Modification of Certain Medical Standards and Procedures and Duration of Certain Medical Certificates, 18092-18098 [E7-6652]
Download as PDF
18092
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 10, 2007 / Proposed Rules
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 61, 65, 67, and 183
[Docket No. FAA–2007–27812; Notice No.
07–08]
RIN 2120–AI91
Modification of Certain Medical
Standards and Procedures and
Duration of Certain Medical
Certificates
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This proposal would extend
the duration of first- and third-class
medical certificates for certain
individuals. A first-class medical
certificate is required when exercising
airline transport pilot privileges and at
least a third-class medical certificate
when exercising private pilot privileges.
Certain conforming amendments to
medical certification procedures and
some general editorial amendments also
are proposed. The intent of this action
is to improve the efficiency of the
medical certification program and
service provided to medical certificate
applicants.
SUMMARY:
Send your comments on or
before June 11, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments
identified by Docket Number FAA–
2007–27812 using any of the following
methods:
• DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://
dms.dot.gov and follow the instructions
for sending your comments
electronically.
• Government-wide rulemaking Web
site: Go to https://www.regulations.gov
and follow the instructions for sending
your comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 400
Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building,
Room PL–401, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
• Fax: 1–202–493–2251.
• Hand Delivery: Room PL–401 on
the plaza level of the Nassif Building,
400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For more information on the
rulemaking process, see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document. Privacy: We will post all
comments we receive, without change,
to https://dms.dot.gov, including any
personal information you provide. For
more information, see the Privacy Act
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS2
DATES:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Apr 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
discussion in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
Docket: To read background documents
or comments received, go to https://
dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room PL–
401 on the plaza level of the Nassif
Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judi
Citrenbaum, Office of the Federal Air
Surgeon, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone (202) 267–9689; e-mail:
Judi.M.Citrenbaum@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to
participate in this rulemaking by
submitting written comments, data, or
views. We also invite comments relating
to the economic, environmental, energy,
or federalism impacts that might result
from adopting the proposals in this
document. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. We ask that you send
us two copies of written comments.
We will file in the docket all
comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive
public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking.
The docket is available for public
inspection before and after the comment
closing date. If you wish to review the
docket in person, go to the address in
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may also review the docket using
the Internet at the Web address in the
ADDRESSES section.
Privacy Act: Using the search function
of our docket Web site, anyone can find
and read the comments received into
any of our dockets, including the name
of the individual sending the comment
(or signing the comment on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477–78) or you may visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
Before acting on this proposal, we
will consider all comments we receive
on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring expense or delay. We
may change this proposal in light of the
comments we receive.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
If you want the FAA to acknowledge
receipt of your comments on this
proposal, include with your comments
a pre-addressed, stamped postcard on
which the docket number appears. We
will stamp the date on the postcard and
mail it to you.
Proprietary or Confidential Business
Information
Do not file in the docket information
that you consider to be proprietary or
confidential business information. Send
or deliver this information directly to
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document. You must mark the
information that you consider
proprietary or confidential. If you send
the information on a disk or CD ROM,
mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM
and also identify electronically within
the disk or CD ROM the specific
information that is proprietary or
confidential.
Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), when we are
aware of proprietary information filed
with a comment, we do not place it in
the docket. We hold it in a separate file
to which the public does not have
access, and place a note in the docket
that we have received it. If we receive
a request to examine or copy this
information, we treat it as any other
request under the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). We
process such a request under the DOT
procedures found in 49 CFR part 7.
Availability of Rulemaking Documents
You can get an electronic copy using
the Internet by:
(1) Searching the Department of
Transportation’s electronic Docket
Management System (DMS) Web page
(https://dms.dot.gov/search);
(2) Visiting the FAA’s Regulations and
Policies Web page at https://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/; or
(3) Accessing the Government
Printing Office’s web page at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
You can also get a copy by sending a
request to the Federal Aviation
Administration, Office of Rulemaking,
ARM–1, 800 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by
calling (202) 267–9680. Make sure to
identify the docket number, notice
number, or amendment number of this
rulemaking.
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
E:\FR\FM\10APP2.SGM
10APP2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 10, 2007 / Proposed Rules
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701 and 44703.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS2
Background
Title 14 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, part 67 provides for the
issuance of three classes of medical
certificates. A first-class medical
certificate is required for operations
requiring an airline transport pilot
certificate. At least a second-class
medical certificate is required for
operations requiring a commercial pilot
certificate or an air traffic control tower
operator certificate. At least a third-class
medical certificate is required for
operations requiring a private pilot
certificate, a recreational pilot
certificate, a flight instructor certificate
(when acting as pilot in command or
serving as a required flight crewmember
in operations other than glider or
balloon), or a student pilot certificate.
An applicant who is found to meet
the appropriate medical standards,
based on a medical examination and an
evaluation of the applicant’s history and
condition, is entitled to a medical
certificate without restriction or
limitation other than the prescribed
limitation as to its duration. The
duration standards are set forth under
existing § 61.23, paragraph (d).
The FAA has not reviewed the
medical duration standards since 1996
when it extended the duration of thirdclass medical certificates from 2 years to
3 years for individuals under age 40.
The medical examination duration
standards under existing § 61.23 (d)
represent what the agency determined
years ago to be a reasonable, minimum
timetable to impose for required
examinations and an optimum schedule
in terms of estimated detectable
pathology in the airman population. The
FAA is proposing to further extend
certain § 61.23 (d) provisions in order to
provide a more reasonable, updated
examination timetable for certain
medical certificate holders and with a
view to more efficiently managing the
airman medical certification program
overall.
Discussion of the Proposal
The FAA proposes, primarily, to
amend § 61.23(d) to extend the duration
of first- and third-class medical
certificates for individuals under the age
of 40. Existing § 61.23 prescribes the
duration of validity and privileges of
each class of medical certificate.
Currently the maximum validity on a
first-class medical certificate is 6
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Apr 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
months regardless of age and, on a thirdclass medical certificate, 36 months for
individuals under age 40. Decreasing
the frequency of medical examinations
by increasing the duration of validity
from 6 months to 1 year on first-class
medical certificates for individuals
under age 40 and from 36 months to 60
months on third-class medical
certificates for individuals under age 40
would reflect the FAA’s assessment of
the current, appropriate interval for
younger airmen. It also would decrease
routine workflow thereby allowing the
FAA to focus on the most safety-critical
certification cases and provide more
efficient service to other applicants
waiting to be processed.
The FAA finds that, because medical
standards were last evaluated in 1996,
this rulemaking action also provides the
opportunity to make certain minor, but
necessary, amendatory modifications. In
addition to proposed amendments to
§ 61.23 (d), the FAA also proposes to:
• Add new section § 67.4.
• Amend § 183.15.
• Edit §§ 61.29, 65.16, 67.3, 67.401,
67.405, 67.411, 67.413, and 183.11.
Proposed Amendments
Section 61.23 Medical Certificates:
Requirement and Duration
Rationale for the Change
The FAA extended the duration of
third-class medical certificates from 24
to 36 months for individuals under age
40 in 1996 [61 FR 11243; March 19,
1996]. After careful consideration of the
comments and testimony received
during that rulemaking action, the FAA
determined an extended duration would
pose no detriment to safety in the case
of younger individuals because they are
much less likely to suffer medical
incapacitation. Ten years of experience
with extended duration on the thirdclass medical certificate has had no
adverse impact on safety.
The FAA has no experience extending
the duration of first-class medical
certificates beyond the current 6-month
limit. The FAA developed this proposal
through review of relevant medical
literature, its own aeromedical
certification data, and accident data.
Additionally, the FAA considered the
long-standing International Civil
Aviation Authority (ICAO) standard
requiring revalidation of medical
certification annually for airline
transport and commercial pilots in
multi-crew settings and also the ICAO
standard adopted in November 2005
extending revalidation for private pilots
from 2 years to 5 years under age 40.
