Prohibition on the Exportation, Melting, or Treatment of 5-Cent and One-Cent Coins, 18880-18884 [E7-7088]
Download as PDF
18880
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
creditor agency under paragraph (c)(2)
of this section.
(d) When the debtor transfers to
another Federal agency—(1) Notice to
the creditor agency. If the debtor
transfers to another Federal agency
before the debt is paid in full, the
Commerce entity will notify the creditor
agency and will certify the total amount
of its collection on the debt. The
Commerce entity will provide a copy of
the certification to the creditor agency.
The creditor agency is responsible for
submitting a certified claim to the
debtor’s new employing agency before
collection may begin.
(2) Notice to the debtor. The
Commerce entity will provide to the
debtor a copy of any notices and
certifications sent to the creditor agency
under paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
(e) Request for hearing official. A
Commerce entity will provide a hearing
official upon the creditor agency’s
request with respect to a Commerce
entity employee. See 5 CFR 550.1107(a).
PART 21—[REMOVED AND
RESERVED]
I
2. Remove and reserve part 21.
PART 22—[REMOVED AND
RESERVED]
I
3. Remove and reserve part 22.
Dated: April 5, 2007.
Lisa Casias,
Deputy Chief Financial Officer and Director
for Financial Management, Department of
Commerce.
[FR Doc. E7–6699 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am]
Conference dates:
June 4–7, 2007, Little Rock, Arkansas.
June 13, 2007, Park City, Utah.
June 28–29, 2007, Pittsburgh,
Pennsylvania.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BILLING CODE 3510–FA–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
18 CFR Parts 35 and 37
[Docket Nos. RM05–17–000 and RM05–25–
000; Order No. 890]
Preventing Undue Discrimination and
Preference in Transmission Service
Issued April 6, 2007.
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, DOE.
ACTION: Final Rule; Notice of Technical
Conferences.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: On February 16, 2007, the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
issued Order No. 890, which amended
the regulations and the pro forma open
access transmission tariff (OATT). The
Commission’s staff is convening
technical conferences to review and
discuss the ‘‘strawman’’ proposals
regarding the processes for transmission
planning required by the Final Rule.
Daniel Hedberg (Technical
Information), Office of Energy Markets
and Reliability, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,
(202) 502–6243.
W. Mason Emnett (Legal Information),
Office of the General Counsel—Energy
Markets, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502–6540.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Notice of Technical Conferences
Take notice that Commission staff
will convene technical conferences on
the following dates in the following
cities to review and discuss the
‘‘strawman’’ proposals regarding
processes for transmission planning
required by the Final Rule issued in this
proceeding on February 16, 2007.1 Staff
expects all transmission providers and/
or regional representatives to participate
in the technical conference for their
particular region, although all interested
persons, including other transmission
providers, are invited to attend each
conference.
Location
Transmission provider participants
June 4–7, 2007 ....................
Little Rock, AR ...................
June 13, 2007 ......................
Park City, Utah ...................
June 28–29, 2007 ................
Pittsburgh, PA ....................
TBD ......................................
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Date
TBD ....................................
Entities located in the states represented in the Southeastern Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (SEARUC) and entities located in the Southwest
Power Pool footprint, presenting on June 4–5 and 6–7, respectively.
Entities located within the ColumbiaGrid and Northern Tier Transmission Group
footprints and other northern WECC regions.2
Entities located within the Midwest ISO, PJM, New York ISO, and ISO New England footprints and adjacent areas.
Entities located in the West other than those attending the June 13, 2007 conference in Park City, Utah.2
A further notice with a detailed
agenda for each conference will be
issued in advance of the conferences. In
the event a transmission provider is
uncertain as to which technical
conference is the appropriate forum for
discussion of its ‘‘strawman’’ proposal,
such transmission providers should
contact Commission staff in advance to
discuss the matter.
For further information about these
conferences, please contact:
W. Mason Emnett, Office of the
General Counsel—Energy Markets,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426, (202) 502–6461,
Mason.Emnett@ferc.gov.
Daniel Hedberg, Office of Energy
Markets and Reliability, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,
(202) 502–6243,
Daniel.Hedberg@ferc.gov.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–7085 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
1 Preventing Undue Discrimination and
Preference in Transmission Service, Order No. 890,
72 FR 12266 (March 15, 2007), FERC Stats. & Regs.
¶ 31,241 at P 443 (2007), reh’g pending.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Monetary Offices
31 CFR Part 82
Prohibition on the Exportation,
Melting, or Treatment of 5-Cent and
One-Cent Coins
United States Mint, Treasury.
Final Rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: To protect the coinage of the
United States, the United States Mint is
adopting a final rule that prohibits the
2 Staff also requests that a representative of
WECC’s Transmission Expansion Planning Policy
Committee attend these technical conferences.
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
exportation, melting, and treatment of 5cent and one-cent coins. This rule is
issued pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 5111(d),
which authorizes the Secretary of the
Treasury to prohibit or limit the
exportation, melting, or treatment of
United States coins when the Secretary
decides the prohibition or limitation is
necessary to protect the coinage of the
United States. This rule’s purpose is to
ensure that sufficient quantities of 5cent and one-cent coins remain in
circulation to meet the needs of the
United States.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is
effective April 16, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristie Bowers, Attorney-Advisor,
United States Mint at (202) 354–7631
(not a toll-free call).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
I. Background
Section 5111(d) of title 31, United
States Code, authorizes the Secretary of
the Treasury to prohibit or limit the
exportation, melting, or treatment of
United States coins when the Secretary
decides the prohibition or limitation is
necessary to protect the coinage of the
United States. In enacting 31 U.S.C.
