Ohio Regulatory Program, 21176-21185 [E7-8171]
Download as PDF
21176
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 82 / Monday, April 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April
20, 2007.
Charles L. Smalley,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E7–8163 Filed 4–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 935
[OH–252–FOR]
Ohio Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We (OSM) are announcing
receipt of a proposed amendment to the
Ohio regulatory program (the ‘‘Ohio
program’’) under the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA or the Act). Ohio proposes to
revise the Ohio Revised Code (ORC)
regarding changes to the State’s
alternate bonding system (bond pool),
funding for its regulatory and
abandoned mine land programs and its
bond pool, permitting procedures for
determining the potential that proposed
mine sites may or may not produce
acid-mine drainage, and authorizes rulemaking if Ohio becomes covered by a
State programmatic general permit
issued by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers for the discharge of dredged
or fill material into waters of the United
States by coal mining operations. The
amendment is primarily intended to
satisfy a program condition codified in
the Federal regulations. This
amendment replaces the State’s bond
pool amendment that the State
previously submitted and that OSM
announced, and requested public
comments on, in the Federal Register
dated February 13, 2006 (71 FR 7480).
This document gives the times and
locations that the Ohio program and
proposed amendment to that program
are available for your inspection, the
comment period during which you may
submit written comments on the
amendment, and the procedures that we
will follow for the public hearing, if one
is requested.
DATES: We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4
p.m. (local time), May 30, 2007. If
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Apr 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
requested, we will hold a public hearing
on the amendment on May 25, 2007. We
will accept requests to speak at a
hearing until 4 p.m., local time, on May
15, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by OH–252–FOR, by any of
the following methods:
• E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov. Include
OH–252–FOR in the subject line of the
message;
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Mr. George
Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh Field Division,
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement, 4605 Morse Road,
Room 102, Columbus, OH 43230.
Telephone: 614–416–2238.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency docket number
for this rulemaking. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see the ‘‘Public
Comment Procedures’’ heading in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document. You may also request to
speak at a public hearing by any of the
methods listed above or by contacting
the individual listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Docket: You may review copies of the
Ohio program, this amendment, a listing
of any scheduled public hearings, and
all written comments received in
response to this document at the
addresses listed below during normal
business hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may also
receive one free copy of this amendment
by contacting OSM’s Pittsburgh Field
Division listed below:
Mr. George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh
Field Division, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
4605 Morse Road, Room 102,
Columbus, OH 43230 614–416–2238.
E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.
Mr. Scott Kell, Acting Chief, Division of
Mineral Resources Management, Ohio
Department of Natural Resources,
2045 Morse Road, Bldg. H–2,
Columbus, Ohio 43229, Telephone:
(614) 265–6633.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh Field
Division, Telephone: (717) 782–4849,
extension 11; or 614–416–2238; or 412–
937–2153. E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Ohio Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
I. Background on the Ohio Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘a State
law which provides for the regulation of
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the
requirements of the Act * * * and rules
and regulations consistent with
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to the Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Ohio
program on August 16, 1982. You can
find background information on the
Ohio program, including the Secretary’s
findings, the disposition of comments,
and conditions of approval of the Ohio
program in the August 16, 1982, Federal
Register (47 FR 34687). You can also
find later actions concerning Ohio’s
program and program amendments at 30
CFR 935.11, 935.15, and 935.16.
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
By letter dated March 6, 2007, Ohio
sent us a proposed amendment to its
program (Administrative Record
Number OH–2185–28) under SMCRA
(30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). In its letter,
Ohio stated that in December of 2006,
the Ohio legislature passed House Bill
443, which is intended to address many
of the issues of concern relative to
Ohio’s bond pool. Ohio proposes to
revise the Ohio Revised Code (ORC)
regarding changes to the State’s
alternate bonding system (bond pool),
funding for its regulatory and
abandoned mine land programs and its
bond pool, permitting procedures for
determining the potential that proposed
mine sites may or may not produce
acid-mine drainage, and authorizes rulemaking if Ohio becomes covered by a
State programmatic general permit
issued by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers for the discharge of dredged
or fill material into waters of the United
States by coal mining operations.
The amendment is intended to satisfy
a program condition codified in the
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 935.11(h),
and is in response to OSM’s letter of
May 4, 2005, issued under provisions of
30 CFR 733.12(b). The program
condition provides that Ohio must
submit a program amendment that
demonstrates how the alternative
bonding system will assure timely
reclamation at the site of all operations
for which bond has been forfeited.
E:\FR\FM\30APP1.SGM
30APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 82 / Monday, April 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules
The State also acknowledged that its
March 6, 2007, submittal is intended to
replace the bond pool amendment that
the State had submitted to OSM on
December 19, 2005. We published and
requested public comment on that
previous bond pool amendment in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2006
(71 FR 7480). Because the State has
requested that the current amendment
replace its previous amendment, we are
hereby withdrawing the proposed
rulemaking that we announced in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2006.
In its March 6, 2007, submittal, Ohio
also stated that it realizes that the
passage of HB 443 is only the first step
in its efforts to establish a bonding
program in Ohio that is in accordance
with the requirements of SMCRA. Ohio
anticipates that significant amendments
to the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC)
will be needed in order to ensure that
the final program amendment, in whole,
is consistent with the relevant Federal
regulations. To that end, Ohio stated,
the Division of Mineral Resources
Management (DMRM) has chartered
several workgroups made up of internal
and external stakeholders to develop
final procedures and policies that will
be used as a basis for revising the OAC
to implement the provisions of HB 443.
Ohio has requested OSM’s technical
assistance on these workgroups.
The current amendment provides the
following specific revisions. In the
descriptions below, we have not
identified the numerous paragraph renumbering and citation referencing
changes that result from the substantive
changes proposed in this amendment.
1. ORC 1513.01(W) Definition of
‘‘Performance Security’’
This definition is new, and provides
as follows:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
(W) ‘‘Performance security’’ means a form
of financial assurance, including, without
limitation, a surety bond issued by a surety
licensed to do business in this state; an
annuity; cash; a negotiable certificate of
deposit; an irrevocable letter of credit that
automatically renews; a negotiable bond of
the United States, this state, or a municipal
corporation in this state; a trust fund of
which the state is named a conditional
beneficiary; or other form of financial
guarantee or financial assurance that is
acceptable to the chief.
In addition to the change quoted
above, the State has amended or deleted
terms throughout ORC Chapter 1513 in
which the word ‘‘bond’’ appears, such
as in the terms ‘‘performance bond’’ and
‘‘bond coverage,’’ and has replaced
those terms with the term ‘‘performance
security.’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Apr 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
2. ORC 1513.02(E)(3) Responsibilities
of the DMRM
This provision is being amended by
deleting the phrase ‘‘coal mining
administration and reclamation reserve
fund created in section 1513.181 of the
Revised Code’’ and revising that phrase
to read: ‘‘Reclamation forfeiture fund
created in section 1513.18 of the
Revised Code.’’
3. ORC 1513.02(J) Responsibilities of
DMRM
This provision is new, and provides
as follows:
(J) If this state becomes covered by a state
programmatic general permit issued by the
United States Army Corps of engineers for
the discharge of dredged or fill material into
the waters of the United States by operations
that conduct surface and underground coal
mining and reclamation operations and the
restoration of abandoned mine lands, the
chief may establish programs and adopt rules
and procedures designed to implement the
terms, limitations, and conditions of the
permit. The purpose of the programs, rules,
and procedures shall be to enable the state
to reduce or eliminate duplicative state and
federal project evaluation, simplify the
regulatory approval process, provide
environmental protection for aquatic
resources that is equivalent to Federal
protection, and satisfy the requirements of
the United States Army Corps of Engineers
regulatory program under which the permit
is issued and that is established under
section 404 of the ‘‘Federal Water Pollution
Control Act,’’ 86 Stat. 48 (1972), 33 U.S.C.
1344, as amended by the ‘‘Clean Water Act
of 1977,’’ 91 Stat. 1600, 33 U.S.C. 1344;
section 10 of the ‘‘Rivers and Harbors Act of
1899,’’ 30 Stat. 1151, 33 U.S.C. 403; and
section 103 of the ‘‘Marine Protection,
Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972,’’ 86
Stat. 1055, 33 U.S.C. 1413.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that ‘‘if’’
a General Permit is issued for Ohio by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
regarding discharges into jurisdictional
waters of United States from surface/
underground coal mining operations
and abandoned mine land reclamation
(AML) projects, then DMRM ‘‘may’’
establish programs, adopt rules and
develop procedures to implement the
General Permit.
4. ORC 1513.07(B)(1) Permit
Application; Permit Fee
Paragraph (B)(1) is proposed to be
deleted in its entirety, and provides as
follows.
(B)(1) Each application for a coal mining
and reclamation permit or renewal of such a
permit shall be accompanied by a permit or
renewal fee in an amount equal to the
product of seventy-five dollars multiplied by
the number of acres, estimated in the
application, that will comprise the area of
land to be affected within the permit or
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21177
renewal period by the coal mining operation
for which the permit or renewal is requested.
5. ORC 1513.07(B)(1)(o) Permit
Application; Statement of Acid
Generating Potential and Acid
Neutralizing Potential
The following new language is added
at the end of this existing paragraph:
If the test borings or core samplings from
the permit area indicate the existence of
potentially acid forming or toxic forming
quantities of sulfur in the coal or overburden
to be disturbed by mining, the application
also shall include a statement of the acid
generating potential and the acid neutralizing
potential of the rock strata to be disturbed as
calculated in accordance with the calculation
method established under section 1513.075
of the Revised Code or with another
calculation method.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that this
new provision directs applicants to
provide an Acid Base Accounting
statement pursuant to methodology
prescribed in ORC 1513.075, or another
method.
6. ORC 1513.07(E)(8) Permit
Application; Monitoring and
Recordkeeping Related to Potential
Acidity and Neutralization Potential
This paragraph is new and provides
as follows:
(8) In the case of the issuance of a permit
that involves a conflict of results between
various methods of calculating potential
acidity and neutralization potential for
purposes of assessing the potential for acid
mine drainage to occur at a mine site, the
permit shall include provisions for
monitoring and record keeping to identify the
creation of unanticipated acid water at the
mine site. If the monitoring detects the
creation of acid water at the site, the permit
shall impose on the permittee additional
requirements regarding mining practices and
site reclamation to prevent the discharge of
acid mine drainage from the mine site. As
used in division (E)(8) of this section,
‘‘potential acidity’’ and ‘‘neutralization
potential’’ have the same meanings as in
section 1513.075 of the Revised Code.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that this
new paragraph provides for additional
monitoring for Acid Mine Drainage if
there is a conflict concerning the
assessment of the potential for a mine to
discharge AMD. In the event
unanticipated AMD occurs during
mining and reclamation, additional
mining practices and reclamation shall
be required in order to prevent AMD
discharges.
7. ORC 1513.075 Definitions and
Calculating Potential Acidity and
Neutralization Potential
This provision is new and provides as
follows:
Sec. 1513.075. (A) As used in this section:
E:\FR\FM\30APP1.SGM
30APP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
21178
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 82 / Monday, April 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(1) ‘‘Potential acidity’’ means a laboratory
measurement of the amount of acidity that
could be produced by material in a rock
strata proposed to be disturbed by mining
and that is expressed by a numeral indicating
the number of tons of that acidity that would
be present in one thousand tons of disturbed
overburden.
(2) ‘‘Neutralization potential’’ means a
laboratory measurement of the alkalinity of a
rock strata expressed as the amount of acidity
that would be neutralized by material
proposed to be disturbed by mining and that
is expressed by a numeral indicating the
number of tons of that alkalinity that would
be present in one thousand tons of disturbed
overburden.
(3) ‘‘Test borings or core samplings’’ refer
to test borings or core samplings performed
on rock strata in an area proposed to be
covered by a permit for a coal mining
operation, the results of which must be stated
in the permit application in accordance with
division (B)(1)(o) of section 1513.07 of the
Revised Code.
(B) For purposes of the determination of
the chief of the division of mineral resources
management regarding whether to approve
an application for a permit for a coal mining
operation based on criteria established in
divisions (E)(2)(a) and (c) of section 1513.07
of the Revised Code and related performance
standards established in division (A)(10) of
section 1513.16 of the Revised Code, the
potential acidity and the neutralization
potential of the rock strata that would be
disturbed under the permit may be calculated
in accordance with this section.
(C) The measurement of potential acidity
may be based on laboratory analyses of the
sulfur content of the coal and overburden to
be disturbed by mining. If the results of test
borings or core samplings include laboratory
analyses of the pyritic form of sulfur, the
applicant may base the calculation of the
potential acidity for the area on the pyritic
sulfur content of the coal and overburden to
be disturbed by mining rather than on the
total sulfur content.
(D) The tons of rock in the area represented
by each core hole resulting from test boring
or core sampling may be estimated and used
to calculate the tons of potential acidity and
tons of neutralization potential for each rock
stratum. The sum of those values across the
proposed permit area may be used to
calculate the site’s overall neutralization
potential and potential acidity.
(E) The proposed permit area may not be
considered to have the potential to create
acid or other toxic mine drainage if either of
the following applies:
(1) The numeral that indicates the site’s
overall neutralization potential divided by
the numeral that indicates the site’s overall
potential acidity results in a quotient that is
equal to or greater than two.
