Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program, 27222-27236 [07-2363]
Download as PDF
27222
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Parts 3280, 3282, and 3288
[Docket No. FR–4813–F–03]
RIN 2502–AH98
Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This rule establishes a federal
manufactured home dispute resolution
program and guidelines for the creation
of state-administered dispute resolution
programs. Under the National
Manufactured Housing Construction
and Safety Standards Act of 1974, as
amended by the Manufactured Housing
Improvement Act of 2000, HUD is
required to establish a program for the
timely resolution of disputes among
manufacturers, retailers, and installers
of manufactured homes regarding
responsibility, and the issuance of
appropriate orders, for the correction or
repair of defects in manufactured homes
that are reported during the 1-year
period beginning on the date of
installation.
DATES:
Effective Date: February 8, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William W. Matchneer III, Associate
Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Regulatory Affairs and Manufactured
Housing, Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street,
SW., Room 9164, Washington, DC
20410, telephone (202) 708–6401 (this is
not a toll-free number). Persons with
hearing or speech impairments may
access this number via TTY by calling
the toll-free Federal Information Relay
Service at (800) 877–8389.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES_2
Requirement for a Dispute Resolution
Program
The National Manufactured Housing
Construction and Safety Standards Act
of 1974 (the Act) (42 U.S.C. 5401–5426)
is intended, in part, to protect the
quality, safety, durability, and
affordability of manufactured homes.
The Act was amended on December 27,
2000, by the Manufactured Housing
Improvement Act of 2000, Public Law
106–569, to require HUD, among other
things, to establish and implement a
new manufactured home dispute
resolution program for states that choose
not to operate their own dispute
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
resolution programs and to establish
guidelines for the creation of stateadministered dispute resolution
programs.
Specifically, section 623(c)(12) of the
Act (42 U.S.C. 5422(c)(12)) calls for the
implementation of ‘‘a dispute resolution
program for the timely resolution of
disputes between manufacturers,
retailers, and installers of manufactured
homes regarding responsibility, and for
the issuance of appropriate orders, for
the correction or repair of defects in
manufactured homes that are reported
during the 1-year period beginning on
the date of installation.’’ A state is not
required to be a State Administrative
Agency under HUD’s manufactured
home program to administer its own
dispute resolution program. However,
any state submitting a state plan to
change its status from a
nonparticipating state to a conditionally
or fully approved State Administrative
Agency after the effective date must
provide for a dispute resolution program
as part of its plan. Any state that was
conditionally or fully approved before
the effective date will not be required to
include a dispute resolution program in
its state plan, as long as the state
maintains conditionally or fully
approved status. Section 623(g)(2) of the
Act requires HUD to implement a HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program that will meet the above
requirements in any state that has not
established a program that complies
with the Act. The state where the home
is sited determines whether the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program or the state program applies.
Proposed Rule
On October 20, 2005, HUD published
the Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program Proposed Rule (70
FR 61178) with a comment due date of
December 19, 2005. HUD received
responses from 20 commenters during
the comment period. The commenters
included two state agencies, several
statewide and national manufactured
housing associations, individuals, the
Manufactured Housing Consensus
Committee (MHCC), and one lowincome housing organization.
II. Particular Areas of Interest to
Commenters
This section of the preamble discusses
particular areas of interest to
commenters in addition to the
discussions of public comments that
appear throughout the preamble in
conjunction with the description of the
dispute resolution program adopted in
this final rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
General
As previously discussed, HUD was
charged with implementing a system to
resolve disputes among manufacturers,
retailers, and installers. As several
commenters noted, the proposed rule
did not include a definition of
‘‘installer.’’ In response to this
comment, this rule defines the term
‘‘installer.’’ Additional information
regarding installers may be found in the
Manufactured Home Installation
Program Proposed Rule published June
14, 2006 (71 FR 34476).
Even though the Act does not require
their participation in the HUD Dispute
Resolution Program, HUD views the
participation of homeowners as a
crucial element to a viable program.
Under Section 625 of the Act, HUD has
the broad authority to involve
homeowners in the dispute resolution
program. Consistent with the proposed
rule, this final rule gives homeowners
the right to participate in the HUD
Dispute Resolution Program by
initiating the Mediation and Arbitration
Process and by acting as observers of the
process. This final rule does not
recognize homeowners as parties.
HUD and the MHCC, in its meetings,
recognized that it may have been
possible under the proposed rule for the
parties to argue that there is no dispute
between them when in fact there is a
defect that needs correction. In this final
rule, HUD has ensured that the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program results in a proper
determination of defect and culpability.
Funding
The MHCC and commenters have
continued to recommend that parties
that use and receive the benefits of the
dispute resolution process pay at least a
portion of the direct costs associated
with the program. HUD agrees with this
‘‘fees for service’’ approach and is
currently seeking statutory authority to
assess users of the program a fee for
costs associated with the program.
Absent such authority, the Department
will absorb the cost of running the
program in HUD-administered states as
general program expenses. It is
anticipated that such fees for service
would not be used to cover the purely
administrative costs to HUD of
implementing the program, but would
include a filing fee to initiate a dispute
resolution process, a fee to initiate
arbitration, and the assessment of
arbitration costs to a losing party. Other
administrative costs of the program in
HUD-administered states would be
funded as general program expenses.
E:\FR\FM\14MYR2.SGM
14MYR2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Several commenters stated it is unfair
to consumers in states with their own
dispute resolution programs both to pay
for their state’s program and subsidize
the administration of HUD’s program in
states that are not offering programs.
The Department is sensitive to this
issue. However, because fees for service
are not currently authorized, the
financing of the HUD Manufactured
Home Dispute Program will be absorbed
as a general Office of Manufactured
Housing program expense as described
above.
As discussed in the proposed rule,
HUD will use mediation and arbitration,
two widely accepted methods of dispute
resolution, as well as an alternative
process that will allow manufacturers,
retailers, and installers an opportunity
to resolve disputes outside of the HUD
Mediation and Arbitration Process
established by this rule. The addition of
an alternate process to the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program is based on comments received
from the MHCC. In its comments to the
proposed rule, the MHCC recommended
that a term other than ‘‘Commercial OptOut Option’’ be used for the alternate
process. In its place, HUD has
substituted the term ‘‘Alternative
Process.’’
The HUD Manufactured Home
Dispute Resolution Program reflects the
Executive Branch’s emphasis on
utilizing dispute resolution processes to
resolve conflicts in a cost-effective and
expeditious manner, and on fostering
good government by giving parties the
opportunity to resolve disputes
amicably and creatively through
alternative dispute resolution. It also
dovetails with Congress’ active
promotion of alternative dispute
resolution as set forth in the
Administrative Dispute Resolution Act
of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 571 et seq.).
There were several comments to the
proposed rule about the relationship
between the HUD Dispute Resolution
Program and subpart I of 24 CFR part
3282 (Subpart I). This final dispute
resolution rule is not inconsistent with
other requirements of the Act.
Specifically, nothing in this final rule
absolves the manufacturer of its
notification and correction
responsibilities or other obligations
under Subpart I. The dispute resolution
program provides an additional
homeowner protection mechanism and
does not toll or replace the
manufacturer’s responsibilities under
Subpart I. Furthermore, the HUD
Dispute Resolution Program does not
replace any manufacturer’s warranty
program.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
III. Program Administration for the
HUD-Administered Program
HUD interprets the language set forth
in section 623(g)(3) of the Act (42 U.S.C.
5422(g)(3)) as permitting the use of
contractors in the implementation of the
dispute resolution program in HUDadministered states. HUD will likely use
contractors as screening neutrals,
mediators, and arbitrators, and they will
be required to become familiar with
HUD’s manufactured home program.
HUD acknowledges, however, that
dispute resolution experts emphasize
that a primary consideration for
selecting neutrals, mediators, and
arbitrators should be their background
and experience in dispute resolution.
The HUD Manufactured Home
Dispute Resolution Program is governed
by the Administrative Dispute
Resolution Act, 5 U.S.C. 571 et seq. The
HUD Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program consists of a
Mediation and Arbitration Process
comprised of six parts, in addition to
the Alternative Process. The six parts of
the Mediation and Arbitration Process
are: Initial Reporting of an Alleged
Defect, Initiating Dispute Resolution,
Intake and Screening, Mediation,
Nonbinding Arbitration, and HUD
Review. When the manufacturer,
retailer, and installer agree that the
homeowner is not responsible for
causing the defect, they may elect to use
the Alternative Process instead of the
HUD Mediation and Arbitration Process.
The parties would then engage in a
neutral evaluation process of their own
design. However, if the defect is not
corrected or repaired, the homeowner
has the right to invoke the HUD
Mediation and Arbitration Process after
30 days have elapsed from the initiation
of the Alternative Process.
IV. HUD Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program in HUDAdministered States
As noted previously, HUD will
administer its dispute resolution
program only in states that choose not
to operate their own dispute resolution
programs. The following discussion of
the HUD-administered program will not
apply in any state that provides
satisfactory assurances that it has
implemented its own qualifying dispute
resolution program, and that certifies its
program to HUD, as described in
Section VI of this preamble.
A. Initial Reporting of an Alleged Defect
Under the Act, alleged defects that
can be referred to the dispute resolution
program must be reported within the
first year after the date of home
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
27223
installation. It is only alleged defects
reported in the first year after the first
installation that are covered under the
HUD Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program. As used in HUD’s
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program and this new part 3288, the
term ‘‘defect’’ is defined to parallel its
definition in the Act. Accordingly, the
rule also makes clear that for the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program, the term ‘‘defect’’ includes
each defect in the installation,
construction, or safety of the home.
Persons familiar with HUD’s longestablished program for manufactured
home construction and safety standards
are likely to be accustomed to using the
term ‘‘defect’’ in a narrower way. In
regulations implementing the historical
aspects of HUD’s manufactured home
program, the term has been defined to
encompass only construction and safety
standards, and to exclude matters that
involve significant health and safety
issues. See the definition in § 3282.7(j).
For purposes of the HUD Manufactured
Home Dispute Resolution Program,
however, a defect is any problem in the
performance, construction, components,
or material of the home that renders the
home or any part of it not fit for the
ordinary use for which it was intended,
including, but not limited to, a defect in
the construction, safety, or installation
of the home. The broader use of the term
as it applies to rights and
responsibilities established under this
new part 3288, is distinguished from the
term’s historical use in part 3282.
As previously discussed, alleged
defects must be reported within 1 year
of the date of home installation to be
eligible for the HUD Manufactured
Home Dispute Resolution Program. The
Department strongly encourages the
parties and homeowners to seek to
resolve disputes directly with the party
or parties that they believe to be
responsible for causing the alleged
defect before invoking the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program. Nevertheless, any of the
parties, and the homeowners, must
report the existence of possible defects
within the 1-year period in order to
preserve the option of initiating the
HUD Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program. The report may be
made to the Department, any of the
parties, or a State Administrative
Agency. To be more flexible, the
Department is permitting reports to be
made to State Administrative Agencies
in addition to the Department and the
parties. The Department recommends
that reports of alleged defects be made
in writing, including, but not limited to,
E:\FR\FM\14MYR2.SGM
14MYR2
27224
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
e-mail, written letter, certified mail, or
fax. Reports are also permitted by
telephone. A report of an alleged defect
must, at a minimum, include a
description of the alleged defect, the
name of the homeowner, and the
address of the home. Parties alleging
defects are encouraged to send any
written correspondence via certified
mail, fax, e-mail or other method, so
that there will be proof of date of
delivery. After reporting an alleged
defect, the reporting party or
homeowner is encouraged to allow time
for a satisfactory response before
initiating the HUD Manufactured Home
Dispute Resolution Program.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES_2
B. Initiating the Process
Any party or a homeowner may
initiate the HUD Mediation and
Arbitration Process in a HUDadministered state by submitting a
request for dispute resolution to the
dispute resolution provider or by calling
a toll-free number.
C. Intake and Screening
When the request for dispute
resolution has been received by the
dispute resolution provider, the
screening neutral will review the
sufficiency of the information provided
with the request. Although there is no
specified time period established for the
screening neutral to review the request
for dispute resolution, as recommended
by the MHCC and other commenters, it
is HUD’s intention to perform this task
in a timely manner. If a defect is
properly alleged and timely reported,
notice of the request will be forwarded
to the manufacturer, retailer, and
installer by the screening neutral to the
extent the appropriate parties can be
identified based on the information in
the request. If the screening neutral
determines there is sufficient
documentation of an alleged defect
presenting an unreasonable risk of
injury or death, a copy of the request
will be sent to HUD. If a request is
lacking any of the required information,
the screening neutral will contact the
requester or the parties to supplement
the initial request. If information
necessary to qualify the matter for the
HUD Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program is not received
within a reasonable time established by
the screening neutral, the request for
dispute resolution will be considered
withdrawn. The Department anticipates
establishing additional specific time
periods for intake and screening as part
of the contracting process with the
third-party dispute resolution provider
and publicizing these time periods on
HUD’s Web site https://www.hud.gov.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
D. Mandatory Mediation
The second stage in the process is
mandatory mediation. The dispute
resolution provider will select a
mediator, who will be a different
individual from the screening neutral
used during the intake and screening
process. The mediator will mediate the
dispute and attempt to facilitate a
settlement. The parties will be given 30
days from the commencement of the
mediation to reach a settlement. For
cases involving defects presenting an
unreasonable risk of injury, death, or
significant loss or damage to valuable
personal property, the parties will have
a maximum of 10 days from the
commencement of the mediation to
reach an agreement. The dispute
resolution provider will notify the
parties and the homeowner in writing of
the date of the commencement of the
mediation. Sample agreements will be
made available to the parties as drafting
guidance. Upon the parties reaching and
signing an agreement, the mediator will
forward copies of any settlements
reached to the parties, the homeowner,
and HUD. Except for the report of an
alleged defect, any request for dispute
resolution, and any written settlement
agreement, all other documents and
communications provided in confidence
and used in the mediation will be
confidential, in accordance with the
Administrative Dispute Resolution Act
of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 571 et seq.). Once the
settlement agreement is signed, the
corrective repairs must be completed
within 30 days, unless a longer period
is agreed to by the homeowner and the
parties.
E. Nonbinding Arbitration
The third stage that may be invoked
is nonbinding arbitration. If the parties
fail to reach a settlement during
mediation, a party or the homeowner
may, within 15 days of the expiration of
the time allowed for reaching a
settlement, request nonbinding
arbitration. The party or the homeowner
requesting nonbinding arbitration will
be required to submit a written request
for arbitration to the dispute resolution
provider. The dispute resolution
provider will determine how an
arbitrator will be selected for each case.
