Draft Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis caurina, 20865-20866 [E7-8007]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 80 / Thursday, April 26, 2007 / Notices
(5) Do you use Coast Guard HF radio
Simplex Teletype over Radio (SITOR)
(also known as Narrow Band Direct
printing (NBDP)) to receive marine
weather forecasts? (Yes or No) If yes,
how often do you use Coast Guard
SITOR radio broadcasts and how critical
are they to your safety and operation as
compared to the other sources you listed
in your response to Question 2?
(6) What alternative source(s) for
obtaining marine weather forecasts
would you pursue if Coast Guard HF
broadcasts were no longer available?
How would you rate the alternative
source(s) in terms of (a) user cost and (b)
usefulness of the information as
compared to the Coast Guard HF
broadcast it replaces?
(7) Would the loss of Coast Guard HF
marine weather broadcasts affect you?
Please explain.
(8) How far seaward does your vessel
primarily operate? (For example, coastal
(0–25 nautical miles (nm) seaward);
offshore (25–200 nm seaward); or, high
seas (more than 200 nm seaward.) In
what geographic area(s) do you
generally operate your vessel? (For
example, mid-Atlantic, New England,
North Central Pacific, Hawaii, Gulf of
Mexico, etc.)
As noted previously, comments
regarding these questions, and any other
pertinent matters brought to our
attention during the comment period,
will be taken into account in our future
actions regarding the issues raised by
these questions.
Dated: April 18, 2007.
C.S. Johnson, JR.,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Assistant
Commandant for Command, Control,
Communications, Computers and
Information Technology.
[FR Doc. E7–7945 Filed 4–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Magda Ruiz, Disaster Assistance
Directorate, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, Washington, DC
20472, (202) 646–2705.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice
of an emergency declaration for the
State of Indiana is hereby amended to
include the following areas among those
areas determined to have been adversely
affected by the catastrophe declared an
emergency by the President in his
declaration of March 12, 2007:
Porter, Steuben, and Wells Counties for
emergency protective measures (Category B),
including snow removal, under the Public
Assistance program for any continuous 48hour period during or proximate to the
incident period.
(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used
for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora
Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services
Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and
Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and
Households Disaster Housing Operations;
97.050, Individuals and Households
Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation
Grant Program).
R. David Paulison,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. E7–7972 Filed 4–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Draft Recovery Plan for the Northern
Spotted Owl (Strix occidentalis
caurina)
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability
for review and comment.
AGENCY:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
[FEMA–3274–EM]
Indiana; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of
an Emergency Declaration
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Notice.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice
of an emergency declaration for the
State of Indiana (FEMA–3274–EM),
dated March 12, 2007, and related
determinations.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 17, 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:59 Apr 25, 2007
Jkt 211001
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, announce the
availability of the Draft Recovery Plan
for the Northern Spotted Owl (Strix
occidentalis caurina) (northern spotted
owl) for public review and comment.
DATES: Comments on the draft recovery
plan must be received on or before June
25, 2007. We will also conduct four
public meetings in order to receive oral
comments about this plan. For dates,
times, and locations, please refer to the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this notice.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the plan can
be sent electronically to
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20865
NSOplan@fws.gov, or mailed to NSO
Recovery Plan, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Ecological Services, 911 NE.,
11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97232.
Copies of the draft recovery plan will be
available by request from the same
Portland address (telephone: 503–231–
2194). An electronic copy of the draft
recovery plan is also available at:
https://www.fws.gov/pacific/ecoservices/
endangered/recovery/plans.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Phifer, Northern Spotted Owl Recovery
Plan Project Manager, at the Portland
address identified above (telephone
503–724–1886, fax 503–231–2050).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Restoring endangered or threatened
animals and plants to the point where
they are again secure, self-sustaining
members of their ecosystems is a
primary goal of our endangered species
program. The Endangered Species Act
(16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (ESA) requires
the development of recovery plans for
listed species unless such a plan would
not promote the conservation of a
particular species. Recovery plans help
guide the recovery effort by describing
actions considered necessary for the
conservation of the species, establishing
criteria for downlisting or delisting
listed species, and estimating time and
cost for implementing the measures
needed for recovery.