(2) The numeral that indicates the
neutralization potential subtracted from the
numeral that indicates the potential acidity
results in a remainder that is equal to or less
than either of the following:
(a) Negative five in the case that the total
sulfur content of rock strata is used to
calculate potential acidity;
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Apr 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
(b) Negative ten in the case that the pyritic
sulfur content of rock strata is used to
calculate potential acidity.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that this
new provision defines certain terms
relative to potential acidity and
neutralization potential of strata
overlying the coal to be mined. The
provision also provides for calculation
of proposed mining operations’
potential to create acid or toxic drainage
based on specific criteria and indicates
that proposed mining areas not meeting
certain numeric criteria ‘‘may’’ not be
considered as potential acid/toxic
producers.
8. ORC 1513.08 Requirement to File a
Performance Security
This provision is amended by
deleting, adding and rearranging
language relating to performance
security. Much new language is added
to this provision, and the provision is
reorganized to accommodate the new
language. As amended this section
provides as follows:
Sec. 1513.08. (A) After a coal mining and
reclamation permit application has been
approved, but before the permit is issued, the
applicant shall file with the chief of the
division of mineral resources management,
on a form prescribed and furnished by the
chief, the performance security required
under this section.
(B) Using the information contained in the
permit application; the requirements
contained in the approved permit and
reclamation plan; and, after considering the
topography, geology, hydrology, and
revegetation potential of the area of the
approved permit, the probable difficulty of
reclamation; the chief shall determine the
estimated cost of reclamation under the
initial term of the permit if the reclamation
has to be performed by the division of
mineral resources management in the event
of forfeiture of the performance security by
the applicant. The chief shall send written
notice of the amount of the estimated cost of
reclamation by certified mail to the
applicant. The applicant shall send written
notice to the chief indicating the method by
which the applicant will provide the
performance security pursuant to division (C)
of this section.
(C) The applicant shall provide the
performance security in an amount using one
of the following:
(1) If the applicant elects to provide
performance security without reliance on the
reclamation forfeiture fund created in section
1513.18 of the Revised Code, the amount of
the estimated cost of reclamation as
determined by the chief under division (B) of
this section for the increments of land on
which the operator will conduct a coal
mining and reclamation operation under the
initial term of the permit as indicated in the
application;
(2) If the applicant elects to provide
performance security together with reliance
on the reclamation forfeiture fund through
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
payment of the additional tax on the
severance of coal that is levied under
division (A)(8) of section 5749.02 of the
Revised Code, an amount of twenty-five
hundred dollars per acre of land on which
the operator will conduct coal mining and
reclamation under the initial term of the
permit as indicated in the application.
However, in order to be eligible to provide
performance security in accordance with
division (C)(2) of this section, an applicant
shall have held a permit issued under this
chapter for any coal mining and reclamation
operation for a period of not less than five
years. In the event of forfeiture of
performance security that was provided in
accordance with division (C)(2) of this
section, the difference between the amount of
that performance security and the estimated
cost of reclamation as determined by the
chief under division (B) of this section shall
be obtained from money in the reclamation
forfeiture fund as needed to complete the
reclamation.
The performance security provided under
division (C) of this section for the entire area
to be mined under one permit issued under
this chapter shall not be less than ten
thousand dollars. The performance security
shall cover areas of land affected by mining
within or immediately adjacent to the
permitted area, so long as the total number
of acres does not exceed the number of acres
for which the performance security is
provided. However, the authority for the
performance security to cover areas of land
immediately adjacent to the permitted area
does not authorize a permittee to mine areas
outside an approved permit area. As
succeeding increments of coal mining and
reclamation operations are to be initiated and
conducted within the permit area, the
permittee shall file with the chief additional
performance security to cover the increments
in accordance with this section. If a permittee
intends to mine areas outside the approved
permit area, the permittee shall provide
additional performance security in
accordance with this section to cover the
areas to be mined.
An applicant shall provide performance
security in accordance with division (C)(1) of
this section in the full amount of the
estimated cost of reclamation as determined
by the chief for a permitted coal preparation
plant or coal refuse disposal area that is not
located within a permitted area of a mine. A
permittee shall provide the performance
security not later than one year after the
effective date of this amendment for a
permitted coal preparation plant or coal
refuse disposal area that is in existence on
the effective date of this amendment and that
is not located within a permitted area of a
mine.
(D) A permittee’s liability under the
performance security shall be limited to the
obligations established under the permit,
which include completion of the reclamation
plan in order to make the land capable of
supporting the postmining land use that was
approved in the permit. The period of
liability under the performance security shall
be for the duration of the coal mining and
reclamation operation and for a period
coincident with the operator’s responsibility
E:\FR\FM\30APP1.SGM
30APP1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 82 / Monday, April 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules
for revegetation requirements under section
1513.16 of the Revised Code.
(E) The amount of the estimated cost of
reclamation determined under division (B) of
this section and the amount of a permittee’s
performance security provided in accordance
with division (C)(1) of this section may be
adjusted by the chief as the land that is
affected by mining increases or decreases or
if the cost of reclamation increases or
decreases. If the performance security was
provided in accordance with division (C)(2)
of this section and the chief has issued a
cessation order under division (D)(2) of
section 1513.02 of the Revised Code for
failure to abate a violation of the
contemporaneous reclamation requirement
under division (A)(15) of section 1513.16 of
the Revised Code, the chief may require the
permittee to increase the amount of
performance security from twenty-five
hundred dollars per acre of land to five
thousand dollars per acre of land.
The chief shall notify the permittee, each
surety, and any person who has a property
interest in the performance security and who
has requested to be notified of any proposed
adjustment to the performance security. The
permittee may request an informal
conference with the chief concerning the
proposed adjustment, and the chief shall
provide such an informal conference.
If the chief increases the amount of
performance security under this division, the
permittee shall provide additional
performance security in an amount
determined by the chief. If the chief
decreases the amount of performance
security under this division, the chief shall
determine the amount of the reduction of the
performance security and send written notice
of the amount of reduction to the permittee.
The permittee may reduce the amount of the
performance security in the amount
determined by the chief.
(F) A permittee may request a reduction in
the amount of the performance security by
submitting to the chief documentation
proving that the amount of the performance
security provided by the permittee exceeds
the estimated cost of reclamation if the
reclamation would have to be performed by
the division in the event of forfeiture of the
performance security. The chief shall
examine the documentation and determine
whether the permittee’s performance security
exceeds the estimated cost of reclamation. If
the chief determines that the performance
security exceeds that estimated cost, the chief
shall determine the amount of the reduction
of the performance security and send written
notice of the amount to the permittee. The
permittee may reduce the amount of the
performance security in the amount
determined by the chief. Adjustments in the
amount of performance security under this
division shall not be considered release of
performance security and are not subject to
section 1513.16 of the Revised Code.
(G) If the performance security is a bond,
it shall be executed by the operator and a
corporate surety licensed to do business in
this state. If the performance security is a
cash deposit or negotiable certificates of
deposit of a bank or savings and loan
association, the bank or savings and loan
association shall be licensed and operating in
this state. The cash deposit or market value
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:42 Apr 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
of the securities shall be equal to or greater
than the amount of the performance security
required under this section. The chief shall
review any documents pertaining to the
performance security and approve or
disapprove the documents. The chief shall
notify the applicant of the chief’s
determination.
(H) If the performance security is a bond,
the chief may accept the bond of the
applicant itself without separate surety when
the applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction
of the chief the existence of a suitable agent
to receive service of process and a history of
financial solvency and continuous operation
sufficient for authorization to self-insure or
bond the amount.
(I) Performance security provided under
this section may be held in trust, provided
that the state is the conditional beneficiary of
the trust and the custodian of the
performance security held in trust is a bank,
trust company, or other financial institution
that is licensed and operating in this state.
The chief shall review the trust document
and approve or disapprove the document.
The chief shall notify the applicant of the
chief’s determination.
(J) If a surety, bank, savings and loan
association, trust company, or other financial
institution that holds the performance
security required under this section becomes
insolvent, the permittee shall notify the chief
of the insolvency, and the chief shall order
the permittee to submit a plan for
replacement performance security within
thirty days after receipt of notice from the
chief. If the permittee provided performance
security in accordance with division (C)(1) of
this section, the permittee shall provide the
replacement performance security within
ninety days after receipt of notice from the
chief. If the permittee provided performance
security in accordance with division (C)(2) of
this section, the permittee shall provide the
replacement performance security within one
year after receipt of notice from the chief,
and, for a period of one year after the
permittee’s receipt of notice from the chief or
until the permittee provides the replacement
performance security, whichever occurs first,
money in the reclamation forfeiture fund
shall be the permittee’s replacement
performance security in an amount not to
exceed the estimated cost of reclamation as
determined by the chief.
(K) A permittee’s responsibility for
repairing material damage and replacement
of water supply resulting from subsidence
may be satisfied by liability insurance
required under this chapter in lieu of the
permittee’s performance security if the
liability insurance policy contains terms and
conditions that specifically provide coverage
for repairing material damage and
replacement of water supply resulting from
subsidence.
(L) If the performance security provided in
accordance with this section exceeds the
estimated cost of reclamation, the chief may
authorize the amount of the performance
security that exceeds the estimated cost of
reclamation together with any interest or
other earnings on the performance security to
be paid to the permittee.
In its submittal, Ohio summarized the
amendments at ORC 1513.08 as follows.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21179
Ohio stated that ORC 1513.08(B)
requires the Chief of DMRM to
determine the cost of reclamation, on a
case by case basis, for all permit
applications submitted. The cost of such
reclamation shall be determined as if
forfeiture of the performance security
had occurred and DMRM is required to
perform the reclamation. This
determination shall be a basis for the
amount of performance security, and
shall be made subsequent to application
approval, but prior to permit issuance.
DMRM notifies the applicant via
certified mail of the cost of performance
security. Ohio stated that the applicant
then responds and indicates the method
of providing performance security at
ORC 1513.08(C):
(C)(1) Full cost, incrementally, under the
initial permit term, or
(C)(2) $2,500/acre on land under initial
permit term.
If choosing option (C)(2), the company
will pay additional tax into the bond
pool in the amount provided by ORC
5749.02(A)(8).
Ohio stated that if performance
security is forfeited, the bond pool may
be used to supplement the $2,500/acre
flat bond rate up to the Chief’s
determination of cost pursuant to
ORC1513.08(B). Only applicants
holding permits in Ohio for at least 5
years have option (C)(2).
The minimum performance security
shall be $10,000 for any one permit.
Existing (permitted) coal prep plants/
refuse disposal facilities not within a
permit of a mine must provide full cost
performance security within one year of
the effective date of the law.
Ohio stated that under ORC
1513.08(D), performance security
liability is limited to obligations
established under the permit.
Ohio stated that under ORC
1513.08(E), the Chief’s estimated cost of
reclamation and amount of performance
security may be adjusted by DMRM
based upon cost increases/decreases.
Operators choosing the flat rate/bond
pool option may have the bond rate
increased to $5,000/acre if a failure to
abate cession order is issued due to noncontemporaneous reclamation.
Ohio stated that performance security
adjustments require notification to
permittee, surety and any person who
has a property interest in the
performance security upon request. A
permittee may request an informal
conference regarding a proposed rate
adjustment.
Ohio stated that ORC 1513.08(F),
provides for a permittee to request
reduction in performance security based
upon documentation proving actual cost
E:\FR\FM\30APP1.SGM
30APP1
21180
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 82 / Monday, April 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules
of reclamation to the Division is less
than the amount posted.
Ohio stated that under ORC 1513.08
(G), if performance security is issued in
the form of a bond, the surety must be
licensed to conduct business in Ohio. If
the performance security is cash deposit
or a certificate of deposit of a bank or
savings and loan association, that
business shall be licensed and operating
in Ohio. Ohio further stated that the
Chief is required to review performance
security documents and approve of their
use.
Ohio stated that ORC 1513.08(I)
provides criteria for performance
security held in trust. The Chief must
review and approve trust documents.
Ohio stated that ORC 1513.08 (J)
provides the following procedures for
holder of performance security
insolvency: Permittee notification to
DMRM; Plan for replacement of
performance; security; Replacement of
full cost performance security in 90
days; Replacement of flat rate
performance security in one year.
Ohio stated that ORC 1513.08(K)
provides that subsidence damages and
replacement of subsidence damaged
water supplies may be satisfied by
liability insurance in lieu of
performance security. Such insurance
specifically must address such damages.
Ohio stated that ORC 1513.08(L)
provides that performance security
exceeding the cost of reclamation may
be returned to the operator along with
interest or other earnings.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
9. ORC 1513.081 DMRM Priority Lien
This provision is new and provides as
follows:
Sec. 1513.081. (A) If an operator becomes
insolvent, the division of mineral resources
management shall have a priority lien in
front of all other interested creditors against
the assets of that operator for the amount of
any reclamation that is required as a result
of the operator’s mining activities. The chief
of the division of mineral resources
management shall file a statement in the
office of the county recorder of each county
in which the mined land lies of the estimated
cost to reclaim the land. The estimated cost
to reclaim the land shall include the direct
and indirect costs of the development,
design, construction, management, and
administration of the reclamation. The
statement shall constitute a lien on the assets
of the operator as of the date of the filing. The
lien shall continue in force so long as any
portion of the lien remains unpaid or until
the chief issues a certificate of release of the
lien. If the chief issues a certificate of release
of the lien, the chief shall file the certificate
of release in the office of each applicable
county recorder.
(B) The chief promptly shall issue a
certificate of release of a lien under any of
the following circumstances:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Apr 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
(1) Upon the repayment in full of the
money that is necessary to complete the
reclamation;
(2) Upon the transfer of an existing permit
that includes the areas of the operation for
which reclamation was not completed to a
different operator;
(3) Any other circumstance that the chief
determines to be in the best interests of the
state.
