Census Tract Program for the 2010 Census-Proposed Criteria, 17329-17337 [E7-6466]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices
boundaries of UAs at the time of each
decennial census or from the results of
a special census during the intercensal
period.
Visible feature—A map feature that
can be seen on the ground such as a
road, railroad track, major above-ground
transmission line or pipeline, stream,
shoreline, fence, sharply defined
mountain ridge, or cliff. A nonstandard
visible feature is a feature that may not
be clearly defined on the ground (such
as a ridge), may be seasonal (such as an
intermittent stream), or may be
relatively impermanent (such as a
fence). The Census Bureau generally
requests verification that nonstandard
features pose no problem in their
location during field work.
Zona urbana—In Puerto Rico, the
settled area functioning as the seat of
government for a municipio. A zona
urbana cannot cross a municipio
boundary.
Executive Order 12866
This notice has been determined to be
not significant under Executive Order
12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This program notice does not
represent a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
Dated: April 3, 2007.
Charles Louis Kincannon,
Director, Bureau of the Census.
[FR Doc. E7–6465 Filed 4–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of the Census
[Docket Number 070321065–7066–01]
Census Tract Program for the 2010
Census—Proposed Criteria
Bureau of the Census,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of proposed program
revisions and request for comments.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES2
SUMMARY: Census tracts are relatively
permanent small-area geographic
divisions of a county or statistically
equivalent entity 1 defined for the
1 Includes parishes in Louisiana; boroughs, city
and boroughs, census areas, and municipalities in
Alaska; independent cities in Maryland, Missouri,
Nevada, and Virginia; districts in American Samoa
and the U.S. Virgin Islands; municipalities in the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands;
municipios in Puerto Rico; the areas constituting
the District of Columbia and Guam. This notice will
refer to all these entities collectively as ‘‘counties.’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:15 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
17329
tabulation of decennial census data and
selected other statistical programs.
Census tracts also will be used to
tabulate and publish estimates from the
American Community Survey (ACS) 2
after 2010. The primary goal of the
census tract program is to provide a set
of nationally consistent small, statistical
geographic units, with stable
boundaries, that facilitate analysis of
data across time.
Most provisions of the census tract
criteria for the 2010 Census remain
unchanged from those used in
conjunction with Census 2000.
However, based on consultation with
data users and internal review the
Bureau of the Census (Census Bureau) is
proposing the following changes for the
2010 Census: (1) Lowering the
minimum population threshold for
census tracts; (2) using housing unit
counts (as an alternative to population
counts) in the review and update of
tracts; (3) applying the same population
and housing unit thresholds to all types
of populated tracts within the United
States,3 including census tracts
delineated on American Indian
reservations and off-reservation trust
lands,4 Puerto Rico, the Island Areas,5
and encompassing group quarters,
military installations, and institutions;
(4) allowing the delineation of census
tracts for large water bodies with areas
of approximately 100 square miles or
more and special land use (e.g., large
airports or public parks) with an official
name; and (5) allowing for geographic
frameworks of tribal tracts (separate
from the standard census tracts defined
within counties) to be defined within
federally-recognized American Indian
reservations and off-reservation trust
lands.
In addition to proposed criteria, this
notice includes a description of the
changes from the criteria used for
Census 2000 and a list of definitions of
key terms used in the criteria.
The Census Bureau is publishing this
notice in the Federal Register to request
comments from the public and other
government agencies. The Census
Bureau will respond to the comments
received as part of the publication of
final criteria in the Federal Register.
After the final criteria are published in
the Federal Register, the Census Bureau
will offer designated governments or
organizations an opportunity to review
and, if necessary, suggest updates to the
boundaries and attributes (e.g., tract
code) of the census tracts in their
geographic area under the Participant
Statistical Areas Program (PSAP). In
addition to census tracts, the program
also encompasses the review and update
of block groups, census designated
places, and census county divisions.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before July 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Please direct all written
comments on this proposed program to
the Director, U.S. Census Bureau, Room
8H001, mail stop 0100, Washington, DC
20233–0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information on
this proposed program should be
directed to Michael Ratcliffe, Chief,
Geographic Standards and Criteria
Branch, Geography Division, U.S.
Census Bureau, via e-mail at
geo.psap.list@census.gov or telephone at
301–763–3056.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
2 The ACS is conducted in the United States and
in Puerto Rico. In Puerto Rico the survey is called
the Puerto Rico Community Survey (PRCS). For
ease of discussion, throughout this document the
term ACS is used to represent the surveys
conducted in the United States and in Puerto Rico.
3 For Census Bureau purposes, the United States
includes the fifty States and the District of
Columbia.
4 The proposed criteria for the tribal statistical
areas program will be outlined in a separate Federal
Register notice. In the tribal statistical areas
program, federally recognized American Indian
tribes that have a reservation and/or off-reservation
trust land may delineate census designated places
(CDPs), and, if these areas have a population of
2,400 or greater, may delineate tribal tracts and
tribal block groups for their reservation and offreservation trust land.
5 For Census Bureau purposes, the Island Areas
includes American Samoa, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, the U.S.
Virgin Islands, and the U.S. Minor Outlying Islands.
The U.S. Minor Outlying Islands is an aggregation
of nine U.S. territories: Baker Island, Howland
Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef,
Midway Islands, Navassa Island, Palmyra Atoll, and
Wake Island.
I. History of Census Tracts
In 1905, Dr. Walter Laidlaw originated
the concept of permanent, small
geographic areas as a framework for
studying change from one decennial
census to another in neighborhoods
within New York City. For the 1910
Census, eight cities—New York,
Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, Cleveland,
Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and St.
Louis—delineated census tracts (then
termed ‘‘districts’’) for the first time. No
additional jurisdictions delineated
census tracts until just prior to the 1930
Census, when an additional ten cities
chose to do so. The increased interest in
census tracts for the 1930 Census is
attributed to the promotional efforts of
Howard Whipple Green, who was a
statistician in Cleveland, Ohio, and later
the chairman of the American Statistical
Association’s Committee on Census
Enumeration Areas. For more than
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\06APN2.SGM
06APN2
17330
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES2
twenty-five years, Mr. Green strongly
encouraged local citizens, via
committees, to establish census tracts
and other census statistical geographic
areas. The committees created by local
citizens were known as Census Tract
Committees, later called Census
Statistical Areas Committees.
After 1930, the Census Bureau saw
the need to standardize the delineation,
review, and updating of census tracts
and published the first set of census
tract criteria in 1934. The goal of the
criteria has remained unchanged; that
is, to assure comparability and data
reliability through the standardization
of the population thresholds for census
tracts, as well as requiring that their
boundaries follow specific types of
geographic features that do not change
frequently. The Census Bureau began
publishing census tract data as part of
its standard tabulations beginning with
the 1940 Census. Prior to that time,
census tract data were published as
special tabulations.
For the 1940 Census, the Census
Bureau began publishing census block
data for all cities with 50,000 or more
people. Census block numbers were
assigned, where possible, by census
tract, but for those cities that had not yet
delineated census tracts, ‘‘block areas’’
(called ‘‘block numbering areas’’ [BNAs]
in later censuses) were created to assign
census block numbers.
Starting with the 1960 Census, the
Census Bureau assumed a greater role in
promoting and coordinating the
delineation, review, and update of
census tracts. For the 1980 Census,
criteria for BNAs were changed to make
them more comparable in size and
shape to census tracts. For the 1990
Census, all counties contained either
census tracts or BNAs.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:15 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
Census 2000 was the first decade in
which census tracts were defined in all
counties. In addition, the Census Bureau
increased the number of geographic
areas whose boundaries could be used
as census tract boundaries. It also
allowed tribal governments of federally
recognized American Indian tribes with
a reservation and/or off-reservation trust
lands to delineate tracts without regard
to State and/or county boundaries,
provided the tribe had a 1990 Census
population of at least 1,000.
II. General Principles and Criteria for
Census Tracts for the 2010 Census
A. General Principles
1. A century of census tract use has
shown that continuity and
comparability in tracts and their
boundaries over time are of considerable
importance to data users. Comparability
has always been a goal in the census
tract program since its inception for the
1910 census; however, as the use of tract
data increases, the importance of
comparability increases as well.
Maintaining comparability of tract
boundaries over time facilitates
longitudinal data analysis. The advent
of the ACS and the averaging of sample
data for tracts over a five-year span
further underscore the need for
consistent tract boundaries over time.
Pursuant to this goal of continuity and
comparability, the Census Bureau
requests that where a census tract must
be updated, for example to meet the
minimum or maximum population or
housing unit thresholds, that the outer
boundaries of the tract not be changed,
but rather that a tract be split into two
or more tracts, or merged with an
adjacent tract. The Census Bureau
discourages changes to tract boundaries
(that is, ‘‘retracting’’), except in
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
specified circumstances, which the
Census Bureau will review on a case-bycase basis.
