Intent To Prepare a Legislative Environmental Impact Statement, for the Proposed Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet Deep Draft De-Authorization (3-D), LA, 18641-18643 [E7-7086]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 71 / Friday, April 13, 2007 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF THE DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Jacksonville Harbor Navigation
Study, General Re-Evaluation Report,
Located in Duval County, FL
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army of Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps), Jacksonville District,
intends to prepare a Draft Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement
(DSEIS), for the Jacksonville Harbor
Navigation Study, General ReEvaluation Report. This action is a
cooperative effort between the Corps
and the Jacksonville Harbor Port
Authority.
ADDRESSES: U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers, Planning Division,
Environmental Branch, P.O. Box 4970,
Jacksonville, FL 32232–0019.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Paul Stodola, by e-mail
Paul.E.Stodola@saj02.usace.army.mil or
by telephone at (904) 232–3271.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
a. The Jacksonville Part Authority has
requested that the Corps study the
feasibility of further deepening the Port
of Jacksonville. The proposed DSEIS for
additional deepening would
supplement the Jacksonville Harbor
Navigation Improvements EIS
completed in July 1996. Authorization
for the study is contained in House
Report 107–681 and the Senate
explanatory statement as delineated in
the Congressional Record of January 15,
2003, pages S492 and S546.
b. Objectives. The objectives of the
study are to determine if light loading
of ships, tidal delay, or other
commercial navigation benefits exist to
justify additional deepening below the
existing 40-foot project depth from the
entrance channel to river mile 20 and
for Cuts F and G of the West Blount
Island Channel; evaluate measures
including wideners along the Trout
River Cut Range, and Quarantine
(Bartram) Island Upper Range which
would reduce navigation concerns and
improve ship traffic safety; examine the
impact of channel deepening on the
capacity of existing upland confined
disposal facilities and the offshore
dredge material disposal site; evaluate
new upland confined disposal facilities,
if required; determine if beneficial uses
of dredged material such as
manufactured soils, recycling of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:52 Apr 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
dredged material for construction fill,
development of artificial reefs, or use of
beach quality material for placement
along adjacent beaches would provide
appropriate alternatives for disposal of
dredged material; evaluate the impact of
deepening and widening measures on
shoaling rates for existing and advanced
harbor maintenance needs; examine the
hydrodynamic and environmental
effects of the deepening and widening
measures on Chicopit Bay, White Shells
Bay, Mill Cove and adjacent harbor
shorelines; identify environmental and
cultural resources in the study area and
potential impacts from deepening or
widening to those resources; identify
the NED plan for Jacksonville Harbor
which most efficiently and safely
accommodates existing and larger
commercial ship and barge traffic while
avoiding or minimizing impacts to
environmental resources.
c. Alternatives. The proposed
alternatives include making no further
improvements to the project (no action
alternatives); deepening the project
channel in 1 foot increments from the
existing depth of 40 feet from the
entrance channel (mouth of St. Johns
River) extending upstream to river mile
20; constructing channel wideners; and
dredged material placement in upland
disposal areas, artificial reefs, approved
beach areas, and the designated Ocean
Dredged Material Disposal Site.
d. Issues. The DEIS will consider the
possible effects of blasting on aquatic
resources, loss of wetlands from
expansion of upland disposal areas at
Bartram Island, as well as other project
related impacts on protected species,
water quality, fish and wildlife
resources, cultural resources, essential
fish habitat, socio-economic resources
coastal processes, aesthetics and
recreation, and other impacts identified
through scoping, public involvement,
and agency coordination.
e. Scoping Process. The scoping
process as outlined by the Council on
Environmental Quality would be
utilized to involve Federal, State, and
local agencies, and other interested
persons and organizations. A scoping
letter would be sent to the appropriate
parties requesting comments and
concerns regarding issues to consider
during the study. Public scoping
meetings would be held. Exact dates,
times, and locations would be published
in local papers.
