Member Inspection of Credit Union Books, Records, and Minutes, 20061-20067 [E7-7610]
Download as PDF
20061
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 77
Monday, April 23, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 37
[Docket No. DHS–2006–0030]
RIN 1601–AA37
Minimum Standards for Driver’s
Licenses and Identification Cards
Acceptable by Federal Agencies for
Official Purposes
Office of the Secretary, DHS.
Notice of public meeting;
request for comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of Homeland
Security, Office of the Secretary, will
hold a public meeting to receive
comments on the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, ‘‘Minimum Standards for
Driver’s Licenses and Identification
Cards Acceptable by Federal Agencies
for Official Purposes,’’ published in the
Federal Register on March 9, 2007 (72
FR 10820). We encourage interested
parties to attend the meeting and submit
comments for discussion during the
meeting. In addition, we will also seek
comments via email for discussion
during the meeting from any party who
is unable to attend in person. The
webcast of the public meeting will be
viewable at https://
www.realidtownhall.com.
SUMMARY:
Public Meeting: We will hold the
meeting on May 1, 2007, from 10 a.m.
to 2 p.m.
ADDRESSES: We will hold the meeting in
Freeborn Hall on the campus of the
University of California, Davis. The
university is located in the City of
Davis, approximately 11 miles west of
downtown Sacramento. The street
address for Freeborn Hall is 104
Freeborn Hall, One Shields Ave., Davis,
CA 95616.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information concerning this public
meeting, please contact Mike Kangior,
U.S. Department of Homeland Security,
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Apr 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
the final rulemaking development
process.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
What Issues Should I Discuss at the
Meeting?
How Are Comments Being Solicited for
This Rulemaking?
In addition to the public meeting on
May 1, 2007, the Department of
Homeland Security is soliciting
comments through the following
methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 866–466–5370.
• Mail: Paper, disk or CD–ROM
submissions can be mailed to the
Department of Homeland Security, Attn:
NAC 1–12037, Washington, D.C. 20538.
Please include the DHS Docket Number,
DHS–2006–0030 on any comments
submitted to DHS. Individuals that
provide comments at the public meeting
may also submit comments through one
of the above methods.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
DATES:
Washington, DC 20528, at 202–282–
8939.
How Can I Get Additional Information,
Including Copies of This Notice or
Other Related Documents?
The Federal Rulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov maintains the
public docket for this proposed rule.
The docket number for the rule is DHS–
2006–0030. Comments submitted during
the public meeting, and any other
documents submitted to DHS at the
public meeting, including any
comments that were not discussed at the
meeting, will become part of this docket
and will be available for inspection
electronically at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Where Can I Get Information on
Service for Individuals With
Disabilities?
To obtain information on facilities or
services for individuals with disabilities
or to request that we provide special
assistance at the public meeting, please
contact Mike Kangior as soon as
possible. You will find his address and
phone number in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
notice.
Why Is the Department of Homeland
Security Holding This Public Meeting?
This meeting serves as an additional
opportunity for members of the public
to submit comments on the proposed
rule to DHS for consideration as part of
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The public meeting on May 1, 2007
will provide a forum for members of the
public to discuss various issues related
to the proposed rule. Such issues may
include consumer concerns,
verification, privacy/security, funding/
implementation and law enforcement.
For convenience to public participants
who wish to attend the meeting, DHS
intends to discuss these issues under
the proposed agenda below.
What Is the Agenda for the Public
Meeting?
Agenda
The agenda for the meeting on May 1,
2007 is as follows:
• Session I—Introduction and
Overview.
• Session II—Presentation and
discussion of public comments.
Dated: April 17, 2007.
Richard C. Barth,
Assistant Secretary of Policy Development.
[FR Doc. E7–7655 Filed 4–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–10–P
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 701
RIN 3133–AD33
Member Inspection of Credit Union
Books, Records, and Minutes
National Credit Union
Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA) is issuing a
proposed rule on member inspection of
federal credit union (FCU) books,
records, and minutes. The rule provides
that a group of members representing
approximately one percent of the
membership, with a proper purpose and
upon petition, may inspect and copy the
nonconfidential portions of the credit
union’s books, records, and minutes.
This proposal standardizes and clarifies
existing member inspection rights.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 22, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
20062
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 77 / Monday, April 23, 2007 / Proposed Rules
You may submit comments
by any of the following methods (Please
send comments by one method only):
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• NCUA Web site: https://
www.ncua.gov/
RegulationsOpinionsLaws/
proposed_regs/proposed_regs.html.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: Address to
regcomments@ncua.gov. Include ‘‘[Your
name] Comments on Proposed Rule
701.3’’ in the e-mail subject line.
• Fax: (703) 518–6319. Use the
subject line described above for e-mail.
• Mail: Address to Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board, National Credit
Union Administration, 1775 Duke
Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314–
3428.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as
mail address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Peterson or Annette Tapia, Staff
Attorneys, at the above address or
telephone number (703) 518–6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
A. Background
This proposed rule provides that a
group of members representing
approximately one percent of an FCU’s
membership, upon petition and with a
proper purpose, may obtain access to
the nonconfidential portions of the
FCU’s books, records, and minutes.
FCUs are not-for-profit, memberowned cooperatives organized to
provide financial services and products
to their members. The financial interests
of members in their credit union are
similar to the financial interests
shareholders have in for-profit
corporations. Corporate shareholders
have various methods to protect their
financial interests in the corporation,
including the right at common law and
in various state statutes to inspect
corporate books and records. Because of
the similarity of interests between credit
union members and corporate
shareholders, NCUA legal opinions
going back many years have stated that
FCU members may inspect the FCU’s
books and records under the same terms
and conditions that state corporation
law where the FCU is located permits
shareholder inspection of corporate
records. See, e.g., OGC Ops. 92–0101,
96–0451, and 06–0127B. These opinion
letters are available at https://
www.ncua.gov.
The NCUA Board believes regulating
member inspection of FCU records is
preferable to reliance on state
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Apr 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
corporation law. Corporation law on
shareholder inspection, for example,
varies from state to state, and FCUs
should have a consistent standard
regardless of an FCU’s location. Some
FCUs have branches in multiple states,
further complicating the application of
state law to inspection requests. In
addition, some courts may refuse to
apply their corporation law to
inspection requests by FCU members or
may incorrectly analogize the financial
interests of credit union members to
those of depositors in a mutual savings
bank and deny members inspection on
those grounds. See, e.g., Save Columbia
Credit Union Committee v. Columbia
Credit Union, 139 P.3d 386, 393–95
(Wash. App. 2006) (refusing to apply
state corporation law to records
inspection request by members of a
state-chartered credit union).
The Board considered when and why
members might want to inspect FCU
records. The law charges members with
responsibility for important decisions
that affect both the FCU and the
members’ financial interests. For
example, a vote of the FCU’s members
is required on the election and removal
of directors, mergers, conversion from
federal to private account insurance,
conversion from a federal to state
charter or conversion to a mutual
savings bank, and voluntary
liquidations. In these situations,
members may want to inspect FCU
records to better inform themselves
before voting and to ensure that
directors are acting in the best interests
of the members. There are other
situations where the members want to
inspect records to protect their financial
interests, as discussed further below.
The Board also considered how
stakeholders of depository institutions
other than credit unions may inspect
their institution’s books and records.
The Board identified an existing Office
of Thrift Supervision (OTS) rule
governing the right of shareholders to
inspect the books, records, and minutes
of federal stock savings associations. 12
CFR 552.11 (OTS Rule). The ownership
interests of members in an FCU are
similar to the ownership interests of
stockholders in a stock savings
association; the issues on which FCU
members and stock bank shareholders
vote are similar; and the regulatory and
supervisory powers of NCUA and OTS
over their respective regulated
institutions are also similar.
Accordingly, this proposed rule tracks,
in large part, the OTS Rule. The
proposal is also consistent with existing
NCUA guidance on member inspection
of FCU records. See FCU Handbook
(Rev. 2006), p.68.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
B. Paragraph-by-Paragraph Analysis
(a) Member Inspection Rights
Proposed paragraph (a) establishes the
right of a group of members of an FCU,
upon submission of a proper petition, to
inspect and copy the credit union’s
books and records of account and
minutes of the proceedings of the credit
union’s members, board of directors,
and committees of directors. This
inspection right is similar to that in the
OTS Rule, with the use of a member
petition in lieu of the stockholder
affidavit requirement in the OTS Rule.
The member petition must meet the
requirements in proposed paragraph (b).
Also, inspection rights are limited to the
nonconfidential portions of the credit
union’s books, records, and minutes.
Proposed paragraph (d) defines
confidential books, records, and
minutes; all other books, records, and
minutes are nonconfidential.