2. The sample size for the ACS is
smaller than the sample from the
decennial census long form of previous
censuses. As a general rule, estimates
from programs providing sample data,
including the ACS, for geographic areas
with smaller populations will be subject
to higher variances than comparable
estimates for areas with larger
populations. In addition, the Census
Bureau’s disclosure rules may have the
effect of restricting the availability and
amount of sample data published for
geographic areas with small
populations. Aiming to create census
tracts that meet the optimal population
of 4,000 and maintaining minimum
thresholds will improve the reliability
and availability of data, and local
governments and planners should
consider these factors when defining
their census tracts. Therefore, the
Census Bureau proposes that any census
tracts not flagged as a water body or
special land use tract (General Principle
4) must encompass at least 1,200 people
or at least 480 housing units. Any
census tract with a population or
housing unit count less than the
minimum threshold should be merged
with an adjacent census tract to form a
single tract with at least 1,200 people or
at least 480 housing units (Figure 1).
The Census Bureau will use Census
2000 population and housing unit
counts, with allowance made for growth
since 2000, to assess whether each
census tract submitted meets this
criterion. Program participants may
submit local estimates as a surrogate for
the Census 2000 population and
housing unit counts for a census tract.
E:\FR\FM\06APN2.SGM
06APN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:15 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
these areas as water body tracts and
special land use tracts. Special land use
tracts must be designated as a specific
type of land use (e.g., State park,
municipal park) and have an official
name, generally have little or no
residential population or housing units,
and must not create a noncontiguous
census tract. If located in a densely
populated urban area, a special land use
tract must have an area of
approximately 1 square mile or more. If
delineated completely outside an urban
area, a special land use tract must have
an area of approximately 10 square
miles or more. The Census Bureau
recognizes that some special land use
areas not intended for residential
population, such as parks, may contain
some population, such as caretakers or
the homeless. Our intent is to allow for
the delineation of parks and other
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
special land use areas as separate tracts
and therefore will accept such areas as
tracts even if some residential
population is present.
5. To facilitate the analysis of data for
American Indian tribes, and to
recognize their unique governmental
status, program participants are
encouraged to merge, split, or redefine
census tracts to avoid unnecessarily
splitting American Indian reservations
and/or off-reservation trust lands. Each
contiguous American Indian reservation
and/or off-reservation trust land should
be included, along with any necessary
territory outside the reservation and/or
off-reservation trust land, within a
single census tract or as few census
tracts as possible for the 2010 Census.
This is the only situation in which
retracting is encouraged. See, for
example, Figure 2 below.
E:\FR\FM\06APN2.SGM
06APN2
EN06AP07.010
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES2
3. With the advent of the ACS and the
‘‘continuous measurement’’ of
characteristics of the population and
housing based on a five-year average,
there are some new issues to consider in
the census tract criteria. The Census
Bureau proposes the use of either
population or housing units in the
review of census tracts. The ACS is
designed to produce local area data as
of a 12-month period estimate (or an
average); whereas, in the past local area
data were represented as of the April 1
census day.
4. The Census Bureau recognizes that
there are geographic areas that are not
characterized by a residential
population, and which local
participants may wish to separate from
populated tracts for analytical or
cartographic purposes or both. The
Census Bureau proposes identifying
17331
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices
B. Changes to the Census Tract Criteria
for the 2010 Census
Most provisions of the census tract
criteria for the 2010 Census would
remain unchanged from those used in
conjunction with Census 2000 with only
the following exceptions:
1. The minimum population
threshold for census tracts would be
1,200, lowered from the minimum
threshold of 1,500 used in Census 2000.
This change seeks to create a standard
minimum threshold for census block
groups and census tracts, in order to
support the reliability and availability of
sample data for these statistical
geographies.
2. Housing unit counts may be used
instead of population counts in the
review and update of tracts. This change
seeks to accommodate seasonal
communities in which residents often
are not present on the date of the
decennial census, but will be present at
other times of the year and for which
estimates may be reflected in the ACS.
3. For Census 2000, minimum
population thresholds for census tracts
varied. The minimum population
threshold for census tracts delineated on
American Indian reservations and offreservation trust lands was 1,000. This
differed from the minimum threshold of
1,500 people for census tracts defined
elsewhere in the United States, as well
as in Puerto Rico and the Island Areas.
Optimum populations for census tracts
also varied: 4,000 in the United States
and Puerto Rico, and 2,500 on American
Indian reservations and in the Island
Areas. The maximum population for a
census tract in any of these areas was
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:15 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
8,000. In addition, for Census 2000,
tracts that enclosed an institution, a
military installation, or other ‘‘special
place’’ had a minimum population
requirement of 1,000 inhabitants, with
no optimum or maximum.
For the 2010 Census the same
population and housing unit thresholds
would apply to all types of populated
tracts, including census tracts
delineated on American Indian
reservations and off-reservation trust
lands, the Island Areas, and
encompassing group quarters, military
installations, and institutions. The
Census Bureau proposes this change in
order to aid in the availability and
reliability of data for all tracts and to
create a single national standard.
4. The delineation of census tracts
would be permitted, and encouraged,
for the following types of geographic
areas:
a. Large water bodies with areas of
approximately 100 square miles or
more.
b. Special land uses (for example,
large airports, public parks, or public
forests) with an official name.
The Census Bureau would require
that special land use tracts have little or
no residential population. All such
census tracts would meet all other tract
criteria.
5. A geographic framework of tribal
tracts, separate from the standard census
tracts defined within counties, may be
defined within federally recognized
American Indian reservations and/or
off-reservation trust lands, subject to
other population, housing, and
boundary criteria contained in this
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
document. This represents a change
from the practice for Census 2000. The
Census Bureau proposes this change to
better recognize the unique statistical
data needs of federally recognized
American Indian tribes and their
reservation and off-reservation trust
lands.
C. Census Tract Criteria for the 2010
Census
The criteria proposed herein apply to
the United States, including federally
recognized American Indian
reservations and off-reservation trust
lands, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas.
The Census Bureau may modify and, if
necessary, reject any proposals for
census tracts that do not meet the
established criteria. In addition, the
Census Bureau reserves the right to
modify the boundaries and attributes of
tracts as needed to meet the published
criteria and/or maintain geographic
relationships before the final tabulation
geography is set for the 2010 Census.
The Census Bureau proposes the
following criteria for use in reviewing
2010 Census tracts:
1. A census tract must comprise a
reasonably compact and contiguous
land area.
Noncontiguous boundaries are
permitted only where a noncontiguous
area or inaccessible area would not meet
population or housing unit count
requirements for a separate tract, in
which case the noncontiguous or
inaccessible area must be included
within an adjacent or proximate tract.
For example, an island that does not
meet the minimum population
E:\FR\FM\06APN2.SGM
06APN2
EN06AP07.011
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES2
17332
17333
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices
threshold for recognition as a separate
tract should be combined with other
proximate land to form a single tract.
Each case will be reviewed and
accepted at the Census Bureau’s
discretion.
2. A census tract must cover the entire
land and water area of a county.
In counties containing coastal waters,
territorial sea, and portions of the Great
Lakes, and very large, contiguous,
inland water bodies, a single water body
tract should be created for each discrete
water body to provide for complete
census tract coverage.
3. Census tract boundaries should
follow visible and identifiable features.
To make the location of census tract
boundaries less ambiguous, wherever
possible, tract boundaries should follow
visible and identifiable features. The
Census Bureau also permits the use of
State and county boundaries in all
States, and incorporated place and
minor civil division boundaries in
States where those boundaries tend to
remain unchanged over time (see Table
1). The use of visible features also
makes it easier to locate and identify
tract boundaries over time, as the
locations of many visible features in the
landscape tend to change infrequently.
The following features are preferred
as census tract boundaries for the 2010
Census:
a. State and county boundaries must
always be tract boundaries. This
criterion takes precedence over all other
criteria or requirements except for the
population threshold criteria for tribal
tracts on American Indian reservations
and/or off-reservation trust lands.
b. American Indian reservation and
off-reservation trust land boundaries.
c. Visible, perennial natural and
cultural features, such as roads,
shorelines, rivers, perennial streams and
canals, railroad tracks, or above-ground
high-tension power lines.
d. Boundaries of legal and
administrative entities in selected
States. Table 1 identifies by State which
minor civil division (MCD) and
incorporated place boundaries may be
used as tract boundaries.
TABLE 1.—ACCEPTABLE MCD AND INCORPORATED PLACE BOUNDARIES
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES2
All MCD
boundaries
Alabama ...........................................................................................................................
Alaska ..............................................................................................................................
Arizona .............................................................................................................................
Arkansas ..........................................................................................................................
California ..........................................................................................................................
Colorado ..........................................................................................................................
Connecticut ......................................................................................................................
Delaware ..........................................................................................................................
Florida ..............................................................................................................................
Georgia ............................................................................................................................
Hawaii ..............................................................................................................................
Idaho ................................................................................................................................
Illinois ...............................................................................................................................
Indiana .............................................................................................................................
Iowa .................................................................................................................................
Kansas .............................................................................................................................
Kentucky ..........................................................................................................................
Louisiana ..........................................................................................................................
Maine ...............................................................................................................................
Maryland ..........................................................................................................................
Massachusetts .................................................................................................................
Michigan ...........................................................................................................................
Minnesota ........................................................................................................................
