In the Matter of: Consumers Energy Company (Big Rock Point Facility); Order Approving Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment, 19055-19057 [E7-7208]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Notices
In the absence of the statutory
licenses, cable operators, satellite
carriers, and copyright owners would
have to negotiate the rights to carry
programs according to marketplace
rates, terms, and conditions. As stated
earlier, cable operators and satellite
carriers have successfully negotiated the
right to carry local television broadcast
signals of the major broadcast networks
under the retransmission consent
provisions found in Section 325 of the
Communications Act. We seek comment
on whether we should recommend to
Congress that Sections 111 and 119 be
repealed and superceded by Section 325
so that distant broadcast stations can
freely negotiate signal carriage rights
with cable operators and satellite
carriers without reference to a statutory
license.13 Could retransmission consent
perform the same payment functions as
Section 111 and Section 119? In other
words, is there any way a
retransmission consent agreement can
be structured so that the monetary value
of the underlying content is collected by
broadcast stations and then paid to the
copyright owners of the programs that
are retransmitted? Is there any reason
why retransmission consent would not
work for the retransmission of distant
television signals? Are there any
contractual impediments, such as
network–station affiliation
arrangements, that would preclude the
retransmission of distant television
signals under a privately negotiated
agreement? Are there any legal
impediments, such as the FCC’s
network non–duplication rules, that
would frustrate private agreements? Is it
difficult for small cable operators to
negotiate the rights necessary to carry
the signals of distant television stations?
Would the elimination of the statutory
licenses cause harm to cable or satellite
subscribers? If so, how?
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
III. CONCLUSION
We hereby seek comment from the
public on the legal and factual matters
identified herein associated with the
retention, reform, or elimination of
Sections 111, 119, and 122 of the
Communications Act, filed March 20, 2007. The
Petition did not raise for comment whether Internet
video programming distributors may still avail
themselves of the statutory licenses under the
Copyright Act.
13 One cable operator appears to advocate the
replacement of retransmission consent with a new
statutory license covering the cable retransmission
of local broadcast television signals. See Ted Hearn,
Willner Calls for Tax to Aid TV Stations,
Multichannel News, March 13, 2007 (Insight
Communications CEO Michael Willner has
proposed a ‘‘TV tax’’ to replace retransmission
consent that would fund a ‘‘federal royalty pool’’
‘‘similar to the one used to compensate sports
leagues and Hollywood studios’’).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Copyright Act. If there are any
additional issues not discussed above,
we encourage interested parties to bring
those matters to our attention.
Dated: April 11, 2007
Marybeth Peters,
Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. E7–7207 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–S
NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE
ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
Meetings of Humanities Panel
The National Endowment for
the Humanities.
ACTION: Notice of meetings.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the provisions of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463, as amended), notice is
hereby given that the following
meetings of Humanities Panels will be
held at the Old Post Office, 1100
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20506.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Heather C. Gottry, Acting Advisory
Committee Management Officer,
National Endowment for the
Humanities, Washington, DC 20506;
telephone (202) 606–8322. Hearingimpaired individuals are advised that
information on this matter may be
obtained by contacting the
Endowment’s TDD terminal on (202)
606–8282.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed meetings are for the purpose
of panel review, discussion, evaluation
and recommendation on applications
for financial assistance under the
National Foundation on the Arts and the
Humanities Act of 1965, as amended,
including discussion of information
given in confidence to the agency by the
grant applicants. Because the proposed
meetings will consider information that
is likely to disclose trade secrets and
commercial or financial information
obtained from a person and privileged
or confidential and/or information of a
personal nature the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy, pursuant
to authority granted me by the
Chairman’s Delegation of Authority To
Close Advisory Committee Meetings,
dated July 19, 1993, I have determined
that these meetings will be closed to the
public pursuant to subsections (c) (4)
and (6) of section 552b of Title 5, United
States Code.
1. Date: May 1, 2007.
Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Room: 315.
