Census County Division (CCD) and Equivalent Entities Program for the 2010 Census-Proposed Change and Proposed Criteria, 17324-17326 [E7-6464]
Download as PDF
17324
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of the Census
[Docket Number 070111009–7011–01]
Census County Division (CCD) and
Equivalent Entities Program for the
2010 Census—Proposed Change and
Proposed Criteria
Bureau of the Census,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of proposed program
revisions and request for comments.
AGENCY:
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES2
SUMMARY: CCDs and equivalent entities
are statistical geographic entities
established cooperatively by the Bureau
of the Census (Census Bureau) and
officials of state and local governments
in 22 states 1 where minor civil
divisions (MCDs) either do not exist or
are unsatisfactory for reporting
decennial census data. The primary goal
of the CCD program has been to
establish and maintain a set of
subcounty 2 units that have stable
boundaries and recognizable names.
The Census Bureau is publishing this
notice in the Federal Register to request
comments from the public and other
government agencies. The Census
Bureau will respond to the comments
received as part of the publication of
final criteria in the Federal Register.
After the final criteria are published in
the Federal Register, the Census Bureau
will offer designated governments or
organizations an opportunity to review
and, if necessary, suggest updates to the
boundaries and attributes of the CCDs in
their geographic area under the
Participant Statistical Areas Program
(PSAP). In addition to CCDs, the
program also encompasses the review
and update of census tracts, block
groups, and census designated places.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before July 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Please direct all written
comments on this proposed program to
the Director, U.S. Census Bureau, Room
8H001, mail stop 0100, Washington, DC
20233–0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information on
this proposed program should be
1 In Alaska, census subareas are equivalents of
CCDs. For the purposes of this notice, the term
‘‘CCD’’ will also refer to census subareas in Alaska.
2 For Census Bureau purposes, the term ‘‘county’’
includes parishes in Louisiana; boroughs and
census areas in Alaska; independent cities in
Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia; districts
in American Samoa and the U.S. Virgin Islands;
municipalities in the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands; municipios in Puerto
Rico; and the areas constituting the District of
Columbia and Guam. This notice will refer to all of
these entities collectively as ‘‘counties.’’
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:15 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
directed to Michael Ratcliffe, Chief,
Geographic Standards and Criteria
Branch, Geography Division, U.S.
Census Bureau, via e-mail at
geo.psap.list@census.gov or telephone at
301–763–3056.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. History
When CCDs were introduced prior to
the 1950 Census, few alternatives were
available for the provision of statistical
data related to relatively stable,
subcounty geographic units. Census
tracts were defined in only a subset of
metropolitan area counties; MCDs
existed in all counties, but in some
states MCD boundaries changed
frequently enough that they were not
useful for comparing statistical data
from one decade to another.
For much of the period from the 1950
Census through the 1980 Census, county
subdivisions (MCDs and CCDs)
provided the only subcounty unit of
geography at which data users could
obtain statistical data for complete
coverage of counties nationwide. The
introduction of block-numbering areas
(BNAs) in counties without census
tracts for the 1990 Census offered an
alternate subcounty entity for which
data could be tabulated. For Census
2000, the Census Bureau introduced
census tracts nationwide (in many
counties BNAs were simply relabeled as
‘‘census tracts’’) and the greater
dissemination of, and ability to analyze,
data at the census tract-level made CCDs
less necessary as statistical reporting
units.
II. General Principles and Guidelines
for CCDs for the 2010 Census
A. General Principles and Guidelines
1. The primary goal of the CCD
program has been to establish and
maintain a set of subcounty units that
have stable boundaries and recognizable
names. The boundaries of CCDs usually
coincide with visible features or stable,
significant legal boundaries, such as the
boundary of an American Indian
reservation, federally-managed land, or
conjoint incorporated places, and have
no legal status; there are no officials
elected to serve traditional local
governmental functions.
2. A CCD usually represents a single
contiguous area consisting of one or
more communities, trading centers, or,
in some instances, major land uses that
are relatively compact in shape.
