Freedom of Information Act; Implementation, 18406-18411 [E7-6774]
Download as PDF
18406
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 72, No. 70
Thursday, April 12, 2007
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL
5 CFR Part 1820
Freedom of Information Act;
Implementation
U.S. Office of Special Counsel.
Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Special
Counsel (OSC) proposes to revise its
regulations dealing primarily with the
agency’s implementation of the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The
regulation, as revised, would implement
provisions of the FOIA as amended,
update information in the current
regulation, and contain new and
expanded information about the
agency’s processing of FOIA requests
and appeals. Included in the revised
regulation, as proposed, are provisions
containing updated, revised, or new
information about: publicly available
records and information; requirements
for making FOIA requests, including
updated contact information;
consultations with and referrals to other
agencies; responses to requests,
including information about multitrack
and expedited processing; requirements
for appealing initial decisions on
requests, including updated contact
information; fees, including new and
revised cost information; and business
information. Finally, the regulation, as
revised, would address responses to
demands by courts or other authorities
to an OSC employee for production of
official records or testimony in legal
proceedings.
Comments on the proposed rule
must be received by May 14, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Kurt, FOIA Officer, in
writing at: U.S. Office of Special
Counsel, Legal Counsel and Policy
Division, 1730 M Street, NW., Suite 218,
Washington, DC 20036-4505; by
telephone at (202) 254-3600; or by
facsimile at (202) 653-5151.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OSC
proposes to revise its regulations at 5
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
C.F.R. Part 1820, dealing primarily with
the agency’s implementation of the
FOIA. The regulation, as revised, would
implement provisions of the FOIA, at 5
U.S.C. 552, as amended, update
information in the current regulation,
and contain new and expanded
information about the agency’s
processing of FOIA requests and
appeals. A description of proposed
changes follows.
The title of part 1820 would be
changed to reflect its primary focus on
the agency’s implementation of the
FOIA, and its coverage of responses to
certain demands for production of
official records and testimony. Section
1820.1 would be substantially revised
and updated to: outline the scope of part
1820; make clear that the part should be
read together with provisions of the
FOIA; provide readers with the address
for the FOIA page of OSC’s web site;
and describe information publicly
available without a FOIA request.
Section 1820.2 would be revised and
enlarged to: describe requirements for
FOIA requests; provide updated OSC
contact information for such requests;
and describe the agreement to pay fees
implicit in FOIA requests, unless
waived or specified otherwise.
Sections 1820.3-1820.7 of the current
regulation, dealing with FOIA fees,
would be consolidated into a new
section 1820.7, to be described later in
this notice. A new section 1820.3 would
address consultations with and referrals
to other agencies, describing
circumstances in which OSC may
consult with other agencies about a
FOIA request and refer records to
another agency for a disclosure
decision.
A new section 1820.4 would deal
with the timing of responses to FOIA
requests, and incorporate including new
regulatory provisions on multitrack and
expedited processing of requests and
appeals.
A new section 1820.5 would describe
the types of responses to FOIA requests,
including adverse determinations.
The current section of part 1820
dealing with appeals (1820.8), would be
re-numbered as section 1820.6. The new
section 1820.6 would: contain an
expanded discussion of requirements
for filing appeals of adverse FOIA
determinations; provide updated OSC
contact information for such appeals;
extend the time for filing an appeal from
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
30 to 45 days from the date of the
determination; and describe the nature
of responses to appeals.
A new section 1820.7, as noted before,
would incorporate updated and
expanded provisions on fees associated
with the processing of FOIA requests,
including: a provision specifying that if
a fee incurred for responding to a FOIA
request is $20.00 or less, no fee will be
charged to the requester; revision of
labor rates for search and review time
for clerical and professional personnel,
reflecting current costs, and addition of
a labor category for managerial
personnel; inclusion of the cost of
retrieving records from a Federal
Records Center and expanded
discussion of requirements and criteria
for fee waiver or fee reduction requests.
A new section 1820.8 would
implement the provisions of Executive
Order No. 12600, and outline
procedures to be followed in case OSC
were to receive a FOIA request for
business information.
A new section 1820.9 would provide
that part 1820 should not be construed
as entitling any person to any service or
the disclosure of any record to which
such person is not entitled under the
FOIA.
Finally, section 1820.9 in the current
regulation has been re-numbered as
section 1820.10 and re-titled to clarify
the scope of that section.
Procedural Determinations
Congressional Review Act: OSC has
determined that these proposed
revisions are non-major under the
Congressional Review Act, and will
submit a report on this final rule to
Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to the
act.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Certification (5 U.S.C. 605): I certify that
this regulation will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
OSC primarily handles matters
involving individuals who are current
or former Federal government
employees, applicants for federal
employment, certain state or local
government employees, and
representatives of these individuals.
These regulations, as revised, would
affect only the implementation of the
Freedom of Information Act at OSC, and
responses by OSC to certain demands
for production of records or testimony.
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
These proposed revisions will not cause
significant additional impact.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA): This proposed revision does
not impose any Federal mandates on
state, local, or tribal governments, or on
the private sector within the meaning of
the UMRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act: This
revision does no impose any new
recordkeeping, reporting or other
information collection requirements on
the public.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review): While not
required to do so, OSC has reviewed
this revision under Executive Order
12866 and anticipates that the economic
impact of this revision will be
insignificant. Thus, this proposed
revision is not a significant regulatory
action under §3(f) of Executive Order
12866, and does not require an
assessment of potential costs and
benefits under §6(a)(3) of the order.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism):
This proposed revision does not have
new federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. The Hatch Act,
at title 5 of the U.S. Code, chapter 15,
prohibits certain political activities of
covered state and local government
employees. OSC has jurisdiction to
issue advisory opinions on political
activity by those employees, and to
bring enforcement action before the
Merit Systems Protection Board for
prohibited activity by a covered state or
local government employee. These
revised regulations affect only the
implementation of the Freedom of
Information Act at OSC, and responses
by OSC to certain demands for
production of records or testimony, and
do not significantly change the rights of
state and local government employees.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform): This proposed rule meets
applicable standards of §§ 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 1820
Administrative practice and
procedure, Government employees,
Freedom of Information.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, OSC proposes to revise 5 CFR
Part 1820 to read as follows:
PART 1820—FREEDOM OF
INFORMATION ACT REQUESTS;
PRODUCTION OF RECORDS OR
TESTIMONY
Sec.
1820.1 General provisions.
1820.2 Requirements for making FOIA
requests.
1820.3 Consultations and referrals.
1820.4 Timing of responses to requests.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
1820.5 Responses to requests.
1820.6 Appeals.
1820.7 Fees.
1820.8 Business information.
1820.9 Other rights and services.
1820.10 Production of official records or
testimony in legal proceedings.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552 and 1212(e);
Executive Order No. 12600, 52 FR 23781, 3
CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 235.
§ 1820.1
General provisions.
This part contains rules and
procedures followed by the Office of
Special Counsel (OSC) in processing
requests for records under the Freedom
of Information Act (FOIA), as amended,
at 5 U.S.C. 552. These rules and
procedures should be read together with
the FOIA, which provides additional
information about access to agency
records. Further information about the
FOIA and access to OSC records is
available on the FOIA page of OSC’s
web site (www.osc.gov/foia.htm).
Information routinely provided to the
public as part of a regular OSC activity–
for example, forms, press releases issued
by the public affairs officer, records
published on the agency’s web site
(www.osc.gov), or public lists
maintained at OSC headquarters offices
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1219–may be
requested and provided to the public
without following this part. This part
also addresses responses to demands by
a court or other authority to an
employee for production of official
records or testimony in legal
proceedings.
§ 1820.2 Requirements for making FOIA
requests.
(a) How made and addressed. A
request for OSC records under the FOIA
should be made by writing to the
agency. The request should be sent by
regular mail addressed to: FOIA Officer,
U.S. Office of Special Counsel, 1730 M
Street, NW. (Suite 218), Washington, DC
20036-4505. Such requests may also be
faxed to the FOIA Officer at the number
provided on the FOIA page of OSC’s
web site (see section 1820.1). For the
quickest handling, both the request
letter and envelope or any fax cover
sheet should be clearly marked ‘‘FOIA
Request.’’ Whether sent by mail or by
fax, a FOIA request will not be
considered to have been received by
OSC until it reaches the FOIA Officer.
