Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in Alaska; Harvest Regulations for Migratory Birds in Alaska During the 2007 Season, 18318-18325 [E7-6667]
Download as PDF
18318
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
July 21, 2003 (68 FR 43010), April 2,
2004 (69 FR 17318), April 8, 2005 (70
FR 18244), and February 28, 2006 (71
FR 10404). These documents are readily
available at https://alaska.fws.gov/
ambcc/regulations.htm.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 92
RIN 1018–AU59
Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in
Alaska; Harvest Regulations for
Migratory Birds in Alaska During the
2007 Season
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service or we) is publishing
harvest regulations for migratory bird
subsistence hunting in Alaska for the
2007 season. This final rule establishes
regulations that prescribe frameworks,
or outer limits, for dates when
harvesting of birds may occur, species
that can be taken, and methods and
means that are excluded from use.
These regulations were developed under
a Co-management process involving the
Service, the Alaska Department of Fish
and Game, and Alaska Native
representatives. These regulations
provide a framework to enable the
continuation of customary and
traditional subsistence uses of migratory
birds in Alaska. The rulemaking is
necessary because the regulations
governing the subsistence harvest of
migratory birds in Alaska are subject to
annual review. This rulemaking
establishes regulations that go into effect
on April 2, 2007, and expire on August
31, 2007.
DATES: The amendments to subpart C of
50 CFR part 92 become effective May
11, 2007. The amendments to subparts
A and D of 50 CFR part 92 are effective
April 11, 2007, through August 31,
2007.
Fred
Armstrong, (907) 786–3887, or Donna
Dewhurst, (907) 786–3499, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 1011 E. Tudor
Road, Mail Stop 201, Anchorage, AK
99503.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES_2
How Do I Find the History of These
Regulations?
Background information, including
past events leading to this action,
accomplishments since the Migratory
Bird Treaties with Canada and Mexico
were amended, and a history of
addressing conservation issues can be
found in the following Federal Register
notices: August 16, 2002 (67 FR 53511),
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:15 Apr 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
Why Is This Current Rulemaking
Necessary?
This current rulemaking is necessary
because the migratory bird harvest
season is closed unless opened, and the
regulations governing subsistence
harvest of migratory birds in Alaska are
subject to public review and annual
approval. The Co-management Council
held a meeting in April 2006 to develop
recommendations for changes effective
for the 2007 harvest season. These
recommendations were presented to the
Service Regulations Committee (SRC) on
July 26 and 27, 2006, and were
approved.
On December 13, 2006, we published
in the Federal Register (71 FR 75061) a
proposed rule to establish spring/
summer migratory bird subsistence
harvest regulations in Alaska for the
2007 subsistence season. The proposed
rule provided for a public comment
period of 60 days.
This rule finalizes regulations for the
taking of migratory birds for subsistence
uses in Alaska during 2007. This rule
lists migratory bird species that are open
or closed to harvest, as well as season
openings and closures by region, and a
change to the Fairbanks North Star
Borough excluded area. It also describes
a change in the methods and means of
taking migratory birds for subsistence
purposes.
How Will the Service Continue To
Ensure That the Subsistence Harvest
Will Not Raise Overall Migratory Bird
Harvest?
The Service has an emergency closure
provision (50 CFR 92.21), so that if any
significant increases in harvest are
documented for one or more species in
a region, an emergency closure can be
requested and implemented. Eligibility
to harvest under the regulations
established in 2003 was limited to
permanent residents, regardless of race,
in villages located within the Alaska
Peninsula, Kodiak Archipelago, the
Aleutian Islands and in areas north and
west of the Alaska Range (50 CFR 92.5).
These geographical restrictions opened
the initial subsistence migratory bird
harvest to only about 13 percent of
Alaska residents. High-population areas
such as Anchorage, the MatanuskaSusitna and Fairbanks North Star
boroughs, the Kenai Peninsula roaded
area, the Gulf of Alaska roaded area and
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Southeast Alaska were excluded from
the eligible subsistence harvest areas.
Based on petitions requesting
inclusion in the harvest, in 2004, we
added 13 additional communities based
on the five criteria set forth in 50 CFR
92.5(c). These communities included:
Gulkana, Gakona, Tazlina, Copper
Center, Mentasta Lake, Chitina,
Chistochina, Tatitlek, Chenega, Port
Graham and Nanwalek, Tyonek, and
Hoonah, with populations totaling
2,766. In 2005, we added three
additional communities for glaucouswinged gull egg gathering only, based
on petitions requesting inclusion. These
southeastern communities included
Craig, Hydaburg, and Yakutat, with a
combined population of 2,459. These
new communities increased the
percentage of the State population
included in the subsistence bird harvest
to 14 percent.
In this rule, we have enacted the
Alaska Department of Fish and Game’s
(ADFG) request to expand the Fairbanks
North Star Borough excluded area to the
Central Interior excluded area
comprising the following: That portion
of Unit 20(A) east of the Wood River
drainage and south of Rex Trail,
including the upper Wood River
drainage south of its confluence with
Chicken Creek; that portion of Unit
20(C) east of Denali National Park north
to Rock Creek and east to Unit 20(A);
and that portion of Unit 20(D) west of
the Tanana River between its confluence
with the Johnson and Delta Rivers, west
of the east bank of the Johnson River,
and north and west of the Volmar
drainage, including the Goodpaster
River drainage.
The purpose of the excluded area’s
expansion is to prevent new traditions
and increased harvest levels that could
result from inclusion of communities
that have not traditionally hunted
migratory birds in the spring and
summer for subsistence. Specifically,
this regulation would exclude residents
of Delta Junction/Big Delta/Fort Greely,
McKinley Park/Village, Healy and Ferry
from eligibility to participate in spring/
summer migratory bird subsistence
hunts. There is no evidence that there
has been a tradition of spring/summer
subsistence migratory bird hunting in
the excluded area. ADFG also cited the
action by the Alaska Joint Boards of
Fisheries and Game in 1992 creating the
Fairbanks Non-subsistence area as
additional rationale for this regulation.
The report focused on a socio-economic
study that was conducted to determine
whether or not subsistence traits existed
in the Fairbanks region to justify it being
considered a subsistence eligible area.
The summary report recommended the
E:\FR\FM\11APR2.SGM
11APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
Fairbanks area be considered a
nonsubsistence use area. The study was
based on the application of 12 socioeconomic factors to each community to
determine whether or not subsistencerelated traits existed.
In addition, we clarified the definition
of excluded areas to explain that
persons living in excluded areas are not
eligible to participate in the Alaska
spring/summer subsistence harvest and
that the excluded area is closed to
harvesting.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES_2
What Is Changing in the Methods and
Means Prohibitions for 2007?
When we established the initial
methods and means regulations (68 FR
43010, July 21, 2003), we followed the
Co-management Council
recommendation to adopt those existing
methods and means prohibitions that
occur in the Federal (50 CFR 20.21) and
Alaska (5AAC92.100) migratory bird
hunting regulations and that do not
conflict with the customary and
traditional methods of taking birds. In
this rule, we have incorporated the
ADFG’s request to prohibit baiting and
shooting over a baited area (Statewide).
What Is Changing in the List of Birds
Open to Harvest for 2007?
At the request of the North Slope
Borough Fish and Game Management
Committee, the Co-management Council
recommended continuing into 2007 the
provisions originally established in
2005 to allow subsistence use of yellowbilled loons inadvertently caught in
subsistence fishing (gill) nets on the
North Slope. Yellow-billed loons are
culturally important for the Inupiat
Eskimo of the North Slope for use in
traditional dance regalia. A maximum of
20 yellow-billed loons may be caught in
2007 pursuant to this provision. The
North Slope Borough Department of
Wildlife requires individuals to report
their take of yellow-billed loons by the
end of each season. In addition, the
North Slope Borough has asked
fishermen, through announcements on
the radio and through personal contact,
to report all entanglements of loons to
better estimate the levels of injury or
mortality caused by gill nets. In 2006,
four yellow-billed loons were reported
taken in fishing nets and an additional
one was found alive in a net and
released. This provision, to allow
subsistence possession and use of
yellow-billed loons caught in fishing gill
nets, is subject to annual review and
renewal by the SRC.
Summary of Public Involvement
On December 13, 2006, we published
in the Federal Register (71 FR 75061) a
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:15 Apr 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
proposed rule to establish spring/
summer migratory bird subsistence
harvest regulations in Alaska for the
2007 subsistence season. The proposed
rule provided for a public comment
period of 60 days. We posted an
announcement of the comment period
dates for the proposed rule, as well as
the rule itself and related historical
documents, on the Council’s internet
homepage. We issued a press release
announcing our request for public
comments and the pertinent deadlines
for such comments, which was faxed to
the media Statewide. By the close of the
public comment period on February 12,
2007, we had received written responses
from three entities. Two of the
responses were from individuals and
one from a non-governmental
organization.
Response to Public Comments
General Comments
One general comment was received
on the overall regulations by expressing
strong opposition to the concept of
allowing any harvest of migratory birds
in Alaska.
Service Response: For centuries,
indigenous inhabitants of Alaska have
harvested migratory birds for
subsistence purposes during the spring
and summer months. The Canada and
Mexico migratory bird treaties were
recently amended for the express
purpose of allowing subsistence hunting
for migratory birds during the spring
and summer and clearly contemplate
that the Service would issue regulations
allowing such hunting as provided in
the Migratory Bird Treat Act, 16 U.S.C.
712(1). See Statutory Authority section
for more details.
The Preamble of the Protocol
amending the Canada Treaty states one
of its goals is to allow a traditional
subsistence hunt while also improving
conservation of migratory birds through
effective regulation of this hunt. In
addition, the Preamble notes that, by
sanctioning a traditional subsistence
hunt, the Parties do not intend to cause
significant increases in the take of
migratory birds, relative to their
continental population sizes, compared
to the take that is presently occurring.
Any such increase in take as a result of
the types of hunting provided for in the
Protocol would be inconsistent with the
Convention. If at some point the
subsistence harvest regulations result in
increased harvest, management
strategies will be implemented to ensure
maintenance of continental populations.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
18319
How Will the Service Continue To
Ensure That the Subsistence Harvest
Will Not Raise Overall Migratory Bird
Harvest?
Two comments were received
regarding passage of a request to expand
the Fairbanks North Star Borough
excluded area to the Central Interior
excluded area, which would exclude
residents of Delta Junction/Big Delta/
Fort Greely, McKinley Park/Village,
Healy and Ferry from eligibility to
participate in spring/summer migratory
bird subsistence hunts. The expansion
mirrors the current State of Alaska
Fairbanks Non-subsistence Use Area
boundaries. One commenter expressed
support of expansion of the excluded
area, stating that there is no evidence of
a tradition of spring/summer
subsistence hunting within the area.
Another commenter brought up the
question of whether due process was
followed in the decision making process
to take away the subsistence rights of
the subsistence users in this area. The
commenter further questions if all
means (example: radio, television, local
paper, State paper, flyers, meeting etc.)
were exhausted in notifying the public
(community) to weigh in on this issue
involving taking away their subsistence
right to hunt waterfowl. The commenter
asks why other options were not
brought to the table, such as alternate
means of management including quotas
or bag limits. The commenter also asks
if there were any biological studies
reflecting a negative impact on the
waterfowl harvested in the area.
Service Response: A process for
petitioning to exclude a community was
approved by the Co-management
Council on April 6, 2006. The approval
process starts with petitions to exclude
communities being sent to the Comanagement Council during the
November 1–December 15 open
submission period. A petition should
address the five criteria listed in 50 CFR
92.5(c). Upon submission, the petition
will follow the normal review process
outlined for regulatory proposals,
including review by the Co-management
Council’s Technical Committee and
petition dispersal to the regional
management bodies for their review and
recommendation(s). The affected
regions are then responsible to conduct
public meetings in the affected
communities, after appropriate public
notice.
