Safety Zone; Patapsco River, Northwest and Inner Harbors, Baltimore, MD, 17458-17460 [E7-6537]
Download as PDF
17458
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 67 / Monday, April 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD and Department of
Homeland Security Management
Directive 5100.1, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical
exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, we believe that
this rule should be categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the instruction, an
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’ is
not required for this rule. Comments on
this section will be considered before
we make the final decision on whether
this rule should be categorically
excluded from further environmental
review.
warrant, or petty officer of the Coast
Guard who has been designated by the
Commander, Coast Guard Sector North
Carolina.
(2) Official Patrol means any vessel
assigned or approved by Commander,
Coast Guard Sector North Carolina with
a commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer on board and displaying a Coast
Guard ensign.
(c) Special local regulations. (1)
Except for persons or vessels authorized
by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander,
no person or vessel may enter or remain
in the regulated area.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
regulated area shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately when
directed to do so by any Official Patrol.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any official
patrol.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 10 a.m. to 8:30
p.m. on June 24, July 22, August 11, 12,
19, September 30 and October 21, 2007.
Dated: March 20, 2007.
Larry L. Hereth,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 07–1621 Filed 4–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
Request for Comments
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100
Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR Part 100 as follows:
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
PART 100—SAFETY OF LIFE ON
NAVIGABLE WATERS
RIN 1625–AA00
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD05–07–010]
1. The authority citation for Part 100
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
§ 100.35–T05–029 Roanoke River,
Plymouth, North Carolina.
(a) Regulated area. The regulated area
includes all waters of Roanoke River
commencing at the north river bank at
latitude 350°52′20″ N, longitude
0760°44′47″ W, thence a line 180
degrees due south across the river to the
shoreline thence west along the
shoreline to a position located at
latitude 35°51′43″ N, longitude
076°43′45″ W, thence 000 degrees due
north across the river to the shoreline
thence east along the shoreline to the
point of origin. All coordinates
reference Datum NAD 1983.
(b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol
Commander means a commissioned,
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Apr 06, 2007
Safety Zone; Patapsco River,
Northwest and Inner Harbors,
Baltimore, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
2. Add temporary § 100.35-T05–029 to
read as follows:
Jkt 211001
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a permanent safety zone upon
certain waters of the Patapsco River,
Northwest Harbor, and Inner Harbor
during the movement of the historic
sloop-of-war USS CONSTELLATION,
annually, on the Friday following Labor
Day. This action is necessary to provide
for the safety of life on navigable waters
during the tow of the vessel from its
berth at the Inner Harbor in Baltimore,
Maryland, to a point on the Patapsco
River near the Fort McHenry National
Monument and Historic Shrine in
Baltimore, Maryland, and return. This
action will restrict vessel traffic in
portions of the Patapsco River,
Northwest Harbor, and Inner Harbor
during the event.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Comments and related material
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
June 8, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments
and related material to Commander,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, 2401
Hawkins Point Road, Building 70,
Waterways Management Division,
Baltimore, Maryland, 21226–1791. Coast
Guard Sector Baltimore, Waterways
Management Division, maintains the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Comments and material received from
the public, as well as documents
indicated in this preamble as being
available in the docket, will become part
of this docket and will be available for
inspection or copying at Commander, U.
S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, 2401
Hawkins Point Road, Building 70,
Waterways Management Division,
Baltimore, Maryland, 21226–1791
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ronald Houck, at Coast Guard Sector
Baltimore, Waterways Management
Division, at (410) 576–2674 or (410)
576–2693.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Sfmt 4702
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you
do so, please include your name and
address, identify the docket number for
this rulemaking (CGD05–07–010),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and give the reason for each
comment. Please submit all comments
and related material in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying. If you would like
to know they reached us, please enclose
a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change
this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for a meeting by writing to Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Waterways
Management Division, at the address
under ADDRESSES explaining why one
would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we
will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the
Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
Each year, the USS CONSTELLATION
Museum conducts a ‘‘turn-around’’
E:\FR\FM\09APP1.SGM
09APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 67 / Monday, April 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
ceremony involving the sloop-of-war
USS CONSTELLATION in Baltimore,
Maryland on the Friday following Labor
Day. The annual turning of the USS
CONSTELLATION aids in the
maintenance of the historic ship by
ensuring even weathering of her hull.