Existing U.S. medical certificate validity
standards for commercial pilots under
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
18093
age 40 in a multi-crew setting currently
are the same as ICAO’s; therefore, the
FAA sees no need to consider a change
to FAA second-class medical certificate
validity standards. The FAA is
proposing to modify existing, more
restrictive U.S. medical certificate
validity standards for airline transport
and private pilots under age 40 in part
because of the international application
of less restrictive standards that has had
no reported adverse impact on safety.
To explore whether the reexamination period for pilots under age
40 holding an FAA first-class medical
certificate could be safely extended from
6 months to 12 months, FAA
researchers randomly selected a sample
of 100 airmen issued a first-class
medical certificate under age 40 from its
medical certification database and
reviewed medical records over a 36month period for the presence of 91
predetermined pathology codes defined
as significant. Significant codes
represent serious medical conditions
that would negatively impact aviation
safety. The proportion of significant
pathology codes assigned to airmen who
were examined at 6- and 12-month
intervals were compared.
Comparison of the 6- and 12-month
intervals revealed one medically
significant pathology code (Code 551,
colitis and ileitis) at the 6-month
interval and one medically significant
pathology code (Code 343,
pneumothorax) at the 12-month
interval. The FAA determined that there
was no significant difference between
the proportion of medically significant
pathology codes assigned to pilots who
recertified at 6-month intervals and 12month intervals.
FAA certification trends consistently
indicate no significant increase either in
undetected pathology between required
medical examinations or in medical
disability among younger applicants.
While applicants of any age manifesting
medical conditions that represent a risk
to safety are denied certification under
§ 67.409, the trends reveal that the
percentage of younger applicants being
denied medical certification is
consistently lower than that of older
applicants. It is also consistently
evident that older applicants are more
likely to have to apply for special
issuance under § 67.401 than are
younger applicants.
Aviation Safety Information Analysis
and Sharing (ASIAS) accident database
queries on airline transport and private
pilots under age 40 reveal relatively few
accidents and incidents, when total
number of enplanements is considered,
related to pilot medical events. The
National Transportation Safety Board
E:\FR\FM\10APP2.SGM
10APP2
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS2
18094
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 10, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(NTSB) Accident and Incident Data
System was searched for medical events
for pilots under age 40 from 1983 to the
present. Under the general categories of
incapacitation and physical impairment,
various sub-queries were performed to
find accidents or incidents due, for
example, to incapacitation or physical
impairment due to cardiovascular, loss
of consciousness, neurologic, visual, or
other organic problems. Search of these
categories revealed 6 incidents and 21
accidents over the 23-year period that
met the criteria of the database query,
with only 9 of these deemed appropriate
to consider for this analysis.
The data considered revealed what
the NTSB data characterizes as one
commercial (air carrier) aviation
incident, one commercial (air taxi)
aviation incident, and one commercial
(air taxi) aviation accident attributed to
incapacitating medical cause. Both the
air carrier and air taxi incidents
involved emergency landings made by
captains due to incapacitations of the
first officers. The air carrier incident
was fatal for the first officer. The air taxi
incident was non-fatal. The first officer
involved in the air taxi incident was
able to be treated and was diagnosed as
suffering from a viral syndrome. The air
taxi accident was non-fatal involving
the unspecified incapacitation of the
pilot in command with the first officer
taking control and landing the airplane
without further incident.
The data also revealed what the NTSB
data characterized as four general
aviation accidents attributed to
incapacitation and one incident
attributed to physical impairment. Two
of the incapacitating accidents, both
fatal, were due to heart attack of the
pilots in command. Two non-fatal,
incapacitating accidents were attributed
to pilots, one a low-time pilot and one
a student pilot, losing consciousness
upon landing while performing certain
practice maneuvers. The accident
reports indicated inexperience and
nervousness as contributing to the
accidents. The non-fatal incident
attributed to physical impairment
involved a pilot taking sinus medication
90 minutes after takeoff and then further
medication 30 minutes later that,
apparently, may have incapacitated
him.
Considering the limited findings
revealed by reviewing ASIAS and FAA
aeromedical certification data, the FAA
believes the incremental risks associated
with extending the duration of medical
certificates would be minimal.
Additionally, the ancillary benefit this
proposal would provide by allowing the
FAA to shift resources otherwise
involved in processing routine cases to
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Apr 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
the more safety-critical medical
certification cases would go a long way
toward improving customer service. The
FAA has been making incremental
changes over a considerable period of
time to improve the workflow of the
medical certification process; this
proposal would provide an additional
opportunity for continuous
improvement.
Proposed Implementation of the Change
The FAA intends that the proposed,
extended validity periods would be
effective upon issuance of the final rule.
Therefore, it would not matter whether
an individual had a medical
examination the day before or the day
after the effective date of the final rule.
Validity standards are applied according
to the date of examination placed on the
medical certificate and in accordance
with the duration periods specified
under § 61.23(d).
Under this proposal, § 61.23(d) would
be simplified into a more user-friendly
chart format.
Section 67.3 Issue
The FAA proposes an editorial
amendment to delete a reference to a
non-existent § 67.5. On October 5, 1998
[63 FR 53532] the FAA removed several
regulatory provisions under 14 CFR that
restricted the licensing of foreign
persons outside of the United States.
The restrictive language was originally
placed in the regulations because of
administrative concerns that are no
longer applicable and that came to be
regarded as restricting harmonization
efforts. Section 67.5 was removed in this
1998 final rule; however, the FAA
inadvertently did not remove the
reference to former § 67.5 in existing
§ 67.3. This proposal would remove that
erroneous reference and leave § 67.3
otherwise unchanged.
Section 67.4 Application
The FAA proposes to add a new
section, § 67.4.
Proposed paragraph (a) would add a
provision to require individuals to make
application for FAA medical
certification ‘‘on a form and in a manner
acceptable to the Administrator.’’
Adding this language would clarify that
it is necessary to fill out a form to apply
for a medical certificate and thereby
conform part 67 with existing language
under § 61.13(a) that requires pilot
certificate applicants to make
application ‘‘on a form and in a manner
acceptable to the Administrator.’’
Proposed paragraph (b) would move
existing provisions regarding how
individuals may locate an AME from
existing § 67.405.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
Proposed paragraph (c) would require
applicants to present proof of age and
identity when making application.
While an AME currently may not
conduct an examination unless the
medical certificate applicant presents
proof of age and identity, this practice
now would be codified under the
regulation.
Section 67.401 Special Issuance of
Medical Certificates
Existing paragraph (j) would be
deleted as it contains a reference to a
previous compliance date that is no
longer necessary. The section would
remain otherwise unchanged.
Section 67.405 Medical Examinations:
Who May Give?
Current paragraphs (a) and (b)
regarding how the public may locate
and contact an AME are redundant and
need to be expanded. The FAA would
update and move these provisions to
proposed § 67.4. In addition, the FAA
would change the words ‘‘give the
examination’’ to ‘‘perform the
examination.’’ The word ‘‘give’’ in the
title of this section also would be
changed to ‘‘perform.’’
Section 67.411 Medical Certificates by
Flight Surgeons of the Armed Forces
The FAA proposes to remove and
reserve this section. The FAA has
determined that a specific section to
address military flight surgeons holding
AME designation is no longer necessary.
The FAA has ceased designating
military installations in favor of
designating individual military
personnel as AMEs in the same manner
as civilians. Thus there no longer is a
meaningful distinction between civilian
AME and military flight surgeons in
terms of issuing FAA medical
certificates.
Section 67.413 Medical Records
The FAA proposes to simplify
§ 67.413 by re-formatting its provisions
into more user-friendly paragraphs. This
intent of this section would not change.
Section 61.29 Replacement of a Lost or
Destroyed Airman or Medical Certificate
or Knowledge Test Report
Section 65.16 Change of Name:
Replacement of Lost or Destroyed
Certificate
The FAA proposes to change the P.O.
Box address listed under §§ 61.29(b) and
65.16(b) from P.O. Box 25082 to P.O.
Box 26200 for individuals to use when
requesting replacement of a lost or
destroyed medical certificate. While the
current P.O. Box is valid, replacement
requests are received more
E:\FR\FM\10APP2.SGM
10APP2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 10, 2007 / Proposed Rules
expeditiously, and therefore processed
more efficiently, when sent to P.O. Box
26200.