The parties may request an in-person
hearing, to be held at the discretion of
the arbitrator, after considering factors
such as cost. If such a request is not
made by all parties within 5 days of the
dispute resolution provider’s receipt of
the request for arbitration, the arbitrator
may conduct either a record review or
a telephonic hearing. The dispute
resolution provider will issue a notice to
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the parties and the homeowner setting
forth the date, place, and time the
arbitration is to be held. If a party
chooses not to participate in the
arbitration, the process will continue
without input from that party. The
arbitrator will have the authority to
issue requests for documentation and
information necessary to complete the
record, conduct on-site inspections,
dismiss frivolous allegations, and set
hearing dates and deadlines. The
arbitrator will be required to complete
the arbitration within 21 days of receipt
of the request for arbitration, unless
good cause is found by HUD. After
conducting a hearing, the arbitrator will
provide the parties and HUD with a
written nonbinding recommendation as
to who the responsible party or parties
are and what actions should be taken.
Several commenters, including the
MHCC, proposed that the contents of
the recommendation be made available
to HUD and the parties simultaneously.
The Department agrees and has
restructured the Mediation and
Arbitration Process accordingly. Several
commenters, including the MHCC,
stated that the parties should have the
ability to enter into binding agreements
of their choosing at any point in the
process. Taking this into consideration,
HUD has modified the procedures set
out in the proposed rule. Under the final
rule, at any time before HUD issues a
final order, the parties may submit an
offer of settlement to HUD that HUD
may, at its discretion, incorporate into
the order.
F. HUD Review
The final stage of the process is HUD
Review. After the arbitrator makes a
recommendation, he or she will forward
it to HUD. HUD will review the
arbitrator’s recommendation, the record,
and any settlement offers. HUD will
accept, modify, or reject the
recommendation. Several commenters,
including the MHCC, were opposed to
HUD having the option to accept,
modify, or reject the arbitrator’s
recommendation. HUD considers it
appropriate for HUD to issue final
enforceable orders and that this inherent
governmental function cannot be
delegated to a private party. It is HUD’s
obligation to issue an order that under
the Administrative Procedure Act can
withstand the arbitrary and capricious
standard. When a defect is determined
to be present, HUD will issue an
appropriate order that assigns
responsibility for correction of the
defect. In the order for correction, HUD
will include a date by which the
correction of all defects must be
completed, taking into consideration the
E:\FR\FM\14MYR2.SGM
14MYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
seriousness of the defect. A party’s
failure to comply with an order of HUD
will be considered a violation of section
610(a)(5) of the Act (42 U.S.C.
5409(a)(5)).
The responsible party or parties will
be required to pay for or provide any
repair of the home. HUD may apportion
the costs for correction and repair if
culpability rests with more than one
party.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES_2
G. Alternative Process When
Homeowners Are Not Responsible for
the Defect
Manufacturers, retailers, and
installers who have been unable to
resolve a dispute involving a defect
among themselves and who certify that
the homeowner is not responsible for
the defect will have the option of
electing to use an Alternative Process
under the HUD Manufactured Home
Dispute Resolution Program. The
Alternative Process permits the parties
to seek neutral evaluation outside of the
procedures established by the HUD
Mediation and Arbitration Process. To
participate in the Alternative Process, at
least one of the parties must submit a
written notification to the dispute
resolution provider after it has reported
an alleged defect or has been informed
that an alleged defect has been reported
to another party. Parties must elect to
use the Alternative Process no more
than 7 days after notification of a
request for dispute resolution has been
delivered by overnight delivery, or
commercial carrier, or by fax, to the
screening neutral. Parties who elect to
use the Alternative Process must agree
to engage a neutral of their own
selection. The selected neutral will
evaluate the dispute and make an
assignment of responsibility for
correction and repair. The actual
process followed will be designed and
agreed to by the parties; there are no
particular procedural requirements,
such as witnesses or formal evidence.
The parties may elect to memorialize
the assignment of responsibility in
writing and should agree to act upon the
neutral’s assignment of responsibility
for correction and repair. The
participants must agree to allow the
homeowner or the homeowner’s
representative to be present at any
meetings and to be informed of the
outcome. The parties may inform the
Department of the outcome. At any time
after 30 days of the Alternative Process
notification, any party or the
homeowner may invoke the HUD
Mediation and Arbitration Process and
proceed to mediation by following the
established procedures.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
V. Informing Homeowners About
Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution
One key component of the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program is notifying homeowners about
the availability of dispute resolution in
HUD-administered states through the
HUD Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program, and in all other
states through state dispute resolution
programs. Homeowners will be advised
of the availability of the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program from retailers when purchasing
a manufactured home. The rule requires
retailers to provide each homeowner
with a standard notice at the time of
signing of a contract for the sale or lease
of a manufactured home. This is
consistent with numerous comments
received from the MHCC and others
opposed to the posting of a notice in
each home, but favoring a standard
notice to be provided at or before the
signing of the sales contract.
The Department will notify the public
about the HUD Manufactured Home
Dispute Resolution Program through the
Consumer Manual that 42 U.S.C. 5416
and 24 CFR 3282.207 currently require
be provided with each manufactured
home. The manufacturer will be
required to include in the Consumer
Manual the specific language that is set
out in the revised § 3282.207 in this
rule. The language gives detailed
information about the HUD program.
VI. State Dispute Resolution Programs
in Non-HUD-Administered States
The HUD Manufactured Home
Dispute Resolution Program will not be
implemented in states that are certified
by HUD and have dispute resolution
programs that comply with the
minimum requirements set out in these
regulations. These states will administer
their own dispute resolution programs.
A state dispute resolution program will
be required to meet criteria listed in a
certification form. However, the final
rule does not specify how the criteria
are to be met. Comments from the
MHCC and others strongly supported
redefining HUD’s proposed state
requirements for certification. Those
commenters were in favor of having the
state requirements parallel the statutory
requirements. Additionally, those
commenters noted that some states have
already implemented programs that
closely model the statutory
requirements. The proposed rule
included six requirements for full
certification and five for conditional
approval. In response to the comments,
HUD has reduced the minimum
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
27225
requirements for full certification to
four, and to three for conditional
approval. The proposed rule also
required that states allow homeowners
to initiate complaints. Comments from
the MHCC and others recommended
that this requirement be removed. HUD
has changed the certification form to
allow states flexibility when operating
their own programs and to give them the
ability to design programs that closely
model the statutory requirements. The
minimum requirements for certification
are set forth in Part II of the Dispute
Resolution Certification attached as an
appendix, and include provisions for:
(1) The timely resolution of disputes
regarding responsibility for correction
and repair of defects in manufactured
homes involving manufacturers,
retailers, or installers; (2) provisions for
issuance of appropriate orders for
correction and repairs of defects in the
homes; (3) a coverage period for
disputes involving defects that are
reported within a minimum of 1 year
from the date beginning on the date of
first installation; and (4) adequate
funding and personnel. Any state that
certifies that its program meets these
four minimum requirements will be
accepted and permitted to implement its
own program. A state that meets three
of the four minimum requirements
under § 3288.205(a)(1) through (4) will
be conditionally approved by HUD.
HUD recognizes that some states may
have a different definition of ‘‘defect’’ or
use a different threshold for its program
than the one set forth in these
regulations for the HUD program. For
purposes of state certification, this rule
provides for state approval if the
threshold for the program is
functionally equivalent to the federal
definition of ‘‘defect.’’
VII. Role of the Manufactured Housing
Consensus Committee in Future
Revisions of This Regulation
Several commenters expressed a
desire to have the Department work
closely with the MHCC in future
rulemaking for the dispute resolution
program. Such involvement is not
specifically provided for in the Act.
However, HUD provides in this rule for
the MHCC’s input prior to publication
of any new dispute resolution
rulemaking initiated by HUD. This rule
also provides that the MHCC may
initiate its own recommendations for
HUD regarding dispute resolution
regulations, and that HUD will explain
to the MHCC any modification or
rejection by HUD of the MHCC
recommendations.
E:\FR\FM\14MYR2.SGM
14MYR2
27226
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
VIII. Conforming Amendments
As stated in the October 20, 2005,
proposed rule, since HUD is using the
term ‘‘manufactured home’’ in this rule,
it is taking this opportunity to correct
the definition in 24 CFR 3280.2 by
adding the reference to self-propelled
vehicles found in section 603(6) of the
Act (42 U.S.C. 5402(6)). HUD is also
clarifying the methodology for the
calculation of square footage that is
included in the current regulatory
definition. This action will result in
consistent usage of the term for all parts
of the manufactured home program. The
definition in this final rule is unchanged
from the definition that appeared in the
proposed rule.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES_2
IX. Changes to the Proposed Rule in
This Final Rule
The following changes to the October
20, 2005, proposed rule are made by this
final rule, consistent with the
discussion of public comments in this
preamble and as further explained
below:
1. To provide consistency in this rule
with the terminology used in other HUD
regulations, the term ‘‘manufactured
home’’ rather than ‘‘manufactured
housing’’ is used, and references to
‘‘HUD’’ have been substituted for
references to ‘‘the Secretary.’’
2. While this final rule gives
homeowners the right to participate in
the HUD Dispute Resolution Program by
initiating the Mediation and Arbitration
Process and by acting as observers of the
process, it does not recognize
homeowners as parties.
3. A statement has been added to the
dispute resolution language required in
the consumer manual by § 3280.2(e) that
the HUD Dispute Resolution Program
does not replace any manufacturer’s
warranty program.
4. A definition of the term ‘‘installer’’
has been added to the list of definitions
at § 3288.3.
5. The rule at § 3288.5 requires
retailers to provide each homeowner
with a standard notice at the time of
signing of a contract for the sale or lease
of a manufactured home, rather than the
posting of a notice in each home.
6. The rule at § 3288.15(b) now
permits reports of defects to be made to
State Administrative Agencies in
addition to the Department and the
parties.
7. A provision is added at § 3288.30(c)
that denial of a dispute by all of the
parties that there is a dispute does not
preclude the dispute resolution process
from going forward to mediation. A
provision is also added at § 3288.35(c)
that, during mediation, denial of a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
dispute by all parties without
acceptance of responsibility will result
in the mediator referring the matter to
arbitration for determination of the
defect and responsibility for the defect.
A similar provision is added at
§ 3288.40(d), that if the parties deny a
dispute exists and the arbitrator
determines there is a defect, the
arbitrator will make a determination of
responsibility for the defect. These
additions protect the homeowner’s right
to have the existence of, and
responsibility for, any alleged defect
determined through the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program in HUD-administered states in
the event existence of a dispute is
denied by all of the parties without
determination of the defect and of
responsibility for the defect.
8. A procedure cited in the preamble
of the proposed rule (at 70 FR 61180),
that if the screening neutral determines
there is sufficient documentation of an
alleged defect presenting an
unreasonable risk of injury or death, a
copy of the request will be sent to HUD,
is explicitly added to this rule at
§ 3288.30(d). Similarly, a procedure
cited in the preamble of the proposed
rule (at 70 FR 61180), to make sample
agreements available to the mediation
parties as drafting guidance, is included
in the final rule at § 3288.35(d)(2).
9. Section 3288.40(c) makes explicit
the arbitrator’s authority to make
proposed findings of the presence of a
defect and culpability.
10. An extension of the 21-day time
period by which the arbitrator is
required to complete the arbitration is
now permitted for good cause under
§ 3288.40(h).
11. Under § 3288.40(h), the contents
of the arbitrator’s recommendation are
to be made available to HUD and the
parties simultaneously, rather than only
to HUD as was stated in the proposed
rule.
12. The final rule, at § 3288.40(i),
allows the parties to submit an offer of
settlement to HUD at any time before a
final order is issued that HUD may, at
HUD’s discretion, incorporate into the
order.
13. For the alternate dispute
resolution procedure of subpart C, the
term ‘‘Alternative Process’’ has been
substituted for ‘‘Commercial Opt-Out
Option.’’
14. In § 3288.205(a), the final rule has
reduced the minimum requirements for
full certification from six to four, and
from five to three for conditional
approval. The proposed requirements
dealing with homeowner initiation of
the process and conflict of interest have
been removed.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
15. A new subpart E has been added
to address the role of the MHCC in
Dispute Resolution Program rulemaking
procedures.
X. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) reviewed this rule under
Executive Order 12866 (entitled
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’).
OMB determined that this rule is a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined in section 3(f) of the Order
(although not an economically
significant regulatory action under the
Order). The docket file is available for
public inspection in the Regulations
Division, Office of General Counsel,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW.,
Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410–
0500. Due to security measures at the
HUD Headquarters building, please
schedule an appointment to review the
docket file by calling the Regulations
Division at (202) 708–3055 (this is not
a toll-free number).
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements contained in this rule have
been approved by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520) and assigned OMB
control number 2502–0562. In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act, HUD may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information,
unless the collection displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538) establishes requirements for
federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on state, local,
and tribal governments and the private
sector. This rule, which implements a
statutory mandate to establish a program
for the resolution of a narrow category
of disputes, will not impose any federal
mandates on any state, local, or tribal
government or the private sector within
the meaning of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
Environmental Review
This final rule does not direct,
provide for assistance or loan and
mortgage insurance for, or otherwise
govern or regulate, real property
acquisition, disposition, leasing,
rehabilitation, alteration, demolition, or
new construction, or establish, revise, or
provide for standards for construction or
construction materials, manufactured
E:\FR\FM\14MYR2.SGM
14MYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES_2
housing, or occupancy. Accordingly,
under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(1), this final rule
is categorically excluded from
environmental review under the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires that a
regulation that has a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, small
businesses, or small organizations
include an initial regulatory flexibility
analysis describing the regulation’s
impact on small entities. Such an
analysis need not be undertaken if the
agency has certified that the regulation
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
HUD has conducted a labor and travel
cost impact analysis for this rule. The
cost analysis determines the cost
difference between a typical dispute
resolution process (the process)
involving manufactured housing and
the civil litigation costs between one or
more parties involved in a
manufactured housing dispute. A
typical dispute resolution method is a
two-step process: mediation and, for a
small percent of unsuccessful mediation
cases, arbitration.
The potential cost impact of the
mediation step for manufacturers would
be approximately $1,550 per dispute,
$237 for retailers, and $177 for
installers. HUD anticipates that it may
be administering the dispute resolution
process in 26 states where
approximately 37,800 homes are
expected to be installed annually.
Currently, 45 manufacturing corporate
entities ship into those states, while
1,719 retailers sell homes and
approximately 5,000 individuals or
businesses install manufactured homes
in those states.
Based on the preceding data, HUD
anticipates taking action on 1,890
complaints under the federal
manufactured home dispute resolution
process during an average year.
Presuming that the average cost of this
action ($1,964) will be incorporated into
the home price or related service fees of
every installed home in the 26 states
(37,800), the cost impact to each
installed home would be $98.