f. Coordination. The proposed action
is being coordinated with the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the
National Marine Fisheries Service under
Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act, with the FWS under the Fish and
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18641
Wildlife Coordination Act, and with the
State Historic Preservation Officer.
g. Other Environmental Review and
Consultation. The proposed action
would involve evaluation for
compliance with guidelines pursuant to
Section 404(b) of the Clean Water Act;
application (to the State of Florida) for
Water Quality Certification pursuant to
Section 401 of the Clean Water Act;
certification of state lands, easements,
and rights of way; Essential Fish Habitat
with National Marine Fisheries Service;
and determination of Coastal Zone
Management Act consistency.
h. Agency Role. The non-Federal
sponsor (Jacksonville Port Authority)
will provide extensive information and
assistance on the resources to be
impacted, mitigation measures, and
alternatives.
i. DSEIS Preparation. It is estimated
that the DSEIS will be available to the
public on or about three years after
completion of the Feasibility Scoping
Meeting currently scheduled for
September 2007.
Dated: April 2, 2007.
Stuart J. Appelbaum,
Chief, Planning Division.
[FR Doc. 07–1835 Filed 4–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–AJ–M
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Legislative
Environmental Impact Statement, for
the Proposed Mississippi River—Gulf
Outlet Deep Draft De-Authorization
(3–D), LA
Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This notice of intent (NOI) is
for the Mississippi River—Gulf Outlet
(MRGO) 3–D Project. This notice of
intent addresses the Federally
authorized navigation channel located
in southeastern Louisiana.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Questions about the proposed action
and Legislative Environmental Impact
Statement can be answered by: Mr. Sean
P. Mickal, 504 862–2319, CEMVN–PM–
RS, P.O. Box 60267, New Orleans, LA
70160–0267.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
MRGO is a Federally-authorized 36-foot
deep, 500-foot bottom width waterway
which allows deep-draft access to New
Orleans area port facilities via a shorter
route than using the Mississippi River.
Congress authorized MRGO channel
E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM
13APN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
18642
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 71 / Friday, April 13, 2007 / Notices
construction in the River and Harbor
Act of 1956. Public Law 84–445, 70 Stat.
65 states: ‘‘Be it enacted by the Senate
and House of Representatives of the
United States of America Congress
assembled, that the existing project for
the Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to
the Gulf of Mexico, is hereby modified
to provide for the Mississippi River-Gulf
Outlet to be constructed under the
direction of the Secretary of the Army
and supervision of the Chief of
Engineers, substantially in accordance
with the recommendation of the Chief of
Engineers contained in House
Document 245, Eighty-Second Congress,
at an estimated cost of $88,000,000
* * .*’’
The LEIS would accompany the
MRGO 3–D report to Congress being
prepared to aid in identifying a
comprehensive plan for de-authorizing
deep-draft navigation on the MRGO
from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway
(GIWW) to the Gulf of Mexico. Public
Law 109–234, the Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act for
Defense, the Global War on Terror, and
Hurricane Recovery, 2006, reads in part:
‘‘* * * the Secretary of the Army,
acting through the Chief of Engineers,
utilizing $3,300,000 of the funds
provided herein shall develop a
comprehensive plan, at full Federal
expense, to de-authorize deep-draft
navigation on the Mississippi River-Gulf
Outlet, Louisiana, extending from the
Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf Intracoastal
Waterway: Provided further, That, not
later than 6 months after the date of
enactment of this Act, the Secretary
shall submit an interim report to
Congress comprising the plan: Provided
further, That the Secretary shall refine
the plan, if necessary, to be fully
consistent, integrated, and included in
the final report to be issued in December
2007 for the Louisiana Coastal
Protection and Restoration Plan.’’
1. Proposed Action and Reasonable
Alternatives: Congress has directed the
Secretary of the Army, acting through
the Chief of Engineers, to plan for deauthorization of deep-draft navigation
on the MRGO. Congress has authorized
the United States Army Corps of
Engineers (USACE) to prepare a
comprehensive plan to de-authorize
deep-draft navigation on the MRGO
channel and has also encouraged the
USACE to identify any measures for
hurricane and storm damage reduction.
