Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement on Transportation Improvements Within Downtown Dallas, TX, 18511-18513 [E7-6938]
Download as PDF
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Notices
Background: States are legally
required to enact and enforce laws that
revoke or suspend the drivers licenses
of any individual convicted of a drug
offense and to make annual
certifications to the FHWA on their
actions. The implementing regulations
of the Department of Transportation and
Related Agencies Appropriation Act,
1993 (Public Law 102–388, October 6,
1992) require annual certifications by
the Governors. In this regard, the State
must submit by January 1 of each year
either a written certification, signed by
the Governor, stating that the State is in
compliance with 23 U.S.C. 159; or a
written certification stating that the
Governor is opposed to the enactment or
enforcement, and that the State
legislature has adopted a resolution
expressing its opposition to 23 U.S.C.
159.
Beginning in Fiscal Year 1996, States’
failure to comply by October 1 of each
fiscal year resulted in a withholding
penalty of 10 percent from major
categories of Federal-aid funds (i.e.,
National Highway System, Surface
Transportation Program and the
Interstate Maintenance Program) from
States’ apportionments for the fiscal
year. Any funds withheld in Fiscal Year
1996 and thereafter cannot be restored
and will be redistributed.
Respondents: 50 States and the
District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.
Estimated Annual Burden Hours:
Annual average of 5 hours for each
respondent; 260 total annual burden
hours.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenneth Epstein, 202–366–2157,
Department of Transportation, Federal
Highway Administration, Office of
Safety, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20590. Office hours are
from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Public Comments Invited: You are
asked to comment on any aspect of
these information collections, including:
(1) Whether the proposed collections are
necessary for the FHWA’s performance;
(2) the accuracy of the estimated
burdens; (3) ways for the FHWA to
enhance the quality, usefulness, and
clarity of the collected information; and
(4) ways that the burdens could be
minimized, including use of electronic
technology, without reducing the
quality of the collected information. The
agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB’s
clearance of these information
collections.
Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended;
and 49 CFR 1.48.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:49 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
Issued On: April 5, 2007.
James R. Kabel,
Chief, Management Programs and Analysis
Division.
[FR Doc. E7–6885 Filed 4–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Intent to Prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement on Transportation
Improvements Within Downtown
Dallas, TX
Federal Transit Administration
(FTA), Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit
Administration (FTA) and Dallas Area
Rapid Transit (DART) have issued this
notice to advise interested agencies and
the public of their intent to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
concurrent with a planning Alternatives
Analysis (AA) for transportation
improvements in the central business
district (CBD) of Dallas, Texas. The EIS
will be prepared in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), as amended. The EIS is
being initiated to alleviate the capacity
constraints on the LRT System within
the Dallas CBD. The purpose of this
Notice of Intent is to alert interested
parties regarding the plan to prepare the
EIS, to provide information on the
purpose and need of the proposed
transit project, to invite participation in
the EIS process, including comments on
the scope of the EIS proposed in this
notice, and to announce that public
scoping meetings will be conducted.
DATES: Comment Due Date: Written
comments on the scope of the
alternatives and issues to be considered
should be sent to Ernie G. Martinez,
Project Manager by June 1, 2007. See
ADDRESSES below.
Scoping Meetings: Two public
scoping meetings will be held at the
DART Headquarters, located at 1401
Pacific Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75266 in
the Board Room on:
—May 2, 2007 at 12 noon and on
—May 3, 2007 at 6:30 p.m.
Scoping material will be available at the
meetings, on the project Web site at
https://www.dart.org/about/expansion/
dallascbd.asp or by contacting Mr.
Martinez, DART Project Manager, as
indicated under ADDRESSES below.
The meetings will be accessible to
persons with disabilities. Individuals
requiring special assistance to
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18511
participate fully, such as a translator or
sign-language interpreter, should notify
DART in advance as indicated under
ADDRESSES below.
