Special local regulation: ULHRA Hydroplane Races, Howard Amon Park, Richland, WA, 27735-27738 [07-2460]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 95 / Thursday, May 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 522
Animal drugs.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs and redelegated to
the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21
CFR part 522 is amended as follows:
I
PART 522—IMPLANTATION OR
INJECTABLE DOSAGE FORM NEW
ANIMAL DRUGS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 522 continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.
2. Revise § 522.1192 to read as
follows:
I
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES
§ 522.1192
Ivermectin.
(a) Specifications—(1) Each milliliter
(mL) of solution contains 20 milligrams
(mg) ivermectin.
(2) Each mL of solution contains 10
mg ivermectin.
(3) Each mL of solution contains 2.7
mg ivermectin.
(b) Sponsors. See sponsors in
§ 510.600(c) of this chapter for use as in
paragraph (e) of this section.
(1) No. 050604 for use of the product
described in paragraph (a)(1) of this
section as in paragraph (e)(1) of this
section; the product described in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section as in
paragraphs (e)(2)(i), (e)(2)(ii)(A),
(e)(2)(ii)(C), (e)(2)(iii), (e)(3), (e)(4) and
(e)(5) of this section; and the product
described in paragraph (a)(3) of this
section as in paragraphs (e)(3) and (e)(6)
of this section.
(2) Nos. 059130 and 055529 for use of
the product described in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section as in paragraphs
(e)(2)(i), (e)(2)(ii)(A), (e)(2)(ii)(B),
(e)(2)(iii), (e)(3), (e)(4), and (e)(5) of this
section.
(c) Related tolerances. See § 556.344
of this chapter.
(d) Special considerations—(1) See
§ 500.25 of this chapter.
(2) Labeling shall bear the following
precaution: ‘‘This product should not be
used in other animal species as severe
adverse reactions, including fatalities in
dogs, may result.’’
(e) Conditions of use—(1) Horses—(i)
Amount. 200 micrograms per kilogram
(µg/kg) of body weight by intramuscular
injection.
(ii) Indications for use. For the
treatment and control of large strongyles
(adult) (Strongylus vulgaris, S.
edentatus, Triodontophorus spp.), small
strongyles (adult and fourth stage
larvae) (Cyathostomum spp.,
Cylicocyclus spp., Cylicostephanus
spp.), pinworms (adult and fourth-stage
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:07 May 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
larvae) (Oxyuris equi), large
roundworms (adult) (Parascaris
equorum), hairworms (adult)
(Trichostrongylus axei), large mouth
stomach worms (adult) (Habronema
muscae), neck threadworms
(microfilariae) (Onchocerca spp.), and
stomach bots (Gastrophilus spp.).
(iii) Limitations. Not for use in horses
intended for human consumption.
Federal law restricts this drug to use by
or on the order of a licensed
veterinarian.
(2) Cattle—(i) Amount. 200 µg/kg of
body weight by subcutaneous injection.
(ii) Indications for use—(A) For the
treatment and control of gastrointestinal
nematodes (adults and fourth-stage
larvae) (Haemonchus placei, Ostertagia
ostertagi (including inhibited larvae), O.
lyrata, T. axei, T. colubriformis,
Cooperia oncophora, C. punctata, C.
pectinata, Oesophagostomum radiatum,
Nematodirus helvetianus (adults only),
N. spathiger (adults only), Bunostomum
phlebotomum); lungworms (adults and
fourth-stage larvae) (Dictyocaulus
viviparus); grubs (parasitic stages)
(Hypoderma bovis, H. lineatum);
sucking lice (Linognathus vituli,
Haematopinus eurysternus, Solenopotes
capillatus); mites (scabies) (Psoroptes
ovis (syn. P. communis var. bovis),
Sarcoptes scabiei var. bovis).
(B) For control of infections of D.
viviparus for 28 days after treatment,
and O. ostertagi for 21 days after
treatment, and H. placei, T. axei, C.
punctata, C. oncophora, and O.
radiatum for 14 days after treatment.