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19055
Program: This meeting will review
applications for Landmarks of American
History and Culture, submitted to the
Division of Education Programs, at the
March 15, 2007 deadline.
2. Date: May 2, 2007.
Time: 8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
Room: 415.
Program: This meeting will review
applications for Radio Projects:
Development and Production Grants,
submitted to the Division of Public
Programs, at the March 20, 2007
deadline.
3. Date: May 2, 2007.
Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Room: 315.
Program: This meeting will review
applications for Landmarks of American
History and Culture, submitted to the
Division of Education Programs at the
March 15, 2007 deadline.
4. Date: May 24, 2007.
Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Room: 315.
Program: This meeting will review
applications for Digital Humanities
Start-Up Grants, submitted in response
to the Endowment’s Digital Humanities
Initiative at the April 3, 2007 deadline.
5. Date: May 29, 2007.
Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Room: 315.
Program: This meeting will review
applications for Digital Humanities
Start-Up Grants, submitted in response
to the Endowment’s Digital Humanities
Initiative at the April 3, 2007 deadline.
6. Date: April 31, 2007.
Time: 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Room: 315.
Program: This meeting will review
applications for Digital Humanities
Start-Up Grants, submitted in response
to the Endowment’s Digital Humanities
Initiative at the April 3, 2007 deadline.
Heather C. Gottry,
Acting Advisory Committee Management
Officer.
[FR Doc. E7–7197 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket Nos.: 50–155; 72–043; License No.
DPR–06]
In the Matter of: Consumers Energy
Company (Big Rock Point Facility);
Order Approving Transfer of License
and Conforming Amendment
I.
Consumers Energy Company
(Consumers) is the holder of Facility
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
19056
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Operating License No. DPR–06, which
authorizes the possession and use of the
Big Rock Point site (Big Rock), and an
onsite Independent Spent Fuel Storage
Installation (ISFSI) under a general
license, SFGL–16, granted pursuant to
Title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), § 72.210. Consumers
is licensed by the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC, the
Commission) to operate the Big Rock
ISFSI. The facility is located at the
licensee’s site in Charlevoix, Michigan.
In 2006, Consumers completed
decommissioning and decontamination
of the majority of the land on the site.
On April 3, 2006, Consumers informed
the Commission of its intent to release
approximately 475 acres of land from
the operating license, in accordance
with the Big Rock license termination
plan. Consumers submitted its final
status survey report on November 2006,
and NRC approved the release of the
land in a letter to the licensee dated
January 8, 2007. The only asset
remaining subject to the license is a
parcel of land of approximately 30 acres
within which the ISFSI itself resides,
and an additional parcel of
approximately 75 acres adjacent to the
ISFSI.
II.
By letter dated October 31, 2006,
Consumers, Entergy Nuclear Palisades,
LLC (ENP), and Entergy Nuclear
Operations, Inc. (ENO) (collectively,
‘‘the applicants’’) submitted an
application requesting approval of the
direct transfer of Consumers’ interest in
Big Rock Facility Operating License
DPR–06 and general ISFSI License No.
SFGL–16 to ENP to possess and own,
and ENO, to control and operate, the Big
Rock ISFSI and certain additional lands.
Consumers, ENP, and ENO also
requested approval of a conforming
license amendment that would replace
references to Consumers in the license
with references to ENP and ENO to
reflect the direct transfer of ownership,
and revise paragraph 1.A in the license
to be consistent with paragraph 2
regarding the disposition of the Facility
Operating License. No physical changes
to the facilities or operational changes
were proposed in the application. After
completion of the proposed transfer,
ENP and ENO would be the owner and
operator, respectively, of Big Rock and
the ISFSI.
Approval of the transfer of the facility
operating license and conforming
license amendment is requested
pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80 and 72.50.
