Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Administrative Procedures for the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Categorization, 27573-27574 [E7-9435]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 16, 2007 / Notices cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES Families (TANF) under Sections 101– 103, 106–110, 112, 115, and 116 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, 42 U.S.C. 1305 note, 42 U.S.C. 601 et seq., and as amended now and hereafter. In addition, in exercising authority under Section 103, ‘‘Section 413, Research, Evaluations, and National Studies,’’ of the Social Security Act, the Director, Office of Family Assistance, Administration for Children and Families, is expected to consult with the Department of Health and Human Services, Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. 3. Authority to administer the provisions of the Adult Assistance (AA) Programs under Titles I, X, XIV and XVI (Grants to States for Aid to the Aged, Blind and Disabled) of the Social Security Act, and as amended now and hereafter. 4. Authority under Section 1119 of the Social Security Act, and as amended now and hereafter, to approve Federal financial participation in payments for repairs to homes owned by recipients of aid or assistance under Titles I, X, XIV, or XVI. (b) Limitations 1. This delegation of authority shall be exercised under the Department’s existing policies on delegations and regulations. 2. This delegation of authority does not include the authority to submit reports to Congress and shall be exercised under financial and administrative requirements applicable to all Administration for Children and Families’ authorities. 3. The approval or disapproval of grant applications requires concurrence of the appropriate Grants Officer. The approval or disapproval of contract proposals and awards are subject to the requirements of the Federal Acquisition Regulations and requires the concurrence of the Contracting Officer. 4. The authority to approve/ disapprove under 45 CFR 205.55(d) State applications to use alternate sources of information for income and eligibility (i.e., IEVS) requires consultation with the Office of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Administration and with the other programs affected by the request. 5. This delegation of authority does not include the authority to issue annual rankings of States’ most and least successful work programs and outof-wedlock birth ratios under Sections 413(d)(1) and 413(e)(1) of the Social Security Act. 6. This delegation of authority does not include the authority under sections VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:27 May 15, 2007 Jkt 211001 409(a) or 412(g) of the Social Security Act to make determinations regarding State or tribal compliance or performance or technical noncompliance and to impose penalties and the authority under section 410(a) of the Social Security Act to issue notices to States or tribes regarding the imposition of such penalties. 7. This delegation of authority does not include the authority to sign and issue notices of grant awards for family assistance programs. 8. This delegation of authority does not include the authority to appoint Central Office and Regional Office Grant Officers for the administration of family assistance programs. 9. This delegation of authority does not include the authority to appoint Action Officials for Audit Resolution. 10. This delegation of authority does not include the authority to conduct research under sections 413(a), (b), and (h) of the Social Security Act or to review proposals and approve State funding for evaluations of Title IV–A programs under section 413(f) of the Social Security Act. 11. This delegation of authority excludes the authority to hold hearings. 12. This delegation of authority does not include the authority to approve or disapprove State requests for Federal financial participation for the costs of automated data processing equipment and services which affect more than one HHS Operating Division. 13. This delegation of authority does not include the authority to make determinations on State appeals concerning audit questions or recommendations by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Audit Agency which involve ACF program practices reviewed under Titles I, X, XI and XVI of the Social Security Act. 14. This delegation of authority does not include the authority to disapprove Adult Assistance State Plans and amendments. 15. This delegation of authority does not include the authority to approve or disapprove TANF work participation plans. 16. This delegation of authority does not include the authority to sign official policy transmittals such as Action Transmittals, Information Memoranda, etc. 17. This delegation of authority does not include the authority to approve or disapprove corrective compliance plans or make reasonable cause determinations. 18. This delegation of authority does not include the authority to make PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 27573 determinations that TANF plans are incomplete. 19. This delegation of authority does not include the authority to disapprove Tribal TANF and Tribal NEW plans or amendments. 20. This delegation of authority does not include the authority to take disallowances in Tribal NEW programs. 21. This delegation of authority does not include the authority to approve or disapprove discretionary grant applications under section 403(a)(2) of the Social Security Act. 22. The issuance of new policy interpretations require the concurrence of the Director, OFA. 23. Actions likely to have a significant impact on State or Tribes, or discretionary grantees or have political ramifications or be subject to or receive adverse publicity shall be brought to the prior attention of the Director, OFA. 24. Any redelegation shall be in writing and prompt notification must be provided to all affected managers, supervisors, and other personnel, and requires the concurrence of the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Administration. (c) Effective Date This delegation of authority was effective on April 17, 2007. (d) Effect on Existing Delegations As related to the authorities delegated herein, this delegation of authority supersedes all previous delegations of authority to the Associate Director, TANF. I hereby affirm and ratify any actions taken by the Associate Director, TANF, Office of Family Assistance, which involved the exercise of the authorities delegated herein prior to the effective date of this delegation. Dated: May 9, 2007. Sidonie Squier, Director, Office of Family Assistance. [FR Doc. E7–9420 Filed 5–15–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4184–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Administration [Docket No. 2007N–0041] Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Administrative Procedures for the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Categorization AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1 27574 ACTION: Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 16, 2007 / Notices Notice. In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for review and clearance: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Administrative Procedures for the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Categorization (42 CFR 493.17) Fax written comments on the collection of information by June 15, 2007. DATES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX: 202–395–6974. All comments should be identified with the OMB Control Number 0910–NEW and the title ‘‘Administrative Procedures for the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Categorization.’’ Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Jr., Office of the Chief Information Officer (HFA–250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827– 1472. A draft guidance document entitled ‘‘Guidance for Administrative Procedures for Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 Categorization’’ (CLIA) was released for comment on August 14, 2000. The document describes procedures FDA will use to assign the complexity category to a device. Typically, FDA assigns complexity categorizations to devices at the time of clearance or approval of the device. In this way, no additional burden is incurred by the manufacturer since the labeling (including operating instructions) is included in the 510(k) or premarket approval (PMA). In some cases, however, a manufacturer may request CLIA categorization even if FDA is not simultaneously reviewing a 510(k) or PMA. One example is when a manufacturer requests that FDA assign CLIA categorization to a previously cleared device that has changed names since the original CLIA categorization. Another example is when a device is exempt from premarket review. In such cases, the guidance recommends that manufacturers provide FDA with a copy of the package insert for the device and a cover letter indicating why the manufacturer is requesting a categorization (e.g., name change exempt from 510(k) review). The draft guidance recommends that in the correspondence to FDA the manufacturer should identify the product code and classification as well as reference to the original 510(k) when this is available. A previous 60-day notice that published August 14, 2000 (65 FR 49582), announced the availability of a draft guidance and did not include a Paperwork Analysis Section. This 60day notice for public comment supersedes that notice and is correcting that error. In the Federal Register of February 14, 2007 (72 FR 7043), FDA published a 60-day notice soliciting public comment on the proposed collection of information requirements. In response to that notice, no comments were received. The likely respondents for this collection are Investigational New Drug Application sponsors. FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows: TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1 42 CFR Section No. of Respondents Annual Frequency per Response Total Annual Responses Hours per Response Total Hours Total Operating & Maintenance Costs 493.17 60 15 900 1 900 $45,000 Total 60 15 900 1 900 $45,000 1 There are no capital costs associated with this collection of information. cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES The number of respondents is approximately 60. On average, each respondent will request categorizations (independent of a 510(k) or PMA) 15 times per year. The cost, not including personnel, is estimated at $50. This includes the cost of copying and mailing copies of package inserts and a cover letter, which includes a statement of the reason for the request and reference to the original 510(k) numbers, including regulation numbers and product codes. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Food and Drug Administration FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonna Capezzuto, Office of the Chief Information Officer (HFA–250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827– 4659. Dated: May 10, 2007. Jeffrey Shuren, Assistant Commissioner for Policy. [FR Doc. E7–9435 Filed 5–15–07; 8:45 am] HHS. BILLING CODE 4160–01–S VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:27 May 15, 2007 Jkt 211001 [Docket No. 2005N–0494] Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office of Management and Budget Approval; Cosmetic Labeling Regulations AGENCY: ACTION: Food and Drug Administration, Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a collection of information entitled ‘‘Cosmetic Labeling Regulations’’ has been approved by the Office of PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 In the Federal Register of December 4, 2006 (71 FR 70411), the agency announced that the proposed information collection had been submitted to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information collection and has assigned SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM 16MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27573-27574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9435]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. 2007N-0041]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office 
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Administrative 
Procedures for the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 
Categorization