Section 183.11 Selection
The FAA proposes to change ‘‘his
authorized representatives’’ to ‘‘his or
her authorized representatives’’ in order
to conform to the existing language of
other sections, for example, § 67.407(d),
that use ‘‘his or her.’’ This section
otherwise would remain unchanged.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS2
Section 183.15 Duration of Certificates
The FAA proposes to amend § 183.15.
Under rulemaking that became effective
on November 14, 2005 [‘‘Establishment
of Organization Designation
Authorization Program; 70 FR 59932;
October 13, 2005’’], the FAA amended
§ 183.15 to remove a specific time limit
on designated authority for certain
representatives of the Administrator and
provide instead that designations be
effective until the expiration date shown
on whatever credentialing
documentation or certificate is held by
a particular designee. Adding such a
provision has worked well among the
designees of the FAA Flight Standards
and Aircraft Certification Services. In
addition to reducing cost and workload,
it has allowed greater flexibility, in
particular, in automatically extending
the designation authority of valued FAA
designees. Including AMEs under this
process will further enhance the FAA’s
ability to more efficiently manage FAA
designee programs.
Existing paragraph (b) would be
revised to provide, in addition to Flight
Standards and Aircraft Certification
Service Designated Representatives, that
the designation of Aviation Medical
Examiners would be ‘‘effective until the
expiration date shown on the document
granting the authorization.’’ Therefore
existing paragraph (a), a stand-alone
paragraph referencing AMEs only,
would no longer be needed and
therefore removed. Existing paragraph
(b) would be revised as proposed and
become new paragraph (a). Existing
paragraph (c) would become new
paragraph (b) and remain unchanged
except it would include the word ‘‘her’’
where necessary in the paragraph.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Currently, the reverse side of FAA
Form 8500–9, the FAA medical
certificate, lists the ‘‘Conditions of
Issue’’ of the certificate and specifies the
validity period of each class of medical
certificate. If this rule is adopted, the
back of FAA Form 8500–9 would have
to be reprinted to reveal the new
validity periods for first- and third-class
medical certificate holders under age 40.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Apr 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
Further, approximately 2,000 boxes of
reprinted forms would have to be
mailed from the Oklahoma City
distribution site to various Aviation
Medical Examiners and FAA offices
across the country.
In anticipation of revising the back of
the medical certificate attached to FAA
Form 8500–8, the FAA will request new
approval given the cost to the FAA
associated with amending and
reprinting it. As required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3507(d)), the FAA has submitted
the information requirements associated
with this proposal to the Office of
Management and Budget for its review.
International Compatibility
In keeping with U.S. obligations
under the Convention on International
Civil Aviation, it is FAA policy to
comply with International Civil
Aviation Organization (ICAO) Standards
and Recommended Practices to the
maximum extent practicable. This
action, if adopted, would meet ICAO
standard.
Economic Assessment, Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Determination,
Trade Impact Assessment, and
Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Changes to Federal regulations must
undergo several economic analyses.
First, Executive Order 12866 directs that
each Federal agency shall propose or
adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned
determination that the benefits of the
intended regulation justify its costs.
Second, the Regulatory Flexibility Act
of 1980 (Pub. L. 96–354) requires
agencies to analyze the economic
impact of regulatory changes on small
entities. Third, the Trade Agreements
Act (Pub. L. 96–39) prohibits agencies
from setting standards that create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States. In
developing U.S. standards, this Trade
Act requires agencies to consider
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis of
U.S. standards. Fourth, the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4) requires agencies to prepare a
written assessment of the costs, benefits,
and other effects of proposed or final
rules that include a Federal mandate
likely to result in the expenditure by
State, local, or tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million or more annually (adjusted
for inflation with base year of 1995).
This portion of the preamble
summarizes the FAA’s analysis of the
economic impacts of this proposed rule.
We suggest readers seeking greater
detail read the full regulatory
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
18095
evaluation, a copy of which we have
placed in the docket for this rulemaking.
In conducting these analyses, FAA
has determined that this proposed rule:
(1) Has benefits that justify its costs, (2)
is not an economically ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ as defined in section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, (3) is not
‘‘significant’’ as defined in DOT’s
Regulatory Policies and Procedures; (4)
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities; (5) would not create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign
commerce of the United States; and (6)
would not impose an unfunded
mandate on State, local, or tribal
governments, or on the private sector by
exceeding the threshold identified
above. These analyses are summarized
below.
This proposal would extend the
duration of first- and third-class medical
certificates for medical certificate
holders under the age of 40 and make
certain editorial amendments to the
medical certification regulations. The
proposal is estimated to generate $85.0
million ($59.7 million, discounted) of
cost savings while only imposing
$123,000 ($115,000, discounted) of costs
over 10 years.
Regulatory Flexibility Determination
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(Pub. L. 96–354) (RFA) establishes ‘‘as a
principle of regulatory issuance that
agencies shall endeavor, consistent with
the objectives of the rule and of
applicable statutes, to fit regulatory and
informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and
governmental jurisdictions subject to
regulation. To achieve this principle,
agencies are required to solicit and
consider flexible regulatory proposals
and to explain the rationale for their
actions to assure that such proposals are
given serious consideration.’’ The RFA
covers a wide range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-forprofit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to
determine whether a rule will have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. If
the agency determines that it will, the
agency must prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis as described in the
RFA.
However, if an agency determines that
a rule is not expected to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
section 605(b) of the RFA provides that
the head of the agency may so certify
and a regulatory flexibility analysis is
not required. The certification must
E:\FR\FM\10APP2.SGM
10APP2
18096
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 10, 2007 / Proposed Rules
include a statement providing the
factual basis for this determination, and
the reasoning should be clear.
This proposal would not impact small
entities. It would only impact 1st class
and 3rd class pilots who are expected to
save about $300 for each time that they
do not have to renew their medical
certificates. (The FAA cost-estimates on
the price of a medical exam, the time for
the exam, the time to fill out the form,
and the travel time would total
approximately $300.) Therefore, the
FAA certifies that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
International Trade Impact Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979
(Pub. L. 96–39) prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing any
standards or engaging in related
activities that create unnecessary
obstacles to the foreign commerce of the
United States. Legitimate domestic
objectives, such as safety, are not
considered unnecessary obstacles. The
statute also requires consideration of
international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for
U.S. standards. The FAA has assessed
the potential effect of this proposed rule
and has determined that it would have
only a domestic impact and therefore no
effect on international trade.
Unfunded Mandates Assessment
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS2
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4)
requires each Federal agency to prepare
a written statement assessing the effects
of any Federal mandate in a proposed or
final agency rule that may result in an
expenditure of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation with the
base year 1995) in any one year by State,
local, and tribal governments, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector; such
a mandate is deemed to be a ‘‘significant
regulatory action.’’ The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of
$128.1 million in lieu of $100 million.
This proposed rule does not contain
such a mandate.
The proposed rule does not contain
any Federal intergovernmental or
private sector mandates; therefore, the
requirements of Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 do not
apply.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The FAA has analyzed this proposed
rule under the principles and criteria of
Executive Order 13132, Federalism. We
determined that this action would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, and therefore
would not have federalism implications.
Plain English
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
Oct. 4, 1993) requires each agency to
write regulations that are simple and
easy to understand. We invite your
comments on how to make these
proposed regulations easier to
understand, including answers to
questions such as the following:
• Are the requirements in the
proposed regulations clearly stated?
• Do the proposed regulations contain
unnecessary technical language or
jargon that interferes with their clarity?
• Would the regulations be easier to
understand if they were divided into
more (but shorter) sections?
• Is the description in the preamble
helpful in understanding the proposed
regulations?
Please send your comments to the
address specified in the ADDRESSES
section.
Environmental Analysis
FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA
actions that are categorically excluded
from preparation of an environmental
assessment or environmental impact
statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act in the
absence of extraordinary circumstances.