Notice of the request for approval and
opportunity for a hearing were
published in the Federal Register on
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
January 30, 2007 (72 FR 4302–4303). A
petition for leave to intervene pursuant
to 10 CFR 2.309 was received from
Nuclear Information and Resource
Service, Do Not Waste Michigan, and
Mr. Victor McManemy. The petition is
under consideration by the Commission.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80, no license,
or any right thereunder, shall be
transferred, directly or indirectly,
through transfer of control of the
license, unless the Commission shall
give its consent in writing. Pursuant to
10 CFR 72.50, no license or any part
included in a license issued under this
part for an ISFSI shall be transferred,
assigned, or in any matter disposed of,
either voluntarily or involuntarily,
directly or indirectly, through transfer of
control of the license to any person,
unless the Commission gives its consent
in writing. Upon review of the
information in the application and other
information before the Commission, and
relying upon the representations and
agreements contained in the
application, the NRC staff has
determined that ENP is qualified to hold
the ownership interests in the facility
previously held by Consumers, and
ENO is qualified to hold the operating
authority under the license, and that the
transfers of ownership and operating
interests in the facility to ENP and ENO,
respectively, described in the
application is otherwise consistent with
applicable provisions of law,
regulations, and orders issued by the
Commission, subject to the condition set
forth below. The NRC staff has further
found that the application for the
proposed license amendment complies
with the standards and requirements of
the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as
amended (the Act), and the
Commission’s rules and regulations set
forth in 10 CFR Chapter I. The facility
will operate in conformity with the
applications, the provisions of the Act
and the rules and regulations of the
Commission; there is reasonable
assurance that the activities authorized
by the proposed license amendment can
be conducted without endangering the
health and safety of the public, or the
environment, and that such activities
will be conducted in compliance with
the Commission’s regulations; the
issuance of the proposed license
amendment will not be inimical to the
common defense and security or to the
health and safety of the public, or the
environment; and the issuance of the
proposed amendment will be in
accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the
Commission’s regulations and all
applicable requirements have been
satisfied.
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The findings set forth above are
supported by NRC’s Safety Evaluation
Report dated April 6, 2007.
III.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections
161b, 161i, and 184 of the Act; 42 U.S.C.
2201(b), 2201(i), and 2234; 10 CFR 50.80
and 10 CFR 72.50, It is hereby ordered
that the direct transfer of the license, as
described herein, to ENP and ENO is
approved, subject to the following
condition:
Prior to completion of the transfer of the
license, Entergy shall provide the Directors of
the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and
the Office of Federal and State Materials and
Environmental Management Programs
satisfactory documentary evidence that it has
obtained the appropriate amount of
insurance required of licensees under 10 CFR
Part 140 of the Commission’s regulations.
It is further ordered that, consistent
with 10 CFR 2.1315(b), license
amendment that makes changes, as
indicated in Enclosure 2 to the cover
letter forwarding this Order to conform
the license to reflect the subject direct
license transfer, is approved. The
amendment shall be issued and made
effective at the time the proposed direct
license transfer is completed.
It is further ordered that ENP and
ENO shall inform the Directors of the
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
and the Office of Federal and State
Materials and Environmental
Management Programs in writing of the
date of closing of the transfer of the
Consumers interest in Big Rock to ENP
and ENO, at least 1 business day prior
to closing. Should the transfer of the
license not be completed within one
year of this Order’s date of issuance, this
Order shall become null and void,
provided; however, that upon written
application and for good cause shown,
such date may be extended by order.
This Order is effective upon issuance.
For further details with respect to this
Order, see the initial application dated
October 31, 2006, and the Safety
Evaluation Report dated April 6, 2007,
which are available for public
inspection at the Commission’s Public
Document Room (PDR), located at One
White Flint North, Public File Area 01
F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland and accessible
electronically from the Agencywide
Documents Access and Management
System (ADAMS) Public Electronic
Reading Room on the Internet at the
NRC Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who
do not have access to ADAMS, or who
encounter problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, should
contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Notices
telephone at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 6th day
of April, 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Charles L. Miller,
Director, Office of Federal and State Materials
and Environmental Management Programs.
