Hazardous Materials: Miscellaneous Cargo Tank Motor Vehicle and Cylinder Issues; Petitions for Rulemaking, 18446-18456 [E7-6942]
Download as PDF
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
18446
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4). This proposed rule also
does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will
it have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely
proposes to approve a state rule
implementing a Federal requirement,
and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and
responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This proposed rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Redesignation is an
action that affects the status of a
geographical area and does not impose
any new requirements on sources. Thus,
the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this proposed rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct. EPA
has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the executive
order.
This rule, proposing to approve the
redesignation of the Richmond Area to
attainment for the 8-hour ozone
NAAQS, the associated maintenance
plan, the 2002 base-year inventory, and
the MVEBS identified in the
maintenance plan, does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
40 CFR Part 81
Air pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: April 5, 2007.
Judith Katz,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. E7–7018 Filed 4–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 107, 171, 172, 173, 176,
178, and 180
[Docket No. PHMSA–2006–25910 (HM–
218E)]
RIN: 2137–AE23
Hazardous Materials: Miscellaneous
Cargo Tank Motor Vehicle and Cylinder
Issues; Petitions for Rulemaking
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: PHMSA proposes to amend
the Hazardous Materials Regulations
(HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171–180) to revise
certain requirements applicable to the
manufacture, maintenance, and use of
DOT and MC specification cargo tank
motor vehicles, DOT specification
cylinders and UN pressure receptacles.
The proposed revisions are based on
petitions for rulemaking submitted by
the regulated community and are
intended to enhance the safe
transportation of hazardous materials in
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
commerce, clarify regulatory
requirements, and reduce operating
burdens on cargo tank and cylinder
manufacturers, requalifiers, carriers,
shippers, and users.
DATES: Comments must be received by
June 11, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by the docket number
PHMSA–2006–25910 (HM–218E) by any
of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments on the DOT electronic docket
site.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Management System;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
001.
• Hand Delivery: To the Docket
Management System; Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal
Holidays.
Instructions: You must include the
agency name and docket number
PHMSA–2006–25910 (Docket No. HM–
218E) or the Regulatory Identification
Number (RIN) for this notice of
proposed rulemaking at the beginning of
your comment. Please note that all
comments received will be posted
without change to https://dms.dot.gov
including any personal information
provided. See the Privacy Act section of
this document.
Docket: You may view the public
docket through the Internet at https://
dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket
Management System office at the above
address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cameron Satterthwaite or T. Glenn
Foster, Office of Hazardous Materials
Standards, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, U.S.
Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590–0001, telephone (202) 366–8553.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) requires Federal agencies to give
interested persons the right to petition
for the issuance, amendment, or repeal
of a rule (5 U.S.C. 553(e)). PHMSA’s
rulemaking procedure regulations, at 49
CFR 106.95, provide for persons to ask
PHMSA to add, amend or delete a
regulation by filing a petition for
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
rulemaking containing adequate support
for the requested action. In this NPRM,
PHMSA (also ‘‘we’’ or ‘‘us’’) proposes to
amend the HMR based on petitions for
rulemaking submitted by cargo tank and
cylinder manufacturers, requalifiers,
shippers, and carriers. We are also
proposing revisions to address requests
for clarification of the regulations. These
proposed revisions are intended to
enhance the safe transportation of
hazardous materials in cargo tank motor
vehicles and cylinders, clarify
regulatory requirements, and reduce
operating burdens on carriers, shippers,
and users.
II. Summary of Proposals in This
NPRM
The development of this rulemaking
was influenced by a wide array of
correspondence received from persons
engaged in the manufacture,
maintenance, or use of cargo tanks and
cylinders. We received petitions for
rulemaking requesting changes to the
cargo tank and cylinder requirements
specified in the HMR and clarification
of existing requirements. These
petitions are summarized and discussed
in the following review-by-section
summary:
A. Part 171
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Updated/Revised/Added Incorporations
by Reference (§ 171.7)
We have reviewed the following
documents pertaining to cargo tanks and
compressed gas cylinders. As a result,
we have found no provisions that would
impose a substantial burden or would
have an adverse impact on safety.
Therefore, we are proposing to update,
revise, and add the following
incorporation by reference (IBR)
materials in paragraph (a)(3) of § 171.7
in the Table of material incorporated by
reference:
• In response to Western Growers
Association (WGA) petition P–1352,
under the entry ‘‘American Society of
Mechanical Engineers,’’ we propose to
revise the reference for ‘‘ASME Code,
Sections II (Parts A and B), V, VIII
(Division 1), and IX of 1998 Edition of
American Society of Mechanical
Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel
Code’’ to add a section reference for
§ 173.5b. See review-by-section
preamble discussion in § 173.5b for
further details.
• In response to WGA petition P–
1352, under the entry ‘‘American
Society for Testing and Materials,’’ we
propose to add references to ASTM
A53/A53M–06a and ASTM A106/
A106M–06a. See review-by-section
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
preamble discussion in § 173.5b for
further details.
• In response to Compressed Gas
Association (CGA) petition P–1482,
under the entry ‘‘Compressed Gas
Association, Inc,’’ we propose to add a
reference to CGA, C–1 ‘‘Methods for
Hydrostatic Testing of Compressed Gas
Cylinders,’’ 2004 edition. See review-bysection preamble discussion in
§ 180.205 for further details.
• In response to CGA petition P–
1489, under the entry ‘‘Compressed Gas
Association, Inc,’’ we propose to update
CGA G–2.2, ‘‘Guideline Method for
Determining Minimum of 0.2% Water in
Anhydrous Ammonia,’’ from the 1985
Edition to reflect the 1985 Second
Edition, Reaffirmed 1997. Paragraph (l),
in § 173.315, restricts the use of MC 330
and MC 331 cargo tanks constructed of
quenched and tempered ‘‘QT’’ steel
from transporting anhydrous ammonia
unless the ammonia has the specified
minimum water content. The analysis of
the water content in the ammonia is
conducted as prescribed in CGA G–2.2.
Currently, CGA G–2.2, 1985, Second
Edition is incorporated by reference in
§ 171.7(a)(3). CGA reaffirmed this
publication in 1997. There were no
changes to the document other than the
title reflecting that it was reaffirmed in
1997.
• In response to CGA petition P–
1488, under the entry ‘‘Compressed Gas
Association, Inc,’’ we propose to update
CGA P–20, ‘‘Standard for Classification
of Toxic Gas Mixtures’’ from the 1995
2nd edition to the 2003 3rd edition. See
review-by-section preamble discussion
in § 173.115 for further details.
• In response to CGA petition P–
1484, under the entry ‘‘Compressed Gas
Association, Inc,’’ we propose to add a
reference to CGA TB–25 ‘‘Design
Considerations for Tube Trailers,’’ 2005
edition. See review-by-section preamble
discussion in § 173.301 for further
details.
• In response to CGA petition P–
1422, under the entry ‘‘Compressed Gas
Association, Inc,’’ we propose to add a
reference to CGA V–9 ‘‘Standard for
Compressed Gas Cylinder Valves,’’ 2005
edition. See review-by-section preamble
discussion in §§ 173.40 and 173.301 for
further details.
In response to Tank Trailer
Manufacturers Association (TTMA)
petition P–1408, we are also proposing
to revise paragraph (b) of § 171.7, List of
informational materials not requiring
incorporation by reference, to add a
reference to TTMA RP No. 96–01,
‘‘Structural Integrity of DOT 406, DOT
407, and DOT 412 Cylindrical Cargo
Tanks, January 1, 2001 Edition.’’ See
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18447
review-by-section preamble discussion
in § 178.345–3 for further details.
B. Part 173
Mobile Refrigeration Systems (§ 173.5b)
The agricultural produce industry
uses large, mobile refrigeration systems
on field sites to help preserve freshly
harvested fruit and vegetables. These
refrigeration systems consist of ASME
non-DOT specification pressure
components with a maximum total
volumetric capacity per vehicle of 2,500
gallons. Refrigerant systems placed in
service prior to June 1, 1991, have a
maximum allowable working pressure
(MAWP) between 150 to 250 psig; and
those placed in service on or after June
1, 1991, have an MAWP of 250 psig. The
refrigeration system, commonly known
as vacuum tubes, accumulators,
refrigeration units, icemakers, pressure
coolers or evaporators, primarily use
Division 2.2 refrigerant gases or
anhydrous ammonia in the cooling
process. The refrigeration systems may
or may not be mounted on a motor
vehicle. These refrigerant systems are
operated under special permit, SP–
10285, which requires each refrigeration
system to be visually inspected annually
and proof pressure tested at least once
every two years. The Western Growers
Association (WGA) P–1352 requests we
establish design and safety control
measures for these refrigeration systems
consistent with those specified in the
special permit and provide for their use
in the HMR. WGA states these
refrigeration systems have been
authorized under DOT–SP 10285 for
highway transportation since 1989 and
have an exceptional transportation
safety record. WGA conservatively
estimates that in a two-month period,
these refrigeration systems cool over
18,000,000 cartons of produce valued at
more than $56 million. We agree with
WGA that these portable refrigeration
systems have a proven safety record
under the special permit. Therefore, we
propose to add a new § 173.5b to
authorize the transportation of these
refrigeration systems subject to the
design and safety control measures
recommended in the petition and
prescribed in DOT–SP 10285.
Standards for Cylinder Valves
(§§ 173.40 and 173.301)
Currently, § 173.40(c) of the HMR
requires each cylinder containing a
poison inhalation hazard (PIH) material
in Hazard Zone A to be closed with a
plug or valve having a taper-threaded
connection. Each cylinder, with the
plug or valve installed, must be capable
of withstanding the cylinder test
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
18448
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
pressure without damage or leakage, as
specified in § 173.40(c). CGA (P–1422)
requests we add a new paragraph (c)(5)
to § 173.40 to require cylinders
containing a Hazard Zone A material to
be closed with a plug or a valve
conforming to CGA V–9, ‘‘Compressed
Gas Association Standard for
Compressed Gas Cylinder Valves,’’ 2005
edition. Section 173.301 prescribes
general requirements for the shipment
of compressed gases in cylinders and
spherical vessels. CGA further requests
we revise § 173.301(c) to require
cylinders containing Hazard Zone A and
B toxic gases and mixtures to meet the
requirements in CGA V–9. CGA V–9
defines a cylinder valve as the
mechanical device attached to a
compressed gas cylinder that permits
flow into or out of the cylinder when
the device is in the open position, and
prevents flow when it is in the closed
position. CGA V–9 contains standards
on general cylinder valve design, design
qualification, and performance
requirements such as operating
temperature limits, pressure ranges, and
flow capabilities. This standard also
contains testing and maintenance
requirements to ensure valves are
maintained in a safe working condition.
CGA V–9 is not applicable to cylinder
valves used on non-refillable cylinders
whose valves or inlet connections are
permanently attached to the cylinders
by means of welding or brazing, or to
valves on cylinders that are horizontally
mounted to a chassis or framework for
road transportation. CGA states use of
this publication will provide greater
assurance that valves used on cylinders
containing toxic materials are in good
condition and properly maintained.
Based on our review of CGA V–9, we
agree with CGA that providing for the
use of CGA V–9 will assist shippers in
the proper selection and use of valves
installed in DOT specification cylinders
containing toxic and various types of
other gases. Because gases vary in
degrees of corrosivity, toxicity, and
pressure and concentration, a user must
use care in selecting a cylinder valve
appropriate for the cylinder’s intended
use and pressure. The current HMR
offer no guidance to users on the proper
selection of valves. Therefore, we
propose to revise §§ 173.40(c) and
173.301(a) to require valves on
cylinders, unless otherwise excepted, to
conform to the requirements in CGA V–
9, ‘‘Standard for Compressed Gas
Cylinder Valves,’’ 2005 Fifth Edition.
We also solicit comments on the
potential cost impacts, if any, of
requiring compliance with CGA V–9.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
Classification Criteria for Toxic Gas
Mixtures (§ 173.115)
In § 173.155(c)(2), the definition for
Division 2.3 material (gas poisonous by
inhalation) provides that LC50 values for
mixtures may be determined using the
formula in § 173.133(b)(1)(i) or CGA P–
20, ‘‘Standard for Classification of Toxic
Gas Mixtures.’’ CGA (P–1488) requests
we update CGA P–20 from the 1995 2nd
edition to the 2003 3rd edition. CGA
enclosed a list of changes contained in
the 3rd edition. These changes align the
LC50 values contained in CGA P–20
with values contained in the
international standards for the following
materials: Ethylene oxide, Hydrogen
fluoride, Methyl amine, Nitrogen
trioxide, Phosphorous pentafluoride,
Phosphorous trifluoride, and Tungsten
hexafluoride. We agree the petition has
merit and propose to revise paragraph
(c)(2) to reflect the updated CGA P–20,
‘‘Standard for Classification of Toxic
Gas Mixtures.’’
Tube Trailers (§ 173.301)
This section prescribes general
requirements for the shipment of
compressed gases in cylinders and
spherical pressure vessels. Paragraph (i)
of § 173.301 specifies guidelines for
cylinders mounted on motor vehicles or
in frames, commonly referred to as tube
trailers. CGA (P–1484) requests we
revise § 73.301(i) to reference the
technical bulletin, CGA TB–25, ‘‘Design
Considerations for Tube Trailers,’’ 2005
edition. CGA TB–25 addresses
protective structures for valves and
pressure relief devices, and design
considerations for the static, dynamic,
and thermal loads affecting tube trailers.
