Agency Information Collection Activities: Extension of Proposed Collection; Comment Request-Food Stamp Program State Agency Options, 20318-20319 [E7-7715]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
20318
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 78
Tuesday April 24, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Extension of Proposed
Collection; Comment Request—Food
Stamp Program State Agency Options
Food and Nutrition Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on the
proposed extension of this collection
relating to State agency calculations of
household expenses for Food Stamp
Program purposes. The information
collection requirement described in this
notice is OMB Number 0584–0496: State
Agency Options.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before June 25, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on:
(a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information shall have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of the burden of the proposed collection
of information including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology. Comments may be sent to
Patrick Waldron, Branch Chief,
Certification Policy Branch, Program
Development Division, Food and
Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, 3101 Park Center Drive,
Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:32 Apr 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
also be faxed to the attention of Mr.
Waldron at (703) 305–2486. The Internet
address is:
patrick.waldron@FNS.USDA.GOV. All
written comments will be open for
public inspection at the office of the
Food and Nutrition Service during
regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5
p.m., Monday through Friday) at 3101
Park Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia
22302, Room 800.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for OMB approval. All comments will
be a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Mr. Waldron at
(703) 305–2495.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Food Stamp Program: State
Agency Options.
OMB Number: 0584–0496.
Form Number: None.
Expiration Date: 7/31/07.
Type of Request: Extension of a
currently approved information
collection.
Abstract: Title 7, Part 273 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR) sets forth
the Food Stamp Program requirements
for the application, certification and
continued eligibility for food stamp
benefits. This notice extends the
collection burden to account for changes
required by the Farm Security and Rural
Investment Act of 2002 (FSRIA),
pending the issuance of a final rule.
Establishing and reviewing standard
utility allowances. The regulations at 7
CFR 273.9(d)(6)(iii)(B) allow State
agencies to establish standard utility
allowances (SUA) and once established
requires State agencies to review and
adjust SUAs annually to reflect changes
in the cost of utilities. Many State
agencies already have one or more
approved standards, which they update
annually. State agencies may use
information already available from case
files, quality control reviews or other
sources and from utility companies.
State agencies may make adjustments
based on cost-of-living increases. The
information will be used to establish
standards to be used in place of actual
utility costs in the computation of the
excess shelter deduction. State agencies
are required to submit the amounts of
these standards and methodologies used
in developing and updating the
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
standards to FNS when they are
developed or changed.
Estimates of burden: Currently 52
State agencies have a standard that
includes heating or cooling costs and 41
have a standard for utility costs other
than heating or cooling. In addition, 51
State agencies have a telephone
allowance standard. State agencies are
required to review the standards yearly
to determine if increases are needed due
to the cost of living. We estimate a
minimum of 2.5 hours annually to make
this review and adjustment (2.5 hours ×
52 State agencies = 130 hours). Total
burden for this provision is estimated to
be 130 hours per year.
Self-employment costs. The
regulations at 7 CFR 273.11(b) allow
self-employment gross income to be
reduced by the cost of producing such
income. The regulations allow the State
agencies, with approval from FNS, to
establish the methodology for offsetting
the costs of producing self-employment
income, as long as the procedure does
not increase Program costs. State
agencies may submit a request to FNS
to use a method of producing a
reasonable estimate of the costs of
producing self-employment income in
lieu of calculating the actual costs for
each household with such income.
Different methods may be proposed for
different types of self-employment. The
proposal shall include a description of
the proposed method, the number and
type of households and percent of the
caseload affected, and documentation
indicating that the proposed procedure
will not increase program costs. State
agencies may collect this data from
household case records or other sources
that may be available.
Estimates of burden: We estimate that
10 State agencies will submit a request
of this type each year for the next three
years. It is estimated that these States
will incur a one-time burden of at least
10 working hours gathering and
analyzing data, developing the
methodology, determining the cost
implication, and submitting a request to
FNS for a total burden of 100 hours
annually. State agencies are not required
to periodically review their approved
methodologies. We do not anticipate
that State agencies will voluntarily
review their methodologies for change
on a regular basis, thus burden is not
being assessed for this purpose at this
time.
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 78 / Tuesday April 24, 2007 / Notices
Record keeping burden only: Each
State agency would be required to keep
a record of the information gathered and
submitted to FNS. We estimate this to
be 7 minutes per year for the 53 State
agencies to equal a total of 6 burden
hours annually. (53 × 7 minutes/60
minutes per hour = 6 hours annual
burden).
Summary of burden hours:
Affected Public: State agencies and
local governments administering the
Food Stamp Program.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
53.
Estimated Number of Responses Per
Respondent: 2.16.
Estimated Number of Responses: 115.
Estimated Hours Per Response: 2.05.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 236.
Dated: April 17, 2007.
