Repositionable Notes Minor Classification Change, 19059-19060 [E7-7102]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Notices
Yucca Mountain, the potential nearfield chemistry in repository tunnels,
and waste package design and prototype
development. An update on
probabilistic volcanic hazards analysis
will complete the day’s agenda.
Time will be set aside at the end of
the day for public comments. Those
wanting to speak are encouraged to sign
the ‘‘Public Comment Register’’ at the
check-in table. A time limit may have to
be set on individual remarks, but
written comments of any length may be
submitted for the record.
Transcripts of the meetings will be
available on the Board’s Web site, by
e-mail, on computer disk, and on a
library-loan basis in paper format from
Davonya Barnes of the Board’s staff no
later than June 4, 2007.
A block of rooms has been reserved
for meeting participants at the Crowne
Plaza. When making a reservation,
please state that you are attending the
NWTRB meeting. Reservations should
be made by April 21, 2007, to ensure
receiving the meeting rate.
For more information, contact Karyn
Severson, NWTRB External Affairs;
2300 Clarendon boulevard, Suite 1300;
Arlington, VA 22201–3367; (tel) 703–
235–4473; (fax) 703–235–4495.
Dated: April 11, 2007.
William D. Barnard,
Executive Director, Nuclear Waste Technical
Review Board.
[FR Doc. 07–1876 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–AM–M
OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT
CORPORATION
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
April 26, 2007 Board of Directors
Meeting
Time and Date: Thursday, April 26,
2007, 10 a.m. (Open Portion) 10:15 a.m.
(Closed Portion).
Place: Offices of the Corporation,
Twelfth Floor Board Room, 1100 New
York Avenue, NW., Washington, DC.
Status: Meeting Open to the Public
from 10 a.m. to 10:15 a.m. Closed
portion will commence at 10:15 a.m.
(approx.).
Matters to be Considered:
1. President’s Report.
2. Tribute—Ambassador Josette
Sheeran.
3. Tribute—Steven J. Law.
4. Approval of January 18, 2007
Minutes (Open Portion.
Further Matters to be Considered:
(Closed to the Public 10:15 a.m.)
1. Report from Audit Committee.
2. Finance Project—Global.
3. Finance Project—Central America.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
4. Finance Project—Israel.
5. Finance Project—Latin America
and Pakistan.
6. Approval of January 18, 2007
Minutes (Closed Portion).
7. Pending Major Projects.
8. Reports.
Contact Person for Information:
Information on the meeting may be
obtained from Connie M. Downs at (202)
336–8438.
Dated: April 12, 2007.
Connie M. Downs,
Corporate Secretary, Overseas Private
Investment Corporation.
[FR Doc. 07–1903 Filed 4–12–07; 3:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 3210–01–M
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. MC2007–2; Order No. 9]
Repositionable Notes Minor
Classification Change
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice and order.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document establishes a
formal docket to consider extending the
provisional Repositionable Notes (RPN)
service by one year. Shortly before the
expiration date, the Postal Service filed
a request seeking to maintain the status
quo to allow time to determine how
RPNs may be affected by the recent
implementation of the Postal
Accountability and Enhancement Act
(PAEA). This document describes the
requested change and identifies several
initial procedural steps, including
authorization of settlement negotiations.
DATES: April 20, 2007: Deadline for
intervention, responses to request for
consideration under rule 69, comments
on suspension of this docket, answers to
Conditional Motion for Waiver, and
comments on appropriateness of
authorizing settlement procedures.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202–789–6820 and
stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory History
71 FR 3894 (January 24, 2006).
I. Background
Under the terms of the Domestic Mail
Classification Schedule (DMCS),
provisional Repositionable Notes (RPN)
service expires April 3, 2007, barring
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19059
the Service’s filing of a request to
continue to test the service or to make
it a permanent offering. See DMCS
221.336(a). Notice is hereby given that
on April 2, 2007, the Postal Service filed
with the Commission a Request, along
with related pleadings, that tolls the
scheduled expiration date by seeking
establishment of a docket to consider a
change which would extend expiration
by one year, to April 2, 2008.1
The instant Request was filed
pursuant to section 3623 of the Postal
Reorganization Act, 39 U.S.C. 101 et
seq. The Request identifies with
specificity the requested change in the
expiration date in affected DMCS
classification provisions and in the
associated rates specified in certain rate
schedules. Related concurrent filings
include the Direct Testimony of
Broderick A. Parr (USPS–T–1); a
separate Notice addressing, among other
things, the Service’s interest in
settlement; and a pleading including a
Conditional Motion for Waiver.2
The Service also suggests, in the
alternative, that suspension of the
docket might be appropriate. Request at
1–2. The rationale for this suggestion is
the Service’s belief that it might be
advisable to wait until PAEA
implementation matures sufficiently to
illuminate other options for moving
forward or until the Service files
another request involving RPNs. Id. at 2.
