Large Passenger Vessel Crew Requirements, 20278-20286 [E7-7696]
Download as PDF
20278
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 78 / Tuesday April 24, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
* Elevation
in feet
(NGVD)
+ Elevation
in feet
(NAVD)
# Depth in
feet above
ground
modified
Flooding source(s)
Location of referenced elevation
Ottauquechee River ...................
Approximately 0.94 mile upstream of Taftsville Dam .................
+657
+815
Second Branch White River ......
Approximately 1,840 feet upstream of confluence of Curtis Hollow Brook.
Approximately 1.24 miles upstream of State Route 14 ..............
Approximately 0.86 mile downstream of Stove Hill Road ..........
Approximately 0.79 mile downstream of State Routes 12 and
107/River Street.
Approximately 3.56 miles downstream of Liberty Hill Road .......
+527
+531
Communities
affected
White River ................................
+525
Town of Bridgewater, Town of
Pomfret.
Town of Bethel, Town of Royalton.
Town of Bethel, Town of Stockbridge.
+754
# Depth in feet above ground.
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
ADDRESSES
Town of Bethel
Maps available for inspection
Town of Bridgewater
Maps available for inspection
Town of Cavendish
Maps available for inspection
Town of Hartland
Maps available for inspection
Town of Plymouth
Maps available for inspection
Town of Pomfret
Maps available for inspection
Town of Reading
Maps available for inspection
Town of Royalton
Maps available for inspection
Town of Springfield
Maps available for inspection
Town of Stockbridge
Maps available for inspection
Town of Weathersfield
Maps available for inspection
Town of Windsor
Maps available for inspection
at the Bethel Town Office, 134 South Main Street, Bethel, Vermont.
at the Bridgewater Town Office, 7335 U.S. Route 4, Bridgewater, Vermont.
at the Cavendish Town Office, 37 High Street, Cavendish, Vermont.
at the Town of Hartland Clerk’s Office, Damon Hall, 1 Quechee Road, Hartland, Vermont.
at the Plymouth Town Office, 68 Town Office Road, Plymouth, Vermont.
at the Pomfret Town Office, 5188 Pomfret Road, North Pomfret, Vermont.
at the Reading Town Office, Robinson Hall, 799 Vermont Route 106, Reading, Vermont.
at the Royalton Town Office, 23 Alexander Place, Suite 1, South Royalton, Vermont.
at the Springfield Town Office, 96 Main Street, Springfield, Vermont.
at the Town of Stockbridge Clerk’s Office, 1722 Vermont Route 100, Stockbridge, Vermont.
at the Town of Weathersfield, Martin Memorial Hall, 5259 Route 5, Ascutney, Vermont.
at the Windsor Town Office, 29 Union Street, Windsor, Vermont.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No.
83.100, ‘‘Flood Insurance.’’)
Dated: April 10, 2007.
David I. Maurstad,
Federal Insurance Administrator of the
National Flood Insurance Program, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department
of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 07–1978 Filed 4–23–07; 8:45 am]
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
BILLING CODE 9110–12–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Parts 12 and 15
[USCG–2007–27761]
RIN 1625–AB16
Large Passenger Vessel Crew
Requirements
Coast Guard, DHS.
Interim rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:55 Apr 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending
its regulations on merchant mariner
documentation to implement section
3509 of the John Warner National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2007 (Warner Act), which allows
for the issuance of merchant mariner
documents (MMDs) to certain nonresident aliens for service in the
stewards departments of U.S.-flag large
passenger vessels endorsed for
coastwise trade. Coast Guard regulations
currently prohibit the Coast Guard from
issuing MMDs, which are required for
service on large passenger vessels, to
non-immigrant aliens. This interim rule
E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM
24APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 78 / Tuesday April 24, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
amends Coast Guard regulations to
allow the Coast Guard to issue MMDs to
qualified non-resident aliens who are
authorized to be employed in the United
States. This rule also sets the
requirements that these aliens must
meet in order to qualify for MMDs, and
the requirements for the large passenger
vessels that may choose to hire these
aliens. This interim rule only applies to
large passenger vessels, as defined
under the Warner Act.
DATES: This interim rule is effective
April 24, 2007. Comments and related
material must reach the Docket
Management Facility on or before July
23, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG–2007–27761 to the
Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of the
following methods:
(1) Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590–0001.
(3) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(4) Delivery: Room PL–401 on the
Plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The telephone number is 202–366–
9329.
(5) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call
LCDR Derek D’Orazio, Coast Guard,
telephone 202–372–1405. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–493–0402.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
The SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this interim final rule sets forth the basis,
purpose and particulars of this rulemaking
action and is organized as follows:
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
II. Background and Purpose
III. Discussion of the Interim Rule
IV. Regulatory Requirements
A. Administrative Procedure Act
B. Regulatory Evaluation
i. Affected Population
ii. Industry Profile
iii. Direct Impacts
iv. Indirect Impacts
C. Small Entities
D. Assistance for Small Entities
E. Collection of Information
F. Federalism
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:55 Apr 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
H. Taking of Private Property
I. Civil Justice Reform Act
J. Protection of Children
K. Indian Tribal Governments
L. Energy Effects
M. Technical Standards
N. Environment
List of Subjects
I. Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://dms.dot.gov
and will include any personal
information you have provided. We
have an agreement with the Department
of Transportation (DOT) to use the
Docket Management Facility. Please see
DOT’s ‘‘Privacy Act’’ paragraph below.
Submitting comments: If you submit a
comment, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (USCG–2007–27761),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. You may submit your
comments and material by electronic
means, mail, fax, or delivery to the
Docket Management Facility at the
address under ADDRESSES; but please
submit your comments and material by
only one means. If you submit them by
mail or delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this rule in view of them.
Viewing comments and documents:
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://dms.dot.gov at any time, click on
‘‘Simple Search,’’ enter the last five
digits of the docket number for this
rulemaking, and click on ‘‘Search.’’ You
may also visit the Docket Management
Facility in room PL–401 on the Plaza
level of the Nassif Building, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review the Department of
Transportation’s Privacy Act Statement
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20279
in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
Public Meeting: We do not currently
plan to hold a public meeting. But you
may submit a request for one to the
Docket Management Facility at the
address under ADDRESSES explaining
why one would be beneficial. If we
determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
II. Background and Purpose
Title 46 U.S.C. 8103 generally
requires that unlicensed seamen on
documented vessels must be of the
following status: (a) Citizens of the
United States; (b) lawful permanent
residents; or (c) foreign nationals
enrolled in the United States Merchant
Marine Academy. No more than 25
percent of such unlicensed seamen may
be lawful permanent residents.
On October 17, 2006, Congress
enacted the John Warner National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal
Year 2007 (Warner Act), Public Law
109–364, sec. 3509, 120 Stat. 2518.
Section 3509 of the Warner Act (46
U.S.C. 8103(k)) amends 46 U.S.C. 8103
to permit large passenger vessels to also
employ non-resident aliens who are
authorized to work in the United States.
The statute maintains a cap so that no
more than twenty-five percent of the
unlicensed seamen on any large
passenger vessel are aliens, whether
admitted to the United States as lawful
permanent residents or otherwise
allowed to be employed in the United
States as nonresident aliens. ‘‘Large
passenger vessel’’ is defined under the
Warner Act to mean ‘‘a vessel of more
than 70,000 gross tons, as measured
under section 14302 of this title, with
capacity for at least 2,000 passengers
and documented with a coastwise
endorsement under chapter 121 of this
title.’’
The Warner Act also contains the
following qualifications and restrictions
on non-resident aliens serving as
unlicensed seamen on large passenger
vessels:
1. Non-resident aliens may not
perform watchstanding, engine room
duty watch, or vessel navigation
functions;
2. Non-resident aliens must be aliens
employable in the United States under
the Immigration and Nationality Act of
1952, as amended (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.)
(INA), including an alien crewman
described in § 101(a)(15)(D)(i) of the
INA (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(D)(i));
3. Non-resident aliens must have been
employed, for a period of at least one
E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM
24APR1
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
20280
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 78 / Tuesday April 24, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
year, on a passenger vessel, including a
foreign flag passenger vessel, under the
same common ownership or control as
the U.S.-flag vessel they will be working
on, as certified by the owner or
managing operator of such vessel;
4. Non-resident aliens must have no
record of material disciplinary actions
during such employment as verified in
writing by the owner or managing
operator of such vessel;
5. Non-resident aliens must have
successfully completed a United States
Government security check of the
relevant domestic and international
databases, as appropriate, or any other
national security-related information or
database (which is required for a MMD
or Transportation Worker Identification
Credential (TWIC));
6. Non-resident aliens must have
successfully undergone an employer
background check for which the owner
or managing operator provides a signed
report that describes the background
checks undertaken. The background
check must consist of a search of all
information that is reasonably and
legally available to the owner or
managing operator in the seaman’s
country of citizenship and any other
country in which the seaman receives
employment referrals, or resides. The
report must be kept on the vessel and
available for inspection, and the
information derived from the
background check must be made
available upon request;
7. Non-resident aliens may not be
citizens or temporary or permanent
residents of a country designated by the
United States as a sponsor of terrorism
or any other country that the Secretary
of Homeland Security, in consultation
with the Secretary of State and the
heads of other appropriate United States
agencies, determines to be a security
threat to the United States; and
8. Non-resident aliens may only serve
for an aggregate period of 36 months of
actual service on all authorized U.S.-flag
large passenger vessels combined. Once
this 36-month limitation has been
reached, the merchant mariner’s
document becomes invalid and the
individual’s employer must return it to
the Coast Guard, and the individual is
no longer authorized service in a
position requiring a merchant mariner’s
document on any U.S.-flag large
passenger vessel.
Under current law, all individuals
serving in the steward’s department on
passenger vessels of 100 gross register
tons (GRT) or more must hold a
merchant mariner’s document (MMD).
46 U.S.C. 8701. The only exception is
for entertainment personnel employed
for a period of 30 days or less per year,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:55 Apr 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
who are exempt from the MMD
requirement.
Coast Guard regulations governing the
issuance of MMDs currently prohibit the
issuance of MMDs to non-resident
aliens. See 46 CFR part 12. The Coast
Guard, through this interim rule, is
amending its regulations to authorize
the issuance of MMDs to non-resident
aliens authorized to work in the United
States who meet the criteria of the
Warner Act and the requirements set
forth in this rule.
III. Discussion of Interim Rule
To implement 46 U.S.C. 8103(k), the
Coast Guard is revising its regulations
within 46 CFR subchapter B. This
interim rule will add a new 46 CFR
subpart 12.40. Companies that wish to
hire non-resident aliens must meet the
requirements specified in new § 12.40–
7, subject to the civil penalty provisions
specified in 46 U.S.C. 8103(f) for any
violation of the section.