Interagency Coordination Meeting:
DART will conduct an interagency
coordination meeting with Federal,
State, and local agencies with an
interest in the project. Invitations
announcing the coordination meeting
and inviting the agencies to participate
will be sent.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the
project scope, including the project’s
purpose and need, the range of
alternatives to be considered, and the
environmental and community impact
issues should be sent to: Ernie G.
Martinez, Project Manager, DART
Planning, P.O. Box 660163, 1401 Pacific
Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75266–7213.
Telephone (214) 749–3201, Fax (214)
749–3844, E-mail: emartine@dart.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
John Sweek, Community Planner,
Federal Transit Administration, Region
VI; Telephone (817) 978–0550. E-mail:
john.sweek@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Scoping
The FTA and DART invite interested
individuals, organizations, and Federal,
State, and local agencies to participate
in refining purpose and need for the
project, the alternatives, including:
modes, alignments and station
locations, and the environmental and
community impacts to be assessed.
Scoping comments should identify
significant social, economic, or
environmental issues related to the
proposed project. Scoping comments
may be made at the scoping meetings or
in writing no later than June 1, 2007 (see
DATES and ADDRESSES above). Scoping
comments may also suggest alternatives
that are less costly or more responsive
to environmental issues, while still
satisfying the project’s purpose and
need. Scoping comments should focus
on the issues and alternatives for
analysis, and not on a preference for a
particular alternative. Additional
information on the EIS process, the
project’s purpose and need, and the
alternatives and impact issues to be
addressed will be included in the
‘‘Scoping Information Report’’. Copies
of the scoping information document, as
well as the Public Involvement and
Agency Coordination Plan, will be
available from DART at the scoping
meetings, at DART Headquarters and on
the DART Web site (https://
www.dart.org/about/expansion/
dallascbd.asp), thereafter (see DATES and
ADDRESSES above).
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
18512
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Notices
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
II. Description of the Study Area
The area that is historically
considered to be Downtown Dallas has
primarily been an employment center.
This area is bounded by a freeway loop
formed by U.S. 75 and IH 45 to the east,
IH 30 to the south, IH 35E to the west
and Woodall Rogers Freeway to the
north. This is changing. Downtown
Dallas is expanding, and our Study Area
boundaries are laid out to reflect that.
They consist of Industrial Blvd—from
IH 30 north to Oak Lawn; Oak Lawn—
from Industrial east to McKinnon;
McKinnon—from Oak Lawn south to
Cedar Springs/Turtle Creek; Cedar
Springs/Turtle Creek—from McKinnon
northeast to Hall; Hall—from Cedar
Springs/Turtle Creek south to Gaston;
Gaston—from Hall west to Malcolm X;
Malcolm X—from Gaston south to IH
30; IH 30—from Malcolm X west to
Central; Central—from IH 30 south to
Gano; Gano—from Central west to Wall;
Wall—from Gano south to McKee;
McKee—from Wall west to Austin;
Austin from McKee north to IH 30; IH
30—from Austin west to Industrial.
Also, the traditional core has been
transitioning into a more mixed-use
environment as new residential, retail
and entertainment developments are
completed. Recent additions to the
Convention Center, planned
improvements to the Farmers Market,
the expanding Arts District, the first
downtown grocery store in the modern
day era, and the new American Airlines
Center are changing the makeup of
downtown Dallas.
On October 24, 2006, the DART Board
approved the 2030 Transit System Plan.
While the Plan addresses all modes
operated by DART, the rail element will
influence needs in the CBD and must be
considered as part of the CBD AA/DEIS.
Rail recommendations include
approximately 43 miles of additional
rail service, of which two (2) LRT lines
would be routed through the CBD.
Information on this plan is on https://
www.dart.org.
III. Project Purpose and Need
The proposed action is intended to
achieve the following goals:
• Increase transit capacity within
Downtown Dallas;
• Improve regional mobility;
• Improve LRT operational flexibility,
service reliability and efficiency through
the CBD;
• Serve new CBD markets by
increasing transit access and circulation
between major activity centers; and
• Maximize potential for transit
oriented and economic development.