These design considerations are
intended to reduce the likelihood of the
tube separating from the trailer and to
minimize the unintentional release of
hazardous materials in the event of a
highway collision, including but not
limited to, a rollover accident. These
guidelines are intended to promote the
reliable operation of the trailers under
normal conditions and minimize the
risk of a catastrophic incident in the
event of an accident.
We agree the guidelines contained in
CGA TB–25 will enhance the safe
transportation of tube trailers. CGA
developed TB–25 to address safety
concerns identified following a May 1,
2001 hydrogen gas tube trailer incident
investigated by the National
Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). In
the incident, certain horizontally
mounted cylinders on a semi-trailer,
along with valves, piping and fittings,
were damaged, causing the release of
hydrogen gas. As a result, NTSB made
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
several recommendations to PHMSA in
an effort to address safety concerns.
PHMSA responded to NTSB
Recommendation H–02–25 by revising
ERG Guide 115 in the 2004 Emergency
Response Guidebook to include
information on the difficulty of
detecting and extinguishing hydrogenfuel fires. As a result, NTSB classified
Safety Recommendation H–02–25 as
‘‘Closed—Acceptable Action.’’ NTSB
also recommended that PHMSA revise
§ 173.301 to clearly require valves,
piping, and fittings for cylinders that are
horizontally mounted and used to
transport hazardous materials to be
protected from multidirectional forces
that are likely to occur during accidents,
including rollovers (NTSB
Recommendation H–02–23); and to
require cylinders that are used to
transport hazardous materials and are
horizontally mounted on a semi-trailer
to be protected from impact with the
roadway or terrain to reduce the
likelihood of their being fractured and
ejected during a rollover accident
(NTSB Recommendation H–02–24).
Accordingly, we propose to revise
§ 173.301(i) to require tube trailers to
conform to the requirements in CGA
TB–25, ‘‘Design Considerations for Tube
Trailers.’’ We also solicit comments on
the potential cost impacts, if any, of
requiring compliance with CGA TB–25.
Requalification of DOT 3BN Cylinders
(§ 173.338)
Section 173.338 authorizes the use of
DOT 3BN cylinders for the shipment of
tungsten hexafluoride. Section 173.163
permits cylinders used exclusively for
hydrogen fluoride to be requalified by
external visual inspection in place of
the periodic volumetric expansion test.
Air Products (P–1458) requests we
permit DOT 3BN cylinders used
exclusively for tungsten hexafluoride to
be requalified by an external visual
inspection in place of the volumetric
expansion test. Air Products states the
chemical and physical properties of
tungsten hexafluoride are similar to
those of hydrogen fluoride. Air Products
states noble metal nickel 200 does not
corrode in tungsten hexafluoride service
and the company has never had a
cylinder fail a volumetric expansion
test. We agree with the petitioner that
the chemical properties of tungsten
hexafluoride are similar to those of
hydrogen fluoride. Tungsten
hexafluoride does not corrode nickel;
therefore, an internal inspection is not
warranted. We have authorized DOT
3BN cylinders used exclusively for
tungsten hexafluoride to be requalified
by an external visual inspection for
several years under special permit, SP–
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
14016, with satisfactory transportation
experience. SP–14016 stipulates that
DOT 3BN cylinders removed from
service must be condemned. Therefore,
in § 173.338, we propose to permit DOT
3BN cylinders used exclusively for
tungsten hexafluoride to be requalified
by an external visual inspection in place
of the volumetric expansion test. The
cylinders must be condemned when
removed from service.
C. Part 176
Stowage Requirements for Class 2
Material on Vessels (§ 176.200)
Section 176.200 prescribes general
stowage requirements for Class 2
(Compressed gases) materials
transported aboard vessels. Horizon
Lines (P–1471) requests we prohibit
vessel stowage of Division 2.1
(flammable gases) in ‘‘reefer units,’’ that
is, powered refrigerated temperature
controlled containers. Horizon Lines
expresses concern that sparks emitted
from mechanical components of the
reefer unit could come into contact with
flammable gas in the event of a spill and
cause an explosion. Horizon Lines
further states its concern was
substantiated by several major
manufacturers of reefer units. We agree
with the petitioner that the stowage of
flammable gases in powered refrigerated
temperature controlled containers
should not be permitted without
adequate safety measures. The transport
of hazardous materials in temperature
controlled containers is addressed in
Chapter 7 of the International Maritime
Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code. More
specifically, the IMDG Code, at 7.4 and
7.7 requires the use of refrigeration
systems with explosion-proof electric
fittings within the cooling compartment
to prevent ignition of flammable vapors.
Consistent with the IMDG Code, we
propose to revise § 176.200 (f) to restrict
any package containing a Division 2.1
material from transportation in powered
refrigerated temperature controlled
containers, unless the container
equipment is capable of preventing
ignition of flammable vapor by having
non-sparking or explosion-proof electric
fittings within the cooling compartment.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
D. Part 178
DOT 4E Cylinders (§ 178.68)
Section 178.68 contains the
manufacturing specification for DOT 4E
welded aluminum cylinders. Paragraph
(l)(2) specifies the guided bend test
procedures and rejection criteria to be
applied to welds. Worthington
Cylinders Corp (Worthington) (P–1486)
requests we revise this paragraph to
authorize the use of an alternate bend
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
test illustrated in paragraph 12 of The
Aluminum Association’s publication,
‘‘Welding Aluminum: Theory and
Practice’’ for determining the soundness
of circumferential seam welds on
aluminum cylinders. Worthington states
use of this alternate test will assure the
stress is placed on the weld, rather than
the heat-affected zone of the weld. We
agree that this alternate bend test is an
acceptable test method for aluminum
cylinders, as well as the currently
authorized bend test designed for thinwalled steel cylinders. Therefore, we are
proposing to revise § 178.68(l) to allow
the bend test described in The
Aluminum Association’s publication,
‘‘Welding Aluminum: Theory and
Practice,’’ as an alternative test method.
DOT 406, 407, and 412 Cargo Tank
Motor Vehicles (§ 178.345–3)
Section 178.345–3 prescribes
structural integrity requirements for the
design and construction of DOT 406,
DOT 407, and DOT 412 cargo tank
motor vehicles. Paragraph (a) specifies
the general requirements and
acceptance criteria for structural
integrity. The Tank Trailer
Manufacturers Association (TTMA) (P–
1408) requests we revise paragraph (a)
to reference TTMA Recommended
Practice (RP) No. 96–97, ‘‘Structural
Integrity of DOT 406, DOT 407, and
DOT 412 Cylindrical Cargo Tanks,’’
December 1, 1997 Edition. This
standard contains methods for
calculating the structural integrity of
DOT 406, DOT 407 and DOT 412
cylindrical cargo tanks in conformance
with §§ 178.345–3 and 178.345–8(e).
Based on the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Administration’s review of
TTMA RP No. 96–97, we agree with the
petitioner that using the methods
outlined in the publication for
calculating the structural integrity of
cargo tanks will be beneficial to
manufacturers in reducing time to
perform the calculations. Therefore, we
propose to revise § 178.345–3(a)(3) to
reference the updated TTMA RP 96–01,
2001 Edition, as suitable guidance for
performing the structural integrity
calculations.
Manhole Assemblies on DOT 406, 407,
and 412 Cargo Tank Motor Vehicles
(§ 178.345–5)
Section 178.345–5 prescribes
requirements for manhole assemblies
used on DOT 406, DOT 407, and DOT
412 cargo tank motor vehicles.
Paragraph (f) specifies that all fittings
and devices mounted on a manhole
cover, coming in contact with the
lading, must withstand the same static
internal fluid pressure and contain the
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18449
same permanent compliance markings
as those prescribed in paragraph (e) for
the manhole cover. Because paragraph
(e) already requires the manhole cover
to be marked with a statement certifying
that the manhole cover meets the
requirements in § 178.345–5, TTMA (P–
1372) requests we remove the marking
requirement in paragraph (f). We agree
with the petitioner that the requirement
in § 178.345–5(f) to mark the manhole’s
fittings is duplicative of the manhole
cover marking requirement in paragraph
(e). Therefore, we propose to remove the
redundant wording in paragraph (f).
E. Part 180
Cylinder Requalification (§ 180.205)
Section 180.205 prescribes general
requirements for requalification of DOT
specification cylinders and special
permit cylinders. Paragraph (g) contains
requirements for conducting a periodic
pressure test for the requalification of
cylinders. These requirements include
parameters for accuracy of the test
equipment. CGA requests we revise
paragraph (g) to reference CGA C–1
‘‘Methods for Hydrostatic Testing of
Compressed Gas Cylinders,’’ 2004
edition. This CGA publication contains
hydrostatic testing requirements for the
requalification of cylinders.
We agree the CGA publication more
adequately reflects the equipment
accuracy requirements for performing a
pressure test on cylinders. We propose
to revise § 180.205(g) to reference CGA
C–1 for requalification of DOT
specification cylinders. Section 180.207
covering UN pressure receptacles also
references § 180.205(g) for test
equipment accuracy. We propose to
retain the current requirement in
paragraph (g) that permits a pressure
test to be repeated, in the event of test
equipment failure only, at a pressure
increased by 10%, or 100 psi, whichever
is the lower value. If repeated, the
cumulative increase in test pressure
may not exceed 10% of minimum
prescribed test pressure, as noted in
CGA C–1. As an example, using a
cylinder marked ‘‘DOT3AA1800’’, if the
first test is performed exactly at the
minimum test pressure of 3000 psi (5/
3 service pressure), and subsequent tests
exactly at 3100, 3200, and 3300, a total
of three repeat tests could be performed.
However, if the first test is performed at
3200, one repeat test could be
performed at 3300. The proposed rule
does not alter any of the requirements
for the operator to ensure the test system
is accurate and ready to test cylinders.
We are retaining the requirements
contained in current paragraph (g)
concerning bands and other removable
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
18450
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
attachments, allowing other calibration
standards approved by the Associate
Administrator, requiring the requalifier
to demonstrate calibration to an
authorized DOT inspector, and the
retention of calibrated cylinder
certificates.
Cargo Tank Testing and Inspection
(§ 180.407)
Section 180.407 prescribes
requirements for the periodic testing
and inspection of specification cargo
tanks. Paragraph (d)(3) of § 180.407
requires each reclosing pressure relief
valve that is required to be removed and
tested to be able to open at the required
set pressure and reseat to a leak-tight
condition at 90 percent of the set-todischarge pressure or the pressure for
the applicable cargo tank specification.
Paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(A) of § 180.407
requires each self-closing pressure relief
valve that is an emergency relief vent to
open at the required set pressure and
seat to a leak-tight condition at 90
percent of the set-to-discharge pressure
or the pressure for the applicable cargo
tank specification. Keehn Service
Corporation (Keehn Service) (P–1436)
states the majority of pressure relief
valves installed on MC–330 and MC–
331 cargo tank motor vehicles
transporting liquefied petroleum gas
have a start-to-discharge set pressure of
250 psi. Keehn Service states it is
difficult for existing or rebuilt valves to
open at this exact pressure. In fact, a
margin of error of as much as 4 psig
could occur when using a typical 0–400
psig pressure gauge. Keehn Service
requests we specify a start-to-discharge
tolerance for pressure relief valves. We
agree with the petitioner that it may be
difficult for a pressure relief valve to
function exactly at the specified set
pressure and that we should allow a
margin of error. Therefore, we propose
to revise paragraphs (d)(3) and
(g)(1)(ii)(A), of § 180.407, to specify that
reclosing and self-closing pressure relief
valves must be set-to-discharge at a
pressure no more than 110% of the
required set pressure. Providing for a
tolerance is consistent with the set-todischarge tolerance allowed for certain
other DOT specification pressure
vessels.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
III. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This
Rulemaking
This notice is published under
authority of 49 U.S.C. 5103(b), which
authorizes the Secretary of
Transportation to prescribe regulations
for the safe transportation, including
security, of hazardous material in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
intrastate, interstate, and foreign
commerce. This notice proposes to
adopt regulations intended to enhance
the safe transportation of hazardous
materials in cargo tank motor vehicles
and cylinders, clarify regulatory
requirements, and reduce operating
burdens on carriers, shippers, and users.
B. Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This notice of proposed rulemaking is
not considered a significant regulatory
action under section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 and, therefore, was not
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). This rule is not
significant under the Regulatory Policies
and Procedures of the Department of
Transportation (44 FR 11034).
The proposed rule addresses several
petitions for rulemaking submitted by
the regulated community. For the most
part, the petitioners request revisions to
the HMR that should reduce overall
compliance costs. For example, several
of the petitioners request we update
industry consensus standards
incorporated by reference into the HMR.
Adoption of industry standards reduces
the regulatory burden on persons who
offer hazardous material for
transportation and persons who
transport hazardous materials in
commerce. Industry standards
developed and adopted by consensus
generally are accepted and followed by
the industry; thus, their incorporation
by reference in the HMR assures that the
industry is not forced to comply with a
different set of standards to accomplish
the same safety goal. In addition, several
of the petitions request regulatory relief
through alternative means of
compliance with current safety
regulations or the elimination of
requirements that are duplicative, outdated, or otherwise unnecessary for
safety. Thus, we are proposing to
eliminate a duplicative marking
requirement for manholes on certain
cargo tank motor vehicles and provide
alternative manufacturing and
requalification methods for certain
cylinders and cargo tank motor vehicles.