The new subpart adds definitions for
‘‘large passenger vessel,’’ ‘‘non-resident
alien,’’ and ‘‘steward’s department.’’ It
also contains citizenship and identity
requirements for non-resident aliens
employed as unlicensed seamen by
large passenger vessels, in lieu of the
requirements of 46 CFR 12.02–10,
12.02–12, and 12.02–14. In addition to
those citizenship and identity
requirements, this rule establishes the
requirement that non-resident alien
applicants satisfy the requirements of
the Warner Act (discussed above), and
stipulates how mariners, and the
companies that employee them, must
satisfy those requirements. The
company must submit the additional
required merchant mariner application
information to the Coast Guard on the
employee’s behalf.
Title 46 U.S.C. 8103(k)(3)(A) states
that non-resident aliens may not be
citizens or temporary or permanent
residents of a country designated by the
United States as a sponsor of terrorism.
The Coast Guard interprets this to mean
that non-resident aliens may not be
citizens or residents of a country
designated by the United States as a
sponsor of terrorism under section 6(j)
of the Export Administration Act of
1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)), or section
620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of
1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371). Under new
section 12.40–11(c), the Coast Guard
will not issue MMDs to non-resident
aliens that are citizens or residents
(temporary or permanent) of countries
listed on the Department of State’s
‘‘State Sponsors of Terrorism’’ list. The
list, as of the date of publication of this
rule, may be found at https://
www.state.gov/s/ct/c14151.htm.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Warner Act also allows the
Secretary of Homeland Security, upon
consultation with the Secretary of State
and the heads of other appropriate
United States agencies, to determine
that other countries present a security
threat to the United States for purpose
of determining eligibility for
employment of non-resident aliens.
DHS has initiated this consultation and
may add more countries or lists of
countries in the future as a result of
these consultations.
The interim rule also adds 46 CFR
15.530, which provides company
responsibilities associated with
employment of non-resident aliens on
their vessels relative to the International
Labor Organization’s Merchant
Shipping (Minimum Standards)
Convention of 1976. Title 46 CFR 15.530
also requires that no more than 25
percent of the unlicensed seamen on a
large passenger vessel be aliens,
whether admitted to the United States
for permanent residence or otherwise
employable in the United States as nonresident aliens. This limitation is also
mandated by 46 U.S.C. 8103(k)(2).
Only three U.S.-flag vessels currently
fall within the definition of ‘‘large
passenger vessel’’ under 48 U.S.C.
8103(k), each of which are owned by the
same cruise line.1 Because the statute
limits the non-resident aliens who are
eligible for employment on large
passenger vessels to aliens who have
otherwise been employed by that cruise
line for one year, and such aliens cannot
compose more than 25% of the number
of unlicensed seamen on such vessels,
the Coast Guard believes that
approximately 600 to 800 non-resident
aliens could be transferred to
employment on one of the three large
passenger vessels within the first year of
the rule taking effect.
The Coast Guard notes that, although
the Warner Act refers to section
101(a)(15)(d) of the INA (which defines
aliens authorized for crew visas), it does
not waive any provision or requirement
of the INA pertaining to visas or
employment eligibility for non-resident
aliens. In addition, we note that all
affected aliens must comply with any
required identification, tracking and
reporting programs, including DHS’s
United States Visitor and Immigrant
Status Indicator Technology Program
(US–VISIT) and the National Security
Entry-Exit Registration System
(NSEERS). The Coast Guard is
promulgating this interim rule under its
1 The Coast Guard notes, however, that on April
11, 2007, the cruise line announced that it would
be reflagging one of these three vessels to a foreign
flag in the near future; ultimately reducing the
number of eligible vessels to two.
E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM
24APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 78 / Tuesday April 24, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
The Coast Guard has determined that
good cause exists to implement this rule
as an interim rule under the
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b). The Coast Guard, under this
interim rule, is implementing a
Congressional directive that does not
provide Coast Guard with discretion in
the issuance of MMDs to non-resident
aliens as a class. Further, as discussed
above, this rule will only directly
regulate one party at this time—the
owner of the three vessels that fall
within the statutory definition of ‘‘large
passenger vessels.’’ The Coast Guard has
consulted with that carrier during the
development of this interim rule. In
addition, under the current statutory
restrictions, only aliens already
employed by this company can be
transferred to employment on one of the
three eligible passenger vessels. Given
the limited regulatory impact of this
rule, we do not believe there will be
significant public interest in this interim
rule.
Accordingly, the Coast Guard has
determined that delaying
implementation of this rule to allow
public comment prior to
implementation would be impracticable
and unnecessary. 5 U.S.C. 553(b). For
reasons stated above, the Coast Guard
also finds that good cause exists under
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
The Coast Guard, however, values
public input to the regulatory process,
and for this reason we are inviting posteffective-date comments on this interim
rule. We may change this rule as a result
of the comments we receive.
departments of large passenger vessels,
as entertainment and service personnel,
including wait staff, hotel housekeeping
staff, and food handlers. Currently, only
U.S. citizens, lawful permanent
residents, and foreign nationals enrolled
at the U.S. Merchant Mariner Academy
can obtain MMDs as unlicensed seamen
(and no more than 25 percent of these
unlicensed seamen may be lawful
permanent residents). This rule will
permit non-resident aliens to also obtain
MMDs for employment as unlicensed
seamen on large passenger vessels,
except no more than 25 percent of the
unlicensed seamen on a large passenger
vessel can be aliens (whether nonresident aliens or lawful permanent
residents). The rule further requires that
the non-resident aliens may only be
employed in the steward’s department
of the large passenger vessel.
Although the Warner Act, and this
interim rule, allow large passenger
vessels to hire non-immigrant aliens,
neither the Act nor this rule mandate
that they do so. Accordingly, there are
no mandatory costs to large passenger
vessels resulting from this interim rule.
Rather, a company will only choose to
avail itself of the exemption if the
benefits to the company from the hiring
of non-resident aliens are greater than
the costs.
The following is an assessment of the
affected population, an industry profile,
and an evaluation of the direct and
indirect impacts of the rule. The only
company affected by this rulemaking,
discussed below, provided us with
aggregated business data to protect
proprietary and confidential business
information and details of their business
operations. The industry estimates
discussed herein are preliminary and
may not reflect the actual impacts after
industry implements the alternative
compliance method.
B. Regulatory Evaluation
i. Affected Population
Executive Order 12866 requires
agencies to assess the costs and benefits
of significant regulatory actions as
defined in Section 3(f). At this time, we
expect this interim rule will not be an
economically significant action under
Section 3(f)(1) of the Order (i.e., an
annual effect of $100 million or more on
the economy).
The Coast Guard is promulgating this
rulemaking as mandated by Congress
through the Warner Act, see
‘‘Background and Purpose’’ section for
more information about this legislation.
The rule creates an exemption to
allow qualified non-resident aliens to
obtain MMDs for employment as
unlicensed seamen in the steward’s
Vessel Owners
authority to issue MMDs, and only to
that extent.
IV. Regulatory Requirements
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
A. Administrative Procedure Act
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:55 Apr 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
The rule will affect owners of large
passenger vessels more than 70,000
gross tons, with a capacity of at least
2,000 passengers, and documented with
a coastwise endorsement (e.g. U.S.-flag
vessel). Vessel owners will be able to
hire non-resident aliens to comprise up
to 25 percent of the unlicensed seamen
onboard their vessels, but only in the
steward’s department. The rule allows
vessel owners to hire only those nonresident aliens that have been
employed, for a period of not less than
one year, on a passenger vessel,
including a foreign flag passenger
vessel, under the same common
ownership, control or managing
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20281
ownership as the U.S.-flag vessel on
which they will be working, see the
‘‘Discussion of Interim Rule’’ section for
more detail on the conditions and
restrictions for hiring non-resident
aliens.
Based on Coast Guard data, we
determined there are three large
passenger vessels currently in service
that meet the qualifications of this rule.
Norwegian Cruise Line America (NCLA)
operates these vessels in coastwise
service in the Hawaiian Islands. NCLA
is a brand of the Miami-based
Norwegian Cruise Line Corporation
(NCL), which itself is a subsidiary of
Star Cruises Limited of Hong Kong.
NCLA announced on April 11, 2007,
that it would be removing one of the
three vessels from U.S. flag service and
re-flagging for foreign service.
At this time, we have no information
to suggest that additional companies
will enter into coastwise service with
large passenger vessels, and we do not
expect NCLA to expand its coastwise
fleet of large passenger vessels because
of this rule. This is due to the costs
associated with flagging and operating
vessels of this nature in the United
States.
Unlicensed Mariners
The rule affects unlicensed mariners
working on or applying for work on
these vessels. This rule allows vessel
owners to employ non-resident aliens
on their vessels, capped at 25 percent of
the overall total of unlicensed seamen
per vessel. This rule also indirectly
affects unions that maintain the
collective bargaining agreements for
these mariners in terms of changes in
membership. Based on information from
NCLA, the Coast Guard anticipates that
we will issue MMDs to approximately
600 to 800 non-resident aliens within
the first year of the rule. By the end of
the second year of the rule, the Coast
Guard estimates that we will issue an
additional 900 to 1,200 MMDs to
support non-resident alien crew shift
change and reserve. After this two-year
implementation period, NCLA intends
to maintain an average annual full
compliment of 1,500 to 2,000 onboard,
shift, and reserve non-resident alien
crewmembers under this rule.
Government Resources
The rule will also affect Coast Guard
and potentially other government
resources used to process, review, and
issue documentation to unlicensed
mariners and non-resident aliens
affected by this rule. We estimate that
certain Coast Guard Regional
Examination Centers (RECs) in the
Hawaiian Islands and West Coast may
E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM
24APR1
20282
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 78 / Tuesday April 24, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
incur increased processing burden to
accommodate industry participation in
this rulemaking, especially in the first
two years as mentioned below. We
anticipate that the requirements of this
rule and the ultimate issuance of MMDs
to non-resident aliens will involve
additional processing exceeding the
current processing for U.S. residents to
ensure that background checks and
applications meet security
requirements. The additional Coast
Guard burden at the RECs will be
proportional to the number of
applications submitted by vessel owners
on behalf of non-resident aliens.
At this time, however, we anticipate
that this rule will not substantially
change the annual total number of MMD
applications received or the total
number of MMDs issued by the Coast
Guard. Based on correspondence
between NCLA and the Coast Guard,
NCLA stated that this rule would
stabilize the crew situation onboard the
three vessels and reduce turnover rates.
NCLA claims that the potential
workforce stability that results from this
rule will eventually reduce the number
of MMD applications that the Coast
Guard processes for NCLA crews.
ii. Industry Profile
Based on industry information, the
number of overall Hawaii cruise ship
passengers grew from 240,800 in 2004 to
about 398,000 in 2005. In 2006,
approximately 408,500 cruise
passengers visited Hawaii onboard 56
cruise ships, including NCLA’s three
U.S.-flag vessels. Capacity has also
increased over the past several years
and passenger costs have decreased.