The specific needs to be addressed by
the proposed action include:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:49 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
• Relieve CBD LRT capacity
constraint;
• Serve inner-city infill development
and general system growth demands;
• Serve new CBD transit markets;
• Enhance CBD development
potential;
As part of the scoping and public and
agency involvement process, these goals
and objectives may be refined and
expanded.
IV. Alternatives
The initial alternatives presented
below correspond to Downtown
transportation problems and to the
above-described project purpose and
need. The alternatives are grouped into
the traditional and Federal processrequired categories, including: NoAction, Baseline/Transportation
Systems Management (TSM) and Build
Alternatives.
Consideration of a second LRT
alignment began when the City of Dallas
and DART entered into the Master
Interlocal Agreement (ILA) in 1992. As
noted earlier, the ILA requires DART to
supplement the current transit mall
when specified operating and/or
ridership measures are met. It is
anticipated that additional build
corridors and alignment options will be
identified during scoping.
No Action
This alternative will consist of
existing and committed projects
included in the MPO long-range plan.
This alternative is intended to serve as
the alternative against which build
alternatives are compared. Examples of
committed projects are: the Super LRV
fleet; signal prioritization along the
existing mall; Bryan/Hawkins Junction
improvements; trolley line extension
from Ross Avenue to the existing mall;
and, additional CBD bus service.
Baseline/Transportation System
Management (TSM) Alternative
This alternative will consist of the No
Action Alternative ‘‘committed
projects’’, as well as additional
relatively low-cost improvements. These
improvements would be combined to
alleviate LRT congestion without
making a fixed guideway transit
investment. This alternative will serve
as the baseline alternative for New
Starts evaluation purposes. Elements of
this alternative would include, but not
be limited to: Fully low-floor vehicle
fleet; improved signals/train control;
adjusted headways on selected routes;
additional junction improvements;
improved bus/LRT connections; LRT
shuttles with forced transfers outside
the CBD; and additional CBD bus
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
service that would likely include bus
feeder service, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
service that would serve as a bus bridge
between radial LRT lines terminating at
the CBD boundary, and combined bus
feeder/circulator service.
Build Alternatives
The Build Alternative proposed at
this early stage is LRT in a broad
corridor recommended by a recent City
of Dallas Downtown transportation
study. The Comprehensive
Transportation Plan for the Central
Business District, (June 2005), which
evaluated alignment options, resulted in
the recommendation of a corridor for a
second LRT alignment through the CBD
that is generally bounded by Woodall
Rodgers Freeway, Field Street,
Commerce Street, Young Street and
Lamar Street. Within this broad
corridor, there is a range of possible
alignment options. A specific
recommendation was made in the City
study for a tunnel alignment between
Ross and Commerce Avenues to avoid
an at-grade crossing of the existing LRT
mall and short north-south blocks.
While alignment options outside of
this broad corridor have been identified
and studied over the past several years,
this broad corridor will be the starting
point for the scoping process. Other
previously studied alternatives and new
alternatives may be added to the list of
initial alternatives during the scoping
process.
The Build Alternative will include a
new LRT alignment through downtown.
Possible alignment variations include:
All surface with at-grade crossing of
existing LRT mall;
Combination surface/subway with or
without underground stations;
All subway with underground
stations; and a
Modern streetcar system. A build
alternative without a modern streetcar
system will also be tested to understand
the relationship between the two modes.
V. Probable Effects
The FTA and DART will evaluate all
significant environmental, social, and
economic impacts of the alternatives
analyzed in the EIS. Impact areas to be
addressed include: economic
development; land acquisition,
displacements, and relocation of
existing uses; cultural resource impacts
including impacts on historical and
archaeological resources and parklands/
recreational areas; noise and vibration;
safety and security; utilities; traffic and
transportation impacts.
Potential impacts will be addressed
for the long-term operation of each
alternative and the short-term
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Notices
construction period. Measures to avoid,
minimize, and mitigate all adverse
impacts will be identified, evaluated,
and adopted as appropriate.