In a public meeting held in Anchorage
on April 6, 2006, the Co-management
Council voted to recommend approval
of the proposal to expand the Fairbanks
North Star Borough excluded area and
re-named it the Central Interior
E:\FR\FM\11APR2.SGM
11APR2
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES_2
18320
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
excluded area. Justification to proceed
was based on the fact that there is no
evidence that there has been a tradition
of spring and summer hunting of
migratory birds in the proposed
excluded area. The proposal cited
previous action by the Alaska Joint
Boards of Fisheries and Game in 1992
creating the Fairbanks Non-subsistence
area as rationale for this regulation. The
report focused on a socio-economic
study that was conducted to determine
whether or not subsistence traits existed
in the Fairbanks region to justify it being
considered a subsistence eligible area.
The summary report recommended the
Fairbanks area be considered a nonsubsistence use area. The study was
based on the application of 12 socioeconomic factors to each community to
determine whether or not subsistencerelated traits existed. The Joint Boards
of Fisheries and Game unanimously
approved the non-subsistence use area.
To address the commenter’s concern
about public notification, we offer the
following: The issue of excluding
communities in the Interior of Alaska is
not a new issue. Since the inception of
the Co-management Council, we have
had several proposals to expand or
exclude either the Interior region or
communities from participating in the
spring and summer harvest of migratory
birds in Alaska. The first year, a
proposal was submitted to exclude
several communities including Delta
Junction, Tok, and other communities
located on the Alaska Highway. At that
time, the Co-management Council
rejected the proposal based on the fact
that there was no process or criteria for
excluding communities or regions from
participation in the spring/summer
program. The second year, a proposal
was submitted to exclude the
agricultural fields located on the Alaska
Highway that were the focus of the
problem encountered by farmers and
hunters. That proposal was rejected
based on the fact that the regional
management partner had not held any
regional meetings to vet the proposal.
The Co-management Council is
required by its by-laws to publicize the
meetings 30 days prior to the meetings
in a public newspaper. We also post the
notices, draft agendas, and proposals on
our website, which is available to
anyone with internet access. The Comanagement Council also utilizes the
Service’s Alaska Region External Affairs
distribution system, which disseminates
public notices to more than 40
newspaper and radio/television stations
in Alaska, to invite public participation
in the Co-management Council
Meetings. The Co-management Council
provides ample opportunity during their
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:15 Apr 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
meetings for people to comment and
voice their concerns. Potential closing of
the region to subsistence bird hunting
has been discussed at the local Fish and
Game Advisory Committee meetings,
which are open to the public.
We also send Federal Register
publications to the various conservation
system units in Alaska, including the
National Wildlife Refuge system in
Alaska, the National Park Service, the
Bureau of Land Management, and other
conservation-oriented programs in
Alaska.
Finally, the Co-management Council
produces on an annual basis a userfriendly version of the regulations. This
handbook is developed annually and
dispersed to more than 26,000
households in eligible communities in
Alaska. The handbooks reflect current
regional and Statewide regulations as
well as changes for the upcoming
season.
The commenter asked if other
management options, such as bag limits
or quotas, were brought to the table for
discussion prior to this exclusion
decision. The options of going to bag
limits or quotas were not discussed
formally at the Co-management Council
level. Relative to this proposal,
however, these ideas have been
discussed in other settings, and because
of the spirit and intent of legitimizing
the spring and summer harvest, such as
sharing and passing down of customs
and traditions, the notion of bag limits
was dismissed because it did not fit into
the local traditions of harvesting and
sharing with others in a community. A
parallel proposal, to close subsistence
migratory bird hunting in a portion of
the agricultural fields in Unit 20(D) for
August 15–31 of each year, was brought
forward and tabled for one year. The Comanagement Council on April 6, 2006,
opted to support ADFG’s exclusion
proposal instead of the option of a
seasonal closure of the agricultural
fields.
The commenter asked if there were
any biological studies reflecting a
negative impact on the waterfowl
harvested in the area. Neither the
Service nor ADFG has conducted any
formal studies of the effects of spring/
summer subsistence migratory bird
hunting in the expanded exclusion area
on either the local or nationwide
waterfowl species populations. The
Service has not conducted subsistence
migratory bird harvest surveys of the
communities that will be excluded
under the exclusion area expansion
during the 4 years of legal harvest
(2003–06).
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
What Is Changing on the List of Birds
Open to Harvest for 2007?
One comment was received stating
continued opposition to maintaining 15
species of conservation concern on the
list of birds open to harvest for 2007.
These 15 species included: brant (Banta
bernicula), king and common eiders
(Somateria spectabilis and millissma),
black scoter (Melanitta nigra), longtailed duck (Clangula hyemalis), redthroated and yellow-billed loons (Gavia
stellata and adamsii), black
oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani),
bar-tailed godwit (Limosa lapponica),
ruddy turnstone (Arenaria interpres),
dunlin (Calidris alpine), red-legged
kittiwake (Rissa brevirostris), Arctic and
Aleutian terns (Sterna paradisaea and
aleutica), and whiskered auklet (Aethia
pygmaea).
Service Response: The Service
originally addressed the Birds of
Conservation Concern relative to the
subsistence harvest starting in July
2003, with a final decision published in
the April 2, 2004, Federal Register (69
FR 17318). The Birds of Conservation
Concern list does not include waterfowl
species, so the first five species listed in
the comment were not addressed. Brant
population trends were extensively
discussed in 2005 and 2006, and
regional closures were put in place
starting in the 2006 season (71 FR
10404; February 28, 2006).
If the commentor desires to pursue
subsistence harvest restrictions on the
bird species listed above, the
commenter could submit one or more
formal proposals to change harvest
regulations during the annual open
period of November 1–December 15,
2007. The proposal(s) should include
any new and updated species
population data that would justify a
change in the original Service decisions.
The Co-management Council is a Comanagement system comprised of
Alaska Natives, and State and Federal
representatives, acting as equals, that
provide recommendations to the SRC on
conservation issues relative to the
subsistence harvest of migratory birds in
Alaska.
One commenter requested that ivory
gulls (Pagophila eburnea) be removed
from the List of Birds Open to Harvest
in 2007. The documented population
decline was cited as justification as well
as the recent recommendation to list the
species as endangered by the Committee
on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in
Canada.
Service Response: Ivory gulls are
spring and fall migrants along Alaska’s
North Slope and northern Bering Sea. A
similar concern was raised in comments
E:\FR\FM\11APR2.SGM
11APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
on the 2004 proposed rule (69 FR 17318;
April 2, 2004), but no formal proposals
have ever been submitted for closure.
Ivory gulls are not on the Birds of
Conservation Concern list on any scale,
because the list does not include casual
migrants/non-breeders. We will
continue to monitor circumpolar
management recommendations and
species population trends. The Arctic
Council’s Conservation of Arctic Flora
and Fauna-Circumpolar Seabird
Working Group will be completing an
Ivory Gull Conservation Strategy in
2007 that will document this bird’s
current, global population status and
identify conservation issues. Proposals
to remove ivory gulls from the 2009
harvest regulations may be submitted
during the annual open period of
November 1–December 15, 2007.
Statutory Authority
We derive our authority to issue these
regulations from the Migratory Bird
Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. 712(1), which
authorizes the Secretary of the Interior,
in accordance with the treaties with
Canada, Mexico, Japan, and Russia, to
‘‘issue such regulations as may be
necessary to assure that the taking of
migratory birds and the collection of
their eggs, by the indigenous inhabitants
of the State of Alaska, shall be permitted
for their own nutritional and other
essential needs, as determined by the
Secretary of the Interior, during seasons
established so as to provide for the
preservation and maintenance of stocks
of migratory birds.’’
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES_2
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this
document is not a significant rule
subject to OMB review under Executive
Order 12866.
(a) This rule will not have an annual
economic effect of $100 million or more
or adversely affect an economic sector,
productivity, jobs, the environment, or
other units of government. The rule
does not provide for new or additional
hunting opportunities and therefore will
have minimal economic or
environmental impact. This rule
benefits those participants who engage
in the subsistence harvest of migratory
birds in Alaska in two identifiable ways:
first, participants receive the
consumptive value of the birds
harvested; and second, participants get
the cultural benefit associated with the
maintenance of a subsistence economy
and way of life. The Service can
estimate the consumptive value for
birds harvested under this rule but does
not have a dollar value for the cultural
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:15 Apr 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
benefit of maintaining a subsistence
economy and way of life.
The economic value derived from the
consumption of the harvested migratory
birds has been estimated using the
results of a paper by Robert J. Wolfe
titled, ‘‘Subsistence Food Harvests in
Rural Alaska, and Food Safety Issues’’
(August 13, 1996). Using data from
Wolfe’s paper and applying it to the
areas that will be included in this
process, we determined a maximum
economic value of $6 million annually.
This is the estimated economic benefit
of the consumptive part of this rule for
participants in subsistence hunting. The
cultural benefits of maintaining a
subsistence economy and way of life
can be of considerable value to the
participants, and these benefits are not
included in this figure.
(b) This rule will not create
inconsistencies with other agencies’
actions. We are the Federal agency
responsible for the management of
migratory birds, coordinating with the
State of Alaska’s Department of Fish and
Game on management programs within
Alaska. The State of Alaska is a member
of the Alaska Migratory Bird Comanagement Council.
(c) This rule will not materially affect
entitlements, grants, user fees, loan
programs, or the rights and obligations
of their recipients. The rule does not
affect entitlement programs.
(d) This rule will not raise novel legal
or policy issues. The subsistence harvest
regulations will go through the same
national regulatory process as the
existing migratory bird hunting
regulations in 50 CFR part 20.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities as
defined under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). An initial
regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. Accordingly, a Small Entity
Compliance Guide is not required. The
rule legalizes a pre-existing subsistence
activity, and the resources harvested
will be consumed by the harvesters or
persons within their local community.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act, as
discussed in the Executive Order 12866
section above.
(a) This rule will not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million
or more. It will legalize and regulate a
traditional subsistence activity. It will
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
18321
not result in a substantial increase in
subsistence harvest or a significant
change in harvesting patterns. The
commodities being regulated under this
rule are migratory birds. This rule deals
with legalizing the subsistence harvest
of migratory birds and, as such, does not
involve commodities traded in the
marketplace. A small economic benefit
from this rule derives from the sale of
equipment and ammunition to carry out
subsistence hunting. Most, if not all,
businesses that sell hunting equipment
in rural Alaska would qualify as small
businesses. We have no reason to
believe that this rule will lead to a
disproportionate distribution of
benefits.
(b) This rule will not cause a major
increase in costs or prices for
consumers; individual industries;
Federal, State, or local government
agencies; or geographic regions. This
rule does not deal with traded
commodities and, therefore, does not
have an impact on prices for consumers.
(c) This rule does not have significant
adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises. This rule deals with
the harvesting of wildlife for personal
consumption. It does not regulate the
marketplace in any way to generate
effects on the economy or the ability of
businesses to compete.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
We have determined and certified
pursuant to the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) that
this rule will not impose a cost of $100
million or more in any given year on
local, State, or tribal governments or
private entities. A statement containing
the information required by this Act is
therefore not necessary. Participation on
regional management bodies and the Comanagement Council will require travel
expenses for some Alaska Native
organizations and local governments. In
addition, they will assume some
expenses related to coordinating
involvement of village councils in the
regulatory process. Total coordination
and travel expenses for all Alaska
Native organizations are estimated to be
less than $300,000 per year. In the
March 28, 2000, Notice of Decision (65
FR 16405), we identified 12 partner
organizations (Alaska Native non-profits
and local governments) to administer
the regional programs. The ADFG will
also incur expenses for travel to Comanagement Council and regional
management body meetings. In
addition, the State of Alaska will be
required to provide technical staff
E:\FR\FM\11APR2.SGM
11APR2
18322
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
support to each of the regional
management bodies and to the Comanagement Council. Expenses for the
State’s involvement may exceed
$100,000 per year, but should not
exceed $150,000 per year. When
funding permits, we make annual grant
agreements available to the partner
organizations and the ADFG to help
offset their expenses.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule has been examined under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
and has been found to contain
information collection requirements.
