb/MMBTU of heat input on a rolling 24-hour
average basis. For Phase II, January 1, 2012 and beyond, the short term
NOX emission rate limit is 0.125 lb/MMBTU of heat input on a
rolling 24-hour average basis.
A unit subject to this regulation shall not emit annual
NOX mass emissions that exceed the values shown in Table I
on or after January 1, 2009.
[[Page 27788]]
Table I.--Annual NOX Mass Emissions Limits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Control period
NOX mass
Unit emissions limit
(tons)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edge Moor 3........................................... 773
Edge Moor 4........................................... 1339
Edge Moor 5........................................... 1348
Indian River 1........................................ 601
Indian River 2........................................ 628
Indian River 3........................................ 977
Indian River 4........................................ 2032
McKee Run 3........................................... 244
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. SO2
Regulation No. 1146 includes short term SO2 emission
rate limits and will also be implemented in a phased manner. For Phase
I, May 1, 2009 through December 31, 2011, the short term SO2
emission rate limit is 0.37 lb/MMBTU of heat input on a rolling 24-hour
average basis. For Phase II, January 1, 2012 and beyond, the short term
SO2 emission rate limit is 0.26 lb/MMBTU of heat input on a
rolling 24-hour average basis.
A unit subject to this regulation shall not emit annual
SO2 mass emissions that exceed the values shown in Table II
on or after January 1, 2009.
Table II.--Annual SO2 Mass Emissions Limits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Control period
SO2 mass
Unit emissions limit
(tons)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Edge Moor 3........................................... 1391
Edge Moor 4........................................... 2410
Edge Moor 5........................................... 2427
Indian River 1........................................ 1082
Indian River 2........................................ 1130
Indian River 3........................................ 1759
Indian River 4........................................ 3657
McKee Run 3........................................... 439
------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Compliance Demonstration
NOX and SO2 emissions from multiple units
subject to Regulation No. 1146 at a common facility may be averaged on
a heat input basis to demonstrate compliance.
Regulation No. 1146 requires compliance demonstration with the
emissions limitations for NOX and SO2 through the
use of EPA and DNREC approved continuous emissions monitoring systems
(CEMS). Regulation No. 1146 also requires that these CEMS must be
installed, certified, calibrated, operated, and maintained in
accordance with EPA requirements. For NOX and SO2
emissions, Regulation No. 1146 specifies that CEMS must comply with all
40 CFR part 75; including monitoring, recordkeeping, quality assurance/
quality control (QA/QC), and reporting requirements. These are the same
requirements that are necessary for compliance with EPA's CAIR program,
for which each of the units subject to this regulation are also
subject.
C. Compliance Plan
Regulation No. 1146 requires a submission of a compliance plan from
the owner or operator of a unit subject to this regulation to DNREC on
or before July 1, 2007.
D. Recordkeeping and Reporting
Regulation No. 1146 requires compliance with all applicable
recordkeeping and reporting requirements of 40 CFR part 75. Owner or
operator of a unit subject to this regulation shall maintain for a
period of at least 5 years, copies of all measurements, tests, reports
and other information required by 40 CFR part 75. This information
shall be provided to DNREC upon request at anytime.
III. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the Delaware SIP revision for
Regulation No. 1146--Electric Generating Unit Multi-Pollutant
Regulation submitted on November 16, 2006 pertaining to NOX
and SO2. This regulation will result in the reduction of
NOX and SO2 emissions from the affected sources.
EPA is soliciting public comments on the issues discussed in this
document. These comments will be considered before taking final action.
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
proposed action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and
therefore is not subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive
Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)).
This action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that
this proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule proposes to approve pre-
existing requirements under state law and does not impose any
additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does
not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect
small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). This proposed rule also does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), because it
merely proposes to approve a state rule implementing a Federal
requirement, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of
power and responsibilities established in the Clean Air Act. This
proposed rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required by section 3
of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this proposed rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and
provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining
the takings implications of the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney
General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and
Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive order.
This proposed rule pertaining to Delaware's Electric Generating
Unit Multi-Pollutant Regulation, does not
[[Page 27789]]
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 10, 2007.
William T. Wisniewski,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. E7-9519 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P