Virginia Regulatory Program, 17449-17452 [E7-6577]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 67 / Monday, April 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
initial certification is 3 days on-site and
$ 9,000. Re-certification is required biannually at an estimated annual cost of
$3,000.
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
The FHWA has analyzed this
proposed action under Executive Order
13211, Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that this is not a significant
energy action under this order because
it is not a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. Therefore, a Statement of Energy
Effects under Executive Order 13211 is
not required.
The FHWA analyzed this proposed
amendment in accordance with the
principles and criteria contained in
Executive Order 13132, dated August 4,
1999, and the FHWA has determined
that this proposed action would not
have a substantial direct effect or
sufficient federalism implications on
States and local governments that would
limit the policy making discretion of the
States and local governments.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This proposed rule would not impose
unfunded mandates as defined by the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4, March 22, 1995; 109
Stat. 48). This proposed rule will not
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $128.1
million or more in any one year (2
U.S.C. 1532).
Paperwork Reduction Act
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.),
Federal agencies must obtain approval
from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct, sponsor, or
require through regulations. The FHWA
has determined that this proposed
action does not contain a collection of
information requirement for the
purposes of the PRA.
Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice
Reform)
This proposed action meets
applicable standards in Sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, to eliminate ambiguity, and to
reduce burden.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
Executive Order 13045 (Protection of
Children)
The FHWA has analyzed this
proposed action under Executive Order
13045, Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This is not an economically
significant proposed action and does not
concern an environmental risk to health
or safety that may disproportionately
affect children.
Executive Order 12630 (Taking of
Private Property)
This proposed action would not affect
a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Apr 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
Executive Order 13175 (Tribal
Consultation)
Since none of the existing test
laboratories are owned, operated, or in
any way controlled by Indian tribes, the
FHWA believes that it will not have any
direct effects on one or more Indian
tribes; will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian tribal
governments; and will not preempt
tribal law. Therefore, a tribal summary
impact statement is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
The agency has analyzed this
proposed action for the purpose of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and has
determined that it would not have any
effect on the quality of the environment.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. This proposed rule
uses voluntary consensus standards.
Regulation Identification Number
A regulation identification number
(RIN) is assigned to each regulatory
action listed in the Unified Agenda of
Federal Regulations. The Regulatory
Information Service Center publishes
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17449
the Unified Agenda in April and
October of each year. The RIN contained
in the heading of this document can be
used to cross-reference this action with
the Unified Agenda.
List of Subjects in 23 CFR Part 637
Construction inspection and approval;
Highways and roads.
Issued on: March 30, 2007.
J. Richard Capka,
Federal Highway Administrator.
In consideration of the foregoing, the
FHWA proposes to amend, title 23,
Code of Federal Regulations, part 637,
as set forth below:
PART 637—QUALITY ASSURANCE
PROCEDURES FOR CONSTRUCTION
1. The authority citation for part 637
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sec. 1307, Pub. L. 105–178, 112
Stat. 107; 23 U.S.C. 109, 114, and 315; 49
CFR 1.48(b).
2. In § 637.209, add paragraph (a)(5) to
read as follows:
§ 637.209 Laboratory and sampling and
testing personnel qualifications
(a) * * *
(5) After [insert date two years after
the date of publication of the final rule
in the Federal Register], laboratories
that perform crash testing for acceptance
of roadside hardware by the FHWA
shall be accredited by a laboratory
accreditation body that is recognized by
the National Laboratory Accreditation
Cooperation (NACLA), is a signatory to
the Asia Pacific Laboratory
Accreditation Cooperation (APLAC)
Mutual Recognition Arrangement
(MRA), is a signatory to the
International Laboratory Accreditation
Cooperation (ILAC) Mutual Recognition
Arrangement (MRA), or another
accreditation body acceptable to FHWA.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E7–6533 Filed 4–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 946
[VA–123–FOR]
Virginia Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\09APP1.SGM
09APP1
17450
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 67 / Monday, April 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
ACTION:
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of
a proposed amendment to the Virginia
regulatory program under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of
1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Virginia is
proposing to revise its remining
regulations to make three provisions
permanent by deleting a termination
date of September 30, 2004, from the
regulations. The amendments are
intended to render the State’s
regulations consistent with recent
amendments to SMCRA.