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has approved the collection of
information associated with the
voluntary annual household surveys
that we use to determine levels of
subsistence take. OMB has assigned
OMB control number 1018–0124, which
expires on January 31, 2010. We
estimate the annual burden for this
information collection to be 4,156
hours. We will seek OMB approval for
other necessary information collections
contained in 50 CFR part 92. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Federalism Effects
As discussed in the Executive Order
12866 and Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act sections above, this rule does not
have sufficient federalism implications
to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment under Executive
Order 13132. We worked with the State
of Alaska on development of these
regulations.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES_2
Civil Justice Reform—Executive Order
12988
The Department, in promulgating this
rule, has determined that it will not
unduly burden the judicial system and
that it meets the requirements of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988.
Takings Implication Assessment
This rule is not specific to particular
land ownership, but applies to the
harvesting of migratory bird resources
throughout Alaska. Therefore, in
accordance with Executive Order 12630,
this rule does not have significant
takings implications.
Government-to-Government Relations
With Native American Tribal
Governments
In accordance with the President’s
memorandum of April 29, 1994,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:15 Apr 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
‘‘Government-to-Government Relations
With Native American Tribal
Governments’’ (59 FR 22951), and
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 6, 2000), concerning
consultation and coordination with
Indian Tribal Governments, we have
consulted with Alaska tribes and
evaluated the rule for possible effects on
tribes or trust resources, and have
determined that there are no significant
effects. The rule will legally recognize
the subsistence harvest of migratory
birds and their eggs for tribal members,
as well as for other indigenous
inhabitants.
Endangered Species Act Consideration
Section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531–1543;
87 Stat. 884), provides that, ‘‘The
Secretary shall review other programs
administered by him and utilize such
programs in furtherance of the purposes
of the Act’’ and shall ‘‘insure that any
action authorized, funded, or carried out
* * * is not likely to jeopardize the
continued existence of any endangered
species or threatened species or result in
the destruction or adverse modification
of [critical] habitat. * * *’’
Consequently, we consulted with the
Anchorage Fish and Wildlife Field
Office of the Service to ensure that
actions resulting from these regulations
would not likely jeopardize the
continued existence of spectacled or
Steller’s eiders or result in the
destruction or adverse modification of
their critical habitat. Findings from this
consultation are included in the
Biological Opinion on the Effects of the
Proposed 2007 Spring and Summer
Subsistence Harvest of Birds on the
Threatened Steller’s and Spectacled
Eiders (dated March 30, 2007). The
consultation concluded that the 2007
regulations are not likely to jeopardize
the continued existence of either the
Steller’s or spectacled eider.
Additionally, any modifications
resulting from this consultation to
regulatory measures previously
proposed are reflected in this final rule.
National Environmental Policy Act
Consideration
The annual regulations and options
were considered in the Environmental
Assessment, ‘‘Managing Migratory Bird
Subsistence Hunting in Alaska: Hunting
Regulations for the 2007 Spring/
Summer Harvest,’’ issued August 15,
2006. Copies are available from the
address indicated under the caption
ADDRESSES.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
(Executive Order 13211)
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 on regulations
that significantly affect energy supply,
distribution, and use. Executive Order
13211 requires agencies to prepare
Statements of Energy Effects when
undertaking certain actions. Because
this rule would allow only for
traditional subsistence harvest and
would improve conservation of
migratory birds by allowing effective
regulation of this harvest, it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 13211. Consequently, it
is not expected to significantly affect
energy supplies, distribution, and use.
Therefore, this action is not a significant
energy action under Executive Order
13211 and no Statement of Energy
Effects is required.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 92
Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Subsistence, Treaties, Wildlife.
I For the reasons set out in the
preamble, we amend title 50, chapter I,
subchapter G, of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 92—MIGRATORY BIRD
SUBSISTENCE HARVEST IN ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 92
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703–712.
Subpart A—General Provisions
2. In subpart A, amend § 92.5 by:
a. Removing paragraph (a)(3); and
b. Revising the introductory text and
paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2) introductory
text, (a)(2)(iv), and (b).
I
I
I
§ 92.5
Who is eligible to participate?
If you are a permanent resident of a
village within a subsistence harvest
area, you will be eligible to harvest
migratory birds and their eggs for
subsistence purposes during the
applicable periods specified in subpart
D of this part.
(a) * * *
(1) Any person may request the Comanagement Council to recommend that
an otherwise included area be excluded
by submitting a petition stating how the
area does not meet the criteria identified
in paragraph (c) of this section. The Comanagement Council will forward
petitions to the appropriate regional
management body. The Co-management
Council will then consider each petition
and will submit to the Service any
recommendations to exclude areas from
the spring and summer subsistence
E:\FR\FM\11APR2.SGM
11APR2
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES_2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
harvest. The Service will publish any
approved recommendations for public
comment in the Federal Register.
(2) Based on petitions for inclusion
recommended by the Co-management
Council, the Service has added the
following communities to the included
areas under this part:
*
*
*
*
*
(iv) Southeast Alaska Region—
Hoonah, Craig, Hydaburg, and Yakutat.
(b) Excluded areas. Excluded areas
are not subsistence harvest areas and are
closed to harvest. Residents of excluded
areas are not eligible persons as defined
in § 92.4. Communities located within
the excluded areas provided in
paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this
section may petition the Comanagement Council through their
regional management body for
designation as a spring and summer
subsistence harvest area. The petition
must state how the community meets
the criteria identified in paragraph (c) of
this section. The Co-management
Council will consider each petition and
will submit to the Service any
recommendations to designate a
community as a spring and summer
subsistence harvest area. The Service
will publish any approved new
designations of communities for public
comment in the Federal Register.
Excluded areas consist of the following:
(1) All areas outside of Alaska.
(2) Village areas located in Anchorage,
the Matanuska-Susitna Borough, the
Kenai Peninsula roaded area, the Gulf of
Alaska roaded area, Southeast Alaska,
and the Central Interior Excluded Area
as described in paragraph (b)(3) of this
section generally do not qualify for a
spring and summer harvest.
(3) The Central Interior Excluded Area
comprises the following: That portion of
Unit 20(A) east of the Wood River
drainage and south of Rex Trail,
including the upper Wood River
drainage south of its confluence with
Chicken Creek; that portion of Unit
20(C) east of Denali National Park north
to Rock Creek and east to Unit 20(A);
and that portion of Unit 20(D) west of
the Tanana River between its confluence
with the Johnson and Delta Rivers, west
of the east bank of the Johnson River,
and north and west of the Volmar
drainage, including the Goodpaster
River drainage. The following
communities are within the Excluded
Area: Delta Junction/Big Delta/Fort
Greely, McKinley Park/Village, Healy,
Ferry, and all residents of the formerly
named Fairbanks North Star Borough
Excluded Area.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:15 Apr 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
Subpart C—General Regulations
Governing Subsistence Harvest
3. In subpart C, amend § 92.20 by:
a. Removing ‘‘or’’ from the end of
paragraph (i);
I b. Removing the period from, and
adding in its place ‘‘; or’’ at, the end of
paragraph (j); and
I c. Adding a new paragraph (k) to read
as set forth below.
I
I
§ 92.20
Methods and means.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) By the aid of baiting, or on or over
any baited area, where a person knows
or reasonably should know that the area
is or has been baited, as provided at 50
CFR 20.21(i) and 16 U.S.C. 704(b).
Subpart D—Annual Regulations
Governing Subsistence Harvest
4. In subpart D, revise §§ 92.31
through 92.33 to read as follows:
I
§ 92.31 Migratory bird species closed to
subsistence harvest.
(a) Because of conservation concerns,
you may not harvest birds or gather eggs
from the following species in 2007:
(1) Spectacled Eider (Somateria
fischeri).
(2) Steller’s Eider (Polysticta stelleri).
(3) Emperor Goose (Chen canagica).
(4) Aleutian Canada Goose (Branta
canadensis leucopareia)—Semidi
Islands only.
(5) Yellow-billed Loons (Gavia
adamsii)—Except that in the North
Slope Region only, up to 20 yellowbilled loons total for the region may be
inadvertently caught in fishing nets and
kept for subsistence purposes.
(b) In addition, you may not gather
eggs from the following species in 2007:
(1) Cackling Canada Goose (Branta
canadensis minima).
(2) Black Brant (Branta bernicla
nigricans)—in the Yukon/Kuskokwim
Delta and North Slope regions only.
§ 92.32 Subsistence migratory bird
species.
You may harvest birds or gather eggs
from the following species, listed in
taxonomic order, within all included
areas. When birds are listed only to the
species level, all subspecies existing in
Alaska are open to harvest.
(a) Family Anatidae.
(1) Greater White-fronted Goose
(Anser albifrons).
(2) Snow Goose (Chen caerulescens).
(3) Lesser Canada Goose (Branta
canadensis parvipes).
(4) Taverner’s Canada Goose (Branta
canadensis taverneri).
(5) Aleutian Canada Goose (Branta
canadensis leucopareia)—except in the
Semidi Islands.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
18323
(6) Cackling Canada Goose (Branta
canadensis minima)—except no egg
gathering is permitted.
(7) Black Brant (Branta bernicla
nigricans)—except no egg gathering is
permitted in the Yukon/Kuskokwim
Delta and the North Slope regions.
(8) Tundra Swan (Cygnus
columbianus)—except in Units 9(D) and
10.
(9) Gadwall (Anas strepera).
(10) Eurasian Wigeon (Anas
penelope).
(11) American Wigeon (Anas
americana).
(12) Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos).
(13) Blue-winged Teal (Anas discors).
(14) Northern Shoveler (Anas
clypeata).
(15) Northern Pintail (Anas acuta).
(16) Green-winged Teal (Anas crecca).
(17) Canvasback (Aythya valisineria).
(18) Redhead (Aythya americana).
(19) Ring-necked Duck (Aythya
collaris).
(20) Greater Scaup (Aythya marila).
(21) Lesser Scaup (Aythya affinis).
(22) King Eider (Somateria
spectabilis).
(23) Common Eider (Somateria
mollissima).
(24) Harlequin Duck (Histrionicus
histrionicus).
(25) Surf Scoter (Melanitta
perspicillata).
(26) White-winged Scoter (Melanitta
fusca).
(27) Black Scoter (Melanitta nigra).
(28) Long-tailed Duck (Clangula
hyemalis).
(29) Bufflehead (Bucephala albeola).
(30) Common Goldeneye (Bucephala
clangula).
(31) Barrow’s Goldeneye (Bucephala
islandica).
(32) Hooded Merganser (Lophodytes
cucullatus).
(33) Common Merganser (Mergus
merganser).
(34) Red-breasted Merganser (Mergus
serrator).
(b) Family Gaviidae.
(1) Red-throated Loon (Gavia stellata).
(2) Arctic Loon (Gavia arctica).
(3) Pacific Loon (Gavia pacifica).
(4) Common Loon (Gavia immer).
(5) Yellow-billed Loon (Gavia
adamsii)—In the North Slope Region
only, a total of up to 20 yellow-billed
loons inadvertently caught in fishing
nets may be kept for subsistence
purposes.
