Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Mint Crop Insurance Provisions, 24523-24530 [E7-8340]
Download as PDF
24523
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 85
Thursday, May 3, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Part 457
RIN 0563–AC03
Common Crop Insurance Regulations;
Mint Crop Insurance Provisions
Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation (FCIC) finalizes the
Common Crop Insurance Regulations;
Mint Crop Insurance Provisions to
convert the mint pilot crop insurance
program to a permanent insurance
program for the 2008 and succeeding
crop years.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Linda Williams, Risk Management
Specialist, Product Management,
Product Administration and Standards
Division, Risk Management Agency,
United States Department of
Agriculture, 6501 Beacon Drive, Stop
0812, Room 421, Kansas City, MO,
64133–4676, telephone (816) 926–7730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Executive Order 12866
mmaher on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with $$_JOB
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this rule is
non-significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, it
has not been reviewed by OMB.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Pursuant to the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. chapter 35), the collections of
information in this rule have been
approved by OMB under control
number 0563–0053 through November
30, 2007.
VerDate Mar 15 2010
05:31 Aug 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with
the E-Government Act, to promote the
use of the Internet and other
information technologies to provide
increased opportunities for citizen
access to Government information and
services, and for other purposes.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) establishes
requirements for Federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory
actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector.
This rule contains no Federal mandates
(under the regulatory provisions of title
II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector.
Therefore, this rule is not subject to the
requirements of sections 202 and 205 of
UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section
1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have
sufficient implications to warrant
consultation with the States. The
provisions contained in this rule will
not have a substantial direct effect on
States, or on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. Program requirements for the
Federal crop insurance program are the
same for all producers regardless of the
size of their farming operation. For
instance, all producers are required to
submit an application and acreage
report to establish their insurance
guarantees and compute premium
amounts, and all producers are required
to submit a notice of loss and
production information to determine the
amount of an indemnity payment in the
event of an insured cause of crop loss.
Whether a producer has 10 acres or
1000 acres, there is no difference in the
kind of information collected. To ensure
crop insurance is available to small
entities, the Federal Crop Insurance Act
authorizes FCIC to waive collection of
administrative fees from limited
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
resource farmers. FCIC believes this
waiver helps to ensure that small
entities are given the same opportunities
as large entities to manage their risks
through the use of crop insurance. A
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not
been prepared since this regulation does
not have an impact on small entities,
and, therefore, this regulation is exempt
from the provisions of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance under
No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the
provisions of Executive Order 12372,
which require intergovernmental
consultation with State and local
officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR
part 3015, subpart V, published at 48 FR
29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed in
accordance with Executive Order 12988
on civil justice reform. The provisions
of this rule will not have a retroactive
effect. The provisions of this rule will
preempt State and local laws to the
extent such State and local laws are
inconsistent herewith. With respect to
any direct action taken by FCIC or to
require the insurance provider to take
specific action under the terms of the
crop insurance policy, the
administrative appeal provisions
published at 7 CFR part 11 must be
exhausted before any action against
FCIC for judicial review may be brought.
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on the
quality of the human environment,
health, or safety. Therefore, neither an
Environmental Assessment nor an
Environmental Impact Statement is
needed.
Background
On Monday, February 6, 2006, FCIC
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register at 71
FR 6016–6021 to add 7 CFR 457.169
Mint crop insurance provisions effective
for the 2008 and succeeding crop years.
The public was afforded 60 days to
submit written comments and opinions.
E:\FEDREG\03MYR1.LOC
03MYR1
mmaher on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with $$_JOB
24524
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 85 / Thursday, May 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
The e-mail address listed on the
proposed rule and the Federal
eRulemaking Portal address were not
operational during that time period,
therefore, FCIC published a notice in the
Federal Register at 71 FR 14828 on
March 24, 2006, extending the comment
period for an additional 30 days, until
April 24, 2006.
A total of 20 comments were received
from 3 commenters. The commenters
were an insurance services organization
and 2 approved insurance providers.
The comments received and FCIC’s
responses are as follows:
Comment: Two commenters
recommended adding a definition for
‘‘sales closing date’’ to these provisions
which would define the rules when a
county has two sales closing dates
similar to what has been done in the
Small Grains Crop Provisions. The
definition in the Basic Provisions
assumes a single sales closing date for
the crop.
Response: Neither the Small Grains
Crop Provisions or the Mint Crop
Provisions assume a single sales closing
date. With respect to the actual sales
closing date, both state that it is the
dates contained in the Special
Provisions. Therefore, the Special
Provisions can have separate sales
closing dates for the Winter Coverage
Option and the spring insurance period.
FCIC agrees that there is some confusion
regarding when application must be
made and is adding a definition of
‘‘sales closing date’’ to make it clear that
if the Winter Coverage Option is
selected, applications for both the
Winter Coverage Option and the spring
insurance period must be submitted by
the sales closing date for the Winter
Coverage Option and coverage may not
be changed between the winter and the
spring coverage periods. If the producer
only wants coverage for the spring
insurance period, application must be
made by the spring sales closing date
and changes to the policy can be made
for the following crop year by the next
spring sales closing date.
Comment: Two commenters
recommended the definition of ‘‘type’’
should be retained in the provisions
because the term ‘‘type’’ is used
frequently in the policy. Both
commenters recommended revising the
definition to include all insurable mint
types. One commenter questioned if a
definition of ‘‘type’’ would also have an
effect on the definition of ‘‘mint,’’ which
refers to spearmint or peppermint.
Response: FCIC agrees with the
recommendation to include the
definition of ‘‘type.’’ Section 1 of the
Crop Provisions has been revised
accordingly. It is not appropriate to
VerDate Mar 15 2010
05:31 Aug 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
include all the insurable mint types in
the definition because certain types may
only be insurable in certain counties.
For this reason the definition refers to
the categories of mint designated as a
type in the Special Provisions. The
definition of ‘‘type’’ does not have any
effect on the definition of ‘‘mint.’’ The
definition of ‘‘type’’ refers to the
categories of mint designated as types.
Since mint is defined as spearmint or
peppermint, type would refer to the
designation of different types of
peppermint and spearmint. No change
to the definition of ‘‘mint’’ has been
made.
Comment: Two commenters stated in
regards to section 2, producers use
‘‘still’’ records to separate types (basic
units) and optional units. They asked
whether pre-authorization is required
for commingled production as with
other crops such as corn and soybeans.
Response: Section 2 of the Mint Crop
Provisions states basic units will be
established for each mint type listed in
the Special Provisions. As provided in
the Basic Provisions, producer’s
verifiable ‘‘still’’ records may be used to
establish basic units. However, oil
derived from peppermint and spearmint
types would not be commingled
together. Oil from each mint type, for
example, two different types of
spearmint, are not supposed to be
commingled because each is a separate
unit. According to section 11(a)(2) of the
Mint Crop Provisions, if production is
commingled between basic units, any
commingled production will be
allocated to such units in proportion to
the liability on the harvested acreage for
the units.
Comment: One commenter questioned
whether the term ‘‘stand age’’ belongs in
section 3(b)(2) which lists various things
that ‘‘* * * may reduce the expected
yield below the yield upon which the
insurance guarantee is based * * *’’ The
commenter recommended the term
‘‘stand age’’ could be combined with the
reporting of the planting dates for new
and existing mint acreage currently
listed in sections 3(b)(3) and (4).
Response: FCIC agrees that the stand
age is not something that would
necessarily reduce the yield below the
yield upon which the guarantee is
based. Therefore, FCIC has removed the
term ‘‘stand age’’ from section 3(b)(2).
The stand age reporting requirement is
now contained in section 3(b)(3).
Comment: One commenter
recommended changing ‘‘* * * deemed
to not have attached * * *’’ in section
5 to ‘‘* * * deemed not to have attached
* * *.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Response: FCIC agrees with the
commenter and has made the revision
accordingly.
Comment: Two commenters
expressed concerns regarding the added
language in sections 6(a)(4)(i) and (ii)
that indicates an inspection is required
not only the initial year insured but also
any ‘‘subsequent crop year following an
indemnified loss’’ or when ‘‘an
indemnity was paid the previous crop
year.’’ The commenters questioned if
mint is the second crop on the acreage,
and a loss is incurred but the producer
elects not to accept the loss payment on
the mint whether an inspection is
necessary the subsequent crop year.
They also stated if a claim was filed the
preceding crop year and it was
determined there was an adequate stand
as a result, another inspection should
not be necessary because there was not
a payable loss. One commenter
indicated with this additional
requirement, approved insurance
providers would have to do what they
could to complete claims and
inspections for acreage insured under
the Winter Coverage Option before the
mint was plowed down for the winter.
Response: The provisions contained
in section 6(a)(4)(i) and (ii) were added
to the crop provisions as a result of the
FCIC Board of Directors’ (Board)
approval to convert the mint pilot crop
insurance program to a permanent
program. The Board’s decision was
based on an independent contractor’s
recommendation to modify the selfcertification program to reduce the
program integrity problem caused by
insuring acreage that did not have an
adequate stand at the time insurance
attached. The Board’s Final Resolution
specified that when an indemnity was
paid the previous year’s approved
insurance providers must conduct a
crop inspection to determine if the crop
has an adequate stand.
However, in response to the
commenters, FCIC has revised the
provisions in sections 6(a)(4) and 13(e)
to not require an inspection for the
following year in situations where a
notice of loss has been filed, but it is
determined that there is an adequate
stand on the mint acreage. If there has
been an indemnity paid or a notice of
loss filed and the approved insurance
provider determined there was not an
adequate stand, the acreage must be
inspected before insurance will attach
for the next insurance period. For
example, in those cases where a
producer receives an indemnity
payment for spring mint, or claims a
loss and the approved insurance
provider determines there is not an
adequate stand, an inspection of the
E:\FEDREG\03MYR1.LOC
03MYR1
mmaher on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with $$_JOB
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 85 / Thursday, May 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
acreage insured under the Winter
Coverage Option must be conducted
before coverage begins in October or
November.
Comment: One commenter
recommended rewording the phrase in
section 6(c) ‘‘* * * which provides
coverage for mint that is damaged after
the date coverage ends in the fall and
before the date coverage begins in the
spring * * *’’ The phrase could be
misleading to new producers since they
had no previous coverage that ended in
the fall.
Response: The provision in section
6(c) merely notifies producers that
winter coverage for mint is available.
However, the provision referred to is
duplicative of the provisions in section
13. Therefore, to avoid any potential
conflicts or ambiguity between sections
6(c) and section 13, FCIC is revising
section 6(c) to state that winter coverage
is available in accordance with section
13. Section 13 states when coverage is
provided under the Winter Coverage
Option.