DATES: We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4
p.m. (local time), on May 9, 2007. If
requested, we will hold a public hearing
on the amendment on May 4, 2007. We
will accept requests to speak at a
hearing until 4 p.m. (local time), on
April 24, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by VA–123–FOR, by any of
the following methods:
• E-mail: tdieringer@osmre.gov.
Include VA–123–FOR in the subject line
of the message.
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Mr. Tim
Dieringer, Director, Knoxville Field
Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1941
Neeley Road, Suite 201, Compartment
116, Big Stone Gap, Virginia 24219.
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency docket number
for this rulemaking. For detailed
instructions on submitting comments
and additional information on the
rulemaking process, see the ‘‘Public
Comment Procedures’’ heading in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document. You may also request to
speak at a public hearing by any of the
methods listed above or by contacting
the individual listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Docket: You may review copies of the
Virginia program, this amendment, a
listing of any scheduled public hearings,
and all written comments received in
response to this document at the
addresses listed below during normal
business hours, Monday through Friday,
excluding holidays. You may receive
one free copy of the amendment by
contacting OSM’s Big Stone Gap Area
Office.
Mr. Tim Dieringer, Director, Knoxville
Field Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1941
Neeley Road, Suite 201, Compartment
116, Big Stone Gap, Virginia 24219,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Apr 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
Telephone: (276) 523–4303. E-mail:
tdieringer@osmre.gov.
Mr. Leslie S. Vincent, Virginia
Division of Mined Land Reclamation,
P. O. Drawer 900, Big Stone Gap,
Virginia 24219, Telephone: (276) 523–
8100. E-mail: lsv@mme.state.va.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Tim Dieringer, Director, Knoxville Field
Office; Telephone: (276) 523–4303. Email: tdieringer@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Virginia Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Virginia Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, ‘‘. . . a
State law which provides for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations in accordance
with the requirements of the Act . . .;
and rules and regulations consistent
with regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to the Act.’’ See 30 U.S.C.
1253(a)(1) and (7). On the basis of these
criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Virginia
program on December 15, 1981. You can
find background information on the
Virginia program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and conditions of approval
of the Virginia program in the December
15, 1981, Federal Register (46 FR
61088). You can also find later actions
concerning Virginia’s program and
program amendments at 30 CFR 946.12,
946.13, and 946.15.
II. Description of the Proposed
Amendment
By letter dated February 13, 2007
(Administrative Record Number VA–
1058), the Virginia Department of
Mines, Minerals and Energy (DMME)
submitted an amendment to the Virginia
program. In its letter, the DMME stated
that the program amendment revises
Virginia Coal Surface Mining
Reclamation Regulations to reflect the
deletion from SMCRA at section 510(e)
of the termination date of section 510(e)
of September 30, 2004.
Section 510 of SMCRA concerns
permit approval or denial. Subsection
510(e) provides an exception to the
prohibition of subsection (c) , which
prohibits the issuance of a permit where
any surface coal mining operation
owned or controlled by an applicant is
currently in violation of SMCRA or such
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
other laws referenced at subsection
510(c). Prior to being amended by the
Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006,
subsection 510(e) provided as follows:
(e) After the date of enactment of this
subsection, the prohibition of subsection (c)
shall not apply to a permit application due
to any violation resulting from an
unanticipated event or condition at a surface
coal mining operation on lands eligible for
remining under a permit held by the person
making such application. As used in this
subsection, the term ‘‘violation’’ has the same
meaning as such term has under subsection
(c). The authority of this subsection and
section 515(b)(20)(B) shall terminate on
September 30, 2004.