Competition from cruises with foreign
crews have pushed prices down, in
particular those offering 15-day cruises
from the West Coast.
Based on industry information, in
general the cruise industry has
historically consisted of foreign flag
vessels, as opposed to U.S.-flag vessels,
employing mariners from a variety of
foreign countries in lower wage scales
and for longer hours than U.S. mariners.
NCLA must operate their U.S.-flag fleet
with mostly U.S. citizens and residents,
driving labor costs higher for NCLA
than for cruise lines operating foreign
flag vessels with foreign mariners.
Based on industry information, the
cost structure for operating the affected
U.S.-flag vessels will be higher than
operating foreign flag vessels due to the
high labor costs associated with hiring
and maintaining U.S. crews. NCLA
claims that high crew costs and
increased industry capacity directly
contribute to the decrease in the
profitability of their U.S.-flag fleet.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:55 Apr 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
According to NCLA, the annual
turnover rate for U.S. unlicensed
mariners working as hospitality staff on
these vessels has been as high as 200
percent suggesting the undesirability by
U.S. unlicensed mariners to work in
hospitality positions and under the five
months on and one month off crew shift
conditions on the domestic vessels.
NCLA has recently reported that the
current turnover rate for the U.S.
unlicensed mariners has fallen to 110
percent. NCLA has stated that the high
turnover rate and the associated costs of
maintaining an all U.S. crew is the only
reason why they are participating in the
alternative compliance method. As
turnover occurs for the U.S. crew, we
expect NCLA to employ the full
contingent of non-resident aliens
allowed by this rule.
iii. Direct Impacts
We expect most of the direct costs of
the rule will be borne by NCLA. The
rule will require companies to perform
an employer-conducted background
check and submit additional required
merchant mariner application
information to the Coast Guard on the
employee’s behalf. However, NCLA
participation in this alternative
compliance method is voluntary and
NCLA will only participate if the net
benefits of doing so are positive. We
estimate the benefit to NCLA from
participating in this rule to be the cost
savings made through reduced turnover
and decreased startup training since the
non-resident alien hired under this
program will have experience aboard
foreign flag vessels.
We have not estimated the overall
effectiveness of this rule in reducing
turnover rates or labor costs for NCLA.
NCLA provided preliminary
information that suggests they could
reduce turnover rates by about 25 to 35
percent annually resulting in a potential
reduction in labor costs by
approximately $5 to $10 million
annually; however, these are
preliminary estimates and NCLA cannot
estimate the actual reduction in
turnover rates and labor costs until they
implement the alternative compliance
program. Being that NCLA is the only
company directly regulated by this
rulemaking and these estimates are
based on proprietary and confidential
business information, the Coast Guard
and DHS cannot substantiate these
estimates. This reduction in labor cost is
the estimated cost savings or net benefit
for NCLA to participate in the
alternative MMD citizenship
compliance method of this rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Indirect Impacts
We reviewed potential indirect
impacts of this rule on labor conditions
and prevailing wages for U.S.
unlicensed mariners and non-resident
aliens employed under the rule.
We do not have information to suggest
that NCLA will replace U.S. mariners
currently employed in the steward’s
department on these vessels with nonresident aliens. In addition, NCLA must
still employ U.S. residents for at least 75
percent of the total unlicensed seamen
onboard their U.S.-flag vessels. Given
the high turnover rate among the U.S.
crew, we expect NCLA will still face
challenges recruiting and maintaining
their required U.S. resident hospitality
staff onboard these vessels.
The Act does not mandate nor does
the rule require that owners and
operators bear responsibilities
associated with conditions of
employment and shipboard living
arrangements for non-resident aliens on
their vessels. The United States is
signatory to the International Labor
Organization’s Merchant Shipping
(Minimum Standards) Convention of
1976 (ILO 147), which establishes
shipboard conditions of employment
and shipboard living arrangements.
Since the United States is signatory to
this Convention, participating owners
and operators must comply with the
requirements of the convention in their
employment of all mariners onboard.
The Act does not mandate that
participating owners and operators pay
the non-resident aliens the same
prevailing wages as the U.S. crew.
However, United States’ responsibilities
under the International Labor
Organization’s Merchant Shipping
(Minimum Standards) Convention of
1976 (including the Conventions in the
Annex), require that seamen can
negotiate compensation and that seamen
have the right to enter into collective
bargaining agreements. Based on
industry information, the sole affected
owner (NCLA) has entered into a
collective bargaining agreement with the
current U.S. crew and intends on
employing non-resident aliens under
the same agreement. This rule does not
require participating owners to extend
current labor agreements to non-resident
aliens employed under this program.
The collective bargaining agreement
between the affected owner and the
union will determine non-resident alien
employment compensation and pay.
We are interested in the potential
impacts from this rule on industry and
mariners, and we request public
comment on these potential impacts. If
you think that this rulemaking would
E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM
24APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 78 / Tuesday April 24, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
have a significant economic impact,
please submit a comment to the Docket
Management Facility at the address
under ADDRESSES. In your comment,
explain why, how, and to what degree
you think this rule would have an
economic impact on you.
C. Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
(‘‘RFA’’; 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended)
requires agencies to consider whether
regulatory actions would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
RFA analysis is not required when a
rule is exempt from notice and comment
rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553(b). The
Coast Guard determined that this rule is
exempt from notice and comment
rulemaking pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B). Therefore, an RFA analysis is
not required for this rule. The Coast
Guard, nonetheless, expects that this
interim rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This interim rule will affect owners
and operators of, and unlicensed
seamen working on or applying for work
on, large passenger vessels of more than
70,000 gross tons, with a capacity of at
least 2,000 passengers, and documented
with a coastwise endorsement. This
rulemaking will also indirectly affect
unions for unlicensed mariners.
We have determined that individual
mariners and the unions affected by this
rule are not small entities under the
definition of a small entity in the RFA.
We also determined that the unions are
not directly regulated by the rule.
Owners and operators affected by this
rule will most likely be classified under
one of the following North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS)
6-digit codes for water transportation:
483114—Coastal and Great Lakes
Passenger Transportation or 483112—
Deep Sea Passenger Transportation.
According to the Small Business
Administration’s size standards, a U.S.
company classified under these NAICS
codes and employing less than 500
employees is considered a small entity.
Based on Coast Guard data, we have
determined that there is only one
company affected by this rule. We
researched company size and revenue
data using proprietary and public
business databases and found that this
company employs more than 500
employees and is not considered a small
entity by the Small Business
Administration’s size standards. In
addition, we found that this company
was a subsidiary of a large foreignowned corporation. See the ‘‘Regulatory
Evaluation’’ section for more
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:55 Apr 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
information about the effected vessel
owner.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies
under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule will have a significant
economic impact on it, please submit a
comment to the Docket Management
Facility at the address under ADDRESSES.
In your comment, explain why you
think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically
affect it.
D. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this interim rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact LCDR Derek
D’Orazio at 202–372–1405. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
E. Collection of Information
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) reviews
agency collection of information
requirements. As part of its review,
OMB evaluates the practical utility of
the information in light of the burden
imposed by its collection. Collection of
information requirements include
reporting, recordkeeping, notification,
and other similar requirements. This
interim rule will require employers to
submit employee information to the
Coast Guard before the Coast Guard will
issue an MMD for their employees.
However, we expect only one company
will be affected by this requirement
each year, as there is only one company
in a position to take advantage of these
regulations. As such, this rule contains
no new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act.
F. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them.
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20283
States may not regulate in categories
reserved for regulation by the Coast
Guard. All of the categories covered in
46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703, 7101, and 8101
(design, construction, alteration, repair,
maintenance, operation, equipping,
personnel qualification, and manning of
vessels), as well as the reporting of
casualties and any other category in
which Congress intended the Coast
Guard to be the sole source of a vessel’s
obligations, are within the field
foreclosed from regulation by the States.
See United States v. Locke and
Intertanko v. Locke, 529 U.S. 89 (March
6, 2000). This interim rule deals with
personnel qualifications and the
manning requirements on large
passenger vessels. Because the States
may not regulate within these
categories, preemption under Executive
Order 13132 is not an issue.
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we discuss the effects of
this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
H. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
I. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
J. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
K. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM
24APR1
20284
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 78 / Tuesday April 24, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
L. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. The
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a
Statement of Energy Effects under
Executive Order 13211.
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
M. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
N. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have made a preliminary
determination that there are no factors
in this case that would limit the use of
a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, we
believe that this rule should be
categorically excluded, under figure 2–
1, paragraph (34)(c), of the Instruction,
from further environmental
documentation. This paragraph
excludes regulatory actions concerning
the training, qualifying, licensing, and
disciplining of maritime personnel from
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:55 Apr 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
further environmental documentation,
and this interim rule concerns the
licensing of maritime personnel. An
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
and a ‘‘Categorical Exclusion
Determination’’ are available in the
docket where indicated under the
‘‘Public Participation and Request for
Comments’’ section of this preamble.
Comments on this section will be
considered before we make the final
decision on whether this rule should be
categorically excluded from further
environmental review.
List of Subjects
46 CFR Part 12
Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Schools,
Seamen.
46 CFR Part 15
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Seamen, Vessels.
I Accordingly, 46 CFR Chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 12—CERTIFICATION OF
SEAMEN
1. Add new Subpart 12.40 to read as
follows:
I
Subpart 12.40—Non-resident Alien
Unlicensed Members of the Steward’s
Department on U.S.-Flag Large
Passenger Vessels
Sec.
12.40–1
12.40–3
12.40–5
12.40–7
12.40–9
12.40–11
12.40–13
12.40–15
Purpose of rules.
Definitions.
General application requirements.
Employer requirements.
Basis for denial.
Citizenship and identity.
Restrictions.
Alternative means of compliance.
Purpose of rules.
The rules in this subpart implement
46 U.S.C. 8103(k) by establishing
requirements for the issuance of
merchant mariner’s documents, valid
only for service in the steward’s
department of U.S.-flag large passenger
vessels, to non-resident aliens.
§ 12.40–3
Definitions.
As used in this subpart:
Large passenger vessel means a vessel
of more than 70,000 gross tons, as
measured under 46 U.S.C. 14302 and
documented under the laws of the
United States, with capacity for at least
2,000 passengers and a coastwise
endorsement under 46 U.S.C. chapter
121.
PO 00000
§ 12.40–5 General application
requirements.
(a) Unless otherwise expressly
specified in this subpart, non-resident
alien applicants for Coast Guard-issued
merchant mariner’s documents are
subject to all applicable requirements
contained in this subchapter.
(b) No application from a non-resident
alien for a merchant mariner’s
document issued pursuant to this
subpart will be accepted unless the
applicant’s employer satisfies all of the
requirements of § 12.40–7.