Mississippi ........................................................................................................................
Missouri ............................................................................................................................
Montana ...........................................................................................................................
Nebraska ..........................................................................................................................
Nevada .............................................................................................................................
New Hampshire ...............................................................................................................
New Jersey ......................................................................................................................
New Mexico .....................................................................................................................
New York .........................................................................................................................
North Carolina ..................................................................................................................
North Dakota ....................................................................................................................
Ohio .................................................................................................................................
Oklahoma .........................................................................................................................
Oregon .............................................................................................................................
Pennsylvania ....................................................................................................................
Rhode Island ....................................................................................................................
South Carolina .................................................................................................................
South Dakota ...................................................................................................................
Tennessee .......................................................................................................................
Texas ...............................................................................................................................
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:15 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Boundaries
of MCDs
not coincident with
the boundaries of incorporated
places that
themselves
are MCDs
All incorporated
place
boundaries
Only conjoint incorporated
places
boundaries
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
X
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
X
....................
....................
....................
....................
X
....................
X
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
X
X
....................
X
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
X
X
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
Xa
....................
X
X
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
X
X
....................
Xb
....................
Xa
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
X
X
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
X
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
X
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
X
....................
X
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
X
X
....................
X
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
X
X
....................
....................
....................
....................
X
X
X
X
X
X
E:\FR\FM\06APN2.SGM
06APN2
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
17334
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices
TABLE 1.—ACCEPTABLE MCD AND INCORPORATED PLACE BOUNDARIES—Continued
All MCD
boundaries
Utah .................................................................................................................................
Vermont ...........................................................................................................................
Virginia .............................................................................................................................
Washington ......................................................................................................................
West Virginia ....................................................................................................................
Wisconsin .........................................................................................................................
Wyoming ..........................................................................................................................
a Townships
Boundaries
of MCDs
not coincident with
the boundaries of incorporated
places that
themselves
are MCDs
All incorporated
place
boundaries
Only conjoint incorporated
places
boundaries
....................
X
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
X
....................
....................
X
....................
....................
....................
....................
....................
X
X
X
X
X
X
only.
townships only.
b Governmental
e. Additionally, the following legally
defined, administrative boundaries
would be permitted as census tract
boundaries:
i. Barrio, barrio-pueblo, and subbarrio
boundaries in Puerto Rico;
ii. Census subdistrict boundaries in
the U.S. Virgin Islands;
iii. County and island boundaries
(both MCD equivalents) in American
Samoa;
iv. Election district boundaries in
Guam;
v. Municipal district boundaries in
the Commonwealth of the Northern
Mariana Islands; and
vi. Alaska Native regional corporation
boundaries in Alaska, at the discretion
of the Census Bureau, insofar as such
boundaries are unambiguous for
allocating living quarters as part of 2010
Census activities.
f. When acceptable visible and
governmental boundary features are not
available for use as tract boundaries, the
Census Bureau may, at its discretion,
approve other nonstandard visible
features, such as ridge lines, aboveground pipelines, intermittent streams,
or fence lines. The Census Bureau may
also accept, on a case-by-case basis, the
boundaries of selected nonstandard and
potentially nonvisible features, such as
the boundaries of military installations,
National Parks, National Monuments,
National Forests, other types of parks or
forests, airports, marine ports,
cemeteries, golf courses, penitentiaries/
prisons, or glaciers, or the straight-line
extensions of visible features and other
lines-of-sight.
g. The boundaries of large water
bodies and special land use tracts,
including parks, forests, large airports,
and military installations, provided the
boundaries are clearly marked or easily
recognized.
4. Population, Housing Unit, and Area
Thresholds
The Census Bureau proposes the
following population, housing unit, and
area threshold criteria for census tracts
(as summarized in Table 2).
TABLE 2.—TRACT THRESHOLDS
Tract type
Threshold type
Standard & tribal tracts ..............................
Population threshold .................................
Housing Unit threshold ..............................
Area threshold (square miles) ...................
Area threshold for an urban area (square
miles).
Area threshold outside an urban area
(square miles).
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES2
Water body tracts .......................................
Special land use tracts ..............................
a. Population counts should be used
in tract review in most cases. Housing
unit counts should be used for seasonal
communities that have no or low
population on census day (April 1).
Locally produced population and
housing unit estimates can be used
when reviewing and updating tracts,
especially in areas that have
experienced considerable growth since
Census 2000.
b. The housing unit thresholds are
based on a national average of 2.5
persons per household. The Census
Bureau recognizes that there are
regional variations to this average and
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:15 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
Optimum
4,000
1,600
none
none
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Maximum
.......................
.......................
........................
........................
1,200
480
100
1
8,000
3,200
none
none
none ........................
10
none
will take this into consideration when
reviewing all tract proposals.
c. The Census Bureau recognizes the
tension that exists between meeting the
optimum population or housing unit
threshold in a tract and maintaining
tract comparability over time. For
example, if population growth has
occurred since 2000 or is expected
before 2010 for a census tract, the tract
should not be merged if it has a Census
2000 population of at least 1,100 or a
housing unit count of at least 440 and
acceptable supporting evidence is
supplied by the PSAP participant that
population and/or housing unit growth
PO 00000
Minimum
has occurred since Census 2000, or will
likely occur before 2010, and has been
sufficient to meet the minimum
thresholds. However, should the census
tract’s population not increase as
expected and does not meet either of the
minimum thresholds in 2010, this may
adversely affect the reliability and
availability of any sample estimates for
that tract. For this reason, the Census
Bureau suggests merging the census
tract with another if there is a
possibility that anticipated growth will
not be sufficient to meet minimum
thresholds.
E:\FR\FM\06APN2.SGM
06APN2
17335
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices
d. The Census Bureau may waive the
maximum population and housing
thresholds as required to achieve the
objectives of this notice.
e. For the 2010 Census, the Census
Bureau encourages the delineation of
special-use tracts in specific types of
areas.
i. A special land use tract must be
designated as a specific land use type
(e.g., State park), must have an official
name (e.g., Jay Cooke State Park), have
little or no residential population, and
must not create a noncontiguous tract.
In some instances, multiple areas can be
combined to form a single special landuse tract if the land management
characteristics are similar, such as a
special land-use tract comprising
adjacent Federal and State parks. If the
special land use tract is delineated in a
densely populated, urban area, the tract
must have an area of approximately one
square mile or more. If the special landuse tract is delineated completely
outside an urban area, the tract must
have an area of approximately 10 square
miles or more.
ii. A water body tract must encompass
all or part of a territorial sea, coastal
water, a Great Lake, or an inland water
body at least 100 square miles in area.
If a water body meets this criterion and
is in more than one county, each county
can delineate a tract for its portion of
the water body. Any islands within a
qualifying water body should be
included within a separate tract.
5. Identification of Census Tracts
a. A census tract has a basic census
tract identifier composed of no more
than four digits and may have a twodigit decimal suffix.
b. The range of acceptable basic
census tract identifiers for the 2010
Census is from 1 to 9949 (but, see 5.c.
below); tracts delineated specifically to
complete coverage of large water bodies
will be numbered from 9950 to 9989 in
each county. All other tracts that fall
within the 9950–9989 range must be
renumbered. For Census 2000, water
body tracts were all coded 0000. Each of
these must be renumbered for the 2010
Census.
c. Census tracts delineated within or
to primarily encompass American
Indian reservations and/or offreservation trust lands can continue to
be numbered from 9400 to 9499. Local
participants may opt to renumber these
census tracts in a numeric range
consistent with the rest of the county
since tribal tracts are proposed to be a
separate and distinct geographic entity.
d. Census tract identifiers must be
unique within each county.
e. Once used, census tract identifiers
cannot be reused in a subsequent census
to reference a completely different area
within a county. If a tract is split, each
portion may keep the same basic 4-digit
identifier, but each portion must be
given a unique suffix. If a census tract
that was suffixed for Census 2000 is
split, each portion must be given a new
suffix.
f. The range of acceptable census tract
suffixes is .01 to .98.
6. Census Tract types
Table 3 below contains a summary of
the types of census tracts (with their
respective population, housing unit and
area characteristics) that the Census
Bureau proposes to use for the 2010
Census.
TABLE 3.—SUMMARY OF CENSUS TRACT TYPES
How distinct from standard census
tracts
Standard & tribal
tracts.
Water body tract ....
Special land-use
tract.
Population thresholds
Housing unit
thresholds
Tribal tracts are conceptually similar
and equivalent to census tracts defined within the standard Statecounty-tract-block group geographic
hierarchy used for tabulating and
publishing statistical data.
A tract encompassing all or part of a
territorial sea, coastal water, a
Great Lake, or an inland water body
at least 100 square miles in area.
A tract encompassing a large airport,
public park, or public forest with little or no population or housing
units. In a densely populated, urban
area, a special land use tract
should be approximately 1 square
mile in area or greater. If delineated
completely outside an urban area, a
special land-use tract should have
an area of 10 square miles or greater.
Optimum: 4,000; ...
Minimum: 1,200; ...
Maximum: 8,000 ...
Optimum: 1,600;
Minimum: 480; ......
