Certification and Funding of State and Local Fair Housing Enforcement Agencies, 19070-19083 [E7-7087]
Download as PDF
19070
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 115
[Docket No. FR–4748–F–02]
RIN 2529–AA90
Certification and Funding of State and
Local Fair Housing Enforcement
Agencies
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
SUMMARY: This final rule revises and
updates HUD’s regulation implementing
section 810(f) of the federal Fair
Housing Act. This regulation establishes
the criteria for certification of state and
local fair housing laws that are
substantially equivalent to the federal
Fair Housing Act, as well as for
decertification of state and local fair
housing laws that are deemed no longer
substantially equivalent. This final rule
also revises the funding criteria for
agencies participating in the Fair
Housing Assistance Program (FHAP).
DATES: Effective Date: May 16, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bryan Greene, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and
Programs, Office of Fair Housing and
Equal Opportunity, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
Seventh Street, SW., Room 5204,
Washington, DC 20410–2000; telephone
(202) 402–7078 (this is not a toll-free
number). Hearing- or speech-impaired
persons may contact the FHAP Division
by calling (800) 290–1617, or the tollfree Federal Information Relay Service
at (800) 877–8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On May 18, 2005, HUD published a
proposed rule (70 FR 28748) for public
comment that would clarify numerous
issues related to substantial equivalency
certification and the FHAP. Under the
FHAP, a state or local agency applies for
substantial equivalency certification and
the Department determines whether the
agency enforces a law that provides
substantive rights, procedures,
remedies, and judicial review
provisions that are substantially
equivalent to the federal Fair Housing
Act. The FHAP provides support for
complaint processing, training,
technical assistance, education and
outreach, data and information systems,
and other activities that will further fair
housing within the state or local
agency’s jurisdiction.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
The proposed rule provided a
comprehensive revision of 24 CFR part
115 to provide greater clarity and
guidance to FHAP agencies. Among the
proposed revisions were new
definitions, revised and additional
performance standards, and timeframes.
The proposed rule also added
procedures for renewal of certification
and procedures for requests after
withdrawal. HUD also proposed the
addition of § 115.309, titled FHAP and
the First Amendment, which provided
that no funding made available under
the FHAP may be used to investigate or
prosecute any activity that may be
protected by the First Amendment of
the United States Constitution. Finally,
HUD added § 115.310, which provided
requirements for fair housing testing
activities funded under the FHAP. A
detailed description of the proposed
rule can be found at 70 FR 28748–
28751.
In addition to inviting comments on
the proposed rule generally, HUD
sought comment from the public on
three issues in particular. First, HUD
requested that FHAP agencies of varying
sizes provide insight into what would
constitute reasonable complaint
numbers. Second, HUD sought comment
on the appropriateness of enumerating
timeframes by which interim and
certified agencies must comply in
sending out letters notifying parties of a
failure to meet the 100-day (completion
of investigation) or the one-year (final
administrative disposition)
requirements. Third, HUD invited
comments from the public on whether
100 cases is still a reasonable number an
agency must acceptably process in order
to obtain 10 percent of the agency’s total
FHAP payment amount. See section III
of this preamble for a summary of the
issues raised by the public commenters
and HUD’s responses.
II. This Final Rule
This rule follows publication of the
May 18, 2005, proposed rule and takes
into consideration the public comments
received on the proposed rule. HUD
received five comments related to the
May 18, 2005, proposed rule. After
careful review of the public comments,
HUD has made four noteworthy changes
to the proposed rule.
First, this final rule adds a timeframe
for FHAP agencies to send 100-day
letters. Performance Standard 1, at
§ 115.206, requires that an agency
unable to complete investigative
activities with respect to a complaint
within 100 days must send written
notification to the parties within 110
days of the filing of a complaint.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Second, this rule revises § 115.210 of
the proposed rule to clarify that HUD
may suspend all types of funding (not
just complaint processing funds) during
suspension and withdrawal because of
FHAP agency performance deficiencies.
Third, HUD proposed to remove
§ 115.305, the special enforcement effort
(SEE) fund provisions, from the
regulations but has retained the
provision in this final rule. In addition
to retaining the current regulatory
provision, this final rule includes
examples of meritorious mention, which
is one of the criteria for obtaining SEE
funds.
Fourth, in this final rule, HUD has
further clarified the requirement that a
FHAP agency spend at least 20 percent
of its total annual budget on fair housing
activities. Section 115.307(a)(5) of this
final rule clarifies that this requirement
applies only to FHAP agencies that
enforce antidiscrimination laws other
than a fair housing law.
III. Discussion of Public Comments on
the May 18, 2005, Proposed Rule
The public comment period on the
May 18, 2005, proposed rule ended on
July 18, 2005. HUD received five
comments. Commenters included one
private fair housing organization, two
current FHAP agencies, one local
community affairs department, and one
local housing authority. The summary
of comments that follows presents the
major issues and questions raised by the
public comments on the proposed rule.
HUD’s response follows each comment.
Comment: One commenter wrote that,
although some provisions strengthen
FHAP agencies, the majority create
unnecessary infringements that exceed
HUD’s authority and are better left to
state agencies.
HUD Response. The commenter did
not include any specific examples of
provisions that create unnecessary
infringements that exceed HUD’s
authority. Therefore, HUD cannot
respond because of the lack of
specificity. The authority to make the
revisions contained in the proposed rule
is set forth at 42 U.S.C. 3610(f) and 42
U.S.C. 3608(a).
Comment: The same commenter
recommended that no agency remain
certified if it processes fewer than 20
complaints in any given year after its
first year of operation.
HUD Response. After careful
consideration, HUD has determined that
it is inappropriate to identify in a
regulation a specific number of housing
discrimination complaints that agencies
must process. A one-size-fits-all
approach is impracticable because,
among other considerations, FHAP
E:\FR\FM\16APR2.SGM
16APR2
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
agencies serve populations of varying
sizes. An agency-by-agency analysis is a
more reasonable approach. As provided
in the proposed rule, this final rule
identifies factors HUD will consider in
determining what constitutes a
reasonable number of housing
discrimination complaints that a given
agency should receive and process.
Those factors include, but are not
limited to, the jurisdiction’s population;
the length of time the agency has
participated in the FHAP; and the
number of housing discrimination
complaints that the agency has received
and processed in the past. If an agency
fails to receive and process a reasonable
number of housing discrimination
complaints during a year of FHAP
participation, given education and
outreach efforts conducted and receipts
of complaints, the final rule gives the
Office of Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity (FHEO) regional director
the authority to put the agency on a
Performance Improvement Plan (PIP).
The PIP will set forth the number of
housing discrimination complaints that
the agency must receive and process
during subsequent years of FHAP
participation.
Comment: Another commenter wrote
that the determination of a reasonable
number of complaints be a joint
determination by HUD and the FHAP
agency.
HUD Response. As noted in response
to a similar comment, the determination
of what constitutes a reasonable number
of housing discrimination cases will be
made on an agency-by-agency basis. The
final rule identifies factors that HUD
will consider in making such a
determination for a given agency. This
commenter also recommended that the
determination be based on the historical
number of complaints that the FHAP
agency has processed. This is one of the
factors HUD has enumerated in this
final rule.
Comment: One commenter
recommended that HUD establish a 10day timeframe for sending out 100-day
letters.
HUD Response. HUD agrees and has
amended Performance Standard 1 in
§ 115.206 of the proposed regulation to
add paragraph (e)(1)(vi), which sets
forth a timeframe within which FHAP
agencies must issue 100-day letters.
HUD’s Title VIII Complaint Intake,
Investigation, and Conciliation
Handbook requires HUD to prepare case
status reports for a complaint at the 85th
day after the complaint is filed. The
completion of a case status report
triggers HUD’s automated complaint
processing system to generate 100-day
letters. Supervisors then review the case
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
status report, followed by the issuance
of the 100-day letter. Using HUD’s
procedure as a guide, Performance
Standard 1, in § 115.206(e)(1)(vi)
establishes that 100-day letters be issued
within 110 days of the filing of the
complaint.
Comment: A commenter wrote that
granting authority to regional FHEO
directors may be an improvement;
however, the authority should be
accompanied by consistent national
guidance about performance assessment
requirements and standards to avoid
inconsistent outcomes.
HUD Response. The proposed
regulation and the final regulation are
clear, stating that HUD may utilize the
performance deficiency procedures at
any time that the agency does not meet
one or more of the ten performance
standards enumerated in § 115.206. The
Department believes that these
enumerated standards compose the
consistent national guidance sought by
the commenter. The final regulation
further states that the performance
deficiency procedures may be applied to
agencies with either interim
certification or certification. At this
time, HUD will not set forth further
guidance regarding deficiency
procedures. HUD will, however,
monitor the implementation of the
performance standards and consider
developing additional guidance on this
issue as necessary.
Comment: Another commenter
recommended that HUD provide an
appeal process so that an agency that
has been placed on a PIP can appeal the
decision of the FHEO regional director
if they have a basis to believe that they
were wrongly placed on a performance
improvement plan (PIP).
HUD Response. After careful
consideration, HUD has determined that
it will not provide in the regulation an
appeal process for an agency placed on
a PIP. HUD believes that an agency’s
interests are sufficiently protected
within the performance deficiency
process set forth in the final rule, which
provides several opportunities for an
under-performing agency to avoid
involuntary withdrawal from the
program. The fact that an agency has
been placed on a PIP will not, in and of
itself, result in an agency’s inability to
participate in the FHAP. If an agency
fails to improve after being placed on a
PIP, HUD may move to suspend the
agency. If suspension is proposed, an
agency is given an opportunity to
respond within 30 days of receipt of the
suspension notification. Suspension
also does not result in an agency’s
inability to participate in the FHAP. If
an agency fails to improve after a period
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
19071
of suspension, the Assistant Secretary
for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity
may propose withdrawal. If withdrawal
is proposed, the agency is given the
opportunity to provide information and
documentation that establishes that the
administration of its law meets all of the
substantial equivalency certification
criteria set forth in 24 CFR part 115.
Comment: A commenter suggested
that HUD add mandated, on-site
performance assessments at least every
24 months and a requirement that FHEO
seek public input before certifying an
agency. The commenter also
recommended that HUD be required to
investigate complaints from the public
about performance.
HUD Response. The language of the
final rule regarding on-site assessments,
which in this respect is unchanged from
the proposed rule, provides HUD with
all of the authority necessary to
accomplish its oversight
responsibilities, while at the same time
allowing HUD the flexibility to match
available resources to identified
priorities.
With regard to the second issue
identified by the commenter, the final
rule indicates, as did the proposed rule,
that HUD will seek public input before
certifying an agency. Section 115.102(b)
states:
On an annual basis, the Assistant Secretary
may publish in the Federal Register a notice
that identifies all agencies that have received
interim certification during the prior year.
The notice will invite the public to comment
on the state and local laws of the new interim
agencies, as well as on the performance of the
agencies in enforcing their laws.
With regard to the third issue, while
the final rule does not require HUD to
investigate public complaints about the
performance of an agency, § 115.206
does require that ‘‘[A]ll [public]
comments will be considered before a
final decision on certification is made.’’
Moreover, complaints about a FHAP
agency will be considered and
examined as part of an agency’s
performance assessment.
Comment: Another commenter
recommended that HUD not recognize
prohibited bases in any manner because
these are state, county, and city rules
that are ‘‘completely foreign’’ to HUD.
HUD Response. The proposed rule
did not recognize any prohibited bases
that have not already been recognized in
the federal Fair Housing Act. Rather,
§ 115.204 simply sets forth the longstanding HUD policy that the inclusion
of additional prohibited bases in a state
or local law does not preclude HUD
from determining that a given law is
substantially equivalent to the Fair
Housing Act. While a state or local law
E:\FR\FM\16APR2.SGM
16APR2
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
19072
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
that has additional prohibited bases may
be found substantially equivalent, it is
important to note that HUD has not, and
will not, pay FHAP agencies for cases
that are not cognizable under the federal
Fair Housing Act.
Comment: A commenter
recommended that HUD not change
current HUD standards for
administrative closures. This
commenter also recommended that no
more than 12 percent of cases be closed
administratively.
HUD Response. Because
administrative closure standards for
FHAP agencies do not exist under the
current regulation, HUD is in the
process of developing such standards
and will provide further guidance.
Section 115.206 of this final rule adds
Performance Standard 2, which requires
that administrative closures be utilized
only in appropriate and limited
circumstances. In response to the
second part of the comment, HUD
believes it is inappropriate to mandate
an across-the-board cap on
administrative closures, as FHAP
agencies often have little control over
circumstances that may warrant
administrative closures. HUD’s objective
in developing administrative closure
guidance is not to prevent the use of
administrative closures in cases in
which they are warranted, but rather to
prevent their use in cases where a
finding on the merits would be more
appropriate.
Comment: The same commenter
recommended that the final rule require
that FHAP agencies follow the
procedures and standards for
investigation set forth in the Title VIII
Handbook (HUD Handbook 8024–1).
HUD Response. The Fair Housing Act,
at § 810(f)(3)(A), states that the Secretary
of HUD ‘‘may certify an agency * * *
only if the Secretary determines that
* * * the substantive rights protected
by such agency * * *; the procedures
followed by such agency; the remedies
available to such agency; and the
availability of judicial review of such
agency’s action * * * are substantially
equivalent to those created by and
under this title’’ (emphasis added). The
Fair Housing Act does not require an
agency’s law and procedures to be
identical to the Fair Housing Act.
Although HUD makes the Title VIII
Handbook available to FHAP agencies
and recommends that it be utilized in
the processing of dual-filed housing
discrimination complaints, HUD has
stopped short of requiring its usage. The
Title VIII Handbook is based on the Fair
Housing Act and its implementing
regulations. Because substantially
equivalent state and local laws may
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
deviate from the Fair Housing Act to a
certain extent, certain aspects of the
Title VIII Handbook might prove
impracticable for some FHAP agencies.
Comment: A commenter
recommended that the complaint be
closed and the complainant advised to
proceed through the courts if the
complainant rejects an offer by the
respondent to conciliation that
represents full relief.
HUD Response. HUD did not accept
this suggestion. The goal of conciliation
is to reach a resolution of a complaint
that is mutually acceptable to all parties,
including the complainant, the
respondent, and the FHAP agency. A
conciliator may educate parties about
settlement and the realities of a case.
However, a conciliator must never
threaten, or appear to threaten, a party
with adverse consequences for failing to
conciliate a complaint. In addition, a
FHAP agency must never close a
complaint and advise a complainant to
proceed to court if a complainant rejects
a respondent’s offer during conciliation,
even if the FHAP agency believes the
offer represents full relief. Instead, if
either party rejects an offer by the other
party, the FHAP agency should proceed
with its appropriate investigation and
disposition of the complaint.
Comment: A commenter stated that, if
there is a disagreement on the
determination issued by the FHAP
agency, HUD should pay the FHAP
agency for substantial work done and
reactivate the complaint for HUD’s
investigation.
HUD Response. If HUD disagrees with
the determination, the government
technical representative (GTR) may
deny payment to the agency for the case,
or return the case to the agency for
additional work. All cases in which
HUD has denied payment will be
considered as factors that affect the
continued interim certification and
certification.
Whenever complainants or
respondents disagree with the
determination, they are bound by the
FHAP agency’s procedures. HUD has no
authority to reactivate a case or reverse
a decision once the FHAP agency has
rendered a determination.
Comment: A commenter
recommended that HUD move
immediately to withdraw certification if
a statutory change or judicial action
‘‘limits the effectiveness of the law’’
rather than wait to determine if the law
is going to be changed and let cases be
processed by the FHAP agency during
the meantime.