§ 12.40–7
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701; 46 U.S.C. 2101,
2103, 2110, 7301, 7302, 7503, 7505, 7701 and
8103; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
§ 12.40–1
Non-resident alien means an
individual who is not a citizen or alien
lawfully admitted to the United States
for permanent residence, but who is
employable in the United States under
the Immigration and Nationality Act (8
U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), including an alien
crewman described in section
101(a)(15)(D)(i) of that Act who meets
the requirements of 46 U.S.C.
8103(k)(3)(A).
Steward’s department means the
department that includes entertainment
personnel and all service personnel,
including wait staff, housekeeping staff,
and galley workers, as defined in the
vessel security plan approved by the
Secretary under 46 U.S.C. 70103(c).
These personnel may also be referred to
as members of the hotel department on
a large passenger vessel.
Frm 00064
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Employer requirements.
(a) The employer must submit the
following to the Coast Guard, as a part
of the applicant’s merchant mariner’s
document application, on behalf of the
applicant:
(1) A signed report that contains all
material disciplinary actions related to
the applicant, such as, but not limited
to, violence or assault, theft, drug and
alcohol policy violations, and sexual
harassment, along with an explanation
of the criteria used by the employer to
determine the materiality of those
actions;
(2) A signed report regarding an
employer-conducted background check.
The report must contain:
(i) A statement that the applicant has
successfully undergone an employerconducted background check;
(ii) A description of the employerconducted background check, including
all databases and records searched. The
background check must, at a minimum,
show that the employer has reviewed all
information reasonably and legally
available to the owner or managing
operator, including the review of
available court and police records in the
applicant’s country of citizenship, and
any other country in which the
E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM
24APR1
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 78 / Tuesday April 24, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
applicant has received employment
referrals, or resided, for the past 20
years prior to the date of application;
and,
(iii) All information derived from the
employer-conducted background check.
(3) The employer-conducted
background check must be conducted to
the satisfaction of the Coast Guard for a
merchant mariner’s document to be
issued to the applicant.
(b) If a merchant mariner’s document
is issued to the applicant, the report and
information required in paragraph (a)(2)
of this section must be securely kept by
the employer on the U.S.-flag large
passenger vessel, or U.S.-flag large
passenger vessels, on which the
applicant is employed. The report and
information must remain on the last
U.S.-flag large passenger vessel on
which the applicant was employed until
such time as the merchant mariner’s
document is returned to the Coast Guard
in accordance with paragraph (d) of this
section.
(c) If a merchant mariner’s document
or a transportation worker identification
credential (TWIC) is issued to the
applicant, each merchant mariner’s
document and TWIC must be securely
kept by the employer on the U.S.-flag
large passenger vessel on which the
applicant is employed. The employer
must maintain a detailed record of the
seaman’s total service on all authorized
U.S.-flag large passenger vessels, and
must make that information available to
the Coast Guard upon request, to
demonstrate that the limitations of
§ 12.40–13(c) have not been exceeded.
(d) In the event that the seaman’s
merchant mariner’s document and/or
TWIC expires, the seaman’s visa status
terminates, the seaman serves onboard
the U.S.-flag large passenger vessel(s) for
36 months in the aggregate as a
nonimmigrant crewman, the employer
terminates employment of the seaman
or if the seaman otherwise ceases
working with the employer, the
employer must return the merchant
mariner’s document to the Coast Guard
and/or the TWIC to the Transportation
Security Administration within 10 days
of the event.
(e) In addition to the initial material
disciplinary actions report and the
initial employer-conducted background
check specified in paragraph (a) of this
section, the employer must:
(1) Submit an annual material
disciplinary actions report to update
whether there have been any material
disciplinary actions related to the
applicant since the last material
disciplinary actions report was
submitted to the Coast Guard.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:55 Apr 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
(i) The annual material disciplinary
actions report must be submitted to the
satisfaction of the Coast Guard in
accordance with the same criteria set
forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section,
except that the period of time examined
for the material disciplinary actions
report need only extend back to the date
of the last material disciplinary actions
report; and
(ii) The annual material disciplinary
actions report must be submitted to the
Coast Guard on or before the
anniversary of the issuance date of the
merchant mariner’s document.
(2) Conduct a background check each
year that the merchant mariner’s
document is valid to search for any
changes that might have occurred since
the last employer-conducted
background check was performed:
(i) The annual background check must
be conducted to the satisfaction of the
Coast Guard in accordance with the
same criteria set forth in paragraph
(a)(2) of this section, except that the
period of time examined during the
annual background check need only
extend back to the date of the last
background check; and
(ii) All information derived from the
annual background check must be
submitted to the Coast Guard on or
before the anniversary of the issuance
date of the merchant mariner’s
document.
(f) The employer is subject to the civil
penalty provisions specified in 46
U.S.C. 8103(f) for any violation of this
section.
§ 12.40–9
Basis for denial.
In addition to the requirements for a
merchant mariner’s document
established elsewhere in this
subchapter, and the basis for denial
established in § 12.02–4 of this part, an
applicant for a merchant mariner’s
document issued pursuant to this
subpart must:
(a) Have been employed, for a period
of at least one year, on a foreign-flag
passenger vessel, or foreign flag
passenger vessels, that are under the
same common ownership or control as
the U.S.-flag large passenger vessel, or
U.S.-flag large passenger vessels, on
which the applicant will be employed
upon issuance of a merchant mariner’s
document under this subpart.
(b) Have no record of material
disciplinary actions during the
employment required under paragraph
(a) of this section, as verified in writing
by the owner or managing operator of
the U.S.-flag large passenger vessel, or
U.S.-flag large passenger vessels, on
which the applicant will be employed.
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20285
(c) Have successfully completed an
employer-conducted background check,
to the satisfaction of both the employer
and the Coast Guard.
(d) Meet the citizenship and identity
requirements of § 12.40–11.
§ 12.40–11
Citizenship and identity.
(a) In lieu of the requirements of
§§ 12.02–10, 12.02–12 and 12.02–14 of
this part, a non-resident alien may apply
for a Coast Guard-issued merchant
mariner’s document, endorsed and valid
only for service in the steward’s
department of a U.S.-flag large
passenger vessel as defined in this
subpart, if he or she is employable in
the United States under the Immigration
and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101, et
seq.), including an alien crewman
described in section 101 (a)(15)(D)(i) of
that Act.
(b) To meet the citizenship and
identity requirements of this subpart, an
applicant must present an unexpired
passport issued by the government of
the country of which the applicant is a
citizen or subject; and either a valid U.S.
C–1/D Crewman Visa or other valid U.S.
visa or authority deemed acceptable by
the Coast Guard.
(c) Any non-resident alien applying
for a merchant mariner’s document
under this subpart may not be a citizen
of, or a temporary or permanent resident
of, a country designated by the
Department of State as a ‘‘State Sponsor
of Terrorism’’ pursuant to section 6(j) of
the Export Administration Act of 1979
(50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)) or section 620A
of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961
(22 U.S.C. 2371).
§ 12.40–13
Restrictions.
(a) A merchant mariner’s document
issued to a non-resident alien under this
subpart authorizes service only in the
steward’s department of the U.S.-flag
large passenger vessel(s), that is/are
under the same common ownership and
control as the foreign-flag passenger
vessel(s), on which the non-resident
alien served to meet the requirements of
§ 12.40–9(a):
(1) The merchant mariner’s document
will be endorsed for service in the
steward’s department in accordance
with § 12.25–10 of this part;
(2) The merchant mariner’s document
may also be endorsed for service as a
food handler if the applicant meets the
requirements of § 12.25–20 of this part;
and
(3) No other rating or endorsement is
authorized, except lifeboatman, in
which case all applicable requirements
of this subchapter and the STCW
Convention and STCW Code must be
met.
E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM
24APR1
ycherry on PROD1PC64 with RULES
20286
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 78 / Tuesday April 24, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(b) The following restrictions must be
printed on the merchant mariner’s
document, or listed in an accompanying
Coast Guard letter, or both:
(1) The name and official number of
all U.S.-flag vessels on which the nonresident alien may serve. Service is not
authorized on any other U.S.-flag vessel;
(2) Upon issuance, the merchant
mariner’s document must remain in the
custody of the employer at all times;
(3) Upon termination of employment,
the merchant mariner’s document must
be returned to the Coast Guard within
10-days in accordance with § 12.40–7;
(4) A non-resident alien issued a
merchant mariner’s document under
this subpart may not perform
watchstanding, engine room duty
watch, or vessel navigation functions;
and,
(5) A non-resident alien issued a
merchant mariner’s document under
this subpart may perform emergencyrelated duties provided:
(i) The emergency-related duties do
not require any other rating or
endorsement, except lifeboatman as
specified in paragraph (a)(3) of this
section;
(ii) The non-resident alien has
completed familiarization and basic
safety training, as required in § 15.1105
of this subchapter;
(iii) That if the non-resident alien
serves as a lifeboatman, he or she must
have the necessary lifeboatman’s
endorsement; and
(iv) The non-resident alien has
completed the training for crewmembers
on passenger ships performing duties
involving safety or care for passengers,
as required in subpart 12.35 of this part.
(c) A non-resident alien may only
serve for an aggregate period of 36
months actual service on all authorized
U.S.-flag large passenger vessels
combined under the provisions of this
subpart:
(1) Once this 36-month limitation is
reached, the merchant mariner’s
document becomes invalid and must be
returned to the Coast Guard under
§ 12.40–7(d), and the non-resident alien
is no longer authorized serve in a
position requiring a merchant mariner’s
document on any U.S.-flag large
passenger vessel; and
(2) An individual who successfully
adjusts his or her immigration status to
become either a alien lawfully admitted
for permanent residence to the United
States or citizen of the United States
may apply for a merchant mariner’s
document, subject to the requirements
of §§ 12.02–10, 12.02–12 and 12.02–14
of this part, without any restrictions or
limitations imposed by this subpart.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:55 Apr 23, 2007
Jkt 211001
§ 12.40–15 Alternative means of
compliance.
(a) The owner or managing operator of
a U.S.-flag large passenger vessel, or
U.S.-flag large passenger vessels,
seeking to employ non-resident aliens
issued merchant mariner’s documents
under this subpart may submit a plan to
the Coast Guard, which, if approved,
will serve as an alternative means of
complying with the requirements of this
subpart.
(b) The plan must address all of the
elements contained in this subpart, as
well as the related elements contained
in § 15.530 of this subchapter, to the
satisfaction of the Coast Guard.
PART 15—MANNING REQUIREMENTS
3. The authority citation for part 15 is
revised to read as follows:
I
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2101, 2103, 3306,
3703, 8101, 8102, 8104, 8105, 8301, 8304,
8502, 8503, 8701, 8702, 8901, 8902, 8903,
8904, 8905(b), 8906, 9102, and 8103; and
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
4. Add new § 15.530 to subpart D to
read as follows:
I
§ 15.530
Large passenger vessels.
(a) The definition of terms used in
this section is the same as § 12.40–3 of
this subchapter.