The FAA has determined this proposed
rulemaking action qualifies for the
categorical exclusion and involves no
extraordinary circumstances.
Regulations that Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
The FAA has analyzed this NPRM
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). We
have determined that it is not a
‘‘significant energy action’’ under the
executive order because it is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866, and it is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy.
List of Subjects
14 CFR Part 61
Aircraft, Airmen, Aviation safety, and
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
14 CFR Part 65
Airmen other than flight
crewmembers.
14 CFR Part 67
Aircraft, Airmen, Alcohol abuse, Drug
abuse, Recreation and recreation areas,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
14 CFR Part 183
Aircraft, Airmen, Authority
delegations (Government agencies),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend Chapter I of Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 61—CERTIFICATION: PILOTS,
FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS, AND GROUND
INSTRUCTORS
1. The authority citation for part 61
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701–
44703, 44707, 44709–44711, 45102–45103,
45301–45302.
2. Amend § 61.23 by revising
paragraph (d) as follows:
§ 61.23 Medical certificates: Requirement
and duration.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Duration of a medical certificate.
Use the following table to determine
how long each class of medical
certificate is valid:
If you hold
And you are
Conducting an operation requiring
Then your medical certificate is valid from the date
of the examination, through
the rest of that month, and
for
(1) A first-class medical certificate.
(i) Under age 40 ................
an airline transport pilot certificate ................................
12 more calendar months.
(ii) Age 40 or older ............
an airline transport pilot certificate ................................
6 more calendar months.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Apr 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\10APP2.SGM
10APP2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 10, 2007 / Proposed Rules
If you hold
Then your medical certificate is valid from the date
of the examination, through
the rest of that month, and
for
And you are
Conducting an operation requiring
(iii) Of any age ...................
a commercial pilot certificate or an air traffic control
tower operator certificate.
a recreational pilot certificate, a private pilot certificate,
a flight instructor certificate (when acting as pilot in
command or a required pilot flight crewmember in
operations other than glider or balloon), or a student
pilot certificate.
a recreational pilot certificate, a private pilot certificate,
a flight instructor certificate (when acting as pilot in
command or a required pilot flight crewmember in
operations other than glider or balloon), or a student
pilot certificate.
a commercial pilot certificate or an air traffic control
tower operator certificate.
a recreational pilot certificate, a private pilot certificate,
a flight instructor certificate (when acting as pilot in
command or a required pilot flight crewmember in
operations other than glider or balloon), or a student
pilot certificate.
a recreational pilot certificate, a private pilot certificate,
a flight instructor certificate (when acting as pilot in
command or a required pilot flight crewmember in
operations other than glider or balloon), or a student
pilot certificate.
a recreational pilot certificate, a private pilot certificate,
a flight instructor certificate (when acting as pilot in
command or a required pilot flight crewmember in
operations other than glider or balloon), or a student
pilot certificate.
a recreational pilot certificate, a private pilot certificate,
a flight instructor certificate (when acting as pilot in
command or a required pilot flight crewmember in
operations other than glider or balloon), or a student
pilot certificate.
(iv) Under age 40 ..............
(v) Age 40 or older ............
(2) A second-class medical
certificate.
(i) Of any age ....................
(ii) Under age 40 ...............
(iii) Age 40 or older ...........
(3) A third-class medical
certificate.
(i) Under age 40 ................
(ii) Age 40 or older ............
§ 65.16 Change of name: Replacement of
lost or destroyed certificate.
3. Amend § 61.29 by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 61.29 Replacement of a lost or destroyed
airman or medical certificate or knowledge
test report.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) A request for the replacement of a
lost or destroyed medical certificate
must be made by letter to the
Department of Transportation, FAA,
Aeromedical Certification Division, P.O.
Box 26200, Oklahoma City, OK 73125,
and must be accompanied by a check or
money order for the appropriate fee
payable to the FAA.
*
*
*
*
*
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS2
PART 65—CERTIFICATION: AIRMEN
OTHER THAN FLIGHT
CREWMEMBERS
5. Amend § 65.16 by revising
paragraph (b) introductory text to read
as follows:
Jkt 211001
PART 67—MEDICAL STANDARDS AND
CERTIFICATION
6. The authority citation for part 67
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701–
44703, 44707, 44709–44711, 45102–45103,
45301–45302.
§ 67.3
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701–
44703, 44707, 44709–44711, 45102–45103,
45301–45302.
15:33 Apr 09, 2007
*
*
*
*
(b) An application for a replacement
of a lost or destroyed certificate must be
made by letter to the Department of
Transportation, Federal Aviation
Administration, Airman Certification
Division, Post Office Box 26200,
Oklahoma City, 73215. The letter
must—
*
*
*
*
*
7. Revise § 67.3 to read as follows:
4. The authority citation for part 65
continues to read as follows:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
*
Issue.
A person who meets the medical
standards prescribed in this part, based
on medical examination and evaluation
of the person’s history and condition, is
entitled to an appropriate medical
certificate.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
18097
12 more calendar months.
60 more calendar months.
24 more calendar months.
12 more calendar months.
60 more calendar months.
24 more calendar months.
60 more calendar months.
24 more calendar months.
8. Add § 67.4 to read as follows:
§ 67.4
Application.
An applicant for first-, second- and
third-class medical certification must:
(a) Apply on a form and in a manner
prescribed by the Administrator;
(b) Be examined by an aviation
medical examiner designated in
accordance with part 183 of this
chapter. An applicant may obtain a list
of aviation medical examiners from the
FAA Office of Aerospace Medicine
homepage on the FAA Web site, from
any FAA Regional Flight Surgeon, or by
contacting the Manager of the
Aeromedical Education Division, P.O.
Box 26200, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
73125.
(c) Show proof of age and identity by
presenting a government-issued photo
identification (such as a current and
valid U.S. driver’s license, identification
card issued by a driver’s license
authority, military identification, or
passport). If an applicant does not have
government-issued identification, he or
she may use non-photo, governmentissued identification (such as a birth
certificate or voter registration card) in
E:\FR\FM\10APP2.SGM
10APP2
18098
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 10, 2007 / Proposed Rules
conjunction with a photo identification
(such as a work identification card or a
student identification card.)
9. Amend § 67.401 by removing
paragraph (j).
10. Revise § 67.405 to read as follows:
§ 67.405 Medical examinations: Who may
perform?
(a) First-class. Any aviation medical
examiner who is specifically designated
for the purpose may perform
examinations for the first-class medical
certificate.
(b) Second- and third-class. Any
aviation medical examiner may perform
examinations for the second-or thirdclass medical certificate.
11. Remove and reserve § 67.411.
12. Revise § 67.413 to read as follows:
§ 67.413
Medical records.
cprice-sewell on PROD1PC66 with PROPOSALS2
(a) Whenever the Administrator finds
that additional medical information or
history is necessary to determine
whether you meet the medical standards
required to hold a medical certificate,
you must:
(1) Furnish that information to the
FAA; or
(2) Authorize any clinic, hospital,
physician, or other person to release to
the FAA all available information or
records concerning that history.
(b) If you fail to provide the requested
medical information or history or to
authorize its release, the FAA may
suspend, modify, or revoke your
medical certificate or, in the case of an
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:33 Apr 09, 2007
Jkt 211001
applicant, deny the application for a
medical certificate.
(c) If your medical certificate is
suspended, modified, or revoked under
paragraph (b) of this section, that
suspension or modification remains in
effect until you provide the requested
information, history, or authorization to
the FAA and until the FAA determines
that you meet the medical standards set
forth in this part.
PART 183—REPRESENTATIVES OF
THE ADMINISTRATOR
13. The authority citation for part 183
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701; 49 U.S.C.
106(g), 40113, 44702, 44721, 45303.
14. Amend § 183.11 by revising
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
§ 183.11
Selection.
(a) The Federal Air Surgeon, or his or
her authorized representatives within
the FAA, may select Aviation Medical
Examiners from qualified physicians
who apply. In addition, the Federal Air
Surgeon may designate qualified
forensic pathologists to assist in the
medical investigation of aircraft
accidents.