3. The area of a CCD has a
relationship to the existing census
tracts, usually consisting of one or more
contiguous census tracts or having two
or more CCDs nesting within a single
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
census tract. The boundaries of CCDs
generally align with census tract
boundaries. Note that a county with a
population less than the optimum
population for a census tract (less than
4,000 people) may contain more CCDs
than census tracts. For example,
McCone County, Montana, which has a
2005 estimated population of 1,805,
contains only one census tract, which
covers the full extent of the county, but
is divided into two CCDs.
4. Since the 1950s, the Census Bureau
has worked with state and local officials
to replace MCDs with CCDs for the
collection, presentation, and analysis of
census statistics, particularly in states in
which MCDs do not provide
governmental services and functions,
and in which MCD boundaries tend to
change between decennial censuses. To
date, 22 states have shifted to CCDs:
Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, California,
Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia,
Hawaii, Idaho, Kentucky, Montana,
Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma,
Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Texas, Utah, Washington, and
Wyoming.
B. Proposed Changes to the CCD
Program
The Census Bureau has noted that
data users are not requesting or using
data for CCDs to the extent they did in
the past, preferring instead to analyze
and aggregate data by census tract and
block group. Some data users may view
the introduction of CCDs in hierarchical
tabulations as hampering data
extraction. Therefore, if interest no
longer exists and data are not used, or
the geography introduces unnecessary
complexity in the hierarchy, the Census
Bureau will consider eliminating CCDs
for the 2010 Census.
Therefore, the Census Bureau is
interested in ascertaining whether data
users still find CCDs to be a useful
geographic entity for reporting and
analyzing statistical data, and if so,
specific examples of CCD usage. In
addition, and related to this request for
information, the Census Bureau
proposes the following options for
CCDs:
1. Eliminate the CCD concept; do not
replace with another type of subcounty
geographic unit. If this proposal is
adopted, the Census Bureau will not
replace the CCD concept with another
type of county subdivision entity (i.e.,
MCDs or some other type of legal,
administrative, or statistical area). As a
result, there would be no geographic
entity defined at the county subdivision
level of the census geographic hierarchy
for those areas where CCDs existed
previously.
E:\FR\FM\06APN2.SGM
06APN2
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices
2. Retain the CCD concept. The
Census Bureau will retain the CCD
concept if data user comments indicate
that CCDs continue to be useful
geographic units for reporting statistical
data, or if comments indicate that
creation of a gap in the census
geographic hierarchy is not favorable
(see option #1 above). If the CCD
concept is retained, the Census Bureau
will strongly encourage partners in the
program to maintain CCD boundaries as
defined for Census 2000, to the extent
possible, in order to preserve
comparability of data from one decade
to another.
The Census Bureau may consider
other proposals, for example, to
eliminate CCDs on a state-by-state basis.
C. CCD Criteria for the 2010 Census
The criteria proposed herein apply to
the United States, 3 including American
Indian reservations and off-reservation
trust lands, Puerto Rico, and the Island.
Areas. 4 The Census Bureau may modify
and, if necessary, reject any proposals
for census tracts that do not meet the
established criteria. In addition, the
Census Bureau reserves the right to
modify the boundaries and attributes of
CCDs as needed to maintain geographic
relationships before the final tabulation
geography is set for the 2010 Census.
Should CCDs be retained for the 2010
Census, the Census Bureau will require
that CCDs (1) have community
orientation, (2) have visible and/or
stable boundaries, (3) conform to census
tract boundaries, and (4) have
recognizable names.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES2
1. Community Orientation
Each CCD should focus on one or
more communities or places and
encompass in some fashion the
additional surrounding territory that is
served by these. The definition of
community should take into account
factors, such as production, marketing,
consumption, and the integrating factor
of local institutions.
The community in which a CCD is
centered usually is an incorporated
place or an unincorporated community,
which might be identified as a census
designated place. In some cases, the
CCD may center on a major area of
significantly different land use or
ownership, such as a large military base
or American Indian reservation. A CCD
should always comprise a reasonably
compact, continuous land area.
3 For Census Bureau purposes, the United States
includes the 50 states and the District of Columbia.