Two of the proposals in this NPRM
may result in increased compliance
costs on the regulated community. We
are proposing to require valves on
cylinders authorized for the
transportation of hazardous materials to
conform to requirements in a CGA
consensus standard—CGA V–9—
applicable to compressed gas cylinder
valves. Use of the CGA standard will
help shippers to select a valve that is
appropriate for the cylinder’s intended
use and pressure. Use of the correct
valve is critical to prevent leaks or
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
failures during transportation. We
believe that most cylinder users already
use the CGA consensus standard to
guide their valve selection decisions;
thus, we expect increased compliance
costs associated with this proposal to be
minimal. However, we request
comments on the potential costs and
impacts of requiring compliance with
the valve requirements in CGA V–9.
In addition, we are proposing to
address a safety problem involving the
transportation of hazardous materials in
tube trailers through adoption of CGA
consensus standard TB–24, ‘‘Design
Considerations for Tube Trailers.’’ The
CGA standard addresses safety concerns
identified by NTSB in its investigation
of an accident involving tube trailers
that resulted in the release of hydrogen
gas. We anticipate transportation of
hydrogen gas in tube trailers will
increase significantly in the coming
years to support its use as an alternative
fuel for automobiles and other vehicles.
Ensuring that hydrogen gas will be
transported safely to suppliers and
distribution centers will be essential to
support its use as an alternative fuel.
The CGA standard addresses protective
structures for valves and pressure relief
devices and design considerations for
static, dynamic, and thermal loads
affecting tube trailers. The standard is
intended to reduce the likelihood of the
tube trailer separating from its trailer
and to prevent the unintentional release
of hazardous materials in the event of a
highway collision or rollover accident.
Because we are proposing to adopt an
industry consensus standard that is
already in widespread use by the
industry, we expect compliance costs
associated with this proposal will be
minimal. However, we request
comments on the potential cost and
other impacts of requiring compliance
with the CGA standard.
If adopted, the proposals in this
NPRM will enhance transportation
safety and may reduce the overall
compliance burden on the regulated
industry.
C. Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule has been analyzed
in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13132 (‘‘federalism’’). This proposed
rule would preempt State, local, and
Indian tribe requirements but does not
propose any regulation that has
substantial direct effects on the States,
the relationship between the national
government and the States, or the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Therefore, the
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
consultation and funding requirements
of Executive Order 13132 do not apply.
The Federal hazardous materials
transportation law, 49 U.S.C. 5101–
5127, contains an express preemption
provision (49 U.S.C. 5125(b)) that
preempts State, local, and Indian tribe
requirements on certain covered
subjects. Covered subjects are:
(i) The designation, description, and
classification of hazardous material;
(ii) The packing, repacking, handling,
labeling, marking, and placarding of
hazardous material;
(iii) The preparation, execution, and
use of shipping documents related to
hazardous material and requirements
related to the number, contents, and
placement of those documents;
(iv) The written notification,
recording, and reporting of the
unintentional release in transportation
of hazardous material; or
(v) The design, manufacture,
fabrication, inspection, marking,
maintenance, reconditioning, repair, or
testing of a packaging or container
represented, marked, certified, or sold
as qualified for use in transporting
hazardous material in commerce.
This proposed rule addresses covered
subject items (v) above and preempts
State, local, and Indian tribe
requirements not meeting the
‘‘substantively the same’’ standard. This
proposed rule is necessary to update,
clarify and provide relief from
regulatory requirements.
Federal hazardous materials
transportation law provides at
§ 5125(b)(2) that, if DOT issues a
regulation concerning any of the
covered subjects, DOT must determine
and publish in the Federal Register the
effective date of Federal preemption.
The effective date may not be earlier
than the 90th day following the date of
issuance of the final rule and not later
than two years after the date of issuance.
PHMSA has determined the effective
date of Federal preemption for these
requirements will be 1 year from the
date of publication of a final rule in the
Federal Register.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
D. Executive Order 13084
This proposed rule has been analyzed
in accordance with the principles and
criteria contained in Executive Order
13084 (‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’).
Because this proposed rule does not
significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of the Indian tribal
governments and does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs, the
funding and consultation requirements
of Executive Order 13084 do not apply.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive
Order 13272, and DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an agency to
review regulations to assess their impact
on small entities unless the agency
determines a rule is not expected to
have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The proposed rule incorporates several
petitions for rulemaking submitted by
the regulated community. As specified
above, there may be minimal increased
costs associated with the adoption of
CGA V–9 and CGA TB–24. However, the
revisions as a whole proposed in this
rulemaking, if adopted, may decrease
overall compliance costs for the
regulated community while enhancing
the safe transportation of hazardous
materials in commerce. Therefore, I
certify this rule should not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This notice has been developed in
accordance with Executive Order 13272
(‘‘Proper Consideration of Small Entities
in Agency Rulemaking’’) and DOT’s
procedures and policies to promote
compliance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act to ensure potential
impacts of draft rules on small entities
are properly considered.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
PHMSA currently has approved
information collections under Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) Control
Number 2137–0014, ‘‘Cargo Tank
Specification Requirements,’’ with an
expiration date of November 30, 2007,
and Control Number 2137–0022,
‘‘Testing, Inspection, and Marking
Requirements for Cylinders,’’ with an
expiration date of August 31, 2008. This
rule proposes no new information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements.
Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations
requires us to provide interested
members of the public and affected
agencies an opportunity to comment on
information collection and
recordkeeping requests. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act, no person is
required to respond to an information
collection unless it has been approved
by OMB and displays a valid OMB
control number.
Requests for a copy of these
information collections should be
directed to Deborah Boothe or T. Glenn
Foster, Office of Hazardous Materials
Standards (DHM–10), Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, Room 8422, 400
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18451
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590–0001, Telephone (202) 366–8553.
All comments should be addressed to
the Dockets Unit as identified in the
ADDRESSES section, and received prior
to the close of the comment period
identified in the DATES section of this
rulemaking. In addition, you may
submit comments specifically related to
the information collection burden to the
PHMSA Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), at fax
number 202–395–6974. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no
person is required to respond to an
information collection unless it displays
a valid OMB control number.
G. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN)
is assigned to each regulatory action
listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal
Regulations. The Regulatory Information
Service Center publishes the Unified
Agenda in April and October of each
year. The RIN number contained in the
heading of this document can be used
to cross-reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This proposed rule imposes no
unfunded mandates and thus does not
impose unfunded mandates under the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
I. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78) or you
may visit https://dms.dot.gov.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 171
Exports, Hazardous materials
transportation, Hazardous waste,
Imports, Incorporation by reference,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 173
Hazardous materials transportation,
Incorporation by reference, Packaging
and containers, Radioactive materials,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Uranium.
49 CFR Part 176
Hazardous materials transportation,
Incorporation by reference, Maritime
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
18452
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
carriers, Radioactive materials,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 178
Hazardous materials transportation,
Motor vehicle safety, Packaging and
containers, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 180
Hazardous materials transportation,
Incorporation by reference, Motor
carriers, Motor vehicle safety, Packaging
and containers, Railroad safety,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, 49
CFR Chapter I is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 171—GENERAL INFORMATION,
REGULATIONS, AND DEFINITIONS
1. The authority citation for part 171
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701; 49
CFR 1.45 and 1.53; Pub. L. 101–410 section
4 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note); Pub L. 104–134
section 31001.
2. In § 171.7, make the following
changes:
a. In the table in paragraph (a)(3),
under The Aluminum Association, a
new entry titled ‘‘Welding Aluminum:
Theory and Practice,’’ 2002 Fourth
Edition is added;
b. In the table in paragraph (a)(3),
under American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, the entry titled ‘‘ASME Code,
Sections II (Parts A and B), V, VIII
(Division 1), and IX of 1998 Edition of
American Society of Mechanical
Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel
Code,’’ is revised;
c. In the table in paragraph (a)(3),
under American Society for Testing and
Materials, entries for ASTM A53/
A53M–06a and ASTM A106/A106M–
06a are added;
Source and name of material
*
The Aluminum Association,
*
§ 171.7
Reference material.
(a) * * *
(3) Table of material incorporated by
reference. * * *
49 CFR reference
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Welding Aluminum: Theory and Practice, 2002 Fourth Edition ........ 178.68.
*
*
American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
d. In the table in paragraph (a)(3),
under Compressed Gas Association,
Inc., entries for CGA Pamphlet G–2.2
1985 edition and CGA Pamphlet P–20
1995 edition are revised;
e. In the table in paragraph (a)(3),
under Compressed Gas Association Inc.,
new entries for CGA C–1 2005 edition,
CGA TB–25 2005 edition, and CGA V–
9 2005 edition are added; and
f. In paragraph (b), a new entry
‘‘Truck Trailer Manufacturers
Association,’’ 1020 Princess Street,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314, ‘‘TTMA RP
No. 96–01,’’ January 1, 2001 Edition is
added in alphabetical order.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
ASME Code, Sections II (Parts A and B), V, VIII (Division 1), and 172.102; 173.5b; 173.24b; 173.32; 173.306; 173.315; 173.318;
IX of 1998 Edition of American Society of Mechanical Engineers
173.420; 178.245–1; 178.245–3; 178.245–4; 178.245–6; 178.245–7;
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code.
178.255–1; 178.255–2; 178.255–14; 178.255–15; 178.270–2;
178.270–3; 178.270–7; 178.270–9; 178.270–11; 178.270–12;
178.271–1; 178.272–1; 178.273; 178.274; 178.276; 178.277;
178.320; 178.337–1; 178.337–2; 178.337–3; 178.337–4; 178.337–6;
178.337–16; 178.337–18; 178.338–1; 178.338–2; 178.338–3;
178.338–4; 178.338–5; 178.338–6; 178.338–13; 178.338–16;
178.338–18; 178.338–19; 178.345–1; 178.345–2; 178.345–3;
178.345–4; 178.345–7; 178.345–14; 178.345–15; 178.346–1;
178.347–1; 178.348–1; 179.400–3; 180.407.
*
*
American Society for Testing and Materials,
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
ASTM A53/A53M–06a Standard Specification for Pipe, Steel, 173.5b.
Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated, Welded and Seamless.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
ASTM A106/A106M–06a Standard Specification for Seamless Car- 173.5b.
bon Steel Pipe for High-Temperature Service.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
CGA C–1, Methods for Hydrostatic Testing of Compressed Gas 180.205.
Cylinders, 2004 Edition.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
CGA G–2.2, Guideline Method for Determining Minimum of 0.2% 173.315.
Water in Anhydrous Ammonia, 1985, Second Edition, Reaffirmed 1997.
*
*
*
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
*
*
Compressed Gas Association, Inc.,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
*
*
*
PO 00000
*
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
18453
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Source and name of material
49 CFR reference
*
*
*
*
CGA P–20, Standard for the Classification of Toxic Gas Mixtures, 173.115.
2003, Third Edition.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
CGA TB–25, Design Considerations for Tube Trailers, 2005 Edi- 173.301.
tion.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
CGA V–9, Standard for Compressed Gas Cylinder Valves, 2005 173.40; 173.301.
Fifth Edition.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(b) List of informational materials not
requiring incorporation by reference.
* * *
Source and name of material
49 CFR reference
*
*
*
*
Truck Trailer Manufacturers Association, 1020 Princess Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314
TTMA RP No. 96–01, Structural Integrity of DOT 406, DOT 407, 178.345–3.
and DOT 412 Cylindrical Cargo Tanks, January, 2001 Edition.
*
*
*
PART 173—SHIPPERS—GENERAL
REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIPMENTS
AND PACKAGINGS
The authority citation for part 173
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128, 44701; 49
CFR 1.45, 1.53.
4. A new § 173.5b is added to read as
follows:
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
§ 173.5b Portable and mobile refrigeration
systems.
This section authorizes the highway
transportation of residual amounts of
Division 2.2 refrigerant gases or
anhydrous ammonia contained in nonspecification pressure vessels that are
components of refrigeration systems,
which may or may not be permanently
mounted to a transport vehicle, used for
agricultural operations. These
refrigeration systems are used at field
sites to cool (pre-cool) produce before
the produce is loaded into trucks or
railcars for market or used to
supplement stationary refrigeration
systems during peak harvest times. The
components of these refrigeration
systems are commonly known as
vacuum tubes, accumulators,
refrigeration units, ice makers, pressure
coolers, or evaporators.
(a) General packaging requirements.
Each non-specification pressure vessel
must conform to the following:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(1) Each pressure vessel must be
designed, manufactured, and
maintained in accordance with
applicable requirements of the ASME
Code (IBR, see § 171.7 of this
subchapter).
(2) Except as authorized in this
section, each pressure vessel and
associated piping must be rated at a
maximum allowable work pressure
(MAWP) of 250 psig. The pressure in
these components may not exceed
MAWP.
(3) Any part of the piping or pressure
vessel separated from another
component of the refrigeration system
by means of a valve, blank flange, or
other device must be equipped with a
pressure relief valve set at MAWP. All
lines that must be disconnected for
transportation purposes must be closed
by means of a cap, plug or blank flange,
and valves at the end of disconnected
lines must be tightly closed.
