Advance Electronic Presentation of Cargo Information for Truck Carriers Required To Be Transmitted Through ACE Truck Manifest at Ports in the States of Vermont, North Dakota and New Hampshire, 18574-18575 [E7-6908]
Download as PDF
18574
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 71 / Friday, April 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
will, by regulation, notify the submitter
at least five days prior to disclosure.
This allows the submitter an
opportunity to respond, as well as to
pursue an injunction against release in
district court.
10. The Commission’s regulations do
not require separation of the
opportunity to comment and notice of
release. However, it was the
Commission’s practice in processing
CEII requests to issue these notifications
separately. As the Commission
explained in its September 21 Order,
combining the two will increase the
efficiency of processing CEII requests.
See September 21 Order at P 9–10. But
those opposing release will continue to
have ten days of notice before the
information is released.
11. Contrary to EEI’s assertion, there
is no inconsistency in the application of
the rules to CEII and FOIA requests. The
combined notice that the Commission
sends pursuant to the September 21
Order explains that a submitter has an
opportunity (5-day minimum) to submit
timely comments opposing release. See
18 CFR 388.112(d). It further explains
that if the submitter provides timely
comments, he or she will be notified in
advance of the release of any
information in accordance with 18 CFR
388.112(e) (another 5-day minimum). In
other words, if the submitter provides
comments, a second notice of release
follows the first (a total of 10-day
minimum). In the event timely
comments opposing release are not
received, the combined notice
constitutes notice of release of the
specified document in accordance with
18 CFR 388.112(e), subject to an
appropriate non-disclosure agreement.
The combined opportunity to comment
and notice of release does not reduce
the submitter’s opportunity to respond
or to pursue judicial relief.
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
Requirements To Comply With
Procedural Requirements
12. The September 21 Order states
that an application will be rejected in its
entirety if information is mislabeled as
CEII or a legal justification for CEII is
not provided. The purpose of that rule
is to dissuade applicants from carelessly
using the CEII designation because such
misuse prevents interested parties and
other deserving members of the public
from accessing needed information in
the timeliest manner. As the
Commission said in the September 21
NOPR, the ‘‘Commission retains its
concern for CEII filing abuses and will
take action against applicants or parties
who knowingly misfile information as
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Apr 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
CEII.’’ 17 The Commission disagrees
with EEI’s assertion that rejection is
unacceptably harsh. Applications are
frequently rejected for failure to comply
with procedural requirements. See, e.g.,
ANR Pipeline Co., 103 FERC ¶ 61,261 at
P 8 (2003) (rejecting filing without
prejudice to filing a fully supported
application in accordance with the
Commission’s regulations). In instances
in which documents are rejected for
filing, the rejection is usually without
prejudice and no substantive rights are
lost. Id. The application must merely be
refiled in accordance with the
procedural requirements. That is not
harsh, but rather promotes the proper
use of the CEII designation.
The Commission orders:
EEI’s request for rehearing is denied
as described above. The California State
Agencies’ request for reconsideration is
rejected in this docket as untimely filed.
By the Commission.
Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–7005 Filed 4–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border
Protection
19 CFR Part 123
Advance Electronic Presentation of
Cargo Information for Truck Carriers
Required To Be Transmitted Through
ACE Truck Manifest at Ports in the
States of Vermont, North Dakota and
New Hampshire
Customs and Border Protection,
Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 343(a) of
the Trade Act of 2002 and implementing
regulations, truck carriers and other
eligible parties are required to transmit
advance electronic truck cargo
information to the Bureau of Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) through a
CBP-approved electronic data
interchange. In a previous document,
CBP designated the Automated
Commercial Environment (ACE) Truck
Manifest System as the approved
interchange and announced that the
requirement that advance electronic
cargo information be transmitted
through ACE would be phased in by
groups of ports of entry. This document
announces that at all land border ports
17 September
PO 00000
Frm 00012
21 NOPR at P 17.
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
in Vermont and New Hampshire and at
the land border ports in North Dakota in
which ACE has not yet been required,
truck carriers will be required to file
electronic manifests through the ACE
Truck Manifest System.