Section 4(f) of the ESA requires that
public notice, and an opportunity for
public review and comment, be
provided during recovery plan
development. We will consider all
information presented during the public
comment period. Substantive comments
on the recovery needs of the species or
other aspects of recovery plan
development may result in changes to
the recovery plan. Substantive
comments regarding recovery plan
implementation may not necessarily
result in changes to the recovery plan,
but will be forwarded to appropriate
Federal agencies or other entities so that
they can take these comments into
account during the course of
implementing recovery actions.
Individual responses to comments will
not be provided.
The northern spotted owl inhabits
structurally complex forests from
southwest British Columbia through the
Cascade Mountains and coastal ranges
in Washington, Oregon, and California,
as far south as Marin County. When the
northern spotted owl was listed under
the ESA as a threatened species on June
26, 1990, the major threats were
identified as widespread loss and
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
20866
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 80 / Thursday, April 26, 2007 / Notices
adverse modification of suitable habitat
across the owl’s entire range and the
inadequacy of existing regulatory
mechanisms to conserve the owl.
Currently, populations of northern
spotted owls are declining, especially in
the northern parts of the species’ range.
Scientific research and monitoring
have reported that northern spotted
owls generally rely on older forested
habitats because such habitats contain
the structures and characteristics
required for nesting, roosting, and
foraging. Recent landscape-level studies
in several southern portions of the
northern spotted owl’s range suggest a
mosaic of forest conditions may result
in good northern spotted owl habitat,
though other studies have not reported
that finding.
The most important threat currently
facing the northern spotted owl is
believed to be competition with the
barred owl (Strix varia). Actions
associated with addressing the barred
owl threat were given the highest
recovery priority, meaning the action
‘‘must be taken to prevent extinction or
prevent the species from declining
irreversibly in the foreseeable future.’’
Other important threats to the northern
spotted owl continue to be loss of
habitat quality and quantity as a result
of past activities and disturbances, and
ongoing and projected loss of habitat as
a result of fire, logging and conversion
of habitat to other uses.
The draft recovery plan provides two
options for recovery, and we are seeking
public comment on the effectiveness of
both options to achieve recovery. Both
options are based on the same
underlying science, and contain
essentially the same recovery goal,
objectives, criteria, and actions. The
options differ in that option 1 identifies
(i.e., maps) the specific conservation
area boundaries in which most of the
recovery actions and criteria will be
targeted. Option 2 does not designate
specific conservation area boundaries,
rather it provides a ‘‘rule set’’ that will
help guide the Federal land
management agencies when undertaking
conservation actions for the northern
spotted owl. Both options rely on
Federal lands to provide the primary
contribution for northern spotted owl
recovery.
The intent of providing two options
for public comment in a draft recovery
plan is to promote open public
discussion about how to successfully
recover this species.
Public Comments Solicited
We will conduct four public meetings,
from 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., to receive
oral comments about this plan on:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:59 Apr 25, 2007
Jkt 211001
• May 22, 2007, Tuesday at the
Douglas County Fairgrounds Complex
Conference Hall, 2110 SW Frear Street,
Roseburg, OR;
• May 23, 2007, Wednesday at the
Redding Convention Center, 700
Auditorium Drive, Redding, CA;
• May 30, 2007, Wednesday at the
Oregon Convention Center, Portland
Ballroom, 777 Northeast Martin Luther
King, Jr. Blvd., Portland, OR; and
• May 31, 2007, Thursday at St.
Martin’s University, Norman
Worthington Conference Center, 5300
Pacific Ave. SE., Lacey, WA.
Persons with disabilities needing
reasonable accommodations to
participate in the public meetings are
invited to contact Angela Butsch at 1–
888–812–5759 (voice) or 503–231–6263
(TTY), or angela_butsch@fws.gov.
Reasonable accommodation requests
should be received at least 3 business
days prior to the meeting to help ensure
availability; 2 weeks notice is requested
for ASL/ESL interpreter needs.
We are also soliciting written
comments on the draft recovery plan
described. All comments received by
the date specified above will be
considered in the finalization of this
plan. Before including your address,
phone number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. Comments and materials received
will be available for public inspection,
by appointment, during normal business
hours at the above address.
