Approval of Exemption From the Bond/Escrow Requirement Relating to the Sale of Assets by an Employer Who Contributes to a Multiemployer Plan; Washington Nationals Baseball Club, LLC, 17959-17961 [E7-6706]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 10, 2007 / Notices
TXU Generation Company LP, Docket
Nos. 50–445 and 50–446, Comanche
Peak Steam Electric Station (CPSES),
Unit Nos. 1 and 2, Somervell County,
Texas
Date of amendment request: February
21, 2006, as supplemented by letter
dated March 19, 2007.
Brief description of amendments: The
amendments revise TS 5.6.5 entitled,
‘‘Core Operating Limits Report (COLR),’’
by adding two reports providing Lossof-Coolant Accident (LOCA) and nonLOCA analysis methodologies for
CPSES Unit 1.
Date of issuance: March 26, 2007.
Effective date: As of the date of
issuance and shall be implemented
within 120 days from the date of
issuance, but no later than the entry into
Mode 5 in the restart of Unit 1 from its
spring 2007 refueling outage.
Amendment Nos.: 135/135.
Facility Operating License Nos. NPF–
87 and NPF–89: The amendments
revised the Facility Operating Licenses
and Technical Specifications.
Date of initial notice in Federal
Register: June 6, 2006 (71 FR 32609).
The supplemental letter dated March
19, 2007, provided additional
information that clarified the
application, did not expand the scope of
the application as originally noticed,
and did not change the staff’s original
proposed no significant hazards
consideration determination as
published in the Federal Register.
The Commission’s related evaluation
of the amendments is contained in a
Safety Evaluation dated March 26, 2007.
No significant hazards consideration
comments received: No.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Union Electric Company, Docket No.
50–483, Callaway Plant, Unit 1,
Callaway County, Missouri
Date of application for amendment:
May 25, 2006, as supplemented by letter
dated March 12, 2007.
Brief description of amendment: The
amendment revised Technical
Specifications 3.1.7, ‘‘Rod Position
Indication,’’ 3.2.1, ‘‘Heat Flux Hot
Channel Factor (FQ(Z)) (FQ
Methodology),’’ 3.2.4, ‘‘Quadrant Power
Tilt Ratio (QPTR),’’ and 3.3.1, ‘‘Reactor
Trip System (RTS) Instrumentation,’’ to
allow use of the Westinghouse
proprietary computer code, the Best
Estimate Analyzer for Core Operations—
Nuclear (BEACON). Certain required
actions, for when a limiting condition
for operation is not met, and certain
surveillance requirements are being
changed to refer to power distribution
measurements or measurement
information of the core.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
16:29 Apr 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
Date of issuance: March 21, 2007.
Effective date: As of its date of
issuance and shall be implemented
before entry into Mode 2 in the plant
restart from the refueling outage
scheduled for the spring of 2007. This
includes the incorporation of the
identified changes to the Final Safety
Analysis Report (FSAR) in Attachment
6 of the licensee’s application dated
May 25, 2006, into the FSAR.
Amendment No.: 182.
Facility Operating License No. NPF–
30: The amendment revised the
Operating License and Technical
Specifications.
Date of initial notice in Federal
Register: July 18, 2006 (71 FR 40756)
The supplemental letter dated March
12, 2007, provided additional
information that clarified the
application, did not expand the scope of
the application as originally noticed,
and did not change the NRC staff’s
original proposed no significant hazards
consideration determination published
in the Federal Register on July 18, 2006.
The Commission’s related evaluation
of the amendment is contained in a
Safety Evaluation dated March 21, 2007.
No significant hazards consideration
comments received: No.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 3rd day
of April 2007.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Catherine Haney,
Director, Division of Operating Reactor
Licensing, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E7–6632 Filed 4–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
OVERSEAS PRIVATE INVESTMENT
CORPORATION
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Overseas Private Investment
Corporation (OPIC)
ACTION: Request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Under the provision of the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35), agencies are required to
publish a Notice in the Federal Register
notifying the public that Agency is
preparing an information collection
request for OMB review and approval
and to request public review and
comment on the submission.