4 For Census Bureau purposes, the Island Areas
include the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa,
the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana
Islands, and Guam.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
20:32 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
2. Visible, Stable Boundaries
To make the location of CCD
boundaries less ambiguous, CCD
boundaries should follow, wherever
possible, visible and identifiable
features. The use of visible features
makes it easier to locate and identify
CCD boundaries over time, as the
locations of many visible features in the
landscape tend to change infrequently,
making data collection easier and more
reliable while reducing the possibility
for data allocation errors. The Census
Bureau also permits the use of state,
county, and census tract boundaries,
defined federally-recognized American
Indian reservations, and the boundaries
of federally, state, or locally managed
land.
The following features are acceptable:
a. County boundaries (always a CCD
boundary);
b. Census tract boundaries, which
usually follow visible, perennial,
natural, and cultural features, such as
roads, rivers, canals, railroads, or aboveground high-tension power lines;
c. Legally-defined, federallyrecognized American Indian reservation
boundaries;
d. The boundaries of federally, state,
or locally managed land, such as
National Parks, National Monuments,
National Forests, other types of large
parks or forests, airports, marine ports,
penitentiaries/prisons, military
installations, or other facilities; and
e. Conjoint city limits (in certain
situations).
f. When the above types of features
are not available for use as CCD
boundaries, the Census Bureau may, at
its discretion, approve other
nonstandard, visible features, such as
ridge lines, above-ground pipelines,
streams, or fence lines. The Census
Bureau may also accept, on a case-bycase basis, the boundaries of selected
nonstandard and potentially nonvisible
features, such as the boundaries of
cemeteries, golf courses, glaciers, or the
straight-line extensions of visible
features and other lines-of-sight.
3. Census Tract Boundaries, CCD
Population Size
Whenever possible, a CCD should
encompass one or more contiguous
census tracts. Therefore, CCD
boundaries should be consistent with
census tract boundaries. Population size
is not as an important consideration
with CCDs as it is with census tracts.
Historically, CCDs have ranged from a
few hundred people (in selected
situations) to more than one million.
However, data quality and availability
may be factors that local governments
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
17325
and planners should consider in
defining geographic areas. As a general
rule, estimates of demographic
characteristics of small areas from the
American Community Survey and the
Puerto Rico Community Survey will be
subject to higher variances than
comparable estimates for areas with
larger populations. In addition, the
Census Bureau’s disclosure rules may
have the effect of restricting the
availability and amount of data for areas
with small populations. Therefore,
CCDs that are new for the 2010 Census
must have a population of at least 1,200
people, the minimum for a census tract.
Adhering to this minimum threshold
will improve data reliability and
minimize the application of disclosure
avoidance methodologies (e.g., data
suppression or data swapping) to
tabulated data.
4. Name Identification
A CCD usually should be named after
the largest population center or place
within it (e.g., Taos, Chimayo, or Ohkay
Owingeh, NM). Sometimes a CCD name
may represent the two largest centers
(e.g., Mount Pleasant-Moroni, UT). In
some situations, a CCD may be named
after a prominent physical feature (e.g.,
Castle Rock, CO, and Mount Rainier,
WA) or a distinctive region within the
county (e.g., Death Valley, CA;
Everglades and Lower Keys, FL; and
Tellico Plains, TN). In other cases, a
CCD name may consist of the county
name and a compass direction to
indicate the portion of the county in the
CCD, or a place name and a compass
direction to give the CCD location
relative to the place. The directional
indicator usually precedes a county
name (e.g., Northeast Cobb, GA). If a
place name is used, the directional
indicator follows it (e.g., Del Rio
Northwest, TX). In all cases, the
objective is to clearly identify the extent
of the CCD by means of an area name
since CCD names always should be
meaningful to data users. Any name
used as a CCD name must also be
recognized by the Board on Geographic
Names for federal use and appear in the
Geographic Names Information System
maintained by the U.S. Geological
Survey. This includes any individual
names combined to make a hyphenated
CCD name.