Minutes
The Board intends the phrase
‘‘minutes of the proceedings at all
meetings of its members, board of
directors, and committees of directors’’
to include any summary or recording of
the proceedings and all documents,
reports, studies, and visual aids
considered by the meeting participants.
The Board believes this broad
interpretation of minutes is appropriate.
For example, in situations where an
FCU membership vote is required, the
vote is either about the election or
removal of directors or officers or is
precipitated by the actions of the
directors as in the case of a merger or
conversion. Members should have
access to the directors’ deliberations to
help members decide how to vote and
help members determine if the directors
are acting in the members’ best interests.
Books and Records of Account
Courts have interpreted the phrase
‘‘books and records of account’’
differently. Some courts have
interpreted the phrase broadly to
include both financial and nonfinancial
records while other courts have
interpreted the phrase to include only
financial records. See, e.g., Meyer v.
Ford Industries, Inc., 538 P.2d 353, 358
(Or. 1975) (broad interpretation); Corwin
v. Abbott Laboratories, 819 N.E.2d 1249
(Ill. App. 2004), app. den. 2005 Ill.
LEXIS 609 (Ill. 2005) (phrase includes
both financial and nonfinancial
records); and Jewelers International
Showcase, Inc. v. Mandell, 529 So. 2d
1211 (Fla. Dist. Ct App. 3d Dist. 1988)
(stockholder was entitled to inspect
financial records such as general ledger,
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 77 / Monday, April 23, 2007 / Proposed Rules
balance sheets, and profit and loss
statements).
The NCUA Board believes a narrow
interpretation is best. The plain
language meaning of ‘‘of account’’
supports a limitation to accounting
records. Stockholder inspection of
corporate records under the Model
Business Corporation Act (MBCA) is
expressly limited to minutes and
‘‘accounting records,’’ and the Counsel
to the Federal Home Loan Bank Board
(FHLBB), in interpreting the predecessor
to the OTS rule, has cited to the MBCA
as authority for the OTS rule. Letter
from Julie Williams, FHLBB Deputy
General Counsel, dated September 17,
1986, located at 1986 FHLBB LEXIS 82
(hereinafter 1986 FHLBB DGC Letter);
and Model Bus. Corp. Act
§ 16.02(b)(2)(1984). The Board believes
the financial interests of members are
adequately protected by combining a
broad interpretation of minutes with a
more restrictive interpretation of the
phrase books and records of account.
represent the petitioners on issues such
as inspection procedures, costs, and
potential disputes. At least one percent
of the credit union’s members, with a
minimum of 20 members and a
maximum of 250 members, must sign
the petition.
The language of this proposed
paragraph is similar to language in
paragraphs (b) and (c) of the OTS Rule.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Inspection and Copying
Generally, a member’s right to inspect
FCU minutes and records includes the
right to make copies of those records.
Obtaining copies enables members to
provide the information to other
members or, in some cases, to experts
for independent analysis and review. If
an FCU believes that certain of its
records should not be copied, it may
request that the regional director impose
conditions on the inspection, as
discussed further below.
Minimum Signature Requirement
The OTS Rule requires stockholders
seeking records to own a certain number
of shares and to submit an affidavit
describing their request to the savings
association. For shareholders who have
owned their shares at least six months,
the affidavit generally must be signed by
shareholders representing at least one
percent of the outstanding shares. OTS
Rule, paragraphs (b)(1) and (2). The
proposal substitutes a member petition
for this stockholder affidavit. The
petition also employs a minimum
signature requirement of one percent of
the members, representing an
ownership interest roughly equivalent
to one percent of the shares of a stock
association. The proposed rule further
provides that a minimum of 20 members
and a maximum of 250 must sign the
petition. The one percent and minimum
and maximum signature requirements
are similar to those established in
NCUA’s standard FCU bylaws for
members seeking a nomination by
petition to run for election to an FCU’s
board of directors. NCUA Standard FCU
Bylaws, Art. V, Sec. 1 (Rev. April 2006).
(b) Petition for Inspection
Proposed paragraph (b) establishes the
member petition requirements.
The petition must describe the
particular records to be inspected and
state a purpose for the inspection
related to the business of the credit
union. The petition must state that the
petitioners as a whole, or certain named
petitioners, agree to pay the direct and
reasonable costs associated with search
and duplication of requested material.
The petition must also state that the
inspection is not desired for any
purpose in the interest of a business or
object other than the business of the
credit union; that the members signing
the petition have not within five years
preceding the signature date sold or
offered for sale, and do not now intend
to sell or offer for sale, any information
obtained from the credit union; and that
the members signing the petition have
not within the past five years aided or
abetted any other person in procuring
any information from the credit union
for purposes of sale. The petition must
name one or more members who will
Proper Purpose
The purpose of an inspection must be
related to the business of the credit
union. A proper purpose includes
attempting to ascertain and protect
members’ financial interests and to
ascertain possible mismanagement. See,
e.g., 1986 FHLBB DGC Letter
(interpreting OTS Rule).
The issue of member inspection of
records may arise, for example, in the
context of a member vote on merger or
charter conversion. Members of a
merging or converting credit union may
desire access to the due diligence
performed by their directors, and other
credit union books and records, to
determine if the directors are acting in
the members’ best interests. Members of
a credit union merging with another
credit union may also have an interest
in determining if they are receiving an
appropriate share adjustment. 12 CFR
708b.103(a)(5). Members may have a
financial interest in ascertaining how
the proposed merger or conversion will
affect their services, rates, and fees and
how the directors analyzed this issue.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Apr 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20063
Members of a credit union merging with
a bank may have a further interest in
determining the value of their shares
plus any associated premium and
whether the directors carefully
considered all the available merger
opportunities with a view to
maximizing the financial benefit to the
members. Members of a credit union
converting to a bank may also want to
know if their directors considered the
possibility of a merger and appropriate
payments to members.
Members may wish to obtain FCU
records in other contexts. For example,
some members might want records
about FCU decisions that have a direct
effect on the members, such as a
determination to close a branch office or
to discontinue a service or product.
Members electing directors might want
records from the credit union about the
qualifications of and benefits received
by sitting directors. Members might also
want records about the qualifications
and compensation of senior
management.
Burden of Proof on Proper Purpose
Generally, in the absence of evidence
indicating an improper purpose, courts
do not assume that stockholders of a
corporation requesting an inspection
intend to use the information
improperly just because it would be
possible for them to do so. Fears v.
Cattlemen’s Inv. Co., 483 P.2d 724, 730
(Okla. 1971). The requirement in the
proposed rule that petitioners state they
are not intending to sell the information,
nor have they aided or abetted such
sales in the past five years, helps ensure
a proper purpose. The minimum
signature requirement in the proposal
also helps ensure a proper purpose
because members seeking signatures
will have to convince other members
that they share a common and
appropriate purpose. Accordingly, a
petition meeting the requirements of
paragraph (c) creates a presumption of
proper purpose, and an FCU should
have substantial evidence of improper
purpose to deny inspection for that
reason.
Description of Records
The petition must describe the
particular records sought and the
description must be specific enough to
allow the FCU to identify responsive
records. The FCU may ask the
petitioners for more information if
necessary to help understand the scope
of the request.
(c) Inspection Procedures
Proposed paragraph (b) provides the
inspection procedures. Within 14 days
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
20064
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 77 / Monday, April 23, 2007 / Proposed Rules
of receipt of a petition, the FCU must
either allow inspection and copying of
all requested material or inform the
petitioning members in writing why it is
not able to do so. Inspection may be in
person or by an agent or attorney and at
any reasonable time or times. Member
inspection rights under this paragraph
are in addition to any other member
inspection rights afforded by law,
regulation, or the credit union’s bylaws.
Unless a regional director imposes
conditions on a particular request for
records, the member’s right to inspect
records includes the right to make
copies. In many cases, the credit union
will mail or deliver copies of the
requested documents to the
individual(s) designated by the
petitioners. In some cases, however, the
petitioners may request an inspection of
requested documents at the credit union
before copies are made or the credit
union may ask the petitioners to come
to the credit union to pick up the
copies. The Board recognizes original
documents may be at a credit union
office some distance from where the
petitioners live and that conducting an
on-site inspection or pick-up may be
difficult or expensive for petitioners.
The Board expects credit unions and
petitioners to work out reasonable,
mutually acceptable arrangements for
on-site inspection or pick-up, including,
for example, movement of documents or
copies to a credit union branch location
convenient to petitioners.