*
*
*
*
*
15. Revise § 183.15 to read as follows:
§ 183.15
Duration of certificates.
(a) Unless sooner terminated under
paragraph (b) of this section, a
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4702
designation as an Aviation Medical
Examiner or as a Flight Standards or
Aircraft Certification Service Designated
Representative as described in
§§ 183.21, 183.23, 183.25, 183.27,
183.29, 183.31, or 183.33 is effective
until the expiration date shown on the
document granting the authorization.
(b) A designation made under this
subpart terminates:
(1) Upon the written request of the
representative;
(2) Upon the written request of the
employer in any case in which the
recommendation of the employer is
required for the designation;
(3) Upon the representative being
separated from the employment of the
employer who recommended him or her
for certification;
(4) Upon a finding by the
Administrator that the representative
has not properly performed his or her
duties under the designation;
(5) Upon the assistance of the
representative being no longer needed
by the Administrator; or
(6) For any reason the Administrator
considers appropriate.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 23,
2007.
Frederick E. Tilton,
Federal Air Surgeon.
[FR Doc. E7–6652 Filed 4–9–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\10APP2.SGM
10APP2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 68 (Tuesday, April 10, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18092-18098]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6652]
[[Page 18091]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part III
Department of Transportation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 61, 65, 67, and 183
Modification of Certain Medical Standards and Procedures and Duration
of Certain Medical Certificates; Proposed Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 68 / Tuesday, April 10, 2007 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 18092]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Parts 61, 65, 67, and 183
[Docket No. FAA-2007-27812; Notice No. 07-08]
RIN 2120-AI91
Modification of Certain Medical Standards and Procedures and
Duration of Certain Medical Certificates
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposal would extend the duration of first- and third-
class medical certificates for certain individuals. A first-class
medical certificate is required when exercising airline transport pilot
privileges and at least a third-class medical certificate when
exercising private pilot privileges. Certain conforming amendments to
medical certification procedures and some general editorial amendments
also are proposed. The intent of this action is to improve the
efficiency of the medical certification program and service provided to
medical certificate applicants.
DATES: Send your comments on or before June 11, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by Docket Number FAA-2007-
27812 using any of the following methods:
DOT Docket Web site: Go to https://dms.dot.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Nassif Building, Room PL-401,
Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
Hand Delivery: Room PL-401 on the plaza level of the
Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW., Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For more information on the rulemaking process, see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. Privacy: We will
post all comments we receive, without change, to https://dms.dot.gov,
including any personal information you provide. For more information,
see the Privacy Act discussion in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
of this document. Docket: To read background documents or comments
received, go to https://dms.dot.gov at any time or to Room PL-401 on the
plaza level of the Nassif Building, 400 Seventh Street, SW.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judi Citrenbaum, Office of the Federal
Air Surgeon, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-9689; e-mail:
Judi.M.Citrenbaum@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. We also
invite comments relating to the economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that might result from adopting the proposals in
this document. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion
of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. We ask that you send us two copies of written
comments.
We will file in the docket all comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking. The docket is available for public
inspection before and after the comment closing date. If you wish to
review the docket in person, go to the address in the ADDRESSES section
of this preamble between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. You may also review the docket using the
Internet at the Web address in the ADDRESSES section.
Privacy Act: Using the search function of our docket Web site,
anyone can find and read the comments received into any of our dockets,
including the name of the individual sending the comment (or signing
the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit
https://dms.dot.gov.
Before acting on this proposal, we will consider all comments we
receive on or before the closing date for comments. We will consider
comments filed late if it is possible to do so without incurring
expense or delay. We may change this proposal in light of the comments
we receive.
If you want the FAA to acknowledge receipt of your comments on this
proposal, include with your comments a pre-addressed, stamped postcard
on which the docket number appears. We will stamp the date on the
postcard and mail it to you.
Proprietary or Confidential Business Information
Do not file in the docket information that you consider to be
proprietary or confidential business information. Send or deliver this
information directly to the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. You must mark the
information that you consider proprietary or confidential. If you send
the information on a disk or CD ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD
ROM and also identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is proprietary or confidential.
Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), when we are aware of proprietary information
filed with a comment, we do not place it in the docket. We hold it in a
separate file to which the public does not have access, and place a
note in the docket that we have received it. If we receive a request to
examine or copy this information, we treat it as any other request
under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552). We process such a
request under the DOT procedures found in 49 CFR part 7.
Availability of Rulemaking Documents
You can get an electronic copy using the Internet by:
(1) Searching the Department of Transportation's electronic Docket
Management System (DMS) Web page (https://dms.dot.gov/search);
(2) Visiting the FAA's Regulations and Policies Web page at https://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/; or
(3) Accessing the Government Printing Office's web page at https://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/.
You can also get a copy by sending a request to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking, ARM-1, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling (202) 267-9680. Make
sure to identify the docket number, notice number, or amendment number
of this rulemaking.
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs,
[[Page 18093]]
describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701 and 44703.
Background
Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations, part 67 provides for
the issuance of three classes of medical certificates. A first-class
medical certificate is required for operations requiring an airline
transport pilot certificate. At least a second-class medical
certificate is required for operations requiring a commercial pilot
certificate or an air traffic control tower operator certificate. At
least a third-class medical certificate is required for operations
requiring a private pilot certificate, a recreational pilot
certificate, a flight instructor certificate (when acting as pilot in
command or serving as a required flight crewmember in operations other
than glider or balloon), or a student pilot certificate.
An applicant who is found to meet the appropriate medical
standards, based on a medical examination and an evaluation of the
applicant's history and condition, is entitled to a medical certificate
without restriction or limitation other than the prescribed limitation
as to its duration. The duration standards are set forth under existing
Sec. 61.23, paragraph (d).
The FAA has not reviewed the medical duration standards since 1996
when it extended the duration of third-class medical certificates from
2 years to 3 years for individuals under age 40. The medical
examination duration standards under existing Sec. 61.23 (d) represent
what the agency determined years ago to be a reasonable, minimum
timetable to impose for required examinations and an optimum schedule
in terms of estimated detectable pathology in the airman population.
The FAA is proposing to further extend certain Sec. 61.23 (d)
provisions in order to provide a more reasonable, updated examination
timetable for certain medical certificate holders and with a view to
more efficiently managing the airman medical certification program
overall.
Discussion of the Proposal
The FAA proposes, primarily, to amend Sec. 61.23(d) to extend the
duration of first- and third-class medical certificates for individuals
under the age of 40. Existing Sec. 61.23 prescribes the duration of
validity and privileges of each class of medical certificate. Currently
the maximum validity on a first-class medical certificate is 6 months
regardless of age and, on a third-class medical certificate, 36 months
for individuals under age 40. Decreasing the frequency of medical
examinations by increasing the duration of validity from 6 months to 1
year on first-class medical certificates for individuals under age 40
and from 36 months to 60 months on third-class medical certificates for
individuals under age 40 would reflect the FAA's assessment of the
current, appropriate interval for younger airmen. It also would
decrease routine workflow thereby allowing the FAA to focus on the most
safety-critical certification cases and provide more efficient service
to other applicants waiting to be processed.
The FAA finds that, because medical standards were last evaluated
in 1996, this rulemaking action also provides the opportunity to make
certain minor, but necessary, amendatory modifications. In addition to
proposed amendments to Sec. 61.23 (d), the FAA also proposes to:
Add new section Sec. 67.4.
Amend Sec. 183.15.
Edit Sec. Sec. 61.29, 65.16, 67.3, 67.401, 67.405,
67.411, 67.413, and 183.11.
Proposed Amendments
Section 61.23 Medical Certificates: Requirement and Duration
Rationale for the Change
The FAA extended the duration of third-class medical certificates
from 24 to 36 months for individuals under age 40 in 1996 [61 FR 11243;
March 19, 1996]. After careful consideration of the comments and
testimony received during that rulemaking action, the FAA determined an
extended duration would pose no detriment to safety in the case of
younger individuals because they are much less likely to suffer medical
incapacitation. Ten years of experience with extended duration on the
third-class medical certificate has had no adverse impact on safety.