HUD Response. In most cases, HUD
will not immediately withdraw
certification after learning that a change
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
to the law impacts substantial
equivalence. Rather than proceeding
directly to withdrawal, HUD will
proceed with the progressive scheme
identified in § 115.211 of the proposed
rule and this final rule. It is important
to note, however, that at each stage of
the progressive scheme, HUD may
decline to refer some or all complaints
to the agency, and elect not to provide
payments for complaints to the agency,
as provided in § 115.211. Moreover, it is
important to note that a change limiting
the effectiveness of an agency’s law may
not necessarily impair its ability to
process all types of housing
discrimination complaints.
Comment: The same commenter
wrote that partnerships with private fair
housing organizations, including
qualified fair housing organizations, be
added to the list of proper partnership
funds usage.
HUD Response. HUD believes that the
language of the proposed rule
sufficiently addressed this concern.
Section 115.304(d) states, ‘‘[s]ome
examples of proper P fund usage
include, but are not limited to * * *
contracting with qualified organizations
to conduct fair housing testing in
appropriate cases * * *.’’ The language
in this final rule is unchanged from that
of the proposed rule.
Comment: A commenter suggested
that HUD add a provision that states
that agencies under a PIP, suspension or
withdrawal status are not eligible for
Partnership ‘‘P’’ funding.
HUD Response. After considering this
comment, HUD revised § 115.210. The
section previously indicated that HUD
may suspend only complaint processing
funds during a period of suspension
and/or withdrawal. Section 115.210 in
this final rule is revised to state that
HUD may suspend all types of funding
under the FHAP during a period of
suspension and withdrawal.
Comment: A commenter
recommended that HUD reinstate SEE
(Special Enforcement Effort) funding.
HUD Response. After considering this
comment, HUD has decided to retain
SEE funds in this final rule. It is
important to recognize, however, that
identifying funding in the final
regulation does not guarantee that it will
be available to FHAP agencies, since
funding is subject to the annual
congressional appropriations process.
In reincorporating SEE funds at
§ 115.305, HUD has added examples to
clarify the current regulation. This final
rule more fully defines what is meant by
the meritorious mention criteria (which
is one of the criteria for obtaining SEE
funds identified in the regulation).
E:\FR\FM\16APR2.SGM
16APR2
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Comment: A commenter suggested
that HUD remove the deduction
provision or change it to specify that
training funds will be deducted if the
agency does not participate in HUDapproved training.
HUD Response. HUD agrees with this
commenter and has revised § 115.306(b)
of the final rule to state, ‘‘* * * [i]f the
agency does not participate in
mandatory HUD-approved or HUDsponsored training, training funds will
be deducted from the agency’s overall
training amount.’’
Comment: Several commenters noted
that funding for other agency
components is often beyond a FHAP
agency’s control. The commenters
suggested that if an agency performs
adequately, it should not matter what
the percentage of its budget is for fair
housing.
HUD Response. It is important to
HUD that a substantially equivalent
state or local agency demonstrate a
commitment to fair housing
enforcement by devoting financial
resources to its fair housing program
and that those resources be comparable
to amounts devoted to the enforcement
of other antidiscrimination laws.
Therefore, HUD will not eliminate the
20 percent requirement. HUD has,
however, revised § 115.306(a)(5) to
further clarify that this requirement
applies only when an agency enforces
antidiscrimination laws other than a fair
housing law.
Comment: A commenter wrote that
HUD should not, and does not, fund
local agencies to enforce HUD’s fair
housing responsibilities and suggested
that the funds would be better used for
the operating fund.
HUD Response. Under section 810(f)
of the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C.
3610(f) (‘‘the Act’’), the Secretary of
HUD is required to refer housing
discrimination complaints to state and
local agencies that administer fair
housing laws certified as substantially
equivalent to the Act. The Secretary is
further authorized by § 817 of the Act,
42 U.S.C. 3616, to reimburse such
agencies for services rendered in
assisting HUD’s enforcement of the Act.
Comment: A commenter wrote that
First Amendment provisions should not
be incorporated into this rule because
some agencies will have different state
constitutional provisions.
HUD Response. The provision at
§ 115.310 is unchanged in this final
rule. The purpose of FHAP is to provide
assistance and reimbursement to
certified state and local fair housing
enforcement agencies. The intent of this
funding program is to build a
coordinated intergovernmental
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:55 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
enforcement effort to further fair
housing, within constitutional
limitations. HUD will not accept for
filing any housing discrimination
complaint in which the alleged
discriminatory acts are protected by the
First Amendment to the Constitution of
the United States. This necessarily
means that such complaints will not be
dual-filed, and concomitantly, that
FHAP agencies cannot and will not be
reimbursed by HUD for any work
related to the processing, investigation,
or enforcement of such complaints.
Findings and Certifications
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements contained in this rule have
been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520) and assigned OMB control
number 2529–0005. This rule does not
revise these information collection
requirements. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information, unless the collection
displays a valid control number.
19073
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism
implications if the rule either imposes
substantial direct compliance costs on
state and local governments and is not
required by statute, or the rule preempts
state law, unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive Order. This
final rule does not have federalism
implications and does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
state and local governments or preempt
state law within the meaning of the
Executive Order.
Environmental Impact
This final rule involves a policy
document that sets out enforcement
procedures and provides for fair
housing enforcement assistance.
Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(3),
this final rule is categorically excluded
from environmental review under the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4321).
Regulatory Planning and Review
Impact on Small Entities
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) reviewed this rule under
Executive Order 12866 (entitled
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’).
OMB determined that this rule is a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined in section 3(f) of the Order
(although not economically significant,
as provided in section 3(f)(1) of the
Order). Any changes made to the rule
subsequent to its submission to OMB
are identified in the docket file, which
is available for public inspection in the
Regulations Division, Office of General
Counsel, Department of Housing and
Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street,
SW, Room 10276, Washington, DC
20410–0500. Due to security measures
at the HUD Headquarters building,
please schedule an appointment to
review the docket file by calling the
Regulations Division at (202) 708–3055
(this is not a toll-free number).
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires an
agency to conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements, unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This final rule
revises and makes clarifying changes
related to substantial equivalency
certification and the FHAP. Specifically,
this rule is limited to providing clear
timeframes, procedures, and concise
explanations to assist FHAP agencies in
complying with the regulations and
successfully administering their
agencies. Accordingly, the undersigned
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance Number is 14.401.
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements
for federal agencies to assess the effects
of their regulatory actions on state,
local, and tribal governments and the
private sector. This final rule does not
impose any federal mandates on any
state, local, or tribal governments or the
private sector within the meaning of the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Number
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 115
Administrative practice and
procedure, Aged, Fair housing, Grant
programs—housing and community
development, Individuals with
disabilities, Intergovernmental relations,
Mortgages, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
E:\FR\FM\16APR2.SGM
16APR2
19074
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
For the reasons stated in the preamble,
HUD revises 24 CFR part 115 to read as
follows:
I
PART 115—CERTIFICATION AND
FUNDING OF STATE AND LOCAL FAIR
HOUSING ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
Subpart A—General
Sec.
115.100 Definitions.
115.101 Program administration.
115.102 Public notices.
Subpart B—Certification of Substantially
Equivalent Agencies
115.200 Purpose.
115.201 The two phases of substantial
equivalency certification.
115.202 Request for interim certification.
115.203 Interim certification procedures.
115.204 Criteria for adequacy of law.
115.205 Certification procedures.
115.206 Performance assessments;
Performance standards.
115.207 Consequences of interim
certification and certification.
115.208 Procedures for renewal of
certification.
115.209 Technical assistance.
115.210 Performance deficiency
procedures; Suspension; Withdrawal.
115.211 Changes limiting effectiveness of
agency’s law; Corrective actions;
Suspension; Withdrawal; Consequences
of repeal; Changes not limiting
effectiveness.
115.212 Request after withdrawal.
Subpart C—Fair Housing Assistance
Program
115.300 Purpose.
115.301 Agency eligibility criteria; Funding
availability.
115.302 Capacity building funds.
115.303 Eligible activities for capacity
building funds.
115.304 Agencies eligible for contributions
funds.
115.305 Special enforcement effort (SEE)
funds.
115.306 Training funds.
115.307 Requirements for participation in
the FHAP; Corrective and remedial
action for failing to comply with
requirements.
115.308 Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
115.309 Subcontracting under the FHAP.
115.310 FHAP and the First Amendment.
115.311 Testing.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3601–19; 42 U.S.C.
3535(d).
Subpart A—General
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
§ 115.100
Definitions.
(a) The terms ‘‘Fair Housing Act,’’
‘‘HUD,’’ and ‘‘the Department,’’ as used
in this part, are defined in 24 CFR 5.100.
(b) The terms ‘‘aggrieved person,’’
‘‘complainant,’’ ‘‘conciliation,’’
‘‘conciliation agreement,’’
‘‘discriminatory housing practice,’’
‘‘dwelling,’’ ‘‘handicap,’’ ‘‘person,’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
‘‘respondent,’’ ‘‘secretary,’’ and ‘‘state,’’
as used in this part, are defined in
Section 802 of the Fair Housing Act (42
U.S.C. 3602).
(c) Other definitions. The following
definitions also apply to this part:
Act means the Fair Housing Act, as
defined in 24 CFR 5.100.
Assistant Secretary means the
Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and
Equal Opportunity.
Certified agency is an agency that has
been granted certification by the
Assistant Secretary in accordance with
the requirements of this part.
Cooperative agreement is the
instrument HUD will use to provide
funds. The Cooperative Agreement
includes attachments and/or appendices
establishing requirements relating to the
operation and performance of the
agency.
Cooperative agreement officer (CAO)
is the administrator of the funds
awarded pursuant to this part and is a
regional director of the Office of Fair
Housing and Equal Opportunity.
Dual-filed complaint means a housing
discrimination complaint that has been
filed with both HUD and the agency that
has been granted interim certification or
certification by the Assistant Secretary.
FHAP means the Fair Housing
Assistance Program.
FHEO means HUD’s Office of Fair
Housing and Equal Opportunity.
FHEO regional director means a
regional director of the Office of Fair
Housing and Equal Opportunity.
Fair housing law or Law refers to both
state fair housing laws and local fair
housing laws.
Final administrative disposition
means an agency’s completion of a case
following a reasonable cause finding,
including, but not limited to, an agencyapproved settlement or a final,
administrative decision issued by
commissioners, hearing officers or
administrative law judges. Final
administrative disposition does not
include dispositions in judicial
proceedings resulting from election or
appeal.
Government Technical Monitor (GTM)
means the HUD staff person who has
been designated to provide technical
and financial oversight and evaluation
of the FHAP grantee’s performance.
Government Technical Representative
(GTR) means the HUD staff person who
is responsible for the technical
administration of the FHAP grant, the
evaluation of performance under the
FHAP grant, the acceptance of technical
reports or projects, the approval of
payments, and other such specific
responsibilities as may be stipulated in
the FHAP grant.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Impracticable, as used in this part, is
when complaint processing is delayed
by circumstances beyond the control of
the interim or certified agency. Those
situations include, but are not limited
to, complaints involving complex issues
requiring extensive investigations,
complaints involving new and
complicated areas of law that need to be
analyzed, and where a witness is
discovered late in the investigation and
needs to be interviewed.
Interim agency is an agency that has
been granted interim certification by the
Assistant Secretary.
Ordinance, as used in this part, means
a law enacted by the legislative body of
a municipality.
Statute, as used in this part, means a
law enacted by the legislative body of a
state.
Testing refers to the use of an
individual or individuals (‘‘testers’’)
who, without a bona fide intent to rent
or purchase a house, apartment, or other
dwelling, pose as prospective renters or
purchasers for the purpose of gathering
information that may indicate whether a
housing provider is complying with fair
housing laws.
§ 115.101
Program administration.
(a) Authority and responsibility. The
Secretary has delegated the authority
and responsibility for administering this
part to the Assistant Secretary.
(b) Delegation of Authority. The
Assistant Secretary retains the right to
make final decisions concerning the
granting and withdrawal of substantial
equivalency interim certification and
certification. The Assistant Secretary
delegates the authority and
responsibility for administering the
remainder of this part to the FHEO
regional director. This includes
assessing the performance of interim
and certified agencies as described in
§ 115.206. This also includes the
offering of a Performance Improvement
Plan (PIP) as described in § 115.210 and
the suspension of interim certification
or certification due to performance
deficiencies as described in § 115.210.
§ 115.102
Public notices.
(a) Periodically, the Assistant
Secretary will publish the following
public notices in the Federal Register:
(1) A list of all interim and certified
agencies; and
(2) A list of agencies to which a
withdrawal of interim certification or
certification has been proposed.
(b) On an annual basis, the Assistant
Secretary may publish in the Federal
Register a notice that identifies all
agencies that have received interim
certification during the prior year. The
E:\FR\FM\16APR2.SGM
16APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
notice will invite the public to comment
on the state and local laws of the new
interim agencies, as well as on the
performance of the agencies in enforcing
their laws. All comments will be
considered before a final decision on
certification is made.
Subpart B—Certification of
Substantially Equivalent Agencies
§ 115.200
Purpose.
This subpart implements section
810(f) of the Fair Housing Act. The
purpose of this subpart is to set forth:
(a) The basis for agency interim
certification and certification;
(b) Procedures by which a
determination is made to grant interim
certification or certification;
(c) How the Department will evaluate
the performance of an interim and
certified agency;
(d) Procedures that the Department
will utilize when an interim or certified
agency performs deficiently;
(e) Procedures that the Department
will utilize when there are changes
limiting the effectiveness of an interim
or certified agency’s law;
(f) Procedures for renewal of
certification; and
(g) Procedures when an agency
requests interim certification or
certification after a withdrawal.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
§ 115.201 The two phases of substantial
equivalency certification.
Substantial equivalency certification
is granted if the Department determines
that a state or local agency enforces a
law that is substantially equivalent to
the Fair Housing Act with regard to
substantive rights, procedures,
remedies, and the availability of judicial
review. The Department has developed
a two-phase process of substantial
equivalency certification.
(a) Adequacy of Law. In the first
phase, the Assistant Secretary will
determine whether, on its face, the fair
housing law that the agency administers
provides rights, procedures, remedies,
and the availability of judicial review
that are substantially equivalent to those
provided in the federal Fair Housing
Act. An affirmative conclusion may
result in the Department offering the
agency interim certification. An agency
must obtain interim certification prior to
obtaining certification.
(b) Adequacy of Performance. In the
second phase, the Assistant Secretary
will determine whether, in operation,
the fair housing law that the agency
administers provides rights, procedures,
remedies, and the availability of judicial
review that are substantially equivalent
to those provided in the federal Fair
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Housing Act. An affirmative conclusion
will result in the Department offering
the agency certification.
§ 115.202
Request for interim certification.
(a) A request for interim certification
under this subpart shall be filed with
the Assistant Secretary by the state or
local official having principal
responsibility for the administration of
the state or local fair housing law. The
request shall be supported by the text of
the jurisdiction’s fair housing law, the
law creating and empowering the
agency, all laws referenced in the
jurisdiction’s fair housing law, any
regulations and directives issued under
the law, and any formal opinions of the
State Attorney General or the chief legal
officer of the jurisdiction that pertain to
the jurisdiction’s fair housing law. A
request shall also include organizational
information of the agency responsible
for administering and enforcing the law.
(b) The request and supporting
materials shall be filed with the
Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and
Equal Opportunity, Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20410–2000. The Assistant Secretary
shall forward a copy of the request and
supporting materials to the appropriate
FHEO regional director. A copy of the
request and supporting materials will be
kept available for public examination
and copying at:
(1) The office of the Assistant
Secretary; and
(2) The office of the state or local
agency charged with administration and
enforcement of the state or local fair
housing law.
