Pythium Oligandrum DV 74; Exemption from the Requirement of a Tolerance, 27448-27452 [E7-9298]
Download as PDF
27448
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
is in a fixed (non-transportation)
operating mode.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 07–2404 Filed 5–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–M
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2005–0121; FRL–7713–1]
Pythium Oligandrum DV 74; Exemption
from the Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
I. General Information
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of Pythium
oligandrum DV 74 on food crops.
Biopreparaty Co. Ltd. submitted a
petition to EPA under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as
amended by the Food Quality Protection
Act of 1996 (FQPA), requesting an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance. This regulation eliminates the
need to establish a maximum
permissible level for residues of
Pythium oligandrum DV 74.
DATES: This regulation is effective May
16, 2007. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
July 16, 2007, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQOPP-2005-EPA-0121. To access the
electronic docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, select ‘‘Advanced
Search,’’ then ‘‘Docket Search.’’ Insert
the docket ID number where indicated
and select the ‘‘Submit’’ button. Follow
the instructions on the regulations.gov
web site to view the docket index or
access available documents. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the docket index available in
regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov,or, if only
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 May 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400,
One Potomac Yard (South Bldg., 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The Docket
Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket telephone number
is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tessa Milofsky, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(703) 308-0455; e-mail address:
milofsky.tessa@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. To determine whether
you or your business may be affected by
this action, you should carefully
examine the applicability provisions. If
you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic
copy of this Federal Register document
through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access
this ‘‘Federal Register’’ document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may
also access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s pilot e-CFR site at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing
Request?
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as
amended by the FQPA, any person may
file an objection to any aspect of this
regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. The EPA
procedural regulations which govern the
submission of objections and requests
for hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178.
You must file your objection or request
a hearing on this regulation in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA-HQOPP-2005-EPA-0121 in the subject line
on the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be
mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
on or before July 16, 2007.
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing that does not
contain any CBI for inclusion in the
public docket that is described in
ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2
may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your
copies, identified by docket ID number
EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-EPA-0121, by one of
the following methods.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460-0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket’s
normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to
4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is (703) 3055805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of May 25,
2005 (70 FR 30105) (FRL–7713–1). EPA
issued a notice pursuant to section
408(d)(3) of the FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide tolerance petition (PP 4F6877)
by Biopreparaty, Co. Ltd. Tylisovska I,
Prague 6, Czech Republic. The petition
requested that 40 CFR part 180 be
amended by establishing an exemption
from the requirement Pythium
E:\FR\FM\16MYR1.SGM
16MYR1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
oligandrum DV 74. This notice included
a summary of the petition prepared by
the petitioner Biopreparaty Co. Ltd.
One comment was received from a
private citizen opposing the
‘‘production or selling’’ of Pythium
oligandrum DV 74. The commentor
further stated that it was their wish that
no exemptions be issued and that no
tolerances should be approved. The
Agency understands the commentor’s
concerns and recognizes that some
individuals believe that pesticides
should be banned completely. However,
under the existing legal framework
provided by section 408 of the FFDCA
EPA is required to establish pesticide
tolerances or exemptions where persons
seeking such exemptions have
demonstrated that the pesticide meets
the safety standard imposed by that
statute. The commentor has not
provided the Agency with a specific
rationale or additional information
pertaining to the legal standards in
FFDCA section 408 for opposing the
establishment of a tolerance exemption
for Pythium oligandrum DV 74. In the
absence of any additional information of
a factual nature, the Agency can not
effectively respond to the commentor’s
disagreement with the Agency’s
decision.
Another comment was received that
supported the registration. The
commentator stated that ‘‘Pythium
oligandrum appears to be an unusually
effective (in its rapidity of action) and
exceptionally safe (in terms of
mammalian toxicity) crop protection
product.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Pursuant to
section 408(c)(2)(B), in establishing or
maintaining in effect an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance, EPA
must take into account the factors set
forth in section 408(b)(2)(C), which
require EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and
children to the pesticide chemical
residue in establishing a tolerance and
to ‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 May 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
infants and children from aggregate
exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue. . . . ’’ Additionally, section
408(b)(2)(D) of the FFDCA requires that
the Agency consider ‘‘available
information concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide’s
residues ’’ and ‘‘other substances that
have a common mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA performs a number of analyses to
determine the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide residues. First,
EPA determines the toxicity of
pesticides. Second, EPA examines
exposure to the pesticide through food,
drinking water, and through other
exposures that occur as a result of
pesticide use in residential settings.
III. Toxicological Profile
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D)
of the FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other
relevant information in support of this
action and considered its validity,
completeness, and reliability and the
relationship of this information to
human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the
variability of the sensitivities of major
identifiable subgroups of consumers,
including infants and children.
