Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Tennessee: Approval of Revisions to the Knox County Portion of the Tennessee State Implementation Plan, 18389-18391 [E7-6717]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
9.3
Live Animals
*
*
*
*
*
9.3.4 Adult Fowl
[Revise 9.3.4 as follows:]
Disease-free adult fowl may be mailed
domestically when shipped under
applicable law in accordance with
601.1.7. Adult chickens, turkeys, guinea
fowl, doves, pigeons, pheasants,
partridges, and quail as well as ducks,
geese, and swans are mailable as
follows:
a. The mailer must send adult fowl by
Express Mail in secure containers
approved by the manager of Mailing
Standards (see 608.8.0 for address).
b. The number of birds per parcel
must follow the container manufacturer
limits and each bird must weigh more
than 6 ounces.
c. Indemnity may be paid only for
loss, damage, or rifling, and not for
death of the birds in transit if there is
no visible damage to the mailing
container.
[Delete 9.3.5, Adult Chickens, and
renumber 9.3.6 through 9.3.13 as new
9.3.5 through 9.3.12.]
*
*
*
*
*
Neva R. Watson,
Attorney, Legislative.
[FR Doc. E7–6529 Filed 4–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2006–0787–200621(a);
FRL–8297–4]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Tennessee:
Approval of Revisions to the Knox
County Portion of the Tennessee State
Implementation Plan
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to
the State Implementation Plan (SIP)
submitted by the State of Tennessee,
through Tennessee Department of
Environment and Conservation (TDEC),
on August 18, 1999 and July 16, 2001.
The revisions pertain to the Knox
County portion of the Tennessee SIP
and include changes to the Knox County
Air Quality Regulations (KCAQR)
Section 51.0—Standards for Cement
Kilns. These standards set nitrogen
oxides (NOX) emissions control,
compliance demonstration, certification,
record keeping, and reporting
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:18 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
requirements for Portland cement kilns
in the County. The revisions were
initially reviewed by TDEC, which
found them to be as stringent as the
State’s requirements. The proposed
changes are part of the Knox County
strategy to meet the national ambient air
quality standards (NAAQS) by reducing
the emissions of NOX, a precursor of
ozone formation. Because of the harmful
health effects of ozone, EPA limits the
amount of volatile organic compounds
and NOX that can be released into the
atmosphere. This action is being taken
pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air
Act (CAA).
DATES: This direct final rule is effective
June 11, 2007 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse comment
by May 14, 2007. If adverse comment is
received, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal of the direct final rule in the
Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2006–0787 by one of the following
methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
2. E-mail: louis.egide@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562–9019.
4. Mail: ‘‘EPA–R04–OAR–2006–
0787,’’ Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Dr. Egide
Louis, Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division 12 floor
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the
Regional Office’s normal hours of
operation. The Regional Office’s official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R04–OAR–2006–
0787. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit through
www.regulations.gov or e-mail,
information that you consider to be CBI
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18389
or otherwise protected. The
www.regulations.gov Web site is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through
www.regulations.gov, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses. For additional information
about EPA’s public docket visit the EPA
Docket Center homepage at https://
www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays.
Dr.
Egide Louis, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street,
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The
telephone number is (404) 562–9240.
Dr. Louis can also be reached via
electronic mail at louis.egide@epa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
18390
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
I. Background
On October 27, 1998, EPA published
a final rule known as ‘‘NOX SIP Call.’’
(see 63 FR 57356). The NOX SIP Call
requires 22 states, including the State of
Tennessee, and the District of Columbia
to meet statewide NOX emission budgets
during the ozone season in order to
reduce the amount of ground-level
ozone that is transported across the
eastern United States. The amounts of
required reductions in NOX emissions
were set to equal the amounts that
would be achieved by applying highly
cost-effective control measures to source
categories available in each state. The
source categories identified and
regulated in the NOX SIP Call are
electric generating units, non-electric
generating units, internal combustion
engines, and cement kilns.
In order to meet NOX SIP Call
requirements, the State of Tennessee
submitted SIP revisions to EPA for
approval on November 7, 2000, and
additional materials on January 11, 2001
and October 04, 2001. These revisions
established a NOX allowance trading
program for large electrical generating
and industrial units, and NOX
reductions for cement kilns. To reduce
NOX emissions from cement kilns, the
State proposed the addition of State
Rule 1200–3–27–.04—Standards for
Cement Kilns. EPA approved these
revisions to Tennessee SIP on January
22, 2004. (See 69 FR 3015). This
document addresses Knox County
request to add a rule in the Knox County
portion of the Tennessee SIP that is
similar to the State’s.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES
II. Analysis of State Submittals
On August 18, 1999, and July 16,
2001, the State of Tennessee, through
TDEC, submitted revisions to the
Tennessee SIP. The revisions pertain to
the Knox County portion of the
Tennessee SIP and include changes to
KCAQR Section 51.0—Standards for
Cement Kilns. These revisions were
initially submitted by Knox County for
review by TDEC, which found them to
be as or more stringent than State’s
requirements. After conducting its own
review of these revisions, EPA concurs
with TDEC’s finding. The rule changes
became State effective on August 12,
1999 and July 11, 2001, respectively and
are part of the Knox County’s strategy to
attain and maintain the NAAQS. They
are approvable into the Knox County
portion of the Tennessee SIP pursuant
to section 110 of the CAA.