(c) Upon receipt of a request, HUD
will analyze the agency’s fair housing
law to determine whether it meets the
criteria identified in § 115.204.
(d) HUD shall review a request for
interim certification from a local agency
located in a state with an interim
certified or certified substantially
equivalent state agency. However, in the
request for interim certification, the
local agency must certify that the
substantially equivalent state law does
not prohibit the local agency from
administering and enforcing its own fair
housing law within the locality.
§ 115.203
Interim certification procedures.
(a) Upon receipt of a request for
interim certification filed under
§ 115.202, the Assistant Secretary may
request further information necessary
for a determination to be made under
this section. The Assistant Secretary
may consider the relative priority given
to fair housing administration, as
compared to the agency’s other duties
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
19075
and responsibilities, as well as the
compatibility or potential conflict of fair
housing objectives with these other
duties and responsibilities.
(b) If the Assistant Secretary
determines, after application of the
criteria set forth in § 115.204, that the
state or local law, on its face, provides
substantive rights, procedures,
remedies, and judicial review
procedures for alleged discriminatory
housing practices that are substantially
equivalent to those provided in the Act,
the Assistant Secretary may offer to
enter into an Agreement for the Interim
Referral of Complaints and Other
Utilization of Services (interim
agreement). The interim agreement will
outline the procedures and authorities
upon which the interim certification is
based.
(c) Such interim agreement, after it is
signed by all appropriate signatories,
will result in the agency receiving
interim certification. Appropriate
signatories include the Assistant
Secretary, the FHEO regional director,
and the state or local official having
principal responsibility for the
administration of the state or local fair
housing law.
(d) Interim agreements shall be for a
term of no more than three years.
(e) All regulations, rules, directives,
and/or opinions of the State Attorney
General or the jurisdiction’s chief legal
officer that are necessary for the law to
be substantially equivalent on its face
must be enacted and effective in order
for the Assistant Secretary to offer the
agency an interim agreement.
(f) Interim certification required prior
to certification. An agency is required to
obtain interim certification prior to
obtaining certification.
§ 115.204
Criteria for adequacy of law.
(a) In order for a determination to be
made that a state or local fair housing
agency administers a law, which, on its
face, provides rights and remedies for
alleged discriminatory housing practices
that are substantially equivalent to those
provided in the Act, the law must:
(1) Provide for an administrative
enforcement body to receive and
process complaints and provide that:
(i) Complaints must be in writing;
(ii) Upon the filing of a complaint, the
agency shall serve notice upon the
complainant acknowledging the filing
and advising the complainant of the
time limits and choice of forums
provided under the law;
(iii) Upon the filing of a complaint,
the agency shall promptly serve notice
on the respondent or person charged
with the commission of a discriminatory
housing practice advising of his or her
E:\FR\FM\16APR2.SGM
16APR2
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
19076
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
procedural rights and obligations under
the statute or ordinance, together with a
copy of the complaint;
(iv) A respondent may file an answer
to a complaint.
(2) Delegate to the administrative
enforcement body comprehensive
authority, including subpoena power, to
investigate the allegations of
complaints, and power to conciliate
complaints, and require that:
(i) The agency commences
proceedings with respect to the
complaint before the end of the 30th day
after receipt of the complaint;
(ii) The agency investigates the
allegations of the complaint and
complete the investigation within the
timeframe established by section
810(a)(1)(B)(iv) of the Act or comply
with the notification requirements of
section 810(a)(1)(C) of the Act;
(iii) The agency make final
administrative disposition of a
complaint within one year of the date of
receipt of a complaint, unless it is
impracticable to do so. If the agency is
unable to do so, it shall notify the
parties, in writing, of the reasons for not
doing so;
(iv) Any conciliation agreement
arising out of conciliation efforts by the
agency shall be an agreement between
the respondent, the complainant, and
the agency and shall require the
approval of the agency;
(v) Each conciliation agreement shall
be made public, unless the complainant
and respondent otherwise agree and the
agency determines that disclosure is not
required to further the purpose of the
law.
(3) Not place excessive burdens on the
aggrieved person that might discourage
the filing of complaints, such as:
(i) A provision that a complaint must
be filed within any period of time less
than 180 days after an alleged
discriminatory practice has occurred or
terminated;
(ii) Anti-testing provisions;
(iii) Provisions that could subject an
aggrieved person to costs, criminal
penalties, or fees in connection with the
filing of complaints.
(4) Not contain exemptions that
substantially reduce the coverage of
housing accommodations as compared
to section 803 of the Act.
(5) Provide the same protections as
those afforded by sections 804, 805, 806,
and 818 of the Act, consistent with
HUD’s implementing regulations found
at 24 CFR part 100.
(b) In addition to the factors described
in paragraph (a) of this section, the
provisions of the state or local law must
afford administrative and judicial
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
protection and enforcement of the rights
embodied in the law.
(1) The agency must have the
authority to:
(i) Grant or seek prompt judicial
action for appropriate temporary or
preliminary relief pending final
disposition of a complaint, if such
action is necessary to carry out the
purposes of the law;
(ii) Issue and seek enforceable
subpoenas;
(iii) Grant actual damages in an
administrative proceeding or provide
adjudication in court at agency expense
to allow the award of actual damages to
an aggrieved person;
(iv) Grant injunctive or other
equitable relief, or be specifically
authorized to seek such relief in a court
of competent jurisdiction;
(v) Provide an administrative
proceeding in which a civil penalty may
be assessed or provide adjudication in
court, at agency expense, allowing the
assessment of punitive damages against
the respondent.
(2) If an agency’s law offers an
administrative hearing, the agency must
also provide parties an election option
substantially equivalent to the election
provisions of section 812 of the Act.
(3) Agency actions must be subject to
judicial review upon application by any
party aggrieved by a final agency order.
(4) Judicial review of a final agency
order must be in a court with authority
to:
(i) Grant to the petitioner, or to any
other party, such temporary relief,
restraining order, or other order as the
court determines is just and proper;
(ii) Affirm, modify, or set aside, in
whole or in part, the order, or remand
the order for further proceeding; and
(iii) Enforce the order to the extent
that the order is affirmed or modified.
(c) The requirement that the state or
local law prohibit discrimination on the
basis of familial status does not require
that the state or local law limit the
applicability of any reasonable local,
state, or federal restrictions regarding
the maximum number of occupants
permitted to occupy a dwelling.
(d) The state or local law may assure
that no prohibition of discrimination
because of familial status applies to
housing for older persons, as described
in 24 CFR part 100, subpart E.
(e) A determination of the adequacy of
a state or local fair housing law ‘‘on its
face’’ is intended to focus on the
meaning and intent of the text of the
law, as distinguished from the
effectiveness of its administration.
Accordingly, this determination is not
limited to an analysis of the literal text
of the law. Regulations, directives, rules
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
of procedure, judicial decisions, or
interpretations of the fair housing law
by competent authorities will be
considered in making this
determination.
(f) A law will be found inadequate
‘‘on its face’’ if it permits any of the
agency’s decision-making authority to
be contracted out or delegated to a nongovernmental authority. For the
purposes of this paragraph, ‘‘decisionmaking authority’’ includes but is not
limited to:
(1) Acceptance of a complaint;
(2) Approval of a conciliation
agreement;
(3) Dismissal of a complaint;
(4) Any action specified in
§ 115.204(a)(2)(iii) or (b)(1); and
(5) Any decision-making regarding
whether a particular matter will or will
not be pursued.
(g) The state or local law must provide
for civil enforcement of the law by an
aggrieved person by the commencement
of an action in an appropriate court at
least one year after the occurrence or
termination of an alleged discriminatory
housing practice. The court must be
empowered to:
(1) Award the plaintiff actual and
punitive damages;
(2) Grant as relief, as it deems
appropriate, any temporary or
permanent injunction, temporary
restraining order or other order; and
(3) Allow reasonable attorney’s fees
and costs.
(h) If a state or local law is different
than the Act in a way that does not
diminish coverage of the Act, including,
but not limited to, the protection of
additional prohibited bases, then the
state or local law may still be found
substantially equivalent.
§ 115.205
Certification procedures.
(a) Certification. (1) If the Assistant
Secretary determines, after application
of criteria set forth in §§ 115.204,
115.206, and this section, that the state
or local law, both ‘‘on its face’’ and ‘‘in
operation,’’ provides substantive rights,
procedures, remedies, and judicial
review procedures for alleged
discriminatory housing practices that
are substantially equivalent to those
provided in the Act, the Assistant
Secretary may enter into a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
with the agency.
(2) The MOU is a written agreement
providing for the referral of complaints
to the agency and for communication
procedures between the agency and
HUD that are adequate to permit the
Assistant Secretary to monitor the
agency’s continuing substantial
equivalency certification.
E:\FR\FM\16APR2.SGM
16APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(3) The MOU, after it is signed by all
appropriate signatories, may authorize
an agency to be a certified agency for a
period of not more than five years.
Appropriate signatories include the
Assistant Secretary, the FHEO regional
director, and the authorized employee(s)
of the agency.
(b) In order to receive certification,
during the 60 days prior to the
expiration of the agency’s interim
agreement, the agency must certify to
the Assistant Secretary that the state or
local fair housing law, ‘‘on its face,’’
continues to be substantially equivalent
to the Act (i.e., there have been no
amendments to the state or local fair
housing law, adoption of rules or
procedures concerning the fair housing
law, or judicial or other authoritative
interpretations of the fair housing law
that limit the effectiveness of the
agency’s fair housing law).
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
§ 115.206 Performance assessments;
Performance standards.
(a) Frequency of on-site performance
assessment during interim certification.
The Assistant Secretary, through the
appropriate FHEO regional office, may
conduct an on-site performance
assessment not later than six months
after the execution of the interim
agreement. An on-site performance
assessment may also be conducted
during the six months immediately
prior to the expiration of the interim
agreement. HUD has the discretion to
conduct additional performance
assessments during the period of
interim certification, as it deems
necessary.
(b) Frequency of on-site performance
assessment during certification. During
certification, the Assistant Secretary
through the FHEO regional office, may
conduct on-site performance
assessments every 24 months. HUD has
the discretion to conduct additional
performance assessments during the
period of certification, as it deems
necessary.
(c) In conducting the performance
assessment, the FHEO regional office
shall determine whether the agency
engages in timely, comprehensive, and
thorough fair housing complaint
investigation, conciliation, and
enforcement activities. In the
performance assessment report, the
FHEO regional office may recommend
to the Assistant Secretary whether the
agency should continue to be interim
certified or certified. In conducting the
performance assessment, the FHEO
regional office shall also determine
whether the agency is in compliance
with the requirements for participation
in the FHAP enumerated in §§ 115.307,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
115.308, 115.309, 115.310, and 115.311
of this part. In the performance
assessment report, the FHEO regional
office shall identify whether the agency
meets the requirements of §§ 115.307,
115.308, 115.309, 115.310, and 115.311
of this part, and, therefore, should
continue receiving funding under the
FHAP.
(d) At a minimum, the performance
assessment will consider the following
to determine the effectiveness of an
agency’s fair housing complaint
processing, consistent with such
guidance as may be issued by HUD:
(1) The agency’s case processing
procedures;
(2) The thoroughness of the agency’s
case processing;
(3) A review of cause and no cause
determinations for quality of
investigations and consistency with
appropriate standards;
(4) A review of conciliation
agreements and other settlements;
(5) A review of the agency’s
administrative closures; and
(6) A review of the agency’s
enforcement procedures, including
administrative hearings and judicial
proceedings.
(e) Performance standards. HUD shall
utilize the following performance
standards while conducting
performance assessments. If an agency
does not meet one or more performance
standard(s), HUD shall utilize the
performance deficiency procedures
enumerated in § 115.210.
(1) Performance Standard 1.
Commence complaint proceedings,
carry forward such proceedings,
complete investigations, issue
determinations, and make final
administrative dispositions in a timely
manner. To meet this standard, the
performance assessment will consider
the timeliness of the agency’s actions
with respect to its complaint processing,
including, but not limited to:
(i) Whether the agency began its
processing of fair housing complaints
within 30 days of receipt;
(ii) Whether the agency completes the
investigative activities with respect to a
complaint within 100 days from the
date of receipt or, if it is impracticable
to do so, notifies the parties in writing
of the reason(s) for the delay;
(iii) Whether the agency makes a
determination of reasonable cause or no
reasonable cause with respect to a
complaint within 100 days from the
date of receipt or, if it is impracticable
to do so, notifies the parties in writing
of the reason(s) for the delay;
(iv) Whether the agency makes a final
administrative disposition of a
complaint within one year from the date
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
19077
of receipt or, if it is impracticable to do
so, notifies the parties in writing of the
reason(s) for the delay; and
(v) Whether the agency completed the
investigation of the complaint and
prepared a complete, final investigative
report.
(vi) When an agency is unable to
complete investigative activities with
respect to a complaint within 100 days,
the agency must send written
notification to the parties, indicating the
reason(s) for the delay, within 110 days
of the filing of the complaint.
(2) Performance Standard 2.
Administrative closures are utilized
only in limited and appropriate
circumstances. Administrative closures
should be distinguished from a closure
on the merits and may not be used
instead of making a recommendation or
determination of reasonable or no
reasonable cause. HUD will provide
further guidance to interim and certified
agencies on the appropriate
circumstances for administrative
closures.
(3) Performance Standard 3. During
the period beginning with the filing of
a complaint and ending with filing of a
charge or dismissal, the agency will, to
the extent feasible, attempt to conciliate
the complaint. After a charge has been
issued, the agency will, to the extent
feasible, continue to attempt settlement
until a hearing or a judicial proceeding
has begun.
(4) Performance Standard 4. The
agency conducts compliance reviews of
settlements, conciliation agreements,
and orders resolving discriminatory
housing practices. The performance
assessment shall include, but not be
limited to:
(i) An assessment of the agency’s
procedures for conducting compliance
reviews; and
(ii) Terms and conditions of
agreements and orders issued.
(5) Performance Standard 5. The
agency must consistently and
affirmatively seek and obtain the type of
relief designed to prevent recurrences of
discriminatory practices. The
performance assessment shall include,
but not be limited to:
(i) An assessment of the agency’s use
of its authority to seek actual damages,
as appropriate;
(ii) An assessment of the agency’s use
of its authority to seek and assess civil
penalties or punitive damages, as
appropriate;
(iii) An assessment of the types of
relief sought by the agency with
consideration for the inclusion of
affirmative provisions designed to
protect the public interest;
E:\FR\FM\16APR2.SGM
16APR2
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
19078
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(iv) A review of all types of relief
obtained;
(v) A review of the adequacy of the
relief sought and obtained in light of the
issues raised by the complaint;
(vi) The number of complaints closed
with relief and the number closed
without relief;
(vii) The number of complaints that
proceed to administrative hearing and
the result; and
(viii) The number of complaints that
proceed to judicial proceedings and the
result.
(6) Performance Standard 6. The
agency must consistently and
affirmatively seek to eliminate all
prohibited practices under its fair
housing law. An assessment under this
standard will include, but not be limited
to, an identification of the education
and outreach efforts of the agency.
(7) Performance Standard 7. The
agency must demonstrate that it receives
and processes a reasonable number of
complaints cognizable under both the
federal Fair Housing Act and the
agency’s fair housing statute or
ordinance. The reasonable number will
be determined by HUD and based on all
relevant circumstances including, but
not limited to, the population of the
jurisdiction that the agency serves, the
length of time that the agency has
participated in the FHAP, and the
number of complaints that the agency
has received and processed in the past.