Comments are being solicited on the
need for the information, its practical
utility, the accuracy of the Agency’s
burden estimate, and on ways to
minimize the reporting burden,
including automated collection
techniques and uses of other forms of
PO 00000
Frm 00144
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17959
technology. The proposed form under
review is summarized below.
DATES: Comments must be received
within 30 calendar days of this notice.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the subject form
and the request for review prepared for
submission to OMB may be obtained
from the Agency submitting officer.
Comments on the form should be
submitted to the Agency Submitting
Officer.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OPIC Agency Submitting Officer: Essie
Bryant, Record Manager, Overseas
Private Investment Corporation, 1100
New York Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20527; 202–336–8563.
Summary Form Under Review
Type of Request: Revised form.
Title: OPIC Self-Monitoring
Questionnaire.
Form Number: OPIC–162.
Frequency of Use: Annually for
duration of project.
Type of Respondents: Business or
other institution (except farms);
individuals.
Standard Industrial Classification
Codes: All.
Description of Affected Public: U.S.
companies or citizens investing
overseas.
Reporting Hours: 6.5 hours per
project.
Number of Responses: 350 per year.
Federal Cost: $35,000.
Authority for Information Collection:
Sections 231, 234(a), 239(d), and 240A
of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961,
as amended.
Abstract (Needs and Uses): The
questionnaire is completed by OPICassisted investors annually. The
questionnaire allows OPIC’s assessment
of effects of OPIC-assisted projects on
the U.S. economy and employment, as
well as on the environment and
economic development abroad.
Dated: April 5, 2007.
John P. Crowley, III,
Senior Administrative Counsel, Department
of Legal Affairs.
[FR Doc. 07–1771 Filed 4–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3210–01–M
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
Approval of Exemption From the Bond/
Escrow Requirement Relating to the
Sale of Assets by an Employer Who
Contributes to a Multiemployer Plan;
Washington Nationals Baseball Club,
LLC
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
17960
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 10, 2007 / Notices
Notice of approval.
SUMMARY: The Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation has granted a request from
the Washington Nationals Baseball
Club, LLC for an exemption from the
bond/escrow requirement of section
4204(a)(1)(B) of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974,
as amended, with respect to the Major
League Baseball Players Benefit Plan. A
notice of the request for exemption from
the requirement was published on
January 31, 2007 (72 FR 4538). The
effect of this notice is to advise the
public of the decision on the exemption
request.
ADDRESSES: The non-confidential
portions of the request for an exemption
and any PBGC response to the request
may be obtained by writing PBGC’s
Communications and Public Affairs
Department (CPAD) at Suite 1200, 1200
K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005–
4026, or by visiting or calling CPAD
during normal business hours (202–
326–4040).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric
Field, Office of the Chief Counsel,
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation,
1200 K Street, NW., Washington, DC
20005–4026; telephone 202–326–4020.
(For TTY/TDD users, call the Federal
Relay Service toll-free at 1–800–877–
8339 and ask to be connected to 202–
326–4020).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Background
Section 4204 of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974,
as amended by the Multiemployer
Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980
(‘‘ERISA’’ or ‘‘the Act’’), provides that a
bona fide arm’s-length sale of assets of
a contributing employer to an unrelated
party will not be considered a
withdrawal if three conditions are met.
These conditions, enumerated in section
4204(a)(1)(A)–(C), are that—
(A) The purchaser has an obligation to
contribute to the plan with respect to
the operations for substantially the same
number of contribution base units for
which the seller was obligated to
contribute;
(B) The purchaser obtains a bond or
places an amount in escrow, for a period
of five plan years after the sale, in an
amount equal to the greater of the
seller’s average required annual
contribution to the plan for the three
plan years preceding the year in which
the sale occurred or the seller’s required
annual contribution for the plan year
preceding the year in which the sale
occurred (the amount of the bond or
escrow is doubled if the plan is in
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Apr 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
reorganization in the year in which the
sale occurred); and
(C) The contract of sale provides that
if the purchaser withdraws from the
plan within the first five plan years
beginning after the sale and fails to pay
any of its liability to the plan, the seller
shall be secondarily liable for the
liability it (the seller) would have had
but for section 4204.
