Nez Perce National Forest, Idaho County; ID; Designated Route and Motorized Vehicle Use, 27800-27801 [07-2419]

Download as PDF 27800 Notices Federal Register Vol. 72, No. 95 Thursday, May 17, 2007 pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency statements of organization and functions are examples of documents appearing in this section. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Purpose and Need for Action In November 2005, the USDA published the Travel Management; Designated Routes and Areas for Motor Vehicle Use; Final Rule [36 CFR parts 212, 251, 261, and 295] (the rule). This rule requires designations of those roads, trails, and areas that are open to motor vehicle use. Designations will be made by class of vehicle, and if DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE appropriate, by time of year. The final Forest Service rule prohibits the use of motor vehicles off the designated system, as well as the Nez Perce National Forest, Idaho use of motor vehicles on routes and in County; ID; Designated Route and areas not consistent with those Motorized Vehicle Use designations. The rule seeks to create a system of routes and areas where AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA. motorized use is appropriate. The ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an primary difference from our current environmental impact statement. system that will occur when SUMMARY: The Nez Perce National Forest implementing the rule is that routes and is undergoing planning efforts to areas are closed to motorized use unless comply with the designated routes and specifically designated open. The following vehicles and uses are areas for motor vehicle use rule of exempt from Provisions in the rule [36 November 9, 2005. The forest is CFR 212.51]: proposing to analyze motorized routes and areas forest-wide to determine a Aircraft, Watercraft, Over-snow vehicles, base system, while considering the Limited administrative use by Forest Service, needs of the users, resources effects, Use of any fire, military, emergency, of law enforcement vehicles for emergency rule requirements, and fiscal capabilities for continued maintenance. purposes, Authorized use of any combat or combat support vehicle for national defense DATES: Comments concerning the scope purposes, Law enforcement [in] response to of the analysis must be received by 45 violations of law, and, any motor vehicle use days after the date of publication in the that is specifically authorized under a written Federal Register. The draft authorization issued under Federal law or environmental impact statement is regulation. expected June of 2008 and the final Current direction for the Nez Perce environmental impact statement is National Forest, under the Nez Perce expected February 2009. National Forest Plan (1987) Amendment ADDRESSES: Send written comments to No. 2, October 1988, allows crossJane Cottrell, Forest Supervisor, 1005 country motorized travel unless Highway 13, Grangeville, ID 83530, otherwise designated closed. Attn: Designated Routes and Areas for The Designated Routes and Areas for Motor Vehicle Use. Motor Vehicle Use planning effort is The Nez Perce National Forest has designed to bring the direction for the scheduled public meetings, to be held in Nez Perce National Forest in three separate locations, to introduce compliance with the Executive orders of this project and discuss the most the rule that ‘‘direct Federal agencies to effective ways the public can become ensure that the use of off road vehicles involved. Meetings will take place in on public lands will be controlled and Elk City, ID on May 29, in Grangeville, directed so as to protect the resources of ID on May 30, and in Riggins, ID on May those lands, to promote the safety of all 31, 2007. Additional information will be users of those lands, and to minimize provided in the local newspaper prior to conflicts among various uses of those meeting times. lands’’. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Proposed Action Alexandra Botello, Project Lead, 1005 The proposed action is to designate Highway 13, Grangeville, ID 83530, the current National Forest System Attn: Designated Routes and Areas for (NFS) motorized routes on the Nez Motor Vehicle Use. VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:15 May 16, 2007 Jkt 211001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Perce National Forest, under class of vehicle and seasons of use, as they are presently (April, 2007). This action would close the forest to cross-country motorized travel except in specifically designated areas or to over snow vehicle use (see attached map and legend). The proposed action also includes a distance 300 feet from center of road which allows for motorized use for the purposes of dispersed camping only, in areas where geography and resource protection are not limiting factors (e.g., cliffs, streams, etc.). This action does not supersede CFR 261.12 National Forest System roads and trails; * * * prohibition (c) Damaging and leaving in a damaged condition any such road, trail, or segment thereof. Nor will this action supersede CFR 261.15 Use of vehicles off roads; It is prohibited to operate any vehicle off National Forest System, State, or County roads; (h) In a manner which damages or unreasonably disturbs the land, wildlife, or vegetative resources. Responsible Official Jane Cottrell, Forest Supervisor, Nez Perce National Forest, 1005 Highway 13, Grangeville, ID 83530 is the responsible official for this proposal. Nature of Decision To Be Made The Nez Perce National Forest will decide what routes and areas are appropriate to designate and manage for motor vehicle use by class of vehicle and seasons of use. Additionally, we will determine whether to amend the Nez Perce Forest Plan to remove certain existing standards applicable to motorized routes and area management. Scoping Process The U.S. Forest Service uses the process required by the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA requires a systematic, interdisciplinary approach to ensure integrated application of the natural and social sciences and the environmental design arts in any planning and decisionmaking that affects the human environment (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(A)). Comments are accepted for 45 days after notification in the Federal Register. These comments help identify significant issues and/or eliminate nonsignificant issues from detailed study in the environmental impact statement. E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM 17MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 95 / Thursday, May 17, 2007 / Notices pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES Comment Requested This notice of intent initiates the scoping process which guides the development of the environmental impact statement. The Nez Perce National Forest is seeing comments and issues you may have regarding this project. Comments are most useful if they are specific. Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent Environmental Review: A draft environmental impact statement will be prepared for comment. The comment period on the draft environmental impact statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal Register. The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of draft environmental impact statements must structure their participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer’s position and contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 519,553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at the draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, it is very important that those interested in this proposed action participate by the close of the 45 day comment period so that comments and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final environmental impact statement. To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues nd concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft environmental impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft environmental impact statement or the merits of the alternatives formulated and discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of the VerDate Aug<31>2005 17:15 May 16, 2007 Jkt 211001 National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in addressing these points. Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal and will be available for public inspection. (Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section 21.) Dated: May 10, 2007. Jane L. Cottrell, Nez Perce National Forest Supervisor. [FR Doc. 07–2419 Filed 5–16–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–11–M DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Foreign–Trade Zones Board [Docket T–3–2007] Foreign–Trade Zone 7 - - Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, Application for Temporary/Interim Manufacturing Authority, Merck Sharpe & Dohme Quimica De Puerto Rico, Inc., (Pharmaceutical Products), Caguas, Puerto Rico An application has been submitted to the Executive Secretary of the Foreign– Trade Zones Board (the Board) by the Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company (PRIDCO), grantee of FTZ 7, requesting temporary/interim manufacturing (T/IM) authority within FTZ 7 at the MOVA Pharmaceutical Corporation (MOVA) facility in Caguas, Puerto Rico, on behalf of Merck Sharp & Dohme Quimica De Puerto Rico, Inc. (MSDQ). The application was filed on May 10, 2007. The MOVA facility (650 employees, 250,000 sq. ft.) is located at State Road 1, Km 34.8, within the Villa Blanca Industrial Park in Caguas (Site 1, Parcel 2). T/IM procedures would be used for pharmaceutical manufacturing involving two products, MK–431A and sitagliptin (HTSUS 3004.90 and 2933.59) on behalf of MSDQ for the U.S. market and export. Foreign components that would be used in the manufacturing process (up to 25% of total content) include sitagliptin, metformin hydrochloride, enamine amide and butyl josphos (duty rates of 3.7 to 6.5%). MSDQ has also submitted a request for permanent FTZ manufacturing authority (which will be docketed with the Board separately). FTZ procedures would exempt MSDQ from Customs duty payments on foreign components used in production for export to non–NAFTA countries. For domestic and NAFTA markets, MSDQ could select the duty rate that applies to PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 27801 the finished product (duty–free to 6.5%) for the components used in production when the finished products are entered for U.S. consumption from the zone. The application indicates that the company would also realize duty deferral and certain logistical/supply chain savings. Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions (original and 3 copies) shall be addressed to the Board’s Executive Secretary at the following address: Office of the Executive Secretary, Room 2111, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230. The closing period for receipt of comments is June 18, 2007. A copy of the application will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Foreign–Trade Zones Board’s Executive Secretary at the address listed above. For further information, contact Christopher Kemp at: christopherlkemp@ita.doc.gov, or (202) 482–0862. Dated: May 10, 2007. Andrew McGilvray, Executive Secretary. [FR Doc. E7–9539 Filed 5–16–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–830] Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico: Extension of Time Limits for the Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jolanta Lawska or John Conniff, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 3, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Ave, NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–8362 or (202) 482– 1009, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On November 27, 2006, the Department of Commerce (‘‘Department’’) published a notice of initiation of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Mexico, covering the period October 1, 2005, to September 30, 2006. See Initiation of Antidumping and E:\FR\FM\17MYN1.SGM 17MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 95 (Thursday, May 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27800-27801]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2419]