(b) The owner or operator of a U.S.flag large passenger vessel must ensure
that any non-resident alien holding a
Coast Guard-issued merchant mariner’s
document described in subpart 12.40 of
this subchapter is provided the rights,
protections, and benefits of the
International Labor Organization’s
Merchant Shipping (Minimum
Standards) Convention of 1976.
(c) On U.S.-flag large passenger
vessels, non-resident aliens holding a
Coast-Guard issued merchant mariner’s
document described in subpart 12.40 of
this subchapter:
(1) May only be employed in the
steward’s department on the vessel(s)
specified on the merchant mariner’s
document or accompanying Coast Guard
letter under § 12.40–13(b)(1) of this
subchapter;
(2) May only be employed for an
aggregate period of 36 months actual
service on all authorized U.S.-flag large
passenger vessels combined, under
§ 12.40–13(c) of this subchapter;
(3) May not perform watchstanding,
engine room duty watch, or vessel
navigation functions, under § 12.40–
13(b)(4) of this subchapter; and
(4) May perform emergency-related
duties only if, under § 12.40–13(b)(5) of
this subchapter:
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(i) The emergency-related duties do
not require any other rating or
endorsement, except lifeboatman as
specified in § 12.40–13(a)(3) of this
subchapter;
(ii) The non-resident alien has
completed familiarization and basic
safety training, as required in § 15.1105
of this part;
(iii) That if the non-resident alien
serves as a lifeboatman, he or she must
have the necessary lifeboatman’s
endorsement; and
(iv) The non-resident alien has
completed the training for crewmembers
on passenger ships performing duties
involving safety or care for passengers,
as required in subpart 12.35 of this
subchapter.
(d) No more than 25 percent of the
total number of unlicensed seamen on a
U.S.-flag large passenger vessel may be
aliens, whether admitted to the United
States for permanent residence or
otherwise allowed to be employed in
the United States as non-resident aliens.
(e) The owner or operator of a U.S.flag large passenger vessel employing
non-resident aliens holding Coast
Guard-issued merchant mariner’s
documents described in subpart 12.40 of
this subchapter must:
(1) Retain custody of all non-resident
alien merchant mariner’s documents for
the duration of employment, under
§ 12.40–13(b)(2) of this subchapter; and
(2) Return all non-resident alien
merchant mariner’s documents to the
Coast Guard upon termination of
employment, under § 12.40–13(b)(3) of
this subchapter.
(f) The owner or operator of a U.S.flag large passenger vessel employing
non-resident aliens holding Coast
Guard-issued merchant mariner’s
documents described in subpart 12.40 of
this subchapter is subject to the civil
penalty provisions specified in 46
U.S.C. 8103(f), for any violation of this
section.
Dated: April 18, 2007.
Thad W. Allen,
Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commandant.
[FR Doc. E7–7696 Filed 4–23–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM
24APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 24, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20278-20286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7696]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
46 CFR Parts 12 and 15
[USCG-2007-27761]
RIN 1625-AB16
Large Passenger Vessel Crew Requirements
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is amending its regulations on merchant
mariner documentation to implement section 3509 of the John Warner
National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Warner Act),
which allows for the issuance of merchant mariner documents (MMDs) to
certain non-resident aliens for service in the stewards departments of
U.S.-flag large passenger vessels endorsed for coastwise trade. Coast
Guard regulations currently prohibit the Coast Guard from issuing MMDs,
which are required for service on large passenger vessels, to non-
immigrant aliens. This interim rule
[[Page 20279]]
amends Coast Guard regulations to allow the Coast Guard to issue MMDs
to qualified non-resident aliens who are authorized to be employed in
the United States. This rule also sets the requirements that these
aliens must meet in order to qualify for MMDs, and the requirements for
the large passenger vessels that may choose to hire these aliens. This
interim rule only applies to large passenger vessels, as defined under
the Warner Act.
DATES: This interim rule is effective April 24, 2007. Comments and
related material must reach the Docket Management Facility on or before
July 23, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG-2007-27761 to the Docket Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid duplication, please use only one
of the following methods:
(1) Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(3) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(4) Delivery: Room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif
Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
(5) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call LCDR Derek D'Orazio, Coast Guard, telephone 202-372-1405. If you
have questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-493-
0402.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
The SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this interim final rule
sets forth the basis, purpose and particulars of this rulemaking
action and is organized as follows:
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
II. Background and Purpose
III. Discussion of the Interim Rule
IV. Regulatory Requirements
A. Administrative Procedure Act
B. Regulatory Evaluation
i. Affected Population
ii. Industry Profile
iii. Direct Impacts
iv. Indirect Impacts
C. Small Entities
D. Assistance for Small Entities
E. Collection of Information
F. Federalism
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
H. Taking of Private Property
I. Civil Justice Reform Act
J. Protection of Children
K. Indian Tribal Governments
L. Energy Effects
M. Technical Standards
N. Environment
List of Subjects
I. Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://dms.dot.gov and will include any personal
information you have provided. We have an agreement with the Department
of Transportation (DOT) to use the Docket Management Facility. Please
see DOT's ``Privacy Act'' paragraph below.
Submitting comments: If you submit a comment, please include your
name and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (USCG-
2007-27761), indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. You may
submit your comments and material by electronic means, mail, fax, or
delivery to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES; but please submit your comments and material by only one
means. If you submit them by mail or delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period. We may change this rule in
view of them.
Viewing comments and documents: To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
go to https://dms.dot.gov at any time, click on ``Simple Search,'' enter
the last five digits of the docket number for this rulemaking, and
click on ``Search.'' You may also visit the Docket Management Facility
in room PL-401 on the Plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh
Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Privacy Act: Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the
Department of Transportation's Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477), or you may visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
Public Meeting: We do not currently plan to hold a public meeting.
But you may submit a request for one to the Docket Management Facility
at the address under ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial.
If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at
a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
II. Background and Purpose
Title 46 U.S.C. 8103 generally requires that unlicensed seamen on
documented vessels must be of the following status: (a) Citizens of the
United States; (b) lawful permanent residents; or (c) foreign nationals
enrolled in the United States Merchant Marine Academy. No more than 25
percent of such unlicensed seamen may be lawful permanent residents.
On October 17, 2006, Congress enacted the John Warner National
Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (Warner Act), Public Law
109-364, sec. 3509, 120 Stat. 2518. Section 3509 of the Warner Act (46
U.S.C. 8103(k)) amends 46 U.S.C. 8103 to permit large passenger vessels
to also employ non-resident aliens who are authorized to work in the
United States. The statute maintains a cap so that no more than twenty-
five percent of the unlicensed seamen on any large passenger vessel are
aliens, whether admitted to the United States as lawful permanent
residents or otherwise allowed to be employed in the United States as
nonresident aliens. ``Large passenger vessel'' is defined under the
Warner Act to mean ``a vessel of more than 70,000 gross tons, as
measured under section 14302 of this title, with capacity for at least
2,000 passengers and documented with a coastwise endorsement under
chapter 121 of this title.''
The Warner Act also contains the following qualifications and
restrictions on non-resident aliens serving as unlicensed seamen on
large passenger vessels:
1. Non-resident aliens may not perform watchstanding, engine room
duty watch, or vessel navigation functions;
2. Non-resident aliens must be aliens employable in the United
States under the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, as amended (8
U.S.C. 1101 et seq.) (INA), including an alien crewman described in
Sec. 101(a)(15)(D)(i) of the INA (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(D)(i));
3. Non-resident aliens must have been employed, for a period of at
least one
[[Page 20280]]
year, on a passenger vessel, including a foreign flag passenger vessel,
under the same common ownership or control as the U.S.-flag vessel they
will be working on, as certified by the owner or managing operator of
such vessel;
4. Non-resident aliens must have no record of material disciplinary
actions during such employment as verified in writing by the owner or
managing operator of such vessel;
5. Non-resident aliens must have successfully completed a United
States Government security check of the relevant domestic and
international databases, as appropriate, or any other national
security-related information or database (which is required for a MMD
or Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC));
6. Non-resident aliens must have successfully undergone an employer
background check for which the owner or managing operator provides a
signed report that describes the background checks undertaken. The
background check must consist of a search of all information that is
reasonably and legally available to the owner or managing operator in
the seaman's country of citizenship and any other country in which the
seaman receives employment referrals, or resides. The report must be
kept on the vessel and available for inspection, and the information
derived from the background check must be made available upon request;
7. Non-resident aliens may not be citizens or temporary or
permanent residents of a country designated by the United States as a
sponsor of terrorism or any other country that the Secretary of
Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the
heads of other appropriate United States agencies, determines to be a
security threat to the United States; and
8. Non-resident aliens may only serve for an aggregate period of 36
months of actual service on all authorized U.S.-flag large passenger
vessels combined. Once this 36-month limitation has been reached, the
merchant mariner's document becomes invalid and the individual's
employer must return it to the Coast Guard, and the individual is no
longer authorized service in a position requiring a merchant mariner's
document on any U.S.-flag large passenger vessel.
Under current law, all individuals serving in the steward's
department on passenger vessels of 100 gross register tons (GRT) or
more must hold a merchant mariner's document (MMD). 46 U.S.C. 8701. The
only exception is for entertainment personnel employed for a period of
30 days or less per year, who are exempt from the MMD requirement.
Coast Guard regulations governing the issuance of MMDs currently
prohibit the issuance of MMDs to non-resident aliens. See 46 CFR part
12. The Coast Guard, through this interim rule, is amending its
regulations to authorize the issuance of MMDs to non-resident aliens
authorized to work in the United States who meet the criteria of the
Warner Act and the requirements set forth in this rule.
III. Discussion of Interim Rule
To implement 46 U.S.C. 8103(k), the Coast Guard is revising its
regulations within 46 CFR subchapter B. This interim rule will add a
new 46 CFR subpart 12.40. Companies that wish to hire non-resident
aliens must meet the requirements specified in new Sec. 12.40-7,
subject to the civil penalty provisions specified in 46 U.S.C. 8103(f)
for any violation of the section.
The new subpart adds definitions for ``large passenger vessel,''
``non-resident alien,'' and ``steward's department.'' It also contains
citizenship and identity requirements for non-resident aliens employed
as unlicensed seamen by large passenger vessels, in lieu of the
requirements of 46 CFR 12.02-10, 12.02-12, and 12.02-14. In addition to
those citizenship and identity requirements, this rule establishes the
requirement that non-resident alien applicants satisfy the requirements
of the Warner Act (discussed above), and stipulates how mariners, and
the companies that employee them, must satisfy those requirements. The
company must submit the additional required merchant mariner
application information to the Coast Guard on the employee's behalf.