If all 1,890 cases were settled through
litigation rather than dispute resolution,
the cost of litigating 1,890 cases would
total $18.9 million. Averaged across
37,800 homes, the average cost of
litigation incorporated into each home
price would be $500 per home,
compared to the average cost of dispute
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
resolution of $98 per home. Dispute
resolution would, therefore, provide an
average savings of $402 per home.
Several commenters claimed that the
number of complaints was not properly
substantiated and was unrealistically
low. However, these numbers were
developed by carefully sampling 12
current state dispute resolution
programs. Furthermore, the Small
Business Administration has accepted
these estimates while none of the
commenters supplied any numbers of
their own. Some commenters also
complained that the cost estimate
provided by HUD runs only through the
mediation phase. While this is true,
HUD’s research, which was again based
on current state program experience,
determined that the number of disputes
requiring arbitration would be minimal.
The small increase in total cost
associated with this final rule would not
impose a significant burden for a small
business. The rule would regulate
establishments primarily engaged in the
production of manufactured homes
(NAICS 32991) and the sale of
manufactured homes (NAICS 453930).
In addition, manufactured home set-up
and tie-down establishments (installers)
would be included within the definition
of all other special trade contractors
(NAICS 23599). Of the 222 firms
included under the NAICS 32991
definition, 198 are small manufacturers,
which fall below the small business
threshold of 500 employees. There are
10,691 retailers included under NAICS
453930; all of the firms fall below the
$11 million annual income rate. Of the
31,320 firms included under NAICS
23599 definitions, only 53 firms exceed
the small business threshold of 500
employees and none of these is
primarily a manufactured home set-up
and tie-down establishment. The rule,
therefore, would affect a substantial
number of small entities. However, the
home manufacturers, retailers, and
installers would be subject only to an
associated labor cost and travel expense
necessary to attend the mediation
process and labor costs to participate in
the expected record review and possible
telephonic or face-to-face meeting for
arbitration. Moreover, because the great
majority of manufacturers, retailers, and
installers are considered small entities,
there would not be any disproportionate
impact on them. Therefore, although
this rule would affect a substantial
number of small entities, it would not
have a significant economic impact on
them. In addition, the speedier and
more certain resolution of disputes
should help the affected businesses.
Accordingly, the undersigned certifies
that this final rule would not have a
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
27227
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits, to the extent
practicable and permitted by law, an
agency from promulgating a regulation
that has federalism implications and
either imposes substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments and is not required by
statute, or preempts state law, unless the
relevant requirements of section 6 of the
Executive Order are met. This rule does
not have federalism implications and
does not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments or preempt state law
within the meaning of the Executive
Order. State and local governments are
not required to establish dispute
resolution programs, but the rule
provides a mechanism to recognize state
programs that meet the statutory
elements of a dispute resolution
program to operate in lieu of the federal
manufactured home dispute resolution
program.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance number for Manufactured
Housing is 14.171.
List of Subjects
24 CFR Part 3280
Housing standards, Incorporation by
reference, Manufactured homes.
24 CFR Part 3282
Administrative practice and
procedure, Consumer protection,
Intergovernmental relations,
Investigations, Manufactured homes,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Warranties.
24 CFR Part 3288
Administrative practice and
procedure, Consumer protection,
Intergovernmental relations,
Manufactured homes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, HUD amends parts 3280
and 3282 and adds a new part 3288 in
chapter XX of title 24 of the Code of
Federal Regulations to read as follows:
I
PART 3280—MANUFACTURED HOME
CONSTRUCTION AND SAFETY
STANDARDS
1. The authority citation for part 3280
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), 5403, and
5424.
E:\FR\FM\14MYR2.SGM
14MYR2
27228
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
2. In § 3280.2, the definition of
‘‘manufactured home’’ is revised to read
as follows:
I
§ 3280.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Manufactured home means a
structure, transportable in one or more
sections, which in the traveling mode is
8 body feet or more in width or 40 body
feet or more in length or which when
erected on-site is 320 or more square
feet, and which is built on a permanent
chassis and designed to be used as a
dwelling with or without a permanent
foundation when connected to the
required utilities, and includes the
plumbing, heating, air-conditioning, and
electrical systems contained in the
structure. This term includes all
structures that meet the above
requirements except the size
requirements and with respect to which
the manufacturer voluntarily files a
certification pursuant to § 3282.13 of
this chapter and complies with the
construction and safety standards set
forth in this part 3280. The term does
not include any self-propelled
recreational vehicle. Calculations used
to determine the number of square feet
in a structure will include the total of
square feet for each transportable
section comprising the completed
structure and will be based on the
structure’s exterior dimensions
measured at the largest horizontal
projections when erected on site. These
dimensions will include all expandable
rooms, cabinets, and other projections
containing interior space, but do not
include bay windows. Nothing in this
definition should be interpreted to mean
that a manufactured home necessarily
meets the requirements of HUD’s
Minimum Property Standards (HUD
Handbook 4900.1) or that it is
automatically eligible for financing
under 12 U.S.C. 1709(b).
*
*
*
*
*
PART 3282—MANUFACTURED HOME
PROCEDURAL AND ENFORCEMENT
REGULATIONS
3. The authority citation for part 3282
is revised to read as follows:
I
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2461 note; 42 U.S.C.
3535(d) and 5424.
4. In § 3282.207, redesignate
paragraph (e) as paragraph (f), add a
new paragraph (e), and revise the
second sentence of paragraph (f) as
redesignated, to read as follows:
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES_2
I
§ 3282.207 Manufactured home consumer
manual requirements.
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
*
18:08 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
(e) Dispute resolution information. (1)
The manufacturer must include the
following language under a heading of
‘‘Dispute Resolution Process’’ in the
consumer manual:
Many states have a consumer assistance or
dispute resolution program that homeowners
may use to resolve problems with
manufacturers, retailers, or installers
concerning defects in their manufactured
homes that render part of the home unfit for
its intended use. Such state programs may
include a process to resolve a dispute among
a manufacturer, a retailer, and an installer
about who will correct the defect. In states
where there is not a dispute resolution
program that meets the federal requirements,
the HUD Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program will operate. These are
‘‘HUD-administered states.’’ The HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program is not for cosmetic or minor
problems in the home. You may contact the
HUD Manufactured Housing Program Office
at (202) 708–6423 or (800) 927–2891, or visit
the HUD website at www.hud.gov to
determine whether your state has a state
program or whether you should use the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program. Contact information for state
programs is also available on the HUD
website. If your state has a state program,
please contact the state for information about
the program, how it operates, and what steps
to take to request dispute resolution. When
there is no state dispute resolution program,
a homeowner may use the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program to resolve disputes among the
manufacturer, retailer, and installer about
responsibility for the correction or repair of
defects in the manufactured home that were
reported during the 1-year period starting on
the date of installation. Even after the 1-year
period, manufacturers have continuing
responsibility to review certain problems that
affect the intended use of the manufactured
home or its parts, but for which correction
may no longer be required under federal law.
(2) The manufacturer must include
the following language under a heading
of ‘‘Additional Information ‘‘ HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program’’ in the consumer manual:
The steps and information outlined below
apply only to the HUD Manufactured Home
Dispute Resolution Program that operates in
HUD-administered states, as described under
the heading ‘‘Dispute Resolution
Information’’ in this manual. Under the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program, homeowners must report defects to
the manufacturer, retailer, installer, a State
Administrative Agency, or HUD within 1
year after the date of the first installation.
Homeowners are encouraged to report defects
in writing, including, but not limited to,
email, written letter, certified mail, or fax,
but they may also make a report by
telephone. To demonstrate that the report
was made within 1 year after the date of
installation, homeowners should report
defects in a manner that will create a dated
record of the report: for example, by certified
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
mail, by fax, or by email. When making a
report by telephone, homeowners are
encouraged to make a note of the phone call,
including names of conversants, date, and
time. No particular format is required to
submit a report of an alleged defect, but any
such report should at a minimum include a
description of the alleged defect, the name of
the homeowner, and the address of the home.
Homeowners are encouraged to send
reports of an alleged defect first to the
manufacturer, retailer, or installer of the
manufactured home, or a State
Administrative Agency. Reports of alleged
defects may also be sent to HUD at: HUD,
Office of Regulatory Affairs and
Manufactured Housing, Attn: Dispute
Resolution, 451 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20410–8000; faxed to (202)
708–4213; e-mailed to mhs@hud.gov, or
reported telephonically at (202) 708–6423 or
(800) 927–2891.
If, after taking the steps outlined above, the
homeowner does not receive a satisfactory
response from the manufacturer, retailer, or
installer, the homeowner may file a dispute
resolution request with the dispute
resolution provider in writing, or by making
a request by phone. No particular format is
required to make a request for dispute
resolution, but the request should generally
include the following information:
(1) The name, address, and contact
information of the homeowner;
(2) The name and contact information of
the manufacturer, retailer, and installer of the
manufactured home;
(3) The date or dates the report of the
alleged defect was made;
(4) Identification of the entities or persons
to whom each report of the alleged defect
was made and the method that was used to
make the report;
(5) The date of installation of the
manufactured home affected by the alleged
defect; and
(6) A description of the alleged defect.
Information about the dispute resolution
provider and how to make a request for
dispute resolution is available at https://
www.hud.gov or by contacting the Office of
Manufactured Housing Programs at (202)
708–6423 or (800) 927–2891.
A screening agent will review the request
and, as appropriate, forward the request to
the manufacturer, retailer, installer, and
mediator. The mediator will mediate the
dispute and attempt to facilitate a settlement.
The parties to a settlement include, as
applicable, the manufacturer, retailer, and
installer. If the parties are unable to reach a
settlement that results in correction or repair
of the alleged defect, any party or the
homeowner may request nonbinding
arbitration. Should any party refuse to
participate, the arbitration shall proceed
without that party’s input. Once the
arbitrator makes a non-binding
recommendation, the arbitrator will forward
it to the parties and HUD. HUD will have the
option of adopting, modifying, or rejecting
the recommendation when issuing an order
requiring the responsible party or parties to
make any corrections or repairs in the home.
At any time before HUD issues a final order,
the parties may submit an offer of settlement
E:\FR\FM\14MYR2.SGM
14MYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
to HUD that may, at HUD’s discretion, be
incorporated into the order.
In circumstances where the parties agree
that one or more of them, and not the
homeowner, is responsible for the alleged
defect, the parties will have the opportunity
to resolve the dispute outside of the HUD
Mediation and Arbitration process by using
the Alternative Process. Homeowners will
maintain the right to be informed in writing
of the outcome when the Alternative Process
is used, within 5 days of the outcome. At any
time after 30 days of the Alternative Process
notification, any participant or the
homeowner may invoke the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program and proceed to mediation.
The HUD Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program is not a warranty
program and does not replace the
manufacturer’s or any other warranty
program.
(f) * * * A manual substantially
complies with the guidelines if it
includes the language in paragraph (e)
of this section and presents current
material on each of the subjects covered
in the guidelines in sufficient detail to
inform consumers about the operation,
maintenance, and repair of
manufactured homes.* * *
5. In chapter XX, add a new part 3288,
to read as follows:
I
PART 3288—MANUFACTURED HOME
DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM
Subpart A—General
Sec.
3288.1
3288.3
3288.5
Purpose and scope.
Definitions.
Retailer notification at sale.
Subpart B—HUD Manufactured Home
Dispute Resolution Program in HUDAdministered States
3288.10 Applicability.
3288.15 Eligibility for dispute resolution.
3288.20 Reporting a defect.
3288.25 Initiation of dispute resolution.
3288.30 Screening of dispute resolution
request.
3288.33 Notice of dispute resolution.
3288.35 Mediation.
3288.40 Nonbinding arbitration.
3288.45 HUD review and order.
Subpart C—Alternative Process in HUDAdministered States
3288.100 Scope and applicability.
3288.105 Time when Alternative Process is
available.
3288.110 Alternative Process agreements.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES_2
Subpart D—State Dispute Resolution
Programs in Non-HUD-Administered States
3288.200 Applicability.
3288.205 Minimum requirements.
3288.210 Acceptance and recertification
process.
3288.215 Effect on other manufactured
home program requirements.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
Subpart E—Dispute Resolution Program
Rulemaking Procedures
3288.300 Applicability.
3288.305 Consultation with the
Manufactured Housing Consensus
Committee.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), 5422 and
5424.
Subpart A—General
§ 3288.1
Purpose and scope.
(a) Purpose. The Act is intended, in
part, to protect the quality, safety,
durability, and affordability of
manufactured homes. Section 623(c)(12)
of the Act (42 U.S.C. 5422 (c)(12))
requires the implementation of ‘‘a
dispute resolution program for the
timely resolution of disputes between
manufacturers, retailers, and installers
of manufactured homes regarding
responsibility, and for the issuance of
appropriate orders, for the correction or
repair of defects in manufactured homes
that are reported during the 1-year
period beginning on the date of
installation.’’ The purpose of this part is
to provide a dispute resolution program
for the timely resolution of disputes
among manufacturers, retailers, and
installers regarding the responsibility
for correction or repair of defects
reported by the homeowner or others
and reported in the 1-year period after
the first installation of the manufactured
home.
(b) Scope— (1) Applicability. In
carrying out this purpose, it is presumed
that if a manufactured home contains an
alleged defect that is reported in the first
year after installation and was not
caused by the homeowner, then the
manufacturer, retailer, or installer is
responsible for the alleged defect and
the dispute resolution process
recognized in this part is an appropriate
means for resolving disputes about
responsibility for correction and repair
of the alleged defect. For purposes of the
dispute resolution process recognized in
this part, only alleged defects reported
in the first year after the first installation
are covered by the process. The state
where the home is sited determines
whether the HUD Manufactured Home
Dispute Resolution Program or a state
program applies. Subpart A of this part
establishes general provisions
applicable to HUD’s implementation of
a dispute resolution program as required
by the Act. Subpart B of this part
establishes the HUD Manufactured
Home Dispute Resolution Program that
HUD will administer in any state that
does not establish a program that
complies with the Act and been
accepted by HUD as provided in subpart
D of this part. Subpart C of this part
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
27229
provides an Alternative Process for
manufacturers, retailers, and installers
who agree that a homeowner is not
responsible for the alleged defect to
resolve their disputes about
responsibility for correction or repair
outside of the HUD Mediation and
Arbitration Process under subpart B.
Subpart D of this part establishes the
minimum requirements that must be
met by a state applying to implement its
own dispute resolution program that
complies with the Act, and the
procedure for determining whether the
requirements for complying have been
met. Subpart E of this part establishes
special rulemaking procedures that
apply to the issuance of new regulations
that implement the dispute resolution
requirements set forth in section 623 of
the Act (42 U.S.C. 5422).