The bond or escrow described above
would be paid to the plan if the
purchaser withdraws from the plan or
fails to make any required contributions
to the plan within the first five plan
years beginning after the sale.
Additionally, section 4204(b)(1)
provides that if a sale of assets is
covered by section 4204, the purchaser
assumes by operation of law the
contribution record of the seller for the
plan year in which the sale occurred
and the preceding four plan years.
Section 4204(c) of ERISA authorizes
the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation (‘‘PBGC’’) to grant
individual or class variances or
exemptions from the purchaser’s bond/
escrow requirement of section
4204(a)(1)(B) when warranted. The
legislative history of section 4204
indicates a Congressional intent that the
sales rules be administered in a manner
that assures protection of the plan with
the least practicable intrusion into
normal business transactions. Senate
Committee on Labor and Human
Resources, 96th Cong., 2nd Sess., S.
1076, The Multiemployer Pension Plan
Amendments Act of 1980: Summary
and Analysis of Considerations 16
(Comm. Print, April 1980); 128 Cong.
Rec. S10117 (July 29, 1980). The
granting of an exemption or variance
from the bond/escrow requirement does
not constitute a finding by the PBGC
that a particular transaction satisfies the
other requirements of section 4204(a)(1).
Under the PBGC’s regulation on
variances for sales of assets (29 CFR Part
4204), a request for a variance or waiver
of the bond/escrow requirement under
any of the tests established in the
regulation (sections 4204.12 & 4204.13)
is to be made to the plan in question.
The PBGC will consider waiver requests
only when the request is not based on
satisfaction of one of the three
regulatory tests or when the parties
assert that the financial information
necessary to show satisfaction of one of
the regulatory tests is privileged or
confidential financial information
within the meaning of 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(4)
of the Freedom of Information Act.
Under section 4204.22 of the
regulation, the PBGC shall approve a
request for a variance or exemption if it
PO 00000
Frm 00145
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
determines that approval of the request
is warranted, in that it—
(1) Would more effectively or
equitably carry out the purposes of Title
IV of the Act; and
(2) Would not significantly increase
the risk of financial loss to the plan.
Section 4204(c) of ERISA and section
4204.22(b) of the regulation require the
PBGC to publish a notice of the
pendency of a request for a variance or
exemption in the Federal Register, and
to provide interested parties with an
opportunity to comment on the
proposed variance or exemption. The
PBGC received no comments on the
request for exemption.
Decision
On January 31, 2007, the PBGC
published a notice of the pendency of a
request by the Washington Nationals
Baseball Club, LLC (the ‘‘Buyer’’) for an
exemption from the bond/escrow
requirement of section 4204(a)(1)(B)
with respect to its purchase of the
Washington Nationals Baseball Team
from Baseball Expos, L.P. (the ‘‘Seller’’)
(72 FR 4538). According to the request,
the Major League Baseball Players
Benefit Plan (the ‘‘Plan’’) was
established and is maintained pursuant
to a collective bargaining agreement
between the professional major league
baseball teams (the ‘‘Clubs’’) and the
Major League Baseball Players
Association (the ‘‘Players Association’’).
According to the Buyer’s
representations, the Seller was obligated
to contribute to the Plan for certain
employees of the sold operations.
Pursuant to an agreement dated April
24, 2006, the Buyer and Seller entered
into an agreement under which the
Buyer agreed to purchase substantially
all of the assets and assume
substantially all of the liabilities of the
Seller relating to the business of
employing employees under the Plan.
The Buyer agreed to contribute to the
Plan for substantially the same number
of contribution base units as the Seller.
The Seller agreed to be secondarily
liable for any withdrawal liability it
would have had with respect to the sold
operations (if not for section 4204)
should the Buyer withdraw from the
Plan within the five plan years
following the sale and fail to pay its
withdrawal liability. The amount of the
bond/escrow required under section
4204(a)(1)(B) of ERISA is $2,803,040.