If an agency fails to receive and process
a reasonable number of complaints
during a year of FHAP participation,
given education and outreach efforts
conducted and receipts of complaints,
then the FHEO regional director may
offer the agency a Performance
Improvement Plan (PIP), as described in
§ 115.210(a)(2). The PIP will set forth
the number of complaints the agency
must process during subsequent years of
FHAP participation. After issuing the
PIP, the FHEO regional office will
provide the agency with technical
assistance on ways to increase
awareness of fair housing rights and
responsibilities in the jurisdiction.
(8) Performance Standard 8. The
agency must report to HUD on the final
status of all dual-filed complaints where
a determination of reasonable cause was
made. The report must identify, at a
minimum, how complaints were
resolved (e.g., settlement, judicial
proceedings, or administrative hearing),
when they were resolved, the forum in
which they were resolved, and types
and amounts of relief obtained.
(9) Performance Standard 9. The
agency must conform its performance to
the provisions of any written
agreements executed by the agency and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
the Department related to substantial
equivalency certification, including, but
not limited to, the interim agreement or
MOU.
§ 115.207 Consequences of interim
certification and certification.
(a) Whenever a complaint received by
the Assistant Secretary alleges
violations of a fair housing law
administered by an agency that has been
interim certified or certified as
substantially equivalent, the complaint
will be referred to the agency, and no
further action shall be taken by the
Assistant Secretary with respect to such
complaint except as provided for by the
Act, this part, 24 CFR part 103, subpart
C, and any written agreements executed
by the Agency and the Assistant
Secretary. HUD shall make referrals to
interim certified and certified local
agencies in accordance with this section
even when the local agency is located in
a state with an interim certified or
certified state agency.
(b) If HUD determines that a
complaint has not been processed in a
timely manner in accordance with the
performance standards set forth in
§ 115.206, HUD may reactivate the
complaint, conduct its own
investigation and conciliation efforts,
and make a determination consistent
with 24 CFR part 103.
(c) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of
this section, whenever the Assistant
Secretary has reason to believe that a
complaint demonstrates a basis for the
commencement of proceedings against
any respondent under section 814(a) of
the Act or for proceedings by any
governmental licensing or supervisory
authorities, the Assistant Secretary shall
transmit the information upon which
such belief is based to the Attorney
General, federal financial regulatory
agencies, other federal agencies, or other
appropriate governmental licensing or
supervisory authorities.
§ 115.208 Procedures for renewal of
certification.
(a) If the Assistant Secretary
affirmatively concludes that the
agency’s law and performance have
complied with the requirements of this
part in each of the five years of
certification, the Assistant Secretary
may renew the certification of the
agency.
(b) In determining whether to renew
the certification of an agency, the
Assistant Secretary’s review may
include, but is not limited to:
(1) Performance assessments of the
agency conducted by the Department
during the five years of certification;
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(2) The agency’s own certification that
the state or local fair housing law
continues to be substantially equivalent
both ‘‘on its face’’ and ‘‘in operation;’’
(i.e., there have been no amendments to
the state or local fair housing law,
adoption of rules or procedures
concerning the fair housing law, or
judicial or other authoritative
interpretations of the fair housing law
that limit the effectiveness of the
agency’s fair housing law); and
(3) Any and all public comments
regarding the relevant state and local
laws and the performance of the agency
in enforcing the law.
(c) If the Assistant Secretary decides
to renew an agency’s certification, the
Assistant Secretary will offer the agency
either a new MOU or an Addendum to
the Memorandum of Understanding
(addendum). The new MOU or
addendum will extend and update the
MOU between HUD and the agency.
(d) The new MOU or addendum,
when signed by all appropriate
signatories, will result in the agency’s
certification being renewed for five
years from the date on which the
previous MOU was to expire.
Appropriate signatories include the
Assistant Secretary, the FHEO regional
director, and the authorized employee(s)
of the agency.
(e) The provisions of this section may
be applied to an agency that has an
expired MOU or an expired addendum.
§ 115.209
Technical assistance.
(a) The Assistant Secretary, through
the FHEO regional office, may provide
technical assistance to the interim and
certified agencies at any time. The
agency may request such technical
assistance or the FHEO regional office
may determine the necessity for
technical assistance and require the
agency’s cooperation and participation.
(b) The Assistant Secretary, through
FHEO headquarters or regional staff,
will require that the agency participate
in training conferences and seminars
that will enhance the agency’s ability to
process complaints alleging
discriminatory housing practices.
§ 115.210 Performance deficiency
procedures; Suspension; Withdrawal.
(a) HUD may utilize the following
performance deficiency procedures if it
determines at any time that the agency
does not meet one or more of the
performance standards enumerated in
§ 115.206. The performance deficiency
procedures may be applied to agencies
with either interim certification or
certification. If an agency fails to meet
performance standard 7, HUD may
bypass the technical assistance
E:\FR\FM\16APR2.SGM
16APR2
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
performance deficiency procedure and
proceed to the PIP.
(1) Technical assistance. After
discovering the deficiency, the FHEO
regional office should immediately
inform the agency and provide the
agency with technical assistance.
(2) Performance improvement plan. If,
following technical assistance, the
agency does not bring its performance
into compliance with § 115.206 within a
time period identified by the FHEO
regional director, the FHEO regional
director may offer the agency a PIP.
(i) The PIP will outline the agency’s
performance deficiencies, identify the
necessary corrective actions, and
include a timetable for completion.
(ii) If the agency receives a PIP,
funding under the FHAP may be
suspended for the duration of the PIP.
(iii) Once the agency has
implemented the corrective actions to
eliminate the deficiencies, and such
corrective actions are accepted by the
FHEO regional director, funding may be
restored.
(iv) The FHEO regional office may
provide the agency with technical
assistance during the period of the PIP,
if appropriate.
(b) Suspension. If the agency does not
agree to implement the PIP or does not
implement the corrective actions
identified in the PIP within the time
allotted, then the FHEO regional
director may suspend the agency’s
interim certification or certification.
(1) The FHEO regional director shall
notify the agency in writing of the
specific reasons for the suspension and
provide the agency with an opportunity
to respond within 30 days.
(2) Suspension shall not exceed 180
days.
(3) During the period of suspension,
HUD will not refer complaints to the
agency.
(4) If an agency is suspended, the
FHEO regional office may elect not to
provide funding under the FHAP to the
agency during the period of suspension,
unless and until the Assistant Secretary
determines that the agency is fully in
compliance with § 115.206.
(5) HUD may provide the agency with
technical assistance during the period of
suspension, if appropriate.
(6) No more than 60 days prior to the
end of suspension, the FHEO regional
office shall conduct a performance
assessment of the agency.
(c) Withdrawal. If, following the
performance assessment conducted at
the end of suspension, the Assistant
Secretary determines that the agency
has not corrected the deficiencies, the
Assistant Secretary may propose to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
withdraw the interim certification or
certification of the agency.
(1) The Assistant Secretary shall
proceed with withdrawal, unless the
agency provides information or
documentation that establishes that the
agency’s administration of its law meets
all of the substantial equivalency
certification criteria set forth in 24 CFR
part 115.
(2) The Assistant Secretary shall
inform the agency in writing of the
reasons for the withdrawal.
(3) During any period after which the
Assistant Secretary proposes
withdrawal, until such time as the
agency establishes that administration
of its law meets all of the substantial
equivalency certification criteria set
forth in 24 CFR part 115, the agency
shall be ineligible for funding under the
FHAP.
§ 115.211 Changes limiting effectiveness
of agency’s law; Corrective actions;
Suspension; Withdrawal; Consequences of
repeal; Changes not limiting effectiveness.
(a) Changes limiting effectiveness of
agency’s law. (1) If a state or local fair
housing law that HUD has previously
deemed substantially equivalent to the
Act is amended; or rules or procedures
concerning the fair housing law are
adopted; or judicial or other
authoritative interpretations of the fair
housing law are issued, the interimcertified or certified agency must inform
the Assistant Secretary of such
amendment, adoption, or interpretation
within 60 days of its discovery.
(2) The requirements of this section
shall apply equally to the amendment,
adoption, or interpretation of any
related law that bears on any aspect of
the effectiveness of the agency’s fair
housing law.
(3) The Assistant Secretary may
conduct a review to determine if the
amendment, adoption, or interpretation
limits the effectiveness of the interim
agency’s fair housing law.
(b) Corrective actions. (1) If the review
indicates that the agency’s law no longer
meets the criteria identified in
§ 115.204, the Assistant Secretary will
so notify the agency in writing.
Following notification, HUD may take
appropriate actions, including, but not
limited to, any or all of the following:
(i) Declining to refer some or all
complaints to the agency unless and
until the fair housing law meets the
criteria identified in § 115.204;
(ii) Electing not to provide payment
for complaints processed by the agency
unless and until the fair housing law
meets the criteria identified in
§ 115.204;
(iii) Providing technical assistance
and/or guidance to the agency to assist
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
19079
the agency in curing deficiencies in its
fair housing law.
(2) Suspension based on changes in
the law. If the corrective actions
identified in paragraph (b)(1)(i) through
(iii) of this section fail to bring the state
or local fair housing law back into
compliance with the criteria identified
in § 115.204 within the timeframe
identified in HUD’s notification to the
agency, the Assistant Secretary may
suspend the agency’s interim
certification or certification based on
changes in the law or a related law.
(i) The Assistant Secretary will notify
the agency in writing of the specific
reasons for the suspension and provide
the agency with an opportunity to
respond within 30 days.
(ii) During the period of suspension,
the Assistant Secretary has the
discretion to not refer some or all
complaints to the agency unless and
until the agency’s law meets the criteria
identified in § 115.204.
(iii) During suspension, HUD may
elect not to provide payment for
complaints processed unless and until
the agency’s law meets the criteria
identified in § 115.204.
(iv) During the period of suspension,
if the fair housing law is brought back
into compliance with the criteria
identified in § 115.204, and the
Assistant Secretary determines that the
fair housing law remains substantially
equivalent to the Act, the Assistant
Secretary will rescind the suspension
and reinstate the agency’s interim
certification or certification.
(3) Withdrawal based on changes in
the law. If the Assistant Secretary
determines that the agency has not
brought its law back into compliance
with the criteria identified in § 115.204
during the period of suspension, the
Assistant Secretary may propose to
withdraw the agency’s interim
certification or certification.
(i) The Assistant Secretary will
proceed with withdrawal unless the
agency provides information or
documentation that establishes that the
agency’s current law meets the criteria
of substantial equivalency certification
identified in § 115.204.
(ii) The Assistant Secretary will
inform the agency in writing of the
reasons for the withdrawal.
(c) (1) If, following notification from
HUD that its fair housing law no longer
meets the criteria identified in
§ 115.204, an interim-certified or
certified agency unequivocally
expresses to HUD that its fair housing
law will not be brought back into
compliance, the Assistant Secretary may
forgo suspension and proceed directly
E:\FR\FM\16APR2.SGM
16APR2
19080
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
to withdrawal of the agency’s interim
certification or certification.
(2) During any period after which the
Assistant Secretary proposes
withdrawal, until such time as the
agency establishes that administration
of its law meets all of the substantial
equivalency certification criteria set
forth in 24 CFR part 115, the agency
shall be ineligible for funding under the
FHAP.
(d) Consequences of repeal. If a state
or local fair housing law that HUD has
previously deemed substantially
equivalent to the Act is repealed, in
whole or in part, or a related law that
bears on any aspect of the effectiveness
of the agency’s fair housing law is
repealed, in whole or in part, the
Assistant Secretary may immediately
withdraw the agency’s interim
certification or certification.
(e) Changes not limiting effectiveness.
Nothing in this section is meant to limit
the Assistant Secretary’s authority to
determine that a change to a fair
housing law does not jeopardize the
substantial equivalency interim
certification or certification of an
agency.
(1) Under such circumstances, the
Assistant Secretary may proceed in
maintaining the existing relationship
with the agency, as set forth in the
interim agreement or MOU.
(2) Alternatively, the Assistant
Secretary may decide not to refer certain
types of complaints to the agency. The
Assistant Secretary may elect not to
provide payment for these complaints
and may require the agency to refer such
complaints to the Department for
investigation, conciliation, and
enforcement activities.
(3) When the Assistant Secretary
determines that a change to a fair
housing law does not jeopardize an
agency’s substantial equivalency
certification, the Assistant Secretary
need not proceed to suspension or
withdrawal if the change is not
reversed.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
§ 115.212
Request after withdrawal.
(a) An agency that has had its interim
certification or certification withdrawn,
either voluntarily or by the Department,
may request substantial equivalency
interim certification or certification.
(b) The request shall be filed in
accordance with § 115.202.
(c) The Assistant Secretary shall
determine whether the state or local
law, on its face, provides substantive
rights, procedures, remedies, and
judicial review procedures for alleged
discriminatory housing practices that
are substantially equivalent to those
provided in the federal Fair Housing
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
Act. To meet this standard, the state or
local law must meet the criteria
enumerated in § 115.204.
(d) Additionally, if the agency had
documented performance deficiencies
that contributed to the past withdrawal,
then the Department shall consider the
agency’s performance and any steps the
agency has taken to correct performance
deficiencies and to prevent them from
recurring in determining whether to
grant interim certification or
certification. The review of the agency’s
performance shall include HUD
conducting a performance assessment in
accordance with § 115.206.
Subpart C—Fair Housing Assistance
Program
§ 115.300
Purpose.
The purpose of the Fair Housing
Assistance Program (FHAP) is to
provide assistance and reimbursement
to state and local fair housing
enforcement agencies. The intent of this
funding program is to build a
coordinated intergovernmental
enforcement effort to further fair
housing and to encourage the agencies
to assume a greater share of the
responsibility for the administration and
enforcement of fair housing laws.
The financial assistance is designed to
provide support for:
(a) The processing of dual-filed
complaints;
(b) Training under the Fair Housing
Act and the agencies’ fair housing law;
(c) The provision of technical
assistance;
(d) The creation and maintenance of
data and information systems; and
(e) The development and
enhancement of fair housing education
and outreach projects, special fair
housing enforcement efforts, fair
housing partnership initiatives, and
other fair housing projects.
§ 115.301 Agency eligibility criteria;
Funding availability.
An agency with certification or
interim certification under subpart B of
this part, and which has entered into a
MOU or interim agreement, is eligible to
participate in the FHAP. All FHAP
funding is subject to congressional
appropriation.
§ 115.302
Capacity building funds.
(a) Capacity building (CB) funds are
funds that HUD may provide to an
agency with interim certification.
(b) CB funds will be provided in a
fixed annual amount to be utilized for
the eligible activities established
pursuant to § 115.303. When the fixed
annual amount will not adequately
compensate an agency in its first year of
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
participation in the FHAP due to the
large number of fair housing complaints
that the agency reasonably anticipates
processing, HUD may provide the
agency with additional funds.
(c) HUD may provide CB funds during
an agency’s first three years of
participation in the FHAP. However, in
the second and third year of the
agency’s participation in the FHAP,
HUD has the option to permit the
agency to receive contribution funds
under § 115.304, instead of CB funds.
(d) In order to receive CB funding,
agencies must submit a statement of
work prior to the signing of the
cooperative agreement. The statement of
work must identify:
(1) The objectives and activities to be
carried out with the CB funds received;
(2) A plan for training all of the
agency’s employees involved in the
administration of the agency’s fair
housing law;
(3) A statement of the agency’s
intention to participate in HUDsponsored training in accordance with
the training requirements set out in the
cooperative agreement;
(4) A description of the agency’s
complaint processing data and
information system, or, alternatively,
whether the agency plans to use CB
funds to purchase and install a data
system;
(5) A description of any other fair
housing activities that the agency will
undertake with its CB funds. All such
activities must address matters affecting
fair housing enforcement that are
cognizable under the Fair Housing Act.