The August 18, 1999 SIP revisions
proposed the addition of a new section
to KCAQR, Section 51.0—Standards for
Cement Kilns. The rules in this section
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:18 Apr 11, 2007
Jkt 211001
were designed to reduce NOX emissions
by setting emissions control,
compliance demonstration, certification,
record keeping, and reporting
requirements for Portland cement kilns
in the County. In the July 16, 2001 SIP
Submittal, Knox County proposed
changes to KCAQR, Section 51.0 by
adopting the same language used in the
State’s air regulations. For example, the
County eliminated the definitions for
the terms ‘‘shutdown’’ and ‘‘startup’’ as
related Portland cement kilns in the
original rule because they were not
found in the State’s rule on ‘‘Standards
for Cement Kilns’’.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the aforementioned
changes to the Knox County portion of
the Tennessee SIP. EPA has reviewed
the Knox County’s justification
concerning the addition of the standards
for cement kilns into the Knox County
portion of the Tennessee SIP and
concurs with the changes.
EPA is publishing this rule without
prior proposal because the Agency
views this as a noncontroversial
submittal and anticipates no adverse
comments. However, in the proposed
rules section of this Federal Register
publication, EPA is publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposal to approve the SIP revision
should adverse comments be filed. This
rule will be effective June 11, 2007
without further notice, unless the
Agency receives adverse comments by
May 14, 2007.
If EPA receives such comments, then
EPA will publish a notice withdrawing
the final rule and informing the public
that the rule will not take effect. All
public comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule
based on the proposed rule. The EPA
will not institute a second comment
period. Parties interested in
commenting should do so at this time.
If no such comments are received, the
public is advised that this rule will be
effective on June 11, 2007 and no
further action will be taken on the
proposed rule. Please note that if we
receive adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be
severed from the remainder of the rule,
we may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an
adverse comment.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews:
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the states,
on the relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
CAA. This rule also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. In this context, in the absence
of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the CAA. Thus, the requirements of
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
18391
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 70 / Thursday, April 12, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not
apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by June 11, 2007. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 29, 2007.
J.I. Palmer,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
I
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart RR
Tennessee
2. Section 52.2220(c) is amended by
adding the entry ‘‘Section 51.0’’ in Table
3 of the Knox County portion of the
Tennessee State Implementation Plan to
read as follows:
I
§ 52.2220
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
TABLE 3.—EPA APPROVED KNOX COUNTY, REGULATIONS
State effective date
State citation
Title/subject
*
*
51.0 ..........................................
*
Standards for Cement Kilns ...
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–6717 Filed 4–11–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2006–0779; FRL–8296–3]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Wisconsin; Prevention of Significant
Deterioration
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
rmajette on PROD1PC67 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is revising the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) to give the
Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources (WDNR) full regulatory
responsibility for EPA-issued
Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD) permits. WDNR has the necessary
state legislative authority to take
responsibility for the permits, and has
demonstrated that it has adequate
VerDate Aug<31>2005
14:18 Apr 11, 2007
*
07/11/01
Jkt 211001
EPA approval date
*
04/12/2007 [Insert citation of
publication].
*
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
resources to maintain oversight of these
permits.
DATES: This direct final rule will be
effective June 11, 2007, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by May 14,
2007. If adverse comments are received,
EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2006–0779, by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: blakley.pamela@epa.gov.
• Fax: (312) 886–5824.
• Mail: Pamela Blakley, Chief, Air
Permits Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
• Hand Delivery: Pamela Blakley,
Chief, Air Permits Section, Air Programs
Branch (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Regional Office normal hours
Explanation
*
of operation, and special arrangements
should be made for deliveries of boxed
information. The Regional Office official
hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding
Federal holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. EPA–R05–OAR–2006–
0779. EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or e-mail. The www.regulations.gov Web
site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system,
which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your
comment. If you send an e-mail
comment directly to EPA without going
through www.regulations.gov your email address will be automatically
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 70 (Thursday, April 12, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18389-18391]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6717]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2006-0787-200621(a); FRL-8297-4]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Tennessee:
Approval of Revisions to the Knox County Portion of the Tennessee State
Implementation Plan
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving revisions to the State Implementation Plan
(SIP) submitted by the State of Tennessee, through Tennessee Department
of Environment and Conservation (TDEC), on August 18, 1999 and July 16,
2001. The revisions pertain to the Knox County portion of the Tennessee
SIP and include changes to the Knox County Air Quality Regulations
(KCAQR) Section 51.0--Standards for Cement Kilns. These standards set
nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions control, compliance
demonstration, certification, record keeping, and reporting
requirements for Portland cement kilns in the County. The revisions
were initially reviewed by TDEC, which found them to be as stringent as
the State's requirements. The proposed changes are part of the Knox
County strategy to meet the national ambient air quality standards
(NAAQS) by reducing the emissions of NOX, a precursor of
ozone formation. Because of the harmful health effects of ozone, EPA
limits the amount of volatile organic compounds and NOX that
can be released into the atmosphere. This action is being taken
pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This direct final rule is effective June 11, 2007 without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by May 14, 2007. If
adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2006-0787 by one of the following methods:
1. www.regulations.gov: Follow the online instructions for
submitting comments.