A. Acute Oral Toxicity and
Pathogenicity (Master Record
Identification numbers 464107-02 and
464109-03; Data Request 152-30; OPPTS
Harmonize Guideline. 885.3050)
A guideline acute oral toxicity study
was carried out in 2001 using mice. Ten
mice (five males, five females) were
given a total dose of 5,000 milligrams/
kilogram (mg/kg) Pythium oligandrum
DV 74 and no adverse effects were seen
in the mice which were observed for 14
days after dosing. The test substance
was rated Toxicity Category IV.
B. Acute Dermal Toxicity (Master
Record Identification numbers 46410904, 464107-02; OPPTS Harmonize
Guideline 870.1200)
A guideline acute dermal toxicity
study was conducted using rats. The
dermal LD50 for males, females, and
combined was greater than 5,000 mg/kg
body wt. Pythium oligandrum DV 74
test substance was rated Toxicity
Category IV.
C. Acute Inhalation Toxicity (Master
Record Identification number 46410905; OPPTS Harmonize Guideline
870.1300)
In a four-hour acute inhalation
toxicity study using rats, a limit dose (5
mg/L) of Pythium oligandrum DV 74
produced no mortality nor adverse
effects, and no gross abnormalities were
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
27449
seen at necropsy 14 days later. Although
the MMD was 7.45 and µm,
approximately 68% of the particles were
≤3.75 µm. The acute inhalation LC50 for
males, females, and combined was >5
mg/L for a 4 hour exposure. The test
substance is Toxicity Category IV.
D. Acute Pulmonary Toxicity/
Pathogenicity-Waiver Granted (Master
Record Identification number 46410910; OPPTS Harmonize Guideline
885.3150)
In a four-hour acute inhalation
toxicity study using rats, a limit dose (5
mg/L) of Pythium oligandrum DV 74
produced no mortality or adverse
effects, and no gross abnormalities were
seen at necropsy 14 days later. Although
the MMD was 7.45 µm, approximately
68% of the particles were ≤3.75 µm. The
acute inhalation LC50 for males, females,
and combined was >5 mg/L for a 4 hour
exposure. The test substance is
classified as Toxicity Category IV.
Infectivity testing was waived for this
study based on the results of the growth
temperature study which showed no
growth on plant-based growth media at
or above 37° C, and no growth at any
temperature on animal tissue-based
growth media.
E. Acute Injection Tocity/Pathogenicity
(Master Record Identification numbers
465823-01, 467542-01,464109-10, and
469901-01; OPPTS Harmonize
Guideline 885.3200)
An acute injection toxicity/
pathogenicity study was conducted
using rats. Storage, stability data
showed that after Batch No. 150405 was
stored for approximately 9 months, of
1.3x106 oospores/g active ingredient
80.5% were viable after 120 hours
incubation, giving 1.1x106 cfu/g however, this study lists Batch No.
150405 as containing 107 granules/g, so
viability would then be only 11%.
Based on the data submitted, Pythium
oligandrum DV 74 does not appear toxic
nor pathogenic to rats when dosed at
2.9x104 oospores/animal – although no
attempts to isolate viable organisms
prior to testing, or from test animals
after inoculation, were made. Therefore,
infectivity cannot be assessed in the
study, initially rated not toxic nor
pathogenic. In addition, there were
discrepancies with characterization of
the test substance. However, infectivity
testing was waived for this study, based
on the results of the growth temperature
study which showed no growth on
plant-based growth media at or above
37° C, and no growth at any temperature
on animal tissue-based growth media.
E:\FR\FM\16MYR1.SGM
16MYR1
27450
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
F. Primary Dermal Irritation (Master
Record Identification numbers 46460502 and 464107-02; OPPTS Harmonize
Guideline 870.2500)
An acute dermal irritation study was
conducted using rabbits. Very slight
erythema was noted on the skin of three
rabbits one hour after patch removal,
with clearance on two rabbits by 24
hours and on one rabbit by 48 hours.
The primary irritation index was 0.3.
Technical DV 74 was essentially
nonirritating; the test substance was
rated Toxicity Category IV.
G. Acute Eye Irritation (Master Record
Identification number 464109-06;OPPTS
Harmonize Guideline 870.2400)
An acute eye irritation study was
conducted using rabbits. No corneal
opacity nor iritis was observed during
the study. Positive conjunctival
irritation (score 2) was noted on 2
rabbits 1 hour after Pythium oligandrum
DV 74 instillation with resolution by 48
hours. The maximumaverage score was
6.7 at 24 hours after test material
instillation. The test substance is
Toxicity Category III.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
H. Skin sensitization-Waiver Granted
(Master Record Identification number
464109-10; OPPTS Harmonize
Guideline 870.2600)
A guideline acute dermal toxicity
study was conducted using rats. The
dermal LD50 for males, females, and
combined was greater than 5,000 mg/kg
body wt. Pythium oligandrum DV 74
and rated Toxicity Category IV. An acute
dermal irritation study was conducted
using rabbits. Very slight erythema was
noted on 3/3 rabbits one hour after
patch removal, with clearance on two
rabbits by 24 hours and on one rabbit by
48 hours. The primary irritation index
was 0.3. Technical DV 74 was
essentially nonirritating and rated
Toxicity Caterogy IV. In addition,
Pythium oligandrum occurs naturally in
a variety of soil types over a wide range
of environmental conditions. Although
application of Pythium oligandrum DV
74 to seeds, foliage, or soil will likely
temporarily increase its concentration in
the environment, the population is
expected to subside to normal levels,
because the organism does not thrive in
the absence of sufficient nutrients. A
search of the public literature found no
reports of Pythium oligandrum having
adverse effects in humans or other
mammals. The only known biological
effects of Pythium oligandrum are
parasitic effects on fungal species and
stimulation of resistance to parasitic
infection in plants. Neither the
mechanism of the mycoparasitic action
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 May 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
nor the stimulation of plant resistance is
associated with adverse effects in
mammals. Pythium oligandrum DV 74 is
the active ingredient in various overthe-counter products sold in Europe,
including a mouthwash, a bath additive
and a skin cream. These products have
been on the market in parts of the EU
since 1999 with no reported adverse
effects. The lack of any reported
sensitization effects from repeated
dermal exposure to the consumer
products suggests that Pythium
oligandrum is not a dermal sensitizer.