VI. FTA Procedures
In accordance with FTA policy, all
Federal environmental laws,
regulations, and executive orders
affecting project development, including
but not limited to the regulations of the
Council on Environmental Quality
implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts
1500–1508, the joint FHWA/FTA
environmental regulations (23 CFR part
771), the project-level conformity
requirements of the Clean Air Act,
Section 404 of the Clean Water Act, the
National Historic Preservation Act, the
Endangered Species Act, and Section
4(f) of the Department of Transportation
Act (49 U.S.C. 303) will be addressed to
the maximum extent practicable during
the NEPA process. Following the
scoping process, a Draft EIS will be
prepared and made available for public
review and comment. One or more
public hearings will be held during the
Draft EIS public comment period. On
the basis of the Draft EIS and comments
received, the project will be revised or
further refined as necessary and the
Final EIS prepared.
Issued on: April 5, 2007.
Robert C. Patrick,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7–6938 Filed 4–11–07; 8:45 am]
lines and current operations will not
exceed $5 million.
The transaction is expected to be
consummated on or shortly after April
26, 2007. If the verified notice contains
false or misleading information, the
exemption is void ab initio. Petitions to
revoke the exemption under 49 U.S.C.
10502(d) may be filed at any time. The
filing of a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the transaction.
Petitions to stay must be filed no later
than April 19, 2007 (at least 7 days
before the exemption becomes effective.
An original and 10 copies of all
pleadings, referring to STB Finance
Docket No. 35009, must be filed with
the Surface Transportation Board, 395 E
Street, SW., Washington, DC 20423–
0001. In addition, a copy of each
pleading must be served on Karl Morell,
Of Counsel, Ball Janik LLP, 1455 F
Street, NW., Suite 225, Washington, DC
20005.
Board decisions and notices are
available on our Web site at https://
www.stb.dot.gov.
Decided: April 2, 2007.
By the Board, David M. Konschnik,
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Vernon A. Williams,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–6614 Filed 4–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
BILLING CODE 4910–57–P
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35009]
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with NOTICES
CG Railway, Inc.—Lease and Operation
Exemption—Terminal Railway
Alabama State Docks
CG Railway, Inc. (CGR), a Class III rail
carrier, has filed a verified notice of
exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to
acquire by lease from Terminal Railway
Alabama State Docks (TASD), an agency
of the State of Alabama, and to operate
approximately 0.583 miles of rail line
consisting of track numbers North 14
and North 15 in TASD’s North Yard in
Mobile, AL.1 There are no mileposts
associated with the two lines.
CGR certifies that its projected annual
revenues as a result of this transaction
will not result in the creation of a Class
II or Class I rail carrier, and further
certifies that its projected annual
revenues from operation of the leased
1 CGR states that it will shortly enter into an
agreement with TASD for the lease of the rails.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:49 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
April 9, 2007
The Department of the Treasury has
submitted the following public
information collection requirement(s) to
OMB for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Pub.
L. 104–13. Copies of the submission(s)
may be obtained by calling the Treasury
Bureau Clearance Officer listed.
Comments regarding this information
collection should be addressed to the
OMB reviewer listed and to the
Treasury Department Clearance Officer,
Department of the Treasury, Room
11000, 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20220.
Dates: Written comments should be
received on or before May 14, 2007 to
be assured of consideration.
Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
OMB Number: 1545–1549.
Type of Review: Extension.
Title: Tip Reporting Alternative
Commitment (TRAC) for Use in the
Food and Beverage Industry.
Description: Information is required
by the Internal Revenue Service in its
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
18513
compliance efforts to assist employers
and their employees in understanding
and complying with section 6053(a),
which requires employees to report all
their tips monthly to their employers.
Respondents: Businesses and other
for-profit institutions.
Estimated Total Burden Hours:
296,916 hours.
OMB Number: 1545–1036.
Type of Review: Extension.
Title: Election to Have a Tax Year
Other Than a Required Tax Year.
Form: 8716.