The effect of the deletion of the
termination date in the quoted
paragraph above (the entire last
sentence was deleted) is twofold: (1) To
make permanent the authority at
subsection 510(e) of SMCRA to approve
a permit application for surface coal
mining and reclamation
notwithstanding the existence of a
violation resulting from an
unanticipated event or condition at the
site, and (2) to make permanent the twoyear revegetation responsibility period
for lands eligible for remining at
subsection 515(b)(20)(B) of SMCRA.
In the proposed program amendments
identified below, Virginia is deleting the
termination date of September 30, 2004,
from three of its program regulations
concerning remining.
1. 4 VAC 25–130–785.25. Lands eligible
for remining
This provision is proposed to be
amended by deleting subsection (c) in
its entirety. Currently, 4 VAC 25–130–
785.25 provides as follows:
(a) This section contains permitting
requirements to implement 4VAC25–130–
773.15(b)(4). Any person who submits a
permit application to conduct a surface coal
mining operation on lands eligible for
remining must comply with this section.
(b) Any application for a permit under this
section shall be made according to all
requirements of this subchapter applicable to
surface coal mining and reclamation
operations. In addition, the application shall:
(1) To the extent not otherwise addressed
in the permit application, identify potential
environmental and safety problems related to
prior mining activity at the site and that
could be reasonably anticipated to occur.
This identification shall be based on a due
diligence investigation which shall include
visual observations at the site, a record
review of past mining at the site, and
environmental sampling tailored to current
site conditions.
(2) With regard to potential environmental
and safety problems referred in subdivision
(b)(1) of this section, describe the mitigative
measures that will be taken to ensure that the
applicable reclamation requirements of this
chapter can be met.
E:\FR\FM\09APP1.SGM
09APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 67 / Monday, April 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
(c) The requirements of this section shall
not apply after September 30, 2004.
In its submittal letter, the DMME
stated that the deletion of subsection (c)
containing the termination date of
September 30, 2004, is intended to
reflect the deletion of that same
termination date at subsection 510(e) of
SMCRA.
2. 4VAC25–130–816.116 and 817.116.
Revegetation; Standards for Success
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
These provisions are proposed to be
amended by deleting the phrase
‘‘included in permits issued before
September 30, 2004, or any renewals
thereof’’ at the end of the first sentence
in subparts (c)(2)(ii). Currently, 4 VAC
25–130–816.116(c) and 817.116(c)
provide as follows:
(c) (1) The period of extended
responsibility for successful revegetation
shall begin after the last year of augmented
seeding, fertilizing, irrigation, or other work,
excluding husbandry practices that are
approved by the division in accordance with
subdivision (c)(3) of this section.
(2) The period of responsibility shall
continue for a period of not less than:
(i) Five full years except as provided in
subdivision (c)(2)(ii) of this section. The
vegetation parameters identified in
subsection (b) of this section for grazing land
or pastureland and cropland shall equal or
exceed the approved success standard during
the growing seasons of any two years of the
responsibility period, except the first year.
Areas approved for the other uses identified
in subsection (b) of this section shall equal
or exceed the applicable success standard
during the growing season of the last year of
the responsibility period.
(ii) Two full years for lands eligible for
remining included in permits issued before
September 30, 2004, or any renewals thereof.
To the extent that the success standards are
established by subdivision (b)(5) of this
section, the lands shall equal or exceed the
standards during the growing season of the
last year of the responsibility period.
(3) The division may approve selective
husbandry practices, excluding augmented
seeding, fertilization, or irrigation, without
extending the period of responsibility for
revegetation success and bond liability, if
such practices can be expected to continue as
part of the postmining land use or if
discontinuance of the practices after the
liability period expires will not reduce the
probability of permanent revegetation
success. Approved practices shall be normal
conservation practices within the region for
unmined lands having land uses similar to
the approved postmining land use of the
disturbed area, including such practices as
disease, pest, and vermin control; and any
pruning, reseeding and/or transplanting
specifically necessitated by such actions.