To reduce exposure to this active
ingredient from its pesticide use, the
agricultural use label requires that
applicators and handlers wear a longsleeved shirt and long pants, waterproof
gloves, and shoes plus socks.
it related to any class of known
endocrine disruptors. Consequently,
endocrine-related concerns did not
adversely impact the Agency’s safety
finding for Pythium oligandrum.
I. Pathogenicity and Infectivity (Master
Record Identification numbers 46990101 and 02)
Pythium oligandrum DV 74 is
primarily a fungal hyperparasite that
exhibits limited growth on plant-based
media and no growth on animal tissuebased media. In addition, its growth
tapers off as temperature approaches
normal human body temperature of 37°
C and there is no growth at or above this
temperature. Therefore, infectivity
testing is not possible. This information
supports waivers for infectivity testing
in the acute oral, acute dermal, acute
inhalation, and injection exposure
studies.
Due to the proposed use of Pythium
oligandrum on food crops, fungal
residues may be present on agricultural
commodities. However, negligible to no
risk is expected for the general
population, including infants and
children, because Pythium oligandrum
demonstrated no pathogenicity nor
acute oral toxicity at the maximum
doses tested.
1. Food. Due to the proposed use of
Pythium oligandrum on food crops,
fungal residues may be present on
agricultural commodities. However,
negligible to no risk is expected for the
general population, including infants
and children, because Pythium
oligandrum demonstrated no
pathogenicity or oral toxicity at the
maximum doses tested.
2. Drinking water exposure. Pythium
oligandrum does not thrive in aquatic
environments and there are no aquatic
use sites for the pesticide. Accordingly,
application of this pesticide to approved
use sites is not expected to increase
drinking water exposure to Pythium
oligandrum. Furthermore, any Pythium
oligandrum that might be consumed
through drinking water would pose
negligible to the general population,
including infants and children, due to
the pesticide’s low toxicity
classification.
J. Subchronic, Chronic Toxicity and
Oncogenicity
Based on the data generated in
accordance with Tier I data
requirements (40 CFR 158.740(c)), Tier
II tests (Guidelines 152B-40 through
152B-49), which include acute oral,
acute inhalation, subchronic oral, acute
intraperitoneal/intracerebral, primary
dermal, primary eye, immune response,
teratogenicity, virulence enhancement,
and mammalian mutagenicity were not
required. Tier III tests (Guidelines 15250 through 53), which include chronic
testing, oncogenicity testing,
mutagenicity, and teratogenicity were
also not required.
K. Effects on the Endocrine System
EPA is required under section 408(p)
of the FFDCA, as amended by FQPA, to
develop a screening program to
determine whether certain substances
(including all pesticide active and other
ingredients) ‘‘humans that is similar to
an effect produced by a naturallyoccurring estrogen, or other such
endocrine effects as the Administrator
may designate.’’ Pythium oligandrum is
not a known endocrine disruptor nor is
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
IV. Aggregate Exposures
In examining aggregate exposure,
section 408 of the FFDCA directs EPA
to consider available information
concerning exposures from the pesticide
residue in food and all other nonoccupational exposures, including
drinking water from ground water or
surface water and exposure through
pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or
buildings (residential and other indoor
uses).
A. Dietary Exposure
B. Other Non-Occupational Exposure
Pythium oligandrum will be applied
to agricultural fields, turf and
professional landscapes, and in home
gardens. Although some applications
may be made near residential areas, no
harm would be expected to result from
exposure to Pythium oligandrum due to
its low toxicity classification.
1.Dermal exposure. Dermal exposure
is limited by use of the required PPE
and REI in occupational settings, and
residential users are advised to avoid
E:\FR\FM\16MYR1.SGM
16MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
skin contact and to wash any exposed
skin or clothing.
2. Inhalation exposure. The greatest
likelihood of inhalation exposure would
occur in an occupational setting, among
mixers/loaders and applicators.