The estimated amount of the unfunded
vested benefits allocable to the Seller
with respect to the operations subject to
the sale is $14,454,124. While the
separate major league clubs are the
nominal contributing employers to the
Plan, the Major League Central Fund
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 10, 2007 / Notices
under the Office of the Commissioner
receives the revenues and makes the
payments for certain common expenses,
including each club’s contribution to
the Plan. In support of the waiver
request, the requester asserts that: ‘‘The
Plan is funded directly from Revenues
which are paid from the Central Fund
directly to the Plan without passing
through the hands of any of the clubs.
Therefore, the Plan enjoys a substantial
degree of security with respect to
contributions on behalf of the clubs. A
change in ownership of a club does not
affect the obligation of the Central Fund
to fund the Plan out of the Revenue. As
such, approval of this exemption
request would not significantly increase
the risk of financial loss to the Plan.’’
Based on the facts of this case and the
representations and statements made in
connection with the request for an
exemption, the PBGC has determined
that an exemption from the bond/
escrow requirement is warranted, in that
it would more effectively carry out the
purposes of Title IV of ERISA and
would not significantly increase the risk
of financial loss to the Plan. Therefore,
the PBGC hereby grants the request for
an exemption for the bond/escrow
requirement. The granting of an
exemption or variance from the bond/
escrow requirement of section
4204(a)(1)(B) does not constitute a
finding by the PBGC that the transaction
satisfies the other requirements of
section 4204(a)(1).
The determination of whether the
transaction satisfies such other
requirements is a determination to be
made by the Plan sponsor.
Issued at Washington, DC, on this 30th day
of March, 2007.
Vincent K. Snowbarger,
Interim Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
[FR Doc. E7–6706 Filed 4–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7708–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
[Release No. 34–55570; File No. SR–CBOE–
2007–15]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend
CBOE’s Membership Application
Procedures To Incorporate Individuals
Who Are Acting in an Exchange
Trading Floor Capacity
April 2, 2007.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:22 Apr 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
14, 2007, The Chicago Board Options
Exchange, Incorporated (‘‘CBOE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’), filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
substantially prepared by CBOE. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of the Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
membership application procedures to
incorporate those individuals who are
acting in an Exchange trading floor
capacity. Set forth below are the
proposed changes to the rule text with
additions in italic.
Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated
Rules
*
*
*
*
*
Rule 3.9. Application Procedures and
Approval or Disapproval
(a)–(f) No Change.
(g) Any person applying pursuant to
paragraph (a) of this Rule to have an
authorized trading function is required
to have completed the Exchange’s
Member Orientation Program and to
have passed an Exchange Trading
Member Qualification Exam.
Additionally, any person who has
completed the Member Orientation
Program and taken and passed the
applicable Trading Member
Qualification Exam and who then does
not possess an authorized trading
function or Exchange trading floor
capacity for more than 1 year is required
to complete the Member Orientation
Program and to re-pass the applicable
Trading Member Qualification Exam in
order to once again become eligible to
have an authorized trading function. A
person must score 75% or better on the
applicable Trading Member
Qualification Exam in order to pass the
Exam. Any person who fails the
applicable Trading Member
Qualification Exam must wait 30 days to
re-take the Exam after failing the Exam
for the first time, must wait 60 days to
re-take the Exam after failing the Exam
for the second time, and must wait 120
days to re-take the Exam after failing the
Exam for a third or subsequent time.
The Exchange may not waive any of the
1 15
2 17
PO 00000
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
Frm 00146
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17961
requirements set forth in this paragraph
(g).
(h)–(l) No Change.
* * * Interpretations and Policies:
.01 No Change.
.02 No Change.
.03 For purposes of this rule,
‘‘Exchange trading floor capacity’’
means any person who is acting on
behalf of the Exchange in an Exchange
trading floor capacity, such as a PAR
Official, Order Book Official, or other
similar function.
*
*
*
*
*
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
CBOE included statements concerning
the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. CBOE has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Exchange Rule 3.9, entitled
‘‘Application Procedures and Approval
or Disapproval,’’ outlines, among other
things, the application procedures for an
individual who desires to become a
member of the Exchange. Paragraph (g)
of Exchange Rule 3.9 currently requires
any person applying to the Exchange to
(i) have completed the Exchange’s
Member Orientation Program
(‘‘Orientation Program’’) and (ii) passed
an Exchange Trading Member
Qualification Exam (‘‘Qualification
Exam’’). However, a person who has
completed the Orientation Program and
taken and passed the Qualification
Exam but does not possess an
authorized trading function for more
than one year must again complete the
Orientation Program and re-pass the
Qualification Exam.