In its submittal letter, the DMME
stated that the deletion of the September
30, 2004, termination date at subparts
(c)(2)(ii) is intended to reflect the
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Apr 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
deletion of that same termination date at
subsection 510(e) of SMCRA.
As amended, 4VAC25–130–
816.116(c)(2)(ii) and 817.116(c)(2)(ii)
provide as follows:
(ii) Two full years for lands eligible for
remining. To the extent that the success
standards are established by subdivision
(b)(5) of this section, the lands shall equal or
exceed the standards during the growing
season of the last year of the responsibility
period.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR
732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment
satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we
approve the amendment, it will become
part of the Virginia program.
Written Comments
Send your written or electronic
comments to OSM at the address given
above. Your written comments should
be specific, pertain only to the issues
proposed in this rulemaking, and
include explanations in support of your
recommendations. We may not consider
or respond to your comments when
developing the final rule if they are
received after the close of the comment
period (see DATES). We will make every
attempt to log all comments into the
administrative record, but comments
delivered to an address other than the
Big Stone Gap Area Office may not be
logged in.
Electronic Comments
Please submit Internet comments as
an E-mail or Word file avoiding the use
of special characters and any form of
encryption. Please also include Attn:
SATS NO. VA–123–FOR and your name
and return address in your Internet
message. If you do not receive a
confirmation that we have received your
Internet message, contact the Big Stone
Gap Area office at (276) 523–4303.
Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public
hearing, contact the person listed under
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17451
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4
p.m. (local time), on April 24, 2007. If
you are disabled and need special
accommodations to attend a public
hearing, contact the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. We
will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting
the hearing. If no one requests an
opportunity to speak, we will not hold
a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an
accurate record, we request, if possible,
that each person who speaks at the
public hearing provide us with a written
copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified
date until everyone scheduled to speak
has been given an opportunity to be
heard. If you are in the audience and
have not been scheduled to speak and
wish to do so, you will be allowed to
speak after those who have been
scheduled. We will end the hearing after
everyone scheduled to speak and others
present in the audience who wish to
speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an
opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public
hearing. If you wish to meet with us to
discuss the amendment, please request
a meeting by contacting the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All such meetings will be
open to the public and, if possible, we
will post notices of meetings at the
locations listed under ADDRESSES. We
will make a written summary of each
meeting a part of the Administrative
Record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630—Takings
This rule does not have takings
implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the
counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review
This rule is exempt from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
conducted the reviews required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and
has determined that this rule meets the
applicable standards of subsections (a)
and (b) of that section. However, these
standards are not applicable to the
actual language of State regulatory
programs and program amendments
because each program is drafted and
E:\FR\FM\09APP1.SGM
09APP1
17452
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 67 / Monday, April 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
promulgated by a specific State, not by
OSM. Under sections 503 and 505 of
SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and
the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10),
decisions on proposed State regulatory
programs and program amendments
submitted by the States must be based
solely on a determination of whether the
submittal is consistent with SMCRA and
its implementing Federal regulations
and whether the other requirements of
30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism
implications. SMCRA delineates the
roles of the Federal and State
governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations. One of the
purposes of SMCRA is to ‘‘establish a
nationwide program to protect society
and the environment from the adverse
effects of surface coal mining
operations.’’ Section 503(a)(1) of
SMCRA requires that State laws
regulating surface coal mining and
reclamation operations be ‘‘in
accordance with’’ the requirements of
SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7) requires
that State programs contain rules and
regulations ‘‘consistent with’’
regulations issued by the Secretary
pursuant to SMCRA.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order
13175, we have evaluated the potential
effects of this rule on Federallyrecognized Indian tribes and have
determined that the rule does not have
substantial direct effects on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The basis for this determination is our
decision is on a State regulatory
program and does not involve a Federal
regulation involving Indian lands.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect The Supply,
Distribution, Or Use Of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 which requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rule that is (1)
Considered significant under Executive
Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a
significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under
Executive Order 12866 and is not
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Apr 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
expected to have a significant adverse
effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy, a Statement of Energy Effects
is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an
environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30
U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that agency
decisions on proposed State regulatory
program provisions do not constitute
major Federal actions within the
meaning of section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act (42
U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain
information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). The State submittal,
which is the subject of this rule, is based
upon counterpart Federal regulations for
which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that
such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a
substantial number of small entities. In
making the determination as to whether
this rule would have a significant
economic impact, the Department relied
upon the data and assumptions for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) Does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) Does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises. This
determination is based upon the
analysis performed under various laws
and executive orders for the counterpart
Federal regulations.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This determination is based upon
the analysis performed under various
laws and executive orders for the
counterpart Federal regulations.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 948
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
Dated: March 2, 2007.