However, as demonstrated in the acute
pulmonary toxicity/pathogenicity test,
Pythium oligandrum is not infective,
pathogenic, or toxic to mammals.
Despite the benign nature of the active
ingredient, the agency requires that all
workers exposed to microbial pesticides
must wear a dust/mist filtering
respirator. As such, the risks anticipated
for inhalation exposure are minimal.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
V. Cumulative Effects
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of the FFDCA
requires the Agency to consider the
cumulative effect of exposure to
Pythium oligandrum and to other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity. These
considerations include the possible
cumulative effects of such residues on
infants and children. As demonstrated
in Unit III.A., Pythium oligandrum is
not toxic or pathogenic to mammals,
and only minimally irritating to eyes.
Consequently, no cumulative effects
from the residues of this product with
other related microbial pesticides are
anticipated.
VI. Determination of Safety for U.S.
Population, Infants and Children
There is a reasonable certainty that no
harm to the U.S. population, including
infants and children, will result from
aggregate exposure to residues of
Pythium oligandrum due to its use as a
microbial pest control agent. This
includes all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information. As
discussed in UnitIII.A., Pythium
oligandrum is not toxic or pathogenic to
mammals, and only minimally irritating
in an eye exposure study. Accordingly,
exempting Pythium oligandrum from
the requirement of a tolerance is
considered safe and poses no significant
risks.
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides
that EPA shall apply an additional
tenfold margin of exposure (safety) for
infants and children in the case of
threshold effects to account for prenatal
and postnatal toxicity and the
completeness of the data base on
toxicity and exposure, unless EPA
determines that a different margin of
exposure (safety) will be safe for infants
and children. Margins of exposure
(safety), which often are referred to as
uncertainty factors, are incorporated
into EPA risk assessment either directly
or through the use of a margin of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 May 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
exposure analysis or by using
uncertainty (safety) factors in
calculating a dose level that poses no
appreciable risk. Actual exposures to
adults and children through diet are
expected to be several orders of
magnitude less than the doses used in
the toxicity and pathogenicity tests
referenced in Unit III. Thus, the Agency
has determined that an additional
margin of safety for infants and children
is unnecessary.
VII. Other Considerations
A. Endocrine Disruptors
EPA is required under section 408(p)
of the FFDCA, as amended by FQPA, to
develop a screening program to
determine whether certain substances
(including all pesticide active and other
ingredients) ‘‘may have an effect in
humans that is similar to an effect
produced by a naturally-occurring
estrogen, or other such endocrine effects
as the Administrator may designate.’’
Pythium oligandrum is not a known
endocrine disruptor nor is it related to
any class of known endocrine
disruptors. Consequently, endocrinerelated concerns did not adversely
impact the Agency’s safety finding for
Pythium oligandrum.
B. Analytical Method(s)
The acute oral toxicity and
pathogenicity findings discussed in Unit
III demonstrate that the active
ingredient does not pose a dietary risk.
Nevertheless, the Agency has concluded
that for the analysis of the pesticide
itself, microbiological and biochemical
methods exist and are acceptable forthe
enforcement purposes for product
identity of Pythium oligandrum DV 74.
Other appropriate methods are required
for quality control to assure that product
characterization, the control of human
pathogens, and other unintentional
metabolites or ingredients are within
regulatory limits, and to ascertain
storage stability and viability of the
pesticidal active ingredient.
C. Codex Maximum Residue Level
There is no established Codex
maximum residue level for residues of
Pythium oligandrum DV 74.
VIII. Conclusions
The results of the studies discussed
are sufficient to comply with the
requirements of FQPA. They support an
exemption from the requirement of
tolerance for residues of Pythium
oligandrum DV 74, on treated food of
food commodities. In addition, the
Agency is of the opinion that, if the
microbial active ingredient is used as
allowed, aggregate and cumulative
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
27451
exposures are not likely to pose any
undue hazard to the U.S. population of
adult, children, and infant humans.
Therefore, an exemption from the
requirement of tolerance is granted in
response to pesticide petition 4F6877.
IX. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance
under section 408(d) of FFDCA in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled Regulatory
Planning and Review (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this rule has
been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997).
This final rule does not contain any
information collections subject to OMB
approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates
growers, food processors, food handlers
and food retailers, not States or tribes,
nor does this action alter the
relationships or distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such,
the Agency has determined that this
action will not have a substantial direct
effect on States or tribal governments,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled Consultation and Coordination
E:\FR\FM\16MYR1.SGM
16MYR1
27452
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 94 / Wednesday, May 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR
67249, November 6, 2000) do not apply
to this rule. In addition, This rule does
not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
(Public Law 104-4).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section
12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
X. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of this final rule in the
Federal Register. This final rule is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: May 4, 2007.
Debra Edwards,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is
amended as follows:
I
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Section 180.1275 is added to
subpart D to read as follows:
I
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with RULES
§ 180.1275 Pythium; Exception from the
requirement of a tolerance.
An exemption from the requirement
of tolerance is established on all food/
feed commodities, for residues of
pythium oligandrum DV 74 when the
pesticide is used on food crops.