The Service asserts that the requested
change conforms with the criteria of 39
U.S.C. 3623(c), and will further the
general policies of efficient postal
operations and reasonable rates and fees
enunciated in the Postal Reorganization
Act. Id. It states the requested change is
intended to maintain status quo ante
and avoid disruption for mailers
currently using RPN service and those
that may be considering such use.
II. Application of Expedited Rules
Rationale for filing under rules for
expedited minor classification cases.
The Postal Service denominates its
request as a minor classification change,
1 Request of the United States Postal Service for
a Recommended Decision on Change of Expiration
Date for Provisional Repositionable Notes
Classifications and Rates, April 2, 2007 (Request).
The Request includes three attachments.
Attachment A consists of the Service’s proposed
changes in the DMCS. Attachment B is an index of
direct testimony. Attachment C is a statement of
compliance with Commission rules 64, 69 and 69a.
2 Notice of Filing of Request of the United States
Postal Service for a Recommended Decision on
Change of Expiration Date for Provisional
Repositionable Notes Classifications and Rates
(Notice) and Statement of the United States Postal
Service Concerning Compliance with Filing
Requirements and Conditional Motion for Waiver
(Conditional Motion for Waiver), both filed April 2,
2007.
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
19060
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Notices
in conformance with rule 69, and seeks
to have it considered under the
Commission’s rules for expedited minor
classification cases. Notice at 1; 39 CFR
3001.69. In support of this treatment, it
notes that the requested change is
minor. It also observes that although no
particular need for expedition exists, the
proposed change meets the
requirements set out in the expedited
rules, as it does not involve a change in
any rate or fee; does not impose any
additional eligibility restrictions; and
will not significantly change the
estimated institutional cost contribution
of the affected subclasses. Request at 3.
III. Suspension Option
The Service asserts that the
Commission has some discretion in
handling the Request in light of current
PAEA implementation activity. It
observes:
While the formal thrust of this Request
would extend expiration of RPN provisional
service until April 3, 2008, the Postal Service
would also support another procedural
option. The Commission could suspend all
activity in this docket until PAEA
implementation matures sufficiently to
illuminate other options for moving forward,
or until a further request involving RPNs is
filed. The Postal Service is prepared to defer
to the Commission’s preference here.
Id. at 2. The Service addresses
additional issues related to suspension
in the accompanying Notice. Notice at 2.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
IV. Preliminary Procedural Steps
The Commission’s rules for expedited
minor classification cases set out several
pre-established deadlines designed to
foster expedition. For example, rule 69
requires that the Commission issue
notice of the proceeding within 5 days
of the Service’s filing. This notice,
among other things, must afford
interested persons 15 days after filing of
the Postal Service’s request to intervene
and to respond to the Postal Service’s
proposal to have its Request considered
under rule 69 procedures. Consistent
with this requirement, intervention
shall be allowed until April 20, 2007.
Intervenors seeking a hearing on issues
raised in the Request shall identify the
fact or facts in the Postal Service filing
that require a hearing.
To assist the Commission in
determining an appropriate course of
action, intervenors, in addition to
addressing the appropriateness of using
the expedited rules in this proceeding,
are invited to address the Service’s
suggestion that suspension is an
appropriate option; the Service’s
conditional Motion for Waiver; and the
possibility of settlement. These
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
pleadings, which may be combined, are
due no later than April 20, 2007.
Public participation. In conformance
with section 3624(a) of title 39, the
Commission designates Shelley S.
Dreifuss, director of the Commission’s
Office of the Consumer Advocate, to
represent the interests of the general
public in this proceeding. Pursuant to
this designation, Ms. Dreifuss will direct
the activities of Commission personnel
assigned to assist her and, upon request,
will supply their names for the record.
Neither Ms. Dreifuss nor any of the
assigned personnel will participate in or
provide advice on any Commission
decision in this proceeding.
V. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket
No. MC2007–2 to consider the Postal
Service Request referred to in the body
of this order.
2. The Commission will act en banc
in this proceeding.
3. Notices of intervention shall be
filed no later than April 20, 2007.
4. Responses to the Service’s request
for consideration of its Request under
rule 69 are due no later than April 20,
2007.
5. Comments on the Service’s
suggestion that suspension of this
docket is a procedural option are due no
later than April 20, 2007.
6. Answers to the Service’s
Conditional Motion for Waiver are due
no later than April 20, 2007.