Planned events include a three-hour,
round-trip tow of the CONSTELLATION
in the Port of Baltimore, with an
onboard salute with navy pattern
cannon while the historic vessel is
positioned off Fort McHenry National
Monument and Historic Site. The
historic sloop-of-war USS
CONSTELLATION will be towed ‘‘dead
ship,’’ which means that the vessel will
be underway without the benefit of
mechanical or sail propulsion. The
return dead ship tow of the
CONSTELLATION to its berth in the
Inner Harbor is expected to occur
immediately upon execution of a tugassisted turn-around of the
CONSTELLATION on the Patapsco
River near Fort McHenry. The Coast
Guard anticipates a large recreational
boating fleet during this event.
Operators should expect significant
vessel congestion along the planned
route.
The purpose of this rule is to promote
maritime safety and protect participants
and the boating public in the Port of
Baltimore immediately prior to, during,
and after the scheduled event. The rule
will provide for a clear transit route for
the participating vessels, and provide a
safety buffer around the participating
vessels while they are in transit. The
rule will impact the movement of all
vessels operating upon certain waters of
the Patapsco River, Northwest Harbor
and Inner Harbor.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The historic sloop-of-war USS
CONSTELLATION is towed ‘‘dead
ship’’ annually on the Friday following
Labor Day, from its berth at Pier 1 in
Baltimore’s Inner Harbor to a point on
the Patapsco River near Fort McHenry
National Monument and Historic
Shrine, Baltimore, Maryland. The
voyage takes place along a planned
route of approximately four nautical
miles one-way, which includes waters
of the Patapsco River, Northwest Harbor
and Inner Harbor. After being turnedaround, the USS CONSTELLATION is
returned to its original berth at Pier 1,
Inner Harbor, Baltimore, Maryland.
The safety of dead ship tow
participants requires that persons and
vessels be kept at a safe distance from
the intended route during this
evolution. The Coast Guard proposes to
establish a moving safety zone around
the USS CONSTELLATION dead ship
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Apr 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
tow participants annually, between 2
p.m. and 7 p.m., local time, on the
Friday following Labor Day, to ensure
the safety of participants and spectators
immediately prior to, during, and
following the dead ship tow.
Interference with normal port
operations will be kept to the minimum
considered necessary to ensure the
safety of life on the navigable waters
immediately before, during, and after
the scheduled event.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. It is not
‘‘significant’’ under the regulatory
policies and procedures of the
Department of Homeland Security
(DHS).
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation under the
regulatory policies and procedures of
DHS is unnecessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would affect
the following entities, some of which
might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to
operate, remain or anchor within certain
waters of the Patapsco River, Northwest
Harbor and Inner Harbor, in Baltimore,
Maryland, from 2 p.m. through 7 p.m.,
local time, annually on the Friday
following Labor Day. Because the zone
is of limited size and duration, it is
expected that there will be minimal
disruption to the maritime community.
Before the effective period, the Coast
Guard will issue maritime advisories
widely available to users of the river
and harbors to allow mariners to make
alternative plans for transiting the
affected areas. In addition, smaller
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
17459
vessels not constrained by their draft,
which are more likely to be small
entities, may transit around the safety
zone.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this rule or
any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
E:\FR\FM\09APP1.SGM
09APP1
17460
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 67 / Monday, April 9, 2007 / Proposed Rules
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSAL
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
VerDate Aug<31>2005
17:56 Apr 06, 2007
Jkt 211001
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD and Department of
Homeland Security Management
Directive 5100.1, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that there are no factors in this case that
would limit the use of a categorical
exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, we believe that
this rule should be categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation because
the rule establishes a safety zone.
A preliminary ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ is available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. Comments on this section
will be considered before we make the
final decision on whether this rule
should be categorically excluded from
further environmental review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR
1.05–1(g), 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Pub. L.
107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.512 to read as follows:
§ 165.512 Safety Zone; Patapsco River,
Northwest and Inner Harbors, Baltimore,
MD.
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of
this section:
(1) Captain of the Port, Baltimore,
Maryland means the Commander, Coast
Guard Sector Baltimore or any Coast
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Guard commissioned, warrant, or petty
officer who has been authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland
to act on his or her behalf.
(2) USS CONSTELLATION ‘‘turnaround’’ participants means the USS
CONSTELLATION, its support craft and
the accompanying towing vessels.
(b) Location. The following area is a
moving safety zone: all waters, from
surface to bottom, within 200 yards
ahead of or 100 yards outboard or aft of
the historic sloop-of-war USS
CONSTELLATION, while operating in
the Inner Harbor, the Northwest Harbor
or the Patapsco River.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general
regulations governing safety zones,
found in § 165.23, apply to the safety
zone described in paragraph (b) of this
section.