[FR Doc. E7–9298 Filed 5–15–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:04 May 15, 2007
Jkt 211001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0800; FRL–8128–2]
Chlorantraniliprole; Time-Limited
Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
time-limited tolerances for residues of
chlorantraniliprole in or on apple and
apple, wet pomace, celery, cucumber,
head and leaf lettuce, pear, pepper,
spinach, squash, tomato and
watermelon commodities. DuPont Crop
Protection requested these tolerances
under the Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended by
the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996
(FQPA). The tolerances will expire on
May 1, 2010.
DATES: This regulation is effective May
16, 2007. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
July 16, 2007, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
SUMMARY:
EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2006–0800. To access the
electronic docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, select ‘‘Advanced
Search,’’ then ‘‘Docket Search.’’ Insert
the docket ID number where indicated
and select the ‘‘Submit’’ button. Follow
the instructions on the regulations.gov
web site to view the docket index or
access available documents. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the docket index available in
regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available either in the electronic docket
at https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Public Docket, in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The Docket
Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket telephone number
is (703) 305-5805.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kable Bo Davis, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460-0001; telephone number: 703
306-0415; e-mail address:
kable.davis@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather provides a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. To determine whether
you or your business may be affected by
this action, you should carefully
examine the applicability provisions
discussed above. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic
copy of this Federal Register document
through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may
also access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Printing
Office’s pilot e-CFR site at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing
Request?
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as
amended by the FQPA, any person may
file an objection to any aspect of this
regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. The EPA
E:\FR\FM\16MYR1.SGM
16MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 16, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27448-27452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9298]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-0121; FRL-7713-1]
Pythium Oligandrum DV 74; Exemption from the Requirement of a
Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of Pythium oligandrum DV 74 on food crops.
Biopreparaty Co. Ltd. submitted a petition to EPA under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended by the Food Quality
Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA), requesting an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance. This regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of Pythium
oligandrum DV 74.
DATES: This regulation is effective May 16, 2007. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before July 16, 2007, and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-EPA-0121. To access the
electronic docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced
Search,'' then ``Docket Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where
indicated and select the ``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on
the regulations.gov web site to view the docket index or access
available documents. All documents in the docket are listed in the
docket index available in regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at https://www.regulations.gov,or, if
only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm.
S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg., 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington,
VA. The Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket telephone number
is (703) 305-5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tessa Milofsky, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number: (703) 308-0455; e-mail address: milofsky.tessa@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. To determine
whether you or your business may be affected by this action, you should
carefully examine the applicability provisions. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?
In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal
Register document through the electronic docket at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access this ``Federal Register'' document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a
frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the
Government Printing Office's pilot e-CFR site at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?
Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any
person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may
also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural
regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for
hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or
request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by
EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-EPA-0121 in the
subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be
in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or
before July 16, 2007.
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OPP-2005-EPA-0121, by one of the following methods.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is (703) 305-5805.
II. Background and Statutory Findings
In the Federal Register of May 25, 2005 (70 FR 30105) (FRL-7713-1).
EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of the FFDCA, 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance
petition (PP 4F6877) by Biopreparaty, Co. Ltd. Tylisovska I, Prague 6,
Czech Republic. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be amended
by establishing an exemption from the requirement Pythium
[[Page 27449]]
oligandrum DV 74. This notice included a summary of the petition
prepared by the petitioner Biopreparaty Co. Ltd.
One comment was received from a private citizen opposing the
``production or selling'' of Pythium oligandrum DV 74. The commentor
further stated that it was their wish that no exemptions be issued and
that no tolerances should be approved. The Agency understands the
commentor's concerns and recognizes that some individuals believe that
pesticides should be banned completely. However, under the existing
legal framework provided by section 408 of the FFDCA EPA is required to
establish pesticide tolerances or exemptions where persons seeking such
exemptions have demonstrated that the pesticide meets the safety
standard imposed by that statute. The commentor has not provided the
Agency with a specific rationale or additional information pertaining
to the legal standards in FFDCA section 408 for opposing the
establishment of a tolerance exemption for Pythium oligandrum DV 74. In
the absence of any additional information of a factual nature, the
Agency can not effectively respond to the commentor's disagreement with
the Agency's decision.
Another comment was received that supported the registration. The
commentator stated that ``Pythium oligandrum appears to be an unusually
effective (in its rapidity of action) and exceptionally safe (in terms
of mammalian toxicity) crop protection product.''
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA
defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a reasonable certainty that no
harm will result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue, including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other
exposures for which there is reliable information.'' This includes
exposure through drinking water and in residential settings, but does
not include occupational exposure. Pursuant to section 408(c)(2)(B), in
establishing or maintaining in effect an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set forth in
section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special consideration
to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue
in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . . ''
Additionally, section 408(b)(2)(D) of the FFDCA requires that the
Agency consider ``available information concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues '' and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. First, EPA determines the
toxicity of pesticides. Second, EPA examines exposure to the pesticide
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as
a result of pesticide use in residential settings.