(C) The chief may modify the amount of a
lien under this section. If the chief modifies
a lien, the chief shall file a statement in the
office of the county recorder of each
applicable county of the new amount of the
lien.
(D) The chief may authorize an agent to
hold a certificate of release in escrow for a
period not to exceed one hundred eighty
days for the purpose of facilitating the
transfer of unreclaimed mine land.
(E) All money from the collection of liens
under this section shall be deposited in the
state treasury to the credit of the reclamation
forfeiture fund created in section 1513.18 of
the Revised Code.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that ORC
1513.081(A) provides for DMRM’s
priority lien ahead of other creditors in
event of operator insolvency. Lien can
be used to recover the cost of
reclamation including all associated
administrative costs. Lien must be filed
by DMRM in the appropriate county
recorder’s office. Ohio stated that
subsection (B) provides for the release of
a filed lien and/or adjustment.
10. ORC 1513.16(F)(8)(a)
Financial Security (AFS)
Alternative
This provision is new and provides as
follows:
(8)(a) Except as provided in division
(F)(8)(c) of this section, if the chief
determines that a permittee is responsible for
mine drainage that requires water treatment
after reclamation is completed under the
terms of the permit or that a permittee must
provide an alternative water supply after
reclamation is completed under the terms of
the permit, the permittee shall provide
alternative financial security in an amount
determined by the chief prior to the release
of the remaining portion of performance
security under division (F)(3)(c) of this
section. The alternative financial security
shall be in an amount that is equal to or
greater than the present value of the
estimated cost over time to develop and
implement mine drainage plans and provide
water treatment or in an amount that is
necessary to provide and maintain an
alternative water supply, as applicable. The
alternative financial security shall include a
contract, trust, or other agreement or
mechanism that is enforceable under law to
provide long-term water treatment or a longterm alternative water supply, or both.
(b) The chief shall adopt rules in
accordance with Chapter 119 of the Revised
Code that are necessary for the
administration of division (F)(8)(a) of this
section.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(c) Division (F)(8)(a) of this section does
not apply while the chief’s determination of
a permittee’s responsibility under that
division is the subject of a good faith
administrative or judicial appeal contesting
the validity of the determination. If after
completion of the appeal there is an
enforceable administrative or judicial
decision affirming or modifying the chief’s
determination, the permittee shall provide
the alternative financial security in an
amount established in the administrative or
judicial decision.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that ORC
1513.16(F)(8) provides provisions for an
Alternative Financial Security (AFS) to
address mine drainage treatment or
alternative water supply replacement
after reclamation is completed. An AFS
is to be provided prior to release of
remaining bond in the form of a
contract, trust or other agreements
enforceable under law to provide longterm water treatment or alternative
supply. Subsection (b) requires the
Chief to adopt new rules to administer
the AFS.
11. ORC 1513.16(F)(9)
Jurisdiction
Termination of
This provision is new and provides as
follows:
(9) Final release of the performance
security in accordance with division (F)(3)(c)
of this section terminates the jurisdiction of
the chief under this chapter over the
reclaimed site of a surface coal mining and
reclamation operation or applicable portion
of an operation. However, the chief shall
reassert jurisdiction over such a site if the
release was based on fraud, collusion, or
misrepresentation of a material fact and the
chief, in writing, demonstrates evidence of
the fraud, collusion, or misrepresentation.
Any person with an interest that is or may
be adversely affected by the chief’s
determination may appeal the determination
to the reclamation commission in accordance
with section 1513.13 of the Revised Code.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that this
provision provides for the final release
of performance security and terminates
the Division’s jurisdiction unless certain
specific issues are subsequently found
to be present.
12. ORC 1513.171
Tax Credit
Coal Reclamation
This provision is new, and provides
as follows:
Sec. 1513.171. (A) For the purpose of
claiming a credit under section 5749.11 of
the Revised Code, an operator with a valid
permit issued under section 1513.07 of the
Revised Code may submit an application to
the chief of the division of mineral resources
management to perform reclamation on land
or water resources that are not within the
area of the applicant’s permit and that have
been adversely affected by past coal mining
for which the performance security was
E:\FR\FM\30APP1.SGM
30APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 82 / Monday, April 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
forfeited. The chief shall provide the
application form. The application shall
include all of the following:
(1) The operator’s name, address, and
telephone number;
(2) The valid permit number of the
operator;
(3) An identification of the area or areas to
be reclaimed;
(4) An identification of the owner of the
land;
(5) A reclamation plan that describes the
work to be done to reclaim the land or water
resources. The plan shall include a
description of how the plan is consistent
with local physical, environmental, and
climatological conditions and the measures
to be taken during the reclamation to ensure
the protection of water systems.
(6) An estimate of the total cost of the
reclamation;
(7) An estimate of the timetables for
accomplishing the reclamation;
(8) Any other requirements that the chief
prescribes by rule.
The chief shall approve, disapprove, or
approve with modifications the application
concerning the proposed reclamation work. If
the chief approves the application, the
applicant may commence reclamation in
accordance with the timetables included in
the application. Upon the completion of the
reclamation to the satisfaction of the chief,
the chief shall issue a numbered reclamation
tax credit certificate showing the amount of
the credit and the identity of the recipient.
Prior to the close of the fiscal quarter in
which the tax credit certificate is issued, the
chief shall certify to the tax commissioner the
amount of the credit and the identity of the
recipient.
(B) The chief shall determine the amount
of the credit in accordance with this section
and rules adopted under it. The amount of
the credit shall be equal to the cost that the
division of mineral resources management
would have expended from the reclamation
forfeiture fund created in section 1513.18 of
the Revised Code to complete the
reclamation.
(C) The chief shall adopt rules in
accordance with Chapter 119. of the Revised
Code that are necessary to administer this
section. The rules shall establish all of the
following:
(1) A procedure that the chief shall use to
determine the amount of the credit issued
under this section;
(2) A procedure by which the chief may
obtain consent of the owners of land or water
resources to allow reclamation work for
purposes of this section;
(3) A procedure for delivery of notice to the
owners of land or water resources on which
the reclamation work is to be performed. The
rules shall require the notice to include the
date on which the reclamation work is
scheduled to begin.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that this
provision establishes procedures for
claiming tax credit pursuant to section
5749.11 of the ORC. A coal mine
operator may submit an application to
reclaim another mined area with
forfeited bond. Once reclamation is
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Apr 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
completed, the Chief shall issue
numbered tax credits in the amount of
the credit. Under subsection (B), the
Chief shall determine the amount of the
credit, equivalent to the cost of
reclamation to the division if the work
had been completed by the state.
Subsection (C) requires the Chief to
adopt rules to administer and establish
procedures to address: Amount of tax
credit; Consent of landowner or owner
of the water resources to conduct
reclamation; and Notification to
landowner of reclamation work and
schedule.
13. ORC 1513.18
Forfeiture Fund
Reclamation
Subsection (B) is amended in the first
sentence by deleting the phrase ‘‘any
moneys transferred to it under this
division from the unreclaimed lands
fund created in section 1513.30.’’ In
place of that deleted language, the
following phrase is added: ‘‘All money
from the collection of liens under
section 1513.081.’’ The first sentence in
subsection (B) is also amended by
identifying that funds derived from
certain fines will be added to the
reclamation forfeiture fund. Language
concerning the Chief’s management of
the fund is deleted. Language
concerning the transfer of funds from
the unreclaimed lands fund is deleted.
Language concerning use of money from
the reclamation forfeiture fund to cover
administrative expenses has been
added. As amended, subsection (B)
provides as follows:
(B) The fund also shall consist of all money
from the collection of liens under section
1513.081 of the Revised Code, any moneys
transferred to it under section 1513.181 of the
Revised Code from the coal mining and
reclamation reserve fund created in that
section, fines collected under division (E) of
section 1513.02 and section 1513.99 of the
Revised Code, fines collected for a violation
of section 2921.31 of the Revised Code that,
prior to July 1, 1996, would have been a
violation of division (G) of section 1513.17 of
the Revised Code as it existed prior to that
date, and moneys collected and credited to
it pursuant to section 5749.02 of the Revised
Code. Disbursements from the fund shall be
made by the chief in accordance with
division (D) of this section for the purpose of
reclaiming areas that an operator has affected
by mining and failed to reclaim under a coal
mining and reclamation permit issued under
this chapter or under a surface mining permit
issued under Chapter 1514. of the Revised
Code.
The chief may expend moneys from the
fund to pay necessary administrative costs,
including engineering and design services,
incurred by the division of mineral resources
management in reclaiming these areas. The
chief also may expend moneys from the fund
to pay necessary administrative costs of the
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21181
reclamation forfeiture fund advisory board
created in section 1513.182 of the Revised
Code as authorized by the board under that
section. Expenditures from the fund to pay
such administrative costs need not be made
under contract.
Subsection (C) is amended by adding
the phrase ‘‘or trustee, if the
performance security is held in trust,’’
immediately following the words ‘‘or a
contractor hired by the surety.’’
Subsection (D) is amended by
amending the existing language,
codifying the existing language as
paragraph (1), and by adding three new
paragraphs. As amended, subsection (D)
provides as follows:
(D)(1) The chief shall expend money
credited to the reclamation forfeiture fund
from the forfeiture of the performance
security applicable to an area of land or
under section 1513.181 of the Revised Code
the amount of money to pay for the cost of
the reclamation of the land.
(2) If the performance security for the area
of land was provided under division (C)(1) of
section 1513.08 of the Revised Code, the
chief shall use the money from the forfeited
performance security to complete the
reclamation that the operator failed to do
under the operator’s applicable coal mining
and reclamation permit issued under this
chapter.
(3) If the performance security for the area
of land was provided under division (C)(2) of
section 1513.08 of the Revised Code, the
chief shall use the money from the forfeited
performance security to complete the
reclamation that the operator failed to do
under the operator’s applicable coal mining
and reclamation permit issued under this
chapter. If the money credited to the
reclamation forfeiture fund from the
forfeiture of the performance security
provided under division (C)(2) of section
1513.08 of the Revised Code is not sufficient
to complete the reclamation, the chief shall
notify the reclamation forfeiture fund
advisory board of the amount of the
insufficiency. The chief may expend money
credited to the reclamation forfeiture fund
under section 5749.02 of the Revised Code or
transferred to the fund under section
1513.181 of the Revised Code to complete the
reclamation. The chief shall not expend
money from the fund in an amount that
exceeds the difference between the amount of
the performance security provided under
division (C)(2) of section 1513.08 of the
Revised Code and the estimated cost of
reclamation as determined by the chief under
divisions (B) and (E) of that section.
(4) Money from the reclamation forfeiture
fund shall not be used for reclamation of land
or water resources affected by material
damage from subsidence, mine drainage that
requires extended water treatment after
reclamation is completed under the terms of
the permit, or coal preparation plants or coal
refuse disposal areas not located within a
permitted area of a mine if performance
security for the area of land was provided
under division (C)(2) of section 1513.08 of
the Revised Code.
E:\FR\FM\30APP1.SGM
30APP1
21182
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 82 / Monday, April 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Subsection (F) is amended in the first
sentence by adding the following
proviso to the beginning of the sentence:
‘‘Except as otherwise provided in
division (H) of this section.’’
New subsection (H) is added to
provide as follows:
(H) All investment earnings of the fund
shall be credited to the fund and shall be
used only for the reclamation of land for
which performance security was provided
under division (C)(2) of section 1513.08 of
the Revised Code.
14. ORC 1513.181 Coal Mining
Administration and Reclamation
Reserve Fund
This provision is amended by deleting
from the first paragraph, third sentence,
the following phrase: ‘‘Or by surface
mining under a surface mining permit
issued under Chapter 1514 of the
Revised Code.’’ Also, the second
paragraph, concerning the identification
of fines collected that would be added
to the coal mining administration and
reclamation reserve fund is deleted.
That deleted paragraph is replaced by
the following new paragraph:
If the director of natural resources
determines it to be necessary, the director
may request the controlling board to transfer
an amount of money from the coal mining
administration and reclamation reserve fund
to the unreclaimed lands fund created in
section 1513.30 of the Revised Code.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
15. ORC 1513.182 Reclamation
Forfeiture Fund Advisory Board
This provision is new, and provides
as follows:
Sec. 1513.182. (A) There is hereby created
the reclamation forfeiture fund advisory
board consisting of the director of natural
resources, the director of insurance, and
seven members appointed by the governor
with the advice and consent of the senate. Of
the governor’s appointments, one shall be a
certified public accountant, one shall be a
registered professional engineer with
experience in reclamation of mined land, two
shall represent agriculture, agronomy, or
forestry, one shall be a representative of
operators of coal mining operations that have
valid permits issued under this chapter and
that have provided performance security
under division (C)(1) of section 1513.08 of
the Revised Code, one shall be a
representative of operators of coal mining
operations that have valid permits issued
under this chapter and that have provided
performance security under division (C)(2) of
section 1513.08 of the Revised Code, and one
shall be a representative of the public.
Of the original members appointed by the
governor, two shall serve an initial term of
two years, three an initial term of three years,
and two an initial term of four years.