We would specifically appreciate
comments on the following topics found
in both options:
• The methods used to determine
desired habitat percentages listed in
Recovery Criterion 4. If
recommendations are offered,
respondents are asked to explain the
scientific foundation supporting their
comments;
• The biological need, design and
feasibility of attempting to provide
connectivity between the Olympic
Peninsula and central Washington
northern spotted owl populations;
• The biological value in identifying
conservation areas in southwest
Washington and northwest Oregon;
• The practicality of Appendix E,
which provides examples of how a
salvage logging action (Recovery Action
22) may be implemented;
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• The identified boundaries of the
Managed Owl Conservation Areas
(option 1 only) and the Conservation
Support Areas;
• Methods for managing the threat
posed by barred owls; and
• Ways to create incentives for
private land owners and managers to
support recovery of the northern spotted
owl.
Authority: The authority for this action is
section 4(f) of the Endangered Species Act,
16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
Dated: April 20, 2007.
David J. Wesley,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E7–8007 Filed 4–25–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; 5-Year Review of 22
Southeastern Species
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Fish and Wildlife Service
is initiating 5-year reviews of the
Southeastern beach mouse (Peromyscus
polionotus niveiventris), rice rat
(Oryzomys palustris natator), Florida
salt marsh vole (Microtus
pennsylvanicus dukecampbelli), Key
Largo woodrat (Neotoma floridana
smalli), Florida grasshopper sparrow
(Ammodramus savannarum floridanus),
Atlantic salt marsh snake (Nerodia
clarkii taeniata), Schaus swallowtail
butterfly (Heraclides aristodemus
ponceanus), Squirrel Chimney Cave
shrimp (Palaemonetes cummingi),
Florida bonamia (Bonamia grandiflora),
pigeon wings (Clitoria fragrans), shortleaved rosemary (Conradina brevifolia),
Rugel’s pawpaw (Deeringothamnus
rugelii), longspurred mint (Dicerandra
cornutissima), Lakela’s mint
(Dicerandra immaculata), scrub
buckwheat (Eriogonum longifolium var.
gnaphalifolium), Telephus spurge
(Euphorbia telephioides), Highlands
scrub hypericum (Hypericum
cumulicola), scrub lupine (Lupinus
aridorum), papery whitlow-wort
(Paronychia chartacea), Miccosukee
gooseberry (Ribes echinellum), Cooley’s
meadowrue (Thalictrum cooleyi), and
Carter’s mustard (Warea carteri), under
section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.), as amended (Act). The purpose of
reviews conducted under this section of
E:\FR\FM\26APN1.SGM
26APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 80 (Thursday, April 26, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20865-20866]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-8007]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Draft Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl (Strix
occidentalis caurina)
AGENCY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of document availability for review and comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce the
availability of the Draft Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl
(Strix occidentalis caurina) (northern spotted owl) for public review
and comment.
DATES: Comments on the draft recovery plan must be received on or
before June 25, 2007. We will also conduct four public meetings in
order to receive oral comments about this plan. For dates, times, and
locations, please refer to the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this notice.
ADDRESSES: Comments on the plan can be sent electronically to
NSOplan@fws.gov, or mailed to NSO Recovery Plan, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Ecological Services, 911 NE., 11th Avenue, Portland, Oregon
97232. Copies of the draft recovery plan will be available by request
from the same Portland address (telephone: 503-231-2194). An electronic
copy of the draft recovery plan is also available at: https://
www.fws.gov/pacific/ecoservices/endangered/recovery/plans.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Phifer, Northern Spotted Owl
Recovery Plan Project Manager, at the Portland address identified above
(telephone 503-724-1886, fax 503-231-2050).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Restoring endangered or threatened animals and plants to the point
where they are again secure, self-sustaining members of their
ecosystems is a primary goal of our endangered species program. The
Endangered Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) (ESA) requires the
development of recovery plans for listed species unless such a plan
would not promote the conservation of a particular species. Recovery
plans help guide the recovery effort by describing actions considered
necessary for the conservation of the species, establishing criteria
for downlisting or delisting listed species, and estimating time and
cost for implementing the measures needed for recovery.
Section 4(f) of the ESA requires that public notice, and an
opportunity for public review and comment, be provided during recovery
plan development. We will consider all information presented during the
public comment period. Substantive comments on the recovery needs of
the species or other aspects of recovery plan development may result in
changes to the recovery plan. Substantive comments regarding recovery
plan implementation may not necessarily result in changes to the
recovery plan, but will be forwarded to appropriate Federal agencies or
other entities so that they can take these comments into account during
the course of implementing recovery actions. Individual responses to
comments will not be provided.