H. Vann Weaver,
Acting Regional Director, Appalachian
Region.
[FR Doc. E7–6577 Filed 4–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 946
[VA–124–FOR]
Virginia Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment
period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of
a proposed amendment to the Virginia
regulatory program under the Surface
Mining Control and Reclamation Act of
1977 (SMCRA or the Act). The program
amendment revises the Virginia Coal
Surface Mining Reclamation
Regulations concerning the distribution
of topsoil and subsoil materials,
revegetation standards for success, and
to allow approval of natural stream
restoration channel design, as
developed in consultation with the
Army Corps of Engineers.
DATES: We will accept written
comments on this amendment until 4
p.m. (local time), on May 9, 2007. If
requested, we will hold a public hearing
on the amendment on May 4, 2007. We
will accept requests to speak at a
hearing until 4 p.m. (local time), on
April 24, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by VA–124–FOR, by any of
the following methods:
• E-mail: tdieringer@osmre.gov.
Include VA–124–FOR in the subject line
of the message.
• Mail/Hand Delivery: Mr. Tim
Dieringer, Director, Knoxville Field
Office, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 1941
Neeley Road, Suite 201, Compartment
116, Big Stone Gap, Virginia 24219.
E:\FR\FM\09APP1.SGM
09APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 67 (Monday, April 9, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17449-17452]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6577]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 946
[VA-123-FOR]
Virginia Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM),
Interior.
[[Page 17450]]
ACTION: Proposed rule; public comment period and opportunity for public
hearing on proposed amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are announcing receipt of a proposed amendment to the
Virginia regulatory program under the Surface Mining Control and
Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). Virginia is proposing to
revise its remining regulations to make three provisions permanent by
deleting a termination date of September 30, 2004, from the
regulations. The amendments are intended to render the State's
regulations consistent with recent amendments to SMCRA.
DATES: We will accept written comments on this amendment until 4 p.m.
(local time), on May 9, 2007. If requested, we will hold a public
hearing on the amendment on May 4, 2007. We will accept requests to
speak at a hearing until 4 p.m. (local time), on April 24, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by VA-123-FOR, by any of
the following methods:
E-mail: tdieringer@osmre.gov. Include VA-123-FOR in the
subject line of the message.
Mail/Hand Delivery: Mr. Tim Dieringer, Director, Knoxville
Field Office, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement,
1941 Neeley Road, Suite 201, Compartment 116, Big Stone Gap, Virginia
24219.
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency
docket number for this rulemaking. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional information on the rulemaking
process, see the ``Public Comment Procedures'' heading in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. You may also
request to speak at a public hearing by any of the methods listed above
or by contacting the individual listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Docket: You may review copies of the Virginia program, this
amendment, a listing of any scheduled public hearings, and all written
comments received in response to this document at the addresses listed
below during normal business hours, Monday through Friday, excluding
holidays. You may receive one free copy of the amendment by contacting
OSM's Big Stone Gap Area Office.