III. Definitions of Key Terms
American Indian reservation—A
federally-recognized American Indian
land area with boundaries established
by final treaty, statute, executive order,
and/or court order, and over which a
federally-recognized American Indian
tribal government has governmental
E:\FR\FM\06APN2.SGM
06APN2
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES2
17326
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices
authority. Along with reservations,
designations such as colonies,
communities, pueblos, rancherias, and
reserves apply to American Indian
reservations.
Block Group—A statistical
subdivision of a census tract consisting
of all census blocks whose numbers
begin with the same digit in a census
tract.
Census block—A geographic area
bounded by visible and/or invisible
features in the Census Bureau’s
Topographically Integrated Geographic
Encoding and Referencing system, and
shown on maps prepared by the Census
Bureau. A block is the smallest
geographic entity for which the Census
Bureau tabulates decennial census data.
Census designated place—A statistical
geographic entity with a concentration
of population, housing, and commercial
structures that is identifiable by name,
but is not within an incorporated place.
Census tract—A small, relatively
permanent statistical geographic
division of a county defined for the
tabulation and publication of Census
Bureau data. The primary goal of the
census tract program is to provide a set
of nationally consistent small, statistical
geographic units, with stable
boundaries, that facilitate analysis of
data across time.
Conjoint—A description of a
boundary shared by two adjacent
geographic areas.
Contiguous—A description of
geographic areas that are adjacent to one
another, sharing either a common
boundary or point.
Federally managed land—Territory
that is federally owned and
administered by an agency of the U.S.
federal government, such as the
National Park Service, Bureau of Land
Management, or Department of Defense.
Incorporated place—A type of
governmental unit, incorporated under
state law as a city, town (except in New
England, New York, and Wisconsin),
borough (except in Alaska and New
York), or village, generally to provide
specific governmental services for a
concentration of people within legally
prescribed boundaries.
Minor civil division—The primary
governmental or administrative division
of a county in 28 states, Puerto Rico,
and the Island Areas having legal
boundaries, names, and descriptions.
MCDs represent many different types of
legal entities with a wide variety of
characteristics, powers, and functions
depending on the state and type of
MCD. In some states, some or all of the
incorporated places also constitute
MCDs.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
19:15 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
Nonvisible feature—A map feature
that is not visible on the ground, such
as a city or county boundary through
space, a property line running through
space, a short line-of-sight extension of
a road, or a point-to-point line of sight.
Visible feature—A map feature that
can be seen on the ground, such as a
road, railroad track, major above-ground
transmission line or pipeline, stream,
shoreline, fence, sharply defined
mountain ridge, or cliff. A nonstandard
visible feature is a feature that may not
be clearly defined on the ground (such
as a ridge), may be seasonal (such as an
intermittent stream), or may be
relatively impermanent (such as a
fence). The Census Bureau generally
requests verification that nonstandard
features pose no problem in their
location during fieldwork.
Executive Order 12866
This notice has been determined to be
not significant under Executive Order
12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This program notice does not
represent a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
Dated: April 3, 2007.
Charles Louis Kincannon,
Director, Bureau of the Census.
[FR Doc. E7–6464 Filed 4–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of the Census
[Docket Number 070104002–7003–01]
Census Designated Place (CDP)
Program for the 2010 Census—
Proposed Criteria
Bureau of the Census,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of proposed program and
request for comments.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Census designated places
(CDPs) 1 are statistical geographic
entities representing closely settled,
unincorporated communities that are
locally recognized and identified by
name. They are the statistical
equivalents of incorporated places, with
the primary differences being the lack of
both a legally defined boundary and an
active, functioning governmental
structure, chartered by the state and
administered by elected officials. CDPs
1 The term CDP includes communidades and
zonas urbanas in Puerto Rico.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4703
defined for the 2010 Census also will be
used to tabulate American Community
Survey, Puerto Rico Community Survey,
and Economic Census data after 2010,
and potentially data from other Bureau
of the Census (Census Bureau) censuses
and surveys.
The Census Bureau is publishing this
notice in the Federal Register to request
comments from the public and other
government agencies. The Census
Bureau will respond to the comments
received as part of the publication of
final criteria in the Federal Register.
