Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highway in Indiana, 19228-19229 [E7-7231]
Download as PDF
19228
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 73 / Tuesday, April 17, 2007 / Notices
that are final within the meaning of 23
U.S.C. § 139(l)(1). The actions relate to
Barbara J. Hairston,
a proposed highway project, I–69,
Supervisory Docket Officer, Docket
Evansville to Indianapolis, Indiana, in
Operations, Alternate Federal Register
the Counties of Vanderburgh, Warrick,
Liaison.
Gibson, Pike, Daviess, Greene, Monroe,
[FR Doc. E7–7246 Filed 4–16–07; 8:45 am]
Morgan, Johnson and Marion, State of
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
Indiana. The Federal actions, taken as a
result of a tiered environmental review
process under the National
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C.
4321–4351 (NEPA), and implementing
Office of the Secretary
regulations on tiering, 40 CFR 1502.20,
40 CFR 1508.28, and 23 CFR Part 771,
Notice of Applications for Certificates
determined certain issues relating to the
of Public Convenience and Necessity
proposed project. Those decisions will
and Foreign Air Carrier Permits Filed
Under Subpart B (Formerly Subpart Q) be used by Federal agencies in
subsequent proceedings, including
During the Week Ending April 6, 2007
decisions whether to grant licenses,
The following Applications for
permits, and approvals for the highway
Certificates of Public Convenience and
project. The decisions also may be
Necessity and Foreign Air Carrier
relied upon by State and local agencies
Permits were filed under Subpart B
in proceedings on the proposed project.
(formerly Subpart Q) of the Department
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is
of Transportation’s Procedural
advising the public that the FHWA and
Regulations (See 14 CFR 301.201 et
the USFWS have made decisions that
seq.). The due date for Answers,
are subject to 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1) and are
Conforming Applications, or Motions to final within the meaning of that law. A
Modify Scope are set forth below for
claim seeking judicial review of those
each application. Following the Answer Federal agency decisions on the
period DOT may process the application proposed highway project will be barred
by expedited procedures. Such
unless the claim is filed on or before
procedures may consist of the adoption
October 15, 2007. If the Federal law that
of a show-cause order, a tentative order, authorizes judicial review of a claim
or in appropriate cases a final order
provides a time period of less than 180
without further proceedings.
days for filing such claim, then the
Docket Number: OST–2007–27815.
shorter time period applies.
Date Filed: April 4, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
Due Date for Answers, Conforming
the FHWA: Mr. Anthony DeSimone,
Applications, or Motion to Modify
P.E., Federal Highway Administration,
Scope: April 25, 2007.
Indiana Division, 575 North
Description: Application of Exec Air
Pennsylvania Street, Room 254,
Inc. of Naples Dba. ExecAir requesting
Indianapolis, IN 46204–1576; telephone:
authority to conduct scheduled
(317) 226–5307; e-mail:
passenger operations as a commuter air
Anthony.DeSimone@fhwa.dot.gov. The
carrier.
FHWA Indiana Division Office’s normal
Barbara J. Hairston,
business hours are 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
e.t. For the USFWS: Mr. Scott Pruitt,
Supervisory Docket Officer, Docket
Operations, Altenate Federal Register Liaison. Field Supervisor, Bloomington Field
Office, USFWS, 620 South Walker
[FR Doc. E7–7248 Filed 4–16–07; 8:45 am]
Street, Bloomington, IN 47403–2121;
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
telephone: 812–334–4261; e-mail:
Scott_Pruitt@fws.gov. Normal business
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION hours for the USFWS Bloomington Field
Office are: 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., e.t. You
Federal Highway Administration
may also contact Mr. Thomas Seeman,
Project Manager, Indiana Department of
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions Transportation (INDOT), 100 North
on Proposed Highway in Indiana
Senate Avenue, Indianapolis, IN 46204;
telephone: (317) 232–5336; e-mail:
AGENCY: Federal Highway
TSeeman@indot.IN.gov. Normal
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
business hours for the Indiana
ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims
for Judicial Review of Actions by FHWA Department of Transportation are: 8 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., e.t.
and United States Fish and Wildlife
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is
Service (USFWS), DOI.
hereby given that the FHWA has
SUMMARY: This notice announces actions approved a Tier 1 Final Environmental
Impact Statement (FEIS) and issued a
taken by the FHWA and the USFWS
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Intended effective date: 15 April 2007.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:39 Apr 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Record of Decision (ROD) in connection
with a proposed highway project in the
State of Indiana: I–69 from Evansville to
Indianapolis, in Vanderburgh, Warrick,
Gibson, Pike, Daviess, Greene, Monroe,
Morgan, Johnson and Marion Counties.