(b) Description of records sought.
Requesters must describe the records
sought in enough detail for them to be
located with a reasonable amount of
effort. When requesting records about an
OSC case file, the case file number,
name, and type (for example, prohibited
personnel practice, Hatch Act, USERRA
or other complaint; Hatch Act advisory
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18407
opinion; or whistleblower disclosure)
should be provided, if known.
Whenever possible, requests should
describe any particular record sought,
such as the date, title or name, author,
recipient, and subject matter.
(c) Agreement to pay fees. Making a
FOIA request shall be considered an
agreement by the requester to pay all
applicable fees chargeable under section
1820.7, up to and including the amount
of $25.00, unless the requester asks for
a waiver of fees. When making a
request, a requester may specify a
willingness to pay a greater or lesser
amount.
§ 1820.3
Consultations and referrals.
When OSC receives a FOIA request
for a record in the agency’s possession,
it may determine that another Federal
agency is better able to decide whether
or not the record is exempt from
disclosure under the FOIA. If so, OSC
will either: (1) respond to the request for
the record after consulting with the
other agency and with any other agency
that has a substantial interest in the
record; or (2) refer the responsibility for
responding to the request to the other
agency deemed better able to determine
whether to disclose it. Consultations
and referrals will be handled according
to the date that the FOIA request was
initially received by the first agency.
§ 1820.4
Timing of responses to requests.
(a) In general. OSC ordinarily will
respond to FOIA requests according to
their order of receipt. In determining
which records are responsive to a
request, OSC ordinarily will include
only records in its possession as of the
date on which it begins its search for
them. If any other date is used, OSC will
inform the requester of that date.
(b) Multitrack processing. (1) OSC
may use two or more processing tracks
by distinguishing between simple and
more complex requests based on the
amount of work and/or time needed to
process the request.
(2) When using multitrack processing,
OSC may provide requesters in its
slower track(s) with an opportunity to
limit the scope of their requests in order
to qualify for faster processing within
the specified limits of the faster track(s).
(c) Expedited processing. (1) Requests
and appeals will be taken out of order
and given expedited treatment
whenever OSC has established to its
satisfaction that: (i) failure to obtain
requested records on an expedited basis
could reasonably be expected to pose an
imminent threat to the life or physical
safety of an individual; (ii) with respect
to a request made by a person primarily
engaged in disseminating information,
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
18408
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
an urgency exists to inform the public
about an actual or alleged federal
government activity; or (iii) records
requested relate to an appeal that is
pending before, or that the requester
faces an imminent deadline for filing
with, the Merit Systems Protection
Board or other administrative tribunal
or a court of law, seeking personal relief
pursuant to a complaint filed by the
requester with OSC, or referred to OSC
pursuant to title 38 of the U.S. Code.
(2) A request for expedited processing
must be made in writing and sent to
OSC’s FOIA Officer. Such a request will
not be considered to have been received
until it reaches the FOIA Officer.
(3) A requester who seeks expedited
processing must submit a statement,
certified to be true and correct to the
best of that person’s knowledge and
belief, explaining in detail the basis for
requesting expedited processing. For
example, a requester within the category
described in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this
section, if not a full-time member of the
news media, must establish that he or
she is a person whose main professional
activity or occupation is information
dissemination, though it need not be his
or her sole occupation. The formality of
certification may be waived as a matter
of OSC’s administrative discretion.
(4) OSC shall decide whether to grant
a request for expedited processing and
notify the requester of its decision
within 10 calendar days of the FOIA
Officer’s receipt of the request. If the
request for expedited processing is
granted, the request for records shall be
processed as soon as practicable. If a
request for expedited processing is
denied, any administrative appeal of
that decision shall be acted on
expeditiously.
(d) Aggregated requests. OSC may
aggregate multiple requests by the same
requester, or by a group of requesters
acting in concert, if it reasonably
believes that such requests actually
constitute a single request involving
unusual circumstances, as defined by
the FOIA, supporting an extension of
time to respond, and the requests
involve clearly related matters.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
§ 1820.5
Responses to requests.
(a) General. Once OSC makes a
determination to grant a FOIA request
for records, or makes an adverse
determination denying a request in any
respect, it will notify the requester in
writing. Adverse determinations, or
denials of requests, consist of: a
determination to withhold any
requested record in whole or in part; a
determination that a requested record
does not exist or cannot be located; a
determination that a record is not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
readily reproducible in the form or
format sought by the requester; a
determination that what has been
requested is not a record subject to the
FOIA; a determination on any disputed
fee matter, including a denial of a
request for a fee waiver; and a denial of
a request for expedited treatment.
(b) Adverse determinations. A
notification to a requester of an adverse
determination on a request shall
include: (1) a brief statement of the
reason(s) for the denial of the request,
including any FOIA exemption applied
by OSC in denying the request; and (2)
a statement that the denial may be
appealed under section 1820.6(a), with
a description of the requirements of that
subsection.
§ 1820.6
Appeals.
(a) Appeals of adverse
determinations. A requester may appeal
an adverse determination denying a
FOIA request in any respect to the Legal
Counsel and Policy Division, U.S. Office
of Special Counsel, 1730 M Street, NW.
(Suite 218), Washington, DC 200364505. The appeal must be in writing,
and sent by regular mail or by fax. The
appeal must be received by the Legal
Counsel and Policy Division within 45
days of the date of the letter denying the
request. For the quickest possible
handling, the appeal letter and envelope
or any fax cover sheet should be clearly
marked ‘‘FOIA Appeal.’’ The appeal
letter may include as much or as little
related information as the requester
wishes, as long as it clearly identifies
the OSC determination (including the
assigned FOIA request number, if
known) being appealed. An appeal
ordinarily will not be acted on if the
request becomes a matter of FOIA
litigation.
(b) Responses to appeals. The agency
decision on an appeal will be made in
writing. A decision affirming an adverse
determination in whole or in part shall
inform the requester of the provisions
for judicial review of that decision. If
the adverse determination is reversed or
modified on appeal, in whole or in part,
the requester will be notified in a
written decision and the request will be
reprocessed in accordance with that
appeal decision.
§ 1820.7
Fees.
(a) In general. OSC shall charge for
processing requests under the FOIA in
accordance with paragraph (c) of this
section, except where fees are limited
under paragraph (d) of this section or
where a waiver or reduction of fees is
granted under paragraph (k) of this
section. OSC may collect all applicable
fees before sending copies of requested
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
records to a requester. Requesters must
pay fees by check or money order made
payable to the Treasury of the United
States.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this
section:
(1) ‘‘’Commercial use’ request’’ means
a request from or on behalf of a person
who seeks information for a use or
purpose that furthers his or her
commercial, trade, or profit interests,
which can include furthering those
interests through litigation. OSC shall
determine, whenever reasonably
possible, the use to which a requester
will put the requested records. When it
appears that the requester will put the
records to a commercial use, either
because of the nature of the request
itself or because OSC has reasonable
cause to doubt a requester’s stated use,
OSC shall provide the requester with a
reasonable opportunity to submit
further clarification.
(2) ‘‘Direct costs’’ means those
expenses that OSC incurs in searching
for and duplicating (and, in the case of
commercial use requests, reviewing)
records to respond to a FOIA request.
Direct costs include, for example, the
salary of the employee performing the
work (the basic rate of pay for the
employee plus 16 percent of that rate to
cover benefits) and the cost of operating
duplicating equipment. Direct costs do
not include overhead expenses such as
the costs of space, and heating or
lighting the facility in which the records
are kept.
(3) ‘‘Duplication’’ means the process
of making of a copy of a record, or of
the information contained in it,
necessary to respond to a FOIA request.
Copies can take the form of paper,
microform, audiovisual materials, or
electronic records (for example, on
digital data storage discs), among others.
(4) ‘‘Educational institution’’ means a
preschool, a public or private
elementary or secondary school, an
institution of undergraduate higher
education, an institution of graduate
higher education, an institution of
professional education, or an institution
of vocational education, that operates a
program of scholarly research. To be in
this category, a requester must show
that the request is authorized by and is
made under the auspices of a qualifying
institution and that the records are not
sought for a commercial use but are
sought to further scholarly research.