Comment: Two commenters
recommended the reference to actuarial
documents in sections 7(b)(1) and (2) be
changed back to refer to the Special
Provisions as this is where the rotation
and age limitation statements are
located. One commenter suggested since
mint will no longer be a pilot program,
exceptions to the provisions should be
made to allow coverage by written
agreement.
Response: FCIC agrees section 7(b)(1)
and (2) should reference the Special
Provisions. FCIC also agrees with the
comment and has revised the provisions
to allow rotation requirements and age
limitations to be modified by written
agreement.
Comment: Two commenters
questioned whether a two-week period
is sufficient to complete inspections on
all new mint policies as required in
section 8(b). Both commenters
recommended changing it to a 30-day
period to provide adequate time to do
the inspection. This would be consistent
with the 30-day period for many other
crops (i.e. Nursery). One commenter
questioned whether the inspection time
period in section 8(b) also applies to the
subsequent crop year following an
indemnified loss and should it be
referenced in this provision as well. One
commenter also expressed concerns that
the second sentence in section 8(b)
could be confusing and lead to the
impression that coverage starts after the
application is received in the local
office.
Response: Mint is similar to other
perennial crops and must be inspected
to determine if the mint stand is capable
VerDate Mar 15 2010
05:31 Aug 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
of producing the yield used to establish
the production guarantee.
Unfortunately, it is not possible to
change the period for a crop inspection
for the spring insurance period because
the mint plants will not be out of
dormancy 30 days before the start of the
insurance period. Therefore, it cannot
be determined if there is an adequate
stand earlier than two weeks before the
start of the insurance period.
FCIC agrees the provisions should
include the requirement that an
inspection must be made before the next
insurance period following a notice of
loss for which an indemnity was paid or
the approved insurance provider
determined there was not an adequate
stand to determine if the mint acreage
has an adequate stand for the next
insurance period. FCIC also agrees the
second sentence in section 8(b) could be
confusing. Therefore, section 8(b) has
been revised to specify that for the year
of application and for the crop year
following a loss, insurance will attach
on the date coverage begins unless
insurability requirements are not met.
Comment: Three commenters stated
section 8(c)(3) references that coverage
ends at the harvest for each cutting. The
reference should be revised since mint
has multiple cuttings each crop year,
and coverage does not end until the
final cutting of the crop year, as was
done in the pilot program.
Response: FCIC agrees and has
revised section 8(c)(3) to specify
coverage ends at final cutting of the crop
for the crop year.
Comment: Two commenters suggested
revising section 9(a)(2) to state ‘‘Fire,
due to natural causes’’ would clarify
when fire is an insured cause of loss
consistent with the Federal Crop
Insurance Act and the Crop Insurance
Handbook.
Response: In addition to the Mint
Crop Provisions, the Common Crop
Insurance Policy, Basic Provisions are
applicable for mint. Section 12 of the
Basic Provisions states all specified
causes of loss must be due to a naturally
occurring event. Adding the suggested
language would be redundant and could
cause confusion by suggesting that the
other listed causes of loss do not have
to be due to natural causes. Therefore,
no change has been made.
Comment: One commenter suggested
‘‘marketable’’ should be added to
section 11(d)(2). For example, a sample
was distilled on a 7 acre unit that was
cut but not distilled because of rain over
a 3–4 day period. The sample distilled
was a bronze color when it should have
been clear. It was determined the oil
from the sample was not a marketable
product and thus had no value. Mint oil
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24525
is either marketable or not, there is no
middle ground.
Response: Adding ‘‘marketable’’ to
section 11(d)(2) would effectively add
quality adjustment to the policy. Quality
adjustment can only be added to the
policy if there is an objective grading
standard upon which to base the
quality. There are no objective grading
standards for mint oil. In many
instances different qualities of mint oil
(such as smell and taste) are blended by
buyers for varying uses such as gum,
toothpaste, etc. This means it would be
up to the buyer to determine what is
‘‘marketable,’’ which would add a
significant vulnerability to the policy
because the buyer could elect not to
purchase the mint for reasons other than
the quality and shift the loss to the
government. Further, without a
consistent standard, it would be
possible for some producers to be
indemnified under the policy while
others are not based on the subjective
decision of the buyer. No change has
been made.
Comment: One commenter suggested
for section 13(a), deleting the comma
before ‘‘* * * if’’.
Response: FCIC agrees with the
suggestion and has revised section 13(a).
Comment: Two commenters asked if
any new mint acreage planted after the
applicable acreage reporting date as
stated in section 13(d) is to be reported
as insurable or uninsurable. A final
planting date for mint covered under the
Winter Coverage Option cannot be
found in the actuarial documents. The
commenters questioned whether there is
any time between the fall acreage
reporting date and the spring final
planting date that mint should not be
planted for insurance. The commenter
also questioned if they should be
providing the Winter Coverage Option
for mint planted past a certain date.
Response: Mint is a perennial crop
and producers will plant it, depending
upon the region and weather conditions,
during late fall, winter, or early spring.
Therefore, there is no final planting date
because FCIC does not want to dictate
to the producer when the crop must be
planted. However, all acreage of mint in
the county must be reported on the
acreage report. Therefore, mint planted
after the acreage reporting date must be
reported within two weeks of planting.
FCIC recognizes that, depending on
when it is planted, newly planted mint
may not have attained an adequate
stand by the date coverage begins. FCIC
is revising the provisions to clarify that
all mint must have attained an adequate
stand by the date coverage begins before
it can be reported as insurable. Mint that
does not have an adequate stand on the
E:\FEDREG\03MYR1.LOC
03MYR1
mmaher on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with $$_JOB
24526
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 85 / Thursday, May 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
date coverage began, or that was planted
after coverage began, must be reported
as uninsured.
Comment: Two commenters stated
section 13(e)(4) of the proposed rule
referenced new mint acreage that is
planted during the Winter Coverage
Option insurance period but a final
planting date could not be found for the
Winter Coverage Option.
Response: It is not practical to specify
a final planting date under the Winter
Coverage Option for new mint acreage
because mint is usually planted at any
time throughout the Winter Coverage
Option insurance period, depending on
conditions. However, as stated above,
FCIC has revised the provisions to make
it clear that before it is insured, the new
mint acreage must have attained an
adequate stand. Therefore, mint acreage
planted during the Winter Coverage
Option insurance period must be
reported as uninsured.
Comment: Two comments were
received regarding the provisions
contained in section 13(e)(4)(i), which
requires that new mint acreage planted
during the Winter Coverage Option be
inspected and accepted for the first crop
year. Insurance providers must notify
the producer of acceptance or rejection
of the application no later than
November 15 adding that failure to
notify by then will indicate acceptance.
They questioned how the November 15
deadline fits with the December 15
acreage reporting date for acreage
insured under the Winter Coverage
Option. They also questioned how it
works for new mint acreage planted
after the Winter Coverage Option
acreage reporting date. They asked
whether it is covered by section
13(e)(4)(iv), allowing certification by the
producer in place of the insurance
provider’s inspection for any mint
acreage planted after the initial
inspection. They asked what happens if
additional acreage is planted after the
inspection as there does not seem to be
a final plant date for mint under the
option.
Response: There were no subparagraphs (i) and (iv) in section
13(e)(4) of the proposed rule as
indicated by the commenters. FCIC
believes the commenters
unintentionally combined proposed
section 13(e)(4) with sub-paragraphs (i)
and (iv) from proposed section 13(e)(5).
Section 13(e)(4) pertained to new mint
planted after the acreage reporting date,
and section 13(e)(5)(i) and (iv) pertained
to all mint, including newly planted and
established, for which a premium rate is
provided for the Winter Coverage
Option. As stated above, FCIC has
revised section 13(e) to require that all
VerDate Mar 15 2010
05:31 Aug 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
mint have an adequate stand at the time
coverage begins to be insured. Mint
planted during the Winter Coverage
Option insurance period cannot meet
this requirement and, therefore, must be
reported as uninsured. This will
eliminate any confusion regarding the
insurability of mint planted after the
date coverage begins and no additional
inspection will be required of such
acreage until the start of the next
insurance period. However, FCIC has
added provisions to section 8(b)
requiring that mint acreage reported as
being planted during the Winter
Coverage Option insurance period be
inspected to determine whether it has
attained an adequate stand before the
date coverage begins for the spring
insurance period.
Comment: Two commenters stated
sections 13(e)(4)(ii) and (iii) do not
appear to apply to ‘‘new mint acreage’’
since they address inspection or
certification in subsequent crop years.
These should remain separate
subparagraphs (5) and (6) as in the
current pilot Crop Provisions.
Response: Section 13(e)(4) of the
proposed rule did not contain subparagraphs (ii) and (iii) as indicated by
the commenters. FCIC believes the
commenters unintentionally combined
proposed section 13(e)(4) with subparagraphs (ii) and (iii) from proposed
section 13(e)(5). The requirement that
mint acreage must be inspected and
accepted for the crop year following a
loss that caused an inadequate stand or
certified as having an adequate stand
after the first year of coverage was
contained in section 13(e)(5), which
pertains to all mint types in the county.
As stated above, FCIC has clarified that
all mint must have an adequate stand to
be insured and mint planted during the
Winter Coverage Option insurance
period must be reported as uninsured.
Therefore, section 13(e) was correct in
not making paragraph (5) applicable to
new mint acreage. No change has been
made in response to this comment.
Comment: One commenter questioned
if the ‘‘after’’ should be deleted from
section 13(e)(5)(iii) so it would read ‘‘*
* * on the date coverage begins the first
crop year * * *’’.
Response: Section 13(e)(5)(i) of the
proposed rule required all mint types to
be inspected and accepted the first crop
year of insurance. Therefore, there is no
need for the producer to provide such
a certification in the first year and the
provisions have been so revised. In
addition, as stated above, the provision
has been revised to require inspection
the year after a reported loss that has
caused an inadequate stand. Therefore,
section 13(e)(4)(iii) will now require
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
producers to certify to an adequate
stand each crop year unless there was a
reported loss that has caused an
inadequate stand.
Comment: One commenter stated
section 13(e)(5)(iv) seems to indicate the
producer could plant throughout the
winter coverage insurance period and
obtain coverage on new mint acreage
provided the two week notice of
planting was met.
Response: As stated above, because
mint is a perennial crop, producers will
plant, depending upon the region and
weather conditions, during late fall,
winter, or early spring. However, the
requirement that mint must have an
adequate stand at the time coverage
begins to be insurable applies to mint
under the Winter Coverage Option.