Maximum: 3,200 ...
None.
Zero ......................
Zero ......................
100 square miles if an inland water
body.
Little or none ........
Little or none ........
1 square mile within an urban area/10
square miles outside an urban area.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES2
D. Tribal Tracts
Tribal tracts are statistical geographic
entities defined by the Census Bureau in
cooperation with tribal officials to
provide meaningful, relevant, and
reliable data for small geographic areas
within the boundaries of federally
recognized American Indian reservation
and/or off-reservation trust lands. As
such, they recognize the unique
statistical data needs of federally
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:15 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
recognized American Indian tribes. The
delineation of tribal tracts allows for an
unambiguous presentation of tract-level
data specific to the American Indian
reservations and/or off-reservation trust
lands without the imposition of State or
county boundaries, which might
artificially separate American Indian
populations located within a single
reservation and/or off-reservation trust
land. To this end, the American Indian
tribal participant may define tribal tracts
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
Area thresholds
that cross county or State boundaries, or
both. For federally recognized American
Indian tribes with reservations and/or
off-reservation trust lands that have
more than 2,400 residents, the Census
Bureau will offer the tribal government
the opportunity to delineate tribal tracts
and other tribal statistical geography on
their reservation and/or off-reservation
trust land. For federally recognized
tribes with an American Indian
reservation and/or off-reservation trust
E:\FR\FM\06APN2.SGM
06APN2
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES2
17336
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices
lands that have fewer than 2,400
residents, the Census Bureau will define
one tribal tract and one tribal block
group coextensive with the reservation
and/or off-reservation trust land. Tribal
tracts must be delineated to meet all
other census tract criteria, and must be
numbered uniquely so as to clearly
distinguish them from county-based
census tracts. Tribal tracts are
conceptually similar and equivalent to
census tracts defined within the
standard State-county-tract-block group
geographic hierarchy used for tabulating
and publishing statistical data.
In order to provide meaningful
statistical geographic areas within the
reservation and/or off-reservation trust
land as well as to make meaningful and
reliable data available for these areas
and their populations, the Census
Bureau proposes that for the 2010
Census, standard census tracts be
delineated nationwide, and the tribal
tract geography be maintained
separately and defined through a
separate program designed specifically
for tribal statistical geography. This
differs from the procedure for Census
2000 in which tribal tracts were defined
for federally recognized American
Indian reservations and/or offreservation trust lands and standard
census tracts were identified by
superimposing county and State
boundaries onto the tribal tracts.
For Census 2000 products in which
data were presented by State and
county, the standard State-countycensus tract hierarchy was maintained,
even for territory contained within an
American Indian reservation and/or offreservation trust land. In such instances,
the State/county portions of a tribal tract
were identified as individual census
tracts. These standard census tracts may
not have met the minimum population
or housing unit thresholds, therefore
potentially limiting sample data
reliability or availability for both the
tribal tract and the derived standard
tracts. The proposed change in the tribal
tract program for the 2010 Census,
creating standard, county-based census
tracts nationwide and maintaining tribal
tracts as a completely separate set of
geography from standard tracts for both
geographic information and data
presentation purposes, seeks to
eliminate, in part, these issues that
existed with Census 2000 data.
As with standard census tracts
submitted through this program, the
tribal tracts would be submitted to the
Census Bureau, and would be subject to
review to ensure compliance with the
final published criteria. Tribal tracts
will be defined as part of a separate
Tribal Statistical Areas Program (TSAP)
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:15 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
for the 2010 Census. Detailed criteria
pertaining to tribal tracts will be
published in a separate Federal Register
notice pertaining to all American Indian
statistical areas defined through the
TSAP.
III. Definitions of Key Terms
Alaska Native regional corporation
(ANRC)—A corporate geographic area
established under the Alaska Native
Claims Settlement Act (Pub. L. 92–203)
to conduct both the business and
nonprofit affairs of Alaska Natives.
Twelve ANRCs cover the entire State of
Alaska except for the Annette Island
Reserve.
American Indian off-reservation trust
land—A federally recognized American
Indian land area located outside the
boundaries of an American Indian
reservation whose boundaries are
established by deed and over which a
federally recognized American Indian
tribal government has governmental
authority.
American Indian reservation (AIR)—A
federally recognized American Indian
land area with boundaries established
by final treaty, statute, executive order,
and/or court order and over which a
federally recognized American Indian
tribal government has governmental
authority. Along with reservation,
designations such as colonies,
communities, pueblos, rancherias, and
reserves apply to AIRs.
Coastal water—Water bodies between
territorial seas and inland water, the
encompassing headlands being more
than one mile apart and less than 24
miles apart.
Conjoint—A description of a
boundary shared by two adjacent
geographic entities.
Contiguous—A description of areas
sharing common boundaries, such that
the areas, when combined, form a single
piece of territory. Noncontiguous areas
form disjoint pieces.
Great Lakes’ waters—Water area
beyond one mile wide headland
embayments located in any of the five
Great Lakes: Erie, Huron, Michigan,
Ontario, or Superior.
Group quarters—A place where
people live or stay, in a group living
arrangement, that is owned or managed
by an entity or organization providing
housing and/or services for the
residents. This is not a typical
household-type living arrangement.
These services may include custodial or
medical care as well as other types of
assistance, and residency is commonly
restricted to those receiving these
services. People living in group quarters
are usually not related to each other.
Group quarters include such places as
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
college residence halls, residential
treatment centers, skilled nursing
facilities, group homes, military
barracks, correctional facilities, and
workers’ dormitories.
Incorporated place—A type of
governmental unit, incorporated under
State law as a city, town (except in New
England, New York, and Wisconsin),
borough (except in Alaska and New
York), or village, generally to provide
governmental services for a
concentration of people within legally
prescribed boundaries.
Inland water—Water bodies entirely
surrounded by land or at the point
where their opening to coastal waters,
territorial seas, or the Great Lakes is less
than one mile across.
Minor civil division (MCD)—The
primary governmental or administrative
division of a county in 28 States and the
Island Areas having legal boundaries,
names, and descriptions. The MCDs
represent many different types of legal
entities with a wide variety of
characteristics, powers, and functions
depending on the State and type of
MCD. In some States, some or all of the
incorporated places also constitute
MCDs.
Nonvisible feature—A map feature
that is not visible on the ground such as
a city or county boundary through
space, a property line, or line-of-sight
extension of a road.
Retracting—Substantially changing
the boundaries of a tract so that
comparability over time is not
maintained.
Special land use tract—Type of
census tract that must be designated as
a specific land use type (e.g., State park)
and have an official name (e.g., Jay
Cooke State Park), must have little or no
residential population or housing units,
and must not create a noncontiguous
tract. If delineated in a densely
populated, urban area, a special land
use tract must have an area of
approximately one square mile or more.
If delineated completely outside an
urban area, a special land use tract must
have an area of approximately 10 square
miles or more.
Territorial seas—Water bodies not
included under the rules for inland
water, coastal water, or Great Lakes’
waters, see above.
TIGER—Topologically Integrated
Geographic Encoding and Referencing
database developed by the Census
Bureau to support its mapping needs for
the decennial census and other Census
Bureau programs. The topological
structure of the TIGER database
defines the location and relationship of
boundaries, streets, rivers, railroads, and
other features to each other and to the
E:\FR\FM\06APN2.SGM
06APN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices
numerous geographic areas for which
the Census Bureau tabulates data from
its censuses and surveys.
Visible feature—A map feature that
can be seen on the ground such as a
road, railroad track, major above-ground
transmission line or pipeline, river,
stream, shoreline, fence, sharply defined
mountain ridge, or cliff. A nonstandard
visible feature is a feature that may not
be clearly defined on the ground (such
as a ridge), may be seasonal (such as an
intermittent stream), or may be
relatively impermanent (such as a
fence). The Census Bureau generally
requests verification that nonstandard
features used as boundaries for the
PSAP geographic areas pose no problem
in their location during field work.
Water body tract—Type of tract
encompassing territorial seas, coastal
water, the Great Lakes, or inland water
at least 100 square miles in area. If an
inland water body meets this criterion,
each county can delineate a tract for its
portion of the water body.
Executive Order 12866
This notice has been determined to be
not significant under Executive Order
12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This program notice does not
represent a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
Dated: April 3, 2007.
Charles Louis Kincannon,
Director, Bureau of the Census.
[FR Doc. E7–6466 Filed 4–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of the Census
[Docket Number 070126022–0723–01]
Census Block Group Program for the
2010 Census—Proposed Criteria
Bureau of the Census,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of proposed program
revisions and request for comments.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES2
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Block groups are statistical
geographic divisions of a census tract,
defined for the tabulation and
dissemination of decennial census data.
Block groups also will be used to
tabulate and publish estimates from the
American Community Survey (ACS) 1
1 The ACS is conducted in the United States and
in Puerto Rico. In Puerto Rico, the survey is called
the Puerto Rico Community Survey. For ease of
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:15 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
after 2010. Each block group comprises
a reasonably compact and contiguous
cluster of census blocks; up to nine
block groups can be contained within a
single census tract.