After the final criteria are published in
the Federal Register, the Census Bureau
will offer designated governments or
organizations an opportunity to review
and, if necessary, suggest updates to the
boundaries and attributes of the CDPs in
their geographic area under the
Participant Statistical Areas Program
(PSAP). In addition to CDPs, the
program also encompasses the review
and update of census tracts, block
groups, and census county divisions.
Written comments must be
submitted on or before July 5, 2007.
DATES:
Please direct all written
comments on this proposed program to
the Director, U.S. Census Bureau, Room
8H001, mail stop 0100, Washington, DC
20233–0001.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information on
this proposed program should be
directed to Michael Ratcliffe, Chief,
Geographic Standards and Criteria
Branch, Geography Division, U.S.
Census Bureau, via e-mail at
geo.psap.list@census.gov or telephone at
301–763–3056.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. History
The CDP concept and delineation
criteria have evolved over the past five
decades in response to data user needs
for place-level data. This evolution has
taken into account differences in the
way in which places were perceived,
and the propensity for places to
incorporate in various states. The result,
over time, has been an increase in the
number and types of unincorporated
communities identified as CDPs, as well
as increasing consistency in the
relationship between the CDP concept
and the kinds of places encompassed by
the incorporated place category, or a
compromise between localized
perceptions of place and a concept that
would be familiar to data users
throughout the United States, Puerto
Rico, and the Island Areas.
E:\FR\FM\06APN2.SGM
06APN2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 66 (Friday, April 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17324-17326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6464]
[[Page 17323]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Part III
Department of Commerce
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bureau of the Census
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Census County Division (CCD) and Equivalent Entities, Census Designated
Place (CDP), Census Tract, and Census Block Group Programs for the 2010
Census--Proposed Changes and Proposed Criteria; Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 /
Notices
[[Page 17324]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of the Census
[Docket Number 070111009-7011-01]
Census County Division (CCD) and Equivalent Entities Program for
the 2010 Census--Proposed Change and Proposed Criteria
AGENCY: Bureau of the Census, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of proposed program revisions and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: CCDs and equivalent entities are statistical geographic
entities established cooperatively by the Bureau of the Census (Census
Bureau) and officials of state and local governments in 22 states \1\
where minor civil divisions (MCDs) either do not exist or are
unsatisfactory for reporting decennial census data. The primary goal of
the CCD program has been to establish and maintain a set of subcounty
\2\ units that have stable boundaries and recognizable names.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ In Alaska, census subareas are equivalents of CCDs. For the
purposes of this notice, the term ``CCD'' will also refer to census
subareas in Alaska.
\2\ For Census Bureau purposes, the term ``county'' includes
parishes in Louisiana; boroughs and census areas in Alaska;
independent cities in Maryland, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia;
districts in American Samoa and the U.S. Virgin Islands;
municipalities in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands;
municipios in Puerto Rico; and the areas constituting the District
of Columbia and Guam. This notice will refer to all of these
entities collectively as ``counties.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Census Bureau is publishing this notice in the Federal Register
to request comments from the public and other government agencies. The
Census Bureau will respond to the comments received as part of the
publication of final criteria in the Federal Register. After the final
criteria are published in the Federal Register, the Census Bureau will
offer designated governments or organizations an opportunity to review
and, if necessary, suggest updates to the boundaries and attributes of
the CCDs in their geographic area under the Participant Statistical
Areas Program (PSAP). In addition to CCDs, the program also encompasses
the review and update of census tracts, block groups, and census
designated places.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before July 5, 2007.
ADDRESSES: Please direct all written comments on this proposed program
to the Director, U.S. Census Bureau, Room 8H001, mail stop 0100,
Washington, DC 20233-0001.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information on
this proposed program should be directed to Michael Ratcliffe, Chief,
Geographic Standards and Criteria Branch, Geography Division, U.S.