III. Toxicological Profile
Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of the FFDCA, EPA has reviewed
the available scientific data and other relevant information in support
of this action and considered its validity, completeness, and
reliability and the relationship of this information to human risk. EPA
has also considered available information concerning the variability of
the sensitivities of major identifiable subgroups of consumers,
including infants and children.
A. Acute Oral Toxicity and Pathogenicity (Master Record Identification
numbers 464107-02 and 464109-03; Data Request 152-30; OPPTS Harmonize
Guideline. 885.3050)
A guideline acute oral toxicity study was carried out in 2001 using
mice. Ten mice (five males, five females) were given a total dose of
5,000 milligrams/kilogram (mg/kg) Pythium oligandrum DV 74 and no
adverse effects were seen in the mice which were observed for 14 days
after dosing. The test substance was rated Toxicity Category IV.
B. Acute Dermal Toxicity (Master Record Identification numbers 464109-
04, 464107-02; OPPTS Harmonize Guideline 870.1200)
A guideline acute dermal toxicity study was conducted using rats.
The dermal LD50 for males, females, and combined was greater
than 5,000 mg/kg body wt. Pythium oligandrum DV 74 test substance was
rated Toxicity Category IV.
C. Acute Inhalation Toxicity (Master Record Identification number
464109-05; OPPTS Harmonize Guideline 870.1300)
In a four-hour acute inhalation toxicity study using rats, a limit
dose (5 mg/L) of Pythium oligandrum DV 74 produced no mortality nor
adverse effects, and no gross abnormalities were seen at necropsy 14
days later. Although the MMD was 7.45 and [micro]m, approximately 68%
of the particles were <=3.75 [micro]m. The acute inhalation
LC50 for males, females, and combined was >5 mg/L for a 4
hour exposure. The test substance is Toxicity Category IV.
D. Acute Pulmonary Toxicity/Pathogenicity-Waiver Granted (Master Record
Identification number 464109-10; OPPTS Harmonize Guideline 885.3150)
In a four-hour acute inhalation toxicity study using rats, a limit
dose (5 mg/L) of Pythium oligandrum DV 74 produced no mortality or
adverse effects, and no gross abnormalities were seen at necropsy 14
days later. Although the MMD was 7.45 [micro]m, approximately 68% of
the particles were <=3.75 [micro]m. The acute inhalation
LC50 for males, females, and combined was >5 mg/L for a 4
hour exposure. The test substance is classified as Toxicity Category
IV. Infectivity testing was waived for this study based on the results
of the growth temperature study which showed no growth on plant-based
growth media at or above 37[deg] C, and no growth at any temperature on
animal tissue-based growth media.
E. Acute Injection Tocity/Pathogenicity (Master Record Identification
numbers 465823-01, 467542-01,464109-10, and 469901-01; OPPTS Harmonize
Guideline 885.3200)
An acute injection toxicity/pathogenicity study was conducted using
rats. Storage, stability data showed that after Batch No. 150405 was
stored for approximately 9 months, of 1.3x106 oospores/g
active ingredient 80.5% were viable after 120 hours incubation, giving
1.1x106 cfu/g - however, this study lists Batch No. 150405
as containing 107 granules/g, so viability would then be
only 11%. Based on the data submitted, Pythium oligandrum DV 74 does
not appear toxic nor pathogenic to rats when dosed at
2.9x104 oospores/animal - although no attempts to isolate
viable organisms prior to testing, or from test animals after
inoculation, were made. Therefore, infectivity cannot be assessed in
the study, initially rated not toxic nor pathogenic. In addition, there
were discrepancies with characterization of the test substance.
However, infectivity testing was waived for this study, based on the
results of the growth temperature study which showed no growth on
plant-based growth media at or above 37[deg] C, and no growth at any
temperature on animal tissue-based growth media.
[[Page 27450]]
F. Primary Dermal Irritation (Master Record Identification numbers
464605-02 and 464107-02; OPPTS Harmonize Guideline 870.2500)
An acute dermal irritation study was conducted using rabbits. Very
slight erythema was noted on the skin of three rabbits one hour after
patch removal, with clearance on two rabbits by 24 hours and on one
rabbit by 48 hours. The primary irritation index was 0.3. Technical DV
74 was essentially nonirritating; the test substance was rated Toxicity
Category IV.
G. Acute Eye Irritation (Master Record Identification number 464109-
06;OPPTS Harmonize Guideline 870.2400)
An acute eye irritation study was conducted using rabbits. No
corneal opacity nor iritis was observed during the study. Positive
conjunctival irritation (score 2) was noted on 2 rabbits 1 hour after
Pythium oligandrum DV 74 instillation with resolution by 48 hours. The
maximumaverage score was 6.7 at 24 hours after test material
instillation. The test substance is Toxicity Category III.
H. Skin sensitization-Waiver Granted (Master Record Identification
number 464109-10; OPPTS Harmonize Guideline 870.2600)
A guideline acute dermal toxicity study was conducted using rats.