Thereafter, terms of appointed members shall
be for four years, with each term ending on
the same date as the original date of
appointment. An appointed member shall
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Apr 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
hold office from the date of appointment
until the end of the term for which the
member was appointed. Vacancies shall be
filled in the same manner as original
appointments. A member appointed to fill a
vacancy occurring prior to the expiration of
the term for which the member’s predecessor
was appointed shall hold office for the
remainder of that term. A member shall
continue in office subsequent to the
expiration date of the member’s term until
the member’s successor takes office or until
a period of sixty days has elapsed, whichever
occurs first. The governor may remove an
appointed member of the board for
misfeasance, nonfeasance, or malfeasance.
The directors of natural resources and
insurance shall not receive compensation for
serving on the board, but shall be reimbursed
for the actual and necessary expenses
incurred in the performance of their duties as
members of the board. The members
appointed by the governor shall receive per
diem compensation fixed pursuant to
division (J) of section 124.15 of the Revised
Code and reimbursement for the actual and
necessary expenses incurred in the
performance of their duties.
(B) The board annually shall elect from
among its members a chairperson, a vicechairperson, and a secretary to record the
board’s meetings.
(C) The board shall hold meetings as often
as necessary as the chairperson or a majority
of the members determines.
(D) The board shall establish procedures
for conducting meetings and for the election
of its chairperson, vice-chairperson, and
secretary.
(E) The board shall do all of the following:
(1) Review the deposits into and
expenditures from the reclamation forfeiture
fund created in section 1513.18 of the
Revised Code;
(2) Retain periodically a qualified actuary
to perform an actuarial study of the
reclamation forfeiture fund;
(3) Based on an actuarial study and as
determined necessary by the board, adopt
rules in accordance with Chapter 119. of the
Revised Code to adjust the rate of the tax
levied under division (A)(8) of section
5749.02 of the Revised Code and the balance
of the reclamation forfeiture fund that
pertains to that rate;
(4) Evaluate any rules, procedures, and
methods for estimating the cost of
reclamation for purposes of determining the
amount of performance security that is
required under section 1513.08 of the
Revised Code; the collection of forfeited
performance security; payments to the
reclamation forfeiture fund; reclamation of
sites for which operators have forfeited the
performance security; and the compliance of
operators with their reclamation plans;
(5) Provide a forum for discussion of issues
related to the reclamation forfeiture fund and
the performance security that is required
under section 1513.08 of the Revised Code;
(6) Submit a report biennially to the
governor that describes the financial status of
the reclamation forfeiture fund and the
adequacy of the amount of money in the fund
to accomplish the purposes of the fund and
that may discuss any matter related to the
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
performance security that is required under
section 1513.08 of the Revised Code;
(7) Make recommendations to the governor,
if necessary, of alternative methods of
providing money for or using money in the
reclamation forfeiture fund and issues related
to the reclamation of land or water resources
that have been adversely affected by past coal
mining for which the performance security
was forfeited;
(8) Adopt rules in accordance with Chapter
119. of the Revised Code that are necessary
to administer this section.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that ORC
1513.182 creates the reclamation
forfeiture fund advisory board,
establishes specific terms of
appointments and per diem
compensation, and establishes the
duties of the board.
16. ORC 1513.29 Council on
Unreclaimed Strip Mined Lands
This existing provision is amended in
the third paragraph by deleting the
requirement to hold ‘‘at least four
regular quarterly meetings each year,’’
and amending the provision to
authorize meetings ‘‘as necessary.’’ The
fourth paragraph is amended by deleting
reference to the ‘‘strip mining
reclamation fund,’’ and in its place,
adding reference to the ‘‘reclamation
forfeiture fund created in section
1513.18 of the Revised Code.’’ The fifth
paragraph is amended by deleting the
phrase ‘‘of the division of mineral
resources management.’’
17. ORC 1513.30 Unreclaimed Strip
Mined Lands Fund
This provision is amended by deleting
the following requirement to provide
public notice:
At least two weeks before any meeting of
the council on unreclaimed strip mined
lands at which the chief will submit a project
proposal, a project area will be selected, or
the boundaries of a project area will be
determined, the chief shall mail notice by
first class mail to the board of county
commissioners of the county and the board
of township trustees of the township in
which the proposed project lies and the chief
executive and the legislative authority of
each municipal corporation within the
proposed project area. The chief also shall
give reasonable notice to the news media in
the county where the proposed project lies.
ORC 1513.30 is also amended by
deleting a paragraph that authorized the
controlling board to transfer excess
funds from the oil and gas well fund.
ORC 1513.30 is amended by adding a
new paragraph to authorize the
controlling board to transfer money
from the fund to the coal mining
administration and reclamation reserve
fund. The new paragraph provides as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\30APP1.SGM
30APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 82 / Monday, April 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules
If the director of natural resources
determines it to be necessary, the director
may request the controlling board to transfer
an amount of money from the fund to the
coal mining administration and reclamation
reserve fund created in section 1513.181 of
the Revised Code.
18. ORC 1513.37 Abandoned Mine
Reclamation Fund
This provision is amended at
subsection (C)(3) by adding the words
‘‘performance security, or other form of
financial guarantee’’ in three places
following the word ‘‘bond.’’
19. ORC 1513.371 Mined Land Set
Aside Fund
This provision is new and provides as
follows:
There is hereby created in the state
treasury the mined land set aside fund
consisting of grants made by the United
States secretary of the interior from the
federal abandoned mine reclamation fund
pursuant to section 402 of the ‘‘Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of
1977,’’ 91 Stat. 445, 30 U.S.C. 1232. The chief
of the division of mineral resources
management shall administer the fund.
Money in the fund shall be used solely for
the purposes specified in divisions (B)(1) to
(4) of section 1513.37 of the Revised Code.
All investment earnings of the fund shall be
credited to the fund.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
20. ORC 5749.02 Excise Tax on
Severance of Natural Resources
Subsection (A) is amended at
paragraph (A)(1) by increasing the
severance tax levied on coal from
‘‘Seven’’ cents to ‘‘Ten’’ cents.
Subsection (A) is further amended by
adding new paragraphs (8) and (9). New
paragraph (A)(8) levies a tax of 14 cents
per ton of coal to fund the bond pool,
and paragraph (A)(9) levies a tax of one
and two tenths cents per ton of coal.
New paragraphs (A)(8) and (A)(9)
provide as follows:
(8) Except as otherwise provided in this
division or in rules adopted by the
reclamation forfeiture fund advisory board
under section 1513.182 of the Revised Code,
an additional fourteen cents per ton of coal
produced from an area under a coal mining
and reclamation permit issued under Chapter
1513. of the Revised Code for which the
performance security is provided under
division (C)(2) of section 1513.08 of the
Revised Code. If at the end of a fiscal
biennium the balance of the reclamation
forfeiture fund created in section 1513.18 of
the Revised Code is equal to or greater than
ten million dollars, the rate levied shall be
twelve cents per ton. If at the end of a fiscal
biennium the balance of the fund is at least
five million dollars, but less than ten million
dollars, the rate levied shall be fourteen cents
per ton. If at the end of a fiscal biennium the
balance of the fund is less than five million
dollars, the rate levied shall be sixteen cents
per ton. Not later than thirty days after the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Apr 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
close of a fiscal biennium, the chief of the
division of mineral resources management
shall certify to the tax commissioner the
amount of the balance of the reclamation
forfeiture fund as of the close of the fiscal
biennium. Any necessary adjustment of the
rate levied shall take effect on the first day
of the following January and shall remain in
effect during the calendar biennium that
begins on that date.
(9) An additional one and two-tenths cents
per ton of coal mined by surface mining
methods.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that ORC
5749.02(A) has been amended by
increasing the coal severance tax from
seven cents to 10 cents per ton. New
paragraph (8) provides that if
performance security is provided by
way of the bond pool and $2,500 flat
rate bond, then an additional 14 cents
per ton is required by those operations.
If the forfeiture fund balance exceeds
$10 million at the end of a fiscal
biennium, the rate is reduced to 12
cents per ton. If the balance is greater
than $5 million but less than $10
million, 14 cents per ton is required. If
the balance is less than $5 million, 16
cents per ton is required.
Ohio stated that paragraph (9)
provides for an additional one and two
tenths cents per ton at all surface coal
mines.
Subsection (B) is amended by
changing the allocation values of the
moneys received under the taxes levied
under ORC 5749.02(A)(1), specifying
that all of the moneys received under
paragraph (A)(8) will be credited to the
reclamation forfeiture fund, and
specifying that all of the moneys
received under paragraph (A)(9) will be
credited to the unreclaimed lands fund.
Paragraph (C), concerning a tax levied
for the purpose of crediting moneys to
the reclamation forfeiture fund is
deleted. Paragraph (D) is amended by
deleting the first paragraph (including
its designation as (D)) concerning a tax
levied for the purpose of crediting
moneys to the reclamation forfeiture
fund, and revising the second paragraph
by adding language concerning
adjustments to be made to the tax levied
under paragraph (A)(8) based upon the
balance of the reclamation forfeiture
fund at the close of any fiscal year. As
amended, ORC 5749.02(B) provides as
follows:
(B) Of the moneys received by the treasurer
of state from the tax levied in division (A)(1)
of this section, four and seventy-sixhundredths per cent shall be credited to the
geological mapping fund created in section
1505.09 of the Revised Code, eighty and
ninety-five-hundredths per cent shall be
credited to the coal mining administration
and reclamation reserve fund created in
section 1513.181 of the Revised Code, and
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21183
fourteen and twenty-nine-hundredths per
cent shall be credited to the unreclaimed
lands fund created in section 1513.30 of the
Revised Code.
Fifteen per cent of the moneys received by
the treasurer of state from the tax levied in
division (A)(2) of this section shall be
credited to the geological mapping fund and
the remainder shall be credited to the
unreclaimed lands fund.
Of the moneys received by the treasurer of
state from the tax levied in divisions (A)(3)
and (4) of this section, seven and five-tenths
per cent shall be credited to the geological
mapping fund, forty-two and five-tenths per
cent shall be credited to the unreclaimed
lands fund, and the remainder shall be
credited to the surface mining fund created
in section 1514.06 of the Revised Code.
Of the moneys received by the treasurer of
state from the tax levied in divisions (A)(5)
and (6) of this section, ninety per cent shall
be credited to the oil and gas well fund
created in section 1509.02 of the Revised
Code and ten per cent shall be credited to the
geological mapping fund. All of the moneys
received by the treasurer of state from the tax
levied in division (A)(7) of this section shall
be credited to the surface mining fund.
All of the moneys received by the treasurer
of state from the tax levied in division (A)(8)
of this section shall be credited to the
reclamation forfeiture fund.
All of the moneys received by the treasurer
of state from the tax levied in division (A)(9)
of this section shall be credited to the
unreclaimed lands fund.
When, at the close of any fiscal year, the
chief finds that the balance of the
reclamation forfeiture fund, plus estimated
transfers to it from the coal mining
administration and reclamation reserve fund
under section 1513.181 of the Revised Code,
plus the estimated revenues from the tax
levied by division (A)(8) of this section for
the remainder of the calendar year that
includes the close of the fiscal year, are
sufficient to complete the reclamation of
lands for which the performance security has
been provided under division (C)(2) of
section 1513.08 of the Revised Code, the
purposes for which the tax under division
(A)(8) of this section is levied shall be
deemed accomplished at the end of that
calendar year. The chief, within thirty days
after the close of the fiscal year, shall certify
those findings to the tax commissioner, and
the tax levied under division (A)(8) of this
section shall cease to be imposed after the
last day of that calendar year on coal
produced under a coal mining and
reclamation permit issued under Chapter
1513. of the Revised Code if the permittee
has made tax payments under division (A)(8)
of this section during each of the preceding
five full calendar years. Not later than thirty
days after the close of a fiscal year, the chief
shall certify to the tax commissioner the
identity of any permittees who accordingly
no longer are required to pay the tax levied
under division (A)(8) of this section.
Ohio stated that subsection ORC
5749.02(B) is amended to provide that
the moneys received from the ten-cent
tax per ton of coal tax levied in ORC
E:\FR\FM\30APP1.SGM
30APP1
21184
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 82 / Monday, April 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules
5749.02(A)(1) is allocated as follows:
0.476 cents per ton to the geological
mapping fund; 8.095 cents per ton to the
coal mining administration fund; and
1.429 cents per ton to the State AML
fund. Ohio also stated that all of the
moneys received from the 1.2 cents per
ton of on coal tax levied in ORC
5749.02(A)(9) is allocated to the State
AML fund.
Ohio stated that subsection ORC
5749.02(C) is deleted to eliminate the
tax levied at the rate of one cent per ton
of coal, the moneys of which were
allocated to reclaiming bond forfeiture
lands.
Ohio stated that subsection ORC
5749.02(D) is amended to eliminate the
one cent per ton of coal that was
allocated to bond forfeited permits
issued between April 10, 1972 and
September 1, 1981. Subsection (D) also
provides for cessation of the subsection
(A)(8) tax (14 cents/ton) upon finding by
Chief that funds in the reclamation
forfeiture fund are adequate to address
bond pool reclamation on a permit by
permit basis; upon such finding
operators listed as having provided
adequate performance security shall no
longer be required to pay the (A)(8) tax
(14 cents/ton), provided such operators
have made such payments during the
preceding five years.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
21. ORC 5749.11 Nonrefundable
Credit
This provision is new, and provides
for a nonrefundable credit against the
taxes imposed under ORC
5749.02(A)(8). This new provision
provides as follows:
Sec. 5749.11. (A) There is hereby allowed
a nonrefundable credit against the taxes
imposed under division (A)(8) of section
5749.02 of the Revised Code for any severer
to which a reclamation tax credit certificate
is issued under section 1513.171 of the
Revised Code. The credit shall be claimed in
the amount shown on the certificate. The
credit shall be claimed by deducting the
amount of the credit from the amount of the
first tax payment due under section 5749.06
of the Revised Code after the certificate is
issued.