The language of this paragraph is
similar to language in paragraph (b) of
the OTS Rule. The proposed 14-day
compliance timeframe, not found in the
OTS Rule, will ensure that an FCU
responds promptly to the member
petition. The proposed paragraph also
recognizes that members may have
additional inspection rights, including,
for example, inspection rights related to
merger compensation in another
pending NCUA rulemaking.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
(d) Confidential Books, Records, and
Minutes
Proposed paragraph (d) provides that
members do not have the right to
inspect portions of the books, records,
or minutes of an FCU under certain
circumstances: first, if federal law or
regulation prohibits disclosure of that
portion; second, if that portion contains
nonpublic personal information; and,
third, if that portion contains
information about credit union
employees or officials the release of
which would constitute an unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Apr 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
Federal Law or Regulation Prohibits
Disclosure
The provision prohibits credit unions,
for example, from disclosing nonpublic
records generated by NCUA, including
reports of inspection that might
otherwise be considered by the FCU’s
board of directors and included within
its meeting minutes. 12 CFR 792.40,
792.49.
Nonpublic Personal Information
The members of a credit union are
both its customers and its owners, and
the credit union maintains sensitive
personal and financial information
about members that must be protected.
The OTS Rule protects the privacy of a
bank’s customers by providing that no
stockholder may inspect any list of
depositors or borrowers or their
addresses, deposit, or loan records or
any data from which that information
can be constructed. The proposed rule
provides similar protection for the
personal and financial information of a
credit union’s members, but instead of
a reference to specific sensitive
information as in the OTS Rule, the
proposal will protect all nonpublic
personal information as that term is
defined in NCUA’s rules on the privacy
of consumer financial information. 12
CFR part 716. Nonpublic personal
information includes information such
as the fact an individual is a member,
account numbers and balances,
transaction information, consumer
reports, and any information provided
by the member to obtain a financial
product from the credit union. 12 CFR
716(r). Information that is publicly
available or information that does not
identify a particular member would not
be nonpublic personal information. 12
CFR 716(q).
Information About Credit Union
Employees or Officials
The proposed rule also protects from
inspection information about the FCU’s
employees and officials if disclosure
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy. This
terminology is similar to the
confidentiality provision in the
Freedom of Information Act. 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(6). Some categories of
information that will receive
confidentiality treatment include
marital status, financial status, children,
medical conditions, dates of birth,
religious affiliations, citizenship data,
sexual inclinations, and social security
numbers. See Freedom of Information
Act Guide and Privacy Act Overview,
U.S. Department of Justice (May 2004
ed.).
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
As an exception to this confidentiality
provision, FCU members may inspect
materials describing the compensation
and benefits provided to senior
executive officers. The member-owners
of a credit union have a financial
interest in how their credit union is
managed, and that interest extends to
knowledge about who the senior
managers are, their qualifications, and
their compensation levels. The
members’ interest in this information
outweighs any privacy interests the
senior managers may have in the
information. Accordingly, the rule
provides that members may inspect
information about the qualifications,
compensation and benefits of senior
executive officers, as defined in § 701.14
of NCUA’s rules:
Senior executive officer means a credit
union’s chief executive officer (typically this
individual holds the title of president or
treasurer/manager), any assistant chief
executive officer (e.g., any assistant
president, any vice president or any assistant
treasurer/ manager), and the chief financial
officer (controller). The term ‘‘senior
executive officer’’ also includes employees of
an entity, such as a consulting firm, hired to
perform the functions of positions covered by
the regulation.
12 CFR 701.14(b)(2).
Other Considerations
This proposal provides confidentiality
only for materials the release of which
is prohibited by federal law, materials
that contain nonpublic personal
information, and personal information
about FCU employees and officials. In
some states, courts have withheld other
types of documents from shareholder
inspection, such as confidential internal
correspondence or materials containing
corporate trade secrets. See, e.g., Morton
v. Rodgers, 20 Ariz. App. 581, 514, P.2d
752 (Ariz. Div. 1, 1973) (trade secrets);
State Ex. Rel. Armour & Co. v. Gulf
Sulphur Corp., 231, A.2d 470 (Del.
1967) (trade secrets); and State ex rel.
Jones v. Ralston Purina Co., 358 S.W.2d
772, 778 (Mo. 1962) (internal
correspondence). As one court noted,
however:
Both under the common law and under our
statute a stockholder of a corporation is
entitled to examine the books and records of
the corporation * * *. The right rests upon
the proposition that, while the corporation
holds the legal title to its property, the
stockholders are deemed to be the real and
beneficial owners thereof and, as such, are
entitled to information concerning the
management of the property and business
which they have confided to the officers and
directors of the corporation as their agents
* * *. It ordinarily is not enough to deny the
right that the information sought is of a
confidential nature.
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 77 / Monday, April 23, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Nationwide Corp. v. Northwestern
National Life Insurance Co., 251 Minn.
255, 256; 87 N.W.2d 671, 672 (Minn.
1958).
This proposal, like the OTS Rule, has
no confidentiality provisions related to
internal memoranda or trade secrets for
several reasons. First, credit unions do
not generally have trade secrets, that is,
secret formulas or technology on which
the success of the organization is
dependent, and cases that deal with
confidential internal correspondence
generally do not provide a standard by
which confidentiality can be measured.
Second, it is unlikely that, given the
narrow interpretation of ‘‘books and
records of account’’ intended by the
Board, any materials deserving of
confidentiality would appear among
those materials subject to inspection.
Third, even if confidential materials
appear among the materials subject to
this rule, requested materials must be
relevant to the petitioners’ stated
business purpose before they become
subject to inspection. See, e.g., Azzar v.
Primebank Federal Savings Bank, 499
N.W.2d 793, 798 (Ct. App. Mich.
1993)(interpreting the OTS Rule).
Finally, and as discussed above, if a
credit union has substantial evidence of
an improper purpose, it may deny
inspection for that reason.
In the unlikely event there are
portions of relevant FCU books and
records of account or minutes the public
release of which might cause the credit
union substantial competitive injury or
financial damage, the dispute resolution
paragraph of the proposed rule permits
the regional director to place conditions
on member inspection that balance the
interests of the member-owners in the
requested information against any
interests the credit union may have in
maintaining confidentiality. The
regional director’s authority to resolve
disputes is discussed further below.
The NCUA Board also considered if
privileged information, that is, exempt
from discovery in court cases, should be
withheld from members. Case law on
the corporate shareholder’s right to
inspect privileged information differs by
jurisdiction. In California, for example,
shareholders lack the right to inspect
corporate books and records covered by
the attorney-client privilege. National
Football League Properties, Inc. v.
Oakland Raiders, 75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 893
(Ca. Ct. App. 6th District 1998). In other
jurisdictions, however, shareholders
who are concerned with corporate
mismanagement may inspect attorneyclient privileged documents. Beard v.
Ames, 168 A2d 119 (N.Y. 1983); Garner
v. Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir.
1970). For example, in determining that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Apr 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
20065
stockholders could inspect
communications between attorney and
corporate management under some
circumstances, the Garner court stated:
for costs of shareholder inspection and
copying of stock savings association
records, an OTS legal opinion describes
that reimbursement:
But in assessing management assertions of
injury to the corporation it must be borne in
mind that management does not manage for
itself and that the beneficiaries of its action
are the stockholders. Conceptualistic phrases
describing the corporation as an entity
separate from its stockholders are not useful
tools of analysis. They serve only to obscure
the fact that management has duties which
run to the benefit ultimately of the
stockholders.
In our view, a federal stock association
may charge a requesting Qualifying
Shareholder reasonable expenses for
document searches, duplication, and direct
costs associated with producing and
delivering documents. However, a requesting
Qualifying Shareholder is not obligated to
pay the association’s attorneys fees in order
to gain access to review the association’s
books and records required to be made
available to shareholders under section
552.11.
Id. at 1101.
The Board believes member-owners
with a proper purpose should have
access to relevant FCU information.
Accordingly, and like the OTS Rule, this
proposal does not include
confidentiality protection for privileged
information, but that does not mean that
privileged material will automatically
be subject to inspection. Privileged
material would have to be the subject of
a proper petition with a valid purpose;
it would have to fall within the scope
of ‘‘books and records of account’’ or
‘‘minutes;’’ and it would have to be
relevant to the petitioners’’ stated
purpose, all before it would be subject
to inspection. Proposed paragraph (f)
also provides regional directors with
authority to resolve disputes, and a
regional director could place conditions
on the release of the privileged material
where appropriate.
The FCU may have other minutes or
books and records of account that it has
designated as confidential by policy or
otherwise. That designation by an FCU
does not defeat the inspection rights of
members. If the requested material does
not contain confidential information as
described in § 701.3(d), the memberowners have the right to inspect it upon
a proper petition. Again, as discussed
below, a regional director may impose
conditions on inspection and copying in
appropriate cases.