DATES: Trucks entering the United
States through land border ports of entry
in the states of Vermont and New
Hampshire and at the ports of St. John,
Fortuna, Ambrose, Carbury, Noonan,
Dunseith, Sherwood, Antler, Northgate,
Westhope, and Portal in the state of
North Dakota, will be required to
transmit the advance information
through the ACE Truck Manifest system
effective July 12, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
James Swanson, via e-mail at
james.d.swanson@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 343(a) of the Trade Act of
2002, as amended (the Act; 19 U.S.C.
2071 note), required that CBP
promulgate regulations providing for the
mandatory transmission of electronic
cargo information by way of a CBPapproved electronic data interchange
(EDI) system before the cargo is brought
into or departs the United States by any
mode of commercial transportation (sea,
air, rail or truck). The cargo information
required is that which is reasonably
necessary to enable high-risk shipments
to be identified for purposes of ensuring
cargo safety and security and preventing
smuggling pursuant to the laws enforced
and administered by CBP.
On December 5, 2003, CBP published
in the Federal Register (68 FR 68140) a
final rule to effectuate the provisions of
the Act. In particular, a new section
123.92 (19 CFR 123.92) was added to
the regulations to implement the
inbound truck cargo provisions. Section
123.92 describes the general
requirement that, in the case of any
inbound truck required to report its
arrival under section 123.1(b), if the
truck will have commercial cargo
aboard, CBP must electronically receive
certain information regarding that cargo
through a CBP-approved EDI system no
later than 1 hour prior to the carrier’s
reaching the first port of arrival in the
United States. For truck carriers arriving
with shipments qualified for clearance
under the FAST (Free and Secure Trade)
program, section 123.92 provides that
CBP must electronically receive such
cargo information through the CBPapproved EDI system no later than 30
minutes prior to the carrier’s reaching
the first port of arrival in the United
States.
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 71 / Friday, April 13, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
ACE Truck Manifest Test
On September 13, 2004, CBP
published a notice in the Federal
Register (69 FR 55167) announcing a
test allowing participating Truck Carrier
Accounts to transmit electronic manifest
data for inbound cargo through ACE,
with any such transmissions
automatically complying with advance
cargo information requirements as
provided in section 343(a) of the Trade
Act of 2002. Truck Carrier Accounts
participating in the test were given the
ability to electronically transmit the
truck manifest data and obtain release of
their cargo, crew, conveyances, and
equipment via the ACE Portal or
electronic data interchange messaging.
A series of notices announced
additional deployments of the test, with
deployment sites being phased in as
clusters. Clusters were announced in the
following notices published in the
Federal Register: 70 FR 30964 (May 31,
2005); 70 FR 43892 (July 29, 2005); 70
FR 60096 (October 14, 2005); 71 FR
3875 (January 24, 2006); 71 FR 23941
(April 25, 2006); 71 FR 42103 (July 25,
2006), 71 FR 77404 (December 26, 2006)
and 72 FR 7058 (February 14, 2007).
CBP continues to test ACE at various
ports. CBP will continue, as necessary,
to announce in subsequent notices in
the Federal Register the deployment of
the ACE truck manifest system test at
additional ports.
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
Designation of ACE Truck Manifest
System as the Approved Data
Interchange System
In a notice published October 27,
2006 (71 FR 62922), CBP designated the
Automated Commercial Environment
(ACE) Truck Manifest System as the
approved EDI for the transmission of
required data and announced that the
requirement that advance electronic
cargo information be transmitted
through ACE would be phased in by
groups of ports of entry.
ACE will be phased in as the required
transmission system at some ports even
while it is still being tested at other
ports. However, the use of ACE to
transmit advance electronic truck cargo
information will not be required in any
port in which CBP has not first
conducted the test.