2. E-mail: louis.egide@epa.gov.
3. Fax: (404) 562-9019.
4. Mail: ``EPA-R04-OAR-2006-0787,'' Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Dr. Egide Louis, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division 12 floor U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours
of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal
holidays.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-R04-OAR-
2006-0787. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit through www.regulations.gov or e-
mail, information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' systems,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov,
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at https://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.
Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official
hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Egide Louis, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number
is (404) 562-9240. Dr. Louis can also be reached via electronic mail at
louis.egide@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 18390]]
I. Background
On October 27, 1998, EPA published a final rule known as
``NOX SIP Call.'' (see 63 FR 57356). The NOX SIP
Call requires 22 states, including the State of Tennessee, and the
District of Columbia to meet statewide NOX emission budgets
during the ozone season in order to reduce the amount of ground-level
ozone that is transported across the eastern United States. The amounts
of required reductions in NOX emissions were set to equal
the amounts that would be achieved by applying highly cost-effective
control measures to source categories available in each state. The
source categories identified and regulated in the NOX SIP
Call are electric generating units, non-electric generating units,
internal combustion engines, and cement kilns.
In order to meet NOX SIP Call requirements, the State of
Tennessee submitted SIP revisions to EPA for approval on November 7,
2000, and additional materials on January 11, 2001 and October 04,
2001. These revisions established a NOX allowance trading
program for large electrical generating and industrial units, and
NOX reductions for cement kilns. To reduce NOX
emissions from cement kilns, the State proposed the addition of State
Rule 1200-3-27-.04--Standards for Cement Kilns. EPA approved these
revisions to Tennessee SIP on January 22, 2004. (See 69 FR 3015). This
document addresses Knox County request to add a rule in the Knox County
portion of the Tennessee SIP that is similar to the State's.
II. Analysis of State Submittals
On August 18, 1999, and July 16, 2001, the State of Tennessee,
through TDEC, submitted revisions to the Tennessee SIP. The revisions
pertain to the Knox County portion of the Tennessee SIP and include
changes to KCAQR Section 51.0--Standards for Cement Kilns. These
revisions were initially submitted by Knox County for review by TDEC,
which found them to be as or more stringent than State's requirements.
After conducting its own review of these revisions, EPA concurs with
TDEC's finding. The rule changes became State effective on August 12,
1999 and July 11, 2001, respectively and are part of the Knox County's
strategy to attain and maintain the NAAQS. They are approvable into the
Knox County portion of the Tennessee SIP pursuant to section 110 of the
CAA.
The August 18, 1999 SIP revisions proposed the addition of a new
section to KCAQR, Section 51.0--Standards for Cement Kilns. The rules
in this section were designed to reduce NOX emissions by
setting emissions control, compliance demonstration, certification,
record keeping, and reporting requirements for Portland cement kilns in
the County. In the July 16, 2001 SIP Submittal, Knox County proposed
changes to KCAQR, Section 51.0 by adopting the same language used in
the State's air regulations. For example, the County eliminated the
definitions for the terms ``shutdown'' and ``startup'' as related
Portland cement kilns in the original rule because they were not found
in the State's rule on ``Standards for Cement Kilns''.
III. Final Action
EPA is approving the aforementioned changes to the Knox County
portion of the Tennessee SIP. EPA has reviewed the Knox County's
justification concerning the addition of the standards for cement kilns
into the Knox County portion of the Tennessee SIP and concurs with the
changes.
EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should
adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective June 11, 2007
without further notice, unless the Agency receives adverse comments by
May 14, 2007.
If EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a notice
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public
is advised that this rule will be effective on June 11, 2007 and no
further action will be taken on the proposed rule. Please note that if
we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of
the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are
not the subject of an adverse comment.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews:
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the national government and the
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA.
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority to
disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of
[[Page 18391]]
section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this
rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House
of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States
prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by June 11, 2007. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Nitrogen dioxide,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 29, 2007.
J.I. Palmer,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart RR Tennessee
0
2. Section 52.2220(c) is amended by adding the entry ``Section 51.0''
in Table 3 of the Knox County portion of the Tennessee State
Implementation Plan to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Table 3.--EPA Approved Knox County, Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
State citation Title/subject effective EPA approval date Explanation
date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
51.0............................. Standards for Cement 07/11/01 04/12/2007 [Insert ....................
Kilns. citation of
publication].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E7-6717 Filed 4-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P