Description: Filed by partnerships, S
Corporations, and personal service
corporations, under section 444(a), to
retain or to adopt a tax year that is not
a required tax year. Service Centers
accept Form 8716 and use the form
information to assign master-file codes
that allow the Center to accept the filer’s
tax return filed for a tax year (fiscal
year) that would not otherwise be
acceptable.
Respondents: Businesses and other
for-profit institutions.
Estimated Total Burden Hours:
204,400 hours.
OMB Number: 1545–2034.
Type of Review: Extension.
Title: U.S. Partnership Declaration for
an IRS e-file Return.
Form: 8453–PE.
Description: Form 8453–PE, U.S.
Partnership Declaration for an IRS e-file
Return, was developed for Modernized
e-file for partnerships. Internal Revenue
Code sections 6109 and 6103.
Respondents: Businesses or other forprofit institutions.
Estimated Total Burden Hours: 1,560
hours.
OMB Number: 1545–0962.
Type of Review: Extension.
Title: Tax Information Security
Guidelines for Federal, State, and Local
Agencies.
Form: 1075.
Description: Internal Revenue Code
section 6103(p) requires that IRS
provide periodic reports to Congress
describing safeguard procedures,
utilized by agencies which receive
information from the IRS, to protect the
confidentiality of the information. This
section also requires that these agencies
furnish reports to the IRS describing
their safeguards.
Respondents: State, local, and tribal
governments.
Estimated Total Burden Hours:
204,000 hours.
OMB Number: 1545–0092.
Type of Review: Extension.
Title: U.S. Income Tax Return for
Estates and Trusts.
Form: 1041, Schedules D, J, K–1.
E:\FR\FM\12APN1.SGM
12APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 70 (Thursday, April 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18511-18513]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6938]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Transit Administration
Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement on
Transportation Improvements Within Downtown Dallas, TX
AGENCY: Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) and Dallas Area Rapid
Transit (DART) have issued this notice to advise interested agencies
and the public of their intent to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) concurrent with a planning Alternatives Analysis (AA)
for transportation improvements in the central business district (CBD)
of Dallas, Texas. The EIS will be prepared in accordance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), as amended. The EIS
is being initiated to alleviate the capacity constraints on the LRT
System within the Dallas CBD. The purpose of this Notice of Intent is
to alert interested parties regarding the plan to prepare the EIS, to
provide information on the purpose and need of the proposed transit
project, to invite participation in the EIS process, including comments
on the scope of the EIS proposed in this notice, and to announce that
public scoping meetings will be conducted.
DATES: Comment Due Date: Written comments on the scope of the
alternatives and issues to be considered should be sent to Ernie G.
Martinez, Project Manager by June 1, 2007. See ADDRESSES below.
Scoping Meetings: Two public scoping meetings will be held at the
DART Headquarters, located at 1401 Pacific Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75266
in the Board Room on:
--May 2, 2007 at 12 noon and on
--May 3, 2007 at 6:30 p.m.
Scoping material will be available at the meetings, on the project Web
site at https://www.dart.org/about/expansion/dallascbd.asp or by
contacting Mr. Martinez, DART Project Manager, as indicated under
ADDRESSES below.
The meetings will be accessible to persons with disabilities.
Individuals requiring special assistance to participate fully, such as
a translator or sign-language interpreter, should notify DART in
advance as indicated under ADDRESSES below.
Interagency Coordination Meeting: DART will conduct an interagency
coordination meeting with Federal, State, and local agencies with an
interest in the project. Invitations announcing the coordination
meeting and inviting the agencies to participate will be sent.