(2) With the exception of USS
CONSTELLATION ‘‘turn-around’’
participants, entry into or remaining in
this zone is prohibited, unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Baltimore, Maryland.
(3) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through the moving
safety zone must first request
authorization from the Captain of the
Port, Baltimore, Maryland. The Captain
of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland can be
contacted at telephone number (410)
576–2693. The Coast Guard vessels
enforcing this section can be contacted
on Marine Band Radio VHF Channel 16
(156.8 MHz). Upon being hailed by a
U.S. Coast Guard vessel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, persons
or vessels shall proceed as directed. If
permission is granted, all persons or
vessels must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port,
Baltimore, Maryland, and proceed at the
minimum speed necessary to maintain a
safe course while within the zone.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast
Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the zone by Federal,
State and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 2 p.m. through 7
p.m., local time, annually on the Friday
following Labor Day.
Dated: March 22, 2007.
Jonathan C. Burton,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting
Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland.
[FR Doc. E7–6537 Filed 4–6–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
E:\FR\FM\09APP1.SGM
09APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 67 (Monday, April 9, 2007)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 17458-17460]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6537]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[CGD05-07-010]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Patapsco River, Northwest and Inner Harbors,
Baltimore, MD
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a permanent safety zone
upon certain waters of the Patapsco River, Northwest Harbor, and Inner
Harbor during the movement of the historic sloop-of-war USS
CONSTELLATION, annually, on the Friday following Labor Day. This action
is necessary to provide for the safety of life on navigable waters
during the tow of the vessel from its berth at the Inner Harbor in
Baltimore, Maryland, to a point on the Patapsco River near the Fort
McHenry National Monument and Historic Shrine in Baltimore, Maryland,
and return. This action will restrict vessel traffic in portions of the
Patapsco River, Northwest Harbor, and Inner Harbor during the event.
DATES: Comments and related material must reach the Coast Guard on or
before June 8, 2007.
ADDRESSES: You may mail comments and related material to Commander,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road, Building
70, Waterways Management Division, Baltimore, Maryland, 21226-1791.
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore, Waterways Management Division, maintains
the public docket for this rulemaking. Comments and material received
from the public, as well as documents indicated in this preamble as
being available in the docket, will become part of this docket and will
be available for inspection or copying at Commander, U. S. Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, 2401 Hawkins Point Road, Building 70, Waterways
Management Division, Baltimore, Maryland, 21226-1791 between 8 a.m. and
3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Ronald Houck, at Coast Guard
Sector Baltimore, Waterways Management Division, at (410) 576-2674 or
(410) 576-2693.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. If you do so, please include your name
and address, identify the docket number for this rulemaking (CGD05-07-
010), indicate the specific section of this document to which each
comment applies, and give the reason for each comment. Please submit
all comments and related material in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying. If you would like to know
they reached us, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period. We may change this proposed rule in view of them.
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for a meeting by writing to Coast Guard Sector Baltimore,
Waterways Management Division, at the address under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that one would
aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
Each year, the USS CONSTELLATION Museum conducts a ``turn-around''
[[Page 17459]]
ceremony involving the sloop-of-war USS CONSTELLATION in Baltimore,
Maryland on the Friday following Labor Day. The annual turning of the
USS CONSTELLATION aids in the maintenance of the historic ship by
ensuring even weathering of her hull. Planned events include a three-
hour, round-trip tow of the CONSTELLATION in the Port of Baltimore,
with an onboard salute with navy pattern cannon while the historic
vessel is positioned off Fort McHenry National Monument and Historic
Site. The historic sloop-of-war USS CONSTELLATION will be towed ``dead
ship,'' which means that the vessel will be underway without the
benefit of mechanical or sail propulsion. The return dead ship tow of
the CONSTELLATION to its berth in the Inner Harbor is expected to occur
immediately upon execution of a tug-assisted turn-around of the
CONSTELLATION on the Patapsco River near Fort McHenry. The Coast Guard
anticipates a large recreational boating fleet during this event.
Operators should expect significant vessel congestion along the planned
route.