The project will be an approximately
142 mile long Interstate highway. It will
begin at the I–64/I–164 interchange just
north of Evansville, Indiana and end at
I–465 in Indianapolis, to the west of the
I–465/SR 37 interchange. The proposed
freeway will be on both new and
existing alignment.
Decisions in the FHWA Tier 1 ROD
that have final approval include, but are
not limited to, the following:
1. Purpose and need for the project
(see section 3.1).
2. Range of alternatives for analysis
(see sections 3.3 and 3.4).
3. Selection of the Interstate highway
build alternative and highway corridor
for the project. The selected alternative,
referred to in the FEIS as Alternative 3C,
involves completing I–69 as an
Interstate highway from Evansville to
Indianapolis via Oakland City,
Washington, Crane Naval Surface
Warfare Center, Bloomington, and
Martinsville (see section 2.1). This
alternative includes the use of parts of
the existing alignment of SR 37 to reach
I–465 and the route variation known as
WE2 in the area of Washington, Indiana.
The ultimate alignment of the highway
within the corridor, and the location
and number of interchanges and rest
areas will be evaluated in the Tier 2
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) proceedings.
4. Elimination of other alternatives
from consideration in Tier 2 NEPA
proceedings. The alternatives that will
not be considered any further include,
but are not limited to, those identified
in the Tier 1 FEIS as the ‘‘no build’’
alternative, and alternatives 1, 2A, 2B,
2C, 3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 5A, and 5B. Also
eliminated were a number of hybrids
and variations on these alternatives,
including the ‘‘Mann Road Variation’’
for reaching I–465 and variations WW1,
WW2, and WE1 in the area of
Washington, Indiana. Detailed
information about the alternatives
considered in Tier 1, and about the
Federal decisions that eliminate
alternatives other than Alternative 3C
from further consideration, is available
in section 3 of the Tier 1 ROD and the
Tier 1 FEIS sections cited therein.
5. Process for completing the Tier 2
alternatives analysis and studies for the
project, including the designation of six
Tier 2 sections and a decision to prepare
a separate environmental impact
statement for each Tier 2 section (see
section 2.3).
E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM
17APN1
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 73 / Tuesday, April 17, 2007 / Notices
Interested parties may consult the
Tier 1 ROD and Tier 1 FEIS for details
about each of the decisions described
above and for information on other
issues decided. The documents are
available as described below.
Following the completion of the Tier
1 ROD, interested parties submitted
comments suggesting that new
information existed that might affect the
Tier 1 FEIS analyses and the Federal
decisions based on those analyses. In
response, the FHWA reevaluated the
project and decided that the changes
that occurred following the ROD did not
individually or collectively require
supplementation of the Tier 1 FEIS.
The Tier 1 FEIS (issued on December
5, 2003), the Tier 1 ROD (issued on
March 24, 2004), the FHWA decision
that supplementation of the Tier 1 FEIS
is not required (issued on February 12,
2007), and other documents in the
project records are available by
contacting the FHWA or the INDOT at
the addresses provided above. Interested
parties also may view or download the
FHWA Tier 1 FEIS, Tier 1 ROD, the
decision not to prepare a Tier 1
supplemental EIS, the related
reevaluation report, and INDOT
responses to comments on the
reevaluation report at the project Web
site, https://deis.i69indyevn.org/, or by
contacting FHWA or INDOT at the
addresses listed above.