If the amount of the credit shown on a
certificate exceeds the amount of the tax
otherwise due with that first payment, the
excess shall be claimed against the amount
of tax otherwise due on succeeding payment
dates until the entire credit amount has been
deducted. The total amount of credit claimed
against payments shall not exceed the total
amount of credit shown on the certificate.
(B) A severer claiming a credit under this
section shall retain a reclamation tax credit
certificate for not less than four years
following the date of the last tax payment
against which the credit allowed under that
certificate was applied. Severers shall make
tax credit certificates available for inspection
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Apr 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
by the tax commissioner upon the tax
commissioner’s request.
Appalachian Region office at: (614) 416–
2238 .
22. Section 3 of the Amendment
Submittal Provides as Follows
Availability of Comments
Section 3. It is the intent of the General
Assembly to appropriate five million dollars
for the reclamation of land affected by the
surface mining of coal. Of that five million
dollars, not more than fifty thousand dollars
shall be used to study the management of the
financial resources of the coal mining
regulatory program of the Division of Mineral
Resources Management in the Department of
Natural Resources. The Chief of the Division
of Mineral Resources Management, in
consultation with a statewide association
representing the coal mining industry and a
statewide association representing
environmental advocacy, shall develop an
outline of the subjects for the study. The
Chief shall select an objective third party that
has knowledge in the management of
finances to conduct the study. Upon
completion of the study, the third party shall
prepare a report of its findings and submit
the report to the Director of [the Department
of] Natural Resources.
23. Section 6 of the Amendment
Submittal Provides That Section
5749.02 of the Revised Code as
Amended by This Act Shall Take Effect
on April 1, 2007
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment
satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we
approve the amendment, it will become
part of the Ohio program.
Written Comments
Send your written comments to OSM
at the address given above. Your written
comments should be specific, pertain
only to the issues proposed in this
rulemaking, and include explanations in
support of your recommendations. We
will not consider or respond to your
comments when developing the final
rule if they are received after the close
of the comment period (see DATES). We
will make every attempt to log all
comments into the administrative
record, but comments delivered to an
address other than the Appalachian
Region office identified above may not
be logged in.
Electronic Comments
Please submit Internet comments as
an e-mail or Word file avoiding the use
of special characters and any form of
encryption. Please also include ‘‘Attn:
SATS No. OH–252–FOR,’’ your name
and return address in your Internet
message. If you do not receive a
confirmation that we have received your
Internet message, contact the
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4
p.m., local time, on May 15, 2007. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
the hearing. To assist the transcriber and
ensure an accurate record, we request, if
possible, that each person who speaks at
a public hearing provide us with a
written copy of his or her comments.
The public hearing will continue on the
specified date until everyone scheduled
to speak has been given an opportunity
to be heard. If you are in the audience
and have not been scheduled to speak
and wish to do so, you will be allowed
to speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard. If you are
disabled and need a special
accommodation to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an
opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public
hearing. If you wish to meet with us to
discuss the amendment, please request
a meeting by contacting the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings are open to
the public and, if possible, we will post
notices of meetings at the locations
listed under ADDRESSES. We will make
a written summary of each meeting a
part of the administrative record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rule does not have takings
implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
E:\FR\FM\30APP1.SGM
30APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 82 / Monday, April 30, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempted from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under Executive Order 12866.
Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
The basis for this determination is that
our decision is on a State regulatory
program and does not involve a Federal
program involving Indian lands.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that, to the extent
allowable by law, this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a)
and (b) of that section. However, these
standards are not applicable to the
actual language of State regulatory
programs and program amendments
since each such program is drafted and
promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the
submittal is consistent with SMCRA and
its implementing Federal regulations
and whether the other requirements of
30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of
SMCRA requires that State laws
regulating surface coal mining and
reclamation operations be ‘‘in
accordance with’’ the requirements of
SMCRA. Section 503(a)(7) requires that
State programs contain rules and
regulations ‘‘consistent with’’
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on Federallyrecognized Indian tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:35 Apr 27, 2007
Jkt 211001
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
Section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1292(d)) provides that a decision on a
proposed State regulatory program
provision does not constitute a major
Federal action within the meaning of
section 102(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)). A determination has been
made that such decisions are
categorically excluded from the NEPA
process (516 DM 8.4.A).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior has
determined that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal
that is the subject of this rule is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities.
Accordingly, this rule will ensure that
existing requirements previously
promulgated by OSM will be
implemented by the State. In making the
determination as to whether this rule
would have a significant economic
impact, the Department relied upon the
data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
21185
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, geographic
regions, or Federal, State or local
governmental agencies; and (c) Does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the fact
that the State submittal, which is the
subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for
which an analysis was prepared and a
determination made that the Federal
regulation was not considered a major
rule.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose a cost of
$100 million or more in any given year
on any governmental entity or the
private sector.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 935
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: March 21, 2007.
H. Vann Weaver,
Acting Regional Director Appalachian
Region.
[FR Doc. E7–8171 Filed 4–27–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 943
[Docket No. TX–057–FOR]
Texas Regulatory Program and
Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation
Plan
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSM), are announcing receipt of a
proposed amendment to the Texas
regulatory program (Texas program) and
the Texas abandoned mine land plan
(Texas plan) under the Surface Mining
E:\FR\FM\30APP1.SGM
30APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 82 (Monday, April 30, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21176-21185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8171]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 935
[OH-252-FOR]
Ohio Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We (OSM) are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the
Ohio regulatory program (the ``Ohio program'') under the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Ohio proposes
to revise the Ohio Revised Code (ORC) regarding changes to the State's
alternate bonding system (bond pool), funding for its regulatory and
abandoned mine land programs and its bond pool, permitting procedures
for determining the potential that proposed mine sites may or may not
produce acid-mine drainage, and authorizes rule-making if Ohio becomes
covered by a State programmatic general permit issued by the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers for the discharge of dredged or fill material into
waters of the United States by coal mining operations. The amendment is
primarily intended to satisfy a program condition codified in the
Federal regulations. This amendment replaces the State's bond pool
amendment that the State previously submitted and that OSM announced,
and requested public comments on, in the Federal Register dated
February 13, 2006 (71 FR 7480).
This document gives the times and locations that the Ohio program
and proposed amendment to that program are available for your
inspection, the comment period during which you may submit written
comments on the amendment, and the procedures that we will follow for
the public hearing, if one is requested.
DATES: We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4 p.m.
(local time), May 30, 2007. If requested, we will hold a public hearing
on the amendment on May 25, 2007. We will accept requests to speak at a
hearing until 4 p.m., local time, on May 15, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by OH-252-FOR, by any of
the following methods:
E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov. Include OH-252-FOR in the
subject line of the message;
Mail/Hand Delivery: Mr. George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh
Field Division, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
4605 Morse Road, Room 102, Columbus, OH 43230. Telephone: 614-416-2238.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency
docket number for this rulemaking. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking
process, see the ``Public Comment Procedures'' heading in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. You may also
request to speak at a public hearing by any of the methods listed above
or by contacting the individual listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Docket: You may review copies of the Ohio program, this amendment,
a listing of any scheduled public hearings, and all written comments
received in response to this document at the addresses listed below
during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding
holidays. You may also receive one free copy of this amendment by
contacting OSM's Pittsburgh Field Division listed below:
Mr. George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh Field Division, Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement 4605 Morse Road, Room 102, Columbus,
OH 43230 614-416-2238. E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.
Mr. Scott Kell, Acting Chief, Division of Mineral Resources Management,
Ohio Department of Natural Resources, 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. H-2,
Columbus, Ohio 43229, Telephone: (614) 265-6633.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. George Rieger, Chief, Pittsburgh
Field Division, Telephone: (717) 782-4849, extension 11; or 614-416-
2238; or 412-937-2153. E-mail: grieger@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Ohio Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Ohio Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, ``a State law which provides
for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the requirements of the Act * * * and rules and
regulations consistent with regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to the Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis
of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior conditionally approved
the Ohio program on August 16, 1982. You can find background
information on the Ohio program, including the Secretary's findings,
the disposition of comments, and conditions of approval of the Ohio
program in the August 16, 1982, Federal Register (47 FR 34687). You can
also find later actions concerning Ohio's program and program
amendments at 30 CFR 935.11, 935.15, and 935.16.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By letter dated March 6, 2007, Ohio sent us a proposed amendment to
its program (Administrative Record Number OH-2185-28) under SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1201 et seq.). In its letter, Ohio stated that in December of
2006, the Ohio legislature passed House Bill 443, which is intended to
address many of the issues of concern relative to Ohio's bond pool.
Ohio proposes to revise the Ohio Revised Code (ORC) regarding changes
to the State's alternate bonding system (bond pool), funding for its
regulatory and abandoned mine land programs and its bond pool,
permitting procedures for determining the potential that proposed mine
sites may or may not produce acid-mine drainage, and authorizes rule-
making if Ohio becomes covered by a State programmatic general permit
issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the discharge of dredged
or fill material into waters of the United States by coal mining
operations.
The amendment is intended to satisfy a program condition codified
in the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 935.11(h), and is in response to
OSM's letter of May 4, 2005, issued under provisions of 30 CFR
733.12(b). The program condition provides that Ohio must submit a
program amendment that demonstrates how the alternative bonding system
will assure timely reclamation at the site of all operations for which
bond has been forfeited.
[[Page 21177]]
The State also acknowledged that its March 6, 2007, submittal is
intended to replace the bond pool amendment that the State had
submitted to OSM on December 19, 2005. We published and requested
public comment on that previous bond pool amendment in the Federal
Register on February 13, 2006 (71 FR 7480). Because the State has
requested that the current amendment replace its previous amendment, we
are hereby withdrawing the proposed rulemaking that we announced in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2006.
In its March 6, 2007, submittal, Ohio also stated that it realizes
that the passage of HB 443 is only the first step in its efforts to
establish a bonding program in Ohio that is in accordance with the
requirements of SMCRA. Ohio anticipates that significant amendments to
the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC) will be needed in order to ensure
that the final program amendment, in whole, is consistent with the
relevant Federal regulations. To that end, Ohio stated, the Division of
Mineral Resources Management (DMRM) has chartered several workgroups
made up of internal and external stakeholders to develop final
procedures and policies that will be used as a basis for revising the
OAC to implement the provisions of HB 443. Ohio has requested OSM's
technical assistance on these workgroups.
The current amendment provides the following specific revisions. In
the descriptions below, we have not identified the numerous paragraph
re-numbering and citation referencing changes that result from the
substantive changes proposed in this amendment.
1. ORC 1513.01(W) Definition of ``Performance Security''
This definition is new, and provides as follows:
(W) ``Performance security'' means a form of financial
assurance, including, without limitation, a surety bond issued by a
surety licensed to do business in this state; an annuity; cash; a
negotiable certificate of deposit; an irrevocable letter of credit
that automatically renews; a negotiable bond of the United States,
this state, or a municipal corporation in this state; a trust fund
of which the state is named a conditional beneficiary; or other form
of financial guarantee or financial assurance that is acceptable to
the chief.
In addition to the change quoted above, the State has amended or
deleted terms throughout ORC Chapter 1513 in which the word ``bond''
appears, such as in the terms ``performance bond'' and ``bond
coverage,'' and has replaced those terms with the term ``performance
security.''
2. ORC 1513.02(E)(3) Responsibilities of the DMRM
This provision is being amended by deleting the phrase ``coal
mining administration and reclamation reserve fund created in section
1513.181 of the Revised Code'' and revising that phrase to read:
``Reclamation forfeiture fund created in section 1513.18 of the Revised
Code.''
3. ORC 1513.02(J) Responsibilities of DMRM
This provision is new, and provides as follows:
(J) If this state becomes covered by a state programmatic
general permit issued by the United States Army Corps of engineers
for the discharge of dredged or fill material into the waters of the
United States by operations that conduct surface and underground
coal mining and reclamation operations and the restoration of
abandoned mine lands, the chief may establish programs and adopt
rules and procedures designed to implement the terms, limitations,
and conditions of the permit. The purpose of the programs, rules,
and procedures shall be to enable the state to reduce or eliminate
duplicative state and federal project evaluation, simplify the
regulatory approval process, provide environmental protection for
aquatic resources that is equivalent to Federal protection, and
satisfy the requirements of the United States Army Corps of
Engineers regulatory program under which the permit is issued and
that is established under section 404 of the ``Federal Water
Pollution Control Act,'' 86 Stat. 48 (1972), 33 U.S.C. 1344, as
amended by the ``Clean Water Act of 1977,'' 91 Stat. 1600, 33 U.S.C.
1344; section 10 of the ``Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899,'' 30 Stat.
1151, 33 U.S.C. 403; and section 103 of the ``Marine Protection,
Research, and Sanctuaries Act of 1972,'' 86 Stat. 1055, 33 U.S.C.
1413.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that ``if'' a General Permit is
issued for Ohio by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regarding
discharges into jurisdictional waters of United States from surface/
underground coal mining operations and abandoned mine land reclamation
(AML) projects, then DMRM ``may'' establish programs, adopt rules and
develop procedures to implement the General Permit.
4. ORC 1513.07(B)(1) Permit Application; Permit Fee
Paragraph (B)(1) is proposed to be deleted in its entirety, and
provides as follows.