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

[[Page 27574]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by June 
15, 2007.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are 
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office 
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, 
FAX: 202-395-6974. All comments should be identified with the OMB 
Control Number 0910-NEW and the title ``Administrative Procedures for 
the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 
Categorization.'' Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets 
in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Denver Presley, Jr., Office of the 
Chief Information Officer (HFA-250), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-1472.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has 
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for 
review and clearance:

Administrative Procedures for the Clinical Laboratory Improvement 
Amendments of 1988 Categorization (42 CFR 493.17)

    A draft guidance document entitled ``Guidance for Administrative 
Procedures for Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 
Categorization'' (CLIA) was released for comment on August 14, 2000. 
The document describes procedures FDA will use to assign the complexity 
category to a device. Typically, FDA assigns complexity categorizations 
to devices at the time of clearance or approval of the device. In this 
way, no additional burden is incurred by the manufacturer since the 
labeling (including operating instructions) is included in the 510(k) 
or premarket approval (PMA). In some cases, however, a manufacturer may 
request CLIA categorization even if FDA is not simultaneously reviewing 
a 510(k) or PMA. One example is when a manufacturer requests that FDA 
assign CLIA categorization to a previously cleared device that has 
changed names since the original CLIA categorization. Another example 
is when a device is exempt from premarket review. In such cases, the 
guidance recommends that manufacturers provide FDA with a copy of the 
package insert for the device and a cover letter indicating why the 
manufacturer is requesting a categorization (e.g., name change exempt 
from 510(k) review). The draft guidance recommends that in the 
correspondence to FDA the manufacturer should identify the product code 
and classification as well as reference to the original 510(k) when 
this is available.
    A previous 60-day notice that published August 14, 2000 (65 FR 
49582), announced the availability of a draft guidance and did not 
include a Paperwork Analysis Section. This 60-day notice for public 
comment supersedes that notice and is correcting that error.
    In the Federal Register of February 14, 2007 (72 FR 7043), FDA 
published a 60-day notice soliciting public comment on the proposed 
collection of information requirements. In response to that notice, no 
comments were received.
    The likely respondents for this collection are Investigational New 
Drug Application sponsors.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as 
follows:

                                                     Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                                       Total Operating &
            42 CFR Section                    No. of        Annual Frequency     Total Annual        Hours per         Total Hours         Maintenance
                                           Respondents        per Response        Responses           Response                               Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
493.17                                                 60                 15                900                  1                900            $45,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total                                                  60                 15                900                  1                900            $45,000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs associated with this collection of information.

    The number of respondents is approximately 60. On average, each 
respondent will request categorizations (independent of a 510(k) or 
PMA) 15 times per year. The cost, not including personnel, is estimated 
at $50. This includes the cost of copying and mailing copies of package 
inserts and a cover letter, which includes a statement of the reason 
for the request and reference to the original 510(k) numbers, including 
regulation numbers and product codes.

    Dated: May 10, 2007.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E7-9435 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.