Most provisions of the block group
criteria for the 2010 Census remain
unchanged from those used in
conjunction with Census 2000.
However, based on consultation with
data users and internal review, the
Bureau of the Census (Census Bureau) is
proposing the following changes for the
2010 Census: (1) Increasing the
minimum population and housing unit
counts for block groups; (2) using
housing unit counts (as an alternative to
population counts) in the delineation of
block groups; (3) applying the same
population and housing unit thresholds
to all types of populated block groups in
the United States,2 including block
groups delineated on American Indian
reservations and/or off-reservation trust
lands,3 the Island Areas,4 and
encompassing group quarters, military
installations, and institutions; (4)
allowing the delineation of block groups
for large water bodies with areas of
approximately 100 square miles or more
and special land uses (e.g., large airports
or public parks) with an official name;
and (5) allowing for geographic
frameworks of tribal block groups
(separate from the standard block
groups defined within counties and
standard census tracts) to be defined
within federally-recognized American
Indian reservations and/or offreservation trust lands.
In addition to the proposed criteria,
this notice includes a description of the
changes from the criteria used for
Census 2000 and a list of definitions of
key terms used in the criteria.
The Census Bureau is publishing this
notice in the Federal Register to request
discussion, throughout this document the term ACS
is used to represent both the survey that is
conducted in the United States and in Puerto Rico.
2 For Census Bureau purposes, the United States
includes the fifty states and the District of
Columbia.
3 The proposed criteria for the tribal statistical
areas program will be outlined in a separate Federal
Register notice. In the tribal statistical areas
program, federally recognized American Indian
tribes that have a reservation and/or off-reservation
trust land may delineate census designated places
and, if these areas have a population of 2,400 or
greater, may delineate tribal tracts and tribal block
groups for their reservation and off-reservation trust
land.
4 For Census Bureau purposes, the Island Areas
includes American Samoa, the Commonwealth of
the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, the U.S.
Virgin Islands, and the U.S. Minor Outlying Islands.
The U.S. Minor Outlying Islands is an aggregation
of nine U.S. territories: Baker Island, Howland
Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston Atoll, Kingman Reef,
Midway Islands, Navassa Island, Palmyra Atoll, and
Wake Island.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
17337
comments from the public and other
government agencies. The Census
Bureau will respond to the comments
received as part of the publication of
final criteria in the Federal Register.
After the final criteria are published in
the Federal Register, the Census Bureau
will offer designated governments or
organizations an opportunity to review
and, if necessary, suggest updates to the
boundaries and attributes of the block
groups in their geographic area under
the Participant Statistical Areas Program
(PSAP). In addition to block groups, the
program also encompasses the review
and update of census tracts, census
designated places, and census county
divisions.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before July 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Please direct all written
comments on this proposed program to
the Director, U.S. Census Bureau, Room
8H001, Mail Stop 0100, Washington, DC
20233–0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information on
this proposed program should be
directed to Michael Ratcliffe, Chief,
Geographic Standards and Criteria
Branch, Geography Division, U.S.
Census Bureau, via e-mail at
geo.psap.list@census.gov or telephone at
301–763–3056.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. History of Block Groups
The Census Bureau first delineated
block groups as statistical geographic
divisions of census tracts for the 1970
Census, comprising contiguous
combinations of census blocks for data
presentation purposes. At that time,
census block groups only existed in
urbanized areas in which census blocks
were defined. Block groups were
defined without regard to political and
administrative boundaries, with an
average population of 1,000, and to be
approximately equal in area.
As census block, block group, and
census tract data were used increasingly
by data users, the Census Bureau
expanded these programs to cover
additional geographic areas, while
redefining the population threshold
criteria to more adequately suit data
users’ needs. The 1990 Census was the
first in which census blocks and block
groups were defined throughout the
entirety of the United States, Puerto
Rico, and the Island Areas. For Census
2000, as with census tracts, the Census
Bureau increased the number of
geographic areas whose boundaries
could be used as block group
boundaries, and allowed tribal
governments of federally recognized
E:\FR\FM\06APN2.SGM
06APN2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 66 (Friday, April 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17329-17337]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6466]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of the Census
[Docket Number 070321065-7066-01]
Census Tract Program for the 2010 Census--Proposed Criteria
AGENCY: Bureau of the Census, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of proposed program revisions and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Census tracts are relatively permanent small-area geographic
divisions of a county or statistically equivalent entity \1\ defined
for the tabulation of decennial census data and selected other
statistical programs. Census tracts also will be used to tabulate and
publish estimates from the American Community Survey (ACS) \2\ after
2010. The primary goal of the census tract program is to provide a set
of nationally consistent small, statistical geographic units, with
stable boundaries, that facilitate analysis of data across time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Includes parishes in Louisiana; boroughs, city and boroughs,
census areas, and municipalities in Alaska; independent cities in
Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia; districts in American
Samoa and the U.S. Virgin Islands; municipalities in the
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands; municipios in Puerto
Rico; the areas constituting the District of Columbia and Guam. This
notice will refer to all these entities collectively as
``counties.''
\2\ The ACS is conducted in the United States and in Puerto
Rico. In Puerto Rico the survey is called the Puerto Rico Community
Survey (PRCS). For ease of discussion, throughout this document the
term ACS is used to represent the surveys conducted in the United
States and in Puerto Rico.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Most provisions of the census tract criteria for the 2010 Census
remain unchanged from those used in conjunction with Census 2000.
However, based on consultation with data users and internal review the
Bureau of the Census (Census Bureau) is proposing the following changes
for the 2010 Census: (1) Lowering the minimum population threshold for
census tracts; (2) using housing unit counts (as an alternative to
population counts) in the review and update of tracts; (3) applying the
same population and housing unit thresholds to all types of populated
tracts within the United States,\3\ including census tracts delineated
on American Indian reservations and off-reservation trust lands,\4\
Puerto Rico, the Island Areas,\5\ and encompassing group quarters,
military installations, and institutions; (4) allowing the delineation
of census tracts for large water bodies with areas of approximately 100
square miles or more and special land use (e.g., large airports or
public parks) with an official name; and (5) allowing for geographic
frameworks of tribal tracts (separate from the standard census tracts
defined within counties) to be defined within federally-recognized
American Indian reservations and off-reservation trust lands.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For Census Bureau purposes, the United States includes the
fifty States and the District of Columbia.
\4\ The proposed criteria for the tribal statistical areas
program will be outlined in a separate Federal Register notice. In
the tribal statistical areas program, federally recognized American
Indian tribes that have a reservation and/or off-reservation trust
land may delineate census designated places (CDPs), and, if these
areas have a population of 2,400 or greater, may delineate tribal
tracts and tribal block groups for their reservation and off-
reservation trust land.
\5\ For Census Bureau purposes, the Island Areas includes
American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands,
Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the U.S. Minor Outlying Islands.
The U.S. Minor Outlying Islands is an aggregation of nine U.S.
territories: Baker Island, Howland Island, Jarvis Island, Johnston
Atoll, Kingman Reef, Midway Islands, Navassa Island, Palmyra Atoll,
and Wake Island.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to proposed criteria, this notice includes a
description of the changes from the criteria used for Census 2000 and a
list of definitions of key terms used in the criteria.
The Census Bureau is publishing this notice in the Federal Register
to request comments from the public and other government agencies. The
Census Bureau will respond to the comments received as part of the
publication of final criteria in the Federal Register. After the final
criteria are published in the Federal Register, the Census Bureau will
offer designated governments or organizations an opportunity to review
and, if necessary, suggest updates to the boundaries and attributes
(e.g., tract code) of the census tracts in their geographic area under
the Participant Statistical Areas Program (PSAP). In addition to census
tracts, the program also encompasses the review and update of block
groups, census designated places, and census county divisions.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before July 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Please direct all written comments on this proposed program
to the Director, U.S. Census Bureau, Room 8H001, mail stop 0100,
Washington, DC 20233-0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information on
this proposed program should be directed to Michael Ratcliffe, Chief,
Geographic Standards and Criteria Branch, Geography Division, U.S.
Census Bureau, via e-mail at geo.psap.list@census.gov or telephone at
301-763-3056.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. History of Census Tracts
In 1905, Dr. Walter Laidlaw originated the concept of permanent,
small geographic areas as a framework for studying change from one
decennial census to another in neighborhoods within New York City. For
the 1910 Census, eight cities--New York, Baltimore, Boston, Chicago,
Cleveland, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and St. Louis--delineated census
tracts (then termed ``districts'') for the first time. No additional
jurisdictions delineated census tracts until just prior to the 1930
Census, when an additional ten cities chose to do so. The increased
interest in census tracts for the 1930 Census is attributed to the
promotional efforts of Howard Whipple Green, who was a statistician in
Cleveland, Ohio, and later the chairman of the American Statistical
Association's Committee on Census Enumeration Areas. For more than
[[Page 17330]]
twenty-five years, Mr. Green strongly encouraged local citizens, via
committees, to establish census tracts and other census statistical
geographic areas. The committees created by local citizens were known
as Census Tract Committees, later called Census Statistical Areas
Committees.