Any activities that do not address the
implementation of the agency’s fair
housing law, and that are therefore not
cognizable under the Fair Housing Act,
will be disapproved.
§ 115.303 Eligible activities for capacity
building funds.
The primary purposes of capacitybuilding funding are to provide for
complaint activities and to support
activities that produce increased
awareness of fair housing rights and
remedies. All such activities must
support the agency’s administration and
enforcement of its fair housing law and
address matters affecting fair housing
that are cognizable under the Fair
Housing Act.
§ 115.304 Agencies eligible for
contributions funds.
(a) An agency that has received CB
funds for one to three consecutive years
may be eligible for contributions
funding. Contributions funding consists
of five categories:
(1) Complaint processing (CP) funds;
E:\FR\FM\16APR2.SGM
16APR2
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Special enforcement effort (SEE)
funds (see § 115.305);
(3) Training funds (see § 115.306);
(4) Administrative cost (AC) funds;
and
(5) Partnership (P) funds.
(b) CP funds. (1) Agencies receiving
CP funds will receive such support
based solely on the number of
complaints processed by the agency and
accepted for payment by the FHEO
regional director during a consecutive,
specifically identified, 12-month period.
The 12-month period will be identified
in the cooperative agreement between
HUD and the agency. The FHEO
regional office shall determine whether
or not cases are acceptably processed
based on requirements enumerated in
the cooperative agreement and its
attachments/appendices, performance
standards set forth in 24 CFR 115.206,
and provisions of the interim agreement
or MOU.
(2) The amount of funding to agencies
that are new to contributions funding
will be based on the number of
complaints acceptably processed by the
agency during the specifically identified
12-month period preceding the signing
of the cooperative agreement.
(c) AC funds. (1) Agencies that
acceptably process 100 or more cases
will receive no less than 10 percent of
the agency’s total FHAP payment
amount for the preceding year, in
addition to CP funds, contingent on
fiscal year appropriations. Agencies that
acceptably process fewer than 100 cases
will receive a flat rate, contingent on
fiscal year appropriations.
(2) Agencies will be required to
provide HUD with a statement of how
they intend to use the AC funds. HUD
may require that some or all AC funding
be directed to activities designed to
create, modify, or improve local,
regional, or national information
systems concerning fair housing matters
(including the purchase of state-of-theart computer systems, obtaining and
maintaining Internet access, etc.).
(d) P funds. The purpose of P funds
is for an agency participating in the
FHAP to utilize the services of
individuals and/or public, private, forprofit, or not-for-profit organizations
that have expertise needed to effectively
carry out the provisions of the agency’s
fair housing law. P funds are fixed
amounts and shall be allocated based on
the FHAP appropriation. Agencies must
consult with the CAO and GTR in
identifying appropriate usage of P funds
for the geographical area that the agency
services. Some examples of proper P
fund usage include, but are not limited
to:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
(1) Contracting with qualified
organizations to conduct fair housing
testing in appropriate cases;
(2) Hiring experienced, temporary
staff to assist in the investigation of
complex or aged cases;
(3) Partnering with grassroots, faithbased or other community-based
organizations to conduct education and
outreach to people of different
backgrounds on how to live together
peacefully in the same housing
complex, neighborhood, or community;
(4) Contracting with individuals
outside the agency who have special
expertise needed for the investigation of
fair housing cases (e.g., architects for
design and construction cases or
qualified individuals from colleges and
universities for the development of data
and statistical analyses).
§ 115.305
funds.
Special enforcement effort (SEE)
(a) SEE funds are funds that HUD may
provide to an agency to enhance
enforcement activities of the agency’s
fair housing law. SEE funds will be a
maximum of 20 percent of the agency’s
total FHAP cooperative agreement for
the previous contract year, based on
approval of eligible activity or activities,
and contingent upon the appropriation
of funds. All agencies receiving
contributions funds are eligible to
receive SEE funds if they meet three of
the six criteria set out in paragraphs
(a)(1) through (a)(6) of this section:
(1) The agency enforced a subpoena or
made use of its prompt judicial action
authority within the past year;
(2) The agency has held at least one
administrative hearing or has had at
least one case on a court’s docket for
civil proceedings during the past year;
(3) At least ten percent of the agency’s
fair housing caseload resulted in written
conciliation agreements providing
monetary relief for the complainant as
well as remedial action, monitoring,
reporting, and public interest relief
provisions;
(4) The agency has had in the most
recent three years, or is currently
engaged in, at least one major fair
housing systemic investigation requiring
an exceptional amount of funds
expenditure;
(5) The agency’s administration of its
fair housing law received meritorious
mention for its fair housing complaint
processing or other fair housing
activities that were innovative. The
meritorious mention criterion may be
met by an agency’s successful fair
housing work being identified and/or
published by a reputable source.
Examples of meritorious mention
include, but are not limited to:
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
19081
(i) An article in a minority newspaper
or a newspaper of general circulation
that identifies the agency’s role in the
successful resolution of a housing
discrimination complaint;
(ii) A letter from a sponsoring
organization of a fair housing
conference or symposium that identifies
the agency’s successful participation
and presentation at the conference or
symposium;
(iii) A letter of praise, proclamation,
or other formal documentation from the
mayor, county executive, or governor
recognizing the fair housing
achievement of the agency.
(6) The agency has completed the
investigation of at least 10 fair housing
complaints during the previous funding
year.
(b) Regardless of whether an agency
meets the eligibility criteria set forth in
paragraph (a) of this section, an agency
is ineligible for SEE funds if:
(1) Twenty percent or more of an
agency’s fair housing complaints result
in administrative closures; or
(2) The agency is currently on a PIP,
or its interim certification or
certification has been suspended during
the federal fiscal year in which SEE
funds are sought.
(c) SEE funding amounts are subject
to the FHAP appropriation by Congress
and will be described in writing in the
cooperative agreements annually. HUD
will periodically publish a list of
activities eligible for SEE funding in the
Federal Register.
§ 115.306
Training funds.
(a) All agencies, including agencies
that receive CB funds, are eligible to
receive training funds. Training funds
are fixed amounts based on the number
of agency employees to be trained.
Training funds shall be allocated based
on the FHAP appropriation. Training
funds may be used only for HUDapproved or HUD-sponsored training.
Agency-initiated training or other
formalized training may be included in
this category. However, such training
must first be approved by the CAO and
the GTR. Specifics on the amount of
training funds that an agency will
receive and, if applicable, amounts that
may be deducted, will be set out in the
cooperative agreement each year.
(b) Each agency must send staff to
mandatory FHAP training sponsored by
HUD, including, but not necessarily
limited to, the National Fair Housing
Training Academy and the National Fair
Housing Policy Conference. If the
agency does not participate in
mandatory HUD-approved and HUDsponsored training, training funds will
be deducted from the agency’s overall
E:\FR\FM\16APR2.SGM
16APR2
19082
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
training amount. All staff of the agency
responsible for the administration and
enforcement of the fair housing law
must participate in HUD-approved or
HUD-sponsored training each year.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
§ 115.307 Requirements for participation
in the FHAP; Corrective and remedial action
for failing to comply with requirements.
(a) Agencies that participate in the
FHAP must meet the requirements
enumerated in this section. The FHEO
regional office shall review the agency’s
compliance with the requirements of
this section when it conducts on-site
performance assessments in accordance
with § 115.206. The requirements for
participation in the FHAP are as
follows:
(1) The agency must conform to all
reporting and record maintenance
requirements set forth in § 115.308, as
well as any additional reporting and
record maintenance requirements
identified by the Assistant Secretary.
(2) The agency must agree to on-site
technical assistance and guidance and
implementation of corrective actions set
out by the Department in response to
deficiencies found during the technical
assistance or performance assessment
evaluations of the agency’s operations.
(3) The agency must use the
Department’s official complaint data
information system and must input all
relevant data and information into the
system in a timely manner.
(4) The agency must agree to
implement and adhere to policies and
procedures (as the agency’s laws allow)
provided to the agency by the Assistant
Secretary, including, but not limited to,
guidance on investigative techniques,
case file preparation and organization,
and implementation of data elements for
complaint tracking.
(5) If an agency that participates in the
FHAP enforces antidiscrimination laws
other than a fair housing law (e.g.,
administration of a fair employment
law), the agency must annually provide
a certification to HUD stating that it
spends at least 20 percent of its total
annual budget on fair housing activities.
The term ‘‘total annual budget,’’ as used
in this subsection, means the entire
budget assigned by the jurisdiction to
the agency for enforcing and
administering antidiscrimination laws,
but does not include FHAP funds.
(6) The agency may not co-mingle
FHAP funds with other funds. FHAP
funds must be segregated from the
agency’s and the state or local
government’s other funds and must be
used for the purpose that HUD provided
the funds.
(7) An agency may not unilaterally
reduce the level of financial resources
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
currently committed to fair housing
activities (budget and staff reductions or
other actions outside the control of the
agency will not, alone, result in a
negative determination for the agency’s
participation in the FHAP).
(8) The agency must comply with the
provisions, certifications, and
assurances required in any and all
written agreements executed by the
agency and the Department related to
participation in the FHAP, including,
but not limited to, the cooperative
agreement.
(9) The agency must draw down its
funds in a timely manner.
(10) The agency must be audited and
receive copies of the audit reports in
accordance with applicable rules and
regulations of the state and local
government in which it is located.
(11) The agency must participate in
all required training, as described in
§ 115.306(b).
(12) If the agency subcontracts any
activity for which the subcontractor will
receive FHAP funds, the agency must
conform to the subcontracting
requirements of § 115.309.
(13) If the agency receives a complaint
that may implicate the First
Amendment of the United States
Constitution, then the agency must
conform to the requirements of
§ 115.310.
(14) If the agency utilizes FHAP funds
to conduct fair housing testing, then the
agency must conform to the
requirements of § 115.311.
(b) Corrective and remedial action for
failing to comply with requirements.
The agency’s refusal to provide
information, assist in implementation,
or carry out the requirements of this
section may result in the denial or
interruption of its receipt of FHAP
funds. Prior to denying or interrupting
an agency’s receipt of FHAP funds, HUD
will put the agency on notice of its
intent to deny or interrupt. HUD will
identify its rationale for the denial or
interruption and provide the agency
with an opportunity to respond within
a reasonable period of time. If, within
the time period requested, the agency
does not provide information or
documentation indicating that the
requirement(s) enumerated in this
section is/are met, HUD may proceed
with the denial or interruption of FHAP
funds. If, at any time following the
denial or interruption, HUD learns that
the agency meets the requirements
enumerated in this section, HUD may
opt to reinstate the agency’s receipt of
FHAP funds.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
§ 115.308 Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
(a) The agency shall establish and
maintain records demonstrating:
(1) Its financial administration of
FHAP funds; and
(2) Its performance under the FHAP.
(b) The agency will provide to the
FHEO regional director reports
maintained pursuant to paragraph (a) of
this section. The agency will provide
reports to the FHEO regional director in
accordance with the frequency and
content requirements identified in the
cooperative agreement. In addition, the
agency will provide reports on the final
status of complaints following
reasonable cause findings, in
accordance with Performance Standard
8 identified in § 115.206.
(c) The agency will permit reasonable
public access to its records consistent
with the jurisdiction’s requirements for
release of information. Documents
relevant to the agency’s participation in
the FHAP must be made available at the
agency’s office during normal working
hours (except that documents with
respect to ongoing fair housing
complaint investigations are exempt
from public review consistent with
federal and/or state law).
(d) The Secretary, Inspector General
of HUD, and the Comptroller General of
the United States or any of their duly
authorized representatives shall have
access to all pertinent books, accounts,
reports, files, and other payments for
surveys, audits, examinations, excerpts,
and transcripts as they relate to the
agency’s participation in FHAP.
(e) All files will be kept in such
fashion as to permit audits under
applicable Office of Management and
Budget circulars, procurement
regulations and guidelines, and the
Single Audit requirements for state and
local agencies.
§ 115.309
Subcontracting under the FHAP.
If an agency subcontracts to a public
or private organization any activity for
which the organization will receive
FHAP funds, the agency must ensure
and certify in writing that the
organization is:
(a) Using services, facilities, and
electronic information technologies that
are accessible in accordance with the
Americans with Disability Act (ADA)
(42 U.S.C. 12101), Section 504 of the
1973 Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 701),
and Section 508(a)(1) of the
Rehabilitation Act amendments of 1998;
(b) Complying with the standards of
Section 3 of the Housing and Urban
Development Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C.
1441);
E:\FR\FM\16APR2.SGM
16APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(c) Affirmatively furthering fair
housing in the provision of housing and
housing-related services; and
(d) Not presently debarred,
suspended, proposed for debarment,
declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from covered transactions by
any federal debarment or agency.
§ 115.310
FHAP and the First Amendment.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with RULES2
None of the funding made available
under the FHAP may be used to
investigate or prosecute any activity
engaged in by one or more persons,
including the filing or maintaining of a
non-frivolous legal action, that may be
protected by the First Amendment of
the United States Constitution. HUD
guidance is available that sets forth the
procedures HUD will follow when it is
asked to accept and dual-file a case that
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:29 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
may implicate the First Amendment of
the United States Constitution.
§ 115.311
Testing.
The following requirements apply to
testing activities funded under the
FHAP:
(a) The testing must be done in
accordance with a HUD-approved
testing methodology;
(b) Testers must not have prior felony
convictions or convictions of any crimes
involving fraud or perjury.
(c) Testers must receive training or be
experienced in testing procedures and
techniques.
(d) Testers and the organizations
conducting tests, and the employees and
agents of these organizations may not:
(1) Have an economic interest in the
outcome of the test, without prejudice to
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
19083
the right of any person or entity to
recover damages for any cognizable
injury;
(2) Be a relative or acquaintance of
any party in a case;
(3) Have had any employment or
other affiliation, within five years, with
the person or organization to be tested;
or
(4) Be a competitor of the person or
organization to be tested in the listing,
rental, sale, or financing of real estate.
Dated: April 5, 2007.
Kim Kendrick,
Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and
Equal Opportunity.
[FR Doc. E7–7087 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
E:\FR\FM\16APR2.SGM
16APR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 72 (Monday, April 16, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19070-19083]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7087]
[[Page 19069]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Department of Housing and Urban Development
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
24 CFR Part 115
Certification and Funding of State and Local Fair Housing Enforcement
Agencies; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 19070]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Part 115
[Docket No. FR-4748-F-02]
RIN 2529-AA90
Certification and Funding of State and Local Fair Housing
Enforcement Agencies
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal
Opportunity, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule revises and updates HUD's regulation
implementing section 810(f) of the federal Fair Housing Act. This
regulation establishes the criteria for certification of state and
local fair housing laws that are substantially equivalent to the
federal Fair Housing Act, as well as for decertification of state and
local fair housing laws that are deemed no longer substantially
equivalent. This final rule also revises the funding criteria for
agencies participating in the Fair Housing Assistance Program (FHAP).
DATES: Effective Date: May 16, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bryan Greene, Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Enforcement and Programs, Office of Fair Housing and
Equal Opportunity, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451
Seventh Street, SW., Room 5204, Washington, DC 20410-2000; telephone
(202) 402-7078 (this is not a toll-free number). Hearing- or speech-
impaired persons may contact the FHAP Division by calling (800) 290-
1617, or the toll-free Federal Information Relay Service at (800) 877-
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On May 18, 2005, HUD published a proposed rule (70 FR 28748) for
public comment that would clarify numerous issues related to
substantial equivalency certification and the FHAP. Under the FHAP, a
state or local agency applies for substantial equivalency certification
and the Department determines whether the agency enforces a law that
provides substantive rights, procedures, remedies, and judicial review
provisions that are substantially equivalent to the federal Fair
Housing Act. The FHAP provides support for complaint processing,
training, technical assistance, education and outreach, data and
information systems, and other activities that will further fair
housing within the state or local agency's jurisdiction.