(C) For control of infections and to
protect from reinfection with D.
viviparus and O. radiatum for 28 days
after treatment; O. ostertagi, T. axei, and
C. punctata for 21 days after treatment;
H. placei and C. oncophora for 14 days
after treatment.
(iii) Limitations. Do not treat cattle
within 35 days of slaughter. Because a
withdrawal time in milk has not been
established, do not use in female dairy
cattle of breeding age. A withdrawal
period has not been established for this
product in pre-ruminating calves. Do
not use in calves to be processed for
veal.
(3) Swine—(i) Amount. 300 µg/kg of
body weight by subcutaneous injection.
(ii) Indications for use. For the
treatment and control of gastrointestinal
roundworms (adults and fourth-stage
larvae) (large roundworm, Ascaris
suum; red stomach worm,
Hyostrongylus rubidus; nodular worm,
Oesophagostomum spp.; threadworm,
Strongyloides ransomi (adults only));
somatic roundworm larvae
(threadworm, S. ransomi (somatic
larvae)); lungworms (Metastrongylus
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
27735
spp. (adults only)); lice (H. suis); and
mites (S. scabiei var. suis).
(iii) Limitations. Do not treat swine
within 18 days of slaughter.
(4) American bison—(i) Amount. 200
µg/kg of body weight by subcutaneous
injection.
(ii) Indications for use. For the
treatment and control of grubs (H.
bovis).
(iii) Limitations. Do not slaughter
within 56 days of last treatment.
(5) Reindeer—(i) Amount. 200 µg/kg
of body weight by subcutaneous
injection.
(ii) Indications for use. For the
treatment and control of warbles
(Oedemagena tarandi).
(iii) Limitations. Do not treat reindeer
within 56 days of slaughter.
(6) Ranch-raised foxes—(i) Amount.
200 µg/kg of body weight by
subcutaneous injection. Repeat in 3
weeks.
(ii) Indications for use. For treatment
and control of ear mites (Otodectes
cynotis).
Dated: May 7, 2007.
Bernadette Dunham,
Deputy Director, Center for Veterinary
Medicine.
[FR Doc. E7–9515 Filed 5–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD13–07–013]
RIN 1625–AA00
Special local regulation: ULHRA
Hydroplane Races, Howard Amon
Park, Richland, WA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Special local regulation
temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
undertaking two actions with regard to
the above captioned regulation. The first
is to withdraw the temporary final rule
previously published on April 23, 2007
because it erroneously described the
race area. The second is to correct the
previous error by establishing a
temporary special local regulation for
the ULHRA National Series Hydroplane
Race to be held on the waters of the
Columbia River in the vicinity of
Howard Amon Park, Richland, WA.
These special local regulations limit the
movement of non-participating vessels
in the regulated race area. This
E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM
17MYR1
27736
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 95 / Thursday, May 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
temporary rule is needed to provide for
the safety of life on navigable waters
during the event.
DATES: This regulation is effective from
7 a.m. (PDT) to 7 p.m. (PDT) on May 19
and 20, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket (CGD13–07–
013) and are available for inspection or
copying at U. S. Coast Guard Sector
Portland, 6767 N. Basin Avenue,
Portland, Oregon 97217 between 7 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Petty Officer Michelle Duty, c/o Captain
of the Port, Portland 6767 N. Basin
Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97217, (503)
240–2590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds
that good cause exists for not publishing
an NPRM and for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Publishing an NPRM would be contrary
to public interest since immediate
action is necessary to ensure the safety
of vessels and spectators. If normal
notice and comment procedures were
followed, or if the effective date of this
rule were delayed by 30 days, this rule
would not become effective until after
the date of the event. For this reason,
following normal rulemaking
procedures in this case would be
contrary to the public interest.
Background and Purpose
The Coast Guard is undertaking two
actions in this document. The first is to
withdraw the temporary final rule
previously published on April 23, 2007
at 72 FR 20047 because it erroneously
described the race area. The second is
to correct the previous error by
establishing a temporary special local
regulation for the ULHRA National
Series Hydroplane Race to be held on
the waters of the Columbia River in the
vicinity of Howard Amon Park,
Richland, WA.