Since mint planted during the Winter
Coverage Option insurance period could
never have an adequate stand before
coverage begins, it must be reported as
uninsurable. Therefore, FCIC has
removed section 13(e)(5)(iv) because it
suggests that mint planted during the
Winter Coverage Option insurance
period is insurable as long as it is
certified on the acreage report and this
is not correct.
Comment: Regarding section 13(i),
three commenters asked if since this
provision is only applicable to the
Winter Coverage Option, should the
correct production to count be 60
percent of the production guarantee as
indicated in sections 13(b) and (l)(1).
Response: Section 13(i) was added to
address those instances when a
producer wishes to destroy a portion of
mint acreage during the Winter
Coverage Option insurance period and
before it can be determined if there is an
adequate stand on the acreage. The
producer must agree in writing that no
indemnity will be paid for the acreage
destroyed with consent. The total
production to be counted for those acres
destroyed with consent will not be less
than the approved yield. Section 13(b)
states the guarantee under the Winter
Coverage Option is ‘‘equal to 60 percent
of the guarantee determined under
section 3 of the Crop Provisions.’’
In addition to the changes described
above, FCIC has modified section 11(c)
to clarify the claim for indemnity
calculation when more than one mint
type is insured.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457
Crop insurance, Mint, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Final Rule
Accordingly, as set forth in the
preamble, the Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation amends 7 CFR part 457 for
■
E:\FEDREG\03MYR1.LOC
03MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 85 / Thursday, May 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
the 2008 and succeeding crop years as
follows:
PART 457—COMMON CROP
INSURANCE REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR
part 457 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(p).
2. Section 457.169 is added to read as
follows:
■
§ 457.169
Mint crop insurance provisions.
mmaher on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with $$_JOB
The Mint Crop Insurance Provisions
for the 2008 and succeeding crop years
are as follows:
FCIC policies:
United States Department of Agriculture
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
Reinsured policies:
(Appropriate title for insurance
provider)
Both FCIC and reinsured policies:
Mint Crop Insurance Provisions
1. Definitions
Adequate Stand. A population of live
mint plants that equals or exceeds the
minimum required number of plants or
percentage of ground cover, as specified
in the Special Provisions.
Appraisal. A method of determining
potential production by harvesting and
distilling a representative sample of the
mint crop.
Cover crop. A small grain crop seeded
into mint acreage to reduce soil erosion
and wind damage.
Cutting. Severance of the upper part
of the mint plant from its stalk and
roots.
Distillation. A process of extracting
mint oil from harvested mint plants by
heating and condensing.
Existing mint. Mint planted for
harvest during a previous crop year.
Ground cover. Mint plants, including
mint foliage and stolons, grown on
insured acreage.
Harvest. Removal of mint from the
windrow.
Mint. A perennial spearmint or
peppermint plant of the family Labiatae
and the genus Mentha grown for
distillation of mint oil.
Mint oil. Oil produced by the
distillation of harvested mint plants.
New mint. Mint planted for harvest
for the first time.
Planted acreage. In addition to the
definition in the Basic Provisions, land
in which mint stolons have been placed
in a manner appropriate for the planting
method and at the correct depth into a
seedbed that has been properly
prepared.
Pound. 16 ounces avoirdupois.
Sales closing date. In lieu of the
definition contained in the Basic
VerDate Mar 15 2010
05:31 Aug 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
24527
Provisions, if you select the Winter
Coverage Option, application for the
Winter Coverage Option will include
application for the spring insurance
period and must be submitted by the
sales closing date for the Winter
Coverage Option contained in the
Special Provisions. Coverage may not be
changed between the end of the Winter
Coverage Option insurance period and
the beginning of the spring insurance
period. If you do not elect the Winter
Coverage Option, application must be
made by the spring sales closing date
contained in the Special Provisions and
all policy changes must be made by that
date. If you later elect the Winter
Coverage Option, you may select your
coverage under the Winter Coverage
Option.
Stolon. A stem at or just below the
surface of the ground that produces new
mint plants at its tips or nodes.
Type. A category of mint identified as
a type in the Special Provisions.
Windrow. Mint that is cut and placed
in a row.
(3) The stand age;
(4) The date existing mint acreage was
planted;
(5) The date new mint acreage was
initially planted; and
(6) The type of mint.
(c) If you fail to notify us of any
circumstance that may reduce your
yields or insurable acres from previous
levels, we will reduce your production
guarantee and insurable acres at any
time we become aware of the
circumstance based on our estimate of
the effect of damage to or removal of
mint plants or stolons; stand age; change
in practices; and any other circumstance
that may affect the yield potential or
insurable acres of the insured crop.
2. Unit Division
In accordance with section 2 of the
Basic Provisions, the cancellation date
is September 30 and the termination
date is November 30. If your policy is
terminated after insurance has attached
for the subsequent crop year, coverage
will be deemed not to have attached to
the acreage for the subsequent crop year.
A basic unit, as defined in section 1
of the Basic Provisions, will be divided
into additional basic units by each mint
type designated in the Special
Provisions.
3. Insurance Guarantees, Coverage
Levels, and Prices for Determining
Indemnities
(a) In addition to the requirements of
section 3 of the Basic Provisions, you
may only select one price election for all
the mint in the county insured under
this policy unless the actuarial
documents provide different price
elections by type, in which case you
may only select one price election for
each type designated in the actuarial
documents. The price elections you
choose for each type must have the
same percentage relationship to the
maximum price election offered by us
for each type. For example, if you
choose 100 percent of the maximum
price election for one specific type, you
must also choose 100 percent of the
maximum price election for other types.
(b) In addition to the provisions in
section 3 of the Basic Provisions, you
must report:
(1) The total amount of mint oil
produced from insurable acreage for all
cuttings for each unit;
(2) Any damage to or removal of mint
plants or stolons; any change in
practices; or any other circumstance that
may reduce the expected yield below
the yield upon which the production
guarantee is based, and the number of
affected acres;
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
4. Contract Changes
In accordance with section 4 of the
Basic Provisions, the contract change
date is June 30 preceding the
cancellation date.
5. Cancellation and Termination Dates
6. Insured Crop
(a) In accordance with the provisions
of section 8 of the Basic Provisions, the
crop insured will be all mint types in
the county for which a premium rate is
provided by the actuarial documents:
(1) In which you have a share;
(2) That are planted for harvest and
distillation for mint oil;
(3) That have an adequate stand by
the date coverage begins; and
(4) That have been:
(i) Inspected and accepted by us for
the first crop year you are insured; or
(ii) Certified by you as having an
adequate stand on the date coverage
begins after the first crop year you are
insured unless an inspection is required
under section 8(b).
(b) In lieu of the provisions of section
8 of the Basic Provisions that prohibit
insurance of a second crop harvested
following the same crop in the same
crop year, multiple harvests of mint on
the same acreage will be considered as
one mint crop.
(c) In addition to the coverages
provided in these Crop Provisions, you
may also elect the Winter Coverage
Option in accordance with section 13.
E:\FEDREG\03MYR1.LOC
03MYR1
24528
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 85 / Thursday, May 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
7. Insurable Acreage
9. Causes of Loss
(a) Mint interplanted with a cover
crop will not be considered interplanted
for the purposes of section 9 of the Basic
Provisions if the cover crop is destroyed
prior to its maturity and is not harvested
as grain.
(b) In addition to the provisions of
section 9 of the Basic Provisions, unless
allowed by written agreement, we will
not insure any acreage that:
(1) Does not meet rotation
requirements contained in the Special
Provisions; or
(2) Exceeds existing mint age
limitations contained in the Special
Provisions.
(a) In accordance with the provisions
of section 12 of the Basic Provisions,
insurance is provided only against the
following causes of loss that occur
during the insurance period:
(1) Adverse weather conditions;
(2) Fire;
(3) Insects or plant disease (except
Verticillium Wilt disease), but not
damage due to insufficient or improper
application of control measures;
(4) Wildlife;
(5) Earthquake;
(6) Volcanic eruption; or
(7) Failure of the irrigation water
supply, if caused by an insured cause of
loss listed in sections 9(a)(1) through (6)
that occurs during the insurance period.
(b) In addition to the causes of loss
excluded in section 12 of the Basic
Provisions, we will not insure against
any loss of production that:
(1) Occurs after harvest;
(2) Is due to your failure to distill the
crop, unless such failure is due to actual
physical damage to the crop caused by
an insured cause of loss that occurs
during the insurance period; or
(3) Is due to Verticillium Wilt disease.
mmaher on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with $$_JOB
8. Insurance Period
In lieu of the provisions of section 11
of the Basic Provisions:
(a) Coverage begins on each unit or
part of a unit for acreage with an
adequate stand on the following
calendar dates:
(1) June 16 in Indiana, Montana, and
Wisconsin;
(2) May 16 in Washington; and
(3) For all other states, the date as
provided in the Special Provisions.
(b) For the year of application, for
when you have reported planting mint
during the Winter Coverage Option
insurance period, or for any insurance
period following the payment of an
indemnity or a reported loss where the
crop was determined to not have an
adequate stand, we will inspect all mint
acreage within the two-week period
before coverage begins (If you have
elected the Winter Coverage Option,
such inspection will occur not later than
November 15).
(1) Insurance will attach on the date
coverage begins, as specified in section
8(a), unless we inspect the acreage
during the two-week period and
determine it does not meet insurability
requirements as specified in section 2 of
the Basic Provisions, the application, or
these Crop Provisions.
(2) You must provide any information
we require for the crop or to determine
the condition of the crop.
(c) Coverage ends for each unit or part
of a unit at the earliest of:
(1) Total destruction of the insured
crop on the unit;
(2) Final adjustment of a loss;
(3) The final cutting for the crop year;
(4) Abandonment of the crop; or
(5) The following calendar date:
(i) September 30 in Indiana and
Wisconsin;
(ii) October 15 in Montana;
(iii) October 31 in Washington; and
(iv) For all other states, the date as
provided in the Special Provisions.
VerDate Mar 15 2010
05:31 Aug 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
10. Duties In The Event of Damage or
Loss
In addition to your duties contained
in section 14 of the Basic Provisions, if
you discover that any insured mint is
damaged, or if you intend to claim an
indemnity on any unit:
(a) You must give us notice of
probable loss at least 15 days before the
beginning of any cutting or immediately
if probable loss is discovered after
cutting has begun or when cutting
should have begun; and
(b) You must timely harvest and
completely distill a sample of the crop
on any acreage you do not intend to
harvest, as designated by us, to
determine if an indemnity is due.