ADDRESSES: Written comments on the project scope, including the
project's purpose and need, the range of alternatives to be considered,
and the environmental and community impact issues should be sent to:
Ernie G. Martinez, Project Manager, DART Planning, P.O. Box 660163,
1401 Pacific Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75266-7213. Telephone (214) 749-
3201, Fax (214) 749-3844, E-mail: emartine@dart.org.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John Sweek, Community Planner,
Federal Transit Administration, Region VI; Telephone (817) 978-0550. E-
mail: john.sweek@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Scoping
The FTA and DART invite interested individuals, organizations, and
Federal, State, and local agencies to participate in refining purpose
and need for the project, the alternatives, including: modes,
alignments and station locations, and the environmental and community
impacts to be assessed. Scoping comments should identify significant
social, economic, or environmental issues related to the proposed
project. Scoping comments may be made at the scoping meetings or in
writing no later than June 1, 2007 (see DATES and ADDRESSES above).
Scoping comments may also suggest alternatives that are less costly or
more responsive to environmental issues, while still satisfying the
project's purpose and need. Scoping comments should focus on the issues
and alternatives for analysis, and not on a preference for a particular
alternative. Additional information on the EIS process, the project's
purpose and need, and the alternatives and impact issues to be
addressed will be included in the ``Scoping Information Report''.
Copies of the scoping information document, as well as the Public
Involvement and Agency Coordination Plan, will be available from DART
at the scoping meetings, at DART Headquarters and on the DART Web site
(https://www.dart.org/about/expansion/dallascbd.asp), thereafter (see
DATES and ADDRESSES above).
[[Page 18512]]
II. Description of the Study Area
The area that is historically considered to be Downtown Dallas has
primarily been an employment center. This area is bounded by a freeway
loop formed by U.S. 75 and IH 45 to the east, IH 30 to the south, IH
35E to the west and Woodall Rogers Freeway to the north. This is
changing. Downtown Dallas is expanding, and our Study Area boundaries
are laid out to reflect that. They consist of Industrial Blvd--from IH
30 north to Oak Lawn; Oak Lawn--from Industrial east to McKinnon;
McKinnon--from Oak Lawn south to Cedar Springs/Turtle Creek; Cedar
Springs/Turtle Creek--from McKinnon northeast to Hall; Hall--from Cedar
Springs/Turtle Creek south to Gaston; Gaston--from Hall west to Malcolm
X; Malcolm X--from Gaston south to IH 30; IH 30--from Malcolm X west to
Central; Central--from IH 30 south to Gano; Gano--from Central west to
Wall; Wall--from Gano south to McKee; McKee--from Wall west to Austin;
Austin from McKee north to IH 30; IH 30--from Austin west to
Industrial. Also, the traditional core has been transitioning into a
more mixed-use environment as new residential, retail and entertainment
developments are completed. Recent additions to the Convention Center,
planned improvements to the Farmers Market, the expanding Arts
District, the first downtown grocery store in the modern day era, and
the new American Airlines Center are changing the makeup of downtown
Dallas.
On October 24, 2006, the DART Board approved the 2030 Transit
System Plan. While the Plan addresses all modes operated by DART, the
rail element will influence needs in the CBD and must be considered as
part of the CBD AA/DEIS. Rail recommendations include approximately 43
miles of additional rail service, of which two (2) LRT lines would be
routed through the CBD. Information on this plan is on https://
www.dart.org.
III. Project Purpose and Need
The proposed action is intended to achieve the following goals:
Increase transit capacity within Downtown Dallas;
Improve regional mobility;
Improve LRT operational flexibility, service reliability
and efficiency through the CBD;
Serve new CBD markets by increasing transit access and
circulation between major activity centers; and
Maximize potential for transit oriented and economic
development.
The specific needs to be addressed by the proposed action include:
Relieve CBD LRT capacity constraint;
Serve inner-city infill development and general system
growth demands;
Serve new CBD transit markets;
Enhance CBD development potential;
As part of the scoping and public and agency involvement process,
these goals and objectives may be refined and expanded.
IV. Alternatives
The initial alternatives presented below correspond to Downtown
transportation problems and to the above-described project purpose and
need. The alternatives are grouped into the traditional and Federal
process-required categories, including: No-Action, Baseline/
Transportation Systems Management (TSM) and Build Alternatives.