(c) Family Podicipedidae.
(1) Horned Grebe (Podiceps auritus).
(2) Red-necked Grebe (Podiceps
grisegena).
(d) Family Procellariidae.
(1) Northern Fulmar (Fulmarus
glacialis).
E:\FR\FM\11APR2.SGM
11APR2
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES_2
18324
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
(2) [Reserved].
(e) Family Phalacrocoracidae.
(1) Double-crested Cormorant
(Phalacrocorax auritus).
(2) Pelagic Cormorant (Phalacrocorax
pelagicus).
(f) Family Gruidae.
(1) Sandhill Crane (Grus canadensis).
(2) [Reserved].
(g) Family Charadriidae.
(1) Black-bellied Plover (Pluvialis
squatarola).
(2) Common Ringed Plover
(Charadrius hiaticula).
(h) Family Haematopodidae.
(1) Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus
bachmani).
(2) [Reserved].
(i) Family Scolopacidae.
(1) Greater Yellowlegs (Tringa
melanoleuca).
(2) Lesser Yellowlegs (Tringa
flavipes).
(3) Spotted Sandpiper (Actitis
macularia).
(4) Bar-tailed Godwit (Limosa
lapponica).
(5) Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria
interpres).
(6) Semipalmated Sandpiper (Calidris
pusilla).
(7) Western Sandpiper (Calidris
mauri).
(8) Least Sandpiper (Calidris
minutilla).
(9) Baird’s Sandpiper (Calidris
bairdii).
(10) Sharp-tailed Sandpiper (Calidris
acuminata).
(11) Dunlin (Calidris alpina).
(12) Long-billed Dowitcher
(Limnodromus scolopaceus).
(13) Common Snipe (Gallinago
gallinago).
(14) Red-necked phalarope
(Phalaropus lobatus).
(15) Red phalarope (Phalaropus
fulicaria).
(j) Family Laridae.
(1) Pomarine Jaeger (Stercorarius
pomarinus).
(2) Parasitic Jaeger (Stercorarius
parasiticus).
(3) Long-tailed Jaeger (Stercorarius
longicaudus).
(4) Bonaparte’s Gull (Larus
philadelphia).
(5) Mew Gull (Larus canus).
(6) Herring Gull (Larus argentatus).
(7) Slaty-backed Gull (Larus
schistisagus).
(8) Glaucous-winged Gull (Larus
glaucescens).
(9) Glaucous Gull (Larus
hyperboreus).
(10) Sabine’s Gull (Xema sabini).
(11) Black-legged Kittiwake (Rissa
tridactyla).
(12) Red-legged Kittiwake (Rissa
brevirostris).
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:15 Apr 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
(13) Ivory Gull (Pagophila eburnea).
(14) Arctic Tern (Sterna paradisaea).
(15) Aleutian Tern (Sterna aleutica).
(k) Family Alcidae.
(1) Common Murre (Uria aalge).
(2) Thick-billed Murre (Uria lomvia).
(3) Black Guillemot (Cepphus grylle).
(4) Pigeon Guillemot (Cepphus
columba).
(5) Cassin’s Auklet (Ptychoramphus
aleuticus).
(6) Parakeet Auklet (Aethia
psittacula).
(7) Least Auklet (Aethia pusilla).
(8) Whiskered Auklet (Aethia
pygmaea).
(9) Crested Auklet (Aethia cristatella).
(10) Rhinoceros Auklet (Cerorhinca
monocerata).
(11) Horned Puffin (Fratercula
corniculata).
(12) Tufted Puffin (Fratercula
cirrhata).
(l) Family Strigidae.
(1) Great Horned Owl (Bubo
virginianus).
(2) Snowy Owl (Nyctea scandiaca).
§ 92.33
Region-specific regulations.
The 2007 season dates for the eligible
subsistence harvest areas are as follows:
(a) Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Region.
(1) Northern Unit (Pribilof Islands):
(i) Season: April 2–June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1–August 31.
(2) Central Unit (Aleut Region’s
eastern boundary on the Alaska
Peninsula westward to and including
Unalaska Island):
(i) Season: April 2–June 15 and July
16–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 16–July 15.
(iii) Special Black Brant Season
Closure: August 16–August 31, only in
Izembek and Moffet lagoons.
(iv) Special Tundra Swan Closure: All
hunting and egg gathering closed in
units 9(D) and 10.
(3) Western Unit (Umnak Island west
to and including Attu Island):
(i) Season: April 2–July 15 and August
16–August 31.
(ii) Closure: July 16–August 15.
(b) Yukon/Kuskokwim Delta Region.
(1) Season: April 2–August 31.
(2) Closure: 30-day closure dates to be
announced by the Service’s Alaska
Regional Director or his designee, after
consultation with local subsistence
users, field biologists, and the
Association of Village Council
President’s Waterfowl Conservation
Committee. This 30-day period will
occur between June 1 and August 15 of
each year. A press release announcing
the actual closure dates will be
forwarded to regional newspapers and
radio and television stations and posted
in village post offices and stores.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(3) Special Black Brant and Cackling
Goose Season Hunting Closure: From
the period when egg laying begins until
young birds are fledged. Closure dates to
be announced by the Service’s Alaska
Regional Director or his designee, after
consultation with field biologists and
the Association of Village Council
President’s Waterfowl Conservation
Committee. A press release announcing
the actual closure dates will be
forwarded to regional newspapers and
radio and television stations and posted
in village post offices and stores.
(4) Special Area Closure:
(i) The following described goose
nesting colonies are closed to all
hunting and egg gathering from the
period of nest initiation until young
birds are fledged:
(A) Kokechik Bay Colony—bounded
by 61.61° N to 61.67° N and 165.83° W
to 166.08° W;
(B) Tutakoke River Colony—bounded
by 61.20° N to 61.28° N and 165.08° W
to 165.13° W;
(C) Kigigak Island Colony—bounded
by island’s edge;
(D) Baird Peninsula Colony—bounded
by 60.87° N to 60.91° N and 164.65° W
to 165.80° W; and
(E) Baird Island Colony—bounded by
island’s edge.
(ii) Closure dates to be announced by
the Alaska Regional Director or his
designee, after consultation with field
biologists and the Association of Village
Council President’s Waterfowl
Conservation Committee. A press
release announcing the actual closure
dates will be forwarded to regional
newspapers and radio and television
stations and posted in village post
offices and stores.
(c) Bristol Bay Region.
(1) Season: April 2–June 14 and July
16–August 31 (general season); April 2–
July 15 for seabird egg gathering only.
(2) Closure: June 15–July 15 (general
season); July 16–August 31 (seabird egg
gathering).
(d) Bering Strait/Norton Sound
Region.
(1) Stebbins/St. Michael Area (Point
Romanof to Canal Point):
(i) Season: April 15–June 14 and July
16–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 15–July 15.
(2) Remainder of the region:
(i) Season: April 2–June 14 and July
16–August 31 for waterfowl; April 2–
July 19 and August 21–August 31 for all
other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 15–July 15 for
waterfowl; July 20–August 20 for all
other birds.
(e) Kodiak Archipelago Region, except
for the Kodiak Island roaded area, is
closed to the harvesting of migratory
E:\FR\FM\11APR2.SGM
11APR2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 / Rules and Regulations
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC71 with RULES_2
birds and their eggs. The closed area
consists of all lands and waters
(including exposed tidelands) east of a
line extending from Crag Point in the
north to the west end of Saltery Cove in
the south and all lands and water south
of a line extending from Termination
Point along the north side of Cascade
Lake extending to Anton Larson Bay.
Waters adjacent to the closed area are
closed to harvest within 500 feet from
the water’s edge. The offshore islands
are open to harvest.
(1) Season: April 2–June 20 and July
22–August 31; egg gathering: May 1–
June 20 only.
(2) Closure: June 21–July 21.
(f) Northwest Arctic Region.
(1) Season: April 2–June 9 and August
15–August 31 (hunting in general);
waterfowl egg gathering May 20–June 9
only; seabird egg gathering July 3–July
12 only; hunting molting/non-nesting
waterfowl July 1–July 31 only.
(2) Closure: June 10–August 14,
except for the taking of seabird eggs and
molting/non-nesting waterfowl as
provided in paragraph (f)(1) of this
section.
(g) North Slope Region.
(1) Southern Unit (Southwestern
North Slope regional boundary east to
Peard Bay, everything west of the
longitude line 158°30′ W and south of
the latitude line 70°45′ N to the west
bank of the Ikpikpuk River, and
everything south of the latitude line
69°45′ N between the west bank of the
Ikpikpuk River to the east bank of
Sagavinirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2–June 29 and July
30–August 31 for seabirds; April 2–June
19 and July 20–August 31 for all other
birds.
(ii) Closure: June 30–July 29 for
seabirds; June 20–July 19 for all other
birds.
(2) Northern Unit (At Peard Bay,
everything east of the longitude line
158°30′ W and north of the latitude line
70°45′ N to west bank of the Ikpikpuk
River, and everything north of the
latitude line 69°45′ N between the west
bank of the Ikpikpuk River to the east
bank of Sagavinirktok River):
VerDate Aug<31>2005
13:15 Apr 10, 2007
Jkt 211001
(i) Season: April 6–June 6 and July 7–
August 31 for king and common eiders
and April 2–June 15 and July 16–August
31 for all other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 7–July 6 for king and
common eiders; June 16–July 15 for all
other birds.
(3) Eastern Unit (East of eastern bank
of the Sagavanirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2–June 19 and July
20–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 20–July 19.
(4) All Units: yellow-billed loons.
Annually, up to 20 yellow-billed loons
total for the region may be caught
inadvertently in subsistence fishing nets
in the North Slope Region and kept for
subsistence use. Individuals must report
each yellow-billed loon inadvertently
caught while subsistence gill net fishing
to the North Slope Borough Department
of Wildlife Management by the end of
the season.
(h) Interior Region.
(1) Season: April 2–June 14 and July
16–August 31; egg gathering May 1–June
14 only.
(2) Closure: June 15–July 15.
(i) Upper Copper River (Harvest Area:
State of Alaska Game Management Units
11 and 13) (Eligible communities:
Gulkana, Chitina, Tazlina, Copper
Center, Gakona, Mentasta Lake,
Chistochina and Cantwell).
(1) Season: April 15–May 26 and June
27–August 31.
(2) Closure: May 27–June 26.
(3) The Copper River Basin
communities listed above also
documented traditional use harvesting
birds in Unit 12, making them eligible
to hunt in this unit using the seasons
specified in paragraph (h) of this
section.
(j) Gulf of Alaska Region.
(1) Prince William Sound Area
(Harvest area: Unit 6 [D]), (Eligible
Chugach communities: Chenega Bay,
Tatitlek).
(i) Season: April 2–May 31 and July
1–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 1–30.
(2) Kachemak Bay Area (Harvest area:
Unit 15[C] South of a line connecting
the tip of Homer Spit to the mouth of
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
18325
Fox River) (Eligible Chugach
Communities: Port Graham, Nanwalek).
(i) Season: April 2–May 31 and July
1–August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 1–30.
(k) Cook Inlet (Harvest area: portions
of Unit 16[B] as specified below)
(Eligible communities: Tyonek only).
(1) Season: April 2–May 31—That
portion of Unit 16(B) south of the
Skwentna River and west of the Yentna
River, and August 1–31—That portion
of Unit 16(B) south of the Beluga River,
Beluga Lake, and the Triumvirate
Glacier.
(2) Closure: June 1–July 31.
(l) Southeast Alaska.
(1) Community of Hoonah (Harvest
area: National Forest lands in Icy Strait
and Cross Sound, including Middle Pass
Rock near the Inian Islands, Table Rock
in Cross Sound, and other traditional
locations on the coast of Yakobi Island.