5111(d), Congress has conferred upon
the Secretary of the Treasury broad
discretion to ensure that he can
effectively carry out his statutory duties
to protect the Nation’s coinage and to
ensure that sufficient quantities of coins
are in circulation to meet the needs of
the United States.
Pursuant to this authority, the
Secretary of the Treasury has
determined that, to protect the coinage
of the United States, it is necessary to
generally prohibit the exportation,
melting, or treatment of 5-cent and onecent coins minted and issued by the
United States. The Secretary has made
this determination because the values of
the metal contents of 5-cent and onecent coins are in excess of their
respective face values, raising the
likelihood that these coins will be the
subject of recycling and speculation.
The prohibitions contained in this final
rule apply only to 5-cent and one-cent
coins. It is anticipated that this
regulation will be a temporary measure
that will be rescinded once actions are
taken, or conditions change, to abate
concerns that sufficient quantities of 5cent and one-cent coins will remain in
circulation to meet the needs of the
United States. The Secretary of the
Treasury has delegated to the Director of
the United States Mint the authority to
issue these regulations and to approve
exceptions by license.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
II. Interim Rule
This final rule is based on the interim
rule published Wednesday, December
20, 2006 (71 FR 76148). The interim rule
sought public comment on the proposed
final rule.
The comment period for the interim
rule ended on January 19, 2007. The
United States Mint received 31
comments from members of the public,
businesses and trade associations.
III. Summary of Comments
General Overview
Two commenters fully supported the
regulation. One trade association
supported the regulation as long as its
proposed exception was included in the
final regulation. Three commenters
stated that the regulation should only be
a temporary measure until a solution
could be attained on the underlying
issue. One commenter supported the
regulation as it applies to 5-cent coins,
but opposed the regulation as it applies
to one-cent coins. Eighteen commenters
generally opposed the regulation. Six
commenters did not state whether they
supported or opposed the regulation,
but instead suggested an amendment to
the regulation or proposed a solution to
the underlying issue.
Comments on Eliminating the 5-Cent
Coin or One-Cent Coin and Altering
Their Composition
One bank and three individuals
suggested that the United States
government should eliminate the 5-cent
coin and the one-cent coin as circulating
coinage. The bank stated, ‘‘The cost
associated with the creating and
handling of these low denomination
coins far exceeds their value.’’ Five
commenters suggested that the United
States Mint change the content of the 5cent and one-cent coins to less
expensive alloys. Two commenters
suggested that the United States Mint
eliminate the one-cent coin and alter the
composition of the 5-cent coin.
Commenters stated that the United
States government should eliminate
one-cent coins because they ‘‘waste
pocket space’’ and people ‘‘throw them
away.’’ A few of the commenters
suggested that one-cent coins be
eliminated after the 2009 Abraham
Lincoln Bicentennial One-Cent Coin
Redesign, provided for by Title III of the
Presidential $1 Coin Act of 2005, Public
Law 109–145 (Dec. 22, 2005). Two
commenters suggested that existing 5cent and one-cent coins be physically
altered; one suggested punching holes
in the center to decrease their melt
value, and the other suggested encasing
them in a ring of metal and increasing
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18881
the denomination of the coins. Two
commenters suggested the United States
Mint begin producing a two-cent coin or
a three-cent coin.
The changes suggested by these
comments are outside the scope of the
interim rule, which is limited to
implementation of the Secretary of the
Treasury’s authority under 31 U.S.C.
5111(d) to prohibit the exportation,
melting, or treatment of coins when
necessary to protect the coinage of the
United States. We note, however, that
under Article I, section 8, clause 5, of
the United States Constitution, only
Congress has the power to coin money
and regulate its value. Congress
determines the denominations,
specifications, and design of United
States coins. Under 31 U.S.C. 5112(c),
Congress has delegated to the Secretary
of the Treasury the authority to
‘‘prescribe the weight and the
composition of copper and zinc in the
alloy of the one-cent coin that the
Secretary decides are appropriate when
the Secretary decides that a different
weight and alloy of copper and zinc are
necessary to ensure an adequate supply
of one-cent coins to meet the needs of
the United States.’’ However, Congress
has not delegated to the Secretary the
authority to alter the composition of the
one-cent coin to a metal, or an alloy of
metals, other than copper and zinc. The
United States Mint has ongoing research
into alternative metals for the Nation’s
coinage. Changing the metal content or
the denomination of United States coins
requires legislation passed by Congress
and approved by the President.
Comments on Increasing the Face Value
Limit on the Exporting Exception for
One-Cent and 5-Cent Coins Carried on
Individual or in Personal Effects
Three commenters suggested that the
aggregate face-value limit on the number
of 5-cent and one-cent coins that can be
exported by an individual carried on his
or her person or in his or her personal
effects should be increased. One of the
commenters gave the example of
Americans crossing the border into
Canada to play ‘‘nickel slot’’ machines
or ‘‘penny-ante’’ poker. The other
commenter pointed out that a person
would not be able to carry on his or her
person one roll containing 5-cent coins
bearing each of the five United States
Mint Westward Journey Nickel SeriesTM
designs without exceeding the $5 facevalue limit, and would have to ship
them out of the country instead.
The aggregate face-value limit
selected for the interim rule was the
same face-value limit used when the
Secretary invoked the standby authority
of 31 U.S.C. 5111(d) for the periods
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
18882
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
1967–1969 and 1974–1978. The United
States Mint recognizes that some 30
years have passed since this authority
was last invoked and, based on the
consumer price index, the $5 limit in
the previous regulations would be
equivalent to about $20 today. However,
the face values of 5-cent coins and onecent coins obviously have not changed
over this time period and there is no
evidence to suggest that an average
individual carries any more 5-cent or
one-cent coins in his or her pocket
change today, than in 1974 or 1967.