(2) Warranties not affected. This part
is not a warranty program and the
requirements established in this part do
not replace the manufacturer’s or any
other warranty program. Such warranty
program may have its own
requirements.
§ 3288.3
Definitions.
The following definitions apply in
this part:
Act means the National Manufactured
Housing Construction and Safety
Standards Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. 5401–
5426.
Appropriate order means an order
issued by HUD or an order that is
enforceable under state law.
Date of installation means the date all
utilities are connected and the
manufactured home is ready for
occupancy as established, if applicable,
by a certificate of occupancy, except as
follows: if the manufactured home has
not been sold to the first person
purchasing the home in good faith for
purposes other than resale by the date
the home is ready for occupancy, the
date of installation is the date of closing
under the purchase agreement or sales
contract for the manufactured home.
Day means a calendar day.
Defect means any defect in the
performance, construction, components,
or material of a manufactured home that
renders the home or any part of the
home not fit for the ordinary use for
which it was intended, including, but
not limited to, a defect in the
construction, safety, or installation of
the home. For purposes of state
certification under § 3288.205, HUD will
find it acceptable if the threshold for the
state’s program is functionally
equivalent to this definition.
Dispute resolution provider means a
person or entity providing dispute
resolution services for HUD.
E:\FR\FM\14MYR2.SGM
14MYR2
27230
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Homeowner means a person who
purchased or leased the manufactured
home in good faith for purposes other
than resale.
HUD means the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development.
Installer means the person who is
retained to engage in, or who engages in,
the business of directing, supervising,
controlling, or correcting the initial
installation of a manufactured home.
Manufactured home has the same
meaning as the term ‘‘manufactured
home’’ as defined in 24 CFR 3280.2.
Manufactured Housing Consensus
Committee or MHCC means the
consensus committee established
pursuant to section 604(a)(3) of the Act,
42 U.S.C. 5403(a)(3).
Party or parties means, individually
or collectively, the manufacturer,
retailer, or installer of a manufactured
home in which a defect has been
reported in accordance with § 3288.20.
State Administrative Agency means
an agency of a state that has been
approved or conditionally approved to
carry out the state plan for enforcement
of the standards pursuant to section 623
of the Act, 42 U.S.C. 5422.
Timely reporting means the reporting
of an alleged defect within 1 year after
the date of installation of a
manufactured home in accordance with
§ 3288.20.
Timely resolution means the
resolution of disputes among
manufacturers, retailers, and installers
within 120 days of the time a request for
dispute resolution is made, except that
if the defect presents an unreasonable
risk of injury, death, or significant loss
or damage to valuable personal
property, the resolution must be within
60 days of the time a request for dispute
resolution is made.
§ 3288.5
Retailer notification at sale.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES_2
Retailer notice at the time of signing.
At the time of signing a contract for sale
or lease for a manufactured home, the
retailer must provide the purchaser with
a retailer notice. This notice may be in
a separate document from the sales
contract or may be incorporated clearly
in a separate section on consumer
dispute resolution information at the
top of the sales contract. The notice
must include the following language:
The U.S. Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) Manufactured
Home Dispute Resolution Program is
available to resolve disputes among
manufacturers, retailers, or installers
concerning defects in manufactured homes.
Many states also have a consumer assistance
or dispute resolution program. For additional
information about these programs, see
sections titled ‘‘Dispute Resolution Process’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:50 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
and ‘‘Additional Information—HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program’’ in the Consumer Manual required
to be provided to the purchaser. These
programs are not warranty programs and do
not replace the manufacturer’s, or any other
person’s, warranty program.
Subpart B—HUD Manufactured Home
Dispute Resolution Program in HUDAdministered States
§ 3288.10
Applicability.
The requirements of the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program established in this subpart B
apply in each state that does not
establish a state dispute resolution
program that complies with the Act and
has been accepted by HUD as provided
in subpart D of this part.
§ 3288.15
Eligibility for dispute resolution.
(a) Initiation of actions.
Manufacturers, retailers, and installers
of manufactured homes are eligible to
initiate and participate in the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program. Homeowners may initiate
action under, and be observers to, the
HUD Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program.
(b) Eligible disputes. Only disputes
concerning alleged defects that have
been reported to the manufacturer,
retailer, installer, HUD, or a State
Administrative Agency within 1 year
after the date of the first installation of
the manufactured home are eligible for
resolution through the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program. The eligible dispute includes
the defect alleged in a timely report and
any related issues.
§ 3288.20
Reporting a defect.
(a) Making a report. To preserve the
right to request dispute resolution
through HUD, alleged defects must be
reported to the manufacturer, retailer,
installer, HUD, or a State Administrative
Agency. An alleged defect may be
reported by a homeowner,
manufacturer, retailer, or installer.
(b) Form of report. It is recommended
that alleged defects be reported in
writing, including, but not limited to, email, written letter, certified mail, or
fax. The existence of an alleged defect
may also be reported by telephone.
(c) Content of report. No particular
form or format is required to report an
alleged defect, but any such report must,
at a minimum, include a description of
the alleged defect, the name of
homeowner, and the address of the
home.
(d) Record of report—(1) To evidence
timeliness. To establish timely
reporting, the report of an alleged defect
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
that is made to the manufacturer,
retailer, installer, or a State
Administrative Agency of the
manufactured home should be done in
a manner that will create a dated record
of the report that demonstrates that the
report was made within 1 year after the
date of installation; for example, by
certified mail, fax, or email. Persons
who report an alleged defect by
telephone should make a
contemporaneous note of the telephone
call, including date, time, the name of
the person who received the report, the
name of the business contacted, and the
telephone number called. If the matter
goes to arbitration, the arbitrator and
HUD will review whether there is
sufficient evidence to believe the report
was made on a timely basis.
(2) Obligation to retain. Each report of
a defect, including logs of telephonic
complaints, received by a manufacturer,
retailer, a State Administrative Agency
or installer, must be maintained for 3
years from the date of receipt.
(e) Reports made to a State
Administrative Agency. Reports of
defects in the manufactured home that
are made in the first year after its
installation can be sent to the
appropriate State Administrative
Agency. Contact information about a
State Administrative Agency is available
at https://www.hud.gov. Contact the
appropriate State Administrative
Agency to determine the method for
making the report.
(f) Reports made to HUD. Reports of
alleged defects in the manufactured
home that are made in the first year after
its installation can be sent to HUD. The
report to HUD may be made using any
of the following methods:
(1) In writing at: HUD, Office of
Regulatory Affairs and Manufactured
Housing, Attn: Dispute Resolution, 451
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20410–8000;
(2) By telephone at: (202) 708–6423 or
(800) 927–2891;
(3) By fax at: (202) 708–4213; or
(4) By e-mail at mhs@hud.gov.
(g) Effect of report. The reporting of an
alleged defect does not initiate the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program, but only establishes whether
the requirement of timely reporting in
accordance with § 3288.15(b) has been
met. The HUD Manufactured Home
Dispute Resolution Process is initiated
when a request for dispute resolution is
submitted to HUD in accordance with
§ 3288.25.
§ 3288.25
Initiation of dispute resolution.
(a) Preliminary effort. HUD strongly
encourages the homeowner or party
reporting an alleged defect to seek to
E:\FR\FM\14MYR2.SGM
14MYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
resolve the dispute directly with any
manufacturer, retailer, or installer that
the person reporting the defect believes
to be responsible before initiating the
HUD dispute resolution process.
(b) Request for dispute resolution.
Any of the parties or the homeowner
may initiate the HUD Manufactured
Home Dispute Resolution Program at
any time after an alleged defect has been
reported, by requesting dispute
resolution, as follows:
(1) By mailing, e-mailing, or otherwise
delivering a written request for dispute
resolution to the dispute resolution
provider at the address or e-mail
address provided either at https://
www.hud.gov, or by contacting HUD’s
Office of Regulatory Affairs and
Manufactured Housing at (202) 708–
6423 or (800) 927–2891;
(2) By faxing a request for dispute
resolution to the fax number provided
either at https://www.hud.gov, or by
contacting HUD’s Office of Regulatory
Affairs and Manufactured Housing at
(202) 708–6423 or (800) 927–2891; or
(3) By telephoning a request for
dispute resolution to the number
provided either at https://www.hud.gov,
or by contacting HUD’s Office of
Regulatory Affairs and Manufactured
Housing at (202) 708–6423 or (800) 927–
2891.
(c) Requested information. The
dispute resolution provider will request
at least the following information when
a person seeks to initiate dispute
resolution under the HUD Manufactured
Home Dispute Resolution Program:
(1) The name, address, and contact
information of the homeowner;
(2) The name and contact information
of the manufacturer, retailer, and
installer of the manufactured home, to
the extent available;
(3) The date the report of the alleged
defect was made;
(4) The name and contact information
of the recipient or recipients of the
report of the alleged defect;
(5) The date of installation of the
manufactured home affected by the
alleged defect; and
(6) A description of the alleged defect.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES_2
§ 3288.30
request.
Screening of dispute resolution
(a) Review for sufficiency. When the
request for dispute resolution has been
received by the dispute resolution
provider, a screening neutral will
review the sufficiency of the
information provided in the request for
dispute resolution and determine if the
dispute resolution process should
proceed. If the screening neutral
determines that a defect is properly
alleged and timely reported, notice of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:50 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
the request will be forwarded, as
provided in § 3288.33, to the
manufacturer, retailer, and installer, as
appropriate and to the extent the
appropriate parties can be identified
based on the information in the request.
(b) Insufficient information. If a
request for dispute resolution is lacking
any information necessary to determine
if the dispute resolution process should
proceed, the screening neutral will
contact the requester or the parties
about supplementing the initial request.
If information necessary to qualify the
matter for the HUD Manufactured Home
Dispute Resolution Program is not
received within a reasonable time
established by the screening neutral, the
request for dispute resolution will be
considered withdrawn.
(c) Denial of a dispute. Denial by all
of the parties that there is a dispute does
not preclude the dispute resolution
process from going forward to
mediation. A screening neutral’s
determination that a defect is properly
alleged is prima facie evidence of a
dispute. If the defect has not been
corrected or repaired, the matter will be
referred to mediation.
(d) Determination of unreasonable
risk. If the screening neutral determines
there is sufficient documentation of an
alleged defect presenting an
unreasonable risk of injury or death, he
or she will send a copy of the request
to HUD.
§ 3288.33
Notice of dispute resolution.
(a) Once the screening neutral
determines that a defect is properly
alleged and timely reported, notice
about the request will be forwarded to
the parties by overnight delivery,
commercial carrier, or fax.
(b) If the parties have not initiated the
Alternative Process in accordance with
§ 3288.105 of this part within 7 days of
the screening neutral’s notification, the
screening neutral will refer the matter to
mediation.
§ 3288.35
Mediation.
(a) Mediator. The dispute resolution
provider will provide for the selection
of a mediator. The selected mediator
will not be the person who screened the
dispute resolution request. The selected
mediator will mediate the dispute and
attempt to facilitate a settlement. If a
party identifies any other party that
should be included in the mediation,
the mediator will contact the other party
and provide information about the
scheduled mediation meetings.
(b) Time—(1) For reaching settlement.
Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2)
of this section, the parties are allowed
30 days from the commencement of the
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
27231
mediation to reach a mediated
settlement. In every case, the dispute
resolution provider will notify the
parties and the homeowner, in writing,
of the date of the commencement of the
mediation.
(2) Alleged defects presenting an
unreasonable risk of injury, death, or
significant loss or damage to valuable
personal property. For mediations
involving alleged defects that appear to
present an unreasonable risk of injury,
death, or significant loss or damage to
valuable personal property as
determined by the screening neutral, the
parties have a maximum 10 days from
the commencement of the mediation to
reach a settlement.
(3) For corrective repairs. Unless a
longer period is agreed to in writing by
the parties to the mediated settlement
and the homeowner, corrective repairs
must be completed no later than 30 days
after the date the settlement agreement
is signed by the applicable parties.
(c) Denial of dispute. During
mediation, denial of a dispute by all
parties without acceptance of
responsibility will result in the mediator
referring the matter to arbitration for
determination of the defect and
responsibility for the defect.
(d) Written settlement agreement.
(1) Upon reaching an agreement, the
parties will sign a written settlement
agreement. The dispute resolution
provider will forward copies of the
agreements with the original signatures
of the parties to the parties, the
homeowner, and to HUD.
(2) Sample agreements will be made
available to the parties as drafting
guidance by the dispute resolution
provider.
(e) Failure of mediation. If mediation
is not successful, parties or the
homeowner may proceed to nonbinding
arbitration, as provided in § 3288.40 of
this part.
(f) Confidentiality. Except for the
report of an alleged defect, any request
for dispute resolution, and any written
settlement agreement, all other
documents and communications
provided in confidence and used in the
mediation will be confidential, in
accordance with the Administrative
Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C.
571 et seq.).
§ 3288.40
Nonbinding arbitration.
(a) When initiated. (1) If, following
mediation under § 3288.35, the parties
fail to reach a settlement, any party or
the homeowner may, within 15 days of
the expiration of the deadline applicable
under § 3288.35(b), initiate nonbinding
arbitration.
E:\FR\FM\14MYR2.SGM
14MYR2
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES_2
27232
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(2) In addition, arbitration may be
initiated upon referral by the mediator
pursuant to § 3288.35(c).
(b) Written request—(1) Submission to
HUD. A written request for arbitration
must be submitted to the dispute
resolution provider. Information about
the dispute resolution provider and how
to make a request for dispute resolution
will be available at https://www.hud.gov
or by contacting HUD’s Office of
Manufactured Housing Programs at
(202) 708–6423 or (800) 927–2891.
(2) Contents of request. The written
request for arbitration must include:
(i) The name and address of the party
making the request;
(ii) A brief description of the alleged
defect or a copy of the report of the
alleged defect; and
(iii) A copy of the request for dispute
resolution.
(c) Appointment and authority of
arbitrator. Upon receipt of the request,
the dispute resolution provider will
select an arbitrator. The arbitrator will
have the authority to:
(1) Set hearing dates and deadlines;
(2) Conduct on-site inspections;
(3) Issue requests for documentation
and information necessary to complete
the record;
(4) Dismiss frivolous allegations;
(5) Make proposed findings, including
findings of defect and culpability and a
disposition recommendation to HUD;
and
(6) Recommend apportionment of the
responsibility of paying for or providing
any correction or repair of the home
when recommending that culpability be
assessed to more than one party.
(d) Denial of dispute. If the parties
deny a dispute exists and the arbitrator
determines there is a defect, the
arbitrator will make a determination of
responsibility for the defect.