The Coast Guard is establishing a
temporary special local regulation to
allow for a safe racing event. This event
occurs on the Columbia River in the
vicinity of Howard Amon Park in
Richland, WA and is scheduled to start
at 7 a.m. (PDT) and last until 7 p.m.
(PDT) on May 19 and 20, 2007. This
event may result in a number of
recreational vessels congregating near
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 May 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
the hydroplane races. The hydroplane
race poses several dangers to the public
including excessive noise, objects
falling from any accidents, and
hydroplanes racing at high speeds in
proximity to other vessels. Accordingly,
the Special local regulation is needed to
protect watercraft and their occupants
from safety hazards associated with the
event. This Special local regulation will
be enforced by representatives of the
Captain of the Port, Portland, Oregon.
The Captain of the Port may be assisted
by other federal, state, and local
agencies.
Discussion of Rule
This temporary rule will create a
regulated area to assist in minimizing
the inherent dangers associated with
hydroplane races. These dangers
include, but are not limited to, excessive
noise, race craft traveling at high speed
in close proximity to one another and to
spectator craft, and the risk of airborne
objects from any accidents associated
with hydroplanes. In the event that
hydroplanes require emergency
assistance, rescuers must have
immediate and unencumbered access to
the craft. The Coast Guard, through this
action, intends to promote the safety of
personnel, vessels, and facilities in the
area. Due to these concerns, public
safety requires these regulations to
provide for the safety of life on the
navigable waters.
Regulatory Evaluation
This temporary rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this temporary rule to be so minimal
that a full Regulatory Evaluation under
the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary. This expectation
is based on the fact that the regulated
area established by this rule
encompasses an area on the Columbia
River near Howard Amon Park in
Richland, WA not frequented by
commercial navigation. The regulation
is established for the benefit and safety
of the recreational boating public and
the event will pause in order to allow
the ferry to pass through the area at its
allotted times, any negative recreational
boating impact is offset by the benefits
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of allowing the hydroplanes to race.
This rule would be enforced from 7 a.m.
to 7 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time each day
on May 19 and 20, 2007. For the above
reasons, the Coast Guard does not
anticipate any significant economic
impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of the Columbia River during
the time mentioned under Background
and Purpose. This Special local
regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities due to its short
duration and small area. The only
vessels likely to be impacted will be
recreational boaters, small passenger
vessel operators, and a ferry that runs
through the regulated area twice a day.
The event is held for the benefit and
entertainment of the recreational and
small passenger vessel operators, and
the event will pause in order to allow
the ferry to pass through the area at its
allotted times. Because the impacts of
this proposal are expected to be so
minimal, the Coast Guard certifies
under 605(b) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) that
this temporary rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this temporary rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offered to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM
17MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 95 / Thursday, May 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–888–REG–888–FAIR (1–888–734–
3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that order and have
determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism under that
Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
state, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES
This rule will not effect taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 May 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian tribal governments, because
it does not have a substantial direct
effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the federal
government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the federal
government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.1D
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
27737
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h) of Commandant Instruction
M16475.1D, from further environmental
documentation. Special local
regulations issued in conjunction with a
regatta or marine event permit are
specifically excluded from further
analysis and documentation under that
section.
Under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(h) of
the instruction, an ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ and a categorical
exclusion determination are not
required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine Safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and Recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 100 as follows:
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
§ 100.T13–009
[Withdrawn].
2. Withdraw temporary § 100.T13–
009.
I 3. Add temporary § 100.T13–010 to
read as follows:
I
§ 100.T13–010 ULHRA Hydroplane Races
Howard Amon Park, Richland, Washington.
(a) Regulated Area. The regulated area
is defined as the waters of the Columbia
River from bank to bank in the vicinity
of Howard Amon Park on the Columbia
River in Richland, Washington
commencing at the Interstate 182 Bridge
and continuing up river Northward 3.0
miles and terminating at the Columbia
River Mile 339.