Roberto Salazar,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. E7–7715 Filed 4–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Shasta-Trinity National Forest,
California Mudflow Vegetation
Management Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Shasta-Trinity National Forest
proposes to harvest timber and remove
accumulations of down wood (fuels) on
approximately 2900 acres of National
Forest System lands. Trees on about
80% of the area would be thinned by
removing a portion of the trees from
overcrowded forest stands. Trees
removed would be those infected with
disease or insects and those generally
smaller in size than trees that will be
retained. Most of the trees on
approximately 15% of the area are
infected by root disease and insects and
would be removed. Young tree seedlings
would be planted in the openings
created in these areas. Encroaching
conifers will be removed from the
remaining 5% of the area to restore and
maintain wet meadow characteristics in
a condition that existed in the past. The
majority of project area is within
township T40N, R2W, MDM with minor
inclusions in T39N, R2W and T40N,
R3W, MDM. The project is located
immediately north and east of the town
of McCloud, California. The Forest Land
and Resource Management Plan has
allocated portions of the project area to
18:32 Apr 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis should be received no
later than 30 days after the publication
of this notice in the Federal Register.
The draft environmental impact
statement is expected in June 2007 and
the final environmental impact
statement is expected in September
2007.
DATES:
Send written comments to
District Ranger Michael Hupp, ShastaMcCloud Management Unit, 204 W.
Alma Street, Mt. Shasta, California
96067.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Dusty Miller, McCloud Ranger Station,
P.O. Box 1620, McCloud, California
96057, telephone (530) 964–3771 or via
e-mail at dmiller@fs.fed.us.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
Forest Service
VerDate Aug<31>2005
Late-Successional Reserves and Special
Area Management (Research Natural
Area) with the remainder designated as
Matrix lands. About five percent of the
area is zoned as Riparian Reserve
(wetlands and areas adjacent to
streams).
A century of fire exclusion in the
project area has resulted in overcrowded
forest conditions and the loss of wet
meadow habitat. Overcrowded
conditions in forested areas have
reduced tree vigor, reduced the
proportion of hardwoods in forested
areas and promoted the spread of root
diseases. In the absence of fire, an
understory of shrubs and small trees has
developed which can act as a fuel
ladder and carry fire into the forest
canopy resulting in the loss of forest
habitat. The lack of fire has resulted in
accumulations of ground fuels which
also increases the likelihood of flames
reaching the canopy layer. The purpose
of this project is to meet Forest Plan
objectives by restoring forest ecosystem
health within the project area through a
variety of management activities.
There is a need to reduce tree density
in areas where overcrowded forest
conditions currently exist. Thinning
will improve the health of these forest
areas by making more water, nutrients
and sunlight available for use by the
remaining trees with a subsequent
improvement in the ability of trees to
withstand insects, pathogens and
drought. Removing small trees from the
understory will remove ladder fuels that
may otherwise carry fire from the
ground into the forest canopy if wildfire
occurs. This is important because it will
leave the treated stands in a more
sustainable, healthy condition. There is
a need to break the current cycle of re-
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20319
infection in areas heavily infected by
root diseases. The removal of groups of
diseased trees will remove the source of
infection from affected areas. Replanting with conifer species suited to
the specific root disease problems
identified at each site will reestablish
live trees. This is important because it
will reduce future tree mortality and
slow or stop the spread of root diseases
in the project area.
There is a need to reduce
accumulations of ground fuels to levels
where flames are not likely to reach the
canopy layer in case of wildfire.
Machine piling and burning will reduce
fuel loads in treatment areas while still
meeting other resource needs. This is
important because it will reduce the
probability of stand replacing wildfires.
There is a need to restore the historic
size, continuity, and function of wet
meadow ecosystems in the project area.
Encroaching conifers will be removed
from areas that were historically
meadows and where trees may not be
sustainable due to mortality resulting
from fluctuating water tables. The
removal of competing conifers will
promote the development of naturally
occurring hardwoods and meadow
vegetation. Restoration activities will
return meadows to conditions that will
allow the reintroduction of fire to
maintain natural ecosystem function.
This is important because meadows
provide significant water storage and
biodiversity.
There is a need to provide for the
long-term sustainability of hardwoods
in the landscape. In dense mixed
conifer/hardwood forests, the
abundance and vigor of hardwoods is
declining as overtopping conifers block
necessary sunlight. Treatments in such
areas will emphasize the removal of
some competing conifers to provide
growing space and sunlight for
overtopped hardwoods. In dense mature
oak stands with little reproduction, oak
trees will be thinned to promote growth
and encourage stump sprouting. In areas
where the surrounding conifer forest has
encroached and replaced historic aspen
stands, most conifer trees will be
removed to allow residual aspen trees to
reclaim the site. This is important
because hardwoods provide valuable
wildlife habitat and stand diversity and
are important in Native American
traditions.
