Safety Zone; Michigan Aerospace Challenge, Muskegon Lake, Muskegon, MI, 18124-18126 [E7-6777]
Download as PDF
18124
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
and Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 5100.1, which
guides the Coast Guard in complying
with the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370f), and have concluded that there
are no factors in this case that would
limit the use of a categorical exclusion
under section 2.B.2 of the Instruction.
Therefore, this rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. Special
local regulations issued in conjunction
with a regatta or marine event permit
are specifically excluded from further
analysis and documentation under those
sections.
on May 12, 2007. If the marine event is
postponed due to weather, then the
temporary special local regulations will
be enforced during the same time period
on May 13, 2007.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
I For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 100 as follows:
33 CFR Part 165
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
AGENCY:
1. The authority citation for part 100
continues to read as follows:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
Muskegon Lake near Muskegon, MI.
This zone is intended to restrict vessels
from a portion of the Muskegon Lake
during the Michigan Aerospace
Challenge Rocket Launch. This
temporary safety zone is necessary to
protect spectators and vessels from the
hazards associated with sport rockets.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m.
(local) to 6 p.m. (local) on April 28,
2007.
ACTION:
2. Add temporary § 100.35–T05–009
to read as follows:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Martin Lagoon, Middle
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area
includes all waters of Martin Lagoon
that are north of a line drawn from
latitude 39°19′34″ N, 076°25′41″ W,
thence to a position located at 39°19′33″
N, 076°25′33″ W. All coordinates
reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
warrant, or petty officer of the Coast
Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore with a
commissioned, warrant, or petty officer
on board and displaying a Coast Guard
ensign.
(c) Special local regulations. (1)
Except for persons or vessels authorized
by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain
in the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when
directed to do so by any Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any official
patrol.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 9 a.m. to 11 p.m.
Jkt 211001
Coast Guard
Safety Zone; Michigan Aerospace
Challenge, Muskegon Lake, Muskegon,
MI
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
12:59 Apr 10, 2007
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
RIN 1625–AA00
I
VerDate Aug<31>2005
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
[CGD09–07–011]
I
§ 100.35–T05–009
River, Maryland.
Dated: March 29, 2007.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E7–6781 Filed 4–10–07; 8:45 am]
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket CGD09–07–
011 and are available for inspection or
copying at U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake
Michigan, 2420 South Lincoln Memorial
Drive, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53207
between 8 a.m. (local) and 3 p.m. (local),
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
CWO Brad Hinken, Prevention
Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake
Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at (414) 747–
7154.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. The permit
application was not received in time to
publish an NPRM followed by a final
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
rule before the effective date. Under 5
U.S.C. 553(d)(3), good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying this rule would be
contrary to the public interest of
ensuring the safety of spectators and
vessels during this event and immediate
action is necessary to prevent possible
loss of life or property. The Coast Guard
has not received any complaints or
negative comments previously with
regard to this event.
Background and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is
necessary to ensure the safety of vessels
and spectators from hazards associated
with a sport rocket launch. Based on the
explosive and missile hazards of sport
rockets, the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan has determined sport rocket
launches in close proximity to
watercraft pose significant risk to public
safety and property. The likely
combination of large numbers of
recreation vessels, congested waterways,
and debris falling into the water could
easily result in serious injuries or
fatalities. Establishing a safety zone to
control vessel movement around the
location of the rocket launch site will
help ensure the safety of persons and
property at these events and help
minimize the associated risks.
Discussion of Rule
A temporary safety zone is necessary
to ensure the safety of spectators and
vessels during the setup, loading and
launching of a sport rockets in
conjunction with the Michigan
Aerospace Challenge Rocket Launch.
The rocket launch will occur between 8
a.m. (local) and 6 p.m. (local) on April
28, 2007.
The safety zone for the rocket launch
will encompass all waters and adjacent
shoreline of Muskegon Lake and within
the arc of a circle with a 1500-yard
radius from the rocket launch site
located at the West Michigan Dock and
Market Corp facility with its center in
position 43°14′21″ N, 086°15′35″ W
(NAD 83).
All persons and vessels shall comply
with the instructions of the Coast Guard
Captain of the Port or the designated onscene representative. Entry into,
transiting, or anchoring within the
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or his designated onscene representative. The Captain of the
Port or his designated on-scene
representative may be contacted via
VHF Channel 16.
E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM
11APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. It is not ‘‘significant’’ under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
the Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the
minimal time that vessels will be
restricted from the zone and the zone is
an area where the Coast Guard expects
insignificant adverse impact to mariners
from the zone’s activation.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: The owners and operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of Muskegon Lake near
Muskegon, Michigan between 8 a.m.
(local) and 6 p.m. (local) on April 28,
2007.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons: this rule will be
in effect for only ten hours for one
event. Vessel traffic can safely pass
outside the safety zone during the event.