(b) Special Local Regulations. This
event will take place from 7 a.m. PDT
to approximately 7 p.m. PDT May 19 to
20, 2007, in the described waters of the
Columbia River in Richland,
Washington.
(1) No persons may enter or remain in
the regulated area except for
participants in the event, supporting
personnel, vessels registered with the
event organizer, and personnel or
E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM
17MYR1
27738
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 95 / Thursday, May 17, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
vessels authorized by the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander.
(2) The Coast Guard Patrol
Commander is a commissioned,
warrant, petty officer, or auxiliarist of
the Coast Guard who has been
designated by Commander, Coast Guard
Sector Portland. A Coast Guard
Auxiliarist, when so appointed by the
COTP per 14 U.S.C 831, may act as the
Patrol Commander. The Patrol
Commander is empowered to control
movement of vessels in the regulated
area and adjoining waters during the
hours these regulations are in effect.
(3) A succession of sharp, short
signals by whistle, siren, or horn from
vessels patrolling the area shall serve as
a signal to stop. Vessels or persons
signaled shall stop and shall comply
with the orders of the patrol vessels.
Failure to due so may result in the
expulsion from the area, citation, for
failure to comply or both.
(4) Any spectator vessel may anchor
outside the regulated area specified in
paragraph (a) of this section, but may
not block a navigable channel.
Dated: May 4, 2007.
K.S. Cook,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Commander, 13th Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 07–2460 Filed 5–15–07; 9:58 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 151
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2007–28201 and are
available for inspection or copying at
the Docket Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, room PL–
401, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. You may also find this
docket on the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov.
If
you have questions on this rule, call Mr.
Ray Davis, Coast Guard, telephone 202–
372–1461. If you have questions on
viewing the docket, call Ms. Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–493–0402.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regulatory History
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under both 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(A) and (b)(B), the Coast Guard
finds this rule is exempt from notice
and comment rulemaking requirements
because this change involves agency
organization and practices, and good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM
for the revision in the rule because it is
a non-substantive change. This rule
consists only of a technical and
conforming amendment. The change
will have no substantive effect on the
public; therefore, it is unnecessary to
publish an NPRM. Under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that, for
the same reasons, good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register.
[USCG–2007–28201]
Background and Purpose
RIN 1625–ZA13
This rule, which becomes effective
May 17, 2007, makes a technical
correction to 33 CFR part 151. This rule
does not create any substantive
requirements.
Vessels Carrying Oil, Noxious Liquid
Substances, Garbage, Municipal or
Commercial Waste, and Ballast Water;
Technical, Organizational and
Conforming Amendment
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule makes a nonsubstantive change to Title 33 of the
Code of Federal Regulations. The
purpose of this rule is to make a
conforming amendment and technical
correction to a Coast Guard navigation
and navigable water regulation. This
rule will have no substantive effect on
the regulated public.
DATES: This final rule is effective May
17, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:37 May 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
Discussion of Rule
This rule corrects the authority
citation in part 151 and amends 33 CFR
§ 151.2010. When the Coast Guard
converted the voluntary ballast water
management guidelines in 33 CFR part
151, Subpart D, into a mandatory ballast
water management program (69 FR
44952, July 28, 2004), we inadvertently
did not make changes to § 151.2010 to
reflect several exemptions. Specifically,
that crude oil tankers engaged in
coastwise trade and Department of
Defense and Coast Guard vessels were
exempted from the mandatory ballast
water management requirements in
§ 151.2035, which had previously been
a voluntary program as stated by
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
statutory language in the National
Invasive Species Act of 1996 (NISA). We
discussed this exemption and its
reasoning in the preamble of the 2004
final rule, stating, ‘‘NISA authorizes
specific exemptions for crude oil
tankers engaged in coastwise trade, and
Department of Defense and Coast Guard
vessels. Therefore, we do not currently
have the authority to include these
vessels in the applicability for the final
rule.’’ This statement made clear our
intention to carry that exemption
forward into the mandatory program.
