Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Administrative Procedures for the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Categorization, 27573-27574 [E7-9435]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 16, 2007 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Families (TANF) under Sections 101–
103, 106–110, 112, 115, and 116 of the
Personal Responsibility and Work
Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996,
42 U.S.C. 1305 note, 42 U.S.C. 601 et
seq., and as amended now and hereafter.
In addition, in exercising authority
under Section 103, ‘‘Section 413,
Research, Evaluations, and National
Studies,’’ of the Social Security Act, the
Director, Office of Family Assistance,
Administration for Children and
Families, is expected to consult with the
Department of Health and Human
Services, Assistant Secretary for
Planning and Evaluation.
3. Authority to administer the
provisions of the Adult Assistance (AA)
Programs under Titles I, X, XIV and XVI
(Grants to States for Aid to the Aged,
Blind and Disabled) of the Social
Security Act, and as amended now and
hereafter.
4. Authority under Section 1119 of
the Social Security Act, and as amended
now and hereafter, to approve Federal
financial participation in payments for
repairs to homes owned by recipients of
aid or assistance under Titles I, X, XIV,
or XVI.
(b) Limitations
1. This delegation of authority shall
be exercised under the Department’s
existing policies on delegations and
regulations.
2. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority to submit
reports to Congress and shall be
exercised under financial and
administrative requirements applicable
to all Administration for Children and
Families’ authorities.
3. The approval or disapproval of
grant applications requires concurrence
of the appropriate Grants Officer. The
approval or disapproval of contract
proposals and awards are subject to the
requirements of the Federal Acquisition
Regulations and requires the
concurrence of the Contracting Officer.
4. The authority to approve/
disapprove under 45 CFR 205.55(d)
State applications to use alternate
sources of information for income and
eligibility (i.e., IEVS) requires
consultation with the Office of the
Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Administration and with the other
programs affected by the request.
5. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority to issue
annual rankings of States’ most and
least successful work programs and outof-wedlock birth ratios under Sections
413(d)(1) and 413(e)(1) of the Social
Security Act.
6. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority under sections
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:27 May 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
409(a) or 412(g) of the Social Security
Act to make determinations regarding
State or tribal compliance or
performance or technical
noncompliance and to impose penalties
and the authority under section 410(a)
of the Social Security Act to issue
notices to States or tribes regarding the
imposition of such penalties.
7. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority to sign and
issue notices of grant awards for family
assistance programs.
8. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority to appoint
Central Office and Regional Office Grant
Officers for the administration of family
assistance programs.
9. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority to appoint
Action Officials for Audit Resolution.
10. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority to conduct
research under sections 413(a), (b), and
(h) of the Social Security Act or to
review proposals and approve State
funding for evaluations of Title IV–A
programs under section 413(f) of the
Social Security Act.
11. This delegation of authority
excludes the authority to hold hearings.
12. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority to approve or
disapprove State requests for Federal
financial participation for the costs of
automated data processing equipment
and services which affect more than one
HHS Operating Division.
13. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority to make
determinations on State appeals
concerning audit questions or
recommendations by the Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS)
Audit Agency which involve ACF
program practices reviewed under Titles
I, X, XI and XVI of the Social Security
Act.
14. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority to disapprove
Adult Assistance State Plans and
amendments.
15. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority to approve or
disapprove TANF work participation
plans.
16. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority to sign official
policy transmittals such as Action
Transmittals, Information Memoranda,
etc.
17. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority to approve or
disapprove corrective compliance plans
or make reasonable cause
determinations.
18. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority to make
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27573
determinations that TANF plans are
incomplete.
19. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority to disapprove
Tribal TANF and Tribal NEW plans or
amendments.
20. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority to take
disallowances in Tribal NEW programs.
21. This delegation of authority does
not include the authority to approve or
disapprove discretionary grant
applications under section 403(a)(2) of
the Social Security Act.
22. The issuance of new policy
interpretations require the concurrence
of the Director, OFA.
23. Actions likely to have a significant
impact on State or Tribes, or
discretionary grantees or have political
ramifications or be subject to or receive
adverse publicity shall be brought to the
prior attention of the Director, OFA.
24. Any redelegation shall be in
writing and prompt notification must be
provided to all affected managers,
supervisors, and other personnel, and
requires the concurrence of the Deputy
Assistant Secretary for Administration.
(c) Effective Date
This delegation of authority was
effective on April 17, 2007.
(d) Effect on Existing Delegations
As related to the authorities delegated
herein, this delegation of authority
supersedes all previous delegations of
authority to the Associate Director,
TANF.
I hereby affirm and ratify any actions
taken by the Associate Director, TANF,
Office of Family Assistance, which
involved the exercise of the authorities
delegated herein prior to the effective
date of this delegation.
Dated: May 9, 2007.
Sidonie Squier,
Director, Office of Family Assistance.
[FR Doc. E7–9420 Filed 5–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2007N–0041]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Administrative
Procedures for the Clinical Laboratory
Improvement Amendments of 1988
Categorization
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
27574
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 16, 2007 / Notices
Notice.
In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Administrative Procedures for the
Clinical Laboratory Improvement
Amendments of 1988 Categorization (42
CFR 493.17)
Fax written comments on the
collection of information by June 15,
2007.
DATES:
To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
202–395–6974. All comments should be
identified with the OMB Control
Number 0910–NEW and the title
‘‘Administrative Procedures for the
Clinical Laboratory Improvement
Amendments of 1988 Categorization.’’
Also include the FDA docket number
found in brackets in the heading of this
document.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Denver Presley, Jr., Office of the Chief
Information Officer (HFA–250), Food
and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–
1472.