Actions taken by the USFWS,
pursuant to the Endangered Species Act,
16 U.S.C. 1531–1544, include its
concurrence with the FHWA’s
determination that the I–69 project is
not likely to adversely affect the eastern
fanshell mussel (Cyprogenia stegaria)
and that the project is still likely to
adversely affect, but not jeopardize, the
bald eagle. The USFWS concluded that
the project is not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of the Indiana bat
and is not likely to adversely modify the
bat’s designated Critical Habitat. The
USFWS decisions are described in the
Programmatic Biological Opinion issued
on December 3, 2003, the Revised
Programmatic Biological Opinion issued
on August 24, 2006, and other
documents in the project records. These
opinions, and other project records
relating to the USFWS actions, are
available by contacting the FHWA,
INDOT, or USFWS at the addresses
provided above. The Programmatic
Biological Opinion can be viewed in the
Appendices Section and downloaded
from the project Web site at https://
deis.i69indyevn.org/FEIS/
and the Revised Programmatic
Biological Opinion can be viewed and
downloaded from the project Web site at
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:39 Apr 16, 2007
Jkt 211001
https://i69indyevn.org/Corridor_Reports/
corridor_reports.html.
This notice applies to all Federal
agency decisions that are final within
the meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(1)(1) as of
the issuance date of this notice, and to
all laws under which such actions were
taken. The laws include, but are not
limited to:
1. National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321–4351].
2. Federal-Aid Highway Act [23
U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128].
3. Endangered Species Act [16 U.S.C.
1531–1544].
4. National Historic Preservation Act
of 1966, as amended [16 U.S.C. 470 et
seq.].
5. Section 4(f) of the Department of
Transportation Act of 1966 [49 U.S.C.
303 and 23 U.S.C. 138].
6. Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401–
7671(q)].
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Robert F. Tally Jr.,
Division Administrator, Indianapolis,
Indiana.
[FR Doc. E7–7231 Filed 4–16–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–RY–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Docket No. AB–534 (Sub-No. 3X)]
Lake State Railway Company—
Abandonment Exemption—Rail Line in
Otsego County, MI
On March 28, 2007, the Lake State
Railway Company (Lake State) filed
with the Surface Transportation Board a
petition under 49 U.S.C. 10502 for
exemption from the provisions of 49
U.S.C. 10903 to permit the
abandonment of 4.15 miles of rail line
in Otsego County, MI. The line includes
the northernmost portion of the carrier’s
main line Mackinaw Subdivision
extending from milepost MP 116.8
(where the line crosses East McCoy
Road) to the end of the line at milepost
MP 120.95 The line traverses U.S. Postal
Service Zip Code 49735.
The line does not contain Federally
granted rights-of-way. Any
documentation in Lake State’s
possession will be made available
promptly to those requesting it.
The interest of railroad employees
will be protected by the conditions set
PO 00000
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19229
forth in Oregon Short Line R. Co.—
Abandonment—Goshen, 360 I.C.C. 91
(1979).
By issuance of this notice, the Board
is instituting an exemption proceeding
pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 10502(b). A final
decision will be issued by July 16, 2007.
Any offer of financial assistance
(OFA) under 49 CFR 1152.27(b)(2) will
be due no later than 10 days after
service of a decision granting the
petition for exemption. Each OFA must
be accompanied by a $1,300 filing fee.
See 49 CFR 1002.2(f)(25).
All interested persons should be
aware that, following abandonment of
rail service and salvage of the line, the
line may be suitable for other public
use, including interim trail use. Any
request for a public use condition under
49 CFR 1152.28 or for trail use/rail
banking under 49 CFR 1152.29 will be
due no later than May 7, 2007. Each trail
use request must be accompanied by a
$200 filing fee. See 49 CFR
1002.2(f)(27).
All filings in response to this notice
must refer to STB Docket No. AB–534
(Sub-No. 3X), and must be sent to: (1)
Surface Transportation Board, 395 E.
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001; and (2) Andrew B. Kolestar, 1224
Seventeenth Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20036. Replies to the petition are
due on or before May 7, 2007.
Persons seeking further information
concerning abandonment procedures
may contact the Board’s Office of Public
Services at (202) 245–0230 or refer to
the full abandonment or discontinuance
regulations at 49 CFR part 1152.
Questions concerning environmental
issues may be directed to the Board’s
Section of Environmental Analysis
(SEA) at (202) 245–0305. [Assistance for
the hearing impaired is available
through the Federal Information Relay
Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339.]
An environmental assessment (EA) (or
environmental impact statement (EIS), if
necessary) prepared by SEA will be
served upon all parties of record and
upon any agencies or other persons who
commented during its preparation.