Accordingly, the United States Mint has
kept the aggregate face-value limit for
the exception provided for in the
current regulation at section 82.2(a)(2) at
$5.
The United States Mint nevertheless
acknowledges the concerns raised by
the commenters. Therefore, the
exception provided for in the current
regulation at section 82.2(a)(2) has been
amended to reasonably accommodate
these concerns by allowing exportation
of 5-cent and one-cent coins having an
aggregate face value of up to $25 when
it is clear that the purpose for exporting
such coins is for legitimate personal
numismatic, amusement, or recreational
use.
Comments on Redeeming or Reclaiming
One-Cent Coins
Two commenters suggested the
United States Mint should redeem
existing 5-cent and one-cent coins and
alter their physical form, as discussed
above. One commenter suggested that
the United States Mint and the Federal
Reserve should encourage the public to
redeem their unused one-cent coins and
pay a small premium over their face
value, and then the United States Mint
could reclaim the pre-1982 copper onecent coins for their metal content. One
commenter stated that recycling the 5cent and one-cent coins should not be
prohibited because, if the coins are
recycled for their metal content, it
would increase the supply of copper,
nickel and zinc, with the ensuing
market forces resulting in a price
decrease for those metals.
The purpose of this regulation is to
protect 5-cent and one-cent coins in
circulation from being the subject of
recycling and speculation in order to
ensure that sufficient quantities of the
coins remain in circulation to meet the
needs of the United States. This
regulation is not intended to address the
cost and supply of metals used in, or the
specifications for, the production of
future 5-cent and one-cent coins.
Further, the authorizing statute, 31
U.S.C. 5111(d), permits the Secretary of
the Treasury only to prohibit or limit
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
the exportation, melting, or treatment of
United States coins. It does not
authorize the Secretary to redeem
current United States coin.
Comments on the Constitutionality of
the Regulation
Twelve commenters stated that coins
are the personal property of the holder
and the Department of the Treasury
does not have the authority to regulate
what a person does with his or her own
property. Although it is generally
recognized that money is the property of
its bearer under common law, Congress
has the power to regulate the coins and
currency of the United States pursuant
to its authority under Article I, section
8, clause 5, of the United States
Constitution. For instance, Congress has
relied on that authority to regulate the
use of coins by making it illegal to alter,
deface, or mutilate United States coins
with fraudulent intent, see 18 U.S.C.
331; to debase United States coins with
fraudulent intent, see 18 U.S.C. 332; and
to attach any business or professional
card, notice, or advertisement on any
United States coin, see 18 U.S.C. 475.
There are many other examples of
personal property whose use is
regulated by the Federal government.
These include controlled drugs;
firearms; copyrighted books, electronic
recordings; United States postage
stamps; Federal Reserve notes; and
uniforms and service medals of the
Armed Forces. Such regulations are
generally enacted to protect competing
ownership interests in the same
property, to protect the health and
safety of the public, or to protect a
special governmental interest in
property otherwise privately owned. In
this case, the Federal Government has
an interest in ensuring that sufficient
quantities of 5-cent and one-cent coins
remain in circulation to meet the needs
of the United States.
Moreover, while several provisions of
the Constitution protect property rights,
a statute or regulation is not
unconstitutional merely because it has
some effect on those rights. See, e.g.,
Penn Central Transp. Corp. v. New York
City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978) (Government
restrictions on the use of private
property are legal when substantially
related to the promotion of the general
welfare and do not prohibit reasonable
beneficial use). The regulation here is
necessary to protect the United States
coinage. In addition, the standby
authority that the Secretary of the
Treasury possesses under 31 U.S.C.
5111(d) has been in effect since 1965;
therefore, members of the public
generally have been on notice that they
accept and use U.S. coinage subject to
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
this potential limitation. None of the
comments set forth any specific theory
under which the regulation is asserted
to be unconstitutional, and we continue
to believe that this is not the case.
Comments on Debasement and
Devaluation
Eleven commenters discussed
inflation and the debasement and
devaluation of United States currency.
However, this issue is beyond the scope
of this regulation. Pursuant to the
authorizing statute, 31 U.S.C. 5111, this
regulation’s purpose is to protect the
Nation’s coinage by ensuring there are
sufficient 5-cent and one-cent coins in
circulation to meet the needs of the
United States.
Comments on Enforcement of the
Regulation
One commenter stated that the
penalties provided in the regulation are
too harsh. However, the statute that
enables the Secretary of the Treasury to
issue this regulation, 31 U.S.C. 5111(d),
mandates the penalties for engaging in
the prohibited activities, as follows:
(d)(1) The Secretary may prohibit or
limit the exportation, melting, or
treatment of United States coins when
the Secretary decides the prohibition or
limitation is necessary to protect the
coinage of the United States.
(2) A person knowingly violating an
order or license issued or regulation
prescribed under paragraph (1) of this
subsection, shall be fined not more than
$ 10,000, imprisoned not more than 5
years, or both.
Three commenters stated that the cost
of enforcing the regulation would
exceed the minting costs that the
regulation is intended to save, or that
enforcing the regulation is a waste of
law enforcement resources. The
Secretary of the Treasury has weighed
the enforcement costs associated with
the enactment of this regulation against
the potential costs of not enacting this
regulation and has determined that it is
in the public’s best interest to enact this
regulation as a temporary measure until
actions are taken, or conditions change,
to abate concerns that sufficient
quantities of 5-cent and one-cent coins
will remain in circulation to meet the
needs of the United States.
Two commenters voiced concern that
the Federal Government could arrest or
fine a science teacher for experimenting
with a one-cent coin during a classroom
demonstration, or could arrest or fine a
child for using a penny pressing
machine at an amusement park.
