Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Pamlico River, Washington, NC, 26298-26300 [E7-8814]
Download as PDF
26298
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 9, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 165 as follows:
I
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary § 165.T11–180 to
read as follows:
I
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES
§ 165.T11–180 Safety Zone; KFOG
‘‘KaBoom’’ Fireworks Display, San
Francisco Bay, CA.
(a) Location. This safety zone is
established for the waters of San
Francisco Bay surrounding a barge used
as a firework launch platform during the
KFOG ‘‘KaBoom’’ fireworks display.
During the loading of the fireworks
barge, during the transit of the fireworks
barge to the display location, and until
the start of the fireworks display, the
regulated area encompasses the
navigable waters around and under the
fireworks barge within a radius of 100
feet. Fifteen minutes prior to and during
the twenty-two minute fireworks
display, the temporary regulated area
increases in size to encompass the
navigable waters around and under the
fireworks launch barge within a radius
of 1,000 feet. Loading of the
pyrotechnics onto the fireworks barge is
scheduled to commence at 8 a.m. on
May 10, 2007, and will take place at Pier
50 in San Francisco. Towing of the
barge from Pier 50 to the display
location is scheduled to take place on
May 12, 2007. During the fireworks
display, scheduled to start at 9 p.m. on
May 12, 2007, the barge will be located
approximately 1,000 feet from San
Francisco Pier 30 in position 37°47.21′
N, 122°22.86′ W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced from 8 a.m. May 10,
2007 to 9:30 p.m. on May 12, 2007. If
the event concludes prior to the
scheduled termination time, the Coast
Guard will cease enforcement of this
safety zone and will announce that fact
via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Regulations. In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into, transit through, or
anchoring within this safety zone by all
vessels and persons is prohibited,
unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port San Francisco, or his
designated representative.
(d) Enforcement. All persons and
vessels shall comply with the
instructions of the Coast Guard Captain
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:44 May 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
of the Port, or the designated on-scene
patrol personnel. Patrol personnel can
be comprised of commissioned, warrant,
and petty officers of the Coast Guard
onboard Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, local, state, and federal law
enforcement vessels. Upon being hailed
by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other
means, the operator of a vessel shall
proceed as directed.
The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted
in the patrol and enforcement of this
safety zone by local law enforcement as
necessary.
Dated: April 20, 2007.
W.J. Uberti,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, San Francisco.
[FR Doc. E7–8815 Filed 5–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD05–07–040]
RIN 1625 AA00
Safety Zone; Fireworks Display,
Pamlico River, Washington, NC
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone
during the ‘‘Washington Summer
Festival and the Washington 4th of July
Fireworks’’ displays to be held on the
waters of the Pamlico River,
Washington, North Carolina. This action
is necessary to provide for the safety of
life on navigable waters during the
event. This action will restrict vessel
traffic in portions of the Pamlico River
adjacent to Washington, North Carolina
during the fireworks display.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30
p.m. on June 8 until 10 p.m. on July 4,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket [CGD05–07–
040] and are available for inspection or
copying at Commander (dpi), Fifth
Coast Guard District, 431 Crawford
Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 23704–
5004, between 9 a.m. and 2 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
CWO Christopher Humphrey, Coast
Guard Sector North Carolina, Atlantic
Beach, NC at (252) 247–4525.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. Publishing
an NPRM would be impracticable and
contrary to public interest since
immediate action is needed to minimize
potential danger to the public during the
event. The necessary information to
determine whether the marine event
poses a threat to persons and vessels
was not provided with sufficient time to
publish an NPRM. The danger posed by
fireworks fall-out makes a safety zone
necessary to provide for the safety of
spectator craft and other vessels
transiting the event area. For the safety
concerns noted, it is in the public
interest to have these regulations in
effect during the event. The Coast Guard
will issue broadcast notice to mariners
to advise vessel operators of
navigational restrictions. On scene Coast
Guard and local law enforcement
vessels will also provide actual notice to
mariners.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) and for the
same reasons, the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Delaying the effective date would be
contrary to the public interest, since
immediate action is needed to ensure
the safety of the event participants,
spectator craft and other vessels
transiting the event area. Advance
notifications will be made to users of
the Pamlico River via marine
information broadcasts, local notice to
mariners, commercial radio stations and
area newspapers.
