Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Unmodified Qualified Trust Model Certificates and Model Trust Documents, 27132-27134 [E7-9162]
Download as PDF
27132
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Notices
• Total risk-based ratio: PCA total capital
divided by risk-weighted assets.
• Tier 1 growth to asset growth: Annual
growth of PCA tier 1 capital divided by
annual growth of total assets.
• Regulatory capital to internallydetermined capital needs: PCA tier 1 and
total capital divided by internallydetermined capital needs as determined from
economic capital models, internal capital
adequacy assessments processes (ICAAP), or
similar processes.
• Qualitative and mitigating capitalization
factors: Includes considerations such as
strength of capital planning and ICAAP
processes, and the strength of financial
support provided by the parent.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Asset Quality
• Non-performing assets to tier 1 capital:
Nonaccrual loans, loans past due over 90
days, and other real estate owned divided by
PCA tier 1 capital.
• ALLL to loans: Allowance for loan and
lease losses plus allocated transfer risk
reserves divided by total loans and leases.
• Net charge-off rate: Loan and lease losses
charged to the allowance for loan and lease
losses (less recoveries) divided by average
total loans and leases.
• Earnings coverage of net loan losses:
Loan and lease losses charged to the
allowance for loan and lease losses (less
recoveries) divided by pre-tax, pre-loan loss
provision earnings.
• Higher risk loans to tier 1 capital: Sum
of sub-prime loans, alternative or exotic
mortgage products, leveraged lending, and
other high risk lending (e.g., speculative
construction or commercial real estate
financing) divided by PCA tier 1 capital.
• Criticized and classified assets to tier 1
capital: Assets assigned to regulatory
categories of Special Mention, Substandard,
Doubtful, or Loss (and not charged-off)
divided by PCA tier 1 capital.
• EAD-weighted average PD: Weighted
average estimate of the probability of default
(PD) for an institution’s obligors where the
weights are the estimated exposures-atdefault (EAD). PD and EAD risk metrics can
be defined using either the Basel II
framework or internally defined estimates.
• EAD-weighted average LGD: Weighted
average estimate of loss given default (LGD)
for an institution’s credit exposures where
the weights are the estimated EADs for each
exposure. LGD and PD risk metrics can be
defined using either the Basel II framework
or internally defined estimates.
• Qualitative and mitigating asset quality
factors: Includes considerations such as the
extent of credit risk mitigation in place;
underwriting trends; strength of credit risk
monitoring; and the extent of securitization,
derivatives, and off-balance sheet financing
activities that could result in additional
credit exposure.
Liquidity and Market Risk Indicators
• Core deposits to total funding: The sum
of demand, savings, MMDA, and time
deposits under $100 thousand divided by
total funding sources.
• Net loans to assets: Loans and leases (net
of the allowance for loan and lease losses)
divided by total assets.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:21 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
• Liquid and marketable assets to shortterm obligations and certain off-balance sheet
commitments: The sum of cash, balances due
from depository institutions, marketable
securities (fair value), federal funds sold,
securities purchased under agreement to
resell, and readily marketable loans (e.g.,
securitized mortgage pools) divided by the
sum of obligations maturing within one year,
undrawn commercial and industrial loans,
and letters of credit.
• Qualitative and mitigating liquidity
factors: Includes considerations such as the
extent of back-up lines, pledged assets, the
strength of contingency and funds
management practices, and the stability of
various categories of funding sources.
• Earnings and capital at risk to fluctuating
market prices: Quantified measures of
earnings or capital at risk to shifts in interest
rates, changes in foreign exchange values, or
changes in market and commodity prices.
This would include measures of value-at-risk
(VaR) on trading book assets.
• Qualitative and mitigating market risk
factors: Includes considerations of the
strength of interest rate risk and market risk
measurement systems and management
practices, and the extent of risk mitigation
(e.g., interest rate hedges) in place.
Other Market Indicators
• Subordinated debt spreads: Dealerprovided quotes of interest rate spreads paid
on subordinated debt issued by insured
subsidiaries relative to comparable maturity
treasury obligations.
• Credit default swap spreads: Dealerprovided quotes of interest rate spreads paid
by a credit protection buyer to a credit
protection seller relative to a reference
obligation issued by an insured institution.