(4) The aggregate total volumetric
capacity of components within the
refrigeration system authorized for
highway transportation in accordance
with this section may not exceed 2,500
gallons per vehicle.
(5) Each pressure vessel and
associated piping containing anhydrous
ammonia must conform to the
following:
(i) Piping with a diameter of 2 inches
or more must conform to ASTM
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Specification A53B Schedule 40 (IBR,
see § 171.7 of this subchapter) or ASTM
Specification A106 Schedule 40 (IBR,
see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
(ii) Piping with a diameter of less than
2 inches must conform to ASTM
Specification A53B (IBR, see § 171.7 of
this subchapter) Schedule 80 or ASTM
Specification A106 Schedule 80 (IBR,
see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
(iii) The words ‘‘Inhalation Hazard’’
must be marked as required in special
provision 13 in § 172.102 of this
subchapter and, when practicable,
within 24 inches of the placard.
(b) Refrigeration systems placed into
service prior to June 1, 1991. (1) For
refrigeration systems placed into service
prior to June 1, 1991, each pressure
vessel and associated piping for the
condensing line (‘‘high side’’) must be
rated at an MAWP of not less than 250
psig. Each pressure vessel and
associated piping for the evaporating
line (‘‘low side’’) must be rated at an
MAWP of not less than 150 psig, except
that each pressure vessel or associated
piping that will contain refrigerant gas
during transportation must be rated at
an MAWP of not less than 250 psig.
During transportation, pressure in the
components that are part of the
evaporating line may not exceed 150
psig.
(2) Each pressure vessel and
associated piping that is part of the
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
18454
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
evaporating line must be marked ‘‘LOW
SIDE’’ in a permanent and clearly
visible manner. The evaporating line
must have a pressure gauge with
corresponding temperature markings
mounted so as to be easily readable
when standing on the ground. The
gauge must be permanently marked or
tagged ‘‘SATURATION GAUGE’’.
(3) Each pressure vessel and
associated piping with an MAWP of 250
psig or greater containing liquid
anhydrous ammonia must be isolated
using appropriate means from piping
and components marked ‘‘LOW SIDE’’.
(4) Liquid lading is only authorized in
system components with a rated MAWP
of not less than 250 psig.
(5) Prior to transportation, each
pressure vessel and associated piping
with a rated MAWP of less than 250
psig must be relieved of enough gaseous
lading to ensure that the MAWP is not
exceeded at transport temperatures up
to 54 °C (130 °F).
(6) Refrigeration systems placed into
service prior to June 1, 1991, may
continue in service until October 1,
2017.
(c) Prior to transportation over public
highways, each pressure vessel and
associated piping must be drained of
refrigerant gas or liquid anhydrous
ammonia to the extent practicable.
Drained contents must be recovered in
conformance with all applicable
environmental regulations. Residual
liquid anhydrous ammonia in each
component may not exceed one percent
of the component’s total volumetric
capacity or 10 gallons, whichever is
less.
(d) System inspection and testing. (1)
Each refrigeration system authorized
under this section must be visually
inspected every year. The visual
inspection must include items listed in
§ 180.407(d)(2) applicable to
refrigeration systems. A certificate of the
annual visual inspection must be dated
and signed by the person performing the
inspection and must contain that
person’s company affiliation. The
certificate must remain at the equipment
owner’s office.
(2) Each refrigeration system
authorized under this section must be
proof pressure tested every two years
beginning with the initial pressure test
performed after manufacture.
Additional pressure tests must be
performed after any modification, repair
or damage to a part of the system
pressurized with refrigerant gas. System
test pressures may not be less than oneand-one-half (1.50) times the rated
MAWP of the system component or
piping.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
(3) Pressure relief valves must be
successfully tested every two years at
the MAWP for the components or
piping to which they are attached.
Pressure relief valves may be replaced
and marked every 5 years with valves
certified at the appropriate MAWP, in
which case the valves need not be tested
every two years. Valves that do not pass
the test must be repaired or replaced.
(e) Test markings and reports. (1)
Evidence of testing specified in
paragraph (d) of this section must be
marked on the right forward side of the
refrigeration system with 2 inch high
letters indicating type of last test (V =
visual; P = pressure: hydrostatic or
pneumatic) and the month/year in
which it was performed. Reports and all
of the requirements for records of
inspections including markings must be
completed as specified in part 180.
(2) Pressure relief valves must be
durably marked with either the date of
last test, set-pressure and testing
company or the date of last replacement,
set-pressure, and certifying company, as
applicable.
5. In § 173.40, the introductory text to
paragraph (c) is revised to read as
follows:
§ 173.40 General packaging requirements
for toxic materials packaged in cylinders.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Closures. When a valve is installed
in a DOT specification cylinder
containing a hazardous material, unless
otherwise excepted, the valve must
conform to the requirements in CGA V–
9 (IBR; see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
In addition, each cylinder containing a
Hazard Zone A material must be closed
with a plug or valve conforming to the
following:
*
*
*
*
*
6. In § 173.115, paragraph (c)(2) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 173.115 Class 2, Divisions 2.1, 2.2, and
2.3—Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) In the absence of adequate data on
human toxicity, is presumed to be toxic
to humans because when tested on
laboratory animals it has an LC50 value
of not more than 5000 mL/m3 (see
§ 173.116(a) of this subpart for
assignment of Hazard Zones A, B, C or
D). LC50 values for mixtures may be
determined using the formula in
§ 173.133(b)(1)(i) or CGA P–20 (IBR, see
§ 171.7 of this subchapter).
*
*
*
*
*
7. In § 173.301, a new paragraph
(a)(11) is added and paragraph (i) is
revised to read as follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 173.301 General requirements for
shipment of compressed gases in cylinders
and spherical pressure vessels.
(a) * * *
(11) When a valve is installed in a
DOT specification cylinder containing a
hazardous material, unless otherwise
excepted, the valve must conform to the
requirements in CGA V–9 (IBR; see
§ 171.7 of this subchapter).
*
*
*
*
*
(i) Cylinders mounted in motor
vehicles or in frames. (1) MEGCs must
conform to the requirements in
§ 173.312. DOT specification cylinders
mounted on motor vehicles or in frames
must conform to the requirements
specified in this paragraph (i).
(2) Seamless DOT specification
cylinders longer than 2 m (6.5 feet) are
authorized for transportation only when
horizontally mounted on a motor
vehicle or in an ISO framework or other
framework of equivalent structural
integrity in accordance with CGA TB–25
(IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter). The
pressure relief device must be arranged
to discharge unobstructed to the open
air. In addition, for Division 2.1
(flammable gas) material, the pressure
relief devices must be arranged to
discharge upward to prevent any
escaping gas from contacting personnel
or any adjacent cylinders.
(3) Cylinders may not be transported
by rail in container on freight car
(COFC) or trailer on flat car (TOFC)
service except under conditions
approved by the Associate
Administrator for Safety, Federal
Railroad Administration.
*
*
*
*
*
8. Section 173.338 is revised to read
as follows:
§ 173.338
Tungsten hexafluoride.
(a) Tungsten hexafluoride must be
packaged in specification 3A, 3AA,
3BN, or 3E (§§ 178.36, 178.37, 178.39,
178.42 of this subchapter) cylinders.
Cylinders must be equipped with a
valve protection cap or be packed in a
strong outside container complying with
the provisions of § 173.40. Outlets of
any valves must be capped or plugged.
As an alternative, the cylinder opening
may be closed by the use of a metal
plug. Specification 3E cylinders must be
shipped in an overpack that complies
with the provisions of § 173.40.
(b) In place of the volumetric
expansion test, DOT 3BN cylinders used
in exclusive service may be given a
complete external visual inspection in
conformance with part 180, subpart C,
of this subchapter, at the time such
periodic requalification becomes due.
Cylinders that undergo a complete
external visual inspection, in place of
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
the volumetric expansion test, must be
condemned in accordance with
§ 180.205 of this subchapter if removed
from tungsten hexafluoride service.
PART 176—CARRIAGE BY VESSEL
9. The authority citation for part 176
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128; 49 CFR
1.53.
10. In § 176.200, paragraph (f) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 176.200
General stowage requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Class 2 (compressed gas) material
must be kept as cool as practicable and
be stowed away from all sources of heat
and ignition. Any package containing a
Division 2.1 (flammable gas) material is
restricted from transport in powered
refrigerated temperature controlled
containers, unless the equipment is
capable of preventing ignition of
flammable vapors by having nonsparking or explosion-proof electric
fittings within the cooling compartment.
PART 178—SPECIFICATIONS FOR
PACKAGINGS
11. The authority citation for part 178
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128; 49 CFR
1.53.
12. In § 178.68, paragraph (l)(2) is
revised to read as follows:
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
15. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
§ 180.407 Requirements for test and
inspection of specification cargo tanks.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101–5128; 49 CFR
1.53.
*
§ 178.345–3
Structural integrity.
(a) * * *
(3) * * * TTMA RP 96–01, Structural
Integrity of DOT 406, DOT 407, and
DOT 412 Cylindrical Cargo Tanks, may
be used as guidance in performing the
calculations.
*
*
*
*
*
14. In § 178.345–5, paragraph (f) is
revised to read as follows:
Manhole assemblies.
*
*
*
*
*
(l) * * *
(2) Guided bend test. A bend test
specimen must be cut from the cylinder
used for the physical test specified in
paragraph (j) of this section. Specimen
must be taken across the seam, must be
a minimum of 11⁄2 inches wide, edges
must be parallel and rounded with a
file, and back-up strip, if used, must be
removed by machining. The specimen
shall be tested as follows:
(i) The specimen must be bent to
refusal in the guided bend test jig as
illustrated in paragraph 6.10 of CGA C–
3 (IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter).
The root of the weld (inside surface of
the cylinder) must be located away from
the ram of the jig. The specimen must
not show a crack or other open defect
exceeding 1⁄8 inch in any direction upon
completion of the test. Should this
specimen fail to meet the requirements,
specimens may be taken from each of 2
additional cylinders from the same lot
and tested. If either of the latter
specimens fails to meet requirements,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
PART 180—CONTINUING
QUALIFICATION AND MAINTENANCE
OF PACKAGINGS
under pressure. The pressure test
procedures and equipment accuracy for
the volumetric expansion test and,
when authorized, the proof pressure test
must be in accordance with CGA C–1
(IBR, see § 171.7 of this subchapter),
subject to the following limitations as
applicable:
(1) Bands and other removable
attachments must be loosened or
removed before testing so that the
cylinder is free to expand in all
directions.
(2) Each day before testing, the
requalifier shall confirm the accuracy of
the expansion-indicating device and the
pressure-indicating device by using a
calibrated cylinder or other method
authorized in writing by the Associate
Administrator. In the event the
calibrated cylinder’s expansion values
have changed from the certified
certificate expansion values, the
calibrated cylinder may be recalibrated
using a dead weight test device
traceable to the National Institute of
Standards and Testing (NIST)
measurement standards or using another
calibrated cylinder.
(3) The requalifier must demonstrate
calibration in conformance with this
paragraph (g) to an authorized inspector
on any day that the requalifier retests
cylinders. A requalifier must maintain
calibrated cylinder certificates in
accordance with § 180.215(b)(4).
(4) When a test pressure cannot be
achieved or maintained due to a
malfunction of the test equipment, the
pressure test may be repeated only at a
pressure increased by 10% or 100 psig,
whichever is the lower value. The
cumulative increase in test pressure
may not exceed 10% of minimum
prescribed test pressure.
(5) This paragraph (g) does not
authorize retest of a cylinder otherwise
required to be condemned under
paragraph (i) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
In § 180.407, paragraphs (d)(3) and
(g)(1)(ii)(A) are revised to read as
follows:
§ 178.345–5
§ 178.68 Specification 4E welded
aluminum cylinders.
*
the entire lot represented must be
rejected.
(ii) Alternatively, the specimen may
be tested in a guided bend test jig as
illustrated in paragraph 12 of The
Aluminum Association’s publication,
‘‘Welding Aluminum: Theory and
Practice’’ (IBR, see § 171.7 of this
subchapter). The root of the weld
(inside surface of the cylinder) must be
located away from the mandrel of the
jig. No specimen must show a crack or
other open defect exceeding 1⁄8 inch in
any direction upon completion of the
test. Should this specimen fail to meet
the requirements, specimens may be
taken from each of 2 additional
cylinders from the same lot and tested.
If either of the latter specimens fails to
meet requirements, the entire lot
represented must be rejected.
*
*
*
*
*
13. In § 178.345–3, at the end of
paragraph (a)(3), a sentence is added to
read as follows:
18455
*
*
*
*
(f) All components mounted on a
manhole cover that form part of the
lading retention structure of the cargo
tank wall must withstand the same
static internal fluid pressure as that
required for the manhole cover. The
component manufacturer shall verify
compliance using the same test
procedure and frequency of testing as
specified in § 178.345–5(b).