The proposed rule provided a comprehensive revision of 24 CFR part
115 to provide greater clarity and guidance to FHAP agencies. Among the
proposed revisions were new definitions, revised and additional
performance standards, and timeframes. The proposed rule also added
procedures for renewal of certification and procedures for requests
after withdrawal. HUD also proposed the addition of Sec. 115.309,
titled FHAP and the First Amendment, which provided that no funding
made available under the FHAP may be used to investigate or prosecute
any activity that may be protected by the First Amendment of the United
States Constitution. Finally, HUD added Sec. 115.310, which provided
requirements for fair housing testing activities funded under the FHAP.
A detailed description of the proposed rule can be found at 70 FR
28748-28751.
In addition to inviting comments on the proposed rule generally,
HUD sought comment from the public on three issues in particular.
First, HUD requested that FHAP agencies of varying sizes provide
insight into what would constitute reasonable complaint numbers.
Second, HUD sought comment on the appropriateness of enumerating
timeframes by which interim and certified agencies must comply in
sending out letters notifying parties of a failure to meet the 100-day
(completion of investigation) or the one-year (final administrative
disposition) requirements. Third, HUD invited comments from the public
on whether 100 cases is still a reasonable number an agency must
acceptably process in order to obtain 10 percent of the agency's total
FHAP payment amount. See section III of this preamble for a summary of
the issues raised by the public commenters and HUD's responses.
II. This Final Rule
This rule follows publication of the May 18, 2005, proposed rule
and takes into consideration the public comments received on the
proposed rule. HUD received five comments related to the May 18, 2005,
proposed rule. After careful review of the public comments, HUD has
made four noteworthy changes to the proposed rule.
First, this final rule adds a timeframe for FHAP agencies to send
100-day letters. Performance Standard 1, at Sec. 115.206, requires
that an agency unable to complete investigative activities with respect
to a complaint within 100 days must send written notification to the
parties within 110 days of the filing of a complaint.
Second, this rule revises Sec. 115.210 of the proposed rule to
clarify that HUD may suspend all types of funding (not just complaint
processing funds) during suspension and withdrawal because of FHAP
agency performance deficiencies.
Third, HUD proposed to remove Sec. 115.305, the special
enforcement effort (SEE) fund provisions, from the regulations but has
retained the provision in this final rule. In addition to retaining the
current regulatory provision, this final rule includes examples of
meritorious mention, which is one of the criteria for obtaining SEE
funds.
Fourth, in this final rule, HUD has further clarified the
requirement that a FHAP agency spend at least 20 percent of its total
annual budget on fair housing activities. Section 115.307(a)(5) of this
final rule clarifies that this requirement applies only to FHAP
agencies that enforce antidiscrimination laws other than a fair housing
law.
III. Discussion of Public Comments on the May 18, 2005, Proposed Rule
The public comment period on the May 18, 2005, proposed rule ended
on July 18, 2005. HUD received five comments. Commenters included one
private fair housing organization, two current FHAP agencies, one local
community affairs department, and one local housing authority. The
summary of comments that follows presents the major issues and
questions raised by the public comments on the proposed rule. HUD's
response follows each comment.
Comment: One commenter wrote that, although some provisions
strengthen FHAP agencies, the majority create unnecessary infringements
that exceed HUD's authority and are better left to state agencies.
HUD Response. The commenter did not include any specific examples
of provisions that create unnecessary infringements that exceed HUD's
authority. Therefore, HUD cannot respond because of the lack of
specificity. The authority to make the revisions contained in the
proposed rule is set forth at 42 U.S.C. 3610(f) and 42 U.S.C. 3608(a).
Comment: The same commenter recommended that no agency remain
certified if it processes fewer than 20 complaints in any given year
after its first year of operation.
HUD Response. After careful consideration, HUD has determined that
it is inappropriate to identify in a regulation a specific number of
housing discrimination complaints that agencies must process. A one-
size-fits-all approach is impracticable because, among other
considerations, FHAP
[[Page 19071]]
agencies serve populations of varying sizes. An agency-by-agency
analysis is a more reasonable approach. As provided in the proposed
rule, this final rule identifies factors HUD will consider in
determining what constitutes a reasonable number of housing
discrimination complaints that a given agency should receive and
process. Those factors include, but are not limited to, the
jurisdiction's population; the length of time the agency has
participated in the FHAP; and the number of housing discrimination
complaints that the agency has received and processed in the past. If
an agency fails to receive and process a reasonable number of housing
discrimination complaints during a year of FHAP participation, given
education and outreach efforts conducted and receipts of complaints,
the final rule gives the Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity
(FHEO) regional director the authority to put the agency on a
Performance Improvement Plan (PIP). The PIP will set forth the number
of housing discrimination complaints that the agency must receive and
process during subsequent years of FHAP participation.
Comment: Another commenter wrote that the determination of a
reasonable number of complaints be a joint determination by HUD and the
FHAP agency.
HUD Response. As noted in response to a similar comment, the
determination of what constitutes a reasonable number of housing
discrimination cases will be made on an agency-by-agency basis. The
final rule identifies factors that HUD will consider in making such a
determination for a given agency. This commenter also recommended that
the determination be based on the historical number of complaints that
the FHAP agency has processed. This is one of the factors HUD has
enumerated in this final rule.
Comment: One commenter recommended that HUD establish a 10-day
timeframe for sending out 100-day letters.
HUD Response. HUD agrees and has amended Performance Standard 1 in
Sec. 115.206 of the proposed regulation to add paragraph (e)(1)(vi),
which sets forth a timeframe within which FHAP agencies must issue 100-
day letters. HUD's Title VIII Complaint Intake, Investigation, and
Conciliation Handbook requires HUD to prepare case status reports for a
complaint at the 85th day after the complaint is filed. The completion
of a case status report triggers HUD's automated complaint processing
system to generate 100-day letters. Supervisors then review the case
status report, followed by the issuance of the 100-day letter. Using
HUD's procedure as a guide, Performance Standard 1, in Sec.
115.206(e)(1)(vi) establishes that 100-day letters be issued within 110
days of the filing of the complaint.
Comment: A commenter wrote that granting authority to regional FHEO
directors may be an improvement; however, the authority should be
accompanied by consistent national guidance about performance
assessment requirements and standards to avoid inconsistent outcomes.
HUD Response. The proposed regulation and the final regulation are
clear, stating that HUD may utilize the performance deficiency
procedures at any time that the agency does not meet one or more of the
ten performance standards enumerated in Sec. 115.206. The Department
believes that these enumerated standards compose the consistent
national guidance sought by the commenter. The final regulation further
states that the performance deficiency procedures may be applied to
agencies with either interim certification or certification. At this
time, HUD will not set forth further guidance regarding deficiency
procedures. HUD will, however, monitor the implementation of the
performance standards and consider developing additional guidance on
this issue as necessary.
Comment: Another commenter recommended that HUD provide an appeal
process so that an agency that has been placed on a PIP can appeal the
decision of the FHEO regional director if they have a basis to believe
that they were wrongly placed on a performance improvement plan (PIP).
HUD Response. After careful consideration, HUD has determined that
it will not provide in the regulation an appeal process for an agency
placed on a PIP. HUD believes that an agency's interests are
sufficiently protected within the performance deficiency process set
forth in the final rule, which provides several opportunities for an
under-performing agency to avoid involuntary withdrawal from the
program. The fact that an agency has been placed on a PIP will not, in
and of itself, result in an agency's inability to participate in the
FHAP. If an agency fails to improve after being placed on a PIP, HUD
may move to suspend the agency. If suspension is proposed, an agency is
given an opportunity to respond within 30 days of receipt of the
suspension notification. Suspension also does not result in an agency's
inability to participate in the FHAP. If an agency fails to improve
after a period of suspension, the Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing
and Equal Opportunity may propose withdrawal. If withdrawal is
proposed, the agency is given the opportunity to provide information
and documentation that establishes that the administration of its law
meets all of the substantial equivalency certification criteria set
forth in 24 CFR part 115.
Comment: A commenter suggested that HUD add mandated, on-site
performance assessments at least every 24 months and a requirement that
FHEO seek public input before certifying an agency. The commenter also
recommended that HUD be required to investigate complaints from the
public about performance.
HUD Response. The language of the final rule regarding on-site
assessments, which in this respect is unchanged from the proposed rule,
provides HUD with all of the authority necessary to accomplish its
oversight responsibilities, while at the same time allowing HUD the
flexibility to match available resources to identified priorities.
With regard to the second issue identified by the commenter, the
final rule indicates, as did the proposed rule, that HUD will seek
public input before certifying an agency. Section 115.102(b) states:
On an annual basis, the Assistant Secretary may publish in the
Federal Register a notice that identifies all agencies that have
received interim certification during the prior year. The notice
will invite the public to comment on the state and local laws of the
new interim agencies, as well as on the performance of the agencies
in enforcing their laws.
With regard to the third issue, while the final rule does not
require HUD to investigate public complaints about the performance of
an agency, Sec. 115.206 does require that ``[A]ll [public] comments
will be considered before a final decision on certification is made.''
Moreover, complaints about a FHAP agency will be considered and
examined as part of an agency's performance assessment.
Comment: Another commenter recommended that HUD not recognize
prohibited bases in any manner because these are state, county, and
city rules that are ``completely foreign'' to HUD.
HUD Response. The proposed rule did not recognize any prohibited
bases that have not already been recognized in the federal Fair Housing
Act. Rather, Sec. 115.204 simply sets forth the long-standing HUD
policy that the inclusion of additional prohibited bases in a state or
local law does not preclude HUD from determining that a given law is
substantially equivalent to the Fair Housing Act. While a state or
local law
[[Page 19072]]
that has additional prohibited bases may be found substantially
equivalent, it is important to note that HUD has not, and will not, pay
FHAP agencies for cases that are not cognizable under the federal Fair
Housing Act.
Comment: A commenter recommended that HUD not change current HUD
standards for administrative closures. This commenter also recommended
that no more than 12 percent of cases be closed administratively.
HUD Response. Because administrative closure standards for FHAP
agencies do not exist under the current regulation, HUD is in the
process of developing such standards and will provide further guidance.
Section 115.206 of this final rule adds Performance Standard 2, which
requires that administrative closures be utilized only in appropriate
and limited circumstances. In response to the second part of the
comment, HUD believes it is inappropriate to mandate an across-the-
board cap on administrative closures, as FHAP agencies often have
little control over circumstances that may warrant administrative
closures. HUD's objective in developing administrative closure guidance
is not to prevent the use of administrative closures in cases in which
they are warranted, but rather to prevent their use in cases where a
finding on the merits would be more appropriate.
Comment: The same commenter recommended that the final rule require
that FHAP agencies follow the procedures and standards for
investigation set forth in the Title VIII Handbook (HUD Handbook 8024-
1).
HUD Response. The Fair Housing Act, at Sec. 810(f)(3)(A), states
that the Secretary of HUD ``may certify an agency * * * only if the
Secretary determines that * * * the substantive rights protected by
such agency * * *; the procedures followed by such agency; the remedies
available to such agency; and the availability of judicial review of
such agency's action * * * are substantially equivalent to those
created by and under this title'' (emphasis added). The Fair Housing
Act does not require an agency's law and procedures to be identical to
the Fair Housing Act. Although HUD makes the Title VIII Handbook
available to FHAP agencies and recommends that it be utilized in the
processing of dual-filed housing discrimination complaints, HUD has
stopped short of requiring its usage. The Title VIII Handbook is based
on the Fair Housing Act and its implementing regulations. Because
substantially equivalent state and local laws may deviate from the Fair
Housing Act to a certain extent, certain aspects of the Title VIII
Handbook might prove impracticable for some FHAP agencies.
Comment: A commenter recommended that the complaint be closed and
the complainant advised to proceed through the courts if the
complainant rejects an offer by the respondent to conciliation that
represents full relief.
HUD Response. HUD did not accept this suggestion. The goal of
conciliation is to reach a resolution of a complaint that is mutually
acceptable to all parties, including the complainant, the respondent,
and the FHAP agency. A conciliator may educate parties about settlement
and the realities of a case. However, a conciliator must never
threaten, or appear to threaten, a party with adverse consequences for
failing to conciliate a complaint. In addition, a FHAP agency must
never close a complaint and advise a complainant to proceed to court if
a complainant rejects a respondent's offer during conciliation, even if
the FHAP agency believes the offer represents full relief. Instead, if
either party rejects an offer by the other party, the FHAP agency
should proceed with its appropriate investigation and disposition of
the complaint.
Comment: A commenter stated that, if there is a disagreement on the
determination issued by the FHAP agency, HUD should pay the FHAP agency
for substantial work done and reactivate the complaint for HUD's
investigation.
HUD Response. If HUD disagrees with the determination, the
government technical representative (GTR) may deny payment to the
agency for the case, or return the case to the agency for additional
work. All cases in which HUD has denied payment will be considered as
factors that affect the continued interim certification and
certification.
Whenever complainants or respondents disagree with the
determination, they are bound by the FHAP agency's procedures. HUD has
no authority to reactivate a case or reverse a decision once the FHAP
agency has rendered a determination.
Comment: A commenter recommended that HUD move immediately to
withdraw certification if a statutory change or judicial action
``limits the effectiveness of the law'' rather than wait to determine
if the law is going to be changed and let cases be processed by the
FHAP agency during the meantime.
HUD Response. In most cases, HUD will not immediately withdraw
certification after learning that a change to the law impacts
substantial equivalence. Rather than proceeding directly to withdrawal,
HUD will proceed with the progressive scheme identified in Sec.
115.211 of the proposed rule and this final rule. It is important to
note, however, that at each stage of the progressive scheme, HUD may
decline to refer some or all complaints to the agency, and elect not to
provide payments for complaints to the agency, as provided in Sec.
115.211. Moreover, it is important to note that a change limiting the
effectiveness of an agency's law may not necessarily impair its ability
to process all types of housing discrimination complaints.
Comment: The same commenter wrote that partnerships with private
fair housing organizations, including qualified fair housing
organizations, be added to the list of proper partnership funds usage.
HUD Response. HUD believes that the language of the proposed rule
sufficiently addressed this concern. Section 115.304(d) states,
``[s]ome examples of proper P fund usage include, but are not limited
to * * * contracting with qualified organizations to conduct fair
housing testing in appropriate cases * * *.'' The language in this
final rule is unchanged from that of the proposed rule.
Comment: A commenter suggested that HUD add a provision that states
that agencies under a PIP, suspension or withdrawal status are not
eligible for Partnership ``P'' funding.
HUD Response. After considering this comment, HUD revised Sec.
115.210. The section previously indicated that HUD may suspend only
complaint processing funds during a period of suspension and/or
withdrawal. Section 115.210 in this final rule is revised to state that
HUD may suspend all types of funding under the FHAP during a period of
suspension and withdrawal.
Comment: A commenter recommended that HUD reinstate SEE (Special
Enforcement Effort) funding.
HUD Response. After considering this comment, HUD has decided to
retain SEE funds in this final rule. It is important to recognize,
however, that identifying funding in the final regulation does not
guarantee that it will be available to FHAP agencies, since funding is
subject to the annual congressional appropriations process.
In reincorporating SEE funds at Sec. 115.305, HUD has added
examples to clarify the current regulation. This final rule more fully
defines what is meant by the meritorious mention criteria (which is one
of the criteria for obtaining SEE funds identified in the regulation).
[[Page 19073]]
Comment: A commenter suggested that HUD remove the deduction
provision or change it to specify that training funds will be deducted
if the agency does not participate in HUD-approved training.