• Market-based default indicators:
Estimates of the likelihood of default by an
insured organization that are based on either
traded equity or debt prices.
• Qualitative market indicators or
mitigating market factors: Includes
considerations such as agency rating
outlooks, debt and equity analyst opinions
and outlooks, the relative level of liquidity of
any debt and equity issues used to develop
market indicators defined above, and marketbased indicators of the parent company.
Risk Measures Pertaining to Stress
Conditions
Ability To Withstand Stress Conditions
• Concentration risk measures: Measures
of the level of concentrated risk exposures
and extent to which an insured institution’s
capital and earnings would be adversely
affected due to exposures to common risk
factors such as the condition of a single
obligor, poor industry sector conditions, poor
local or regional economic conditions, or
poor conditions for groups of related obligors
(e.g., subprime borrowers).
• Qualitative and mitigating factors
relating to the ability to withstand stress
conditions: Includes results of stress tests or
scenario analyses that measure the extent of
capital, earnings, or liquidity depletion under
varying degrees of financial stress such as
adverse economic, industry, market, and
liquidity events as well as the
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
comprehensiveness of risk identification and
stress testing analyses, the plausibility of
stress scenarios considered, and the
sensitivity of scenario analyses to changes in
assumptions.
Loss Severity Indicators
• Subordinated liabilities to total
liabilities: The sum of obligations, such as
subordinated debt, that would have a
subordinated claim to the institution’s assets
in the event of failure divided by total
liabilities.
• Secured (priority) liabilities to total
liabilities: The sum of claims, such as trade
payables and secured borrowings, that would
have priority claim to the institution’s assets
in the event of failure divided by total
liabilities.
• Foreign assets relative to foreign
deposits: The sum of assets held in foreign
units relative to foreign deposits.
• Liquidation value of assets: Estimated
value of assets, based largely on historical
loss rates experienced by the FDIC on various
asset classes, in the event of liquidation.
• Qualitative and mitigating factors
relating to loss severity: Includes
considerations such as the sufficiency of
information and systems capabilities relating
to qualified financial contracts and deposits
to facilitate quick and cost efficient
resolution, the extent to which critical
functions or staff are housed outside the
insured entity, and prospects for foreign
deposit ring-fencing in the event of failure.
By order of the Board of Directors.
Dated at Washington, DC, this 8th day of
May, 2007.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
Robert E. Feldman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–9196 Filed 5–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714–01–P
OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request for Unmodified Qualified Trust
Model Certificates and Model Trust
Documents
AGENCY:
Office of Government Ethics
(OGE).
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Office of Government
Ethics is publishing this first round
notice and seeking comment on the
twelve executive branch OGE model
certificates and model documents for
qualified trusts. OGE intends to submit
these forms for extension of approval
(up to two years) by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act. OGE is
proposing no changes to these forms at
this time. As in the past, OGE will notify
filers of an update to the privacy
information contained in the existing
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Notices
forms, and will post a notification
thereof on its Web site.
DATES: Written comments by the public
and the agencies on this proposed
extension are invited and must be
received by July 13, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
to OGE on this paperwork notice by any
of the following methods:
E-mail: usoge@oge.gov. (Include
reference to ‘‘Qualified trust model
certificates and model trust documents
paperwork comment’’ in the subject line
of the message).
FAX: 202–482–9237.
Mail, Hand Delivery/Courier: Office of
Government Ethics, Suite 500, 1201
New York Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20005–3917, Attention: Paul D.
Ledvina, Records Officer, Information
Resources Management Division.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ledvina at the Office of Government
Ethics; telephone: 202–482–9281; TDD:
202–482–9293; FAX: 202–482–9237; Email: pdledvin@oge.gov. The model
certificates of independence and
compliance for qualified trusts are
codified in appendixes A, B, and C to
5 CFR part 2634. Copies of the model
trust documents are available through
the Forms, Publications & Other Ethics
Documents section of OGE’s Web site at
https://www.usoge.gov. Copies of the
qualified trust model certificates and the
model trust documents may also be
obtained, without charge, by contacting
Mr. Ledvina.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office
of Government Ethics is planning to
submit, after this first round notice and
comment period, all twelve qualified
trust model certificates and model
documents described below (all of
which are included under OMB
paperwork control number 3209–0007)
for a two-year extension of approval by
OMB under the Paperwork Reduction
Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). At that time,
OGE will publish a second paperwork
notice in the Federal Register to inform
the public and the agencies. The current
paperwork approval, last granted by
OMB in 2005, for the model certificates
and model trust documents is scheduled
to expire at the end of June 2007. OGE
is proposing no changes to the twelve
qualified trust certificates and model
documents at this time.
