Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Tennessee: Approval of Revisions to the Knox County Portion of the Tennessee State Implementation Plan, 18389-18391 [E7-6717]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Rules and Regulations 9.3 Live Animals * * * * * 9.3.4 Adult Fowl [Revise 9.3.4 as follows:] Disease-free adult fowl may be mailed domestically when shipped under applicable law in accordance with 601.1.7. Adult chickens, turkeys, guinea fowl, doves, pigeons, pheasants, partridges, and quail as well as ducks, geese, and swans are mailable as follows: a. The mailer must send adult fowl by Express Mail in secure containers approved by the manager of Mailing Standards (see 608.8.0 for address). b. The number of birds per parcel must follow the container manufacturer limits and each bird must weigh more than 6 ounces. c. Indemnity may be paid only for loss, damage, or rifling, and not for death of the birds in transit if there is no visible damage to the mailing container. [Delete 9.3.5, Adult Chickens, and renumber 9.3.6 through 9.3.13 as new 9.3.5 through 9.3.12.] * * * * * Neva R. Watson, Attorney, Legislative. [FR Doc. E7–6529 Filed 4–11–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–12–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R04–OAR–2006–0787–200621(a); FRL–8297–4] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Tennessee: Approval of Revisions to the Knox County Portion of the Tennessee State Implementation Plan Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES AGENCY: SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Tennessee, through Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), on August 18, 1999 and July 16, 2001. The revisions pertain to the Knox County portion of the Tennessee SIP and include changes to the Knox County Air Quality Regulations (KCAQR) Section 51.0—Standards for Cement Kilns. These standards set nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions control, compliance demonstration, certification, record keeping, and reporting VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:18 Apr 11, 2007 Jkt 211001 requirements for Portland cement kilns in the County. The revisions were initially reviewed by TDEC, which found them to be as stringent as the State’s requirements. The proposed changes are part of the Knox County strategy to meet the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) by reducing the emissions of NOX, a precursor of ozone formation. Because of the harmful health effects of ozone, EPA limits the amount of volatile organic compounds and NOX that can be released into the atmosphere. This action is being taken pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA). DATES: This direct final rule is effective June 11, 2007 without further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by May 14, 2007. If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04– OAR–2006–0787 by one of the following methods: 1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. 2. E-mail: louis.egide@epa.gov. 3. Fax: (404) 562–9019. 4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2006– 0787,’’ Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. 5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Dr. Egide Louis, Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division 12 floor U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office’s normal hours of operation. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2006– 0787. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or e-mail, information that you consider to be CBI PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 18389 or otherwise protected. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at https:// www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm. Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays. Dr. Egide Louis, Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The telephone number is (404) 562–9240. Dr. Louis can also be reached via electronic mail at louis.egide@epa.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM 12APR1 18390 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Rules and Regulations I. Background On October 27, 1998, EPA published a final rule known as ‘‘NOX SIP Call.’’ (see 63 FR 57356). The NOX SIP Call requires 22 states, including the State of Tennessee, and the District of Columbia to meet statewide NOX emission budgets during the ozone season in order to reduce the amount of ground-level ozone that is transported across the eastern United States. The amounts of required reductions in NOX emissions were set to equal the amounts that would be achieved by applying highly cost-effective control measures to source categories available in each state. The source categories identified and regulated in the NOX SIP Call are electric generating units, non-electric generating units, internal combustion engines, and cement kilns. In order to meet NOX SIP Call requirements, the State of Tennessee submitted SIP revisions to EPA for approval on November 7, 2000, and additional materials on January 11, 2001 and October 04, 2001. These revisions established a NOX allowance trading program for large electrical generating and industrial units, and NOX reductions for cement kilns. To reduce NOX emissions from cement kilns, the State proposed the addition of State Rule 1200–3–27–.04—Standards for Cement Kilns. EPA approved these revisions to Tennessee SIP on January 22, 2004. (See 69 FR 3015). This document addresses Knox County request to add a rule in the Knox County portion of the Tennessee SIP that is similar to the State’s. rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES II. Analysis of State Submittals On August 18, 1999, and July 16, 2001, the State of Tennessee, through TDEC, submitted revisions to the Tennessee SIP. The revisions pertain to the Knox County portion of the Tennessee SIP and include changes to KCAQR Section 51.0—Standards for Cement Kilns. These revisions were initially submitted by Knox County for review by TDEC, which found them to be as or more stringent than State’s requirements. After conducting its own review of these revisions, EPA concurs with TDEC’s finding. The rule changes became State effective on August 12, 1999 and July 11, 2001, respectively and are part of the Knox County’s strategy to attain and maintain the NAAQS. They are approvable into the Knox County portion of the Tennessee SIP pursuant to section 110 of the CAA. The August 18, 1999 SIP revisions proposed the addition of a new section to KCAQR, Section 51.0—Standards for Cement Kilns. The rules in this section VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:18 Apr 11, 2007 Jkt 211001 were designed to reduce NOX emissions by setting emissions control, compliance demonstration, certification, record keeping, and reporting requirements for Portland cement kilns in the County. In the July 16, 2001 SIP Submittal, Knox County proposed changes to KCAQR, Section 51.0 by adopting the same language used in the State’s air regulations. For example, the County eliminated the definitions for the terms ‘‘shutdown’’ and ‘‘startup’’ as related Portland cement kilns in the original rule because they were not found in the State’s rule on ‘‘Standards for Cement Kilns’’. III. Final Action EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to the Knox County portion of the Tennessee SIP. EPA has reviewed the Knox County’s justification concerning the addition of the standards for cement kilns into the Knox County portion of the Tennessee SIP and concurs with the changes. EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective June 11, 2007 without further notice, unless the Agency receives adverse comments by May 14, 2007. If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a notice withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public is advised that this rule will be effective on June 11, 2007 and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment. III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews: Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and therefore is not subject to review by the PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Office of Management and Budget. For this reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4). This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant. In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM 12APR1 18391 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Rules and Regulations section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 11, 2007. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: March 29, 2007. J.I. Palmer, Regional Administrator, Region 4. I 40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: PART 52—[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: I Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart RR Tennessee 2. Section 52.2220(c) is amended by adding the entry ‘‘Section 51.0’’ in Table 3 of the Knox County portion of the Tennessee State Implementation Plan to read as follows: I § 52.2220 * Identification of plan. * * (c) * * * * * TABLE 3.—EPA APPROVED KNOX COUNTY, REGULATIONS State effective date State citation Title/subject * * 51.0 .......................................... * Standards for Cement Kilns ... * * * * * * * * [FR Doc. E7–6717 Filed 4–11–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R05–OAR–2006–0779; FRL–8296–3] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Wisconsin; Prevention of Significant Deterioration Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule. rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES AGENCY: SUMMARY: EPA is revising the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to give the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) full regulatory responsibility for EPA-issued Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permits. WDNR has the necessary state legislative authority to take responsibility for the permits, and has demonstrated that it has adequate VerDate Aug<31>2005 14:18 Apr 11, 2007 * 07/11/01 Jkt 211001 EPA approval date * 04/12/2007 [Insert citation of publication]. * PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 * * * * resources to maintain oversight of these permits. DATES: This direct final rule will be effective June 11, 2007, unless EPA receives adverse comments by May 14, 2007. If adverse comments are received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule in the Federal Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05– OAR–2006–0779, by one of the following methods: • www.regulations.gov: Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. • E-mail: blakley.pamela@epa.gov. • Fax: (312) 886–5824. • Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. • Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office normal hours Explanation * of operation, and special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The Regional Office official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays. Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2006– 0779. EPA’s policy is that all comments received will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available online at https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your email address will be automatically E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM 12APR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 70 (Thursday, April 12, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18389-18391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6717]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2006-0787-200621(a); FRL-8297-4]


Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Tennessee: 
Approval of Revisions to the Knox County Portion of the Tennessee State 
Implementation Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to the State Implementation Plan 
(SIP) submitted by the State of Tennessee, through Tennessee Department 
of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), on August 18, 1999 and July 16, 
2001. The revisions pertain to the Knox County portion of the Tennessee 
SIP and include changes to the Knox County Air Quality Regulations 
(KCAQR) Section 51.0--Standards for Cement Kilns. These standards set 
nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions control, compliance 
demonstration, certification, record keeping, and reporting 
requirements for Portland cement kilns in the County. The revisions 
were initially reviewed by TDEC, which found them to be as stringent as 
the State's requirements. The proposed changes are part of the Knox 
County strategy to meet the national ambient air quality standards 
(NAAQS) by reducing the emissions of NOX, a precursor of 
ozone formation. Because of the harmful health effects of ozone, EPA 
limits the amount of volatile organic compounds and NOX that 
can be released into the atmosphere. This action is being taken 
pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: This direct final rule is effective June 11, 2007 without 
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by May 14, 2007. If 
adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of 
the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public 
that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2006-0787 by one of the following methods:
    1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the online instructions for 
submitting comments.
    2. E-mail: louis.egide@epa.gov.
    3. Fax: (404) 562-9019.
    4. Mail: ``EPA-R04-OAR-2006-0787,'' Regulatory Development Section, 
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, 
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW, 
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
    5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Dr. Egide Louis, Regulatory 
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 
Management Division 12 floor U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such 
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours 
of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business are 
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal 
holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R04-OAR-
2006-0787. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included 
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at 
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, 
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential 
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is 
restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or e-
mail, information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected. 
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' systems, 
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information 
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov, 
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part 
of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available 
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends 
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of 
your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read 
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for 
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic 
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of 
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional 
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center 
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the 
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some 
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such 
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket 
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or 
in hard copy at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning 
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. 
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., 
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you 
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official 
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. 
excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Egide Louis, Regulatory 
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics 
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number 
is (404) 562-9240. Dr. Louis can also be reached via electronic mail at 
louis.egide@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