11. Settlement of Claim
(a) We will determine your loss on a
unit basis. In the event you are unable
to provide separate, acceptable
production records:
(1) For any optional units, we will
combine all optional units for which
such production records were not
provided; or
(2) For any basic units, we will
allocate any commingled production to
such units in proportion to our liability
on the harvested acreage for the units.
(b) We may defer appraisals until the
crop reaches maturity or the date mint
harvest is general in the area.
(c) In the event of loss or damage
covered by this policy, we will settle
your claim by:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(1) Multiplying the insured acreage
for each type, if applicable, by its
respective production guarantee;
(2) Multiplying the result of section
11(c)(1) by the respective price election
for each type, if applicable;
(3) Totaling the results of section
11(c)(2);
(4) Multiplying the total production to
be counted (see section 11(d)) of each
type, if applicable, by its respective
price election;
(5) Totaling the results of section
11(c)(4);
(6) Subtracting the result in section
11(c)(5) from the result of section
11(c)(3); and
(7) Multiplying the result in section
11(c)(6) by your share.
For example:
Assume that you have a 100 percent
share in 100 acres of peppermint in the
unit, with a production guarantee of 50
pounds of oil per acre and a price
election of $12 per pound. Because an
insured cause of loss has reduced
production, you only harvest and distill
2,500 pounds of peppermint oil. Your
indemnity would be calculated as
follows:
(1) 100 acres x 50 pounds = 5,000
pound production guarantee;
(2) 5,000 pound production guarantee
x $12 price election = $60,000 value of
production guarantee;
(3) 2,500 pounds production to count
x $12 price election = $30,000 value of
production to count;
(4) $60,000 - $30,000 = $30,000 loss;
and
(5) $30,000 x 100 percent share =
$30,000 indemnity payment.
(d) The total production to count (in
pounds of oil) from all insurable acreage
on the unit will include:
(1) All appraised production as
follows:
(i) Not less than the production
guarantee per acre for acreage:
(A) That is abandoned;
(B) That is put to another use without
our consent;
(C) For which you fail to meet the
requirements contained in section 10 of
these Crop Provisions;
(D) That is damaged solely by
uninsured causes; or
(E) For which you fail to provide
production records that are acceptable
to us;
(ii) All production lost due to
uninsured causes;
(iii) All unharvested production;
(iv) All potential production on
insured acreage that you intend to put
to another use or abandon with our
consent:
(A) If you do not elect to continue to
care for the crop, we may give you our
E:\FEDREG\03MYR1.LOC
03MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 85 / Thursday, May 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
consent to put the acreage to another
use if you agree to leave intact and
provide sufficient care for representative
samples of the crop in locations
acceptable to us (The amount of
production to count for such acreage
will be based on the harvested
production or appraisals from the
samples at the time harvest should have
occurred. If you do not leave the
required samples intact, or fail to
provide sufficient care for the samples,
the amount of production to count will
be not less than the production
guarantee per acre); or
(B) If you elect to continue to care for
the crop, the amount of production to
count for the acreage will be the
harvested production, or the appraised
production at the time the crop reaches
maturity.
(2) All harvested production from the
insurable acreage.
(e) Harvested production must be
distilled to determine production to
count.
(f) Any oil distilled from plants
growing in the mint will be counted as
mint oil on a weight basis.
(g) You are responsible for the cost of
distilling samples for loss adjustment
purposes.
12. Late and Prevented Planting.
The late and prevented planting
provisions of the Basic Provisions are
not applicable.
mmaher on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with $$_JOB
13. Winter Coverage Option
(a) The provisions of this option are
continuous and will be attached to and
made part of your insurance policy if:
(1) You elect the Winter Coverage
Option on your application, or on a
form approved by us, on or before the
fall sales closing date for the crop year
in which you wish to insure mint under
this option, and pay the additional
premium indicated in the actuarial
documents for this optional coverage;
and
(2) You have not elected coverage
under the Catastrophic Risk Protection
Endorsement.
(b) This option provides a production
guarantee equal to 60 percent of the
production guarantee determined under
section 3 of these Crop Provisions.
(c) If you elect this option, all of the
insurable acreage in the county will be
insured by this option.
(d) In addition to the requirements of
section 6 of the Basic Provisions, any
acreage of new mint planted after the
applicable acreage reporting date must
be certified by you and reported to us
within two weeks of planting.
(e) In lieu of section 6(a) of these Crop
Provisions, the crop insured will be all
VerDate Mar 15 2010
05:31 Aug 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
mint types in the county for which a
premium rate is provided by the
actuarial documents:
(1) In which you have a share;
(2) That are planted for harvest and
distillation as mint oil;
(3) That have an adequate stand on
the date coverage begins (newly planted
mint types must be reported in
accordance with section 8(d) but they
must be reported as uninsured unless
they have an adequate stand by the date
coverage begins); and
(4) That has been:
(i) Inspected and accepted by us for
the first crop year you are insured (We
will inspect all mint acreage and will
notify you of the acceptance or rejection
of your application not later than
November 15. If we fail to notify you by
that date, your application will be
accepted unless other grounds exist to
reject the application, as specified in the
Basic Provisions, the application, or
these Crop Provisions);
(ii) Inspected and accepted by us not
later than November 15 for the crop year
following the payment of an indemnity
or a reported loss unless the crop was
determined to have an adequate stand
(If we determined there was an adequate
stand after the loss was reported, no
inspection is necessary); or
(iii) Certified by you as having an
adequate stand on the date coverage
begins unless an inspection is required
under section 13(e)(4)(ii).
(f) Coverage under this option begins:
(1) On existing mint acreage with an
adequate stand at 12:01 a.m. on the
calendar date listed below:
(i) October 1 in Indiana and
Wisconsin;
(ii) October 16 in Montana;
(iii) November 1 in Washington; and
(iv) For all other states, the date as
provided in the Special Provisions.
(2) On new mint acreage, that has an
adequate stand by the date coverage
begins as specified in section 13(f)(1).
(g) Coverage under this option ends
on the unit or part of the unit at 11:59
p.m. on the calendar date listed below:
(1) June 15 in Indiana, Montana, and
Wisconsin;
(2) May 15 in Washington; and
(3) For all other states, the date as
provided in the Special Provisions.
(h) In lieu of section 10(a) of these
Crop Provisions, you must give notice of
probable loss within 72 hours after you
discover any insured mint is damaged
and does not have an adequate stand,
but no later than the date coverage ends
for this option.
(i) In addition to the requirements of
section 10 of these Crop Provisions, you
must give us notice if you want our
consent to put any mint acreage to
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24529
another use before a determination can
be made if there is an adequate stand on
the acreage. We will inspect the acreage
and you must agree in writing no
payment or indemnity will be made for
the acreage put to another use. The total
production to be counted for acreage put
to another use with our consent in
accordance with this section will not be
less than the approved yield.
(j) In addition to section 11(a) of these
Crop Provisions we will make a Winter
Coverage Option payment only on
acreage that had an adequate stand on
the date that insurance attached if the
adequate stand was lost due to an
insured cause of loss occurring within
the Winter Coverage Option insurance
period and the acreage consists of at
least 20 acres or 20 percent of the
insurable planted acres in the unit.
(k) In lieu of section 11(b) of these
Crop Provisions, we may defer
appraisals until the date coverage ends
under this option.
(l) In lieu of section 11(c) of these
Crop Provisions, in the event of loss or
damage covered by this policy, we will
settle your claim by:
(1) Multiplying 60 percent by your
production guarantee per acre;
(2) Multiplying the result in section
13(l)(1) by the number of acres that do
not have an adequate stand;
(3) Multiplying the result in section
13(l)(2) by the price election; and
(4) Multiplying the result in section
13(l)(3) by your share.
For example:
Assume that you have a 100 percent
share in 100 acres of mint with a
production guarantee of 50 pounds of
oil per acre and a price election of $12
per pound. Also assume that you do not
have an adequate stand on 50 acres by
the date coverage ends for this option
because an insured cause has damaged
the stand. Your Winter Coverage Option
payment would be calculated as
follows:
(1) 60 percent x 50 pound production
guarantee = 30 pound production
guarantee per acre;
(2) 30 pound production guarantee
per acre x 50 acres without an adequate
stand = 1,500 pounds;
(3) 1,500 pounds x $12 price election
= $18,000; and
(4) $18,000 x 100 percent share =
$18,000 Winter Coverage Option
payment.
(m) In lieu of section 11(d) of these
Crop Provisions, the population of live
mint plants to be counted from
insurable acreage on the unit will be not
less than the population of live mint
plants in an adequate stand for acreage:
(1) That is abandoned;
(2) That is put to another use without
our consent;
E:\FEDREG\03MYR1.LOC
03MYR1
24530
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 85 / Thursday, May 3, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(3) For which you fail to meet the
requirements contained in section 13(h);
or
(4) That is damaged solely by
uninsured causes.
(n) Acreage for which a Winter
Coverage Option payment has been
made is no longer insurable under the
Crop Provisions for the current crop
year. Any mint production subsequently
harvested from uninsured acreage for
the crop year and not kept separate from
production from insured acreage will be
considered production to count.
(o) Acreage for which a Winter
Coverage Option payment has been
made will receive an amount of
production of zero when computing
subsequent year’s approved yield.
(p) Sections 11(e), (f), and (g) of these
Crop Provisions do not apply to this
option.
Signed in Washington, DC, on April 25,
2007.
Eldon Gould,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E7–8340 Filed 5–2–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–08–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 966
[Docket No. AMS–FV–06–0208; FV07–966–
1 FIR]
Tomatoes Grown in Florida; Change in
Handling Requirements
Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
mmaher on DSK3CLS3C1PROD with $$_JOB
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is adopting, as a
final rule, without change, an interim
final rule changing the handling
requirements currently prescribed under
the Florida Tomato marketing order
(order). The order regulates the handling
of tomatoes grown in Florida, and is
administered locally by the Florida
Tomato Committee (Committee). This
rule continues in effect the action that
limited the use of inverted lids on
tomato containers to the handler whose
information initially appeared on the
lid. This rule helps ensure that lids do
not contain the information for more
than one active handler and aids in
maintaining the positive identification
and traceability of Florida tomatoes.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William Pimental, Marketing Specialist;
or Christian Nissen, Regional Manager,
VerDate Mar 15 2010
05:31 Aug 19, 2011
Jkt 223001
Southeast Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA; Telephone: (863) 324–
3375, Fax: (863) 325–8793, or E-mail:
William.Pimental@usda.gov or
Christian.Nissen@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule
is issued under Marketing Agreement
No. 125 and Order No. 966, both as
amended (7 CFR part 966), regulating
the handling of tomatoes grown in
Florida, hereinafter referred to as the
‘‘order.’’ The order is effective under the
Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act
of 1937, as amended (7 U.S.C. 601–674),
hereinafter referred to as the ‘‘Act.’’