In 2003, OGE updated the OGE/
GOVT–1 system of records notice
(covering SF 278 Public Financial
Disclosure Reports and other nameretrieved ethics program records),
including the addition of the three new
routine uses. As a result, the Privacy Act
Statement on each of the qualified trust
model certificates and documents,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:21 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
which includes paraphrases of the
routine uses, is affected. OGE has not
incorporated this update into the
qualified trust model certificates and
documents at this time, since a more
thorough revision of these information
collections is planned within the next
two years. Upon distribution of the trust
model certificates and documents, OGE
will continue to inform users of the
update to the Privacy Act Statement.
OGE will also post a notification thereof
on its Web site to accompany the model
certificates and documents.
OGE is the supervising ethics office
for the executive branch of the Federal
Government under the Ethics in
Government Act of 1978 (Ethics Act).
Presidential nominees to executive
branch positions subject to Senate
confirmation and any other executive
branch officials may seek OGE approval
for Ethics Act qualified blind or
diversified trusts as one means to be
used to avoid conflicts of interest.
OGE is the sponsoring agency for the
model certificates and model trust
documents for qualified blind and
diversified trusts of executive branch
officials set up under section 102(f) of
the Ethics Act, 5 U.S.C. app. § 102(f),
and OGE’s implementing financial
disclosure regulations at subpart D of 5
CFR part 2634. The various model
certificates and model trust documents
are utilized by OGE and settlors,
trustees and other fiduciaries in
establishing and administering these
qualified trusts.
There are two categories of
information collection requirements that
OGE plans to submit for renewed
paperwork approval, each with its own
related reporting model certificates or
model trust documents which are
subject to paperwork review and
approval by OMB. The OGE regulatory
citations for these two categories,
together with identification of the forms
used for their implementation, are as
follows:
i. Qualified trust certifications—5 CFR
2634.401(d)(2), 2634.403(b)(11),
2634.404(c)(11), 2634.406(a)(3) and (b),
2634.408, 2634.409 and appendixes A
and B to part 2634 (the two
implementing forms, the Certificate of
Independence and Certificate of
Compliance, are codified respectively in
the cited appendixes; see also the
Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction
Act notices thereto in appendix C); and
ii. Qualified trust communications
and model provisions and agreements—
5 CFR 2634.401(c)(1)(i) and (d)(2),
2634.403(b), 2634.404(c), 2634.408 and
2634.409 (the ten implementing forms
are the: (A) Blind Trust
Communications (Expedited Procedure
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27133
for Securing Approval of Proposed
Communications); (B) Model Qualified
Blind Trust Provisions; (C) Model
Qualified Diversified Trust Provisions;
(D) Model Qualified Blind Trust
Provisions (For Use in the Case of
Multiple Fiduciaries); (E) Model
Qualified Blind Trust Provisions (For
Use in the Case of an Irrevocable PreExisting Trust); (F) Model Qualified
Diversified Trust Provisions (Hybrid
Version); (G) Model Qualified
Diversified Trust Provisions (For Use in
the Case of Multiple Fiduciaries); (H)
Model Qualified Diversified Trust
Provisions (For Use in the Case of an
Irrevocable Pre-Existing Trust); (I)
Model Confidentiality Agreement
Provisions (For Use in the Case of a
Privately Owned Business); and (J)
Model Confidentiality Agreement
Provisions (For Use in the Case of
Investment Management Activities). As
noted above, blank copies of each of
these model documents are posted on
OGE’s Web site.
The communications formats and the
confidentiality agreements (items ii. (A),
(I) and (J) above), once completed,
would not be available to the public
because they contain sensitive,
confidential information. All the other
completed model trust certificates and
model trust documents (except for any
trust provisions that relate to the
testamentary disposition of trust assets)
are publicly available based upon a
proper Ethics Act request (by filling out
an OGE Form 201 access form).
