Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments, 17156-17157 [E7-6456]
Download as PDF
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
17156
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices
construction of the Jordan Dam
Hydroelectric Project. This will be the
first and second 2-year extensions of
three authorized by Public Law 109–
297. The requested new deadlines
would be October 24, 2008, and October
24, 2010, to commence and complete
construction, respectively.
l. Locations of the Application: A
copy of the application is available for
inspection and reproduction at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room,
located at 888 First Street, NE., Room
2A, Washington, DC 20426, or by calling
(202) 502–8371. This filing may also be
viewed on the Commission’s Web site at
https://www.ferc.gov using the
‘‘eLibrary’’ link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in
the docket number field to access the
document. You may also register online
at https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects.
For assistance, call toll-free 1–866–208–
3676 or e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov. For TTY,
call (202) 502–8659. A copy is also
available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item h.
above.
m. Individuals desiring to be included
on the Commission’s mailing list should
so indicate by writing to the Secretary
of the Commission.
n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to
Intervene—Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to
intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211, .214.
In determining the appropriate action to
take, the Commission will consider all
protests or other comments filed, but
only those who file a motion to
intervene in accordance with the
Commission’s Rules may become a
party to the proceeding. Any comments,
protests, or motions to intervene must
be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular
application.
o. Any filings must bear in all capital
letters the title ‘‘COMMENTS’’,
‘‘PROTEST’’, or ‘‘MOTION TO
INTERVENE’’, as applicable, and the
Project Number of the particular
application to which the filing refers.
p. Agency Comments—Federal, state,
and local agencies are invited to file
comments on the described application.
A copy of the application may be
obtained by agencies directly from the
Applicant. If an agency does not file
comments within the time specified for
filing comments, it will be presumed to
have no comments. One copy of an
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:39 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
agency’s comments must also be sent to
the Applicant’s representatives.
q. Comments, protests, and
interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the
instructions on the Commission’s Web
site at https://www.ferc.gov under the ‘‘eFiling’’ link.
Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–6441 Filed 4–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP07–52–000]
Downeast LNG, Inc.; Notice of
Technical Conference
April 2, 2007.
On Wednesday, April 25, 2007, at 9
a.m. (EDT), staff of the Office of Energy
Projects will convene a cryogenic design
and technical conference regarding the
proposed Downeast LNG import
terminal. The cryogenic conference will
be held at the Calais Motor Inn at 663
Main Street, Calais, Maine 04619. For
Calais Motor Inn details call 1–800–
439–5531.
The conference will review the design
of the LNG storage tanks and facility,
instrumentation and controls, hazard
detection and controls, spill
containment, geotechnical topics, and
other issues related to the operation of
the proposed facility. Issues related to
environmental impacts and LNG vessel
transit are outside the scope of the
conference.
In view of the nature of critical energy
infrastructure information and security
issues to be explored, the cryogenic
conference will not be open to the
public. Attendance at this conference
will be limited to existing parties to the
proceeding (anyone who has
specifically requested to intervene as a
party) and to representatives of
interested federal, state, and local
agencies. Any person planning to attend
the April 25th cryogenic conference
must register by close of business on
Thursday, April 19, 2007. Registrations
may be submitted either online at
https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/
registration/cryo-conf-form.asp or by
faxing a copy of the form (found at the
referenced online link) to 202–208–
0353. All attendees must sign a nondisclosure statement prior to entering
the conference. For additional
information regarding the cryogenic
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7–6437 Filed 4–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6685–7]
Environmental Impact Statements and
Regulations; Availability of EPA
Comments
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
PO 00000
conference, please contact Tejal Patel at
202–502–6037.
Availability of EPA comments
prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section
309 of the Clean Air Act and Section
102(2)(c) of the National Environmental
Policy Act as amended. Requests for
copies of EPA comments can be directed
to the Office of Federal Activities at
202–564–7167.
Summary of Rating Definitions
Environmental Impact of the Action
LO—Lack of Objections
The EPA review has not identified
any potential environmental impacts
requiring substantive changes to the
proposal. The review may have
disclosed opportunities for application
of mitigation measures that could be
accomplished with no more than minor
changes to the proposal.