The dermal LD50 for males, females, and combined was greater
than 5,000 mg/kg body wt. Pythium oligandrum DV 74 and rated Toxicity
Category IV. An acute dermal irritation study was conducted using
rabbits. Very slight erythema was noted on 3/3 rabbits one hour after
patch removal, with clearance on two rabbits by 24 hours and on one
rabbit by 48 hours. The primary irritation index was 0.3. Technical DV
74 was essentially nonirritating and rated Toxicity Caterogy IV. In
addition, Pythium oligandrum occurs naturally in a variety of soil
types over a wide range of environmental conditions. Although
application of Pythium oligandrum DV 74 to seeds, foliage, or soil will
likely temporarily increase its concentration in the environment, the
population is expected to subside to normal levels, because the
organism does not thrive in the absence of sufficient nutrients. A
search of the public literature found no reports of Pythium oligandrum
having adverse effects in humans or other mammals. The only known
biological effects of Pythium oligandrum are parasitic effects on
fungal species and stimulation of resistance to parasitic infection in
plants. Neither the mechanism of the mycoparasitic action nor the
stimulation of plant resistance is associated with adverse effects in
mammals. Pythium oligandrum DV 74 is the active ingredient in various
over-the-counter products sold in Europe, including a mouthwash, a bath
additive and a skin cream. These products have been on the market in
parts of the EU since 1999 with no reported adverse effects. The lack
of any reported sensitization effects from repeated dermal exposure to
the consumer products suggests that Pythium oligandrum is not a dermal
sensitizer. To reduce exposure to this active ingredient from its
pesticide use, the agricultural use label requires that applicators and
handlers wear a long-sleeved shirt and long pants, waterproof gloves,
and shoes plus socks.
I. Pathogenicity and Infectivity (Master Record Identification numbers
469901-01 and 02)
Pythium oligandrum DV 74 is primarily a fungal hyperparasite that
exhibits limited growth on plant-based media and no growth on animal
tissue-based media. In addition, its growth tapers off as temperature
approaches normal human body temperature of 37[deg] C and there is no
growth at or above this temperature. Therefore, infectivity testing is
not possible. This information supports waivers for infectivity testing
in the acute oral, acute dermal, acute inhalation, and injection
exposure studies.
J. Subchronic, Chronic Toxicity and Oncogenicity
Based on the data generated in accordance with Tier I data
requirements (40 CFR 158.740(c)), Tier II tests (Guidelines 152B-40
through 152B-49), which include acute oral, acute inhalation,
subchronic oral, acute intraperitoneal/intracerebral, primary dermal,
primary eye, immune response, teratogenicity, virulence enhancement,
and mammalian mutagenicity were not required. Tier III tests
(Guidelines 152-50 through 53), which include chronic testing,
oncogenicity testing, mutagenicity, and teratogenicity were also not
required.
K. Effects on the Endocrine System
EPA is required under section 408(p) of the FFDCA, as amended by
FQPA, to develop a screening program to determine whether certain
substances (including all pesticide active and other ingredients)
``humans that is similar to an effect produced by a naturally-occurring
estrogen, or other such endocrine effects as the Administrator may
designate.'' Pythium oligandrum is not a known endocrine disruptor nor
is it related to any class of known endocrine disruptors. Consequently,
endocrine-related concerns did not adversely impact the Agency's safety
finding for Pythium oligandrum.
IV. Aggregate Exposures
In examining aggregate exposure, section 408 of the FFDCA directs
EPA to consider available information concerning exposures from the
pesticide residue in food and all other non-occupational exposures,
including drinking water from ground water or surface water and
exposure through pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or buildings
(residential and other indoor uses).
A. Dietary Exposure
Due to the proposed use of Pythium oligandrum on food crops, fungal
residues may be present on agricultural commodities. However,
negligible to no risk is expected for the general population, including
infants and children, because Pythium oligandrum demonstrated no
pathogenicity nor acute oral toxicity at the maximum doses tested.
1. Food. Due to the proposed use of Pythium oligandrum on food
crops, fungal residues may be present on agricultural commodities.
However, negligible to no risk is expected for the general population,
including infants and children, because Pythium oligandrum demonstrated
no pathogenicity or oral toxicity at the maximum doses tested.
2. Drinking water exposure. Pythium oligandrum does not thrive in
aquatic environments and there are no aquatic use sites for the
pesticide. Accordingly, application of this pesticide to approved use
sites is not expected to increase drinking water exposure to Pythium
oligandrum. Furthermore, any Pythium oligandrum that might be consumed
through drinking water would pose negligible to the general population,
including infants and children, due to the pesticide's low toxicity
classification.
B. Other Non-Occupational Exposure
Pythium oligandrum will be applied to agricultural fields, turf and
professional landscapes, and in home gardens. Although some
applications may be made near residential areas, no harm would be
expected to result from exposure to Pythium oligandrum due to its low
toxicity classification.
