Draft Environmental Impact Statement/General Management Plan, Pinnacles National Monument, San Benito and Monterey Counties, CA; Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement, 17181-17182 [E7-6447]
Download as PDF
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices
documentation for this general
management plan update.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This new
general management plan (GMP) will
update the overall direction for the
national monument, setting broad
management goals for managing the area
over the next 15 to 20 years. As noted
above, the GMP was originally scoped
as an EIS. However, few public
comments were received in the scoping
process. No issues with the potential for
controversial impacts were identified
for the general management plan. The
current GMP was approved in 1979.
In the general management planning
process the NPS planning team
developed four preliminary alternatives
for the national monument, none of
which would result in substantial
changes in the operation and
management of the area. The three
‘‘action’’ alternatives primarily focus on
maintaining and protecting
paleontological and other resources, and
expanding interpretation and visitor
opportunities where appropriate. The
alternatives vary in their treatment of
the Cant Ranch cultural landscape, the
management of the Hancock mammal
quarry, and the development of new
trails. Preliminary analysis of the
alternatives has revealed no major (nor
significant) potential effects on the
quality of the human environment, nor
any potential for impairment of park
resources and values. Most of the
impacts from the alternatives are
expected to be negligible to minor in
magnitude, with the remainder being of
a minor to moderate level.
For these reasons the NPS determined
that the requisite conservation planning
and environmental impact analysis
necessary for updating the general
management plan can appropriately be
completed through preparation of an
Environmental Assessment (EA). For
further information about this
determination or other aspects of the
GMP process, please contact: James
Hammett, Superintendent, John Day
Fossil Beds National Monument, 32651
Highway 19, Kimberly, OR 97848
(telephone: (514) 987–2333; e-mail:
JODA_Superintendent@nps.gov).
Decsion Process: The draft general
management plan/EA is expected to be
distributed for public comment in the
fall/winter of 2007. The NPS will notify
the public about release of the draft
general management plan/EA by mail,
local and regional media, Web site
postings, and other means; all
announcements will include
information on where and how to obtain
a copy of the EA, how to comment on
the EA, and the length of the public
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:39 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
comment period. Following due
consideration of public comments and
agency consults, at this time a decision
is expected be made in the winter of
2008. The official responsible for the
final decision on the GMP is the
Regional Director; subsequently the
responsible official for implementing
the approved GMP is the
Superintendent, John Day Fossil Beds
National Monument.
Dated: January 26, 2007.
Jonathan B. Jarvis,
Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. E7–6451 Filed 4–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–3J–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Draft Environmental Impact Statement/
General Management Plan, Pinnacles
National Monument, San Benito and
Monterey Counties, CA; Notice of
Intent To Prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement
SUMMARY: In accord with section 102(C)
of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.), the
National Park Service (NPS) has
undertaken a conservation planning and
environmental impact analysis process
for updating the General Management
Plan (GMP) for Pinnacles National
Monument. An Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) will be prepared
concurrently with the GMP. The GMP
will address desired conditions for the
Monument, uses or treatment needs for
resource protection, visitor use and
other management goals thus serving as
a ‘‘blueprint’’ to guide management of
natural and cultural resources and
visitor use during the next 15–20 years.
This notice supersedes the previous
notice published in the Federal Register
on November 19, 1998 (Vol. 63, No.
223).
Background: Pinnacles National
Monument preserves an ecologicallyrich, geologically-spectacular, and
culturally-significant landscape in the
Central Coast region of California.
Established in 1908 and named for
dramatic rock formations that are the
remains of an ancient volcano, the
Monument preserves a landscape
shaped by earthquake, fire, and flood.
The Monument is rich in plant and
animal life that inhabit the park’s
chaparral, oak woodland, talus cave,
riparian, and rock-and-scree habitats. In
2003, Pinnacles became the home once
again to the California condor, one of
the nation’s most endangered species,
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17181
elevating the Monument’s profile
substantially throughout the region.
Pinnacles preserves a rich human
history with archeological sites reaching
back at least 2,000 years, revealing use
by indigenous people. Sites from the
1800s reflect the homesteading history
of the area. In the 1930s, the Civilian
Conservation Corps played the central
role in the development of the
Monument that visitors enjoy today,
evidenced by roads, a visitor center,
numerous park structures, and an
outstanding trail system that stands as
an important cultural resource in itself.
Located 100 miles south of the greater
San Francisco Bay Area, Pinnacles is on
the edge of one of the state’s most
populated and fastest-growing areas.