Proposed Action
The project will include the following
treatments:
1. Thinning treatments on
approximately 2100 acres.
In all thinning treatments, trees will
be thinned to a spacing that is
E:\FR\FM\24APN1.SGM
24APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 24, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20318-20319]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7715]
========================================================================
Notices
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains documents other than rules
or proposed rules that are applicable to the public. Notices of hearings
and investigations, committee meetings, agency decisions and rulings,
delegations of authority, filing of petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are examples of documents
appearing in this section.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 78 / Tuesday April 24, 2007 /
Notices
[[Page 20318]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection Activities: Extension of Proposed
Collection; Comment Request--Food Stamp Program State Agency Options
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment
on the proposed extension of this collection relating to State agency
calculations of household expenses for Food Stamp Program purposes. The
information collection requirement described in this notice is OMB
Number 0584-0496: State Agency Options.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before June 25, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who
respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology. Comments may be sent to Patrick
Waldron, Branch Chief, Certification Policy Branch, Program Development
Division, Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,
3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may also be
faxed to the attention of Mr. Waldron at (703) 305-2486. The Internet
address is: patrick.waldron@FNS.USDA.GOV. All written comments will be
open for public inspection at the office of the Food and Nutrition
Service during regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday) at 3101 Park Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia 22302,
Room 800.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for OMB approval. All comments will be a matter of public
record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to Mr. Waldron at (703) 305-2495.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Food Stamp Program: State Agency Options.
OMB Number: 0584-0496.
Form Number: None.
Expiration Date: 7/31/07.
Type of Request: Extension of a currently approved information
collection.
Abstract: Title 7, Part 273 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) sets forth the Food Stamp Program requirements for the
application, certification and continued eligibility for food stamp
benefits. This notice extends the collection burden to account for
changes required by the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002
(FSRIA), pending the issuance of a final rule.
Establishing and reviewing standard utility allowances. The
regulations at 7 CFR 273.9(d)(6)(iii)(B) allow State agencies to
establish standard utility allowances (SUA) and once established
requires State agencies to review and adjust SUAs annually to reflect
changes in the cost of utilities. Many State agencies already have one
or more approved standards, which they update annually. State agencies
may use information already available from case files, quality control
reviews or other sources and from utility companies. State agencies may
make adjustments based on cost-of-living increases. The information
will be used to establish standards to be used in place of actual
utility costs in the computation of the excess shelter deduction. State
agencies are required to submit the amounts of these standards and
methodologies used in developing and updating the standards to FNS when
they are developed or changed.
Estimates of burden: Currently 52 State agencies have a standard
that includes heating or cooling costs and 41 have a standard for
utility costs other than heating or cooling. In addition, 51 State
agencies have a telephone allowance standard. State agencies are
required to review the standards yearly to determine if increases are
needed due to the cost of living. We estimate a minimum of 2.5 hours
annually to make this review and adjustment (2.5 hours x 52 State
agencies = 130 hours). Total burden for this provision is estimated to
be 130 hours per year.
Self-employment costs. The regulations at 7 CFR 273.11(b) allow
self-employment gross income to be reduced by the cost of producing
such income. The regulations allow the State agencies, with approval
from FNS, to establish the methodology for offsetting the costs of
producing self-employment income, as long as the procedure does not
increase Program costs. State agencies may submit a request to FNS to
use a method of producing a reasonable estimate of the costs of
producing self-employment income in lieu of calculating the actual
costs for each household with such income. Different methods may be
proposed for different types of self-employment. The proposal shall
include a description of the proposed method, the number and type of
households and percent of the caseload affected, and documentation
indicating that the proposed procedure will not increase program costs.
State agencies may collect this data from household case records or
other sources that may be available.
Estimates of burden: We estimate that 10 State agencies will submit
a request of this type each year for the next three years. It is
estimated that these States will incur a one-time burden of at least 10
working hours gathering and analyzing data, developing the methodology,
determining the cost implication, and submitting a request to FNS for a
total burden of 100 hours annually. State agencies are not required to
periodically review their approved methodologies. We do not anticipate
that State agencies will voluntarily review their methodologies for
change on a regular basis, thus burden is not being assessed for this
purpose at this time.
[[Page 20319]]
Record keeping burden only: Each State agency would be required to
keep a record of the information gathered and submitted to FNS. We
estimate this to be 7 minutes per year for the 53 State agencies to
equal a total of 6 burden hours annually. (53 x 7 minutes/60 minutes
per hour = 6 hours annual burden).
Summary of burden hours:
Affected Public: State agencies and local governments administering
the Food Stamp Program.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 53.
Estimated Number of Responses Per Respondent: 2.16.
Estimated Number of Responses: 115.
Estimated Hours Per Response: 2.05.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 236.
Dated: April 17, 2007.
Roberto Salazar,
Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. E7-7715 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P