HUD Response. HUD agrees with this commenter and has revised Sec.
115.306(b) of the final rule to state, ``* * * [i]f the agency does not
participate in mandatory HUD-approved or HUD-sponsored training,
training funds will be deducted from the agency's overall training
amount.''
Comment: Several commenters noted that funding for other agency
components is often beyond a FHAP agency's control. The commenters
suggested that if an agency performs adequately, it should not matter
what the percentage of its budget is for fair housing.
HUD Response. It is important to HUD that a substantially
equivalent state or local agency demonstrate a commitment to fair
housing enforcement by devoting financial resources to its fair housing
program and that those resources be comparable to amounts devoted to
the enforcement of other antidiscrimination laws. Therefore, HUD will
not eliminate the 20 percent requirement. HUD has, however, revised
Sec. 115.306(a)(5) to further clarify that this requirement applies
only when an agency enforces antidiscrimination laws other than a fair
housing law.
Comment: A commenter wrote that HUD should not, and does not, fund
local agencies to enforce HUD's fair housing responsibilities and
suggested that the funds would be better used for the operating fund.
HUD Response. Under section 810(f) of the Fair Housing Act, 42
U.S.C. 3610(f) (``the Act''), the Secretary of HUD is required to refer
housing discrimination complaints to state and local agencies that
administer fair housing laws certified as substantially equivalent to
the Act. The Secretary is further authorized by Sec. 817 of the Act,
42 U.S.C. 3616, to reimburse such agencies for services rendered in
assisting HUD's enforcement of the Act.
Comment: A commenter wrote that First Amendment provisions should
not be incorporated into this rule because some agencies will have
different state constitutional provisions.
HUD Response. The provision at Sec. 115.310 is unchanged in this
final rule. The purpose of FHAP is to provide assistance and
reimbursement to certified state and local fair housing enforcement
agencies. The intent of this funding program is to build a coordinated
intergovernmental enforcement effort to further fair housing, within
constitutional limitations. HUD will not accept for filing any housing
discrimination complaint in which the alleged discriminatory acts are
protected by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United
States. This necessarily means that such complaints will not be dual-
filed, and concomitantly, that FHAP agencies cannot and will not be
reimbursed by HUD for any work related to the processing,
investigation, or enforcement of such complaints.
Findings and Certifications
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements contained in this rule have
been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520) and assigned OMB control number 2529-0005. This rule does not
revise these information collection requirements. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information, unless the collection displays a valid
control number.
Regulatory Planning and Review
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) reviewed this rule under
Executive Order 12866 (entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'').
OMB determined that this rule is a ``significant regulatory action'' as
defined in section 3(f) of the Order (although not economically
significant, as provided in section 3(f)(1) of the Order). Any changes
made to the rule subsequent to its submission to OMB are identified in
the docket file, which is available for public inspection in the
Regulations Division, Office of General Counsel, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW, Room 10276, Washington,
DC 20410-0500. Due to security measures at the HUD Headquarters
building, please schedule an appointment to review the docket file by
calling the Regulations Division at (202) 708-3055 (this is not a toll-
free number).
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531-1538) (UMRA) establishes requirements for federal agencies to
assess the effects of their regulatory actions on state, local, and
tribal governments and the private sector. This final rule does not
impose any federal mandates on any state, local, or tribal governments
or the private sector within the meaning of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits an agency
from publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule
either imposes substantial direct compliance costs on state and local
governments and is not required by statute, or the rule preempts state
law, unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive Order. This final rule does not have
federalism implications and does not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local governments or preempt state law
within the meaning of the Executive Order.
Environmental Impact
This final rule involves a policy document that sets out
enforcement procedures and provides for fair housing enforcement
assistance. Accordingly, under 24 CFR 50.19(c)(3), this final rule is
categorically excluded from environmental review under the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321).
Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally
requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any
rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements, unless the
agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. This final rule
revises and makes clarifying changes related to substantial equivalency
certification and the FHAP. Specifically, this rule is limited to
providing clear timeframes, procedures, and concise explanations to
assist FHAP agencies in complying with the regulations and successfully
administering their agencies. Accordingly, the undersigned certifies
that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number is 14.401.
List of Subjects in 24 CFR Part 115
Administrative practice and procedure, Aged, Fair housing, Grant
programs--housing and community development, Individuals with
disabilities, Intergovernmental relations, Mortgages, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
[[Page 19074]]
0
For the reasons stated in the preamble, HUD revises 24 CFR part 115 to
read as follows:
PART 115--CERTIFICATION AND FUNDING OF STATE AND LOCAL FAIR HOUSING
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
Subpart A--General
Sec.
115.100 Definitions.
115.101 Program administration.
115.102 Public notices.
Subpart B--Certification of Substantially Equivalent Agencies
115.200 Purpose.
115.201 The two phases of substantial equivalency certification.
115.202 Request for interim certification.
115.203 Interim certification procedures.
115.204 Criteria for adequacy of law.
115.205 Certification procedures.
115.206 Performance assessments; Performance standards.
115.207 Consequences of interim certification and certification.
115.208 Procedures for renewal of certification.
115.209 Technical assistance.
115.210 Performance deficiency procedures; Suspension; Withdrawal.
115.211 Changes limiting effectiveness of agency's law; Corrective
actions; Suspension; Withdrawal; Consequences of repeal; Changes not
limiting effectiveness.
115.212 Request after withdrawal.
Subpart C--Fair Housing Assistance Program
115.300 Purpose.
115.301 Agency eligibility criteria; Funding availability.
115.302 Capacity building funds.
115.303 Eligible activities for capacity building funds.
115.304 Agencies eligible for contributions funds.
115.305 Special enforcement effort (SEE) funds.
115.306 Training funds.
115.307 Requirements for participation in the FHAP; Corrective and
remedial action for failing to comply with requirements.
115.308 Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
115.309 Subcontracting under the FHAP.
115.310 FHAP and the First Amendment.
115.311 Testing.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3601-19; 42 U.S.C. 3535(d).
Subpart A--General
Sec. 115.100 Definitions.
(a) The terms ``Fair Housing Act,'' ``HUD,'' and ``the
Department,'' as used in this part, are defined in 24 CFR 5.100.
(b) The terms ``aggrieved person,'' ``complainant,''
``conciliation,'' ``conciliation agreement,'' ``discriminatory housing
practice,'' ``dwelling,'' ``handicap,'' ``person,'' ``respondent,''
``secretary,'' and ``state,'' as used in this part, are defined in
Section 802 of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3602).
(c) Other definitions. The following definitions also apply to this
part:
Act means the Fair Housing Act, as defined in 24 CFR 5.100.
Assistant Secretary means the Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing
and Equal Opportunity.
Certified agency is an agency that has been granted certification
by the Assistant Secretary in accordance with the requirements of this
part.
Cooperative agreement is the instrument HUD will use to provide
funds. The Cooperative Agreement includes attachments and/or appendices
establishing requirements relating to the operation and performance of
the agency.
Cooperative agreement officer (CAO) is the administrator of the
funds awarded pursuant to this part and is a regional director of the
Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity.
Dual-filed complaint means a housing discrimination complaint that
has been filed with both HUD and the agency that has been granted
interim certification or certification by the Assistant Secretary.
FHAP means the Fair Housing Assistance Program.
FHEO means HUD's Office of Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity.
FHEO regional director means a regional director of the Office of
Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity.
Fair housing law or Law refers to both state fair housing laws and
local fair housing laws.
Final administrative disposition means an agency's completion of a
case following a reasonable cause finding, including, but not limited
to, an agency-approved settlement or a final, administrative decision
issued by commissioners, hearing officers or administrative law judges.
Final administrative disposition does not include dispositions in
judicial proceedings resulting from election or appeal.
Government Technical Monitor (GTM) means the HUD staff person who
has been designated to provide technical and financial oversight and
evaluation of the FHAP grantee's performance.
Government Technical Representative (GTR) means the HUD staff
person who is responsible for the technical administration of the FHAP
grant, the evaluation of performance under the FHAP grant, the
acceptance of technical reports or projects, the approval of payments,
and other such specific responsibilities as may be stipulated in the
FHAP grant.
Impracticable, as used in this part, is when complaint processing
is delayed by circumstances beyond the control of the interim or
certified agency. Those situations include, but are not limited to,
complaints involving complex issues requiring extensive investigations,
complaints involving new and complicated areas of law that need to be
analyzed, and where a witness is discovered late in the investigation
and needs to be interviewed.
Interim agency is an agency that has been granted interim
certification by the Assistant Secretary.
Ordinance, as used in this part, means a law enacted by the
legislative body of a municipality.
Statute, as used in this part, means a law enacted by the
legislative body of a state.
Testing refers to the use of an individual or individuals
(``testers'') who, without a bona fide intent to rent or purchase a
house, apartment, or other dwelling, pose as prospective renters or
purchasers for the purpose of gathering information that may indicate
whether a housing provider is complying with fair housing laws.
Sec. 115.101 Program administration.
(a) Authority and responsibility. The Secretary has delegated the
authority and responsibility for administering this part to the
Assistant Secretary.
(b) Delegation of Authority. The Assistant Secretary retains the
right to make final decisions concerning the granting and withdrawal of
substantial equivalency interim certification and certification. The
Assistant Secretary delegates the authority and responsibility for
administering the remainder of this part to the FHEO regional director.
This includes assessing the performance of interim and certified
agencies as described in Sec. 115.206. This also includes the offering
of a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) as described in Sec. 115.210
and the suspension of interim certification or certification due to
performance deficiencies as described in Sec. 115.210.
Sec. 115.102 Public notices.
(a) Periodically, the Assistant Secretary will publish the
following public notices in the Federal Register:
(1) A list of all interim and certified agencies; and
(2) A list of agencies to which a withdrawal of interim
certification or certification has been proposed.
(b) On an annual basis, the Assistant Secretary may publish in the
Federal Register a notice that identifies all agencies that have
received interim certification during the prior year. The
[[Page 19075]]
notice will invite the public to comment on the state and local laws of
the new interim agencies, as well as on the performance of the agencies
in enforcing their laws. All comments will be considered before a final
decision on certification is made.
Subpart B--Certification of Substantially Equivalent Agencies
Sec. 115.200 Purpose.
This subpart implements section 810(f) of the Fair Housing Act. The
purpose of this subpart is to set forth:
(a) The basis for agency interim certification and certification;
(b) Procedures by which a determination is made to grant interim
certification or certification;
(c) How the Department will evaluate the performance of an interim
and certified agency;
(d) Procedures that the Department will utilize when an interim or
certified agency performs deficiently;
(e) Procedures that the Department will utilize when there are
changes limiting the effectiveness of an interim or certified agency's
law;
(f) Procedures for renewal of certification; and
(g) Procedures when an agency requests interim certification or
certification after a withdrawal.
Sec. 115.201 The two phases of substantial equivalency certification.
Substantial equivalency certification is granted if the Department
determines that a state or local agency enforces a law that is
substantially equivalent to the Fair Housing Act with regard to
substantive rights, procedures, remedies, and the availability of
judicial review. The Department has developed a two-phase process of
substantial equivalency certification.
(a) Adequacy of Law. In the first phase, the Assistant Secretary
will determine whether, on its face, the fair housing law that the
agency administers provides rights, procedures, remedies, and the
availability of judicial review that are substantially equivalent to
those provided in the federal Fair Housing Act. An affirmative
conclusion may result in the Department offering the agency interim
certification. An agency must obtain interim certification prior to
obtaining certification.
(b) Adequacy of Performance. In the second phase, the Assistant
Secretary will determine whether, in operation, the fair housing law
that the agency administers provides rights, procedures, remedies, and
the availability of judicial review that are substantially equivalent
to those provided in the federal Fair Housing Act. An affirmative
conclusion will result in the Department offering the agency
certification.
Sec. 115.202 Request for interim certification.
(a) A request for interim certification under this subpart shall be
filed with the Assistant Secretary by the state or local official
having principal responsibility for the administration of the state or
local fair housing law. The request shall be supported by the text of
the jurisdiction's fair housing law, the law creating and empowering
the agency, all laws referenced in the jurisdiction's fair housing law,
any regulations and directives issued under the law, and any formal
opinions of the State Attorney General or the chief legal officer of
the jurisdiction that pertain to the jurisdiction's fair housing law. A
request shall also include organizational information of the agency
responsible for administering and enforcing the law.
(b) The request and supporting materials shall be filed with the
Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity, Department
of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC 20410-2000. The Assistant Secretary shall forward a copy of the
request and supporting materials to the appropriate FHEO regional
director. A copy of the request and supporting materials will be kept
available for public examination and copying at:
(1) The office of the Assistant Secretary; and
(2) The office of the state or local agency charged with
administration and enforcement of the state or local fair housing law.
(c) Upon receipt of a request, HUD will analyze the agency's fair
housing law to determine whether it meets the criteria identified in
Sec. 115.204.
(d) HUD shall review a request for interim certification from a
local agency located in a state with an interim certified or certified
substantially equivalent state agency. However, in the request for
interim certification, the local agency must certify that the
substantially equivalent state law does not prohibit the local agency
from administering and enforcing its own fair housing law within the
locality.
Sec. 115.203 Interim certification procedures.
(a) Upon receipt of a request for interim certification filed under
Sec. 115.202, the Assistant Secretary may request further information
necessary for a determination to be made under this section. The
Assistant Secretary may consider the relative priority given to fair
housing administration, as compared to the agency's other duties and
responsibilities, as well as the compatibility or potential conflict of
fair housing objectives with these other duties and responsibilities.
(b) If the Assistant Secretary determines, after application of the
criteria set forth in Sec. 115.204, that the state or local law, on
its face, provides substantive rights, procedures, remedies, and
judicial review procedures for alleged discriminatory housing practices
that are substantially equivalent to those provided in the Act, the
Assistant Secretary may offer to enter into an Agreement for the
Interim Referral of Complaints and Other Utilization of Services
(interim agreement). The interim agreement will outline the procedures
and authorities upon which the interim certification is based.
(c) Such interim agreement, after it is signed by all appropriate
signatories, will result in the agency receiving interim certification.
Appropriate signatories include the Assistant Secretary, the FHEO
regional director, and the state or local official having principal
responsibility for the administration of the state or local fair
housing law.
(d) Interim agreements shall be for a term of no more than three
years.
(e) All regulations, rules, directives, and/or opinions of the
State Attorney General or the jurisdiction's chief legal officer that
are necessary for the law to be substantially equivalent on its face
must be enacted and effective in order for the Assistant Secretary to
offer the agency an interim agreement.
(f) Interim certification required prior to certification. An
agency is required to obtain interim certification prior to obtaining
certification.
Sec. 115.204 Criteria for adequacy of law.
(a) In order for a determination to be made that a state or local
fair housing agency administers a law, which, on its face, provides
rights and remedies for alleged discriminatory housing practices that
are substantially equivalent to those provided in the Act, the law
must:
(1) Provide for an administrative enforcement body to receive and
process complaints and provide that:
(i) Complaints must be in writing;
(ii) Upon the filing of a complaint, the agency shall serve notice
upon the complainant acknowledging the filing and advising the
complainant of the time limits and choice of forums provided under the
law;
(iii) Upon the filing of a complaint, the agency shall promptly
serve notice on the respondent or person charged with the commission of
a discriminatory housing practice advising of his or her
[[Page 19076]]
procedural rights and obligations under the statute or ordinance,
together with a copy of the complaint;
(iv) A respondent may file an answer to a complaint.