(5) ‘‘Non-commercial scientific
institution’’ means an institution that is
not operated on a ‘‘commercial’’ basis,
as that term is referenced in paragraph
(b)(1) of this section, and that is
operated solely for the purpose of
conducting scientific research the
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
results of which are not intended to
promote any particular product or
industry. To be in this category, a
requester must show that the request is
authorized by and is made under the
auspices of a qualifying institution and
that the records are not sought for a
commercial use but are sought to further
scientific research.
(6) ‘‘Representative of the news
media’’ or ‘‘news media requester’’
means any person actively gathering
news for an entity that is organized and
operated to publish or broadcast news to
the public. The term ‘‘news’’ means
information that is about current events
or that would be of current interest to
the public. Examples of news media
entities include television or radio
stations broadcasting to the public at
large and publishers of periodicals (but
only in those instances where they can
qualify as disseminators of ‘‘news’’) who
make their products available for
purchase or subscription by the general
public. For ‘‘freelance’’ journalists to be
regarded as working for a news
organization, they must demonstrate a
solid basis for expecting publication
through that organization. A publication
contract would be the clearest proof, but
OSC may also look to the past
publication record of a requester in
making this determination. To be in this
category, a requester must not be
seeking the requested records for a
commercial use. However, a request for
records supporting the newsdissemination function of the requester
shall not be considered to be for a
commercial use.
(7) ‘‘Review’’ means the process of
examining a record located in response
to a request in order to determine
whether any portion of the record is
exempt from disclosure. It includes
processing any record for disclosure for example, doing all that is necessary
to redact it and otherwise prepare it for
disclosure. Review time also includes
time spent obtaining and considering
any formal objection to disclosure made
by a business submitter under section
1820.8(f). It does not include time spent
resolving general legal or policy issues
about the application of exemptions.
Review costs are properly charged in
connection with commercial use
requests even if a record ultimately is
not disclosed.
(8) ‘‘Search’’ means the process of
looking for and retrieving records or
information responsive to a request. It
includes page-by-page or line-by-line
identification of information within
records when undertaken, and
reasonable efforts to locate and retrieve
information from records maintained in
electronic form or format, to the extent
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
that such efforts would not significantly
interfere with the operation of an
automatic information system.
(c) Fees. In responding to FOIA
requests, OSC shall charge the following
fees unless a waiver or reduction of fees
has been granted under paragraph (k) of
this section:
(1) Search. (i) Search fees will be
charged for all requests - other than
requests made by educational
institutions, noncommercial scientific
institutions, or representatives of the
news media - subject to the limitations
of paragraph (d) of this section. OSC
may charge for time spent searching
even if it fails to locate responsive
records, or records located after a search
are determined to be exempt from
disclosure.
(ii) For each quarter hour spent by
clerical personnel in searching for and
retrieving a requested record, the fee
will be $5.50. Where a search and
retrieval cannot be performed entirely
by clerical personnel - for example,
where the identification of records
within the scope of a request requires
the use of professional personnel - the
fee will be $9.00 for each quarter hour
of search time spent by professional
personnel. Where the time of managerial
personnel is required, the fee will be
$17.50 for each quarter hour of time
spent by those personnel.
(iii) For electronic searches of records,
requesters will be charged the direct
costs of conducting the search,
including the costs of operator/
programmer staff time apportionable to
the search.
(iv) For requests requiring the
retrieval of records from any Federal
Records Center, additional costs may be
charged in accordance with the
applicable billing schedule established
by the National Archives and Records
Administration.
(2) Duplication. Duplication fees will
be charged to all requesters, subject to
the limitations of paragraph (d) of this
section. For a standard paper photocopy
of a record (no more than one copy of
which need be supplied), the fee will be
25 cents per page. For copies produced
by computer, such as discs or printouts,
OSC will charge the direct costs,
including staff time, of producing the
copy. For other forms of duplication,
OSC will charge the direct costs of that
duplication.
(3) Review. Review fees will be
charged to requesters who make a
commercial use request. Review fees
will be charged for only initial record
review - in other words, the review done
when OSC analyzes whether an
exemption applies to a particular record
or record portion at the initial request
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18409
level. No charge will be made for review
at the administrative appeal level for an
exemption already applied. However,
records or record portions withheld
under an exemption that is
subsequently determined not to apply
may be reviewed again to determine
whether any other exemption not
previously considered applies; the costs
of that review are chargeable where it is
made necessary by such a change of
circumstances. Review fees will be
charged at the same rates as those
charged for a search under paragraph
(c)(1)(ii) of this section.
(d) Limitations on charging fees. (1)
No search fee will be charged for
requests by educational institutions,
noncommercial scientific institutions,
or representatives of the news media.
(2) No search fee or review fee will be
charged for a quarter-hour period unless
more than half of that period is required
for search or review.
(3) Except for requesters seeking
records for a commercial use, OSC will
provide without charge:
(i) The first 100 pages of duplication
(or the cost equivalent); and
(ii) The first two hours of search (or
the cost equivalent).
(4) Whenever a total fee calculated
under paragraph (c) of this section is
$20.00 or less for any request, no fee
will be charged.
(5) The provisions of paragraphs (d)(3)
and (d)(4) of this section work together.
This means that for requesters other
than those seeking records for a
commercial use, no fee will be charged
unless the cost of search in excess of
two hours plus the cost of duplication
in excess of 100 pages totals more than
$20.00.
(e) Notice of anticipated fees in excess
of $25.00. When OSC determines or
estimates that the fees to be charged
under this section will amount to more
than $25.00, OSC shall notify the
requester of the actual or estimated
amount of the fees, unless the requester
has indicated a willingness to pay fees
as high as those anticipated. If only a
portion of the fee can be estimated
readily, OSC will advise the requester
that the estimated fee may be only a
portion of the total fee. In cases in
which a requester has been notified that
actual or estimated fees amount to more
than $25.00, the request shall not be
considered received and further work
will not be done on it until the requester
agrees to pay the anticipated total fee. A
notice under this paragraph will offer
the requester an opportunity to discuss
the matter with OSC in order to
reformulate the request to meet the
requester’s needs at a lower cost.
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
18410
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(f) Charges for other services. Apart
from the other provisions of this section,
when OSC chooses as a matter of
administrative discretion to provide a
special service–such as sending records
by other than ordinary mail–the direct
costs of providing the service ordinarily
will be charged.
(g) Charging interest. OSC may charge
interest on any unpaid fee starting on
the 31st day after the date of on which
the billing was sent to the requester.
Interest charges will be assessed at the
rate provided in 31 U.S.C. 3717 and will
accrue from the date of billing until
payment is received by OSC. OSC will
follow the provisions of the Debt
Collection Act of 1982 (Public Law 97365, 96 Stat. 1749), as amended by the
Debt Collection Act of 1996 (Public Law
104-134, 110 Stat. 1321-358), and its
administrative procedures, including
the use of consumer reporting agencies,
collection agencies, and offset.
(h) Aggregating requests. Where OSC
reasonably believes that a requester or a
group of requesters acting together is
attempting to divide a request into a
series of requests that otherwise could
have been submitted as a single request,
for the purpose of avoiding fees, OSC
may aggregate those requests and charge
accordingly. OSC may presume that
multiple requests of this type made
within a 30-day period have been made
in order to avoid fees. Where requests
are separated by a longer period, OSC
will aggregate them only where a
reasonable basis exists for determining
that aggregation is warranted under all
of the circumstances involved. Multiple
requests involving unrelated matters
will not be aggregated.
(i) Advance payments. (1) For
requests other than those described in
paragraphs (i)(2) and (i)(3) of this
section, OSC will not require the
requester to make an advance payment
before work is begun or continued on a
request. Payment owed for work already
completed (that is, pre-payment after
processing a request but before copies
are sent to the requester) is not an
advance payment.
(2) Where OSC determines or
estimates that a total fee to be charged
under this section will be more than
$250.00, it may require the requester to
make an advance payment of an amount
up to the amount of the entire
anticipated fee before beginning to
process the request, except where it
receives a satisfactory assurance of full
payment from a requester who has a
history of prompt payment.
(3) Where a requester has previously
failed to pay a properly charged FOIA
fee to any agency within 30 days of the
date of billing, OSC may require the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
requester to pay the full amount due,
plus any applicable interest, and to
make an advance payment of the full
amount of any anticipated fee, before
OSC begins to process a new request or
continues to process a pending request
from that requester.