The Office of Government Ethics
administers the qualified trust program
for the executive branch. Therefore, the
estimated burden figures provided
below represent branchwide
implementation of the forms. The
estimated hour burden, which remains
the same as last indicated by OGE in its
prior second round paperwork renewal
notice in 2005 (70 FR 31471–31472 June
1, 2005), is based on the amount of time
imposed on a trust administrator or
private representative.
i. Trust Certificates:
A. Certificate of Independence: total
filers (executive branch): 5; private
citizen filers (100%): 5; private citizen
burden hours (20 minutes/certificate): 2.
B. Certificate of Compliance: total
filers (executive branch): 10; private
citizen filers (100%): 10; private citizen
burden hours (20 minutes/certificate): 3;
and
ii. Model Qualified Trust Documents:
A. Blind Trust Communications: total
users (executive branch): 5; private
citizen users (100%): 5;
communications documents (private
citizens): 25 (based on an average of five
communications per user, per year);
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
27134
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Notices
private citizen burden hours (20
minutes/communication): 8.
B. Model Qualified Blind Trust: total
users (executive branch): 2; private
citizen users (100%): 2; private citizen
burden hours (100 hours/model): 200.
C. Model Qualified Diversified Trust:
total users (executive branch): 1; private
citizen users (100%): 1; private citizen
burden hours (100 hours/model): 100.
D.–H. Of the five remaining model
qualified trust documents: total users
(executive branch): 2; private citizen
users (100%): 2; private citizen burden
hours (100 hours/model): 200.
I.–J. Of the two model confidentiality
agreements: total users (executive
branch): 1; private citizen users (100%):
1; private citizen burden hours (50
hours/agreement): 50.
However, the total annual reporting
hour burden on filers themselves is zero
and not the 563 hours estimated above
because OGE’s estimating methodology
reflects the fact that all respondents hire
private trust administrators or other
private representatives to set up and
maintain the qualified blind and
diversified trusts. Respondents
themselves, typically incoming private
citizen Presidential nominees, therefore
incur no hour burden. The estimated
total annual cost burden to respondents
resulting from the collection of
information is $1,000,000. Those who
use the model documents for guidance
are private trust administrators or other
private representatives hired to set up
and maintain the qualified blind and
diversified trusts of executive branch
officials who seek to establish qualified
trusts. The cost burden figure is based
primarily on OGE’s knowledge of the
typical trust administrator fee structure
(an average of 1 percent of total assets)
and OGE’s experience with
administration of the qualified trust
program. The $1,000,000 annual cost
figure is based on OGE’s estimate of an
average of five active trusts anticipated
to be under administration for each of
the next two years with combined total
assets of $100,000,000. However, OGE
notes that the $1,000,000 figure is a cost
estimate for the overall administration
of the trusts, only a portion of which
relates to information collection and
reporting. For want of a precise way to
break out the costs directly associated
with information collection, OGE is
continuing to report to OMB the full
$1,000,000 estimate for paperwork
clearance purposes.
Public comment is invited on each
aspect of the model qualified trust
certificates and model trust documents,
and underlying regulatory provisions, as
set forth in this notice, including
specific views on the need for and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:21 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
practical utility of this set of collections
of information, the accuracy of OGE’s
burden estimate, the potential for
enhancement of quality, utility and
clarity of the information collected, and
the minimization of burden (including
the use of information technology).
Comments received in response to
this notice will be summarized for, and
may be included with, the OGE request
for extension of the OMB paperwork
approval for the set of the various
existing qualified trust model
certificates, the model communications
package, and the model trust
documents. The comments will also
become a matter of public record.
Approved: May 3, 2007.
Robert I. Cusick,
Director, Office of Government Ethics.
[FR Doc. E7–9162 Filed 5–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6345–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Toxicology Program (NTP);
Liaison and Scientific Review Office;
Meeting of the NTP Board of Scientific
Counselors
National Institute of
Environmental Health Sciences
(NIEHS), National Institutes of Health.