The FAA has no experience extending the duration of first-class
medical certificates beyond the current 6-month limit. The FAA
developed this proposal through review of relevant medical literature,
its own aeromedical certification data, and accident data.
Additionally, the FAA considered the long-standing International Civil
Aviation Authority (ICAO) standard requiring revalidation of medical
certification annually for airline transport and commercial pilots in
multi-crew settings and also the ICAO standard adopted in November 2005
extending revalidation for private pilots from 2 years to 5 years under
age 40. Existing U.S. medical certificate validity standards for
commercial pilots under age 40 in a multi-crew setting currently are
the same as ICAO's; therefore, the FAA sees no need to consider a
change to FAA second-class medical certificate validity standards. The
FAA is proposing to modify existing, more restrictive U.S. medical
certificate validity standards for airline transport and private pilots
under age 40 in part because of the international application of less
restrictive standards that has had no reported adverse impact on
safety.
To explore whether the re-examination period for pilots under age
40 holding an FAA first-class medical certificate could be safely
extended from 6 months to 12 months, FAA researchers randomly selected
a sample of 100 airmen issued a first-class medical certificate under
age 40 from its medical certification database and reviewed medical
records over a 36-month period for the presence of 91 predetermined
pathology codes defined as significant. Significant codes represent
serious medical conditions that would negatively impact aviation
safety. The proportion of significant pathology codes assigned to
airmen who were examined at 6- and 12-month intervals were compared.
Comparison of the 6- and 12-month intervals revealed one medically
significant pathology code (Code 551, colitis and ileitis) at the 6-
month interval and one medically significant pathology code (Code 343,
pneumothorax) at the 12-month interval. The FAA determined that there
was no significant difference between the proportion of medically
significant pathology codes assigned to pilots who recertified at 6-
month intervals and 12-month intervals.
FAA certification trends consistently indicate no significant
increase either in undetected pathology between required medical
examinations or in medical disability among younger applicants. While
applicants of any age manifesting medical conditions that represent a
risk to safety are denied certification under Sec. 67.409, the trends
reveal that the percentage of younger applicants being denied medical
certification is consistently lower than that of older applicants. It
is also consistently evident that older applicants are more likely to
have to apply for special issuance under Sec. 67.401 than are younger
applicants.
Aviation Safety Information Analysis and Sharing (ASIAS) accident
database queries on airline transport and private pilots under age 40
reveal relatively few accidents and incidents, when total number of
enplanements is considered, related to pilot medical events. The
National Transportation Safety Board
[[Page 18094]]
(NTSB) Accident and Incident Data System was searched for medical
events for pilots under age 40 from 1983 to the present. Under the
general categories of incapacitation and physical impairment, various
sub-queries were performed to find accidents or incidents due, for
example, to incapacitation or physical impairment due to
cardiovascular, loss of consciousness, neurologic, visual, or other
organic problems. Search of these categories revealed 6 incidents and
21 accidents over the 23-year period that met the criteria of the
database query, with only 9 of these deemed appropriate to consider for
this analysis.
The data considered revealed what the NTSB data characterizes as
one commercial (air carrier) aviation incident, one commercial (air
taxi) aviation incident, and one commercial (air taxi) aviation
accident attributed to incapacitating medical cause. Both the air
carrier and air taxi incidents involved emergency landings made by
captains due to incapacitations of the first officers. The air carrier
incident was fatal for the first officer. The air taxi incident was
non-fatal. The first officer involved in the air taxi incident was able
to be treated and was diagnosed as suffering from a viral syndrome. The
air taxi accident was non-fatal involving the unspecified
incapacitation of the pilot in command with the first officer taking
control and landing the airplane without further incident.
The data also revealed what the NTSB data characterized as four
general aviation accidents attributed to incapacitation and one
incident attributed to physical impairment. Two of the incapacitating
accidents, both fatal, were due to heart attack of the pilots in
command. Two non-fatal, incapacitating accidents were attributed to
pilots, one a low-time pilot and one a student pilot, losing
consciousness upon landing while performing certain practice maneuvers.
The accident reports indicated inexperience and nervousness as
contributing to the accidents. The non-fatal incident attributed to
physical impairment involved a pilot taking sinus medication 90 minutes
after takeoff and then further medication 30 minutes later that,
apparently, may have incapacitated him.
Considering the limited findings revealed by reviewing ASIAS and
FAA aeromedical certification data, the FAA believes the incremental
risks associated with extending the duration of medical certificates
would be minimal. Additionally, the ancillary benefit this proposal
would provide by allowing the FAA to shift resources otherwise involved
in processing routine cases to the more safety-critical medical
certification cases would go a long way toward improving customer
service. The FAA has been making incremental changes over a
considerable period of time to improve the workflow of the medical
certification process; this proposal would provide an additional
opportunity for continuous improvement.
Proposed Implementation of the Change
The FAA intends that the proposed, extended validity periods would
be effective upon issuance of the final rule. Therefore, it would not
matter whether an individual had a medical examination the day before
or the day after the effective date of the final rule. Validity
standards are applied according to the date of examination placed on
the medical certificate and in accordance with the duration periods
specified under Sec. 61.23(d).
Under this proposal, Sec. 61.23(d) would be simplified into a more
user-friendly chart format.
Section 67.3 Issue
The FAA proposes an editorial amendment to delete a reference to a
non-existent Sec. 67.5. On October 5, 1998 [63 FR 53532] the FAA
removed several regulatory provisions under 14 CFR that restricted the
licensing of foreign persons outside of the United States. The
restrictive language was originally placed in the regulations because
of administrative concerns that are no longer applicable and that came
to be regarded as restricting harmonization efforts. Section 67.5 was
removed in this 1998 final rule; however, the FAA inadvertently did not
remove the reference to former Sec. 67.5 in existing Sec. 67.3. This
proposal would remove that erroneous reference and leave Sec. 67.3
otherwise unchanged.
Section 67.4 Application
The FAA proposes to add a new section, Sec. 67.4.
Proposed paragraph (a) would add a provision to require individuals
to make application for FAA medical certification ``on a form and in a
manner acceptable to the Administrator.'' Adding this language would
clarify that it is necessary to fill out a form to apply for a medical
certificate and thereby conform part 67 with existing language under
Sec. 61.13(a) that requires pilot certificate applicants to make
application ``on a form and in a manner acceptable to the
Administrator.''
Proposed paragraph (b) would move existing provisions regarding how
individuals may locate an AME from existing Sec. 67.405.
Proposed paragraph (c) would require applicants to present proof of
age and identity when making application. While an AME currently may
not conduct an examination unless the medical certificate applicant
presents proof of age and identity, this practice now would be codified
under the regulation.
Section 67.401 Special Issuance of Medical Certificates
Existing paragraph (j) would be deleted as it contains a reference
to a previous compliance date that is no longer necessary. The section
would remain otherwise unchanged.
Section 67.405 Medical Examinations: Who May Give?
Current paragraphs (a) and (b) regarding how the public may locate
and contact an AME are redundant and need to be expanded. The FAA would
update and move these provisions to proposed Sec. 67.4. In addition,
the FAA would change the words ``give the examination'' to ``perform
the examination.'' The word ``give'' in the title of this section also
would be changed to ``perform.''
Section 67.411 Medical Certificates by Flight Surgeons of the Armed
Forces
The FAA proposes to remove and reserve this section. The FAA has
determined that a specific section to address military flight surgeons
holding AME designation is no longer necessary. The FAA has ceased
designating military installations in favor of designating individual
military personnel as AMEs in the same manner as civilians. Thus there
no longer is a meaningful distinction between civilian AME and military
flight surgeons in terms of issuing FAA medical certificates.
Section 67.413 Medical Records
The FAA proposes to simplify Sec. 67.413 by re-formatting its
provisions into more user-friendly paragraphs. This intent of this
section would not change.