(4) In cases in which OSC requires
advance payment or payment due under
paragraph (i)(2) or (3) of this section, the
request shall not be considered received
and further work will not be done on
the request until the required payment
is received.
(j) Other statutes specifically
providing for fees. The fee schedule of
this section does not apply to fees
charged under any statute that
specifically requires an agency to set
and collect fees for particular types of
records. Where records responsive to
requests are maintained for distribution
by agencies operating such statutorily
based fee schedule programs, OSC will
provide contact information for use by
requesters in obtaining records from
those sources.
(k) Requirements for waiver or
reduction of fees. (1) Records responsive
to a request shall be furnished without
charge or at a charge reduced below that
established under paragraph (c) of this
section where OSC determines, based
on all available information, that the
requester has demonstrated that:
(i) Disclosure of the requested
information is in the public interest
because it is likely to contribute
significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the
government, and
(ii) Disclosure of the information is
not primarily in the commercial interest
of the requester.
(2) To determine whether the first fee
waiver requirement is met, OSC will
consider the following factors:
(i) The subject of the request: Whether
the subject of the requested records
concerns ‘‘the operations or activities of
the government.’’ The subject of the
requested records must concern
identifiable operations or activities of
the federal government, with a
connection that is direct and clear, not
remote or attenuated.
(ii) The informative value of the
information to be disclosed: Whether
the disclosure is ‘‘likely to contribute’’
to an understanding of government
operations or activities. The disclosable
portions of the requested records must
be meaningfully informative about
government operations or activities in
order to be ‘‘likely to contribute’’ to an
increased public understanding of those
operations or activities. The disclosure
of information that already is in the
public domain, in either a duplicative or
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
a substantially identical form, would
not be as likely to contribute to such
understanding where nothing new
would be added to the public’s
understanding.
(iii) The contribution to an
understanding of the subject by the
public likely to result from disclosure:
Whether disclosure of the requested
information will contribute to ‘‘public
understanding.’’ The disclosure must
contribute to the understanding of a
reasonably broad audience of persons
interested in the subject, as opposed to
the individual understanding of the
requester. A requester’s expertise in the
subject area and ability and intention to
effectively convey information to the
public shall be considered. It shall be
presumed that a representative of the
news media satisfies this consideration.
(iv) The significance of the
contribution to public understanding:
Whether the disclosure is likely to
contribute ‘‘significantly’’ to public
understanding of government operations
or activities. The public’s understanding
of the subject in question, as compared
to the level of public understanding
existing prior to the disclosure, must be
enhanced by the disclosure to a
significant extent. OSC shall not make
value judgments about whether
information that would contribute
significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the
government is ‘‘important’’ enough to be
made public.
(3) To determine whether the second
fee waiver requirement is met, OSC will
consider the following factors:
(i) The existence and magnitude of a
commercial interest: Whether the
requester has a commercial interest that
would be furthered by the requested
disclosure. OSC shall consider any
commercial interest of the requester
(with reference to the definition of
‘‘commercial use’’ in paragraph (b)(1) of
this section), or of any person on whose
behalf the requester may be acting, that
would be furthered by the requested
disclosure. Requesters shall be given an
opportunity to provide explanatory
information about this consideration.
(ii) The primary interest in disclosure:
Whether any identified commercial
interest of the requester is sufficiently
large, in comparison with the public
interest in disclosure, that disclosure is
‘‘primarily in the commercial interest of
the requester.’’ A fee waiver or
reduction is justified where the public
interest standard is satisfied and that
public interest is greater in magnitude
than that of any identified commercial
interest in disclosure. OSC ordinarily
shall presume that where a news media
requester has satisfied the public
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Proposed Rules
interest standard, the public interest
will be the interest primarily served by
disclosure to that requester. Disclosure
to data brokers or others who merely
compile and market government
information for direct economic return
shall not be presumed to primarily serve
the public interest.
(4) Where only some of the records to
be released satisfy the requirements for
a waiver of fees, a waiver shall be
granted for those records.
(5) Requests for the waiver or
reduction of fees should address the
factors listed in paragraphs (k)(2) and (3)
of this section, insofar as they apply to
each request. OSC will exercise its
discretion to consider the costeffectiveness of its investment of
administrative resources in this decision
making process, however, in deciding to
grant waivers or reductions of fees.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with PROPOSALS
§ 1820.8
Business information.
(a) In general. Business information
obtained by OSC from a submitter will
be disclosed under the FOIA only under
this section.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this
section:
(1) ‘‘Business information’’ means
commercial or financial information
obtained by OSC from a submitter that
may be protected from disclosure under
exemption 4 of the FOIA.
(2) ‘‘Submitter’’ means any person or
entity from whom the OSC obtains
business information, directly or
indirectly. The term includes
corporations, and state, local, tribal and
foreign governments.
(c) Designation of business
information. A submitter of business
information will use good-faith efforts to
designate, by appropriate markings,
either at the time of submission or at a
reasonable time thereafter, any portion
of its submission that it considers to be
protected from disclosure under
exemption 4. These designations will
expire 10 years after the date of the
submission unless the submitter
requests, and provides justification for,
a longer designation period.
(d) Notice to submitters. OSC shall
provide a submitter with prompt written
notice of a FOIA request or
administrative appeal that seeks its
business information wherever required
under paragraph (e) of this section,
except as provided in paragraph (h) of
this section, in order to give the
submitter an opportunity to object to
disclosure of any specified portion of
that information under paragraph (f) of
this section. The notice shall either
describe the business information
requested or include copies of the
requested records or record portions
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:48 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
containing the information. When
notification of a voluminous number of
submitters is required, notification may
be made by posting or publishing the
notice in a place reasonably likely to
accomplish it.
(e) When notice is required. Notice
shall be given to a submitter wherever:
(1) The information has been
designated in good faith by the
submitter as information considered
protected from disclosure under
exemption 4; or
(2) OSC has reason to believe that the
information may be protected from
disclosure under exemption 4.
(f) Opportunity to object to disclosure.
OSC will allow a submitter a reasonable
time to respond to the notice described
in paragraph (d) of this section and will
specify that time period within the
notice. If a submitter has any objection
to disclosure, it is required to submit a
detailed written statement. The
statement must specify all grounds for
withholding any portion of the
information under any exemption of the
FOIA and, in the case of exemption 4,
it must show why the information is a
trade secret or commercial or financial
information that is privileged or
confidential. If a submitter fails to
respond to the notice within the time
specified in it, the submitter will be
considered to have no objection to
disclosure of the information.
Information provided by the submitter
that is not received by OSC until after
its disclosure decision has been made
shall not be considered by OSC.
Information provided by a submitter
under this paragraph may itself be
subject to disclosure under the FOIA.
(g) Notice of intent to disclose. OSC
shall consider a submitter’s objections
and specific grounds for nondisclosure
in deciding whether to disclose business
information. Whenever OSC decides to
disclose business information over the
objection of a submitter, OSC shall give
the submitter written notice, which
shall include:
(1) A statement of the reason(s) why
each of the submitter’s disclosure
objections was not sustained;
(2) A description of the business
information to be disclosed; and
(3) A specified disclosure date, which
shall be a reasonable time subsequent to
the notice.
(h) Exceptions to notice requirements.
The notice requirements of paragraphs
(d) and (g) of this section shall not apply
if:
(1) OSC determines that the
information should not be disclosed;
(2) The information lawfully has been
published or has been officially made
available to the public;
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
18411
(3) Disclosure of the information is
required by statute (other than the
FOIA) or by a regulation issued in
accordance with the requirements of
Executive Order 12600; or
(4) The designation made by the
submitter under paragraph (c) of this
section appears obviously frivolous except that, in such a case, OSC shall,
within a reasonable time prior to a
specified disclosure date, give the
submitter written notice of any final
decision to disclose the information.
(i) Notice of FOIA lawsuit. Whenever
a requester files a lawsuit seeking to
compel the disclosure of business
information, OSC shall promptly notify
the submitter.
(j) Corresponding notice to requesters.
Whenever OSC provides a submitter
with notice and an opportunity to object
to disclosure under paragraph (d) of this
section, OSC shall also notify the
requester(s). Whenever OSC notifies a
submitter of its intent to disclose
requested information under paragraph
(g) of this section, OSC shall also notify
the requester(s). Whenever a submitter
files a lawsuit seeking to prevent the
disclosure of business information, OSC
shall notify the requester(s).