The land and waters of Glacier Bay
National Park remain closed to all
subsistence harvesting [50 CFR Part
100.3]).
(i) Season: glaucous-winged gull egg
gathering only: May 15–June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1–August 31.
(2) Communities of Craig and
Hydaburg (Harvest area: small islands
and adjacent shoreline of western Prince
of Wales Island from Point Baker to
Cape Chacon, but also including
Coronation and Warren islands).
(i) Season: glaucous-winged gull egg
gathering only: May 15–June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1–August 31.
(3) Community of Yakutat (Harvest
area: Icy Bay [Icy Cape to Pt. Riou], and
coastal lands and islands bordering the
Gulf of Alaska from Pt. Manby southeast
to Dry Bay).
(i) Season: glaucous-winged gull egg
gathering only: May 15–June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1–August 31.
Dated: March 30, 2007.
Todd Willens,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and
Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E7–6667 Filed 4–10–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
E:\FR\FM\11APR2.SGM
11APR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 69 (Wednesday, April 11, 2007)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18318-18325]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6667]
[[Page 18317]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part II
Department of the Interior
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Fish and Wildlife Service
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
50 CFR Part 92
Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in Alaska; Harvest Regulations for
Migratory Birds in Alaska During the 2007 Season; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 69 / Wednesday, April 11, 2007 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 18318]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 92
RIN 1018-AU59
Migratory Bird Subsistence Harvest in Alaska; Harvest Regulations
for Migratory Birds in Alaska During the 2007 Season
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or we) is
publishing harvest regulations for migratory bird subsistence hunting
in Alaska for the 2007 season. This final rule establishes regulations
that prescribe frameworks, or outer limits, for dates when harvesting
of birds may occur, species that can be taken, and methods and means
that are excluded from use. These regulations were developed under a
Co-management process involving the Service, the Alaska Department of
Fish and Game, and Alaska Native representatives. These regulations
provide a framework to enable the continuation of customary and
traditional subsistence uses of migratory birds in Alaska. The
rulemaking is necessary because the regulations governing the
subsistence harvest of migratory birds in Alaska are subject to annual
review. This rulemaking establishes regulations that go into effect on
April 2, 2007, and expire on August 31, 2007.
DATES: The amendments to subpart C of 50 CFR part 92 become effective
May 11, 2007. The amendments to subparts A and D of 50 CFR part 92 are
effective April 11, 2007, through August 31, 2007.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Armstrong, (907) 786-3887, or
Donna Dewhurst, (907) 786-3499, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 E.
Tudor Road, Mail Stop 201, Anchorage, AK 99503.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
How Do I Find the History of These Regulations?
Background information, including past events leading to this
action, accomplishments since the Migratory Bird Treaties with Canada
and Mexico were amended, and a history of addressing conservation
issues can be found in the following Federal Register notices: August
16, 2002 (67 FR 53511), July 21, 2003 (68 FR 43010), April 2, 2004 (69
FR 17318), April 8, 2005 (70 FR 18244), and February 28, 2006 (71 FR
10404). These documents are readily available at https://alaska.fws.gov/
ambcc/regulations.htm.
Why Is This Current Rulemaking Necessary?
This current rulemaking is necessary because the migratory bird
harvest season is closed unless opened, and the regulations governing
subsistence harvest of migratory birds in Alaska are subject to public
review and annual approval. The Co-management Council held a meeting in
April 2006 to develop recommendations for changes effective for the
2007 harvest season. These recommendations were presented to the
Service Regulations Committee (SRC) on July 26 and 27, 2006, and were
approved.
On December 13, 2006, we published in the Federal Register (71 FR
75061) a proposed rule to establish spring/summer migratory bird
subsistence harvest regulations in Alaska for the 2007 subsistence
season. The proposed rule provided for a public comment period of 60
days.
This rule finalizes regulations for the taking of migratory birds
for subsistence uses in Alaska during 2007. This rule lists migratory
bird species that are open or closed to harvest, as well as season
openings and closures by region, and a change to the Fairbanks North
Star Borough excluded area. It also describes a change in the methods
and means of taking migratory birds for subsistence purposes.
How Will the Service Continue To Ensure That the Subsistence Harvest
Will Not Raise Overall Migratory Bird Harvest?
The Service has an emergency closure provision (50 CFR 92.21), so
that if any significant increases in harvest are documented for one or
more species in a region, an emergency closure can be requested and
implemented. Eligibility to harvest under the regulations established
in 2003 was limited to permanent residents, regardless of race, in
villages located within the Alaska Peninsula, Kodiak Archipelago, the
Aleutian Islands and in areas north and west of the Alaska Range (50
CFR 92.5). These geographical restrictions opened the initial
subsistence migratory bird harvest to only about 13 percent of Alaska
residents. High-population areas such as Anchorage, the Matanuska-
Susitna and Fairbanks North Star boroughs, the Kenai Peninsula roaded
area, the Gulf of Alaska roaded area and Southeast Alaska were excluded
from the eligible subsistence harvest areas.
Based on petitions requesting inclusion in the harvest, in 2004, we
added 13 additional communities based on the five criteria set forth in
50 CFR 92.5(c). These communities included: Gulkana, Gakona, Tazlina,
Copper Center, Mentasta Lake, Chitina, Chistochina, Tatitlek, Chenega,
Port Graham and Nanwalek, Tyonek, and Hoonah, with populations totaling
2,766. In 2005, we added three additional communities for glaucous-
winged gull egg gathering only, based on petitions requesting
inclusion. These southeastern communities included Craig, Hydaburg, and
Yakutat, with a combined population of 2,459. These new communities
increased the percentage of the State population included in the
subsistence bird harvest to 14 percent.
In this rule, we have enacted the Alaska Department of Fish and
Game's (ADFG) request to expand the Fairbanks North Star Borough
excluded area to the Central Interior excluded area comprising the
following: That portion of Unit 20(A) east of the Wood River drainage
and south of Rex Trail, including the upper Wood River drainage south
of its confluence with Chicken Creek; that portion of Unit 20(C) east
of Denali National Park north to Rock Creek and east to Unit 20(A); and
that portion of Unit 20(D) west of the Tanana River between its
confluence with the Johnson and Delta Rivers, west of the east bank of
the Johnson River, and north and west of the Volmar drainage, including
the Goodpaster River drainage.
The purpose of the excluded area's expansion is to prevent new
traditions and increased harvest levels that could result from
inclusion of communities that have not traditionally hunted migratory
birds in the spring and summer for subsistence. Specifically, this
regulation would exclude residents of Delta Junction/Big Delta/Fort
Greely, McKinley Park/Village, Healy and Ferry from eligibility to
participate in spring/summer migratory bird subsistence hunts. There is
no evidence that there has been a tradition of spring/summer
subsistence migratory bird hunting in the excluded area. ADFG also
cited the action by the Alaska Joint Boards of Fisheries and Game in
1992 creating the Fairbanks Non-subsistence area as additional
rationale for this regulation. The report focused on a socio-economic
study that was conducted to determine whether or not subsistence traits
existed in the Fairbanks region to justify it being considered a
subsistence eligible area. The summary report recommended the
[[Page 18319]]
Fairbanks area be considered a nonsubsistence use area. The study was
based on the application of 12 socio-economic factors to each community
to determine whether or not subsistence-related traits existed.
In addition, we clarified the definition of excluded areas to
explain that persons living in excluded areas are not eligible to
participate in the Alaska spring/summer subsistence harvest and that
the excluded area is closed to harvesting.
What Is Changing in the Methods and Means Prohibitions for 2007?
When we established the initial methods and means regulations (68
FR 43010, July 21, 2003), we followed the Co-management Council
recommendation to adopt those existing methods and means prohibitions
that occur in the Federal (50 CFR 20.21) and Alaska (5AAC92.100)
migratory bird hunting regulations and that do not conflict with the
customary and traditional methods of taking birds. In this rule, we
have incorporated the ADFG's request to prohibit baiting and shooting
over a baited area (Statewide).
What Is Changing in the List of Birds Open to Harvest for 2007?
At the request of the North Slope Borough Fish and Game Management
Committee, the Co-management Council recommended continuing into 2007
the provisions originally established in 2005 to allow subsistence use
of yellow-billed loons inadvertently caught in subsistence fishing
(gill) nets on the North Slope. Yellow-billed loons are culturally
important for the Inupiat Eskimo of the North Slope for use in
traditional dance regalia. A maximum of 20 yellow-billed loons may be
caught in 2007 pursuant to this provision. The North Slope Borough
Department of Wildlife requires individuals to report their take of
yellow-billed loons by the end of each season. In addition, the North
Slope Borough has asked fishermen, through announcements on the radio
and through personal contact, to report all entanglements of loons to
better estimate the levels of injury or mortality caused by gill nets.
In 2006, four yellow-billed loons were reported taken in fishing nets
and an additional one was found alive in a net and released. This
provision, to allow subsistence possession and use of yellow-billed
loons caught in fishing gill nets, is subject to annual review and
renewal by the SRC.
Summary of Public Involvement
On December 13, 2006, we published in the Federal Register (71 FR
75061) a proposed rule to establish spring/summer migratory bird
subsistence harvest regulations in Alaska for the 2007 subsistence
season. The proposed rule provided for a public comment period of 60
days. We posted an announcement of the comment period dates for the
proposed rule, as well as the rule itself and related historical
documents, on the Council's internet homepage. We issued a press
release announcing our request for public comments and the pertinent
deadlines for such comments, which was faxed to the media Statewide. By
the close of the public comment period on February 12, 2007, we had
received written responses from three entities. Two of the responses
were from individuals and one from a non-governmental organization.
Response to Public Comments
General Comments
One general comment was received on the overall regulations by
expressing strong opposition to the concept of allowing any harvest of
migratory birds in Alaska.
Service Response: For centuries, indigenous inhabitants of Alaska
have harvested migratory birds for subsistence purposes during the
spring and summer months. The Canada and Mexico migratory bird treaties
were recently amended for the express purpose of allowing subsistence
hunting for migratory birds during the spring and summer and clearly
contemplate that the Service would issue regulations allowing such
hunting as provided in the Migratory Bird Treat Act, 16 U.S.C. 712(1).
See Statutory Authority section for more details.
The Preamble of the Protocol amending the Canada Treaty states one
of its goals is to allow a traditional subsistence hunt while also
improving conservation of migratory birds through effective regulation
of this hunt. In addition, the Preamble notes that, by sanctioning a
traditional subsistence hunt, the Parties do not intend to cause
significant increases in the take of migratory birds, relative to their
continental population sizes, compared to the take that is presently
occurring. Any such increase in take as a result of the types of
hunting provided for in the Protocol would be inconsistent with the
Convention. If at some point the subsistence harvest regulations result
in increased harvest, management strategies will be implemented to
ensure maintenance of continental populations.
How Will the Service Continue To Ensure That the Subsistence Harvest
Will Not Raise Overall Migratory Bird Harvest?
Two comments were received regarding passage of a request to expand
the Fairbanks North Star Borough excluded area to the Central Interior
excluded area, which would exclude residents of Delta Junction/Big
Delta/Fort Greely, McKinley Park/Village, Healy and Ferry from
eligibility to participate in spring/summer migratory bird subsistence
hunts. The expansion mirrors the current State of Alaska Fairbanks Non-
subsistence Use Area boundaries. One commenter expressed support of
expansion of the excluded area, stating that there is no evidence of a
tradition of spring/summer subsistence hunting within the area. Another
commenter brought up the question of whether due process was followed
in the decision making process to take away the subsistence rights of
the subsistence users in this area. The commenter further questions if
all means (example: radio, television, local paper, State paper,
flyers, meeting etc.) were exhausted in notifying the public
(community) to weigh in on this issue involving taking away their
subsistence right to hunt waterfowl. The commenter asks why other
options were not brought to the table, such as alternate means of
management including quotas or bag limits. The commenter also asks if
there were any biological studies reflecting a negative impact on the
waterfowl harvested in the area.