USDA is issuing this rule in
conformance with Executive Order
12866.
This rule has been reviewed under
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform. This rule is not intended to
have retroactive effect. This rule will
not preempt any State or local laws,
regulations, or policies, unless they
present an irreconcilable conflict with
this rule.
The Act provides that administrative
proceedings must be exhausted before
parties may file suit in court. Under
section 608c(15)(A) of the Act, any
handler subject to an order may file
with USDA a petition stating that the
order, any provision of the order, or any
obligation imposed in connection with
the order is not in accordance with law
and request a modification of the order
or to be exempted therefrom. A handler
is afforded the opportunity for a hearing
on the petition. After the hearing USDA
would rule on the petition. The Act
provides that the district court of the
United States in any district in which
the handler is an inhabitant, or has his
or her principal place of business, has
jurisdiction to review USDA’s ruling on
the petition, provided an action is filed
not later than 20 days after the date of
the entry of the ruling.
This rule continues in effect the
action that changed the handling
requirements currently prescribed under
the order. This rule continues to limit
the use of inverted lids on tomato
containers to the handler whose
information initially appeared on the
lid. This rule helps ensure that lids do
not contain the information for more
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
than one active handler and aids in
maintaining the positive identification
and traceability of Florida tomatoes.
This action was unanimously
recommended by the Committee at a
meeting on October 4, 2006.
Section 966.52 of the order provides
the authority to establish pack and
container requirements for tomatoes
grown under the order. This includes
fixing the size, weight, capacity,
dimensions, markings, or pack of the
container or containers which may be
used in the handling of tomatoes.
Section 966.323 of the order’s
administrative rules prescribes the
handling regulations for Florida
tomatoes. Section 966.323(a)(3)
delineates the requisite container
requirements for weight, markings, and
appearance. The section specifies, in
part, that each container or lid must
show the name and address of the
registered handler.
The majority of Florida tomatoes are
packed in containers that have a
separate lid. Most lids are preprinted
with the handler’s name and address. In
addition, most lids can be inverted by
reversing the lid so the blank side is on
the outside, and the preprinted
information is flipped to the underside
of the lid. This is done so new
information can be printed on the lid.
This rule amends § 966.323(a)(3) by
limiting the use of inverted lids on
tomato containers to the handler whose
information first appeared on the lid.
Inverted lids have been used in
minimal quantities in past seasons,
usually when a tomato packing
operation was purchased by another
entity. Any containers included in the
purchase could be used by the
purchasing handler by inverting the lids
so the purchaser’s information could be
affixed on the clean side. Usually there
were not many containers remaining, so
the containers requiring inverted lids
were fairly limited in quantity.
Recently, container sales companies
have started offering their container
overruns at discounted prices to tomato
handlers. These containers usually have
preprinted handler and product
information on the lids. The Committee
is concerned this could significantly
increase the number of inverted lids
being used by the industry and could
pose problems with the positive
identification and traceability of
tomatoes.
In their discussion of this issue, the
Committee agreed the ability to
positively identify product is a necessity
in today’s marketplace. The Committee
expressed concern that the practice of
E:\FEDREG\03MYR1.LOC
03MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 85 (Thursday, May 3, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24523-24530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8340]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 85 / Thursday, May 3, 2007 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 24523]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
7 CFR Part 457
RIN 0563-AC03
Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Mint Crop Insurance Provisions
AGENCY: Federal Crop Insurance Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation (FCIC) finalizes the
Common Crop Insurance Regulations; Mint Crop Insurance Provisions to
convert the mint pilot crop insurance program to a permanent insurance
program for the 2008 and succeeding crop years.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 4, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Linda Williams, Risk Management
Specialist, Product Management, Product Administration and Standards
Division, Risk Management Agency, United States Department of
Agriculture, 6501 Beacon Drive, Stop 0812, Room 421, Kansas City, MO,
64133-4676, telephone (816) 926-7730.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
rule is non-significant for the purposes of Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, it has not been reviewed by OMB.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Pursuant to the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. chapter 35), the collections of information in this rule
have been approved by OMB under control number 0563-0053 through
November 30, 2007.
E-Government Act Compliance
FCIC is committed to complying with the E-Government Act, to
promote the use of the Internet and other information technologies to
provide increased opportunities for citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other purposes.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA)
establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal governments and
the private sector. This rule contains no Federal mandates (under the
regulatory provisions of title II of the UMRA) for State, local, and
tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this rule is not
subject to the requirements of sections 202 and 205 of UMRA.
Executive Order 13132
It has been determined under section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, that this rule does not have sufficient implications to
warrant consultation with the States. The provisions contained in this
rule will not have a substantial direct effect on States, or on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
FCIC certifies that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Program
requirements for the Federal crop insurance program are the same for
all producers regardless of the size of their farming operation. For
instance, all producers are required to submit an application and
acreage report to establish their insurance guarantees and compute
premium amounts, and all producers are required to submit a notice of
loss and production information to determine the amount of an indemnity
payment in the event of an insured cause of crop loss. Whether a
producer has 10 acres or 1000 acres, there is no difference in the kind
of information collected. To ensure crop insurance is available to
small entities, the Federal Crop Insurance Act authorizes FCIC to waive
collection of administrative fees from limited resource farmers. FCIC
believes this waiver helps to ensure that small entities are given the
same opportunities as large entities to manage their risks through the
use of crop insurance. A Regulatory Flexibility Analysis has not been
prepared since this regulation does not have an impact on small
entities, and, therefore, this regulation is exempt from the provisions
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605).
Federal Assistance Program
This program is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.450.
Executive Order 12372
This program is not subject to the provisions of Executive Order
12372, which require intergovernmental consultation with State and
local officials. See the Notice related to 7 CFR part 3015, subpart V,
published at 48 FR 29115, June 24, 1983.
Executive Order 12988
This rule has been reviewed in accordance with Executive Order
12988 on civil justice reform. The provisions of this rule will not
have a retroactive effect. The provisions of this rule will preempt
State and local laws to the extent such State and local laws are
inconsistent herewith. With respect to any direct action taken by FCIC
or to require the insurance provider to take specific action under the
terms of the crop insurance policy, the administrative appeal
provisions published at 7 CFR part 11 must be exhausted before any
action against FCIC for judicial review may be brought.
Environmental Evaluation
This action is not expected to have a significant economic impact
on the quality of the human environment, health, or safety. Therefore,
neither an Environmental Assessment nor an Environmental Impact
Statement is needed.
Background
On Monday, February 6, 2006, FCIC published a notice of proposed
rulemaking in the Federal Register at 71 FR 6016-6021 to add 7 CFR
457.169 Mint crop insurance provisions effective for the 2008 and
succeeding crop years.
The public was afforded 60 days to submit written comments and
opinions.
[[Page 24524]]
The e-mail address listed on the proposed rule and the Federal
eRulemaking Portal address were not operational during that time
period, therefore, FCIC published a notice in the Federal Register at
71 FR 14828 on March 24, 2006, extending the comment period for an
additional 30 days, until April 24, 2006.
A total of 20 comments were received from 3 commenters. The
commenters were an insurance services organization and 2 approved
insurance providers. The comments received and FCIC's responses are as
follows:
Comment: Two commenters recommended adding a definition for ``sales
closing date'' to these provisions which would define the rules when a
county has two sales closing dates similar to what has been done in the
Small Grains Crop Provisions. The definition in the Basic Provisions
assumes a single sales closing date for the crop.
Response: Neither the Small Grains Crop Provisions or the Mint Crop
Provisions assume a single sales closing date. With respect to the
actual sales closing date, both state that it is the dates contained in
the Special Provisions. Therefore, the Special Provisions can have
separate sales closing dates for the Winter Coverage Option and the
spring insurance period. FCIC agrees that there is some confusion
regarding when application must be made and is adding a definition of
``sales closing date'' to make it clear that if the Winter Coverage
Option is selected, applications for both the Winter Coverage Option
and the spring insurance period must be submitted by the sales closing
date for the Winter Coverage Option and coverage may not be changed
between the winter and the spring coverage periods. If the producer
only wants coverage for the spring insurance period, application must
be made by the spring sales closing date and changes to the policy can
be made for the following crop year by the next spring sales closing
date.
Comment: Two commenters recommended the definition of ``type''
should be retained in the provisions because the term ``type'' is used
frequently in the policy. Both commenters recommended revising the
definition to include all insurable mint types. One commenter
questioned if a definition of ``type'' would also have an effect on the
definition of ``mint,'' which refers to spearmint or peppermint.
Response: FCIC agrees with the recommendation to include the
definition of ``type.'' Section 1 of the Crop Provisions has been
revised accordingly. It is not appropriate to include all the insurable
mint types in the definition because certain types may only be
insurable in certain counties. For this reason the definition refers to
the categories of mint designated as a type in the Special Provisions.
The definition of ``type'' does not have any effect on the definition
of ``mint.'' The definition of ``type'' refers to the categories of
mint designated as types. Since mint is defined as spearmint or
peppermint, type would refer to the designation of different types of
peppermint and spearmint. No change to the definition of ``mint'' has
been made.
Comment: Two commenters stated in regards to section 2, producers
use ``still'' records to separate types (basic units) and optional
units. They asked whether pre-authorization is required for commingled
production as with other crops such as corn and soybeans.
Response: Section 2 of the Mint Crop Provisions states basic units
will be established for each mint type listed in the Special
Provisions. As provided in the Basic Provisions, producer's verifiable
``still'' records may be used to establish basic units. However, oil
derived from peppermint and spearmint types would not be commingled
together. Oil from each mint type, for example, two different types of
spearmint, are not supposed to be commingled because each is a separate
unit. According to section 11(a)(2) of the Mint Crop Provisions, if
production is commingled between basic units, any commingled production
will be allocated to such units in proportion to the liability on the
harvested acreage for the units.
Comment: One commenter questioned whether the term ``stand age''
belongs in section 3(b)(2) which lists various things that ``* * * may
reduce the expected yield below the yield upon which the insurance
guarantee is based * * *'' The commenter recommended the term ``stand
age'' could be combined with the reporting of the planting dates for
new and existing mint acreage currently listed in sections 3(b)(3) and
(4).
