Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation; Imposition of Nonproliferation Measures Against Foreign Persons, Including a Ban on U.S. Government Procurement., 20158-20159 [E7-7660]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
20158
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 77 / Monday, April 23, 2007 / Notices
Application for Wife’s or Husband’s
Insurance Benefits (SSA–2)
SSA uses the information collected on
Form SSA–2 to determine if an
applicant (including a divorced
applicant) can be entitled to benefits as
the spouse of the worker and the
amount of the spouse’s benefits. The
respondents are applicants for wife’s or
husband’s benefits, including those who
are divorced.
Approximately 700,000 respondents
complete the SSA–2 annually. Of this
total 95% (665,000) are completed
through MCS and 50% of the MCS
respondents will use Signature Proxy
(332,500). The breakdown is displayed
on the following chart:
Number of
respondents
Collection method
Estimated
completion
time
(minutes)
Burden hours
MCS .............................................................................................................................................
MCS/Signature Proxy ..................................................................................................................
Paper ...........................................................................................................................................
332,500
332,500
35,000
15
14
15
83,125
77,583
8,750
Totals ....................................................................................................................................
700,000
........................
169,458
Application for Disability Insurance
Benefits (SSA–16)
Form SSA–16–F6 obtains the
information necessary to determine
whether the provisions of the Act have
been satisfied with respect to an
applicant for disability benefits, and
detects whether the applicant has
dependents who would qualify for
benefits on his or her earnings record.
The information collected on form SSA–
16 helps to determine eligibility for
Social Security disability benefits. The
respondents are applicants for Social
Security disability benefits.
Approximately 1,513,677 respondents
complete the SSA–16 annually. Of this
total 97% (1,468,267) are completed
through SSA’s Modernized Claims
System (MCS) and 50% of the MCS
respondents will use Signature Proxy
(734,133.5). The breakdown is displayed
on the following chart:
Number of
respondents
Collection method
Estimated
completion
time
(minutes)
Burden hours
MCS .............................................................................................................................................
MCS/Signature Proxy ..................................................................................................................
Paper ...........................................................................................................................................
734,134
734,133
45,410
20
19
20
244,711
232,476
15,137
Totals ....................................................................................................................................
1,513,677
........................
492,324
Dated: April 17, 2007.
Elizabeth A. Davidson,
Reports Clearance Officer, Social Security
Administration.
[FR Doc. E7–7649 Filed 4–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5781]
Bureau of International Security and
Nonproliferation; Imposition of
Nonproliferation Measures Against
Foreign Persons, Including a Ban on
U.S. Government Procurement.
Department of State.
Notice.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: A determination has been
made that fourteen foreign persons have
engaged in activities that warrant the
imposition of measures pursuant to
Section 3 of the Iran and Syria
Nonproliferation Act, which provides
for penalties on foreign persons
(including individuals,
nongovernmental entities and
organizations, governments and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:17 Apr 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
government entities) for the transfer to
or acquisition from Iran since January 1,
1999 or the transfer to or acquisition
from Syria since January 1, 2005, of
equipment and technology controlled
under multilateral export control lists
(Missile Technology Control Regime,
Australia Group, Chemical Weapons
Convention, Nuclear Suppliers Group,
Wassenaar Arrangement) or otherwise
having the potential to make a material
contribution to the development of
weapons of mass destruction (WMD) or
cruise or ballistic missile systems. The
latter category includes (a) items of the
same kind as those on multilateral lists,
but falling below the control list
parameters, when it is determined that
such items have the potential of making
a material contribution to WMD or
cruise or ballistic missile systems, (b)
other items with the potential of making
such a material contribution, when
added through case-by-case decisions,
and (c) items on U.S. national control
lists for WMD/missile reasons that are
not on multilateral lists.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
PO 00000
Frm 00054
April 17, 2007.
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
On
general issues: Pamela K. Durham,
Office of Missile Threat Reduction,
Bureau of International Security and
Nonproliferation, Department of State
(202–647–4931). On U.S. Government
procurement ban issues: Gladys Gines,
Office of the Procurement Executive,
Department of State (703–516–1691).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to Sections 2 and 3 of the Iran and Syria
Nonproliferation Act (Pub. L. 109–112),
the U.S. Government determined on
April 10, 2007 that the measures
authorized in Section 3 of the Act shall
apply to the following foreign persons
identified in the report submitted
pursuant to Section 2(a) of the Act:
China National Precision Machinery
Import/Export Corporation (CPMIEC)
(China) and any successor, sub-unit, or
subsidiary thereof;
Shanghai Non-Ferrous Metals Pudong
Development Trade Co. Ltd. (China) and
any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary
thereof;
Zibo Chemet Equipment Company
(China) and any successor, sub-unit, or
subsidiary thereof;
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 77 / Monday, April 23, 2007 / Notices
Defense Industries Organization (DIO)
(Iran) and any successor, sub-unit, or
subsidiary thereof;
Hizballah and any successor, subunit, or subsidiary thereof;
Sokkia Singapore PTE Ltd.