(e) Notice to parties. The dispute
resolution provider will provide the
parties and the homeowner with a
notice setting forth the date, place, and
time an arbitration is to be held.
(f) Proceedings. (1) If all parties do not
request an in-person hearing under
paragraph (f)(2) of this section within 5
days of the dispute resolution provider’s
receipt of the request for arbitration, or
if the arbitrator rejects the request for an
in-person hearing, the arbitrator may
conduct either a record review or a
telephonic hearing.
(2) If any party wants to request an inperson hearing, in which the parties or
their representatives may personally
appear before the arbitrator, the
arbitrator will consider such a request if
it is made by all of the parties that are
participating in the arbitration. Such an
in-person hearing will be held at the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:50 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
discretion of the arbitrator, after
considering appropriate factors, such as
cost.
(g) Effect on nonparticipating parties.
If a party chooses not to participate in
the arbitration, the process will
continue without further input from that
party. In such a case, the arbitrator may
rely on the record developed through
the arbitration to find a nonparticipating
party responsible for correction or repair
of a defect.
(h) Completion of arbitration. (1)
Unless an extension is granted for good
cause by HUD, the arbitrator, within 21
days of the dispute resolution provider’s
receipt of the request for arbitration, the
arbitrator will complete the arbitration
process and provide HUD with all
background information used during the
arbitration and with a written,
nonbinding recommendation as to
which party or parties are responsible
for the defect, and what corrective
actions should be taken.
(2) Unless an extension is granted for
good cause by HUD, the arbitrator,
within 21 days of the dispute resolution
provider’s receipt of the request for
arbitration, will provide the parties with
a copy of the nonbinding
recommendation that was delivered to
HUD, in accordance with
§ 3288.40(h)(1).
(i) Settlement offers. At any time
before HUD issues a final order, the
parties may submit to HUD a proposal
to resolve the dispute.
§ 3288.45
HUD review and order.
(a) Appropriate order. HUD will
review the arbitrator’s recommendation
provided in accordance with
§ 3288.40(h), any settlement offers
presented by the parties in accordance
with § 3288.40(i), and the information
gathered during the arbitration, and will
issue an appropriate order in which
HUD may accept, modify, or reject the
recommendations. HUD will forward a
copy of the order to the arbitrator and
to each of the parties and the
homeowner, whether or not a party
chose to participate in the arbitration.
(b) Contents of order. If HUD finds
that a defect exists, the order will
include the following:
(1) Assignment of responsibility for
the correction and repair of all defects
and associated costs; and
(2) If the manufacturer, retailer, or
installer is responsible for corrective
action, a date by which the correction
and repair of each defect must be
completed, taking into consideration the
seriousness of the defect.
(c) Failure to comply. Failure to
comply with an order issued by HUD is
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
a violation of section 610(a)(5) of the
Act (42 U.S.C. 5409(a)(5)).
Subpart C—Alternative Process in
HUD-Administered States
§ 3288.100
Scope and applicability.
The requirements of this subpart C
may be followed in lieu of the
requirements of subpart B of this part to
resolve disputes among manufacturers,
retailers, and installers of manufactured
homes in any state where subpart B of
this part would otherwise apply. In
limited circumstances, this subpart C
permits manufacturers, retailers, and
installers of manufactured homes to use
neutrals of their choosing to resolve
disputes concerning alleged defects in
manufactured homes.
§ 3288.105 Time when Alternative Process
is available.
(a) The Alternative Process may be
invoked after an alleged defect has been
reported, pursuant to § 3288.15(b).
However, the Alternative Process may
not be invoked more than 7 days after
notification of a request for dispute
resolution has been received by all of
the parties. The notification must be
delivered by overnight delivery,
commercial carrier, or fax by the
screening neutral, in accordance with
§ 3288.30. If within 7 days of the receipt
of notification, the Alternative Process
is not initiated, the screening neutral
will refer the matter to the mediator.
Once the Alternative Process is invoked,
neither the parties nor the homeowner
may invoke the Mediation and
Arbitration Process in the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program for 30 days.
(b) No particular form or format is
required to provide notification for the
Alternative Process, but the party or
parties submitting the notification must
include a statement from the parties
participating in the Alternative Process
stating that the homeowner is not
responsible for the alleged defect and
that one or more of the parties will
correct or repair the defect. All required
agreements are set forth in § 3288.110 of
this part. The parties must also make
reasonable efforts to include the
following information in the
notification:
(1) Identification of the case; and
(2) Identification of the parties
participating in the Alternative Process.
(c) The screening neutral will notify
the parties if the case is referred to the
Alternative Process for resolution.
§ 3288.110 Alternative Process
agreements.
(a) Required agreement. To use the
Alternative Process, the manufacturer,
E:\FR\FM\14MYR2.SGM
14MYR2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
retailer, and installer of the
manufactured home at issue, as
appropriate, must agree:
(1) That there is a defect in the
manufactured home;
(2) That the manufacturer, retailer, or
installer is responsible for the defect;
(3) That the homeowner is not
responsible for the defect;
(4) To engage a neutral to evaluate the
dispute and make an assignment of
responsibility for correction and repair;
and
(5) To notify the homeowner of, and
allow the homeowner to be present at,
any meetings and to inform the
homeowner of the outcome.
(b) Additional element of agreement.
In addition, the parties should agree to
act upon the neutral’s assignment of
responsibility for correction and repair.
Subpart D—State Dispute Resolution
Programs in Non-HUD Administered
States
§ 3288.200
Applicability.
This subpart D establishes the
minimum requirements that must be
met by a state to implement its own
dispute resolution program and
therefore not be covered by the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program established in accordance with
subpart B. The subpart also establishes
the procedure for determining whether
the state dispute resolution program
meets the requirements of the Act for
operating in lieu of the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES_2
§ 3288.205
Minimum requirements.
(a) List of requirements. The HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program will not be implemented in any
state that complies with the procedures
of this subpart D and that has a dispute
resolution program that provides for the
following minimum requirements:
(1) The timely resolution of disputes
among manufacturers, retailers, or
installers regarding responsibility for
correction and repair of defects in
manufactured homes;
(2) The issuance of appropriate orders
for correction and repair of defects in
such homes;
(3) A coverage period for disputes that
includes at least defects that are
reported within 1 year after the date of
first installation; and
(4) Adequate funding and personnel.
(b) Applicability to programs in state
plans. (1) In order to include a dispute
resolution program in a state plan that
on February 8, 2008 is fully or
conditionally approved under
§ 3282.302 of this chapter, a state must
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
amend its state plan to provide for the
requirements of paragraphs (a)(1)
through (3) of this section.
(2) After February 8, 2008, a state that
submits a state plan for approval in
accordance with § 3282.302 of this
chapter must provide for the
requirements of paragraphs (a)(1)
through (3) of this section in its state
plan.
§ 3288.210
process.
Acceptance and recertification
(a) Submission of certification. A state
seeking HUD acceptance of its state
dispute resolution program under this
subpart must submit to HUD a
completed Dispute Resolution
Certification Form, which is available
by contacting HUD by telephone at (202)
708–6423 or by e-mail at mhs@hud.gov.
The certification may be submitted as a
part of, or independent of, a state plan
under § 3282.302 of this chapter. If
included as part of a state plan, the state
does not have to separately certify that
it meets the requirements of
§ 3288.205(a)(4).
(b) HUD review and action. (1) HUD
will review the Dispute Resolution
Certification Form submitted by a state
and may contact the state to request
additional clarification or information
as necessary. Upon completing its
review, HUD will provide the state with
notice of acceptance, conditional
acceptance, or rejection of its dispute
resolution program.
(2) A notice of acceptance will
include the date of acceptance.
(3) If HUD rejects a state’s dispute
resolution program, HUD will provide
an explanation of what is necessary to
obtain full acceptance. A revised
Dispute Resolution Certification Form
may be submitted within 30 days of
receipt of such notification. If the
revised Dispute Resolution Certification
Form is inadequate or if the state fails
to resubmit within the 30-day period or
otherwise indicates that it does not
intend to change its Dispute Resolution
Certification Form, HUD will notify the
state that its dispute resolution program
is not accepted and that it has a right to
a hearing on the rejection using the
procedures set forth under subpart D of
part 3282 of this chapter.
(c) Conditional acceptance. A state
meeting three of the four minimum
requirements set forth under
§ 3288.205(a)(1) through (4) will be
conditionally accepted by HUD. If HUD
conditionally accepts a state’s dispute
resolution program, HUD will provide
an explanation of what is necessary to
obtain full acceptance. A revised
Dispute Resolution Certification Form
may be submitted within 30 days of
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
27233
receipt of such notification. Any state
conditionally accepted will be
permitted to implement its own dispute
resolution program for a period of not
more than 3 years, absent extension of
this period by HUD.
(d) Revocation. If HUD becomes aware
at any time that a state no longer meets
the minimum requirements set forth
under § 3288.205, HUD may revoke
acceptance of the state’s certification
after an opportunity for a hearing, using
the procedures set forth under subpart
D of part 3282.
(e) Recertification of a program not
included in state plan. Except as
provided in paragraph (f), to maintain
its accepted status, a state whose
program is not included in an approved
or conditionally approved state plan
must submit a current Dispute
Resolution Certification Form to HUD
for review and acceptance as follows:
(1) Every 3 years within 90 days of the
day and month of the most recent date
of HUD’s acceptance of the state’s
program or
(2) Whenever there is a significant
change to the program.
(f) Inclusion in state plan. If a state
dispute resolution program is part of a
state plan, it will be reviewed annually
as part of the state plan and separate
recertification of the state’s dispute
resolution program is not required.
§ 3288.215 Effect on other manufactured
home program requirements.
A state with an accepted dispute
resolution program will operate in lieu
of HUD’s Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program established under
subpart B of this part 3288. A state
dispute resolution program, even if it is
an accepted dispute resolution program
under this part, does not supersede the
requirements applicable to any other
aspect of HUD’s manufactured home
program. Any responsibilities, rights,
and remedies applicable under the
Manufactured Home Construction and
Safety Standards in part 3280 of this
chapter and the Manufactured Home
Procedural and Enforcement
Regulations in part 3282 of this chapter
continue to apply as provided in those
parts in all states.
Subpart E—Dispute Resolution
Program Rulemaking Procedures
§ 3288.300
Applicability.
This subpart establishes special
regulatory procedures for issuing or
revising dispute resolution program
regulations as codified in this part.
E:\FR\FM\14MYR2.SGM
14MYR2
27234
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
§ 3288.305 Consultation with the
Manufactured Housing Consensus
Committee.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES_2
HUD will seek input from the MHCC
when revising the HUD Manufactured
Home Dispute Resolution Program
regulations in this part 3288. Before
publication of a proposed rule to revise
these regulations, HUD will provide the
MHCC with an opportunity to comment
on such revision. The MHCC may send
to HUD any of the MHCC’s own
recommendations to adopt new dispute
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
resolution program regulations or to
modify or repeal any of the regulations
in this part. Along with each
recommendation, the MHCC must set
forth pertinent data and arguments in
support of the action sought. HUD will
either: accept or modify the
recommendation and publish it for
public comment in accordance with
section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553), along with
an explanation of the reasons for any
such modification; or reject the
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
recommendation entirely, and provide
to the MHCC a written explanation of
the reasons for the rejection. This
section does not supersede section 605
of the National Manufactured Housing
Construction and Safety Standards Act
of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5404).
Dated: May 7, 2007.
Brian D. Montgomery,
Assistant Secretary for Housing—Federal
Housing Commissioner.
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
E:\FR\FM\14MYR2.SGM
14MYR2
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\14MYR2.SGM
14MYR2
27235
ER14MY07.006
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
27236
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
[FR Doc. 07–2363 Filed 5–11–07; 8:45 am]
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:08 May 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14MYR2.SGM
14MYR2
ER14MY07.007
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES_2
BILLING CODE 4210–67–C
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 92 (Monday, May 14, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27222-27236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-2363]
[[Page 27221]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part III
Department of Housing and Urban Development
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
24 CFR Parts 3280, 3282, and 3288
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 92 / Monday, May 14, 2007 / Rules and
Regulations
[[Page 27222]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Parts 3280, 3282, and 3288
[Docket No. FR-4813-F-03]
RIN 2502-AH98
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule establishes a federal manufactured home dispute
resolution program and guidelines for the creation of state-
administered dispute resolution programs. Under the National
Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974, as
amended by the Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000, HUD is
required to establish a program for the timely resolution of disputes
among manufacturers, retailers, and installers of manufactured homes
regarding responsibility, and the issuance of appropriate orders, for
the correction or repair of defects in manufactured homes that are
reported during the 1-year period beginning on the date of
installation.
DATES: Effective Date: February 8, 2008.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William W. Matchneer III, Associate
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Regulatory Affairs and Manufactured
Housing, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street, SW., Room 9164, Washington, DC 20410, telephone (202) 708-6401
(this is not a toll-free number). Persons with hearing or speech
impairments may access this number via TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 877-8389.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Requirement for a Dispute Resolution Program
The National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards
Act of 1974 (the Act) (42 U.S.C. 5401-5426) is intended, in part, to
protect the quality, safety, durability, and affordability of
manufactured homes. The Act was amended on December 27, 2000, by the
Manufactured Housing Improvement Act of 2000, Public Law 106-569, to
require HUD, among other things, to establish and implement a new
manufactured home dispute resolution program for states that choose not
to operate their own dispute resolution programs and to establish
guidelines for the creation of state-administered dispute resolution
programs.
Specifically, section 623(c)(12) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 5422(c)(12))
calls for the implementation of ``a dispute resolution program for the
timely resolution of disputes between manufacturers, retailers, and
installers of manufactured homes regarding responsibility, and for the
issuance of appropriate orders, for the correction or repair of defects
in manufactured homes that are reported during the 1-year period
beginning on the date of installation.'' A state is not required to be
a State Administrative Agency under HUD's manufactured home program to
administer its own dispute resolution program. However, any state
submitting a state plan to change its status from a nonparticipating
state to a conditionally or fully approved State Administrative Agency
after the effective date must provide for a dispute resolution program
as part of its plan. Any state that was conditionally or fully approved
before the effective date will not be required to include a dispute
resolution program in its state plan, as long as the state maintains
conditionally or fully approved status. Section 623(g)(2) of the Act
requires HUD to implement a HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program that will meet the above requirements in any state that has not
established a program that complies with the Act. The state where the
home is sited determines whether the HUD Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program or the state program applies.
Proposed Rule
On October 20, 2005, HUD published the Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program Proposed Rule (70 FR 61178) with a comment due date
of December 19, 2005. HUD received responses from 20 commenters during
the comment period. The commenters included two state agencies, several
statewide and national manufactured housing associations, individuals,
the Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee (MHCC), and one low-income
housing organization.