EC—Environmental Concerns
The EPA review has identified
environmental impacts that should be
avoided in order to fully protect the
environment. Corrective measures may
require changes to the preferred
alternative or application of mitigation
measures that can reduce the
environmental impact. EPA would like
to work with the lead agency to reduce
these impacts.
EO—Environmental Objections
The EPA review has identified
significant environmental impacts that
must be avoided in order to provide
adequate protection for the
environment. Corrective measures may
require substantial changes to the
preferred alternative or consideration of
some other project alternative
(including the no action alternative or a
new alternative). EPA intends to work
with the lead agency to reduce these
impacts.
EU—Environmentally Unsatisfactory
The EPA review has identified
adverse environmental impacts that are
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices
of sufficient magnitude that they are
unsatisfactory from the standpoint of
public health or welfare or
environmental quality. EPA intends to
work with the lead agency to reduce
these impacts. If the potentially
unsatisfactory impacts are not corrected
at the final EIS stage, this proposal will
be recommended for referral to the CEQ.
Adequacy of the Impact Statement
Category 1—Adequate
EPA believes the draft EIS adequately
sets forth the environmental impact(s) of
the preferred alternative and those of
the alternatives reasonably available to
the project or action. No further analysis
or data collection is necessary, but the
reviewer may suggest the addition of
clarifying language or information.
Category 2—Insufficient Information
The draft EIS does not contain
sufficient information for EPA to fully
assess environmental impacts that
should be avoided in order to fully
protect the environment, or the EPA
reviewer has identified new reasonably
available alternatives that are within the
spectrum of alternatives analyzed in the
draft EIS, which could reduce the
environmental impacts of the action.
The identified additional information,
data, analyses, or discussion should be
included in the final EIS.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Category 3—Inadequate
EPA does not believe that the draft
EIS adequately assesses potentially
significant environmental impacts of the
action, or the EPA reviewer has
identified new, reasonably available
alternatives that are outside of the
spectrum of alternatives analyzed in the
draft EIS, which should be analyzed in
order to reduce the potentially
significant environmental impacts. EPA
believes that the identified additional
information, data, analyses, or
discussions are of such a magnitude that
they should have full public review at
a draft stage. EPA does not believe that
the draft EIS is adequate for the
purposes of the NEPA and/or Section
309 review, and thus should be formally
revised and made available for public
comment in a supplemental or revised
draft EIS. On the basis of the potential
significant impacts involved, this
proposal could be a candidate for
referral to the CEQ.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20060488, ERP No. F–BLM–
J02049–WY, Atlantic Rim Natural Gas
Field Development Project, Proposed
Natural Gas Development to 2000 Wells,
1800 to Coal Beds and 200 to Other
Formations, Carbon County, WY.
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:39 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
Summary: EPA continues to have
environmental concerns about adverse
impacts to water quality, wildlife
habitat and native vegetation, and
suggests that the ROD include
additional BMPs that avoid or reduce
impacts to these resources.
EIS No. 20070023, ERP No. F–AFS–
L65521–WA, Buckhorn Access Project,
To Utilize the Marias Creek Route to
Construct and Reconstruct Roads,
Funding, NPDES Permit and U.S. Army
COE Section 404 Permit, Okanogan and
Wenatchee National Forests, Tonasket
Ranger District, Okanogan County, WA.
Summary: The Final EIS addressed
EPA’s comments on the NPDES permit
and surface water quality; however, EPA
continues to have environmental
concerns about impacts to wetlands.
EPA requests that the ROD include
detailed information on the performance
bond and implementation of the
monitoring plan based on the most
recent modeling and analysis of water
resources. Additionally, the ROD should
outline how the monitoring activities of
3 agencies will be coordinated.
EIS No. 20070062, ERP No. F–NPS–
H65025–NE, Niobrara National Scenic
River General Management Plan,
Implementation, Brown, Cherry, Keya
Paha and Rock Counties, NE.
Summary: EPA does not object to the
proposed action.