========================================================================
Notices
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules 
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings 
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings, 
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency 
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents 
appearing in this section.

========================================================================


Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 95 / Thursday, May 17, 2007 / 
Notices

[[Page 27800]]



DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Forest Service


Nez Perce National Forest, Idaho County; ID; Designated Route and 
Motorized Vehicle Use

AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Nez Perce National Forest is undergoing planning efforts 
to comply with the designated routes and areas for motor vehicle use 
rule of November 9, 2005. The forest is proposing to analyze motorized 
routes and areas forest-wide to determine a base system, while 
considering the needs of the users, resources effects, rule 
requirements, and fiscal capabilities for continued maintenance.

DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received 
by 45 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register. The 
draft environmental impact statement is expected June of 2008 and the 
final environmental impact statement is expected February 2009.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Jane Cottrell, Forest Supervisor, 
1005 Highway 13, Grangeville, ID 83530, Attn: Designated Routes and 
Areas for Motor Vehicle Use.
    The Nez Perce National Forest has scheduled public meetings, to be 
held in three separate locations, to introduce this project and discuss 
the most effective ways the public can become involved. Meetings will 
take place in Elk City, ID on May 29, in Grangeville, ID on May 30, and 
in Riggins, ID on May 31, 2007. Additional information will be provided 
in the local newspaper prior to meeting times.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexandra Botello, Project Lead, 1005 
Highway 13, Grangeville, ID 83530, Attn: Designated Routes and Areas 
for Motor Vehicle Use.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Purpose and Need for Action

    In November 2005, the USDA published the Travel Management; 
Designated Routes and Areas for Motor Vehicle Use; Final Rule [36 CFR 
parts 212, 251, 261, and 295] (the rule). This rule requires 
designations of those roads, trails, and areas that are open to motor 
vehicle use. Designations will be made by class of vehicle, and if 
appropriate, by time of year. The final rule prohibits the use of motor 
vehicles off the designated system, as well as the use of motor 
vehicles on routes and in areas not consistent with those designations. 
The rule seeks to create a system of routes and areas where motorized 
use is appropriate. The primary difference from our current system that 
will occur when implementing the rule is that routes and areas are 
closed to motorized use unless specifically designated open.
    The following vehicles and uses are exempt from Provisions in the 
rule [36 CFR 212.51]:

    Aircraft, Watercraft, Over-snow vehicles, Limited administrative 
use by Forest Service, Use of any fire, military, emergency, of law 
enforcement vehicles for emergency purposes, Authorized use of any 
combat or combat support vehicle for national defense purposes, Law 
enforcement [in] response to violations of law, and, any motor 
vehicle use that is specifically authorized under a written 
authorization issued under Federal law or regulation.

Current direction for the Nez Perce National Forest, under the Nez 
Perce National Forest Plan (1987) Amendment No. 2, October 1988, allows 
cross-country motorized travel unless otherwise designated closed.
    The Designated Routes and Areas for Motor Vehicle Use planning 
effort is designed to bring the direction for the Nez Perce National 
Forest in compliance with the Executive orders of the rule that 
``direct Federal agencies to ensure that the use of off road vehicles 
on public lands will be controlled and directed so as to protect the 
resources of those lands, to promote the safety of all users of those 
lands, and to minimize conflicts among various uses of those lands''.