Census Bureau, via e-mail at geo.psap.list@census.gov or telephone at
301-763-3056.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. History
When CCDs were introduced prior to the 1950 Census, few
alternatives were available for the provision of statistical data
related to relatively stable, subcounty geographic units. Census tracts
were defined in only a subset of metropolitan area counties; MCDs
existed in all counties, but in some states MCD boundaries changed
frequently enough that they were not useful for comparing statistical
data from one decade to another.
For much of the period from the 1950 Census through the 1980
Census, county subdivisions (MCDs and CCDs) provided the only subcounty
unit of geography at which data users could obtain statistical data for
complete coverage of counties nationwide. The introduction of block-
numbering areas (BNAs) in counties without census tracts for the 1990
Census offered an alternate subcounty entity for which data could be
tabulated. For Census 2000, the Census Bureau introduced census tracts
nationwide (in many counties BNAs were simply relabeled as ``census
tracts'') and the greater dissemination of, and ability to analyze,
data at the census tract-level made CCDs less necessary as statistical
reporting units.
II. General Principles and Guidelines for CCDs for the 2010 Census
A. General Principles and Guidelines
1. The primary goal of the CCD program has been to establish and
maintain a set of subcounty units that have stable boundaries and
recognizable names. The boundaries of CCDs usually coincide with
visible features or stable, significant legal boundaries, such as the
boundary of an American Indian reservation, federally-managed land, or
conjoint incorporated places, and have no legal status; there are no
officials elected to serve traditional local governmental functions.
2. A CCD usually represents a single contiguous area consisting of
one or more communities, trading centers, or, in some instances, major
land uses that are relatively compact in shape.
3. The area of a CCD has a relationship to the existing census
tracts, usually consisting of one or more contiguous census tracts or
having two or more CCDs nesting within a single census tract. The
boundaries of CCDs generally align with census tract boundaries. Note
that a county with a population less than the optimum population for a
census tract (less than 4,000 people) may contain more CCDs than census
tracts. For example, McCone County, Montana, which has a 2005 estimated
population of 1,805, contains only one census tract, which covers the
full extent of the county, but is divided into two CCDs.
4. Since the 1950s, the Census Bureau has worked with state and
local officials to replace MCDs with CCDs for the collection,
presentation, and analysis of census statistics, particularly in states
in which MCDs do not provide governmental services and functions, and
in which MCD boundaries tend to change between decennial censuses. To
date, 22 states have shifted to CCDs: Alabama, Alaska, Arizona,
California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho,
Kentucky, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, South
Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming.
B. Proposed Changes to the CCD Program
The Census Bureau has noted that data users are not requesting or
using data for CCDs to the extent they did in the past, preferring
instead to analyze and aggregate data by census tract and block group.
Some data users may view the introduction of CCDs in hierarchical
tabulations as hampering data extraction. Therefore, if interest no
longer exists and data are not used, or the geography introduces
unnecessary complexity in the hierarchy, the Census Bureau will
consider eliminating CCDs for the 2010 Census.
Therefore, the Census Bureau is interested in ascertaining whether
data users still find CCDs to be a useful geographic entity for
reporting and analyzing statistical data, and if so, specific examples
of CCD usage. In addition, and related to this request for information,
the Census Bureau proposes the following options for CCDs:
1. Eliminate the CCD concept; do not replace with another type of
subcounty geographic unit. If this proposal is adopted, the Census
Bureau will not replace the CCD concept with another type of county
subdivision entity (i.e., MCDs or some other type of legal,
administrative, or statistical area). As a result, there would be no
geographic entity defined at the county subdivision level of the census
geographic hierarchy for those areas where CCDs existed previously.
[[Page 17325]]
2. Retain the CCD concept. The Census Bureau will retain the CCD
concept if data user comments indicate that CCDs continue to be useful
geographic units for reporting statistical data, or if comments
indicate that creation of a gap in the census geographic hierarchy is
not favorable (see option 1 above). If the CCD concept is
retained, the Census Bureau will strongly encourage partners in the
program to maintain CCD boundaries as defined for Census 2000, to the
extent possible, in order to preserve comparability of data from one
decade to another.