Response: FCIC agrees that the stand age is not something that
would necessarily reduce the yield below the yield upon which the
guarantee is based. Therefore, FCIC has removed the term ``stand age''
from section 3(b)(2). The stand age reporting requirement is now
contained in section 3(b)(3).
Comment: One commenter recommended changing ``* * * deemed to not
have attached * * *'' in section 5 to ``* * * deemed not to have
attached * * *.''
Response: FCIC agrees with the commenter and has made the revision
accordingly.
Comment: Two commenters expressed concerns regarding the added
language in sections 6(a)(4)(i) and (ii) that indicates an inspection
is required not only the initial year insured but also any ``subsequent
crop year following an indemnified loss'' or when ``an indemnity was
paid the previous crop year.'' The commenters questioned if mint is the
second crop on the acreage, and a loss is incurred but the producer
elects not to accept the loss payment on the mint whether an inspection
is necessary the subsequent crop year. They also stated if a claim was
filed the preceding crop year and it was determined there was an
adequate stand as a result, another inspection should not be necessary
because there was not a payable loss. One commenter indicated with this
additional requirement, approved insurance providers would have to do
what they could to complete claims and inspections for acreage insured
under the Winter Coverage Option before the mint was plowed down for
the winter.
Response: The provisions contained in section 6(a)(4)(i) and (ii)
were added to the crop provisions as a result of the FCIC Board of
Directors' (Board) approval to convert the mint pilot crop insurance
program to a permanent program. The Board's decision was based on an
independent contractor's recommendation to modify the self-
certification program to reduce the program integrity problem caused by
insuring acreage that did not have an adequate stand at the time
insurance attached. The Board's Final Resolution specified that when an
indemnity was paid the previous year's approved insurance providers
must conduct a crop inspection to determine if the crop has an adequate
stand.
However, in response to the commenters, FCIC has revised the
provisions in sections 6(a)(4) and 13(e) to not require an inspection
for the following year in situations where a notice of loss has been
filed, but it is determined that there is an adequate stand on the mint
acreage. If there has been an indemnity paid or a notice of loss filed
and the approved insurance provider determined there was not an
adequate stand, the acreage must be inspected before insurance will
attach for the next insurance period. For example, in those cases where
a producer receives an indemnity payment for spring mint, or claims a
loss and the approved insurance provider determines there is not an
adequate stand, an inspection of the
[[Page 24525]]
acreage insured under the Winter Coverage Option must be conducted
before coverage begins in October or November.
Comment: One commenter recommended rewording the phrase in section
6(c) ``* * * which provides coverage for mint that is damaged after the
date coverage ends in the fall and before the date coverage begins in
the spring * * *'' The phrase could be misleading to new producers
since they had no previous coverage that ended in the fall.
Response: The provision in section 6(c) merely notifies producers
that winter coverage for mint is available. However, the provision
referred to is duplicative of the provisions in section 13. Therefore,
to avoid any potential conflicts or ambiguity between sections 6(c) and
section 13, FCIC is revising section 6(c) to state that winter coverage
is available in accordance with section 13. Section 13 states when
coverage is provided under the Winter Coverage Option.
Comment: Two commenters recommended the reference to actuarial
documents in sections 7(b)(1) and (2) be changed back to refer to the
Special Provisions as this is where the rotation and age limitation
statements are located. One commenter suggested since mint will no
longer be a pilot program, exceptions to the provisions should be made
to allow coverage by written agreement.
Response: FCIC agrees section 7(b)(1) and (2) should reference the
Special Provisions. FCIC also agrees with the comment and has revised
the provisions to allow rotation requirements and age limitations to be
modified by written agreement.
Comment: Two commenters questioned whether a two-week period is
sufficient to complete inspections on all new mint policies as required
in section 8(b). Both commenters recommended changing it to a 30-day
period to provide adequate time to do the inspection. This would be
consistent with the 30-day period for many other crops (i.e. Nursery).
One commenter questioned whether the inspection time period in section
8(b) also applies to the subsequent crop year following an indemnified
loss and should it be referenced in this provision as well. One
commenter also expressed concerns that the second sentence in section
8(b) could be confusing and lead to the impression that coverage starts
after the application is received in the local office.
Response: Mint is similar to other perennial crops and must be
inspected to determine if the mint stand is capable of producing the
yield used to establish the production guarantee. Unfortunately, it is
not possible to change the period for a crop inspection for the spring
insurance period because the mint plants will not be out of dormancy 30
days before the start of the insurance period. Therefore, it cannot be
determined if there is an adequate stand earlier than two weeks before
the start of the insurance period.
FCIC agrees the provisions should include the requirement that an
inspection must be made before the next insurance period following a
notice of loss for which an indemnity was paid or the approved
insurance provider determined there was not an adequate stand to
determine if the mint acreage has an adequate stand for the next
insurance period. FCIC also agrees the second sentence in section 8(b)
could be confusing. Therefore, section 8(b) has been revised to specify
that for the year of application and for the crop year following a
loss, insurance will attach on the date coverage begins unless
insurability requirements are not met.
Comment: Three commenters stated section 8(c)(3) references that
coverage ends at the harvest for each cutting. The reference should be
revised since mint has multiple cuttings each crop year, and coverage
does not end until the final cutting of the crop year, as was done in
the pilot program.
Response: FCIC agrees and has revised section 8(c)(3) to specify
coverage ends at final cutting of the crop for the crop year.
Comment: Two commenters suggested revising section 9(a)(2) to state
``Fire, due to natural causes'' would clarify when fire is an insured
cause of loss consistent with the Federal Crop Insurance Act and the
Crop Insurance Handbook.
Response: In addition to the Mint Crop Provisions, the Common Crop
Insurance Policy, Basic Provisions are applicable for mint. Section 12
of the Basic Provisions states all specified causes of loss must be due
to a naturally occurring event. Adding the suggested language would be
redundant and could cause confusion by suggesting that the other listed
causes of loss do not have to be due to natural causes. Therefore, no
change has been made.
Comment: One commenter suggested ``marketable'' should be added to
section 11(d)(2). For example, a sample was distilled on a 7 acre unit
that was cut but not distilled because of rain over a 3-4 day period.
The sample distilled was a bronze color when it should have been clear.
It was determined the oil from the sample was not a marketable product
and thus had no value. Mint oil is either marketable or not, there is
no middle ground.
Response: Adding ``marketable'' to section 11(d)(2) would
effectively add quality adjustment to the policy. Quality adjustment
can only be added to the policy if there is an objective grading
standard upon which to base the quality. There are no objective grading
standards for mint oil. In many instances different qualities of mint
oil (such as smell and taste) are blended by buyers for varying uses
such as gum, toothpaste, etc. This means it would be up to the buyer to
determine what is ``marketable,'' which would add a significant
vulnerability to the policy because the buyer could elect not to
purchase the mint for reasons other than the quality and shift the loss
to the government. Further, without a consistent standard, it would be
possible for some producers to be indemnified under the policy while
others are not based on the subjective decision of the buyer. No change
has been made.
Comment: One commenter suggested for section 13(a), deleting the
comma before ``* * * if''.
Response: FCIC agrees with the suggestion and has revised section
13(a).
Comment: Two commenters asked if any new mint acreage planted after
the applicable acreage reporting date as stated in section 13(d) is to
be reported as insurable or uninsurable. A final planting date for mint
covered under the Winter Coverage Option cannot be found in the
actuarial documents. The commenters questioned whether there is any
time between the fall acreage reporting date and the spring final
planting date that mint should not be planted for insurance. The
commenter also questioned if they should be providing the Winter
Coverage Option for mint planted past a certain date.
Response: Mint is a perennial crop and producers will plant it,
depending upon the region and weather conditions, during late fall,
winter, or early spring. Therefore, there is no final planting date
because FCIC does not want to dictate to the producer when the crop
must be planted. However, all acreage of mint in the county must be
reported on the acreage report. Therefore, mint planted after the
acreage reporting date must be reported within two weeks of planting.
FCIC recognizes that, depending on when it is planted, newly planted
mint may not have attained an adequate stand by the date coverage
begins. FCIC is revising the provisions to clarify that all mint must
have attained an adequate stand by the date coverage begins before it
can be reported as insurable. Mint that does not have an adequate stand
on the
[[Page 24526]]
date coverage began, or that was planted after coverage began, must be
reported as uninsured.
Comment: Two commenters stated section 13(e)(4) of the proposed
rule referenced new mint acreage that is planted during the Winter
Coverage Option insurance period but a final planting date could not be
found for the Winter Coverage Option.
Response: It is not practical to specify a final planting date
under the Winter Coverage Option for new mint acreage because mint is
usually planted at any time throughout the Winter Coverage Option
insurance period, depending on conditions. However, as stated above,
FCIC has revised the provisions to make it clear that before it is
insured, the new mint acreage must have attained an adequate stand.
Therefore, mint acreage planted during the Winter Coverage Option
insurance period must be reported as uninsured.
Comment: Two comments were received regarding the provisions
contained in section 13(e)(4)(i), which requires that new mint acreage
planted during the Winter Coverage Option be inspected and accepted for
the first crop year. Insurance providers must notify the producer of
acceptance or rejection of the application no later than November 15
adding that failure to notify by then will indicate acceptance. They
questioned how the November 15 deadline fits with the December 15
acreage reporting date for acreage insured under the Winter Coverage
Option. They also questioned how it works for new mint acreage planted
after the Winter Coverage Option acreage reporting date. They asked
whether it is covered by section 13(e)(4)(iv), allowing certification
by the producer in place of the insurance provider's inspection for any
mint acreage planted after the initial inspection. They asked what
happens if additional acreage is planted after the inspection as there
does not seem to be a final plant date for mint under the option.
Response: There were no sub-paragraphs (i) and (iv) in section
13(e)(4) of the proposed rule as indicated by the commenters. FCIC
believes the commenters unintentionally combined proposed section
13(e)(4) with sub-paragraphs (i) and (iv) from proposed section
13(e)(5). Section 13(e)(4) pertained to new mint planted after the
acreage reporting date, and section 13(e)(5)(i) and (iv) pertained to
all mint, including newly planted and established, for which a premium
rate is provided for the Winter Coverage Option. As stated above, FCIC
has revised section 13(e) to require that all mint have an adequate
stand at the time coverage begins to be insured. Mint planted during
the Winter Coverage Option insurance period cannot meet this
requirement and, therefore, must be reported as uninsured. This will
eliminate any confusion regarding the insurability of mint planted
after the date coverage begins and no additional inspection will be
required of such acreage until the start of the next insurance period.
