Draft Indiana Bat Recovery Plan, First Revision; Draft Survey Protocol, 19015-19016 [07-1866]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Final Comprehensive Conservation
Plan for Horicon and Fox River
National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs)
Dodge, Fond du Lac, and Marquette
Counties, WI
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service announces that the Final
Comprehensive Conservation Plan
(CCP) is available for Horicon and Fox
River NWRs, Wisconsin.
The CCP was prepared pursuant to
the National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997, and the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969. Goals and objectives in the CCP
describe how the agency intends to
manage the refuge over the next 15
years.
Copies of the Final CCP are
available on compact disk or hard copy.
You may obtain a copy by writing to:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Division
of Conservation Planning, Bishop Henry
Whipple Federal Building, 1 Federal
Drive, Fort Snelling, Minnesota 55111
or you may access and download a copy
via the planning Web site at https://
www.fws.gov/midwest/planning/
horicon.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Patti
Meyers, (920) 387–2658.
The
21,417-acre Horicon NWR was
established in 1941 through land
purchases approved by the Migratory
Bird Conservation Commission. The
1,004-acre Fox River NWR is
administered by the Horicon staff and
was established by the Director in
October 1978. The southern one-third of
the Horicon Marsh is managed by the
Department of Natural Resources and
their land managers actively
participated in the development of the
CCP.
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee et seq.), requires the
Service to develop a CCP for each
National Wildlife Refuge. The purpose
in developing a CCP is to provide refuge
managers with a 15-year strategy for
achieving refuge purposes and
contributing toward the mission of the
National Wildlife Refuge System,
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
consistent with sound principles of fish
and wildlife management, conservation,
legal mandates, and Service policies. In
addition to outlining broad management
direction for conserving wildlife and
their habitats, the CCP identifies
wildlife-dependent recreational
opportunities available to the public,
including opportunities for hunting,
fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation. We will
review and update these CCPs at least
every 15 years.
Management of the Refuges for the
next 15 years will focus on: (1)
Improving the long-term sustainability
of wildlife habitats; (2) increasing
opportunities for wildlife-dependent
recreation; and (3) strengthening and
expanding partnerships with
government agencies, organizations, and
communities.
This document was received at the Office
of the Federal Register on April 11, 2007.
Dated: December 8, 2006.
Charles M. Wooley,
Acting Regional Director, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. E7–7109 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Draft Indiana Bat Recovery Plan, First
Revision; Draft Survey Protocol
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability for review
and comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), announce
availability of the draft revised recovery
plan and draft survey protocol for the
Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) for public
review and comment. This species is
federally listed as endangered under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act).
DATES: In order to consider your
comments on the draft recovery plan
and draft survey protocol, we must
receive them on or before July 16, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Recovery Plan: You may
obtain a copy of the recovery plan by
any of the following means:
1. World Wide Web: https://
midwest.fws.gov/endangered; or
2. U.S. mail or in-person pickup:
Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Ecological Services Field
Office, 620 South Walker Street,
Bloomington, IN 47403–2121.
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19015
You may submit electronic comments
on the recovery plan to this e-mail
address: ibat_recovery_plan@fws.gov.
Draft Survey Protocol: The draft
survey protocol is available at https://
www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/
mammals/ibat_srvyprtcl.html; this Web
page also provides instructions and
addresses for submitting comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Lori Pruitt, by U.S. mail or e-mail (see
ADDRESSES).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery of endangered or threatened
animals or plants is a primary goal of
our endangered species program.
Recovery plans describe actions
considered necessary for the
conservation of the species, establish
criteria for delisting species, and
provide estimates of the time and cost
for implementing the measures needed
for recovery.
The Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.)
requires the development of recovery
plans for listed species, unless such a
plan would not promote the
conservation of a particular species.
Section 4(f) of the Act, as amended in
1988, requires that we provide public
notice and opportunity for public
review and comment during recovery
plan development. The Service will
consider all information presented
during a public comment period prior to
approval of each new or revised
recovery plan. The Service and other
Federal agencies all also take these
comments into consideration in the
course of implementing approved
recovery plans.
The species was originally listed as in
danger of extinction under the
Exchanged Species Preservation Act of
1966. The original recovery plan for the
species was published in 1983; this is
the first recovery plan revision. As of
October 2006, the Service had records of
extant winter populations at
approximately 281 hibernacula in 19
states and 269 maternity colonies in 16
states. The 2005 winter census estimate
of the population was 457,000.