II. Particular Areas of Interest to Commenters
This section of the preamble discusses particular areas of interest
to commenters in addition to the discussions of public comments that
appear throughout the preamble in conjunction with the description of
the dispute resolution program adopted in this final rule.
General
As previously discussed, HUD was charged with implementing a system
to resolve disputes among manufacturers, retailers, and installers. As
several commenters noted, the proposed rule did not include a
definition of ``installer.'' In response to this comment, this rule
defines the term ``installer.'' Additional information regarding
installers may be found in the Manufactured Home Installation Program
Proposed Rule published June 14, 2006 (71 FR 34476).
Even though the Act does not require their participation in the HUD
Dispute Resolution Program, HUD views the participation of homeowners
as a crucial element to a viable program. Under Section 625 of the Act,
HUD has the broad authority to involve homeowners in the dispute
resolution program. Consistent with the proposed rule, this final rule
gives homeowners the right to participate in the HUD Dispute Resolution
Program by initiating the Mediation and Arbitration Process and by
acting as observers of the process. This final rule does not recognize
homeowners as parties.
HUD and the MHCC, in its meetings, recognized that it may have been
possible under the proposed rule for the parties to argue that there is
no dispute between them when in fact there is a defect that needs
correction. In this final rule, HUD has ensured that the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program results in a proper
determination of defect and culpability.
Funding
The MHCC and commenters have continued to recommend that parties
that use and receive the benefits of the dispute resolution process pay
at least a portion of the direct costs associated with the program. HUD
agrees with this ``fees for service'' approach and is currently seeking
statutory authority to assess users of the program a fee for costs
associated with the program. Absent such authority, the Department will
absorb the cost of running the program in HUD-administered states as
general program expenses. It is anticipated that such fees for service
would not be used to cover the purely administrative costs to HUD of
implementing the program, but would include a filing fee to initiate a
dispute resolution process, a fee to initiate arbitration, and the
assessment of arbitration costs to a losing party. Other administrative
costs of the program in HUD-administered states would be funded as
general program expenses.
[[Page 27223]]
Several commenters stated it is unfair to consumers in states with
their own dispute resolution programs both to pay for their state's
program and subsidize the administration of HUD's program in states
that are not offering programs. The Department is sensitive to this
issue. However, because fees for service are not currently authorized,
the financing of the HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Program will be
absorbed as a general Office of Manufactured Housing program expense as
described above.
As discussed in the proposed rule, HUD will use mediation and
arbitration, two widely accepted methods of dispute resolution, as well
as an alternative process that will allow manufacturers, retailers, and
installers an opportunity to resolve disputes outside of the HUD
Mediation and Arbitration Process established by this rule. The
addition of an alternate process to the HUD Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program is based on comments received from the MHCC. In its
comments to the proposed rule, the MHCC recommended that a term other
than ``Commercial Opt-Out Option'' be used for the alternate process.
In its place, HUD has substituted the term ``Alternative Process.''
The HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program reflects the
Executive Branch's emphasis on utilizing dispute resolution processes
to resolve conflicts in a cost-effective and expeditious manner, and on
fostering good government by giving parties the opportunity to resolve
disputes amicably and creatively through alternative dispute
resolution. It also dovetails with Congress' active promotion of
alternative dispute resolution as set forth in the Administrative
Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 571 et seq.).
There were several comments to the proposed rule about the
relationship between the HUD Dispute Resolution Program and subpart I
of 24 CFR part 3282 (Subpart I). This final dispute resolution rule is
not inconsistent with other requirements of the Act. Specifically,
nothing in this final rule absolves the manufacturer of its
notification and correction responsibilities or other obligations under
Subpart I. The dispute resolution program provides an additional
homeowner protection mechanism and does not toll or replace the
manufacturer's responsibilities under Subpart I. Furthermore, the HUD
Dispute Resolution Program does not replace any manufacturer's warranty
program.
III. Program Administration for the HUD-Administered Program
HUD interprets the language set forth in section 623(g)(3) of the
Act (42 U.S.C. 5422(g)(3)) as permitting the use of contractors in the
implementation of the dispute resolution program in HUD-administered
states. HUD will likely use contractors as screening neutrals,
mediators, and arbitrators, and they will be required to become
familiar with HUD's manufactured home program. HUD acknowledges,
however, that dispute resolution experts emphasize that a primary
consideration for selecting neutrals, mediators, and arbitrators should
be their background and experience in dispute resolution.
The HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program is governed by
the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act, 5 U.S.C. 571 et seq. The HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program consists of a Mediation
and Arbitration Process comprised of six parts, in addition to the
Alternative Process. The six parts of the Mediation and Arbitration
Process are: Initial Reporting of an Alleged Defect, Initiating Dispute
Resolution, Intake and Screening, Mediation, Nonbinding Arbitration,
and HUD Review. When the manufacturer, retailer, and installer agree
that the homeowner is not responsible for causing the defect, they may
elect to use the Alternative Process instead of the HUD Mediation and
Arbitration Process. The parties would then engage in a neutral
evaluation process of their own design. However, if the defect is not
corrected or repaired, the homeowner has the right to invoke the HUD
Mediation and Arbitration Process after 30 days have elapsed from the
initiation of the Alternative Process.
IV. HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program in HUD-
Administered States
As noted previously, HUD will administer its dispute resolution
program only in states that choose not to operate their own dispute
resolution programs. The following discussion of the HUD-administered
program will not apply in any state that provides satisfactory
assurances that it has implemented its own qualifying dispute
resolution program, and that certifies its program to HUD, as described
in Section VI of this preamble.
A. Initial Reporting of an Alleged Defect
Under the Act, alleged defects that can be referred to the dispute
resolution program must be reported within the first year after the
date of home installation. It is only alleged defects reported in the
first year after the first installation that are covered under the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program. As used in HUD's
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program and this new part 3288,
the term ``defect'' is defined to parallel its definition in the Act.
Accordingly, the rule also makes clear that for the HUD Manufactured
Home Dispute Resolution Program, the term ``defect'' includes each
defect in the installation, construction, or safety of the home.
Persons familiar with HUD's long-established program for manufactured
home construction and safety standards are likely to be accustomed to
using the term ``defect'' in a narrower way. In regulations
implementing the historical aspects of HUD's manufactured home program,
the term has been defined to encompass only construction and safety
standards, and to exclude matters that involve significant health and
safety issues. See the definition in Sec. 3282.7(j). For purposes of
the HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program, however, a defect
is any problem in the performance, construction, components, or
material of the home that renders the home or any part of it not fit
for the ordinary use for which it was intended, including, but not
limited to, a defect in the construction, safety, or installation of
the home. The broader use of the term as it applies to rights and
responsibilities established under this new part 3288, is distinguished
from the term's historical use in part 3282.
As previously discussed, alleged defects must be reported within 1
year of the date of home installation to be eligible for the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program. The Department strongly
encourages the parties and homeowners to seek to resolve disputes
directly with the party or parties that they believe to be responsible
for causing the alleged defect before invoking the HUD Manufactured
Home Dispute Resolution Program. Nevertheless, any of the parties, and
the homeowners, must report the existence of possible defects within
the 1-year period in order to preserve the option of initiating the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program. The report may be made to
the Department, any of the parties, or a State Administrative Agency.
To be more flexible, the Department is permitting reports to be made to
State Administrative Agencies in addition to the Department and the
parties. The Department recommends that reports of alleged defects be
made in writing, including, but not limited to,
[[Page 27224]]
e-mail, written letter, certified mail, or fax. Reports are also
permitted by telephone. A report of an alleged defect must, at a
minimum, include a description of the alleged defect, the name of the
homeowner, and the address of the home. Parties alleging defects are
encouraged to send any written correspondence via certified mail, fax,
e-mail or other method, so that there will be proof of date of
delivery. After reporting an alleged defect, the reporting party or
homeowner is encouraged to allow time for a satisfactory response
before initiating the HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program.
B. Initiating the Process
Any party or a homeowner may initiate the HUD Mediation and
Arbitration Process in a HUD-administered state by submitting a request
for dispute resolution to the dispute resolution provider or by calling
a toll-free number.
C. Intake and Screening
When the request for dispute resolution has been received by the
dispute resolution provider, the screening neutral will review the
sufficiency of the information provided with the request. Although
there is no specified time period established for the screening neutral
to review the request for dispute resolution, as recommended by the
MHCC and other commenters, it is HUD's intention to perform this task
in a timely manner. If a defect is properly alleged and timely
reported, notice of the request will be forwarded to the manufacturer,
retailer, and installer by the screening neutral to the extent the
appropriate parties can be identified based on the information in the
request. If the screening neutral determines there is sufficient
documentation of an alleged defect presenting an unreasonable risk of
injury or death, a copy of the request will be sent to HUD. If a
request is lacking any of the required information, the screening
neutral will contact the requester or the parties to supplement the
initial request. If information necessary to qualify the matter for the
HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program is not received within
a reasonable time established by the screening neutral, the request for
dispute resolution will be considered withdrawn. The Department
anticipates establishing additional specific time periods for intake
and screening as part of the contracting process with the third-party
dispute resolution provider and publicizing these time periods on HUD's
Web site https://www.hud.gov.
D. Mandatory Mediation
The second stage in the process is mandatory mediation. The dispute
resolution provider will select a mediator, who will be a different
individual from the screening neutral used during the intake and
screening process. The mediator will mediate the dispute and attempt to
facilitate a settlement. The parties will be given 30 days from the
commencement of the mediation to reach a settlement. For cases
involving defects presenting an unreasonable risk of injury, death, or
significant loss or damage to valuable personal property, the parties
will have a maximum of 10 days from the commencement of the mediation
to reach an agreement. The dispute resolution provider will notify the
parties and the homeowner in writing of the date of the commencement of
the mediation. Sample agreements will be made available to the parties
as drafting guidance. Upon the parties reaching and signing an
agreement, the mediator will forward copies of any settlements reached
to the parties, the homeowner, and HUD. Except for the report of an
alleged defect, any request for dispute resolution, and any written
settlement agreement, all other documents and communications provided
in confidence and used in the mediation will be confidential, in
accordance with the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act of 1996 (5
U.S.C. 571 et seq.). Once the settlement agreement is signed, the
corrective repairs must be completed within 30 days, unless a longer
period is agreed to by the homeowner and the parties.
E. Nonbinding Arbitration
The third stage that may be invoked is nonbinding arbitration. If
the parties fail to reach a settlement during mediation, a party or the
homeowner may, within 15 days of the expiration of the time allowed for
reaching a settlement, request nonbinding arbitration. The party or the
homeowner requesting nonbinding arbitration will be required to submit
a written request for arbitration to the dispute resolution provider.
The dispute resolution provider will determine how an arbitrator will
be selected for each case. The parties may request an in-person
hearing, to be held at the discretion of the arbitrator, after
considering factors such as cost. If such a request is not made by all
parties within 5 days of the dispute resolution provider's receipt of
the request for arbitration, the arbitrator may conduct either a record
review or a telephonic hearing. The dispute resolution provider will
issue a notice to the parties and the homeowner setting forth the date,
place, and time the arbitration is to be held. If a party chooses not
to participate in the arbitration, the process will continue without
input from that party. The arbitrator will have the authority to issue
requests for documentation and information necessary to complete the
record, conduct on-site inspections, dismiss frivolous allegations, and
set hearing dates and deadlines. The arbitrator will be required to
complete the arbitration within 21 days of receipt of the request for
arbitration, unless good cause is found by HUD. After conducting a
hearing, the arbitrator will provide the parties and HUD with a written
nonbinding recommendation as to who the responsible party or parties
are and what actions should be taken. Several commenters, including the
MHCC, proposed that the contents of the recommendation be made
available to HUD and the parties simultaneously. The Department agrees
and has restructured the Mediation and Arbitration Process accordingly.
Several commenters, including the MHCC, stated that the parties should
have the ability to enter into binding agreements of their choosing at
any point in the process. Taking this into consideration, HUD has
modified the procedures set out in the proposed rule. Under the final
rule, at any time before HUD issues a final order, the parties may
submit an offer of settlement to HUD that HUD may, at its discretion,
incorporate into the order.
F. HUD Review
The final stage of the process is HUD Review. After the arbitrator
makes a recommendation, he or she will forward it to HUD. HUD will
review the arbitrator's recommendation, the record, and any settlement
offers. HUD will accept, modify, or reject the recommendation. Several
commenters, including the MHCC, were opposed to HUD having the option
to accept, modify, or reject the arbitrator's recommendation. HUD
considers it appropriate for HUD to issue final enforceable orders and
that this inherent governmental function cannot be delegated to a
private party. It is HUD's obligation to issue an order that under the
Administrative Procedure Act can withstand the arbitrary and capricious
standard. When a defect is determined to be present, HUD will issue an
appropriate order that assigns responsibility for correction of the
defect. In the order for correction, HUD will include a date by which
the correction of all defects must be completed, taking into
consideration the
[[Page 27225]]
seriousness of the defect. A party's failure to comply with an order of
HUD will be considered a violation of section 610(a)(5) of the Act (42
U.S.C. 5409(a)(5)).
The responsible party or parties will be required to pay for or
provide any repair of the home. HUD may apportion the costs for
correction and repair if culpability rests with more than one party.
G. Alternative Process When Homeowners Are Not Responsible for the
Defect
Manufacturers, retailers, and installers who have been unable to
resolve a dispute involving a defect among themselves and who certify
that the homeowner is not responsible for the defect will have the
option of electing to use an Alternative Process under the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program. The Alternative Process
permits the parties to seek neutral evaluation outside of the
procedures established by the HUD Mediation and Arbitration Process. To
participate in the Alternative Process, at least one of the parties
must submit a written notification to the dispute resolution provider
after it has reported an alleged defect or has been informed that an
alleged defect has been reported to another party. Parties must elect
to use the Alternative Process no more than 7 days after notification
of a request for dispute resolution has been delivered by overnight
delivery, or commercial carrier, or by fax, to the screening neutral.
Parties who elect to use the Alternative Process must agree to engage a
neutral of their own selection. The selected neutral will evaluate the
dispute and make an assignment of responsibility for correction and
repair. The actual process followed will be designed and agreed to by
the parties; there are no particular procedural requirements, such as
witnesses or formal evidence. The parties may elect to memorialize the
assignment of responsibility in writing and should agree to act upon
the neutral's assignment of responsibility for correction and repair.
The participants must agree to allow the homeowner or the homeowner's
representative to be present at any meetings and to be informed of the
outcome. The parties may inform the Department of the outcome. At any
time after 30 days of the Alternative Process notification, any party
or the homeowner may invoke the HUD Mediation and Arbitration Process
and proceed to mediation by following the established procedures.