[FR Doc. E7–7208 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–255; Renewed License No.
DPR–20]
In the Matter of Consumers Energy
Company Nuclear Management
Company (Palisades Nuclear Plant);
Order Approving Transfer of License
and Conforming Amendment
I.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Consumers Energy Company
(Consumers) and Nuclear Management
Company, LLC (NMC) are holders of
Renewed Facility Operating License No.
DPR–20, which authorizes the
possession, use, and operation of
Palisades Nuclear Plant (Palisades).
Consumers is authorized to possess and
use, and NMC is authorized to possess,
use, and operate Palisades. The facility
is located at the licensee’s site in Van
Buren County, Michigan.
II.
By letter dated August 31, 2006,
Consumers, NMC, Entergy Nuclear
Palisades, LLC (ENP), and Entergy
Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENO)
(collectively, ‘‘the applicants’’)
submitted an application to the U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC
or Commission) requesting approval of
the direct transfer of Renewed Facility
Operating License No. DPR–20 from
Palisades to ENP. The application is in
connection with the sale of Consumer’s
ownership interest (100 percent) in
Palisades to ENP, and the related
transfer of operating authority for the
facility from NMC to ENO.
Supplemental information was
provided by letters dated December 15,
2006, and March 1 and April 4, 2007
(hereinafter, the August 31 application
and December 15, 2006, and March 1
and April 4, 2007, supplemental
information will be referred to
collectively as the ‘‘application’’). The
applicants also requested approval of a
conforming license amendment that
would replace references to Consumers
and NMC in the license with references
to ENP and ENO to reflect the transfer
of ownership, and would revise
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
paragraph 1.B in the license to be
consistent with paragraph 2 regarding
the disposition of the Provisional
Operating License. No physical changes
to the facilities or operational changes
were proposed in the application. After
completion of the proposed transfer,
ENP and ENO would be the owner and
operator, respectfully, of the facility.
Approval of the transfer of the facility
operating license and conforming
license amendment is requested by the
applicants pursuant to Sections 50.80
and 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (10 CFR). Notice of
the request for approval and
opportunity for a hearing were
published in the Federal Register on
November 16, 2006 (71 FR 66805). No
comments were received. A petition for
leave to intervene pursuant to 10 CFR
2.309 was received on December 5,
2006, from the Van Buren County,
Covert Township, Covert Public
Schools, Van Buren County
Intermediate School District, Van Buren
County District Library, Lake Michigan
College, and South Haven Hospitals. A
second petition for leave to intervene
pursuant to 10 CFR 2.309 was received
on December 6, 2006, from Michigan
Environmental Council and Public
Interest Research Group. The petitions
are under consideration by the
Commission.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80, no license,
or any right thereunder, shall be
transferred, directly or indirectly,
through transfer of control of the
license, unless the Commission shall
give its consent in writing. Upon review
of the information in the application
and other information before the
Commission, and relying upon the
representations and agreements
contained in the application, the NRC
staff has determined that ENP is
qualified to hold the ownership
interests in the facility previously held
by Consumers, and ENO is qualified to
hold the operating authority under the
license, and that the transfer of
ownership interests and the operating
interests in the facility to ENP and ENO,
respectively, described in the
application is otherwise consistent with
applicable provisions of law,
regulations, and orders issued by the
Commission, subject to the conditions
set forth below. The NRC staff has
further found that the application for
the proposed license amendment
complies with the standards and
requirements of the Atomic Energy Act
of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the
Commission’s rules and regulations set
forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; the facility
will operate in conformity with the
applications, the provisions of the Act,
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19057
and the rules and regulations of the
Commission; there is reasonable
assurance that the activities authorized
by the proposed license amendment can
be conducted without endangering the
health and safety of the public and that
such activities will be conducted in
compliance with the Commission’s
regulations; the issuance of the
proposed license amendment will not
be inimical to the common defense and
security or to the health and safety of
the public; and the issuance of the
proposed amendment will be in
accordance with 10 CFR part 51 of the
Commission’s regulations and all
applicable requirements have been
satisfied.