16. In § 180.205, paragraph (g) is
revised to read as follows:
§ 180.205 General requirements for
requalification of specification cylinders.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Pressure test. Unless otherwise
provided, each cylinder required to be
pressure tested under this subpart must
be tested by means suitable for
measuring the expansion of the cylinder
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) All reclosing pressure relief valves
must be externally inspected for any
corrosion or damage which might
prevent safe operation. All reclosing
pressure relief valves on cargo tanks
carrying lading corrosive to the valve
must be removed from the cargo tank for
inspection and testing. Each reclosing
pressure relief valve required to be
removed and tested must open at no less
than the required set pressure and no
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
18456
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
more than 110 percent of the required
set pressure and reseat to a leak-tight
condition at 90 percent of the set-todischarge pressure or the pressure
prescribed for the applicable cargo tank
specification.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
(A) Each self-closing pressure relief
valve that is an emergency relief vent
must open at no less than the required
set pressure and no more than 110
percent of the required set pressure and
reseat to a leak-tight condition at 90
percent of the set-to-discharge pressure
or the pressure prescribed for the
applicable cargo tank specification.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Issued in Washington, DC on April 6, 2007
under authority delegated in 49 CFR part
106.
Theodore L. Willke,
Acting Associate Administrator for
Hazardous Materials Safety.
[FR Doc. E7–6942 Filed 4–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–60–P
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 70 (Thursday, April 12, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18446-18456]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6942]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
49 CFR Parts 107, 171, 172, 173, 176, 178, and 180
[Docket No. PHMSA-2006-25910 (HM-218E)]
RIN: 2137-AE23
Hazardous Materials: Miscellaneous Cargo Tank Motor Vehicle and
Cylinder Issues; Petitions for Rulemaking
AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: PHMSA proposes to amend the Hazardous Materials Regulations
(HMR; 49 CFR Parts 171-180) to revise certain requirements applicable
to the manufacture, maintenance, and use of DOT and MC specification
cargo tank motor vehicles, DOT specification cylinders and UN pressure
receptacles. The proposed revisions are based on petitions for
rulemaking submitted by the regulated community and are intended to
enhance the safe transportation of hazardous materials in commerce,
clarify regulatory requirements, and reduce operating burdens on cargo
tank and cylinder manufacturers, requalifiers, carriers, shippers, and
users.
DATES: Comments must be received by June 11, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by the docket number
PHMSA-2006-25910 (HM-218E) by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Web Site: https://dms.dot.gov. Follow the instructions for
submitting comments on the DOT electronic docket site.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Mail: Docket Management System; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590-001.
Hand Delivery: To the Docket Management System; Room PL-
401 on the plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal Holidays.
Instructions: You must include the agency name and docket number
PHMSA-2006-25910 (Docket No. HM-218E) or the Regulatory Identification
Number (RIN) for this notice of proposed rulemaking at the beginning of
your comment. Please note that all comments received will be posted
without change to https://dms.dot.gov including any personal information
provided. See the Privacy Act section of this document.
Docket: You may view the public docket through the Internet at
https://dms.dot.gov, or in person at the Docket Management System office
at the above address.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cameron Satterthwaite or T. Glenn
Foster, Office of Hazardous Materials Standards, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC 20590-0001, telephone (202) 366-
8553.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The Administrative Procedure Act (APA) requires Federal agencies to
give interested persons the right to petition for the issuance,
amendment, or repeal of a rule (5 U.S.C. 553(e)). PHMSA's rulemaking
procedure regulations, at 49 CFR 106.95, provide for persons to ask
PHMSA to add, amend or delete a regulation by filing a petition for
[[Page 18447]]
rulemaking containing adequate support for the requested action. In
this NPRM, PHMSA (also ``we'' or ``us'') proposes to amend the HMR
based on petitions for rulemaking submitted by cargo tank and cylinder
manufacturers, requalifiers, shippers, and carriers. We are also
proposing revisions to address requests for clarification of the
regulations. These proposed revisions are intended to enhance the safe
transportation of hazardous materials in cargo tank motor vehicles and
cylinders, clarify regulatory requirements, and reduce operating
burdens on carriers, shippers, and users.
II. Summary of Proposals in This NPRM
The development of this rulemaking was influenced by a wide array
of correspondence received from persons engaged in the manufacture,
maintenance, or use of cargo tanks and cylinders. We received petitions
for rulemaking requesting changes to the cargo tank and cylinder
requirements specified in the HMR and clarification of existing
requirements. These petitions are summarized and discussed in the
following review-by-section summary:
A. Part 171
Updated/Revised/Added Incorporations by Reference (Sec. 171.7)
We have reviewed the following documents pertaining to cargo tanks
and compressed gas cylinders. As a result, we have found no provisions
that would impose a substantial burden or would have an adverse impact
on safety. Therefore, we are proposing to update, revise, and add the
following incorporation by reference (IBR) materials in paragraph
(a)(3) of Sec. 171.7 in the Table of material incorporated by
reference:
In response to Western Growers Association (WGA) petition
P-1352, under the entry ``American Society of Mechanical Engineers,''
we propose to revise the reference for ``ASME Code, Sections II (Parts
A and B), V, VIII (Division 1), and IX of 1998 Edition of American
Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code'' to
add a section reference for Sec. 173.5b. See review-by-section
preamble discussion in Sec. 173.5b for further details.
In response to WGA petition P-1352, under the entry
``American Society for Testing and Materials,'' we propose to add
references to ASTM A53/A53M-06a and ASTM A106/A106M-06a. See review-by-
section preamble discussion in Sec. 173.5b for further details.
In response to Compressed Gas Association (CGA) petition
P-1482, under the entry ``Compressed Gas Association, Inc,'' we propose
to add a reference to CGA, C-1 ``Methods for Hydrostatic Testing of
Compressed Gas Cylinders,'' 2004 edition. See review-by-section
preamble discussion in Sec. 180.205 for further details.
In response to CGA petition P-1489, under the entry
``Compressed Gas Association, Inc,'' we propose to update CGA G-2.2,
``Guideline Method for Determining Minimum of 0.2% Water in Anhydrous
Ammonia,'' from the 1985 Edition to reflect the 1985 Second Edition,
Reaffirmed 1997. Paragraph (l), in Sec. 173.315, restricts the use of
MC 330 and MC 331 cargo tanks constructed of quenched and tempered
``QT'' steel from transporting anhydrous ammonia unless the ammonia has
the specified minimum water content. The analysis of the water content
in the ammonia is conducted as prescribed in CGA G-2.2. Currently, CGA
G-2.2, 1985, Second Edition is incorporated by reference in Sec.
171.7(a)(3). CGA reaffirmed this publication in 1997. There were no
changes to the document other than the title reflecting that it was
reaffirmed in 1997.
In response to CGA petition P-1488, under the entry
``Compressed Gas Association, Inc,'' we propose to update CGA P-20,
``Standard for Classification of Toxic Gas Mixtures'' from the 1995 2nd
edition to the 2003 3rd edition. See review-by-section preamble
discussion in Sec. 173.115 for further details.
In response to CGA petition P-1484, under the entry
``Compressed Gas Association, Inc,'' we propose to add a reference to
CGA TB-25 ``Design Considerations for Tube Trailers,'' 2005 edition.
See review-by-section preamble discussion in Sec. 173.301 for further
details.
In response to CGA petition P-1422, under the entry
``Compressed Gas Association, Inc,'' we propose to add a reference to
CGA V-9 ``Standard for Compressed Gas Cylinder Valves,'' 2005 edition.
See review-by-section preamble discussion in Sec. Sec. 173.40 and
173.301 for further details.
In response to Tank Trailer Manufacturers Association (TTMA)
petition P-1408, we are also proposing to revise paragraph (b) of Sec.
171.7, List of informational materials not requiring incorporation by
reference, to add a reference to TTMA RP No. 96-01, ``Structural
Integrity of DOT 406, DOT 407, and DOT 412 Cylindrical Cargo Tanks,
January 1, 2001 Edition.'' See review-by-section preamble discussion in
Sec. 178.345-3 for further details.
B. Part 173
Mobile Refrigeration Systems (Sec. 173.5b)
The agricultural produce industry uses large, mobile refrigeration
systems on field sites to help preserve freshly harvested fruit and
vegetables. These refrigeration systems consist of ASME non-DOT
specification pressure components with a maximum total volumetric
capacity per vehicle of 2,500 gallons. Refrigerant systems placed in
service prior to June 1, 1991, have a maximum allowable working
pressure (MAWP) between 150 to 250 psig; and those placed in service on
or after June 1, 1991, have an MAWP of 250 psig. The refrigeration
system, commonly known as vacuum tubes, accumulators, refrigeration
units, icemakers, pressure coolers or evaporators, primarily use
Division 2.2 refrigerant gases or anhydrous ammonia in the cooling
process. The refrigeration systems may or may not be mounted on a motor
vehicle. These refrigerant systems are operated under special permit,
SP-10285, which requires each refrigeration system to be visually
inspected annually and proof pressure tested at least once every two
years. The Western Growers Association (WGA) P-1352 requests we
establish design and safety control measures for these refrigeration
systems consistent with those specified in the special permit and
provide for their use in the HMR. WGA states these refrigeration
systems have been authorized under DOT-SP 10285 for highway
transportation since 1989 and have an exceptional transportation safety
record. WGA conservatively estimates that in a two-month period, these
refrigeration systems cool over 18,000,000 cartons of produce valued at
more than $56 million. We agree with WGA that these portable
refrigeration systems have a proven safety record under the special
permit. Therefore, we propose to add a new Sec. 173.5b to authorize
the transportation of these refrigeration systems subject to the design
and safety control measures recommended in the petition and prescribed
in DOT-SP 10285.
Standards for Cylinder Valves (Sec. Sec. 173.40 and 173.301)
Currently, Sec. 173.40(c) of the HMR requires each cylinder
containing a poison inhalation hazard (PIH) material in Hazard Zone A
to be closed with a plug or valve having a taper-threaded connection.
Each cylinder, with the plug or valve installed, must be capable of
withstanding the cylinder test
[[Page 18448]]
pressure without damage or leakage, as specified in Sec. 173.40(c).
CGA (P-1422) requests we add a new paragraph (c)(5) to Sec. 173.40 to
require cylinders containing a Hazard Zone A material to be closed with
a plug or a valve conforming to CGA V-9, ``Compressed Gas Association
Standard for Compressed Gas Cylinder Valves,'' 2005 edition. Section
173.301 prescribes general requirements for the shipment of compressed
gases in cylinders and spherical vessels. CGA further requests we
revise Sec. 173.301(c) to require cylinders containing Hazard Zone A
and B toxic gases and mixtures to meet the requirements in CGA V-9. CGA
V-9 defines a cylinder valve as the mechanical device attached to a
compressed gas cylinder that permits flow into or out of the cylinder
when the device is in the open position, and prevents flow when it is
in the closed position. CGA V-9 contains standards on general cylinder
valve design, design qualification, and performance requirements such
as operating temperature limits, pressure ranges, and flow
capabilities. This standard also contains testing and maintenance
requirements to ensure valves are maintained in a safe working
condition. CGA V-9 is not applicable to cylinder valves used on non-
refillable cylinders whose valves or inlet connections are permanently
attached to the cylinders by means of welding or brazing, or to valves
on cylinders that are horizontally mounted to a chassis or framework
for road transportation. CGA states use of this publication will
provide greater assurance that valves used on cylinders containing
toxic materials are in good condition and properly maintained. Based on
our review of CGA V-9, we agree with CGA that providing for the use of
CGA V-9 will assist shippers in the proper selection and use of valves
installed in DOT specification cylinders containing toxic and various
types of other gases. Because gases vary in degrees of corrosivity,
toxicity, and pressure and concentration, a user must use care in
selecting a cylinder valve appropriate for the cylinder's intended use
and pressure. The current HMR offer no guidance to users on the proper
selection of valves. Therefore, we propose to revise Sec. Sec.
173.40(c) and 173.301(a) to require valves on cylinders, unless
otherwise excepted, to conform to the requirements in CGA V-9,
``Standard for Compressed Gas Cylinder Valves,'' 2005 Fifth Edition. We
also solicit comments on the potential cost impacts, if any, of
requiring compliance with CGA V-9.
Classification Criteria for Toxic Gas Mixtures (Sec. 173.115)
In Sec. 173.155(c)(2), the definition for Division 2.3 material
(gas poisonous by inhalation) provides that LC50 values for
mixtures may be determined using the formula in Sec. 173.133(b)(1)(i)
or CGA P-20, ``Standard for Classification of Toxic Gas Mixtures.'' CGA
(P-1488) requests we update CGA P-20 from the 1995 2nd edition to the
2003 3rd edition. CGA enclosed a list of changes contained in the 3rd
edition. These changes align the LC50 values contained in
CGA P-20 with values contained in the international standards for the
following materials: Ethylene oxide, Hydrogen fluoride, Methyl amine,
Nitrogen trioxide, Phosphorous pentafluoride, Phosphorous trifluoride,
and Tungsten hexafluoride. We agree the petition has merit and propose
to revise paragraph (c)(2) to reflect the updated CGA P-20, ``Standard
for Classification of Toxic Gas Mixtures.''
Tube Trailers (Sec. 173.301)
This section prescribes general requirements for the shipment of
compressed gases in cylinders and spherical pressure vessels. Paragraph
(i) of Sec. 173.301 specifies guidelines for cylinders mounted on
motor vehicles or in frames, commonly referred to as tube trailers. CGA
(P-1484) requests we revise Sec. 73.301(i) to reference the technical
bulletin, CGA TB-25, ``Design Considerations for Tube Trailers,'' 2005
edition. CGA TB-25 addresses protective structures for valves and
pressure relief devices, and design considerations for the static,
dynamic, and thermal loads affecting tube trailers. These design
considerations are intended to reduce the likelihood of the tube
separating from the trailer and to minimize the unintentional release
of hazardous materials in the event of a highway collision, including
but not limited to, a rollover accident. These guidelines are intended
to promote the reliable operation of the trailers under normal
conditions and minimize the risk of a catastrophic incident in the
event of an accident.