This filing proposes to amend CBOE’s
rules to provide that PAR Officials and
Order Book Officials, as described in
CBOE’s rules and discussed below, as
well as others acting in a similar
capacity (i.e., an Exchange trading floor
capacity), shall be included in the rule,
in addition to those who possess an
authorized trading function, since both
functions are similar.
On November 18, 2005, the
Commission approved a filing which
E:\FR\FM\10APN1.SGM
10APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17959-17961]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6706]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
Approval of Exemption From the Bond/Escrow Requirement Relating
to the Sale of Assets by an Employer Who Contributes to a Multiemployer
Plan; Washington Nationals Baseball Club, LLC
AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[[Page 17960]]
ACTION: Notice of approval.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation has granted a request
from the Washington Nationals Baseball Club, LLC for an exemption from
the bond/escrow requirement of section 4204(a)(1)(B) of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, with respect to the
Major League Baseball Players Benefit Plan. A notice of the request for
exemption from the requirement was published on January 31, 2007 (72 FR
4538). The effect of this notice is to advise the public of the
decision on the exemption request.
ADDRESSES: The non-confidential portions of the request for an
exemption and any PBGC response to the request may be obtained by
writing PBGC's Communications and Public Affairs Department (CPAD) at
Suite 1200, 1200 K Street, NW., Washington, DC 20005-4026, or by
visiting or calling CPAD during normal business hours (202-326-4040).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Field, Office of the Chief
Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street, NW.,
Washington, DC 20005-4026; telephone 202-326-4020. (For TTY/TDD users,
call the Federal Relay Service toll-free at 1-800-877-8339 and ask to
be connected to 202-326-4020).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 4204 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974, as amended by the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of
1980 (``ERISA'' or ``the Act''), provides that a bona fide arm's-length
sale of assets of a contributing employer to an unrelated party will
not be considered a withdrawal if three conditions are met. These
conditions, enumerated in section 4204(a)(1)(A)-(C), are that--
(A) The purchaser has an obligation to contribute to the plan with
respect to the operations for substantially the same number of
contribution base units for which the seller was obligated to
contribute;
(B) The purchaser obtains a bond or places an amount in escrow, for
a period of five plan years after the sale, in an amount equal to the
greater of the seller's average required annual contribution to the
plan for the three plan years preceding the year in which the sale
occurred or the seller's required annual contribution for the plan year
preceding the year in which the sale occurred (the amount of the bond
or escrow is doubled if the plan is in reorganization in the year in
which the sale occurred); and
(C) The contract of sale provides that if the purchaser withdraws
from the plan within the first five plan years beginning after the sale
and fails to pay any of its liability to the plan, the seller shall be
secondarily liable for the liability it (the seller) would have had but
for section 4204.
The bond or escrow described above would be paid to the plan if the
purchaser withdraws from the plan or fails to make any required
contributions to the plan within the first five plan years beginning
after the sale. Additionally, section 4204(b)(1) provides that if a
sale of assets is covered by section 4204, the purchaser assumes by
operation of law the contribution record of the seller for the plan
year in which the sale occurred and the preceding four plan years.
Section 4204(c) of ERISA authorizes the Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation (``PBGC'') to grant individual or class variances or
exemptions from the purchaser's bond/escrow requirement of section
4204(a)(1)(B) when warranted. The legislative history of section 4204
indicates a Congressional intent that the sales rules be administered
in a manner that assures protection of the plan with the least
practicable intrusion into normal business transactions. Senate
Committee on Labor and Human Resources, 96th Cong., 2nd Sess., S. 1076,
The Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act of 1980: Summary and
Analysis of Considerations 16 (Comm. Print, April 1980); 128 Cong. Rec.
S10117 (July 29, 1980). The granting of an exemption or variance from
the bond/escrow requirement does not constitute a finding by the PBGC
that a particular transaction satisfies the other requirements of
section 4204(a)(1).