Background and Purpose
On June 8 & 9 and July 4, 2007 the
Washington/Beaufort County Chamber
of Commerce and the City of
Washington will sponsor the
‘‘Washington Summer Festival’’ and the
‘‘4th of July’’ fireworks displays over the
waters of the Pamlico River. A fleet of
spectator vessels is anticipated to gather
nearby to view the display. Due to the
need for vessel control during the event,
vessel traffic will be temporarily
restricted to provide for the safety of
participants, spectators and transiting
vessels.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone on specified waters of the
Pamlico River adjacent to Washington,
North Carolina. The regulated area
includes a section of the Pamlico River
E:\FR\FM\09MYR1.SGM
09MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 9, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
from the Highway 17 Swing Bridge
south approximately one half mile long
and bounded in width by each
shoreline. The rule would be enforced
from 8:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. and would
restrict general navigation in the
regulated area during the fireworks
display. The Coast Guard, at its
discretion, when practical would allow
the passage of vessels when the
fireworks displays are not taking place.
Except for participants and vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, no person or vessel would
be allowed to enter or remain in the
regulated area during the enforcement
period. These regulations are needed to
control vessel traffic during the events
to enhance the safety of participants,
spectators and transiting vessels.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
Although this regulation restricts
vessel traffic from transiting Pamlico
River during the event, the effect of this
regulation will not be significant due to
the limited duration that the regulated
area will be in effect and the extensive
advance notifications that will be made
to the maritime community via marine
information broadcasts and area
newspapers so mariners can adjust their
plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:44 May 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the Pamlico
River during the scheduled events.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons. This rule will be
enforced for only a short period, from
8:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. Before the
enforcement period, we will issue
maritime advisories so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we offered to assist small entities
in understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or
governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact
the address listed under ADDRESSES. The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26299
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
E:\FR\FM\09MYR1.SGM
09MYR1
26300
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 89 / Wednesday, May 9, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Technical Standards
I
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1 which
guides the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This rule
fits the category selected from paragraph
(34)(g), as it establishes a safety zone. A
final ‘‘Environmental Analysis Check
List’’ and a final ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ will be available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
I
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES
I
2. Add temporary § 165.T05–040 to
read as follows:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
§ 165.T05–040 Safety Zone; Pamlico River,
Washington, North Carolina.
40 CFR Part 174
(a) Regulated area. The safety zone
includes all waters of Pamlico River
south of the intersection of the Highway
17 Swing Bridge south along the west
river bank to latitude 35°32′19″ N,
longitude 077°03′40″ W, thence across
the river on a line 045 degrees due
northeast across the river to the
intersection of the east river bank at
position 35°32′30″ N, longitude
077°03′25″ W, thence north along the
shoreline to the Highway 17 Swing
Bridge thence west to the point of
origin. All coordinates reference Datum
NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. The following
definitions apply to this section: (1)
Coast Guard Patrol Commander means
a commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer of the Coast Guard who has been
designated by the Commander, Coast
Guard Sector North Carolina.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by the Sector
Commander, Coast Guard Sector North
Carolina with a commissioned, warrant,
or petty officer on board and displaying
a Coast Guard ensign.
(c) Regulations. The general
regulations governing safety zones,
found in 33 CFR 165.23, apply to the
safety zone described in paragraph (a) of
this section.
(1) Except for persons or vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area must:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when
directed to do so by any Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any official
patrol.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8:30 p.m. to 10
p.m. on June 8 & 9 and July 4, 2007.
Dated: April 24, 2007.
Gregory D. Case,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port, Atlantic Beach, North Carolina.
[FR Doc. E7–8814 Filed 5–8–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:44 May 08, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2006–0913; FRL–8124–6]
Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3Aa19
Protein in Cotton; Exemption from the
Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
extension of the temporary exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of the Bacillus thuringiensis
Vip3Aa19 protein in cotton when
applied/used as a plant-incorporated
protectant (PIP). Syngenta Seeds, Inc.
submitted a petition to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), as amended by the Food
Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA),
requesting the temporary tolerance
exemption. This regulation eliminates
the need to establish a maximum
permissible level for residues of the
Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3Aa19 protein
in cotton when applied/used as a PIP on
cotton. The temporary tolerance
exemption expires on May 1, 2008.
DATES: This regulation is effective May
9, 2007. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
July 9, 2007, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2006–0913. To access the
electronic docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, select ‘‘Advanced
Search,’’ then ‘‘Docket Search.’’ Insert
the docket ID number where indicated
and select the ‘‘Submit’’ button. Follow
the instructions on the regulations.gov
website to view the docket index or
access available documents. All
documents in the docket are listed in
the docket index available in
regulations.gov. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\09MYR1.SGM
09MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 9, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26298-26300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8814]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD05-07-040]
RIN 1625 AA00
Safety Zone; Fireworks Display, Pamlico River, Washington, NC
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone during
the ``Washington Summer Festival and the Washington 4th of July
Fireworks'' displays to be held on the waters of the Pamlico River,
Washington, North Carolina. This action is necessary to provide for the
safety of life on navigable waters during the event. This action will
restrict vessel traffic in portions of the Pamlico River adjacent to
Washington, North Carolina during the fireworks display.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30 p.m. on June 8 until 10 p.m. on
July 4, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket [CGD05-07-040] and are available for