We agree the guidelines contained in CGA TB-25 will enhance the
safe transportation of tube trailers. CGA developed TB-25 to address
safety concerns identified following a May 1, 2001 hydrogen gas tube
trailer incident investigated by the National Transportation Safety
Board (NTSB). In the incident, certain horizontally mounted cylinders
on a semi-trailer, along with valves, piping and fittings, were
damaged, causing the release of hydrogen gas. As a result, NTSB made
several recommendations to PHMSA in an effort to address safety
concerns. PHMSA responded to NTSB Recommendation H-02-25 by revising
ERG Guide 115 in the 2004 Emergency Response Guidebook to include
information on the difficulty of detecting and extinguishing hydrogen-
fuel fires. As a result, NTSB classified Safety Recommendation H-02-25
as ``Closed--Acceptable Action.'' NTSB also recommended that PHMSA
revise Sec. 173.301 to clearly require valves, piping, and fittings
for cylinders that are horizontally mounted and used to transport
hazardous materials to be protected from multidirectional forces that
are likely to occur during accidents, including rollovers (NTSB
Recommendation H-02-23); and to require cylinders that are used to
transport hazardous materials and are horizontally mounted on a semi-
trailer to be protected from impact with the roadway or terrain to
reduce the likelihood of their being fractured and ejected during a
rollover accident (NTSB Recommendation H-02-24). Accordingly, we
propose to revise Sec. 173.301(i) to require tube trailers to conform
to the requirements in CGA TB-25, ``Design Considerations for Tube
Trailers.'' We also solicit comments on the potential cost impacts, if
any, of requiring compliance with CGA TB-25.
Requalification of DOT 3BN Cylinders (Sec. 173.338)
Section 173.338 authorizes the use of DOT 3BN cylinders for the
shipment of tungsten hexafluoride. Section 173.163 permits cylinders
used exclusively for hydrogen fluoride to be requalified by external
visual inspection in place of the periodic volumetric expansion test.
Air Products (P-1458) requests we permit DOT 3BN cylinders used
exclusively for tungsten hexafluoride to be requalified by an external
visual inspection in place of the volumetric expansion test. Air
Products states the chemical and physical properties of tungsten
hexafluoride are similar to those of hydrogen fluoride. Air Products
states noble metal nickel 200 does not corrode in tungsten hexafluoride
service and the company has never had a cylinder fail a volumetric
expansion test. We agree with the petitioner that the chemical
properties of tungsten hexafluoride are similar to those of hydrogen
fluoride. Tungsten hexafluoride does not corrode nickel; therefore, an
internal inspection is not warranted. We have authorized DOT 3BN
cylinders used exclusively for tungsten hexafluoride to be requalified
by an external visual inspection for several years under special
permit, SP-
[[Page 18449]]
14016, with satisfactory transportation experience. SP-14016 stipulates
that DOT 3BN cylinders removed from service must be condemned.
Therefore, in Sec. 173.338, we propose to permit DOT 3BN cylinders
used exclusively for tungsten hexafluoride to be requalified by an
external visual inspection in place of the volumetric expansion test.
The cylinders must be condemned when removed from service.
C. Part 176
Stowage Requirements for Class 2 Material on Vessels (Sec. 176.200)
Section 176.200 prescribes general stowage requirements for Class 2
(Compressed gases) materials transported aboard vessels. Horizon Lines
(P-1471) requests we prohibit vessel stowage of Division 2.1 (flammable
gases) in ``reefer units,'' that is, powered refrigerated temperature
controlled containers. Horizon Lines expresses concern that sparks
emitted from mechanical components of the reefer unit could come into
contact with flammable gas in the event of a spill and cause an
explosion. Horizon Lines further states its concern was substantiated
by several major manufacturers of reefer units. We agree with the
petitioner that the stowage of flammable gases in powered refrigerated
temperature controlled containers should not be permitted without
adequate safety measures. The transport of hazardous materials in
temperature controlled containers is addressed in Chapter 7 of the
International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) Code. More specifically,
the IMDG Code, at 7.4 and 7.7 requires the use of refrigeration systems
with explosion-proof electric fittings within the cooling compartment
to prevent ignition of flammable vapors. Consistent with the IMDG Code,
we propose to revise Sec. 176.200 (f) to restrict any package
containing a Division 2.1 material from transportation in powered
refrigerated temperature controlled containers, unless the container
equipment is capable of preventing ignition of flammable vapor by
having non-sparking or explosion-proof electric fittings within the
cooling compartment.
D. Part 178
DOT 4E Cylinders (Sec. 178.68)
Section 178.68 contains the manufacturing specification for DOT 4E
welded aluminum cylinders. Paragraph (l)(2) specifies the guided bend
test procedures and rejection criteria to be applied to welds.
Worthington Cylinders Corp (Worthington) (P-1486) requests we revise
this paragraph to authorize the use of an alternate bend test
illustrated in paragraph 12 of The Aluminum Association's publication,
``Welding Aluminum: Theory and Practice'' for determining the soundness
of circumferential seam welds on aluminum cylinders. Worthington states
use of this alternate test will assure the stress is placed on the
weld, rather than the heat-affected zone of the weld. We agree that
this alternate bend test is an acceptable test method for aluminum
cylinders, as well as the currently authorized bend test designed for
thin-walled steel cylinders. Therefore, we are proposing to revise
Sec. 178.68(l) to allow the bend test described in The Aluminum
Association's publication, ``Welding Aluminum: Theory and Practice,''
as an alternative test method.
DOT 406, 407, and 412 Cargo Tank Motor Vehicles (Sec. 178.345-3)
Section 178.345-3 prescribes structural integrity requirements for
the design and construction of DOT 406, DOT 407, and DOT 412 cargo tank
motor vehicles. Paragraph (a) specifies the general requirements and
acceptance criteria for structural integrity. The Tank Trailer
Manufacturers Association (TTMA) (P-1408) requests we revise paragraph
(a) to reference TTMA Recommended Practice (RP) No. 96-97, ``Structural
Integrity of DOT 406, DOT 407, and DOT 412 Cylindrical Cargo Tanks,''
December 1, 1997 Edition. This standard contains methods for
calculating the structural integrity of DOT 406, DOT 407 and DOT 412
cylindrical cargo tanks in conformance with Sec. Sec. 178.345-3 and
178.345-8(e). Based on the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration's review of TTMA RP No. 96-97, we agree with the
petitioner that using the methods outlined in the publication for
calculating the structural integrity of cargo tanks will be beneficial
to manufacturers in reducing time to perform the calculations.
Therefore, we propose to revise Sec. 178.345-3(a)(3) to reference the
updated TTMA RP 96-01, 2001 Edition, as suitable guidance for
performing the structural integrity calculations.
Manhole Assemblies on DOT 406, 407, and 412 Cargo Tank Motor Vehicles
(Sec. 178.345-5)
Section 178.345-5 prescribes requirements for manhole assemblies
used on DOT 406, DOT 407, and DOT 412 cargo tank motor vehicles.
Paragraph (f) specifies that all fittings and devices mounted on a
manhole cover, coming in contact with the lading, must withstand the
same static internal fluid pressure and contain the same permanent
compliance markings as those prescribed in paragraph (e) for the
manhole cover. Because paragraph (e) already requires the manhole cover
to be marked with a statement certifying that the manhole cover meets
the requirements in Sec. 178.345-5, TTMA (P-1372) requests we remove
the marking requirement in paragraph (f). We agree with the petitioner
that the requirement in Sec. 178.345-5(f) to mark the manhole's
fittings is duplicative of the manhole cover marking requirement in
paragraph (e). Therefore, we propose to remove the redundant wording in
paragraph (f).
E. Part 180
Cylinder Requalification (Sec. 180.205)
Section 180.205 prescribes general requirements for requalification
of DOT specification cylinders and special permit cylinders. Paragraph
(g) contains requirements for conducting a periodic pressure test for
the requalification of cylinders. These requirements include parameters
for accuracy of the test equipment. CGA requests we revise paragraph
(g) to reference CGA C-1 ``Methods for Hydrostatic Testing of
Compressed Gas Cylinders,'' 2004 edition. This CGA publication contains
hydrostatic testing requirements for the requalification of cylinders.
We agree the CGA publication more adequately reflects the equipment
accuracy requirements for performing a pressure test on cylinders. We
propose to revise Sec. 180.205(g) to reference CGA C-1 for
requalification of DOT specification cylinders. Section 180.207
covering UN pressure receptacles also references Sec. 180.205(g) for
test equipment accuracy. We propose to retain the current requirement
in paragraph (g) that permits a pressure test to be repeated, in the
event of test equipment failure only, at a pressure increased by 10%,
or 100 psi, whichever is the lower value. If repeated, the cumulative
increase in test pressure may not exceed 10% of minimum prescribed test
pressure, as noted in CGA C-1. As an example, using a cylinder marked
``DOT3AA1800'', if the first test is performed exactly at the minimum
test pressure of 3000 psi (5/3 service pressure), and subsequent tests
exactly at 3100, 3200, and 3300, a total of three repeat tests could be
performed. However, if the first test is performed at 3200, one repeat
test could be performed at 3300. The proposed rule does not alter any
of the requirements for the operator to ensure the test system is
accurate and ready to test cylinders. We are retaining the requirements
contained in current paragraph (g) concerning bands and other removable
[[Page 18450]]
attachments, allowing other calibration standards approved by the
Associate Administrator, requiring the requalifier to demonstrate
calibration to an authorized DOT inspector, and the retention of
calibrated cylinder certificates.
Cargo Tank Testing and Inspection (Sec. 180.407)
Section 180.407 prescribes requirements for the periodic testing
and inspection of specification cargo tanks. Paragraph (d)(3) of Sec.
180.407 requires each reclosing pressure relief valve that is required
to be removed and tested to be able to open at the required set
pressure and reseat to a leak-tight condition at 90 percent of the set-
to-discharge pressure or the pressure for the applicable cargo tank
specification. Paragraph (g)(1)(ii)(A) of Sec. 180.407 requires each
self-closing pressure relief valve that is an emergency relief vent to
open at the required set pressure and seat to a leak-tight condition at
90 percent of the set-to-discharge pressure or the pressure for the
applicable cargo tank specification. Keehn Service Corporation (Keehn
Service) (P-1436) states the majority of pressure relief valves
installed on MC-330 and MC-331 cargo tank motor vehicles transporting
liquefied petroleum gas have a start-to-discharge set pressure of 250
psi. Keehn Service states it is difficult for existing or rebuilt
valves to open at this exact pressure. In fact, a margin of error of as
much as 4 psig could occur when using a typical 0-400 psig pressure
gauge. Keehn Service requests we specify a start-to-discharge tolerance
for pressure relief valves. We agree with the petitioner that it may be
difficult for a pressure relief valve to function exactly at the
specified set pressure and that we should allow a margin of error.
Therefore, we propose to revise paragraphs (d)(3) and (g)(1)(ii)(A), of
Sec. 180.407, to specify that reclosing and self-closing pressure
relief valves must be set-to-discharge at a pressure no more than 110%
of the required set pressure. Providing for a tolerance is consistent
with the set-to-discharge tolerance allowed for certain other DOT
specification pressure vessels.
III. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
A. Statutory/Legal Authority for This Rulemaking
This notice is published under authority of 49 U.S.C. 5103(b),
which authorizes the Secretary of Transportation to prescribe
regulations for the safe transportation, including security, of
hazardous material in intrastate, interstate, and foreign commerce.
This notice proposes to adopt regulations intended to enhance the safe
transportation of hazardous materials in cargo tank motor vehicles and
cylinders, clarify regulatory requirements, and reduce operating
burdens on carriers, shippers, and users.
B. Executive Order 12866 and DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This notice of proposed rulemaking is not considered a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, was not reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). This rule is not significant under the Regulatory Policies and
Procedures of the Department of Transportation (44 FR 11034).
The proposed rule addresses several petitions for rulemaking
submitted by the regulated community. For the most part, the
petitioners request revisions to the HMR that should reduce overall
compliance costs. For example, several of the petitioners request we
update industry consensus standards incorporated by reference into the
HMR. Adoption of industry standards reduces the regulatory burden on
persons who offer hazardous material for transportation and persons who
transport hazardous materials in commerce. Industry standards developed
and adopted by consensus generally are accepted and followed by the
industry; thus, their incorporation by reference in the HMR assures
that the industry is not forced to comply with a different set of
standards to accomplish the same safety goal. In addition, several of
the petitions request regulatory relief through alternative means of
compliance with current safety regulations or the elimination of
requirements that are duplicative, out-dated, or otherwise unnecessary
for safety. Thus, we are proposing to eliminate a duplicative marking
requirement for manholes on certain cargo tank motor vehicles and
provide alternative manufacturing and requalification methods for
certain cylinders and cargo tank motor vehicles.