A draft guidance document entitled
‘‘Guidance for Administrative
Procedures for Clinical Laboratory
Improvement Amendments of 1988
Categorization’’ (CLIA) was released for
comment on August 14, 2000. The
document describes procedures FDA
will use to assign the complexity
category to a device. Typically, FDA
assigns complexity categorizations to
devices at the time of clearance or
approval of the device. In this way, no
additional burden is incurred by the
manufacturer since the labeling
(including operating instructions) is
included in the 510(k) or premarket
approval (PMA). In some cases,
however, a manufacturer may request
CLIA categorization even if FDA is not
simultaneously reviewing a 510(k) or
PMA. One example is when a
manufacturer requests that FDA assign
CLIA categorization to a previously
cleared device that has changed names
since the original CLIA categorization.
Another example is when a device is
exempt from premarket review. In such
cases, the guidance recommends that
manufacturers provide FDA with a copy
of the package insert for the device and
a cover letter indicating why the
manufacturer is requesting a
categorization (e.g., name change
exempt from 510(k) review). The draft
guidance recommends that in the
correspondence to FDA the
manufacturer should identify the
product code and classification as well
as reference to the original 510(k) when
this is available.
A previous 60-day notice that
published August 14, 2000 (65 FR
49582), announced the availability of a
draft guidance and did not include a
Paperwork Analysis Section. This 60day notice for public comment
supersedes that notice and is correcting
that error.
In the Federal Register of February
14, 2007 (72 FR 7043), FDA published
a 60-day notice soliciting public
comment on the proposed collection of
information requirements. In response
to that notice, no comments were
received.
The likely respondents for this
collection are Investigational New Drug
Application sponsors.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
42 CFR Section
No. of
Respondents
Annual Frequency
per Response
Total Annual
Responses
Hours per
Response
Total Hours
Total Operating &
Maintenance
Costs
493.17
60
15
900
1
900
$45,000
Total
60
15
900
1
900
$45,000
1 There
are no capital costs associated with this collection of information.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
The number of respondents is
approximately 60. On average, each
respondent will request categorizations
(independent of a 510(k) or PMA) 15
times per year. The cost, not including
personnel, is estimated at $50. This
includes the cost of copying and mailing
copies of package inserts and a cover
letter, which includes a statement of the
reason for the request and reference to
the original 510(k) numbers, including
regulation numbers and product codes.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Food and Drug Administration
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonna Capezzuto, Office of the Chief
Information Officer (HFA–250), Food
and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers
Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–
4659.
Dated: May 10, 2007.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E7–9435 Filed 5–15–07; 8:45 am]
HHS.
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:27 May 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
[Docket No. 2005N–0494]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Announcement of Office of
Management and Budget Approval;
Cosmetic Labeling Regulations
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Food and Drug Administration,
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a collection of information entitled
‘‘Cosmetic Labeling Regulations’’ has
been approved by the Office of
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In the
Federal Register of December 4, 2006
(71 FR 70411), the agency announced
that the proposed information collection
had been submitted to OMB for review
and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An
agency may not conduct or sponsor, and
a person is not required to respond to,
a collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. OMB has now approved the
information collection and has assigned
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27573-27574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9435]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. 2007N-0041]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Administrative
Procedures for the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988
Categorization
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
[[Page 27574]]
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by June
15, 2007.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX: 202-395-6974. All comments should be identified with the OMB
Control Number 0910-NEW and the title ``Administrative Procedures for
the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988
Categorization.'' Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Jr., Office of the
Chief Information Officer (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1472.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance:
Administrative Procedures for the Clinical Laboratory Improvement
Amendments of 1988 Categorization (42 CFR 493.17)
A draft guidance document entitled ``Guidance for Administrative
Procedures for Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988
Categorization'' (CLIA) was released for comment on August 14, 2000.
The document describes procedures FDA will use to assign the complexity
category to a device. Typically, FDA assigns complexity categorizations
to devices at the time of clearance or approval of the device. In this
way, no additional burden is incurred by the manufacturer since the
labeling (including operating instructions) is included in the 510(k)
or premarket approval (PMA). In some cases, however, a manufacturer may
request CLIA categorization even if FDA is not simultaneously reviewing
a 510(k) or PMA. One example is when a manufacturer requests that FDA
assign CLIA categorization to a previously cleared device that has
changed names since the original CLIA categorization. Another example
is when a device is exempt from premarket review. In such cases, the
guidance recommends that manufacturers provide FDA with a copy of the
package insert for the device and a cover letter indicating why the
manufacturer is requesting a categorization (e.g., name change exempt
from 510(k) review). The draft guidance recommends that in the
correspondence to FDA the manufacturer should identify the product code
and classification as well as reference to the original 510(k) when
this is available.
A previous 60-day notice that published August 14, 2000 (65 FR
49582), announced the availability of a draft guidance and did not
include a Paperwork Analysis Section. This 60-day notice for public
comment supersedes that notice and is correcting that error.
In the Federal Register of February 14, 2007 (72 FR 7043), FDA
published a 60-day notice soliciting public comment on the proposed
collection of information requirements. In response to that notice, no
comments were received.
The likely respondents for this collection are Investigational New
Drug Application sponsors.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Operating &
42 CFR Section No. of Annual Frequency Total Annual Hours per Total Hours Maintenance
Respondents per Response Responses Response Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
493.17 60 15 900 1 900 $45,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 60 15 900 1 900 $45,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs associated with this collection of information.
The number of respondents is approximately 60. On average, each
respondent will request categorizations (independent of a 510(k) or
PMA) 15 times per year. The cost, not including personnel, is estimated
at $50. This includes the cost of copying and mailing copies of package
inserts and a cover letter, which includes a statement of the reason
for the request and reference to the original 510(k) numbers, including
regulation numbers and product codes.
Dated: May 10, 2007.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E7-9435 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S