With respect to the exemptions for
vessels operating exclusively within one
Captain of the Port (COTP) Zone, the
language changed to include only
exemptions for §§ 151.2040 and
151.2045, but not § 151.2035. This
exemption is not taken from NISA. The
Coast Guard established it as a
discretionary exercise of its regulatory
authority after notice and comment
rulemaking. It would be inappropriate
to expand the ballast water management
requirements exemption beyond those
previously granted by means of a
technical amendment not subject to a
notice and comment rulemaking. These
vessels will continue following the
requirements in § 151.2035. While this
includes the requirements in
§ 151.2035(b), which calls for ballast
water management for vessels operating
outside the U.S. EEZ, vessels operating
exclusively in a COTP Zone will not
operate outside the U.S. EEZ and,
therefore, compliance with those
particular requirements is not
mandatory. These vessels are reminded,
however, that they must comply with
§ 151.2035(a), which calls for ballast
water management inside of U.S.
waters.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. We expect the economic impact
of this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
As this rule involves internal agency
practices and procedures and a nonsubstantive change, it will not impose
any costs on the public.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
E:\FR\FM\17MYR1.SGM
17MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27735-27738]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2460]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[CGD13-07-013]
RIN 1625-AA00
Special local regulation: ULHRA Hydroplane Races, Howard Amon
Park, Richland, WA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Special local regulation temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is undertaking two actions with regard to the
above captioned regulation. The first is to withdraw the temporary
final rule previously published on April 23, 2007 because it
erroneously described the race area. The second is to correct the
previous error by establishing a temporary special local regulation for
the ULHRA National Series Hydroplane Race to be held on the waters of
the Columbia River in the vicinity of Howard Amon Park, Richland, WA.
These special local regulations limit the movement of non-participating
vessels in the regulated race area. This
[[Page 27736]]
temporary rule is needed to provide for the safety of life on navigable
waters during the event.
DATES: This regulation is effective from 7 a.m. (PDT) to 7 p.m. (PDT)
on May 19 and 20, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket (CGD13-07-013) and are available for
inspection or copying at U. S. Coast Guard Sector Portland, 6767 N.
Basin Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97217 between 7 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Petty Officer Michelle Duty, c/o
Captain of the Port, Portland 6767 N. Basin Avenue, Portland, Oregon
97217, (503) 240-2590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B) and 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing an NPRM and for
making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the
Federal Register. Publishing an NPRM would be contrary to public
interest since immediate action is necessary to ensure the safety of
vessels and spectators. If normal notice and comment procedures were
followed, or if the effective date of this rule were delayed by 30
days, this rule would not become effective until after the date of the
event. For this reason, following normal rulemaking procedures in this
case would be contrary to the public interest.
Background and Purpose
The Coast Guard is undertaking two actions in this document. The
first is to withdraw the temporary final rule previously published on
April 23, 2007 at 72 FR 20047 because it erroneously described the race
area. The second is to correct the previous error by establishing a
temporary special local regulation for the ULHRA National Series
Hydroplane Race to be held on the waters of the Columbia River in the
vicinity of Howard Amon Park, Richland, WA.
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary special local
regulation to allow for a safe racing event. This event occurs on the
Columbia River in the vicinity of Howard Amon Park in Richland, WA and
is scheduled to start at 7 a.m. (PDT) and last until 7 p.m. (PDT) on
May 19 and 20, 2007. This event may result in a number of recreational
vessels congregating near the hydroplane races. The hydroplane race
poses several dangers to the public including excessive noise, objects
falling from any accidents, and hydroplanes racing at high speeds in
proximity to other vessels. Accordingly, the Special local regulation
is needed to protect watercraft and their occupants from safety hazards
associated with the event. This Special local regulation will be
enforced by representatives of the Captain of the Port, Portland,
Oregon. The Captain of the Port may be assisted by other federal,
state, and local agencies.