[[Page 18390]]

I. Background

    On October 27, 1998, EPA published a final rule known as 
``NOX SIP Call.'' (see 63 FR 57356). The NOX SIP 
Call requires 22 states, including the State of Tennessee, and the 
District of Columbia to meet statewide NOX emission budgets 
during the ozone season in order to reduce the amount of ground-level 
ozone that is transported across the eastern United States. The amounts 
of required reductions in NOX emissions were set to equal 
the amounts that would be achieved by applying highly cost-effective 
control measures to source categories available in each state. The 
source categories identified and regulated in the NOX SIP 
Call are electric generating units, non-electric generating units, 
internal combustion engines, and cement kilns.
    In order to meet NOX SIP Call requirements, the State of 
Tennessee submitted SIP revisions to EPA for approval on November 7, 
2000, and additional materials on January 11, 2001 and October 04, 
2001. These revisions established a NOX allowance trading 
program for large electrical generating and industrial units, and 
NOX reductions for cement kilns. To reduce NOX 
emissions from cement kilns, the State proposed the addition of State 
Rule 1200-3-27-.04--Standards for Cement Kilns. EPA approved these 
revisions to Tennessee SIP on January 22, 2004. (See 69 FR 3015). This 
document addresses Knox County request to add a rule in the Knox County 
portion of the Tennessee SIP that is similar to the State's.

II. Analysis of State Submittals

    On August 18, 1999, and July 16, 2001, the State of Tennessee, 
through TDEC, submitted revisions to the Tennessee SIP. The revisions 
pertain to the Knox County portion of the Tennessee SIP and include 
changes to KCAQR Section 51.0--Standards for Cement Kilns. These 
revisions were initially submitted by Knox County for review by TDEC, 
which found them to be as or more stringent than State's requirements. 
After conducting its own review of these revisions, EPA concurs with 
TDEC's finding. The rule changes became State effective on August 12, 
1999 and July 11, 2001, respectively and are part of the Knox County's 
strategy to attain and maintain the NAAQS. They are approvable into the 
Knox County portion of the Tennessee SIP pursuant to section 110 of the 
CAA.
    The August 18, 1999 SIP revisions proposed the addition of a new 
section to KCAQR, Section 51.0--Standards for Cement Kilns. The rules 
in this section were designed to reduce NOX emissions by 
setting emissions control, compliance demonstration, certification, 
record keeping, and reporting requirements for Portland cement kilns in 
the County. In the July 16, 2001 SIP Submittal, Knox County proposed 
changes to KCAQR, Section 51.0 by adopting the same language used in 
the State's air regulations. For example, the County eliminated the 
definitions for the terms ``shutdown'' and ``startup'' as related 
Portland cement kilns in the original rule because they were not found 
in the State's rule on ``Standards for Cement Kilns''.

III. Final Action

    EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to the Knox County 
portion of the Tennessee SIP. EPA has reviewed the Knox County's 
justification concerning the addition of the standards for cement kilns 
into the Knox County portion of the Tennessee SIP and concurs with the 
changes.
    EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the 
Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no 
adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this 
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document 
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should 
adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective June 11, 2007 
without further notice, unless the Agency receives adverse comments by 
May 14, 2007.
    If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a notice 
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will 
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in 
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not 
institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting 
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public 
is advised that this rule will be effective on June 11, 2007 and no 
further action will be taken on the proposed rule. Please note that if 
we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of 
this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of 
the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are 
not the subject of an adverse comment.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews:

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this 
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not 
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this 
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211, 
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy 
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action 
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes 
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. 
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because 
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does 
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by 
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will 
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on 
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or 
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism 
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the 
states, on the relationship between the national government and the 
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the 
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule 
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or 
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA. 
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of 
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this 
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State 
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to 
disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be 
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP 
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise 
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of

[[Page 18391]]

section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act 
of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an 
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork 
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as 
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency 
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy 
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller 
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this 
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House 
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States 
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule 
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
section 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review 
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for 
the appropriate circuit by June 11, 2007. Filing a petition for 
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect 
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does 
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be 
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. 
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its 
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide, 
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: March 29, 2007.
J.I. Palmer,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.

0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart RR Tennessee

0
2. Section 52.2220(c) is amended by adding the entry ``Section 51.0'' 
in Table 3 of the Knox County portion of the Tennessee State 
Implementation Plan to read as follows:


Sec.  52.2220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                 Table 3.--EPA Approved Knox County, Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            State
          State citation               Title/subject      effective     EPA approval date        Explanation
                                                             date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
51.0.............................  Standards for Cement     07/11/01  04/12/2007 [Insert    ....................
                                    Kilns.                             citation of
                                                                       publication].
 
                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
 [FR Doc. E7-6717 Filed 4-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.