In some cases, materials requested by
members may include a mix of both
confidential portions and
nonconfidential portions. An FCU must
make as much of the nonconfidential
material available to members as
possible, redacting or withholding only
the confidential portions.
(e) Costs
Proposed paragraph (e) states that an
FCU may charge petitioners the direct
and reasonable costs associated with
search and duplication but it may not
charge for other costs, including indirect
costs or attorney’s fees.
While the OTS Rule does not
specifically address the reimbursement
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Letter from Harris Weinstein, OTS Chief
Counsel, dated December 5, 1991 (1991
OTS LEXIS 68). The proposed
paragraph (e) addresses costs in a
manner similar to that described in OTS
legal opinions.
Typically, the direct costs of search
and duplication would include only the
number of hours a clerk might take to
locate and duplicate the requested
documents multiplied by the clerk’s
hourly compensation rate, plus the perpage costs of duplication. Requesters
need not reimburse the credit union for
other costs, including costs associated
with the management or supervision of
the person(s) conducting the search,
costs to review documents, costs
associated with in-person inspection of
records, overhead costs, or the costs of
any legal services.
As noted above, the petition must
recognize the obligation of the
petitioners as a whole, or certain named
petitioners, to pay the direct and
reasonable costs associated with search
and duplication. Petitioners may also
include in the petition, if they want, a
maximum amount that they are willing
to pay; and the FCU, if it wants, may
provide petitioners with an estimate of
the search and duplication costs. The
rule does not require, however, that
petitioners pay in advance, or agree to
pay any specific amount, before the FCU
provides the petitioners with the
requested documents.
(f) Dispute Resolution
Proposed paragraph (f) provides, in
the event of a dispute between an FCU
and its members concerning a petition
for inspection or the associated costs,
either party may submit the dispute to
the regional director. The regional
director, after obtaining the views of
both parties, will direct the credit union
either to withhold the disputed
materials or to make them available for
member inspection and copying. The
regional director may place conditions
upon release, if appropriate. Depending
on the circumstances, conditions
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
20066
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 77 / Monday, April 23, 2007 / Proposed Rules
imposed by the regional director might
include limitations on making copies or
a requirement that the parties enter into
a contract restricting the use or further
dissemination of the material.
The OTS Rule does not contain a
dispute resolution procedure. The
NCUA Board believes that a dispute
resolution procedure is necessary to
protect both the inspection rights of
members and the FCU’s interests.
In other circumstances involving
member disputes with FCUs, NCUA
usually refers the dispute to the FCU’s
supervisory committee for resolution.
The proposed rule does not require such
referral because, in certain
circumstances, such as a pending
member vote on a charter or share
insurance conversion or a merger,
members’ need for the information may
be time sensitive. Still, in the event of
a dispute over access to FCU records,
petitioners, if they desire, may contact
an FCU’s supervisory committee before
taking it directly to the regional director.
Similarly, if a regional director receives
a request from a petitioner for dispute
resolution and determines that
resolution is not time sensitive, the
director may refer the matter to the
FCU’s supervisory committee for
analysis and response before the
director makes any decision about the
dispute.
The NCUA Board does not believe
that specific time frames for regional
director action are appropriate. The time
needed for dispute resolution could
vary significantly from case to case
depending on the complexity of the
dispute. In addition, the Board does not
believe a right to appeal to the Board is
necessary.
C. Request for Public Comment
NCUA’s goal is to promulgate clear
and understandable regulations that
impose minimal regulatory burden. The
Board requests public comments on
whether the proposed rule is
understandable and minimally intrusive
and also solicits specific suggestions to
improve the content of the rule.
D. Regulatory Procedures
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires NCUA to prepare an analysis to
describe any significant economic
impact a rule may have on a substantial
number of small credit unions, defined
as those under ten million dollars in
assets. This proposed rule standardizes
and clarifies the rights of members to
inspect FCU records. The rule is not a
significant departure from existing
practice that FCUs must permit
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Apr 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
inspection under the same terms and
conditions that state law requires for
shareholders to inspect corporation
records. The proposed rule requires that
a minimum of one percent of the FCU’s
members sign a petition to obtain
access. In some states, this burden on
the members might exceed the burden
on shareholders to obtain access and so
reduces the likelihood of an FCU having
to grant access. Accordingly, the Board
does not anticipate that the proposed
rule, if adopted, would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small credit
unions.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Section 701.3 contains information
collection requirements. As required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3507(d)), NCUA is submitting
a copy of this proposed regulation as
part of an information collection
package to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for its review and
approval of a new collection of
information.
The proposed rule standardizes and
clarifies the circumstances and
conditions under which FCU members
may inspect and copy an FCU’s books,
records of accounts, and minutes of
meetings. The FCU must permit
inspection of relevant records if it
receives a member petition stating a
proper purpose for inspection and
signed by at least one percent of
members, with a minimum of five and
a maximum of 250.
NCUA does not believe members will
use this petition authority often. NCUA
estimates that there will be, perhaps,
five such petitions per year. NCUA also
estimates it will take an FCU that
receives a petition approximately 20
hours to evaluate the petition, locate
relevant documents, and make them
available for inspection and copying.
Five petitions times 20 hours per
petition equals 100 annual burden hours
associated with this proposed collection
of information. The Board also notes
that the costs of document search and
duplication will fall on the petitioners
and not on the FCU.
Organizations and individuals that
wish to submit comments on this
information collection requirement
should direct them to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: Mark Menchik, Room
10226, New Executive Office Building,
Washington, DC 20503, with a copy to
Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board,
National Credit Union Administration,
1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia
22314–3428.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
The NCUA considers comments by
the public on this proposed collection of
information in:
• Evaluating whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the NCUA, including
whether the information will have a
practical use;
• Evaluating the accuracy of the
NCUA’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhancing the quality, usefulness,
and clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimizing the burden of collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
The Paperwork Reduction Act
requires OMB to make a decision
concerning the collection of information
contained in the proposed regulation
between 30 and 60 days after
publication of this document in the
Federal Register. Therefore, a comment
to OMB is best assured of having its full
effect if OMB receives it within 30 days
of publication. This does not affect the
deadline for the public to comment to
the NCUA on the proposed regulation.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages
independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on
state and local interests. In adherence to
fundamental federalism principles,
NCUA, an independent regulatory
agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5),
voluntarily complies with the executive
order. The proposed rule would not
have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the connection between the
national government and the states, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. NCUA has
determined that this proposed rule does
not constitute a policy that has
federalism implications for purposes of
the executive order.
The Treasury and General Government
Appropriations Act, 1999—Assessment
of Federal Regulations and Policies on
Families
The NCUA has determined that this
proposed rule would not affect family
well-being within the meaning of
section 654 of the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999,
Pub. L. 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681 (1998).
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 77 / Monday, April 23, 2007 / Proposed Rules
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 701
Credit unions, Records.
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board on April 12, 2007.
Mary F. Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
Accordingly, NCUA proposes to
amend 12 CFR part 701 as follows:
PART 701—ORGANIZATION AND
OPERATIONS OF FEDERAL CREDIT
UNIONS
1. The authority citation for part 701
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1752(5), 1755, 1756,
1757, 1759, 1761a, 1761b, 1766, 1767, 1782,
1784, 1787, 1789. Section 701.6 is also
authorized by 15 U.S.C. 3717. Section 701.31
is also authorized by 15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.;
42 U.S.C. 1981 and 3601–3610. Section
701.35 is also authorized by 42 U.S.C. 4311–
4312.
2. Add § 701.3 to read as follows:
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with PROPOSALS
§ 701.3 Member inspection of credit union
books, records, and minutes.
(a) Member inspection rights. A group
of members of a federal credit union has
the right, upon submission of a petition
to the credit union as described in
paragraph (b) of this section, to inspect
and copy nonconfidential portions of
the credit union’s:
(1) Books and records of account; and
(2) Minutes of the proceedings of the
credit union’s members, board of
directors, and committees of directors.
(b) Petition for inspection. The
petition must describe the particular
records to be inspected and state a
purpose for the inspection related to the
business of the credit union. The
petition must state that the petitioners
as a whole, or certain named petitioners,
agree to pay the direct and reasonable
costs associated with search and
duplication of requested material. The
petition must also state that the
inspection is not desired for any
purpose in the interest of a business or
object other than the business of the
credit union; that the members signing
the petition have not within five years
preceding the signature date sold or
offered for sale, and do not now intend
to sell or offer for sale, any information
obtained from the credit union; and that
the members signing the petition have
not within the past five years aided or
abetted any other person in procuring
any information from the credit union
for purposes of sale. The petition must
name one or more members who will
represent the petitioners on issues such
as inspection procedures, costs, and
potential disputes. At least one percent
of the credit union’s members, with a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:49 Apr 20, 2007
Jkt 211001
minimum of 20 members and a
maximum of 250 members, must sign
the petition.