After 1930, the Census Bureau saw the need to standardize the
delineation, review, and updating of census tracts and published the
first set of census tract criteria in 1934. The goal of the criteria
has remained unchanged; that is, to assure comparability and data
reliability through the standardization of the population thresholds
for census tracts, as well as requiring that their boundaries follow
specific types of geographic features that do not change frequently.
The Census Bureau began publishing census tract data as part of its
standard tabulations beginning with the 1940 Census. Prior to that
time, census tract data were published as special tabulations.
For the 1940 Census, the Census Bureau began publishing census
block data for all cities with 50,000 or more people. Census block
numbers were assigned, where possible, by census tract, but for those
cities that had not yet delineated census tracts, ``block areas''
(called ``block numbering areas'' [BNAs] in later censuses) were
created to assign census block numbers.
Starting with the 1960 Census, the Census Bureau assumed a greater
role in promoting and coordinating the delineation, review, and update
of census tracts. For the 1980 Census, criteria for BNAs were changed
to make them more comparable in size and shape to census tracts. For
the 1990 Census, all counties contained either census tracts or BNAs.
Census 2000 was the first decade in which census tracts were
defined in all counties. In addition, the Census Bureau increased the
number of geographic areas whose boundaries could be used as census
tract boundaries. It also allowed tribal governments of federally
recognized American Indian tribes with a reservation and/or off-
reservation trust lands to delineate tracts without regard to State
and/or county boundaries, provided the tribe had a 1990 Census
population of at least 1,000.
II. General Principles and Criteria for Census Tracts for the 2010
Census
A. General Principles
1. A century of census tract use has shown that continuity and
comparability in tracts and their boundaries over time are of
considerable importance to data users. Comparability has always been a
goal in the census tract program since its inception for the 1910
census; however, as the use of tract data increases, the importance of
comparability increases as well. Maintaining comparability of tract
boundaries over time facilitates longitudinal data analysis. The advent
of the ACS and the averaging of sample data for tracts over a five-year
span further underscore the need for consistent tract boundaries over
time.
Pursuant to this goal of continuity and comparability, the Census
Bureau requests that where a census tract must be updated, for example
to meet the minimum or maximum population or housing unit thresholds,
that the outer boundaries of the tract not be changed, but rather that
a tract be split into two or more tracts, or merged with an adjacent
tract. The Census Bureau discourages changes to tract boundaries (that
is, ``retracting''), except in specified circumstances, which the
Census Bureau will review on a case-by-case basis.
2. The sample size for the ACS is smaller than the sample from the
decennial census long form of previous censuses. As a general rule,
estimates from programs providing sample data, including the ACS, for
geographic areas with smaller populations will be subject to higher
variances than comparable estimates for areas with larger populations.
In addition, the Census Bureau's disclosure rules may have the effect
of restricting the availability and amount of sample data published for
geographic areas with small populations. Aiming to create census tracts
that meet the optimal population of 4,000 and maintaining minimum
thresholds will improve the reliability and availability of data, and
local governments and planners should consider these factors when
defining their census tracts. Therefore, the Census Bureau proposes
that any census tracts not flagged as a water body or special land use
tract (General Principle 4) must encompass at least 1,200 people or at
least 480 housing units. Any census tract with a population or housing
unit count less than the minimum threshold should be merged with an
adjacent census tract to form a single tract with at least 1,200 people
or at least 480 housing units (Figure 1). The Census Bureau will use
Census 2000 population and housing unit counts, with allowance made for
growth since 2000, to assess whether each census tract submitted meets
this criterion. Program participants may submit local estimates as a
surrogate for the Census 2000 population and housing unit counts for a
census tract.
[[Page 17331]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06AP07.010
3. With the advent of the ACS and the ``continuous measurement'' of
characteristics of the population and housing based on a five-year
average, there are some new issues to consider in the census tract
criteria. The Census Bureau proposes the use of either population or
housing units in the review of census tracts. The ACS is designed to
produce local area data as of a 12-month period estimate (or an
average); whereas, in the past local area data were represented as of
the April 1 census day.
4. The Census Bureau recognizes that there are geographic areas
that are not characterized by a residential population, and which local
participants may wish to separate from populated tracts for analytical
or cartographic purposes or both. The Census Bureau proposes
identifying these areas as water body tracts and special land use
tracts. Special land use tracts must be designated as a specific type
of land use (e.g., State park, municipal park) and have an official
name, generally have little or no residential population or housing
units, and must not create a noncontiguous census tract. If located in
a densely populated urban area, a special land use tract must have an
area of approximately 1 square mile or more. If delineated completely
outside an urban area, a special land use tract must have an area of
approximately 10 square miles or more. The Census Bureau recognizes
that some special land use areas not intended for residential
population, such as parks, may contain some population, such as
caretakers or the homeless. Our intent is to allow for the delineation
of parks and other special land use areas as separate tracts and
therefore will accept such areas as tracts even if some residential
population is present.
5. To facilitate the analysis of data for American Indian tribes,
and to recognize their unique governmental status, program participants
are encouraged to merge, split, or redefine census tracts to avoid
unnecessarily splitting American Indian reservations and/or off-
reservation trust lands. Each contiguous American Indian reservation
and/or off-reservation trust land should be included, along with any
necessary territory outside the reservation and/or off-reservation
trust land, within a single census tract or as few census tracts as
possible for the 2010 Census. This is the only situation in which
retracting is encouraged. See, for example, Figure 2 below.
[[Page 17332]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06AP07.011
B. Changes to the Census Tract Criteria for the 2010 Census
Most provisions of the census tract criteria for the 2010 Census
would remain unchanged from those used in conjunction with Census 2000
with only the following exceptions:
1. The minimum population threshold for census tracts would be
1,200, lowered from the minimum threshold of 1,500 used in Census 2000.
This change seeks to create a standard minimum threshold for census
block groups and census tracts, in order to support the reliability and
availability of sample data for these statistical geographies.
2. Housing unit counts may be used instead of population counts in
the review and update of tracts. This change seeks to accommodate
seasonal communities in which residents often are not present on the
date of the decennial census, but will be present at other times of the
year and for which estimates may be reflected in the ACS.
3. For Census 2000, minimum population thresholds for census tracts
varied. The minimum population threshold for census tracts delineated
on American Indian reservations and off-reservation trust lands was
1,000. This differed from the minimum threshold of 1,500 people for
census tracts defined elsewhere in the United States, as well as in
Puerto Rico and the Island Areas. Optimum populations for census tracts
also varied: 4,000 in the United States and Puerto Rico, and 2,500 on
American Indian reservations and in the Island Areas. The maximum
population for a census tract in any of these areas was 8,000. In
addition, for Census 2000, tracts that enclosed an institution, a
military installation, or other ``special place'' had a minimum
population requirement of 1,000 inhabitants, with no optimum or
maximum.
For the 2010 Census the same population and housing unit thresholds
would apply to all types of populated tracts, including census tracts
delineated on American Indian reservations and off-reservation trust
lands, the Island Areas, and encompassing group quarters, military
installations, and institutions. The Census Bureau proposes this change
in order to aid in the availability and reliability of data for all
tracts and to create a single national standard.
4. The delineation of census tracts would be permitted, and
encouraged, for the following types of geographic areas:
a. Large water bodies with areas of approximately 100 square miles
or more.
b. Special land uses (for example, large airports, public parks, or
public forests) with an official name.
The Census Bureau would require that special land use tracts have
little or no residential population. All such census tracts would meet
all other tract criteria.
5. A geographic framework of tribal tracts, separate from the
standard census tracts defined within counties, may be defined within
federally recognized American Indian reservations and/or off-
reservation trust lands, subject to other population, housing, and
boundary criteria contained in this document. This represents a change
from the practice for Census 2000. The Census Bureau proposes this
change to better recognize the unique statistical data needs of
federally recognized American Indian tribes and their reservation and
off-reservation trust lands.
C. Census Tract Criteria for the 2010 Census
The criteria proposed herein apply to the United States, including
federally recognized American Indian reservations and off-reservation
trust lands, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas. The Census Bureau may
modify and, if necessary, reject any proposals for census tracts that
do not meet the established criteria. In addition, the Census Bureau
reserves the right to modify the boundaries and attributes of tracts as
needed to meet the published criteria and/or maintain geographic
relationships before the final tabulation geography is set for the 2010
Census. The Census Bureau proposes the following criteria for use in
reviewing 2010 Census tracts:
1. A census tract must comprise a reasonably compact and contiguous
land area.
Noncontiguous boundaries are permitted only where a noncontiguous
area or inaccessible area would not meet population or housing unit
count requirements for a separate tract, in which case the
noncontiguous or inaccessible area must be included within an adjacent
or proximate tract. For example, an island that does not meet the
minimum population
[[Page 17333]]
threshold for recognition as a separate tract should be combined with
other proximate land to form a single tract. Each case will be reviewed
and accepted at the Census Bureau's discretion.
2. A census tract must cover the entire land and water area of a
county.
In counties containing coastal waters, territorial sea, and
portions of the Great Lakes, and very large, contiguous, inland water
bodies, a single water body tract should be created for each discrete
water body to provide for complete census tract coverage.