§ 1820.9
Other rights and services.
Nothing in this part shall be
construed to entitle any person, as of
right, to any service or to the disclosure
of any record to which such person is
not entitled under the FOIA.
§ 1820.10 Production of official records or
testimony in legal proceedings.
No employee or former employee of
the Office of Special Counsel shall, in
response to a demand of a court or other
authority, produce or disclose any
information or records acquired as part
of the performance of his official duties
or because of his official status without
the prior approval of the Special
Counsel or the Special Counsel’s duly
authorized designee.
Dated: April 3, 2007
Scott J. Bloch,
Special Counsel.
[FR Doc. E7–6774 Filed 4–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7405–01–S
E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM
12APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 70 (Thursday, April 12, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18406-18411]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6774]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 18406]]
OFFICE OF SPECIAL COUNSEL
5 CFR Part 1820
Freedom of Information Act; Implementation
AGENCY: U.S. Office of Special Counsel.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) proposes to revise
its regulations dealing primarily with the agency's implementation of
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). The regulation, as revised,
would implement provisions of the FOIA as amended, update information
in the current regulation, and contain new and expanded information
about the agency's processing of FOIA requests and appeals. Included in
the revised regulation, as proposed, are provisions containing updated,
revised, or new information about: publicly available records and
information; requirements for making FOIA requests, including updated
contact information; consultations with and referrals to other
agencies; responses to requests, including information about multitrack
and expedited processing; requirements for appealing initial decisions
on requests, including updated contact information; fees, including new
and revised cost information; and business information. Finally, the
regulation, as revised, would address responses to demands by courts or
other authorities to an OSC employee for production of official records
or testimony in legal proceedings.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be received by May 14, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Kurt, FOIA Officer, in
writing at: U.S. Office of Special Counsel, Legal Counsel and Policy
Division, 1730 M Street, NW., Suite 218, Washington, DC 20036-4505; by
telephone at (202) 254-3600; or by facsimile at (202) 653-5151.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OSC proposes to revise its regulations at 5
C.F.R. Part 1820, dealing primarily with the agency's implementation of
the FOIA. The regulation, as revised, would implement provisions of the
FOIA, at 5 U.S.C. 552, as amended, update information in the current
regulation, and contain new and expanded information about the agency's
processing of FOIA requests and appeals. A description of proposed
changes follows.
The title of part 1820 would be changed to reflect its primary
focus on the agency's implementation of the FOIA, and its coverage of
responses to certain demands for production of official records and
testimony. Section 1820.1 would be substantially revised and updated
to: outline the scope of part 1820; make clear that the part should be
read together with provisions of the FOIA; provide readers with the
address for the FOIA page of OSC's web site; and describe information
publicly available without a FOIA request.
Section 1820.2 would be revised and enlarged to: describe
requirements for FOIA requests; provide updated OSC contact information
for such requests; and describe the agreement to pay fees implicit in
FOIA requests, unless waived or specified otherwise.
Sections 1820.3-1820.7 of the current regulation, dealing with FOIA
fees, would be consolidated into a new section 1820.7, to be described
later in this notice. A new section 1820.3 would address consultations
with and referrals to other agencies, describing circumstances in which
OSC may consult with other agencies about a FOIA request and refer
records to another agency for a disclosure decision.
A new section 1820.4 would deal with the timing of responses to
FOIA requests, and incorporate including new regulatory provisions on
multitrack and expedited processing of requests and appeals.
A new section 1820.5 would describe the types of responses to FOIA
requests, including adverse determinations.
The current section of part 1820 dealing with appeals (1820.8),
would be re-numbered as section 1820.6. The new section 1820.6 would:
contain an expanded discussion of requirements for filing appeals of
adverse FOIA determinations; provide updated OSC contact information
for such appeals; extend the time for filing an appeal from 30 to 45
days from the date of the determination; and describe the nature of
responses to appeals.
A new section 1820.7, as noted before, would incorporate updated
and expanded provisions on fees associated with the processing of FOIA
requests, including: a provision specifying that if a fee incurred for
responding to a FOIA request is $20.00 or less, no fee will be charged
to the requester; revision of labor rates for search and review time
for clerical and professional personnel, reflecting current costs, and
addition of a labor category for managerial personnel; inclusion of the
cost of retrieving records from a Federal Records Center and expanded
discussion of requirements and criteria for fee waiver or fee reduction
requests.
A new section 1820.8 would implement the provisions of Executive
Order No. 12600, and outline procedures to be followed in case OSC were
to receive a FOIA request for business information.
A new section 1820.9 would provide that part 1820 should not be
construed as entitling any person to any service or the disclosure of
any record to which such person is not entitled under the FOIA.
Finally, section 1820.9 in the current regulation has been re-
numbered as section 1820.10 and re-titled to clarify the scope of that
section.
Procedural Determinations
Congressional Review Act: OSC has determined that these proposed
revisions are non-major under the Congressional Review Act, and will
submit a report on this final rule to Congress and the Government
Accountability Office pursuant to the act.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification (5 U.S.C. 605): I certify
that this regulation will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. OSC primarily handles matters
involving individuals who are current or former Federal government
employees, applicants for federal employment, certain state or local
government employees, and representatives of these individuals. These
regulations, as revised, would affect only the implementation of the
Freedom of Information Act at OSC, and responses by OSC to certain
demands for production of records or testimony.
[[Page 18407]]
These proposed revisions will not cause significant additional impact.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA): This proposed revision does
not impose any Federal mandates on state, local, or tribal governments,
or on the private sector within the meaning of the UMRA.
Paperwork Reduction Act: This revision does no impose any new
recordkeeping, reporting or other information collection requirements
on the public.
Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review): While not
required to do so, OSC has reviewed this revision under Executive Order
12866 and anticipates that the economic impact of this revision will be
insignificant. Thus, this proposed revision is not a significant
regulatory action under Sec. 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under
Sec. 6(a)(3) of the order.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism): This proposed revision does not
have new federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. The Hatch
Act, at title 5 of the U.S. Code, chapter 15, prohibits certain
political activities of covered state and local government employees.
OSC has jurisdiction to issue advisory opinions on political activity
by those employees, and to bring enforcement action before the Merit
Systems Protection Board for prohibited activity by a covered state or
local government employee. These revised regulations affect only the
implementation of the Freedom of Information Act at OSC, and responses
by OSC to certain demands for production of records or testimony, and
do not significantly change the rights of state and local government
employees.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform): This proposed rule
meets applicable standards of Sec. Sec. 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988.
List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 1820
Administrative practice and procedure, Government employees,
Freedom of Information.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, OSC proposes to revise 5
CFR Part 1820 to read as follows:
PART 1820--FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUESTS; PRODUCTION OF
RECORDS OR TESTIMONY
Sec.
1820.1 General provisions.
1820.2 Requirements for making FOIA requests.
1820.3 Consultations and referrals.
1820.4 Timing of responses to requests.
1820.5 Responses to requests.
1820.6 Appeals.
1820.7 Fees.
1820.8 Business information.
1820.9 Other rights and services.
1820.10 Production of official records or testimony in legal
proceedings.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552 and 1212(e); Executive Order No. 12600,
52 FR 23781, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 235.
Sec. 1820.1 General provisions.
This part contains rules and procedures followed by the Office of
Special Counsel (OSC) in processing requests for records under the
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), as amended, at 5 U.S.C. 552. These
rules and procedures should be read together with the FOIA, which
provides additional information about access to agency records. Further
information about the FOIA and access to OSC records is available on
the FOIA page of OSC's web site (www.osc.gov/foia.htm). Information
routinely provided to the public as part of a regular OSC activity-for
example, forms, press releases issued by the public affairs officer,
records published on the agency's web site (www.osc.gov), or public
lists maintained at OSC headquarters offices pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1219-
may be requested and provided to the public without following this
part. This part also addresses responses to demands by a court or other
authority to an employee for production of official records or
testimony in legal proceedings.
Sec. 1820.2 Requirements for making FOIA requests.
(a) How made and addressed. A request for OSC records under the
FOIA should be made by writing to the agency. The request should be
sent by regular mail addressed to: FOIA Officer, U.S. Office of Special
Counsel, 1730 M Street, NW. (Suite 218), Washington, DC 20036-4505.