Title 46 U.S.C. 8103(k)(3)(A) states that non-resident aliens may
not be citizens or temporary or permanent residents of a country
designated by the United States as a sponsor of terrorism. The Coast
Guard interprets this to mean that non-resident aliens may not be
citizens or residents of a country designated by the United States as a
sponsor of terrorism under section 6(j) of the Export Administration
Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)), or section 620A of the Foreign
Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371). Under new section 12.40-11(c),
the Coast Guard will not issue MMDs to non-resident aliens that are
citizens or residents (temporary or permanent) of countries listed on
the Department of State's ``State Sponsors of Terrorism'' list. The
list, as of the date of publication of this rule, may be found at
https://www.state.gov/s/ct/c14151.htm.
The Warner Act also allows the Secretary of Homeland Security, upon
consultation with the Secretary of State and the heads of other
appropriate United States agencies, to determine that other countries
present a security threat to the United States for purpose of
determining eligibility for employment of non-resident aliens. DHS has
initiated this consultation and may add more countries or lists of
countries in the future as a result of these consultations.
The interim rule also adds 46 CFR 15.530, which provides company
responsibilities associated with employment of non-resident aliens on
their vessels relative to the International Labor Organization's
Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention of 1976. Title 46 CFR
15.530 also requires that no more than 25 percent of the unlicensed
seamen on a large passenger vessel be aliens, whether admitted to the
United States for permanent residence or otherwise employable in the
United States as non-resident aliens. This limitation is also mandated
by 46 U.S.C. 8103(k)(2).
Only three U.S.-flag vessels currently fall within the definition
of ``large passenger vessel'' under 48 U.S.C. 8103(k), each of which
are owned by the same cruise line.\1\ Because the statute limits the
non-resident aliens who are eligible for employment on large passenger
vessels to aliens who have otherwise been employed by that cruise line
for one year, and such aliens cannot compose more than 25% of the
number of unlicensed seamen on such vessels, the Coast Guard believes
that approximately 600 to 800 non-resident aliens could be transferred
to employment on one of the three large passenger vessels within the
first year of the rule taking effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Coast Guard notes, however, that on April 11, 2007, the
cruise line announced that it would be reflagging one of these three
vessels to a foreign flag in the near future; ultimately reducing
the number of eligible vessels to two.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Coast Guard notes that, although the Warner Act refers to
section 101(a)(15)(d) of the INA (which defines aliens authorized for
crew visas), it does not waive any provision or requirement of the INA
pertaining to visas or employment eligibility for non-resident aliens.
In addition, we note that all affected aliens must comply with any
required identification, tracking and reporting programs, including
DHS's United States Visitor and Immigrant Status Indicator Technology
Program (US-VISIT) and the National Security Entry-Exit Registration
System (NSEERS). The Coast Guard is promulgating this interim rule
under its
[[Page 20281]]
authority to issue MMDs, and only to that extent.
IV. Regulatory Requirements
A. Administrative Procedure Act
The Coast Guard has determined that good cause exists to implement
this rule as an interim rule under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5
U.S.C. 553(b). The Coast Guard, under this interim rule, is
implementing a Congressional directive that does not provide Coast
Guard with discretion in the issuance of MMDs to non-resident aliens as
a class. Further, as discussed above, this rule will only directly
regulate one party at this time--the owner of the three vessels that
fall within the statutory definition of ``large passenger vessels.''
The Coast Guard has consulted with that carrier during the development
of this interim rule. In addition, under the current statutory
restrictions, only aliens already employed by this company can be
transferred to employment on one of the three eligible passenger
vessels. Given the limited regulatory impact of this rule, we do not
believe there will be significant public interest in this interim rule.
Accordingly, the Coast Guard has determined that delaying
implementation of this rule to allow public comment prior to
implementation would be impracticable and unnecessary. 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
For reasons stated above, the Coast Guard also finds that good cause
exists under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for making this rule effective less
than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
The Coast Guard, however, values public input to the regulatory
process, and for this reason we are inviting post-effective-date
comments on this interim rule. We may change this rule as a result of
the comments we receive.
B. Regulatory Evaluation
Executive Order 12866 requires agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of significant regulatory actions as defined in Section 3(f).
At this time, we expect this interim rule will not be an economically
significant action under Section 3(f)(1) of the Order (i.e., an annual
effect of $100 million or more on the economy).
The Coast Guard is promulgating this rulemaking as mandated by
Congress through the Warner Act, see ``Background and Purpose'' section
for more information about this legislation.
The rule creates an exemption to allow qualified non-resident
aliens to obtain MMDs for employment as unlicensed seamen in the
steward's departments of large passenger vessels, as entertainment and
service personnel, including wait staff, hotel housekeeping staff, and
food handlers. Currently, only U.S. citizens, lawful permanent
residents, and foreign nationals enrolled at the U.S. Merchant Mariner
Academy can obtain MMDs as unlicensed seamen (and no more than 25
percent of these unlicensed seamen may be lawful permanent residents).
This rule will permit non-resident aliens to also obtain MMDs for
employment as unlicensed seamen on large passenger vessels, except no
more than 25 percent of the unlicensed seamen on a large passenger
vessel can be aliens (whether non-resident aliens or lawful permanent
residents). The rule further requires that the non-resident aliens may
only be employed in the steward's department of the large passenger
vessel.
Although the Warner Act, and this interim rule, allow large
passenger vessels to hire non-immigrant aliens, neither the Act nor
this rule mandate that they do so. Accordingly, there are no mandatory
costs to large passenger vessels resulting from this interim rule.
Rather, a company will only choose to avail itself of the exemption if
the benefits to the company from the hiring of non-resident aliens are
greater than the costs.
The following is an assessment of the affected population, an
industry profile, and an evaluation of the direct and indirect impacts
of the rule. The only company affected by this rulemaking, discussed
below, provided us with aggregated business data to protect proprietary
and confidential business information and details of their business
operations. The industry estimates discussed herein are preliminary and
may not reflect the actual impacts after industry implements the
alternative compliance method.
i. Affected Population
Vessel Owners
The rule will affect owners of large passenger vessels more than
70,000 gross tons, with a capacity of at least 2,000 passengers, and
documented with a coastwise endorsement (e.g. U.S.-flag vessel). Vessel
owners will be able to hire non-resident aliens to comprise up to 25
percent of the unlicensed seamen onboard their vessels, but only in the
steward's department. The rule allows vessel owners to hire only those
non-resident aliens that have been employed, for a period of not less
than one year, on a passenger vessel, including a foreign flag
passenger vessel, under the same common ownership, control or managing
ownership as the U.S.-flag vessel on which they will be working, see
the ``Discussion of Interim Rule'' section for more detail on the
conditions and restrictions for hiring non-resident aliens.
Based on Coast Guard data, we determined there are three large
passenger vessels currently in service that meet the qualifications of
this rule. Norwegian Cruise Line America (NCLA) operates these vessels
in coastwise service in the Hawaiian Islands. NCLA is a brand of the
Miami-based Norwegian Cruise Line Corporation (NCL), which itself is a
subsidiary of Star Cruises Limited of Hong Kong. NCLA announced on
April 11, 2007, that it would be removing one of the three vessels from
U.S. flag service and re-flagging for foreign service.
At this time, we have no information to suggest that additional
companies will enter into coastwise service with large passenger
vessels, and we do not expect NCLA to expand its coastwise fleet of
large passenger vessels because of this rule. This is due to the costs
associated with flagging and operating vessels of this nature in the
United States.
Unlicensed Mariners
The rule affects unlicensed mariners working on or applying for
work on these vessels. This rule allows vessel owners to employ non-
resident aliens on their vessels, capped at 25 percent of the overall
total of unlicensed seamen per vessel. This rule also indirectly
affects unions that maintain the collective bargaining agreements for
these mariners in terms of changes in membership. Based on information
from NCLA, the Coast Guard anticipates that we will issue MMDs to
approximately 600 to 800 non-resident aliens within the first year of
the rule. By the end of the second year of the rule, the Coast Guard
estimates that we will issue an additional 900 to 1,200 MMDs to support
non-resident alien crew shift change and reserve. After this two-year
implementation period, NCLA intends to maintain an average annual full
compliment of 1,500 to 2,000 onboard, shift, and reserve non-resident
alien crewmembers under this rule.
Government Resources
The rule will also affect Coast Guard and potentially other
government resources used to process, review, and issue documentation
to unlicensed mariners and non-resident aliens affected by this rule.
We estimate that certain Coast Guard Regional Examination Centers
(RECs) in the Hawaiian Islands and West Coast may
[[Page 20282]]
incur increased processing burden to accommodate industry participation
in this rulemaking, especially in the first two years as mentioned
below. We anticipate that the requirements of this rule and the
ultimate issuance of MMDs to non-resident aliens will involve
additional processing exceeding the current processing for U.S.
residents to ensure that background checks and applications meet
security requirements. The additional Coast Guard burden at the RECs
will be proportional to the number of applications submitted by vessel
owners on behalf of non-resident aliens.
At this time, however, we anticipate that this rule will not
substantially change the annual total number of MMD applications
received or the total number of MMDs issued by the Coast Guard. Based
on correspondence between NCLA and the Coast Guard, NCLA stated that
this rule would stabilize the crew situation onboard the three vessels
and reduce turnover rates. NCLA claims that the potential workforce
stability that results from this rule will eventually reduce the number
of MMD applications that the Coast Guard processes for NCLA crews.
ii. Industry Profile
Based on industry information, the number of overall Hawaii cruise
ship passengers grew from 240,800 in 2004 to about 398,000 in 2005. In
2006, approximately 408,500 cruise passengers visited Hawaii onboard 56
cruise ships, including NCLA's three U.S.-flag vessels. Capacity has
also increased over the past several years and passenger costs have
decreased. Competition from cruises with foreign crews have pushed
prices down, in particular those offering 15-day cruises from the West
Coast.
Based on industry information, in general the cruise industry has
historically consisted of foreign flag vessels, as opposed to U.S.-flag
vessels, employing mariners from a variety of foreign countries in
lower wage scales and for longer hours than U.S. mariners. NCLA must
operate their U.S.-flag fleet with mostly U.S. citizens and residents,
driving labor costs higher for NCLA than for cruise lines operating
foreign flag vessels with foreign mariners.
Based on industry information, the cost structure for operating the
affected U.S.-flag vessels will be higher than operating foreign flag
vessels due to the high labor costs associated with hiring and
maintaining U.S. crews. NCLA claims that high crew costs and increased
industry capacity directly contribute to the decrease in the
profitability of their U.S.-flag fleet.
According to NCLA, the annual turnover rate for U.S. unlicensed
mariners working as hospitality staff on these vessels has been as high
as 200 percent suggesting the undesirability by U.S. unlicensed
mariners to work in hospitality positions and under the five months on
and one month off crew shift conditions on the domestic vessels. NCLA
has recently reported that the current turnover rate for the U.S.
unlicensed mariners has fallen to 110 percent. NCLA has stated that the
high turnover rate and the associated costs of maintaining an all U.S.
crew is the only reason why they are participating in the alternative
compliance method. As turnover occurs for the U.S. crew, we expect NCLA
to employ the full contingent of non-resident aliens allowed by this
rule.
iii. Direct Impacts
We expect most of the direct costs of the rule will be borne by
NCLA. The rule will require companies to perform an employer-conducted
background check and submit additional required merchant mariner
application information to the Coast Guard on the employee's behalf.