Service Response: A process for petitioning to exclude a community
was approved by the Co-management Council on April 6, 2006. The
approval process starts with petitions to exclude communities being
sent to the Co-management Council during the November 1-December 15
open submission period. A petition should address the five criteria
listed in 50 CFR 92.5(c). Upon submission, the petition will follow the
normal review process outlined for regulatory proposals, including
review by the Co-management Council's Technical Committee and petition
dispersal to the regional management bodies for their review and
recommendation(s). The affected regions are then responsible to conduct
public meetings in the affected communities, after appropriate public
notice.
In a public meeting held in Anchorage on April 6, 2006, the Co-
management Council voted to recommend approval of the proposal to
expand the Fairbanks North Star Borough excluded area and re-named it
the Central Interior
[[Page 18320]]
excluded area. Justification to proceed was based on the fact that
there is no evidence that there has been a tradition of spring and
summer hunting of migratory birds in the proposed excluded area. The
proposal cited previous action by the Alaska Joint Boards of Fisheries
and Game in 1992 creating the Fairbanks Non-subsistence area as
rationale for this regulation. The report focused on a socio-economic
study that was conducted to determine whether or not subsistence traits
existed in the Fairbanks region to justify it being considered a
subsistence eligible area. The summary report recommended the Fairbanks
area be considered a non-subsistence use area. The study was based on
the application of 12 socio-economic factors to each community to
determine whether or not subsistence-related traits existed. The Joint
Boards of Fisheries and Game unanimously approved the non-subsistence
use area.
To address the commenter's concern about public notification, we
offer the following: The issue of excluding communities in the Interior
of Alaska is not a new issue. Since the inception of the Co-management
Council, we have had several proposals to expand or exclude either the
Interior region or communities from participating in the spring and
summer harvest of migratory birds in Alaska. The first year, a proposal
was submitted to exclude several communities including Delta Junction,
Tok, and other communities located on the Alaska Highway. At that time,
the Co-management Council rejected the proposal based on the fact that
there was no process or criteria for excluding communities or regions
from participation in the spring/summer program. The second year, a
proposal was submitted to exclude the agricultural fields located on
the Alaska Highway that were the focus of the problem encountered by
farmers and hunters. That proposal was rejected based on the fact that
the regional management partner had not held any regional meetings to
vet the proposal.
The Co-management Council is required by its by-laws to publicize
the meetings 30 days prior to the meetings in a public newspaper. We
also post the notices, draft agendas, and proposals on our website,
which is available to anyone with internet access. The Co-management
Council also utilizes the Service's Alaska Region External Affairs
distribution system, which disseminates public notices to more than 40
newspaper and radio/television stations in Alaska, to invite public
participation in the Co-management Council Meetings. The Co-management
Council provides ample opportunity during their meetings for people to
comment and voice their concerns. Potential closing of the region to
subsistence bird hunting has been discussed at the local Fish and Game
Advisory Committee meetings, which are open to the public.
We also send Federal Register publications to the various
conservation system units in Alaska, including the National Wildlife
Refuge system in Alaska, the National Park Service, the Bureau of Land
Management, and other conservation-oriented programs in Alaska.
Finally, the Co-management Council produces on an annual basis a
user-friendly version of the regulations. This handbook is developed
annually and dispersed to more than 26,000 households in eligible
communities in Alaska. The handbooks reflect current regional and
Statewide regulations as well as changes for the upcoming season.
The commenter asked if other management options, such as bag limits
or quotas, were brought to the table for discussion prior to this
exclusion decision. The options of going to bag limits or quotas were
not discussed formally at the Co-management Council level. Relative to
this proposal, however, these ideas have been discussed in other
settings, and because of the spirit and intent of legitimizing the
spring and summer harvest, such as sharing and passing down of customs
and traditions, the notion of bag limits was dismissed because it did
not fit into the local traditions of harvesting and sharing with others
in a community. A parallel proposal, to close subsistence migratory
bird hunting in a portion of the agricultural fields in Unit 20(D) for
August 15-31 of each year, was brought forward and tabled for one year.
The Co-management Council on April 6, 2006, opted to support ADFG's
exclusion proposal instead of the option of a seasonal closure of the
agricultural fields.
The commenter asked if there were any biological studies reflecting
a negative impact on the waterfowl harvested in the area. Neither the
Service nor ADFG has conducted any formal studies of the effects of
spring/summer subsistence migratory bird hunting in the expanded
exclusion area on either the local or nationwide waterfowl species
populations. The Service has not conducted subsistence migratory bird
harvest surveys of the communities that will be excluded under the
exclusion area expansion during the 4 years of legal harvest (2003-06).
What Is Changing on the List of Birds Open to Harvest for 2007?
One comment was received stating continued opposition to
maintaining 15 species of conservation concern on the list of birds
open to harvest for 2007. These 15 species included: brant (Banta
bernicula), king and common eiders (Somateria spectabilis and
millissma), black scoter (Melanitta nigra), long-tailed duck (Clangula
hyemalis), red-throated and yellow-billed loons (Gavia stellata and
adamsii), black oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani), bar-tailed godwit
(Limosa lapponica), ruddy turnstone (Arenaria interpres), dunlin
(Calidris alpine), red-legged kittiwake (Rissa brevirostris), Arctic
and Aleutian terns (Sterna paradisaea and aleutica), and whiskered
auklet (Aethia pygmaea).
Service Response: The Service originally addressed the Birds of
Conservation Concern relative to the subsistence harvest starting in
July 2003, with a final decision published in the April 2, 2004,
Federal Register (69 FR 17318). The Birds of Conservation Concern list
does not include waterfowl species, so the first five species listed in
the comment were not addressed. Brant population trends were
extensively discussed in 2005 and 2006, and regional closures were put
in place starting in the 2006 season (71 FR 10404; February 28, 2006).
If the commentor desires to pursue subsistence harvest restrictions
on the bird species listed above, the commenter could submit one or
more formal proposals to change harvest regulations during the annual
open period of November 1-December 15, 2007. The proposal(s) should
include any new and updated species population data that would justify
a change in the original Service decisions. The Co-management Council
is a Co-management system comprised of Alaska Natives, and State and
Federal representatives, acting as equals, that provide recommendations
to the SRC on conservation issues relative to the subsistence harvest
of migratory birds in Alaska.
One commenter requested that ivory gulls (Pagophila eburnea) be
removed from the List of Birds Open to Harvest in 2007. The documented
population decline was cited as justification as well as the recent
recommendation to list the species as endangered by the Committee on
the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada.
Service Response: Ivory gulls are spring and fall migrants along
Alaska's North Slope and northern Bering Sea. A similar concern was
raised in comments
[[Page 18321]]
on the 2004 proposed rule (69 FR 17318; April 2, 2004), but no formal
proposals have ever been submitted for closure. Ivory gulls are not on
the Birds of Conservation Concern list on any scale, because the list
does not include casual migrants/non-breeders. We will continue to
monitor circumpolar management recommendations and species population
trends. The Arctic Council's Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna-
Circumpolar Seabird Working Group will be completing an Ivory Gull
Conservation Strategy in 2007 that will document this bird's current,
global population status and identify conservation issues. Proposals to
remove ivory gulls from the 2009 harvest regulations may be submitted
during the annual open period of November 1-December 15, 2007.
Statutory Authority
We derive our authority to issue these regulations from the
Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C. 712(1), which authorizes the
Secretary of the Interior, in accordance with the treaties with Canada,
Mexico, Japan, and Russia, to ``issue such regulations as may be
necessary to assure that the taking of migratory birds and the
collection of their eggs, by the indigenous inhabitants of the State of
Alaska, shall be permitted for their own nutritional and other
essential needs, as determined by the Secretary of the Interior, during
seasons established so as to provide for the preservation and
maintenance of stocks of migratory birds.''
Executive Order 12866
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
document is not a significant rule subject to OMB review under
Executive Order 12866.
(a) This rule will not have an annual economic effect of $100
million or more or adversely affect an economic sector, productivity,
jobs, the environment, or other units of government. The rule does not
provide for new or additional hunting opportunities and therefore will
have minimal economic or environmental impact. This rule benefits those
participants who engage in the subsistence harvest of migratory birds
in Alaska in two identifiable ways: first, participants receive the
consumptive value of the birds harvested; and second, participants get
the cultural benefit associated with the maintenance of a subsistence
economy and way of life. The Service can estimate the consumptive value
for birds harvested under this rule but does not have a dollar value
for the cultural benefit of maintaining a subsistence economy and way
of life.
The economic value derived from the consumption of the harvested
migratory birds has been estimated using the results of a paper by
Robert J. Wolfe titled, ``Subsistence Food Harvests in Rural Alaska,
and Food Safety Issues'' (August 13, 1996). Using data from Wolfe's
paper and applying it to the areas that will be included in this
process, we determined a maximum economic value of $6 million annually.
This is the estimated economic benefit of the consumptive part of this
rule for participants in subsistence hunting. The cultural benefits of
maintaining a subsistence economy and way of life can be of
considerable value to the participants, and these benefits are not
included in this figure.
(b) This rule will not create inconsistencies with other agencies'
actions. We are the Federal agency responsible for the management of
migratory birds, coordinating with the State of Alaska's Department of
Fish and Game on management programs within Alaska. The State of Alaska
is a member of the Alaska Migratory Bird Co-management Council.
(c) This rule will not materially affect entitlements, grants, user
fees, loan programs, or the rights and obligations of their recipients.
The rule does not affect entitlement programs.
(d) This rule will not raise novel legal or policy issues. The
subsistence harvest regulations will go through the same national
regulatory process as the existing migratory bird hunting regulations
in 50 CFR part 20.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small
entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). An initial regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
Accordingly, a Small Entity Compliance Guide is not required. The rule
legalizes a pre-existing subsistence activity, and the resources
harvested will be consumed by the harvesters or persons within their
local community.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act, as discussed in the
Executive Order 12866 section above.
(a) This rule will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100
million or more. It will legalize and regulate a traditional
subsistence activity. It will not result in a substantial increase in
subsistence harvest or a significant change in harvesting patterns. The
commodities being regulated under this rule are migratory birds. This
rule deals with legalizing the subsistence harvest of migratory birds
and, as such, does not involve commodities traded in the marketplace. A
small economic benefit from this rule derives from the sale of
equipment and ammunition to carry out subsistence hunting. Most, if not
all, businesses that sell hunting equipment in rural Alaska would
qualify as small businesses. We have no reason to believe that this
rule will lead to a disproportionate distribution of benefits.
(b) This rule will not cause a major increase in costs or prices
for consumers; individual industries; Federal, State, or local
government agencies; or geographic regions. This rule does not deal
with traded commodities and, therefore, does not have an impact on
prices for consumers.
(c) This rule does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This rule deals with the harvesting of wildlife for
personal consumption. It does not regulate the marketplace in any way
to generate effects on the economy or the ability of businesses to
compete.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
We have determined and certified pursuant to the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.) that this rule will not impose a
cost of $100 million or more in any given year on local, State, or
tribal governments or private entities. A statement containing the
information required by this Act is therefore not necessary.