Such requests may also be faxed to the FOIA Officer at the number
provided on the FOIA page of OSC's web site (see section 1820.1). For
the quickest handling, both the request letter and envelope or any fax
cover sheet should be clearly marked ``FOIA Request.'' Whether sent by
mail or by fax, a FOIA request will not be considered to have been
received by OSC until it reaches the FOIA Officer.
(b) Description of records sought. Requesters must describe the
records sought in enough detail for them to be located with a
reasonable amount of effort. When requesting records about an OSC case
file, the case file number, name, and type (for example, prohibited
personnel practice, Hatch Act, USERRA or other complaint; Hatch Act
advisory opinion; or whistleblower disclosure) should be provided, if
known. Whenever possible, requests should describe any particular
record sought, such as the date, title or name, author, recipient, and
subject matter.
(c) Agreement to pay fees. Making a FOIA request shall be
considered an agreement by the requester to pay all applicable fees
chargeable under section 1820.7, up to and including the amount of
$25.00, unless the requester asks for a waiver of fees. When making a
request, a requester may specify a willingness to pay a greater or
lesser amount.
Sec. 1820.3 Consultations and referrals.
When OSC receives a FOIA request for a record in the agency's
possession, it may determine that another Federal agency is better able
to decide whether or not the record is exempt from disclosure under the
FOIA. If so, OSC will either: (1) respond to the request for the record
after consulting with the other agency and with any other agency that
has a substantial interest in the record; or (2) refer the
responsibility for responding to the request to the other agency deemed
better able to determine whether to disclose it. Consultations and
referrals will be handled according to the date that the FOIA request
was initially received by the first agency.
Sec. 1820.4 Timing of responses to requests.
(a) In general. OSC ordinarily will respond to FOIA requests
according to their order of receipt. In determining which records are
responsive to a request, OSC ordinarily will include only records in
its possession as of the date on which it begins its search for them.
If any other date is used, OSC will inform the requester of that date.
(b) Multitrack processing. (1) OSC may use two or more processing
tracks by distinguishing between simple and more complex requests based
on the amount of work and/or time needed to process the request.
(2) When using multitrack processing, OSC may provide requesters in
its slower track(s) with an opportunity to limit the scope of their
requests in order to qualify for faster processing within the specified
limits of the faster track(s).
(c) Expedited processing. (1) Requests and appeals will be taken
out of order and given expedited treatment whenever OSC has established
to its satisfaction that: (i) failure to obtain requested records on an
expedited basis could reasonably be expected to pose an imminent threat
to the life or physical safety of an individual; (ii) with respect to a
request made by a person primarily engaged in disseminating
information,
[[Page 18408]]
an urgency exists to inform the public about an actual or alleged
federal government activity; or (iii) records requested relate to an
appeal that is pending before, or that the requester faces an imminent
deadline for filing with, the Merit Systems Protection Board or other
administrative tribunal or a court of law, seeking personal relief
pursuant to a complaint filed by the requester with OSC, or referred to
OSC pursuant to title 38 of the U.S. Code.
(2) A request for expedited processing must be made in writing and
sent to OSC's FOIA Officer. Such a request will not be considered to
have been received until it reaches the FOIA Officer.
(3) A requester who seeks expedited processing must submit a
statement, certified to be true and correct to the best of that
person's knowledge and belief, explaining in detail the basis for
requesting expedited processing. For example, a requester within the
category described in paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, if not a
full-time member of the news media, must establish that he or she is a
person whose main professional activity or occupation is information
dissemination, though it need not be his or her sole occupation. The
formality of certification may be waived as a matter of OSC's
administrative discretion.
(4) OSC shall decide whether to grant a request for expedited
processing and notify the requester of its decision within 10 calendar
days of the FOIA Officer's receipt of the request. If the request for
expedited processing is granted, the request for records shall be
processed as soon as practicable. If a request for expedited processing
is denied, any administrative appeal of that decision shall be acted on
expeditiously.
(d) Aggregated requests. OSC may aggregate multiple requests by the
same requester, or by a group of requesters acting in concert, if it
reasonably believes that such requests actually constitute a single
request involving unusual circumstances, as defined by the FOIA,
supporting an extension of time to respond, and the requests involve
clearly related matters.
Sec. 1820.5 Responses to requests.
(a) General. Once OSC makes a determination to grant a FOIA request
for records, or makes an adverse determination denying a request in any
respect, it will notify the requester in writing. Adverse
determinations, or denials of requests, consist of: a determination to
withhold any requested record in whole or in part; a determination that
a requested record does not exist or cannot be located; a determination
that a record is not readily reproducible in the form or format sought
by the requester; a determination that what has been requested is not a
record subject to the FOIA; a determination on any disputed fee matter,
including a denial of a request for a fee waiver; and a denial of a
request for expedited treatment.
(b) Adverse determinations. A notification to a requester of an
adverse determination on a request shall include: (1) a brief statement
of the reason(s) for the denial of the request, including any FOIA
exemption applied by OSC in denying the request; and (2) a statement
that the denial may be appealed under section 1820.6(a), with a
description of the requirements of that subsection.
Sec. 1820.6 Appeals.
(a) Appeals of adverse determinations. A requester may appeal an
adverse determination denying a FOIA request in any respect to the
Legal Counsel and Policy Division, U.S. Office of Special Counsel, 1730
M Street, NW. (Suite 218), Washington, DC 20036-4505. The appeal must
be in writing, and sent by regular mail or by fax. The appeal must be
received by the Legal Counsel and Policy Division within 45 days of the
date of the letter denying the request. For the quickest possible
handling, the appeal letter and envelope or any fax cover sheet should
be clearly marked ``FOIA Appeal.'' The appeal letter may include as
much or as little related information as the requester wishes, as long
as it clearly identifies the OSC determination (including the assigned
FOIA request number, if known) being appealed. An appeal ordinarily
will not be acted on if the request becomes a matter of FOIA
litigation.
(b) Responses to appeals. The agency decision on an appeal will be
made in writing. A decision affirming an adverse determination in whole
or in part shall inform the requester of the provisions for judicial
review of that decision. If the adverse determination is reversed or
modified on appeal, in whole or in part, the requester will be notified
in a written decision and the request will be reprocessed in accordance
with that appeal decision.
Sec. 1820.7 Fees.
(a) In general. OSC shall charge for processing requests under the
FOIA in accordance with paragraph (c) of this section, except where
fees are limited under paragraph (d) of this section or where a waiver
or reduction of fees is granted under paragraph (k) of this section.
OSC may collect all applicable fees before sending copies of requested
records to a requester. Requesters must pay fees by check or money
order made payable to the Treasury of the United States.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section:
(1) ``'Commercial use' request'' means a request from or on behalf
of a person who seeks information for a use or purpose that furthers
his or her commercial, trade, or profit interests, which can include
furthering those interests through litigation. OSC shall determine,
whenever reasonably possible, the use to which a requester will put the
requested records. When it appears that the requester will put the
records to a commercial use, either because of the nature of the
request itself or because OSC has reasonable cause to doubt a
requester's stated use, OSC shall provide the requester with a
reasonable opportunity to submit further clarification.
(2) ``Direct costs'' means those expenses that OSC incurs in
searching for and duplicating (and, in the case of commercial use
requests, reviewing) records to respond to a FOIA request. Direct costs
include, for example, the salary of the employee performing the work
(the basic rate of pay for the employee plus 16 percent of that rate to
cover benefits) and the cost of operating duplicating equipment. Direct
costs do not include overhead expenses such as the costs of space, and
heating or lighting the facility in which the records are kept.
(3) ``Duplication'' means the process of making of a copy of a
record, or of the information contained in it, necessary to respond to
a FOIA request. Copies can take the form of paper, microform,
audiovisual materials, or electronic records (for example, on digital
data storage discs), among others.
(4) ``Educational institution'' means a preschool, a public or
private elementary or secondary school, an institution of undergraduate
higher education, an institution of graduate higher education, an
institution of professional education, or an institution of vocational
education, that operates a program of scholarly research. To be in this
category, a requester must show that the request is authorized by and
is made under the auspices of a qualifying institution and that the
records are not sought for a commercial use but are sought to further
scholarly research.