7. Comments on the appropriateness
of authorizing settlement procedures in
this proceeding are due no later than
April 20, 2007.
8. Shelley S. Dreifuss, director of the
Commission’s Office of the Consumer
Advocate, is designated to represent the
interests of the general public.
9. The Secretary shall cause this
Notice and Order to be published in the
Federal Register.
Issued: April 10, 2007.
By the Commission.
Garry J. Sikora,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–7102 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 5775]
Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean
Development and Climate; Notice of
Grant Opportunity
The U.S. Department of State invites
organizations interested in contributing
to the Asia-Pacific Partnership’s goals,
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
through innovative public-private
partnerships, to submit concept papers
for consideration under the Annual
Program Statement (APS) using
www.grants.gov.
Background
Australia, China, India, Japan, Korea,
and the United States have established
the Asia-Pacific Partnership on Clean
Development and Climate to accelerate
the development and deployment of
clean energy technologies in their
countries. The Partner countries have
decided to work together and with their
private sectors on energy security,
national air pollution reduction, and
climate change in ways that promote
sustainable economic growth and
poverty reduction. The Partnership
involves countries that account for
about half of the world’s population and
more than half of the world’s economy
and energy use.
The Partnership focuses on voluntary
practical measures taken by these six
countries in the Asia-Pacific region to
create new investment opportunities,
build local capacity, and remove
barriers to the introduction of clean,
more efficient technologies. It brings
together key experts from the public and
private sectors.
As a part of the U.S. government’s
participation in the Asia-Pacific
Partnership on Clean Development and
Climate (APP), the Department of State
(DOS) is soliciting Concept Papers from
organizations interested in contributing
to the Partnership’s goals through
innovative public-private partnerships.
These goals include reducing
greenhouse gas emissions; advancing
sustainable economic growth; reducing
poverty; creating new investment
opportunities; building local capacity;
and improving economic and energy
security.
Prospective applicants may include a
wide range of Partner country
organizations, from non-governmental
organizations (NGOs) to commercial
firms. An organization may submit no
more than four (4) Concept Papers total
as lead grant recipient for the entire
Concept Paper process.
The DOS has requested $26 million in
Economic Support Funds (ESF) to fund
Partnership activities in Fiscal Year
2007. Through this Announcement, the
Department of State is soliciting
proposals for activities to be undertaken
in India. The Department of State is not
soliciting proposals for activities to be
undertaken in Australia, China, Japan,
or Korea. To qualify for DOS funding
under this program announcement, a
proposal must demonstrate that the
applicant and its partners are willing/
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 72 (Monday, April 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19059-19060]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7102]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
[Docket No. MC2007-2; Order No. 9]
Repositionable Notes Minor Classification Change
AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice and order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document establishes a formal docket to consider
extending the provisional Repositionable Notes (RPN) service by one
year. Shortly before the expiration date, the Postal Service filed a
request seeking to maintain the status quo to allow time to determine
how RPNs may be affected by the recent implementation of the Postal
Accountability and Enhancement Act (PAEA). This document describes the
requested change and identifies several initial procedural steps,
including authorization of settlement negotiations.
DATES: April 20, 2007: Deadline for intervention, responses to request
for consideration under rule 69, comments on suspension of this docket,
answers to Conditional Motion for Waiver, and comments on
appropriateness of authorizing settlement procedures.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing
Online system at https://www.prc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen L. Sharfman, General Counsel,
202-789-6820 and stephen.sharfman@prc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory History
71 FR 3894 (January 24, 2006).
I. Background
Under the terms of the Domestic Mail Classification Schedule
(DMCS), provisional Repositionable Notes (RPN) service expires April 3,
2007, barring the Service's filing of a request to continue to test the
service or to make it a permanent offering. See DMCS 221.336(a). Notice
is hereby given that on April 2, 2007, the Postal Service filed with
the Commission a Request, along with related pleadings, that tolls the
scheduled expiration date by seeking establishment of a docket to
consider a change which would extend expiration by one year, to April
2, 2008.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Request of the United States Postal Service for a
Recommended Decision on Change of Expiration Date for Provisional
Repositionable Notes Classifications and Rates, April 2, 2007
(Request). The Request includes three attachments. Attachment A
consists of the Service's proposed changes in the DMCS. Attachment B
is an index of direct testimony. Attachment C is a statement of
compliance with Commission rules 64, 69 and 69a.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The instant Request was filed pursuant to section 3623 of the
Postal Reorganization Act, 39 U.S.C. 101 et seq. The Request identifies
with specificity the requested change in the expiration date in
affected DMCS classification provisions and in the associated rates
specified in certain rate schedules. Related concurrent filings include
the Direct Testimony of Broderick A. Parr (USPS-T-1); a separate Notice
addressing, among other things, the Service's interest in settlement;
and a pleading including a Conditional Motion for Waiver.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Notice of Filing of Request of the United States Postal
Service for a Recommended Decision on Change of Expiration Date for
Provisional Repositionable Notes Classifications and Rates (Notice)
and Statement of the United States Postal Service Concerning
Compliance with Filing Requirements and Conditional Motion for
Waiver (Conditional Motion for Waiver), both filed April 2, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Service also suggests, in the alternative, that suspension of
the docket might be appropriate. Request at 1-2. The rationale for this
suggestion is the Service's belief that it might be advisable to wait
until PAEA implementation matures sufficiently to illuminate other
options for moving forward or until the Service files another request
involving RPNs. Id. at 2.