However, NCLA participation in this alternative compliance method is
voluntary and NCLA will only participate if the net benefits of doing
so are positive. We estimate the benefit to NCLA from participating in
this rule to be the cost savings made through reduced turnover and
decreased startup training since the non-resident alien hired under
this program will have experience aboard foreign flag vessels.
We have not estimated the overall effectiveness of this rule in
reducing turnover rates or labor costs for NCLA. NCLA provided
preliminary information that suggests they could reduce turnover rates
by about 25 to 35 percent annually resulting in a potential reduction
in labor costs by approximately $5 to $10 million annually; however,
these are preliminary estimates and NCLA cannot estimate the actual
reduction in turnover rates and labor costs until they implement the
alternative compliance program. Being that NCLA is the only company
directly regulated by this rulemaking and these estimates are based on
proprietary and confidential business information, the Coast Guard and
DHS cannot substantiate these estimates. This reduction in labor cost
is the estimated cost savings or net benefit for NCLA to participate in
the alternative MMD citizenship compliance method of this rule.
Indirect Impacts
We reviewed potential indirect impacts of this rule on labor
conditions and prevailing wages for U.S. unlicensed mariners and non-
resident aliens employed under the rule.
We do not have information to suggest that NCLA will replace U.S.
mariners currently employed in the steward's department on these
vessels with non-resident aliens. In addition, NCLA must still employ
U.S. residents for at least 75 percent of the total unlicensed seamen
onboard their U.S.-flag vessels. Given the high turnover rate among the
U.S. crew, we expect NCLA will still face challenges recruiting and
maintaining their required U.S. resident hospitality staff onboard
these vessels.
The Act does not mandate nor does the rule require that owners and
operators bear responsibilities associated with conditions of
employment and shipboard living arrangements for non-resident aliens on
their vessels. The United States is signatory to the International
Labor Organization's Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention
of 1976 (ILO 147), which establishes shipboard conditions of employment
and shipboard living arrangements. Since the United States is signatory
to this Convention, participating owners and operators must comply with
the requirements of the convention in their employment of all mariners
onboard.
The Act does not mandate that participating owners and operators
pay the non-resident aliens the same prevailing wages as the U.S. crew.
However, United States' responsibilities under the International Labor
Organization's Merchant Shipping (Minimum Standards) Convention of 1976
(including the Conventions in the Annex), require that seamen can
negotiate compensation and that seamen have the right to enter into
collective bargaining agreements. Based on industry information, the
sole affected owner (NCLA) has entered into a collective bargaining
agreement with the current U.S. crew and intends on employing non-
resident aliens under the same agreement. This rule does not require
participating owners to extend current labor agreements to non-resident
aliens employed under this program. The collective bargaining agreement
between the affected owner and the union will determine non-resident
alien employment compensation and pay.
We are interested in the potential impacts from this rule on
industry and mariners, and we request public comment on these potential
impacts. If you think that this rulemaking would
[[Page 20283]]
have a significant economic impact, please submit a comment to the
Docket Management Facility at the address under ADDRESSES. In your
comment, explain why, how, and to what degree you think this rule would
have an economic impact on you.
C. Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (``RFA''; 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended) requires agencies to consider whether regulatory actions would
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. RFA analysis is not required when a rule is exempt from
notice and comment rulemaking under 5 U.S.C. 553(b). The Coast Guard
determined that this rule is exempt from notice and comment rulemaking
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). Therefore, an RFA analysis is not
required for this rule. The Coast Guard, nonetheless, expects that this
interim rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This interim rule will affect owners and operators of, and
unlicensed seamen working on or applying for work on, large passenger
vessels of more than 70,000 gross tons, with a capacity of at least
2,000 passengers, and documented with a coastwise endorsement. This
rulemaking will also indirectly affect unions for unlicensed mariners.
We have determined that individual mariners and the unions affected
by this rule are not small entities under the definition of a small
entity in the RFA. We also determined that the unions are not directly
regulated by the rule.
Owners and operators affected by this rule will most likely be
classified under one of the following North American Industry
Classification System (NAICS) 6-digit codes for water transportation:
483114--Coastal and Great Lakes Passenger Transportation or 483112--
Deep Sea Passenger Transportation. According to the Small Business
Administration's size standards, a U.S. company classified under these
NAICS codes and employing less than 500 employees is considered a small
entity.
Based on Coast Guard data, we have determined that there is only
one company affected by this rule. We researched company size and
revenue data using proprietary and public business databases and found
that this company employs more than 500 employees and is not considered
a small entity by the Small Business Administration's size standards.
In addition, we found that this company was a subsidiary of a large
foreign-owned corporation. See the ``Regulatory Evaluation'' section
for more information about the effected vessel owner.
Therefore, the Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that
this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule will have a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment to the Docket Management Facility at the
address under ADDRESSES. In your comment, explain why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically
affect it.
D. Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this interim rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact LCDR Derek D'Orazio at 202-372-
1405. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
E. Collection of Information
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) reviews agency collection of information
requirements. As part of its review, OMB evaluates the practical
utility of the information in light of the burden imposed by its
collection. Collection of information requirements include reporting,
recordkeeping, notification, and other similar requirements. This
interim rule will require employers to submit employee information to
the Coast Guard before the Coast Guard will issue an MMD for their
employees. However, we expect only one company will be affected by this
requirement each year, as there is only one company in a position to
take advantage of these regulations. As such, this rule contains no new
collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
F. Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them.
States may not regulate in categories reserved for regulation by
the Coast Guard. All of the categories covered in 46 U.S.C. 3306, 3703,
7101, and 8101 (design, construction, alteration, repair, maintenance,
operation, equipping, personnel qualification, and manning of vessels),
as well as the reporting of casualties and any other category in which
Congress intended the Coast Guard to be the sole source of a vessel's
obligations, are within the field foreclosed from regulation by the
States. See United States v. Locke and Intertanko v. Locke, 529 U.S. 89
(March 6, 2000). This interim rule deals with personnel qualifications
and the manning requirements on large passenger vessels. Because the
States may not regulate within these categories, preemption under
Executive Order 13132 is not an issue.
G. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
H. Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
I. Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
J. Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
K. Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian
[[Page 20284]]
tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian
tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
L. Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy action.
Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under
Executive Order 13211.
M. Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
N. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 5100.1, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a
preliminary determination that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of
the Instruction. Therefore, we believe that this rule should be
categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(c), of the
Instruction, from further environmental documentation. This paragraph
excludes regulatory actions concerning the training, qualifying,
licensing, and disciplining of maritime personnel from further
environmental documentation, and this interim rule concerns the
licensing of maritime personnel. An ``Environmental Analysis Check
List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion Determination'' are available in
the docket where indicated under the ``Public Participation and Request
for Comments'' section of this preamble. Comments on this section will
be considered before we make the final decision on whether this rule
should be categorically excluded from further environmental review.
List of Subjects
46 CFR Part 12
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Schools,
Seamen.
46 CFR Part 15
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Seamen, Vessels.
0
Accordingly, 46 CFR Chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 12--CERTIFICATION OF SEAMEN
0
1. Add new Subpart 12.40 to read as follows:
Subpart 12.40--Non-resident Alien Unlicensed Members of the
Steward's Department on U.S.-Flag Large Passenger Vessels
Sec.
12.40-1 Purpose of rules.
12.40-3 Definitions.
12.40-5 General application requirements.
12.40-7 Employer requirements.
12.40-9 Basis for denial.
12.40-11 Citizenship and identity.
12.40-13 Restrictions.
12.40-15 Alternative means of compliance.
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701; 46 U.S.C. 2101, 2103, 2110, 7301,
7302, 7503, 7505, 7701 and 8103; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
Sec. 12.40-1 Purpose of rules.
The rules in this subpart implement 46 U.S.C. 8103(k) by
establishing requirements for the issuance of merchant mariner's
documents, valid only for service in the steward's department of U.S.-
flag large passenger vessels, to non-resident aliens.
Sec. 12.40-3 Definitions.
As used in this subpart:
Large passenger vessel means a vessel of more than 70,000 gross
tons, as measured under 46 U.S.C. 14302 and documented under the laws
of the United States, with capacity for at least 2,000 passengers and a
coastwise endorsement under 46 U.S.C. chapter 121.
Non-resident alien means an individual who is not a citizen or
alien lawfully admitted to the United States for permanent residence,
but who is employable in the United States under the Immigration and
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), including an alien crewman
described in section 101(a)(15)(D)(i) of that Act who meets the
requirements of 46 U.S.C. 8103(k)(3)(A).
Steward's department means the department that includes
entertainment personnel and all service personnel, including wait
staff, housekeeping staff, and galley workers, as defined in the vessel
security plan approved by the Secretary under 46 U.S.C. 70103(c). These
personnel may also be referred to as members of the hotel department on
a large passenger vessel.
Sec. 12.40-5 General application requirements.
(a) Unless otherwise expressly specified in this subpart, non-
resident alien applicants for Coast Guard-issued merchant mariner's
documents are subject to all applicable requirements contained in this
subchapter.
(b) No application from a non-resident alien for a merchant
mariner's document issued pursuant to this subpart will be accepted
unless the applicant's employer satisfies all of the requirements of
Sec. 12.40-7.
Sec. 12.40-7 Employer requirements.
(a) The employer must submit the following to the Coast Guard, as a
part of the applicant's merchant mariner's document application, on
behalf of the applicant:
(1) A signed report that contains all material disciplinary actions
related to the applicant, such as, but not limited to, violence or
assault, theft, drug and alcohol policy violations, and sexual
harassment, along with an explanation of the criteria used by the
employer to determine the materiality of those actions;
(2) A signed report regarding an employer-conducted background
check. The report must contain:
(i) A statement that the applicant has successfully undergone an
employer-conducted background check;
(ii) A description of the employer-conducted background check,
including all databases and records searched. The background check
must, at a minimum, show that the employer has reviewed all information
reasonably and legally available to the owner or managing operator,
including the review of available court and police records in the
applicant's country of citizenship, and any other country in which the
[[Page 20285]]
applicant has received employment referrals, or resided, for the past
20 years prior to the date of application; and,
(iii) All information derived from the employer-conducted
background check.
(3) The employer-conducted background check must be conducted to
the satisfaction of the Coast Guard for a merchant mariner's document
to be issued to the applicant.
(b) If a merchant mariner's document is issued to the applicant,
the report and information required in paragraph (a)(2) of this section
must be securely kept by the employer on the U.S.-flag large passenger
vessel, or U.S.-flag large passenger vessels, on which the applicant is
employed. The report and information must remain on the last U.S.-flag
large passenger vessel on which the applicant was employed until such
time as the merchant mariner's document is returned to the Coast Guard
in accordance with paragraph (d) of this section.