(5) ``Non-commercial scientific institution'' means an institution
that is not operated on a ``commercial'' basis, as that term is
referenced in paragraph (b)(1) of this section, and that is operated
solely for the purpose of conducting scientific research the
[[Page 18409]]
results of which are not intended to promote any particular product or
industry. To be in this category, a requester must show that the
request is authorized by and is made under the auspices of a qualifying
institution and that the records are not sought for a commercial use
but are sought to further scientific research.
(6) ``Representative of the news media'' or ``news media
requester'' means any person actively gathering news for an entity that
is organized and operated to publish or broadcast news to the public.
The term ``news'' means information that is about current events or
that would be of current interest to the public. Examples of news media
entities include television or radio stations broadcasting to the
public at large and publishers of periodicals (but only in those
instances where they can qualify as disseminators of ``news'') who make
their products available for purchase or subscription by the general
public. For ``freelance'' journalists to be regarded as working for a
news organization, they must demonstrate a solid basis for expecting
publication through that organization. A publication contract would be
the clearest proof, but OSC may also look to the past publication
record of a requester in making this determination. To be in this
category, a requester must not be seeking the requested records for a
commercial use. However, a request for records supporting the news-
dissemination function of the requester shall not be considered to be
for a commercial use.
(7) ``Review'' means the process of examining a record located in
response to a request in order to determine whether any portion of the
record is exempt from disclosure. It includes processing any record for
disclosure - for example, doing all that is necessary to redact it and
otherwise prepare it for disclosure. Review time also includes time
spent obtaining and considering any formal objection to disclosure made
by a business submitter under section 1820.8(f). It does not include
time spent resolving general legal or policy issues about the
application of exemptions. Review costs are properly charged in
connection with commercial use requests even if a record ultimately is
not disclosed.
(8) ``Search'' means the process of looking for and retrieving
records or information responsive to a request. It includes page-by-
page or line-by-line identification of information within records when
undertaken, and reasonable efforts to locate and retrieve information
from records maintained in electronic form or format, to the extent
that such efforts would not significantly interfere with the operation
of an automatic information system.
(c) Fees. In responding to FOIA requests, OSC shall charge the
following fees unless a waiver or reduction of fees has been granted
under paragraph (k) of this section:
(1) Search. (i) Search fees will be charged for all requests -
other than requests made by educational institutions, noncommercial
scientific institutions, or representatives of the news media - subject
to the limitations of paragraph (d) of this section. OSC may charge for
time spent searching even if it fails to locate responsive records, or
records located after a search are determined to be exempt from
disclosure.
(ii) For each quarter hour spent by clerical personnel in searching
for and retrieving a requested record, the fee will be $5.50. Where a
search and retrieval cannot be performed entirely by clerical personnel
- for example, where the identification of records within the scope of
a request requires the use of professional personnel - the fee will be
$9.00 for each quarter hour of search time spent by professional
personnel. Where the time of managerial personnel is required, the fee
will be $17.50 for each quarter hour of time spent by those personnel.
(iii) For electronic searches of records, requesters will be
charged the direct costs of conducting the search, including the costs
of operator/programmer staff time apportionable to the search.
(iv) For requests requiring the retrieval of records from any
Federal Records Center, additional costs may be charged in accordance
with the applicable billing schedule established by the National
Archives and Records Administration.
(2) Duplication. Duplication fees will be charged to all
requesters, subject to the limitations of paragraph (d) of this
section. For a standard paper photocopy of a record (no more than one
copy of which need be supplied), the fee will be 25 cents per page. For
copies produced by computer, such as discs or printouts, OSC will
charge the direct costs, including staff time, of producing the copy.
For other forms of duplication, OSC will charge the direct costs of
that duplication.
(3) Review. Review fees will be charged to requesters who make a
commercial use request. Review fees will be charged for only initial
record review - in other words, the review done when OSC analyzes
whether an exemption applies to a particular record or record portion
at the initial request level. No charge will be made for review at the
administrative appeal level for an exemption already applied. However,
records or record portions withheld under an exemption that is
subsequently determined not to apply may be reviewed again to determine
whether any other exemption not previously considered applies; the
costs of that review are chargeable where it is made necessary by such
a change of circumstances. Review fees will be charged at the same
rates as those charged for a search under paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this
section.
(d) Limitations on charging fees. (1) No search fee will be charged
for requests by educational institutions, noncommercial scientific
institutions, or representatives of the news media.
(2) No search fee or review fee will be charged for a quarter-hour
period unless more than half of that period is required for search or
review.
(3) Except for requesters seeking records for a commercial use, OSC
will provide without charge:
(i) The first 100 pages of duplication (or the cost equivalent);
and
(ii) The first two hours of search (or the cost equivalent).
(4) Whenever a total fee calculated under paragraph (c) of this
section is $20.00 or less for any request, no fee will be charged.
(5) The provisions of paragraphs (d)(3) and (d)(4) of this section
work together. This means that for requesters other than those seeking
records for a commercial use, no fee will be charged unless the cost of
search in excess of two hours plus the cost of duplication in excess of
100 pages totals more than $20.00.
(e) Notice of anticipated fees in excess of $25.00. When OSC
determines or estimates that the fees to be charged under this section
will amount to more than $25.00, OSC shall notify the requester of the
actual or estimated amount of the fees, unless the requester has
indicated a willingness to pay fees as high as those anticipated. If
only a portion of the fee can be estimated readily, OSC will advise the
requester that the estimated fee may be only a portion of the total
fee. In cases in which a requester has been notified that actual or
estimated fees amount to more than $25.00, the request shall not be
considered received and further work will not be done on it until the
requester agrees to pay the anticipated total fee. A notice under this
paragraph will offer the requester an opportunity to discuss the matter
with OSC in order to reformulate the request to meet the requester's
needs at a lower cost.
[[Page 18410]]
(f) Charges for other services. Apart from the other provisions of
this section, when OSC chooses as a matter of administrative discretion
to provide a special service-such as sending records by other than
ordinary mail-the direct costs of providing the service ordinarily will
be charged.
(g) Charging interest. OSC may charge interest on any unpaid fee
starting on the 31st day after the date of on which the billing was
sent to the requester. Interest charges will be assessed at the rate
provided in 31 U.S.C. 3717 and will accrue from the date of billing
until payment is received by OSC. OSC will follow the provisions of the
Debt Collection Act of 1982 (Public Law 97-365, 96 Stat. 1749), as
amended by the Debt Collection Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-134, 110
Stat. 1321-358), and its administrative procedures, including the use
of consumer reporting agencies, collection agencies, and offset.
(h) Aggregating requests. Where OSC reasonably believes that a
requester or a group of requesters acting together is attempting to
divide a request into a series of requests that otherwise could have
been submitted as a single request, for the purpose of avoiding fees,
OSC may aggregate those requests and charge accordingly. OSC may
presume that multiple requests of this type made within a 30-day period
have been made in order to avoid fees. Where requests are separated by
a longer period, OSC will aggregate them only where a reasonable basis
exists for determining that aggregation is warranted under all of the
circumstances involved. Multiple requests involving unrelated matters
will not be aggregated.
(i) Advance payments. (1) For requests other than those described
in paragraphs (i)(2) and (i)(3) of this section, OSC will not require
the requester to make an advance payment before work is begun or
continued on a request. Payment owed for work already completed (that
is, pre-payment after processing a request but before copies are sent
to the requester) is not an advance payment.
(2) Where OSC determines or estimates that a total fee to be
charged under this section will be more than $250.00, it may require
the requester to make an advance payment of an amount up to the amount
of the entire anticipated fee before beginning to process the request,
except where it receives a satisfactory assurance of full payment from
a requester who has a history of prompt payment.
(3) Where a requester has previously failed to pay a properly
charged FOIA fee to any agency within 30 days of the date of billing,
OSC may require the requester to pay the full amount due, plus any
applicable interest, and to make an advance payment of the full amount
of any anticipated fee, before OSC begins to process a new request or
continues to process a pending request from that requester.
(4) In cases in which OSC requires advance payment or payment due
under paragraph (i)(2) or (3) of this section, the request shall not be
considered received and further work will not be done on the request
until the required payment is received.
(j) Other statutes specifically providing for fees. The fee
schedule of this section does not apply to fees charged under any
statute that specifically requires an agency to set and collect fees
for particular types of records. Where records responsive to requests
are maintained for distribution by agencies operating such statutorily
based fee schedule programs, OSC will provide contact information for
use by requesters in obtaining records from those sources.