Since 1976, Pinnacles has grown from
16,271 acres to 24,436 acres. In 1976,
15,985 acres were designated by
Congress as Wilderness (and several
tracts of land since transferred from the
BLM bring the Wilderness total acreage
to 16,048). Also, acquisition of the
2,000-acre Pinnacles Ranch during the
spring of 2006 has added substantial
new resources, infrastructure,
recreational opportunities, and
management challenges.
A new GMP reflecting contemporary
issues and challenges facing Pinnacles
in the future is essential. The plan will
provide direction for park management
through the establishment of
management zones, user capacities and
appropriate types and levels of
development and recreational use for all
areas of the park. Resource protection,
visitor experiences, community
relationships, and relationships with
neighboring land management agencies
will be improved through completion
and implementation of the GMP.
Scoping Process: The purpose of the
scoping outreach efforts is to elicit
public comment regarding issues and
concerns, the nature and extent of
potential environmental impacts (and
appropriate mitigation measures) that
should be addressed in the plan. Major
issues anticipated to be addressed in the
EIS include:
• What are the desired conditions for
native/endemic ecosystems?
• What are the desired conditions for
Wilderness areas?
• What are the desired conditions for
cultural resources and cultural
landscapes?
• What areas and structures are
appropriate for museum collections
storage, preservation and accessibility
for research?
• What is the desired visitor
experience throughout the Monument
(east side, west side, high peaks, Bear
Gulch, Chalone, Chaparral, Pinnacles
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
17182
Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 66 / Friday, April 6, 2007 / Notices
Ranch, campground, backcountry,
Wilderness)?
• What are appropriate visitor use
levels for different parts of the
Monument?
• What transportation options should
be considered for providing access to
and within the Monument? What types
of trail (or other) access are appropriate,
and where?
• What is the appropriate level of
development in different parts of the
Monument, and what areas are
appropriate for park administration and
operations activities?
• How should the NPS work with
nearby communities to encourage
community understanding of the
Monument and to address potential
effects of development and population
growth in neighboring communities on
ecological, scenic, and Wilderness
values of the Monument?
• Are there any recommendations for
changes in the authorizing legislation
for Pinnacles National Monument that
should be considered in the GMP?
Comments: Through the outreach
activities planned in this final scoping
effort, the NPS welcomes additional
information and suggestions from the
public regarding resource protection,
visitor use, and land management. This
notice formally resumes the public
scoping comment phase for the EIS
process for the GMP. All interested
persons, organizations, agencies, and
American Indian tribes wishing to
express new concerns or provide
information about management issues
which should be addressed in the GMP
and environmental impact analysis
process are encouraged to contact the
Superintendent (previous responses are
contained in the administrative record
and do not need to be resubmitted). All
comments received will become part of
the public record. Before including your
address, phone number, e-mail address,
or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask us in your comment to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
At this time, public scoping meetings
are anticipated to be held during the
spring of 2007; details will be
announced widely in local and regional
news media, via direct park mailings
and through the GMP Web site: (https://
parkplanning.nps.gov/pinn). All
attendees will be given the opportunity
to ask questions and provide comments
VerDate Aug<31>2005
18:39 Apr 05, 2007
Jkt 211001
to the planning team. The Web site will
provide the most up-to-date information
regarding the project, including project
description, planning process updates,
meeting notices, reports and documents,
and useful links associated with the
project.
All written comments regarding the
preparation of the EIS/GMP must be
postmarked or transmitted not later than
May 31, 2007 and should be submitted
directly to General Management Plan
Team, Pinnacles National Monument,
5000 Hwy 146, Paicines, CA 95043 (or
electronically through the Web site
noted above).
Decision Process: At this time, the
draft EIS/GMP is expected to be released
for public review during the fall of 2008;
following due consideration of all
comments as may be submitted, the
final document is anticipated to be
completed in the summer of 2009.
Formal announcement of the
availability of both documents will be
published in the Federal Register,
publicized via local and regional media
and the internet, and via direct mailing
to the project mailing list.
Responsibility for approving the Final
EIS/GMP is delegated to the NPS, and
the official responsible for the final
decision is the Regional Director, Pacific
West Region; subsequently the official
responsible for implementing the
approved GMP is the Superintendent,
Pinnacles National Monument.
Dated: January 26, 2007.
Jonathan B. Jarvis,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. E7–6447 Filed 4–5–07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312–EP–P
20005; or by fax, 202–371–6447. Written
or faxed comments should be submitted
by April 23, 2007.