The findings set forth above are
supported by NRC safety evaluations
dated April 6, 2007.
III.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections
161b, 161i, and 184 of the Act, 42 U.S.C.
Sections 2201(b), 2201(i), and 2234; and
10 CFR 50.80, it is hereby ordered that
the transfer of the license, as described
herein, to ENP and ENO is approved,
subject to the following condition:
Prior to completion of the transfer of the
license, Entergy shall provide the Director of
the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
satisfactory documentary evidence that it has
obtained the appropriate amount of
insurance required of a licensee under 10
CFR part 140 of the Commission’s
regulations.
It is further ordered that, consistent
with 10 CFR 2.1315(b), the license
amendment that makes changes, as
indicated in Enclosure 2 to the cover
letter forwarding this Order, to conform
the license to reflect the subject direct
license transfer is approved. The
amendment shall be issued and made
effective at the time the proposed direct
license transfer is completed.
It is further ordered that ENP and
ENO shall inform the Director of the
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation in
writing of the date of closing of the
transfer of the Consumers and NMC
interests in Palisades, at least 1 business
day prior to closing. Should the transfer
of the license not be completed within
one year of this Order’s date of issue,
this Order shall become null and void,
provided; however, that upon written
application and for good cause shown,
such date may be extended by order.
This Order is effective upon issuance.
For further details with respect to this
Order, see the initial application dated
August 31, 2006, as supplemented by
letters dated December 15, 2006, and
March 1 and April 4, 2007, and the nonproprietary safety evaluation dated
April 6, 2007, which are available for
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 72 (Monday, April 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19055-19057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7208]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket Nos.: 50-155; 72-043; License No. DPR-06]
In the Matter of: Consumers Energy Company (Big Rock Point
Facility); Order Approving Transfer of License and Conforming Amendment
I.
Consumers Energy Company (Consumers) is the holder of Facility
[[Page 19056]]
Operating License No. DPR-06, which authorizes the possession and use
of the Big Rock Point site (Big Rock), and an onsite Independent Spent
Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) under a general license, SFGL-16,
granted pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
Sec. 72.210. Consumers is licensed by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC, the Commission) to operate the Big Rock ISFSI. The
facility is located at the licensee's site in Charlevoix, Michigan. In
2006, Consumers completed decommissioning and decontamination of the
majority of the land on the site. On April 3, 2006, Consumers informed
the Commission of its intent to release approximately 475 acres of land
from the operating license, in accordance with the Big Rock license
termination plan. Consumers submitted its final status survey report on
November 2006, and NRC approved the release of the land in a letter to
the licensee dated January 8, 2007. The only asset remaining subject to
the license is a parcel of land of approximately 30 acres within which
the ISFSI itself resides, and an additional parcel of approximately 75
acres adjacent to the ISFSI.
II.
By letter dated October 31, 2006, Consumers, Entergy Nuclear
Palisades, LLC (ENP), and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. (ENO)
(collectively, ``the applicants'') submitted an application requesting
approval of the direct transfer of Consumers' interest in Big Rock
Facility Operating License DPR-06 and general ISFSI License No. SFGL-16
to ENP to possess and own, and ENO, to control and operate, the Big
Rock ISFSI and certain additional lands.
Consumers, ENP, and ENO also requested approval of a conforming
license amendment that would replace references to Consumers in the
license with references to ENP and ENO to reflect the direct transfer
of ownership, and revise paragraph 1.A in the license to be consistent
with paragraph 2 regarding the disposition of the Facility Operating
License. No physical changes to the facilities or operational changes
were proposed in the application. After completion of the proposed
transfer, ENP and ENO would be the owner and operator, respectively, of
Big Rock and the ISFSI.