(B)(1) Each application for a coal mining and reclamation permit
or renewal of such a permit shall be accompanied by a permit or
renewal fee in an amount equal to the product of seventy-five
dollars multiplied by the number of acres, estimated in the
application, that will comprise the area of land to be affected
within the permit or renewal period by the coal mining operation for
which the permit or renewal is requested.
5. ORC 1513.07(B)(1)(o) Permit Application; Statement of Acid
Generating Potential and Acid Neutralizing Potential
The following new language is added at the end of this existing
paragraph:
If the test borings or core samplings from the permit area
indicate the existence of potentially acid forming or toxic forming
quantities of sulfur in the coal or overburden to be disturbed by
mining, the application also shall include a statement of the acid
generating potential and the acid neutralizing potential of the rock
strata to be disturbed as calculated in accordance with the
calculation method established under section 1513.075 of the Revised
Code or with another calculation method.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that this new provision directs
applicants to provide an Acid Base Accounting statement pursuant to
methodology prescribed in ORC 1513.075, or another method.
6. ORC 1513.07(E)(8) Permit Application; Monitoring and Recordkeeping
Related to Potential Acidity and Neutralization Potential
This paragraph is new and provides as follows:
(8) In the case of the issuance of a permit that involves a
conflict of results between various methods of calculating potential
acidity and neutralization potential for purposes of assessing the
potential for acid mine drainage to occur at a mine site, the permit
shall include provisions for monitoring and record keeping to
identify the creation of unanticipated acid water at the mine site.
If the monitoring detects the creation of acid water at the site,
the permit shall impose on the permittee additional requirements
regarding mining practices and site reclamation to prevent the
discharge of acid mine drainage from the mine site. As used in
division (E)(8) of this section, ``potential acidity'' and
``neutralization potential'' have the same meanings as in section
1513.075 of the Revised Code.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that this new paragraph provides for
additional monitoring for Acid Mine Drainage if there is a conflict
concerning the assessment of the potential for a mine to discharge AMD.
In the event unanticipated AMD occurs during mining and reclamation,
additional mining practices and reclamation shall be required in order
to prevent AMD discharges.
7. ORC 1513.075 Definitions and Calculating Potential Acidity and
Neutralization Potential
This provision is new and provides as follows:
Sec. 1513.075. (A) As used in this section:
[[Page 21178]]
(1) ``Potential acidity'' means a laboratory measurement of the
amount of acidity that could be produced by material in a rock
strata proposed to be disturbed by mining and that is expressed by a
numeral indicating the number of tons of that acidity that would be
present in one thousand tons of disturbed overburden.
(2) ``Neutralization potential'' means a laboratory measurement
of the alkalinity of a rock strata expressed as the amount of
acidity that would be neutralized by material proposed to be
disturbed by mining and that is expressed by a numeral indicating
the number of tons of that alkalinity that would be present in one
thousand tons of disturbed overburden.
(3) ``Test borings or core samplings'' refer to test borings or
core samplings performed on rock strata in an area proposed to be
covered by a permit for a coal mining operation, the results of
which must be stated in the permit application in accordance with
division (B)(1)(o) of section 1513.07 of the Revised Code.
(B) For purposes of the determination of the chief of the
division of mineral resources management regarding whether to
approve an application for a permit for a coal mining operation
based on criteria established in divisions (E)(2)(a) and (c) of
section 1513.07 of the Revised Code and related performance
standards established in division (A)(10) of section 1513.16 of the
Revised Code, the potential acidity and the neutralization potential
of the rock strata that would be disturbed under the permit may be
calculated in accordance with this section.
(C) The measurement of potential acidity may be based on
laboratory analyses of the sulfur content of the coal and overburden
to be disturbed by mining. If the results of test borings or core
samplings include laboratory analyses of the pyritic form of sulfur,
the applicant may base the calculation of the potential acidity for
the area on the pyritic sulfur content of the coal and overburden to
be disturbed by mining rather than on the total sulfur content.
(D) The tons of rock in the area represented by each core hole
resulting from test boring or core sampling may be estimated and
used to calculate the tons of potential acidity and tons of
neutralization potential for each rock stratum. The sum of those
values across the proposed permit area may be used to calculate the
site's overall neutralization potential and potential acidity.
(E) The proposed permit area may not be considered to have the
potential to create acid or other toxic mine drainage if either of
the following applies:
(1) The numeral that indicates the site's overall neutralization
potential divided by the numeral that indicates the site's overall
potential acidity results in a quotient that is equal to or greater
than two.
(2) The numeral that indicates the neutralization potential
subtracted from the numeral that indicates the potential acidity
results in a remainder that is equal to or less than either of the
following:
(a) Negative five in the case that the total sulfur content of
rock strata is used to calculate potential acidity;
(b) Negative ten in the case that the pyritic sulfur content of
rock strata is used to calculate potential acidity.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that this new provision defines
certain terms relative to potential acidity and neutralization
potential of strata overlying the coal to be mined. The provision also
provides for calculation of proposed mining operations' potential to
create acid or toxic drainage based on specific criteria and indicates
that proposed mining areas not meeting certain numeric criteria ``may''
not be considered as potential acid/toxic producers.
8. ORC 1513.08 Requirement to File a Performance Security
This provision is amended by deleting, adding and rearranging
language relating to performance security. Much new language is added
to this provision, and the provision is reorganized to accommodate the
new language. As amended this section provides as follows:
Sec. 1513.08. (A) After a coal mining and reclamation permit
application has been approved, but before the permit is issued, the
applicant shall file with the chief of the division of mineral
resources management, on a form prescribed and furnished by the
chief, the performance security required under this section.
(B) Using the information contained in the permit application;
the requirements contained in the approved permit and reclamation
plan; and, after considering the topography, geology, hydrology, and
revegetation potential of the area of the approved permit, the
probable difficulty of reclamation; the chief shall determine the
estimated cost of reclamation under the initial term of the permit
if the reclamation has to be performed by the division of mineral
resources management in the event of forfeiture of the performance
security by the applicant. The chief shall send written notice of
the amount of the estimated cost of reclamation by certified mail to
the applicant. The applicant shall send written notice to the chief
indicating the method by which the applicant will provide the
performance security pursuant to division (C) of this section.
(C) The applicant shall provide the performance security in an
amount using one of the following:
(1) If the applicant elects to provide performance security
without reliance on the reclamation forfeiture fund created in
section 1513.18 of the Revised Code, the amount of the estimated
cost of reclamation as determined by the chief under division (B) of
this section for the increments of land on which the operator will
conduct a coal mining and reclamation operation under the initial
term of the permit as indicated in the application;
(2) If the applicant elects to provide performance security
together with reliance on the reclamation forfeiture fund through
payment of the additional tax on the severance of coal that is
levied under division (A)(8) of section 5749.02 of the Revised Code,
an amount of twenty-five hundred dollars per acre of land on which
the operator will conduct coal mining and reclamation under the
initial term of the permit as indicated in the application. However,
in order to be eligible to provide performance security in
accordance with division (C)(2) of this section, an applicant shall
have held a permit issued under this chapter for any coal mining and
reclamation operation for a period of not less than five years. In
the event of forfeiture of performance security that was provided in
accordance with division (C)(2) of this section, the difference
between the amount of that performance security and the estimated
cost of reclamation as determined by the chief under division (B) of
this section shall be obtained from money in the reclamation
forfeiture fund as needed to complete the reclamation.
The performance security provided under division (C) of this
section for the entire area to be mined under one permit issued
under this chapter shall not be less than ten thousand dollars. The
performance security shall cover areas of land affected by mining
within or immediately adjacent to the permitted area, so long as the
total number of acres does not exceed the number of acres for which
the performance security is provided. However, the authority for the
performance security to cover areas of land immediately adjacent to
the permitted area does not authorize a permittee to mine areas
outside an approved permit area. As succeeding increments of coal
mining and reclamation operations are to be initiated and conducted
within the permit area, the permittee shall file with the chief
additional performance security to cover the increments in
accordance with this section. If a permittee intends to mine areas
outside the approved permit area, the permittee shall provide
additional performance security in accordance with this section to
cover the areas to be mined.
An applicant shall provide performance security in accordance
with division (C)(1) of this section in the full amount of the
estimated cost of reclamation as determined by the chief for a
permitted coal preparation plant or coal refuse disposal area that
is not located within a permitted area of a mine. A permittee shall
provide the performance security not later than one year after the
effective date of this amendment for a permitted coal preparation
plant or coal refuse disposal area that is in existence on the
effective date of this amendment and that is not located within a
permitted area of a mine.
(D) A permittee's liability under the performance security shall
be limited to the obligations established under the permit, which
include completion of the reclamation plan in order to make the land
capable of supporting the postmining land use that was approved in
the permit. The period of liability under the performance security
shall be for the duration of the coal mining and reclamation
operation and for a period coincident with the operator's
responsibility
[[Page 21179]]
for revegetation requirements under section 1513.16 of the Revised
Code.
(E) The amount of the estimated cost of reclamation determined
under division (B) of this section and the amount of a permittee's
performance security provided in accordance with division (C)(1) of
this section may be adjusted by the chief as the land that is
affected by mining increases or decreases or if the cost of
reclamation increases or decreases. If the performance security was
provided in accordance with division (C)(2) of this section and the
chief has issued a cessation order under division (D)(2) of section
1513.02 of the Revised Code for failure to abate a violation of the
contemporaneous reclamation requirement under division (A)(15) of
section 1513.16 of the Revised Code, the chief may require the
permittee to increase the amount of performance security from
twenty-five hundred dollars per acre of land to five thousand
dollars per acre of land.
The chief shall notify the permittee, each surety, and any
person who has a property interest in the performance security and
who has requested to be notified of any proposed adjustment to the
performance security. The permittee may request an informal
conference with the chief concerning the proposed adjustment, and
the chief shall provide such an informal conference.
If the chief increases the amount of performance security under
this division, the permittee shall provide additional performance
security in an amount determined by the chief. If the chief
decreases the amount of performance security under this division,
the chief shall determine the amount of the reduction of the
performance security and send written notice of the amount of
reduction to the permittee. The permittee may reduce the amount of
the performance security in the amount determined by the chief.
(F) A permittee may request a reduction in the amount of the
performance security by submitting to the chief documentation
proving that the amount of the performance security provided by the
permittee exceeds the estimated cost of reclamation if the
reclamation would have to be performed by the division in the event
of forfeiture of the performance security. The chief shall examine
the documentation and determine whether the permittee's performance
security exceeds the estimated cost of reclamation. If the chief
determines that the performance security exceeds that estimated
cost, the chief shall determine the amount of the reduction of the
performance security and send written notice of the amount to the
permittee. The permittee may reduce the amount of the performance
security in the amount determined by the chief. Adjustments in the
amount of performance security under this division shall not be
considered release of performance security and are not subject to
section 1513.16 of the Revised Code.
(G) If the performance security is a bond, it shall be executed
by the operator and a corporate surety licensed to do business in
this state. If the performance security is a cash deposit or
negotiable certificates of deposit of a bank or savings and loan
association, the bank or savings and loan association shall be
licensed and operating in this state. The cash deposit or market
value of the securities shall be equal to or greater than the amount
of the performance security required under this section. The chief
shall review any documents pertaining to the performance security
and approve or disapprove the documents. The chief shall notify the
applicant of the chief's determination.
(H) If the performance security is a bond, the chief may accept
the bond of the applicant itself without separate surety when the
applicant demonstrates to the satisfaction of the chief the
existence of a suitable agent to receive service of process and a
history of financial solvency and continuous operation sufficient
for authorization to self-insure or bond the amount.
(I) Performance security provided under this section may be held
in trust, provided that the state is the conditional beneficiary of
the trust and the custodian of the performance security held in
trust is a bank, trust company, or other financial institution that
is licensed and operating in this state. The chief shall review the
trust document and approve or disapprove the document. The chief
shall notify the applicant of the chief's determination.
(J) If a surety, bank, savings and loan association, trust
company, or other financial institution that holds the performance
security required under this section becomes insolvent, the
permittee shall notify the chief of the insolvency, and the chief
shall order the permittee to submit a plan for replacement
performance security within thirty days after receipt of notice from
the chief. If the permittee provided performance security in
accordance with division (C)(1) of this section, the permittee shall
provide the replacement performance security within ninety days
after receipt of notice from the chief. If the permittee provided
performance security in accordance with division (C)(2) of this
section, the permittee shall provide the replacement performance
security within one year after receipt of notice from the chief,
and, for a period of one year after the permittee's receipt of
notice from the chief or until the permittee provides the
replacement performance security, whichever occurs first, money in
the reclamation forfeiture fund shall be the permittee's replacement
performance security in an amount not to exceed the estimated cost
of reclamation as determined by the chief.
(K) A permittee's responsibility for repairing material damage
and replacement of water supply resulting from subsidence may be
satisfied by liability insurance required under this chapter in lieu
of the permittee's performance security if the liability insurance
policy contains terms and conditions that specifically provide
coverage for repairing material damage and replacement of water
supply resulting from subsidence.
(L) If the performance security provided in accordance with this
section exceeds the estimated cost of reclamation, the chief may
authorize the amount of the performance security that exceeds the
estimated cost of reclamation together with any interest or other
earnings on the performance security to be paid to the permittee.