J. Paul Loether,
Chief, National Register of Historic Places/
National Historic Landmarks Program.
COLORADO
Conejos County
Denver & Rio Grande Railroad San Juan
Extension (Boundary Increase), Railway
corridor from Antonito, CO to Chama, NM
via Cubres Pass, Antonito, 07000374
GEORGIA
Carroll County
Carrollton Downtown Historic District,
Roughly around downtown sq. and is
bounded by Johnson Ave., White St., Mill
St. and Barnes St., Carrollton, 07000378
Lowndes County
Southside Historic District, Roughly bounded
by CSX trks, Bunche Dr., Griffin Ave., Old
Statenville Rd., Wisenbake Ln., Dasher Ln.,
and S. Patterson Rd., Valdosta, 07000379
Thomas County
Boston Historic District, Roughly bounded by
U.S. 84, Roundtree and S. Oak St.,
Washington St. and W. Jefferson and W.
Railroad Sts., Boston, 07000375
MARYLAND
Wicomico County
Union Station, WI–150, 611 Railroad Ave.,
Salisbury, 07000389
MICHIGAN
Berrien County
Robbins, Wendell P. and Harriet Rounds,
House, 680 Pipestone St., Benton Harbor,
07000385
Kalamazoo County
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Fanckboner—Nichols Farmstead, 5992 West
VW Ave., Prairie Ronde Township,
07000387
Lenawee County
National Register of Historic Places;
Notification of Pending Nominations
and Related Actions
Nominations for the following
properties being considered for listing
or related actions in the National
Register were received by the National
Park Service before March 24, 2007.
Pursuant to § 60.13 of 36 CFR Part 60
written comments concerning the
significance of these properties under
the National Register criteria for
evaluation may be forwarded by United
States Postal Service, to the National
Register of Historic Places, National
Park Service, 1849 C St., NW., 2280,
Washington, DC 20240; by all other
carriers, National Register of Historic
Places, National Park Service, 1201 Eye
St., NW., 8th floor, Washington, DC
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Davenport Hotel, 1280 US–12, Franklin
Township, 07000383
Irish Hills Towers, 8433 W US–12,
Cambridge Township, 07000380
Saint Joseph Church and Shrine, 8742 US–
12, Cambridge Township, 07000382
Walker’s, S., Hotel, 11705 US–12, Cambridge
Township, 07000381
Marquette County
Cleveland Mine Engine House Number 3, 601
Division St., Ishpeming, 07000386
MISSOURI
Cass County
Watkins Family Farm Historic District, 19116
S. School Rd., Raymore, 07000376
St. Louis Independent City
Wellston Station, 6111 Dr. Martin Luther
King Dr., St. Louis (Independent City),
07000377
E:\FR\FM\06APN1.SGM
06APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 66 (Friday, April 6, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17181-17182]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-6447]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
Draft Environmental Impact Statement/General Management Plan,
Pinnacles National Monument, San Benito and Monterey Counties, CA;
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement
SUMMARY: In accord with section 102(C) of the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.), the National Park Service
(NPS) has undertaken a conservation planning and environmental impact
analysis process for updating the General Management Plan (GMP) for
Pinnacles National Monument. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
will be prepared concurrently with the GMP. The GMP will address
desired conditions for the Monument, uses or treatment needs for
resource protection, visitor use and other management goals thus
serving as a ``blueprint'' to guide management of natural and cultural
resources and visitor use during the next 15-20 years. This notice
supersedes the previous notice published in the Federal Register on
November 19, 1998 (Vol. 63, No. 223).
Background: Pinnacles National Monument preserves an ecologically-
rich, geologically-spectacular, and culturally-significant landscape in
the Central Coast region of California. Established in 1908 and named
for dramatic rock formations that are the remains of an ancient
volcano, the Monument preserves a landscape shaped by earthquake, fire,
and flood. The Monument is rich in plant and animal life that inhabit
the park's chaparral, oak woodland, talus cave, riparian, and rock-and-
scree habitats. In 2003, Pinnacles became the home once again to the
California condor, one of the nation's most endangered species,
elevating the Monument's profile substantially throughout the region.
Pinnacles preserves a rich human history with archeological sites
reaching back at least 2,000 years, revealing use by indigenous people.
Sites from the 1800s reflect the homesteading history of the area. In
the 1930s, the Civilian Conservation Corps played the central role in
the development of the Monument that visitors enjoy today, evidenced by
roads, a visitor center, numerous park structures, and an outstanding
trail system that stands as an important cultural resource in itself.