The October 27, 2006, document
identified all land border ports in the
states of Washington and Arizona and
the ports of Pembina, Neche, Walhalla,
Maida, Hannah, Sarles, and Hansboro in
North Dakota as the first group of ports
where use of the ACE Truck Manifest
System is mandated. Subsequently, CBP
announced on January 19, 2007 (72 FR
2435) that, after 90 days notice, the use
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:52 Apr 12, 2007
Jkt 211001
of the ACE Truck Manifest System will
be mandatory at all land border ports in
the states of California, Texas and New
Mexico. On February 23, 2007 (72 FR
8109), CBP announced that, again after
90 days notice, the ACE Truck Manifest
System will be mandatory at all land
border ports in Michigan and New York,
as well.
ACE Mandated at Land Border Ports of
Entry in Vermont and New Hampshire
and Identified Ports in North Dakota
Applicable regulations (19 CFR
123.92(e)) require CBP, 90 days prior to
mandating advance electronic
information at a port of entry, to publish
notice in the Federal Register informing
affected carriers that the EDI system is
in place and fully operational.
Accordingly, CBP is announcing in this
document that, effective 90 days from
the date of publication of this notice,
truck carriers entering the United States
through land border ports of entry in the
states of Vermont and New Hampshire
and through the ports of St. John,
Fortuna, Ambrose, Carbury, Noonan,
Dunseith, Sherwood, Antler, Northgate,
Westhope, and Portal, in the state of
North Dakota, will be required to
present advance electronic cargo
information regarding truck cargo
through the ACE Truck Manifest
System. Together with the ports
announced in 71 FR 62922, use of the
ACE Truck Manifest System will, 90
days from the date of publication of this
notice, be mandatory in all land border
ports in the state of North Dakota, as
well as the land border ports in the
states of Vermont and New Hampshire.
Although other systems that have
been deemed acceptable by CBP for
transmitting advance truck manifest
data will continue to operate and may
still be used in the normal course of
business for purposes other than
transmitting advance truck manifest
data, use of systems other than ACE will
no longer satisfy advance electronic
cargo information requirements at the
ports of entry announced in this
document as of July 12, 2007.
Compliance Sequence
CBP will be publishing subsequent
notices in the Federal Register as it
phases in the requirement that truck
carriers utilize the ACE system to
present advance electronic truck cargo
information at other ports. ACE will be
phased in as the mandatory EDI system
at the ports identified below in the
sequential order in which they are
listed. The sequential order provided
below is somewhat different than that
announced in the October 27, 2006,
notice. Although further changes to this
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18575
order are not currently anticipated, CBP
will state in future notices if changes do
occur. In any event, as mandatory ACE
is phased in at these remaining ports,
CBP will always provide 90 days’ notice
through publication in the Federal
Register prior to requiring the use of
ACE for the transmission of advance
electronic truck cargo information at a
particular group of ports.
The remaining ports at which the
mandatory use of ACE will be phased
in, listed in sequential order, are as
follows:
1. All land border ports in the states
of Idaho and Montana.
2. All land border ports in the state of
Maine.
3. All land border ports in the states
of Alaska and Minnesota.
Dated: April 6, 2007.
Deborah J. Spero,
Acting Commissioner, Customs and Border
Protection.
[FR Doc. E7–6908 Filed 4–12–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–14–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9313]
RIN 1545–BG29
Corporate Reorganizations; Additional
Guidance on Distributions Under
Sections 368(a)(1)(D) and 354(b)(1)(B);
Correction
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document contains a
correction to temporary regulations (TD
9313) that were published in the
Federal Register on Thursday, March 1,
2007 (72 FR 9262) providing guidance
regarding the qualification of certain
transactions as reorganizations
described in section 368(a)(1)(D) where
no stock and/or securities of the
acquiring corporation are issued and
distributed in the transaction.