EIS No. 20070066, ERP No. F–BLM–
K65294–AZ, Arizona Strip Field Office
Resource Management Plan, which
includes: Vermilion Cliffs National
Monument, Grand-Canyon-Parashant
National Monument (Parashant) BLM
Portion, General Management Plan for
the Grand Canyon-Parashant National
Monument NPS Portion of Parashant,
Implementation, AZ.
Summary: No formal comment letter
was sent to the preparing agency.
Dated: April 3, 2007.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office
of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E7–6456 Filed 4–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[ER–FRL–6685–6]
Environmental Impact Statements;
Notice of Availability
Responsible Agency: Office of Federal
Activities, General Information (202)
564–7167 or https://www.epa.gov/
compliance/nepa/.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact
Statements
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17157
Filed 03/26/2007 Through 03/30/2007
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.
EIS No. 20070126, Final Supplement,
AFS, CA, Watdog Project, Preferred
Alternative is B, Feather River Ranger
District, Plumas National Forest, Butte
and Plumas Counties, CA, Wait Period
Ends: 05/07/2007, Contact: John
Zarlengo 530–534–6500.
EIS No. 20070127, Final EIS, NPS, 00,
Ellis Island and Statue of Liberty
National Monument Development
Concept Plan, Long-Term
Rehabilitation and Reuse for Historic
Buildings, Implementation, New York
Harbor, NY and NJ, Wait Period Ends:
05/07/2007, Contact: Cynthia Garrett
212–363–3206 Ext 100.
EIS No. 20070128, Final EIS, AFS, ID,
Myrtle Creek Healthy Forest
Restoration Act Project, Proposes
Aquatic and Vegetation Improvement
Treatments, Panhandle National
Forests, Bonners Ferry Ranger
District, City of Bonners Ferry,
Boundary County, ID, Wait Period
Ends: 05/07/2007, Contact: Doug
Nishek 208–267–5561.
EIS No. 20070129, Draft Supplement,
NOA, 00, Atlantic Mackerel, Squid
and Butterfish, Fishery Management
Plan, Amendment #9,
Implementation, Essential Fish
Habitat (EFH), Exclusive Economic
Zone (EEZ), Comment Period Ends:
05/21/2007, Contact: Patricia A.
Kurkul 978–281–9250.
EIS No. 20070130, Draft EIS, NOA, 00,
Phase I—Essential Fish Habitat
Omnibus Amendment #2,
Designations for 27 Species,
Amendment #14 to the Northeast
Multispecies FMP, Amendment #14
to the Atlantic Scallop FMP,
Amendment #3 to the Atlantic
Herring FMP, Amendment 4 to the
Monkfish FMP, Amendment 1 to the
Deep-Sea Red Crab FMP, Amendment
2 to the Skates FMP and Amendment
3 to the Atlantic Salmon FMP, Maine
to North Carolina, Comment Period
Ends: 05/21/2007, Contact: Peter
Colosi 978–281–9332.
EIS No. 20070131, Draft EIS, IBR, NM,
Navajo-Gallup Water Supply Project,
To Provide a Long-Term (Year 2040)
Water Supply, Treatment and
Transmission of Municipal and
Industrial (M&I) Water to Navajo
National and Jicarilla Apache Nation,
City of Gallup, New Mexico,
Comment Period Ends: 06/28/2007,
Contact: Rege Leach 970–385–6553.
EIS No. 20070132, Draft EIS, AFS, 00,
Yellowstone and Grand Teton
National Parks and the John D.
Rockefeller, Jr. Memorial Parkway,
Winter Use Plan, To Provide a
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 66 (Friday, April 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17156-17157]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6456]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[ER-FRL-6685-7]
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of
EPA Comments
Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and
Section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended.
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of
Federal Activities at 202-564-7167.
Summary of Rating Definitions
Environmental Impact of the Action
LO--Lack of Objections
The EPA review has not identified any potential environmental
impacts requiring substantive changes to the proposal. The review may
have disclosed opportunities for application of mitigation measures
that could be accomplished with no more than minor changes to the
proposal.
EC--Environmental Concerns
The EPA review has identified environmental impacts that should be
avoided in order to fully protect the environment. Corrective measures
may require changes to the preferred alternative or application of
mitigation measures that can reduce the environmental impact. EPA would
like to work with the lead agency to reduce these impacts.