3. Census tract boundaries should follow visible and identifiable
features.
To make the location of census tract boundaries less ambiguous,
wherever possible, tract boundaries should follow visible and
identifiable features. The Census Bureau also permits the use of State
and county boundaries in all States, and incorporated place and minor
civil division boundaries in States where those boundaries tend to
remain unchanged over time (see Table 1). The use of visible features
also makes it easier to locate and identify tract boundaries over time,
as the locations of many visible features in the landscape tend to
change infrequently.
The following features are preferred as census tract boundaries for
the 2010 Census:
a. State and county boundaries must always be tract boundaries.
This criterion takes precedence over all other criteria or requirements
except for the population threshold criteria for tribal tracts on
American Indian reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands.
b. American Indian reservation and off-reservation trust land
boundaries.
c. Visible, perennial natural and cultural features, such as roads,
shorelines, rivers, perennial streams and canals, railroad tracks, or
above-ground high-tension power lines.
d. Boundaries of legal and administrative entities in selected
States. Table 1 identifies by State which minor civil division (MCD)
and incorporated place boundaries may be used as tract boundaries.
Table 1.--Acceptable MCD and Incorporated Place Boundaries
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Boundaries
of MCDs not
coincident
with the All Only
All MCD boundaries incorporated conjoint
boundaries of place incorporated
incorporated boundaries places
places that boundaries
themselves
are MCDs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama................................................. ............ ............ ............ X
Alaska.................................................. ............ ............ ............ X
Arizona................................................. ............ ............ ............ X
Arkansas................................................ ............ ............ ............ X
California.............................................. ............ ............ ............ X
Colorado................................................ ............ ............ ............ X
Connecticut............................................. X ............ X
Delaware................................................ ............ ............ ............ X
Florida................................................. ............ ............ ............ X
Georgia................................................. ............ ............ ............ X
Hawaii.................................................. ............ ............ ............ X
Idaho................................................... ............ ............ ............ X
Illinois................................................ ............ X \a\ ............ X
Indiana................................................. X ............ ............ X
Iowa.................................................... ............ X ............ X
Kansas.................................................. ............ X ............ X
Kentucky................................................ ............ ............ ............ X
Louisiana............................................... ............ ............ ............ X
Maine................................................... X ............ X
Maryland................................................ ............ ............ ............ X
Massachusetts........................................... X ............ X
Michigan................................................ ............ X ............ X
Minnesota............................................... ............ X ............ X
Mississippi............................................. ............ ............ ............ X
Missouri................................................ ............ X \b\ ............ X
Montana................................................. ............ ............ ............ X
Nebraska................................................ ............ X \a\ ............ X
Nevada.................................................. ............ ............ ............ X
New Hampshire........................................... X ............ X
New Jersey.............................................. X ............ X
New Mexico.............................................. ............ ............ ............ X
New York................................................ X ............ X
North Carolina.......................................... ............ ............ ............ X
North Dakota............................................ ............ X ............ X
Ohio.................................................... ............ X ............ X
Oklahoma................................................ ............ ............ ............ X
Oregon.................................................. ............ ............ ............ X
Pennsylvania............................................ X ............ X
Rhode Island............................................ X ............ X
South Carolina.......................................... ............ ............ ............ X
South Dakota............................................ ............ X ............ X
Tennessee............................................... ............ ............ ............ X
Texas................................................... ............ ............ ............ X
[[Page 17334]]
Utah.................................................... ............ ............ ............ X
Vermont................................................. X ............ X
Virginia................................................ ............ ............ ............ X
Washington.............................................. ............ ............ ............ X
West Virginia........................................... ............ ............ ............ X
Wisconsin............................................... ............ X ............ X
Wyoming................................................. ............ ............ ............ X
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ Townships only.
\b\ Governmental townships only.
e. Additionally, the following legally defined, administrative
boundaries would be permitted as census tract boundaries:
i. Barrio, barrio-pueblo, and subbarrio boundaries in Puerto Rico;
ii. Census subdistrict boundaries in the U.S. Virgin Islands;
iii. County and island boundaries (both MCD equivalents) in
American Samoa;
iv. Election district boundaries in Guam;
v. Municipal district boundaries in the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands; and
vi. Alaska Native regional corporation boundaries in Alaska, at the
discretion of the Census Bureau, insofar as such boundaries are
unambiguous for allocating living quarters as part of 2010 Census
activities.
f. When acceptable visible and governmental boundary features are
not available for use as tract boundaries, the Census Bureau may, at
its discretion, approve other nonstandard visible features, such as
ridge lines, above-ground pipelines, intermittent streams, or fence
lines. The Census Bureau may also accept, on a case-by-case basis, the
boundaries of selected nonstandard and potentially nonvisible features,
such as the boundaries of military installations, National Parks,
National Monuments, National Forests, other types of parks or forests,
airports, marine ports, cemeteries, golf courses, penitentiaries/
prisons, or glaciers, or the straight-line extensions of visible
features and other lines-of-sight.
g. The boundaries of large water bodies and special land use
tracts, including parks, forests, large airports, and military
installations, provided the boundaries are clearly marked or easily
recognized.
4. Population, Housing Unit, and Area Thresholds
The Census Bureau proposes the following population, housing unit,
and area threshold criteria for census tracts (as summarized in Table
2).
Table 2.--Tract Thresholds
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tract type Threshold type Optimum Minimum Maximum
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & tribal tracts.......... Population threshold. 4,000................ 1,200 8,000
Housing Unit 1,600................ 480 3,200
threshold.
Water body tracts................. Area threshold none................. 100 none
(square miles).
Special land use tracts........... Area threshold for an none................. 1 none
urban area (square
miles).
Area threshold none................. 10 none
outside an urban
area (square miles).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
a. Population counts should be used in tract review in most cases.
Housing unit counts should be used for seasonal communities that have
no or low population on census day (April 1). Locally produced
population and housing unit estimates can be used when reviewing and
updating tracts, especially in areas that have experienced considerable
growth since Census 2000.
b. The housing unit thresholds are based on a national average of
2.5 persons per household. The Census Bureau recognizes that there are
regional variations to this average and will take this into
consideration when reviewing all tract proposals.
c. The Census Bureau recognizes the tension that exists between
meeting the optimum population or housing unit threshold in a tract and
maintaining tract comparability over time. For example, if population
growth has occurred since 2000 or is expected before 2010 for a census
tract, the tract should not be merged if it has a Census 2000
population of at least 1,100 or a housing unit count of at least 440
and acceptable supporting evidence is supplied by the PSAP participant
that population and/or housing unit growth has occurred since Census
2000, or will likely occur before 2010, and has been sufficient to meet
the minimum thresholds. However, should the census tract's population
not increase as expected and does not meet either of the minimum
thresholds in 2010, this may adversely affect the reliability and
availability of any sample estimates for that tract. For this reason,
the Census Bureau suggests merging the census tract with another if
there is a possibility that anticipated growth will not be sufficient
to meet minimum thresholds.
[[Page 17335]]
d. The Census Bureau may waive the maximum population and housing
thresholds as required to achieve the objectives of this notice.
e. For the 2010 Census, the Census Bureau encourages the
delineation of special-use tracts in specific types of areas.
i. A special land use tract must be designated as a specific land
use type (e.g., State park), must have an official name (e.g., Jay
Cooke State Park), have little or no residential population, and must
not create a noncontiguous tract. In some instances, multiple areas can
be combined to form a single special land-use tract if the land
management characteristics are similar, such as a special land-use
tract comprising adjacent Federal and State parks. If the special land
use tract is delineated in a densely populated, urban area, the tract
must have an area of approximately one square mile or more. If the
special land-use tract is delineated completely outside an urban area,
the tract must have an area of approximately 10 square miles or more.
ii. A water body tract must encompass all or part of a territorial
sea, coastal water, a Great Lake, or an inland water body at least 100
square miles in area. If a water body meets this criterion and is in
more than one county, each county can delineate a tract for its portion
of the water body. Any islands within a qualifying water body should be
included within a separate tract.
5. Identification of Census Tracts
a. A census tract has a basic census tract identifier composed of
no more than four digits and may have a two-digit decimal suffix.
b. The range of acceptable basic census tract identifiers for the
2010 Census is from 1 to 9949 (but, see 5.c. below); tracts delineated
specifically to complete coverage of large water bodies will be
numbered from 9950 to 9989 in each county. All other tracts that fall
within the 9950-9989 range must be renumbered. For Census 2000, water
body tracts were all coded 0000. Each of these must be renumbered for
the 2010 Census.
c. Census tracts delineated within or to primarily encompass
American Indian reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands can
continue to be numbered from 9400 to 9499. Local participants may opt
to renumber these census tracts in a numeric range consistent with the
rest of the county since tribal tracts are proposed to be a separate
and distinct geographic entity.
d. Census tract identifiers must be unique within each county.
e. Once used, census tract identifiers cannot be reused in a
subsequent census to reference a completely different area within a
county. If a tract is split, each portion may keep the same basic 4-
digit identifier, but each portion must be given a unique suffix. If a
census tract that was suffixed for Census 2000 is split, each portion
must be given a new suffix.
f. The range of acceptable census tract suffixes is .01 to .98.