Approval of the transfer of the facility operating license and
conforming license amendment is requested pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80 and
72.50. Notice of the request for approval and opportunity for a hearing
were published in the Federal Register on January 30, 2007 (72 FR 4302-
4303). A petition for leave to intervene pursuant to 10 CFR 2.309 was
received from Nuclear Information and Resource Service, Do Not Waste
Michigan, and Mr. Victor McManemy. The petition is under consideration
by the Commission.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.80, no license, or any right thereunder,
shall be transferred, directly or indirectly, through transfer of
control of the license, unless the Commission shall give its consent in
writing. Pursuant to 10 CFR 72.50, no license or any part included in a
license issued under this part for an ISFSI shall be transferred,
assigned, or in any matter disposed of, either voluntarily or
involuntarily, directly or indirectly, through transfer of control of
the license to any person, unless the Commission gives its consent in
writing. Upon review of the information in the application and other
information before the Commission, and relying upon the representations
and agreements contained in the application, the NRC staff has
determined that ENP is qualified to hold the ownership interests in the
facility previously held by Consumers, and ENO is qualified to hold the
operating authority under the license, and that the transfers of
ownership and operating interests in the facility to ENP and ENO,
respectively, described in the application is otherwise consistent with
applicable provisions of law, regulations, and orders issued by the
Commission, subject to the condition set forth below. The NRC staff has
further found that the application for the proposed license amendment
complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act
of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and
regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I. The facility will operate in
conformity with the applications, the provisions of the Act and the
rules and regulations of the Commission; there is reasonable assurance
that the activities authorized by the proposed license amendment can be
conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, or
the environment, and that such activities will be conducted in
compliance with the Commission's regulations; the issuance of the
proposed license amendment will not be inimical to the common defense
and security or to the health and safety of the public, or the
environment; and the issuance of the proposed amendment will be in
accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all
applicable requirements have been satisfied.
The findings set forth above are supported by NRC's Safety
Evaluation Report dated April 6, 2007.
III.
Accordingly, pursuant to Sections 161b, 161i, and 184 of the Act;
42 U.S.C. 2201(b), 2201(i), and 2234; 10 CFR 50.80 and 10 CFR 72.50, It
is hereby ordered that the direct transfer of the license, as described
herein, to ENP and ENO is approved, subject to the following condition:
Prior to completion of the transfer of the license, Entergy
shall provide the Directors of the Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation and the Office of Federal and State Materials and
Environmental Management Programs satisfactory documentary evidence
that it has obtained the appropriate amount of insurance required of
licensees under 10 CFR Part 140 of the Commission's regulations.
It is further ordered that, consistent with 10 CFR 2.1315(b),
license amendment that makes changes, as indicated in Enclosure 2 to
the cover letter forwarding this Order to conform the license to
reflect the subject direct license transfer, is approved. The amendment
shall be issued and made effective at the time the proposed direct
license transfer is completed.
It is further ordered that ENP and ENO shall inform the Directors
of the Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation and the Office of Federal
and State Materials and Environmental Management Programs in writing of
the date of closing of the transfer of the Consumers interest in Big
Rock to ENP and ENO, at least 1 business day prior to closing. Should
the transfer of the license not be completed within one year of this
Order's date of issuance, this Order shall become null and void,
provided; however, that upon written application and for good cause
shown, such date may be extended by order.
This Order is effective upon issuance.
For further details with respect to this Order, see the initial
application dated October 31, 2006, and the Safety Evaluation Report
dated April 6, 2007, which are available for public inspection at the
Commission's Public Document Room (PDR), located at One White Flint
North, Public File Area 01 F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland and accessible electronically from the Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Public Electronic
Reading Room on the Internet at the NRC Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm/adams.html. Persons who do not have access to ADAMS, or who
encounter problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS, should
contact the NRC PDR Reference staff by
[[Page 19057]]
telephone at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr@nrc.gov.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland this 6th day of April, 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Charles L. Miller,
Director, Office of Federal and State Materials and Environmental
Management Programs.
[FR Doc. E7-7208 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P