inspection or copying at Commander (dpi), Fifth Coast Guard District,
431 Crawford Street, Portsmouth, Virginia 23704-5004, between 9 a.m.
and 2 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CWO Christopher Humphrey, Coast Guard
Sector North Carolina, Atlantic Beach, NC at (252) 247-4525.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. Publishing an NPRM would be
impracticable and contrary to public interest since immediate action is
needed to minimize potential danger to the public during the event. The
necessary information to determine whether the marine event poses a
threat to persons and vessels was not provided with sufficient time to
publish an NPRM. The danger posed by fireworks fall-out makes a safety
zone necessary to provide for the safety of spectator craft and other
vessels transiting the event area. For the safety concerns noted, it is
in the public interest to have these regulations in effect during the
event. The Coast Guard will issue broadcast notice to mariners to
advise vessel operators of navigational restrictions. On scene Coast
Guard and local law enforcement vessels will also provide actual notice
to mariners.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) and for the same reasons, the Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the
effective date would be contrary to the public interest, since
immediate action is needed to ensure the safety of the event
participants, spectator craft and other vessels transiting the event
area. Advance notifications will be made to users of the Pamlico River
via marine information broadcasts, local notice to mariners, commercial
radio stations and area newspapers.
Background and Purpose
On June 8 & 9 and July 4, 2007 the Washington/Beaufort County
Chamber of Commerce and the City of Washington will sponsor the
``Washington Summer Festival'' and the ``4th of July'' fireworks
displays over the waters of the Pamlico River. A fleet of spectator
vessels is anticipated to gather nearby to view the display. Due to the
need for vessel control during the event, vessel traffic will be
temporarily restricted to provide for the safety of participants,
spectators and transiting vessels.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone on specified waters
of the Pamlico River adjacent to Washington, North Carolina. The
regulated area includes a section of the Pamlico River
[[Page 26299]]
from the Highway 17 Swing Bridge south approximately one half mile long
and bounded in width by each shoreline. The rule would be enforced from
8:30 p.m. until 10 p.m. and would restrict general navigation in the
regulated area during the fireworks display. The Coast Guard, at its
discretion, when practical would allow the passage of vessels when the
fireworks displays are not taking place. Except for participants and
vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no person or
vessel would be allowed to enter or remain in the regulated area during
the enforcement period. These regulations are needed to control vessel
traffic during the events to enhance the safety of participants,
spectators and transiting vessels.
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary.
Although this regulation restricts vessel traffic from transiting
Pamlico River during the event, the effect of this regulation will not
be significant due to the limited duration that the regulated area will
be in effect and the extensive advance notifications that will be made
to the maritime community via marine information broadcasts and area
newspapers so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit the Pamlico River during the scheduled events.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule will be enforced for only a short period, from 8:30 p.m. until 10
p.m. Before the enforcement period, we will issue maritime advisories
so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the address listed under
ADDRESSES. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
[[Page 26300]]
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1 which
guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
that there are no factors in this case that would limit the use of a
categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1,
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. This rule fits the category selected from paragraph
(34)(g), as it establishes a safety zone. A final ``Environmental
Analysis Check List'' and a final ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' will be available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T05-040 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T05-040 Safety Zone; Pamlico River, Washington, North
Carolina.
(a) Regulated area. The safety zone includes all waters of Pamlico
River south of the intersection of the Highway 17 Swing Bridge south
along the west river bank to latitude 35[deg]32'19'' N, longitude
077[deg]03'40'' W, thence across the river on a line 045 degrees due
northeast across the river to the intersection of the east river bank
at position 35[deg]32'30'' N, longitude 077[deg]03'25'' W, thence north
along the shoreline to the Highway 17 Swing Bridge thence west to the
point of origin. All coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
(1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a commissioned, warrant, or
petty officer of the Coast Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector North Carolina.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by the
Sector Commander, Coast Guard Sector North Carolina with a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast
Guard ensign.
(c) Regulations. The general regulations governing safety zones,
found in 33 CFR 165.23, apply to the safety zone described in paragraph
(a) of this section.
(1) Except for persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the
regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the regulated area must:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when directed to do so by any
Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any official patrol.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8:30
p.m. to 10 p.m. on June 8 & 9 and July 4, 2007.
Dated: April 24, 2007.
Gregory D. Case,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Atlantic Beach, North
Carolina.
[FR Doc. E7-8814 Filed 5-8-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P