(2) Delegate to the administrative enforcement body comprehensive
authority, including subpoena power, to investigate the allegations of
complaints, and power to conciliate complaints, and require that:
(i) The agency commences proceedings with respect to the complaint
before the end of the 30th day after receipt of the complaint;
(ii) The agency investigates the allegations of the complaint and
complete the investigation within the timeframe established by section
810(a)(1)(B)(iv) of the Act or comply with the notification
requirements of section 810(a)(1)(C) of the Act;
(iii) The agency make final administrative disposition of a
complaint within one year of the date of receipt of a complaint, unless
it is impracticable to do so. If the agency is unable to do so, it
shall notify the parties, in writing, of the reasons for not doing so;
(iv) Any conciliation agreement arising out of conciliation efforts
by the agency shall be an agreement between the respondent, the
complainant, and the agency and shall require the approval of the
agency;
(v) Each conciliation agreement shall be made public, unless the
complainant and respondent otherwise agree and the agency determines
that disclosure is not required to further the purpose of the law.
(3) Not place excessive burdens on the aggrieved person that might
discourage the filing of complaints, such as:
(i) A provision that a complaint must be filed within any period of
time less than 180 days after an alleged discriminatory practice has
occurred or terminated;
(ii) Anti-testing provisions;
(iii) Provisions that could subject an aggrieved person to costs,
criminal penalties, or fees in connection with the filing of
complaints.
(4) Not contain exemptions that substantially reduce the coverage
of housing accommodations as compared to section 803 of the Act.
(5) Provide the same protections as those afforded by sections 804,
805, 806, and 818 of the Act, consistent with HUD's implementing
regulations found at 24 CFR part 100.
(b) In addition to the factors described in paragraph (a) of this
section, the provisions of the state or local law must afford
administrative and judicial protection and enforcement of the rights
embodied in the law.
(1) The agency must have the authority to:
(i) Grant or seek prompt judicial action for appropriate temporary
or preliminary relief pending final disposition of a complaint, if such
action is necessary to carry out the purposes of the law;
(ii) Issue and seek enforceable subpoenas;
(iii) Grant actual damages in an administrative proceeding or
provide adjudication in court at agency expense to allow the award of
actual damages to an aggrieved person;
(iv) Grant injunctive or other equitable relief, or be specifically
authorized to seek such relief in a court of competent jurisdiction;
(v) Provide an administrative proceeding in which a civil penalty
may be assessed or provide adjudication in court, at agency expense,
allowing the assessment of punitive damages against the respondent.
(2) If an agency's law offers an administrative hearing, the agency
must also provide parties an election option substantially equivalent
to the election provisions of section 812 of the Act.
(3) Agency actions must be subject to judicial review upon
application by any party aggrieved by a final agency order.
(4) Judicial review of a final agency order must be in a court with
authority to:
(i) Grant to the petitioner, or to any other party, such temporary
relief, restraining order, or other order as the court determines is
just and proper;
(ii) Affirm, modify, or set aside, in whole or in part, the order,
or remand the order for further proceeding; and
(iii) Enforce the order to the extent that the order is affirmed or
modified.
(c) The requirement that the state or local law prohibit
discrimination on the basis of familial status does not require that
the state or local law limit the applicability of any reasonable local,
state, or federal restrictions regarding the maximum number of
occupants permitted to occupy a dwelling.
(d) The state or local law may assure that no prohibition of
discrimination because of familial status applies to housing for older
persons, as described in 24 CFR part 100, subpart E.
(e) A determination of the adequacy of a state or local fair
housing law ``on its face'' is intended to focus on the meaning and
intent of the text of the law, as distinguished from the effectiveness
of its administration. Accordingly, this determination is not limited
to an analysis of the literal text of the law. Regulations, directives,
rules of procedure, judicial decisions, or interpretations of the fair
housing law by competent authorities will be considered in making this
determination.
(f) A law will be found inadequate ``on its face'' if it permits
any of the agency's decision-making authority to be contracted out or
delegated to a non-governmental authority. For the purposes of this
paragraph, ``decision-making authority'' includes but is not limited
to:
(1) Acceptance of a complaint;
(2) Approval of a conciliation agreement;
(3) Dismissal of a complaint;
(4) Any action specified in Sec. 115.204(a)(2)(iii) or (b)(1); and
(5) Any decision-making regarding whether a particular matter will
or will not be pursued.
(g) The state or local law must provide for civil enforcement of
the law by an aggrieved person by the commencement of an action in an
appropriate court at least one year after the occurrence or termination
of an alleged discriminatory housing practice. The court must be
empowered to:
(1) Award the plaintiff actual and punitive damages;
(2) Grant as relief, as it deems appropriate, any temporary or
permanent injunction, temporary restraining order or other order; and
(3) Allow reasonable attorney's fees and costs.
(h) If a state or local law is different than the Act in a way that
does not diminish coverage of the Act, including, but not limited to,
the protection of additional prohibited bases, then the state or local
law may still be found substantially equivalent.
Sec. 115.205 Certification procedures.
(a) Certification. (1) If the Assistant Secretary determines, after
application of criteria set forth in Sec. Sec. 115.204, 115.206, and
this section, that the state or local law, both ``on its face'' and
``in operation,'' provides substantive rights, procedures, remedies,
and judicial review procedures for alleged discriminatory housing
practices that are substantially equivalent to those provided in the
Act, the Assistant Secretary may enter into a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) with the agency.
(2) The MOU is a written agreement providing for the referral of
complaints to the agency and for communication procedures between the
agency and HUD that are adequate to permit the Assistant Secretary to
monitor the agency's continuing substantial equivalency certification.
[[Page 19077]]
(3) The MOU, after it is signed by all appropriate signatories, may
authorize an agency to be a certified agency for a period of not more
than five years. Appropriate signatories include the Assistant
Secretary, the FHEO regional director, and the authorized employee(s)
of the agency.
(b) In order to receive certification, during the 60 days prior to
the expiration of the agency's interim agreement, the agency must
certify to the Assistant Secretary that the state or local fair housing
law, ``on its face,'' continues to be substantially equivalent to the
Act (i.e., there have been no amendments to the state or local fair
housing law, adoption of rules or procedures concerning the fair
housing law, or judicial or other authoritative interpretations of the
fair housing law that limit the effectiveness of the agency's fair
housing law).
Sec. 115.206 Performance assessments; Performance standards.
(a) Frequency of on-site performance assessment during interim
certification. The Assistant Secretary, through the appropriate FHEO
regional office, may conduct an on-site performance assessment not
later than six months after the execution of the interim agreement. An
on-site performance assessment may also be conducted during the six
months immediately prior to the expiration of the interim agreement.
HUD has the discretion to conduct additional performance assessments
during the period of interim certification, as it deems necessary.
(b) Frequency of on-site performance assessment during
certification. During certification, the Assistant Secretary through
the FHEO regional office, may conduct on-site performance assessments
every 24 months. HUD has the discretion to conduct additional
performance assessments during the period of certification, as it deems
necessary.
(c) In conducting the performance assessment, the FHEO regional
office shall determine whether the agency engages in timely,
comprehensive, and thorough fair housing complaint investigation,
conciliation, and enforcement activities. In the performance assessment
report, the FHEO regional office may recommend to the Assistant
Secretary whether the agency should continue to be interim certified or
certified. In conducting the performance assessment, the FHEO regional
office shall also determine whether the agency is in compliance with
the requirements for participation in the FHAP enumerated in Sec. Sec.
115.307, 115.308, 115.309, 115.310, and 115.311 of this part. In the
performance assessment report, the FHEO regional office shall identify
whether the agency meets the requirements of Sec. Sec. 115.307,
115.308, 115.309, 115.310, and 115.311 of this part, and, therefore,
should continue receiving funding under the FHAP.
(d) At a minimum, the performance assessment will consider the
following to determine the effectiveness of an agency's fair housing
complaint processing, consistent with such guidance as may be issued by
HUD:
(1) The agency's case processing procedures;
(2) The thoroughness of the agency's case processing;
(3) A review of cause and no cause determinations for quality of
investigations and consistency with appropriate standards;
(4) A review of conciliation agreements and other settlements;
(5) A review of the agency's administrative closures; and
(6) A review of the agency's enforcement procedures, including
administrative hearings and judicial proceedings.
(e) Performance standards. HUD shall utilize the following
performance standards while conducting performance assessments. If an
agency does not meet one or more performance standard(s), HUD shall
utilize the performance deficiency procedures enumerated in Sec.
115.210.
(1) Performance Standard 1. Commence complaint proceedings, carry
forward such proceedings, complete investigations, issue
determinations, and make final administrative dispositions in a timely
manner. To meet this standard, the performance assessment will consider
the timeliness of the agency's actions with respect to its complaint
processing, including, but not limited to:
(i) Whether the agency began its processing of fair housing
complaints within 30 days of receipt;
(ii) Whether the agency completes the investigative activities with
respect to a complaint within 100 days from the date of receipt or, if
it is impracticable to do so, notifies the parties in writing of the
reason(s) for the delay;
(iii) Whether the agency makes a determination of reasonable cause
or no reasonable cause with respect to a complaint within 100 days from
the date of receipt or, if it is impracticable to do so, notifies the
parties in writing of the reason(s) for the delay;
(iv) Whether the agency makes a final administrative disposition of
a complaint within one year from the date of receipt or, if it is
impracticable to do so, notifies the parties in writing of the
reason(s) for the delay; and
(v) Whether the agency completed the investigation of the complaint
and prepared a complete, final investigative report.
(vi) When an agency is unable to complete investigative activities
with respect to a complaint within 100 days, the agency must send
written notification to the parties, indicating the reason(s) for the
delay, within 110 days of the filing of the complaint.
(2) Performance Standard 2. Administrative closures are utilized
only in limited and appropriate circumstances. Administrative closures
should be distinguished from a closure on the merits and may not be
used instead of making a recommendation or determination of reasonable
or no reasonable cause. HUD will provide further guidance to interim
and certified agencies on the appropriate circumstances for
administrative closures.
(3) Performance Standard 3. During the period beginning with the
filing of a complaint and ending with filing of a charge or dismissal,
the agency will, to the extent feasible, attempt to conciliate the
complaint. After a charge has been issued, the agency will, to the
extent feasible, continue to attempt settlement until a hearing or a
judicial proceeding has begun.
(4) Performance Standard 4. The agency conducts compliance reviews
of settlements, conciliation agreements, and orders resolving
discriminatory housing practices. The performance assessment shall
include, but not be limited to:
(i) An assessment of the agency's procedures for conducting
compliance reviews; and
(ii) Terms and conditions of agreements and orders issued.
(5) Performance Standard 5. The agency must consistently and
affirmatively seek and obtain the type of relief designed to prevent
recurrences of discriminatory practices. The performance assessment
shall include, but not be limited to:
(i) An assessment of the agency's use of its authority to seek
actual damages, as appropriate;
(ii) An assessment of the agency's use of its authority to seek and
assess civil penalties or punitive damages, as appropriate;
(iii) An assessment of the types of relief sought by the agency
with consideration for the inclusion of affirmative provisions designed
to protect the public interest;
[[Page 19078]]
(iv) A review of all types of relief obtained;
(v) A review of the adequacy of the relief sought and obtained in
light of the issues raised by the complaint;
(vi) The number of complaints closed with relief and the number
closed without relief;
(vii) The number of complaints that proceed to administrative
hearing and the result; and
(viii) The number of complaints that proceed to judicial
proceedings and the result.
(6) Performance Standard 6. The agency must consistently and
affirmatively seek to eliminate all prohibited practices under its fair
housing law. An assessment under this standard will include, but not be
limited to, an identification of the education and outreach efforts of
the agency.
(7) Performance Standard 7. The agency must demonstrate that it
receives and processes a reasonable number of complaints cognizable
under both the federal Fair Housing Act and the agency's fair housing
statute or ordinance. The reasonable number will be determined by HUD
and based on all relevant circumstances including, but not limited to,
the population of the jurisdiction that the agency serves, the length
of time that the agency has participated in the FHAP, and the number of
complaints that the agency has received and processed in the past. If
an agency fails to receive and process a reasonable number of
complaints during a year of FHAP participation, given education and
outreach efforts conducted and receipts of complaints, then the FHEO
regional director may offer the agency a Performance Improvement Plan
(PIP), as described in Sec. 115.210(a)(2). The PIP will set forth the
number of complaints the agency must process during subsequent years of
FHAP participation. After issuing the PIP, the FHEO regional office
will provide the agency with technical assistance on ways to increase
awareness of fair housing rights and responsibilities in the
jurisdiction.
(8) Performance Standard 8. The agency must report to HUD on the
final status of all dual-filed complaints where a determination of
reasonable cause was made. The report must identify, at a minimum, how
complaints were resolved (e.g., settlement, judicial proceedings, or
administrative hearing), when they were resolved, the forum in which
they were resolved, and types and amounts of relief obtained.
(9) Performance Standard 9. The agency must conform its performance
to the provisions of any written agreements executed by the agency and
the Department related to substantial equivalency certification,
including, but not limited to, the interim agreement or MOU.
Sec. 115.207 Consequences of interim certification and certification.
(a) Whenever a complaint received by the Assistant Secretary
alleges violations of a fair housing law administered by an agency that
has been interim certified or certified as substantially equivalent,
the complaint will be referred to the agency, and no further action
shall be taken by the Assistant Secretary with respect to such
complaint except as provided for by the Act, this part, 24 CFR part
103, subpart C, and any written agreements executed by the Agency and
the Assistant Secretary. HUD shall make referrals to interim certified
and certified local agencies in accordance with this section even when
the local agency is located in a state with an interim certified or
certified state agency.
(b) If HUD determines that a complaint has not been processed in a
timely manner in accordance with the performance standards set forth in
Sec. 115.206, HUD may reactivate the complaint, conduct its own
investigation and conciliation efforts, and make a determination
consistent with 24 CFR part 103.
(c) Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this section, whenever the
Assistant Secretary has reason to believe that a complaint demonstrates
a basis for the commencement of proceedings against any respondent
under section 814(a) of the Act or for proceedings by any governmental
licensing or supervisory authorities, the Assistant Secretary shall
transmit the information upon which such belief is based to the
Attorney General, federal financial regulatory agencies, other federal
agencies, or other appropriate governmental licensing or supervisory
authorities.
Sec. 115.208 Procedures for renewal of certification.
(a) If the Assistant Secretary affirmatively concludes that the
agency's law and performance have complied with the requirements of
this part in each of the five years of certification, the Assistant
Secretary may renew the certification of the agency.
(b) In determining whether to renew the certification of an agency,
the Assistant Secretary's review may include, but is not limited to:
(1) Performance assessments of the agency conducted by the
Department during the five years of certification;
(2) The agency's own certification that the state or local fair
housing law continues to be substantially equivalent both ``on its
face'' and ``in operation;'' (i.e., there have been no amendments to
the state or local fair housing law, adoption of rules or procedures
concerning the fair housing law, or judicial or other authoritative
interpretations of the fair housing law that limit the effectiveness of
the agency's fair housing law); and
(3) Any and all public comments regarding the relevant state and
local laws and the performance of the agency in enforcing the law.
(c) If the Assistant Secretary decides to renew an agency's
certification, the Assistant Secretary will offer the agency either a
new MOU or an Addendum to the Memorandum of Understanding (addendum).
The new MOU or addendum will extend and update the MOU between HUD and
the agency.
(d) The new MOU or addendum, when signed by all appropriate
signatories, will result in the agency's certification being renewed
for five years from the date on which the previous MOU was to expire.
Appropriate signatories include the Assistant Secretary, the FHEO
regional director, and the authorized employee(s) of the agency.
(e) The provisions of this section may be applied to an agency that
has an expired MOU or an expired addendum.
Sec. 115.209 Technical assistance.
(a) The Assistant Sec