During winter, Indiana bats are
restricted to suitable underground
hibernacula. The vast majority of these
sites are caves located in karst areas of
the east-central United State; however,
Indiana bats also hibernate in other
cave-like locations, including
abandoned mines. Most Indiana bats
hibernate in caves or mines where the
ambient temperature remains below 10°
C but infrequently drops below freezing,
and the temperature is relatively stable.
In summer, most reproductive females
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
19016
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 72 / Monday, April 16, 2007 / Notices
occupy roost sites under exfoliating bark
of dead trees that retain large, thick
slabs of peeling bark. These trees are
typically within canopy gaps in a forest,
in a fenceline, or along a wooded edge.
Habitats in which maternity roosts
occur include riparian zones,
bottomland and floodplain habitats,
wooded wetlands, and upland
communities. Indiana bats typically
forage in semi-open to closed forested
habitats, forest edges, and riparian areas.
Threats to the Indiana bat vary during
its annual cycle. At the hibernacula,
threats include modifications to caves,
mines, and surrounding areas that
change airflow and alter microclimate in
the hibernacula. Human disturbance
and vandalism pose significant threats
during hibernation through direct
mortality and by inducing arousal and
consequent depletion of fat reserves.
Natural catastrophes can also have a
significant effect during winter because
of the concentration of individuals in a
relatively few sites. During summer
months, possible threats relate to the
loss and degradation of forested habitat.
Migration pathways and swarming sites
may also be affected by habitat loss and
degradation. In addition to these threats,
significant information gaps remain
regarding the species’ ecology that
hinder sound decision-making on how
best to manage and protect the species.
The objective of the recovery plan is
to provide a framework for the recovery
of Indiana bat so that protection by the
Act is no longer necessary. We may
consider Indiana bat for classification
from Endangered to Threatened status
when the likelihood of the species
becoming extinct in the foreseeable
future has been precluded by
achievement of the following criteria:
(1) Permanent protection of a minimum
of 80 percent of Priority-1 hibernacula
in each of four Recovery Units (OzarkCentral, Midwest, Appalachian
Mountains, and Northeast), with a
minimum of one Priority-1
hibernaculum protected in each unit; (2)
A minimum overall population estimate
equal to the 2005 population estimate of
457,000; and (3) Documentation that
shows important hibernacula within
each Recovery Unit have a positive
annual population growth rate over the
next 10-year period (i.e., five survey
periods).
We will consider Indiana bat for
delisting when the likelihood of the
species becoming threatened in the
foreseeable future has been reduced by
the achievement of the following
criteria: (1) Permanent protection of a
minimum of 50 percent of Priority-2
hibernacula in each Recovery Unit: (2)
A minimum overall population estimate
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:24 Apr 13, 2007
Jkt 211001
equal to the 2005 population estimate of
457,000; and (3) Documentation that
shows a positive population growth rate
within each Recovery Unit over an
additional five sequential survey
periods (i.e., 10 years). If research on
summer habitat requirements indicates
the quality or quantity of maternity
habitat is threatening recovery of the
species, the Service will amend these
criteria. Additional details on
reclassification and delisting criteria are
available in the recovery plan.
We will meet these criteria through
the following actions: (1) Conserving
and managing hibernacula and their
winter populations, (2) Conserving and
managing summer habitat to maximize
survival and fecundity, (3) Planning and
conducting research essential for
recovery, and (4) Developing and
implementing a public information and
outreach program.
In addition to seeking comments on
the content of the entire recovery plan,
we request any information on the
appropriate scope and breadth of this
recovery plan as it relates to the
inclusion of available science for
summer habitat. Furthermore, we are
seeking any information related to
hybridization that may be occurring
with other bats within the range of
Indiana bat. We are interested to know
about this, the extent of such
hybridization and its potential to affect
the Indiana bat as a species. We also
request information about the use of
records of captured individuals to
describe the summer, winter and
maternity distribution of the species. In
addition to soliciting comment on the
recovery plan, we are seeking comment
on a draft survey protocol for
determining presence or probable
absence of Indiana bats at cave portals
or abandoned mines that could serve as
hibernacula. Our goal is to incorporate
comments and finalize the draft survey
protocol in time to be included in the
approved Indiana Bat Recovery Plan.
The draft survey protocol, with
instructions for commenting, is
available on the Internet (see
ADDRESSES).