Proposed Action

    The proposed action is to designate the current National Forest 
System (NFS) motorized routes on the Nez Perce National Forest, under 
class of vehicle and seasons of use, as they are presently (April, 
2007). This action would close the forest to cross-country motorized 
travel except in specifically designated areas or to over snow vehicle 
use (see attached map and legend).
    The proposed action also includes a distance 300 feet from center 
of road which allows for motorized use for the purposes of dispersed 
camping only, in areas where geography and resource protection are not 
limiting factors (e.g., cliffs, streams, etc.).
    This action does not supersede CFR 261.12 National Forest System 
roads and trails; * * * prohibition (c) Damaging and leaving in a 
damaged condition any such road, trail, or segment thereof. Nor will 
this action supersede CFR 261.15 Use of vehicles off roads; It is 
prohibited to operate any vehicle off National Forest System, State, or 
County roads; (h) In a manner which damages or unreasonably disturbs 
the land, wildlife, or vegetative resources.

Responsible Official

    Jane Cottrell, Forest Supervisor, Nez Perce National Forest, 1005 
Highway 13, Grangeville, ID 83530 is the responsible official for this 
proposal.

Nature of Decision To Be Made

    The Nez Perce National Forest will decide what routes and areas are 
appropriate to designate and manage for motor vehicle use by class of 
vehicle and seasons of use. Additionally, we will determine whether to 
amend the Nez Perce Forest Plan to remove certain existing standards 
applicable to motorized routes and area management.

Scoping Process

    The U.S. Forest Service uses the process required by the National 
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). NEPA requires a systematic, 
interdisciplinary approach to ensure integrated application of the 
natural and social sciences and the environmental design arts in any 
planning and decisionmaking that affects the human environment (42 
U.S.C. 4332(2)(A)). Comments are accepted for 45 days after 
notification in the Federal Register. These comments help identify 
significant issues and/or eliminate nonsignificant issues from detailed 
study in the environmental impact statement.

[[Page 27801]]

Comment Requested

    This notice of intent initiates the scoping process which guides 
the development of the environmental impact statement. The Nez Perce 
National Forest is seeing comments and issues you may have regarding 
this project. Comments are most useful if they are specific.
    Early Notice of Importance of Public Participation in Subsequent 
Environmental Review: A draft environmental impact statement will be 
prepared for comment. The comment period on the draft environmental 
impact statement will be 45 days from the date the Environmental 
Protection Agency publishes the notice of availability in the Federal 
Register.
    The Forest Service believes, at this early stage, it is important 
to give reviewers notice of several court rulings related to public 
participation in the environmental review process. First, reviewers of 
draft environmental impact statements must structure their 
participation in the environmental review of the proposal so that it is 
meaningful and alerts an agency to the reviewer's position and 
contentions. Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, 435 U.S. 
519,553 (1978). Also, environmental objections that could be raised at 
the draft environmental impact statement stage but that are not raised 
until after completion of the final environmental impact statement may 
be waived or dismissed by the courts. City of Angoon v. Hodel, 803 F.2d 
1016, 1022 (9th Cir. 1986) and Wisconsin Heritages, Inc. v. Harris, 490 
F. Supp. 1334, 1338 (E.D. Wis. 1980). Because of these court rulings, 
it is very important that those interested in this proposed action 
participate by the close of the 45 day comment period so that comments 
and objections are made available to the Forest Service at a time when 
it can meaningfully consider them and respond to them in the final 
environmental impact statement.
    To assist the Forest Service in identifying and considering issues 
nd concerns on the proposed action, comments on the draft environmental 
impact statement should be as specific as possible. It is also helpful 
if comments refer to specific pages or chapters of the draft statement. 
Comments may also address the adequacy of the draft environmental 
impact statement or the merits of the alternatives formulated and 
discussed in the statement. Reviewers may wish to refer to the Council 
on Environmental Quality Regulations for implementing the procedural 
provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act at 40 CFR 1503.3 in 
addressing these points.
    Comments received, including the names and addresses of those who 
comment, will be considered part of the public record on this proposal 
and will be available for public inspection.
(Authority:
    40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; Forest Service Handbook 1909.15, Section 
21.)

    Dated: May 10, 2007.
Jane L. Cottrell,
Nez Perce National Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. 07-2419 Filed 5-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.