An Interim Report titled, Mississippi
River Gulf Outlet, Deep-Draft DeAuthorization, Interim Report to
Congress, was submitted to Congress in
December 2006. The Interim Report
compared options for a comprehensive
plan for de-authorization of deep-draft
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:52 Apr 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
navigation on the MRGO. The Final
Report and LEIS would identify a
tentatively selected plan and that
tentatively selected plan would be
integrated with the on-going Louisiana
Coastal Protection and Restoration
Study (LACPR).
Alternative 1 (Interim Report Option
2a)—Construct a Dam across the MRGO
at Bayou La Loutre: The existing
Congressional authorization for the
MRGO channel would either be
modified or a new authorization would
be recommended to de-authorize deepdraft navigation and construct a dam.
No additional Federal funds would be
appropriated to maintain any navigation
channel on the MRGO between the
GIWW and the Gulf of Mexico; except
authority may be requested to maintain
existing wetland protection features
along the MRGO. The dam would be
constructed just south of Bayou La
Loutre and would tie in with the
southern Bayou La Loutre Ridge to
completely block the MRGO channel.
The structure would not allow passage
of vessels traveling the length of the
MRGO. Relic features, such as jetties
and aids to navigation, would be
considered for removal and/or
reapplication. Construction of the
closure would be completed within two
years of authorization, pending receipt
of Congressional appropriations.
Alternative 2 (Interim Report Option
2a (phased))—Construct a Dam across
the MRGO at Bayou La Loutre in Two
Phases (Construct a Weir in Phase I;
convert Weir to a full-closure dam in
Phase II when depth of any portion of
the channel measures 14 feet or less):
The existing Congressional
authorization for the MRGO channel
would either be modified or a new
authorization would be recommended
to de-authorize deep-draft navigation
and construct a dam. No additional
Federal funds would be appropriated to
maintain any navigation channel on the
MRGO between the GIWW and the Gulf
of Mexico; except authority may be
requested to maintain existing wetland
protection features along the MRGO. A
dam would be constructed just south of
Bayou La Loutre in two phases and
would tie in with the southern Bayou La
Loutre Ridge to totally block the MRGO
channel. The first phase would be
construction of a dam containing a weir
125-feet wide by 14 feet deep (The weir
would be set at 14 feet to allow safe
passage of 12-foot draft vessels). Once
any reach of the channel shoaled in to
a depth of less than 14-feet, the second
phase of construction would begin. It is
estimated that some reaches of the
MRGO would become impassible to
vessels greater than a 12-foot draft in
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
approximately 2014. The second phase
of construction would complete total
closure of the MRGO by closing the
weir. The completed structure would
not allow passage of vessels traveling
the length of the MRGO. Relic features,
such as jetties and aids to navigation,
would be considered for removal and/or
reapplication. Phase one construction of
the closure would be completed within
two years of receipt of Congressional
appropriations; and phase two would be
completed when the depth of the
navigation channel is less than 14 feet
deep and Congressional appropriations
are provided.
Alternative 3 (Interim Report Option
3)—Cease All MRGO Navigation
Channel Operations and Maintenance
Dredging: The existing Congressional
authorization for the MRGO channel
would either be modified or a new
authorization would be recommended
to de-authorize deep-draft navigation.
No additional Federal funds would be
appropriated to maintain any navigation
channel on the MRGO between the
GIWW and the Gulf of Mexico; except
authority may be requested to maintain
existing wetland protection features
along the MRGO. Relic features, such as
jetties and aids to navigation, would be
considered for removal and/or
reapplication. Under this option,
commercial and recreational shallowdraft vessels could still use the MRGO
until the navigation channel shoals in to
a depth prohibiting navigation. It is
estimated that some reaches of the
MRGO would become impassible to
vessels greater than a 12-foot draft by
approximately 2014.