Located 100 miles south of the greater San Francisco Bay Area,
Pinnacles is on the edge of one of the state's most populated and
fastest-growing areas. Since 1976, Pinnacles has grown from 16,271
acres to 24,436 acres. In 1976, 15,985 acres were designated by
Congress as Wilderness (and several tracts of land since transferred
from the BLM bring the Wilderness total acreage to 16,048). Also,
acquisition of the 2,000-acre Pinnacles Ranch during the spring of 2006
has added substantial new resources, infrastructure, recreational
opportunities, and management challenges.
A new GMP reflecting contemporary issues and challenges facing
Pinnacles in the future is essential. The plan will provide direction
for park management through the establishment of management zones, user
capacities and appropriate types and levels of development and
recreational use for all areas of the park. Resource protection,
visitor experiences, community relationships, and relationships with
neighboring land management agencies will be improved through
completion and implementation of the GMP.
Scoping Process: The purpose of the scoping outreach efforts is to
elicit public comment regarding issues and concerns, the nature and
extent of potential environmental impacts (and appropriate mitigation
measures) that should be addressed in the plan. Major issues
anticipated to be addressed in the EIS include:
What are the desired conditions for native/endemic
ecosystems?
What are the desired conditions for Wilderness areas?
What are the desired conditions for cultural resources and
cultural landscapes?
What areas and structures are appropriate for museum
collections storage, preservation and accessibility for research?
What is the desired visitor experience throughout the
Monument (east side, west side, high peaks, Bear Gulch, Chalone,
Chaparral, Pinnacles
[[Page 17182]]
Ranch, campground, backcountry, Wilderness)?
What are appropriate visitor use levels for different
parts of the Monument?
What transportation options should be considered for
providing access to and within the Monument? What types of trail (or
other) access are appropriate, and where?
What is the appropriate level of development in different
parts of the Monument, and what areas are appropriate for park
administration and operations activities?
How should the NPS work with nearby communities to
encourage community understanding of the Monument and to address
potential effects of development and population growth in neighboring
communities on ecological, scenic, and Wilderness values of the
Monument?
Are there any recommendations for changes in the
authorizing legislation for Pinnacles National Monument that should be
considered in the GMP?
Comments: Through the outreach activities planned in this final
scoping effort, the NPS welcomes additional information and suggestions
from the public regarding resource protection, visitor use, and land
management. This notice formally resumes the public scoping comment
phase for the EIS process for the GMP. All interested persons,
organizations, agencies, and American Indian tribes wishing to express
new concerns or provide information about management issues which
should be addressed in the GMP and environmental impact analysis
process are encouraged to contact the Superintendent (previous
responses are contained in the administrative record and do not need to
be resubmitted). All comments received will become part of the public
record. Before including your address, phone number, e-mail address, or
other personal identifying information in your comment, you should be
aware that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask us in your comment to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
At this time, public scoping meetings are anticipated to be held
during the spring of 2007; details will be announced widely in local
and regional news media, via direct park mailings and through the GMP
Web site: (https://parkplanning.nps.gov/pinn). All attendees will be
given the opportunity to ask questions and provide comments to the
planning team. The Web site will provide the most up-to-date
information regarding the project, including project description,
planning process updates, meeting notices, reports and documents, and
useful links associated with the project.
All written comments regarding the preparation of the EIS/GMP must
be postmarked or transmitted not later than May 31, 2007 and should be
submitted directly to General Management Plan Team, Pinnacles National
Monument, 5000 Hwy 146, Paicines, CA 95043 (or electronically through
the Web site noted above).
Decision Process: At this time, the draft EIS/GMP is expected to be
released for public review during the fall of 2008; following due
consideration of all comments as may be submitted, the final document
is anticipated to be completed in the summer of 2009. Formal
announcement of the availability of both documents will be published in
the Federal Register, publicized via local and regional media and the
internet, and via direct mailing to the project mailing list.
Responsibility for approving the Final EIS/GMP is delegated to the NPS,
and the official responsible for the final decision is the Regional
Director, Pacific West Region; subsequently the official responsible
for implementing the approved GMP is the Superintendent, Pinnacles
National Monument.
Dated: January 26, 2007.
Jonathan B. Jarvis,
Regional Director, Pacific West Region.
[FR Doc. E7-6447 Filed 4-5-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-EP-P