Two of the proposals in this NPRM may result in increased
compliance costs on the regulated community. We are proposing to
require valves on cylinders authorized for the transportation of
hazardous materials to conform to requirements in a CGA consensus
standard--CGA V-9--applicable to compressed gas cylinder valves. Use of
the CGA standard will help shippers to select a valve that is
appropriate for the cylinder's intended use and pressure. Use of the
correct valve is critical to prevent leaks or failures during
transportation. We believe that most cylinder users already use the CGA
consensus standard to guide their valve selection decisions; thus, we
expect increased compliance costs associated with this proposal to be
minimal. However, we request comments on the potential costs and
impacts of requiring compliance with the valve requirements in CGA V-9.
In addition, we are proposing to address a safety problem involving
the transportation of hazardous materials in tube trailers through
adoption of CGA consensus standard TB-24, ``Design Considerations for
Tube Trailers.'' The CGA standard addresses safety concerns identified
by NTSB in its investigation of an accident involving tube trailers
that resulted in the release of hydrogen gas. We anticipate
transportation of hydrogen gas in tube trailers will increase
significantly in the coming years to support its use as an alternative
fuel for automobiles and other vehicles. Ensuring that hydrogen gas
will be transported safely to suppliers and distribution centers will
be essential to support its use as an alternative fuel. The CGA
standard addresses protective structures for valves and pressure relief
devices and design considerations for static, dynamic, and thermal
loads affecting tube trailers. The standard is intended to reduce the
likelihood of the tube trailer separating from its trailer and to
prevent the unintentional release of hazardous materials in the event
of a highway collision or rollover accident. Because we are proposing
to adopt an industry consensus standard that is already in widespread
use by the industry, we expect compliance costs associated with this
proposal will be minimal. However, we request comments on the potential
cost and other impacts of requiring compliance with the CGA standard.
If adopted, the proposals in this NPRM will enhance transportation
safety and may reduce the overall compliance burden on the regulated
industry.
C. Executive Order 13132
This proposed rule has been analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13132
(``federalism''). This proposed rule would preempt State, local, and
Indian tribe requirements but does not propose any regulation that has
substantial direct effects on the States, the relationship between the
national government and the States, or the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, the
[[Page 18451]]
consultation and funding requirements of Executive Order 13132 do not
apply.
The Federal hazardous materials transportation law, 49 U.S.C. 5101-
5127, contains an express preemption provision (49 U.S.C. 5125(b)) that
preempts State, local, and Indian tribe requirements on certain covered
subjects. Covered subjects are:
(i) The designation, description, and classification of hazardous
material;
(ii) The packing, repacking, handling, labeling, marking, and
placarding of hazardous material;
(iii) The preparation, execution, and use of shipping documents
related to hazardous material and requirements related to the number,
contents, and placement of those documents;
(iv) The written notification, recording, and reporting of the
unintentional release in transportation of hazardous material; or
(v) The design, manufacture, fabrication, inspection, marking,
maintenance, reconditioning, repair, or testing of a packaging or
container represented, marked, certified, or sold as qualified for use
in transporting hazardous material in commerce.
This proposed rule addresses covered subject items (v) above and
preempts State, local, and Indian tribe requirements not meeting the
``substantively the same'' standard. This proposed rule is necessary to
update, clarify and provide relief from regulatory requirements.
Federal hazardous materials transportation law provides at Sec.
5125(b)(2) that, if DOT issues a regulation concerning any of the
covered subjects, DOT must determine and publish in the Federal
Register the effective date of Federal preemption. The effective date
may not be earlier than the 90th day following the date of issuance of
the final rule and not later than two years after the date of issuance.
PHMSA has determined the effective date of Federal preemption for these
requirements will be 1 year from the date of publication of a final
rule in the Federal Register.
D. Executive Order 13084
This proposed rule has been analyzed in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in Executive Order 13084
(``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'').
Because this proposed rule does not significantly or uniquely affect
the communities of the Indian tribal governments and does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs, the funding and consultation
requirements of Executive Order 13084 do not apply.
E. Regulatory Flexibility Act, Executive Order 13272, and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires an
agency to review regulations to assess their impact on small entities
unless the agency determines a rule is not expected to have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. The
proposed rule incorporates several petitions for rulemaking submitted
by the regulated community. As specified above, there may be minimal
increased costs associated with the adoption of CGA V-9 and CGA TB-24.
However, the revisions as a whole proposed in this rulemaking, if
adopted, may decrease overall compliance costs for the regulated
community while enhancing the safe transportation of hazardous
materials in commerce. Therefore, I certify this rule should not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This notice has been developed in accordance with Executive Order
13272 (``Proper Consideration of Small Entities in Agency Rulemaking'')
and DOT's procedures and policies to promote compliance with the
Regulatory Flexibility Act to ensure potential impacts of draft rules
on small entities are properly considered.
F. Paperwork Reduction Act
PHMSA currently has approved information collections under Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number 2137-0014, ``Cargo Tank
Specification Requirements,'' with an expiration date of November 30,
2007, and Control Number 2137-0022, ``Testing, Inspection, and Marking
Requirements for Cylinders,'' with an expiration date of August 31,
2008. This rule proposes no new information collection and
recordkeeping requirements.
Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations requires us to provide
interested members of the public and affected agencies an opportunity
to comment on information collection and recordkeeping requests. Under
the Paperwork Reduction Act, no person is required to respond to an
information collection unless it has been approved by OMB and displays
a valid OMB control number.
Requests for a copy of these information collections should be
directed to Deborah Boothe or T. Glenn Foster, Office of Hazardous
Materials Standards (DHM-10), Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, Room 8422, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC
20590-0001, Telephone (202) 366-8553.
All comments should be addressed to the Dockets Unit as identified
in the ADDRESSES section, and received prior to the close of the
comment period identified in the DATES section of this rulemaking. In
addition, you may submit comments specifically related to the
information collection burden to the PHMSA Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), at fax number 202-395-6974. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no person is required to respond to an
information collection unless it displays a valid OMB control number.
G. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)
A regulation identifier number (RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulations. The
Regulatory Information Service Center publishes the Unified Agenda in
April and October of each year. The RIN number contained in the heading
of this document can be used to cross-reference this action with the
Unified Agenda.
H. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This proposed rule imposes no unfunded mandates and thus does not
impose unfunded mandates under the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995.
I. Privacy Act
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477-78) or you may visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
List of Subjects
49 CFR Part 171
Exports, Hazardous materials transportation, Hazardous waste,
Imports, Incorporation by reference, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 173
Hazardous materials transportation, Incorporation by reference,
Packaging and containers, Radioactive materials, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Uranium.
49 CFR Part 176
Hazardous materials transportation, Incorporation by reference,
Maritime
[[Page 18452]]
carriers, Radioactive materials, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
49 CFR Part 178
Hazardous materials transportation, Motor vehicle safety, Packaging
and containers, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
49 CFR Part 180
Hazardous materials transportation, Incorporation by reference,
Motor carriers, Motor vehicle safety, Packaging and containers,
Railroad safety, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
In consideration of the foregoing, 49 CFR Chapter I is proposed to
be amended as follows:
PART 171--GENERAL INFORMATION, REGULATIONS, AND DEFINITIONS
1. The authority citation for part 171 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; 49 CFR 1.45 and 1.53;
Pub. L. 101-410 section 4 (28 U.S.C. 2461 note); Pub L. 104-134
section 31001.
2. In Sec. 171.7, make the following changes:
a. In the table in paragraph (a)(3), under The Aluminum
Association, a new entry titled ``Welding Aluminum: Theory and
Practice,'' 2002 Fourth Edition is added;
b. In the table in paragraph (a)(3), under American Society of
Mechanical Engineers, the entry titled ``ASME Code, Sections II (Parts
A and B), V, VIII (Division 1), and IX of 1998 Edition of American
Society of Mechanical Engineers Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,'' is
revised;
c. In the table in paragraph (a)(3), under American Society for
Testing and Materials, entries for ASTM A53/A53M-06a and ASTM A106/
A106M-06a are added;
d. In the table in paragraph (a)(3), under Compressed Gas
Association, Inc., entries for CGA Pamphlet G-2.2 1985 edition and CGA
Pamphlet P-20 1995 edition are revised;
e. In the table in paragraph (a)(3), under Compressed Gas
Association Inc., new entries for CGA C-1 2005 edition, CGA TB-25 2005
edition, and CGA V-9 2005 edition are added; and
f. In paragraph (b), a new entry ``Truck Trailer Manufacturers
Association,'' 1020 Princess Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314, ``TTMA
RP No. 96-01,'' January 1, 2001 Edition is added in alphabetical order.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 171.7 Reference material.
(a) * * *
(3) Table of material incorporated by reference. * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source and name of material 49 CFR reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
The Aluminum Association,
* * * * * * *
Welding Aluminum: Theory and 178.68.
Practice, 2002 Fourth Edition.
* * * * * * *
American Society of Mechanical
Engineers,
* * * * * * *
ASME Code, Sections II (Parts A and 172.102; 173.5b; 173.24b;
B), V, VIII (Division 1), and IX 173.32; 173.306; 173.315;
of 1998 Edition of American 173.318; 173.420; 178.245-1;
Society of Mechanical Engineers 178.245-3; 178.245-4; 178.245-
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code. 6; 178.245-7; 178.255-1;
178.255-2; 178.255-14; 178.255-
15; 178.270-2; 178.270-3;
178.270-7; 178.270-9; 178.270-
11; 178.270-12; 178.271-1;
178.272-1; 178.273; 178.274;
178.276; 178.277; 178.320;
178.337-1; 178.337-2; 178.337-
3; 178.337-4; 178.337-6;
178.337-16; 178.337-18;
178.338-1; 178.338-2; 178.338-
3; 178.338-4; 178.338-5;
178.338-6; 178.338-13; 178.338-
16; 178.338-18; 178.338-19;
178.345-1; 178.345-2; 178.345-
3; 178.345-4; 178.345-7;
178.345-14; 178.345-15;
178.346-1; 178.347-1; 178.348-
1; 179.400-3; 180.407.
* * * * * * *
American Society for Testing and
Materials,
* * * * * * *
ASTM A53/A53M-06a Standard 173.5b.
Specification for Pipe, Steel,
Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated,
Welded and Seamless.
* * * * * * *
ASTM A106/A106M-06a Standard 173.5b.
Specification for Seamless Carbon
Steel Pipe for High-Temperature
Service.
* * * * * * *
Compressed Gas Association, Inc.,
* * * * * * *
CGA C-1, Methods for Hydrostatic 180.205.
Testing of Compressed Gas
Cylinders, 2004 Edition.
* * * * * * *
CGA G-2.2, Guideline Method for 173.315.
Determining Minimum of 0.2% Water
in Anhydrous Ammonia, 1985, Second
Edition, Reaffirmed 1997.
[[Page 18453]]
* * * * * * *
CGA P-20, Standard for the 173.115.
Classification of Toxic Gas
Mixtures, 2003, Third Edition.
* * * * * * *
CGA TB-25, Design Considerations 173.301.
for Tube Trailers, 2005 Edition.
* * * * * * *
CGA V-9, Standard for Compressed 173.40; 173.301.
Gas Cylinder Valves, 2005 Fifth
Edition.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b) List of informational materials not requiring incorporation by
reference. * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source and name of material 49 CFR reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Truck Trailer Manufacturers
Association, 1020 Princess Street,
Alexandria, Virginia 22314
TTMA RP No. 96-01, Structural 178.345-3.
Integrity of DOT 406, DOT 407, and
DOT 412 Cylindrical Cargo Tanks,
January, 2001 Edition.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART 173--SHIPPERS--GENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR SHIPMENTS AND
PACKAGINGS
The authority citation for part 173 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128, 44701; 49 CFR 1.45, 1.53.
4. A new Sec. 173.5b is added to read as follows:
Sec. 173.5b Portable and mobile refrigeration systems.
This section authorizes the highway transportation of residual
amounts of Division 2.2 refrigerant gases or anhydrous ammonia
contained in non-specification pressure vessels that are components of
refrigeration systems, which may or may not be permanently mounted to a
transport vehicle, used for agricultural operations. These
refrigeration systems are used at field sites to cool (pre-cool)
produce before the produce is loaded into trucks or railcars for market
or used to supplement stationary refrigeration systems during peak
harvest times. The components of these refrigeration systems are
commonly known as vacuum tubes, accumulators, refrigeration units, ice
makers, pressure coolers, or evaporators.
(a) General packaging requirements. Each non-specification pressure
vessel must conform to the following:
(1) Each pressure vessel must be designed, manufactured, and
maintained in accordance with applicable requirements of the ASME Code
(IBR, see Sec. 171.7 of this subchapter).
(2) Except as authorized in this section, each pressure vessel and
associated piping must be rated at a maximum allowable work pressure
(MAWP) of 250 psig. The pressure in these components may not exceed
MAWP.
(3) Any part of the piping or pressure vessel separated from
another component of the refrigeration system by means of a valve,
blank flange, or other device must be equipped with a pressure relief
valve set at MAWP. All lines that must be disconnected for
transportation purposes must be closed by means of a cap, plug or blank
flange, and valves at the end of disconnected lines must be tightly
closed.
(4) The aggregate total volumetric capacity of components within
the refrigeration system authorized for highway transportation in
accordance with this section may not exceed 2,500 gallons per vehicle.
(5) Each pressure vessel and associated piping containing anhydrous
ammonia must conform to the following:
(i) Piping with a diameter of 2 inches or more must conform to ASTM
Specification A53B Schedule 40 (IBR, see Sec. 171.7 of this
subchapter) or ASTM Specification A106 Schedule 40 (IBR, see Sec.