Other interested persons may contact
SEA to obtain a copy of the EA (or EIS).
EAs in these abandonment proceedings
normally will be made available within
60 days of the filing of the petition. The
deadline for submission of comments on
the EA will generally be within 30 days
of its service.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: April 6, 2007.
E:\FR\FM\17APN1.SGM
17APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 73 (Tuesday, April 17, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19228-19229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7231]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Notice of Final Federal Agency Actions on Proposed Highway in
Indiana
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of Limitation on Claims for Judicial Review of Actions
by FHWA and United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), DOI.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces actions taken by the FHWA and the USFWS
that are final within the meaning of 23 U.S.C. Sec. 139(l)(1). The
actions relate to a proposed highway project, I-69, Evansville to
Indianapolis, Indiana, in the Counties of Vanderburgh, Warrick, Gibson,
Pike, Daviess, Greene, Monroe, Morgan, Johnson and Marion, State of
Indiana. The Federal actions, taken as a result of a tiered
environmental review process under the National Environmental Policy
Act, 42 U.S.C. 4321-4351 (NEPA), and implementing regulations on
tiering, 40 CFR 1502.20, 40 CFR 1508.28, and 23 CFR Part 771,
determined certain issues relating to the proposed project. Those
decisions will be used by Federal agencies in subsequent proceedings,
including decisions whether to grant licenses, permits, and approvals
for the highway project. The decisions also may be relied upon by State
and local agencies in proceedings on the proposed project.
DATES: By this notice, the FHWA is advising the public that the FHWA
and the USFWS have made decisions that are subject to 23 U.S.C.
139(l)(1) and are final within the meaning of that law. A claim seeking
judicial review of those Federal agency decisions on the proposed
highway project will be barred unless the claim is filed on or before
October 15, 2007. If the Federal law that authorizes judicial review of
a claim provides a time period of less than 180 days for filing such
claim, then the shorter time period applies.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For the FHWA: Mr. Anthony DeSimone,
P.E., Federal Highway Administration, Indiana Division, 575 North
Pennsylvania Street, Room 254, Indianapolis, IN 46204-1576; telephone:
(317) 226-5307; e-mail: Anthony.DeSimone@fhwa.dot.gov. The FHWA Indiana
Division Office's normal business hours are 7:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., e.t.
For the USFWS: Mr. Scott Pruitt, Field Supervisor, Bloomington Field
Office, USFWS, 620 South Walker Street, Bloomington, IN 47403-2121;
telephone: 812-334-4261; e-mail: Scott--Pruitt@fws.gov. Normal business
hours for the USFWS Bloomington Field Office are: 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
e.t. You may also contact Mr. Thomas Seeman, Project Manager, Indiana
Department of Transportation (INDOT), 100 North Senate Avenue,
Indianapolis, IN 46204; telephone: (317) 232-5336; e-mail:
TSeeman@indot.IN.gov. Normal business hours for the Indiana Department
of Transportation are: 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., e.t.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the FHWA has
approved a Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and
issued a Record of Decision (ROD) in connection with a proposed highway
project in the State of Indiana: I-69 from Evansville to Indianapolis,
in Vanderburgh, Warrick, Gibson, Pike, Daviess, Greene, Monroe, Morgan,
Johnson and Marion Counties. The project will be an approximately 142
mile long Interstate highway. It will begin at the I-64/I-164
interchange just north of Evansville, Indiana and end at I-465 in
Indianapolis, to the west of the I-465/SR 37 interchange. The proposed
freeway will be on both new and existing alignment.
Decisions in the FHWA Tier 1 ROD that have final approval include,
but are not limited to, the following:
1. Purpose and need for the project (see section 3.1).
2. Range of alternatives for analysis (see sections 3.3 and 3.4).
3. Selection of the Interstate highway build alternative and
highway corridor for the project. The selected alternative, referred to
in the FEIS as Alternative 3C, involves completing I-69 as an
Interstate highway from Evansville to Indianapolis via Oakland City,
Washington, Crane Naval Surface Warfare Center, Bloomington, and
Martinsville (see section 2.1). This alternative includes the use of
parts of the existing alignment of SR 37 to reach I-465 and the route
variation known as WE2 in the area of Washington, Indiana. The ultimate
alignment of the highway within the corridor, and the location and
number of interchanges and rest areas will be evaluated in the Tier 2
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) proceedings.