However, FCIC has added provisions to section 8(b) requiring that mint
acreage reported as being planted during the Winter Coverage Option
insurance period be inspected to determine whether it has attained an
adequate stand before the date coverage begins for the spring insurance
period.
Comment: Two commenters stated sections 13(e)(4)(ii) and (iii) do
not appear to apply to ``new mint acreage'' since they address
inspection or certification in subsequent crop years. These should
remain separate subparagraphs (5) and (6) as in the current pilot Crop
Provisions.
Response: Section 13(e)(4) of the proposed rule did not contain
sub-paragraphs (ii) and (iii) as indicated by the commenters. FCIC
believes the commenters unintentionally combined proposed section
13(e)(4) with sub-paragraphs (ii) and (iii) from proposed section
13(e)(5). The requirement that mint acreage must be inspected and
accepted for the crop year following a loss that caused an inadequate
stand or certified as having an adequate stand after the first year of
coverage was contained in section 13(e)(5), which pertains to all mint
types in the county. As stated above, FCIC has clarified that all mint
must have an adequate stand to be insured and mint planted during the
Winter Coverage Option insurance period must be reported as uninsured.
Therefore, section 13(e) was correct in not making paragraph (5)
applicable to new mint acreage. No change has been made in response to
this comment.
Comment: One commenter questioned if the ``after'' should be
deleted from section 13(e)(5)(iii) so it would read ``* * * on the date
coverage begins the first crop year * * *''.
Response: Section 13(e)(5)(i) of the proposed rule required all
mint types to be inspected and accepted the first crop year of
insurance. Therefore, there is no need for the producer to provide such
a certification in the first year and the provisions have been so
revised. In addition, as stated above, the provision has been revised
to require inspection the year after a reported loss that has caused an
inadequate stand. Therefore, section 13(e)(4)(iii) will now require
producers to certify to an adequate stand each crop year unless there
was a reported loss that has caused an inadequate stand.
Comment: One commenter stated section 13(e)(5)(iv) seems to
indicate the producer could plant throughout the winter coverage
insurance period and obtain coverage on new mint acreage provided the
two week notice of planting was met.
Response: As stated above, because mint is a perennial crop,
producers will plant, depending upon the region and weather conditions,
during late fall, winter, or early spring. However, the requirement
that mint must have an adequate stand at the time coverage begins to be
insurable applies to mint under the Winter Coverage Option. Since mint
planted during the Winter Coverage Option insurance period could never
have an adequate stand before coverage begins, it must be reported as
uninsurable. Therefore, FCIC has removed section 13(e)(5)(iv) because
it suggests that mint planted during the Winter Coverage Option
insurance period is insurable as long as it is certified on the acreage
report and this is not correct.
Comment: Regarding section 13(i), three commenters asked if since
this provision is only applicable to the Winter Coverage Option, should
the correct production to count be 60 percent of the production
guarantee as indicated in sections 13(b) and (l)(1).
Response: Section 13(i) was added to address those instances when a
producer wishes to destroy a portion of mint acreage during the Winter
Coverage Option insurance period and before it can be determined if
there is an adequate stand on the acreage. The producer must agree in
writing that no indemnity will be paid for the acreage destroyed with
consent. The total production to be counted for those acres destroyed
with consent will not be less than the approved yield. Section 13(b)
states the guarantee under the Winter Coverage Option is ``equal to 60
percent of the guarantee determined under section 3 of the Crop
Provisions.''
In addition to the changes described above, FCIC has modified
section 11(c) to clarify the claim for indemnity calculation when more
than one mint type is insured.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 457
Crop insurance, Mint, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Final Rule
0
Accordingly, as set forth in the preamble, the Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation amends 7 CFR part 457 for
[[Page 24527]]
the 2008 and succeeding crop years as follows:
PART 457--COMMON CROP INSURANCE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for 7 CFR part 457 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1506(l), 1506(p).
0
2. Section 457.169 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 457.169 Mint crop insurance provisions.
The Mint Crop Insurance Provisions for the 2008 and succeeding crop
years are as follows:
FCIC policies:
United States Department of Agriculture
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
Reinsured policies:
(Appropriate title for insurance provider)
Both FCIC and reinsured policies:
Mint Crop Insurance Provisions
1. Definitions
Adequate Stand. A population of live mint plants that equals or
exceeds the minimum required number of plants or percentage of ground
cover, as specified in the Special Provisions.
Appraisal. A method of determining potential production by
harvesting and distilling a representative sample of the mint crop.
Cover crop. A small grain crop seeded into mint acreage to reduce
soil erosion and wind damage.
Cutting. Severance of the upper part of the mint plant from its
stalk and roots.
Distillation. A process of extracting mint oil from harvested mint
plants by heating and condensing.
Existing mint. Mint planted for harvest during a previous crop
year.
Ground cover. Mint plants, including mint foliage and stolons,
grown on insured acreage.
Harvest. Removal of mint from the windrow.
Mint. A perennial spearmint or peppermint plant of the family
Labiatae and the genus Mentha grown for distillation of mint oil.
Mint oil. Oil produced by the distillation of harvested mint
plants.
New mint. Mint planted for harvest for the first time.
Planted acreage. In addition to the definition in the Basic
Provisions, land in which mint stolons have been placed in a manner
appropriate for the planting method and at the correct depth into a
seedbed that has been properly prepared.
Pound. 16 ounces avoirdupois.
Sales closing date. In lieu of the definition contained in the
Basic Provisions, if you select the Winter Coverage Option, application
for the Winter Coverage Option will include application for the spring
insurance period and must be submitted by the sales closing date for
the Winter Coverage Option contained in the Special Provisions.
Coverage may not be changed between the end of the Winter Coverage
Option insurance period and the beginning of the spring insurance
period. If you do not elect the Winter Coverage Option, application
must be made by the spring sales closing date contained in the Special
Provisions and all policy changes must be made by that date. If you
later elect the Winter Coverage Option, you may select your coverage
under the Winter Coverage Option.
Stolon. A stem at or just below the surface of the ground that
produces new mint plants at its tips or nodes.
Type. A category of mint identified as a type in the Special
Provisions.
Windrow. Mint that is cut and placed in a row.
2. Unit Division
A basic unit, as defined in section 1 of the Basic Provisions, will
be divided into additional basic units by each mint type designated in
the Special Provisions.
3. Insurance Guarantees, Coverage Levels, and Prices for Determining
Indemnities
(a) In addition to the requirements of section 3 of the Basic
Provisions, you may only select one price election for all the mint in
the county insured under this policy unless the actuarial documents
provide different price elections by type, in which case you may only
select one price election for each type designated in the actuarial
documents. The price elections you choose for each type must have the
same percentage relationship to the maximum price election offered by
us for each type. For example, if you choose 100 percent of the maximum
price election for one specific type, you must also choose 100 percent
of the maximum price election for other types.
(b) In addition to the provisions in section 3 of the Basic
Provisions, you must report:
(1) The total amount of mint oil produced from insurable acreage
for all cuttings for each unit;
(2) Any damage to or removal of mint plants or stolons; any change
in practices; or any other circumstance that may reduce the expected
yield below the yield upon which the production guarantee is based, and
the number of affected acres;
(3) The stand age;
(4) The date existing mint acreage was planted;
(5) The date new mint acreage was initially planted; and
(6) The type of mint.
(c) If you fail to notify us of any circumstance that may reduce
your yields or insurable acres from previous levels, we will reduce
your production guarantee and insurable acres at any time we become
aware of the circumstance based on our estimate of the effect of damage
to or removal of mint plants or stolons; stand age; change in
practices; and any other circumstance that may affect the yield
potential or insurable acres of the insured crop.
4. Contract Changes
In accordance with section 4 of the Basic Provisions, the contract
change date is June 30 preceding the cancellation date.
5. Cancellation and Termination Dates
In accordance with section 2 of the Basic Provisions, the
cancellation date is September 30 and the termination date is November
30. If your policy is terminated after insurance has attached for the
subsequent crop year, coverage will be deemed not to have attached to
the acreage for the subsequent crop year.
6. Insured Crop
(a) In accordance with the provisions of section 8 of the Basic
Provisions, the crop insured will be all mint types in the county for
which a premium rate is provided by the actuarial documents:
(1) In which you have a share;
(2) That are planted for harvest and distillation for mint oil;
(3) That have an adequate stand by the date coverage begins; and
(4) That have been:
(i) Inspected and accepted by us for the first crop year you are
insured; or
(ii) Certified by you as having an adequate stand on the date
coverage begins after the first crop year you are insured unless an
inspection is required under section 8(b).
(b) In lieu of the provisions of section 8 of the Basic Provisions
that prohibit insurance of a second crop harvested following the same
crop in the same crop year, multiple harvests of mint on the same
acreage will be considered as one mint crop.
(c) In addition to the coverages provided in these Crop Provisions,
you may also elect the Winter Coverage Option in accordance with
section 13.
[[Page 24528]]
7. Insurable Acreage
(a) Mint interplanted with a cover crop will not be considered
interplanted for the purposes of section 9 of the Basic Provisions if
the cover crop is destroyed prior to its maturity and is not harvested
as grain.
(b) In addition to the provisions of section 9 of the Basic
Provisions, unless allowed by written agreement, we will not insure any
acreage that:
(1) Does not meet rotation requirements contained in the Special
Provisions; or
(2) Exceeds existing mint age limitations contained in the Special
Provisions.
8. Insurance Period
In lieu of the provisions of section 11 of the Basic Provisions:
(a) Coverage begins on each unit or part of a unit for acreage with
an adequate stand on the following calendar dates:
(1) June 16 in Indiana, Montana, and Wisconsin;
(2) May 16 in Washington; and
(3) For all other states, the date as provided in the Special
Provisions.
(b) For the year of application, for when you have reported
planting mint during the Winter Coverage Option insurance period, or
for any insurance period following the payment of an indemnity or a
reported loss where the crop was determined to not have an adequate
stand, we will inspect all mint acreage within the two-week period
before coverage begins (If you have elected the Winter Coverage Option,
such inspection will occur not later than November 15).
(1) Insurance will attach on the date coverage begins, as specified
in section 8(a), unless we inspect the acreage during the two-week
period and determine it does not meet insurability requirements as
specified in section 2 of the Basic Provisions, the application, or
these Crop Provisions.
(2) You must provide any information we require for the crop or to
determine the condition of the crop.
(c) Coverage ends for each unit or part of a unit at the earliest
of:
(1) Total destruction of the insured crop on the unit;
(2) Final adjustment of a loss;
(3) The final cutting for the crop year;
(4) Abandonment of the crop; or
(5) The following calendar date:
(i) September 30 in Indiana and Wisconsin;
(ii) October 15 in Montana;
(iii) October 31 in Washington; and
(iv) For all other states, the date as provided in the Special
Provisions.