1.Dermal exposure. Dermal exposure is limited by use of the
required PPE and REI in occupational settings, and residential users
are advised to avoid
[[Page 27451]]
skin contact and to wash any exposed skin or clothing.
2. Inhalation exposure. The greatest likelihood of inhalation
exposure would occur in an occupational setting, among mixers/loaders
and applicators. However, as demonstrated in the acute pulmonary
toxicity/pathogenicity test, Pythium oligandrum is not infective,
pathogenic, or toxic to mammals. Despite the benign nature of the
active ingredient, the agency requires that all workers exposed to
microbial pesticides must wear a dust/mist filtering respirator. As
such, the risks anticipated for inhalation exposure are minimal.
V. Cumulative Effects
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of the FFDCA requires the Agency to
consider the cumulative effect of exposure to Pythium oligandrum and to
other substances that have a common mechanism of toxicity. These
considerations include the possible cumulative effects of such residues
on infants and children. As demonstrated in Unit III.A., Pythium
oligandrum is not toxic or pathogenic to mammals, and only minimally
irritating to eyes. Consequently, no cumulative effects from the
residues of this product with other related microbial pesticides are
anticipated.
VI. Determination of Safety for U.S. Population, Infants and Children
There is a reasonable certainty that no harm to the U.S.
population, including infants and children, will result from aggregate
exposure to residues of Pythium oligandrum due to its use as a
microbial pest control agent. This includes all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information. As discussed in UnitIII.A., Pythium oligandrum is not
toxic or pathogenic to mammals, and only minimally irritating in an eye
exposure study. Accordingly, exempting Pythium oligandrum from the
requirement of a tolerance is considered safe and poses no significant
risks.
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold margin of exposure (safety) for infants and children
in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the data base on toxicity and
exposure, unless EPA determines that a different margin of exposure
(safety) will be safe for infants and children. Margins of exposure
(safety), which often are referred to as uncertainty factors, are
incorporated into EPA risk assessment either directly or through the
use of a margin of exposure analysis or by using uncertainty (safety)
factors in calculating a dose level that poses no appreciable risk.
Actual exposures to adults and children through diet are expected to be
several orders of magnitude less than the doses used in the toxicity
and pathogenicity tests referenced in Unit III. Thus, the Agency has
determined that an additional margin of safety for infants and children
is unnecessary.
VII. Other Considerations
A. Endocrine Disruptors
EPA is required under section 408(p) of the FFDCA, as amended by
FQPA, to develop a screening program to determine whether certain
substances (including all pesticide active and other ingredients) ``may
have an effect in humans that is similar to an effect produced by a
naturally-occurring estrogen, or other such endocrine effects as the
Administrator may designate.'' Pythium oligandrum is not a known
endocrine disruptor nor is it related to any class of known endocrine
disruptors. Consequently, endocrine-related concerns did not adversely
impact the Agency's safety finding for Pythium oligandrum.
B. Analytical Method(s)
The acute oral toxicity and pathogenicity findings discussed in
Unit III demonstrate that the active ingredient does not pose a dietary
risk. Nevertheless, the Agency has concluded that for the analysis of
the pesticide itself, microbiological and biochemical methods exist and
are acceptable forthe enforcement purposes for product identity of
Pythium oligandrum DV 74. Other appropriate methods are required for
quality control to assure that product characterization, the control of
human pathogens, and other unintentional metabolites or ingredients are
within regulatory limits, and to ascertain storage stability and
viability of the pesticidal active ingredient.
C. Codex Maximum Residue Level
There is no established Codex maximum residue level for residues of
Pythium oligandrum DV 74.
VIII. Conclusions
The results of the studies discussed are sufficient to comply with
the requirements of FQPA. They support an exemption from the
requirement of tolerance for residues of Pythium oligandrum DV 74, on
treated food of food commodities. In addition, the Agency is of the
opinion that, if the microbial active ingredient is used as allowed,
aggregate and cumulative exposures are not likely to pose any undue
hazard to the U.S. population of adult, children, and infant humans.
Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of tolerance is granted in
response to pesticide petition 4F6877.
IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408(d) of
FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this rule is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection of Children
from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997). This final rule does not contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance in
this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply.
This final rule directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this action
alter the relationships or distribution of power and responsibilities
established by Congress in the preemption provisions of section
408(n)(4) of FFDCA. As such, the Agency has determined that this action
will not have a substantial direct effect on States or tribal
governments, on the relationship between the national government and
the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government or between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination
[[Page 27452]]
with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6, 2000) do not
apply to this rule. In addition, This rule does not impose any
enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law
104-4).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law 104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note).
X. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to
the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of this final rule in the Federal
Register. This final rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: May 4, 2007.
Debra Edwards,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
0
Therefore, 40 CFR part 180 is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Section 180.1275 is added to subpart D to read as follows:
Sec. 180.1275 Pythium; Exception from the requirement of a tolerance.
An exemption from the requirement of tolerance is established on
all food/feed commodities, for residues of pythium oligandrum DV 74
when the pesticide is used on food crops.
[FR Doc. E7-9298 Filed 5-15-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S