Mr. Tim Dieringer, Director, Knoxville Field Office, Office of
Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 1941 Neeley Road, Suite
201, Compartment 116, Big Stone Gap, Virginia 24219, Telephone: (276)
523-4303. E-mail: tdieringer@osmre.gov.
Mr. Leslie S. Vincent, Virginia Division of Mined Land Reclamation,
P. O. Drawer 900, Big Stone Gap, Virginia 24219, Telephone: (276) 523-
8100. E-mail: lsv@mme.state.va.us.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Tim Dieringer, Director, Knoxville
Field Office; Telephone: (276) 523-4303. E-mail: tdieringer@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Virginia Program
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
III. Public Comment Procedures
IV. Procedural Determinations
I. Background on the Virginia Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, ``. . . a State law which
provides for the regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation
operations in accordance with the requirements of the Act . . .; and
rules and regulations consistent with regulations issued by the
Secretary pursuant to the Act.'' See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7). On
the basis of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Virginia program on December 15, 1981. You
can find background information on the Virginia program, including the
Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of
approval of the Virginia program in the December 15, 1981, Federal
Register (46 FR 61088). You can also find later actions concerning
Virginia's program and program amendments at 30 CFR 946.12, 946.13, and
946.15.
II. Description of the Proposed Amendment
By letter dated February 13, 2007 (Administrative Record Number VA-
1058), the Virginia Department of Mines, Minerals and Energy (DMME)
submitted an amendment to the Virginia program. In its letter, the DMME
stated that the program amendment revises Virginia Coal Surface Mining
Reclamation Regulations to reflect the deletion from SMCRA at section
510(e) of the termination date of section 510(e) of September 30, 2004.
Section 510 of SMCRA concerns permit approval or denial. Subsection
510(e) provides an exception to the prohibition of subsection (c) ,
which prohibits the issuance of a permit where any surface coal mining
operation owned or controlled by an applicant is currently in violation
of SMCRA or such other laws referenced at subsection 510(c). Prior to
being amended by the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, subsection
510(e) provided as follows:
(e) After the date of enactment of this subsection, the
prohibition of subsection (c) shall not apply to a permit
application due to any violation resulting from an unanticipated
event or condition at a surface coal mining operation on lands
eligible for remining under a permit held by the person making such
application. As used in this subsection, the term ``violation'' has
the same meaning as such term has under subsection (c). The
authority of this subsection and section 515(b)(20)(B) shall
terminate on September 30, 2004.
The effect of the deletion of the termination date in the quoted
paragraph above (the entire last sentence was deleted) is twofold: (1)
To make permanent the authority at subsection 510(e) of SMCRA to
approve a permit application for surface coal mining and reclamation
notwithstanding the existence of a violation resulting from an
unanticipated event or condition at the site, and (2) to make permanent
the two-year revegetation responsibility period for lands eligible for
remining at subsection 515(b)(20)(B) of SMCRA.
In the proposed program amendments identified below, Virginia is
deleting the termination date of September 30, 2004, from three of its
program regulations concerning remining.
1. 4 VAC 25-130-785.25. Lands eligible for remining
This provision is proposed to be amended by deleting subsection (c)
in its entirety. Currently, 4 VAC 25-130-785.25 provides as follows:
(a) This section contains permitting requirements to implement
4VAC25-130-773.15(b)(4). Any person who submits a permit application
to conduct a surface coal mining operation on lands eligible for
remining must comply with this section.
(b) Any application for a permit under this section shall be
made according to all requirements of this subchapter applicable to
surface coal mining and reclamation operations. In addition, the
application shall:
(1) To the extent not otherwise addressed in the permit
application, identify potential environmental and safety problems
related to prior mining activity at the site and that could be
reasonably anticipated to occur. This identification shall be based
on a due diligence investigation which shall include visual
observations at the site, a record review of past mining at the
site, and environmental sampling tailored to current site
conditions.