ACTION: Meeting announcement and
request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to Public Law 92–
463, notice is hereby given of a meeting
of the NTP Board of Scientific
Counselors (NTP BSC). The NTP BSC is
composed of scientists from the public
and private sectors and provides
primary scientific oversight to the NTP
Director and evaluates the scientific
merit of the NTP’s intramural and
collaborative programs.
DATES: The NTP BSC meeting will be
held on June 22, 2007. The deadlines for
submission of written comments and for
pre-registration for the meeting are June
8 and June 15, 2007, respectively.
Persons needing special assistance, such
as sign language interpretation or other
reasonable accommodation in order to
attend, should contact 919–541–2475
(voice), 919–541–4644 TTY (text
telephone), through the Federal TTY
Relay System at 800–877–8339, or by email to niehsoeeo@niehs.nih.gov.
Requests should be made at least 7 days
in advance of the event.
ADDRESSES: The NTP BSC meeting will
be held in the Rodbell Auditorium, Rall
Building at the NIEHS, 111 T.W.
Alexander Drive, Research Triangle
Park, NC 27709. Public comments and
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
any other correspondence should be
submitted to Dr. Barbara Shane,
Executive Secretary for the NTP BSC
(NTP Liaison and Scientific Review
Office, NIEHS, P.O. Box 12233, MD A3–
01, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709;
fax: 919–541–0295; or e-mail:
shane@niehs.nih.gov).
Dr.
Barbara Shane (telephone: 919–541–
4253 or e-mail: shane@niehs.nih.gov).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Preliminary Agenda Topics and
Availability of Meeting Materials
Preliminary agenda topics include:
• Update of NTP activities.
• Implementation of workshop and
NTP retreat recommendations.
• Review of NTP contracts.
• NTP testing nominations.
• Five-year plan for the NTP
Interagency Center for the Evaluation of
Alternative Toxicological Methods
(NICEATM)—Interagency Coordinating
Committee on the Validation of
Alternative Methods (ICCVAM).
A copy of the preliminary agenda,
committee roster, and any additional
information, when available, will be
posted on the NTP Web site (https://
ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/165) or may be
requested in hardcopy from the
Executive Secretary for the NTP BSC
(see ADDRESSES above). Following the
meeting, summary minutes will be
prepared and made available on the
NTP Web site.
Attendance and Registration
The meeting is scheduled for June 22,
2007, from 8:30 a.m. to adjournment
and is open to the public with
attendance limited only by the space
available. Individuals who plan to
attend are encouraged to register online
at the NTP Web site by June 15, 2007
to facilitate planning for the meeting.
Please note that a photo ID is required
to access the NIEHS campus. The NTP
is making plans to videocast the meeting
through the Internet at https://
www.niehs.nih.gov/external/video.htm.
Request for Comments
Time is allotted during the meeting
for the public to present comments to
the NTP BSC on the agenda topics. Each
organization is allowed one time slot
per agenda topic. At least 7 minutes will
be allotted to each speaker, and if time
permits, may be extended to 10 minutes
at the discretion of the NTP BSC chair.
Registration for oral comments will also
be available on-site, although time
allowed for presentation by on-site
registrants may be less than that for preregistered speakers and will be
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 92 (Monday, May 14, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27132-27134]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9162]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS
Proposed Collection; Comment Request for Unmodified Qualified
Trust Model Certificates and Model Trust Documents
AGENCY: Office of Government Ethics (OGE).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Government Ethics is publishing this first round
notice and seeking comment on the twelve executive branch OGE model
certificates and model documents for qualified trusts. OGE intends to
submit these forms for extension of approval (up to two years) by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act. OGE is proposing no changes to these forms at this time. As in the
past, OGE will notify filers of an update to the privacy information
contained in the existing
[[Page 27133]]
forms, and will post a notification thereof on its Web site.
DATES: Written comments by the public and the agencies on this proposed
extension are invited and must be received by July 13, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to OGE on this paperwork notice by
any of the following methods:
E-mail: usoge@oge.gov. (Include reference to ``Qualified trust
model certificates and model trust documents paperwork comment'' in the
subject line of the message).
FAX: 202-482-9237.