DATES: This correcting amendment is
effective April 13, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bruce A. Decker at (202) 622–7550 (not
a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The temporary regulations that are the
subject of this correction are under
section 368 of the Internal Revenue
Code.
E:\FR\FM\13APR1.SGM
13APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 71 (Friday, April 13, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18574-18575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6908]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Bureau of Customs and Border Protection
19 CFR Part 123
Advance Electronic Presentation of Cargo Information for Truck
Carriers Required To Be Transmitted Through ACE Truck Manifest at Ports
in the States of Vermont, North Dakota and New Hampshire
AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection, Department of Homeland Security.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 343(a) of the Trade Act of 2002 and
implementing regulations, truck carriers and other eligible parties are
required to transmit advance electronic truck cargo information to the
Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (CBP) through a CBP-approved
electronic data interchange. In a previous document, CBP designated the
Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) Truck Manifest System as the
approved interchange and announced that the requirement that advance
electronic cargo information be transmitted through ACE would be phased
in by groups of ports of entry. This document announces that at all
land border ports in Vermont and New Hampshire and at the land border
ports in North Dakota in which ACE has not yet been required, truck
carriers will be required to file electronic manifests through the ACE
Truck Manifest System.
DATES: Trucks entering the United States through land border ports of
entry in the states of Vermont and New Hampshire and at the ports of
St. John, Fortuna, Ambrose, Carbury, Noonan, Dunseith, Sherwood,
Antler, Northgate, Westhope, and Portal in the state of North Dakota,
will be required to transmit the advance information through the ACE
Truck Manifest system effective July 12, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. James Swanson, via e-mail at
james.d.swanson@dhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 343(a) of the Trade Act of 2002, as amended (the Act; 19
U.S.C. 2071 note), required that CBP promulgate regulations providing
for the mandatory transmission of electronic cargo information by way
of a CBP-approved electronic data interchange (EDI) system before the
cargo is brought into or departs the United States by any mode of
commercial transportation (sea, air, rail or truck). The cargo
information required is that which is reasonably necessary to enable
high-risk shipments to be identified for purposes of ensuring cargo
safety and security and preventing smuggling pursuant to the laws
enforced and administered by CBP.
On December 5, 2003, CBP published in the Federal Register (68 FR
68140) a final rule to effectuate the provisions of the Act. In
particular, a new section 123.92 (19 CFR 123.92) was added to the
regulations to implement the inbound truck cargo provisions. Section
123.92 describes the general requirement that, in the case of any
inbound truck required to report its arrival under section 123.1(b), if
the truck will have commercial cargo aboard, CBP must electronically
receive certain information regarding that cargo through a CBP-approved
EDI system no later than 1 hour prior to the carrier's reaching the
first port of arrival in the United States. For truck carriers arriving
with shipments qualified for clearance under the FAST (Free and Secure
Trade) program, section 123.92 provides that CBP must electronically
receive such cargo information through the CBP-approved EDI system no
later than 30 minutes prior to the carrier's reaching the first port of
arrival in the United States.
[[Page 18575]]
ACE Truck Manifest Test
On September 13, 2004, CBP published a notice in the Federal
Register (69 FR 55167) announcing a test allowing participating Truck
Carrier Accounts to transmit electronic manifest data for inbound cargo
through ACE, with any such transmissions automatically complying with
advance cargo information requirements as provided in section 343(a) of
the Trade Act of 2002. Truck Carrier Accounts participating in the test
were given the ability to electronically transmit the truck manifest
data and obtain release of their cargo, crew, conveyances, and
equipment via the ACE Portal or electronic data interchange messaging.
A series of notices announced additional deployments of the test,
with deployment sites being phased in as clusters. Clusters were
announced in the following notices published in the Federal Register:
70 FR 30964 (May 31, 2005); 70 FR 43892 (July 29, 2005); 70 FR 60096
(October 14, 2005); 71 FR 3875 (January 24, 2006); 71 FR 23941 (April
25, 2006); 71 FR 42103 (July 25, 2006), 71 FR 77404 (December 26, 2006)
and 72 FR 7058 (February 14, 2007).