EO--Environmental Objections
The EPA review has identified significant environmental impacts
that must be avoided in order to provide adequate protection for the
environment. Corrective measures may require substantial changes to the
preferred alternative or consideration of some other project
alternative (including the no action alternative or a new alternative).
EPA intends to work with the lead agency to reduce these impacts.
EU--Environmentally Unsatisfactory
The EPA review has identified adverse environmental impacts that
are
[[Page 17157]]
of sufficient magnitude that they are unsatisfactory from the
standpoint of public health or welfare or environmental quality. EPA
intends to work with the lead agency to reduce these impacts. If the
potentially unsatisfactory impacts are not corrected at the final EIS
stage, this proposal will be recommended for referral to the CEQ.
Adequacy of the Impact Statement
Category 1--Adequate
EPA believes the draft EIS adequately sets forth the environmental
impact(s) of the preferred alternative and those of the alternatives
reasonably available to the project or action. No further analysis or
data collection is necessary, but the reviewer may suggest the addition
of clarifying language or information.
Category 2--Insufficient Information
The draft EIS does not contain sufficient information for EPA to
fully assess environmental impacts that should be avoided in order to
fully protect the environment, or the EPA reviewer has identified new
reasonably available alternatives that are within the spectrum of
alternatives analyzed in the draft EIS, which could reduce the
environmental impacts of the action. The identified additional
information, data, analyses, or discussion should be included in the
final EIS.
Category 3--Inadequate
EPA does not believe that the draft EIS adequately assesses
potentially significant environmental impacts of the action, or the EPA
reviewer has identified new, reasonably available alternatives that are
outside of the spectrum of alternatives analyzed in the draft EIS,
which should be analyzed in order to reduce the potentially significant
environmental impacts. EPA believes that the identified additional
information, data, analyses, or discussions are of such a magnitude
that they should have full public review at a draft stage. EPA does not
believe that the draft EIS is adequate for the purposes of the NEPA
and/or Section 309 review, and thus should be formally revised and made
available for public comment in a supplemental or revised draft EIS. On
the basis of the potential significant impacts involved, this proposal
could be a candidate for referral to the CEQ.
Final EISs
EIS No. 20060488, ERP No. F-BLM-J02049-WY, Atlantic Rim Natural Gas
Field Development Project, Proposed Natural Gas Development to 2000
Wells, 1800 to Coal Beds and 200 to Other Formations, Carbon County,
WY.
Summary: EPA continues to have environmental concerns about adverse
impacts to water quality, wildlife habitat and native vegetation, and
suggests that the ROD include additional BMPs that avoid or reduce
impacts to these resources.
EIS No. 20070023, ERP No. F-AFS-L65521-WA, Buckhorn Access Project,
To Utilize the Marias Creek Route to Construct and Reconstruct Roads,
Funding, NPDES Permit and U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permit, Okanogan
and Wenatchee National Forests, Tonasket Ranger District, Okanogan
County, WA.
Summary: The Final EIS addressed EPA's comments on the NPDES permit
and surface water quality; however, EPA continues to have environmental
concerns about impacts to wetlands. EPA requests that the ROD include
detailed information on the performance bond and implementation of the
monitoring plan based on the most recent modeling and analysis of water
resources. Additionally, the ROD should outline how the monitoring
activities of 3 agencies will be coordinated.
EIS No. 20070062, ERP No. F-NPS-H65025-NE, Niobrara National Scenic
River General Management Plan, Implementation, Brown, Cherry, Keya Paha
and Rock Counties, NE.
Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action.
EIS No. 20070066, ERP No. F-BLM-K65294-AZ, Arizona Strip Field
Office Resource Management Plan, which includes: Vermilion Cliffs
National Monument, Grand-Canyon-Parashant National Monument (Parashant)
BLM Portion, General Management Plan for the Grand Canyon-Parashant
National Monument NPS Portion of Parashant, Implementation, AZ.
Summary: No formal comment letter was sent to the preparing agency.
Dated: April 3, 2007.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. E7-6456 Filed 4-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P