The Census Bureau may consider other proposals, for example, to
eliminate CCDs on a state-by-state basis.
C. CCD Criteria for the 2010 Census
The criteria proposed herein apply to the United States, \3\
including American Indian reservations and off-reservation trust lands,
Puerto Rico, and the Island. Areas. \4\ The Census Bureau may modify
and, if necessary, reject any proposals for census tracts that do not
meet the established criteria. In addition, the Census Bureau reserves
the right to modify the boundaries and attributes of CCDs as needed to
maintain geographic relationships before the final tabulation geography
is set for the 2010 Census.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For Census Bureau purposes, the United States includes the
50 states and the District of Columbia.
\4\ For Census Bureau purposes, the Island Areas include the
U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of the
Northern Mariana Islands, and Guam.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Should CCDs be retained for the 2010 Census, the Census Bureau will
require that CCDs (1) have community orientation, (2) have visible and/
or stable boundaries, (3) conform to census tract boundaries, and (4)
have recognizable names.
1. Community Orientation
Each CCD should focus on one or more communities or places and
encompass in some fashion the additional surrounding territory that is
served by these. The definition of community should take into account
factors, such as production, marketing, consumption, and the
integrating factor of local institutions.
The community in which a CCD is centered usually is an incorporated
place or an unincorporated community, which might be identified as a
census designated place. In some cases, the CCD may center on a major
area of significantly different land use or ownership, such as a large
military base or American Indian reservation. A CCD should always
comprise a reasonably compact, continuous land area.
2. Visible, Stable Boundaries
To make the location of CCD boundaries less ambiguous, CCD
boundaries should follow, wherever possible, visible and identifiable
features. The use of visible features makes it easier to locate and
identify CCD boundaries over time, as the locations of many visible
features in the landscape tend to change infrequently, making data
collection easier and more reliable while reducing the possibility for
data allocation errors. The Census Bureau also permits the use of
state, county, and census tract boundaries, defined federally-
recognized American Indian reservations, and the boundaries of
federally, state, or locally managed land.
The following features are acceptable:
a. County boundaries (always a CCD boundary);
b. Census tract boundaries, which usually follow visible,
perennial, natural, and cultural features, such as roads, rivers,
canals, railroads, or above-ground high-tension power lines;
c. Legally-defined, federally-recognized American Indian
reservation boundaries;
d. The boundaries of federally, state, or locally managed land,
such as National Parks, National Monuments, National Forests, other
types of large parks or forests, airports, marine ports,
penitentiaries/prisons, military installations, or other facilities;
and
e. Conjoint city limits (in certain situations).
f. When the above types of features are not available for use as
CCD boundaries, the Census Bureau may, at its discretion, approve other
nonstandard, visible features, such as ridge lines, above-ground
pipelines, streams, or fence lines. The Census Bureau may also accept,
on a case-by-case basis, the boundaries of selected nonstandard and
potentially nonvisible features, such as the boundaries of cemeteries,
golf courses, glaciers, or the straight-line extensions of visible
features and other lines-of-sight.
3. Census Tract Boundaries, CCD Population Size
Whenever possible, a CCD should encompass one or more contiguous
census tracts. Therefore, CCD boundaries should be consistent with
census tract boundaries. Population size is not as an important
consideration with CCDs as it is with census tracts. Historically, CCDs
have ranged from a few hundred people (in selected situations) to more
than one million. However, data quality and availability may be factors
that local governments and planners should consider in defining
geographic areas. As a general rule, estimates of demographic
characteristics of small areas from the American Community Survey and
the Puerto Rico Community Survey will be subject to higher variances
than comparable estimates for areas with larger populations. In
addition, the Census Bureau's disclosure rules may have the effect of
restricting the availability and amount of data for areas with small
populations. Therefore, CCDs that are new for the 2010 Census must have
a population of at least 1,200 people, the minimum for a census tract.
Adhering to this minimum threshold will improve data reliability and
minimize the application of disclosure avoidance methodologies (e.g.,
data suppression or data swapping) to tabulated data.
4. Name Identification
A CCD usually should be named after the largest population center
or place within it (e.g., Taos, Chimayo, or Ohkay Owingeh, NM).