V. Informing Homeowners About Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
One key component of the HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program is notifying homeowners about the availability of dispute
resolution in HUD-administered states through the HUD Manufactured Home
Dispute Resolution Program, and in all other states through state
dispute resolution programs. Homeowners will be advised of the
availability of the HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program
from retailers when purchasing a manufactured home. The rule requires
retailers to provide each homeowner with a standard notice at the time
of signing of a contract for the sale or lease of a manufactured home.
This is consistent with numerous comments received from the MHCC and
others opposed to the posting of a notice in each home, but favoring a
standard notice to be provided at or before the signing of the sales
contract.
The Department will notify the public about the HUD Manufactured
Home Dispute Resolution Program through the Consumer Manual that 42
U.S.C. 5416 and 24 CFR 3282.207 currently require be provided with each
manufactured home. The manufacturer will be required to include in the
Consumer Manual the specific language that is set out in the revised
Sec. 3282.207 in this rule. The language gives detailed information
about the HUD program.
VI. State Dispute Resolution Programs in Non-HUD-Administered States
The HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program will not be
implemented in states that are certified by HUD and have dispute
resolution programs that comply with the minimum requirements set out
in these regulations. These states will administer their own dispute
resolution programs. A state dispute resolution program will be
required to meet criteria listed in a certification form. However, the
final rule does not specify how the criteria are to be met. Comments
from the MHCC and others strongly supported redefining HUD's proposed
state requirements for certification. Those commenters were in favor of
having the state requirements parallel the statutory requirements.
Additionally, those commenters noted that some states have already
implemented programs that closely model the statutory requirements. The
proposed rule included six requirements for full certification and five
for conditional approval. In response to the comments, HUD has reduced
the minimum requirements for full certification to four, and to three
for conditional approval. The proposed rule also required that states
allow homeowners to initiate complaints. Comments from the MHCC and
others recommended that this requirement be removed. HUD has changed
the certification form to allow states flexibility when operating their
own programs and to give them the ability to design programs that
closely model the statutory requirements. The minimum requirements for
certification are set forth in Part II of the Dispute Resolution
Certification attached as an appendix, and include provisions for: (1)
The timely resolution of disputes regarding responsibility for
correction and repair of defects in manufactured homes involving
manufacturers, retailers, or installers; (2) provisions for issuance of
appropriate orders for correction and repairs of defects in the homes;
(3) a coverage period for disputes involving defects that are reported
within a minimum of 1 year from the date beginning on the date of first
installation; and (4) adequate funding and personnel. Any state that
certifies that its program meets these four minimum requirements will
be accepted and permitted to implement its own program. A state that
meets three of the four minimum requirements under Sec. 3288.205(a)(1)
through (4) will be conditionally approved by HUD.
HUD recognizes that some states may have a different definition of
``defect'' or use a different threshold for its program than the one
set forth in these regulations for the HUD program. For purposes of
state certification, this rule provides for state approval if the
threshold for the program is functionally equivalent to the federal
definition of ``defect.''
VII. Role of the Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee in Future
Revisions of This Regulation
Several commenters expressed a desire to have the Department work
closely with the MHCC in future rulemaking for the dispute resolution
program. Such involvement is not specifically provided for in the Act.
However, HUD provides in this rule for the MHCC's input prior to
publication of any new dispute resolution rulemaking initiated by HUD.
This rule also provides that the MHCC may initiate its own
recommendations for HUD regarding dispute resolution regulations, and
that HUD will explain to the MHCC any modification or rejection by HUD
of the MHCC recommendations.
[[Page 27226]]
VIII. Conforming Amendments
As stated in the October 20, 2005, proposed rule, since HUD is
using the term ``manufactured home'' in this rule, it is taking this
opportunity to correct the definition in 24 CFR 3280.2 by adding the
reference to self-propelled vehicles found in section 603(6) of the Act
(42 U.S.C. 5402(6)). HUD is also clarifying the methodology for the
calculation of square footage that is included in the current
regulatory definition. This action will result in consistent usage of
the term for all parts of the manufactured home program. The definition
in this final rule is unchanged from the definition that appeared in
the proposed rule.
IX. Changes to the Proposed Rule in This Final Rule
The following changes to the October 20, 2005, proposed rule are
made by this final rule, consistent with the discussion of public
comments in this preamble and as further explained below:
1. To provide consistency in this rule with the terminology used in
other HUD regulations, the term ``manufactured home'' rather than
``manufactured housing'' is used, and references to ``HUD'' have been
substituted for references to ``the Secretary.''
2. While this final rule gives homeowners the right to participate
in the HUD Dispute Resolution Program by initiating the Mediation and
Arbitration Process and by acting as observers of the process, it does
not recognize homeowners as parties.
3. A statement has been added to the dispute resolution language
required in the consumer manual by Sec. 3280.2(e) that the HUD Dispute
Resolution Program does not replace any manufacturer's warranty
program.
4. A definition of the term ``installer'' has been added to the
list of definitions at Sec. 3288.3.
5. The rule at Sec. 3288.5 requires retailers to provide each
homeowner with a standard notice at the time of signing of a contract
for the sale or lease of a manufactured home, rather than the posting
of a notice in each home.
6. The rule at Sec. 3288.15(b) now permits reports of defects to
be made to State Administrative Agencies in addition to the Department
and the parties.
7. A provision is added at Sec. 3288.30(c) that denial of a
dispute by all of the parties that there is a dispute does not preclude
the dispute resolution process from going forward to mediation. A
provision is also added at Sec. 3288.35(c) that, during mediation,
denial of a dispute by all parties without acceptance of responsibility
will result in the mediator referring the matter to arbitration for
determination of the defect and responsibility for the defect. A
similar provision is added at Sec. 3288.40(d), that if the parties
deny a dispute exists and the arbitrator determines there is a defect,
the arbitrator will make a determination of responsibility for the
defect. These additions protect the homeowner's right to have the
existence of, and responsibility for, any alleged defect determined
through the HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program in HUD-
administered states in the event existence of a dispute is denied by
all of the parties without determination of the defect and of
responsibility for the defect.
8. A procedure cited in the preamble of the proposed rule (at 70 FR
61180), that if the screening neutral determines there is sufficient
documentation of an alleged defect presenting an unreasonable risk of
injury or death, a copy of the request will be sent to HUD, is
explicitly added to this rule at Sec. 3288.30(d). Similarly, a
procedure cited in the preamble of the proposed rule (at 70 FR 61180),
to make sample agreements available to the mediation parties as
drafting guidance, is included in the final rule at Sec.
3288.35(d)(2).
9. Section 3288.40(c) makes explicit the arbitrator's authority to
make proposed findings of the presence of a defect and culpability.
10. An extension of the 21-day time period by which the arbitrator
is required to complete the arbitration is now permitted for good cause
under Sec. 3288.40(h).
11. Under Sec. 3288.40(h), the contents of the arbitrator's
recommendation are to be made available to HUD and the parties
simultaneously, rather than only to HUD as was stated in the proposed
rule.
12. The final rule, at Sec. 3288.40(i), allows the parties to
submit an offer of settlement to HUD at any time before a final order
is issued that HUD may, at HUD's discretion, incorporate into the
order.
13. For the alternate dispute resolution procedure of subpart C,
the term ``Alternative Process'' has been substituted for ``Commercial
Opt-Out Option.''
14. In Sec. 3288.205(a), the final rule has reduced the minimum
requirements for full certification from six to four, and from five to
three for conditional approval. The proposed requirements dealing with
homeowner initiation of the process and conflict of interest have been
removed.
15. A new subpart E has been added to address the role of the MHCC
in Dispute Resolution Program rulemaking procedures.
X. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) reviewed this rule under
Executive Order 12866 (entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'').
OMB determined that this rule is a ``significant regulatory action'' as
defined in section 3(f) of the Order (although not an economically
significant regulatory action under the Order). The docket file is
available for public inspection in the Regulations Division, Office of
General Counsel, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451
Seventh Street, SW., Room 10276, Washington, DC 20410-0500. Due to
security measures at the HUD Headquarters building, please schedule an
appointment to review the docket file by calling the Regulations
Division at (202) 708-3055 (this is not a toll-free number).
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements contained in this rule have
been approved by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501-3520) and assigned OMB control number 2502-0562. In
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information, unless the collection displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531-1538) establishes requirements for federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on state, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. This rule, which implements a
statutory mandate to establish a program for the resolution of a narrow
category of disputes, will not impose any federal mandates on any
state, local, or tribal government or the private sector within the
meaning of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
Environmental Review
This final rule does not direct, provide for assistance or loan and
mortgage insurance for, or otherwise govern or regulate, real property
acquisition, disposition, leasing, rehabilitation, alteration,
demolition, or new construction, or establish, revise, or provide for
standards for construction or construction materials, manufactured
[[Page 27227]]
housing, or occupancy. Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(1), this
final rule is categorically excluded from environmental review under
the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321).
Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires that
a regulation that has a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, small businesses, or small organizations
include an initial regulatory flexibility analysis describing the
regulation's impact on small entities. Such an analysis need not be
undertaken if the agency has certified that the regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
HUD has conducted a labor and travel cost impact analysis for this
rule. The cost analysis determines the cost difference between a
typical dispute resolution process (the process) involving manufactured
housing and the civil litigation costs between one or more parties
involved in a manufactured housing dispute. A typical dispute
resolution method is a two-step process: mediation and, for a small
percent of unsuccessful mediation cases, arbitration.
The potential cost impact of the mediation step for manufacturers
would be approximately $1,550 per dispute, $237 for retailers, and $177
for installers. HUD anticipates that it may be administering the
dispute resolution process in 26 states where approximately 37,800
homes are expected to be installed annually. Currently, 45
manufacturing corporate entities ship into those states, while 1,719
retailers sell homes and approximately 5,000 individuals or businesses
install manufactured homes in those states.
Based on the preceding data, HUD anticipates taking action on 1,890
complaints under the federal manufactured home dispute resolution
process during an average year. Presuming that the average cost of this
action ($1,964) will be incorporated into the home price or related
service fees of every installed home in the 26 states (37,800), the
cost impact to each installed home would be $98.
If all 1,890 cases were settled through litigation rather than
dispute resolution, the cost of litigating 1,890 cases would total
$18.9 million. Averaged across 37,800 homes, the average cost of
litigation incorporated into each home price would be $500 per home,
compared to the average cost of dispute resolution of $98 per home.
Dispute resolution would, therefore, provide an average savings of $402
per home.
Several commenters claimed that the number of complaints was not
properly substantiated and was unrealistically low. However, these
numbers were developed by carefully sampling 12 current state dispute
resolution programs. Furthermore, the Small Business Administration has
accepted these estimates while none of the commenters supplied any
numbers of their own. Some commenters also complained that the cost
estimate provided by HUD runs only through the mediation phase. While
this is true, HUD's research, which was again based on current state
program experience, determined that the number of disputes requiring
arbitration would be minimal.
The small increase in total cost associated with this final rule
would not impose a significant burden for a small business. The rule
would regulate establishments primarily engaged in the production of
manufactured homes (NAICS 32991) and the sale of manufactured homes
(NAICS 453930). In addition, manufactured home set-up and tie-down
establishments (installers) would be included within the definition of
all other special trade contractors (NAICS 23599). Of the 222 firms
included under the NAICS 32991 definition, 198 are small manufacturers,
which fall below the small business threshold of 500 employees. There
are 10,691 retailers included under NAICS 453930; all of the firms fall
below the $11 million annual income rate. Of the 31,320 firms included
under NAICS 23599 definitions, only 53 firms exceed the small business
threshold of 500 employees and none of these is primarily a
manufactured home set-up and tie-down establishment. The rule,
therefore, would affect a substantial number of small entities.
However, the home manufacturers, retailers, and installers would be
subject only to an associated labor cost and travel expense necessary
to attend the mediation process and labor costs to participate in the
expected record review and possible telephonic or face-to-face meeting
for arbitration. Moreover, because the great majority of manufacturers,
retailers, and installers are considered small entities, there would
not be any disproportionate impact on them. Therefore, although this
rule would affect a substantial number of small entities, it would not
have a significant economic impact on them. In addition, the speedier
and more certain resolution of disputes should help the affected
businesses.
Accordingly, the undersigned certifies that this final rule would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits, to the
extent practicable and permitted by law, an agency from promulgating a
regulation that has federalism implications and either imposes
substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments and
is not required by statute, or preempts state law, unless the relevant
requirements of section 6 of the Executive Order are met. This rule
does not have federalism implications and does not impose substantial
direct compliance costs on state and local governments or preempt state
law within the meaning of the Executive Order. State and local
governments are not required to establish dispute resolution programs,
but the rule provides a mechanism to recognize state programs that meet
the statutory elements of a dispute resolution program to operate in
lieu of the federal manufactured home dispute resolution program.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number for Manufactured
Housing is 14.171.
List of Subjects
24 CFR Part 3280
Housing standards, Incorporation by reference, Manufactured homes.
24 CFR Part 3282
Administrative practice and procedure, Consumer protection,
Intergovernmental relations, Investigations, Manufactured homes,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Warranties.
24 CFR Part 3288
Administrative practice and procedure, Consumer protection,
Intergovernmental relations, Manufactured homes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
0
Accordingly, HUD amends parts 3280 and 3282 and adds a new part 3288 in
chapter XX of title 24 of the Code of Federal Regulations to read as
follows:
PART 3280--MANUFACTURED HOME CONSTRUCTION AND SAFETY STANDARDS
0
1. The authority citation for part 3280 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), 5403, and 5424.
[[Page 27228]]
0
2. In Sec. 3280.2, the definition of ``manufactured home'' is revised
to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Manufactured home means a structure, transportable in one or more
sections, which in the traveling mode is 8 body feet or more in width
or 40 body feet or more in length or which when erected on-site is 320
or more square feet, and which is built on a permanent chassis and
designed to be used as a dwelling with or without a permanent
foundation when connected to the required utilities, and includes the
plumbing, heating, air-conditioning, and electrical systems contained
in the structure. This term includes all structures that meet the above
requirements except the size requirements and with respect to which the
manufacturer voluntarily files a certification pursuant to Sec.
3282.13 of this chapter and complies with the construction and safety
standards set forth in this part 3280. The term does not include any
self-propelled recreational vehicle. Calculations used to determine the
number of square feet in a structure will include the total of square
feet for each transportable section comprising the completed structure
and will be based on the structure's exterior dimensions measured at
the largest horizontal projections when erected on site. These
dimensions will include all expandable rooms, cabinets, and other
projections containing interior space, but do not include bay windows.