6. Census Tract types
Table 3 below contains a summary of the types of census tracts
(with their respective population, housing unit and area
characteristics) that the Census Bureau proposes to use for the 2010
Census.
Table 3.--Summary of Census Tract Types
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
How distinct from
standard census Population Housing unit Area thresholds
tracts thresholds thresholds
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard & tribal tracts........ Tribal tracts are Optimum: 4,000;... Optimum: 1,600; None.
conceptually Minimum: 1,200;... Minimum: 480;.....
similar and Maximum: 8,000.... Maximum: 3,200....
equivalent to
census tracts
defined within
the standard
State-county-
tract-block group
geographic
hierarchy used
for tabulating
and publishing
statistical data.
Water body tract................ A tract Zero.............. Zero.............. 100 square miles
encompassing all if an inland
or part of a water body.
territorial sea,
coastal water, a
Great Lake, or an
inland water body
at least 100
square miles in
area.
Special land-use tract.......... A tract Little or none.... Little or none.... 1 square mile
encompassing a within an urban
large airport, area/10 square
public park, or miles outside an
public forest urban area.
with little or no
population or
housing units. In
a densely
populated, urban
area, a special
land use tract
should be
approximately 1
square mile in
area or greater.
If delineated
completely
outside an urban
area, a special
land-use tract
should have an
area of 10 square
miles or greater.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Tribal Tracts
Tribal tracts are statistical geographic entities defined by the
Census Bureau in cooperation with tribal officials to provide
meaningful, relevant, and reliable data for small geographic areas
within the boundaries of federally recognized American Indian
reservation and/or off-reservation trust lands. As such, they recognize
the unique statistical data needs of federally recognized American
Indian tribes. The delineation of tribal tracts allows for an
unambiguous presentation of tract-level data specific to the American
Indian reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands without the
imposition of State or county boundaries, which might artificially
separate American Indian populations located within a single
reservation and/or off-reservation trust land. To this end, the
American Indian tribal participant may define tribal tracts that cross
county or State boundaries, or both. For federally recognized American
Indian tribes with reservations and/or off-reservation trust lands that
have more than 2,400 residents, the Census Bureau will offer the tribal
government the opportunity to delineate tribal tracts and other tribal
statistical geography on their reservation and/or off-reservation trust
land. For federally recognized tribes with an American Indian
reservation and/or off-reservation trust
[[Page 17336]]
lands that have fewer than 2,400 residents, the Census Bureau will
define one tribal tract and one tribal block group coextensive with the
reservation and/or off-reservation trust land. Tribal tracts must be
delineated to meet all other census tract criteria, and must be
numbered uniquely so as to clearly distinguish them from county-based
census tracts. Tribal tracts are conceptually similar and equivalent to
census tracts defined within the standard State-county-tract-block
group geographic hierarchy used for tabulating and publishing
statistical data.
In order to provide meaningful statistical geographic areas within
the reservation and/or off-reservation trust land as well as to make
meaningful and reliable data available for these areas and their
populations, the Census Bureau proposes that for the 2010 Census,
standard census tracts be delineated nationwide, and the tribal tract
geography be maintained separately and defined through a separate
program designed specifically for tribal statistical geography. This
differs from the procedure for Census 2000 in which tribal tracts were
defined for federally recognized American Indian reservations and/or
off-reservation trust lands and standard census tracts were identified
by superimposing county and State boundaries onto the tribal tracts.
For Census 2000 products in which data were presented by State and
county, the standard State-county-census tract hierarchy was
maintained, even for territory contained within an American Indian
reservation and/or off-reservation trust land. In such instances, the
State/county portions of a tribal tract were identified as individual
census tracts. These standard census tracts may not have met the
minimum population or housing unit thresholds, therefore potentially
limiting sample data reliability or availability for both the tribal
tract and the derived standard tracts. The proposed change in the
tribal tract program for the 2010 Census, creating standard, county-
based census tracts nationwide and maintaining tribal tracts as a
completely separate set of geography from standard tracts for both
geographic information and data presentation purposes, seeks to
eliminate, in part, these issues that existed with Census 2000 data.
As with standard census tracts submitted through this program, the
tribal tracts would be submitted to the Census Bureau, and would be
subject to review to ensure compliance with the final published
criteria. Tribal tracts will be defined as part of a separate Tribal
Statistical Areas Program (TSAP) for the 2010 Census. Detailed criteria
pertaining to tribal tracts will be published in a separate Federal
Register notice pertaining to all American Indian statistical areas
defined through the TSAP.
III. Definitions of Key Terms
Alaska Native regional corporation (ANRC)--A corporate geographic
area established under the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (Pub. L.
92-203) to conduct both the business and nonprofit affairs of Alaska
Natives. Twelve ANRCs cover the entire State of Alaska except for the
Annette Island Reserve.
American Indian off-reservation trust land--A federally recognized
American Indian land area located outside the boundaries of an American
Indian reservation whose boundaries are established by deed and over
which a federally recognized American Indian tribal government has
governmental authority.
American Indian reservation (AIR)--A federally recognized American
Indian land area with boundaries established by final treaty, statute,
executive order, and/or court order and over which a federally
recognized American Indian tribal government has governmental
authority. Along with reservation, designations such as colonies,
communities, pueblos, rancherias, and reserves apply to AIRs.
Coastal water--Water bodies between territorial seas and inland
water, the encompassing headlands being more than one mile apart and
less than 24 miles apart.
Conjoint--A description of a boundary shared by two adjacent
geographic entities.
Contiguous--A description of areas sharing common boundaries, such
that the areas, when combined, form a single piece of territory.
Noncontiguous areas form disjoint pieces.
Great Lakes' waters--Water area beyond one mile wide headland
embayments located in any of the five Great Lakes: Erie, Huron,
Michigan, Ontario, or Superior.
Group quarters--A place where people live or stay, in a group
living arrangement, that is owned or managed by an entity or
organization providing housing and/or services for the residents. This
is not a typical household-type living arrangement. These services may
include custodial or medical care as well as other types of assistance,
and residency is commonly restricted to those receiving these services.
People living in group quarters are usually not related to each other.
Group quarters include such places as college residence halls,
residential treatment centers, skilled nursing facilities, group homes,
military barracks, correctional facilities, and workers' dormitories.
Incorporated place--A type of governmental unit, incorporated under
State law as a city, town (except in New England, New York, and
Wisconsin), borough (except in Alaska and New York), or village,
generally to provide governmental services for a concentration of
people within legally prescribed boundaries.
Inland water--Water bodies entirely surrounded by land or at the
point where their opening to coastal waters, territorial seas, or the
Great Lakes is less than one mile across.
Minor civil division (MCD)--The primary governmental or
administrative division of a county in 28 States and the Island Areas
having legal boundaries, names, and descriptions. The MCDs represent
many different types of legal entities with a wide variety of
characteristics, powers, and functions depending on the State and type
of MCD. In some States, some or all of the incorporated places also
constitute MCDs.
Nonvisible feature--A map feature that is not visible on the ground
such as a city or county boundary through space, a property line, or
line-of-sight extension of a road.
Retracting--Substantially changing the boundaries of a tract so
that comparability over time is not maintained.
Special land use tract--Type of census tract that must be
designated as a specific land use type (e.g., State park) and have an
official name (e.g., Jay Cooke State Park), must have little or no
residential population or housing units, and must not create a
noncontiguous tract. If delineated in a densely populated, urban area,
a special land use tract must have an area of approximately one square
mile or more. If delineated completely outside an urban area, a special
land use tract must have an area of approximately 10 square miles or
more.
Territorial seas--Water bodies not included under the rules for
inland water, coastal water, or Great Lakes' waters, see above.
TIGER[supreg]--Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and
Referencing database developed by the Census Bureau to support its
mapping needs for the decennial census and other Census Bureau
programs. The topological structure of the TIGER[supreg] database
defines the location and relationship of boundaries, streets, rivers,
railroads, and other features to each other and to the
[[Page 17337]]
numerous geographic areas for which the Census Bureau tabulates data
from its censuses and surveys.
Visible feature--A map feature that can be seen on the ground such
as a road, railroad track, major above-ground transmission line or
pipeline, river, stream, shoreline, fence, sharply defined mountain
ridge, or cliff. A nonstandard visible feature is a feature that may
not be clearly defined on the ground (such as a ridge), may be seasonal
(such as an intermittent stream), or may be relatively impermanent
(such as a fence). The Census Bureau generally requests verification
that nonstandard features used as boundaries for the PSAP geographic
areas pose no problem in their location during field work.
Water body tract--Type of tract encompassing territorial seas,
coastal water, the Great Lakes, or inland water at least 100 square
miles in area. If an inland water body meets this criterion, each
county can delineate a tract for its portion of the water body.
Executive Order 12866
This notice has been determined to be not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This program notice does not represent a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
Dated: April 3, 2007.
Charles Louis Kincannon,
Director, Bureau of the Census.
[FR Doc. E7-6466 Filed 4-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P