The northern spotted owl inhabits structurally complex forests from
southwest British Columbia through the Cascade Mountains and coastal
ranges in Washington, Oregon, and California, as far south as Marin
County. When the northern spotted owl was listed under the ESA as a
threatened species on June 26, 1990, the major threats were identified
as widespread loss and
[[Page 20866]]
adverse modification of suitable habitat across the owl's entire range
and the inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms to conserve the
owl. Currently, populations of northern spotted owls are declining,
especially in the northern parts of the species' range.
Scientific research and monitoring have reported that northern
spotted owls generally rely on older forested habitats because such
habitats contain the structures and characteristics required for
nesting, roosting, and foraging. Recent landscape-level studies in
several southern portions of the northern spotted owl's range suggest a
mosaic of forest conditions may result in good northern spotted owl
habitat, though other studies have not reported that finding.
The most important threat currently facing the northern spotted owl
is believed to be competition with the barred owl (Strix varia).
Actions associated with addressing the barred owl threat were given the
highest recovery priority, meaning the action ``must be taken to
prevent extinction or prevent the species from declining irreversibly
in the foreseeable future.'' Other important threats to the northern
spotted owl continue to be loss of habitat quality and quantity as a
result of past activities and disturbances, and ongoing and projected
loss of habitat as a result of fire, logging and conversion of habitat
to other uses.
The draft recovery plan provides two options for recovery, and we
are seeking public comment on the effectiveness of both options to
achieve recovery. Both options are based on the same underlying
science, and contain essentially the same recovery goal, objectives,
criteria, and actions. The options differ in that option 1 identifies
(i.e., maps) the specific conservation area boundaries in which most of
the recovery actions and criteria will be targeted. Option 2 does not
designate specific conservation area boundaries, rather it provides a
``rule set'' that will help guide the Federal land management agencies
when undertaking conservation actions for the northern spotted owl.
Both options rely on Federal lands to provide the primary contribution
for northern spotted owl recovery.
The intent of providing two options for public comment in a draft
recovery plan is to promote open public discussion about how to
successfully recover this species.
Public Comments Solicited
We will conduct four public meetings, from 6:30 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.,
to receive oral comments about this plan on:
May 22, 2007, Tuesday at the Douglas County Fairgrounds
Complex Conference Hall, 2110 SW Frear Street, Roseburg, OR;
May 23, 2007, Wednesday at the Redding Convention Center,
700 Auditorium Drive, Redding, CA;
May 30, 2007, Wednesday at the Oregon Convention Center,
Portland Ballroom, 777 Northeast Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd.,
Portland, OR; and
May 31, 2007, Thursday at St. Martin's University, Norman
Worthington Conference Center, 5300 Pacific Ave. SE., Lacey, WA.
Persons with disabilities needing reasonable accommodations to
participate in the public meetings are invited to contact Angela Butsch
at 1-888-812-5759 (voice) or 503-231-6263 (TTY), or angela_
butsch@fws.gov. Reasonable accommodation requests should be received at
least 3 business days prior to the meeting to help ensure availability;
2 weeks notice is requested for ASL/ESL interpreter needs.
We are also soliciting written comments on the draft recovery plan
described. All comments received by the date specified above will be
considered in the finalization of this plan. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address, or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you should be aware that your entire
comment--including your personal identifying information--may be made
publicly available at any time. While you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so. Comments and materials
received will be available for public inspection, by appointment,
during normal business hours at the above address.
We would specifically appreciate comments on the following topics
found in both options:
The methods used to determine desired habitat percentages
listed in Recovery Criterion 4. If recommendations are offered,
respondents are asked to explain the scientific foundation supporting
their comments;
The biological need, design and feasibility of attempting
to provide connectivity between the Olympic Peninsula and central
Washington northern spotted owl populations;
The biological value in identifying conservation areas in
southwest Washington and northwest Oregon;
The practicality of Appendix E, which provides examples of
how a salvage logging action (Recovery Action 22) may be implemented;
The identified boundaries of the Managed Owl Conservation
Areas (option 1 only) and the Conservation Support Areas;
Methods for managing the threat posed by barred owls; and
Ways to create incentives for private land owners and
managers to support recovery of the northern spotted owl.
Authority: The authority for this action is section 4(f) of the
Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
Dated: April 20, 2007.
David J. Wesley,
Acting Regional Director, Region 1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. E7-8007 Filed 4-25-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P