(c) Inspection procedures. Within 14
days of receipt of a petition, the federal
credit union must either allow
inspection and copying of all requested
material or inform the petitioning
members in writing why it is not able
to do so. Inspection may be made in
person or by agent or attorney and at
any reasonable time or times. Member
inspection rights under this paragraph
are in addition to any other member
inspection rights afforded by law,
regulation, or the credit union’s bylaws.
(d) Confidential books, records, and
minutes. Members do not have the right
to inspect any portion of the books,
records, or minutes of a federal credit
union if:
(1) Federal law or regulation prohibits
disclosure of that portion,
(2) The portion contains nonpublic
personal information as defined in
§ 716.4 of this part; or
(3) The portion contains information
about credit union employees or
officials the disclosure of which would
constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy. Members
may, however, inspect materials
describing the compensation and
benefits provided by the credit union to
its senior executive officers, and the
qualifications of the senior executive
officers, as that term is defined in
§ 701.14 of this part.
(e) Costs. A federal credit union may
charge petitioners the direct and
reasonable costs associated with search
and duplication. The credit union may
not charge for other costs, including
indirect costs or attorney’s fees.
(f) Dispute resolution. In the event of
a dispute between a federal credit union
and its members concerning a petition
for inspection or the associated costs,
either party may submit the dispute to
the regional director. The regional
director, after obtaining the views of
both parties, will direct the credit union
either to withhold the disputed
materials or to make them available for
member inspection and copying. The
regional director may place conditions
upon release, if appropriate. The
decision of the regional director is a
final agency decision and is not
appealable to the Board.
[FR Doc. E7–7610 Filed 4–20–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
20067
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION
ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 708b
Disclosure of Merger Related
Compensation Arrangements
National Credit Union
Administration (NCUA).
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for
comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: NCUA is issuing a proposed
rule on mergers to require all federally
insured credit unions to include in the
merger plan submitted to NCUA a
description of any arrangements
providing a material increase in
compensation or benefits to senior
management officials in connection
with the merger. The proposed rule also
requires federal credit unions to
disclose the existence of such
compensation arrangements in the
materials provided to members voting
on whether to approve the merger. The
proposed rule will ensure members of a
merging federal credit union and NCUA
are fully informed about arrangements
providing for a material increase in
compensation or benefits to senior
management officials before considering
whether to approve the merger. NCUA
believes this requirement will assure
merger decisions are based on the best
interests of the members.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 22, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods (Please
send comments by one method only):
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• NCUA Web site: https://
www.ncua.gov/news/proposed_regs/
proposed_regs.html. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• E-mail: Address to
regcomments@ncua.gov. Include ‘‘[Your
name] Comments on Proposed Rule Part
708b (Disclosure of Merger Related
Compensation)’’ in the e-mail subject
line.
• Fax: (703) 518–6319. Use the
subject line described above for e-mail.
• Mail: Address to Mary Rupp,
Secretary of the Board, National Credit
Union Administration, 1775 Duke
Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314–
3428.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as
mail address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ross
Kendall, Staff Attorney, Office of
General Counsel, at the above address or
telephone: (703) 518–6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\23APP1.SGM
23APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 77 (Monday, April 23, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 20061-20067]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7610]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION
12 CFR Part 701
RIN 3133-AD33
Member Inspection of Credit Union Books, Records, and Minutes
AGENCY: National Credit Union Administration.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) is issuing a
proposed rule on member inspection of federal credit union (FCU) books,
records, and minutes. The rule provides that a group of members
representing approximately one percent of the membership, with a proper
purpose and upon petition, may inspect and copy the nonconfidential
portions of the credit union's books, records, and minutes. This
proposal standardizes and clarifies existing member inspection rights.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 22, 2007.
[[Page 20062]]
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods
(Please send comments by one method only):
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
NCUA Web site: https://www.ncua.gov/
RegulationsOpinionsLaws/proposed_regs/proposed_regs.html. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: Address to regcomments@ncua.gov. Include ``[Your
name] Comments on Proposed Rule 701.3'' in the e-mail subject line.
Fax: (703) 518-6319. Use the subject line described above
for e-mail.
Mail: Address to Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board,
National Credit Union Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria,
Virginia 22314-3428.
Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as mail address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Peterson or Annette Tapia, Staff
Attorneys, at the above address or telephone number (703) 518-6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
This proposed rule provides that a group of members representing
approximately one percent of an FCU's membership, upon petition and
with a proper purpose, may obtain access to the nonconfidential
portions of the FCU's books, records, and minutes.
FCUs are not-for-profit, member-owned cooperatives organized to
provide financial services and products to their members. The financial
interests of members in their credit union are similar to the financial
interests shareholders have in for-profit corporations. Corporate
shareholders have various methods to protect their financial interests
in the corporation, including the right at common law and in various
state statutes to inspect corporate books and records. Because of the
similarity of interests between credit union members and corporate
shareholders, NCUA legal opinions going back many years have stated
that FCU members may inspect the FCU's books and records under the same
terms and conditions that state corporation law where the FCU is
located permits shareholder inspection of corporate records. See, e.g.,
OGC Ops. 92-0101, 96-0451, and 06-0127B. These opinion letters are
available at https://www.ncua.gov.
The NCUA Board believes regulating member inspection of FCU records
is preferable to reliance on state corporation law. Corporation law on
shareholder inspection, for example, varies from state to state, and
FCUs should have a consistent standard regardless of an FCU's location.
Some FCUs have branches in multiple states, further complicating the
application of state law to inspection requests. In addition, some
courts may refuse to apply their corporation law to inspection requests
by FCU members or may incorrectly analogize the financial interests of
credit union members to those of depositors in a mutual savings bank
and deny members inspection on those grounds. See, e.g., Save Columbia
Credit Union Committee v. Columbia Credit Union, 139 P.3d 386, 393-95
(Wash. App. 2006) (refusing to apply state corporation law to records
inspection request by members of a state-chartered credit union).
The Board considered when and why members might want to inspect FCU
records. The law charges members with responsibility for important
decisions that affect both the FCU and the members' financial
interests. For example, a vote of the FCU's members is required on the
election and removal of directors, mergers, conversion from federal to
private account insurance, conversion from a federal to state charter
or conversion to a mutual savings bank, and voluntary liquidations. In
these situations, members may want to inspect FCU records to better
inform themselves before voting and to ensure that directors are acting
in the best interests of the members. There are other situations where
the members want to inspect records to protect their financial
interests, as discussed further below.
The Board also considered how stakeholders of depository
institutions other than credit unions may inspect their institution's
books and records. The Board identified an existing Office of Thrift
Supervision (OTS) rule governing the right of shareholders to inspect
the books, records, and minutes of federal stock savings associations.
12 CFR 552.11 (OTS Rule). The ownership interests of members in an FCU
are similar to the ownership interests of stockholders in a stock
savings association; the issues on which FCU members and stock bank
shareholders vote are similar; and the regulatory and supervisory
powers of NCUA and OTS over their respective regulated institutions are
also similar. Accordingly, this proposed rule tracks, in large part,
the OTS Rule. The proposal is also consistent with existing NCUA
guidance on member inspection of FCU records. See FCU Handbook (Rev.
2006), p.68.
B. Paragraph-by-Paragraph Analysis
(a) Member Inspection Rights
Proposed paragraph (a) establishes the right of a group of members
of an FCU, upon submission of a proper petition, to inspect and copy
the credit union's books and records of account and minutes of the
proceedings of the credit union's members, board of directors, and
committees of directors. This inspection right is similar to that in
the OTS Rule, with the use of a member petition in lieu of the
stockholder affidavit requirement in the OTS Rule.
The member petition must meet the requirements in proposed
paragraph (b). Also, inspection rights are limited to the
nonconfidential portions of the credit union's books, records, and
minutes. Proposed paragraph (d) defines confidential books, records,
and minutes; all other books, records, and minutes are nonconfidential.
Minutes
The Board intends the phrase ``minutes of the proceedings at all
meetings of its members, board of directors, and committees of
directors'' to include any summary or recording of the proceedings and
all documents, reports, studies, and visual aids considered by the
meeting participants. The Board believes this broad interpretation of
minutes is appropriate. For example, in situations where an FCU
membership vote is required, the vote is either about the election or
removal of directors or officers or is precipitated by the actions of
the directors as in the case of a merger or conversion. Members should
have access to the directors' deliberations to help members decide how
to vote and help members determine if the directors are acting in the
members' best interests.