2. Stakeholder Involvement:
Stakeholder involvement for this
proposed action is integral to the
project. Interested parties, concerned
citizens, other state and Federal
agencies, and private and not for profit
or non-governmental organizations are
strongly encouraged to participate in the
development of the proposed action.
Stakeholder meetings would be held
throughout project development.
Meeting announcements would be made
as information becomes available.
3. Significant Issues: The list of
important resources and issues that
would be evaluated in the EIS include,
but are not limited to tidally influenced
coastal wetlands (marshes and swamps),
fisheries resources, wildlife resources,
essential fish habitat, water quality, air
quality, threatened and endangered
species, recreation resources, and
cultural resources. Socioeconomic items
that would be evaluated in the EIS
include navigation, business and
industrial activity, employment, and
community cohesion.
E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM
13APN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 71 / Friday, April 13, 2007 / Notices
4. Interagency Coordination and
Cooperation: The following agencies
have been informally invited to
participate in the study on the LEIS:
Minerals Management Service, National
Marine Fisheries Service, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S.
Geological Service, Louisiana
Department of Environmental Quality,
Louisiana Department of Natural
Resources, and the Louisiana
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
would provide a Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act Report. Coordination
would be maintained with the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service and the National
Marine Fisheries Service regarding
threatened and endangered species
under their respective jurisdictional
responsibilities. Coordination would be
maintained with the National Marine
Fisheries Service regarding essential
fish habitat. Coordination would be
maintained with the Natural Resources
Conservation Service regarding prime
and unique farmlands. Coordination
would be maintained with the Advisory
Counsel on Historic Preservation and
the State Historic Preservation Officer.
The Louisiana Department of Natural
Resources would be consulted regarding
consistency with the Coastal Zone
Management Act. The Louisiana
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries
would be contacted concerning
potential impacts to Natural and Scenic
Streams.
5. Environmental Consultation and
Review: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (USFWS) would be assisting in
the documentation of existing
conditions and assessment of effects of
project alternatives through Fish and
Wildlife Coordination Act consultation
procedures. The USFWS would also
provide a Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act report. Consultation
would also be accomplished with the
USFWS and the National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) concerning
threatened and endangered species and
their critical habitat. The NMFS would
be consulted on the effects of this
proposed action on Essential Fish
Habitat. The draft EIS or a notice of its
availability would be distributed to all
interested agencies, organizations, and
individuals.
6. Public Scoping Meeting: Scoping
meetings are not required (40 CFR
1506.8 Proposals for legislation (b)(1))
when preparing a LEIS. However, as
indicated in Section 2, Stakeholder
Involvement, an intensive public
engagement program would continue
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:52 Apr 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
throughout the study to solicit input
from affected or interested parties.
7. Estimated Date of Availability: The
earliest date the LEIS is expected to be
available is May of 2007.
Dated: April 4, 2007.
Richard P. Wagenaar,
Colonel, U.S. Army, District Commander.
[FR Doc. E7–7086 Filed 4–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–84–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
18643
District Direct Interconnection
Project, Construct and Operate a 16mile Long 60-Kilovolt Power
Transmission Facilities, (DOE/EIS–
0389, Trinity County, CA.
Summary: EPA does not object to the
proposed project. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20070041, ERP No. D–AFS–
L65532–OR, Five Buttes Project,
Conduct Vegetation Management
Activities, Implementation, Deschutes
National Forest, Crescent Ranger
District, Deschutes County, OR.
[ER–FRL–6685–9]
Summary: EPA does not object to the
proposed action. Rating LO.
Environmental Impact Statements and
Regulations; Availability of EPA
Comments
EIS No. 20070048, ERP No. D–NOA–
L64052–00, PROGRAMMATIC—
Steller Sea Lion and Northern Fur
Seal Research, Proposal to Disburse
Funds and Issue Permit for Research,
AK, WA, OR and CA.