(k) Requirements for waiver or reduction of fees. (1) Records
responsive to a request shall be furnished without charge or at a
charge reduced below that established under paragraph (c) of this
section where OSC determines, based on all available information, that
the requester has demonstrated that:
(i) Disclosure of the requested information is in the public
interest because it is likely to contribute significantly to public
understanding of the operations or activities of the government, and
(ii) Disclosure of the information is not primarily in the
commercial interest of the requester.
(2) To determine whether the first fee waiver requirement is met,
OSC will consider the following factors:
(i) The subject of the request: Whether the subject of the
requested records concerns ``the operations or activities of the
government.'' The subject of the requested records must concern
identifiable operations or activities of the federal government, with a
connection that is direct and clear, not remote or attenuated.
(ii) The informative value of the information to be disclosed:
Whether the disclosure is ``likely to contribute'' to an understanding
of government operations or activities. The disclosable portions of the
requested records must be meaningfully informative about government
operations or activities in order to be ``likely to contribute'' to an
increased public understanding of those operations or activities. The
disclosure of information that already is in the public domain, in
either a duplicative or a substantially identical form, would not be as
likely to contribute to such understanding where nothing new would be
added to the public's understanding.
(iii) The contribution to an understanding of the subject by the
public likely to result from disclosure: Whether disclosure of the
requested information will contribute to ``public understanding.'' The
disclosure must contribute to the understanding of a reasonably broad
audience of persons interested in the subject, as opposed to the
individual understanding of the requester. A requester's expertise in
the subject area and ability and intention to effectively convey
information to the public shall be considered. It shall be presumed
that a representative of the news media satisfies this consideration.
(iv) The significance of the contribution to public understanding:
Whether the disclosure is likely to contribute ``significantly'' to
public understanding of government operations or activities. The
public's understanding of the subject in question, as compared to the
level of public understanding existing prior to the disclosure, must be
enhanced by the disclosure to a significant extent. OSC shall not make
value judgments about whether information that would contribute
significantly to public understanding of the operations or activities
of the government is ``important'' enough to be made public.
(3) To determine whether the second fee waiver requirement is met,
OSC will consider the following factors:
(i) The existence and magnitude of a commercial interest: Whether
the requester has a commercial interest that would be furthered by the
requested disclosure. OSC shall consider any commercial interest of the
requester (with reference to the definition of ``commercial use'' in
paragraph (b)(1) of this section), or of any person on whose behalf the
requester may be acting, that would be furthered by the requested
disclosure. Requesters shall be given an opportunity to provide
explanatory information about this consideration.
(ii) The primary interest in disclosure: Whether any identified
commercial interest of the requester is sufficiently large, in
comparison with the public interest in disclosure, that disclosure is
``primarily in the commercial interest of the requester.'' A fee waiver
or reduction is justified where the public interest standard is
satisfied and that public interest is greater in magnitude than that of
any identified commercial interest in disclosure. OSC ordinarily shall
presume that where a news media requester has satisfied the public
[[Page 18411]]
interest standard, the public interest will be the interest primarily
served by disclosure to that requester. Disclosure to data brokers or
others who merely compile and market government information for direct
economic return shall not be presumed to primarily serve the public
interest.
(4) Where only some of the records to be released satisfy the
requirements for a waiver of fees, a waiver shall be granted for those
records.
(5) Requests for the waiver or reduction of fees should address the
factors listed in paragraphs (k)(2) and (3) of this section, insofar as
they apply to each request. OSC will exercise its discretion to
consider the cost-effectiveness of its investment of administrative
resources in this decision making process, however, in deciding to
grant waivers or reductions of fees.
Sec. 1820.8 Business information.
(a) In general. Business information obtained by OSC from a
submitter will be disclosed under the FOIA only under this section.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section:
(1) ``Business information'' means commercial or financial
information obtained by OSC from a submitter that may be protected from
disclosure under exemption 4 of the FOIA.
(2) ``Submitter'' means any person or entity from whom the OSC
obtains business information, directly or indirectly. The term includes
corporations, and state, local, tribal and foreign governments.
(c) Designation of business information. A submitter of business
information will use good-faith efforts to designate, by appropriate
markings, either at the time of submission or at a reasonable time
thereafter, any portion of its submission that it considers to be
protected from disclosure under exemption 4. These designations will
expire 10 years after the date of the submission unless the submitter
requests, and provides justification for, a longer designation period.
(d) Notice to submitters. OSC shall provide a submitter with prompt
written notice of a FOIA request or administrative appeal that seeks
its business information wherever required under paragraph (e) of this
section, except as provided in paragraph (h) of this section, in order
to give the submitter an opportunity to object to disclosure of any
specified portion of that information under paragraph (f) of this
section. The notice shall either describe the business information
requested or include copies of the requested records or record portions
containing the information. When notification of a voluminous number of
submitters is required, notification may be made by posting or
publishing the notice in a place reasonably likely to accomplish it.
(e) When notice is required. Notice shall be given to a submitter
wherever:
(1) The information has been designated in good faith by the
submitter as information considered protected from disclosure under
exemption 4; or
(2) OSC has reason to believe that the information may be protected
from disclosure under exemption 4.
(f) Opportunity to object to disclosure. OSC will allow a submitter
a reasonable time to respond to the notice described in paragraph (d)
of this section and will specify that time period within the notice. If
a submitter has any objection to disclosure, it is required to submit a
detailed written statement. The statement must specify all grounds for
withholding any portion of the information under any exemption of the
FOIA and, in the case of exemption 4, it must show why the information
is a trade secret or commercial or financial information that is
privileged or confidential. If a submitter fails to respond to the
notice within the time specified in it, the submitter will be
considered to have no objection to disclosure of the information.
Information provided by the submitter that is not received by OSC until
after its disclosure decision has been made shall not be considered by
OSC. Information provided by a submitter under this paragraph may
itself be subject to disclosure under the FOIA.
(g) Notice of intent to disclose. OSC shall consider a submitter's
objections and specific grounds for nondisclosure in deciding whether
to disclose business information. Whenever OSC decides to disclose
business information over the objection of a submitter, OSC shall give
the submitter written notice, which shall include:
(1) A statement of the reason(s) why each of the submitter's
disclosure objections was not sustained;
(2) A description of the business information to be disclosed; and
(3) A specified disclosure date, which shall be a reasonable time
subsequent to the notice.
(h) Exceptions to notice requirements. The notice requirements of
paragraphs (d) and (g) of this section shall not apply if:
(1) OSC determines that the information should not be disclosed;
(2) The information lawfully has been published or has been
officially made available to the public;
(3) Disclosure of the information is required by statute (other
than the FOIA) or by a regulation issued in accordance with the
requirements of Executive Order 12600; or
(4) The designation made by the submitter under paragraph (c) of
this section appears obviously frivolous - except that, in such a case,
OSC shall, within a reasonable time prior to a specified disclosure
date, give the submitter written notice of any final decision to
disclose the information.
(i) Notice of FOIA lawsuit. Whenever a requester files a lawsuit
seeking to compel the disclosure of business information, OSC shall
promptly notify the submitter.
(j) Corresponding notice to requesters. Whenever OSC provides a
submitter with notice and an opportunity to object to disclosure under
paragraph (d) of this section, OSC shall also notify the requester(s).
Whenever OSC notifies a submitter of its intent to disclose requested
information under paragraph (g) of this section, OSC shall also notify
the requester(s). Whenever a submitter files a lawsuit seeking to
prevent the disclosure of business information, OSC shall notify the
requester(s).
Sec. 1820.9 Other rights and services.
Nothing in this part shall be construed to entitle any person, as
of right, to any service or to the disclosure of any record to which
such person is not entitled under the FOIA.
Sec. 1820.10 Production of official records or testimony in legal
proceedings.
No employee or former employee of the Office of Special Counsel
shall, in response to a demand of a court or other authority, produce
or disclose any information or records acquired as part of the
performance of his official duties or because of his official status
without the prior approval of the Special Counsel or the Special
Counsel's duly authorized designee.
Dated: April 3, 2007
Scott J. Bloch,
Special Counsel.
[FR Doc. E7-6774 Filed 4-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7405-01-S