Books and Records of Account
Courts have interpreted the phrase ``books and records of account''
differently. Some courts have interpreted the phrase broadly to include
both financial and nonfinancial records while other courts have
interpreted the phrase to include only financial records. See, e.g.,
Meyer v. Ford Industries, Inc., 538 P.2d 353, 358 (Or. 1975) (broad
interpretation); Corwin v. Abbott Laboratories, 819 N.E.2d 1249 (Ill.
App. 2004), app. den. 2005 Ill. LEXIS 609 (Ill. 2005) (phrase includes
both financial and nonfinancial records); and Jewelers International
Showcase, Inc. v. Mandell, 529 So. 2d 1211 (Fla. Dist. Ct App. 3d Dist.
1988) (stockholder was entitled to inspect financial records such as
general ledger,
[[Page 20063]]
balance sheets, and profit and loss statements).
The NCUA Board believes a narrow interpretation is best. The plain
language meaning of ``of account'' supports a limitation to accounting
records. Stockholder inspection of corporate records under the Model
Business Corporation Act (MBCA) is expressly limited to minutes and
``accounting records,'' and the Counsel to the Federal Home Loan Bank
Board (FHLBB), in interpreting the predecessor to the OTS rule, has
cited to the MBCA as authority for the OTS rule. Letter from Julie
Williams, FHLBB Deputy General Counsel, dated September 17, 1986,
located at 1986 FHLBB LEXIS 82 (hereinafter 1986 FHLBB DGC Letter); and
Model Bus. Corp. Act Sec. 16.02(b)(2)(1984). The Board believes the
financial interests of members are adequately protected by combining a
broad interpretation of minutes with a more restrictive interpretation
of the phrase books and records of account.
Inspection and Copying
Generally, a member's right to inspect FCU minutes and records
includes the right to make copies of those records. Obtaining copies
enables members to provide the information to other members or, in some
cases, to experts for independent analysis and review. If an FCU
believes that certain of its records should not be copied, it may
request that the regional director impose conditions on the inspection,
as discussed further below.
(b) Petition for Inspection
Proposed paragraph (b) establishes the member petition
requirements.
The petition must describe the particular records to be inspected
and state a purpose for the inspection related to the business of the
credit union. The petition must state that the petitioners as a whole,
or certain named petitioners, agree to pay the direct and reasonable
costs associated with search and duplication of requested material. The
petition must also state that the inspection is not desired for any
purpose in the interest of a business or object other than the business
of the credit union; that the members signing the petition have not
within five years preceding the signature date sold or offered for
sale, and do not now intend to sell or offer for sale, any information
obtained from the credit union; and that the members signing the
petition have not within the past five years aided or abetted any other
person in procuring any information from the credit union for purposes
of sale. The petition must name one or more members who will represent
the petitioners on issues such as inspection procedures, costs, and
potential disputes. At least one percent of the credit union's members,
with a minimum of 20 members and a maximum of 250 members, must sign
the petition.
The language of this proposed paragraph is similar to language in
paragraphs (b) and (c) of the OTS Rule.
Minimum Signature Requirement
The OTS Rule requires stockholders seeking records to own a certain
number of shares and to submit an affidavit describing their request to
the savings association. For shareholders who have owned their shares
at least six months, the affidavit generally must be signed by
shareholders representing at least one percent of the outstanding
shares. OTS Rule, paragraphs (b)(1) and (2). The proposal substitutes a
member petition for this stockholder affidavit. The petition also
employs a minimum signature requirement of one percent of the members,
representing an ownership interest roughly equivalent to one percent of
the shares of a stock association. The proposed rule further provides
that a minimum of 20 members and a maximum of 250 must sign the
petition. The one percent and minimum and maximum signature
requirements are similar to those established in NCUA's standard FCU
bylaws for members seeking a nomination by petition to run for election
to an FCU's board of directors. NCUA Standard FCU Bylaws, Art. V, Sec.
1 (Rev. April 2006).
Proper Purpose
The purpose of an inspection must be related to the business of the
credit union. A proper purpose includes attempting to ascertain and
protect members' financial interests and to ascertain possible
mismanagement. See, e.g., 1986 FHLBB DGC Letter (interpreting OTS
Rule).
The issue of member inspection of records may arise, for example,
in the context of a member vote on merger or charter conversion.
Members of a merging or converting credit union may desire access to
the due diligence performed by their directors, and other credit union
books and records, to determine if the directors are acting in the
members' best interests. Members of a credit union merging with another
credit union may also have an interest in determining if they are
receiving an appropriate share adjustment. 12 CFR 708b.103(a)(5).
Members may have a financial interest in ascertaining how the proposed
merger or conversion will affect their services, rates, and fees and
how the directors analyzed this issue. Members of a credit union
merging with a bank may have a further interest in determining the
value of their shares plus any associated premium and whether the
directors carefully considered all the available merger opportunities
with a view to maximizing the financial benefit to the members. Members
of a credit union converting to a bank may also want to know if their
directors considered the possibility of a merger and appropriate
payments to members.
Members may wish to obtain FCU records in other contexts. For
example, some members might want records about FCU decisions that have
a direct effect on the members, such as a determination to close a
branch office or to discontinue a service or product. Members electing
directors might want records from the credit union about the
qualifications of and benefits received by sitting directors. Members
might also want records about the qualifications and compensation of
senior management.
Burden of Proof on Proper Purpose
Generally, in the absence of evidence indicating an improper
purpose, courts do not assume that stockholders of a corporation
requesting an inspection intend to use the information improperly just
because it would be possible for them to do so. Fears v. Cattlemen's
Inv. Co., 483 P.2d 724, 730 (Okla. 1971). The requirement in the
proposed rule that petitioners state they are not intending to sell the
information, nor have they aided or abetted such sales in the past five
years, helps ensure a proper purpose. The minimum signature requirement
in the proposal also helps ensure a proper purpose because members
seeking signatures will have to convince other members that they share
a common and appropriate purpose. Accordingly, a petition meeting the
requirements of paragraph (c) creates a presumption of proper purpose,
and an FCU should have substantial evidence of improper purpose to deny
inspection for that reason.
Description of Records
The petition must describe the particular records sought and the
description must be specific enough to allow the FCU to identify
responsive records. The FCU may ask the petitioners for more
information if necessary to help understand the scope of the request.
(c) Inspection Procedures
Proposed paragraph (b) provides the inspection procedures. Within
14 days
[[Page 20064]]
of receipt of a petition, the FCU must either allow inspection and
copying of all requested material or inform the petitioning members in
writing why it is not able to do so. Inspection may be in person or by
an agent or attorney and at any reasonable time or times. Member
inspection rights under this paragraph are in addition to any other
member inspection rights afforded by law, regulation, or the credit
union's bylaws.
Unless a regional director imposes conditions on a particular
request for records, the member's right to inspect records includes the
right to make copies. In many cases, the credit union will mail or
deliver copies of the requested documents to the individual(s)
designated by the petitioners. In some cases, however, the petitioners
may request an inspection of requested documents at the credit union
before copies are made or the credit union may ask the petitioners to
come to the credit union to pick up the copies. The Board recognizes
original documents may be at a credit union office some distance from
where the petitioners live and that conducting an on-site inspection or
pick-up may be difficult or expensive for petitioners. The Board
expects credit unions and petitioners to work out reasonable, mutually
acceptable arrangements for on-site inspection or pick-up, including,
for example, movement of documents or copies to a credit union branch
location convenient to petitioners.
The language of this paragraph is similar to language in paragraph
(b) of the OTS Rule. The proposed 14-day compliance timeframe, not
found in the OTS Rule, will ensure that an FCU responds promptly to the
member petition. The proposed paragraph also recognizes that members
may have additional inspection rights, including, for example,
inspection rights related to merger compensation in another pending
NCUA rulemaking.
(d) Confidential Books, Records, and Minutes
Proposed paragraph (d) provides that members do not have the right
to inspect portions of the books, records, or minutes of an FCU under
certain circumstances: first, if federal law or regulation prohibits
disclosure of that portion; second, if that portion contains nonpublic
personal information; and, third, if that portion contains information
about credit union employees or officials the release of which would
constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.
Federal Law or Regulation Prohibits Disclosure
The provision prohibits credit unions, for example, from disclosing
nonpublic records generated by NCUA, including reports of inspection
that might otherwise be considered by the FCU's board of directors and
included within its meeting minutes. 12 CFR 792.40, 792.49.