Public Comments Solicited
The Service solicits written comments
on the recovery plan and the draft
survey protocol. All comments received
by the date specified will be considered
prior to approval of the plan. Written
comments and materials regarding the
draft recovery plan should be addressed
to the Field Supervisor (see ADDRESSES).
Comments and materials received about
the draft recovery plan will be available
by appointment for public inspection
during normal business hours at the
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
above address. For information on
commenting on the draft survey
protocol, see ADDRESSES.
Authority: The authority for this action is
section 4(f) of the Endangered Species Act,
16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
Dated: April 4, 2007.
Lynn Lewis,
Deputy Assistant Regional Director,
Ecological Services, Region 3, Fort Snelling,
Minnesota.
[FR Doc. 07–1866 Filed 4–13–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–M
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Seal Beach National Wildlife Refuge,
Seal Beach, Orange County, CA
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare a
comprehensive conservation plan and
environmental assessment;
announcement of public open house
meetings; request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service, we), intend to
gather information necessary to prepare
a comprehensive conservation plan
(CCP) and associated environmental
documents for the Seal Beach National
Wildlife Refuge (NWR). We furnish this
notice in compliance with our CCP
policy to advise other agencies and the
public of our intentions, and to obtain
suggestions and information on the
scope of issues to be considered in the
planning process.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive your written comments by
May 18, 2007. Two public open house
meetings will be held during the
scoping phase of the comprehensive
conservation plan development process.
Special mailings, newspaper articles,
and other media announcements will be
used to inform the public and Tribe,
state, and local governments of the dates
and opportunities for input throughout
the planning process.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments or
requests for more information to
Victoria Touchstone, Refuge Planner,
San Diego National Wildlife Refuge
Complex, 6010 Hidden Valley Road,
Carlsbad, CA 92011; telephone: 760–
431–9440 ex. 349; fax: 760–930–0256; or
electronic mail:
Victoria_Touchstone@fws.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Victoria Touchstone, Refuge Planner,
San Diego NWR Complex, 760–431–
9440 extension 349.
E:\FR\FM\16APN1.SGM
16APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 72 (Monday, April 16, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19015-19016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 07-1866]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Draft Indiana Bat Recovery Plan, First Revision; Draft Survey
Protocol
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability for review and comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce
availability of the draft revised recovery plan and draft survey
protocol for the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) for public review and
comment. This species is federally listed as endangered under the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act).
DATES: In order to consider your comments on the draft recovery plan
and draft survey protocol, we must receive them on or before July 16,
2007.
ADDRESSES: Recovery Plan: You may obtain a copy of the recovery plan by
any of the following means:
1. World Wide Web: https://midwest.fws.gov/endangered; or
2. U.S. mail or in-person pickup: Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Ecological Services Field Office, 620 South Walker
Street, Bloomington, IN 47403-2121.
You may submit electronic comments on the recovery plan to this e-
mail address: ibat_recovery_plan@fws.gov.
Draft Survey Protocol: The draft survey protocol is available at
https://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/ibat_srvyprtcl.html;
this Web page also provides instructions and addresses for submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Lori Pruitt, by U.S. mail or e-
mail (see ADDRESSES).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Recovery of endangered or threatened animals or plants is a primary
goal of our endangered species program. Recovery plans describe actions
considered necessary for the conservation of the species, establish
criteria for delisting species, and provide estimates of the time and
cost for implementing the measures needed for recovery.
The Act (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) requires the development of
recovery plans for listed species, unless such a plan would not promote
the conservation of a particular species. Section 4(f) of the Act, as
amended in 1988, requires that we provide public notice and opportunity
for public review and comment during recovery plan development. The
Service will consider all information presented during a public comment
period prior to approval of each new or revised recovery plan. The
Service and other Federal agencies all also take these comments into
consideration in the course of implementing approved recovery plans.
The species was originally listed as in danger of extinction under
the Exchanged Species Preservation Act of 1966. The original recovery
plan for the species was published in 1983; this is the first recovery
plan revision. As of October 2006, the Service had records of extant
winter populations at approximately 281 hibernacula in 19 states and
269 maternity colonies in 16 states. The 2005 winter census estimate of
the population was 457,000.
During winter, Indiana bats are restricted to suitable underground
hibernacula. The vast majority of these sites are caves located in
karst areas of the east-central United State; however, Indiana bats
also hibernate in other cave-like locations, including abandoned mines.