Availability of EPA comments
prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section
309 of the Clean Air Act and Section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act as amended. Requests for
copies of EPA comments can be directed
to the Office of Federal Activities at
202–564–7167.
An explanation of the ratings assigned
to draft environmental impact
statements (EISs) was published in FR
dated April 6, 2007 (72 FR 17156).
Draft EISs
EIS No. 20070018, ERP No. D–RUS–
H05025–MO, Norborne Baseload
Power Plant, Proposed Construction
and Operation of a 660-megawatt Net
Coal-Fired Power Plant, Carroll
County, MO.
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns about mercury
emissions and the mercury risk
assessment. EPA requested additional
information on the mercury issue and
recommended that ozone monitoring be
continued throughout the ozone season.
Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20070028, ERP No. D–COE–
K39104–CA, PROGRAMMATIC—Los
Angeles River Revitalization Master
Plan (LARRMP) Project,
Implementation, Improving Natural
Habitat, Water Quality, Recreation,
Economic Values and Open Space,
Owensmoth Avenue in Canoga Park
(at the Confluence of Bell Creek and
Arroyo Calabasas) and continues
down stream to Washington
Boulevard near the northern boundary
of the City of Vernon, City of Los
Angeles, Los Angeles County, CA.
Summary: EPA does not object to the
proposed action. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20070039, ERP No. D–WPA–
K08032–CA, Trinity Public Utilities
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Summary: EPA expressed
environmental concerns about
unintentional lethal takes, mortality
rates and impacts from research
activities. EPA requested information on
impact levels and tribal consultation.
Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20070006, ERP No. DS–DOE–
D09800–PA, Gilberton Coal-to-Clean
Fuels and Power Project, Construction
and Operation a New Demonstration
Plant, Updated Information to Correct
Information regarding Carbon Dioxide
(CO2) Emissions, Schuylkill County,
PA.
Summary: EPA requested that
adaptive management provisions be
considered to assess CO2 mitigation
measures. Rating EC2.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20070060, ERP No. F–AFS–
F65063–WI, Twentymile Restoration
Project Area, Restore Northern
Hardwood Forests to an Uneven-aged
Condition, Great Divide Ranger
District, Chequamegon-Nicolet
National Forest, Ashland and Bayfield
Counties, WI.
Summary: The Final EIS addressed
EPA’s comments, including information
on habitat restoration; therefore, EPA
does not object to the proposed project.
Dated: April 10, 2007
Ken Mittelholtz,
Environmental Protection Specialist, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E7–7022 Filed 4–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\13APN1.SGM
13APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 71 (Friday, April 13, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18641-18643]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-7086]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Legislative Environmental Impact Statement,
for the Proposed Mississippi River--Gulf Outlet Deep Draft De-
Authorization (3-D), LA
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice of intent (NOI) is for the Mississippi River--Gulf
Outlet (MRGO) 3-D Project. This notice of intent addresses the
Federally authorized navigation channel located in southeastern
Louisiana.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Questions about the proposed action
and Legislative Environmental Impact Statement can be answered by: Mr.