In its submittal, Ohio summarized the amendments at ORC 1513.08 as
follows. Ohio stated that ORC 1513.08(B) requires the Chief of DMRM to
determine the cost of reclamation, on a case by case basis, for all
permit applications submitted. The cost of such reclamation shall be
determined as if forfeiture of the performance security had occurred
and DMRM is required to perform the reclamation. This determination
shall be a basis for the amount of performance security, and shall be
made subsequent to application approval, but prior to permit issuance.
DMRM notifies the applicant via certified mail of the cost of
performance security. Ohio stated that the applicant then responds and
indicates the method of providing performance security at ORC
1513.08(C):
(C)(1) Full cost, incrementally, under the initial permit term,
or
(C)(2) $2,500/acre on land under initial permit term.
If choosing option (C)(2), the company will pay additional tax into
the bond pool in the amount provided by ORC 5749.02(A)(8).
Ohio stated that if performance security is forfeited, the bond
pool may be used to supplement the $2,500/acre flat bond rate up to the
Chief's determination of cost pursuant to ORC1513.08(B). Only
applicants holding permits in Ohio for at least 5 years have option
(C)(2).
The minimum performance security shall be $10,000 for any one
permit. Existing (permitted) coal prep plants/refuse disposal
facilities not within a permit of a mine must provide full cost
performance security within one year of the effective date of the law.
Ohio stated that under ORC 1513.08(D), performance security
liability is limited to obligations established under the permit.
Ohio stated that under ORC 1513.08(E), the Chief's estimated cost
of reclamation and amount of performance security may be adjusted by
DMRM based upon cost increases/decreases. Operators choosing the flat
rate/bond pool option may have the bond rate increased to $5,000/acre
if a failure to abate cession order is issued due to non-
contemporaneous reclamation.
Ohio stated that performance security adjustments require
notification to permittee, surety and any person who has a property
interest in the performance security upon request. A permittee may
request an informal conference regarding a proposed rate adjustment.
Ohio stated that ORC 1513.08(F), provides for a permittee to
request reduction in performance security based upon documentation
proving actual cost
[[Page 21180]]
of reclamation to the Division is less than the amount posted.
Ohio stated that under ORC 1513.08 (G), if performance security is
issued in the form of a bond, the surety must be licensed to conduct
business in Ohio. If the performance security is cash deposit or a
certificate of deposit of a bank or savings and loan association, that
business shall be licensed and operating in Ohio. Ohio further stated
that the Chief is required to review performance security documents and
approve of their use.
Ohio stated that ORC 1513.08(I) provides criteria for performance
security held in trust. The Chief must review and approve trust
documents.
Ohio stated that ORC 1513.08 (J) provides the following procedures
for holder of performance security insolvency: Permittee notification
to DMRM; Plan for replacement of performance; security; Replacement of
full cost performance security in 90 days; Replacement of flat rate
performance security in one year.
Ohio stated that ORC 1513.08(K) provides that subsidence damages
and replacement of subsidence damaged water supplies may be satisfied
by liability insurance in lieu of performance security. Such insurance
specifically must address such damages.
Ohio stated that ORC 1513.08(L) provides that performance security
exceeding the cost of reclamation may be returned to the operator along
with interest or other earnings.
9. ORC 1513.081 DMRM Priority Lien
This provision is new and provides as follows:
Sec. 1513.081. (A) If an operator becomes insolvent, the
division of mineral resources management shall have a priority lien
in front of all other interested creditors against the assets of
that operator for the amount of any reclamation that is required as
a result of the operator's mining activities. The chief of the
division of mineral resources management shall file a statement in
the office of the county recorder of each county in which the mined
land lies of the estimated cost to reclaim the land. The estimated
cost to reclaim the land shall include the direct and indirect costs
of the development, design, construction, management, and
administration of the reclamation. The statement shall constitute a
lien on the assets of the operator as of the date of the filing. The
lien shall continue in force so long as any portion of the lien
remains unpaid or until the chief issues a certificate of release of
the lien. If the chief issues a certificate of release of the lien,
the chief shall file the certificate of release in the office of
each applicable county recorder.
(B) The chief promptly shall issue a certificate of release of a
lien under any of the following circumstances:
(1) Upon the repayment in full of the money that is necessary to
complete the reclamation;
(2) Upon the transfer of an existing permit that includes the
areas of the operation for which reclamation was not completed to a
different operator;
(3) Any other circumstance that the chief determines to be in
the best interests of the state.
(C) The chief may modify the amount of a lien under this
section. If the chief modifies a lien, the chief shall file a
statement in the office of the county recorder of each applicable
county of the new amount of the lien.
(D) The chief may authorize an agent to hold a certificate of
release in escrow for a period not to exceed one hundred eighty days
for the purpose of facilitating the transfer of unreclaimed mine
land.
(E) All money from the collection of liens under this section
shall be deposited in the state treasury to the credit of the
reclamation forfeiture fund created in section 1513.18 of the
Revised Code.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that ORC 1513.081(A) provides for
DMRM's priority lien ahead of other creditors in event of operator
insolvency. Lien can be used to recover the cost of reclamation
including all associated administrative costs. Lien must be filed by
DMRM in the appropriate county recorder's office. Ohio stated that
subsection (B) provides for the release of a filed lien and/or
adjustment.
10. ORC 1513.16(F)(8)(a) Alternative Financial Security (AFS)
This provision is new and provides as follows:
(8)(a) Except as provided in division (F)(8)(c) of this section,
if the chief determines that a permittee is responsible for mine
drainage that requires water treatment after reclamation is
completed under the terms of the permit or that a permittee must
provide an alternative water supply after reclamation is completed
under the terms of the permit, the permittee shall provide
alternative financial security in an amount determined by the chief
prior to the release of the remaining portion of performance
security under division (F)(3)(c) of this section. The alternative
financial security shall be in an amount that is equal to or greater
than the present value of the estimated cost over time to develop
and implement mine drainage plans and provide water treatment or in
an amount that is necessary to provide and maintain an alternative
water supply, as applicable. The alternative financial security
shall include a contract, trust, or other agreement or mechanism
that is enforceable under law to provide long-term water treatment
or a long-term alternative water supply, or both.
(b) The chief shall adopt rules in accordance with Chapter 119
of the Revised Code that are necessary for the administration of
division (F)(8)(a) of this section.
(c) Division (F)(8)(a) of this section does not apply while the
chief's determination of a permittee's responsibility under that
division is the subject of a good faith administrative or judicial
appeal contesting the validity of the determination. If after
completion of the appeal there is an enforceable administrative or
judicial decision affirming or modifying the chief's determination,
the permittee shall provide the alternative financial security in an
amount established in the administrative or judicial decision.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that ORC 1513.16(F)(8) provides
provisions for an Alternative Financial Security (AFS) to address mine
drainage treatment or alternative water supply replacement after
reclamation is completed. An AFS is to be provided prior to release of
remaining bond in the form of a contract, trust or other agreements
enforceable under law to provide long-term water treatment or
alternative supply. Subsection (b) requires the Chief to adopt new
rules to administer the AFS.
11. ORC 1513.16(F)(9) Termination of Jurisdiction
This provision is new and provides as follows:
(9) Final release of the performance security in accordance with
division (F)(3)(c) of this section terminates the jurisdiction of
the chief under this chapter over the reclaimed site of a surface
coal mining and reclamation operation or applicable portion of an
operation. However, the chief shall reassert jurisdiction over such
a site if the release was based on fraud, collusion, or
misrepresentation of a material fact and the chief, in writing,
demonstrates evidence of the fraud, collusion, or misrepresentation.
Any person with an interest that is or may be adversely affected by
the chief's determination may appeal the determination to the
reclamation commission in accordance with section 1513.13 of the
Revised Code.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that this provision provides for the
final release of performance security and terminates the Division's
jurisdiction unless certain specific issues are subsequently found to
be present.
12. ORC 1513.171 Coal Reclamation Tax Credit
This provision is new, and provides as follows:
Sec. 1513.171. (A) For the purpose of claiming a credit under
section 5749.11 of the Revised Code, an operator with a valid permit
issued under section 1513.07 of the Revised Code may submit an
application to the chief of the division of mineral resources
management to perform reclamation on land or water resources that
are not within the area of the applicant's permit and that have been
adversely affected by past coal mining for which the performance
security was
[[Page 21181]]
forfeited. The chief shall provide the application form. The
application shall include all of the following:
(1) The operator's name, address, and telephone number;
(2) The valid permit number of the operator;
(3) An identification of the area or areas to be reclaimed;
(4) An identification of the owner of the land;
(5) A reclamation plan that describes the work to be done to
reclaim the land or water resources. The plan shall include a
description of how the plan is consistent with local physical,
environmental, and climatological conditions and the measures to be
taken during the reclamation to ensure the protection of water
systems.
(6) An estimate of the total cost of the reclamation;
(7) An estimate of the timetables for accomplishing the
reclamation;
(8) Any other requirements that the chief prescribes by rule.
The chief shall approve, disapprove, or approve with
modifications the application concerning the proposed reclamation
work. If the chief approves the application, the applicant may
commence reclamation in accordance with the timetables included in
the application. Upon the completion of the reclamation to the
satisfaction of the chief, the chief shall issue a numbered
reclamation tax credit certificate showing the amount of the credit
and the identity of the recipient. Prior to the close of the fiscal
quarter in which the tax credit certificate is issued, the chief
shall certify to the tax commissioner the amount of the credit and
the identity of the recipient.
(B) The chief shall determine the amount of the credit in
accordance with this section and rules adopted under it. The amount
of the credit shall be equal to the cost that the division of
mineral resources management would have expended from the
reclamation forfeiture fund created in section 1513.18 of the
Revised Code to complete the reclamation.
(C) The chief shall adopt rules in accordance with Chapter 119.
of the Revised Code that are necessary to administer this section.
The rules shall establish all of the following:
(1) A procedure that the chief shall use to determine the amount
of the credit issued under this section;
(2) A procedure by which the chief may obtain consent of the
owners of land or water resources to allow reclamation work for
purposes of this section;
(3) A procedure for delivery of notice to the owners of land or
water resources on which the reclamation work is to be performed.
The rules shall require the notice to include the date on which the
reclamation work is scheduled to begin.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that this provision establishes
procedures for claiming tax credit pursuant to section 5749.11 of the
ORC. A coal mine operator may submit an application to reclaim another
mined area with forfeited bond. Once reclamation is completed, the
Chief shall issue numbered tax credits in the amount of the credit.
Under subsection (B), the Chief shall determine the amount of the
credit, equivalent to the cost of reclamation to the division if the
work had been completed by the state. Subsection (C) requires the Chief
to adopt rules to administer and establish procedures to address:
Amount of tax credit; Consent of landowner or owner of the water
resources to conduct reclamation; and Notification to landowner of
reclamation work and schedule.
13. ORC 1513.18 Reclamation Forfeiture Fund
Subsection (B) is amended in the first sentence by deleting the
phrase ``any moneys transferred to it under this division from the
unreclaimed lands fund created in section 1513.30.'' In place of that
deleted language, the following phrase is added: ``All money from the
collection of liens under section 1513.081.'' The first sentence in
subsection (B) is also amended by identifying that funds derived from
certain fines will be added to the reclamation forfeiture fund.
Language concerning the Chief's management of the fund is deleted.
Language concerning the transfer of funds from the unreclaimed lands
fund is deleted. Language concerning use of money from the reclamation
forfeiture fund to cover administrative expenses has been added. As
amended, subsection (B) provides as follows:
(B) The fund also shall consist of all money from the collection
of liens under section 1513.081 of the Revised Code, any moneys
transferred to it under section 1513.181 of the Revised Code from
the coal mining and reclamation reserve fund created in that
section, fines collected under division (E) of section 1513.02 and
section 1513.99 of the Revised Code, fines collected for a violation
of section 2921.31 of the Revised Code that, prior to July 1, 1996,
would have been a violation of division (G) of section 1513.17 of
the Revised Code as it existed prior to that date, and moneys
collected and credited to it pursuant to section 5749.02 of the
Revised Code. Disbursements from the fund shall be made by the chief
in accordance with division (D) of this section for the purpose of
reclaiming areas that an operator has affected by mining and failed
to reclaim under a coal mining and reclamation permit issued under
this chapter or under a surface mining permit issued under Chapter
1514. of the Revised Code.
The chief may expend moneys from the fund to pay necessary
administrative costs, including engineering and design services,
incurred by the division of mineral resources management in
reclaiming these areas. The chief also may expend moneys from the
fund to pay necessary administrative costs of the reclamation
forfeiture fund advisory board created in section 1513.182 of the
Revised Code as authorized by the board under that section.
Expenditures from the fund to pay such administrative costs need not
be made under contract.
Subsection (C) is amended by adding the phrase ``or trustee, if the
performance security is held in trust,'' immediately following the
words ``or a contractor hired by the surety.''
Subsection (D) is amended by amending the existing language,
codifying the existing language as paragraph (1), and by adding three
new paragraphs. As amended, subsection (D) provides as follows:
(D)(1) The chief shall expend money credited to the reclamation
forfeiture fund from the forfeiture of the performance security
applicable to an area of land or under section 1513.181 of the
Revised Code the amount of money to pay for the cost of the
reclamation of the land.
(2) If the performance security for the area of land was
provided under division (C)(1) of section 1513.08 of the Revised
Code, the chief shall use the money from the forfeited performance
security to complete the reclamation that the operator failed to do
under the operator's applicable coal mining and reclamation permit
issued under this chapter.