However, the regulation includes an
exception for the treatment of 5-cent
and one-cent coins for educational,
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
amusement, novelty, jewelry, and
similar purposes as long as the volumes
treated and the nature of the treatment
make it clear that such treatment is not
intended as a means by which to profit
solely from the value of the metal
content of the coins.
Six commenters stated that the public
would hoard the coins and remove them
from circulation. The United States
Mint is aware that 5-cent and one-cent
coins may be hoarded. However, the
legislative history of 31 U.S.C. 5111(d)
indicates that when Congress passed the
Coinage Act of 1965, section 105 (the
predecessor provision to 31 U.S.C.
5111(d)), it did not intend on
prohibiting hoarding because of
concerns that such prohibitions would
be difficult to enforce and that citizens
might unknowingly violate the
regulations. The United States Mint
does not intend to prohibit the hoarding
of 5-cent and one-cent coins but,
consistent with the legislative intent of
31 U.S.C. 5111(d), has implemented
these prohibitions on exportation,
melting, and treatment to reduce the
incentive to hoard these coins.
Comments From Trade Associations
and Businesses
The Institute of Scrap Recycling
Industries, Inc. (Institute), a trade
association for the recycling industry,
submitted a comment suggesting that an
exception be added for the unintended
exportation, melting, and treatment of 5cent and one-cent coins that occurs
incidental to the recycling of other
materials, such as scrap automobiles
and construction and demolition debris.
We agree that such melting should not
be prohibited, and have added an
exception for coins incidentally present
in recycled scrap. In doing so, we
express no view as to whether the
melting or export of coins under the
circumstances described by the Institute
would otherwise violate the regulation.
The Industry Council for Tangible
Assets (Council), a trade association for
rare coin and precious metals dealers,
submitted a comment suggesting that an
exception be added for the exportation,
melting, or treatment of ‘‘war nickels.’’
War nickels were 5-cent coins produced
during World War II, from 1942 through
1945, from a special alloy of copper,
silver, and manganese in order to
conserve nickel for the war effort. The
Council points out that the war nickels
are traded for their numismatic value,
they are melted for the value of their
metal composition, and that few, if any,
remain as circulating coins. Because it
appears that covering war nickels under
the regulation would disrupt
longstanding practices and would not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
further the protection of circulating
coinage, we have added an exception for
such coins.
Advice From the Cash Product Office of
the Federal Reserve
The Cash Product Office of the
Federal Reserve advised that some
depository institutions export 5-cent
and one-cent coins, as well as other U.S.
circulating coins, to foreign countries
that have so-called ‘‘dollarized’’
monetary systems. Central banks in
these countries purchase U.S.
circulating coinage from domestic
depository institutions for use as
circulating money in their own
countries. To accommodate this
legitimate requirement to permit the
exportation of 5-cent and one-cent
coins, we have added an additional
exception to the final regulation.
IV. Conclusion
Based on the comments received and
the analysis of those comments as set
forth above, and based on the additional
considerations discussed above, the
Department of the Treasury, United
States Mint, has concluded that the
interim regulation will be adopted as a
final rule, with certain changes as
discussed above and set forth below.
V. Procedural Requirements
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
Because a notice of proposed
rulemaking was not required prior to the
implementation of the interim rule, the
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), do not apply.
The final rule does not impose a
‘‘collection of information’’ requirement
within the meaning of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
The final rule will be effective upon
publication. The final rule relieves some
of the restrictions in the interim rule by
providing for new exceptions and for
the expansion of existing exceptions.
Accordingly, because the final rule
grants or recognizes an exemption or
relieves a restriction currently in place,
5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1) exempts the final rule
from the requirement in 5 U.S.C. 553(d)
that the publication or service of a
substantive rule shall be made not less
than 30 days before its effective date.
VI. Format
The format of the final rule is
generally consistent with the format of
the interim rule.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 82
Administrative practice and
procedure, Currency, Exports, Penalties.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18883
Amendments to the Regulation
For the reasons set forth above, the
interim rule amending Chapter 1 of
Subtitle B of Title 31 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, which was
published at 71 FR 76148 on December
20, 2006, is adopted as a final rule with
the following changes.
I
PART 82—5-CENT AND ONE-CENT
COIN REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 82
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5111(d).
2. Section 82.2 is amended by revising
paragraph (a)(2), redesignating current
paragraph (c) as paragraph (f), and
adding new paragraphs (c), (d), and (e)
as follows:
I
§ 82.2
Exceptions.
(a) * * *
(2) The exportation of 5-cent coins
and one-cent coins carried on an
individual, or in the personal effects of
an individual, departing from a place
subject to the jurisdiction of the United
States, when the aggregate face value is
not more than $5, or when the aggregate
face value is not more than $25 and it
is clear that the purpose for exporting
such coins is for legitimate personal
numismatic, amusement, or recreational
use.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) The prohibition contained in
§ 82.1 against the exportation, melting,
or treatment of 5-cent and one-cent
coins of the United States shall not
apply to coins exported, melted, or
treated incidental to the recycling of
other materials so long as—
(1) Such 5-cent and one-cent coins
were not added to the other materials
for their metallurgical value;
(2) The volumes of the 5-cent coins
and one-cent coins, relative to the
volumes of the other materials recycled,
makes it clear that the presence of such
coins is merely incidental; and
(3) The separation of the 5-cent and
one-cent coins from the other materials
would be impracticable or cost
prohibitive.
(d) The prohibition contained in
§ 82.1 against the exportation, melting,
or treatment of 5-cent coins shall not
apply to 5-cent coins inscribed with the
years 1942, 1943, 1944, or 1945 that are
composed of an alloy comprising
copper, silver and manganese.