In the event that this temporary safety
zone affects shipping, commercial
vessels may request permission from the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to
transit through the safety zone. The
Coast Guard will give notice to the
public via a Broadcast to Mariners that
the regulation is in effect.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
VerDate Aug<31>2005
12:59 Apr 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104–
121), we offered to assist small entities
in understanding the rule so that they
could better evaluate its effects on them
and participate in the rulemaking
process. Small businesses may send
comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise
determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement
Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards.
The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule would not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18125
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not concern an environmental risk
to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedure; and related management
system practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM
11APR1
18126
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
I
(2) This safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the Captain of the Port
Lake Michigan or his designated onscene representative.
(3) The ‘‘on-scene representative’’ of
the Captain of the Port is any Coast
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer who has been designated by the
Captain of the Port to act on his behalf.
The on-scene representative of the
Captain of the Port will be aboard either
a Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary
vessel. The Captain of the Port or his
designated on-scene representative may
be contacted via VHF Channel 16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone shall
contact the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or his on-scene representative
to obtain permission to do so. Vessel
operators given permission to enter or
operate in the safety zone must comply
with all directions given to them by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or his
on-scene representative.
Building 70, Waterways Management
Division, Baltimore, Maryland 21226–
1791, between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ronald L. Houck, at Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore, Waterways Management
Division, at telephone number (410)
576–2674 or (410) 576–2693.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: March 31, 2007.
Bruce C. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. E7–6777 Filed 4–10–07; 8:45 am]
which guides the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical
exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, we believe that
this rule should be categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This
event establishes a safety zone therefore
paragraph (34)(g) of the Instruction
applies.
A final ‘‘Environmental Analysis
Check List’’ is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
Comments on this section will be
considered before we make the final
decision on whether the rule should be
categorically excluded from further
environmental review.
Background and Purpose
Each year, thousands of spectators
attend outdoor fireworks displays
discharged from vessels or floating
platforms on or near the navigable
waters of the United States. Accidental
discharge of fireworks and falling hot
embers are a safety concern during such
events. The Coast Guard has the
authority to impose appropriate controls
on marine events that may pose a threat
to persons, vessels and facilities under
its jurisdiction. The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone that will be
enforced during a fireworks display
held over the Potomac River, in a cove
near Oxon Hill, Maryland. The rule is
needed to control movement through a
portion of the waterway that is expected
to be populated by vessels seeking to
view the fireworks display.
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
I
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Coast Guard
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
33 CFR Part 165
2. A new temporary § 165.T09–011 is
added as follows:
I
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES
§ 165.T09–011 Safety zone; Michigan
Aerospace Challenge, Muskegon Lake,
Muskegon, MI.
12:59 Apr 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Fireworks Display,
Potomac River, Oxon Hill, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone
upon certain waters of the Potomac
River during a fireworks display. This
action is necessary to provide for the
safety of life on navigable waters during
a fireworks display launched from a
barge, located in a cove near Oxon Hill,
Maryland. This action will restrict
vessel traffic in a portion of the Potomac
River.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 p.m.
to 10 p.m. on May 31, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of this docket and are
available for inspection or copying at
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road,
SUMMARY:
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: All waters of
Muskegon Lake and within the arc of a
circle with a 1500-yard radius from the
rocket launch site located at the West
Michigan Dock and Market Corp facility
with its center in position 43°14′21″ N,
086°15′35″ W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective period. This regulation is
effective from 8 a.m. (local) on April 28,
2007 to 6 p.m. (local), on April 28, 2007.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in section 165.23
of this part, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within this safety zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Lake Michigan, or
his designated on-scene representative.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
[CGD05–07–034]
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for not publishing an NPRM. There was
insufficient time to allow for the
publication of an NPRM followed by a
temporary final rule before the effective
date. Any delay of the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to the public
interest by exposing the public to the
known dangers associated with
Fireworks Displays.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
On May 31, 2007, the Peterson
Companies, National Harbor, will
sponsor a fireworks display launched
from a barge located on the Potomac
River near Oxon Hill, in Prince George’s
County, Maryland. The planned event
includes an aerial fireworks display
beginning at 9 p.m. Due to the need for
vessel control during the fireworks
display, vessel traffic will be restricted
to provide for the safety of spectators
and transiting vessels.
The purpose of this rule is to promote
maritime safety, and to protect the
environment and mariners transiting the
area from the potential hazards due to
falling embers or other debris associated
with a fireworks display from a barge.