171.7 of this subchapter).
(ii) Piping with a diameter of less than 2 inches must conform to
ASTM Specification A53B (IBR, see Sec. 171.7 of this subchapter)
Schedule 80 or ASTM Specification A106 Schedule 80 (IBR, see Sec.
171.7 of this subchapter).
(iii) The words ``Inhalation Hazard'' must be marked as required in
special provision 13 in Sec. 172.102 of this subchapter and, when
practicable, within 24 inches of the placard.
(b) Refrigeration systems placed into service prior to June 1,
1991. (1) For refrigeration systems placed into service prior to June
1, 1991, each pressure vessel and associated piping for the condensing
line (``high side'') must be rated at an MAWP of not less than 250
psig. Each pressure vessel and associated piping for the evaporating
line (``low side'') must be rated at an MAWP of not less than 150 psig,
except that each pressure vessel or associated piping that will contain
refrigerant gas during transportation must be rated at an MAWP of not
less than 250 psig. During transportation, pressure in the components
that are part of the evaporating line may not exceed 150 psig.
(2) Each pressure vessel and associated piping that is part of the
[[Page 18454]]
evaporating line must be marked ``LOW SIDE'' in a permanent and clearly
visible manner. The evaporating line must have a pressure gauge with
corresponding temperature markings mounted so as to be easily readable
when standing on the ground. The gauge must be permanently marked or
tagged ``SATURATION GAUGE''.
(3) Each pressure vessel and associated piping with an MAWP of 250
psig or greater containing liquid anhydrous ammonia must be isolated
using appropriate means from piping and components marked ``LOW SIDE''.
(4) Liquid lading is only authorized in system components with a
rated MAWP of not less than 250 psig.
(5) Prior to transportation, each pressure vessel and associated
piping with a rated MAWP of less than 250 psig must be relieved of
enough gaseous lading to ensure that the MAWP is not exceeded at
transport temperatures up to 54 [deg]C (130 [deg]F).
(6) Refrigeration systems placed into service prior to June 1,
1991, may continue in service until October 1, 2017.
(c) Prior to transportation over public highways, each pressure
vessel and associated piping must be drained of refrigerant gas or
liquid anhydrous ammonia to the extent practicable. Drained contents
must be recovered in conformance with all applicable environmental
regulations. Residual liquid anhydrous ammonia in each component may
not exceed one percent of the component's total volumetric capacity or
10 gallons, whichever is less.
(d) System inspection and testing. (1) Each refrigeration system
authorized under this section must be visually inspected every year.
The visual inspection must include items listed in Sec. 180.407(d)(2)
applicable to refrigeration systems. A certificate of the annual visual
inspection must be dated and signed by the person performing the
inspection and must contain that person's company affiliation. The
certificate must remain at the equipment owner's office.
(2) Each refrigeration system authorized under this section must be
proof pressure tested every two years beginning with the initial
pressure test performed after manufacture. Additional pressure tests
must be performed after any modification, repair or damage to a part of
the system pressurized with refrigerant gas. System test pressures may
not be less than one-and-one-half (1.50) times the rated MAWP of the
system component or piping.
(3) Pressure relief valves must be successfully tested every two
years at the MAWP for the components or piping to which they are
attached. Pressure relief valves may be replaced and marked every 5
years with valves certified at the appropriate MAWP, in which case the
valves need not be tested every two years. Valves that do not pass the
test must be repaired or replaced.
(e) Test markings and reports. (1) Evidence of testing specified in
paragraph (d) of this section must be marked on the right forward side
of the refrigeration system with 2 inch high letters indicating type of
last test (V = visual; P = pressure: hydrostatic or pneumatic) and the
month/year in which it was performed. Reports and all of the
requirements for records of inspections including markings must be
completed as specified in part 180.
(2) Pressure relief valves must be durably marked with either the
date of last test, set-pressure and testing company or the date of last
replacement, set-pressure, and certifying company, as applicable.
5. In Sec. 173.40, the introductory text to paragraph (c) is
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 173.40 General packaging requirements for toxic materials
packaged in cylinders.
* * * * *
(c) Closures. When a valve is installed in a DOT specification
cylinder containing a hazardous material, unless otherwise excepted,
the valve must conform to the requirements in CGA V-9 (IBR; see Sec.
171.7 of this subchapter). In addition, each cylinder containing a
Hazard Zone A material must be closed with a plug or valve conforming
to the following:
* * * * *
6. In Sec. 173.115, paragraph (c)(2) is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 173.115 Class 2, Divisions 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3--Definitions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) In the absence of adequate data on human toxicity, is presumed
to be toxic to humans because when tested on laboratory animals it has
an LC50 value of not more than 5000 mL/m\3\ (see Sec.
173.116(a) of this subpart for assignment of Hazard Zones A, B, C or
D). LC50 values for mixtures may be determined using the
formula in Sec. 173.133(b)(1)(i) or CGA P-20 (IBR, see Sec. 171.7 of
this subchapter).
* * * * *
7. In Sec. 173.301, a new paragraph (a)(11) is added and paragraph
(i) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 173.301 General requirements for shipment of compressed gases in
cylinders and spherical pressure vessels.
(a) * * *
(11) When a valve is installed in a DOT specification cylinder
containing a hazardous material, unless otherwise excepted, the valve
must conform to the requirements in CGA V-9 (IBR; see Sec. 171.7 of
this subchapter).
* * * * *
(i) Cylinders mounted in motor vehicles or in frames. (1) MEGCs
must conform to the requirements in Sec. 173.312. DOT specification
cylinders mounted on motor vehicles or in frames must conform to the
requirements specified in this paragraph (i).
(2) Seamless DOT specification cylinders longer than 2 m (6.5 feet)
are authorized for transportation only when horizontally mounted on a
motor vehicle or in an ISO framework or other framework of equivalent
structural integrity in accordance with CGA TB-25 (IBR, see Sec. 171.7
of this subchapter). The pressure relief device must be arranged to
discharge unobstructed to the open air. In addition, for Division 2.1
(flammable gas) material, the pressure relief devices must be arranged
to discharge upward to prevent any escaping gas from contacting
personnel or any adjacent cylinders.
(3) Cylinders may not be transported by rail in container on
freight car (COFC) or trailer on flat car (TOFC) service except under
conditions approved by the Associate Administrator for Safety, Federal
Railroad Administration.
* * * * *
8. Section 173.338 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 173.338 Tungsten hexafluoride.
(a) Tungsten hexafluoride must be packaged in specification 3A,
3AA, 3BN, or 3E (Sec. Sec. 178.36, 178.37, 178.39, 178.42 of this
subchapter) cylinders. Cylinders must be equipped with a valve
protection cap or be packed in a strong outside container complying
with the provisions of Sec. 173.40. Outlets of any valves must be
capped or plugged. As an alternative, the cylinder opening may be
closed by the use of a metal plug. Specification 3E cylinders must be
shipped in an overpack that complies with the provisions of Sec.
173.40.
(b) In place of the volumetric expansion test, DOT 3BN cylinders
used in exclusive service may be given a complete external visual
inspection in conformance with part 180, subpart C, of this subchapter,
at the time such periodic requalification becomes due. Cylinders that
undergo a complete external visual inspection, in place of
[[Page 18455]]
the volumetric expansion test, must be condemned in accordance with
Sec. 180.205 of this subchapter if removed from tungsten hexafluoride
service.
PART 176--CARRIAGE BY VESSEL
9. The authority citation for part 176 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128; 49 CFR 1.53.
10. In Sec. 176.200, paragraph (f) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 176.200 General stowage requirements.
* * * * *
(f) Class 2 (compressed gas) material must be kept as cool as
practicable and be stowed away from all sources of heat and ignition.
Any package containing a Division 2.1 (flammable gas) material is
restricted from transport in powered refrigerated temperature
controlled containers, unless the equipment is capable of preventing
ignition of flammable vapors by having non-sparking or explosion-proof
electric fittings within the cooling compartment.
PART 178--SPECIFICATIONS FOR PACKAGINGS
11. The authority citation for part 178 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128; 49 CFR 1.53.
12. In Sec. 178.68, paragraph (l)(2) is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 178.68 Specification 4E welded aluminum cylinders.
* * * * *
(l) * * *
(2) Guided bend test. A bend test specimen must be cut from the
cylinder used for the physical test specified in paragraph (j) of this
section. Specimen must be taken across the seam, must be a minimum of
1\1/2\ inches wide, edges must be parallel and rounded with a file, and
back-up strip, if used, must be removed by machining. The specimen
shall be tested as follows:
(i) The specimen must be bent to refusal in the guided bend test
jig as illustrated in paragraph 6.10 of CGA C-3 (IBR, see Sec. 171.7
of this subchapter). The root of the weld (inside surface of the
cylinder) must be located away from the ram of the jig. The specimen
must not show a crack or other open defect exceeding \1/8\ inch in any
direction upon completion of the test. Should this specimen fail to
meet the requirements, specimens may be taken from each of 2 additional
cylinders from the same lot and tested. If either of the latter
specimens fails to meet requirements, the entire lot represented must
be rejected.
(ii) Alternatively, the specimen may be tested in a guided bend
test jig as illustrated in paragraph 12 of The Aluminum Association's
publication, ``Welding Aluminum: Theory and Practice'' (IBR, see Sec.
171.7 of this subchapter). The root of the weld (inside surface of the
cylinder) must be located away from the mandrel of the jig. No specimen
must show a crack or other open defect exceeding \1/8\ inch in any
direction upon completion of the test. Should this specimen fail to
meet the requirements, specimens may be taken from each of 2 additional
cylinders from the same lot and tested. If either of the latter
specimens fails to meet requirements, the entire lot represented must
be rejected.
* * * * *
13. In Sec. 178.345-3, at the end of paragraph (a)(3), a sentence
is added to read as follows:
Sec. 178.345-3 Structural integrity.
(a) * * *
(3) * * * TTMA RP 96-01, Structural Integrity of DOT 406, DOT 407,
and DOT 412 Cylindrical Cargo Tanks, may be used as guidance in
performing the calculations.
* * * * *
14. In Sec. 178.345-5, paragraph (f) is revised to read as
follows:
Sec. 178.345-5 Manhole assemblies.
* * * * *
(f) All components mounted on a manhole cover that form part of the
lading retention structure of the cargo tank wall must withstand the
same static internal fluid pressure as that required for the manhole
cover. The component manufacturer shall verify compliance using the
same test procedure and frequency of testing as specified in Sec.
178.345-5(b).
PART 180--CONTINUING QUALIFICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PACKAGINGS
15. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 5101-5128; 49 CFR 1.53.
16. In Sec. 180.205, paragraph (g) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 180.205 General requirements for requalification of
specification cylinders.
* * * * *
(g) Pressure test. Unless otherwise provided, each cylinder
required to be pressure tested under this subpart must be tested by
means suitable for measuring the expansion of the cylinder under
pressure. The pressure test procedures and equipment accuracy for the
volumetric expansion test and, when authorized, the proof pressure test
must be in accordance with CGA C-1 (IBR, see Sec. 171.7 of this
subchapter), subject to the following limitations as applicable:
(1) Bands and other removable attachments must be loosened or
removed before testing so that the cylinder is free to expand in all
directions.
(2) Each day before testing, the requalifier shall confirm the
accuracy of the expansion-indicating device and the pressure-indicating
device by using a calibrated cylinder or other method authorized in
writing by the Associate Administrator. In the event the calibrated
cylinder's expansion values have changed from the certified certificate
expansion values, the calibrated cylinder may be recalibrated using a
dead weight test device traceable to the National Institute of
Standards and Testing (NIST) measurement standards or using another
calibrated cylinder.
(3) The requalifier must demonstrate calibration in conformance
with this paragraph (g) to an authorized inspector on any day that the
requalifier retests cylinders. A requalifier must maintain calibrated
cylinder certificates in accordance with Sec. 180.215(b)(4).
(4) When a test pressure cannot be achieved or maintained due to a
malfunction of the test equipment, the pressure test may be repeated
only at a pressure increased by 10% or 100 psig, whichever is the lower
value. The cumulative increase in test pressure may not exceed 10% of
minimum prescribed test pressure.
(5) This paragraph (g) does not authorize retest of a cylinder
otherwise required to be condemned under paragraph (i) of this section.
* * * * *
In Sec. 180.407, paragraphs (d)(3) and (g)(1)(ii)(A) are revised
to read as follows:
Sec. 180.407 Requirements for test and inspection of specification
cargo tanks.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) All reclosing pressure relief valves must be externally
inspected for any corrosion or damage which might prevent safe
operation. All reclosing pressure relief valves on cargo tanks carrying
lading corrosive to the valve must be removed from the cargo tank for
inspection and testing. Each reclosing pressure relief valve required
to be removed and tested must open at no less than the required set
pressure and no
[[Page 18456]]
more than 110 percent of the required set pressure and reseat to a
leak-tight condition at 90 percent of the set-to-discharge pressure or
the pressure prescribed for the applicable cargo tank specification.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) * * *
(A) Each self-closing pressure relief valve that is an emergency
relief vent must open at no less than the required set pressure and no
more than 110 percent of the required set pressure and reseat to a
leak-tight condition at 90 percent of the set-to-discharge pressure or
the pressure prescribed for the applicable cargo tank specification.
* * * *