(e) The prohibition contained in
§ 82.1 against the exportation of 5-cent
coins and one-cent coins shall not apply
to 5-cent coins and one-cent coins
exported by a Federal Reserve Bank or
a domestic depository institution, or to
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
18884
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
a foreign central bank, when the
exportation of such 5-cent coins and
one-cent coins is for use as circulating
money.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: April 10, 2007.
Edmund C. Moy,
Director, United States Mint.
[FR Doc. E7–7088 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01–07–030]
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Quinnipiac River, New Haven, CT
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast
Guard District, has issued a temporary
deviation from the regulation governing
the operation of the Ferry Street Bridge,
across the Quinnipiac River, mile 0.7, at
New Haven, Connecticut. This
deviation, allows the bridge owner to
keep one of the two moveable bascule
spans in the closed position from April
16, 2007 through September 27, 2007.
This deviation is necessary to facilitate
scheduled bridge maintenance.
DATES: This deviation is effective from
April 16, 2007 through September 27,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Materials referred to in this
document are available for inspection or
copying at the First Coast Guard
District, Bridge Branch Office, One
South Street, New York, New York
10004, between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The telephone number is (212)
668–7165. The First Coast Guard
District Bridge Branch Office maintains
the public docket for this temporary
deviation.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judy
Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First Coast
Guard District, at (212) 668–7165.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Ferry
Street Bridge, across the Quinnipiac
River, mile 0.7, at New Haven,
Connecticut, has a vertical clearance in
the closed position of 25 feet at mean
high water and 31 feet at mean low
water. The existing regulation requires
the bridge to open on demand except for
certain morning, mid-day and evening
hours.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:00 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Connecticut Department of
Transportation on behalf of the owner of
the bridge, the City of New Haven,
requested a temporary deviation to
facilitate scheduled structural bridge
fender repairs and painting at the
bridge.
In order to perform the structural
repairs, one bascule span will remain in
the closed position and the other span
will remain open.
Under this temporary deviation the
Ferry Street Bridge across the
Quinnipiac River, mile 0.7, at New
Haven, Connecticut, may keep one of
the two movable spans closed from
April 16, 2007 through September 27,
2007.
Should the bridge maintenance
authorized by this temporary deviation
be completed before the end of the
effective period published in this notice,
the Coast Guard will rescind the
remainder of this temporary deviation,
and the bridge shall be returned to its
normal operating schedule. Notice of
the above action shall be provided to the
public in the Local Notice to Mariners
and the Federal Register, where
practicable.
This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR
117.35.
Dated: April 6, 2007.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. E7–7156 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[CGD01–07–032]
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
Reynolds Channel, Lawrence, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of temporary deviation
from regulations.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast
Guard District, has issued a temporary
deviation from the regulation governing
the operation of the Atlantic Beach
Bridge across Reynolds Channel, mile
0.4, at Lawrence, New York. Under this
temporary deviation a one-hour advance
notice will be required for bridge
openings from April 9, 2007 through
April 27, 2007, between 7 a.m. and 3:30
p.m., daily. This deviation is necessary
to facilitate scheduled bridge
maintenance.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
This deviation is effective from
April 9, 2007 through April 27, 2007.
DATES:
Materials referred to in this
document are available for inspection or
copying at the First Coast Guard
District, Bridge Branch Office, One
South Street, New York, New York,
10004, between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The telephone number is (212)
668–7165. The First Coast Guard
District Bridge Branch Office maintains
the public docket for this temporary
deviation.
ADDRESSES:
Judy
Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First Coast
Guard District, at (212) 668–7165.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
The
Atlantic Beach Bridge across Reynolds
Channel, mile 0.4, at Lawrence, New
York, has a vertical clearance in the
closed position of 25 feet at mean high
water and 30 feet at mean low water.
The existing operating regulations are
listed at 33 CFR 117.799.
The bridge owner, Nassau County
Bridge Authority, requested a temporary
deviation to allow the bridge owner to
require a one-hour advance notice for
bridge openings to facilitate scheduled
mechanical bridge maintenance.
Under this temporary deviation a onehour advance notice shall be required
for bridge openings at the Atlantic
Beach Bridge from April 9, 2007
through April 27, 2007, between 7 a.m.
and 3:30 p.m., daily.
Should the bridge maintenance
authorized by this temporary deviation
be completed before the end of the
effective period published in this notice,
the Coast Guard will rescind the
remainder of this temporary deviation,
and the bridge shall be returned to its
normal operating schedule. Notice of
the above action shall be provided to the
public in the Local Notice to Mariners
and the Federal Register, where
practicable.
This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR
117.35.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: April 6, 2007.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. E7–7155 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
E:\FR\FM\16APR1.SGM
16APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 72 (Monday, April 16, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18880-18884]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7088]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Monetary Offices
31 CFR Part 82
Prohibition on the Exportation, Melting, or Treatment of 5-Cent
and One-Cent Coins
AGENCY: United States Mint, Treasury.
ACTION: Final Rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: To protect the coinage of the United States, the United States
Mint is adopting a final rule that prohibits the
[[Page 18881]]
exportation, melting, and treatment of 5-cent and one-cent coins. This
rule is issued pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 5111(d), which authorizes the
Secretary of the Treasury to prohibit or limit the exportation,
melting, or treatment of United States coins when the Secretary decides
the prohibition or limitation is necessary to protect the coinage of
the United States. This rule's purpose is to ensure that sufficient
quantities of 5-cent and one-cent coins remain in circulation to meet
the needs of the United States.
DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective April 16, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristie Bowers, Attorney-Advisor,
United States Mint at (202) 354-7631 (not a toll-free call).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 5111(d) of title 31, United States Code, authorizes the
Secretary of the Treasury to prohibit or limit the exportation,
melting, or treatment of United States coins when the Secretary decides
the prohibition or limitation is necessary to protect the coinage of
the United States. In enacting 31 U.S.C. 5111(d), Congress has
conferred upon the Secretary of the Treasury broad discretion to ensure
that he can effectively carry out his statutory duties to protect the
Nation's coinage and to ensure that sufficient quantities of coins are
in circulation to meet the needs of the United States.