Participation on regional management bodies and the Co-management
Council will require travel expenses for some Alaska Native
organizations and local governments. In addition, they will assume some
expenses related to coordinating involvement of village councils in the
regulatory process. Total coordination and travel expenses for all
Alaska Native organizations are estimated to be less than $300,000 per
year. In the March 28, 2000, Notice of Decision (65 FR 16405), we
identified 12 partner organizations (Alaska Native non-profits and
local governments) to administer the regional programs. The ADFG will
also incur expenses for travel to Co-management Council and regional
management body meetings. In addition, the State of Alaska will be
required to provide technical staff
[[Page 18322]]
support to each of the regional management bodies and to the Co-
management Council. Expenses for the State's involvement may exceed
$100,000 per year, but should not exceed $150,000 per year. When
funding permits, we make annual grant agreements available to the
partner organizations and the ADFG to help offset their expenses.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule has been examined under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 and has been found to contain information collection requirements.
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the collection
of information associated with the voluntary annual household surveys
that we use to determine levels of subsistence take. OMB has assigned
OMB control number 1018-0124, which expires on January 31, 2010. We
estimate the annual burden for this information collection to be 4,156
hours. We will seek OMB approval for other necessary information
collections contained in 50 CFR part 92. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
Federalism Effects
As discussed in the Executive Order 12866 and Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act sections above, this rule does not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism
Assessment under Executive Order 13132. We worked with the State of
Alaska on development of these regulations.
Civil Justice Reform--Executive Order 12988
The Department, in promulgating this rule, has determined that it
will not unduly burden the judicial system and that it meets the
requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.
Takings Implication Assessment
This rule is not specific to particular land ownership, but applies
to the harvesting of migratory bird resources throughout Alaska.
Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12630, this rule does not
have significant takings implications.
Government-to-Government Relations With Native American Tribal
Governments
In accordance with the President's memorandum of April 29, 1994,
``Government-to-Government Relations With Native American Tribal
Governments'' (59 FR 22951), and Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 6, 2000), concerning consultation and coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments, we have consulted with Alaska tribes and evaluated
the rule for possible effects on tribes or trust resources, and have
determined that there are no significant effects. The rule will legally
recognize the subsistence harvest of migratory birds and their eggs for
tribal members, as well as for other indigenous inhabitants.
Endangered Species Act Consideration
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, as amended (16 U.S.C.
1531-1543; 87 Stat. 884), provides that, ``The Secretary shall review
other programs administered by him and utilize such programs in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act'' and shall ``insure that any
action authorized, funded, or carried out * * * is not likely to
jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species or
threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification
of [critical] habitat. * * *'' Consequently, we consulted with the
Anchorage Fish and Wildlife Field Office of the Service to ensure that
actions resulting from these regulations would not likely jeopardize
the continued existence of spectacled or Steller's eiders or result in
the destruction or adverse modification of their critical habitat.
Findings from this consultation are included in the Biological Opinion
on the Effects of the Proposed 2007 Spring and Summer Subsistence
Harvest of Birds on the Threatened Steller's and Spectacled Eiders
(dated March 30, 2007). The consultation concluded that the 2007
regulations are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of
either the Steller's or spectacled eider. Additionally, any
modifications resulting from this consultation to regulatory measures
previously proposed are reflected in this final rule.
National Environmental Policy Act Consideration
The annual regulations and options were considered in the
Environmental Assessment, ``Managing Migratory Bird Subsistence Hunting
in Alaska: Hunting Regulations for the 2007 Spring/Summer Harvest,''
issued August 15, 2006. Copies are available from the address indicated
under the caption ADDRESSES.
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use (Executive Order 13211)
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 on
regulations that significantly affect energy supply, distribution, and
use. Executive Order 13211 requires agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions. Because this rule
would allow only for traditional subsistence harvest and would improve
conservation of migratory birds by allowing effective regulation of
this harvest, it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive
Order 13211. Consequently, it is not expected to significantly affect
energy supplies, distribution, and use. Therefore, this action is not a
significant energy action under Executive Order 13211 and no Statement
of Energy Effects is required.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 92
Exports, Hunting, Imports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Subsistence, Treaties, Wildlife.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, we amend title 50, chapter I,
subchapter G, of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 92--MIGRATORY BIRD SUBSISTENCE HARVEST IN ALASKA
0
1. The authority citation for part 92 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 703-712.
Subpart A--General Provisions
0
2. In subpart A, amend Sec. 92.5 by:
0
a. Removing paragraph (a)(3); and
0
b. Revising the introductory text and paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2)
introductory text, (a)(2)(iv), and (b).
Sec. 92.5 Who is eligible to participate?
If you are a permanent resident of a village within a subsistence
harvest area, you will be eligible to harvest migratory birds and their
eggs for subsistence purposes during the applicable periods specified
in subpart D of this part.
(a) * * *
(1) Any person may request the Co-management Council to recommend
that an otherwise included area be excluded by submitting a petition
stating how the area does not meet the criteria identified in paragraph
(c) of this section. The Co-management Council will forward petitions
to the appropriate regional management body. The Co-management Council
will then consider each petition and will submit to the Service any
recommendations to exclude areas from the spring and summer subsistence
[[Page 18323]]
harvest. The Service will publish any approved recommendations for
public comment in the Federal Register.
(2) Based on petitions for inclusion recommended by the Co-
management Council, the Service has added the following communities to
the included areas under this part:
* * * * *
(iv) Southeast Alaska Region--Hoonah, Craig, Hydaburg, and Yakutat.
(b) Excluded areas. Excluded areas are not subsistence harvest
areas and are closed to harvest. Residents of excluded areas are not
eligible persons as defined in Sec. 92.4. Communities located within
the excluded areas provided in paragraphs (b)(2) and (b)(3) of this
section may petition the Co-management Council through their regional
management body for designation as a spring and summer subsistence
harvest area. The petition must state how the community meets the
criteria identified in paragraph (c) of this section. The Co-management
Council will consider each petition and will submit to the Service any
recommendations to designate a community as a spring and summer
subsistence harvest area. The Service will publish any approved new
designations of communities for public comment in the Federal Register.
Excluded areas consist of the following:
(1) All areas outside of Alaska.
(2) Village areas located in Anchorage, the Matanuska-Susitna
Borough, the Kenai Peninsula roaded area, the Gulf of Alaska roaded
area, Southeast Alaska, and the Central Interior Excluded Area as
described in paragraph (b)(3) of this section generally do not qualify
for a spring and summer harvest.
(3) The Central Interior Excluded Area comprises the following:
That portion of Unit 20(A) east of the Wood River drainage and south of
Rex Trail, including the upper Wood River drainage south of its
confluence with Chicken Creek; that portion of Unit 20(C) east of
Denali National Park north to Rock Creek and east to Unit 20(A); and
that portion of Unit 20(D) west of the Tanana River between its
confluence with the Johnson and Delta Rivers, west of the east bank of
the Johnson River, and north and west of the Volmar drainage, including
the Goodpaster River drainage. The following communities are within the
Excluded Area: Delta Junction/Big Delta/Fort Greely, McKinley Park/
Village, Healy, Ferry, and all residents of the formerly named
Fairbanks North Star Borough Excluded Area.
* * * * *
Subpart C--General Regulations Governing Subsistence Harvest
0
3. In subpart C, amend Sec. 92.20 by:
0
a. Removing ``or'' from the end of paragraph (i);
0
b. Removing the period from, and adding in its place ``; or'' at, the
end of paragraph (j); and
0
c. Adding a new paragraph (k) to read as set forth below.
Sec. 92.20 Methods and means.
* * * * *
(k) By the aid of baiting, or on or over any baited area, where a
person knows or reasonably should know that the area is or has been
baited, as provided at 50 CFR 20.21(i) and 16 U.S.C. 704(b).
Subpart D--Annual Regulations Governing Subsistence Harvest
0
4. In subpart D, revise Sec. Sec. 92.31 through 92.33 to read as
follows:
Sec. 92.31 Migratory bird species closed to subsistence harvest.
(a) Because of conservation concerns, you may not harvest birds or
gather eggs from the following species in 2007:
(1) Spectacled Eider (Somateria fischeri).
(2) Steller's Eider (Polysticta stelleri).
(3) Emperor Goose (Chen canagica).
(4) Aleutian Canada Goose (Branta canadensis leucopareia)--Semidi
Islands only.
(5) Yellow-billed Loons (Gavia adamsii)--Except that in the North
Slope Region only, up to 20 yellow-billed loons total for the region
may be inadvertently caught in fishing nets and kept for subsistence
purposes.
(b) In addition, you may not gather eggs from the following species
in 2007:
(1) Cackling Canada Goose (Branta canadensis minima).
(2) Black Brant (Branta bernicla nigricans)--in the Yukon/Kuskokwim
Delta and North Slope regions only.
Sec. 92.32 Subsistence migratory bird species.
You may harvest birds or gather eggs from the following species,
listed in taxonomic order, within all included areas. When birds are
listed only to the species level, all subspecies existing in Alaska are
open to harvest.
(a) Family Anatidae.
(1) Greater White-fronted Goose (Anser albifrons).
(2) Snow Goose (Chen caerulescens).
(3) Lesser Canada Goose (Branta canadensis parvipes).
(4) Taverner's Canada Goose (Branta canadensis taverneri).
(5) Aleutian Canada Goose (Branta canadensis leucopareia)--except
in the Semidi Islands.
(6) Cackling Canada Goose (Branta canadensis minima)--except no egg
gathering is permitted.
(7) Black Brant (Branta bernicla nigricans)--except no egg
gathering is permitted in the Yukon/Kuskokwim Delta and the North Slope
regions.
(8) Tundra Swan (Cygnus columbianus)--except in Units 9(D) and 10.
(9) Gadwall (Anas strepera).
(10) Eurasian Wigeon (Anas penelope).
(11) American Wigeon (Anas americana).
(12) Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos).
(13) Blue-winged Teal (Anas discors).
(14) Northern Shoveler (Anas clypeata).
(15) Northern Pintail (Anas acuta).
(16) Green-winged Teal (Anas crecca).
(17) Canvasback (Aythya valisineria).
(18) Redhead (Aythya americana).
(19) Ring-necked Duck (Aythya collaris).
(20) Greater Scaup (Aythya marila).
(21) Lesser Scaup (Aythya affinis).
(22) King Eider (Somateria spectabilis).
(23) Common Eider (Somateria mollissima).
(24) Harlequin Duck (Histrionicus histrionicus).
(25) Surf Scoter (Melanitta perspicillata).
(26) White-winged Scoter (Melanitta fusca).
(27) Black Scoter (Melanitta nigra).
(28) Long-tailed Duck (Clangula hyemalis).
(29) Bufflehead (Bucephala albeola).
(30) Common Goldeneye (Bucephala clangula).
(31) Barrow's Goldeneye (Bucephala islandica).
(32) Hooded Merganser (Lophodytes cucullatus).
(33) Common Merganser (Mergus merganser).
(34) Red-breasted Merganser (Mergus serrator).
(b) Family Gaviidae.
(1) Red-throated Loon (Gavia stellata).
(2) Arctic Loon (Gavia arctica).
(3) Pacific Loon (Gavia pacifica).
(4) Common Loon (Gavia immer).
(5) Yellow-billed Loon (Gavia adamsii)--In the North Slope Region
only, a total of up to 20 yellow-billed loons inadvertently caught in
fishing nets may be kept for subsistence purposes.
(c) Family Podicipedidae.
(1) Horned Grebe (Podiceps auritus).
(2) Red-necked Grebe (Podiceps grisegena).
(d) Family Procellariidae.
(1) Northern Fulmar (Fulmarus glacialis).
[[Page 18324]]
(2) [Reserved].
(e) Family Phalacrocoracidae.
(1) Double-crested Cormorant (Phalacrocorax auritus).
(2) Pelagic Cormorant (Phalacrocorax pelagicus).
(f) Family Gruidae.
(1) Sandhill Crane (Grus canadensis).
(2) [Reserved].