(Singapore) and any successor, sub-unit,
or subsidiary thereof;
Army Supply Bureau (Syria) and any
successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary
thereof;
Syrian Air Force (Syria) and any
successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary
thereof;
Syrian Navy (Syria) and any
successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary
thereof;
Industrial Establishment of Defense
(Syria) and any successor, sub-unit, or
subsidiary thereof;
Challenger Corporation (Malaysia)
and any successor, sub-unit, or
subsidiary thereof;
Target Airfreight (Malaysia) and any
successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary
thereof;
Aerospace Logistics Services (Mexico)
and any successor, sub-unit, or
subsidiary thereof; and
Arif Durrani (Pakistan);
Accordingly, pursuant to the
provisions of the Act, the following
measures are imposed on these persons:
1. No department or agency of the
United States Government may procure,
or enter into any contract for the
procurement of, any goods, technology,
or services from these foreign persons;
2. No department or agency of the
United States Government may provide
any assistance to the foreign persons,
and these persons shall not be eligible
to participate in any assistance program
of the United States Government;
3. No United States Government sales
to the foreign persons of any item on the
United States Munitions List (as in
effect on August 8, 1995) are permitted,
and all sales to these persons of any
defense articles, defense services, or
design and construction services under
the Arms Export Control Act are
terminated; and,
4. No new individual licenses shall be
granted for the transfer to these foreign
persons of items the export of which is
controlled under the Export
Administration Act of 1979 or the
Export Administration Regulations, and
any existing such licenses are
suspended.
These measures shall be implemented
by the responsible departments and
agencies of the United States
Government and will remain in place
for two years from the effective date,
except to the extent that the Secretary of
State may subsequently determine
otherwise. A new determination will be
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:17 Apr 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
made in the event that circumstances
change in such a manner as to warrant
a change in the duration of sanctions.
Dated: April 17, 2007.
Patricia A. McNerney,
Acting Assistant Secretary of State for
International Security and Nonproliferation,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. E7–7660 Filed 4–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Noise Exposure Map Notice; Receipt of
Noise Compatibility Program and
Request for Review; HartsfieldJackson Atlanta International Airport,
Atlanta, GA
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) announces its
determination that the Noise Exposure
Maps submitted by the City of Atlanta
for Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta
International Airport under the
provisions of 49 U.S.C. 47501 et. seq.
(Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement
Act) and 14 CFR part 150 are in
compliance with applicable
requirements. The FAA also announces
that it is reviewing a proposed Noise
Compatibility Program that was
submitted for Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta
International Airport under Part 150 in
conjunction with the Noise Exposure
Map, and that this program will be
approved or disapproved on or before
October 7, 2007.
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date
of the FAA’s determination on the Noise
Exposure Maps and of the start of its
review of the associated Noise
Compatibility program is April 10, 2007.
The public comment period ends June
11, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bonnie Baskin, Federal Aviation
Administration, Atlanta Airports
District Office, 1701 Columbia Avenue,
Campus Building, Suite 2–260, College
Park, Georgia 30337, 404–305–7152.
Comments on the proposed Noise
Compatibility Program should also be
submitted to the above office.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
Notice announces that the FAA finds
that the Noise Exposure Maps submitted
for Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta
International Airport are in compliance
with applicable requirements of Part
150, effective April 10, 2007. Further,
FAA is reviewing a proposed Noise
Compatibility Program for that Airport
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20159
which will be approved or disapproved
on or before October 7, 2007. This
notice also announces the availability of
this Program for public review and
comment.
Under 49 U.S.C., Section 47503 of the
Aviation Safety and Noise Abatement
Act, (the Act), and airport operator may
submit to the FAA Noise Exposure
Maps which meet applicable regulations
and which depict non-compatible land
uses as of the date of submission of such
maps, a description of projected aircraft
operations, and the ways in which such
operations will affect such maps. The
Act requires such maps to be developed
in consultation with interested and
affected parties in the local community,
government agencies, and persons using
the airport.
An airport operator who has
submitted Noise Exposure Maps that are
found by FAA to be in compliance with
the requirements of Part 150,
promulgated pursuant to the Act, may
submit a Noise Compatibility Program
for FAA approval which sets forth the
measures the operator has taken or
proposes to take to reduce existing noncompatible uses and prevent the
introduction of additional noncompatible uses.
The City of Atlanta submitted to the
FAA on March 29, 2007 Noise Exposure
Maps, descriptions and other
documentation that were produced
during the Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta
International Airport FAR Part 150
Study Noise Exposure Maps Report
conducted between October 9, 2006 and
April 6, 2007. It was requested that the
FAA review this material as the Noise
Exposure Maps, as described in Section
47503 of the Act, and that the noise
mitigation measures, to be implemented
jointly by the airport and surrounding
communities, be approved as a Noise
Compatibility Program under Section
47504 of the Act.