Pursuant to this authority, the Secretary of the Treasury has
determined that, to protect the coinage of the United States, it is
necessary to generally prohibit the exportation, melting, or treatment
of 5-cent and one-cent coins minted and issued by the United States.
The Secretary has made this determination because the values of the
metal contents of 5-cent and one-cent coins are in excess of their
respective face values, raising the likelihood that these coins will be
the subject of recycling and speculation. The prohibitions contained in
this final rule apply only to 5-cent and one-cent coins. It is
anticipated that this regulation will be a temporary measure that will
be rescinded once actions are taken, or conditions change, to abate
concerns that sufficient quantities of 5-cent and one-cent coins will
remain in circulation to meet the needs of the United States. The
Secretary of the Treasury has delegated to the Director of the United
States Mint the authority to issue these regulations and to approve
exceptions by license.
II. Interim Rule
This final rule is based on the interim rule published Wednesday,
December 20, 2006 (71 FR 76148). The interim rule sought public comment
on the proposed final rule.
The comment period for the interim rule ended on January 19, 2007.
The United States Mint received 31 comments from members of the public,
businesses and trade associations.
III. Summary of Comments
General Overview
Two commenters fully supported the regulation. One trade
association supported the regulation as long as its proposed exception
was included in the final regulation. Three commenters stated that the
regulation should only be a temporary measure until a solution could be
attained on the underlying issue. One commenter supported the
regulation as it applies to 5-cent coins, but opposed the regulation as
it applies to one-cent coins. Eighteen commenters generally opposed the
regulation. Six commenters did not state whether they supported or
opposed the regulation, but instead suggested an amendment to the
regulation or proposed a solution to the underlying issue.
Comments on Eliminating the 5-Cent Coin or One-Cent Coin and Altering
Their Composition
One bank and three individuals suggested that the United States
government should eliminate the 5-cent coin and the one-cent coin as
circulating coinage. The bank stated, ``The cost associated with the
creating and handling of these low denomination coins far exceeds their
value.'' Five commenters suggested that the United States Mint change
the content of the 5-cent and one-cent coins to less expensive alloys.
Two commenters suggested that the United States Mint eliminate the one-
cent coin and alter the composition of the 5-cent coin. Commenters
stated that the United States government should eliminate one-cent
coins because they ``waste pocket space'' and people ``throw them
away.'' A few of the commenters suggested that one-cent coins be
eliminated after the 2009 Abraham Lincoln Bicentennial One-Cent Coin
Redesign, provided for by Title III of the Presidential $1 Coin Act of
2005, Public Law 109-145 (Dec. 22, 2005). Two commenters suggested that
existing 5-cent and one-cent coins be physically altered; one suggested
punching holes in the center to decrease their melt value, and the
other suggested encasing them in a ring of metal and increasing the
denomination of the coins. Two commenters suggested the United States
Mint begin producing a two-cent coin or a three-cent coin.
The changes suggested by these comments are outside the scope of
the interim rule, which is limited to implementation of the Secretary
of the Treasury's authority under 31 U.S.C. 5111(d) to prohibit the
exportation, melting, or treatment of coins when necessary to protect
the coinage of the United States. We note, however, that under Article
I, section 8, clause 5, of the United States Constitution, only
Congress has the power to coin money and regulate its value. Congress
determines the denominations, specifications, and design of United
States coins. Under 31 U.S.C. 5112(c), Congress has delegated to the
Secretary of the Treasury the authority to ``prescribe the weight and
the composition of copper and zinc in the alloy of the one-cent coin
that the Secretary decides are appropriate when the Secretary decides
that a different weight and alloy of copper and zinc are necessary to
ensure an adequate supply of one-cent coins to meet the needs of the
United States.'' However, Congress has not delegated to the Secretary
the authority to alter the composition of the one-cent coin to a metal,
or an alloy of metals, other than copper and zinc. The United States
Mint has ongoing research into alternative metals for the Nation's
coinage. Changing the metal content or the denomination of United
States coins requires legislation passed by Congress and approved by
the President.
Comments on Increasing the Face Value Limit on the Exporting Exception
for One-Cent and 5-Cent Coins Carried on Individual or in Personal
Effects
Three commenters suggested that the aggregate face-value limit on
the number of 5-cent and one-cent coins that can be exported by an
individual carried on his or her person or in his or her personal
effects should be increased. One of the commenters gave the example of
Americans crossing the border into Canada to play ``nickel slot''
machines or ``penny-ante'' poker. The other commenter pointed out that
a person would not be able to carry on his or her person one roll
containing 5-cent coins bearing each of the five United States Mint
Westward Journey Nickel SeriesTM designs without exceeding
the $5 face-value limit, and would have to ship them out of the country
instead.
The aggregate face-value limit selected for the interim rule was
the same face-value limit used when the Secretary invoked the standby
authority of 31 U.S.C. 5111(d) for the periods
[[Page 18882]]
1967-1969 and 1974-1978. The United States Mint recognizes that some 30
years have passed since this authority was last invoked and, based on
the consumer price index, the $5 limit in the previous regulations
would be equivalent to about $20 today. However, the face values of 5-
cent coins and one-cent coins obviously have not changed over this time
period and there is no evidence to suggest that an average individual
carries any more 5-cent or one-cent coins in his or her pocket change
today, than in 1974 or 1967. Accordingly, the United States Mint has
kept the aggregate face-value limit for the exception provided for in
the current regulation at section 82.2(a)(2) at $5.