(g) Family Charadriidae.
(1) Black-bellied Plover (Pluvialis squatarola).
(2) Common Ringed Plover (Charadrius hiaticula).
(h) Family Haematopodidae.
(1) Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani).
(2) [Reserved].
(i) Family Scolopacidae.
(1) Greater Yellowlegs (Tringa melanoleuca).
(2) Lesser Yellowlegs (Tringa flavipes).
(3) Spotted Sandpiper (Actitis macularia).
(4) Bar-tailed Godwit (Limosa lapponica).
(5) Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres).
(6) Semipalmated Sandpiper (Calidris pusilla).
(7) Western Sandpiper (Calidris mauri).
(8) Least Sandpiper (Calidris minutilla).
(9) Baird's Sandpiper (Calidris bairdii).
(10) Sharp-tailed Sandpiper (Calidris acuminata).
(11) Dunlin (Calidris alpina).
(12) Long-billed Dowitcher (Limnodromus scolopaceus).
(13) Common Snipe (Gallinago gallinago).
(14) Red-necked phalarope (Phalaropus lobatus).
(15) Red phalarope (Phalaropus fulicaria).
(j) Family Laridae.
(1) Pomarine Jaeger (Stercorarius pomarinus).
(2) Parasitic Jaeger (Stercorarius parasiticus).
(3) Long-tailed Jaeger (Stercorarius longicaudus).
(4) Bonaparte's Gull (Larus philadelphia).
(5) Mew Gull (Larus canus).
(6) Herring Gull (Larus argentatus).
(7) Slaty-backed Gull (Larus schistisagus).
(8) Glaucous-winged Gull (Larus glaucescens).
(9) Glaucous Gull (Larus hyperboreus).
(10) Sabine's Gull (Xema sabini).
(11) Black-legged Kittiwake (Rissa tridactyla).
(12) Red-legged Kittiwake (Rissa brevirostris).
(13) Ivory Gull (Pagophila eburnea).
(14) Arctic Tern (Sterna paradisaea).
(15) Aleutian Tern (Sterna aleutica).
(k) Family Alcidae.
(1) Common Murre (Uria aalge).
(2) Thick-billed Murre (Uria lomvia).
(3) Black Guillemot (Cepphus grylle).
(4) Pigeon Guillemot (Cepphus columba).
(5) Cassin's Auklet (Ptychoramphus aleuticus).
(6) Parakeet Auklet (Aethia psittacula).
(7) Least Auklet (Aethia pusilla).
(8) Whiskered Auklet (Aethia pygmaea).
(9) Crested Auklet (Aethia cristatella).
(10) Rhinoceros Auklet (Cerorhinca monocerata).
(11) Horned Puffin (Fratercula corniculata).
(12) Tufted Puffin (Fratercula cirrhata).
(l) Family Strigidae.
(1) Great Horned Owl (Bubo virginianus).
(2) Snowy Owl (Nyctea scandiaca).
Sec. 92.33 Region-specific regulations.
The 2007 season dates for the eligible subsistence harvest areas
are as follows:
(a) Aleutian/Pribilof Islands Region.
(1) Northern Unit (Pribilof Islands):
(i) Season: April 2-June 30.
(ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
(2) Central Unit (Aleut Region's eastern boundary on the Alaska
Peninsula westward to and including Unalaska Island):
(i) Season: April 2-June 15 and July 16-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 16-July 15.
(iii) Special Black Brant Season Closure: August 16-August 31, only
in Izembek and Moffet lagoons.
(iv) Special Tundra Swan Closure: All hunting and egg gathering
closed in units 9(D) and 10.
(3) Western Unit (Umnak Island west to and including Attu Island):
(i) Season: April 2-July 15 and August 16-August 31.
(ii) Closure: July 16-August 15.
(b) Yukon/Kuskokwim Delta Region.
(1) Season: April 2-August 31.
(2) Closure: 30-day closure dates to be announced by the Service's
Alaska Regional Director or his designee, after consultation with local
subsistence users, field biologists, and the Association of Village
Council President's Waterfowl Conservation Committee. This 30-day
period will occur between June 1 and August 15 of each year. A press
release announcing the actual closure dates will be forwarded to
regional newspapers and radio and television stations and posted in
village post offices and stores.
(3) Special Black Brant and Cackling Goose Season Hunting Closure:
From the period when egg laying begins until young birds are fledged.
Closure dates to be announced by the Service's Alaska Regional Director
or his designee, after consultation with field biologists and the
Association of Village Council President's Waterfowl Conservation
Committee. A press release announcing the actual closure dates will be
forwarded to regional newspapers and radio and television stations and
posted in village post offices and stores.
(4) Special Area Closure:
(i) The following described goose nesting colonies are closed to
all hunting and egg gathering from the period of nest initiation until
young birds are fledged:
(A) Kokechik Bay Colony--bounded by 61.61[deg] N to 61.67[deg] N
and 165.83[deg] W to 166.08[deg] W;
(B) Tutakoke River Colony--bounded by 61.20[deg] N to 61.28[deg] N
and 165.08[deg] W to 165.13[deg] W;
(C) Kigigak Island Colony--bounded by island's edge;
(D) Baird Peninsula Colony--bounded by 60.87[deg] N to 60.91[deg] N
and 164.65[deg] W to 165.80[deg] W; and
(E) Baird Island Colony--bounded by island's edge.
(ii) Closure dates to be announced by the Alaska Regional Director
or his designee, after consultation with field biologists and the
Association of Village Council President's Waterfowl Conservation
Committee. A press release announcing the actual closure dates will be
forwarded to regional newspapers and radio and television stations and
posted in village post offices and stores.
(c) Bristol Bay Region.
(1) Season: April 2-June 14 and July 16-August 31 (general season);
April 2-July 15 for seabird egg gathering only.
(2) Closure: June 15-July 15 (general season); July 16-August 31
(seabird egg gathering).
(d) Bering Strait/Norton Sound Region.
(1) Stebbins/St. Michael Area (Point Romanof to Canal Point):
(i) Season: April 15-June 14 and July 16-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 15-July 15.
(2) Remainder of the region:
(i) Season: April 2-June 14 and July 16-August 31 for waterfowl;
April 2-July 19 and August 21-August 31 for all other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 15-July 15 for waterfowl; July 20-August 20 for
all other birds.
(e) Kodiak Archipelago Region, except for the Kodiak Island roaded
area, is closed to the harvesting of migratory
[[Page 18325]]
birds and their eggs. The closed area consists of all lands and waters
(including exposed tidelands) east of a line extending from Crag Point
in the north to the west end of Saltery Cove in the south and all lands
and water south of a line extending from Termination Point along the
north side of Cascade Lake extending to Anton Larson Bay. Waters
adjacent to the closed area are closed to harvest within 500 feet from
the water's edge. The offshore islands are open to harvest.
(1) Season: April 2-June 20 and July 22-August 31; egg gathering:
May 1-June 20 only.
(2) Closure: June 21-July 21.
(f) Northwest Arctic Region.
(1) Season: April 2-June 9 and August 15-August 31 (hunting in
general); waterfowl egg gathering May 20-June 9 only; seabird egg
gathering July 3-July 12 only; hunting molting/non-nesting waterfowl
July 1-July 31 only.
(2) Closure: June 10-August 14, except for the taking of seabird
eggs and molting/non-nesting waterfowl as provided in paragraph (f)(1)
of this section.
(g) North Slope Region.
(1) Southern Unit (Southwestern North Slope regional boundary east
to Peard Bay, everything west of the longitude line 158[deg]30' W and
south of the latitude line 70[deg]45' N to the west bank of the
Ikpikpuk River, and everything south of the latitude line 69[deg]45' N
between the west bank of the Ikpikpuk River to the east bank of
Sagavinirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2-June 29 and July 30-August 31 for seabirds;
April 2-June 19 and July 20-August 31 for all other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 30-July 29 for seabirds; June 20-July 19 for all
other birds.
(2) Northern Unit (At Peard Bay, everything east of the longitude
line 158[deg]30' W and north of the latitude line 70[deg]45' N to west
bank of the Ikpikpuk River, and everything north of the latitude line
69[deg]45' N between the west bank of the Ikpikpuk River to the east
bank of Sagavinirktok River):
(i) Season: April 6-June 6 and July 7-August 31 for king and common
eiders and April 2-June 15 and July 16-August 31 for all other birds.
(ii) Closure: June 7-July 6 for king and common eiders; June 16-
July 15 for all other birds.
(3) Eastern Unit (East of eastern bank of the Sagavanirktok River):
(i) Season: April 2-June 19 and July 20-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 20-July 19.
(4) All Units: yellow-billed loons. Annually, up to 20 yellow-
billed loons total for the region may be caught inadvertently in
subsistence fishing nets in the North Slope Region and kept for
subsistence use. Individuals must report each yellow-billed loon
inadvertently caught while subsistence gill net fishing to the North
Slope Borough Department of Wildlife Management by the end of the
season.
(h) Interior Region.
(1) Season: April 2-June 14 and July 16-August 31; egg gathering
May 1-June 14 only.
(2) Closure: June 15-July 15.
(i) Upper Copper River (Harvest Area: State of Alaska Game
Management Units 11 and 13) (Eligible communities: Gulkana, Chitina,
Tazlina, Copper Center, Gakona, Mentasta Lake, Chistochina and
Cantwell).
(1) Season: April 15-May 26 and June 27-August 31.
(2) Closure: May 27-June 26.
(3) The Copper River Basin communities listed above also documented
traditional use harvesting birds in Unit 12, making them eligible to
hunt in this unit using the seasons specified in paragraph (h) of this
section.
(j) Gulf of Alaska Region.
(1) Prince William Sound Area (Harvest area: Unit 6 [D]), (Eligible
Chugach communities: Chenega Bay, Tatitlek).
(i) Season: April 2-May 31 and July 1-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 1-30.
(2) Kachemak Bay Area (Harvest area: Unit 15[C] South of a line
connecting the tip of Homer Spit to the mouth of Fox River) (Eligible
Chugach Communities: Port Graham, Nanwalek).
(i) Season: April 2-May 31 and July 1-August 31.
(ii) Closure: June 1-30.
(k) Cook Inlet (Harvest area: portions of Unit 16[B] as specified
below) (Eligible communities: Tyonek only).
(1) Season: April 2-May 31--That portion of Unit 16(B) south of the
Skwentna River and west of the Yentna River, and August 1-31--That
portion of Unit 16(B) south of the Beluga River, Beluga Lake, and the
Triumvirate Glacier.
(2) Closure: June 1-July 31.
(l) Southeast Alaska.
(1) Community of Hoonah (Harvest area: National Forest lands in Icy
Strait and Cross Sound, including Middle Pass Rock near the Inian
Islands, Table Rock in Cross Sound, and other traditional locations on
the coast of Yakobi Island. The land and waters of Glacier Bay National
Park remain closed to all subsistence harvesting [50 CFR Part 100.3]).
(i) Season: glaucous-winged gull egg gathering only: May 15-June
30.
(ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
(2) Communities of Craig and Hydaburg (Harvest area: small islands
and adjacent shoreline of western Prince of Wales Island from Point
Baker to Cape Chacon, but also including Coronation and Warren
islands).
(i) Season: glaucous-winged gull egg gathering only: May 15-June
30.
(ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
(3) Community of Yakutat (Harvest area: Icy Bay [Icy Cape to Pt.
Riou], and coastal lands and islands bordering the Gulf of Alaska from
Pt. Manby southeast to Dry Bay).
(i) Season: glaucous-winged gull egg gathering only: May 15-June
30.
(ii) Closure: July 1-August 31.
Dated: March 30, 2007.
Todd Willens,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. E7-6667 Filed 4-10-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P