Nonpublic Personal Information
The members of a credit union are both its customers and its
owners, and the credit union maintains sensitive personal and financial
information about members that must be protected. The OTS Rule protects
the privacy of a bank's customers by providing that no stockholder may
inspect any list of depositors or borrowers or their addresses,
deposit, or loan records or any data from which that information can be
constructed. The proposed rule provides similar protection for the
personal and financial information of a credit union's members, but
instead of a reference to specific sensitive information as in the OTS
Rule, the proposal will protect all nonpublic personal information as
that term is defined in NCUA's rules on the privacy of consumer
financial information. 12 CFR part 716. Nonpublic personal information
includes information such as the fact an individual is a member,
account numbers and balances, transaction information, consumer
reports, and any information provided by the member to obtain a
financial product from the credit union. 12 CFR 716(r). Information
that is publicly available or information that does not identify a
particular member would not be nonpublic personal information. 12 CFR
716(q).
Information About Credit Union Employees or Officials
The proposed rule also protects from inspection information about
the FCU's employees and officials if disclosure would constitute a
clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. This terminology is
similar to the confidentiality provision in the Freedom of Information
Act. 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(6). Some categories of information that will
receive confidentiality treatment include marital status, financial
status, children, medical conditions, dates of birth, religious
affiliations, citizenship data, sexual inclinations, and social
security numbers. See Freedom of Information Act Guide and Privacy Act
Overview, U.S. Department of Justice (May 2004 ed.).
As an exception to this confidentiality provision, FCU members may
inspect materials describing the compensation and benefits provided to
senior executive officers. The member-owners of a credit union have a
financial interest in how their credit union is managed, and that
interest extends to knowledge about who the senior managers are, their
qualifications, and their compensation levels. The members' interest in
this information outweighs any privacy interests the senior managers
may have in the information. Accordingly, the rule provides that
members may inspect information about the qualifications, compensation
and benefits of senior executive officers, as defined in Sec. 701.14
of NCUA's rules:
Senior executive officer means a credit union's chief executive
officer (typically this individual holds the title of president or
treasurer/manager), any assistant chief executive officer (e.g., any
assistant president, any vice president or any assistant treasurer/
manager), and the chief financial officer (controller). The term
``senior executive officer'' also includes employees of an entity,
such as a consulting firm, hired to perform the functions of
positions covered by the regulation.
12 CFR 701.14(b)(2).
Other Considerations
This proposal provides confidentiality only for materials the
release of which is prohibited by federal law, materials that contain
nonpublic personal information, and personal information about FCU
employees and officials. In some states, courts have withheld other
types of documents from shareholder inspection, such as confidential
internal correspondence or materials containing corporate trade
secrets. See, e.g., Morton v. Rodgers, 20 Ariz. App. 581, 514, P.2d 752
(Ariz. Div. 1, 1973) (trade secrets); State Ex. Rel. Armour & Co. v.
Gulf Sulphur Corp., 231, A.2d 470 (Del. 1967) (trade secrets); and
State ex rel. Jones v. Ralston Purina Co., 358 S.W.2d 772, 778 (Mo.
1962) (internal correspondence). As one court noted, however:
Both under the common law and under our statute a stockholder of
a corporation is entitled to examine the books and records of the
corporation * * *. The right rests upon the proposition that, while
the corporation holds the legal title to its property, the
stockholders are deemed to be the real and beneficial owners thereof
and, as such, are entitled to information concerning the management
of the property and business which they have confided to the
officers and directors of the corporation as their agents * * *. It
ordinarily is not enough to deny the right that the information
sought is of a confidential nature.
[[Page 20065]]
Nationwide Corp. v. Northwestern National Life Insurance Co., 251
Minn. 255, 256; 87 N.W.2d 671, 672 (Minn. 1958).
This proposal, like the OTS Rule, has no confidentiality provisions
related to internal memoranda or trade secrets for several reasons.
First, credit unions do not generally have trade secrets, that is,
secret formulas or technology on which the success of the organization
is dependent, and cases that deal with confidential internal
correspondence generally do not provide a standard by which
confidentiality can be measured. Second, it is unlikely that, given the
narrow interpretation of ``books and records of account'' intended by
the Board, any materials deserving of confidentiality would appear
among those materials subject to inspection. Third, even if
confidential materials appear among the materials subject to this rule,
requested materials must be relevant to the petitioners' stated
business purpose before they become subject to inspection. See, e.g.,
Azzar v. Primebank Federal Savings Bank, 499 N.W.2d 793, 798 (Ct. App.
Mich. 1993)(interpreting the OTS Rule). Finally, and as discussed
above, if a credit union has substantial evidence of an improper
purpose, it may deny inspection for that reason.
In the unlikely event there are portions of relevant FCU books and
records of account or minutes the public release of which might cause
the credit union substantial competitive injury or financial damage,
the dispute resolution paragraph of the proposed rule permits the
regional director to place conditions on member inspection that balance
the interests of the member-owners in the requested information against
any interests the credit union may have in maintaining confidentiality.
The regional director's authority to resolve disputes is discussed
further below.
The NCUA Board also considered if privileged information, that is,
exempt from discovery in court cases, should be withheld from members.
Case law on the corporate shareholder's right to inspect privileged
information differs by jurisdiction. In California, for example,
shareholders lack the right to inspect corporate books and records
covered by the attorney-client privilege. National Football League
Properties, Inc. v. Oakland Raiders, 75 Cal. Rptr. 2d 893 (Ca. Ct. App.
6th District 1998). In other jurisdictions, however, shareholders who
are concerned with corporate mismanagement may inspect attorney-client
privileged documents. Beard v. Ames, 168 A2d 119 (N.Y. 1983); Garner v.
Wolfinbarger, 430 F.2d 1093 (5th Cir. 1970). For example, in
determining that stockholders could inspect communications between
attorney and corporate management under some circumstances, the Garner
court stated:
But in assessing management assertions of injury to the
corporation it must be borne in mind that management does not manage
for itself and that the beneficiaries of its action are the
stockholders. Conceptualistic phrases describing the corporation as
an entity separate from its stockholders are not useful tools of
analysis. They serve only to obscure the fact that management has
duties which run to the benefit ultimately of the stockholders.
Id. at 1101.
The Board believes member-owners with a proper purpose should have
access to relevant FCU information. Accordingly, and like the OTS Rule,
this proposal does not include confidentiality protection for
privileged information, but that does not mean that privileged material
will automatically be subject to inspection. Privileged material would
have to be the subject of a proper petition with a valid purpose; it
would have to fall within the scope of ``books and records of account''
or ``minutes;'' and it would have to be relevant to the petitioners''
stated purpose, all before it would be subject to inspection. Proposed
paragraph (f) also provides regional directors with authority to
resolve disputes, and a regional director could place conditions on the
release of the privileged material where appropriate.
The FCU may have other minutes or books and records of account that
it has designated as confidential by policy or otherwise. That
designation by an FCU does not defeat the inspection rights of members.
If the requested material does not contain confidential information as
described in Sec. 701.3(d), the member-owners have the right to
inspect it upon a proper petition. Again, as discussed below, a
regional director may impose conditions on inspection and copying in
appropriate cases.
In some cases, materials requested by members may include a mix of
both confidential portions and nonconfidential portions. An FCU must
make as much of the nonconfidential material available to members as
possible, redacting or withholding only the confidential portions.
(e) Costs
Proposed paragraph (e) states that an FCU may charge petitioners
the direct and reasonable costs associated with search and duplication
but it may not charge for other costs, including indirect costs or
attorney's fees.
While the OTS Rule does not specifically address the reimbursement
for costs of shareholder inspection and copying of stock savings
association records, an OTS legal opinion describes that reimbursement:
In our view, a federal stock association may charge a requesting
Qualifying Shareholder reasonable expenses for document searches,
duplication, and direct costs associated with producing and
delivering documents. However, a requesting Qualifying Shareholder
is not obligated to pay the association's attorneys fees in order to
gain access to review the association's books and records required
to be made available to shareholders under section 552.11.
Letter from Harris Weinstein, OTS Chief Counsel, dated December 5, 1991
(1991 OTS LEXIS 68). The proposed paragraph (e) addresses costs in a
manner similar to that described in OTS legal opinions.
Typically, the direct costs of search and duplication would include
only the number of hours a clerk might take to locate and duplicate the
requested documents multiplied by the clerk's hourly compensation rate,
plus the per-page costs of duplication. Requesters need not reimburse
the credit union for other costs, including costs associated with the
management or supervision of the person(s) conducting the search, costs
to review documents, costs associated with in-person inspection of
records, overhead costs, or the costs of any legal services.
As noted above, the petition must recognize the obligation of the
petitioners as a whole, or certain named petitioners, to pay the direct
and reasonable costs associated with search and duplication.