(3) If the performance security for the area of land was
provided under division (C)(2) of section 1513.08 of the Revised
Code, the chief shall use the money from the forfeited performance
security to complete the reclamation that the operator failed to do
under the operator's applicable coal mining and reclamation permit
issued under this chapter. If the money credited to the reclamation
forfeiture fund from the forfeiture of the performance security
provided under division (C)(2) of section 1513.08 of the Revised
Code is not sufficient to complete the reclamation, the chief shall
notify the reclamation forfeiture fund advisory board of the amount
of the insufficiency. The chief may expend money credited to the
reclamation forfeiture fund under section 5749.02 of the Revised
Code or transferred to the fund under section 1513.181 of the
Revised Code to complete the reclamation. The chief shall not expend
money from the fund in an amount that exceeds the difference between
the amount of the performance security provided under division
(C)(2) of section 1513.08 of the Revised Code and the estimated cost
of reclamation as determined by the chief under divisions (B) and
(E) of that section.
(4) Money from the reclamation forfeiture fund shall not be used
for reclamation of land or water resources affected by material
damage from subsidence, mine drainage that requires extended water
treatment after reclamation is completed under the terms of the
permit, or coal preparation plants or coal refuse disposal areas not
located within a permitted area of a mine if performance security
for the area of land was provided under division (C)(2) of section
1513.08 of the Revised Code.
[[Page 21182]]
Subsection (F) is amended in the first sentence by adding the
following proviso to the beginning of the sentence: ``Except as
otherwise provided in division (H) of this section.''
New subsection (H) is added to provide as follows:
(H) All investment earnings of the fund shall be credited to the
fund and shall be used only for the reclamation of land for which
performance security was provided under division (C)(2) of section
1513.08 of the Revised Code.
14. ORC 1513.181 Coal Mining Administration and Reclamation Reserve
Fund
This provision is amended by deleting from the first paragraph,
third sentence, the following phrase: ``Or by surface mining under a
surface mining permit issued under Chapter 1514 of the Revised Code.''
Also, the second paragraph, concerning the identification of fines
collected that would be added to the coal mining administration and
reclamation reserve fund is deleted. That deleted paragraph is replaced
by the following new paragraph:
If the director of natural resources determines it to be
necessary, the director may request the controlling board to
transfer an amount of money from the coal mining administration and
reclamation reserve fund to the unreclaimed lands fund created in
section 1513.30 of the Revised Code.
15. ORC 1513.182 Reclamation Forfeiture Fund Advisory Board
This provision is new, and provides as follows:
Sec. 1513.182. (A) There is hereby created the reclamation
forfeiture fund advisory board consisting of the director of natural
resources, the director of insurance, and seven members appointed by
the governor with the advice and consent of the senate. Of the
governor's appointments, one shall be a certified public accountant,
one shall be a registered professional engineer with experience in
reclamation of mined land, two shall represent agriculture,
agronomy, or forestry, one shall be a representative of operators of
coal mining operations that have valid permits issued under this
chapter and that have provided performance security under division
(C)(1) of section 1513.08 of the Revised Code, one shall be a
representative of operators of coal mining operations that have
valid permits issued under this chapter and that have provided
performance security under division (C)(2) of section 1513.08 of the
Revised Code, and one shall be a representative of the public.
Of the original members appointed by the governor, two shall
serve an initial term of two years, three an initial term of three
years, and two an initial term of four years. Thereafter, terms of
appointed members shall be for four years, with each term ending on
the same date as the original date of appointment. An appointed
member shall hold office from the date of appointment until the end
of the term for which the member was appointed. Vacancies shall be
filled in the same manner as original appointments. A member
appointed to fill a vacancy occurring prior to the expiration of the
term for which the member's predecessor was appointed shall hold
office for the remainder of that term. A member shall continue in
office subsequent to the expiration date of the member's term until
the member's successor takes office or until a period of sixty days
has elapsed, whichever occurs first. The governor may remove an
appointed member of the board for misfeasance, nonfeasance, or
malfeasance.
The directors of natural resources and insurance shall not
receive compensation for serving on the board, but shall be
reimbursed for the actual and necessary expenses incurred in the
performance of their duties as members of the board. The members
appointed by the governor shall receive per diem compensation fixed
pursuant to division (J) of section 124.15 of the Revised Code and
reimbursement for the actual and necessary expenses incurred in the
performance of their duties.
(B) The board annually shall elect from among its members a
chairperson, a vice-chairperson, and a secretary to record the
board's meetings.
(C) The board shall hold meetings as often as necessary as the
chairperson or a majority of the members determines.
(D) The board shall establish procedures for conducting meetings
and for the election of its chairperson, vice-chairperson, and
secretary.
(E) The board shall do all of the following:
(1) Review the deposits into and expenditures from the
reclamation forfeiture fund created in section 1513.18 of the
Revised Code;
(2) Retain periodically a qualified actuary to perform an
actuarial study of the reclamation forfeiture fund;
(3) Based on an actuarial study and as determined necessary by
the board, adopt rules in accordance with Chapter 119. of the
Revised Code to adjust the rate of the tax levied under division
(A)(8) of section 5749.02 of the Revised Code and the balance of the
reclamation forfeiture fund that pertains to that rate;
(4) Evaluate any rules, procedures, and methods for estimating
the cost of reclamation for purposes of determining the amount of
performance security that is required under section 1513.08 of the
Revised Code; the collection of forfeited performance security;
payments to the reclamation forfeiture fund; reclamation of sites
for which operators have forfeited the performance security; and the
compliance of operators with their reclamation plans;
(5) Provide a forum for discussion of issues related to the
reclamation forfeiture fund and the performance security that is
required under section 1513.08 of the Revised Code;
(6) Submit a report biennially to the governor that describes
the financial status of the reclamation forfeiture fund and the
adequacy of the amount of money in the fund to accomplish the
purposes of the fund and that may discuss any matter related to the
performance security that is required under section 1513.08 of the
Revised Code;
(7) Make recommendations to the governor, if necessary, of
alternative methods of providing money for or using money in the
reclamation forfeiture fund and issues related to the reclamation of
land or water resources that have been adversely affected by past
coal mining for which the performance security was forfeited;
(8) Adopt rules in accordance with Chapter 119. of the Revised
Code that are necessary to administer this section.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that ORC 1513.182 creates the
reclamation forfeiture fund advisory board, establishes specific terms
of appointments and per diem compensation, and establishes the duties
of the board.
16. ORC 1513.29 Council on Unreclaimed Strip Mined Lands
This existing provision is amended in the third paragraph by
deleting the requirement to hold ``at least four regular quarterly
meetings each year,'' and amending the provision to authorize meetings
``as necessary.'' The fourth paragraph is amended by deleting reference
to the ``strip mining reclamation fund,'' and in its place, adding
reference to the ``reclamation forfeiture fund created in section
1513.18 of the Revised Code.'' The fifth paragraph is amended by
deleting the phrase ``of the division of mineral resources
management.''
17. ORC 1513.30 Unreclaimed Strip Mined Lands Fund
This provision is amended by deleting the following requirement to
provide public notice:
At least two weeks before any meeting of the council on
unreclaimed strip mined lands at which the chief will submit a
project proposal, a project area will be selected, or the boundaries
of a project area will be determined, the chief shall mail notice by
first class mail to the board of county commissioners of the county
and the board of township trustees of the township in which the
proposed project lies and the chief executive and the legislative
authority of each municipal corporation within the proposed project
area. The chief also shall give reasonable notice to the news media
in the county where the proposed project lies.
ORC 1513.30 is also amended by deleting a paragraph that authorized
the controlling board to transfer excess funds from the oil and gas
well fund.
ORC 1513.30 is amended by adding a new paragraph to authorize the
controlling board to transfer money from the fund to the coal mining
administration and reclamation reserve fund. The new paragraph provides
as follows:
[[Page 21183]]
If the director of natural resources determines it to be
necessary, the director may request the controlling board to
transfer an amount of money from the fund to the coal mining
administration and reclamation reserve fund created in section
1513.181 of the Revised Code.
18. ORC 1513.37 Abandoned Mine Reclamation Fund
This provision is amended at subsection (C)(3) by adding the words
``performance security, or other form of financial guarantee'' in three
places following the word ``bond.''
19. ORC 1513.371 Mined Land Set Aside Fund
This provision is new and provides as follows:
There is hereby created in the state treasury the mined land set
aside fund consisting of grants made by the United States secretary
of the interior from the federal abandoned mine reclamation fund
pursuant to section 402 of the ``Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977,'' 91 Stat. 445, 30 U.S.C. 1232. The chief
of the division of mineral resources management shall administer the
fund. Money in the fund shall be used solely for the purposes
specified in divisions (B)(1) to (4) of section 1513.37 of the
Revised Code. All investment earnings of the fund shall be credited
to the fund.
20. ORC 5749.02 Excise Tax on Severance of Natural Resources
Subsection (A) is amended at paragraph (A)(1) by increasing the
severance tax levied on coal from ``Seven'' cents to ``Ten'' cents.
Subsection (A) is further amended by adding new paragraphs (8) and
(9). New paragraph (A)(8) levies a tax of 14 cents per ton of coal to
fund the bond pool, and paragraph (A)(9) levies a tax of one and two
tenths cents per ton of coal. New paragraphs (A)(8) and (A)(9) provide
as follows:
(8) Except as otherwise provided in this division or in rules
adopted by the reclamation forfeiture fund advisory board under
section 1513.182 of the Revised Code, an additional fourteen cents
per ton of coal produced from an area under a coal mining and
reclamation permit issued under Chapter 1513. of the Revised Code
for which the performance security is provided under division (C)(2)
of section 1513.08 of the Revised Code. If at the end of a fiscal
biennium the balance of the reclamation forfeiture fund created in
section 1513.18 of the Revised Code is equal to or greater than ten
million dollars, the rate levied shall be twelve cents per ton. If
at the end of a fiscal biennium the balance of the fund is at least
five million dollars, but less than ten million dollars, the rate
levied shall be fourteen cents per ton. If at the end of a fiscal
biennium the balance of the fund is less than five million dollars,
the rate levied shall be sixteen cents per ton. Not later than
thirty days after the close of a fiscal biennium, the chief of the
division of mineral resources management shall certify to the tax
commissioner the amount of the balance of the reclamation forfeiture
fund as of the close of the fiscal biennium. Any necessary
adjustment of the rate levied shall take effect on the first day of
the following January and shall remain in effect during the calendar
biennium that begins on that date.
(9) An additional one and two-tenths cents per ton of coal mined
by surface mining methods.
In its submittal, Ohio stated that ORC 5749.02(A) has been amended
by increasing the coal severance tax from seven cents to 10 cents per
ton. New paragraph (8) provides that if performance security is
provided by way of the bond pool and $2,500 flat rate bond, then an
additional 14 cents per ton is required by those operations.
If the forfeiture fund balance exceeds $10 million at the end of a
fiscal biennium, the rate is reduced to 12 cents per ton. If the
balance is greater than $5 million but less than $10 million, 14 cents
per ton is required. If the balance is less than $5 million, 16 cents
per ton is required.
Ohio stated that paragraph (9) provides for an additional one and
two tenths cents per ton at all surface coal mines.
Subsection (B) is amended by changing the allocation values of the
moneys received under the taxes levied under ORC 5749.02(A)(1),
specifying that all of the moneys received under paragraph (A)(8) will
be credited to the reclamation forfeiture fund, and specifying that all
of the moneys received under paragraph (A)(9) will be credited to the
unreclaimed lands fund. Paragraph (C), concerning a tax levied for the
purpose of crediting moneys to the reclamation forfeiture fund is
deleted. Paragraph (D) is amended by deleting the first paragraph
(including its designation as (D)) concerning a tax levied for the
purpose of crediting moneys to the reclamation forfeiture fund, and
revising the second paragraph by adding language concerning adjustments
to be made to the tax levied under paragraph (A)(8) based upon the
balance of the reclamation forfeiture fund at the close of any fiscal
year. As amended, ORC 5749.02(B) provides as follows:
(B) Of the moneys received by the treasurer of state from the
tax levied in division (A)(1) of this section, four and seventy-six-
hundredths per cent shall be credited to the geological mapping fund
created in section 1505.09 of the Revised Code, eighty and ninety-
five-hundredths per cent shall be credited to the coal mining
administration and reclamation reserve fund created in section
1513.181 of the Revised Code, and fourteen and twenty-nine-
hundredths per cent shall be credited to the unreclaimed lands fund
created in section 1513.30 of the Revised Code.
Fifteen per cent of the moneys received by the treasurer of
state from the tax levied in division (A)(2) of this section shall
be credited to the geological mapping fund and the remainder shall
be credited to the unreclaimed lands fund.
Of the moneys received by the treasurer of state from the tax
levied in divisions (A)(3) and (4) of this section, seven and five-
tenths per cent shall be credited to the geological mapping fund,
forty-two and five-tenths per cent shall be credited to the
unreclaimed lands fund, and the remainder shall be credited to the
surface mining fund created in section 1514.06 of the Revised Code.
Of the moneys received by the treasurer of state from the tax
levied in divisions (A)(5) and (6) of this section, ninety per cent
shall be credited to the oil and gas well fund created in section
1509.02 of the Revised Code and ten per cent shall be credited to
the geological mapping fund. All of the moneys received by the
treasurer of state from the tax levied in division (A)(7) of this
section shall be credited to the surface mining fund.
All of the moneys received by the treasurer of state from the
tax levied in division (A)(8) of this section shall be credited to
the reclamation forfeiture fund.
All of the moneys received by the treasurer of state from the
tax levied in division (A)(9) of this sectio