Section 61.29 Replacement of a Lost or Destroyed Airman or Medical
Certificate or Knowledge Test Report
Section 65.16 Change of Name: Replacement of Lost or Destroyed
Certificate
The FAA proposes to change the P.O. Box address listed under
Sec. Sec. 61.29(b) and 65.16(b) from P.O. Box 25082 to P.O. Box 26200
for individuals to use when requesting replacement of a lost or
destroyed medical certificate. While the current P.O. Box is valid,
replacement requests are received more
[[Page 18095]]
expeditiously, and therefore processed more efficiently, when sent to
P.O. Box 26200.
Section 183.11 Selection
The FAA proposes to change ``his authorized representatives'' to
``his or her authorized representatives'' in order to conform to the
existing language of other sections, for example, Sec. 67.407(d), that
use ``his or her.'' This section otherwise would remain unchanged.
Section 183.15 Duration of Certificates
The FAA proposes to amend Sec. 183.15. Under rulemaking that
became effective on November 14, 2005 [``Establishment of Organization
Designation Authorization Program; 70 FR 59932; October 13, 2005''],
the FAA amended Sec. 183.15 to remove a specific time limit on
designated authority for certain representatives of the Administrator
and provide instead that designations be effective until the expiration
date shown on whatever credentialing documentation or certificate is
held by a particular designee. Adding such a provision has worked well
among the designees of the FAA Flight Standards and Aircraft
Certification Services. In addition to reducing cost and workload, it
has allowed greater flexibility, in particular, in automatically
extending the designation authority of valued FAA designees. Including
AMEs under this process will further enhance the FAA's ability to more
efficiently manage FAA designee programs.
Existing paragraph (b) would be revised to provide, in addition to
Flight Standards and Aircraft Certification Service Designated
Representatives, that the designation of Aviation Medical Examiners
would be ``effective until the expiration date shown on the document
granting the authorization.'' Therefore existing paragraph (a), a
stand-alone paragraph referencing AMEs only, would no longer be needed
and therefore removed. Existing paragraph (b) would be revised as
proposed and become new paragraph (a). Existing paragraph (c) would
become new paragraph (b) and remain unchanged except it would include
the word ``her'' where necessary in the paragraph.
Paperwork Reduction Act
Currently, the reverse side of FAA Form 8500-9, the FAA medical
certificate, lists the ``Conditions of Issue'' of the certificate and
specifies the validity period of each class of medical certificate. If
this rule is adopted, the back of FAA Form 8500-9 would have to be
reprinted to reveal the new validity periods for first- and third-class
medical certificate holders under age 40. Further, approximately 2,000
boxes of reprinted forms would have to be mailed from the Oklahoma City
distribution site to various Aviation Medical Examiners and FAA offices
across the country.
In anticipation of revising the back of the medical certificate
attached to FAA Form 8500-8, the FAA will request new approval given
the cost to the FAA associated with amending and reprinting it. As
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)),
the FAA has submitted the information requirements associated with this
proposal to the Office of Management and Budget for its review.
International Compatibility
In keeping with U.S. obligations under the Convention on
International Civil Aviation, it is FAA policy to comply with
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Standards and
Recommended Practices to the maximum extent practicable. This action,
if adopted, would meet ICAO standard.
Economic Assessment, Initial Regulatory Flexibility Determination,
Trade Impact Assessment, and Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Changes to Federal regulations must undergo several economic
analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 directs that each Federal agency
shall propose or adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned determination
that the benefits of the intended regulation justify its costs. Second,
the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) requires
agencies to analyze the economic impact of regulatory changes on small
entities. Third, the Trade Agreements Act (Pub. L. 96-39) prohibits
agencies from setting standards that create unnecessary obstacles to
the foreign commerce of the United States. In developing U.S.
standards, this Trade Act requires agencies to consider international
standards and, where appropriate, that they be the basis of U.S.
standards. Fourth, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-4) requires agencies to prepare a written assessment of the costs,
benefits, and other effects of proposed or final rules that include a
Federal mandate likely to result in the expenditure by State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more annually (adjusted for inflation with base year of
1995). This portion of the preamble summarizes the FAA's analysis of
the economic impacts of this proposed rule. We suggest readers seeking
greater detail read the full regulatory evaluation, a copy of which we
have placed in the docket for this rulemaking.
In conducting these analyses, FAA has determined that this proposed
rule: (1) Has benefits that justify its costs, (2) is not an
economically ``significant regulatory action'' as defined in section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, (3) is not ``significant'' as defined in
DOT's Regulatory Policies and Procedures; (4) would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities;
(5) would not create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of
the United States; and (6) would not impose an unfunded mandate on
State, local, or tribal governments, or on the private sector by
exceeding the threshold identified above. These analyses are summarized
below.
This proposal would extend the duration of first- and third-class
medical certificates for medical certificate holders under the age of
40 and make certain editorial amendments to the medical certification
regulations. The proposal is estimated to generate $85.0 million ($59.7
million, discounted) of cost savings while only imposing $123,000
($115,000, discounted) of costs over 10 years.
Regulatory Flexibility Determination
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) (RFA)
establishes ``as a principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall
endeavor, consistent with the objectives of the rule and of applicable
statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions
subject to regulation. To achieve this principle, agencies are required
to solicit and consider flexible regulatory proposals and to explain
the rationale for their actions to assure that such proposals are given
serious consideration.'' The RFA covers a wide range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a rule will
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. If the agency determines that it will, the agency must
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis as described in the RFA.
However, if an agency determines that a rule is not expected to
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, section 605(b) of the RFA provides that the head of the
agency may so certify and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. The certification must
[[Page 18096]]
include a statement providing the factual basis for this determination,
and the reasoning should be clear.
This proposal would not impact small entities. It would only impact
1st class and 3rd class pilots who are expected to save about $300 for
each time that they do not have to renew their medical certificates.
(The FAA cost-estimates on the price of a medical exam, the time for
the exam, the time to fill out the form, and the travel time would
total approximately $300.) Therefore, the FAA certifies that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
International Trade Impact Assessment
The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39) prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing any standards or engaging in related
activities that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of
the United States. Legitimate domestic objectives, such as safety, are
not considered unnecessary obstacles. The statute also requires
consideration of international standards and, where appropriate, that
they be the basis for U.S. standards. The FAA has assessed the
potential effect of this proposed rule and has determined that it would
have only a domestic impact and therefore no effect on international
trade.
Unfunded Mandates Assessment
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4) requires each Federal agency to prepare a written statement
assessing the effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final
agency rule that may result in an expenditure of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation with the base year 1995) in any one
year by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by
the private sector; such a mandate is deemed to be a ``significant
regulatory action.'' The FAA currently uses an inflation-adjusted value
of $128.1 million in lieu of $100 million. This proposed rule does not
contain such a mandate.
The proposed rule does not contain any Federal intergovernmental or
private sector mandates; therefore, the requirements of Title II of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 do not apply.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
The FAA has analyzed this proposed rule under the principles and
criteria of Executive Order 13132, Federalism. We determined that this
action would not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government, and therefore would not have federalism implications.
Plain English
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, Oct. 4, 1993) requires each
agency to write regulations that are simple and easy to understand. We
invite your comments on how to make these proposed regulations easier
to understand, including answers to questions such as the following:
Are the requirements in the proposed regulations clearly
stated?
Do the proposed regulations contain unnecessary technical
language or jargon that interferes with their clarity?
Would the regulations be easier to understand if they were
divided into more (but shorter) sections?
Is the description in the preamble helpful in
understanding the proposed regulations?
Please send your comments to the address specified in the ADDRESSES
section.
Environmental Analysis
FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA actions that are categorically
excluded from preparation of an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy
Act in the absence of extraordinary circumstances. The FAA has
determined this proposed rulemaking action qualifies for the
categorical exclusion and involves no extraordinary circumstances.
Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use
The FAA has analyzed this NPRM under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). We have determined that it is not
a ``significant energy action'' under the executive order because it is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866,
and it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
List of Subjects
14 CFR Part 61
Aircraft, Airmen, Aviation safety, and Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
14 CFR Part 65
Airmen other than flight crewmembers.