Nothing in this definition should be interpreted to mean that a
manufactured home necessarily meets the requirements of HUD's Minimum
Property Standards (HUD Handbook 4900.1) or that it is automatically
eligible for financing under 12 U.S.C. 1709(b).
* * * * *
PART 3282--MANUFACTURED HOME PROCEDURAL AND ENFORCEMENT REGULATIONS
0
3. The authority citation for part 3282 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2461 note; 42 U.S.C. 3535(d) and 5424.
0
4. In Sec. 3282.207, redesignate paragraph (e) as paragraph (f), add a
new paragraph (e), and revise the second sentence of paragraph (f) as
redesignated, to read as follows:
Sec. 3282.207 Manufactured home consumer manual requirements.
* * * * *
(e) Dispute resolution information. (1) The manufacturer must
include the following language under a heading of ``Dispute Resolution
Process'' in the consumer manual:
Many states have a consumer assistance or dispute resolution
program that homeowners may use to resolve problems with
manufacturers, retailers, or installers concerning defects in their
manufactured homes that render part of the home unfit for its
intended use. Such state programs may include a process to resolve a
dispute among a manufacturer, a retailer, and an installer about who
will correct the defect. In states where there is not a dispute
resolution program that meets the federal requirements, the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program will operate. These are
``HUD-administered states.'' The HUD Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program is not for cosmetic or minor problems in the
home. You may contact the HUD Manufactured Housing Program Office at
(202) 708-6423 or (800) 927-2891, or visit the HUD website at
www.hud.gov to determine whether your state has a state program or
whether you should use the HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program. Contact information for state programs is also available on
the HUD website. If your state has a state program, please contact
the state for information about the program, how it operates, and
what steps to take to request dispute resolution. When there is no
state dispute resolution program, a homeowner may use the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program to resolve disputes
among the manufacturer, retailer, and installer about responsibility
for the correction or repair of defects in the manufactured home
that were reported during the 1-year period starting on the date of
installation. Even after the 1-year period, manufacturers have
continuing responsibility to review certain problems that affect the
intended use of the manufactured home or its parts, but for which
correction may no longer be required under federal law.
(2) The manufacturer must include the following language under a
heading of ``Additional Information `` HUD Manufactured Home Dispute
Resolution Program'' in the consumer manual:
The steps and information outlined below apply only to the HUD
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program that operates in HUD-
administered states, as described under the heading ``Dispute
Resolution Information'' in this manual. Under the HUD Manufactured
Home Dispute Resolution Program, homeowners must report defects to
the manufacturer, retailer, installer, a State Administrative
Agency, or HUD within 1 year after the date of the first
installation. Homeowners are encouraged to report defects in
writing, including, but not limited to, email, written letter,
certified mail, or fax, but they may also make a report by
telephone. To demonstrate that the report was made within 1 year
after the date of installation, homeowners should report defects in
a manner that will create a dated record of the report: for example,
by certified mail, by fax, or by email. When making a report by
telephone, homeowners are encouraged to make a note of the phone
call, including names of conversants, date, and time. No particular
format is required to submit a report of an alleged defect, but any
such report should at a minimum include a description of the alleged
defect, the name of the homeowner, and the address of the home.
Homeowners are encouraged to send reports of an alleged defect
first to the manufacturer, retailer, or installer of the
manufactured home, or a State Administrative Agency. Reports of
alleged defects may also be sent to HUD at: HUD, Office of
Regulatory Affairs and Manufactured Housing, Attn: Dispute
Resolution, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20410-8000;
faxed to (202) 708-4213; e-mailed to mhs@hud.gov, or reported
telephonically at (202) 708-6423 or (800) 927-2891.
If, after taking the steps outlined above, the homeowner does
not receive a satisfactory response from the manufacturer, retailer,
or installer, the homeowner may file a dispute resolution request
with the dispute resolution provider in writing, or by making a
request by phone. No particular format is required to make a request
for dispute resolution, but the request should generally include the
following information:
(1) The name, address, and contact information of the homeowner;
(2) The name and contact information of the manufacturer,
retailer, and installer of the manufactured home;
(3) The date or dates the report of the alleged defect was made;
(4) Identification of the entities or persons to whom each
report of the alleged defect was made and the method that was used
to make the report;
(5) The date of installation of the manufactured home affected
by the alleged defect; and
(6) A description of the alleged defect.
Information about the dispute resolution provider and how to
make a request for dispute resolution is available at https://
www.hud.gov or by contacting the Office of Manufactured Housing
Programs at (202) 708-6423 or (800) 927-2891.
A screening agent will review the request and, as appropriate,
forward the request to the manufacturer, retailer, installer, and
mediator. The mediator will mediate the dispute and attempt to
facilitate a settlement. The parties to a settlement include, as
applicable, the manufacturer, retailer, and installer. If the
parties are unable to reach a settlement that results in correction
or repair of the alleged defect, any party or the homeowner may
request nonbinding arbitration. Should any party refuse to
participate, the arbitration shall proceed without that party's
input. Once the arbitrator makes a non-binding recommendation, the
arbitrator will forward it to the parties and HUD. HUD will have the
option of adopting, modifying, or rejecting the recommendation when
issuing an order requiring the responsible party or parties to make
any corrections or repairs in the home. At any time before HUD
issues a final order, the parties may submit an offer of settlement
[[Page 27229]]
to HUD that may, at HUD's discretion, be incorporated into the
order.
In circumstances where the parties agree that one or more of
them, and not the homeowner, is responsible for the alleged defect,
the parties will have the opportunity to resolve the dispute outside
of the HUD Mediation and Arbitration process by using the
Alternative Process. Homeowners will maintain the right to be
informed in writing of the outcome when the Alternative Process is
used, within 5 days of the outcome. At any time after 30 days of the
Alternative Process notification, any participant or the homeowner
may invoke the HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program and
proceed to mediation.
The HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program is not a
warranty program and does not replace the manufacturer's or any
other warranty program.
(f) * * * A manual substantially complies with the guidelines if it
includes the language in paragraph (e) of this section and presents
current material on each of the subjects covered in the guidelines in
sufficient detail to inform consumers about the operation, maintenance,
and repair of manufactured homes.* * *
0
5. In chapter XX, add a new part 3288, to read as follows:
PART 3288--MANUFACTURED HOME DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM
Subpart A--General
Sec.
3288.1 Purpose and scope.
3288.3 Definitions.
3288.5 Retailer notification at sale.
Subpart B--HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program in HUD-
Administered States
3288.10 Applicability.
3288.15 Eligibility for dispute resolution.
3288.20 Reporting a defect.
3288.25 Initiation of dispute resolution.
3288.30 Screening of dispute resolution request.
3288.33 Notice of dispute resolution.
3288.35 Mediation.
3288.40 Nonbinding arbitration.
3288.45 HUD review and order.
Subpart C--Alternative Process in HUD-Administered States
3288.100 Scope and applicability.
3288.105 Time when Alternative Process is available.
3288.110 Alternative Process agreements.
Subpart D--State Dispute Resolution Programs in Non-HUD-Administered
States
3288.200 Applicability.
3288.205 Minimum requirements.
3288.210 Acceptance and recertification process.
3288.215 Effect on other manufactured home program requirements.
Subpart E--Dispute Resolution Program Rulemaking Procedures
3288.300 Applicability.
3288.305 Consultation with the Manufactured Housing Consensus
Committee.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), 5422 and 5424.
Subpart A--General
Sec. 3288.1 Purpose and scope.
(a) Purpose. The Act is intended, in part, to protect the quality,
safety, durability, and affordability of manufactured homes. Section
623(c)(12) of the Act (42 U.S.C. 5422 (c)(12)) requires the
implementation of ``a dispute resolution program for the timely
resolution of disputes between manufacturers, retailers, and installers
of manufactured homes regarding responsibility, and for the issuance of
appropriate orders, for the correction or repair of defects in
manufactured homes that are reported during the 1-year period beginning
on the date of installation.'' The purpose of this part is to provide a
dispute resolution program for the timely resolution of disputes among
manufacturers, retailers, and installers regarding the responsibility
for correction or repair of defects reported by the homeowner or others
and reported in the 1-year period after the first installation of the
manufactured home.
(b) Scope-- (1) Applicability. In carrying out this purpose, it is
presumed that if a manufactured home contains an alleged defect that is
reported in the first year after installation and was not caused by the
homeowner, then the manufacturer, retailer, or installer is responsible
for the alleged defect and the dispute resolution process recognized in
this part is an appropriate means for resolving disputes about
responsibility for correction and repair of the alleged defect. For
purposes of the dispute resolution process recognized in this part,
only alleged defects reported in the first year after the first
installation are covered by the process. The state where the home is
sited determines whether the HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program or a state program applies. Subpart A of this part establishes
general provisions applicable to HUD's implementation of a dispute
resolution program as required by the Act. Subpart B of this part
establishes the HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program that
HUD will administer in any state that does not establish a program that
complies with the Act and been accepted by HUD as provided in subpart D
of this part. Subpart C of this part provides an Alternative Process
for manufacturers, retailers, and installers who agree that a homeowner
is not responsible for the alleged defect to resolve their disputes
about responsibility for correction or repair outside of the HUD
Mediation and Arbitration Process under subpart B. Subpart D of this
part establishes the minimum requirements that must be met by a state
applying to implement its own dispute resolution program that complies
with the Act, and the procedure for determining whether the
requirements for complying have been met. Subpart E of this part
establishes special rulemaking procedures that apply to the issuance of
new regulations that implement the dispute resolution requirements set
forth in section 623 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 5422).
(2) Warranties not affected. This part is not a warranty program
and the requirements established in this part do not replace the
manufacturer's or any other warranty program. Such warranty program may
have its own requirements.
Sec. 3288.3 Definitions.
The following definitions apply in this part:
Act means the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety
Standards Act of 1974, 42 U.S.C. 5401-5426.
Appropriate order means an order issued by HUD or an order that is
enforceable under state law.
Date of installation means the date all utilities are connected and
the manufactured home is ready for occupancy as established, if
applicable, by a certificate of occupancy, except as follows: if the
manufactured home has not been sold to the first person purchasing the
home in good faith for purposes other than resale by the date the home
is ready for occupancy, the date of installation is the date of closing
under the purchase agreement or sales contract for the manufactured
home.
Day means a calendar day.
Defect means any defect in the performance, construction,
components, or material of a manufactured home that renders the home or
any part of the home not fit for the ordinary use for which it was
intended, including, but not limited to, a defect in the construction,
safety, or installation of the home. For purposes of state
certification under Sec. 3288.205, HUD will find it acceptable if the
threshold for the state's program is functionally equivalent to this
definition.
Dispute resolution provider means a person or entity providing
dispute resolution services for HUD.
[[Page 27230]]
Homeowner means a person who purchased or leased the manufactured
home in good faith for purposes other than resale.
HUD means the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Installer means the person who is retained to engage in, or who
engages in, the business of directing, supervising, controlling, or
correcting the initial installation of a manufactured home.
Manufactured home has the same meaning as the term ``manufactured
home'' as defined in 24 CFR 3280.2.
Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee or MHCC means the
consensus committee established pursuant to section 604(a)(3) of the
Act, 42 U.S.C. 5403(a)(3).
Party or parties means, individually or collectively, the
manufacturer, retailer, or installer of a manufactured home in which a
defect has been reported in accordance with Sec. 3288.20.
State Administrative Agency means an agency of a state that has
been approved or conditionally approved to carry out the state plan for
enforcement of the standards pursuant to section 623 of the Act, 42
U.S.C. 5422.
Timely reporting means the reporting of an alleged defect within 1
year after the date of installation of a manufactured home in
accordance with Sec. 3288.20.
Timely resolution means the resolution of disputes among
manufacturers, retailers, and installers within 120 days of the time a
request for dispute resolution is made, except that if the defect
presents an unreasonable risk of injury, death, or significant loss or
damage to valuable personal property, the resolution must be within 60
days of the time a request for dispute resolution is made.
Sec. 3288.5 Retailer notification at sale.
Retailer notice at the time of signing. At the time of signing a
contract for sale or lease for a manufactured home, the retailer must
provide the purchaser with a retailer notice. This notice may be in a
separate document from the sales contract or may be incorporated
clearly in a separate section on consumer dispute resolution
information at the top of the sales contract. The notice must include
the following language:
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program is available to resolve
disputes among manufacturers, retailers, or installers concerning
defects in manufactured homes. Many states also have a consumer
assistance or dispute resolution program. For additional information
about these programs, see sections titled ``Dispute Resolution
Process'' and ``Additional Information--HUD Manufactured Home
Dispute Resolution Program'' in the Consumer Manual required to be
provided to the purchaser. These programs are not warranty programs
and do not replace the manufacturer's, or any other person's,
warranty program.
Subpart B--HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program in HUD-
Administered States
Sec. 3288.10 Applicability.
The requirements of the HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution
Program established in this subpart B apply in each state that does not
establish a state dispute resolution program that complies with the Act
and has been accepted by HUD as provided in subpart D of this part.
Sec. 3288.15 Eligibility for dispute resolution.
(a) Initiation of actions. Manufacturers, retailers, and installers
of manufactured homes are eligible to initiate and participate in the
HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program. Homeowners may
initiate action under, and be observers to, the HUD Manufactured Home
Dispute Resolution Program.
(b) Eligible disputes. Only disputes concerning alleged defects
that have been reported to the manufacturer, retailer, installer, HUD,
or a State Administrative Agency within 1 year after the date of the
first installation of the manufactured home are eligible for resolution
through the HUD Manufactured Home Dispute Resolution Program. The
eligible dispute includes the defect alleged in a timely report and any
related issues.
Sec. 3288.20 Reporting a defect.
(a) Making a report. To preserve the right to request dispute
resolution through HUD, alleged defects must be reported to the
manufacturer, retailer, installer, HUD, or a State Administrative
Agency. An alleged defect may be reported by a homeowner, manufacturer,
retailer, or installer.
(b) Form of report. It is recommended that alleged defects be
reported in writing, including, but not limited to, e-mail, written
letter, certified mail, or fax. The existence of an alleged defect may
also be reported by telephone.
(c) Content of report. No particular form or format is required to
report an alleged defect, but any such report must, at a minimum,
include a description of the alleged defect, the name of homeowner, and
the address of the home.
(d) Record of report--(1) To evidence timeliness. To establish
timely reporting, the report of an alleged defect that is made to the
manufacturer, retailer, installer, or a State Administrative Agency of
the manufactured home should be done in a manner that will create a
dated record of the report that demonstrates that the report was made
within 1 year after the date of installation; for example, by certified
mail, fax, or email. Persons who report an alleged defect by telephone
should make a contemporaneous note of the telephone call, including
date, time, the name of the person who received the report, the name of
the business contacted, and the telephone number cal