Sean P. Mickal, 504 862-2319, CEMVN-PM-RS, P.O. Box 60267, New Orleans,
LA 70160-0267.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The MRGO is a Federally-authorized 36-foot
deep, 500-foot bottom width waterway which allows deep-draft access to
New Orleans area port facilities via a shorter route than using the
Mississippi River. Congress authorized MRGO channel
[[Page 18642]]
construction in the River and Harbor Act of 1956. Public Law 84-445, 70
Stat. 65 states: ``Be it enacted by the Senate and House of
Representatives of the United States of America Congress assembled,
that the existing project for the Mississippi River, Baton Rouge to the
Gulf of Mexico, is hereby modified to provide for the Mississippi
River-Gulf Outlet to be constructed under the direction of the
Secretary of the Army and supervision of the Chief of Engineers,
substantially in accordance with the recommendation of the Chief of
Engineers contained in House Document 245, Eighty-Second Congress, at
an estimated cost of $88,000,000 * * .*''
The LEIS would accompany the MRGO 3-D report to Congress being
prepared to aid in identifying a comprehensive plan for de-authorizing
deep-draft navigation on the MRGO from the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway
(GIWW) to the Gulf of Mexico. Public Law 109-234, the Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act for Defense, the Global War on Terror,
and Hurricane Recovery, 2006, reads in part: ``* * * the Secretary of
the Army, acting through the Chief of Engineers, utilizing $3,300,000
of the funds provided herein shall develop a comprehensive plan, at
full Federal expense, to de-authorize deep-draft navigation on the
Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Louisiana, extending from the Gulf of
Mexico to the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway: Provided further, That, not
later than 6 months after the date of enactment of this Act, the
Secretary shall submit an interim report to Congress comprising the
plan: Provided further, That the Secretary shall refine the plan, if
necessary, to be fully consistent, integrated, and included in the
final report to be issued in December 2007 for the Louisiana Coastal
Protection and Restoration Plan.''
1. Proposed Action and Reasonable Alternatives: Congress has
directed the Secretary of the Army, acting through the Chief of
Engineers, to plan for de-authorization of deep-draft navigation on the
MRGO. Congress has authorized the United States Army Corps of Engineers
(USACE) to prepare a comprehensive plan to de-authorize deep-draft
navigation on the MRGO channel and has also encouraged the USACE to
identify any measures for hurricane and storm damage reduction. An
Interim Report titled, Mississippi River Gulf Outlet, Deep-Draft De-
Authorization, Interim Report to Congress, was submitted to Congress in
December 2006. The Interim Report compared options for a comprehensive
plan for de-authorization of deep-draft navigation on the MRGO. The
Final Report and LEIS would identify a tentatively selected plan and
that tentatively selected plan would be integrated with the on-going
Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration Study (LACPR).
Alternative 1 (Interim Report Option 2a)--Construct a Dam across
the MRGO at Bayou La Loutre: The existing Congressional authorization
for the MRGO channel would either be modified or a new authorization
would be recommended to de-authorize deep-draft navigation and
construct a dam. No additional Federal funds would be appropriated to
maintain any navigation channel on the MRGO between the GIWW and the
Gulf of Mexico; except authority may be requested to maintain existing
wetland protection features along the MRGO. The dam would be
constructed just south of Bayou La Loutre and would tie in with the
southern Bayou La Loutre Ridge to completely block the MRGO channel.
The structure would not allow passage of vessels traveling the length
of the MRGO. Relic features, such as jetties and aids to navigation,
would be considered for removal and/or reapplication. Construction of
the closure would be completed within two years of authorization,
pending receipt of Congressional appropriations.
Alternative 2 (Interim Report Option 2a (phased))--Construct a Dam
across the MRGO at Bayou La Loutre in Two Phases (Construct a Weir in
Phase I; convert Weir to a full-closure dam in Phase II when depth of
any portion of the channel measures 14 feet or less): The existing
Congressional authorization for the MRGO channel would either be
modified or a new authorization would be recommended to de-authorize
deep-draft navigation and construct a dam. No additional Federal funds
would be appropriated to maintain any navigation channel on the MRGO
between the GIWW and the Gulf of Mexico; except authority may be
requested to maintain existing wetland protection features along the
MRGO. A dam would be constructed just south of Bayou La Loutre in two
phases and would tie in with the southern Bayou La Loutre Ridge to
totally block the MRGO channel. The first phase would be construction
of a dam containing a weir 125-feet wide by 14 feet deep (The weir
would be set at 14 feet to allow safe passage of 12-foot draft
vessels). Once any reach of the channel shoaled in to a depth of less
than 14-feet, the second phase of construction would begin. It is
estimated that some reaches of the MRGO would become impassible to
vessels greater than a 12-foot draft in approximately 2014. The second
phase of construction would complete total closure of the MRGO by
closing the weir. The completed structure would not allow passage of
vessels traveling the length of the MRGO. Relic features, such as
jetties and aids to navigation, would be considered for removal and/or
reapplication. Phase one construction of the closure would be completed
within two years of receipt of Congressional appropriations; and phase
two would be completed when the depth of the navigation channel is less
than 14 feet deep and Congressional appropriations are provided.