The FAA has completed its review of
the Noise Exposure Maps and related
descriptions submitted by the City of
Atlanta. The specific documentation
determined to constitute the Noise
Exposure Maps includes: Map A—Noise
Exposure Map: 2007; Map B—Noise
Exposure Map: 2012; Table 3.1, Average
Daily Operations—2007; Table 3.2,
Aircraft Fleet Mix—2007; Table 3.3,
Percent Runway Utilization by Time of
Day7—2007; Table 3.4, Departure
Headings—2007; Figure 3–2, NOMS
Data—East Flow Tracks; Figure 3–3,
NOMS Data—West Flow Tracks; Figure
3–4, 2007 East Flow Corridors; Figure
3–5, 2007 West Flow Corridors; Table
3.5, Departure Stage Length: Air Carrier
Aircraft—2007; Table 3.6, Nighttime
Operations—2007; Table 3.8, Noise
E:\FR\FM\23APN1.SGM
23APN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20158-20159]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7660]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5781]
Bureau of International Security and Nonproliferation;
Imposition of Nonproliferation Measures Against Foreign Persons,
Including a Ban on U.S. Government Procurement.
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: A determination has been made that fourteen foreign persons
have engaged in activities that warrant the imposition of measures
pursuant to Section 3 of the Iran and Syria Nonproliferation Act, which
provides for penalties on foreign persons (including individuals,
nongovernmental entities and organizations, governments and government
entities) for the transfer to or acquisition from Iran since January 1,
1999 or the transfer to or acquisition from Syria since January 1,
2005, of equipment and technology controlled under multilateral export
control lists (Missile Technology Control Regime, Australia Group,
Chemical Weapons Convention, Nuclear Suppliers Group, Wassenaar
Arrangement) or otherwise having the potential to make a material
contribution to the development of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) or
cruise or ballistic missile systems. The latter category includes (a)
items of the same kind as those on multilateral lists, but falling
below the control list parameters, when it is determined that such
items have the potential of making a material contribution to WMD or
cruise or ballistic missile systems, (b) other items with the potential
of making such a material contribution, when added through case-by-case
decisions, and (c) items on U.S. national control lists for WMD/missile
reasons that are not on multilateral lists.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 17, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: On general issues: Pamela K. Durham,
Office of Missile Threat Reduction, Bureau of International Security
and Nonproliferation, Department of State (202-647-4931). On U.S.
Government procurement ban issues: Gladys Gines, Office of the
Procurement Executive, Department of State (703-516-1691).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to Sections 2 and 3 of the Iran and
Syria Nonproliferation Act (Pub. L. 109-112), the U.S. Government
determined on April 10, 2007 that the measures authorized in Section 3
of the Act shall apply to the following foreign persons identified in
the report submitted pursuant to Section 2(a) of the Act:
China National Precision Machinery Import/Export Corporation
(CPMIEC) (China) and any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary thereof;
Shanghai Non-Ferrous Metals Pudong Development Trade Co. Ltd.
(China) and any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary thereof;
Zibo Chemet Equipment Company (China) and any successor, sub-unit,
or subsidiary thereof;
[[Page 20159]]
Defense Industries Organization (DIO) (Iran) and any successor,
sub-unit, or subsidiary thereof;
Hizballah and any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary thereof;
Sokkia Singapore PTE Ltd. (Singapore) and any successor, sub-unit,
or subsidiary thereof;
Army Supply Bureau (Syria) and any successor, sub-unit, or
subsidiary thereof;
Syrian Air Force (Syria) and any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary
thereof;
Syrian Navy (Syria) and any successor, sub-unit, or subsidiary
thereof;
Industrial Establishment of Defense (Syria) and any successor, sub-
unit, or subsidiary thereof;
Challenger Corporation (Malaysia) and any successor, sub-unit, or
subsidiary thereof;
Target Airfreight (Malaysia) and any successor, sub-unit, or
subsidiary thereof;
Aerospace Logistics Services (Mexico) and any successor, sub-unit,
or subsidiary thereof; and
Arif Durrani (Pakistan);
Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions of the Act, the following
measures are imposed on these persons:
1. No department or agency of the United States Government may
procure, or enter into any contract for the procurement of, any goods,
technology, or services from these foreign persons;
2. No department or agency of the United States Government may
provide any assistance to the foreign persons, and these persons shall
not be eligible to participate in any assistance program of the United
States Government;
3. No United States Government sales to the foreign persons of any
item on the United States Munitions List (as in effect on August 8,
1995) are permitted, and all sales to these persons of any defense
articles, defense services, or design and construction services under
the Arms Export Control Act are terminated; and,
4. No new individual licenses shall be granted for the transfer to
these foreign persons of items the export of which is controlled under
the Export Administration Act of 1979 or the Export Administration
Regulations, and any existing such licenses are suspended.
These measures shall be implemented by the responsible departments
and agencies of the United States Government and will remain in place
for two years from the effective date, except to the extent that the
Secretary of State may subsequently determine otherwise. A new
determination will be made in the event that circumstances change in
such a manner as to warrant a change in the duration of sanctions.
Dated: April 17, 2007.
Patricia A. McNerney,
Acting Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and
Nonproliferation, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E7-7660 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-25-P