(2) With regard to potential environmental and safety problems
referred in subdivision (b)(1) of this section, describe the
mitigative measures that will be taken to ensure that the applicable
reclamation requirements of this chapter can be met.
[[Page 17451]]
(c) The requirements of this section shall not apply after
September 30, 2004.
In its submittal letter, the DMME stated that the deletion of
subsection (c) containing the termination date of September 30, 2004,
is intended to reflect the deletion of that same termination date at
subsection 510(e) of SMCRA.
2. 4VAC25-130-816.116 and 817.116. Revegetation; Standards for Success
These provisions are proposed to be amended by deleting the phrase
``included in permits issued before September 30, 2004, or any renewals
thereof'' at the end of the first sentence in subparts (c)(2)(ii).
Currently, 4 VAC 25-130-816.116(c) and 817.116(c) provide as follows:
(c) (1) The period of extended responsibility for successful
revegetation shall begin after the last year of augmented seeding,
fertilizing, irrigation, or other work, excluding husbandry
practices that are approved by the division in accordance with
subdivision (c)(3) of this section.
(2) The period of responsibility shall continue for a period of
not less than:
(i) Five full years except as provided in subdivision (c)(2)(ii)
of this section. The vegetation parameters identified in subsection
(b) of this section for grazing land or pastureland and cropland
shall equal or exceed the approved success standard during the
growing seasons of any two years of the responsibility period,
except the first year. Areas approved for the other uses identified
in subsection (b) of this section shall equal or exceed the
applicable success standard during the growing season of the last
year of the responsibility period.
(ii) Two full years for lands eligible for remining included in
permits issued before September 30, 2004, or any renewals thereof.
To the extent that the success standards are established by
subdivision (b)(5) of this section, the lands shall equal or exceed
the standards during the growing season of the last year of the
responsibility period.
(3) The division may approve selective husbandry practices,
excluding augmented seeding, fertilization, or irrigation, without
extending the period of responsibility for revegetation success and
bond liability, if such practices can be expected to continue as
part of the postmining land use or if discontinuance of the
practices after the liability period expires will not reduce the
probability of permanent revegetation success. Approved practices
shall be normal conservation practices within the region for unmined
lands having land uses similar to the approved postmining land use
of the disturbed area, including such practices as disease, pest,
and vermin control; and any pruning, reseeding and/or transplanting
specifically necessitated by such actions.
In its submittal letter, the DMME stated that the deletion of the
September 30, 2004, termination date at subparts (c)(2)(ii) is intended
to reflect the deletion of that same termination date at subsection
510(e) of SMCRA.
As amended, 4VAC25-130-816.116(c)(2)(ii) and 817.116(c)(2)(ii)
provide as follows:
(ii) Two full years for lands eligible for remining. To the
extent that the success standards are established by subdivision
(b)(5) of this section, the lands shall equal or exceed the
standards during the growing season of the last year of the
responsibility period.
III. Public Comment Procedures
Under the provisions of 30 CFR 732.17(h), we are seeking your
comments on whether the amendment satisfies the applicable program
approval criteria of 30 CFR 732.15. If we approve the amendment, it
will become part of the Virginia program.
Written Comments
Send your written or electronic comments to OSM at the address
given above. Your written comments should be specific, pertain only to
the issues proposed in this rulemaking, and include explanations in
support of your recommendations. We may not consider or respond to your
comments when developing the final rule if they are received after the
close of the comment period (see DATES). We will make every attempt to
log all comments into the administrative record, but comments delivered
to an address other than the Big Stone Gap Area Office may not be
logged in.
Electronic Comments
Please submit Internet comments as an E-mail or Word file avoiding
the use of special characters and any form of encryption. Please also
include Attn: SATS NO. VA-123-FOR and your name and return address in
your Internet message. If you do not receive a confirmation that we
have received your Internet message, contact the Big Stone Gap Area
office at (276) 523-4303.
Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
Public Hearing
If you wish to speak at the public hearing, contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by 4 p.m. (local time), on
April 24, 2007. If you are disabled and need special accommodations to
attend a public hearing, contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. We will arrange the location and time of the
hearing with those persons requesting the hearing. If no one requests
an opportunity to speak, we will not hold a hearing.
To assist the transcriber and ensure an accurate record, we
request, if possible, that each person who speaks at the public hearing
provide us with a written copy of his or her comments. The public
hearing will continue on the specified date until everyone scheduled to
speak has been given an opportunity to be heard. If you are in the
audience and have not been scheduled to speak and wish to do so, you
will be allowed to speak after those who have been scheduled. We will
end the hearing after everyone scheduled to speak and others present in
the audience who wish to speak, have been heard.
Public Meeting
If only one person requests an opportunity to speak, we may hold a
public meeting rather than a public hearing. If you wish to meet with
us to discuss the amendment, please request a meeting by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. All such meetings
will be open to the public and, if possible, we will post notices of
meetings at the locations listed under ADDRESSES. We will make a
written summary of each meeting a part of the Administrative Record.
IV. Procedural Determinations
Executive Order 12630--Takings
This rule does not have takings implications. This determination is
based on the analysis performed for the counterpart Federal regulation.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is exempt from review by the Office of Management and
Budget under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has conducted the reviews required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 and has determined that this rule
meets the applicable standards of subsections (a) and (b) of that
section. However, these standards are not applicable to the actual
language of State regulatory programs and program amendments because
each program is drafted and
[[Page 17452]]
promulgated by a specific State, not by OSM. Under sections 503 and 505
of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1253 and 1255) and the Federal regulations at 30
CFR 730.11, 732.15, and 732.17(h)(10), decisions on proposed State
regulatory programs and program amendments submitted by the States must
be based solely on a determination of whether the submittal is
consistent with SMCRA and its implementing Federal regulations and
whether the other requirements of 30 CFR Parts 730, 731, and 732 have
been met.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule does not have Federalism implications. SMCRA delineates
the roles of the Federal and State governments with regard to the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations. One of
the purposes of SMCRA is to ``establish a nationwide program to protect
society and the environment from the adverse effects of surface coal
mining operations.'' Section 503(a)(1) of SMCRA requires that State
laws regulating surface coal mining and reclamation operations be ``in
accordance with'' the requirements of SMCRA, and section 503(a)(7)
requires that State programs contain rules and regulations ``consistent
with'' regulations issued by the Secretary pursuant to SMCRA.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
In accordance with Executive Order 13175, we have evaluated the
potential effects of this rule on Federally-recognized Indian tribes
and have determined that the rule does not have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
The basis for this determination is our decision is on a State
regulatory program and does not involve a Federal regulation involving
Indian lands.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect The
Supply, Distribution, Or Use Of Energy
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 which
requires agencies to prepare a Statement of Energy Effects for a rule
that is (1) Considered significant under Executive Order 12866, and (2)
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not expected to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
This rule does not require an environmental impact statement
because section 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1292(d)) provides that
agency decisions on proposed State regulatory program provisions do not
constitute major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not contain information collection requirements that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Department of the Interior certifies that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
The State submittal, which is the subject of this rule, is based upon
counterpart Federal regulations for which an economic analysis was
prepared and certification made that such regulations would not have a
significant economic effect upon a substantial number of small
entities. In making the determination as to whether this rule would
have a significant economic impact, the Department relied upon the data
and assumptions for the counterpart Federal regulations.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) Does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) Will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic
regions; and (c) Does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises. This determination is based upon the analysis performed
under various laws and executive orders for the counterpart Federal
regulations.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million or more in any
given year. This determination is based upon the analysis performed
under various laws and executive orders for the counterpart Federal
regulations.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 948
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
Dated: March 2, 2007.
H. Vann Weaver,
Acting Regional Director, Appalachian Region.
[FR Doc. E7-6577 Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P