Alternative 3 (Interim Report Option 3)--Cease All MRGO Navigation
Channel Operations and Maintenance Dredging: The existing Congressional
authorization for the MRGO channel would either be modified or a new
authorization would be recommended to de-authorize deep-draft
navigation. No additional Federal funds would be appropriated to
maintain any navigation channel on the MRGO between the GIWW and the
Gulf of Mexico; except authority may be requested to maintain existing
wetland protection features along the MRGO. Relic features, such as
jetties and aids to navigation, would be considered for removal and/or
reapplication. Under this option, commercial and recreational shallow-
draft vessels could still use the MRGO until the navigation channel
shoals in to a depth prohibiting navigation. It is estimated that some
reaches of the MRGO would become impassible to vessels greater than a
12-foot draft by approximately 2014.
2. Stakeholder Involvement: Stakeholder involvement for this
proposed action is integral to the project. Interested parties,
concerned citizens, other state and Federal agencies, and private and
not for profit or non-governmental organizations are strongly
encouraged to participate in the development of the proposed action.
Stakeholder meetings would be held throughout project development.
Meeting announcements would be made as information becomes available.
3. Significant Issues: The list of important resources and issues
that would be evaluated in the EIS include, but are not limited to
tidally influenced coastal wetlands (marshes and swamps), fisheries
resources, wildlife resources, essential fish habitat, water quality,
air quality, threatened and endangered species, recreation resources,
and cultural resources. Socioeconomic items that would be evaluated in
the EIS include navigation, business and industrial activity,
employment, and community cohesion.
[[Page 18643]]
4. Interagency Coordination and Cooperation: The following agencies
have been informally invited to participate in the study on the LEIS:
Minerals Management Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, Natural
Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Geological Service, Louisiana
Department of Environmental Quality, Louisiana Department of Natural
Resources, and the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries. The
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service would provide a Fish and Wildlife
Coordination Act Report. Coordination would be maintained with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service
regarding threatened and endangered species under their respective
jurisdictional responsibilities. Coordination would be maintained with
the National Marine Fisheries Service regarding essential fish habitat.
Coordination would be maintained with the Natural Resources
Conservation Service regarding prime and unique farmlands. Coordination
would be maintained with the Advisory Counsel on Historic Preservation
and the State Historic Preservation Officer. The Louisiana Department
of Natural Resources would be consulted regarding consistency with the
Coastal Zone Management Act. The Louisiana Department of Wildlife and
Fisheries would be contacted concerning potential impacts to Natural
and Scenic Streams.
5. Environmental Consultation and Review: The U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) would be assisting in the documentation of
existing conditions and assessment of effects of project alternatives
through Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act consultation procedures. The
USFWS would also provide a Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act report.
Consultation would also be accomplished with the USFWS and the National
Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) concerning threatened and endangered
species and their critical habitat. The NMFS would be consulted on the
effects of this proposed action on Essential Fish Habitat. The draft
EIS or a notice of its availability would be distributed to all
interested agencies, organizations, and individuals.
6. Public Scoping Meeting: Scoping meetings are not required (40
CFR 1506.8 Proposals for legislation (b)(1)) when preparing a LEIS.
However, as indicated in Section 2, Stakeholder Involvement, an
intensive public engagement program would continue throughout the study
to solicit input from affected or interested parties.
7. Estimated Date of Availability: The earliest date the LEIS is
expected to be available is May of 2007.
Dated: April 4, 2007.
Richard P. Wagenaar,
Colonel, U.S. Army, District Commander.
[FR Doc. E7-7086 Filed 4-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-84-P