CBP continues to test ACE at various ports. CBP will continue, as
necessary, to announce in subsequent notices in the Federal Register
the deployment of the ACE truck manifest system test at additional
ports.
Designation of ACE Truck Manifest System as the Approved Data
Interchange System
In a notice published October 27, 2006 (71 FR 62922), CBP
designated the Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) Truck Manifest
System as the approved EDI for the transmission of required data and
announced that the requirement that advance electronic cargo
information be transmitted through ACE would be phased in by groups of
ports of entry.
ACE will be phased in as the required transmission system at some
ports even while it is still being tested at other ports. However, the
use of ACE to transmit advance electronic truck cargo information will
not be required in any port in which CBP has not first conducted the
test.
The October 27, 2006, document identified all land border ports in
the states of Washington and Arizona and the ports of Pembina, Neche,
Walhalla, Maida, Hannah, Sarles, and Hansboro in North Dakota as the
first group of ports where use of the ACE Truck Manifest System is
mandated. Subsequently, CBP announced on January 19, 2007 (72 FR 2435)
that, after 90 days notice, the use of the ACE Truck Manifest System
will be mandatory at all land border ports in the states of California,
Texas and New Mexico. On February 23, 2007 (72 FR 8109), CBP announced
that, again after 90 days notice, the ACE Truck Manifest System will be
mandatory at all land border ports in Michigan and New York, as well.
ACE Mandated at Land Border Ports of Entry in Vermont and New Hampshire
and Identified Ports in North Dakota
Applicable regulations (19 CFR 123.92(e)) require CBP, 90 days
prior to mandating advance electronic information at a port of entry,
to publish notice in the Federal Register informing affected carriers
that the EDI system is in place and fully operational. Accordingly, CBP
is announcing in this document that, effective 90 days from the date of
publication of this notice, truck carriers entering the United States
through land border ports of entry in the states of Vermont and New
Hampshire and through the ports of St. John, Fortuna, Ambrose, Carbury,
Noonan, Dunseith, Sherwood, Antler, Northgate, Westhope, and Portal, in
the state of North Dakota, will be required to present advance
electronic cargo information regarding truck cargo through the ACE
Truck Manifest System. Together with the ports announced in 71 FR
62922, use of the ACE Truck Manifest System will, 90 days from the date
of publication of this notice, be mandatory in all land border ports in
the state of North Dakota, as well as the land border ports in the
states of Vermont and New Hampshire.
Although other systems that have been deemed acceptable by CBP for
transmitting advance truck manifest data will continue to operate and
may still be used in the normal course of business for purposes other
than transmitting advance truck manifest data, use of systems other
than ACE will no longer satisfy advance electronic cargo information
requirements at the ports of entry announced in this document as of
July 12, 2007.
Compliance Sequence
CBP will be publishing subsequent notices in the Federal Register
as it phases in the requirement that truck carriers utilize the ACE
system to present advance electronic truck cargo information at other
ports. ACE will be phased in as the mandatory EDI system at the ports
identified below in the sequential order in which they are listed. The
sequential order provided below is somewhat different than that
announced in the October 27, 2006, notice. Although further changes to
this order are not currently anticipated, CBP will state in future
notices if changes do occur. In any event, as mandatory ACE is phased
in at these remaining ports, CBP will always provide 90 days' notice
through publication in the Federal Register prior to requiring the use
of ACE for the transmission of advance electronic truck cargo
information at a particular group of ports.
The remaining ports at which the mandatory use of ACE will be
phased in, listed in sequential order, are as follows:
1. All land border ports in the states of Idaho and Montana.
2. All land border ports in the state of Maine.
3. All land border ports in the states of Alaska and Minnesota.
Dated: April 6, 2007.
Deborah J. Spero,
Acting Commissioner, Customs and Border Protection.
[FR Doc. E7-6908 Filed 4-12-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P