Mail, Hand Delivery/Courier: Office of Government Ethics, Suite
500, 1201 New York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20005-3917, Attention:
Paul D. Ledvina, Records Officer, Information Resources Management
Division.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ledvina at the Office of
Government Ethics; telephone: 202-482-9281; TDD: 202-482-9293; FAX:
202-482-9237; E-mail: pdledvin@oge.gov. The model certificates of
independence and compliance for qualified trusts are codified in
appendixes A, B, and C to 5 CFR part 2634. Copies of the model trust
documents are available through the Forms, Publications & Other Ethics
Documents section of OGE's Web site at https://www.usoge.gov. Copies of
the qualified trust model certificates and the model trust documents
may also be obtained, without charge, by contacting Mr. Ledvina.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Office of Government Ethics is planning
to submit, after this first round notice and comment period, all twelve
qualified trust model certificates and model documents described below
(all of which are included under OMB paperwork control number 3209-
0007) for a two-year extension of approval by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35). At that time, OGE will publish a
second paperwork notice in the Federal Register to inform the public
and the agencies. The current paperwork approval, last granted by OMB
in 2005, for the model certificates and model trust documents is
scheduled to expire at the end of June 2007. OGE is proposing no
changes to the twelve qualified trust certificates and model documents
at this time.
In 2003, OGE updated the OGE/GOVT-1 system of records notice
(covering SF 278 Public Financial Disclosure Reports and other name-
retrieved ethics program records), including the addition of the three
new routine uses. As a result, the Privacy Act Statement on each of the
qualified trust model certificates and documents, which includes
paraphrases of the routine uses, is affected. OGE has not incorporated
this update into the qualified trust model certificates and documents
at this time, since a more thorough revision of these information
collections is planned within the next two years. Upon distribution of
the trust model certificates and documents, OGE will continue to inform
users of the update to the Privacy Act Statement. OGE will also post a
notification thereof on its Web site to accompany the model
certificates and documents.
OGE is the supervising ethics office for the executive branch of
the Federal Government under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978
(Ethics Act). Presidential nominees to executive branch positions
subject to Senate confirmation and any other executive branch officials
may seek OGE approval for Ethics Act qualified blind or diversified
trusts as one means to be used to avoid conflicts of interest.
OGE is the sponsoring agency for the model certificates and model
trust documents for qualified blind and diversified trusts of executive
branch officials set up under section 102(f) of the Ethics Act, 5
U.S.C. app. Sec. 102(f), and OGE's implementing financial disclosure
regulations at subpart D of 5 CFR part 2634. The various model
certificates and model trust documents are utilized by OGE and
settlors, trustees and other fiduciaries in establishing and
administering these qualified trusts.
There are two categories of information collection requirements
that OGE plans to submit for renewed paperwork approval, each with its
own related reporting model certificates or model trust documents which
are subject to paperwork review and approval by OMB. The OGE regulatory
citations for these two categories, together with identification of the
forms used for their implementation, are as follows:
i. Qualified trust certifications--5 CFR 2634.401(d)(2),
2634.403(b)(11), 2634.404(c)(11), 2634.406(a)(3) and (b), 2634.408,
2634.409 and appendixes A and B to part 2634 (the two implementing
forms, the Certificate of Independence and Certificate of Compliance,
are codified respectively in the cited appendixes; see also the Privacy
Act and Paperwork Reduction Act notices thereto in appendix C); and
ii. Qualified trust communications and model provisions and
agreements--5 CFR 2634.401(c)(1)(i) and (d)(2), 2634.403(b),
2634.404(c), 2634.408 and 2634.409 (the ten implementing forms are the:
(A) Blind Trust Communications (Expedited Procedure for Securing
Approval of Proposed Communications); (B) Model Qualified Blind Trust
Provisions; (C) Model Qualified Diversified Trust Provisions; (D) Model
Qualified Blind Trust Provisions (For Use in the Case of Multiple
Fiduciaries); (E) Model Qualified Blind Trust Provisions (For Use in
the Case of an Irrevocable Pre-Existing Trust); (F) Model Qualified
Diversified Trust Provisions (Hybrid Version); (G) Model Qualified
Diversified Trust Provisions (For Use in the Case of Multiple
Fiduciaries); (H) Model Qualified Diversified Trust Provisions (For Use
in the Case of an Irrevocable Pre-Existing Trust); (I) Model
Confidentiality Agreement Provisions (For Use in the Case of a
Privately Owned Business); and (J) Model Confidentiality Agreement
Provisions (For Use in the Case of Investment Management Activities).