The purpose of this rule is to promote maritime safety and protect
participants and the boating public in the Port of Baltimore
immediately prior to, during, and after the scheduled event. The rule
will provide for a clear transit route for the participating vessels,
and provide a safety buffer around the participating vessels while they
are in transit. The rule will impact the movement of all vessels
operating upon certain waters of the Patapsco River, Northwest Harbor
and Inner Harbor.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The historic sloop-of-war USS CONSTELLATION is towed ``dead ship''
annually on the Friday following Labor Day, from its berth at Pier 1 in
Baltimore's Inner Harbor to a point on the Patapsco River near Fort
McHenry National Monument and Historic Shrine, Baltimore, Maryland. The
voyage takes place along a planned route of approximately four nautical
miles one-way, which includes waters of the Patapsco River, Northwest
Harbor and Inner Harbor. After being turned-around, the USS
CONSTELLATION is returned to its original berth at Pier 1, Inner
Harbor, Baltimore, Maryland.
The safety of dead ship tow participants requires that persons and
vessels be kept at a safe distance from the intended route during this
evolution. The Coast Guard proposes to establish a moving safety zone
around the USS CONSTELLATION dead ship tow participants annually,
between 2 p.m. and 7 p.m., local time, on the Friday following Labor
Day, to ensure the safety of participants and spectators immediately
prior to, during, and following the dead ship tow. Interference with
normal port operations will be kept to the minimum considered necessary
to ensure the safety of life on the navigable waters immediately
before, during, and after the scheduled event.
Regulatory Evaluation
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. It is not ``significant''
under the regulatory policies and procedures of the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation under the regulatory policies
and procedures of DHS is unnecessary.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed rule would affect the following
entities, some of which might be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to operate, remain or anchor within
certain waters of the Patapsco River, Northwest Harbor and Inner
Harbor, in Baltimore, Maryland, from 2 p.m. through 7 p.m., local time,
annually on the Friday following Labor Day. Because the zone is of
limited size and duration, it is expected that there will be minimal
disruption to the maritime community. Before the effective period, the
Coast Guard will issue maritime advisories widely available to users of
the river and harbors to allow mariners to make alternative plans for
transiting the affected areas. In addition, smaller vessels not
constrained by their draft, which are more likely to be small entities,
may transit around the safety zone.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise
[[Page 17460]]
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD and Department of Homeland Security Management Directive
5100.1, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that there are no factors in this
case that would limit the use of a categorical exclusion under section
2.B.2 of the Instruction. Therefore, we believe that this rule should
be categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of the
Instruction, from further environmental documentation because the rule
establishes a safety zone.
A preliminary ``Environmental Analysis Check List'' is available in
the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. Comments on this section
will be considered before we make the final decision on whether this
rule should be categorically excluded from further environmental
review.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701; 50
U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g), 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add Sec. 165.512 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.512 Safety Zone; Patapsco River, Northwest and Inner
Harbors, Baltimore, MD.
(a) Definitions. For the purposes of this section:
(1) Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland means the Commander,
Coast Guard Sector Baltimore or any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant,
or petty officer who has been authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Baltimore, Maryland to act on his or her behalf.
(2) USS CONSTELLATION ``turn-around'' participants means the USS
CONSTELLATION, its support craft and the accompanying towing vessels.
(b) Location. The following area is a moving safety zone: all
waters, from surface to bottom, within 200 yards ahead of or 100 yards
outboard or aft of the historic sloop-of-war USS CONSTELLATION, while
operating in the Inner Harbor, the Northwest Harbor or the Patapsco
River.
(c) Regulations. (1) The general regulations governing safety
zones, found in Sec. 165.23, apply to the safety zone described in
paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) With the exception of USS CONSTELLATION ``turn-around''
participants, entry into or remaining in this zone is prohibited,
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, Baltimore, Maryland.
(3) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the
moving safety zone must first request authorization from the Captain of
the Port, Baltimore, Maryland. The Captain of the Port, Baltimore,
Maryland can be contacted at telephone number (410) 576-2693. The Coast
Guard vessels enforcing this section can be contacted on Marine Band
Radio VHF Channel 16 (156.8 MHz). Upon being hailed by a U.S. Coast
Guard vessel by siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, persons
or vessels shall proceed as directed. If permission is granted, all
persons or vessels must comply with the instructions of the Captain of
the Port, Baltimore, Maryland, and proceed at the minimum speed
necessary to maintain a safe course while within the zone.
(d) Enforcement. The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol
and enforcement of the zone by Federal, State and local agencies.
(e) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 2 p.m.
through 7 p.m., local time, annually on the Friday following Labor Day.
Dated: March 22, 2007.
Jonathan C. Burton,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Acting Captain of the Port, Baltimore,
Maryland.
[FR Doc. E7-6537 Filed 4-6-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P