The United States Mint nevertheless acknowledges the concerns
raised by the commenters. Therefore, the exception provided for in the
current regulation at section 82.2(a)(2) has been amended to reasonably
accommodate these concerns by allowing exportation of 5-cent and one-
cent coins having an aggregate face value of up to $25 when it is clear
that the purpose for exporting such coins is for legitimate personal
numismatic, amusement, or recreational use.
Comments on Redeeming or Reclaiming One-Cent Coins
Two commenters suggested the United States Mint should redeem
existing 5-cent and one-cent coins and alter their physical form, as
discussed above. One commenter suggested that the United States Mint
and the Federal Reserve should encourage the public to redeem their
unused one-cent coins and pay a small premium over their face value,
and then the United States Mint could reclaim the pre-1982 copper one-
cent coins for their metal content. One commenter stated that recycling
the 5-cent and one-cent coins should not be prohibited because, if the
coins are recycled for their metal content, it would increase the
supply of copper, nickel and zinc, with the ensuing market forces
resulting in a price decrease for those metals.
The purpose of this regulation is to protect 5-cent and one-cent
coins in circulation from being the subject of recycling and
speculation in order to ensure that sufficient quantities of the coins
remain in circulation to meet the needs of the United States. This
regulation is not intended to address the cost and supply of metals
used in, or the specifications for, the production of future 5-cent and
one-cent coins. Further, the authorizing statute, 31 U.S.C. 5111(d),
permits the Secretary of the Treasury only to prohibit or limit the
exportation, melting, or treatment of United States coins. It does not
authorize the Secretary to redeem current United States coin.
Comments on the Constitutionality of the Regulation
Twelve commenters stated that coins are the personal property of
the holder and the Department of the Treasury does not have the
authority to regulate what a person does with his or her own property.
Although it is generally recognized that money is the property of its
bearer under common law, Congress has the power to regulate the coins
and currency of the United States pursuant to its authority under
Article I, section 8, clause 5, of the United States Constitution. For
instance, Congress has relied on that authority to regulate the use of
coins by making it illegal to alter, deface, or mutilate United States
coins with fraudulent intent, see 18 U.S.C. 331; to debase United
States coins with fraudulent intent, see 18 U.S.C. 332; and to attach
any business or professional card, notice, or advertisement on any
United States coin, see 18 U.S.C. 475. There are many other examples of
personal property whose use is regulated by the Federal government.
These include controlled drugs; firearms; copyrighted books, electronic
recordings; United States postage stamps; Federal Reserve notes; and
uniforms and service medals of the Armed Forces. Such regulations are
generally enacted to protect competing ownership interests in the same
property, to protect the health and safety of the public, or to protect
a special governmental interest in property otherwise privately owned.
In this case, the Federal Government has an interest in ensuring that
sufficient quantities of 5-cent and one-cent coins remain in
circulation to meet the needs of the United States.
Moreover, while several provisions of the Constitution protect
property rights, a statute or regulation is not unconstitutional merely
because it has some effect on those rights. See, e.g., Penn Central
Transp. Corp. v. New York City, 438 U.S. 104 (1978) (Government
restrictions on the use of private property are legal when
substantially related to the promotion of the general welfare and do
not prohibit reasonable beneficial use). The regulation here is
necessary to protect the United States coinage. In addition, the
standby authority that the Secretary of the Treasury possesses under 31
U.S.C. 5111(d) has been in effect since 1965; therefore, members of the
public generally have been on notice that they accept and use U.S.
coinage subject to this potential limitation. None of the comments set
forth any specific theory under which the regulation is asserted to be
unconstitutional, and we continue to believe that this is not the case.
Comments on Debasement and Devaluation
Eleven commenters discussed inflation and the debasement and
devaluation of United States currency. However, this issue is beyond
the scope of this regulation. Pursuant to the authorizing statute, 31
U.S.C. 5111, this regulation's purpose is to protect the Nation's
coinage by ensuring there are sufficient 5-cent and one-cent coins in
circulation to meet the needs of the United States.
Comments on Enforcement of the Regulation
One commenter stated that the penalties provided in the regulation
are too harsh. However, the statute that enables the Secretary of the
Treasury to issue this regulation, 31 U.S.C. 5111(d), mandates the
penalties for engaging in the prohibited activities, as follows:
(d)(1) The Secretary may prohibit or limit the exportation,
melting, or treatment of United States coins when the Secretary decides
the prohibition or limitation is necessary to protect the coinage of
the United States.
(2) A person knowingly violating an order or license issued or
regulation prescribed under paragraph (1) of this subsection, shall be
fined not more than $ 10,000, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or
both.
Three commenters stated that the cost of enforcing the regulation
would exceed the minting costs that the regulation is intended to save,
or that enforcing the regulation is a waste of law enforcement
resources. The Secretary of the Treasury has weighed the enforcement
costs associated with the enactment of this regulation against the
potential costs of not enacting this regulation and has determined that
it is in the public's best interest to enact this regulation as a
temporary measure until actions are taken, or conditions change, to
abate concerns that sufficient quantities of 5-cent and one-cent coins
will remain in circulation to meet the needs of the United States.
Two commenters voiced concern that the Federal Government could
arrest or fine a science teacher for experimenting with a one-cent coin
during a classroom demonstration, or could arrest or fine a child for
using a penny pressing machine at an amusement park. However, the
regulation includes an exception for the treatment of 5-cent and one-
cent coins for educational,
[[Page 18883]]
amusement, novelty, jewelry, and similar purposes as long as the
volumes treated and the nature of the treatment make it clear that such
treatment is not intended as a means by which to profit solely from the
value of the metal content of the coins.