This rule establishes a safety zone on
E:\FR\FM\11APR1.SGM
11APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 11, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18124-18126]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6777]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD09-07-011]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Michigan Aerospace Challenge, Muskegon Lake,
Muskegon, MI
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on
Muskegon Lake near Muskegon, MI. This zone is intended to restrict
vessels from a portion of the Muskegon Lake during the Michigan
Aerospace Challenge Rocket Launch. This temporary safety zone is
necessary to protect spectators and vessels from the hazards associated
with sport rockets.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m. (local) to 6 p.m. (local) on
April 28, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket, are part of docket CGD09-07-011 and are available for
inspection or copying at U.S. Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, 2420
South Lincoln Memorial Drive, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53207 between 8
a.m. (local) and 3 p.m. (local), Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: CWO Brad Hinken, Prevention
Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at (414)
747-7154.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. The permit application was not
received in time to publish an NPRM followed by a final rule before the
effective date. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), good cause exists for making
this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying this rule would be contrary to the public interest
of ensuring the safety of spectators and vessels during this event and
immediate action is necessary to prevent possible loss of life or
property. The Coast Guard has not received any complaints or negative
comments previously with regard to this event.
Background and Purpose
This temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
vessels and spectators from hazards associated with a sport rocket
launch. Based on the explosive and missile hazards of sport rockets,
the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan has determined sport rocket
launches in close proximity to watercraft pose significant risk to
public safety and property. The likely combination of large numbers of
recreation vessels, congested waterways, and debris falling into the
water could easily result in serious injuries or fatalities.
Establishing a safety zone to control vessel movement around the
location of the rocket launch site will help ensure the safety of
persons and property at these events and help minimize the associated
risks.
Discussion of Rule
A temporary safety zone is necessary to ensure the safety of
spectators and vessels during the setup, loading and launching of a
sport rockets in conjunction with the Michigan Aerospace Challenge
Rocket Launch. The rocket launch will occur between 8 a.m. (local) and
6 p.m. (local) on April 28, 2007.
The safety zone for the rocket launch will encompass all waters and
adjacent shoreline of Muskegon Lake and within the arc of a circle with
a 1500-yard radius from the rocket launch site located at the West
Michigan Dock and Market Corp facility with its center in position
43[deg]14[min]21[sec] N, 086[deg]15[min]35[sec] W (NAD 83).
All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated on-scene
representative. Entry into, transiting, or anchoring within the safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or his designated on-scene representative. The Captain of the
Port or his designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF
Channel 16.
[[Page 18125]]
Regulatory Evaluation
This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant'' under the
regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies and procedures
of DHS is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the minimal time that vessels will
be restricted from the zone and the zone is an area where the Coast
Guard expects insignificant adverse impact to mariners from the zone's
activation.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in a portion of Muskegon Lake near Muskegon, Michigan
between 8 a.m. (local) and 6 p.m. (local) on April 28, 2007.
This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: this
rule will be in effect for only ten hours for one event. Vessel traffic
can safely pass outside the safety zone during the event. In the event
that this temporary safety zone affects shipping, commercial vessels
may request permission from the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan to
transit through the safety zone. The Coast Guard will give notice to
the public via a Broadcast to Mariners that the regulation is in
effect.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-121), we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they could better evaluate
its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small
businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who
enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and
the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness
to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of
the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247).
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule would not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not concern an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedure; and related management
system practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
[[Page 18126]]
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that there are no factors in this
case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, we believe that this rule should
be categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental documentation. This event
establishes a safety zone therefore paragraph (34)(g) of the
Instruction applies.
A final ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' is available in the
docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. Comments on this section will
be considered before we make the final decision on whether the rule
should be categorically excluded from further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. A new temporary Sec. 165.T09-011 is added as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-011 Safety zone; Michigan Aerospace Challenge, Muskegon
Lake, Muskegon, MI.
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All
waters of Muskegon Lake and within the arc of a circle with a 1500-yard
radius from the rocket launch site located at the West Michigan Dock
and Market Corp facility with its center in position 43[deg]14'21'' N,
086[deg]15'35'' W (NAD 83).
(b) Effective period. This regulation is effective from 8 a.m.
(local) on April 28, 2007 to 6 p.m. (local), on April 28, 2007.
(c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
section 165.23 of this part, entry into, transiting, or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port Lake Michigan, or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or his designated
on-scene representative.
(3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port is
any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty officer who has been
designated by the Captain of the Port to act on his behalf. The on-
scene representative of the Captain of the Port will be aboard either a
Coast Guard or Coast Guard Auxiliary vessel. The Captain of the Port or
his designated on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16.
(4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone shall contact the Captain of the Port Lake Michigan or his on-
scene representative to obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in the safety zone must comply
with all directions given to them by the Captain of the Port Lake
Michigan or his on-scene representative.
Dated: March 31, 2007.
Bruce C. Jones,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Coast Guard Sector Lake Michigan.
[FR Doc. E7-6777 Filed 4-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P