The Service asserts that the requested change conforms with the
criteria of 39 U.S.C. 3623(c), and will further the general policies of
efficient postal operations and reasonable rates and fees enunciated in
the Postal Reorganization Act. Id. It states the requested change is
intended to maintain status quo ante and avoid disruption for mailers
currently using RPN service and those that may be considering such use.
II. Application of Expedited Rules
Rationale for filing under rules for expedited minor classification
cases. The Postal Service denominates its request as a minor
classification change,
[[Page 19060]]
in conformance with rule 69, and seeks to have it considered under the
Commission's rules for expedited minor classification cases. Notice at
1; 39 CFR 3001.69. In support of this treatment, it notes that the
requested change is minor. It also observes that although no particular
need for expedition exists, the proposed change meets the requirements
set out in the expedited rules, as it does not involve a change in any
rate or fee; does not impose any additional eligibility restrictions;
and will not significantly change the estimated institutional cost
contribution of the affected subclasses. Request at 3.
III. Suspension Option
The Service asserts that the Commission has some discretion in
handling the Request in light of current PAEA implementation activity.
It observes:
While the formal thrust of this Request would extend expiration
of RPN provisional service until April 3, 2008, the Postal Service
would also support another procedural option. The Commission could
suspend all activity in this docket until PAEA implementation
matures sufficiently to illuminate other options for moving forward,
or until a further request involving RPNs is filed. The Postal
Service is prepared to defer to the Commission's preference here.
Id. at 2. The Service addresses additional issues related to
suspension in the accompanying Notice. Notice at 2.
IV. Preliminary Procedural Steps
The Commission's rules for expedited minor classification cases set
out several pre-established deadlines designed to foster expedition.
For example, rule 69 requires that the Commission issue notice of the
proceeding within 5 days of the Service's filing. This notice, among
other things, must afford interested persons 15 days after filing of
the Postal Service's request to intervene and to respond to the Postal
Service's proposal to have its Request considered under rule 69
procedures. Consistent with this requirement, intervention shall be
allowed until April 20, 2007. Intervenors seeking a hearing on issues
raised in the Request shall identify the fact or facts in the Postal
Service filing that require a hearing.
To assist the Commission in determining an appropriate course of
action, intervenors, in addition to addressing the appropriateness of
using the expedited rules in this proceeding, are invited to address
the Service's suggestion that suspension is an appropriate option; the
Service's conditional Motion for Waiver; and the possibility of
settlement. These pleadings, which may be combined, are due no later
than April 20, 2007.
Public participation. In conformance with section 3624(a) of title
39, the Commission designates Shelley S. Dreifuss, director of the
Commission's Office of the Consumer Advocate, to represent the
interests of the general public in this proceeding. Pursuant to this
designation, Ms. Dreifuss will direct the activities of Commission
personnel assigned to assist her and, upon request, will supply their
names for the record. Neither Ms. Dreifuss nor any of the assigned
personnel will participate in or provide advice on any Commission
decision in this proceeding.
V. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. MC2007-2 to consider the
Postal Service Request referred to in the body of this order.
2. The Commission will act en banc in this proceeding.
3. Notices of intervention shall be filed no later than April 20,
2007.
4. Responses to the Service's request for consideration of its
Request under rule 69 are due no later than April 20, 2007.
5. Comments on the Service's suggestion that suspension of this
docket is a procedural option are due no later than April 20, 2007.
6. Answers to the Service's Conditional Motion for Waiver are due
no later than April 20, 2007.
7. Comments on the appropriateness of authorizing settlement
procedures in this proceeding are due no later than April 20, 2007.
8. Shelley S. Dreifuss, director of the Commission's Office of the
Consumer Advocate, is designated to represent the interests of the
general public.
9. The Secretary shall cause this Notice and Order to be published
in the Federal Register.
Issued: April 10, 2007.
By the Commission.
Garry J. Sikora,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-7102 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P