As noted above, blank copies of each of these model documents are
posted on OGE's Web site.
The communications formats and the confidentiality agreements
(items ii. (A), (I) and (J) above), once completed, would not be
available to the public because they contain sensitive, confidential
information. All the other completed model trust certificates and model
trust documents (except for any trust provisions that relate to the
testamentary disposition of trust assets) are publicly available based
upon a proper Ethics Act request (by filling out an OGE Form 201 access
form).
The Office of Government Ethics administers the qualified trust
program for the executive branch. Therefore, the estimated burden
figures provided below represent branchwide implementation of the
forms. The estimated hour burden, which remains the same as last
indicated by OGE in its prior second round paperwork renewal notice in
2005 (70 FR 31471-31472 June 1, 2005), is based on the amount of time
imposed on a trust administrator or private representative.
i. Trust Certificates:
A. Certificate of Independence: total filers (executive branch): 5;
private citizen filers (100%): 5; private citizen burden hours (20
minutes/certificate): 2.
B. Certificate of Compliance: total filers (executive branch): 10;
private citizen filers (100%): 10; private citizen burden hours (20
minutes/certificate): 3; and
ii. Model Qualified Trust Documents:
A. Blind Trust Communications: total users (executive branch): 5;
private citizen users (100%): 5; communications documents (private
citizens): 25 (based on an average of five communications per user, per
year);
[[Page 27134]]
private citizen burden hours (20 minutes/communication): 8.
B. Model Qualified Blind Trust: total users (executive branch): 2;
private citizen users (100%): 2; private citizen burden hours (100
hours/model): 200.
C. Model Qualified Diversified Trust: total users (executive
branch): 1; private citizen users (100%): 1; private citizen burden
hours (100 hours/model): 100.
D.-H. Of the five remaining model qualified trust documents: total
users (executive branch): 2; private citizen users (100%): 2; private
citizen burden hours (100 hours/model): 200.
I.-J. Of the two model confidentiality agreements: total users
(executive branch): 1; private citizen users (100%): 1; private citizen
burden hours (50 hours/agreement): 50.
However, the total annual reporting hour burden on filers
themselves is zero and not the 563 hours estimated above because OGE's
estimating methodology reflects the fact that all respondents hire
private trust administrators or other private representatives to set up
and maintain the qualified blind and diversified trusts. Respondents
themselves, typically incoming private citizen Presidential nominees,
therefore incur no hour burden. The estimated total annual cost burden
to respondents resulting from the collection of information is
$1,000,000. Those who use the model documents for guidance are private
trust administrators or other private representatives hired to set up
and maintain the qualified blind and diversified trusts of executive
branch officials who seek to establish qualified trusts. The cost
burden figure is based primarily on OGE's knowledge of the typical
trust administrator fee structure (an average of 1 percent of total
assets) and OGE's experience with administration of the qualified trust
program. The $1,000,000 annual cost figure is based on OGE's estimate
of an average of five active trusts anticipated to be under
administration for each of the next two years with combined total
assets of $100,000,000. However, OGE notes that the $1,000,000 figure
is a cost estimate for the overall administration of the trusts, only a
portion of which relates to information collection and reporting. For
want of a precise way to break out the costs directly associated with
information collection, OGE is continuing to report to OMB the full
$1,000,000 estimate for paperwork clearance purposes.
Public comment is invited on each aspect of the model qualified
trust certificates and model trust documents, and underlying regulatory
provisions, as set forth in this notice, including specific views on
the need for and practical utility of this set of collections of
information, the accuracy of OGE's burden estimate, the potential for
enhancement of quality, utility and clarity of the information
collected, and the minimization of burden (including the use of
information technology).
Comments received in response to this notice will be summarized
for, and may be included with, the OGE request for extension of the OMB
paperwork approval for the set of the various existing qualified trust
model certificates, the model communications package, and the model
trust documents. The comments will also become a matter of public
record.
Approved: May 3, 2007.
Robert I. Cusick,
Director, Office of Government Ethics.
[FR Doc. E7-9162 Filed 5-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6345-02-P