Petitioners may also include in the petition, if they want, a maximum
amount that they are willing to pay; and the FCU, if it wants, may
provide petitioners with an estimate of the search and duplication
costs. The rule does not require, however, that petitioners pay in
advance, or agree to pay any specific amount, before the FCU provides
the petitioners with the requested documents.
(f) Dispute Resolution
Proposed paragraph (f) provides, in the event of a dispute between
an FCU and its members concerning a petition for inspection or the
associated costs, either party may submit the dispute to the regional
director. The regional director, after obtaining the views of both
parties, will direct the credit union either to withhold the disputed
materials or to make them available for member inspection and copying.
The regional director may place conditions upon release, if
appropriate. Depending on the circumstances, conditions
[[Page 20066]]
imposed by the regional director might include limitations on making
copies or a requirement that the parties enter into a contract
restricting the use or further dissemination of the material.
The OTS Rule does not contain a dispute resolution procedure. The
NCUA Board believes that a dispute resolution procedure is necessary to
protect both the inspection rights of members and the FCU's interests.
In other circumstances involving member disputes with FCUs, NCUA
usually refers the dispute to the FCU's supervisory committee for
resolution. The proposed rule does not require such referral because,
in certain circumstances, such as a pending member vote on a charter or
share insurance conversion or a merger, members' need for the
information may be time sensitive. Still, in the event of a dispute
over access to FCU records, petitioners, if they desire, may contact an
FCU's supervisory committee before taking it directly to the regional
director. Similarly, if a regional director receives a request from a
petitioner for dispute resolution and determines that resolution is not
time sensitive, the director may refer the matter to the FCU's
supervisory committee for analysis and response before the director
makes any decision about the dispute.
The NCUA Board does not believe that specific time frames for
regional director action are appropriate. The time needed for dispute
resolution could vary significantly from case to case depending on the
complexity of the dispute. In addition, the Board does not believe a
right to appeal to the Board is necessary.
C. Request for Public Comment
NCUA's goal is to promulgate clear and understandable regulations
that impose minimal regulatory burden. The Board requests public
comments on whether the proposed rule is understandable and minimally
intrusive and also solicits specific suggestions to improve the content
of the rule.
D. Regulatory Procedures
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires NCUA to prepare an analysis
to describe any significant economic impact a rule may have on a
substantial number of small credit unions, defined as those under ten
million dollars in assets. This proposed rule standardizes and
clarifies the rights of members to inspect FCU records. The rule is not
a significant departure from existing practice that FCUs must permit
inspection under the same terms and conditions that state law requires
for shareholders to inspect corporation records. The proposed rule
requires that a minimum of one percent of the FCU's members sign a
petition to obtain access. In some states, this burden on the members
might exceed the burden on shareholders to obtain access and so reduces
the likelihood of an FCU having to grant access. Accordingly, the Board
does not anticipate that the proposed rule, if adopted, would have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small credit
unions.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Section 701.3 contains information collection requirements. As
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)),
NCUA is submitting a copy of this proposed regulation as part of an
information collection package to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for its review and approval of a new collection of information.
The proposed rule standardizes and clarifies the circumstances and
conditions under which FCU members may inspect and copy an FCU's books,
records of accounts, and minutes of meetings. The FCU must permit
inspection of relevant records if it receives a member petition stating
a proper purpose for inspection and signed by at least one percent of
members, with a minimum of five and a maximum of 250.
NCUA does not believe members will use this petition authority
often. NCUA estimates that there will be, perhaps, five such petitions
per year. NCUA also estimates it will take an FCU that receives a
petition approximately 20 hours to evaluate the petition, locate
relevant documents, and make them available for inspection and copying.
Five petitions times 20 hours per petition equals 100 annual burden
hours associated with this proposed collection of information. The
Board also notes that the costs of document search and duplication will
fall on the petitioners and not on the FCU.
Organizations and individuals that wish to submit comments on this
information collection requirement should direct them to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: Mark Menchik, Room
10226, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503, with a copy
to Mary Rupp, Secretary of the Board, National Credit Union
Administration, 1775 Duke Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-3428.
The NCUA considers comments by the public on this proposed
collection of information in:
Evaluating whether the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the NCUA,
including whether the information will have a practical use;
Evaluating the accuracy of the NCUA's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
Enhancing the quality, usefulness, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
Minimizing the burden of collection of information on
those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
The Paperwork Reduction Act requires OMB to make a decision
concerning the collection of information contained in the proposed
regulation between 30 and 60 days after publication of this document in
the Federal Register. Therefore, a comment to OMB is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it within 30 days of
publication. This does not affect the deadline for the public to
comment to the NCUA on the proposed regulation.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on state and local interests. In
adherence to fundamental federalism principles, NCUA, an independent
regulatory agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5), voluntarily complies
with the executive order. The proposed rule would not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the connection between the national
government and the states, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. NCUA has
determined that this proposed rule does not constitute a policy that
has federalism implications for purposes of the executive order.
The Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act, 1999--
Assessment of Federal Regulations and Policies on Families
The NCUA has determined that this proposed rule would not affect
family well-being within the meaning of section 654 of the Treasury and
General Government Appropriations Act, 1999, Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat.
2681 (1998).
[[Page 20067]]
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 701
Credit unions, Records.
By the National Credit Union Administration Board on April 12,
2007.
Mary F. Rupp,
Secretary of the Board.
Accordingly, NCUA proposes to amend 12 CFR part 701 as follows:
PART 701--ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS OF FEDERAL CREDIT UNIONS
1. The authority citation for part 701 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1752(5), 1755, 1756, 1757, 1759, 1761a,
1761b, 1766, 1767, 1782, 1784, 1787, 1789. Section 701.6 is also
authorized by 15 U.S.C. 3717. Section 701.31 is also authorized by
15 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 1981 and 3601-3610. Section 701.35
is also authorized by 42 U.S.C. 4311-4312.
2. Add Sec. 701.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 701.3 Member inspection of credit union books, records, and
minutes.
(a) Member inspection rights. A group of members of a federal
credit union has the right, upon submission of a petition to the credit
union as described in paragraph (b) of this section, to inspect and
copy nonconfidential portions of the credit union's:
(1) Books and records of account; and
(2) Minutes of the proceedings of the credit union's members, board
of directors, and committees of directors.
(b) Petition for inspection. The petition must describe the
particular records to be inspected and state a purpose for the
inspection related to the business of the credit union. The petition
must state that the petitioners as a whole, or certain named
petitioners, agree to pay the direct and reasonable costs associated
with search and duplication of requested material. The petition must
also state that the inspection is not desired for any purpose in the
interest of a business or object other than the business of the credit
union; that the members signing the petition have not within five years
preceding the signature date sold or offered for sale, and do not now
intend to sell or offer for sale, any information obtained from the
credit union; and that the members signing the petition have not within
the past five years aided or abetted any other person in procuring any
information from the credit union for purposes of sale. The petition
must name one or more members who will represent the petitioners on
issues such as inspection procedures, costs, and potential disputes. At
least one percent of the credit union's members, with a minimum of 20
members and a maximum of 250 members, must sign the petition.
(c) Inspection procedures. Within 14 days of receipt of a petition,
the federal credit union must either allow inspection and copying of
all requested material or inform the petitioning members in writing why
it is not able to do so. Inspection may be made in person or by agent
or attorney and at any reasonable time or times. Member inspection
rights under this paragraph are in addition to any other member
inspection rights afforded by law, regulation, or the credit union's
bylaws.
(d) Confidential books, records, and minutes. Members do not have
the right to inspect any portion of the books, records, or minutes of a
federal credit union if:
(1) Federal law or regulation prohibits disclosure of that portion,
(2) The portion contains nonpublic personal information as defined
in Sec. 716.4 of this part; or
(3) The portion contains information about credit union employees
or officials the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Members may, however, inspect
materials describing the compensation and benefits provided by the
credit union to its senior executive officers, and the qualifications
of the senior executive officers, as that term is defined in Sec.
701.14 of this part.
(e) Costs. A federal credit union may charge petitioners the direct
and reasonable costs associated with search and duplication. The credit
union may not charge for other costs, including indirect costs or
attorney's fees.
(f) Dispute resolution. In the event of a dispute between a federal
credit union and its members concerning a petition for inspection or
the associated costs, either party may submit the dispute to the
regional director. The regional director, after obtaining the views of
both parties, will direct the credit union either to withhold the
disputed materials or to make them available for member inspection and
copying. The regional director may place conditions upon release, if
appropriate. The decision of the regional director is a final agency
decision and is not appealable to the Board.
[FR Doc. E7-7610 Filed 4-20-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7535-01-P