Most Indiana bats hibernate in caves or mines where the ambient
temperature remains below 10[deg] C but infrequently drops below
freezing, and the temperature is relatively stable. In summer, most
reproductive females
[[Page 19016]]
occupy roost sites under exfoliating bark of dead trees that retain
large, thick slabs of peeling bark. These trees are typically within
canopy gaps in a forest, in a fenceline, or along a wooded edge.
Habitats in which maternity roosts occur include riparian zones,
bottomland and floodplain habitats, wooded wetlands, and upland
communities. Indiana bats typically forage in semi-open to closed
forested habitats, forest edges, and riparian areas.
Threats to the Indiana bat vary during its annual cycle. At the
hibernacula, threats include modifications to caves, mines, and
surrounding areas that change airflow and alter microclimate in the
hibernacula. Human disturbance and vandalism pose significant threats
during hibernation through direct mortality and by inducing arousal and
consequent depletion of fat reserves. Natural catastrophes can also
have a significant effect during winter because of the concentration of
individuals in a relatively few sites. During summer months, possible
threats relate to the loss and degradation of forested habitat.
Migration pathways and swarming sites may also be affected by habitat
loss and degradation. In addition to these threats, significant
information gaps remain regarding the species' ecology that hinder
sound decision-making on how best to manage and protect the species.
The objective of the recovery plan is to provide a framework for
the recovery of Indiana bat so that protection by the Act is no longer
necessary. We may consider Indiana bat for classification from
Endangered to Threatened status when the likelihood of the species
becoming extinct in the foreseeable future has been precluded by
achievement of the following criteria: (1) Permanent protection of a
minimum of 80 percent of Priority-1 hibernacula in each of four
Recovery Units (Ozark-Central, Midwest, Appalachian Mountains, and
Northeast), with a minimum of one Priority-1 hibernaculum protected in
each unit; (2) A minimum overall population estimate equal to the 2005
population estimate of 457,000; and (3) Documentation that shows
important hibernacula within each Recovery Unit have a positive annual
population growth rate over the next 10-year period (i.e., five survey
periods).
We will consider Indiana bat for delisting when the likelihood of
the species becoming threatened in the foreseeable future has been
reduced by the achievement of the following criteria: (1) Permanent
protection of a minimum of 50 percent of Priority-2 hibernacula in each
Recovery Unit: (2) A minimum overall population estimate equal to the
2005 population estimate of 457,000; and (3) Documentation that shows a
positive population growth rate within each Recovery Unit over an
additional five sequential survey periods (i.e., 10 years). If research
on summer habitat requirements indicates the quality or quantity of
maternity habitat is threatening recovery of the species, the Service
will amend these criteria. Additional details on reclassification and
delisting criteria are available in the recovery plan.
We will meet these criteria through the following actions: (1)
Conserving and managing hibernacula and their winter populations, (2)
Conserving and managing summer habitat to maximize survival and
fecundity, (3) Planning and conducting research essential for recovery,
and (4) Developing and implementing a public information and outreach
program.
In addition to seeking comments on the content of the entire
recovery plan, we request any information on the appropriate scope and
breadth of this recovery plan as it relates to the inclusion of
available science for summer habitat. Furthermore, we are seeking any
information related to hybridization that may be occurring with other
bats within the range of Indiana bat. We are interested to know about
this, the extent of such hybridization and its potential to affect the
Indiana bat as a species. We also request information about the use of
records of captured individuals to describe the summer, winter and
maternity distribution of the species. In addition to soliciting
comment on the recovery plan, we are seeking comment on a draft survey
protocol for determining presence or probable absence of Indiana bats
at cave portals or abandoned mines that could serve as hibernacula. Our
goal is to incorporate comments and finalize the draft survey protocol
in time to be included in the approved Indiana Bat Recovery Plan. The
draft survey protocol, with instructions for commenting, is available
on the Internet (see ADDRESSES).
Public Comments Solicited
The Service solicits written comments on the recovery plan and the
draft survey protocol. All comments received by the date specified will
be considered prior to approval of the plan. Written comments and
materials regarding the draft recovery plan should be addressed to the
Field Supervisor (see ADDRESSES). Comments and materials received about
the draft recovery plan will be available by appointment for public
inspection during normal business hours at the above address. For
information on commenting on the draft survey protocol, see ADDRESSES.
Authority: The authority for this action is section 4(f) of the
Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. 1533(f).
Dated: April 4, 2007.
Lynn Lewis,
Deputy Assistant Regional Director, Ecological Services, Region 3, Fort
Snelling, Minnesota.
[FR Doc. 07-1866 Filed 4-13-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-M