Discussion of Rule
This temporary rule will create a regulated area to assist in
minimizing the inherent dangers associated with hydroplane races. These
dangers include, but are not limited to, excessive noise, race craft
traveling at high speed in close proximity to one another and to
spectator craft, and the risk of airborne objects from any accidents
associated with hydroplanes. In the event that hydroplanes require
emergency assistance, rescuers must have immediate and unencumbered
access to the craft. The Coast Guard, through this action, intends to
promote the safety of personnel, vessels, and facilities in the area.
Due to these concerns, public safety requires these regulations to
provide for the safety of life on the navigable waters.
Regulatory Evaluation
This temporary rule is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and
benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not
``significant'' under the regulatory policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this temporary rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary. This expectation is based on the
fact that the regulated area established by this rule encompasses an
area on the Columbia River near Howard Amon Park in Richland, WA not
frequented by commercial navigation. The regulation is established for
the benefit and safety of the recreational boating public and the event
will pause in order to allow the ferry to pass through the area at its
allotted times, any negative recreational boating impact is offset by
the benefits of allowing the hydroplanes to race. This rule would be
enforced from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. Pacific Daylight Time each day on May 19
and 20, 2007. For the above reasons, the Coast Guard does not
anticipate any significant economic impact.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in a portion of the Columbia River during the time mentioned
under Background and Purpose. This Special local regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities due to its short duration and small area. The only vessels
likely to be impacted will be recreational boaters, small passenger
vessel operators, and a ferry that runs through the regulated area
twice a day. The event is held for the benefit and entertainment of the
recreational and small passenger vessel operators, and the event will
pause in order to allow the ferry to pass through the area at its
allotted times. Because the impacts of this proposal are expected to be
so minimal, the Coast Guard certifies under 605(b) of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) that this temporary rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this temporary rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can
[[Page 27737]]
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-888-REG-
888-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that order and have determined that this rule does not have
implications for federalism under that Order.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a state, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian tribal governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the federal government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the federal government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.1D
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(h) of Commandant Instruction M16475.1D, from further
environmental documentation. Special local regulations issued in
conjunction with a regatta or marine event permit are specifically
excluded from further analysis and documentation under that section.
Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h) of the instruction, an
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and Recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 100 as follows:
PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
Sec. 100.T13-009 [Withdrawn].
0
2. Withdraw temporary Sec. 100.T13-009.
0
3. Add temporary Sec. 100.T13-010 to read as follows:
Sec. 100.T13-010 ULHRA Hydroplane Races Howard Amon Park, Richland,
Washington.
(a) Regulated Area. The regulated area is defined as the waters of
the Columbia River from bank to bank in the vicinity of Howard Amon
Park on the Columbia River in Richland, Washington commencing at the
Interstate 182 Bridge and continuing up river Northward 3.0 miles and
terminating at the Columbia River Mile 339.
(b) Special Local Regulations. This event will take place from 7
a.m. PDT to approximately 7 p.m. PDT May 19 to 20, 2007, in the
described waters of the Columbia River in Richland, Washington.
(1) No persons may enter or remain in the regulated area except for
participants in the event, supporting personnel, vessels registered
with the event organizer, and personnel or
[[Page 27738]]
vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander.
(2) The Coast Guard Patrol Commander is a commissioned, warrant,
petty officer, or auxiliarist of the Coast Guard who has been
designated by Commander, Coast Guard Sector Portland. A Coast Guard
Auxiliarist, when so appointed by the COTP per 14 U.S.C 831, may act as
the Patrol Commander. The Patrol Commander is empowered to control
movement of vessels in the regulated area and adjoining waters during
the hours these regulations are in effect.
(3) A succession of sharp, short signals by whistle, siren, or horn
from vessels patrolling the area shall serve as a signal to stop.
Vessels or persons signaled shall stop and shall comply with the orders
of the patrol vessels. Failure to due so may result in the expulsion
from the area, citation, for failure to comply or both.
(4) Any spectator vessel may anchor outside the regulated area
specified in paragraph (a) of this section, but may not block a
navigable channel.
Dated: May 4, 2007.
K.S. Cook,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Commander, 13th Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 07-2460 Filed 5-15-07; 9:58 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P