4. Elimination of other alternatives from consideration in Tier 2
NEPA proceedings. The alternatives that will not be considered any
further include, but are not limited to, those identified in the Tier 1
FEIS as the ``no build'' alternative, and alternatives 1, 2A, 2B, 2C,
3A, 3B, 4A, 4B, 5A, and 5B. Also eliminated were a number of hybrids
and variations on these alternatives, including the ``Mann Road
Variation'' for reaching I-465 and variations WW1, WW2, and WE1 in the
area of Washington, Indiana. Detailed information about the
alternatives considered in Tier 1, and about the Federal decisions that
eliminate alternatives other than Alternative 3C from further
consideration, is available in section 3 of the Tier 1 ROD and the Tier
1 FEIS sections cited therein.
5. Process for completing the Tier 2 alternatives analysis and
studies for the project, including the designation of six Tier 2
sections and a decision to prepare a separate environmental impact
statement for each Tier 2 section (see section 2.3).
[[Page 19229]]
Interested parties may consult the Tier 1 ROD and Tier 1 FEIS for
details about each of the decisions described above and for information
on other issues decided. The documents are available as described
below.
Following the completion of the Tier 1 ROD, interested parties
submitted comments suggesting that new information existed that might
affect the Tier 1 FEIS analyses and the Federal decisions based on
those analyses. In response, the FHWA reevaluated the project and
decided that the changes that occurred following the ROD did not
individually or collectively require supplementation of the Tier 1
FEIS.
The Tier 1 FEIS (issued on December 5, 2003), the Tier 1 ROD
(issued on March 24, 2004), the FHWA decision that supplementation of
the Tier 1 FEIS is not required (issued on February 12, 2007), and
other documents in the project records are available by contacting the
FHWA or the INDOT at the addresses provided above. Interested parties
also may view or download the FHWA Tier 1 FEIS, Tier 1 ROD, the
decision not to prepare a Tier 1 supplemental EIS, the related
reevaluation report, and INDOT responses to comments on the
reevaluation report at the project Web site, https://
deis.i69indyevn.org/, or by contacting FHWA or INDOT at the addresses
listed above.
Actions taken by the USFWS, pursuant to the Endangered Species Act,
16 U.S.C. 1531-1544, include its concurrence with the FHWA's
determination that the I-69 project is not likely to adversely affect
the eastern fanshell mussel (Cyprogenia stegaria) and that the project
is still likely to adversely affect, but not jeopardize, the bald
eagle. The USFWS concluded that the project is not likely to jeopardize
the continued existence of the Indiana bat and is not likely to
adversely modify the bat's designated Critical Habitat. The USFWS
decisions are described in the Programmatic Biological Opinion issued
on December 3, 2003, the Revised Programmatic Biological Opinion issued
on August 24, 2006, and other documents in the project records. These
opinions, and other project records relating to the USFWS actions, are
available by contacting the FHWA, INDOT, or USFWS at the addresses
provided above. The Programmatic Biological Opinion can be viewed in
the Appendices Section and downloaded from the project Web site at
https://deis.i69indyevn.org/FEIS/ and the Revised Programmatic
Biological Opinion can be viewed and downloaded from the project Web
site at https://i69indyevn.org/Corridor_Reports/corridor_reports.html.
This notice applies to all Federal agency decisions that are final
within the meaning of 23 U.S.C. 139(1)(1) as of the issuance date of
this notice, and to all laws under which such actions were taken. The
laws include, but are not limited to:
1. National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) [42 U.S.C. 4321-4351].
2. Federal-Aid Highway Act [23 U.S.C. 109 and 23 U.S.C. 128].
3. Endangered Species Act [16 U.S.C. 1531-1544].
4. National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended [16
U.S.C. 470 et seq.].
5. Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 [49
U.S.C. 303 and 23 U.S.C. 138].
6. Clean Air Act [42 U.S.C. 7401-7671(q)].
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)
Authority: 23 U.S.C. 139(l)(1).
Robert F. Tally Jr.,
Division Administrator, Indianapolis, Indiana.
[FR Doc. E7-7231 Filed 4-16-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-RY-P