Under the PBGC's regulation on variances for sales of assets (29
CFR Part 4204), a request for a variance or waiver of the bond/escrow
requirement under any of the tests established in the regulation
(sections 4204.12 & 4204.13) is to be made to the plan in question. The
PBGC will consider waiver requests only when the request is not based
on satisfaction of one of the three regulatory tests or when the
parties assert that the financial information necessary to show
satisfaction of one of the regulatory tests is privileged or
confidential financial information within the meaning of 5 U.S.C.
552(b)(4) of the Freedom of Information Act.
Under section 4204.22 of the regulation, the PBGC shall approve a
request for a variance or exemption if it determines that approval of
the request is warranted, in that it--
(1) Would more effectively or equitably carry out the purposes of
Title IV of the Act; and
(2) Would not significantly increase the risk of financial loss to
the plan.
Section 4204(c) of ERISA and section 4204.22(b) of the regulation
require the PBGC to publish a notice of the pendency of a request for a
variance or exemption in the Federal Register, and to provide
interested parties with an opportunity to comment on the proposed
variance or exemption. The PBGC received no comments on the request for
exemption.
Decision
On January 31, 2007, the PBGC published a notice of the pendency of
a request by the Washington Nationals Baseball Club, LLC (the
``Buyer'') for an exemption from the bond/escrow requirement of section
4204(a)(1)(B) with respect to its purchase of the Washington Nationals
Baseball Team from Baseball Expos, L.P. (the ``Seller'') (72 FR 4538).
According to the request, the Major League Baseball Players Benefit
Plan (the ``Plan'') was established and is maintained pursuant to a
collective bargaining agreement between the professional major league
baseball teams (the ``Clubs'') and the Major League Baseball Players
Association (the ``Players Association'').
According to the Buyer's representations, the Seller was obligated
to contribute to the Plan for certain employees of the sold operations.
Pursuant to an agreement dated April 24, 2006, the Buyer and Seller
entered into an agreement under which the Buyer agreed to purchase
substantially all of the assets and assume substantially all of the
liabilities of the Seller relating to the business of employing
employees under the Plan. The Buyer agreed to contribute to the Plan
for substantially the same number of contribution base units as the
Seller. The Seller agreed to be secondarily liable for any withdrawal
liability it would have had with respect to the sold operations (if not
for section 4204) should the Buyer withdraw from the Plan within the
five plan years following the sale and fail to pay its withdrawal
liability. The amount of the bond/escrow required under section
4204(a)(1)(B) of ERISA is $2,803,040. The estimated amount of the
unfunded vested benefits allocable to the Seller with respect to the
operations subject to the sale is $14,454,124. While the separate major
league clubs are the nominal contributing employers to the Plan, the
Major League Central Fund
[[Page 17961]]
under the Office of the Commissioner receives the revenues and makes
the payments for certain common expenses, including each club's
contribution to the Plan. In support of the waiver request, the
requester asserts that: ``The Plan is funded directly from Revenues
which are paid from the Central Fund directly to the Plan without
passing through the hands of any of the clubs. Therefore, the Plan
enjoys a substantial degree of security with respect to contributions
on behalf of the clubs. A change in ownership of a club does not affect
the obligation of the Central Fund to fund the Plan out of the Revenue.
As such, approval of this exemption request would not significantly
increase the risk of financial loss to the Plan.''
Based on the facts of this case and the representations and
statements made in connection with the request for an exemption, the
PBGC has determined that an exemption from the bond/escrow requirement
is warranted, in that it would more effectively carry out the purposes
of Title IV of ERISA and would not significantly increase the risk of
financial loss to the Plan. Therefore, the PBGC hereby grants the
request for an exemption for the bond/escrow requirement. The granting
of an exemption or variance from the bond/escrow requirement of section
4204(a)(1)(B) does not constitute a finding by the PBGC that the
transaction satisfies the other requirements of section 4204(a)(1).
The determination of whether the transaction satisfies such other
requirements is a determination to be made by the Plan sponsor.
Issued at Washington, DC, on this 30th day of March, 2007.
Vincent K. Snowbarger,
Interim Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. E7-6706 Filed 4-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7708-01-P