(c) If a merchant mariner's document or a transportation worker
identification credential (TWIC) is issued to the applicant, each
merchant mariner's document and TWIC must be securely kept by the
employer on the U.S.-flag large passenger vessel on which the applicant
is employed. The employer must maintain a detailed record of the
seaman's total service on all authorized U.S.-flag large passenger
vessels, and must make that information available to the Coast Guard
upon request, to demonstrate that the limitations of Sec. 12.40-13(c)
have not been exceeded.
(d) In the event that the seaman's merchant mariner's document and/
or TWIC expires, the seaman's visa status terminates, the seaman serves
onboard the U.S.-flag large passenger vessel(s) for 36 months in the
aggregate as a nonimmigrant crewman, the employer terminates employment
of the seaman or if the seaman otherwise ceases working with the
employer, the employer must return the merchant mariner's document to
the Coast Guard and/or the TWIC to the Transportation Security
Administration within 10 days of the event.
(e) In addition to the initial material disciplinary actions report
and the initial employer-conducted background check specified in
paragraph (a) of this section, the employer must:
(1) Submit an annual material disciplinary actions report to update
whether there have been any material disciplinary actions related to
the applicant since the last material disciplinary actions report was
submitted to the Coast Guard.
(i) The annual material disciplinary actions report must be
submitted to the satisfaction of the Coast Guard in accordance with the
same criteria set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section, except
that the period of time examined for the material disciplinary actions
report need only extend back to the date of the last material
disciplinary actions report; and
(ii) The annual material disciplinary actions report must be
submitted to the Coast Guard on or before the anniversary of the
issuance date of the merchant mariner's document.
(2) Conduct a background check each year that the merchant
mariner's document is valid to search for any changes that might have
occurred since the last employer-conducted background check was
performed:
(i) The annual background check must be conducted to the
satisfaction of the Coast Guard in accordance with the same criteria
set forth in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, except that the period
of time examined during the annual background check need only extend
back to the date of the last background check; and
(ii) All information derived from the annual background check must
be submitted to the Coast Guard on or before the anniversary of the
issuance date of the merchant mariner's document.
(f) The employer is subject to the civil penalty provisions
specified in 46 U.S.C. 8103(f) for any violation of this section.
Sec. 12.40-9 Basis for denial.
In addition to the requirements for a merchant mariner's document
established elsewhere in this subchapter, and the basis for denial
established in Sec. 12.02-4 of this part, an applicant for a merchant
mariner's document issued pursuant to this subpart must:
(a) Have been employed, for a period of at least one year, on a
foreign-flag passenger vessel, or foreign flag passenger vessels, that
are under the same common ownership or control as the U.S.-flag large
passenger vessel, or U.S.-flag large passenger vessels, on which the
applicant will be employed upon issuance of a merchant mariner's
document under this subpart.
(b) Have no record of material disciplinary actions during the
employment required under paragraph (a) of this section, as verified in
writing by the owner or managing operator of the U.S.-flag large
passenger vessel, or U.S.-flag large passenger vessels, on which the
applicant will be employed.
(c) Have successfully completed an employer-conducted background
check, to the satisfaction of both the employer and the Coast Guard.
(d) Meet the citizenship and identity requirements of Sec. 12.40-
11.
Sec. 12.40-11 Citizenship and identity.
(a) In lieu of the requirements of Sec. Sec. 12.02-10, 12.02-12
and 12.02-14 of this part, a non-resident alien may apply for a Coast
Guard-issued merchant mariner's document, endorsed and valid only for
service in the steward's department of a U.S.-flag large passenger
vessel as defined in this subpart, if he or she is employable in the
United States under the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101,
et seq.), including an alien crewman described in section 101
(a)(15)(D)(i) of that Act.
(b) To meet the citizenship and identity requirements of this
subpart, an applicant must present an unexpired passport issued by the
government of the country of which the applicant is a citizen or
subject; and either a valid U.S. C-1/D Crewman Visa or other valid U.S.
visa or authority deemed acceptable by the Coast Guard.
(c) Any non-resident alien applying for a merchant mariner's
document under this subpart may not be a citizen of, or a temporary or
permanent resident of, a country designated by the Department of State
as a ``State Sponsor of Terrorism'' pursuant to section 6(j) of the
Export Administration Act of 1979 (50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)) or section
620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371).
Sec. 12.40-13 Restrictions.
(a) A merchant mariner's document issued to a non-resident alien
under this subpart authorizes service only in the steward's department
of the U.S.-flag large passenger vessel(s), that is/are under the same
common ownership and control as the foreign-flag passenger vessel(s),
on which the non-resident alien served to meet the requirements of
Sec. 12.40-9(a):
(1) The merchant mariner's document will be endorsed for service in
the steward's department in accordance with Sec. 12.25-10 of this
part;
(2) The merchant mariner's document may also be endorsed for
service as a food handler if the applicant meets the requirements of
Sec. 12.25-20 of this part; and
(3) No other rating or endorsement is authorized, except
lifeboatman, in which case all applicable requirements of this
subchapter and the STCW Convention and STCW Code must be met.
[[Page 20286]]
(b) The following restrictions must be printed on the merchant
mariner's document, or listed in an accompanying Coast Guard letter, or
both:
(1) The name and official number of all U.S.-flag vessels on which
the non-resident alien may serve. Service is not authorized on any
other U.S.-flag vessel;
(2) Upon issuance, the merchant mariner's document must remain in
the custody of the employer at all times;
(3) Upon termination of employment, the merchant mariner's document
must be returned to the Coast Guard within 10-days in accordance with
Sec. 12.40-7;
(4) A non-resident alien issued a merchant mariner's document under
this subpart may not perform watchstanding, engine room duty watch, or
vessel navigation functions; and,
(5) A non-resident alien issued a merchant mariner's document under
this subpart may perform emergency-related duties provided:
(i) The emergency-related duties do not require any other rating or
endorsement, except lifeboatman as specified in paragraph (a)(3) of
this section;
(ii) The non-resident alien has completed familiarization and basic
safety training, as required in Sec. 15.1105 of this subchapter;
(iii) That if the non-resident alien serves as a lifeboatman, he or
she must have the necessary lifeboatman's endorsement; and
(iv) The non-resident alien has completed the training for
crewmembers on passenger ships performing duties involving safety or
care for passengers, as required in subpart 12.35 of this part.
(c) A non-resident alien may only serve for an aggregate period of
36 months actual service on all authorized U.S.-flag large passenger
vessels combined under the provisions of this subpart:
(1) Once this 36-month limitation is reached, the merchant
mariner's document becomes invalid and must be returned to the Coast
Guard under Sec. 12.40-7(d), and the non-resident alien is no longer
authorized serve in a position requiring a merchant mariner's document
on any U.S.-flag large passenger vessel; and
(2) An individual who successfully adjusts his or her immigration
status to become either a alien lawfully admitted for permanent
residence to the United States or citizen of the United States may
apply for a merchant mariner's document, subject to the requirements of
Sec. Sec. 12.02-10, 12.02-12 and 12.02-14 of this part, without any
restrictions or limitations imposed by this subpart.
Sec. 12.40-15 Alternative means of compliance.
(a) The owner or managing operator of a U.S.-flag large passenger
vessel, or U.S.-flag large passenger vessels, seeking to employ non-
resident aliens issued merchant mariner's documents under this subpart
may submit a plan to the Coast Guard, which, if approved, will serve as
an alternative means of complying with the requirements of this
subpart.
(b) The plan must address all of the elements contained in this
subpart, as well as the related elements contained in Sec. 15.530 of
this subchapter, to the satisfaction of the Coast Guard.
PART 15--MANNING REQUIREMENTS
0
3. The authority citation for part 15 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 2101, 2103, 3306, 3703, 8101, 8102, 8104,
8105, 8301, 8304, 8502, 8503, 8701, 8702, 8901, 8902, 8903, 8904,
8905(b), 8906, 9102, and 8103; and Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
4. Add new Sec. 15.530 to subpart D to read as follows:
Sec. 15.530 Large passenger vessels.
(a) The definition of terms used in this section is the same as
Sec. 12.40-3 of this subchapter.
(b) The owner or operator of a U.S.-flag large passenger vessel
must ensure that any non-resident alien holding a Coast Guard-issued
merchant mariner's document described in subpart 12.40 of this
subchapter is provided the rights, protections, and benefits of the
International Labor Organization's Merchant Shipping (Minimum
Standards) Convention of 1976.
(c) On U.S.-flag large passenger vessels, non-resident aliens
holding a Coast-Guard issued merchant mariner's document described in
subpart 12.40 of this subchapter:
(1) May only be employed in the steward's department on the
vessel(s) specified on the merchant mariner's document or accompanying
Coast Guard letter under Sec. 12.40-13(b)(1) of this subchapter;
(2) May only be employed for an aggregate period of 36 months
actual service on all authorized U.S.-flag large passenger vessels
combined, under Sec. 12.40-13(c) of this subchapter;
(3) May not perform watchstanding, engine room duty watch, or
vessel navigation functions, under Sec. 12.40-13(b)(4) of this
subchapter; and
(4) May perform emergency-related duties only if, under Sec.
12.40-13(b)(5) of this subchapter:
(i) The emergency-related duties do not require any other rating or
endorsement, except lifeboatman as specified in Sec. 12.40-13(a)(3) of
this subchapter;
(ii) The non-resident alien has completed familiarization and basic
safety training, as required in Sec. 15.1105 of this part;
(iii) That if the non-resident alien serves as a lifeboatman, he or
she must have the necessary lifeboatman's endorsement; and
(iv) The non-resident alien has completed the training for
crewmembers on passenger ships performing duties involving safety or
care for passengers, as required in subpart 12.35 of this subchapter.
(d) No more than 25 percent of the total number of unlicensed
seamen on a U.S.-flag large passenger vessel may be aliens, whether
admitted to the United States for permanent residence or otherwise
allowed to be employed in the United States as non-resident aliens.
(e) The owner or operator of a U.S.-flag large passenger vessel
employing non-resident aliens holding Coast Guard-issued merchant
mariner's documents described in subpart 12.40 of this subchapter must:
(1) Retain custody of all non-resident alien merchant mariner's
documents for the duration of employment, under Sec. 12.40-13(b)(2) of
this subchapter; and
(2) Return all non-resident alien merchant mariner's documents to
the Coast Guard upon termination of employment, under Sec. 12.40-
13(b)(3) of this subchapter.
(f) The owner or operator of a U.S.-flag large passenger vessel
employing non-resident aliens holding Coast Guard-issued merchant
mariner's documents described in subpart 12.40 of this subchapter is
subject to the civil penalty provisions specified in 46 U.S.C. 8103(f),
for any violation of this section.
Dated: April 18, 2007.
Thad W. Allen,
Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commandant.
[FR Doc. E7-7696 Filed 4-23-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P