14 CFR Part 67
Aircraft, Airmen, Alcohol abuse, Drug abuse, Recreation and
recreation areas, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
14 CFR Part 183
Aircraft, Airmen, Authority delegations (Government agencies),
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend Chapter I of Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 61--CERTIFICATION: PILOTS, FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS, AND GROUND
INSTRUCTORS
1. The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44703, 44707, 44709-
44711, 45102-45103, 45301-45302.
2. Amend Sec. 61.23 by revising paragraph (d) as follows:
Sec. 61.23 Medical certificates: Requirement and duration.
* * * * *
(d) Duration of a medical certificate. Use the following table to
determine how long each class of medical certificate is valid:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Then your medical
certificate is valid
Conducting an operation from the date of the
If you hold And you are requiring examination, through
the rest of that
month, and for
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) A first-class medical (i) Under age 40...... an airline transport pilot 12 more calendar
certificate. certificate. months.
(ii) Age 40 or older.. an airline transport pilot 6 more calendar
certificate. months.
[[Page 18097]]
(iii) Of any age...... a commercial pilot 12 more calendar
certificate or an air months.
traffic control tower
operator certificate.
(iv) Under age 40..... a recreational pilot 60 more calendar
certificate, a private months.
pilot certificate, a
flight instructor
certificate (when acting
as pilot in command or a
required pilot flight
crewmember in operations
other than glider or
balloon), or a student
pilot certificate.
(v) Age 40 or older... a recreational pilot 24 more calendar
certificate, a private months.
pilot certificate, a
flight instructor
certificate (when acting
as pilot in command or a
required pilot flight
crewmember in operations
other than glider or
balloon), or a student
pilot certificate.
(2) A second-class medical (i) Of any age........ a commercial pilot 12 more calendar
certificate. certificate or an air months.
traffic control tower
operator certificate.
(ii) Under age 40..... a recreational pilot 60 more calendar
certificate, a private months.
pilot certificate, a
flight instructor
certificate (when acting
as pilot in command or a
required pilot flight
crewmember in operations
other than glider or
balloon), or a student
pilot certificate.
(iii) Age 40 or older. a recreational pilot 24 more calendar
certificate, a private months.
pilot certificate, a
flight instructor
certificate (when acting
as pilot in command or a
required pilot flight
crewmember in operations
other than glider or
balloon), or a student
pilot certificate.
(3) A third-class medical (i) Under age 40...... a recreational pilot 60 more calendar
certificate. certificate, a private months.
pilot certificate, a
flight instructor
certificate (when acting
as pilot in command or a
required pilot flight
crewmember in operations
other than glider or
balloon), or a student
pilot certificate.
(ii) Age 40 or older.. a recreational pilot 24 more calendar
certificate, a private months.
pilot certificate, a
flight instructor
certificate (when acting
as pilot in command or a
required pilot flight
crewmember in operations
other than glider or
balloon), or a student
pilot certificate.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Amend Sec. 61.29 by revising paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 61.29 Replacement of a lost or destroyed airman or medical
certificate or knowledge test report.
* * * * *
(b) A request for the replacement of a lost or destroyed medical
certificate must be made by letter to the Department of Transportation,
FAA, Aeromedical Certification Division, P.O. Box 26200, Oklahoma City,
OK 73125, and must be accompanied by a check or money order for the
appropriate fee payable to the FAA.
* * * * *
PART 65--CERTIFICATION: AIRMEN OTHER THAN FLIGHT CREWMEMBERS
4. The authority citation for part 65 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44703, 44707, 44709-
44711, 45102-45103, 45301-45302.
5. Amend Sec. 65.16 by revising paragraph (b) introductory text to
read as follows:
Sec. 65.16 Change of name: Replacement of lost or destroyed
certificate.
* * * * *
(b) An application for a replacement of a lost or destroyed
certificate must be made by letter to the Department of Transportation,
Federal Aviation Administration, Airman Certification Division, Post
Office Box 26200, Oklahoma City, 73215. The letter must--
* * * * *
PART 67--MEDICAL STANDARDS AND CERTIFICATION
6. The authority citation for part 67 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701-44703, 44707, 44709-
44711, 45102-45103, 45301-45302.
7. Revise Sec. 67.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 67.3 Issue.
A person who meets the medical standards prescribed in this part,
based on medical examination and evaluation of the person's history and
condition, is entitled to an appropriate medical certificate.
8. Add Sec. 67.4 to read as follows:
Sec. 67.4 Application.
An applicant for first-, second- and third-class medical
certification must:
(a) Apply on a form and in a manner prescribed by the
Administrator;
(b) Be examined by an aviation medical examiner designated in
accordance with part 183 of this chapter. An applicant may obtain a
list of aviation medical examiners from the FAA Office of Aerospace
Medicine homepage on the FAA Web site, from any FAA Regional Flight
Surgeon, or by contacting the Manager of the Aeromedical Education
Division, P.O. Box 26200, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73125.
(c) Show proof of age and identity by presenting a government-
issued photo identification (such as a current and valid U.S. driver's
license, identification card issued by a driver's license authority,
military identification, or passport). If an applicant does not have
government-issued identification, he or she may use non-photo,
government-issued identification (such as a birth certificate or voter
registration card) in
[[Page 18098]]
conjunction with a photo identification (such as a work identification
card or a student identification card.)
9. Amend Sec. 67.401 by removing paragraph (j).
10. Revise Sec. 67.405 to read as follows:
Sec. 67.405 Medical examinations: Who may perform?
(a) First-class. Any aviation medical examiner who is specifically
designated for the purpose may perform examinations for the first-class
medical certificate.
(b) Second- and third-class. Any aviation medical examiner may
perform examinations for the second-or third-class medical certificate.
11. Remove and reserve Sec. 67.411.
12. Revise Sec. 67.413 to read as follows:
Sec. 67.413 Medical records.
(a) Whenever the Administrator finds that additional medical
information or history is necessary to determine whether you meet the
medical standards required to hold a medical certificate, you must:
(1) Furnish that information to the FAA; or
(2) Authorize any clinic, hospital, physician, or other person to
release to the FAA all available information or records concerning that
history.
(b) If you fail to provide the requested medical information or
history or to authorize its release, the FAA may suspend, modify, or
revoke your medical certificate or, in the case of an applicant, deny
the application for a medical certificate.
(c) If your medical certificate is suspended, modified, or revoked
under paragraph (b) of this section, that suspension or modification
remains in effect until you provide the requested information, history,
or authorization to the FAA and until the FAA determines that you meet
the medical standards set forth in this part.
PART 183--REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ADMINISTRATOR
13. The authority citation for part 183 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701; 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44702,
44721, 45303.
14. Amend Sec. 183.11 by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 183.11 Selection.
(a) The Federal Air Surgeon, or his or her authorized
representatives within the FAA, may select Aviation Medical Examiners
from qualified physicians who apply. In addition, the Federal Air
Surgeon may designate qualified forensic pathologists to assist in the
medical investigation of aircraft accidents.
* * * * *
15. Revise Sec. 183.15 to read as follows:
Sec. 183.15 Duration of certificates.
(a) Unless sooner terminated under paragraph (b) of this section, a
designation as an Aviation Medical Examiner or as a Flight Standards or
Aircraft Certification Service Designated Representative as described
in Sec. Sec. 183.21, 183.23, 183.25, 183.27, 183.29, 183.31, or 183.33
is effective until the expiration date shown on the document granting
the authorization.
(b) A designation made under this subpart terminates:
(1) Upon the written request of the representative;
(2) Upon the written request of the employer in any case in which
the recommendation of the employer is required for the designation;
(3) Upon the representative being separated from the employment of
the employer who recommended him or her for certification;
(4) Upon a finding by the Administrator that the representative has
not properly performed his or her duties under the designation;
(5) Upon the assistance of the representative being no longer
needed by the Administrator; or
(6) For any reason the Administrator considers appropriate.
Issued in Washington, DC, on March 23, 2007.
Frederick E. Tilton,
Federal Air Surgeon.
[FR Doc. E7-6652 Filed 4-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P