9. Causes of Loss
(a) In accordance with the provisions of section 12 of the Basic
Provisions, insurance is provided only against the following causes of
loss that occur during the insurance period:
(1) Adverse weather conditions;
(2) Fire;
(3) Insects or plant disease (except Verticillium Wilt disease),
but not damage due to insufficient or improper application of control
measures;
(4) Wildlife;
(5) Earthquake;
(6) Volcanic eruption; or
(7) Failure of the irrigation water supply, if caused by an insured
cause of loss listed in sections 9(a)(1) through (6) that occurs during
the insurance period.
(b) In addition to the causes of loss excluded in section 12 of the
Basic Provisions, we will not insure against any loss of production
that:
(1) Occurs after harvest;
(2) Is due to your failure to distill the crop, unless such failure
is due to actual physical damage to the crop caused by an insured cause
of loss that occurs during the insurance period; or
(3) Is due to Verticillium Wilt disease.
10. Duties In The Event of Damage or Loss
In addition to your duties contained in section 14 of the Basic
Provisions, if you discover that any insured mint is damaged, or if you
intend to claim an indemnity on any unit:
(a) You must give us notice of probable loss at least 15 days
before the beginning of any cutting or immediately if probable loss is
discovered after cutting has begun or when cutting should have begun;
and
(b) You must timely harvest and completely distill a sample of the
crop on any acreage you do not intend to harvest, as designated by us,
to determine if an indemnity is due.
11. Settlement of Claim
(a) We will determine your loss on a unit basis. In the event you
are unable to provide separate, acceptable production records:
(1) For any optional units, we will combine all optional units for
which such production records were not provided; or
(2) For any basic units, we will allocate any commingled production
to such units in proportion to our liability on the harvested acreage
for the units.
(b) We may defer appraisals until the crop reaches maturity or the
date mint harvest is general in the area.
(c) In the event of loss or damage covered by this policy, we will
settle your claim by:
(1) Multiplying the insured acreage for each type, if applicable,
by its respective production guarantee;
(2) Multiplying the result of section 11(c)(1) by the respective
price election for each type, if applicable;
(3) Totaling the results of section 11(c)(2);
(4) Multiplying the total production to be counted (see section
11(d)) of each type, if applicable, by its respective price election;
(5) Totaling the results of section 11(c)(4);
(6) Subtracting the result in section 11(c)(5) from the result of
section 11(c)(3); and
(7) Multiplying the result in section 11(c)(6) by your share.
For example:
Assume that you have a 100 percent share in 100 acres of peppermint
in the unit, with a production guarantee of 50 pounds of oil per acre
and a price election of $12 per pound. Because an insured cause of loss
has reduced production, you only harvest and distill 2,500 pounds of
peppermint oil. Your indemnity would be calculated as follows:
(1) 100 acres x 50 pounds = 5,000 pound production guarantee;
(2) 5,000 pound production guarantee x $12 price election = $60,000
value of production guarantee;
(3) 2,500 pounds production to count x $12 price election = $30,000
value of production to count;
(4) $60,000 - $30,000 = $30,000 loss; and
(5) $30,000 x 100 percent share = $30,000 indemnity payment.
(d) The total production to count (in pounds of oil) from all
insurable acreage on the unit will include:
(1) All appraised production as follows:
(i) Not less than the production guarantee per acre for acreage:
(A) That is abandoned;
(B) That is put to another use without our consent;
(C) For which you fail to meet the requirements contained in
section 10 of these Crop Provisions;
(D) That is damaged solely by uninsured causes; or
(E) For which you fail to provide production records that are
acceptable to us;
(ii) All production lost due to uninsured causes;
(iii) All unharvested production;
(iv) All potential production on insured acreage that you intend to
put to another use or abandon with our consent:
(A) If you do not elect to continue to care for the crop, we may
give you our
[[Page 24529]]
consent to put the acreage to another use if you agree to leave intact
and provide sufficient care for representative samples of the crop in
locations acceptable to us (The amount of production to count for such
acreage will be based on the harvested production or appraisals from
the samples at the time harvest should have occurred. If you do not
leave the required samples intact, or fail to provide sufficient care
for the samples, the amount of production to count will be not less
than the production guarantee per acre); or
(B) If you elect to continue to care for the crop, the amount of
production to count for the acreage will be the harvested production,
or the appraised production at the time the crop reaches maturity.
(2) All harvested production from the insurable acreage.
(e) Harvested production must be distilled to determine production
to count.
(f) Any oil distilled from plants growing in the mint will be
counted as mint oil on a weight basis.
(g) You are responsible for the cost of distilling samples for loss
adjustment purposes.
12. Late and Prevented Planting.
The late and prevented planting provisions of the Basic Provisions
are not applicable.
13. Winter Coverage Option
(a) The provisions of this option are continuous and will be
attached to and made part of your insurance policy if:
(1) You elect the Winter Coverage Option on your application, or on
a form approved by us, on or before the fall sales closing date for the
crop year in which you wish to insure mint under this option, and pay
the additional premium indicated in the actuarial documents for this
optional coverage; and
(2) You have not elected coverage under the Catastrophic Risk
Protection Endorsement.
(b) This option provides a production guarantee equal to 60 percent
of the production guarantee determined under section 3 of these Crop
Provisions.
(c) If you elect this option, all of the insurable acreage in the
county will be insured by this option.
(d) In addition to the requirements of section 6 of the Basic
Provisions, any acreage of new mint planted after the applicable
acreage reporting date must be certified by you and reported to us
within two weeks of planting.
(e) In lieu of section 6(a) of these Crop Provisions, the crop
insured will be all mint types in the county for which a premium rate
is provided by the actuarial documents:
(1) In which you have a share;
(2) That are planted for harvest and distillation as mint oil;
(3) That have an adequate stand on the date coverage begins (newly
planted mint types must be reported in accordance with section 8(d) but
they must be reported as uninsured unless they have an adequate stand
by the date coverage begins); and
(4) That has been:
(i) Inspected and accepted by us for the first crop year you are
insured (We will inspect all mint acreage and will notify you of the
acceptance or rejection of your application not later than November 15.
If we fail to notify you by that date, your application will be
accepted unless other grounds exist to reject the application, as
specified in the Basic Provisions, the application, or these Crop
Provisions);
(ii) Inspected and accepted by us not later than November 15 for
the crop year following the payment of an indemnity or a reported loss
unless the crop was determined to have an adequate stand (If we
determined there was an adequate stand after the loss was reported, no
inspection is necessary); or
(iii) Certified by you as having an adequate stand on the date
coverage begins unless an inspection is required under section
13(e)(4)(ii).
(f) Coverage under this option begins:
(1) On existing mint acreage with an adequate stand at 12:01 a.m.
on the calendar date listed below:
(i) October 1 in Indiana and Wisconsin;
(ii) October 16 in Montana;
(iii) November 1 in Washington; and
(iv) For all other states, the date as provided in the Special
Provisions.
(2) On new mint acreage, that has an adequate stand by the date
coverage begins as specified in section 13(f)(1).
(g) Coverage under this option ends on the unit or part of the unit
at 11:59 p.m. on the calendar date listed below:
(1) June 15 in Indiana, Montana, and Wisconsin;
(2) May 15 in Washington; and
(3) For all other states, the date as provided in the Special
Provisions.
(h) In lieu of section 10(a) of these Crop Provisions, you must
give notice of probable loss within 72 hours after you discover any
insured mint is damaged and does not have an adequate stand, but no
later than the date coverage ends for this option.
(i) In addition to the requirements of section 10 of these Crop
Provisions, you must give us notice if you want our consent to put any
mint acreage to another use before a determination can be made if there
is an adequate stand on the acreage. We will inspect the acreage and
you must agree in writing no payment or indemnity will be made for the
acreage put to another use. The total production to be counted for
acreage put to another use with our consent in accordance with this
section will not be less than the approved yield.
(j) In addition to section 11(a) of these Crop Provisions we will
make a Winter Coverage Option payment only on acreage that had an
adequate stand on the date that insurance attached if the adequate
stand was lost due to an insured cause of loss occurring within the
Winter Coverage Option insurance period and the acreage consists of at
least 20 acres or 20 percent of the insurable planted acres in the
unit.
(k) In lieu of section 11(b) of these Crop Provisions, we may defer
appraisals until the date coverage ends under this option.
(l) In lieu of section 11(c) of these Crop Provisions, in the event
of loss or damage covered by this policy, we will settle your claim by:
(1) Multiplying 60 percent by your production guarantee per acre;
(2) Multiplying the result in section 13(l)(1) by the number of
acres that do not have an adequate stand;
(3) Multiplying the result in section 13(l)(2) by the price
election; and
(4) Multiplying the result in section 13(l)(3) by your share.
For example:
Assume that you have a 100 percent share in 100 acres of mint with
a production guarantee of 50 pounds of oil per acre and a price
election of $12 per pound. Also assume that you do not have an adequate
stand on 50 acres by the date coverage ends for this option because an
insured cause has damaged the stand. Your Winter Coverage Option
payment would be calculated as follows:
(1) 60 percent x 50 pound production guarantee = 30 pound
production guarantee per acre;
(2) 30 pound production guarantee per acre x 50 acres without an
adequate stand = 1,500 pounds;
(3) 1,500 pounds x $12 price election = $18,000; and
(4) $18,000 x 100 percent share = $18,000 Winter Coverage Option
payment.
(m) In lieu of section 11(d) of these Crop Provisions, the
population of live mint plants to be counted from insurable acreage on
the unit will be not less than the population of live mint plants in an
adequate stand for acreage:
(1) That is abandoned;
(2) That is put to another use without our consent;
[[Page 24530]]
(3) For which you fail to meet the requirements contained in
section 13(h); or
(4) That is damaged solely by uninsured causes.
(n) Acreage for which a Winter Coverage Option payment has been
made is no longer insurable under the Crop Provisions for the current
crop year. Any mint production subsequently harvested from uninsured
acreage for the crop year and not kept separate from production from
insured acreage will be considered production to count.
(o) Acreage for which a Winter Coverage Option payment has been
made will receive an amount of production of zero when computing
subsequent year's approved yield.
(p) Sections 11(e), (f), and (g) of these Crop Provisions do not
apply to this option.
Signed in Washington, DC, on April 25, 2007.
Eldon Gould,
Manager, Federal Crop Insurance Corporation.
[FR Doc. E7-8340 Filed 5-2-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-08-P