Six commenters stated that the public would hoard the coins and
remove them from circulation. The United States Mint is aware that 5-
cent and one-cent coins may be hoarded. However, the legislative
history of 31 U.S.C. 5111(d) indicates that when Congress passed the
Coinage Act of 1965, section 105 (the predecessor provision to 31
U.S.C. 5111(d)), it did not intend on prohibiting hoarding because of
concerns that such prohibitions would be difficult to enforce and that
citizens might unknowingly violate the regulations. The United States
Mint does not intend to prohibit the hoarding of 5-cent and one-cent
coins but, consistent with the legislative intent of 31 U.S.C. 5111(d),
has implemented these prohibitions on exportation, melting, and
treatment to reduce the incentive to hoard these coins.
Comments From Trade Associations and Businesses
The Institute of Scrap Recycling Industries, Inc. (Institute), a
trade association for the recycling industry, submitted a comment
suggesting that an exception be added for the unintended exportation,
melting, and treatment of 5-cent and one-cent coins that occurs
incidental to the recycling of other materials, such as scrap
automobiles and construction and demolition debris. We agree that such
melting should not be prohibited, and have added an exception for coins
incidentally present in recycled scrap. In doing so, we express no view
as to whether the melting or export of coins under the circumstances
described by the Institute would otherwise violate the regulation.
The Industry Council for Tangible Assets (Council), a trade
association for rare coin and precious metals dealers, submitted a
comment suggesting that an exception be added for the exportation,
melting, or treatment of ``war nickels.'' War nickels were 5-cent coins
produced during World War II, from 1942 through 1945, from a special
alloy of copper, silver, and manganese in order to conserve nickel for
the war effort. The Council points out that the war nickels are traded
for their numismatic value, they are melted for the value of their
metal composition, and that few, if any, remain as circulating coins.
Because it appears that covering war nickels under the regulation would
disrupt longstanding practices and would not further the protection of
circulating coinage, we have added an exception for such coins.
Advice From the Cash Product Office of the Federal Reserve
The Cash Product Office of the Federal Reserve advised that some
depository institutions export 5-cent and one-cent coins, as well as
other U.S. circulating coins, to foreign countries that have so-called
``dollarized'' monetary systems. Central banks in these countries
purchase U.S. circulating coinage from domestic depository institutions
for use as circulating money in their own countries. To accommodate
this legitimate requirement to permit the exportation of 5-cent and
one-cent coins, we have added an additional exception to the final
regulation.
IV. Conclusion
Based on the comments received and the analysis of those comments
as set forth above, and based on the additional considerations
discussed above, the Department of the Treasury, United States Mint,
has concluded that the interim regulation will be adopted as a final
rule, with certain changes as discussed above and set forth below.
V. Procedural Requirements
This rule is not a significant regulatory action for the purposes
of Executive Order 12866.
Because a notice of proposed rulemaking was not required prior to
the implementation of the interim rule, the provisions of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), do not apply.
The final rule does not impose a ``collection of information''
requirement within the meaning of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The final rule will be effective upon publication. The final rule
relieves some of the restrictions in the interim rule by providing for
new exceptions and for the expansion of existing exceptions.
Accordingly, because the final rule grants or recognizes an exemption
or relieves a restriction currently in place, 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1)
exempts the final rule from the requirement in 5 U.S.C. 553(d) that the
publication or service of a substantive rule shall be made not less
than 30 days before its effective date.
VI. Format
The format of the final rule is generally consistent with the
format of the interim rule.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 82
Administrative practice and procedure, Currency, Exports,
Penalties.
Amendments to the Regulation
0
For the reasons set forth above, the interim rule amending Chapter 1 of
Subtitle B of Title 31 of the Code of Federal Regulations, which was
published at 71 FR 76148 on December 20, 2006, is adopted as a final
rule with the following changes.
PART 82--5-CENT AND ONE-CENT COIN REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 82 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 5111(d).
0
2. Section 82.2 is amended by revising paragraph (a)(2), redesignating
current paragraph (c) as paragraph (f), and adding new paragraphs (c),
(d), and (e) as follows:
Sec. 82.2 Exceptions.
(a) * * *
(2) The exportation of 5-cent coins and one-cent coins carried on
an individual, or in the personal effects of an individual, departing
from a place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, when the
aggregate face value is not more than $5, or when the aggregate face
value is not more than $25 and it is clear that the purpose for
exporting such coins is for legitimate personal numismatic, amusement,
or recreational use.
* * * * *
(c) The prohibition contained in Sec. 82.1 against the
exportation, melting, or treatment of 5-cent and one-cent coins of the
United States shall not apply to coins exported, melted, or treated
incidental to the recycling of other materials so long as--
(1) Such 5-cent and one-cent coins were not added to the other
materials for their metallurgical value;
(2) The volumes of the 5-cent coins and one-cent coins, relative to
the volumes of the other materials recycled, makes it clear that the
presence of such coins is merely incidental; and
(3) The separation of the 5-cent and one-cent coins from the other
materials would be impracticable or cost prohibitive.
(d) The prohibition contained in Sec. 82.1 against the
exportation, melting, or treatment of 5-cent coins shall not apply to
5-cent coins inscribed with the years 1942, 1943, 1944, or 1945 that
are composed of an alloy comprising copper, silver and manganese.
(e) The prohibition contained in Sec. 82.1 against the exportation
of 5-cent coins and one-cent coins shall not apply to 5-cent coins and
one-cent coins exported by a Federal Reserve Bank or a domestic
depository institution, or to
[[Page 18884]]
a foreign central bank, when the exportation of such 5-cent coins and
one-cent coins is for use as circulating money.
* * * * *
Dated: April 10, 2007.
Edmund C. Moy,
Director, United States Mint.
[FR Doc. E7-7088 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-02-P