Consideration of a second LRT alignment began when the City of
Dallas and DART entered into the Master Interlocal Agreement (ILA) in
1992. As noted earlier, the ILA requires DART to supplement the current
transit mall when specified operating and/or ridership measures are
met. It is anticipated that additional build corridors and alignment
options will be identified during scoping.
No Action
This alternative will consist of existing and committed projects
included in the MPO long-range plan. This alternative is intended to
serve as the alternative against which build alternatives are compared.
Examples of committed projects are: the Super LRV fleet; signal
prioritization along the existing mall; Bryan/Hawkins Junction
improvements; trolley line extension from Ross Avenue to the existing
mall; and, additional CBD bus service.
Baseline/Transportation System Management (TSM) Alternative
This alternative will consist of the No Action Alternative
``committed projects'', as well as additional relatively low-cost
improvements. These improvements would be combined to alleviate LRT
congestion without making a fixed guideway transit investment. This
alternative will serve as the baseline alternative for New Starts
evaluation purposes. Elements of this alternative would include, but
not be limited to: Fully low-floor vehicle fleet; improved signals/
train control; adjusted headways on selected routes; additional
junction improvements; improved bus/LRT connections; LRT shuttles with
forced transfers outside the CBD; and additional CBD bus service that
would likely include bus feeder service, Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)
service that would serve as a bus bridge between radial LRT lines
terminating at the CBD boundary, and combined bus feeder/circulator
service.
Build Alternatives
The Build Alternative proposed at this early stage is LRT in a
broad corridor recommended by a recent City of Dallas Downtown
transportation study. The Comprehensive Transportation Plan for the
Central Business District, (June 2005), which evaluated alignment
options, resulted in the recommendation of a corridor for a second LRT
alignment through the CBD that is generally bounded by Woodall Rodgers
Freeway, Field Street, Commerce Street, Young Street and Lamar Street.
Within this broad corridor, there is a range of possible alignment
options. A specific recommendation was made in the City study for a
tunnel alignment between Ross and Commerce Avenues to avoid an at-grade
crossing of the existing LRT mall and short north-south blocks.
While alignment options outside of this broad corridor have been
identified and studied over the past several years, this broad corridor
will be the starting point for the scoping process. Other previously
studied alternatives and new alternatives may be added to the list of
initial alternatives during the scoping process.
The Build Alternative will include a new LRT alignment through
downtown. Possible alignment variations include:
All surface with at-grade crossing of existing LRT mall;
Combination surface/subway with or without underground stations;
All subway with underground stations; and a
Modern streetcar system. A build alternative without a modern
streetcar system will also be tested to understand the relationship
between the two modes.
V. Probable Effects
The FTA and DART will evaluate all significant environmental,
social, and economic impacts of the alternatives analyzed in the EIS.
Impact areas to be addressed include: economic development; land
acquisition, displacements, and relocation of existing uses; cultural
resource impacts including impacts on historical and archaeological
resources and parklands/recreational areas; noise and vibration; safety
and security; utilities; traffic and transportation impacts.
Potential impacts will be addressed for the long-term operation of
each alternative and the short-term
[[Page 18513]]
construction period. Measures to avoid, minimize, and mitigate all
adverse impacts will be identified, evaluated, and adopted as
appropriate.
VI. FTA Procedures
In accordance with FTA policy, all Federal environmental laws,
regulations, and executive orders affecting project development,
including but not limited to the regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508, the
joint FHWA/FTA environmental regulations (23 CFR part 771), the
project-level conformity requirements of the Clean Air Act, Section 404
of the Clean Water Act, the National Historic Preservation Act, the
Endangered Species Act, and Section 4(f) of the Department of
Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 303) will be addressed to the maximum
extent practicable during the NEPA process. Following the scoping
process, a Draft EIS will be prepared and made available for public
review and comment. One or more public hearings will be held during the
Draft EIS public comment period. On the basis of the Draft EIS and
comments received, the project will be revised or further refined as
necessary and the Final EIS prepared.
Issued on: April 5, 2007.
Robert C. Patrick,
Regional Administrator.
[FR Doc. E7-6938 Filed 4-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-57-P