Sometimes a CCD name may represent the two largest centers (e.g., Mount
Pleasant-Moroni, UT). In some situations, a CCD may be named after a
prominent physical feature (e.g., Castle Rock, CO, and Mount Rainier,
WA) or a distinctive region within the county (e.g., Death Valley, CA;
Everglades and Lower Keys, FL; and Tellico Plains, TN). In other cases,
a CCD name may consist of the county name and a compass direction to
indicate the portion of the county in the CCD, or a place name and a
compass direction to give the CCD location relative to the place. The
directional indicator usually precedes a county name (e.g., Northeast
Cobb, GA). If a place name is used, the directional indicator follows
it (e.g., Del Rio Northwest, TX). In all cases, the objective is to
clearly identify the extent of the CCD by means of an area name since
CCD names always should be meaningful to data users. Any name used as a
CCD name must also be recognized by the Board on Geographic Names for
federal use and appear in the Geographic Names Information System
maintained by the U.S. Geological Survey. This includes any individual
names combined to make a hyphenated CCD name.
III. Definitions of Key Terms
American Indian reservation--A federally-recognized American Indian
land area with boundaries established by final treaty, statute,
executive order, and/or court order, and over which a federally-
recognized American Indian tribal government has governmental
[[Page 17326]]
authority. Along with reservations, designations such as colonies,
communities, pueblos, rancherias, and reserves apply to American Indian
reservations.
Block Group--A statistical subdivision of a census tract consisting
of all census blocks whose numbers begin with the same digit in a
census tract.
Census block--A geographic area bounded by visible and/or invisible
features in the Census Bureau's Topographically Integrated Geographic
Encoding and Referencing system, and shown on maps prepared by the
Census Bureau. A block is the smallest geographic entity for which the
Census Bureau tabulates decennial census data.
Census designated place--A statistical geographic entity with a
concentration of population, housing, and commercial structures that is
identifiable by name, but is not within an incorporated place.
Census tract--A small, relatively permanent statistical geographic
division of a county defined for the tabulation and publication of
Census Bureau data. The primary goal of the census tract program is to
provide a set of nationally consistent small, statistical geographic
units, with stable boundaries, that facilitate analysis of data across
time.
Conjoint--A description of a boundary shared by two adjacent
geographic areas.
Contiguous--A description of geographic areas that are adjacent to
one another, sharing either a common boundary or point.
Federally managed land--Territory that is federally owned and
administered by an agency of the U.S. federal government, such as the
National Park Service, Bureau of Land Management, or Department of
Defense.
Incorporated place--A type of governmental unit, incorporated under
state law as a city, town (except in New England, New York, and
Wisconsin), borough (except in Alaska and New York), or village,
generally to provide specific governmental services for a concentration
of people within legally prescribed boundaries.
Minor civil division--The primary governmental or administrative
division of a county in 28 states, Puerto Rico, and the Island Areas
having legal boundaries, names, and descriptions. MCDs represent many
different types of legal entities with a wide variety of
characteristics, powers, and functions depending on the state and type
of MCD. In some states, some or all of the incorporated places also
constitute MCDs.
Nonvisible feature--A map feature that is not visible on the
ground, such as a city or county boundary through space, a property
line running through space, a short line-of-sight extension of a road,
or a point-to-point line of sight.
Visible feature--A map feature that can be seen on the ground, such
as a road, railroad track, major above-ground transmission line or
pipeline, stream, shoreline, fence, sharply defined mountain ridge, or
cliff. A nonstandard visible feature is a feature that may not be
clearly defined on the ground (such as a ridge), may be seasonal (such
as an intermittent stream), or may be relatively impermanent (such as a
fence). The Census Bureau generally requests verification that
nonstandard features pose no problem in their location during
fieldwork.
Executive Order 12866
This notice has been determined to be not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This program notice does not represent a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35.
Dated: April 3, 2007.
Charles Louis Kincannon,
Director, Bureau of the Census.
[FR Doc. E7-6464 Filed 4-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P